Canstralian commited on
Commit
4e419b9
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 17c9b3f

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +83 -29
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,26 +1,67 @@
1
- ---
2
- license: mit
3
- language:
4
- - en
5
- ---
6
 
7
- # Model Card for Canstralian/CyberAttackDetection
8
 
9
- This modelcard aims to be a base template for new models. It has been generated using [this raw template](https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/blob/main/src/huggingface_hub/templates/modelcard_template.md?plain=1).
 
10
 
11
- ## Model Details
12
 
13
- ### Model Description
 
 
 
 
 
14
 
15
- This model is designed for detecting cyber attacks, focusing on identifying patterns of malicious activities in network traffic or system logs. It can help automate the detection of various types of cyber attacks in real-time or in post-event analysis, enhancing cybersecurity measures and incident response.
16
 
17
  - **Developed by:** Canstralian
18
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
19
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
20
- - **Model type:** Cyber Attack Detection
21
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** Not applicable
22
- - **License:** [More Information Needed]
23
- - **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24
 
25
  ### Model Sources [optional]
26
 
@@ -32,35 +73,46 @@ This model is designed for detecting cyber attacks, focusing on identifying patt
32
 
33
  ### Direct Use
34
 
35
- This model can be used directly for detecting cyber attacks by analyzing network traffic or system logs. It can be deployed as part of an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) or as a stand-alone tool for security analysts.
36
 
37
  ### Downstream Use [optional]
38
 
39
- The model can be fine-tuned further for specific types of cyber attacks or to suit different environments (e.g., enterprise networks, small businesses).
40
 
41
  ### Out-of-Scope Use
42
 
43
- The model is not intended for detecting non-cyber attacks or for use outside cybersecurity applications. It may not perform well with highly specialized or obscure types of attacks.
44
 
45
  ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
46
 
47
- The model's performance depends heavily on the quality and diversity of the data it was trained on. In certain environments, it might produce false positives or miss novel attack patterns. It's also important to note that the model is trained on specific attack vectors and might not detect all possible threats.
48
 
49
  ### Recommendations
50
 
51
- Users should monitor the model's performance and regularly update it with new attack patterns. It's recommended to use the model as part of a multi-layered cybersecurity strategy that includes human oversight.
52
 
53
  ## How to Get Started with the Model
54
 
55
- Use the code below to get started with the model.
56
 
57
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58
 
59
  ## Training Details
60
 
61
  ### Training Data
62
 
63
- The model was trained on publicly available datasets for cybersecurity attacks, such as network traffic and system logs labeled with known attack types. Preprocessing steps included data cleaning and normalization to ensure uniformity in the training set.
 
 
 
 
64
 
65
  ### Training Procedure
66
 
@@ -82,11 +134,13 @@ The model was trained on publicly available datasets for cybersecurity attacks,
82
 
83
  #### Testing Data
84
 
85
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
86
 
87
  #### Factors
88
 
89
- The evaluation was done based on the detection of known attack types, network traffic anomalies, and response times in different environments.
90
 
91
  #### Metrics
92
 
@@ -101,7 +155,7 @@ The evaluation was done based on the detection of known attack types, network tr
101
 
102
  #### Summary
103
 
104
- The model has demonstrated reasonable success in detecting a variety of cyber attack types, but its performance can vary based on the environment and attack vectors.
105
 
106
  ## Model Examination [optional]
107
 
@@ -119,7 +173,7 @@ The model has demonstrated reasonable success in detecting a variety of cyber at
119
 
120
  ### Model Architecture and Objective
121
 
122
- The model utilizes deep learning algorithms, such as neural networks, to analyze patterns in network traffic and system logs for attack detection.
123
 
124
  ### Compute Infrastructure
125
 
@@ -155,4 +209,4 @@ The model utilizes deep learning algorithms, such as neural networks, to analyze
155
 
156
  ## Model Card Contact
157
 
158
- [More Information Needed]
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ language:
4
+ - en
5
+ ---
6
 
7
+ # **Canstralian/CyberAttackDetection - AI Model Overview**
8
 
9
+ ## **Model Description**
10
+ **CyberAttackDetection** is a cutting-edge machine learning model designed to detect and classify a wide range of cyberattacks in real-time. Built using advanced algorithms and a comprehensive dataset of known attack signatures, the model can effectively identify abnormal behaviors, intrusion attempts, and potential threats in network traffic and system logs.
11
 
12
+ The model is optimized for high accuracy and low latency, making it ideal for use in real-time network monitoring, incident response, and security operations centers. By leveraging **WhiteRabbitNeo** (based on Llama-3.1), it offers high adaptability to new attack vectors and ensures robust protection against both common and sophisticated threats.
13
 
14
+ **Key Features:**
15
+ - Real-time detection and classification of cyberattacks
16
+ - Identification of vulnerabilities and exploits, including zero-day attacks
17
+ - Adaptive learning capabilities to recognize new threats
18
+ - High accuracy and low false-positive rates
19
+ - Scalable for deployment in diverse environments, from small businesses to large enterprises
20
 
21
+ This model is tailored for penetration testers, cybersecurity professionals, and organizations looking to enhance their security posture with AI-powered attack detection.
22
 
23
  - **Developed by:** Canstralian
24
+ - **Model type:** Cyberattack Detection
25
+ - **License:** MIT
26
+ - **Finetuned from model:** [WhiteRabbitNeo/Llama-3.1-WhiteRabbitNeo-2-70B](https://huggingface.co/WhiteRabbitNeo/Llama-3.1-WhiteRabbitNeo-2-70B)
27
+
28
+ ## **WhiteRabbitNeo License + Usage Restrictions**
29
+ The **CyberAttackDetection** model is built using **WhiteRabbitNeo**, and it adheres to the Llama-3.1 License, with an extended version specific to **WhiteRabbitNeo**. By using this model, you agree to the following usage restrictions:
30
+
31
+ You may not use the model or its derivatives in any way that:
32
+ - Violates any applicable national or international law or infringes upon third-party rights.
33
+ - Is intended for military use or harm to minors.
34
+ - Generates false information or disseminates inappropriate content.
35
+ - Exploits or harms individuals based on protected characteristics.
36
+ - Discriminates against individuals or groups based on personal characteristics or legal protections.
37
+
38
+ For further details on the licensing and restrictions, refer to the [WhiteRabbitNeo License Agreement](https://www.whiterabbitneo.com/license).
39
+
40
+ ## **Topics Covered in Cyberattack Detection**
41
+ The **CyberAttackDetection** model helps identify vulnerabilities that attackers commonly exploit, including but not limited to:
42
+
43
+ - **Open Ports:** Identifying entry points like HTTP (80, 443), FTP (21), SSH (22), and SMB (445).
44
+ - **Outdated Software:** Vulnerabilities arising from outdated systems and third-party services.
45
+ - **Default Credentials:** Risks posed by common factory-installed usernames and passwords.
46
+ - **Misconfigurations:** Insecure service configurations that can open up attack vectors.
47
+ - **Injection Flaws:** Common web vulnerabilities like SQL injection, XSS, and command injections.
48
+ - **Unencrypted Services:** Identifying services without encryption (e.g., HTTP vs HTTPS).
49
+ - **Known Software Vulnerabilities:** Checking for outdated software vulnerabilities using resources like the NVD or tools like Nessus and OpenVAS.
50
+ - **Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF):** Unauthorized command transmission in web apps.
51
+ - **API Vulnerabilities:** Detecting insecure API endpoints and data leakage.
52
+ - **Denial of Service (DoS):** Identifying DoS vulnerabilities that impact system availability.
53
+ - **Sensitive Data Exposure:** Identifying vulnerabilities that expose personal or financial data.
54
+
55
+ ## **Terms of Use**
56
+ By accessing and using this AI model, you acknowledge that you are solely responsible for its usage and the outcomes that result. You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the creators and any affiliated entities from any liabilities, damages, or losses incurred as a result of using the model.
57
+
58
+ This AI model is provided "as is" and "as available" without any warranties, express or implied. The creators make no guarantee that the model will meet your requirements or be available without interruption, security breaches, or errors.
59
+
60
+ **Disclaimer:** Use this model at your own risk. The creators will not be liable for any damages, including loss of data or system failures, resulting from the use of this model.
61
+
62
+ ---
63
+
64
+ Let me know if you need any more modifications!
65
 
66
  ### Model Sources [optional]
67
 
 
73
 
74
  ### Direct Use
75
 
76
+ This model can be used directly for detecting cyber attacks by analyzing network traffic or system logs. It is especially useful for network administrators and cybersecurity experts who need real-time or historical analysis of potentially malicious activities.
77
 
78
  ### Downstream Use [optional]
79
 
80
+ The model can be fine-tuned further for specific types of cyber attacks or to suit different environments (e.g., enterprise networks, small businesses). It can also be integrated into larger security ecosystems that perform continuous monitoring and threat analysis.
81
 
82
  ### Out-of-Scope Use
83
 
84
+ The model is not intended for detecting non-cyber attacks or for use outside cybersecurity applications. It may not perform well with highly specialized or obscure types of attacks that are not well-represented in the training data.
85
 
86
  ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
87
 
88
+ The models performance is influenced by the quality and diversity of the training data. Misclassifications may occur, particularly when encountering novel attack patterns or environments not well-represented in the dataset. Furthermore, the model may generate false positives or miss complex attack vectors.
89
 
90
  ### Recommendations
91
 
92
+ Users should regularly update the model with new data and threat intelligence to keep it relevant. The model should be used in conjunction with human oversight and other detection mechanisms to minimize the risk of undetected threats.
93
 
94
  ## How to Get Started with the Model
95
 
96
+ To get started with the model, use the following code:
97
 
98
+ ```python
99
+ from transformers import pipeline
100
+
101
+ model = pipeline("cyber_attack_detection", model="Canstralian/CyberAttackDetection")
102
+ # Example usage: Pass network traffic or system log data to the model
103
+ result = model("Example log data or network traffic")
104
+ print(result)
105
+ ```
106
 
107
  ## Training Details
108
 
109
  ### Training Data
110
 
111
+ The model was trained using a combination of datasets related to penetration testing, shell commands, and wordlists, which are essential for recognizing attack vectors and behaviors in real-world environments.
112
+
113
+ - **Pentesting Dataset**: [Canstralian/pentesting_dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Canstralian/pentesting_dataset)
114
+ - **Shell Commands Dataset**: [Canstralian/ShellCommands](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Canstralian/ShellCommands)
115
+ - **Wordlists Dataset**: [Canstralian/Wordlists](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Canstralian/Wordlists)
116
 
117
  ### Training Procedure
118
 
 
134
 
135
  #### Testing Data
136
 
137
+ - **Pentesting Dataset**: Used for testing the model’s ability to detect attack behaviors.
138
+ - **Shell Commands Dataset**: Assessed the model’s effectiveness in recognizing shell-related attack commands.
139
+ - **Wordlists Dataset**: Evaluated the model’s proficiency in detecting dictionary-based attacks.
140
 
141
  #### Factors
142
 
143
+ The evaluation tests for the model’s ability to detect common attack vectors, unusual patterns, and malicious behaviors across different datasets.
144
 
145
  #### Metrics
146
 
 
155
 
156
  #### Summary
157
 
158
+ The model performs well at detecting common types of cyber attacks but is subject to limitations in environments where the attack types differ significantly from those seen in the training datasets.
159
 
160
  ## Model Examination [optional]
161
 
 
173
 
174
  ### Model Architecture and Objective
175
 
176
+ The model uses deep learning techniques to classify and identify malicious patterns in system logs and network traffic.
177
 
178
  ### Compute Infrastructure
179
 
 
209
 
210
  ## Model Card Contact
211
 
212
+ [More Information Needed]