conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Provide a continuation for this: [LOGO]
  AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2, PART B OF THE CO-BRANDING AGREEMENT
  This amendment to Section 2 (titled "Term"), Part B of the Co-Branding Agreement is made effective December 9, 1996 by and between PC Quote, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "PCQ") and A.B. Watley, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "ABW"), who are also the parties contracted in the aforementioned Co-Branding Agreement. This Amendment shall apply to said PCQ and ABW and all of their subsidiaries and related companies.
  ___
  Source: PCQUOTE COM INC, S-1/A, 7/21/1999
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: AGREED TO BY:
  /s/ Steven Malin /s/ Howard Meltzer - -------------------------- --------------------------------- A.B. Watley, Inc. PC Quote, Inc. Mr. Steven Malin Mr. Howard Meltzer Director President Date: 12/5/96 Date: 12/12/96 -------------- ----------------
  Source: PCQUOTE COM INC, S-1/A, 7/21/1999
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: The name of the contract?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2, PART B OF THE CO-BRANDING AGREEMENT
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: The two or more parties who signed the contract?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: * PCQ
  * A.B. Watley, Inc.
  * ABW
  * PC Quote, Inc.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: The date of the contract?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: December 9, 1996
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: The date when the contract is effective ?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: December 9, 1996
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Which state/country's law governs the interpretation of the contract?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: I don't know. Can you provide more information?
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Is there a clause that if a third party gets better terms on the licensing or sale of technology/goods/services described in the contract, the buyer of such technology/goods/services under the contract shall be entitled to those better terms?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: I don't think so.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Is there a requirement on a party not to disparage the counterparty?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: It does not appear so.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Is there any clause providing for joint or shared ownership of intellectual property between the parties to the contract?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: I don't think so.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Does the contract contain a license grant by affiliates of the licensor or that includes intellectual property of affiliates of the licensor? ?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: No.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Is a party restricted from contesting the validity of the counterparty’s ownership of intellectual property or otherwise bringing a claim against the counterparty for matters unrelated to the contract?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: It does not appear so.