<s>[INST] What is the significance of omitting "or Rajpramukh, as the case may be" by s. 29 and Sch.? [/INST] The omission of "or Rajpramukh, as the case may be" by s. 29 and Sch. effectively removes the role or position of a "Rajpramukh" in the context provided. It seems that this was done to streamline and clarify the roles and responsibilities within the system mentioned in the context, possibly by consolidating authority under a single position or body. </s>