Combining Interventional and Observational Data Using Causal Reductions
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal
effects. We propose a causal reduction method that, given a causal model,
replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders
with a single latent confounder that takes values in the same space as the
treatment variable, without changing the observational and interventional
distributions the causal model entails. This allows us to estimate the causal
effect in a principled way from combined data without relying on the common but
often unrealistic assumption that all confounders have been observed. We apply
our causal reduction in three different settings. In the first setting, we
assume the treatment and outcome to be discrete. The causal reduction then
implies bounds between the observational and interventional distributions that
can be exploited for estimation purposes. In certain cases with highly
unbalanced observational samples, the accuracy of the causal effect estimate
can be improved by incorporating observational data. Second, for continuous
variables and assuming a linear-Gaussian model, we derive equality constraints
for the parameters of the observational and interventional distributions.
Third, for the general continuous setting (possibly nonlinear or non-Gaussian),
we parameterize the reduced causal model using normalizing flows, a flexible
class of easily invertible nonlinear transformations. We perform a series of
experiments on synthetic data and find that in several cases the number of
interventional samples can be reduced when adding observational training
samples without sacrificing accuracy.
