XAI in the context of Predictive Process Monitoring: Too much to Reveal
  Predictive Process Monitoring (PPM) has been integrated into process mining
tools as a value-adding task. PPM provides useful predictions on the further
execution of the running business processes. To this end, machine
learning-based techniques are widely employed in the context of PPM. In order
to gain stakeholders trust and advocacy of PPM predictions, eXplainable
Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods are employed in order to compensate for
the lack of transparency of most efficient predictive models. Even when
employed under the same settings regarding data, preprocessing techniques, and
ML models, explanations generated by multiple XAI methods differ profoundly. A
comparison is missing to distinguish XAI characteristics or underlying
conditions that are deterministic to an explanation. To address this gap, we
provide a framework to enable studying the effect of different PPM-related
settings and ML model-related choices on characteristics and expressiveness of
resulting explanations. In addition, we compare how different explainability
methods characteristics can shape resulting explanations and enable reflecting
underlying model reasoning process
