Withholding or withdrawing invasive interventions may not accelerate
  time to death among dying ICU patients
  We considered observational data available from the MIMIC-III open-access ICU
database and collected within a study period between year 2002 up to 2011. If a
patient had multiple admissions to the ICU during the 30 days before death,
only the first stay was analyzed, leading to a final set of 6,436 unique ICU
admissions during the study period. We tested two hypotheses: (i)
administration of invasive intervention during the ICU stay immediately
preceding end-of-life would decrease over the study time period and (ii)
time-to-death from ICU admission would also decrease, due to the decrease in
invasive intervention administration. To investigate the latter hypothesis, we
performed a subgroups analysis by considering patients with lowest and highest
severity. To do so, we stratified the patients based on their SAPS I scores,
and we considered patients within the first and the third tertiles of the
score. We then assessed differences in trends within these groups between years
2002-05 vs. 2008-11.
  Comparing the period 2002-2005 vs. 2008-2011, we found a reduction in
endotracheal ventilation among patients who died within 30 days of ICU
admission (120.8 vs. 68.5 hours for the lowest severity patients, p<0.001; 47.7
vs. 46.0 hours for the highest severity patients, p=0.004). This is explained
in part by an increase in the use of non-invasive ventilation. Comparing the
period 2002-2005 vs. 2008-2011, we found a reduction in the use of vasopressors
and inotropes among patients with the lowest severity who died within 30 days
of ICU admission (41.8 vs. 36.2 hours, p<0.001) but not among those with the
highest severity. Despite a reduction in the use of invasive interventions, we
did not find a reduction in the time to death between 2002-2005 vs. 2008-2011
(7.8 days vs. 8.2 days for the lowest severity patients, p=0.32; 2.1 days vs.
2.0 days for the highest severity patients, p=0.74).
