Why I'm not Answering: Understanding Determinants of Classification of
  an Abstaining Classifier for Cancer Pathology Reports
  Safe deployment of deep learning systems in critical real world applications
requires models to make very few mistakes, and only under predictable
circumstances. In this work, we address this problem using an abstaining
classifier that is tuned to have $>$95% accuracy, and then identify the
determinants of abstention using LIME. Essentially, we are training our model
to learn the attributes of pathology reports that are likely to lead to
incorrect classifications, albeit at the cost of reduced sensitivity. We
demonstrate an abstaining classifier in a multitask setting for classifying
cancer pathology reports from the NCI SEER cancer registries on six tasks of
interest. For these tasks, we reduce the classification error rate by factors
of 2--5 by abstaining on 25--45% of the reports. For the specific task of
classifying cancer site, we are able to identify metastasis, reports involving
lymph nodes, and discussion of multiple cancer sites as responsible for many of
the classification mistakes, and observe that the extent and types of mistakes
vary systematically with cancer site (e.g., breast, lung, and prostate). When
combining across three of the tasks, our model classifies 50% of the reports
with an accuracy greater than 95% for three of the six tasks\edit, and greater
than 85% for all six tasks on the retained samples. Furthermore, we show that
LIME provides a better determinant of classification than measures of word
occurrence alone. By combining a deep abstaining classifier with feature
identification using LIME, we are able to identify concepts responsible for
both correctness and abstention when classifying cancer sites from pathology
reports. The improvement of LIME over keyword searches is statistically
significant, presumably because words are assessed in context and have been
identified as a local determinant of classification.
