The developmental trajectory of object recognition robustness: children
  are like small adults but unlike big deep neural networks
  In laboratory object recognition tasks based on undistorted photographs, both
adult humans and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) perform close to ceiling. Unlike
adults', whose object recognition performance is robust against a wide range of
image distortions, DNNs trained on standard ImageNet (1.3M images) perform
poorly on distorted images. However, the last two years have seen impressive
gains in DNN distortion robustness, predominantly achieved through
ever-increasing large-scale datasets$\unicode{x2014}$orders of magnitude larger
than ImageNet. While this simple brute-force approach is very effective in
achieving human-level robustness in DNNs, it raises the question of whether
human robustness, too, is simply due to extensive experience with (distorted)
visual input during childhood and beyond. Here we investigate this question by
comparing the core object recognition performance of 146 children (aged
4$\unicode{x2013}$15) against adults and against DNNs. We find, first, that
already 4$\unicode{x2013}$6 year-olds showed remarkable robustness to image
distortions and outperform DNNs trained on ImageNet. Second, we estimated the
number of $\unicode{x201C}$images$\unicode{x201D}$ children have been exposed
to during their lifetime. Compared to various DNNs, children's high robustness
requires relatively little data. Third, when recognizing objects
children$\unicode{x2014}$like adults but unlike DNNs$\unicode{x2014}$rely
heavily on shape but not on texture cues. Together our results suggest that the
remarkable robustness to distortions emerges early in the developmental
trajectory of human object recognition and is unlikely the result of a mere
accumulation of experience with distorted visual input. Even though current
DNNs match human performance regarding robustness they seem to rely on
different and more data-hungry strategies to do so.
