Word-order biases in deep-agent emergent communication
  Sequence-processing neural networks led to remarkable progress on many NLP
tasks. As a consequence, there has been increasing interest in understanding to
what extent they process language as humans do. We aim here to uncover which
biases such models display with respect to "natural" word-order constraints. We
train models to communicate about paths in a simple gridworld, using miniature
languages that reflect or violate various natural language trends, such as the
tendency to avoid redundancy or to minimize long-distance dependencies. We
study how the controlled characteristics of our miniature languages affect
individual learning and their stability across multiple network generations.
The results draw a mixed picture. On the one hand, neural networks show a
strong tendency to avoid long-distance dependencies. On the other hand, there
is no clear preference for the efficient, non-redundant encoding of information
that is widely attested in natural language. We thus suggest inoculating a
notion of "effort" into neural networks, as a possible way to make their
linguistic behavior more human-like.
