A Comparison of Action Spaces for Learning Manipulation Tasks
  Designing reinforcement learning (RL) problems that can produce delicate and
precise manipulation policies requires careful choice of the reward function,
state, and action spaces. Much prior work on applying RL to manipulation tasks
has defined the action space in terms of direct joint torques or reference
positions for a joint-space proportional derivative (PD) controller. In
practice, it is often possible to add additional structure by taking advantage
of model-based controllers that support both accurate positioning and control
of the dynamic response of the manipulator. In this paper, we evaluate how the
choice of action space for dynamic manipulation tasks affects the sample
complexity as well as the final quality of learned policies. We compare
learning performance across three tasks (peg insertion, hammering, and
pushing), four action spaces (torque, joint PD, inverse dynamics, and impedance
control), and using two modern reinforcement learning algorithms (Proximal
Policy Optimization and Soft Actor-Critic). Our results lend support to the
hypothesis that learning references for a task-space impedance controller
significantly reduces the number of samples needed to achieve good performance
across all tasks and algorithms.
