Sampling Trade-Offs in Duty-Cycled Systems for Air Quality Low-Cost
  Sensors
  The use of low-cost sensors in conjunction with high-precision
instrumentation for air pollution monitoring has shown promising results in
recent years. One of the main challenges for these sensors has been the quality
of their data, which is why the main efforts have focused on calibrating the
sensors using machine learning techniques to improve the data quality. However,
there is one aspect that has been overlooked, that is, these sensors are
mounted on nodes that may have energy consumption restrictions if they are
battery-powered. In this paper, we show the usual sensor data gathering process
and we study the existing trade-offs between the sampling of such sensors, the
quality of the sensor calibration, and the power consumption involved. To this
end, we conduct experiments on prototype nodes measuring tropospheric ozone,
nitrogen dioxide, and nitrogen monoxide at high frequency. The results show
that the sensor sampling strategy directly affects the quality of the air
pollution estimation and that each type of sensor may require different
sampling strategies. In addition, duty cycles of 0.1 can be achieved when the
sensors have response times in the order of two minutes, and duty cycles
between 0.01 and 0.02 can be achieved when the sensor response times are
negligible, calibrating with hourly reference values and maintaining a quality
of calibrated data similar to when the node is connected to an uninterruptible
power supply.
