Evaluating Independence and Conditional Independence Measures
  Independence and Conditional Independence (CI) are two fundamental concepts
in probability and statistics, which can be applied to solve many central
problems of statistical inference. There are many existing independence and CI
measures defined from diverse principles and concepts. In this paper, the 16
independence measures and 16 CI measures were reviewed and then evaluated with
simulated and real data. For the independence measures, eight simulated data
were generating from normal distribution, normal and Archimedean copula
functions to compare the measures in bivariate or multivariate, linear or
nonlinear settings. Two UCI dataset, including the heart disease data and the
wine quality data, were used to test the power of the independence measures in
real conditions. For the CI measures, two simulated data with normal
distribution and Gumbel copula, and one real data (the Beijing air data) were
utilized to test the CI measures in prespecified linear or nonlinear setting
and real scenario. From the experimental results, we found that most of the
measures work well on the simulated data by presenting the right monotonicity
of the simulations. However, the independence and CI measures were
differentiated on much complex real data respectively and only a few can be
considered as working well with reference to domain knowledge. We also found
that the measures tend to be separated into groups based on the similarity of
the behaviors of them in each setting and in general. According to the
experiments, we recommend CE as a good choice for both independence and CI
measure. This is also due to its rigorous distribution-free definition and
consistent nonparametric estimator.
