Fusing Continuous-valued Medical Labels using a Bayesian Model
  With the rapid increase in volume of time series medical data available
through wearable devices, there is a need to employ automated algorithms to
label data. Examples of labels include interventions, changes in activity (e.g.
sleep) and changes in physiology (e.g. arrhythmias). However, automated
algorithms tend to be unreliable resulting in lower quality care. Expert
annotations are scarce, expensive, and prone to significant inter- and
intra-observer variance. To address these problems, a Bayesian
Continuous-valued Label Aggregator(BCLA) is proposed to provide a reliable
estimation of label aggregation while accurately infer the precision and bias
of each algorithm. The BCLA was applied to QT interval (pro-arrhythmic
indicator) estimation from the electrocardiogram using labels from the 2006
PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge database. It was compared to the
mean, median, and a previously proposed Expectation Maximization (EM) label
aggregation approaches. While accurately predicting each labelling algorithm's
bias and precision, the root-mean-square error of the BCLA was
11.78$\pm$0.63ms, significantly outperforming the best Challenge entry
(15.37$\pm$2.13ms) as well as the EM, mean, and median voting strategies
(14.76$\pm$0.52ms, 17.61$\pm$0.55ms, and 14.43$\pm$0.57ms respectively with
$p<0.0001$).
