Long Story Short: Omitted Variable Bias in Causal Machine Learning
  We derive general, yet simple, sharp bounds on the size of the omitted
variable bias for a broad class of causal parameters that can be identified as
linear functionals of the conditional expectation function of the outcome. Such
functionals encompass many of the traditional targets of investigation in
causal inference studies, such as, for example, (weighted) average of potential
outcomes, average treatment effects (including subgroup effects, such as the
effect on the treated), (weighted) average derivatives, and policy effects from
shifts in covariate distribution -- all for general, nonparametric causal
models. Our construction relies on the Riesz-Frechet representation of the
target functional. Specifically, we show how the bound on the bias depends only
on the additional variation that the latent variables create both in the
outcome and in the Riesz representer for the parameter of interest. Moreover,
in many important cases (e.g, average treatment effects and avearage
derivatives) the bound is shown to depend on easily interpretable quantities
that measure the explanatory power of the omitted variables. Therefore, simple
plausibility judgments on the maximum explanatory power of omitted variables
(in explaining treatment and outcome variation) are sufficient to place overall
bounds on the size of the bias. Furthermore, we use debiased machine learning
to provide flexible and efficient statistical inference on learnable components
of the bounds. Finally, empirical examples demonstrate the usefulness of the
approach.
