Weight of Evidence as a Basis for Human-Oriented Explanations
  Interpretability is an elusive but highly sought-after characteristic of
modern machine learning methods. Recent work has focused on interpretability
via $\textit{explanations}$, which justify individual model predictions. In
this work, we take a step towards reconciling machine explanations with those
that humans produce and prefer by taking inspiration from the study of
explanation in philosophy, cognitive science, and the social sciences. We
identify key aspects in which these human explanations differ from current
machine explanations, distill them into a list of desiderata, and formalize
them into a framework via the notion of $\textit{weight of evidence}$ from
information theory. Finally, we instantiate this framework in two simple
applications and show it produces intuitive and comprehensible explanations.
