Neural Score Matching for High-Dimensional Causal Inference
  Traditional methods for matching in causal inference are impractical for
high-dimensional datasets. They suffer from the curse of dimensionality: exact
matching and coarsened exact matching find exponentially fewer matches as the
input dimension grows, and propensity score matching may match highly unrelated
units together. To overcome this problem, we develop theoretical results which
motivate the use of neural networks to obtain non-trivial, multivariate
balancing scores of a chosen level of coarseness, in contrast to the classical,
scalar propensity score. We leverage these balancing scores to perform matching
for high-dimensional causal inference and call this procedure neural score
matching. We show that our method is competitive against other matching
approaches on semi-synthetic high-dimensional datasets, both in terms of
treatment effect estimation and reducing imbalance.
