Clinical Validation of Single-Chamber Model-Based Algorithms Used to
  Estimate Respiratory Compliance
  Non-invasive estimation of respiratory physiology using computational
algorithms promises to be a valuable technique for future clinicians to detect
detrimental changes in patient pathophysiology. However, few clinical
algorithms used to non-invasively analyze lung physiology have undergone
rigorous validation in a clinical setting, and are often validated either using
mechanical devices, or with small clinical validation datasets using 2-8
patients. This work aims to improve this situation by first, establishing an
open, and clinically validated dataset comprising data from both mechanical
lungs and nearly 40,000 breaths from 18 intubated patients. Next, we use this
data to evaluate 15 different algorithms that use the "single chamber" model of
estimating respiratory compliance. We evaluate these algorithms under varying
clinical scenarios patients typically experience during hospitalization. In
particular, we explore algorithm performance under four different types of
patient ventilator asynchrony. We also analyze algorithms under varying
ventilation modes to benchmark algorithm performance and to determine if
ventilation mode has any impact on the algorithm. Our approach yields several
advances by 1) showing which specific algorithms work best clinically under
varying mode and asynchrony scenarios, 2) developing a simple mathematical
method to reduce variance in algorithmic results, and 3) presenting additional
insights about single-chamber model algorithms. We hope that our paper,
approach, dataset, and software framework can thus be used by future
researchers to improve their work and allow future integration of "single
chamber" algorithms into clinical practice.
