CORE: Automating Review Recommendation for Code Changes
  Code review is a common process that is used by developers, in which a
reviewer provides useful comments or points out defects in the submitted source
code changes via pull request. Code review has been widely used for both
industry and open-source projects due to its capacity in early defect
identification, project maintenance, and code improvement. With rapid updates
on project developments, code review becomes a non-trivial and labor-intensive
task for reviewers. Thus, an automated code review engine can be beneficial and
useful for project development in practice. Although there exist prior studies
on automating the code review process by adopting static analysis tools or deep
learning techniques, they often require external sources such as partial or
full source code for accurate review suggestion. In this paper, we aim at
automating the code review process only based on code changes and the
corresponding reviews but with better performance. The hinge of accurate code
review suggestion is to learn good representations for both code changes and
reviews. To achieve this with limited source, we design a multi-level embedding
(i.e., word embedding and character embedding) approach to represent the
semantics provided by code changes and reviews. The embeddings are then well
trained through a proposed attentional deep learning model, as a whole named
CORE. We evaluate the effectiveness of CORE on code changes and reviews
collected from 19 popular Java projects hosted on Github. Experimental results
show that our model CORE can achieve significantly better performance than the
state-of-the-art model (DeepMem), with an increase of 131.03% in terms of
Recall@10 and 150.69% in terms of Mean Reciprocal Rank. Qualitative general
word analysis among project developers also demonstrates the performance of
CORE in automating code review.
