Do Neural Ranking Models Intensify Gender Bias?
  Concerns regarding the footprint of societal biases in information retrieval
(IR) systems have been raised in several previous studies. In this work, we
examine various recent IR models from the perspective of the degree of gender
bias in their retrieval results. To this end, we first provide a bias
measurement framework which includes two metrics to quantify the degree of the
unbalanced presence of gender-related concepts in a given IR model's ranking
list. To examine IR models by means of the framework, we create a dataset of
non-gendered queries, selected by human annotators. Applying these queries to
the MS MARCO Passage retrieval collection, we then measure the gender bias of a
BM25 model and several recent neural ranking models. The results show that
while all models are strongly biased toward male, the neural models, and in
particular the ones based on contextualized embedding models, significantly
intensify gender bias. Our experiments also show an overall increase in the
gender bias of neural models when they exploit transfer learning, namely when
they use (already biased) pre-trained embeddings.
