Quantifying and Improving Transferability in Domain Generalization
  Out-of-distribution generalization is one of the key challenges when
transferring a model from the lab to the real world. Existing efforts mostly
focus on building invariant features among source and target domains. Based on
invariant features, a high-performing classifier on source domains could
hopefully behave equally well on a target domain. In other words, the invariant
features are \emph{transferable}. However, in practice, there are no perfectly
transferable features, and some algorithms seem to learn "more transferable"
features than others. How can we understand and quantify such
\emph{transferability}? In this paper, we formally define transferability that
one can quantify and compute in domain generalization. We point out the
difference and connection with common discrepancy measures between domains,
such as total variation and Wasserstein distance. We then prove that our
transferability can be estimated with enough samples and give a new upper bound
for the target error based on our transferability. Empirically, we evaluate the
transferability of the feature embeddings learned by existing algorithms for
domain generalization. Surprisingly, we find that many algorithms are not quite
learning transferable features, although few could still survive. In light of
this, we propose a new algorithm for learning transferable features and test it
over various benchmark datasets, including RotatedMNIST, PACS, Office-Home and
WILDS-FMoW. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm achieves
consistent improvement over many state-of-the-art algorithms, corroborating our
theoretical findings.
