Data Stability in Clustering: A Closer Look
  We consider the model introduced by Bilu and Linial (2010), who study
problems for which the optimal clustering does not change when distances are
perturbed. They show that even when a problem is NP-hard, it is sometimes
possible to obtain efficient algorithms for instances resilient to certain
multiplicative perturbations, e.g. on the order of $O(\sqrt{n})$ for max-cut
clustering. Awasthi et al. (2010) consider center-based objectives, and Balcan
and Liang (2011) analyze the $k$-median and min-sum objectives, giving
efficient algorithms for instances resilient to certain constant multiplicative
perturbations.
  Here, we are motivated by the question of to what extent these assumptions
can be relaxed while allowing for efficient algorithms. We show there is little
room to improve these results by giving NP-hardness lower bounds for both the
$k$-median and min-sum objectives. On the other hand, we show that constant
multiplicative resilience parameters can be so strong as to make the clustering
problem trivial, leaving only a narrow range of resilience parameters for which
clustering is interesting. We also consider a model of additive perturbations
and give a correspondence between additive and multiplicative notions of
stability. Our results provide a close examination of the consequences of
assuming stability in data.
