Automation for Interpretable Machine Learning Through a Comparison of
  Loss Functions to Regularisers
  To increase the ubiquity of machine learning it needs to be automated.
Automation is cost-effective as it allows experts to spend less time tuning the
approach, which leads to shorter development times. However, while this
automation produces highly accurate architectures, they can be uninterpretable,
acting as `black-boxes' which produce low conventional errors but fail to model
the underlying input-output relationships -- the ground truth. This paper
explores the use of the Fit to Median Error measure in machine learning
regression automation, using evolutionary computation in order to improve the
approximation of the ground truth. When used alongside conventional error
measures it improves interpretability by regularising learnt input-output
relationships to the conditional median. It is compared to traditional
regularisers to illustrate that the use of the Fit to Median Error produces
regression neural networks which model more consistent input-output
relationships. The problem considered is ship power prediction using a
fuel-saving air lubrication system, which is highly stochastic in nature. The
networks optimised for their Fit to Median Error are shown to approximate the
ground truth more consistently, without sacrificing conventional Minkowski-r
error values.
