SentiCite: An Approach for Publication Sentiment Analysis
  With the rapid growth in the number of scientific publications, year after
year, it is becoming increasingly difficult to identify quality authoritative
work on a single topic. Though there is an availability of scientometric
measures which promise to offer a solution to this problem, these measures are
mostly quantitative and rely, for instance, only on the number of times an
article is cited. With this approach, it becomes irrelevant if an article is
cited 10 times in a positive, negative or neutral way. In this context, it is
quite important to study the qualitative aspect of a citation to understand its
significance. This paper presents a novel system for sentiment analysis of
citations in scientific documents (SentiCite) and is also capable of detecting
nature of citations by targeting the motivation behind a citation, e.g.,
reference to a dataset, reading reference. Furthermore, the paper also presents
two datasets (SentiCiteDB and IntentCiteDB) containing about 2,600 citations
with their ground truth for sentiment and nature of citation. SentiCite along
with other state-of-the-art methods for sentiment analysis are evaluated on the
presented datasets. Evaluation results reveal that SentiCite outperforms
state-of-the-art methods for sentiment analysis in scientific publications by
achieving a F1-measure of 0.71.
