Improving Question Answering Model Robustness with Synthetic Adversarial
  Data Generation
  Despite recent progress, state-of-the-art question answering models remain
vulnerable to a variety of adversarial attacks. While dynamic adversarial data
collection, in which a human annotator tries to write examples that fool a
model-in-the-loop, can improve model robustness, this process is expensive
which limits the scale of the collected data. In this work, we are the first to
use synthetic adversarial data generation to make question answering models
more robust to human adversaries. We develop a data generation pipeline that
selects source passages, identifies candidate answers, generates questions,
then finally filters or re-labels them to improve quality. Using this approach,
we amplify a smaller human-written adversarial dataset to a much larger set of
synthetic question-answer pairs. By incorporating our synthetic data, we
improve the state-of-the-art on the AdversarialQA dataset by 3.7F1 and improve
model generalisation on nine of the twelve MRQA datasets. We further conduct a
novel human-in-the-loop evaluation to show that our models are considerably
more robust to new human-written adversarial examples: crowdworkers can fool
our model only 8.8% of the time on average, compared to 17.6% for a model
trained without synthetic data.
