Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning Classification by
  the Delta Method
  The Delta method is a classical procedure for quantifying epistemic
uncertainty in statistical models, but its direct application to deep neural
networks is prevented by the large number of parameters $P$. We propose a low
cost variant of the Delta method applicable to $L_2$-regularized deep neural
networks based on the top $K$ eigenpairs of the Fisher information matrix. We
address efficient computation of full-rank approximate eigendecompositions in
terms of either the exact inverse Hessian, the inverse outer-products of
gradients approximation or the so-called Sandwich estimator. Moreover, we
provide a bound on the approximation error for the uncertainty of the
predictive class probabilities. We observe that when the smallest eigenvalue of
the Fisher information matrix is near the $L_2$-regularization rate, the
approximation error is close to zero even when $K\ll P$. A demonstration of the
methodology is presented using a TensorFlow implementation, and we show that
meaningful rankings of images based on predictive uncertainty can be obtained
for two LeNet-based neural networks using the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets.
Further, we observe that false positives have on average a higher predictive
epistemic uncertainty than true positives. This suggests that there is
supplementing information in the uncertainty measure not captured by the
classification alone.
