Do Not Trust Additive Explanations
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)has received a great deal of
attention recently. Explainability is being presented as a remedy for the
distrust of complex and opaque models. Model agnostic methods such as LIME,
SHAP, or Break Down promise instance-level interpretability for any complex
machine learning model. But how faithful are these additive explanations? Can
we rely on additive explanations for non-additive models?
  In this paper, we (1) examine the behavior of the most popular instance-level
explanations under the presence of interactions, (2) introduce a new method
that detects interactions for instance-level explanations, (3) perform a large
scale benchmark to see how frequently additive explanations may be misleading.
