High-Resolution Air Quality Prediction Using Low-Cost Sensors
  The use of low-cost sensors in air quality monitoring networks is still a
much-debated topic among practitioners: they are much cheaper than traditional
air quality monitoring stations set up by public authorities (a few hundred
dollars compared to a few dozens of thousand dollars) at the cost of a lower
accuracy and robustness. This paper presents a case study of using low-cost
sensors measurements in an air quality prediction engine. The engine predicts
jointly PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in the United States at a very high
resolution in the range of a few dozens of meters.
  It is fed with the measurements provided by official air quality monitoring
stations, the measurements provided by a network of more than 4000 low-cost
sensors across the country, and traffic estimates. We show that the use of
low-cost sensors' measurements improves the engine's accuracy very
significantly. In particular, we derive a strong link between the density of
low-cost sensors and the predictions' accuracy: the more low-cost sensors are
in an area, the more accurate are the predictions. As an illustration, in areas
with the highest density of low-cost sensors, the low-cost sensors'
measurements bring a 25% and 15% improvement in PM2.5 and PM10 predictions'
accuracy respectively.
  An other strong conclusion is that in some areas with a high density of
low-cost sensors, the engine performs better when fed with low-cost sensors'
measurements only than when fed with official monitoring stations' measurements
only: this suggests that an air quality monitoring network composed of low-cost
sensors is effective in monitoring air quality. This is a very important
result, as such a monitoring network is much cheaper to set up.
