The Impact of Quantity of Training Data on Recognition of Eating
  Gestures
  This paper considers the problem of recognizing eating gestures by tracking
wrist motion. Eating gestures can have large variability in motion depending on
the subject, utensil, and type of food or beverage being consumed. Previous
works have shown viable proofs-of-concept of recognizing eating gestures in
laboratory settings with small numbers of subjects and food types, but it is
unclear how well these methods would work if tested on a larger population in
natural settings. As more subjects, locations and foods are tested, a larger
amount of motion variability could cause a decrease in recognition accuracy. To
explore this issue, this paper describes the collection and annotation of
51,614 eating gestures taken by 269 subjects eating a meal in a cafeteria.
Experiments are described that explore the complexity of hidden Markov models
(HMMs) and the amount of training data needed to adequately capture the motion
variability across this large data set. Results found that HMMs needed a
complexity of 13 states and 5 Gaussians to reach a plateau in accuracy,
signifying that a minimum of 65 samples per gesture type are needed. Results
also found that 500 training samples per gesture type were needed to identify
the point of diminishing returns in recognition accuracy. Overall, the findings
provide evidence that the size a data set typically used to demonstrate a
laboratory proofs-of-concept may not be sufficiently large enough to capture
all the motion variability that could be expected in transitioning to
deployment with a larger population. Our data set, which is 1-2 orders of
magnitude larger than all data sets tested in previous works, is being made
publicly available.
