A Human-Centric Perspective on Fairness and Transparency in Algorithmic
  Decision-Making
  Automated decision systems (ADS) are increasingly used for consequential
decision-making. These systems often rely on sophisticated yet opaque machine
learning models, which do not allow for understanding how a given decision was
arrived at. This is not only problematic from a legal perspective, but
non-transparent systems are also prone to yield unfair outcomes because their
sanity is challenging to assess and calibrate in the first place -- which is
particularly worrisome for human decision-subjects. Based on this observation
and building upon existing work, I aim to make the following three main
contributions through my doctoral thesis: (a) understand how (potential)
decision-subjects perceive algorithmic decisions (with varying degrees of
transparency of the underlying ADS), as compared to similar decisions made by
humans; (b) evaluate different tools for transparent decision-making with
respect to their effectiveness in enabling people to appropriately assess the
quality and fairness of ADS; and (c) develop human-understandable technical
artifacts for fair automated decision-making. Over the course of the first half
of my PhD program, I have already addressed substantial pieces of (a) and (c),
whereas (b) will be the major focus of the second half.
