Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2
  Benchmark
  Despite the recent popularity of neural network-based solvers for optimal
transport (OT), there is no standard quantitative way to evaluate their
performance. In this paper, we address this issue for quadratic-cost transport
-- specifically, computation of the Wasserstein-2 distance, a commonly-used
formulation of optimal transport in machine learning. To overcome the challenge
of computing ground truth transport maps between continuous measures needed to
assess these solvers, we use input-convex neural networks (ICNN) to construct
pairs of measures whose ground truth OT maps can be obtained analytically. This
strategy yields pairs of continuous benchmark measures in high-dimensional
spaces such as spaces of images. We thoroughly evaluate existing optimal
transport solvers using these benchmark measures. Even though these solvers
perform well in downstream tasks, many do not faithfully recover optimal
transport maps. To investigate the cause of this discrepancy, we further test
the solvers in a setting of image generation. Our study reveals crucial
limitations of existing solvers and shows that increased OT accuracy does not
necessarily correlate to better results downstream.
