Disentangling Human Error from the Ground Truth in Segmentation of
  Medical Images
  Recent years have seen increasing use of supervised learning methods for
segmentation tasks. However, the predictive performance of these algorithms
depends on the quality of labels. This problem is particularly pertinent in the
medical image domain, where both the annotation cost and inter-observer
variability are high. In a typical label acquisition process, different human
experts provide their estimates of the "true" segmentation labels under the
influence of their own biases and competence levels. Treating these noisy
labels blindly as the ground truth limits the performance that automatic
segmentation algorithms can achieve. In this work, we present a method for
jointly learning, from purely noisy observations alone, the reliability of
individual annotators and the true segmentation label distributions, using two
coupled CNNs. The separation of the two is achieved by encouraging the
estimated annotators to be maximally unreliable while achieving high fidelity
with the noisy training data. We first define a toy segmentation dataset based
on MNIST and study the properties of the proposed algorithm. We then
demonstrate the utility of the method on three public medical imaging
segmentation datasets with simulated (when necessary) and real diverse
annotations: 1) MSLSC (multiple-sclerosis lesions); 2) BraTS (brain tumours);
3) LIDC-IDRI (lung abnormalities). In all cases, our method outperforms
competing methods and relevant baselines particularly in cases where the number
of annotations is small and the amount of disagreement is large. The
experiments also show strong ability to capture the complex spatial
characteristics of annotators' mistakes.
