Revealing the Excitation Causality between Climate and Political
  Violence via a Neural Forward-Intensity Poisson Process
  The causal mechanism between climate and political violence is fraught with
complex mechanisms. Current quantitative causal models rely on one or more
assumptions: (1) the climate drivers persistently generate conflict, (2) the
causal mechanisms have a linear relationship with the conflict generation
parameter, and/or (3) there is sufficient data to inform the prior
distribution. Yet, we know conflict drivers often excite a social
transformation process which leads to violence (e.g., drought forces
agricultural producers to join urban militia), but further climate effects do
not necessarily contribute to further violence. Therefore, not only is this
bifurcation relationship highly non-linear, there is also often a lack of data
to support prior assumptions for high resolution modeling. Here, we aim to
overcome the aforementioned causal modeling challenges by proposing a neural
forward-intensity Poisson process (NFIPP) model. The NFIPP is designed to
capture the potential non-linear causal mechanism in climate induced political
violence, whilst being robust to sparse and timing-uncertain data. Our results
span 20 recent years and reveal an excitation-based causal link between extreme
climate events and political violence across diverse countries. Our
climate-induced conflict model results are cross-validated against qualitative
climate vulnerability indices. Furthermore, we label historical events that
either improve or reduce our predictability gain, demonstrating the importance
of domain expertise in informing interpretation.
