Empirical Evaluation of Biased Methods for Alpha Divergence Minimization
  In this paper we empirically evaluate biased methods for alpha-divergence
minimization. In particular, we focus on how the bias affects the final
solutions found, and how this depends on the dimensionality of the problem. We
find that (i) solutions returned by these methods appear to be strongly biased
towards minimizers of the traditional "exclusive" KL-divergence, KL(q||p), and
(ii) in high dimensions, an impractically large amount of computation is needed
to mitigate this bias and obtain solutions that actually minimize the
alpha-divergence of interest.
