Quantifying Confounding Bias in Neuroimaging Datasets with Causal
  Inference
  Neuroimaging datasets keep growing in size to address increasingly complex
medical questions. However, even the largest datasets today alone are too small
for training complex machine learning models. A potential solution is to
increase sample size by pooling scans from several datasets. In this work, we
combine 12,207 MRI scans from 15 studies and show that simple pooling is often
ill-advised due to introducing various types of biases in the training data.
First, we systematically define these biases. Second, we detect bias by
experimentally showing that scans can be correctly assigned to their respective
dataset with 73.3% accuracy. Finally, we propose to tell causal from
confounding factors by quantifying the extent of confounding and causality in a
single dataset using causal inference. We achieve this by finding the simplest
graphical model in terms of Kolmogorov complexity. As Kolmogorov complexity is
not directly computable, we employ the minimum description length to
approximate it. We empirically show that our approach is able to estimate
plausible causal relationships from real neuroimaging data.
