Making sense of violence risk predictions using clinical notes
  Violence risk assessment in psychiatric institutions enables interventions to
avoid violence incidents. Clinical notes written by practitioners and available
in electronic health records (EHR) are valuable resources that are seldom used
to their full potential. Previous studies have attempted to assess violence
risk in psychiatric patients using such notes, with acceptable performance.
However, they do not explain why classification works and how it can be
improved. We explore two methods to better understand the quality of a
classifier in the context of clinical note analysis: random forests using topic
models, and choice of evaluation metric. These methods allow us to understand
both our data and our methodology more profoundly, setting up the groundwork to
work on improved models that build upon this understanding. This is
particularly important when it comes to the generalizability of evaluated
classifiers to new data, a trustworthiness problem that is of great interest
due to the increased availability of new data in electronic format.
