Distributed Differential Privacy in Multi-Armed Bandits
  We consider the standard $K$-armed bandit problem under a distributed trust
model of differential privacy (DP), which enables to guarantee privacy without
a trustworthy server. Under this trust model, previous work largely focus on
achieving privacy using a shuffle protocol, where a batch of users data are
randomly permuted before sending to a central server. This protocol achieves
($\epsilon,\delta$) or approximate-DP guarantee by sacrificing an additional
additive $O\!\left(\!\frac{K\log T\sqrt{\log(1/\delta)}}{\epsilon}\!\right)\!$
cost in $T$-step cumulative regret. In contrast, the optimal privacy cost for
achieving a stronger ($\epsilon,0$) or pure-DP guarantee under the widely used
central trust model is only $\Theta\!\left(\!\frac{K\log
T}{\epsilon}\!\right)\!$, where, however, a trusted server is required. In this
work, we aim to obtain a pure-DP guarantee under distributed trust model while
sacrificing no more regret than that under central trust model. We achieve this
by designing a generic bandit algorithm based on successive arm elimination,
where privacy is guaranteed by corrupting rewards with an equivalent discrete
Laplace noise ensured by a secure computation protocol. We also show that our
algorithm, when instantiated with Skellam noise and the secure protocol,
ensures \emph{R\'{e}nyi differential privacy} -- a stronger notion than
approximate DP -- under distributed trust model with a privacy cost of
$O\!\left(\!\frac{K\sqrt{\log T}}{\epsilon}\!\right)\!$.
