Synthetic Interventions
  Consider a setting where there are $N$ heterogeneous units (e.g.,
individuals, sub-populations) and $D$ interventions (e.g., socio-economic
policies). Our goal is to learn the potential outcome associated with every
intervention on every unit (i.e., $N \times D$ causal parameters). Towards
this, we present a causal framework, synthetic interventions (SI), to infer
these $N \times D$ causal parameters while only observing each of the $N$ units
under at most two interventions, independent of $D$. This can be significant as
the number of interventions, i.e, level of personalization, grows. Importantly,
our estimator also allows for latent confounders that determine how
interventions are assigned. Theoretically, under a novel tensor factor model
across units, measurements, and interventions, we formally establish an
identification result for each of these $N \times D$ causal parameters and
establish finite-sample consistency and asymptotic normality of our estimator.
The estimator is furnished with a data-driven test to verify its suitability.
Empirically, we validate our framework through both experimental and
observational case studies; namely, a large-scale A/B test performed on an
e-commerce platform, and an evaluation of mobility restriction on morbidity
outcomes due to COVID-19. We believe this has important implications for
program evaluation and the design of data-efficient RCTs with heterogeneous
units and multiple interventions.
