Understanding and Comparing Scalable Gaussian Process Regression for Big
  Data
  As a non-parametric Bayesian model which produces informative predictive
distribution, Gaussian process (GP) has been widely used in various fields,
like regression, classification and optimization. The cubic complexity of
standard GP however leads to poor scalability, which poses challenges in the
era of big data. Hence, various scalable GPs have been developed in the
literature in order to improve the scalability while retaining desirable
prediction accuracy. This paper devotes to investigating the methodological
characteristics and performance of representative global and local scalable GPs
including sparse approximations and local aggregations from four main
perspectives: scalability, capability, controllability and robustness. The
numerical experiments on two toy examples and five real-world datasets with up
to 250K points offer the following findings. In terms of scalability, most of
the scalable GPs own a time complexity that is linear to the training size. In
terms of capability, the sparse approximations capture the long-term spatial
correlations, the local aggregations capture the local patterns but suffer from
over-fitting in some scenarios. In terms of controllability, we could improve
the performance of sparse approximations by simply increasing the inducing
size. But this is not the case for local aggregations. In terms of robustness,
local aggregations are robust to various initializations of hyperparameters due
to the local attention mechanism. Finally, we highlight that the proper hybrid
of global and local scalable GPs may be a promising way to improve both the
model capability and scalability for big data.
