Let the Model Decide its Curriculum for Multitask Learning
  Curriculum learning strategies in prior multi-task learning approaches
arrange datasets in a difficulty hierarchy either based on human perception or
by exhaustively searching the optimal arrangement. However, human perception of
difficulty may not always correlate well with machine interpretation leading to
poor performance and exhaustive search is computationally expensive. Addressing
these concerns, we propose two classes of techniques to arrange training
instances into a learning curriculum based on difficulty scores computed via
model-based approaches. The two classes i.e Dataset-level and Instance-level
differ in granularity of arrangement. Through comprehensive experiments with 12
datasets, we show that instance-level and dataset-level techniques result in
strong representations as they lead to an average performance improvement of
4.17% and 3.15% over their respective baselines. Furthermore, we find that most
of this improvement comes from correctly answering the difficult instances,
implying a greater efficacy of our techniques on difficult tasks.
