On Losses for Modern Language Models
  BERT set many state-of-the-art results over varied NLU benchmarks by
pre-training over two tasks: masked language modelling (MLM) and next sentence
prediction (NSP), the latter of which has been highly criticized. In this
paper, we 1) clarify NSP's effect on BERT pre-training, 2) explore fourteen
possible auxiliary pre-training tasks, of which seven are novel to modern
language models, and 3) investigate different ways to include multiple tasks
into pre-training. We show that NSP is detrimental to training due to its
context splitting and shallow semantic signal. We also identify six auxiliary
pre-training tasks -- sentence ordering, adjacent sentence prediction, TF
prediction, TF-IDF prediction, a FastSent variant, and a Quick Thoughts variant
-- that outperform a pure MLM baseline. Finally, we demonstrate that using
multiple tasks in a multi-task pre-training framework provides better results
than using any single auxiliary task. Using these methods, we outperform BERT
Base on the GLUE benchmark using fewer than a quarter of the training tokens.
