Analysis of Stopping Active Learning based on Stabilizing Predictions
  Within the natural language processing (NLP) community, active learning has
been widely investigated and applied in order to alleviate the annotation
bottleneck faced by developers of new NLP systems and technologies. This paper
presents the first theoretical analysis of stopping active learning based on
stabilizing predictions (SP). The analysis has revealed three elements that are
central to the success of the SP method: (1) bounds on Cohen's Kappa agreement
between successively trained models impose bounds on differences in F-measure
performance of the models; (2) since the stop set does not have to be labeled,
it can be made large in practice, helping to guarantee that the results
transfer to previously unseen streams of examples at test/application time; and
(3) good (low variance) sample estimates of Kappa between successive models can
be obtained. Proofs of relationships between the level of Kappa agreement and
the difference in performance between consecutive models are presented.
Specifically, if the Kappa agreement between two models exceeds a threshold T
(where $T>0$), then the difference in F-measure performance between those
models is bounded above by $\frac{4(1-T)}{T}$ in all cases. If precision of the
positive conjunction of the models is assumed to be $p$, then the bound can be
tightened to $\frac{4(1-T)}{(p+1)T}$.
