An Experimental Comparison of Several Clustering and Initialization
  Methods
  We examine methods for clustering in high dimensions. In the first part of
the paper, we perform an experimental comparison between three batch clustering
algorithms: the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm, a winner take all
version of the EM algorithm reminiscent of the K-means algorithm, and
model-based hierarchical agglomerative clustering. We learn naive-Bayes models
with a hidden root node, using high-dimensional discrete-variable data sets
(both real and synthetic). We find that the EM algorithm significantly
outperforms the other methods, and proceed to investigate the effect of various
initialization schemes on the final solution produced by the EM algorithm. The
initializations that we consider are (1) parameters sampled from an
uninformative prior, (2) random perturbations of the marginal distribution of
the data, and (3) the output of hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Although
the methods are substantially different, they lead to learned models that are
strikingly similar in quality.
