(Machine) Learning What Policies Value
  When a policy prioritizes one person over another, is it because they benefit
more, or because they are preferred? This paper develops a method to uncover
the values consistent with observed allocation decisions. We use machine
learning methods to estimate how much each individual benefits from an
intervention, and then reconcile its allocation with (i) the welfare weights
assigned to different people; (ii) heterogeneous treatment effects of the
intervention; and (iii) weights on different outcomes. We demonstrate this
approach by analyzing Mexico's PROGRESA anti-poverty program. The analysis
reveals that while the program prioritized certain subgroups -- such as
indigenous households -- the fact that those groups benefited more implies that
they were in fact assigned a lower welfare weight. The PROGRESA case
illustrates how the method makes it possible to audit existing policies, and to
design future policies that better align with values.
