On the Robustness of Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
  In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (c-MARL), agents learn to
cooperatively take actions as a team to maximize a total team reward. We
analyze the robustness of c-MARL to adversaries capable of attacking one of the
agents on a team. Through the ability to manipulate this agent's observations,
the adversary seeks to decrease the total team reward.
  Attacking c-MARL is challenging for three reasons: first, it is difficult to
estimate team rewards or how they are impacted by an agent mispredicting;
second, models are non-differentiable; and third, the feature space is
low-dimensional. Thus, we introduce a novel attack. The attacker first trains a
policy network with reinforcement learning to find a wrong action it should
encourage the victim agent to take. Then, the adversary uses targeted
adversarial examples to force the victim to take this action.
  Our results on the StartCraft II multi-agent benchmark demonstrate that
c-MARL teams are highly vulnerable to perturbations applied to one of their
agent's observations. By attacking a single agent, our attack method has highly
negative impact on the overall team reward, reducing it from 20 to 9.4. This
results in the team's winning rate to go down from 98.9% to 0%.
