Double Perturbation: On the Robustness of Robustness and Counterfactual
  Bias Evaluation
  Robustness and counterfactual bias are usually evaluated on a test dataset.
However, are these evaluations robust? If the test dataset is perturbed
slightly, will the evaluation results keep the same? In this paper, we propose
a "double perturbation" framework to uncover model weaknesses beyond the test
dataset. The framework first perturbs the test dataset to construct abundant
natural sentences similar to the test data, and then diagnoses the prediction
change regarding a single-word substitution. We apply this framework to study
two perturbation-based approaches that are used to analyze models' robustness
and counterfactual bias in English. (1) For robustness, we focus on synonym
substitutions and identify vulnerable examples where prediction can be altered.
Our proposed attack attains high success rates (96.0%-99.8%) in finding
vulnerable examples on both original and robustly trained CNNs and
Transformers. (2) For counterfactual bias, we focus on substituting demographic
tokens (e.g., gender, race) and measure the shift of the expected prediction
among constructed sentences. Our method is able to reveal the hidden model
biases not directly shown in the test dataset. Our code is available at
https://github.com/chong-z/nlp-second-order-attack.
