Communicative Capital for Prosthetic Agents
  This work presents an overarching perspective on the role that machine
intelligence can play in enhancing human abilities, especially those that have
been diminished due to injury or illness. As a primary contribution, we develop
the hypothesis that assistive devices, and specifically artificial arms and
hands, can and should be viewed as agents in order for us to most effectively
improve their collaboration with their human users. We believe that increased
agency will enable more powerful interactions between human users and next
generation prosthetic devices, especially when the sensorimotor space of the
prosthetic technology greatly exceeds the conventional control and
communication channels available to a prosthetic user. To more concretely
examine an agency-based view on prosthetic devices, we propose a new schema for
interpreting the capacity of a human-machine collaboration as a function of
both the human's and machine's degrees of agency. We then introduce the idea of
communicative capital as a way of thinking about the communication resources
developed by a human and a machine during their ongoing interaction. Using this
schema of agency and capacity, we examine the benefits and disadvantages of
increasing the agency of a prosthetic limb. To do so, we present an analysis of
examples from the literature where building communicative capital has enabled a
progression of fruitful, task-directed interactions between prostheses and
their human users. We then describe further work that is needed to concretely
evaluate the hypothesis that prostheses are best thought of as agents. The
agent-based viewpoint developed in this article significantly extends current
thinking on how best to support the natural, functional use of increasingly
complex prosthetic enhancements, and opens the door for more powerful
interactions between humans and their assistive technologies.
