Coherent False Seizure Prediction in Epilepsy, Coincidence or
  Providence?
  Seizure forecasting using machine learning is possible, but the performance
is far from ideal, as indicated by many false predictions and low specificity.
Here, we examine false and missing alarms of two algorithms on long-term
datasets to show that the limitations are less related to classifiers or
features, but rather to intrinsic changes in the data. We evaluated two
algorithms on three datasets by computing the correlation of false predictions
and estimating the information transfer between both classification methods.
For 9 out of 12 individuals both methods showed a performance better than
chance. For all individuals we observed a positive correlation in predictions.
For individuals with strong correlation in false predictions we were able to
boost the performance of one method by excluding test samples based on the
results of the second method. Substantially different algorithms exhibit a
highly consistent performance and a strong coherency in false and missing
alarms. Hence, changing the underlying hypothesis of a preictal state of fixed
time length prior to each seizure to a proictal state is more helpful than
further optimizing classifiers. The outcome is significant for the evaluation
of seizure prediction algorithms on continuous data.
