Data-Free Evaluation of User Contributions in Federated Learning
  Federated learning (FL) trains a machine learning model on mobile devices in
a distributed manner using each device's private data and computing resources.
A critical issues is to evaluate individual users' contributions so that (1)
users' effort in model training can be compensated with proper incentives and
(2) malicious and low-quality users can be detected and removed. The
state-of-the-art solutions require a representative test dataset for the
evaluation purpose, but such a dataset is often unavailable and hard to
synthesize. In this paper, we propose a method called Pairwise Correlated
Agreement (PCA) based on the idea of peer prediction to evaluate user
contribution in FL without a test dataset. PCA achieves this using the
statistical correlation of the model parameters uploaded by users. We then
apply PCA to designing (1) a new federated learning algorithm called Fed-PCA,
and (2) a new incentive mechanism that guarantees truthfulness. We evaluate the
performance of PCA and Fed-PCA using the MNIST dataset and a large industrial
product recommendation dataset. The results demonstrate that our Fed-PCA
outperforms the canonical FedAvg algorithm and other baseline methods in
accuracy, and at the same time, PCA effectively incentivizes users to behave
truthfully.
