A Closer Look at Deep Policy Gradients
  We study how the behavior of deep policy gradient algorithms reflects the
conceptual framework motivating their development. To this end, we propose a
fine-grained analysis of state-of-the-art methods based on key elements of this
framework: gradient estimation, value prediction, and optimization landscapes.
Our results show that the behavior of deep policy gradient algorithms often
deviates from what their motivating framework would predict: the surrogate
objective does not match the true reward landscape, learned value estimators
fail to fit the true value function, and gradient estimates poorly correlate
with the "true" gradient. The mismatch between predicted and empirical behavior
we uncover highlights our poor understanding of current methods, and indicates
the need to move beyond current benchmark-centric evaluation methods.
