Strategic Instrumental Variable Regression: Recovering Causal
  Relationships From Strategic Responses
  In settings where Machine Learning (ML) algorithms automate or inform
consequential decisions about people, individual decision subjects are often
incentivized to strategically modify their observable attributes to receive
more favorable predictions. As a result, the distribution the assessment rule
is trained on may differ from the one it operates on in deployment. While such
distribution shifts, in general, can hinder accurate predictions, our work
identifies a unique opportunity associated with shifts due to strategic
responses: We show that we can use strategic responses effectively to recover
causal relationships between the observable features and outcomes we wish to
predict, even under the presence of unobserved confounding variables.
Specifically, our work establishes a novel connection between strategic
responses to ML models and instrumental variable (IV) regression by observing
that the sequence of deployed models can be viewed as an instrument that
affects agents' observable features but does not directly influence their
outcomes. We show that our causal recovery method can be utilized to improve
decision-making across several important criteria: individual fairness, agent
outcomes, and predictive risk. In particular, we show that if decision subjects
differ in their ability to modify non-causal attributes, any decision rule
deviating from the causal coefficients can lead to (potentially unbounded)
individual-level unfairness.
