Misleading Failures of Partial-input Baselines
  Recent work establishes dataset difficulty and removes annotation artifacts
via partial-input baselines (e.g., hypothesis-only models for SNLI or
question-only models for VQA). When a partial-input baseline gets high
accuracy, a dataset is cheatable. However, the converse is not necessarily
true: the failure of a partial-input baseline does not mean a dataset is free
of artifacts. To illustrate this, we first design artificial datasets which
contain trivial patterns in the full input that are undetectable by any
partial-input model. Next, we identify such artifacts in the SNLI dataset - a
hypothesis-only model augmented with trivial patterns in the premise can solve
15% of the examples that are previously considered "hard". Our work provides a
caveat for the use of partial-input baselines for dataset verification and
creation.
