The few-get-richer: a surprising consequence of popularity-based
  rankings
  Ranking algorithms play a crucial role in online platforms ranging from
search engines to recommender systems. In this paper, we identify a surprising
consequence of popularity-based rankings: the fewer the items reporting a given
signal, the higher the share of the overall traffic they collectively attract.
This few-get-richer effect emerges in settings where there are few distinct
classes of items (e.g., left-leaning news sources versus right-leaning news
sources), and items are ranked based on their popularity. We demonstrate
analytically that the few-get-richer effect emerges when people tend to click
on top-ranked items and have heterogeneous preferences for the classes of
items. Using simulations, we analyze how the strength of the effect changes
with assumptions about the setting and human behavior. We also test our
predictions experimentally in an online experiment with human participants. Our
findings have important implications to understand the spread of
misinformation.
