Policy design in experiments with unknown interference
  This paper proposes an experimental design for estimation and inference on
welfare-maximizing policies in the presence of spillover effects. I consider a
setting where units are organized into a finite number of large clusters and
interact in unknown ways within each cluster. As a first contribution, I
introduce a single-wave experiment which, by carefully varying the
randomization across pairs of clusters, estimates the marginal effect of a
change in treatment probabilities, taking spillover effects into account. Using
the marginal effect, I propose a practical test for policy optimality. The idea
is that researchers should report the marginal effect and test for policy
optimality: the marginal effect indicates the direction for a welfare
improvement, and the test provides evidence on whether it is worth conducting
additional experiments to estimate a welfare-improving treatment allocation. As
a second contribution, I design a multiple-wave experiment to estimate
treatment assignment rules and maximize welfare. I derive strong small-sample
guarantees on the difference between the maximum attainable welfare and the
welfare evaluated at the estimated policy, which converges linearly in the
number of clusters and iterations. Simulations calibrated to existing
experiments on information diffusion and cash-transfer programs show welfare
improvements up to fifty percentage points.
