Deep Learning for Prostate Pathology
  The current study detects different morphologies related to prostate
pathology using deep learning models; these models were evaluated on 2,121
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain histology images captured using bright field
microscopy, which spanned a variety of image qualities, origins (whole slide,
tissue micro array, whole mount, Internet), scanning machines, timestamps, H&E
staining protocols, and institutions. For case usage, these models were applied
for the annotation tasks in clinician-oriented pathology reports for
prostatectomy specimens. The true positive rate (TPR) for slides with prostate
cancer was 99.7% by a false positive rate of 0.785%. The F1-scores of Gleason
patterns reported in pathology reports ranged from 0.795 to 1.0 at the case
level. TPR was 93.6% for the cribriform morphology and 72.6% for the ductal
morphology. The correlation between the ground truth and the prediction for the
relative tumor volume was 0.987 n. Our models cover the major components of
prostate pathology and successfully accomplish the annotation tasks.
