The Long Arc of Fairness: Formalisations and Ethical Discourse
  In recent years, the idea of formalising and modelling fairness for
algorithmic decision making (ADM) has advanced to a point of sophisticated
specialisation. However, the relations between technical (formalised) and
ethical discourse on fairness are not always clear and productive. Arguing for
an alternative perspective, we review existing fairness metrics and discuss
some common issues. For instance, the fairness of procedures and distributions
is often formalised and discussed statically, disregarding both structural
preconditions of the status quo and downstream effects of a given intervention.
We then introduce dynamic fairness modelling, a more comprehensive approach
that realigns formal fairness metrics with arguments from the ethical
discourse. A dynamic fairness model incorporates (1) ethical goals, (2) formal
metrics to quantify decision procedures and outcomes and (3) mid-term or
long-term downstream effects. By contextualising these elements of
fairness-related processes, dynamic fairness modelling explicates formerly
latent ethical aspects and thereby provides a helpful tool to navigate
trade-offs between different fairness interventions. To illustrate the
framework, we discuss an example application -- the current European efforts to
increase the number of women on company boards, e.g. via quota solutions -- and
present early technical work that fits within our framework.
