A New Security Boundary of Component Differentially Challenged XOR PUFs
  Against Machine Learning Modeling Attacks
  Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) are promising security primitives for
resource-constrained network nodes. The XOR Arbiter PUF (XOR PUF or XPUF) is an
intensively studied PUF invented to improve the security of the Arbiter PUF,
probably the most lightweight delay-based PUF. Recently, highly powerful
machine learning attack methods were discovered and were able to easily break
large-sized XPUFs, which were highly secure against earlier machine learning
attack methods. Component-differentially-challenged XPUFs (CDC-XPUFs) are XPUFs
with different component PUFs receiving different challenges. Studies showed
they were much more secure against machine learning attacks than the
conventional XPUFs, whose component PUFs receive the same challenge. But these
studies were all based on earlier machine learning attack methods, and hence it
is not clear if CDC-XPUFs can remain secure under the recently discovered
powerful attack methods. In this paper, the two current most powerful two
machine learning methods for attacking XPUFs are adapted by fine-tuning the
parameters of the two methods for CDC-XPUFs. Attack experiments using both
simulated PUF data and silicon data generated from PUFs implemented on
field-programmable gate array (FPGA) were carried out, and the experimental
results showed that some previously secure CDC-XPUFs of certain circuit
parameter values are no longer secure under the adapted new attack methods,
while many more CDC-XPUFs of other circuit parameter values remain secure.
Thus, our experimental attack study has re-defined the boundary between the
secure region and the insecure region of the PUF circuit parameter space,
providing PUF manufacturers and IoT security application developers with
valuable information in choosing PUFs with secure parameter values.
