Learning to be Fair: A Consequentialist Approach to Equitable
  Decision-Making
  In the dominant paradigm for designing equitable machine learning systems,
one works to ensure that model predictions satisfy various fairness criteria,
such as parity in error rates across race, gender, and other legally protected
traits. That approach, however, typically ignores the downstream decisions and
outcomes that predictions affect, and, as a result, can induce unexpected
harms. Here we present an alternative framework for fairness that directly
anticipates the consequences of decisions. Stakeholders first specify
preferences over the possible outcomes of an algorithmically informed
decision-making process. For example, lenders may prefer extending credit to
those most likely to repay a loan, while also preferring similar lending rates
across neighborhoods. One then searches the space of decision policies to
maximize the specified utility. We develop and describe a method for
efficiently learning these optimal policies from data for a large family of
expressive utility functions, facilitating a more holistic approach to
equitable decision-making.
