Generating Summaries for Scientific Paper Review
  The review process is essential to ensure the quality of publications.
Recently, the increase of submissions for top venues in machine learning and
NLP has caused a problem of excessive burden on reviewers and has often caused
concerns regarding how this may not only overload reviewers, but also may
affect the quality of the reviews. An automatic system for assisting with the
reviewing process could be a solution for ameliorating the problem. In this
paper, we explore automatic review summary generation for scientific papers. We
posit that neural language models have the potential to be valuable candidates
for this task. In order to test this hypothesis, we release a new dataset of
scientific papers and their reviews, collected from papers published in the
NeurIPS conference from 2013 to 2020. We evaluate state of the art neural
summarization models, present initial results on the feasibility of automatic
review summary generation, and propose directions for the future.
