Debiased Bayesian inference for average treatment effects
  Bayesian approaches have become increasingly popular in causal inference
problems due to their conceptual simplicity, excellent performance and in-built
uncertainty quantification ('posterior credible sets'). We investigate Bayesian
inference for average treatment effects from observational data, which is a
challenging problem due to the missing counterfactuals and selection bias.
Working in the standard potential outcomes framework, we propose a data-driven
modification to an arbitrary (nonparametric) prior based on the propensity
score that corrects for the first-order posterior bias, thereby improving
performance. We illustrate our method for Gaussian process (GP) priors using
(semi-)synthetic data. Our experiments demonstrate significant improvement in
both estimation accuracy and uncertainty quantification compared to the
unmodified GP, rendering our approach highly competitive with the
state-of-the-art.
