Can Global Optimization Strategy Outperform Myopic Strategy for Bayesian
  Parameter Estimation?
  Bayesian adaptive inference is widely used in psychophysics to estimate
psychometric parameters. Most applications used myopic one-step ahead strategy
which only optimizes the immediate utility. The widely held expectation is that
global optimization strategies that explicitly optimize over some horizon can
largely improve the performance of the myopic strategy. With limited studies
that compared myopic and global strategies, the expectation was not challenged
and researchers are still investing heavily to achieve global optimization. Is
that really worthwhile? This paper provides a discouraging answer based on
experimental simulations comparing the performance improvement and computation
burden between global and myopic strategies in parameter estimation of multiple
models. The finding is that the added horizon in global strategies has
negligible contributions to the improvement of optimal global utility other
than the most immediate next steps (of myopic strategy). Mathematical recursion
is derived to prove that the contribution of utility improvement of each added
horizon step diminishes fast as that step moves further into the future.
