Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning
  Fair Representations
  How can we learn a classifier that is "fair" for a protected or sensitive
group, when we do not know if the input to the classifier belongs to the
protected group? How can we train such a classifier when data on the protected
group is difficult to attain? In many settings, finding out the sensitive input
attribute can be prohibitively expensive even during model training, and
sometimes impossible during model serving. For example, in recommender systems,
if we want to predict if a user will click on a given recommendation, we often
do not know many attributes of the user, e.g., race or age, and many attributes
of the content are hard to determine, e.g., the language or topic. Thus, it is
not feasible to use a different classifier calibrated based on knowledge of the
sensitive attribute.
  Here, we use an adversarial training procedure to remove information about
the sensitive attribute from the latent representation learned by a neural
network. In particular, we study how the choice of data for the adversarial
training effects the resulting fairness properties. We find two interesting
results: a small amount of data is needed to train these adversarial models,
and the data distribution empirically drives the adversary's notion of
fairness.
