Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy
  We identify a trade-off between robustness and accuracy that serves as a
guiding principle in the design of defenses against adversarial examples.
Although this problem has been widely studied empirically, much remains unknown
concerning the theory underlying this trade-off. In this work, we decompose the
prediction error for adversarial examples (robust error) as the sum of the
natural (classification) error and boundary error, and provide a differentiable
upper bound using the theory of classification-calibrated loss, which is shown
to be the tightest possible upper bound uniform over all probability
distributions and measurable predictors. Inspired by our theoretical analysis,
we also design a new defense method, TRADES, to trade adversarial robustness
off against accuracy. Our proposed algorithm performs well experimentally in
real-world datasets. The methodology is the foundation of our entry to the
NeurIPS 2018 Adversarial Vision Challenge in which we won the 1st place out of
~2,000 submissions, surpassing the runner-up approach by $11.41\%$ in terms of
mean $\ell_2$ perturbation distance.
