Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear
  adjustment for a prognostic score
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical
research. Reducing the statistical uncertainty in these analyses is an
important objective for statisticians. Registries, prior trials, and health
records constitute a growing compendium of historical data on patients under
standard-of-care that may be exploitable to this end. However, most methods for
historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict
type-I error rate control. Here, we propose a use of historical data that
exploits linear covariate adjustment to improve the efficiency of trial
analyses without incurring bias. Specifically, we train a prognostic model on
the historical data, then estimate the treatment effect using a linear
regression while adjusting for the trial subjects' predicted outcomes (their
prognostic scores). We prove that, under certain conditions, this prognostic
covariate adjustment procedure attains the minimum variance possible among a
large class of estimators. When those conditions are not met, prognostic
covariate adjustment is still more efficient than raw covariate adjustment and
the gain in efficiency is proportional to a measure of the predictive accuracy
of the prognostic model above and beyond the linear relationship with the raw
covariates. We demonstrate the approach using simulations and a reanalysis of
an Alzheimer's Disease clinical trial and observe meaningful reductions in
mean-squared error and the estimated variance. Lastly, we provide a simplified
formula for asymptotic variance that enables power calculations that account
for these gains. Sample size reductions between 10% and 30% are attainable when
using prognostic models that explain a clinically realistic percentage of the
outcome variance.
