Removing Hidden Confounding by Experimental Grounding
  Observational data is increasingly used as a means for making
individual-level causal predictions and intervention recommendations. The
foremost challenge of causal inference from observational data is hidden
confounding, whose presence cannot be tested in data and can invalidate any
causal conclusion. Experimental data does not suffer from confounding but is
usually limited in both scope and scale. We introduce a novel method of using
limited experimental data to correct the hidden confounding in causal effect
models trained on larger observational data, even if the observational data
does not fully overlap with the experimental data. Our method makes strictly
weaker assumptions than existing approaches, and we prove conditions under
which it yields a consistent estimator. We demonstrate our method's efficacy
using real-world data from a large educational experiment.
