Characterizing Technical Debt and Antipatterns in AI-Based Systems: A
  Systematic Mapping Study
  Background: With the rising popularity of Artificial Intelligence (AI), there
is a growing need to build large and complex AI-based systems in a
cost-effective and manageable way. Like with traditional software, Technical
Debt (TD) will emerge naturally over time in these systems, therefore leading
to challenges and risks if not managed appropriately. The influence of data
science and the stochastic nature of AI-based systems may also lead to new
types of TD or antipatterns, which are not yet fully understood by researchers
and practitioners. Objective: The goal of our study is to provide a clear
overview and characterization of the types of TD (both established and new
ones) that appear in AI-based systems, as well as the antipatterns and related
solutions that have been proposed. Method: Following the process of a
systematic mapping study, 21 primary studies are identified and analyzed.
Results: Our results show that (i) established TD types, variations of them,
and four new TD types (data, model, configuration, and ethics debt) are present
in AI-based systems, (ii) 72 antipatterns are discussed in the literature, the
majority related to data and model deficiencies, and (iii) 46 solutions have
been proposed, either to address specific TD types, antipatterns, or TD in
general. Conclusions: Our results can support AI professionals with reasoning
about and communicating aspects of TD present in their systems. Additionally,
they can serve as a foundation for future research to further our understanding
of TD in AI-based systems.
