Proof of the Theory-to-Practice Gap in Deep Learning via Sampling
  Complexity bounds for Neural Network Approximation Spaces
  We study the computational complexity of (deterministic or randomized)
algorithms based on point samples for approximating or integrating functions
that can be well approximated by neural networks. Such algorithms (most
prominently stochastic gradient descent and its variants) are used extensively
in the field of deep learning. One of the most important problems in this field
concerns the question of whether it is possible to realize theoretically
provable neural network approximation rates by such algorithms. We answer this
question in the negative by proving hardness results for the problems of
approximation and integration on a novel class of neural network approximation
spaces. In particular, our results confirm a conjectured and empirically
observed theory-to-practice gap in deep learning. We complement our hardness
results by showing that approximation rates of a comparable order of
convergence are (at least theoretically) achievable.
