Can Adversarial Training Be Manipulated By Non-Robust Features?
  Adversarial training, originally designed to resist test-time adversarial
examples, has shown to be promising in mitigating training-time availability
attacks. This defense ability, however, is challenged in this paper. We
identify a novel threat model named stability attacks, which aims to hinder
robust availability by slightly manipulating the training data. Under this
threat, we show that adversarial training using a conventional defense budget
$\epsilon$ provably fails to provide test robustness in a simple statistical
setting, where the non-robust features of the training data can be reinforced
by $\epsilon$-bounded perturbation. Further, we analyze the necessity of
enlarging the defense budget to counter stability attacks. Finally,
comprehensive experiments demonstrate that stability attacks are harmful on
benchmark datasets, and thus the adaptive defense is necessary to maintain
robustness.
