Avoiding Resentment Via Monotonic Fairness
  Classifiers that achieve demographic balance by explicitly using protected
attributes such as race or gender are often politically or culturally
controversial due to their lack of individual fairness, i.e. individuals with
similar qualifications will receive different outcomes. Individually and group
fair decision criteria can produce counter-intuitive results, e.g. that the
optimal constrained boundary may reject intuitively better candidates due to
demographic imbalance in similar candidates. Both approaches can be seen as
introducing individual resentment, where some individuals would have received a
better outcome if they either belonged to a different demographic class and had
the same qualifications, or if they remained in the same class but had
objectively worse qualifications (e.g. lower test scores). We show that both
forms of resentment can be avoided by using monotonically constrained machine
learning models to create individually fair, demographically balanced
classifiers.
