Multiclass Learning Approaches: A Theoretical Comparison with
  Implications
  We theoretically analyze and compare the following five popular multiclass
classification methods: One vs. All, All Pairs, Tree-based classifiers, Error
Correcting Output Codes (ECOC) with randomly generated code matrices, and
Multiclass SVM. In the first four methods, the classification is based on a
reduction to binary classification. We consider the case where the binary
classifier comes from a class of VC dimension $d$, and in particular from the
class of halfspaces over $\reals^d$. We analyze both the estimation error and
the approximation error of these methods. Our analysis reveals interesting
conclusions of practical relevance, regarding the success of the different
approaches under various conditions. Our proof technique employs tools from VC
theory to analyze the \emph{approximation error} of hypothesis classes. This is
in sharp contrast to most, if not all, previous uses of VC theory, which only
deal with estimation error.
