Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness
  A growing number of oversight boards and regulatory bodies seek to monitor
and govern algorithms that make decisions about people's lives. Prior work has
explored how people believe algorithmic decisions should be made, but there is
little understanding of how individual factors like sociodemographics or direct
experience with a decision-making scenario may affect their ethical views. We
take a first step toward filling this gap by exploring how people's perceptions
of one aspect of procedural algorithmic fairness (the fairness of using
particular features in an algorithmic decision) relate to their (i)
demographics (age, education, gender, race, political views) and (ii) personal
experiences with the algorithmic decision-making scenario. We find that
political views and personal experience with the algorithmic decision context
significantly influence people's perceptions about the fairness of using
different features for bail decision-making. Drawing on our results, we discuss
the implications for algorithmic oversight including the need to consider
multiple dimensions of diversity in composing oversight and regulatory bodies.
