Extracting Expert's Goals by What-if Interpretable Modeling
  Although reinforcement learning (RL) has tremendous success in many fields,
applying RL to real-world settings such as healthcare is challenging when the
reward is hard to specify and no exploration is allowed. In this work, we focus
on recovering clinicians' rewards in treating patients. We incorporate the
what-if reasoning to explain the clinician's treatments based on their
potential future outcomes. We use generalized additive models (GAMs) - a class
of accurate, interpretable models - to recover the reward. In both simulation
and a real-world hospital dataset, we show our model outperforms baselines.
Finally, our model's explanations match several clinical guidelines when
treating patients while we found the commonly-used linear model often
contradicts them.
