A Comparison of Contextual and Non-Contextual Preference Ranking for Set
  Addition Problems
  In this paper, we study the problem of evaluating the addition of elements to
a set. This problem is difficult, because it can, in the general case, not be
reduced to unconditional preferences between the choices. Therefore, we model
preferences based on the context of the decision. We discuss and compare two
different Siamese network architectures for this task: a twin network that
compares the two sets resulting after the addition, and a triplet network that
models the contribution of each candidate to the existing set. We evaluate the
two settings on a real-world task; learning human card preferences for deck
building in the collectible card game Magic: The Gathering. We show that the
triplet approach achieves a better result than the twin network and that both
outperform previous results on this task.
