Outcome Assumptions and Duality Theory for Balancing Weights
  We study balancing weight estimators, which reweight outcomes from a source
population to estimate missing outcomes in a target population. These
estimators minimize the worst-case error by making an assumption about the
outcome model. In this paper, we show that this outcome assumption has two
immediate implications. First, we can replace the minimax optimization problem
for balancing weights with a simple convex loss over the assumed outcome
function class. Second, we can replace the commonly-made overlap assumption
with a more appropriate quantitative measure, the minimum worst-case bias.
Finally, we show conditions under which the weights remain robust when our
assumptions on the outcomes are wrong.
