Counterfactual Plans under Distributional Ambiguity
  Counterfactual explanations are attracting significant attention due to the
flourishing applications of machine learning models in consequential domains. A
counterfactual plan consists of multiple possibilities to modify a given
instance so that the model's prediction will be altered. As the predictive
model can be updated subject to the future arrival of new data, a
counterfactual plan may become ineffective or infeasible with respect to the
future values of the model parameters. In this work, we study the
counterfactual plans under model uncertainty, in which the distribution of the
model parameters is partially prescribed using only the first- and
second-moment information. First, we propose an uncertainty quantification tool
to compute the lower and upper bounds of the probability of validity for any
given counterfactual plan. We then provide corrective methods to adjust the
counterfactual plan to improve the validity measure. The numerical experiments
validate our bounds and demonstrate that our correction increases the
robustness of the counterfactual plans in different real-world datasets.
