Sample Complexity of Automated Mechanism Design
  The design of revenue-maximizing combinatorial auctions, i.e. multi-item
auctions over bundles of goods, is one of the most fundamental problems in
computational economics, unsolved even for two bidders and two items for sale.
In the traditional economic models, it is assumed that the bidders' valuations
are drawn from an underlying distribution and that the auction designer has
perfect knowledge of this distribution. Despite this strong and oftentimes
unrealistic assumption, it is remarkable that the revenue-maximizing
combinatorial auction remains unknown. In recent years, automated mechanism
design has emerged as one of the most practical and promising approaches to
designing high-revenue combinatorial auctions. The most scalable automated
mechanism design algorithms take as input samples from the bidders' valuation
distribution and then search for a high-revenue auction in a rich auction
class. In this work, we provide the first sample complexity analysis for the
standard hierarchy of deterministic combinatorial auction classes used in
automated mechanism design. In particular, we provide tight sample complexity
bounds on the number of samples needed to guarantee that the empirical revenue
of the designed mechanism on the samples is close to its expected revenue on
the underlying, unknown distribution over bidder valuations, for each of the
auction classes in the hierarchy. In addition to helping set automated
mechanism design on firm foundations, our results also push the boundaries of
learning theory. In particular, the hypothesis functions used in our contexts
are defined through multi-stage combinatorial optimization procedures, rather
than simple decision boundaries, as are common in machine learning.
