Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalization
  While adversarial training can improve robust accuracy (against an
adversary), it sometimes hurts standard accuracy (when there is no adversary).
Previous work has studied this tradeoff between standard and robust accuracy,
but only in the setting where no predictor performs well on both objectives in
the infinite data limit. In this paper, we show that even when the optimal
predictor with infinite data performs well on both objectives, a tradeoff can
still manifest itself with finite data. Furthermore, since our construction is
based on a convex learning problem, we rule out optimization concerns, thus
laying bare a fundamental tension between robustness and generalization.
Finally, we show that robust self-training mostly eliminates this tradeoff by
leveraging unlabeled data.
