Software Engineering for Fairness: A Case Study with Hyperparameter
  Optimization
  We assert that it is the ethical duty of software engineers to strive to
reduce software discrimination. This paper discusses how that might be done.
This is an important topic since machine learning software is increasingly
being used to make decisions that affect people's lives. Potentially, the
application of that software will result in fairer decisions because (unlike
humans) machine learning software is not biased. However, recent results show
that the software within many data mining packages exhibits "group
discrimination"; i.e. their decisions are inappropriately affected by
"protected attributes"(e.g., race, gender, age, etc.).
  There has been much prior work on validating the fairness of machine-learning
models (by recognizing when such software discrimination exists). But after
detection, comes mitigation. What steps can ethical software engineers take to
reduce discrimination in the software they produce?
  This paper shows that making \textit{fairness} as a goal during
hyperparameter optimization can (a) preserve the predictive power of a model
learned from a data miner while also (b) generates fairer results. To the best
of our knowledge, this is the first application of hyperparameter optimization
as a tool for software engineers to generate fairer software.
