Myths and Legends of the Baldwin Effect
  This position paper argues that the Baldwin effect is widely misunderstood by
the evolutionary computation community. The misunderstandings appear to fall
into two general categories. Firstly, it is commonly believed that the Baldwin
effect is concerned with the synergy that results when there is an evolving
population of learning individuals. This is only half of the story. The full
story is more complicated and more interesting. The Baldwin effect is concerned
with the costs and benefits of lifetime learning by individuals in an evolving
population. Several researchers have focussed exclusively on the benefits, but
there is much to be gained from attention to the costs. This paper explains the
two sides of the story and enumerates ten of the costs and benefits of lifetime
learning by individuals in an evolving population. Secondly, there is a cluster
of misunderstandings about the relationship between the Baldwin effect and
Lamarckian inheritance of acquired characteristics. The Baldwin effect is not
Lamarckian. A Lamarckian algorithm is not better for most evolutionary
computing problems than a Baldwinian algorithm. Finally, Lamarckian inheritance
is not a better model of memetic (cultural) evolution than the Baldwin effect.
