Assessing Robustness of Deep learning Methods in Dermatological Workflow
  This paper aims to evaluate the suitability of current deep learning methods
for clinical workflow especially by focusing on dermatology. Although deep
learning methods have been attempted to get dermatologist level accuracy in
several individual conditions, it has not been rigorously tested for common
clinical complaints. Most projects involve data acquired in well-controlled
laboratory conditions. This may not reflect regular clinical evaluation where
corresponding image quality is not always ideal. We test the robustness of deep
learning methods by simulating non-ideal characteristics on user submitted
images of ten classes of diseases. Assessing via imitated conditions, we have
found the overall accuracy to drop and individual predictions change
significantly in many cases despite of robust training.
