The Great Time Series Classification Bake Off: An Experimental
  Evaluation of Recently Proposed Algorithms. Extended Version
  In the last five years there have been a large number of new time series
classification algorithms proposed in the literature. These algorithms have
been evaluated on subsets of the 47 data sets in the University of California,
Riverside time series classification archive. The archive has recently been
expanded to 85 data sets, over half of which have been donated by researchers
at the University of East Anglia. Aspects of previous evaluations have made
comparisons between algorithms difficult. For example, several different
programming languages have been used, experiments involved a single train/test
split and some used normalised data whilst others did not. The relaunch of the
archive provides a timely opportunity to thoroughly evaluate algorithms on a
larger number of datasets. We have implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms
in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark
classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each
of the 85 datasets. We use these results to test several hypotheses relating to
whether the algorithms are significantly more accurate than the benchmarks and
each other. Our results indicate that only 9 of these algorithms are
significantly more accurate than both benchmarks and that one classifier, the
Collective of Transformation Ensembles, is significantly more accurate than all
of the others. All of our experiments and results are reproducible: we release
all of our code, results and experimental details and we hope these experiments
form the basis for more rigorous testing of new algorithms in the future.
