Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognition
  Data poisoning has been proposed as a compelling defense against facial
recognition models trained on Web-scraped pictures. Users can perturb images
they post online, so that models will misclassify future (unperturbed)
pictures. We demonstrate that this strategy provides a false sense of security,
as it ignores an inherent asymmetry between the parties: users' pictures are
perturbed once and for all before being published (at which point they are
scraped) and must thereafter fool all future models -- including models trained
adaptively against the users' past attacks, or models that use technologies
discovered after the attack. We evaluate two systems for poisoning attacks
against large-scale facial recognition, Fawkes (500'000+ downloads) and LowKey.
We demonstrate how an "oblivious" model trainer can simply wait for future
developments in computer vision to nullify the protection of pictures collected
in the past. We further show that an adversary with black-box access to the
attack can (i) train a robust model that resists the perturbations of collected
pictures and (ii) detect poisoned pictures uploaded online. We caution that
facial recognition poisoning will not admit an "arms race" between attackers
and defenders. Once perturbed pictures are scraped, the attack cannot be
changed so any future successful defense irrevocably undermines users' privacy.
