Link Analysis meets Ontologies: Are Embeddings the Answer?
  The increasing amounts of semantic resources offer valuable storage of human
knowledge; however, the probability of wrong entries increases with the
increased size. The development of approaches that identify potentially
spurious parts of a given knowledge base is thus becoming an increasingly
important area of interest. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of
whether structure-only link analysis methods can already offer a scalable means
to detecting possible anomalies, as well as potentially interesting novel
relation candidates. Evaluating thirteen methods on eight different semantic
resources, including Gene Ontology, Food Ontology, Marine Ontology and similar,
we demonstrated that structure-only link analysis could offer scalable anomaly
detection for a subset of the data sets. Further, we demonstrated that by
considering symbolic node embedding, explanations of the predictions (links)
could be obtained, making this branch of methods potentially more valuable than
the black-box only ones. To our knowledge, this is currently one of the most
extensive systematic studies of the applicability of different types of link
analysis methods across semantic resources from different domains.
