Partially-Typed NER Datasets Integration: Connecting Practice to Theory
  While typical named entity recognition (NER) models require the training set
to be annotated with all target types, each available datasets may only cover a
part of them. Instead of relying on fully-typed NER datasets, many efforts have
been made to leverage multiple partially-typed ones for training and allow the
resulting model to cover a full type set. However, there is neither guarantee
on the quality of integrated datasets, nor guidance on the design of training
algorithms. Here, we conduct a systematic analysis and comparison between
partially-typed NER datasets and fully-typed ones, in both theoretical and
empirical manner. Firstly, we derive a bound to establish that models trained
with partially-typed annotations can reach a similar performance with the ones
trained with fully-typed annotations, which also provides guidance on the
algorithm design. Moreover, we conduct controlled experiments, which shows
partially-typed datasets leads to similar performance with the model trained
with the same amount of fully-typed annotations
