Online Optimization with Untrusted Predictions
  We examine the problem of online optimization, where a decision maker must
sequentially choose points in a general metric space to minimize the sum of
per-round, non-convex hitting costs and the costs of switching decisions
between rounds. The decision maker has access to a black-box oracle, such as a
machine learning model, that provides untrusted and potentially inaccurate
predictions of the optimal decision in each round. The goal of the decision
maker is to exploit the predictions if they are accurate, while guaranteeing
performance that is not much worse than the hindsight optimal sequence of
decisions, even when predictions are inaccurate. We impose the standard
assumption that hitting costs are globally $\alpha$-polyhedral. We propose a
novel algorithm, Adaptive Online Switching (AOS), and prove that, for any
desired $\delta > 0$, it is $(1+2\delta)$-competitive if predictions are
perfect, while also maintaining a uniformly bounded competitive ratio of
$2^{\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/(\alpha \delta))}$ even when predictions are
adversarial. Further, we prove that this trade-off is necessary and nearly
optimal in the sense that any deterministic algorithm which is
$(1+\delta)$-competitive if predictions are perfect must be at least
$2^{\tilde{\Omega}(1/(\alpha \delta))}$-competitive when predictions are
inaccurate.
