Model Selection's Disparate Impact in Real-World Deep Learning
  Applications
  Algorithmic fairness has emphasized the role of biased data in automated
decision outcomes. Recently, there has been a shift in attention to sources of
bias that implicate fairness in other stages in the ML pipeline. We contend
that one source of such bias, human preferences in model selection, remains
under-explored in terms of its role in disparate impact across demographic
groups. Using a deep learning model trained on real-world medical imaging data,
we verify our claim empirically and argue that choice of metric for model
comparison, especially those that do not take variability into account, can
significantly bias model selection outcomes.
