How Much Data is Enough? A Statistical Approach with Case Study on
  Longitudinal Driving Behavior
  Big data has shown its uniquely powerful ability to reveal, model, and
understand driver behaviors. The amount of data affects the experiment cost and
conclusions in the analysis. Insufficient data may lead to inaccurate models
while excessive data waste resources. For projects that cost millions of
dollars, it is critical to determine the right amount of data needed. However,
how to decide the appropriate amount has not been fully studied in the realm of
driver behaviors. This paper systematically investigates this issue to estimate
how much naturalistic driving data (NDD) is needed for understanding driver
behaviors from a statistical point of view. A general assessment method is
proposed using a Gaussian kernel density estimation to catch the underlying
characteristics of driver behaviors. We then apply the Kullback-Liebler
divergence method to measure the similarity between density functions with
differing amounts of NDD. A max-minimum approach is used to compute the
appropriate amount of NDD. To validate our proposed method, we investigated the
car-following case using NDD collected from the University of Michigan Safety
Pilot Model Deployment (SPMD) program. We demonstrate that from a statistical
perspective, the proposed approach can provide an appropriate amount of NDD
capable of capturing most features of the normal car-following behavior, which
is consistent with the experiment settings in many literatures.
