Explaining generalization in deep learning: progress and fundamental
  limits
  This dissertation studies a fundamental open challenge in deep learning
theory: why do deep networks generalize well even while being
overparameterized, unregularized and fitting the training data to zero error?
  In the first part of the thesis, we will empirically study how training deep
networks via stochastic gradient descent implicitly controls the networks'
capacity. Subsequently, to show how this leads to better generalization, we
will derive {\em data-dependent} {\em uniform-convergence-based} generalization
bounds with improved dependencies on the parameter count.
  Uniform convergence has in fact been the most widely used tool in deep
learning literature, thanks to its simplicity and generality. Given its
popularity, in this thesis, we will also take a step back to identify the
fundamental limits of uniform convergence as a tool to explain generalization.
In particular, we will show that in some example overparameterized settings,
{\em any} uniform convergence bound will provide only a vacuous generalization
bound.
  With this realization in mind, in the last part of the thesis, we will change
course and introduce an {\em empirical} technique to estimate generalization
using unlabeled data. Our technique does not rely on any notion of
uniform-convergece-based complexity and is remarkably precise. We will
theoretically show why our technique enjoys such precision.
  We will conclude by discussing how future work could explore novel ways to
incorporate distributional assumptions in generalization bounds (such as in the
form of unlabeled data) and explore other tools to derive bounds, perhaps by
modifying uniform convergence or by developing completely new tools altogether.
