Comparative Survey of Multigraph Integration Methods for Holistic Brain
  Connectivity Mapping
  One of the greatest scientific challenges in network neuroscience is to
create a representative map of a population of heterogeneous brain networks,
which acts as a connectional fingerprint. The connectional brain template
(CBT), also named network atlas, presents a powerful tool for capturing the
most representative and discriminative traits of a given population while
preserving its topological patterns. The idea of a CBT is to integrate a
population of heterogeneous brain connectivity networks, derived from different
neuroimaging modalities or brain views (e.g., structural and functional), into
a unified holistic representation. Here we review current state-of-the-art
methods designed to estimate well-centered and representative CBT for
populations of single-view and multi-view brain networks. We start by reviewing
each CBT learning method, then we introduce the evaluation measures to compare
CBT representativeness of populations generated by single-view and multigraph
integration methods, separately, based on the following criteria: centeredness,
biomarker-reproducibility, node-level similarity, global-level similarity, and
distance-based similarity. We demonstrate that the deep graph normalizer (DGN)
method significantly outperforms other multi-graph and all single-view
integration methods for estimating CBTs using a variety of healthy and
disordered datasets in terms of centeredness, reproducibility (i.e.,
graph-derived biomarkers reproducibility that disentangle the typical from the
atypical connectivity variability), and preserving the topological traits at
both local and global graph-levels.
