GAM(e) changer or not? An evaluation of interpretable machine learning
  models based on additive model constraints
  The number of information systems (IS) studies dealing with explainable
artificial intelligence (XAI) is currently exploding as the field demands more
transparency about the internal decision logic of machine learning (ML) models.
However, most techniques subsumed under XAI provide post-hoc-analytical
explanations, which have to be considered with caution as they only use
approximations of the underlying ML model. Therefore, our paper investigates a
series of intrinsically interpretable ML models and discusses their suitability
for the IS community. More specifically, our focus is on advanced extensions of
generalized additive models (GAM) in which predictors are modeled independently
in a non-linear way to generate shape functions that can capture arbitrary
patterns but remain fully interpretable. In our study, we evaluate the
prediction qualities of five GAMs as compared to six traditional ML models and
assess their visual outputs for model interpretability. On this basis, we
investigate their merits and limitations and derive design implications for
further improvements.
