Minimax Group Fairness: Algorithms and Experiments
  We consider a recently introduced framework in which fairness is measured by
worst-case outcomes across groups, rather than by the more standard differences
between group outcomes. In this framework we provide provably convergent
oracle-efficient learning algorithms (or equivalently, reductions to non-fair
learning) for minimax group fairness. Here the goal is that of minimizing the
maximum loss across all groups, rather than equalizing group losses. Our
algorithms apply to both regression and classification settings and support
both overall error and false positive or false negative rates as the fairness
measure of interest. They also support relaxations of the fairness constraints,
thus permitting study of the tradeoff between overall accuracy and minimax
fairness. We compare the experimental behavior and performance of our
algorithms across a variety of fairness-sensitive data sets and show empirical
cases in which minimax fairness is strictly and strongly preferable to equal
outcome notions.
