PAC-Bayes Un-Expected Bernstein Inequality
  We present a new PAC-Bayesian generalization bound. Standard bounds contain a
$\sqrt{L_n \cdot \KL/n}$ complexity term which dominates unless $L_n$, the
empirical error of the learning algorithm's randomized predictions, vanishes.
We manage to replace $L_n$ by a term which vanishes in many more situations,
essentially whenever the employed learning algorithm is sufficiently stable on
the dataset at hand. Our new bound consistently beats state-of-the-art bounds
both on a toy example and on UCI datasets (with large enough $n$).
Theoretically, unlike existing bounds, our new bound can be expected to
converge to $0$ faster whenever a Bernstein/Tsybakov condition holds, thus
connecting PAC-Bayesian generalization and {\em excess risk\/} bounds---for the
latter it has long been known that faster convergence can be obtained under
Bernstein conditions. Our main technical tool is a new concentration inequality
which is like Bernstein's but with $X^2$ taken outside its expectation.
