Aggregating Pairwise Semantic Differences for Few-Shot Claim Veracity
  Classification
  As part of an automated fact-checking pipeline, the claim veracity
classification task consists in determining if a claim is supported by an
associated piece of evidence. The complexity of gathering labelled
claim-evidence pairs leads to a scarcity of datasets, particularly when dealing
with new domains. In this paper, we introduce SEED, a novel vector-based method
to few-shot claim veracity classification that aggregates pairwise semantic
differences for claim-evidence pairs. We build on the hypothesis that we can
simulate class representative vectors that capture average semantic differences
for claim-evidence pairs in a class, which can then be used for classification
of new instances. We compare the performance of our method with competitive
baselines including fine-tuned BERT/RoBERTa models, as well as the
state-of-the-art few-shot veracity classification method that leverages
language model perplexity. Experiments conducted on the FEVER and SCIFACT
datasets show consistent improvements over competitive baselines in few-shot
settings. Our code is available.
