Kernel Stein Tests for Multiple Model Comparison
  We address the problem of non-parametric multiple model comparison: given $l$
candidate models, decide whether each candidate is as good as the best one(s)
or worse than it. We propose two statistical tests, each controlling a
different notion of decision errors. The first test, building on the post
selection inference framework, provably controls the number of best models that
are wrongly declared worse (false positive rate). The second test is based on
multiple correction, and controls the proportion of the models declared worse
but are in fact as good as the best (false discovery rate). We prove that under
appropriate conditions the first test can yield a higher true positive rate
than the second. Experimental results on toy and real (CelebA, Chicago Crime
data) problems show that the two tests have high true positive rates with
well-controlled error rates. By contrast, the naive approach of choosing the
model with the lowest score without correction leads to more false positives.
