A Survey on the Robustness of Feature Importance and Counterfactual
  Explanations
  There exist several methods that aim to address the crucial task of
understanding the behaviour of AI/ML models. Arguably, the most popular among
them are local explanations that focus on investigating model behaviour for
individual instances. Several methods have been proposed for local analysis,
but relatively lesser effort has gone into understanding if the explanations
are robust and accurately reflect the behaviour of underlying models. In this
work, we present a survey of the works that analysed the robustness of two
classes of local explanations (feature importance and counterfactual
explanations) that are popularly used in analysing AI/ML models in finance. The
survey aims to unify existing definitions of robustness, introduces a taxonomy
to classify different robustness approaches, and discusses some interesting
results. Finally, the survey introduces some pointers about extending current
robustness analysis approaches so as to identify reliable explainability
methods.
