Conditions Under Which Conditional Independence and Scoring Methods Lead
  to Identical Selection of Bayesian Network Models
  It is often stated in papers tackling the task of inferring Bayesian network
structures from data that there are these two distinct approaches: (i) Apply
conditional independence tests when testing for the presence or otherwise of
edges; (ii) Search the model space using a scoring metric. Here I argue that
for complete data and a given node ordering this division is a myth, by showing
that cross entropy methods for checking conditional independence are
mathematically identical to methods based upon discriminating between models by
their overall goodness-of-fit logarithmic scores.
