Distributive Justice as the Foundational Premise of Fair ML: Unification, Extension, and Interpretation of Group Fairness Metrics
Group fairness metrics are an established way of assessing the fairness of
prediction-based decision-making systems. However, these metrics are still
insufficiently linked to philosophical theories, and their moral meaning is
often unclear. We propose a general framework for analyzing the fairness of
decision systems based on theories of distributive justice, encompassing
different established ``patterns of justice'' that correspond to different
normative positions. We show that the most popular group fairness metrics can
be interpreted as special cases of our approach. Thus, we provide a unifying
and interpretative framework for group fairness metrics that reveals the
normative choices associated with each of them and that allows understanding
their moral substance. At the same time, we provide an extension of the space
of possible fairness metrics beyond the ones currently discussed in the fair ML
literature. Our framework also allows overcoming several limitations of group
fairness metrics that have been criticized in the literature, most notably (1)
that they are parity-based, i.e., that they demand some form of equality
between groups, which may sometimes be harmful to marginalized groups, (2) that
they only compare decisions across groups, but not the resulting consequences
for these groups, and (3) that the full breadth of the distributive justice
literature is not sufficiently represented.