Bounding the Effects of Continuous Treatments for Hidden Confounders
  Observational studies often seek to infer the causal effect of a treatment
even though both the assigned treatment and the outcome depend on other
confounding variables. An effective strategy for dealing with confounders is to
estimate a propensity model that corrects for the relationship between
covariates and assigned treatment. Unfortunately, the confounding variables
themselves are not always observed, in which case we can only bound the
propensity, and therefore bound the magnitude of causal effects. In many
important cases, like administering a dose of some medicine, the possible
treatments belong to a continuum. Sensitivity models, which are required to tie
the true propensity to something that can be estimated, have been explored for
binary treatments. We propose one for continuous treatments. We develop a
framework to compute ignorance intervals on the partially identified
dose-response curves, enabling us to quantify the susceptibility of an
inference to hidden confounders. We show with simulations and three real-world
observational studies that our approach can give non-trivial bounds on causal
effects from continuous treatments in the presence of hidden confounders.
