Does Adam optimizer keep close to the optimal point?
  The adaptive optimizer for training neural networks has continually evolved
to overcome the limitations of the previously proposed adaptive methods. Recent
studies have found the rare counterexamples that Adam cannot converge to the
optimal point. Those counterexamples reveal the distortion of Adam due to a
small second momentum from a small gradient. Unlike previous studies, we show
Adam cannot keep closer to the optimal point for not only the counterexamples
but also a general convex region when the effective learning rate exceeds the
certain bound. Subsequently, we propose an algorithm that overcomes Adam's
limitation and ensures that it can reach and stay at the optimal point region.
