The Concordance Index decomposition: a measure for a deeper
  understanding of survival prediction models
  The Concordance Index (C-index) is a commonly used metric in Survival
Analysis to evaluate how good a prediction model is. This paper proposes a
decomposition of the C-Index into a weighted harmonic mean of two quantities:
one for ranking observed events versus other observed events, and the other for
ranking observed events versus censored cases. This decomposition allows a more
fine-grained analysis of the pros and cons of survival prediction methods. The
utility of the decomposition is demonstrated using three benchmark survival
analysis models (Cox Proportional Hazard, Random Survival Forest, and Deep
Adversarial Time-to-Event Network) together with a new variational generative
neural-network-based method (SurVED), which is also proposed in this paper. The
demonstration is done on four publicly available datasets with varying
censoring levels. The analysis with the C-index decomposition shows that all
methods essentially perform equally well when the censoring level is high
because of the dominance of the term measuring the ranking of events versus
censored cases. In contrast, some methods deteriorate when the censoring level
decreases because they do not rank the events versus other events well.
