How do Offline Measures for Exploration in Reinforcement Learning
  behave?
  Sufficient exploration is paramount for the success of a reinforcement
learning agent. Yet, exploration is rarely assessed in an algorithm-independent
way. We compare the behavior of three data-based, offline exploration metrics
described in the literature on intuitive simple distributions and highlight
problems to be aware of when using them. We propose a fourth metric,uniform
relative entropy, and implement it using either a k-nearest-neighbor or a
nearest-neighbor-ratio estimator, highlighting that the implementation choices
have a profound impact on these measures.
