A Comparative Analysis of Feature Selection Methods for Biomarker
  Discovery in Study of Toxicant-treated Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) Liver
  Univariate and multivariate feature selection methods can be used for
biomarker discovery in analysis of toxicant exposure. Among the univariate
methods, differential expression analysis (DEA) is often applied for its
simplicity and interpretability. A characteristic of methods for DEA is that
they treat genes individually, disregarding the correlation that exists between
them. On the other hand, some multivariate feature selection methods are
proposed for biomarker discovery. Provided with various biomarker discovery
methods, how to choose the most suitable method for a specific dataset becomes
a problem. In this paper, we present a framework for comparison of potential
biomarker discovery methods: three methods that stem from different theories
are compared by how stable they are and how well they can improve the
classification accuracy. The three methods we have considered are: Significance
Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) which identifies the differentially expressed
genes; minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) based on information theory;
and Characteristic Direction (GeoDE) inspired by a graphical perspective.
Tested on the gene expression data from two experiments exposing the cod fish
to two different toxicants (MeHg and PCB 153), different methods stand out in
different cases, so a decision upon the most suitable method should be made
based on the dataset under study and the research interest.
