Exploring the effects of Lx-norm penalty terms in multivariate curve
  resolution methods for resolving LC/GC-MS data
  There are different problems for resolution of complex LC-MS or GC-MS data,
such as the existence of embedded chromatographic peaks, continuum background
and overlapping in mass channels for different components. These problems cause
rotational ambiguity in recovered profiles calculated using multivariate curve
resolution (MCR) methods. Since mass spectra are sparse in nature, sparsity has
been proposed recently as a constraint in MCR methods for analyzing LC-MS data.
There are different ways for implementation of the sparsity constraint, and
majority of methods rely on imposing a penalty based on the L0-, L1- and
L2-norms of recovered mass spectra. Ridge regression and least absolute
shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) can be used for implementation of L2-
and L1-norm penalties in MCR, respectively. The main question is which Lx-norm
penalty is more worthwhile for implementation of the sparsity constraint in MCR
methods. In order to address this question, two and three component LC-MS data
were simulated and used for the case study in this work. The areas of feasible
solutions (AFS) were calculated using the grid search strategy. Calculating
Lx-norms values in AFS for x between zero and two revealed that the gradient of
optimization surface increased from x values equal to two to x values near
zero. However, for x equal to zero, the optimization surface was similar to a
plateau, which increased the risk of sticking in local minima. Generally,
results in this work, recommend the use of L1-norm penalty methods like Lasso
for implementation of sparsity constraint in MCR-ALS algorithm for finding more
sparse solutions and reducing the extent of rotational ambiguity.
