An Empirical Evaluation of Four Algorithms for Multi-Class
  Classification: Mart, ABC-Mart, Robust LogitBoost, and ABC-LogitBoost
  This empirical study is mainly devoted to comparing four tree-based boosting
algorithms: mart, abc-mart, robust logitboost, and abc-logitboost, for
multi-class classification on a variety of publicly available datasets. Some of
those datasets have been thoroughly tested in prior studies using a broad range
of classification algorithms including SVM, neural nets, and deep learning.
  In terms of the empirical classification errors, our experiment results
demonstrate:
  1. Abc-mart considerably improves mart. 2. Abc-logitboost considerably
improves (robust) logitboost. 3. Robust) logitboost} considerably improves mart
on most datasets. 4. Abc-logitboost considerably improves abc-mart on most
datasets. 5. These four boosting algorithms (especially abc-logitboost)
outperform SVM on many datasets. 6. Compared to the best deep learning methods,
these four boosting algorithms (especially abc-logitboost) are competitive.
