What's in a Name? Are BERT Named Entity Representations just as Good for
  any other Name?
  We evaluate named entity representations of BERT-based NLP models by
investigating their robustness to replacements from the same typed class in the
input. We highlight that on several tasks while such perturbations are natural,
state of the art trained models are surprisingly brittle. The brittleness
continues even with the recent entity-aware BERT models. We also try to discern
the cause of this non-robustness, considering factors such as tokenization and
frequency of occurrence. Then we provide a simple method that ensembles
predictions from multiple replacements while jointly modeling the uncertainty
of type annotations and label predictions. Experiments on three NLP tasks show
that our method enhances robustness and increases accuracy on both natural and
adversarial datasets.
