Bandit based centralized matching in two-sided markets for peer to peer
  lending
  Sequential fundraising in two sided online platforms enable peer to peer
lending by sequentially bringing potential contributors, each of whose
decisions impact other contributors in the market. However, understanding the
dynamics of sequential contributions in online platforms for peer lending has
been an open ended research question. The centralized investment mechanism in
these platforms makes it difficult to understand the implicit competition that
borrowers face from a single lender at any point in time. Matching markets are
a model of pairing agents where the preferences of agents from both sides in
terms of their preferred pairing for transactions can allow to decentralize the
market. We study investment designs in two sided platforms using matching
markets when the investors or lenders also face restrictions on the investments
based on borrower preferences. This situation creates an implicit competition
among the lenders in addition to the existing borrower competition, especially
when the lenders are uncertain about their standing in the market and thereby
the probability of their investments being accepted or the borrower loan
requests for projects reaching the reserve price. We devise a technique based
on sequential decision making that allows the lenders to adjust their choices
based on the dynamics of uncertainty from competition over time. We simulate
two sided market matchings in a sequential decision framework and show the
dynamics of the lender regret amassed compared to the optimal borrower-lender
matching and find that the lender regret depends on the initial preferences set
by the lenders which could affect their learning over decision making steps.
