Dynamic fairness - Breaking vicious cycles in automatic decision making
  In recent years, machine learning techniques have been increasingly applied
in sensitive decision making processes, raising fairness concerns. Past
research has shown that machine learning may reproduce and even exacerbate
human bias due to biased training data or flawed model assumptions, and thus
may lead to discriminatory actions. To counteract such biased models,
researchers have proposed multiple mathematical definitions of fairness
according to which classifiers can be optimized. However, it has also been
shown that the outcomes generated by some fairness notions may be
unsatisfactory.
  In this contribution, we add to this research by considering decision making
processes in time. We establish a theoretic model in which even perfectly
accurate classifiers which adhere to almost all common fairness definitions
lead to stable long-term inequalities due to vicious cycles. Only demographic
parity, which enforces equal rates of positive decisions across groups, avoids
these effects and establishes a virtuous cycle, which leads to perfectly
accurate and fair classification in the long term.
