Analyzing the Role of Model Uncertainty for Electronic Health Records
  In medicine, both ethical and monetary costs of incorrect predictions can be
significant, and the complexity of the problems often necessitates increasingly
complex models. Recent work has shown that changing just the random seed is
enough for otherwise well-tuned deep neural networks to vary in their
individual predicted probabilities. In light of this, we investigate the role
of model uncertainty methods in the medical domain. Using RNN ensembles and
various Bayesian RNNs, we show that population-level metrics, such as AUC-PR,
AUC-ROC, log-likelihood, and calibration error, do not capture model
uncertainty. Meanwhile, the presence of significant variability in
patient-specific predictions and optimal decisions motivates the need for
capturing model uncertainty. Understanding the uncertainty for individual
patients is an area with clear clinical impact, such as determining when a
model decision is likely to be brittle. We further show that RNNs with only
Bayesian embeddings can be a more efficient way to capture model uncertainty
compared to ensembles, and we analyze how model uncertainty is impacted across
individual input features and patient subgroups.
