Hedging Algorithms and Repeated Matrix Games
  Playing repeated matrix games (RMG) while maximizing the cumulative returns
is a basic method to evaluate multi-agent learning (MAL) algorithms. Previous
work has shown that $UCB$, $M3$, $S$ or $Exp3$ algorithms have good behaviours
on average in RMG. Besides, hedging algorithms have been shown to be effective
on prediction problems. An hedging algorithm is made up with a top-level
algorithm and a set of basic algorithms. To make its decision, an hedging
algorithm uses its top-level algorithm to choose a basic algorithm, and the
chosen algorithm makes the decision. This paper experimentally shows that
well-selected hedging algorithms are better on average than all previous MAL
algorithms on the task of playing RMG against various players. $S$ is a very
good top-level algorithm, and $UCB$ and $M3$ are very good basic algorithms.
Furthermore, two-level hedging algorithms are more effective than one-level
hedging algorithms, and three levels are not better than two levels.
