A Multiple kernel testing procedure for non-proportional hazards in
  factorial designs
  In this paper we propose a Multiple kernel testing procedure to infer
survival data when several factors (e.g. different treatment groups, gender,
medical history) and their interaction are of interest simultaneously. Our
method is able to deal with complex data and can be seen as an alternative to
the omnipresent Cox model when assumptions such as proportionality cannot be
justified. Our methodology combines well-known concepts from Survival Analysis,
Machine Learning and Multiple Testing: differently weighted log-rank tests,
kernel methods and multiple contrast tests. By that, complex hazard
alternatives beyond the classical proportional hazard set-up can be detected.
Moreover, multiple comparisons are performed by fully exploiting the dependence
structure of the single testing procedures to avoid a loss of power. In all,
this leads to a flexible and powerful procedure for factorial survival designs
whose theoretical validity is proven by martingale arguments and the theory for
$V$-statistics. We evaluate the performance of our method in an extensive
simulation study and illustrate it by a real data analysis.
