Bayesian Decision Process for Cost-Efficient Dynamic Ranking via
  Crowdsourcing
  Rank aggregation based on pairwise comparisons over a set of items has a wide
range of applications. Although considerable research has been devoted to the
development of rank aggregation algorithms, one basic question is how to
efficiently collect a large amount of high-quality pairwise comparisons for the
ranking purpose. Because of the advent of many crowdsourcing services, a crowd
of workers are often hired to conduct pairwise comparisons with a small
monetary reward for each pair they compare. Since different workers have
different levels of reliability and different pairs have different levels of
ambiguity, it is desirable to wisely allocate the limited budget for
comparisons among the pairs of items and workers so that the global ranking can
be accurately inferred from the comparison results. To this end, we model the
active sampling problem in crowdsourced ranking as a Bayesian Markov decision
process, which dynamically selects item pairs and workers to improve the
ranking accuracy under a budget constraint. We further develop a
computationally efficient sampling policy based on knowledge gradient as well
as a moment matching technique for posterior approximation. Experimental
evaluations on both synthetic and real data show that the proposed policy
achieves high ranking accuracy with a lower labeling cost.
