Performance Analysis Of Regularized Linear Regression Models For
  Oxazolines And Oxazoles Derivitive Descriptor Dataset
  Regularized regression techniques for linear regression have been created the
last few ten years to reduce the flaws of ordinary least squares regression
with regard to prediction accuracy. In this paper, new methods for using
regularized regression in model choice are introduced, and we distinguish the
conditions in which regularized regression develops our ability to discriminate
models. We applied all the five methods that use penalty-based (regularization)
shrinkage to handle Oxazolines and Oxazoles derivatives descriptor dataset with
far more predictors than observations. The lasso, ridge, elasticnet, lars and
relaxed lasso further possess the desirable property that they simultaneously
select relevant predictive descriptors and optimally estimate their effects.
Here, we comparatively evaluate the performance of five regularized linear
regression methods The assessment of the performance of each model by means of
benchmark experiments is an established exercise. Cross-validation and
resampling methods are generally used to arrive point evaluates the
efficiencies which are compared to recognize methods with acceptable features.
Predictive accuracy was evaluated using the root mean squared error (RMSE) and
Square of usual correlation between predictors and observed mean inhibitory
concentration of antitubercular activity (R square). We found that all five
regularized regression models were able to produce feasible models and
efficient capturing the linearity in the data. The elastic net and lars had
similar accuracies as well as lasso and relaxed lasso had similar accuracies
but outperformed ridge regression in terms of the RMSE and R square metrics.
