Annotation and Classification of Evidence and Reasoning Revisions in
  Argumentative Writing
  Automated writing evaluation systems can improve students' writing insofar as
students attend to the feedback provided and revise their essay drafts in ways
aligned with such feedback. Existing research on revision of argumentative
writing in such systems, however, has focused on the types of revisions
students make (e.g., surface vs. content) rather than the extent to which
revisions actually respond to the feedback provided and improve the essay. We
introduce an annotation scheme to capture the nature of sentence-level
revisions of evidence use and reasoning (the `RER' scheme) and apply it to 5th-
and 6th-grade students' argumentative essays. We show that reliable manual
annotation can be achieved and that revision annotations correlate with a
holistic assessment of essay improvement in line with the feedback provided.
Furthermore, we explore the feasibility of automatically classifying revisions
according to our scheme.
