Fairness With Minimal Harm: A Pareto-Optimal Approach For Healthcare
  Common fairness definitions in machine learning focus on balancing notions of
disparity and utility. In this work, we study fairness in the context of risk
disparity among sub-populations. We are interested in learning models that
minimize performance discrepancies across sensitive groups without causing
unnecessary harm. This is relevant to high-stakes domains such as healthcare,
where non-maleficence is a core principle. We formalize this objective using
Pareto frontiers, and provide analysis, based on recent works in fairness, to
exemplify scenarios were perfect fairness might not be feasible without doing
unnecessary harm. We present a methodology for training neural networks that
achieve our goal by dynamically re-balancing subgroups risks. We argue that
even in domains where fairness at cost is required, finding a
non-unnecessary-harm fairness model is the optimal initial step. We demonstrate
this methodology on real case-studies of predicting ICU patient mortality, and
classifying skin lesions from dermatoscopic images.
