Dynamic Modeling and Equilibria in Fair Decision Making
  Recent studies on fairness in automated decision making systems have both
investigated the potential future impact of these decisions on the population
at large, and emphasized that imposing ''typical'' fairness constraints such as
demographic parity or equality of opportunity does not guarantee a benefit to
disadvantaged groups. However, these previous studies have focused on either
simple one-step cost/benefit criteria, or on discrete underlying state spaces.
In this work, we first propose a natural continuous representation of
population state, governed by the Beta distribution, using a loan granting
setting as a running example. Next, we apply a model of population dynamics
under lending decisions, and show that when conditional payback probabilities
are estimated correctly 1) ``optimal'' behavior by lenders can lead to
''Matthew Effect'' bifurcations (i.e., ''the rich get richer and the poor get
poorer''), but that 2) many common fairness constraints on the allowable
policies cause groups to converge to the same equilibrium point. Last, we
contrast our results in the case of misspecified conditional probability
estimates with prior work, and show that for this model, different levels of
group misestimation guarantees that even fair policies lead to bifurcations. We
illustrate some of the modeling conclusions on real data from credit scoring.
