Generating Fluent Fact Checking Explanations with Unsupervised
  Post-Editing
  Fact-checking systems have become important tools to verify fake and
misguiding news. These systems become more trustworthy when human-readable
explanations accompany the veracity labels. However, manual collection of such
explanations is expensive and time-consuming. Recent works frame explanation
generation as extractive summarization, and propose to automatically select a
sufficient subset of the most important facts from the ruling comments (RCs) of
a professional journalist to obtain fact-checking explanations. However, these
explanations lack fluency and sentence coherence. In this work, we present an
iterative edit-based algorithm that uses only phrase-level edits to perform
unsupervised post-editing of disconnected RCs. To regulate our editing
algorithm, we use a scoring function with components including fluency and
semantic preservation. In addition, we show the applicability of our approach
in a completely unsupervised setting. We experiment with two benchmark
datasets, LIAR-PLUS and PubHealth. We show that our model generates
explanations that are fluent, readable, non-redundant, and cover important
information for the fact check.
