Classifying Dyads for Militarized Conflict Analysis
  Understanding the origins of militarized conflict is a complex, yet important
undertaking. Existing research seeks to build this understanding by considering
bi-lateral relationships between entity pairs (dyadic causes) and multi-lateral
relationships among multiple entities (systemic causes). The aim of this work
is to compare these two causes in terms of how they correlate with conflict
between two entities. We do this by devising a set of textual and graph-based
features which represent each of the causes. The features are extracted from
Wikipedia and modeled as a large graph. Nodes in this graph represent entities
connected by labeled edges representing ally or enemy-relationships. This
allows casting the problem as an edge classification task, which we term dyad
classification. We propose and evaluate classifiers to determine if a
particular pair of entities are allies or enemies. Our results suggest that our
systemic features might be slightly better correlates of conflict. Further, we
find that Wikipedia articles of allies are semantically more similar than
enemies.
