Toward Effective Automated Content Analysis via Crowdsourcing
  Many computer scientists use the aggregated answers of online workers to
represent ground truth. Prior work has shown that aggregation methods such as
majority voting are effective for measuring relatively objective features. For
subjective features such as semantic connotation, online workers, known for
optimizing their hourly earnings, tend to deteriorate in the quality of their
responses as they work longer. In this paper, we aim to address this issue by
proposing a quality-aware semantic data annotation system. We observe that with
timely feedback on workers' performance quantified by quality scores, better
informed online workers can maintain the quality of their labeling throughout
an extended period of time. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed
annotation system through i) evaluating performance based on an expert-labeled
dataset, and ii) demonstrating machine learning tasks that can lead to
consistent learning behavior with 70%-80% accuracy. Our results suggest that
with our system, researchers can collect high-quality answers of subjective
semantic features at a large scale.
