Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Diagnostic Models by
  Adversarial Attack
  Deep learning models (with neural networks) have been widely used in
challenging tasks such as computer-aided disease diagnosis based on medical
images. Recent studies have shown deep diagnostic models may not be robust in
the inference process and may pose severe security concerns in clinical
practice. Among all the factors that make the model not robust, the most
serious one is adversarial examples. The so-called "adversarial example" is a
well-designed perturbation that is not easily perceived by humans but results
in a false output of deep diagnostic models with high confidence. In this
paper, we evaluate the robustness of deep diagnostic models by adversarial
attack. Specifically, we have performed two types of adversarial attacks to
three deep diagnostic models in both single-label and multi-label
classification tasks, and found that these models are not reliable when
attacked by adversarial example. We have further explored how adversarial
examples attack the models, by analyzing their quantitative classification
results, intermediate features, discriminability of features and correlation of
estimated labels for both original/clean images and those adversarial ones. We
have also designed two new defense methods to handle adversarial examples in
deep diagnostic models, i.e., Multi-Perturbations Adversarial Training (MPAdvT)
and Misclassification-Aware Adversarial Training (MAAdvT). The experimental
results have shown that the use of defense methods can significantly improve
the robustness of deep diagnostic models against adversarial attacks.
