Ground-Truth Labels Matter: A Deeper Look into Input-Label
  Demonstrations
  Despite recent explosion in research interests, in-context learning and the
precise impact of the quality of demonstrations remain elusive. While, based on
current literature, it is expected that in-context learning shares a similar
mechanism to supervised learning, Min et al. (2022) recently reported that,
surprisingly, input-label correspondence is less important than other aspects
of prompt demonstrations. Inspired by this counter-intuitive observation, we
re-examine the importance of ground truth labels on in-context learning from
diverse and statistical points of view. With the aid of the newly introduced
metrics, i.e., Ground-truth Label Effect Ratio (GLER), demo-gain, and label
sensitivity, we find that the impact of the correct input-label matching can
vary according to different configurations. Expanding upon the previous key
finding on the role of demonstrations, the complementary and contrastive
results suggest that one might need to take more care when estimating the
impact of each component in in-context learning demonstrations.
