Tight Regret Bounds for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Greedy
  Policies
  State-of-the-art efficient model-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms
typically act by iteratively solving empirical models, i.e., by performing
\emph{full-planning} on Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) built by the gathered
experience. In this paper, we focus on model-based RL in the finite-state
finite-horizon MDP setting and establish that exploring with \emph{greedy
policies} -- act by \emph{1-step planning} -- can achieve tight minimax
performance in terms of regret, $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{HSAT})$. Thus,
full-planning in model-based RL can be avoided altogether without any
performance degradation, and, by doing so, the computational complexity
decreases by a factor of $S$. The results are based on a novel analysis of
real-time dynamic programming, then extended to model-based RL. Specifically,
we generalize existing algorithms that perform full-planning to such that act
by 1-step planning. For these generalizations, we prove regret bounds with the
same rate as their full-planning counterparts.
