Inducing bias is simpler than you think
  Machine learning may be oblivious to human bias but it is not immune to its
perpetuation. Marginalisation and iniquitous group representation are often
traceable in the very data used for training, and may be reflected or even
enhanced by the learning models. To counter this, some of the model accuracy
can be traded off for a secondary objective that helps prevent a specific type
of bias. Multiple notions of fairness have been proposed to this end but recent
studies show that some fairness criteria often stand in mutual competition.
  In the present work, we introduce a solvable high-dimensional model of data
imbalance, where parametric control over the many bias-inducing factors allows
for an extensive exploration of the bias inheritance mechanism. Through the
tools of statistical physics, we analytically characterise the typical
behaviour of learning models trained in our synthetic framework and find
similar unfairness behaviours as those observed on more realistic data.
However, we also identify a positive transfer effect between the different
subpopulations within the data. This suggests that mixing data with different
statistical properties could be helpful, provided the learning model is made
aware of this structure.
  Finally, we analyse the issue of bias mitigation: by reweighing the various
terms in the training loss, we indirectly minimise standard unfairness metrics
and highlight their incompatibilities. Leveraging the insights on positive
transfer, we also propose a theory-informed mitigation strategy, based on the
introduction of coupled learning models. By allowing each model to specialise
on a different community within the data, we find that multiple fairness
criteria and high accuracy can be achieved simultaneously.
