Spectral Overlap and a Comparison of Parameter-Free, Dimensionality
  Reduction Quality Metrics
  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods are a popular tool for data
scientists and researchers to visualize complex, high dimensional data.
However, while these methods continue to improve and grow in number, it is
often difficult to evaluate the quality of a visualization due to a variety of
factors such as lack of information about the intrinsic dimension of the data
and additional tuning required for many evaluation metrics. In this paper, we
seek to provide a systematic comparison of dimensionality reduction quality
metrics using datasets where we know the ground truth manifold. We utilize each
metric for hyperparameter optimization in popular dimensionality reduction
methods used for visualization and provide quantitative metrics to objectively
compare visualizations to their original manifold. In our results, we find a
few methods that appear to consistently do well and propose the best performer
as a benchmark for evaluating dimensionality reduction based visualizations.
