Aligned Weight Regularizers for Pruning Pretrained Neural Networks
  While various avenues of research have been explored for iterative pruning,
little is known what effect pruning has on zero-shot test performance and its
potential implications on the choice of pruning criteria. This pruning setup is
particularly important for cross-lingual models that implicitly learn alignment
between language representations during pretraining, which if distorted via
pruning, not only leads to poorer performance on language data used for
retraining but also on zero-shot languages that are evaluated.
  In this work, we show that there is a clear performance discrepancy in
magnitude-based pruning when comparing standard supervised learning to the
zero-shot setting. From this finding, we propose two weight regularizers that
aim to maximize the alignment between units of pruned and unpruned networks to
mitigate alignment distortion in pruned cross-lingual models and perform well
for both non zero-shot and zero-shot settings.
  We provide experimental results on cross-lingual tasks for the zero-shot
setting using XLM-RoBERTa$_{\mathrm{Base}}$, where we also find that pruning
has varying degrees of representational degradation depending on the language
corresponding to the zero-shot test set. This is also the first study that
focuses on cross-lingual language model compression.
