PaRe: A Paper-Reviewer Matching Approach Using a Common Topic Space
  Finding the right reviewers to assess the quality of conference submissions
is a time consuming process for conference organizers. Given the importance of
this step, various automated reviewer-paper matching solutions have been
proposed to alleviate the burden. Prior approaches, including bag-of-words
models and probabilistic topic models have been inadequate to deal with the
vocabulary mismatch and partial topic overlap between a paper submission and
the reviewer's expertise. Our approach, the common topic model, jointly models
the topics common to the submission and the reviewer's profile while relying on
abstract topic vectors. Experiments and insightful evaluations on two datasets
demonstrate that the proposed method achieves consistent improvements compared
to available state-of-the-art implementations of paper-reviewer matching.
