The Logic Traps in Evaluating Post-hoc Interpretations
  Post-hoc interpretation aims to explain a trained model and reveal how the
model arrives at a decision. Though research on post-hoc interpretations has
developed rapidly, one growing pain in this field is the difficulty in
evaluating interpretations. There are some crucial logic traps behind existing
evaluation methods, which are ignored by most works. In this opinion piece, we
summarize four kinds evaluation methods and point out the corresponding logic
traps behind them. We argue that we should be clear about these traps rather
than ignore them and draw conclusions assertively.
