Statistical laws in linguistics
  Zipf's law is just one out of many universal laws proposed to describe
statistical regularities in language. Here we review and critically discuss how
these laws can be statistically interpreted, fitted, and tested (falsified).
The modern availability of large databases of written text allows for tests
with an unprecedent statistical accuracy and also a characterization of the
fluctuations around the typical behavior. We find that fluctuations are usually
much larger than expected based on simplifying statistical assumptions (e.g.,
independence and lack of correlations between observations).These
simplifications appear also in usual statistical tests so that the large
fluctuations can be erroneously interpreted as a falsification of the law.
Instead, here we argue that linguistic laws are only meaningful (falsifiable)
if accompanied by a model for which the fluctuations can be computed (e.g., a
generative model of the text). The large fluctuations we report show that the
constraints imposed by linguistic laws on the creativity process of text
generation are not as tight as one could expect.
