Fully automated quantification of in vivo viscoelasticity of prostate
  zones using magnetic resonance elastography with Dense U-net segmentation
  Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for measuring viscoelasticity heavily
depends on proper tissue segmentation, especially in heterogeneous organs such
as the prostate. Using trained network-based image segmentation, we
investigated if MRE data suffice to extract anatomical and viscoelastic
information for automatic tabulation of zonal mechanical properties of the
prostate. Overall, 40 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or
prostate cancer (PCa) were examined with three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
sequences: T2-weighted MRI (T2w), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and
MRE-based tomoelastography yielding six independent sets of imaging data per
patient (T2w, DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), MRE magnitude, shear
wave speed, and loss angle maps). Combinations of these data were used to train
Dense U-nets with manually segmented masks of the entire prostate gland (PG),
central zone (CZ), and peripheral zone (PZ) in 30 patients and to validate them
in 10 patients. Dice score (DS), sensitivity, specificity, and Hausdorff
distance were determined. We found that segmentation based on MRE magnitude
maps alone (DS, PG: 0.93$\pm$0.04, CZ: 0.95$\pm$0.03, PZ: 0.77$\pm$0.05) was
more accurate than magnitude maps combined with T2w and DWI_b (DS, PG:
0.91$\pm$0.04, CZ: 0.91$\pm$0.06, PZ: 0.63$\pm$0.16) or T2w alone (DS, PG:
0.92$\pm$0.03, CZ: 0.91$\pm$0.04, PZ: 0.65$\pm$0.08). Automatically tabulated
MRE values were not different from ground-truth values (P>0.05). In conclusion:
MRE combined with Dense U-net segmentation allows tabulation of quantitative
imaging markers without manual analysis and independent of other MRI sequences
and can thus contribute to PCa detection and classification.
