The Devil is in the Details: On the Pitfalls of Vocabulary Selection in
  Neural Machine Translation
  Vocabulary selection, or lexical shortlisting, is a well-known technique to
improve latency of Neural Machine Translation models by constraining the set of
allowed output words during inference. The chosen set is typically determined
by separately trained alignment model parameters, independent of the
source-sentence context at inference time. While vocabulary selection appears
competitive with respect to automatic quality metrics in prior work, we show
that it can fail to select the right set of output words, particularly for
semantically non-compositional linguistic phenomena such as idiomatic
expressions, leading to reduced translation quality as perceived by humans.
Trading off latency for quality by increasing the size of the allowed set is
often not an option in real-world scenarios. We propose a model of vocabulary
selection, integrated into the neural translation model, that predicts the set
of allowed output words from contextualized encoder representations. This
restores translation quality of an unconstrained system, as measured by human
evaluations on WMT newstest2020 and idiomatic expressions, at an inference
latency competitive with alignment-based selection using aggressive thresholds,
thereby removing the dependency on separately trained alignment models.
