Explainability Is in the Mind of the Beholder: Establishing the
  Foundations of Explainable Artificial Intelligence
  Explainable artificial intelligence and interpretable machine learning are
research fields growing in importance. Yet, the underlying concepts remain
somewhat elusive and lack generally agreed definitions. While recent
inspiration from social sciences has refocused the work on needs and
expectations of human recipients, the field still misses a concrete
conceptualisation. We take steps towards addressing this challenge by reviewing
the philosophical and social foundations of human explainability, which we then
translate into the technological realm. In particular, we scrutinise the notion
of algorithmic black boxes and the spectrum of understanding determined by
explanatory processes and explainees' background knowledge. This approach
allows us to define explainability as (logical) reasoning applied to
transparent insights (into black boxes) interpreted under certain background
knowledge - a process that engenders understanding in explainees. We then
employ this conceptualisation to revisit the much disputed trade-off between
transparency and predictive power and its implications for ante-hoc and
post-hoc explainers as well as fairness and accountability engendered by
explainability. We furthermore discuss components of the machine learning
workflow that may be in need of interpretability, building on a range of ideas
from human-centred explainability, with a focus on explainees, contrastive
statements and explanatory processes. Our discussion reconciles and complements
current research to help better navigate open questions - rather than
attempting to address any individual issue - thus laying a solid foundation for
a grounded discussion and future progress of explainable artificial
intelligence and interpretable machine learning. We conclude with a summary of
our findings, revisiting the human-centred explanatory process needed to
achieve the desired level of algorithmic transparency.
