Sex Trouble: Common pitfalls in incorporating sex/gender in medical
  machine learning and how to avoid them
  False assumptions about sex and gender are deeply embedded in the medical
system, including that they are binary, static, and concordant. Machine
learning researchers must understand the nature of these assumptions in order
to avoid perpetuating them. In this perspectives piece, we identify three
common mistakes that researchers make when dealing with sex/gender data: "sex
confusion", the failure to identity what sex in a dataset does or doesn't mean;
"sex obsession", the belief that sex, specifically sex assigned at birth, is
the relevant variable for most applications; and "sex/gender slippage", the
conflation of sex and gender even in contexts where only one or the other is
known. We then discuss how these pitfalls show up in machine learning studies
based on electronic health record data, which is commonly used for everything
from retrospective analysis of patient outcomes to the development of
algorithms to predict risk and administer care. Finally, we offer a series of
recommendations about how machine learning researchers can produce both
research and algorithms that more carefully engage with questions of
sex/gender, better serving all patients, including transgender people.
