Cognitive Model Priors for Predicting Human Decisions
  Human decision-making underlies all economic behavior. For the past four
decades, human decision-making under uncertainty has continued to be explained
by theoretical models based on prospect theory, a framework that was awarded
the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences. However, theoretical models of this kind
have developed slowly, and robust, high-precision predictive models of human
decisions remain a challenge. While machine learning is a natural candidate for
solving these problems, it is currently unclear to what extent it can improve
predictions obtained by current theories. We argue that this is mainly due to
data scarcity, since noisy human behavior requires massive sample sizes to be
accurately captured by off-the-shelf machine learning methods. To solve this
problem, what is needed are machine learning models with appropriate inductive
biases for capturing human behavior, and larger datasets. We offer two
contributions towards this end: first, we construct "cognitive model priors" by
pretraining neural networks with synthetic data generated by cognitive models
(i.e., theoretical models developed by cognitive psychologists). We find that
fine-tuning these networks on small datasets of real human decisions results in
unprecedented state-of-the-art improvements on two benchmark datasets. Second,
we present the first large-scale dataset for human decision-making, containing
over 240,000 human judgments across over 13,000 decision problems. This dataset
reveals the circumstances where cognitive model priors are useful, and provides
a new standard for benchmarking prediction of human decisions under
uncertainty.
