Defining AI in Policy versus Practice
  Recent concern about harms of information technologies motivate consideration
of regulatory action to forestall or constrain certain developments in the
field of artificial intelligence (AI). However, definitional ambiguity hampers
the possibility of conversation about this urgent topic of public concern.
Legal and regulatory interventions require agreed-upon definitions, but
consensus around a definition of AI has been elusive, especially in policy
conversations. With an eye towards practical working definitions and a broader
understanding of positions on these issues, we survey experts and review
published policy documents to examine researcher and policy-maker conceptions
of AI. We find that while AI researchers favor definitions of AI that emphasize
technical functionality, policy-makers instead use definitions that compare
systems to human thinking and behavior. We point out that definitions adhering
closely to the functionality of AI systems are more inclusive of technologies
in use today, whereas definitions that emphasize human-like capabilities are
most applicable to hypothetical future technologies. As a result of this gap,
ethical and regulatory efforts may overemphasize concern about future
technologies at the expense of pressing issues with existing deployed
technologies.
