Revisiting Process versus Product Metrics: a Large Scale Analysis
  Numerous methods can build predictive models from software data. However,
what methods and conclusions should we endorse as we move from analytics
in-the-small (dealing with a handful of projects) to analytics in-the-large
(dealing with hundreds of projects)?
  To answer this question, we recheck prior small-scale results (about process
versus product metrics for defect prediction and the granularity of metrics)
using 722,471 commits from 700 Github projects. We find that some analytics
in-the-small conclusions still hold when scaling up to analytics in-the-large.
For example, like prior work, we see that process metrics are better predictors
for defects than product metrics (best process/product-based learners
respectively achieve recalls of 98\%/44\% and AUCs of 95\%/54\%, median
values).
  That said, we warn that it is unwise to trust metric importance results from
analytics in-the-small studies since those change dramatically when moving to
analytics in-the-large. Also, when reasoning in-the-large about hundreds of
projects, it is better to use predictions from multiple models (since single
model predictions can become confused and exhibit a high variance).
