Are we really making much progress? Revisiting, benchmarking, and
  refining heterogeneous graph neural networks
  Heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNNs) have been blossoming in recent
years, but the unique data processing and evaluation setups used by each work
obstruct a full understanding of their advancements. In this work, we present a
systematical reproduction of 12 recent HGNNs by using their official codes,
datasets, settings, and hyperparameters, revealing surprising findings about
the progress of HGNNs. We find that the simple homogeneous GNNs, e.g., GCN and
GAT, are largely underestimated due to improper settings. GAT with proper
inputs can generally match or outperform all existing HGNNs across various
scenarios. To facilitate robust and reproducible HGNN research, we construct
the Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark (HGB), consisting of 11 diverse datasets with
three tasks. HGB standardizes the process of heterogeneous graph data splits,
feature processing, and performance evaluation. Finally, we introduce a simple
but very strong baseline Simple-HGN--which significantly outperforms all
previous models on HGB--to accelerate the advancement of HGNNs in the future.
