Robust Counterfactual Inferences using Feature Learning and their
  Applications
  In a wide variety of applications, including personalization, we want to
measure the difference in outcome due to an intervention and thus have to deal
with counterfactual inference. The feedback from a customer in any of these
situations is only 'bandit feedback' - that is, a partial feedback based on
whether we chose to intervene or not. Typically randomized experiments are
carried out to understand whether an intervention is overall better than no
intervention. Here we present a feature learning algorithm to learn from a
randomized experiment where the intervention in consideration is most effective
and where it is least effective rather than only focusing on the overall
impact, thus adding a context to our learning mechanism and extract more
information. From the randomized experiment, we learn the feature
representations which divide the population into subpopulations where we
observe statistically significant difference in average customer feedback
between those who were subjected to the intervention and those who were not,
with a level of significance l, where l is a configurable parameter in our
model. We use this information to derive the value of the intervention in
consideration for each instance in the population. With experiments, we show
that using this additional learning, in future interventions, the context for
each instance could be leveraged to decide whether to intervene or not.
