On classification of strategic agents who can both game and improve
  In this work, we consider classification of agents who can both game and
improve. For example, people wishing to get a loan may be able to take some
actions that increase their perceived credit-worthiness and others that also
increase their true credit-worthiness. A decision-maker would like to define a
classification rule with few false-positives (does not give out many bad loans)
while yielding many true positives (giving out many good loans), which includes
encouraging agents to improve to become true positives if possible. We consider
two models for this problem, a general discrete model and a linear model, and
prove algorithmic, learning, and hardness results for each. For the general
discrete model, we give an efficient algorithm for the problem of maximizing
the number of true positives subject to no false positives, and show how to
extend this to a partial-information learning setting. We also show hardness
for the problem of maximizing the number of true positives subject to a nonzero
bound on the number of false positives, and that this hardness holds even for a
finite-point version of our linear model. We also show that maximizing the
number of true positives subject to no false positive is NP-hard in our full
linear model. We additionally provide an algorithm that determines whether
there exists a linear classifier that classifies all agents accurately and
causes all improvable agents to become qualified, and give additional results
for low-dimensional data.
