Ranking the information content of distance measures
  Real-world data typically contain a large number of features that are often
heterogeneous in nature, relevance, and also units of measure. When assessing
the similarity between data points, one can build various distance measures
using subsets of these features. Using the fewest features but still retaining
sufficient information about the system is crucial in many statistical learning
approaches, particularly when data are sparse. We introduce a statistical test
that can assess the relative information retained when using two different
distance measures, and determine if they are equivalent, independent, or if one
is more informative than the other. This in turn allows finding the most
informative distance measure out of a pool of candidates. The approach is
applied to find the most relevant policy variables for controlling the Covid-19
epidemic and to find compact yet informative representations of atomic
structures, but its potential applications are wide ranging in many branches of
science.
