Q* Approximation Schemes for Batch Reinforcement Learning: A Theoretical
  Comparison
  We prove performance guarantees of two algorithms for approximating $Q^\star$
in batch reinforcement learning. Compared to classical iterative methods such
as Fitted Q-Iteration---whose performance loss incurs quadratic dependence on
horizon---these methods estimate (some forms of) the Bellman error and enjoy
linear-in-horizon error propagation, a property established for the first time
for algorithms that rely solely on batch data and output stationary policies.
One of the algorithms uses a novel and explicit importance-weighting correction
to overcome the infamous "double sampling" difficulty in Bellman error
estimation, and does not use any squared losses. Our analyses reveal its
distinct characteristics and potential advantages compared to classical
algorithms.
