(Un)fairness in Post-operative Complication Prediction Models
  With the current ongoing debate about fairness, explainability and
transparency of machine learning models, their application in high-impact
clinical decision-making systems must be scrutinized. We consider a real-life
example of risk estimation before surgery and investigate the potential for
bias or unfairness of a variety of algorithms. Our approach creates transparent
documentation of potential bias so that the users can apply the model
carefully. We augment a model-card like analysis using propensity scores with a
decision-tree based guide for clinicians that would identify predictable
shortcomings of the model. In addition to functioning as a guide for users, we
propose that it can guide the algorithm development and informatics team to
focus on data sources and structures that can address these shortcomings.
