Comparing interpretation methods in mental state decoding analyses with
  deep learning models
  Deep learning (DL) methods find increasing application in mental state
decoding, where researchers seek to understand the mapping between mental
states (such as accepting or rejecting a gamble) and brain activity, by
identifying those brain regions (and networks) whose activity allows to
accurately identify (i.e., decode) these states. Once DL models have been
trained to accurately decode a set of mental states, neuroimaging researchers
often make use of interpretation methods from explainable artificial
intelligence research to understand their learned mappings between mental
states and brain activity. Here, we compare the explanations of prominent
interpretation methods for the mental state decoding decisions of DL models
trained on three functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) datasets. We find
that interpretation methods that capture the model's decision process well, by
producing faithful explanations, generally produce explanations that are less
in line with the results of standard analyses of the fMRI data, when compared
to the explanations of interpretation methods with less explanation
faithfulness. Specifically, we find that interpretation methods that focus on
how sensitively a model's decoding decision changes with the values of the
input produce explanations that better match with the results of a standard
general linear model analysis of the fMRI data, while interpretation methods
that focus on identifying the specific contribution of an input feature's value
to the decoding decision produce overall more faithful explanations that align
less well with the results of standard analyses of the fMRI data.
