On the Computation of Necessary and Sufficient Explanations
  The complete reason behind a decision is a Boolean formula that characterizes
why the decision was made. This recently introduced notion has a number of
applications, which include generating explanations, detecting decision bias
and evaluating counterfactual queries. Prime implicants of the complete reason
are known as sufficient reasons for the decision and they correspond to what is
known as PI explanations and abductive explanations. In this paper, we refer to
the prime implicates of a complete reason as necessary reasons for the
decision. We justify this terminology semantically and show that necessary
reasons correspond to what is known as contrastive explanations. We also study
the computation of complete reasons for multi-class decision trees and graphs
with nominal and numeric features for which we derive efficient, closed-form
complete reasons. We further investigate the computation of shortest necessary
and sufficient reasons for a broad class of complete reasons, which include the
derived closed forms and the complete reasons for Sentential Decision Diagrams
(SDDs). We provide an algorithm which can enumerate their shortest necessary
reasons in output polynomial time. Enumerating shortest sufficient reasons for
this class of complete reasons is hard even for a single reason. For this
problem, we provide an algorithm that appears to be quite efficient as we show
empirically.
