Training Language Models with Language Feedback
  Pretrained language models often do not perform tasks in ways that are in
line with our preferences, e.g., generating offensive text or factually
incorrect summaries. Recent work approaches the above issue by learning from a
simple form of human evaluation: comparisons between pairs of model-generated
task outputs. Comparison feedback conveys limited information about human
preferences per human evaluation. Here, we propose to learn from natural
language feedback, which conveys more information per human evaluation. We
learn from language feedback on model outputs using a three-step learning
algorithm. First, we condition the language model on the initial output and
feedback to generate many refinements. Second, we choose the refinement with
the highest similarity to the feedback. Third, we finetune a language model to
maximize the likelihood of the chosen refinement given the input. In synthetic
experiments, we first evaluate whether language models accurately incorporate
feedback to produce refinements, finding that only large language models (175B
parameters) do so. Using only 100 samples of human-written feedback, our
learning algorithm finetunes a GPT-3 model to roughly human-level
summarization.
