How Robust are the Estimated Effects of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions
  against COVID-19?
  To what extent are effectiveness estimates of nonpharmaceutical interventions
(NPIs) against COVID-19 influenced by the assumptions our models make? To
answer this question, we investigate 2 state-of-the-art NPI effectiveness
models and propose 6 variants that make different structural assumptions. In
particular, we investigate how well NPI effectiveness estimates generalise to
unseen countries, and their sensitivity to unobserved factors. Models that
account for noise in disease transmission compare favourably. We further
evaluate how robust estimates are to different choices of epidemiological
parameters and data. Focusing on models that assume transmission noise, we find
that previously published results are remarkably robust across these variables.
Finally, we mathematically ground the interpretation of NPI effectiveness
estimates when certain common assumptions do not hold.
