Fair Regression under Sample Selection Bias
  Recent research on fair regression focused on developing new fairness notions
and approximation methods as target variables and even the sensitive attribute
are continuous in the regression setting. However, all previous fair regression
research assumed the training data and testing data are drawn from the same
distributions. This assumption is often violated in real world due to the
sample selection bias between the training and testing data. In this paper, we
develop a framework for fair regression under sample selection bias when
dependent variable values of a set of samples from the training data are
missing as a result of another hidden process. Our framework adopts the classic
Heckman model for bias correction and the Lagrange duality to achieve fairness
in regression based on a variety of fairness notions. Heckman model describes
the sample selection process and uses a derived variable called the Inverse
Mills Ratio (IMR) to correct sample selection bias. We use fairness inequality
and equality constraints to describe a variety of fairness notions and apply
the Lagrange duality theory to transform the primal problem into the dual
convex optimization. For the two popular fairness notions, mean difference and
mean squared error difference, we derive explicit formulas without iterative
optimization, and for Pearson correlation, we derive its conditions of
achieving strong duality. We conduct experiments on three real-world datasets
and the experimental results demonstrate the approach's effectiveness in terms
of both utility and fairness metrics.
