Being Negative but Constructively: Lessons Learnt from Creating Better
  Visual Question Answering Datasets
  Visual question answering (Visual QA) has attracted a lot of attention
lately, seen essentially as a form of (visual) Turing test that artificial
intelligence should strive to achieve. In this paper, we study a crucial
component of this task: how can we design good datasets for the task? We focus
on the design of multiple-choice based datasets where the learner has to select
the right answer from a set of candidate ones including the target (\ie the
correct one) and the decoys (\ie the incorrect ones). Through careful analysis
of the results attained by state-of-the-art learning models and human
annotators on existing datasets, we show that the design of the decoy answers
has a significant impact on how and what the learning models learn from the
datasets. In particular, the resulting learner can ignore the visual
information, the question, or both while still doing well on the task. Inspired
by this, we propose automatic procedures to remedy such design deficiencies. We
apply the procedures to re-construct decoy answers for two popular Visual QA
datasets as well as to create a new Visual QA dataset from the Visual Genome
project, resulting in the largest dataset for this task. Extensive empirical
studies show that the design deficiencies have been alleviated in the remedied
datasets and the performance on them is likely a more faithful indicator of the
difference among learning models. The datasets are released and publicly
available via http://www.teds.usc.edu/website_vqa/.
