Applicability and Surrogacy of Uncorrelated Airspace Encounter Models at
  Low Altitudes
  The National Airspace System (NAS) is a complex and evolving system that
enables safe and efficient aviation. Advanced air mobility concepts and new
airspace entrants, such as unmanned aircraft, must integrate into the NAS
without degrading overall safety or efficiency. For instance, regulations,
standards, and systems are required to mitigate the risk of a midair collision
between aircraft. Monte Carlo simulations have been a foundational capability
for decades to develop, assess, and certify aircraft conflict avoidance
systems. These are often validated through human-in-the-loop experiments and
flight testing. For many aviation safety studies, manned aircraft behavior is
represented using dynamic Bayesian networks. The original statistical models
were developed from 2008-2013 to support safety simulations for altitudes above
500 feet Above Ground Level (AGL). However, these models were not sufficient to
assess the safety of smaller UAS operations below 500 feet AGL. In response,
newer models with altitude floors below 500 feet AGL have been in development
since 2018. Many of the models assume that aircraft behavior is uncorrelated
and not dependent on air traffic services or nearby aircraft. Our research
objective was to compare the various uncorrelated models of conventional
aircraft and identify how the models differ. Particularly if models of
rotorcraft were sufficiently different than models of fixed-wing aircraft to
require type specific models. The primary contribution is guidance on which
uncorrelated models to leverage when evaluating the performance of a collision
avoidance system designed for low altitude operations. We also address which
models can be surrogates for noncooperative aircraft without transponders.
