xFAIR: Better Fairness via Model-based Rebalancing of Protected
  Attributes
  Context: Machine learning software can generate models that inappropriately
discriminate against specific protected social groups (e.g., groups based on
gender, ethnicity, etc). Motivated by those results, software engineering
researchers have proposed many methods for mitigating those discriminatory
effects. While those methods are effective in mitigating bias, few of them can
provide explanations on what is the root cause of bias.
  Objective: We aim at better detection and mitigation of algorithmic
discrimination in machine learning software problems.
  Method: Here we propose xFAIR, a model-based extrapolation method, that is
capable of both mitigating bias and explaining the cause. In our xFAIR
approach, protected attributes are represented by models learned from the other
independent variables (and these models offer extrapolations over the space
between existing examples). We then use the extrapolation models to relabel
protected attributes later seen in testing data or deployment time. Our
approach aims to offset the biased predictions of the classification model via
rebalancing the distribution of protected attributes.
  Results: The experiments of this paper show that, without compromising
(original) model performance, xFAIR can achieve significantly better group and
individual fairness (as measured in different metrics) than benchmark methods.
Moreover, when compared to another instance-based rebalancing method, our
model-based approach shows faster runtime and thus better scalability.
  Conclusion: Algorithmic decision bias can be removed via extrapolation that
smooths away outlier points. As evidence for this, our proposed xFAIR is not
only performance-wise better (measured by fairness and performance metrics)
than two state-of-the-art fairness algorithms.
