Interpretability with Accurate Small Models
  Models often need to be constrained to a certain size for them to be
considered interpretable. For example, a decision tree of depth 5 is much
easier to understand than one of depth 50. Limiting model size, however, often
reduces accuracy. We suggest a practical technique that minimizes this
trade-off between interpretability and classification accuracy. This enables an
arbitrary learning algorithm to produce highly accurate small-sized models. Our
technique identifies the training data distribution to learn from that leads to
the highest accuracy for a model of a given size.
  We represent the training distribution as a combination of sampling schemes.
Each scheme is defined by a parameterized probability mass function applied to
the segmentation produced by a decision tree. An Infinite Mixture Model with
Beta components is used to represent a combination of such schemes. The mixture
model parameters are learned using Bayesian Optimization. Under simplistic
assumptions, we would need to optimize for $O(d)$ variables for a distribution
over a $d$-dimensional input space, which is cumbersome for most real-world
data. However, we show that our technique significantly reduces this number to
a \emph{fixed set of eight variables} at the cost of relatively cheap
preprocessing. The proposed technique is flexible: it is \emph{model-agnostic},
i.e., it may be applied to the learning algorithm for any model family, and it
admits a general notion of model size. We demonstrate its effectiveness using
multiple real-world datasets to construct decision trees, linear probability
models and gradient boosted models with different sizes. We observe significant
improvements in the F1-score in most instances, exceeding an improvement of
$100\%$ in some cases.
