Better Short than Greedy: Interpretable Models through Optimal Rule
  Boosting
  Rule ensembles are designed to provide a useful trade-off between predictive
accuracy and model interpretability. However, the myopic and random search
components of current rule ensemble methods can compromise this goal: they
often need more rules than necessary to reach a certain accuracy level or can
even outright fail to accurately model a distribution that can actually be
described well with a few rules. Here, we present a novel approach aiming to
fit rule ensembles of maximal predictive power for a given ensemble size (and
thus model comprehensibility). In particular, we present an efficient
branch-and-bound algorithm that optimally solves the per-rule objective
function of the popular second-order gradient boosting framework. Our main
insight is that the boosting objective can be tightly bounded in linear time of
the number of covered data points. Along with an additional novel pruning
technique related to rule redundancy, this leads to a computationally feasible
approach for boosting optimal rules that, as we demonstrate on a wide range of
common benchmark problems, consistently outperforms the predictive performance
of boosting greedy rules.
