Strategic Ranking
  Strategic classification studies the design of a classifier robust to the
manipulation of input by strategic individuals. However, the existing
literature does not consider the effect of competition among individuals as
induced by the algorithm design. Motivated by constrained allocation settings
such as college admissions, we introduce strategic ranking, in which the
(designed) individual reward depends on an applicant's post-effort rank in a
measurement of interest. Our results illustrate how competition among
applicants affects the resulting equilibria and model insights. We analyze how
various ranking reward designs, belonging to a family of step functions, trade
off applicant, school, and societal utility, as well as how ranking design
counters inequities arising from disparate access to resources. In particular,
we find that randomization in the reward design can mitigate two measures of
disparate impact, welfare gap and access.
