Disease Labeling via Machine Learning is NOT quite the same as Medical
  Diagnosis
  A key step in medical diagnosis is giving the patient a universally
recognized label (e.g. Appendicitis) which essentially assigns the patient to a
class(es) of patients with similar body failures. However, two patients having
the same disease label(s) with high probability may still have differences in
their feature manifestation patterns implying differences in the required
treatments. Additionally, in many cases, the labels of the primary diagnoses
leave some findings unexplained. Medical diagnosis is only partially about
probability calculations for label X or Y. Diagnosis is not complete until the
patient overall situation is clinically understood to the level that enables
the best therapeutic decisions. Most machine learning models are data centric
models, and evidence so far suggest they can reach expert level performance in
the disease labeling phase. Nonetheless, like any other mathematical technique,
they have their limitations and applicability scope. Primarily, data centric
algorithms are knowledge blind and lack anatomy and physiology knowledge that
physicians leverage to achieve complete diagnosis. This article advocates to
complement them with intelligence to overcome their inherent limitations as
knowledge blind algorithms. Machines can learn many things from data, but data
is not the only source that machines can learn from. Historic patient data only
tells us what the possible manifestations of a certain body failure are.
Anatomy and physiology knowledge tell us how the body works and fails. Both are
needed for complete diagnosis. The proposed Double Deep Learning approach,
along with the initiative for Medical Wikipedia for Smart Machines, leads to AI
diagnostic support solutions for complete diagnosis beyond the limited data
only labeling solutions we see today. AI for medicine will forever be limited
until their intelligence also integrates anatomy and physiology.
