Predicting A Creator's Preferences In, and From, Interactive Generative
  Art
  As a lay user creates an art piece using an interactive generative art tool,
what, if anything, do the choices they make tell us about them and their
preferences? These preferences could be in the specific generative art form
(e.g., color palettes, density of the piece, thickness or curvatures of any
lines in the piece); predicting them could lead to a smarter interactive tool.
Or they could be preferences in other walks of life (e.g., music, fashion,
food, interior design, paintings) or attributes of the person (e.g.,
personality type, gender, artistic inclinations); predicting them could lead to
improved personalized recommendations for products or experiences.
  To study this research question, we collect preferences from 311 subjects,
both in a specific generative art form and in other walks of life. We analyze
the preferences and train machine learning models to predict a subset of
preferences from the remaining. We find that preferences in the generative art
form we studied cannot predict preferences in other walks of life better than
chance (and vice versa). However, preferences within the generative art form
are reliably predictive of each other.
