Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with
  Unmeasured Confounding
  We study the problem of constructing bounds on the average treatment effect
in the presence of unobserved confounding under the marginal sensitivity model
of Tan (2006). Combining an existing characterization involving adversarial
propensity scores with a new distributionally robust characterization of the
problem, we propose novel estimators of these bounds that we call
"doubly-valid/doubly-sharp" (DVDS) estimators. Double sharpness corresponds to
the fact that DVDS estimators consistently estimate the tightest possible
(i.e., sharp) bounds implied by the sensitivity model even when one of two
nuisance parameters is misspecified and achieve semiparametric efficiency when
all nuisance parameters are suitably consistent. Double validity is an entirely
new property for partial identification: DVDS estimators still provide valid,
though not sharp, bounds even when most nuisance parameters are misspecified.
In fact, even in cases when DVDS point estimates fail to be asymptotically
normal, standard Wald confidence intervals may remain valid. In the case of
binary outcomes, the DVDS estimators are particularly convenient and possesses
a closed-form expression in terms of the outcome regression and propensity
score. We demonstrate the DVDS estimators in a simulation study as well as a
case study of right heart catheterization.
