Forecast Evaluation in Large Cross-Sections of Realized Volatility
  In this paper, we consider the forecast evaluation of realized volatility
measures under cross-section dependence using equal predictive accuracy testing
procedures. We evaluate the predictive accuracy of the model based on the
augmented cross-section when forecasting Realized Volatility. Under the null
hypothesis of equal predictive accuracy the benchmark model employed is a
standard HAR model while under the alternative of non-equal predictive accuracy
the forecast model is an augmented HAR model estimated via the LASSO shrinkage.
We study the sensitivity of forecasts to the model specification by
incorporating a measurement error correction as well as cross-sectional jump
component measures. The out-of-sample forecast evaluation of the models is
assessed with numerical implementations.
