Reducing the Feeder Effect in Public School Admissions: A Bias-aware
  Analysis for Targeted Interventions
  Traditionally, New York City's top 8 public schools select candidates solely
based on their scores in the Specialized High School Admissions Test (SHSAT).
These scores are known to be impacted by socioeconomic status of students and
test preparation received in "feeder" middle schools, leading to a massive
filtering effect in the education pipeline. For instance, around 50% (resp.
80%) of the students admitted to the top public high schools in New York City
come from only 5% (resp. 15%) of the middle schools. The classical mechanisms
for assigning students to schools do not naturally address problems like school
segregation and class diversity, which have worsened over the years. The
scientific community, including policy makers, have reacted by incorporating
group-specific quotas, proportionality constraints, or summer school
opportunities, but there is evidence that these can end up hurting minorities
or even create legal challenges. We take a completely different approach to
reduce this filtering effect of feeder middle schools, with the goal of
increasing the opportunity of students with high economic needs. We model a
two-sided market where a candidate may not be perceived at their true
potential, and is therefore assigned to a lower level than the one (s)he
deserves. We propose and study the effect of interventions such as additional
training and scholarships towards disadvantaged students, and challenge
existing mechanisms for scholarships. We validate these findings using SAT
scores data from New York City high schools. We further show that our
qualitative takeaways remain the same even when some of the modeling
assumptions are relaxed.
