On the Distinction Between "Conditional Average Treatment Effects"
  (CATE) and "Individual Treatment Effects" (ITE) Under Ignorability
  Assumptions
  Recent years have seen a swell in methods that focus on estimating
"individual treatment effects". These methods are often focused on the
estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects under ignorability assumptions.
This paper hopes to draw attention to the fact that there is nothing
necessarily "individual" about such effects under ignorability assumptions and
isolating individual effects may require additional assumptions. Such
individual effects, more often than not, are more precisely described as
"conditional average treatment effects" and confusion between the two has the
potential to hinder advances in personalized and individualized effect
estimation.
