On Proximity and Structural Role-based Embeddings in Networks:
  Misconceptions, Techniques, and Applications
  Structural roles define sets of structurally similar nodes that are more
similar to nodes inside the set than outside, whereas communities define sets
of nodes with more connections inside the set than outside. Roles based on
structural similarity and communities based on proximity are fundamentally
different but important complementary notions. Recently, the notion of
structural roles has become increasingly important and has gained a lot of
attention due to the proliferation of work on learning representations
(node/edge embeddings) from graphs that preserve the notion of roles.
Unfortunately, recent work has sometimes confused the notion of structural
roles and communities (based on proximity) leading to misleading or incorrect
claims about the capabilities of network embedding methods. As such, this paper
seeks to clarify the misconceptions and key differences between structural
roles and communities, and formalize the general mechanisms (e.g., random
walks, feature diffusion) that give rise to community or role-based structural
embeddings. We theoretically prove that embedding methods based on these
mechanisms result in either community or role-based structural embeddings.
These mechanisms are typically easy to identify and can help researchers
quickly determine whether a method preserves community or role-based
embeddings. Furthermore, they also serve as a basis for developing new and
improved methods for community or role-based structural embeddings. Finally, we
analyze and discuss applications and data characteristics where community or
role-based embeddings are most appropriate.
