Do logarithmic proximity measures outperform plain ones in graph
  clustering?
  We consider a number of graph kernels and proximity measures including
commute time kernel, regularized Laplacian kernel, heat kernel, exponential
diffusion kernel (also called "communicability"), etc., and the corresponding
distances as applied to clustering nodes in random graphs and several
well-known datasets. The model of generating random graphs involves edge
probabilities for the pairs of nodes that belong to the same class or different
predefined classes of nodes. It turns out that in most cases, logarithmic
measures (i.e., measures resulting after taking logarithm of the proximities)
perform better while distinguishing underlying classes than the "plain"
measures. A comparison in terms of reject curves of inter-class and intra-class
distances confirms this conclusion. A similar conclusion can be made for
several well-known datasets. A possible origin of this effect is that most
kernels have a multiplicative nature, while the nature of distances used in
cluster algorithms is an additive one (cf. the triangle inequality). The
logarithmic transformation is a tool to transform the first nature to the
second one. Moreover, some distances corresponding to the logarithmic measures
possess a meaningful cutpoint additivity property. In our experiments, the
leader is usually the logarithmic Communicability measure. However, we indicate
some more complicated cases in which other measures, typically, Communicability
and plain Walk, can be the winners.
