Performative Power
  We introduce the notion of performative power, which measures the ability of
a firm operating an algorithmic system, such as a digital content
recommendation platform, to steer a population. We relate performative power to
the economic theory of market power. Traditional economic concepts are well
known to struggle with identifying anti-competitive patterns in digital
platforms--a core challenge is the difficulty of defining the market, its
participants, products, and prices. Performative power sidesteps the problem of
market definition by focusing on a directly observable statistical measure
instead. High performative power enables a platform to profit from steering
participant behavior, whereas low performative power ensures that learning from
historical data is close to optimal.
  Our first general result shows that under low performative power, a firm
cannot do better than standard supervised learning on observed data. We draw an
analogy with a firm being a price-taker, an economic condition that arises
under perfect competition in classical market models. We then contrast this
with a market where performative power is concentrated and show that the
equilibrium state can differ significantly. We go on to study performative
power in a concrete setting of strategic classification where participants can
switch between competing firms. We show that monopolies maximize performative
power and disutility for the participant, while competition and outside options
decrease performative power. We end on a discussion of connections to measures
of market power in economics and of the relationship with ongoing antitrust
debates.
