How and When Random Feedback Works: A Case Study of Low-Rank Matrix
  Factorization
  The success of gradient descent in ML and especially for learning neural
networks is remarkable and robust. In the context of how the brain learns, one
aspect of gradient descent that appears biologically difficult to realize (if
not implausible) is that its updates rely on feedback from later layers to
earlier layers through the same connections. Such bidirected links are
relatively few in brain networks, and even when reciprocal connections exist,
they may not be equi-weighted. Random Feedback Alignment (Lillicrap et al.,
2016), where the backward weights are random and fixed, has been proposed as a
bio-plausible alternative and found to be effective empirically. We investigate
how and when feedback alignment (FA) works, focusing on one of the most basic
problems with layered structure -- low-rank matrix factorization. In this
problem, given a matrix $Y_{n\times m}$, the goal is to find a low rank
factorization $Z_{n \times r}W_{r \times m}$ that minimizes the error
$\|ZW-Y\|_F$. Gradient descent solves this problem optimally. We show that FA
converges to the optimal solution when $r\ge \mbox{rank}(Y)$. We also shed
light on how FA works. It is observed empirically that the forward weight
matrices and (random) feedback matrices come closer during FA updates. Our
analysis rigorously derives this phenomenon and shows how it facilitates
convergence of FA*, a closely related variant of FA. We also show that FA can
be far from optimal when $r < \mbox{rank}(Y)$. This is the first provable
separation result between gradient descent and FA. Moreover, the
representations found by gradient descent and FA can be almost orthogonal even
when their error $\|ZW-Y\|_F$ is approximately equal. As a corollary, these
results also hold for training two-layer linear neural networks when the
training input is isotropic, and the output is a linear function of the input.
