Learning Multi-item Auctions with (or without) Samples
  We provide algorithms that learn simple auctions whose revenue is
approximately optimal in multi-item multi-bidder settings, for a wide range of
valuations including unit-demand, additive, constrained additive, XOS, and
subadditive. We obtain our learning results in two settings. The first is the
commonly studied setting where sample access to the bidders' distributions over
valuations is given, for both regular distributions and arbitrary distributions
with bounded support. Our algorithms require polynomially many samples in the
number of items and bidders. The second is a more general max-min learning
setting that we introduce, where we are given "approximate distributions," and
we seek to compute an auction whose revenue is approximately optimal
simultaneously for all "true distributions" that are close to the given ones.
These results are more general in that they imply the sample-based results, and
are also applicable in settings where we have no sample access to the
underlying distributions but have estimated them indirectly via market research
or by observation of previously run, potentially non-truthful auctions.
  Our results hold for valuation distributions satisfying the standard (and
necessary) independence-across-items property. They also generalize and improve
upon recent works, which have provided algorithms that learn approximately
optimal auctions in more restricted settings with additive, subadditive and
unit-demand valuations using sample access to distributions. We generalize
these results to the complete unit-demand, additive, and XOS setting, to i.i.d.
subadditive bidders, and to the max-min setting.
  Our results are enabled by new uniform convergence bounds for hypotheses
classes under product measures. Our bounds result in exponential savings in
sample complexity compared to bounds derived by bounding the VC dimension, and
are of independent interest.
