Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by
  interacting with their explanations
  Deep neural networks have shown excellent performances in many real-world
applications. Unfortunately, they may show "Clever Hans"-like behavior---making
use of confounding factors within datasets---to achieve high performance. In
this work, we introduce the novel learning setting of "explanatory interactive
learning" (XIL) and illustrate its benefits on a plant phenotyping research
task. XIL adds the scientist into the training loop such that she interactively
revises the original model via providing feedback on its explanations. Our
experimental results demonstrate that XIL can help avoiding Clever Hans moments
in machine learning and encourages (or discourages, if appropriate) trust into
the underlying model.
