You Are the Best Reviewer of Your Own Papers: An Owner-Assisted Scoring
  Mechanism
  I consider the setting where reviewers offer very noisy scores for a number
of items for the selection of high-quality ones (e.g., peer review of large
conference proceedings) whereas the owner of these items knows the true
underlying scores but prefers not to provide this information. To address this
withholding of information, in this paper, I introduce the \textit{Isotonic
Mechanism}, a simple and efficient approach to improving on the imprecise raw
scores by leveraging certain information that the owner is incentivized to
provide. This mechanism takes as input the ranking of the items from best to
worst provided by the owner, in addition to the raw scores provided by the
reviewers. It reports adjusted scores for the items by solving a convex
optimization problem. Under certain conditions, I show that the owner's optimal
strategy is to honestly report the true ranking of the items to her best
knowledge in order to maximize the expected utility. Moreover, I prove that the
adjusted scores provided by this owner-assisted mechanism are indeed
significantly more accurate than the raw scores provided by the reviewers. This
paper concludes with several extensions of the Isotonic Mechanism and some
refinements of the mechanism for practical considerations.
