Interpreting Verbal Irony: Linguistic Strategies and the Connection to
  the Type of Semantic Incongruity
  Human communication often involves the use of verbal irony or sarcasm, where
the speakers usually mean the opposite of what they say. To better understand
how verbal irony is expressed by the speaker and interpreted by the hearer we
conduct a crowdsourcing task: given an utterance expressing verbal irony, users
are asked to verbalize their interpretation of the speaker's ironic message. We
propose a typology of linguistic strategies for verbal irony interpretation and
link it to various theoretical linguistic frameworks. We design computational
models to capture these strategies and present empirical studies aimed to
answer three questions: (1) what is the distribution of linguistic strategies
used by hearers to interpret ironic messages?; (2) do hearers adopt similar
strategies for interpreting the speaker's ironic intent?; and (3) does the type
of semantic incongruity in the ironic message (explicit vs. implicit) influence
the choice of interpretation strategies by the hearers?
