Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classification
  Data are often labeled by many different experts with each expert only
labeling a small fraction of the data and each data point being labeled by
several experts. This reduces the workload on individual experts and also gives
a better estimate of the unobserved ground truth. When experts disagree, the
standard approaches are to treat the majority opinion as the correct label or
to model the correct label as a distribution. These approaches, however, do not
make any use of potentially valuable information about which expert produced
which label. To make use of this extra information, we propose modeling the
experts individually and then learning averaging weights for combining them,
possibly in sample-specific ways. This allows us to give more weight to more
reliable experts and take advantage of the unique strengths of individual
experts at classifying certain types of data. Here we show that our approach
leads to improvements in computer-aided diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. We
also show that our method performs better than competing algorithms by Welinder
and Perona (2010), and by Mnih and Hinton (2012). Our work offers an innovative
approach for dealing with the myriad real-world settings that use expert
opinions to define labels for training.
