A Corpus for Argumentative Writing Support in German
  In this paper, we present a novel annotation approach to capture claims and
premises of arguments and their relations in student-written persuasive peer
reviews on business models in German language. We propose an annotation scheme
based on annotation guidelines that allows to model claims and premises as well
as support and attack relations for capturing the structure of argumentative
discourse in student-written peer reviews. We conduct an annotation study with
three annotators on 50 persuasive essays to evaluate our annotation scheme. The
obtained inter-rater agreement of $\alpha=0.57$ for argument components and
$\alpha=0.49$ for argumentative relations indicates that the proposed
annotation scheme successfully guides annotators to moderate agreement.
Finally, we present our freely available corpus of 1,000 persuasive
student-written peer reviews on business models and our annotation guidelines
to encourage future research on the design and development of argumentative
writing support systems for students.
