That is a Known Lie: Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claims
  The recent proliferation of "fake news" has triggered a number of responses,
most notably the emergence of several manual fact-checking initiatives. As a
result and over time, a large number of fact-checked claims have been
accumulated, which increases the likelihood that a new claim in social media or
a new statement by a politician might have already been fact-checked by some
trusted fact-checking organization, as viral claims often come back after a
while in social media, and politicians like to repeat their favorite
statements, true or false, over and over again. As manual fact-checking is very
time-consuming (and fully automatic fact-checking has credibility issues), it
is important to try to save this effort and to avoid wasting time on claims
that have already been fact-checked. Interestingly, despite the importance of
the task, it has been largely ignored by the research community so far. Here,
we aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we formulate the task and we discuss
how it relates to, but also differs from, previous work. We further create a
specialized dataset, which we release to the research community. Finally, we
present learning-to-rank experiments that demonstrate sizable improvements over
state-of-the-art retrieval and textual similarity approaches.
