The Tragedy of the AI Commons
  Policy and guideline proposals for ethical artificial-intelligence research
have proliferated in recent years. These are supposed to guide the
socially-responsible development of AI for the common good. However, there
typically exist incentives for non-cooperation (i.e., non-adherence to such
policies and guidelines); and, these proposals often lack effective mechanisms
to enforce their own normative claims. The situation just described constitutes
a social dilemma; namely, a situation where no one has an individual incentive
to cooperate, though mutual cooperation would lead to the best outcome for all
involved. In this paper, we use stochastic evolutionary game dynamics to model
this social dilemma in the context of the ethical development of artificial
intelligence. This formalism allows us to isolate variables that may be
intervened upon, thus providing actionable suggestions for increased
cooperation amongst numerous stakeholders in AI. Our results show how
stochastic effects can help make cooperation viable in such a scenario. They
suggest that coordination for a common good should be attempted in smaller
groups in which the cost for cooperation is low, and the perceived risk of
failure is high. This provides insight into the conditions under which we
should expect such ethics proposals to be successful with regard to their
scope, scale, and content.
