A Realistic Evaluation of Semi-Supervised Learning for Fine-Grained
  Classification
  We evaluate the effectiveness of semi-supervised learning (SSL) on a
realistic benchmark where data exhibits considerable class imbalance and
contains images from novel classes. Our benchmark consists of two fine-grained
classification datasets obtained by sampling classes from the Aves and Fungi
taxonomy. We find that recently proposed SSL methods provide significant
benefits, and can effectively use out-of-class data to improve performance when
deep networks are trained from scratch. Yet their performance pales in
comparison to a transfer learning baseline, an alternative approach for
learning from a few examples. Furthermore, in the transfer setting, while
existing SSL methods provide improvements, the presence of out-of-class is
often detrimental. In this setting, standard fine-tuning followed by
distillation-based self-training is the most robust. Our work suggests that
semi-supervised learning with experts on realistic datasets may require
different strategies than those currently prevalent in the literature.
