Is Big Data Sufficient for a Reliable Detection of Non-Technical Losses?
  Non-technical losses (NTL) occur during the distribution of electricity in
power grids and include, but are not limited to, electricity theft and faulty
meters. In emerging countries, they may range up to 40% of the total
electricity distributed. In order to detect NTLs, machine learning methods are
used that learn irregular consumption patterns from customer data and
inspection results. The Big Data paradigm followed in modern machine learning
reflects the desire of deriving better conclusions from simply analyzing more
data, without the necessity of looking at theory and models. However, the
sample of inspected customers may be biased, i.e. it does not represent the
population of all customers. As a consequence, machine learning models trained
on these inspection results are biased as well and therefore lead to unreliable
predictions of whether customers cause NTL or not. In machine learning, this
issue is called covariate shift and has not been addressed in the literature on
NTL detection yet. In this work, we present a novel framework for quantifying
and visualizing covariate shift. We apply it to a commercial data set from
Brazil that consists of 3.6M customers and 820K inspection results. We show
that some features have a stronger covariate shift than others, making
predictions less reliable. In particular, previous inspections were focused on
certain neighborhoods or customer classes and that they were not sufficiently
spread among the population of customers. This framework is about to be
deployed in a commercial product for NTL detection.
