How fine can fine-tuning be? Learning efficient language models
  State-of-the-art performance on language understanding tasks is now achieved
with increasingly large networks; the current record holder has billions of
parameters. Given a language model pre-trained on massive unlabeled text
corpora, only very light supervised fine-tuning is needed to learn a task: the
number of fine-tuning steps is typically five orders of magnitude lower than
the total parameter count. Does this mean that fine-tuning only introduces
small differences from the pre-trained model in the parameter space? If so, can
one avoid storing and computing an entire model for each task? In this work, we
address these questions by using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from
Transformers (BERT) as an example. As expected, we find that the fine-tuned
models are close in parameter space to the pre-trained one, with the closeness
varying from layer to layer. We show that it suffices to fine-tune only the
most critical layers. Further, we find that there are surprisingly many good
solutions in the set of sparsified versions of the pre-trained model. As a
result, fine-tuning of huge language models can be achieved by simply setting a
certain number of entries in certain layers of the pre-trained parameters to
zero, saving both task-specific parameter storage and computational cost.
