Learning Individual Causal Effects from Networked Observational Data
  Convenient access to observational data enables us to learn causal effects
without randomized experiments. This research direction draws increasing
attention in research areas such as economics, healthcare, and education. For
example, we can study how a medicine (the treatment) causally affects the
health condition (the outcome) of a patient using existing electronic health
records. To validate causal effects learned from observational data, we have to
control confounding bias -- the influence of variables which causally influence
both the treatment and the outcome. Existing work along this line
overwhelmingly relies on the unconfoundedness assumption that there do not
exist unobserved confounders. However, this assumption is untestable and can
even be untenable. In fact, an important fact ignored by the majority of
previous work is that observational data can come with network information that
can be utilized to infer hidden confounders. For example, in an observational
study of the individual-level treatment effect of a medicine, instead of
randomized experiments, the medicine is often assigned to each individual based
on a series of factors. Some of the factors (e.g., socioeconomic status) can be
challenging to measure and therefore become hidden confounders. Fortunately,
the socioeconomic status of an individual can be reflected by whom she is
connected in social networks. With this fact in mind, we aim to exploit the
network information to recognize patterns of hidden confounders which would
further allow us to learn valid individual causal effects from observational
data. In this work, we propose a novel causal inference framework, the network
deconfounder, which learns representations to unravel patterns of hidden
confounders from the network information. Empirically, we perform extensive
experiments to validate the effectiveness of the network deconfounder on
various datasets.
