Crowd, Lending, Machine, and Bias
  Big data and machine learning (ML) algorithms are key drivers of many fintech
innovations. While it may be obvious that replacing humans with machine would
increase efficiency, it is not clear whether and where machines can make better
decisions than humans. We answer this question in the context of crowd lending,
where decisions are traditionally made by a crowd of investors. Using data from
Prosper.com, we show that a reasonably sophisticated ML algorithm predicts
listing default probability more accurately than crowd investors. The dominance
of the machine over the crowd is more pronounced for highly risky listings. We
then use the machine to make investment decisions, and find that the machine
benefits not only the lenders but also the borrowers. When machine prediction
is used to select loans, it leads to a higher rate of return for investors and
more funding opportunities for borrowers with few alternative funding options.
We also find suggestive evidence that the machine is biased in gender and race
even when it does not use gender and race information as input. We propose a
general and effective "debasing" method that can be applied to any prediction
focused ML applications, and demonstrate its use in our context. We show that
the debiased ML algorithm, which suffers from lower prediction accuracy, still
leads to better investment decisions compared with the crowd. These results
indicate that ML can help crowd lending platforms better fulfill the promise of
providing access to financial resources to otherwise underserved individuals
and ensure fairness in the allocation of these resources.
