Deep Neuroevolution: Genetic Algorithms Are a Competitive Alternative
  for Training Deep Neural Networks for Reinforcement Learning
  Deep artificial neural networks (DNNs) are typically trained via
gradient-based learning algorithms, namely backpropagation. Evolution
strategies (ES) can rival backprop-based algorithms such as Q-learning and
policy gradients on challenging deep reinforcement learning (RL) problems.
However, ES can be considered a gradient-based algorithm because it performs
stochastic gradient descent via an operation similar to a finite-difference
approximation of the gradient. That raises the question of whether
non-gradient-based evolutionary algorithms can work at DNN scales. Here we
demonstrate they can: we evolve the weights of a DNN with a simple,
gradient-free, population-based genetic algorithm (GA) and it performs well on
hard deep RL problems, including Atari and humanoid locomotion. The Deep GA
successfully evolves networks with over four million free parameters, the
largest neural networks ever evolved with a traditional evolutionary algorithm.
These results (1) expand our sense of the scale at which GAs can operate, (2)
suggest intriguingly that in some cases following the gradient is not the best
choice for optimizing performance, and (3) make immediately available the
multitude of neuroevolution techniques that improve performance. We demonstrate
the latter by showing that combining DNNs with novelty search, which encourages
exploration on tasks with deceptive or sparse reward functions, can solve a
high-dimensional problem on which reward-maximizing algorithms (e.g.\ DQN, A3C,
ES, and the GA) fail. Additionally, the Deep GA is faster than ES, A3C, and DQN
(it can train Atari in ${\raise.17ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle\sim$}}$4 hours on one
desktop or ${\raise.17ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle\sim$}}$1 hour distributed on 720
cores), and enables a state-of-the-art, up to 10,000-fold compact encoding
technique.
