On The Stability of Interpretable Models
  Interpretable classification models are built with the purpose of providing a
comprehensible description of the decision logic to an external oversight
agent. When considered in isolation, a decision tree, a set of classification
rules, or a linear model, are widely recognized as human-interpretable.
However, such models are generated as part of a larger analytical process. Bias
in data collection and preparation, or in model's construction may severely
affect the accountability of the design process. We conduct an experimental
study of the stability of interpretable models with respect to feature
selection, instance selection, and model selection. Our conclusions should
raise awareness and attention of the scientific community on the need of a
stability impact assessment of interpretable models.
