Contrastive Pessimistic Likelihood Estimation for Semi-Supervised
  Classification
  Improvement guarantees for semi-supervised classifiers can currently only be
given under restrictive conditions on the data. We propose a general way to
perform semi-supervised parameter estimation for likelihood-based classifiers
for which, on the full training set, the estimates are never worse than the
supervised solution in terms of the log-likelihood. We argue, moreover, that we
may expect these solutions to really improve upon the supervised classifier in
particular cases. In a worked-out example for LDA, we take it one step further
and essentially prove that its semi-supervised version is strictly better than
its supervised counterpart. The two new concepts that form the core of our
estimation principle are contrast and pessimism. The former refers to the fact
that our objective function takes the supervised estimates into account,
enabling the semi-supervised solution to explicitly control the potential
improvements over this estimate. The latter refers to the fact that our
estimates are conservative and therefore resilient to whatever form the true
labeling of the unlabeled data takes on. Experiments demonstrate the
improvements in terms of both the log-likelihood and the classification error
rate on independent test sets.
