XAI Establishes a Common Ground Between Machine Learning and Causality
  A handful of recent works have argued on the connection between machine
learning and causality. In a reverse thought process, starting from the
grounding of mental models in causal models, we strengthen these initial works
with results that suggest XAI essentially requiring machine learning to learn
models that are causally consistent with the task at hand. By recognizing how
human mental models (HMM) are naturally represented by the Pearlian Structural
Causal Model (SCM), we make two key observations through the construction of an
example metric space for linear SCM: first, that the notion of a "true"
data-underlying SCM is justified, and second, that an aggregation of
human-derived SCM might point to said "true" SCM. Motivated by the implications
of these insights, we conclude with a third observation which argues that
interpretations derived from HMM must imply interpretability in the SCM
framework. Following this intuition, we present an original derivation using
these priorly established first principles to reveal a human-readable
interpretation scheme consistent with the given SCM, justifying the naming
Structural Causal Interpretations (SCI). Going further, we analyze these SCIs
and their mathematical properties theoretically and empirically. We prove that
any existing graph induction method (GIM) is in fact interpretable in the
SCI-sense. Our first experiment (E1) assesses the quality of such GIM-based
SCI. In (E2) we observe evidence for our conjecture on improved
sample-efficiency for SCI-based learning. For (E3) we conduct a study (N=22)
and observe superiority in human-based SCI over GIM ones, corroborating our
initial hypothesis.
