Compositional Abstraction Error and a Category of Causal Models
  Interventional causal models describe several joint distributions over some
variables used to describe a system, one for each intervention setting. They
provide a formal recipe for how to move between the different joint
distributions and make predictions about the variables upon intervening on the
system. Yet, it is difficult to formalise how we may change the underlying
variables used to describe the system, say moving from fine-grained to
coarse-grained variables. Here, we argue that compositionality is a desideratum
for such model transformations and the associated errors: When abstracting a
reference model M iteratively, first obtaining M' and then further simplifying
that to obtain M'', we expect the composite transformation from M to M'' to
exist and its error to be bounded by the errors incurred by each individual
transformation step. Category theory, the study of mathematical objects via
compositional transformations between them, offers a natural language to
develop our framework for model transformations and abstractions. We introduce
a category of finite interventional causal models and, leveraging theory of
enriched categories, prove the desired compositionality properties for our
framework.
