Are all training examples equally valuable?
  When learning a new concept, not all training examples may prove equally
useful for training: some may have higher or lower training value than others.
The goal of this paper is to bring to the attention of the vision community the
following considerations: (1) some examples are better than others for training
detectors or classifiers, and (2) in the presence of better examples, some
examples may negatively impact performance and removing them may be beneficial.
In this paper, we propose an approach for measuring the training value of an
example, and use it for ranking and greedily sorting examples. We test our
methods on different vision tasks, models, datasets and classifiers. Our
experiments show that the performance of current state-of-the-art detectors and
classifiers can be improved when training on a subset, rather than the whole
training set.
