When Personalization Harms: Reconsidering the Use of Group Attributes in
  Prediction
  The standard approach to personalization in machine learning consists of
training a model with group attributes like sex, age group, and blood type. In
this work, we show that this approach to personalization fails to improve
performance for all groups who provide personal data. We discuss how this
effect inflicts harm in applications where models assign predictions on the
basis of group membership. We propose collective preference guarantees to
ensure the fair use of group attributes in prediction. We characterize how
common approaches to personalization violate fair use due to failures in model
development and deployment. We conduct a comprehensive empirical study of
personalization in clinical prediction models. Our results highlight the
prevalence of fair use violations, demonstrate actionable interventions to
mitigate harm and underscore the need to measure the gains of personalization
for all groups who provide personal data.
