Comparative analysis of machine learning methods for active flow control
  Machine learning frameworks such as Genetic Programming (GP) and
Reinforcement Learning (RL) are gaining popularity in flow control. This work
presents a comparative analysis of the two, bench-marking some of their most
representative algorithms against global optimization techniques such as
Bayesian Optimization (BO) and Lipschitz global optimization (LIPO). First, we
review the general framework of the flow control problem, linking optimal
control theory with model-free machine learning methods. Then, we test the
control algorithms on three test cases. These are (1) the stabilization of a
nonlinear dynamical system featuring frequency cross-talk, (2) the wave
cancellation from a Burgers' flow and (3) the drag reduction in a cylinder wake
flow. Although the control of these problems has been tackled in the recent
literature with one method or the other, we present a comprehensive comparison
to illustrate their differences in exploration versus exploitation and their
balance between `model capacity' in the control law definition versus `required
complexity'. We believe that such a comparison opens the path towards
hybridization of the various methods, and we offer some perspective on their
future development in the literature of flow control problems.
