A two-level solution to fight against dishonest opinions in
  recommendation-based trust systems
  In this paper, we propose a mechanism to deal with dishonest opinions in
recommendation-based trust models, at both the collection and processing
levels. We consider a scenario in which an agent requests recommendations from
multiple parties to build trust toward another agent. At the collection level,
we propose to allow agents to self-assess the accuracy of their recommendations
and autonomously decide on whether they would participate in the recommendation
process or not. At the processing level, we propose a recommendations
aggregation technique that is resilient to collusion attacks, followed by a
credibility update mechanism for the participating agents. The originality of
our work stems from its consideration of dishonest opinions at both the
collection and processing levels, which allows for better and more persistent
protection against dishonest recommenders. Experiments conducted on the
Epinions dataset show that our solution yields better performance in protecting
the recommendation process against Sybil attacks, in comparison with a
competing model that derives the optimal network of advisors based on the
agents' trust values.
