If dropout limits trainable depth, does critical initialisation still
  matter? A large-scale statistical analysis on ReLU networks
  Recent work in signal propagation theory has shown that dropout limits the
depth to which information can propagate through a neural network. In this
paper, we investigate the effect of initialisation on training speed and
generalisation for ReLU networks within this depth limit. We ask the following
research question: given that critical initialisation is crucial for training
at large depth, if dropout limits the depth at which networks are trainable,
does initialising critically still matter? We conduct a large-scale controlled
experiment, and perform a statistical analysis of over $12000$ trained
networks. We find that (1) trainable networks show no statistically significant
difference in performance over a wide range of non-critical initialisations;
(2) for initialisations that show a statistically significant difference, the
net effect on performance is small; (3) only extreme initialisations (very
small or very large) perform worse than criticality. These findings also apply
to standard ReLU networks of moderate depth as a special case of zero dropout.
Our results therefore suggest that, in the shallow-to-moderate depth setting,
critical initialisation provides zero performance gains when compared to
off-critical initialisations and that searching for off-critical
initialisations that might improve training speed or generalisation, is likely
to be a fruitless endeavour.
