Estimating Potential Outcome Distributions with Collaborating Causal
  Networks
  Many causal inference approaches have focused on identifying an individual's
outcome change due to a potential treatment, or the individual treatment effect
(ITE), from observational studies. Rather than only estimating the ITE, we
propose Collaborating Causal Networks (CCN) to estimate the full potential
outcome distributions. This modification facilitates estimating the utility of
each treatment and allows for individual variation in utility functions (e.g.,
variability in risk tolerance). We show that CCN learns distributions that
asymptotically capture the correct potential outcome distributions under
standard causal inference assumptions. Furthermore, we develop a new adjustment
approach that is empirically effective in alleviating sample imbalance between
treatment groups in observational studies. We evaluate CCN by extensive
empirical experiments and demonstrate improved distribution estimates compared
to existing Bayesian and Generative Adversarial Network-based methods.
Additionally, CCN empirically improves decisions over a variety of utility
functions.
