PRover: Proof Generation for Interpretable Reasoning over Rules
  Recent work by Clark et al. (2020) shows that transformers can act as 'soft
theorem provers' by answering questions over explicitly provided knowledge in
natural language. In our work, we take a step closer to emulating formal
theorem provers, by proposing PROVER, an interpretable transformer-based model
that jointly answers binary questions over rule-bases and generates the
corresponding proofs. Our model learns to predict nodes and edges corresponding
to proof graphs in an efficient constrained training paradigm. During
inference, a valid proof, satisfying a set of global constraints is generated.
We conduct experiments on synthetic, hand-authored, and human-paraphrased
rule-bases to show promising results for QA and proof generation, with strong
generalization performance. First, PROVER generates proofs with an accuracy of
87%, while retaining or improving performance on the QA task, compared to
RuleTakers (up to 6% improvement on zero-shot evaluation). Second, when trained
on questions requiring lower depths of reasoning, it generalizes significantly
better to higher depths (up to 15% improvement). Third, PROVER obtains near
perfect QA accuracy of 98% using only 40% of the training data. However,
generating proofs for questions requiring higher depths of reasoning becomes
challenging, and the accuracy drops to 65% for 'depth 5', indicating
significant scope for future work. Our code and models are publicly available
at https://github.com/swarnaHub/PRover
