Nearly Optimal Sample Size in Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional
  Regression
  We consider the problem of fitting the parameters of a high-dimensional
linear regression model. In the regime where the number of parameters $p$ is
comparable to or exceeds the sample size $n$, a successful approach uses an
$\ell_1$-penalized least squares estimator, known as Lasso. Unfortunately,
unlike for linear estimators (e.g., ordinary least squares), no
well-established method exists to compute confidence intervals or p-values on
the basis of the Lasso estimator. Very recently, a line of work
\cite{javanmard2013hypothesis, confidenceJM, GBR-hypothesis} has addressed this
problem by constructing a debiased version of the Lasso estimator. In this
paper, we study this approach for random design model, under the assumption
that a good estimator exists for the precision matrix of the design. Our
analysis improves over the state of the art in that it establishes nearly
optimal \emph{average} testing power if the sample size $n$ asymptotically
dominates $s_0 (\log p)^2$, with $s_0$ being the sparsity level (number of
non-zero coefficients). Earlier work obtains provable guarantees only for much
larger sample size, namely it requires $n$ to asymptotically dominate $(s_0
\log p)^2$.
  In particular, for random designs with a sparse precision matrix we show that
an estimator thereof having the required properties can be computed
efficiently. Finally, we evaluate this approach on synthetic data and compare
it with earlier proposals.
