Bayesian optimization with known experimental and design constraints for
  chemistry applications
  Optimization strategies driven by machine learning, such as Bayesian
optimization, are being explored across experimental sciences as an efficient
alternative to traditional design of experiment. When combined with automated
laboratory hardware and high-performance computing, these strategies enable
next-generation platforms for autonomous experimentation. However, the
practical application of these approaches is hampered by a lack of flexible
software and algorithms tailored to the unique requirements of chemical
research. One such aspect is the pervasive presence of constraints in the
experimental conditions when optimizing chemical processes or protocols, and in
the chemical space that is accessible when designing functional molecules or
materials. Although many of these constraints are known a priori, they can be
interdependent, non-linear, and result in non-compact optimization domains. In
this work, we extend our experiment planning algorithms Phoenics and Gryffin
such that they can handle arbitrary known constraints via an intuitive and
flexible interface. We benchmark these extended algorithms on continuous and
discrete test functions with a diverse set of constraints, demonstrating their
flexibility and robustness. In addition, we illustrate their practical utility
in two simulated chemical research scenarios: the optimization of the synthesis
of o-xylenyl Buckminsterfullerene adducts under constrained flow conditions,
and the design of redox active molecules for flow batteries under synthetic
accessibility constraints. The tools developed constitute a simple, yet
versatile strategy to enable model-based optimization with known experimental
constraints, contributing to its applicability as a core component of
autonomous platforms for scientific discovery.
