On Measuring and Quantifying Performance: Error Rates, Surrogate Loss,
  and an Example in SSL
  In various approaches to learning, notably in domain adaptation, active
learning, learning under covariate shift, semi-supervised learning, learning
with concept drift, and the like, one often wants to compare a baseline
classifier to one or more advanced (or at least different) strategies. In this
chapter, we basically argue that if such classifiers, in their respective
training phases, optimize a so-called surrogate loss that it may also be
valuable to compare the behavior of this loss on the test set, next to the
regular classification error rate. It can provide us with an additional view on
the classifiers' relative performances that error rates cannot capture. As an
example, limited but convincing empirical results demonstrates that we may be
able to find semi-supervised learning strategies that can guarantee performance
improvements with increasing numbers of unlabeled data in terms of
log-likelihood. In contrast, the latter may be impossible to guarantee for the
classification error rate.
