Static Scheduling with Predictions Learned through Efficient Exploration
  A popular approach to go beyond the worst-case analysis of online algorithms
is to assume the existence of predictions that can be leveraged to improve
performances. Those predictions are usually given by some external sources that
cannot be fully trusted. Instead, we argue that trustful predictions can be
built by algorithms, while they run. We investigate this idea in the
illustrative context of static scheduling with exponential job sizes. Indeed,
we prove that algorithms agnostic to this structure do not perform better than
in the worst case. In contrast, when the expected job sizes are known, we show
that the best algorithm using this information, called
Follow-The-Perfect-Prediction (FTPP), exhibits much better performances. Then,
we introduce two adaptive explore-then-commit types of algorithms: they both
first (partially) learn expected job sizes and then follow FTPP once their
self-predictions are confident enough. On the one hand, ETCU explores in
"series", by completing jobs sequentially to acquire information. On the other
hand, ETCRR, inspired by the optimal worst-case algorithm Round-Robin (RR),
explores efficiently in "parallel". We prove that both of them asymptotically
reach the performances of FTPP, with a faster rate for ETCRR. Those findings
are empirically evaluated on synthetic data.
