How Personal is Machine Learning Personalization?
  Though used extensively, the concept and process of machine learning (ML)
personalization have generally received little attention from academics,
practitioners, and the general public. We describe the ML approach as relying
on the metaphor of the person as a feature vector and contrast this with
humanistic views of the person. In light of the recent calls by the IEEE to
consider the effects of ML on human well-being, we ask whether ML
personalization can be reconciled with these humanistic views of the person,
which highlight the importance of moral and social identity. As human behavior
increasingly becomes digitized, analyzed, and predicted, to what extent do our
subsequent decisions about what to choose, buy, or do, made both by us and
others, reflect who we are as persons? This paper first explicates the term
personalization by considering ML personalization and highlights its relation
to humanistic conceptions of the person, then proposes several dimensions for
evaluating the degree of personalization of ML personalized scores. By doing
so, we hope to contribute to current debate on the issues of algorithmic bias,
transparency, and fairness in machine learning.
