Dynamics of Human Cooperation in Economic Games
  Human decision behaviour is quite diverse. In many games humans on average do
not achieve maximal payoff and the behaviour of individual players remains
inhomogeneous even after playing many rounds. For instance, in repeated
prisoner dilemma games humans do not always optimize their mean reward and
frequently exhibit broad distributions of cooperativity. The reasons for these
failures of maximization are not known. Here we show that the dynamics
resulting from the tendency to shift choice probabilities towards previously
rewarding choices in closed loop interaction with the strategy of the opponent
can not only explain systematic deviations from 'rationality', but also
reproduce the diversity of choice behaviours. As a representative example we
investigate the dynamics of choice probabilities in prisoner dilemma games with
opponents using strategies with different degrees of extortion and generosity.
We find that already a simple model for human learning can account for a
surprisingly wide range of human decision behaviours. It reproduces suppression
of cooperation against extortionists and increasing cooperation when playing
with generous opponents, explains the broad distributions of individual choices
in ensembles of players, and predicts the evolution of individual subjects'
cooperation rates over the course of the games. We conclude that important
aspects of human decision behaviours are rooted in elementary learning
mechanisms realised in the brain.
