Exploring the Limits of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Low-Shot
  Settings
  Uncertainty quantification in neural network promises to increase safety of
AI systems, but it is not clear how performance might vary with the training
set size. In this paper we evaluate seven uncertainty methods on Fashion MNIST
and CIFAR10, as we sub-sample and produce varied training set sizes. We find
that calibration error and out of distribution detection performance strongly
depend on the training set size, with most methods being miscalibrated on the
test set with small training sets. Gradient-based methods seem to poorly
estimate epistemic uncertainty and are the most affected by training set size.
We expect our results can guide future research into uncertainty quantification
and help practitioners select methods based on their particular available data.
