Measuring Model Biases in the Absence of Ground Truth
  The measurement of bias in machine learning often focuses on model
performance across identity subgroups (such as man and woman) with respect to
groundtruth labels. However, these methods do not directly measure the
associations that a model may have learned, for example between labels and
identity subgroups. Further, measuring a model's bias requires a fully
annotated evaluation dataset which may not be easily available in practice. We
present an elegant mathematical solution that tackles both issues
simultaneously, using image classification as a working example. By treating a
classification model's predictions for a given image as a set of labels
analogous to a bag of words, we rank the biases that a model has learned with
respect to different identity labels. We use (man, woman) as a concrete example
of an identity label set (although this set need not be binary), and present
rankings for the labels that are most biased towards one identity or the other.
We demonstrate how the statistical properties of different association metrics
can lead to different rankings of the most "gender biased" labels, and conclude
that normalized pointwise mutual information (nPMI) is most useful in practice.
Finally, we announce an open-sourced nPMI visualization tool using TensorBoard.
