Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning
  We study the performance of classical and quantum machine learning (ML)
models in predicting outcomes of physical experiments. The experiments depend
on an input parameter $x$ and involve execution of a (possibly unknown) quantum
process $\mathcal{E}$. Our figure of merit is the number of runs of
$\mathcal{E}$ required to achieve a desired prediction performance. We consider
classical ML models that perform a measurement and record the classical outcome
after each run of $\mathcal{E}$, and quantum ML models that can access
$\mathcal{E}$ coherently to acquire quantum data; the classical or quantum data
is then used to predict outcomes of future experiments. We prove that for any
input distribution $\mathcal{D}(x)$, a classical ML model can provide accurate
predictions on average by accessing $\mathcal{E}$ a number of times comparable
to the optimal quantum ML model. In contrast, for achieving accurate prediction
on all inputs, we prove that exponential quantum advantage is possible. For
example, to predict expectations of all Pauli observables in an $n$-qubit
system $\rho$, classical ML models require $2^{\Omega(n)}$ copies of $\rho$,
but we present a quantum ML model using only $\mathcal{O}(n)$ copies. Our
results clarify where quantum advantage is possible and highlight the potential
for classical ML models to address challenging quantum problems in physics and
chemistry.
