Don't Throw it Away! The Utility of Unlabeled Data in Fair Decision Making
Decision making algorithms, in practice, are often trained on data that
exhibits a variety of biases. Decision-makers often aim to take decisions based
on some ground-truth target that is assumed or expected to be unbiased, i.e.,
equally distributed across socially salient groups. In many practical settings,
the ground-truth cannot be directly observed, and instead, we have to rely on a
biased proxy measure of the ground-truth, i.e., biased labels, in the data. In
addition, data is often selectively labeled, i.e., even the biased labels are
only observed for a small fraction of the data that received a positive
decision. To overcome label and selection biases, recent work proposes to learn
stochastic, exploring decision policies via i) online training of new policies
at each time-step and ii) enforcing fairness as a constraint on performance.
However, the existing approach uses only labeled data, disregarding a large
amount of unlabeled data, and thereby suffers from high instability and
variance in the learned decision policies at different times. In this paper, we
propose a novel method based on a variational autoencoder for practical fair
decision-making. Our method learns an unbiased data representation leveraging
both labeled and unlabeled data and uses the representations to learn a policy
in an online process. Using synthetic data, we empirically validate that our
method converges to the optimal (fair) policy according to the ground-truth
with low variance. In real-world experiments, we further show that our training
approach not only offers a more stable learning process but also yields
policies with higher fairness as well as utility than previous approaches.