Effectively Unbiased FID and Inception Score and where to find them
  This paper shows that two commonly used evaluation metrics for generative
models, the Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) and the Inception Score (IS),
are biased -- the expected value of the score computed for a finite sample set
is not the true value of the score. Worse, the paper shows that the bias term
depends on the particular model being evaluated, so model A may get a better
score than model B simply because model A's bias term is smaller. This effect
cannot be fixed by evaluating at a fixed number of samples. This means all
comparisons using FID or IS as currently computed are unreliable.
  We then show how to extrapolate the score to obtain an effectively bias-free
estimate of scores computed with an infinite number of samples, which we term
$\overline{\textrm{FID}}_\infty$ and $\overline{\textrm{IS}}_\infty$. In turn,
this effectively bias-free estimate requires good estimates of scores with a
finite number of samples. We show that using Quasi-Monte Carlo integration
notably improves estimates of FID and IS for finite sample sets. Our
extrapolated scores are simple, drop-in replacements for the finite sample
scores. Additionally, we show that using low discrepancy sequence in GAN
training offers small improvements in the resulting generator.
