Fast Learning Requires Good Memory: A Time-Space Lower Bound for Parity
  Learning
  We prove that any algorithm for learning parities requires either a memory of
quadratic size or an exponential number of samples. This proves a recent
conjecture of Steinhardt, Valiant and Wager and shows that for some learning
problems a large storage space is crucial.
  More formally, in the problem of parity learning, an unknown string $x \in
\{0,1\}^n$ was chosen uniformly at random. A learner tries to learn $x$ from a
stream of samples $(a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2) \ldots$, where each~$a_t$ is
uniformly distributed over $\{0,1\}^n$ and $b_t$ is the inner product of $a_t$
and $x$, modulo~2. We show that any algorithm for parity learning, that uses
less than $\frac{n^2}{25}$ bits of memory, requires an exponential number of
samples.
  Previously, there was no non-trivial lower bound on the number of samples
needed, for any learning problem, even if the allowed memory size is $O(n)$
(where $n$ is the space needed to store one sample).
  We also give an application of our result in the field of bounded-storage
cryptography. We show an encryption scheme that requires a private key of
length $n$, as well as time complexity of $n$ per encryption/decription of each
bit, and is provenly and unconditionally secure as long as the attacker uses
less than $\frac{n^2}{25}$ memory bits and the scheme is used at most an
exponential number of times. Previous works on bounded-storage cryptography
assumed that the memory size used by the attacker is at most linear in the time
needed for encryption/decription.
