Statistical quantification of confounding bias in predictive modelling
  The lack of non-parametric statistical tests for confounding bias
significantly hampers the development of robust, valid and generalizable
predictive models in many fields of research. Here I propose the partial and
full confounder tests, which, for a given confounder variable, probe the null
hypotheses of unconfounded and fully confounded models, respectively. The tests
provide a strict control for Type I errors and high statistical power, even for
non-normally and non-linearly dependent predictions, often seen in machine
learning. Applying the proposed tests on models trained on functional brain
connectivity data from the Human Connectome Project and the Autism Brain
Imaging Data Exchange dataset reveals confounders that were previously
unreported or found to be hard to correct for with state-of-the-art confound
mitigation approaches. The tests, implemented in the package mlconfound
(https://mlconfound.readthedocs.io), can aid the assessment and improvement of
the generalizability and neurobiological validity of predictive models and,
thereby, foster the development of clinically useful machine learning
biomarkers.
