Exploration vs. Exploitation in Team Formation
  An online labor platform faces an online learning problem in matching workers
with jobs and using the performance on these jobs to create better future
matches. This learning problem is complicated by the rise of complex tasks on
these platforms, such as web development and product design, that require a
team of workers to complete. The success of a job is now a function of the
skills and contributions of all workers involved, which may be unknown to both
the platform and the client who posted the job. These team matchings result in
a structured correlation between what is known about the individuals and this
information can be utilized to create better future matches. We analyze two
natural settings where the performance of a team is dictated by its strongest
and its weakest member, respectively. We find that both problems pose an
exploration-exploitation tradeoff between learning the performance of untested
teams and repeating previously tested teams that resulted in a good
performance. We establish fundamental regret bounds and design near-optimal
algorithms that uncover several insights into these tradeoffs.
