Learning to Compare for Better Training and Evaluation of Open Domain
  Natural Language Generation Models
  Automated evaluation of open domain natural language generation (NLG) models
remains a challenge and widely used metrics such as BLEU and Perplexity can be
misleading in some cases. In our paper, we propose to evaluate natural language
generation models by learning to compare a pair of generated sentences by
fine-tuning BERT, which has been shown to have good natural language
understanding ability. We also propose to evaluate the model-level quality of
NLG models with sample-level comparison results with skill rating system. While
able to be trained in a fully self-supervised fashion, our model can be further
fine-tuned with a little amount of human preference annotation to better
imitate human judgment. In addition to evaluating trained models, we propose to
apply our model as a performance indicator during training for better
hyperparameter tuning and early-stopping. We evaluate our approach on both
story generation and chit-chat dialogue response generation. Experimental
results show that our model correlates better with human preference compared
with previous automated evaluation approaches. Training with the proposed
metric yields better performance in human evaluation, which further
demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed model.
