A Step Toward Quantifying Independently Reproducible Machine Learning
  Research
  What makes a paper independently reproducible? Debates on reproducibility
center around intuition or assumptions but lack empirical results. Our field
focuses on releasing code, which is important, but is not sufficient for
determining reproducibility. We take the first step toward a quantifiable
answer by manually attempting to implement 255 papers published from 1984 until
2017, recording features of each paper, and performing statistical analysis of
the results. For each paper, we did not look at the authors code, if released,
in order to prevent bias toward discrepancies between code and paper.
