Fight Poison with Poison: Detecting Backdoor Poison Samples via
  Decoupling Benign Correlations
  In this work, we study poison samples detection for defending against
backdoor poisoning attacks on deep neural networks (DNNs). A principled idea
underlying prior arts on this problem is to utilize the backdoored models'
distinguishable behaviors on poison and clean populations to distinguish
between these two different populations themselves and remove the identified
poison. Many prior arts build their detectors upon a latent separability
assumption, which states that backdoored models trained on the poisoned dataset
will learn separable latent representations for backdoor and clean samples.
Although such separation behaviors empirically exist for many existing attacks,
there is no control on the separability and the extent of separation can vary a
lot across different poison strategies, datasets, as well as the training
configurations of backdoored models. Worse still, recent adaptive poison
strategies can greatly reduce the "distinguishable behaviors" and consequently
render most prior arts less effective (or completely fail). We point out that
these limitations directly come from the passive reliance on some
distinguishable behaviors that are not controlled by defenders. To mitigate
such limitations, in this work, we propose the idea of active defense -- rather
than passively assuming backdoored models will have certain distinguishable
behaviors on poison and clean samples, we propose to actively enforce the
trained models to behave differently on these two different populations.
Specifically, we introduce confusion training as a concrete instance of active
defense.
