Cross-Subject Statistical Shift Estimation for Generalized
  Electroencephalography-based Mental Workload Assessment
  Assessment of mental workload in real-world conditions is key to ensure the
performance of workers executing tasks that demand sustained attention.
Previous literature has employed electroencephalography (EEG) to this end
despite having observed that EEG correlates of mental workload vary across
subjects and physical strain, thus making it difficult to devise models capable
of simultaneously presenting reliable performance across users. Domain
adaptation consists of a set of strategies that aim at allowing for improving
machine learning systems performance on unseen data at training time. Such
methods, however, might rely on assumptions over the considered data
distributions, which typically do not hold for applications of EEG data.
Motivated by this observation, in this work we propose a strategy to estimate
two types of discrepancies between multiple data distributions, namely marginal
and conditional shifts, observed on data collected from different subjects.
Besides shedding light on the assumptions that hold for a particular dataset,
the estimates of statistical shifts obtained with the proposed approach can be
used for investigating other aspects of a machine learning pipeline, such as
quantitatively assessing the effectiveness of domain adaptation strategies. In
particular, we consider EEG data collected from individuals performing mental
tasks while running on a treadmill and pedaling on a stationary bike and
explore the effects of different normalization strategies commonly used to
mitigate cross-subject variability. We show the effects that different
normalization schemes have on statistical shifts and their relationship with
the accuracy of mental workload prediction as assessed on unseen participants
at training time.
