Towards Group Learning: Distributed Weighting of Experts
  Aggregating signals from a collection of noisy sources is a fundamental
problem in many domains including crowd-sourcing, multi-agent planning, sensor
networks, signal processing, voting, ensemble learning, and federated learning.
The core question is how to aggregate signals from multiple sources (e.g.
experts) in order to reveal an underlying ground truth. While a full answer
depends on the type of signal, correlation of signals, and desired output, a
problem common to all of these applications is that of differentiating sources
based on their quality and weighting them accordingly. It is often assumed that
this differentiation and aggregation is done by a single, accurate central
mechanism or agent (e.g. judge). We complicate this model in two ways. First,
we investigate the setting with both a single judge, and one with multiple
judges. Second, given this multi-agent interaction of judges, we investigate
various constraints on the judges' reporting space. We build on known results
for the optimal weighting of experts and prove that an ensemble of sub-optimal
mechanisms can perform optimally under certain conditions. We then show
empirically that the ensemble approximates the performance of the optimal
mechanism under a broader range of conditions.
