Macro F1 and Macro F1
  The 'macro F1' metric is frequently used to evaluate binary, multi-class and
multi-label classification problems. Yet, we find that there exist two
different formulas to calculate this quantity. In this note, we show that only
under rare circumstances the two computations can be considered equivalent.
More specifically, one formula well 'rewards' classifiers which produce a
skewed error type distribution. In fact, the difference in outcome of the two
computations can be as high as 0.5. The two computations may not only diverge
in their scalar result but can also lead to different classifier rankings.
