When can unlabeled data improve the learning rate?
  In semi-supervised classification, one is given access both to labeled and
unlabeled data. As unlabeled data is typically cheaper to acquire than labeled
data, this setup becomes advantageous as soon as one can exploit the unlabeled
data in order to produce a better classifier than with labeled data alone.
However, the conditions under which such an improvement is possible are not
fully understood yet. Our analysis focuses on improvements in the minimax
learning rate in terms of the number of labeled examples (with the number of
unlabeled examples being allowed to depend on the number of labeled ones). We
argue that for such improvements to be realistic and indisputable, certain
specific conditions should be satisfied and previous analyses have failed to
meet those conditions. We then demonstrate examples where these conditions can
be met, in particular showing rate changes from $1/\sqrt{\ell}$ to $e^{-c\ell}$
and from $1/\sqrt{\ell}$ to $1/\ell$. These results improve our understanding
of what is and isn't possible in semi-supervised learning.
