What underlies rapid learning and systematic generalization in humans
  Despite the groundbreaking successes of neural networks, contemporary models
require extensive training with massive datasets and exhibit poor out-of-sample
generalization. One proposed solution is to build systematicity and
domain-specific constraints into the model, echoing the tenets of classical,
symbolic cognitive architectures. In this paper, we consider the limitations of
this approach by examining human adults' ability to learn an abstract reasoning
task from a brief instructional tutorial and explanatory feedback for incorrect
responses, demonstrating that human learning dynamics and ability to generalize
outside the range of the training examples differ drastically from those of a
representative neural network model, and that the model is brittle to changes
in features not anticipated by its authors. We present further evidence from
human data that the ability to consistently solve the puzzles was associated
with education, particularly basic mathematics education, and with the ability
to provide a reliably identifiable, valid description of the strategy used. We
propose that rapid learning and systematic generalization in humans may depend
on a gradual, experience-dependent process of learning-to-learn using
instructions and explanations to guide the construction of explicit abstract
rules that support generalizable inferences.
