An Investigation of the (In)effectiveness of Counterfactually Augmented
  Data
  While pretrained language models achieve excellent performance on natural
language understanding benchmarks, they tend to rely on spurious correlations
and generalize poorly to out-of-distribution (OOD) data. Recent work has
explored using counterfactually-augmented data (CAD) -- data generated by
minimally perturbing examples to flip the ground-truth label -- to identify
robust features that are invariant under distribution shift. However, empirical
results using CAD for OOD generalization have been mixed. To explain this
discrepancy, we draw insights from a linear Gaussian model and demonstrate the
pitfalls of CAD. Specifically, we show that (a) while CAD is effective at
identifying robust features, it may prevent the model from learning unperturbed
robust features; and (b) CAD may exacerbate existing spurious correlations in
the data. On two crowdsourced CAD datasets, our results show that the lack of
perturbation diversity limits their effectiveness on OOD generalization,
calling for innovative crowdsourcing procedures to elicit diverse perturbation
of examples.
