State space models for building control: how deep should you go?
  Power consumption in buildings show non-linear behaviors that linear models
cannot capture whereas recurrent neural networks (RNNs) can. This ability makes
RNNs attractive alternatives for the model-predictive control (MPC) of
buildings. However RNN models lack mathematical regularity which makes their
use challenging in optimization problems. This work therefore systematically
investigates whether using RNNs for building control provides net gains in an
MPC framework. It compares the representation power and control performance of
two architectures: a fully non-linear RNN architecture and a linear state-space
model with non-linear regressor. The comparison covers five instances of each
architecture over two months of simulated operation in identical conditions.
The error on the one-hour forecast of temperature is 69% lower with the RNN
model than with the linear one. In control the linear state-space model
outperforms by 10% on the objective function, shows 2.8 times higher average
temperature violations, and needs a third of the computation time the RNN model
requires. This work therefore demonstrates that in their current form RNNs do
improve accuracy but on balance well-designed linear state-space models with
non-linear regressors are best in most cases of MPC.
