Input-Output Equivalence of Unitary and Contractive RNNs
  Unitary recurrent neural networks (URNNs) have been proposed as a method to
overcome the vanishing and exploding gradient problem in modeling data with
long-term dependencies. A basic question is how restrictive is the unitary
constraint on the possible input-output mappings of such a network? This work
shows that for any contractive RNN with ReLU activations, there is a URNN with
at most twice the number of hidden states and the identical input-output
mapping. Hence, with ReLU activations, URNNs are as expressive as general RNNs.
In contrast, for certain smooth activations, it is shown that the input-output
mapping of an RNN cannot be matched with a URNN, even with an arbitrary number
of states. The theoretical results are supported by experiments on modeling of
slowly-varying dynamical systems.
