Learning from various labeling strategies for suicide-related messages
  on social media: An experimental study
  Suicide is an important but often misunderstood problem, one that researchers
are now seeking to better understand through social media. Due in large part to
the fuzzy nature of what constitutes suicidal risks, most supervised approaches
for learning to automatically detect suicide-related activity in social media
require a great deal of human labor to train. However, humans themselves have
diverse or conflicting views on what constitutes suicidal thoughts. So how to
obtain reliable gold standard labels is fundamentally challenging and, we
hypothesize, depends largely on what is asked of the annotators and what slice
of the data they label. We conducted multiple rounds of data labeling and
collected annotations from crowdsourcing workers and domain experts. We
aggregated the resulting labels in various ways to train a series of supervised
models. Our preliminary evaluations show that using unanimously agreed labels
from multiple annotators is helpful to achieve robust machine models.
