Contrastive Reasons Detection and Clustering from Online Polarized
  Debate
  This work tackles the problem of unsupervised modeling and extraction of the
main contrastive sentential reasons conveyed by divergent viewpoints on
polarized issues. It proposes a pipeline approach centered around the detection
and clustering of phrases, assimilated to argument facets using a novel Phrase
Author Interaction Topic-Viewpoint model. The evaluation is based on the
informativeness, the relevance and the clustering accuracy of extracted
reasons. The pipeline approach shows a significant improvement over
state-of-the-art methods in contrastive summarization on online debate
datasets.
