How Open Should Open Source Be?
  Many open-source projects land security fixes in public repositories before
shipping these patches to users. This paper presents attacks on such projects -
taking Firefox as a case-study - that exploit patch metadata to efficiently
search for security patches prior to shipping. Using access-restricted bug
reports linked from patch descriptions, security patches can be immediately
identified for 260 out of 300 days of Firefox 3 development. In response to
Mozilla obfuscating descriptions, we show that machine learning can exploit
metadata such as patch author to search for security patches, extending the
total window of vulnerability by 5 months in an 8 month period when examining
up to two patches daily. Finally we present strong evidence that further
metadata obfuscation is unlikely to prevent information leaks, and we argue
that open-source projects instead ought to keep security patches secret until
they are ready to be released.
