Predicting cardiovascular risk from national administrative databases
  using a combined survival analysis and deep learning approach
  AIMS. This study compared the performance of deep learning extensions of
survival analysis models with traditional Cox proportional hazards (CPH) models
for deriving cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction equations in national
health administrative datasets. METHODS. Using individual person linkage of
multiple administrative datasets, we constructed a cohort of all New Zealand
residents aged 30-74 years who interacted with publicly funded health services
during 2012, and identified hospitalisations and deaths from CVD over five
years of follow-up. After excluding people with prior CVD or heart failure,
sex-specific deep learning and CPH models were developed to estimate the risk
of fatal or non-fatal CVD events within five years. The proportion of explained
time-to-event occurrence, calibration, and discrimination were compared between
models across the whole study population and in specific risk groups. FINDINGS.
First CVD events occurred in 61,927 of 2,164,872 people. Among diagnoses and
procedures, the largest 'local' hazard ratios were associated by the deep
learning models with tobacco use in women (2.04, 95%CI: 1.99-2.10) and with
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute lower respiratory infection in
men (1.56, 95%CI: 1.50-1.62). Other identified predictors (e.g. hypertension,
chest pain, diabetes) aligned with current knowledge about CVD risk predictors.
The deep learning models significantly outperformed the CPH models on the basis
of proportion of explained time-to-event occurrence (Royston and Sauerbrei's
R-squared: 0.468 vs. 0.425 in women and 0.383 vs. 0.348 in men), calibration,
and discrimination (all p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION. Deep learning extensions of
survival analysis models can be applied to large health administrative
databases to derive interpretable CVD risk prediction equations that are more
accurate than traditional CPH models.
