Unbiased split variable selection for random survival forests using
  maximally selected rank statistics
  The most popular approach for analyzing survival data is the Cox regression
model. The Cox model may, however, be misspecified, and its proportionality
assumption may not always be fulfilled. An alternative approach for survival
prediction is random forests for survival outcomes. The standard split
criterion for random survival forests is the log-rank test statistics, which
favors splitting variables with many possible split points. Conditional
inference forests avoid this split variable selection bias. However, linear
rank statistics are utilized by default in conditional inference forests to
select the optimal splitting variable, which cannot detect non-linear effects
in the independent variables. An alternative is to use maximally selected rank
statistics for the split point selection. As in conditional inference forests,
splitting variables are compared on the p-value scale. However, instead of the
conditional Monte-Carlo approach used in conditional inference forests, p-value
approximations are employed. We describe several p-value approximations and the
implementation of the proposed random forest approach. A simulation study
demonstrates that unbiased split variable selection is possible. However, there
is a trade-off between unbiased split variable selection and runtime. In
benchmark studies of prediction performance on simulated and real datasets the
new method performs better than random survival forests if informative
dichotomous variables are combined with uninformative variables with more
categories and better than conditional inference forests if non-linear
covariate effects are included. In a runtime comparison the method proves to be
computationally faster than both alternatives, if a simple p-value
approximation is used.
