A Confidence-Based Approach for Balancing Fairness and Accuracy
  We study three classical machine learning algorithms in the context of
algorithmic fairness: adaptive boosting, support vector machines, and logistic
regression. Our goal is to maintain the high accuracy of these learning
algorithms while reducing the degree to which they discriminate against
individuals because of their membership in a protected group.
  Our first contribution is a method for achieving fairness by shifting the
decision boundary for the protected group. The method is based on the theory of
margins for boosting. Our method performs comparably to or outperforms previous
algorithms in the fairness literature in terms of accuracy and low
discrimination, while simultaneously allowing for a fast and transparent
quantification of the trade-off between bias and error.
  Our second contribution addresses the shortcomings of the bias-error
trade-off studied in most of the algorithmic fairness literature. We
demonstrate that even hopelessly naive modifications of a biased algorithm,
which cannot be reasonably said to be fair, can still achieve low bias and high
accuracy. To help to distinguish between these naive algorithms and more
sensible algorithms we propose a new measure of fairness, called resilience to
random bias (RRB). We demonstrate that RRB distinguishes well between our naive
and sensible fairness algorithms. RRB together with bias and accuracy provides
a more complete picture of the fairness of an algorithm.
