Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs
  In massive open online courses (MOOCs), peer grading serves as a critical
tool for scaling the grading of complex, open-ended assignments to courses with
tens or hundreds of thousands of students. But despite promising initial
trials, it does not always deliver accurate results compared to human experts.
In this paper, we develop algorithms for estimating and correcting for grader
biases and reliabilities, showing significant improvement in peer grading
accuracy on real data with 63,199 peer grades from Coursera's HCI course
offerings --- the largest peer grading networks analysed to date. We relate
grader biases and reliabilities to other student factors such as student
engagement, performance as well as commenting style. We also show that our
model can lead to more intelligent assignment of graders to gradees.
