Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Bias
  Over the past two decades, the notion of implicit bias has come to serve as
an important component in our understanding of discrimination in activities
such as hiring, promotion, and school admissions. Research on implicit bias
posits that when people evaluate others -- for example, in a hiring context --
their unconscious biases about membership in particular groups can have an
effect on their decision-making, even when they have no deliberate intention to
discriminate against members of these groups. A growing body of experimental
work has pointed to the effect that implicit bias can have in producing adverse
outcomes.
  Here we propose a theoretical model for studying the effects of implicit bias
on selection decisions, and a way of analyzing possible procedural remedies for
implicit bias within this model. A canonical situation represented by our model
is a hiring setting: a recruiting committee is trying to choose a set of
finalists to interview among the applicants for a job, evaluating these
applicants based on their future potential, but their estimates of potential
are skewed by implicit bias against members of one group. In this model, we
show that measures such as the Rooney Rule, a requirement that at least one of
the finalists be chosen from the affected group, can not only improve the
representation of this affected group, but also lead to higher payoffs in
absolute terms for the organization performing the recruiting. However,
identifying the conditions under which such measures can lead to improved
payoffs involves subtle trade-offs between the extent of the bias and the
underlying distribution of applicant characteristics, leading to novel
theoretical questions about order statistics in the presence of probabilistic
side information.
