Do We Still Need Automatic Speech Recognition for Spoken Language
  Understanding?
  Spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks are usually solved by first
transcribing an utterance with automatic speech recognition (ASR) and then
feeding the output to a text-based model. Recent advances in self-supervised
representation learning for speech data have focused on improving the ASR
component. We investigate whether representation learning for speech has
matured enough to replace ASR in SLU. We compare learned speech features from
wav2vec 2.0, state-of-the-art ASR transcripts, and the ground truth text as
input for a novel speech-based named entity recognition task, a cardiac arrest
detection task on real-world emergency calls and two existing SLU benchmarks.
We show that learned speech features are superior to ASR transcripts on three
classification tasks. For machine translation, ASR transcripts are still the
better choice. We highlight the intrinsic robustness of wav2vec 2.0
representations to out-of-vocabulary words as key to better performance.
