On the Sample Complexity of Learning Graphical Games
  We analyze the sample complexity of learning graphical games from purely
behavioral data. We assume that we can only observe the players' joint actions
and not their payoffs. We analyze the sufficient and necessary number of
samples for the correct recovery of the set of pure-strategy Nash equilibria
(PSNE) of the true game. Our analysis focuses on directed graphs with $n$ nodes
and at most $k$ parents per node. Sparse graphs correspond to ${k \in O(1)}$
with respect to $n$, while dense graphs correspond to ${k \in O(n)}$. By using
VC dimension arguments, we show that if the number of samples is greater than
${O(k n \log^2{n})}$ for sparse graphs or ${O(n^2 \log{n})}$ for dense graphs,
then maximum likelihood estimation correctly recovers the PSNE with high
probability. By using information-theoretic arguments, we show that if the
number of samples is less than ${\Omega(k n \log^2{n})}$ for sparse graphs or
${\Omega(n^2 \log{n})}$ for dense graphs, then any conceivable method fails to
recover the PSNE with arbitrary probability.
