Stochastic Gradient Estimate Variance in Contrastive Divergence and
  Persistent Contrastive Divergence
  Contrastive Divergence (CD) and Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD) are
popular methods for training the weights of Restricted Boltzmann Machines.
However, both methods use an approximate method for sampling from the model
distribution. As a side effect, these approximations yield significantly
different biases and variances for stochastic gradient estimates of individual
data points. It is well known that CD yields a biased gradient estimate. In
this paper we however show empirically that CD has a lower stochastic gradient
estimate variance than exact sampling, while the mean of subsequent PCD
estimates has a higher variance than exact sampling. The results give one
explanation to the finding that CD can be used with smaller minibatches or
higher learning rates than PCD.
