name: X2
full_form: interface between eNBs
context: are in different blocks of 32 codes and the highest power channel of E-DPCCH & HS-DPCCH is placed on the opposite branch to the DPCCH For SF4, the difference between choosing E-DPDCH codes to be spreading factor efficient and to be PAPR efficient is about 1dB PAPR; PAPR efficient selection could lead to no increase in PAPR compared to HSUPA For SF16, the difference between non PAPR efficient and PAPR efficient code selection is about 1.5dB PAPR Of course, scheduler restrictions may prevent PAPR optimal codes from always being selected Also, it was shown that if control channels & the E-DPDCH are placed on different scrambling codes, then there is no possibility for optimising PAPR.
description: The X2 interface is a communication link between two evolved NodeBs (eNBs) in the Long-Term Evolution (LTE) network. It enables the exchange of control plane information, such as handover requests and responses, between eNBs. The X2 interface plays a crucial role in supporting features like self-organizing networks (SON), where eNBs can dynamically adjust their configuration based on changing network conditions.
explanation: The text explicitly refers to the 'X2 interface' as a communication link between eNBs, which is a characteristic of an interface.
section_title: 6.2.3.2.8.8	Handling of resource status request message in the proxy (the X2 proxy needs to split it?, etcâ¦)
biotag_Context: O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Connection,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Connection,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Parameter,O,O,O,O,O,B-Parameter,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Parameter,O,O,B-Technology,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Parameter,O,O,B-Parameter,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Parameter,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Parameter,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O
biotag_Description: O,B-Miscellaneous,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Technology,I-Technology,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,B-Miscellaneous,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O