The current standard for follow- up of these patients is based on pathological markers (peripheral blood counts and/ bone marrow histomorphology) and molecular markers. Although, bone marrow examination could be considered as a standard gold method as it gives detailed information about cellularity, the morphology of each lineage, a degree of fibrosis, transformation and dysplastic features. However, many patients are reluctant to go for this invasive technique which precludes precise assessment of disease activity at the desirable frequencies. Non- invasive techniques which may act as the good clinical surrogate are lacking.