In industrialised countries, the incidence of SA among adolescents (ages 10-19 years old; 1) is estimated between 7% and 9% (2-3). Thirty percent of adolescents who have made a SA will do it again in the year. It appears that previous SA is "an independent and powerful predictor of futur attempt" (4). Moreover, one of the risk factors to commit suicide is to have made a SA, in particular during year preceding the suicide. To prevent suicide, it is thus important to prevent SA and particularly their recurrence. Research on adolescent suicide attempters focus in general on risk or protective factors (5-7). But despite of the knowledge on these characteristics, the rate of SA recurrence doesn't decrease. So, we have to be creative in the care proposals to limit it. An earlier study concluded that when adolescent suicide attempters were not any more in contact with the care system, they had more risk for SA recurrence (8). These last decades, news ways of care to prevent SA recurrence are developing for adults' suicide attempters on. These news cares may be divided into 2 categories: the "intensive cares" and the "connectedness" care (9). The intensive cares are for example specific therapies as cognitive-behaviour-therapy or dialectical behavior therapy (10-12), partial hospitalizations (13), brief psychological intervention at patients 'home (14)... And with some of these treatments, the rate or recurrence decreased (11-13). The "connectedness cares" are based on the fact of "keeping in touch" with patients and encouraging them to call in case of crises in order to avoid the recurrence. Motto and al. were the pioneer in the field of the connectedness in the 70s through the sending of letters regularly after the suicide attempt (15). It might be also through the sending of postcards (16-17), phone calls (18-19) or SMS (20)… As the intensive cares, these cares may have positive results on the rate of recurrence or on the numbers of recurrences. By the way, these different cares have diverse results depending sex or personality of patients (21). There is so a clinical relevance with the both sorts of cares but the "connectedness" one is easier to use, have a low cost and moreover, seems more appropriate for adolescents. Indeed, the therapeutic alliance with the young patients is not easy to install and an "intensive care" might be prevent them joining the care. Moreover, in another study in Nancy, France, the fact of being lost to follow-up by the caregivers is appeared as a risk factor of recurrence, even in 10-year after the suicide attempt. So, the fact of "keeping in touch" with adolescents after a suicide attempt is very important and they probably could accept easily this idea through one media they often use: short message system (SMS). There are yet some MobilHealth programs for adolescents as for adults in other specialties with good results (22-24).