user47: While minifigures may be the 'correct' term, I've never come across anyone who uses that term, instead, everyone uses minifigs, and as such the tag should be renamed. Thoughts? 

user-1: The official product line is LEGO Minifigures and it's not an obtrusively long tag or question title, so I have to disagree - minifigures rather than minifigs. It also works better for search. A search for minifig will match minifigure but not the other way around.

47: <p>While <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minifigures" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;minifigures&#39;" rel="tag">minifigures</a> may be the 'correct' term, I've never come across anyone who uses that term, instead, everyone uses <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minifigs" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;minifigs&#39;" rel="tag">minifigs</a>, and as such the tag should be renamed. Thoughts? </p>
 -1: <p><a href="http://minifigures.lego.com/en-us/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">The official product line is <em>LEGO Minifigures</em></a> and it's not an obtrusively long tag or question title, so I have to disagree - <code>minifigures</code> rather than <code>minifigs</code>. It also works better for search. A search for <em>minifig</em> will match <em>minifigure</em> but not the other way around.</p>
