user56: In the interests of feeding my taxonomy OCD, I was looking at the current part-identification tag, and felt its use was a little haphazard:
We have about 17 items tagged "Part Identification", compared with 74 tagged "Identification".
For some added context:

15 questions are also tagged with sets asking about Set Identification (especially after I added that to a few others)
13 questions are only tagged Identification (note that the query is running on an archived dataset which takes a while for that to update with the changes I made to clean up some of the questions)
5 questions are only tagged "Part Identification"

Currently our "Piece Information" wiki states:

Use identification for questions about unknown pieces or sets.


Do you think "Part Identification" stands on it's own?
Do we need something else to help distinguish "part identification" from "set identification"?
Should we create a similar "Set Identification" tag and remove "sets" from those questions instead?
If we create "Set Identification" should we then retire "Identification"?


user-1: I think we should rather change our definition of identification and move questions to the proper spot. Perhaps even remove straight-up identification and instead do part-identification and set-identification, both of which exist.

56: <p>In the interests of feeding my taxonomy OCD, I was looking at the current <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/part-identification" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;part-identification&#39;" rel="tag">part-identification</a> tag, and felt its use was a little haphazard:</p>

<p>We have about 17 items tagged "Part Identification", compared with 74 tagged "Identification".</p>

<p>For some added context:</p>

<ul>
<li>15 questions are also tagged with <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sets" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;sets&#39;" rel="tag">sets</a> asking about <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sets+identification">Set Identification</a> (especially after I added that to a few others)</li>
<li>13 questions are <a href="http://data.stackexchange.com/bricks/query/154062/questions-with-only-one-tag" rel="nofollow noreferrer">only tagged Identification</a> (note that the query is running on an archived dataset which takes a while for that to update with the changes I made to clean up some of the questions)</li>
<li>5 questions are only tagged "Part Identification"</li>
</ul>

<p>Currently our "<a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/tags/piece-information/info">Piece Information</a>" wiki states:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Use <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification&#39;" rel="tag">identification</a> for questions about unknown pieces or sets.</p>
</blockquote>

<ol>
<li>Do you think "Part Identification" stands on it's own?</li>
<li>Do we need something else to help distinguish "part identification" from "set identification"?</li>
<li>Should we create a similar "Set Identification" tag and remove "sets" from those questions instead?</li>
<li>If we create "Set Identification" should we then retire "Identification"?</li>
</ol>
 -1: <p>I think we should rather change our definition of identification and move questions to the proper spot. Perhaps even remove straight-up identification and instead do part-identification and set-identification, both of which exist.</p>
