user6174: I noticed that there a lot of questions that mention a "part library", but we don't have a tag like "part-database" or "parts-library" to include those.
We have a set-database tag, but that doesn't seem to fit since parts are not sets.  Am I missing something or is there an opportunity for a useful tag here?
I got started on this while trying to find better tags for jncraton's question.  I don't think we have enough on 3D rendering for a tag that specific yet, but the "parts-database" aspect of it seems worthy of a tag to me.
I prefer "part-database" for consistency with "set-database", but "parts-library" is how people seem to use it and should at least be an alias if not the primary tag.

user708: That makes sense to me. I like part-database with parts-library as an alias.

6174: <p>I noticed that there a lot of questions that mention a <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/search?q=part+library">"part library"</a>, but we don't have a tag like "part-database" or "parts-library" to include those.
We have a <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/set-database">set-database tag</a>, but that doesn't seem to fit since parts are not sets.  Am I missing something or is there an opportunity for a useful tag here?</p>

<p>I got started on this while trying to find better tags for <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/9841/is-the-a-current-source-for-the-lgeo-parts-library">jncraton's question</a>.  I don't think we have enough on 3D rendering for a tag that specific yet, but the "parts-database" aspect of it seems worthy of a tag to me.</p>

<p>I prefer "part-database" for consistency with "set-database", but "parts-library" is how people seem to use it and should at least be an alias if not the primary tag.</p>
 708: <p>That makes sense to me. I like part-database with parts-library as an alias.</p>
