user6: Are questions related to megabloks and similar products on-topic?
I ask because the site is bricks.stackexchange.com, but the logo is LEGO ®

user-1: I've asked one, so let's find out! I've got another one coming up too.
(I think yes, any brick-building toys should be allowed, regardless of compatibility with a LEGO product line.)

user47: I would say:
Yes
It would be ridiculous if there existed another se site for brick building toys other than Lego, so welcome one and all.
In related news, we should change the title of the site to Brick Overflow, instead of LEGO®. This would match our domain better too.

6: <p>Are questions related to <a href="http://www.megabloks.com/" rel="nofollow">megabloks</a> and similar products on-topic?</p>

<p>I ask because the site is <code>bricks.stackexchange.com</code>, but the logo is <code>LEGO ®</code></p>
 -1: <p>I've asked one, so <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/26/are-nanoblocks-compatible-with-other-building-bricks">let's find out!</a> I've got another one coming up too.</p>

<p>(I think yes, any brick-building toys should be allowed, regardless of compatibility with a LEGO product line.)</p>
 47: <p>I would say:</p>
<h1>Yes</h1>
<p>It would be ridiculous if there existed another se site for brick building toys <em>other than Lego</em>, so welcome one and all.</p>
<p>In related news, we should change the title of the site to <strong>Brick Overflow</strong>, instead of <strong>LEGO®</strong>. This would match our domain better too.</p>
