text:
Can't take the cold nights and the long winters anymore? Well, try the trendy wall mount electric fireplace. While there are other options for providing heat such as heat fans and radiators, people often prefer the wall mount in their homes. So, what makes them very popular? A best wall mount electric fireplace is not only a great source of heat and warmth but also adds a taste of style to any room. Its beautiful, pulsating flames simulate the waver and gleam of a real fire to create an impression of a standard, authentic fire.
An electric wall mount fireplace is a must in any modern home. It requires little maintenance when compared to a traditional fireplace. It runs through electricity hence no more cleaning up the ashes and venting of the gasses and smoke produced. Depending on the mood in the room, you can set the fire flames from quite soothing to roaring flames.
Having a wall mount fireplace at home makes your room attractive. It doesn't require any particular installation. Just mount it on the wall and plug it into a standard power outlet. Then sit down and relax while you enjoy curling up in a fire all night long.
Top 10+ Wall Mount Electric Fireplace Reviews & Comparison Chart 2018
Jump to right section
- Top 10+ Wall Mount Electric Fireplace Reviews & Comparison Chart 2018
- PuraFlame Galena Black 36-inch Remote Control Portable Wall-mounted Flat Panel Fireplace Heater
- Moda Flame Houston 50″ Electric Wall Mounted Fireplace in Black
- AKDY AZ520AL (Series AZ 520A) Wall Mounted Electric Fireplace – Heater Firebox
- Best Choice Products Large 1500W Heat Adjustable Electric Wall Mount & Free Standing Fireplace Heater with Glass XL
- Moda Flame 50″ Cynergy Pebbles Stone Built-in Wall Mounted Electric Fireplace
- Warm House VWWF-10306 Valencia Widescreen Wall-Mounted Electric Fireplace
- Classic Flame 47II100GRG Felicity 47″ Wall Mounted Infrared Quartz Fireplace
- Gibson Living Soho 35 Inch Curved Log Wall Mounted Electric Fireplace
- Giantex 35″ Xl Large 1500w Adjustable Electric Wall Mount Fireplace
- Garibaldi Heating 50 inch Electric Wall Mounted Fireplace
- Ivation 50 inch Wall Mounted Glass Electric Fireplace
- AKDY® 36 inch LED Wall Mount Electric Fireplace
- How we compiled these best wall mount electric fireplace reviews
- What solution does a better wall mount electric fireplace offer?
- How to compare the best one that suits your need
Take a look at a glance, here are the top 12 wall mount electric fireplace reviews and comparison chat 2018. Compare the features, price and choose the best one that suits your budget.
|Model Name
|Check Price
|PuraFlame Galena
Editor Choice
|38 lbs
|Check Price
|Moda Flame Houston
|Moda Flame
|Check Price
|40.6 lbs
|Check Price
|Best Choice Products Large
|Best Choice Products
|30 lbs
|Check Price
|Moda Flame Cynergy Pebbles
|Moda Flame
|39.7 lbs
|Check Price
|Warm House VWWF-10306
|Warm House
|41.8 lbs
|Check Price
|Classic Flame 47II100GRG
|52.4 lbs
|Check Price
|Gibson Living Soho
|Gibson Living
|38 lbs
|Check Price
|Giantex 35″ Xl Large
|20 lbs
|Check Price
|Garibaldi Heating 50 inch
|Garibaldi Heating
|75.8 lbs
|Check Price
|Ivation 50 inch Wall Mounted Glass
|39.7 lbs
|Check Price
|AKDY® 36 inch LED Wall Mount
|43.5 lbs
|Check Price
PuraFlame Galena Black 36-inch Remote Control Portable Wall-mounted Flat Panel Fireplace Heater
- Uses an LCD remote control
- Produces 12 multi-color combination flame effects
- Easy to install
- Includes a thermostat for added safety
- Doesn't create enough visual ambiance
The gorgeous 36 inch PuraFlame Galena is a perfect fixture for your home. Its polished black finish adds a bold statement of style to any room decor. The glass front panel matches with the exterior frame, making this unit a great showpiece. In fact, your friends will wish they had one for themselves.
You can choose to set it up as a wall hanging mode or a free standing mode. And with heat or no heat, this unit is capable of producing attractive, realistic flame effects. You can even change the brightness and intensity of the fire with the included LCD remote control. This multi-functional remote runs on 2 AAA batteries and the control panel has to use the remote. With this remote, you can quickly adjust any setting on this fireplace.
Colors are eye-catching and a good combination of colors creates a memorable image in our brains. The PuraFlame Galena fireplace includes LED back-lights that turn on alternating 12 multi-color combinations to create that effect. Moreover, you will enjoy up to 4 levels of LED flame brightness cycles.
Click here to View 147+ Buyer Reviews
This is a unit that requires no gas or oil. It is energy efficient and smokeless thus making it Eco-friendly. Installing it is not a hassle and its smooth and quiet in its operation. The PuraFlame Galena also includes a 1350W fan heater to warm up a room up to 400 square feet.
For added safety, this fireplace integrates a thermostat. It automatically senses when the heater is overheating and auto-shuts it off. This maintains the fireplace at the optimum room temperature. If you often forget to switch your fire off, just use the timer set it to shut automatically off from 30 minutes to 9 hours, thanks to the featured timer.
Moda Flame Houston 50″ Electric Wall Mounted Fireplace in Black
- Operates with or without heat
- Comes with a 3-stage remote
- Heats a room of a maximum size of 400 square feet
- No venting required
- Forms particles inside the glass
For an innovative solution for indoor fireplaces and home heating, look no further! The stylish and elegant 50 inch Moda Flame Houston is what you need. It is an attention-grabbing centerpiece that comes in white or black to harmonize with any of your rooms decors. The Moda Flame Houston is a charming fireplace that offers a life-like visual effect without taking up your physical space. The hearth mimics a real fire burning to provide an effortlessly cozy atmosphere in your house.
What can beat the feeling that you get from a welcoming, cozy fireplace in summer or winter? With the Moda Flame Houston, you get to enjoy the ambiance and look of your fireplace with or without heat up to 4-seasons. The fan-forced heater produces up to 5,200 BTUs for heating up room space of not more than 400 square feet.
Click here to View 228+ Buyer reviews
For added protection, this unit integrates a thermostat. The idea behind it is that when overheating occurs, the thermostat detects this change in temperature and automatically switches of the fireplace. This ensures that the Moda Flame Houston only heats your room at a specified temperature.
A multifunctional hand-held remote is a convenience you will sure enjoy. It lets you choose between 3 settings; flame-only, high or low heat effect. This wall mount fireplace has an automatic shut off feature. Hence, you can program anywhere between 30 minutes to 7.5 hours for an auto-shut off.
The Moda Flame Houston requires no gel, ethanol, wood, gas or chimney hence making it eco-friendly. Wall mounting hardware is included hence making it easy to set up unit. You will also find a clear glass for viewing the glowing embers and the rolling flames. At a 36-inch clearance, you can mount your flat screen TV and enjoy watching your favorite program in a warm surrounding.
AKDY AZ520AL (Series AZ 520A) Wall Mounted Electric Fireplace – Heater Firebox
- Easy to install
- Easy to operate; buy the push of buttons
- Produces realist image
- Includes an on and off remote control
- Doesn't produce much heat
The AKDY AZ520AL is a great addition to your house. It has especially been designed to set the mood of any room. This slim wall mounts electric fireplace, is undoubtedly a great conversation piece for your visitors or between strangers. It is what we would describe as aesthetics-wise a great design, beautiful colors, and a refined finish. You will not have to choose function over looks because this creates a right balance between the two.
The AKDY AZ520AL is not only about looks. Besides stirring your senses and spreading a holiday cheer, it is a good source of supplement heat. It comes with 2 heat settings; high and low for adding some warmth is your abode. Better yet, you can place it anywhere; bedroom, living room, office, etc. with an existing hearth.
Click here to view 104+ Buyer Reviews
You will find the AKDY AZ520AL interesting for its impressive, realistic flame image, log set, and ember bed. In its package, there is a remote control for adjusting most settings, e.g., turning the unit on or off, etc. This heater is easy to use and operate. By just the push of a button and you have it up and running.
The model is easy to install and requires no assembly. Once out of the box, mount it on the wall and plug it into a 120v power outlet to enjoy. Since it is a small wall mount electric fireplace, relocating it is not a hassle. With this baby around, you will enjoy warm winter seasons.
Best Choice Products Large 1500W Heat Adjustable Electric Wall Mount & Free Standing Fireplace Heater with Glass XL
- Energy efficient
- Beautiful and modern design
- Cool to the touch
- Produces realistic looking 3D flames
- Doesn't come with a mounting bracket
Who doesn't love to get 2 for the price of 1? The gorgeously designed Best Choice Products Large comes as a free standing or wall mounted design. In fact, it is one among the few affordable wall mount heaters worth of praise. Speaking of affordability, the Best Choice Products Large sells for just a couple of dollars. Well, at a price tag below 200 bucks for its features, this unit is a bang for your bucks!
If you are environmentally conscious, then this fireplace will astound you. It is very energy efficient and doesn't emit gasses. This electric fireplace wall mount comes with 2 heat settings; high and low. A remote control comes in handy to adjust these settings and also the flame effects. You can also turn the Best Choice Products Large on or off from the comfort of your couch or bed.
At the front of this unit is a cool to the touch elegant glass. This means that your kids and pets are safe playing around it. The exterior is made of high-quality stainless steel that gives it's a glossy black finish. This look complimented by the stunning tempered glass panel, make this unit irresistible to the eye.
Click here to view 157+ Buyer Reviews
Integrated with the new smart 3D flame technology, all you have to do is sit down and relax to its vibrancy. This technology produces the most realistic flames to create an illusion of an authentic fireplace. Enjoy a highly practical experience at the units glowing, smoldering amber bed together with soothing heat output.
All you ever wanted in an electric fireplace, has been integrated into this unit. The Best Choice Products Large will make any of your rooms heavenly and heat it up during cold nights and days.
Moda Flame 50″ Cynergy Pebbles Stone Built-in Wall Mounted Electric Fireplace
- Smokeless and ventless
- Includes a remote for convenience
- Comes with wall mounting hardware
- The timer can be set to shut it automatically off
- Noisy while running
You will not find a fireplace as good as the 50 inch Moda Flame to add a touch of class and vibe to your room. It has the state of the art design that matches perfectly with any modern decor. Moda Flame has a perfect length that is proportional to its overall structure. This, together with its sleek design makes this unit a sight for sore eyes.
Place it in any room that is not more than 400 square feet and enjoy the warmth. It produces realistic flames that are well complemented by the beautiful pebble style. This makes the Moda Flame Cynergy one of the most revolutionized hearths is the market.
There is a fan-forced heater with three settings, high, low and no heat. With the no heat setting, you can enjoy the view of beautiful flame effects all year round. A handheld remote included in the package lets you adjust the heat and flame settings to your liking. You can also use it to turn the unit on or off from anywhere in the room.
Click here to view 53+ Buyer Reviews
When it comes to installing Moda Flame Cynergy, it will take a few minutes of your time. The package also includes a wall mounting bracket and is fully assembled. All you have to do is take it out of the box and recess it on the wall.
This sleek wall mounts electric fireplace is completely smokeless and vent free. It doesn't require gas, stove, gel cans, chimney, ethanol or mantle. Hence, making it perfect for either a traditional or modern home.
If you are afraid of extra expenses at the end of the month, this unit is exactly what you need. It is energy and cost efficient since it runs on low power. Even more, the Moda Flame Cynergy has a timer for auto-shutting off this unit anywhere between 30 minutes and 7.5 hours.
Warm House VWWF-10306 Valencia Widescreen Wall-Mounted Electric Fireplace
- Great looking
- Easy to install
- Easy to use and operate
- Produces a substantial amount of heat
- There is a Styrofoam that forms on the glass
The Warm House VWWF-10306 makes a great addition to any house. If words could describe this fireplace, perfection, quality and precision would be make up the long list. It comes fully packed with a full set of features that you will sure love. This fabulous widescreen wall mount hearth produces a stunning flickering effect with heat on or not. The flames glow gloriously to create a remarkable ambiance in winter or summer.
With a remote control, you can brighten or dim the fire intensity to the mood of your room. One interesting thing you will love about this fireplace is that all its effects are natural, no backlighting. There are LED energy efficient and long lasting four bulbs for illumination.
Click here to view 69+ Buyer Reviews
The tempered glass is heat resistant and cool to the touch. This fireplace produces thick fire logs to create a glowing fire effect that simulates a real fire burning. Thus, every glance on this unit is very relaxing and soothing. You can even choose from the three heat options: high, low or no heat. And if your room's space is up to 400 square feet, you will not help but appreciate the warmth produced.
Once out of the box, use the mounting hardware that comes with the package to set it up. The VWWF-10306 will transform any of your rooms into a luxurious getaway. You can even have a romantic dinner with your loved ones around the romantic setting this unit creates.
Wall Hanging Electric Fireplace makes a stunning addition to your home decor. This widescreen wall-mounted fireplace comes with dual heat settings and a built-in timer.
Classic Flame 47II100GRG Felicity 47″ Wall Mounted Infrared Quartz Fireplace
- Produces flame with or without heat
- Includes a heater rated at 5,200 BTU for supplemental zone heating
- The slim-lime remote control adjusts virtually all settings
- Energy efficient
- Flames look faux
The Classic Flame 47II100GRG is a fascinating masterpiece that will create a heavenly atmosphere in any of your room. This unit is 47 inch and will let you maintain a moist and safe atmosphere in your home. The best part is that it is ventless, and you don't require gas lines, chimney or even oil.
Hung it on the wall and add an extra style to your room. If you like, you can also place in it the free standing mode using the included stand. With heat on or not, you will enjoy the view of pulsating rolling flames all year round. Besides, this unit is not all about beauty. It is an incredible source of supplemental zone heating for a room space of up to 100 square feet.
Click here to view 62+ Buyer Reviews
The Classic Flame 47II100GRG use the infrared heat technology. This innovative technology maintains your room at a natural humidity within the air. In turn, it results in the moist and comfortable heat without drying the inside air. There is a thermostat that controls this unit 3 infrared quartz elements.
Depending on your preference, with the Spectrafire you can choose from the three blue flame brightness options. The decorative LED sidelight is one feature that you will most definitely love. It glows with five stunning color choices; Blue, Amber, and Blue, Amber, Color cycling and off.
Gibson Living Soho 35 Inch Curved Log Wall Mounted Electric Fireplace
- Can operate with heat on or not
- Smokeless and Ventless
- Includes a remote control
- Comes with a wall mounting hardware
- Doesn't produce enough heat for a large room
Add vibrancy to your room with Gibson's newly released fireplace, the Soho Curved Log. Install this 35-inch fireplace in your office, living room or bedroom and make your friends envy. Out of the box, this hearth is unbelievably striking. Its exterior is elegantly refined with a black polish to add a focal point in your room. The Soho Curved Log lets you enjoy varying ambient lighting effect by choosing either a log or pebbles. Its flame effects are undoubtedly excellent, and they offer enough light in the dark.
This fireplace is rate with 5,200 BTUs of heat capable of heating a medium sized room. It is powered by electricity thus making it both cost and energy efficient. This model lets you choose from 3 heat settings: high, low or no heat with flame only. It produces beautiful, dancing realistic flames that simulate those of a real traditional fire to set the mood for your room.
Click here to view 38+ Buyer Reviews
The Soho Curved Log is Ventless and smokeless. You will use it without the need for a chimney, gel or mantle. It is also eco-friendly and danger-free hence your loved ones are safe around it. When it comes to efficiency, this is a fireplace that you can count on.
Along with the package is a wall mounting bracket. This black 35-inch wall mount comes pre-assembled. Therefore, installing it is almost effortless. Just recess it on the wall and you are ready to go. With a 24 inch clearance, you can mount your flat screen TV and enjoy curling up around a fire as you watch your favorite movie. Use the remote included to control the flames and heat output from the comfort of your couch.
Giantex 35″ Xl Large 1500w Adjustable Electric Wall Mount Fireplace
- Use the remote to turn it on or off
- Integrated safety mechanism, i.e., overheating and tip over protection
- Easy to install
- Good looking
- Noisy fan
Style and warm up the cold spots in your home with the Giantex 35″ Xl Large. This masterpiece is subtle yet beautiful and will add sophistication and character to your room. You will not get any better fixture that is functional and adds vibe in your house.
Use this fireplace to warm your dining room, living room or bedroom. It is a small wall mount fireplace. Thus you can easily relocate it. Even in the summer, take the opportunity to relax while watching its mesmerizing flames without heat on. Besides providing supplemental heat, the 35 inch Giantex Xl Large is an excellent decoration piece in any house.
You won't have to worry about smoke filling your house. You don't even need to hire wood chopping professionals. All this is possible because this unit runs on electricity thus making it 100 percent energy-efficient. It doesn't produce gasses or pollutants thus leaving your environment clean.
Click here to view 29+ Buyer Reviews
Set the Giantex Xl Large up in just a few minutes. Fit it anywhere on the wall with the included wall mounting hardware. Once installed, use the remote control to adjust the flames intensity and heat output. You can choose to use either high or low heat depending on your room's temperature. Have a view of changing the flame effects from soothing, calm flames to a roaring fire.
The Giantex Xl Large cares for your safety by automatically shutting off when it senses overheating and tip over. You can now fall asleep while watching its pulsating flames knowing that your hearth is smart enough to shut automatically off. Having this fireplace in your room effortlessly enhances its ambiance and consequently making it attractive.
Garibaldi Heating 50 inch Electric Wall Mounted Fireplace
- Quiet flames
- Remote control for adjusting heat and flame settings
- Easy to install
- Cool to the touch
- Flames don't look real enough
Create a memorable impression of your house to your visitors with the 50 inch Garibaldi Heating wall mounts fireplace. Hang this piece on your room's wall in less than 10 minutes and let it do the talking for you. The Garibaldi Heating hearth will effortlessly offer a cozy ambiance perfect for any occasion.
Install it in your office, living room, basement, kitchen or bedroom and share your experience with your friends. You will never believe what this fireplace is capable of until you try. The Garibaldi Heating eliminates the mess associated with a traditional fireplace. All year round, relish a warm environment coupled with a beautiful view without the hassle of clean up or burning smell.
Safety is one primary factor you can't evade considering when buying appliances. That is the reason why the Garibaldi Heating makes sure to pass the test on this one. Its front control panel glass never gets home, making it ideal if you have pets. There is also an overheat protection mechanism that shuts this unit off senses an abnormal change in temperature. You can also program your fireplace to time out after a specified period after which it automatically turns off.
Click here to view 27+Buyer Reviews
Just like most fireplaces, this model doesn't require chimneys or vents. It also doesn't operate on gas, gel cans, propane or ethanol. Instead, it is powered by electricity. If you like, you can mount your flat screen TV with a 24-inch clearance above your heater.
Adjust your flame effects and heat settings using a remote control. When the temperatures are high, switch off the heat and increase the flame intensity for an exotic surrounding. In the cold nights and winter seasons, turn on the heat and warm your room's space up to 300 square feet.
Ivation 50 inch Wall Mounted Glass Electric Fireplace
- Stunningly beautiful
- Has many controls and an ergonomic remote control
- Adjustable heat settings
- Durable mounting hardware
- Short power cord
Do you want to add an item to one of your rooms but space limits you? Well, the 50 inch Ivation fireplace is a masterpiece that will let you realize how much space you have been underutilizing in your house. If you thought that only paintings and some good artwork could bring a whole new meaning to you wall, it is time to prove yourself wrong.
To get started, mount this unit on the wall. Then sit down and relax to the warmth and ambiance of a dazzling fireplace. This unit offers you luxury and effortless enjoyment because it doesn't require gas, firewood or venting.
The Ivation electric fireplace is ideal for both modern and traditional home designs. Meaning that unit will harmonize perfectly with any home décor. It is sleek and has a perfect length that fits well on the wall.
Since this fireplace produces realistic LED flames, you are always guaranteed of a smoke-free and odorless environment. And depending on what you like, you can choose from 3 heat settings. Summers couldn't be any fun. For scorching days, this fireplace lets you use the no heat flame only option to enjoy every moment.
Click here to view 18+ Buyer Reviews
In the winter months and breezy, chilly nights, you can make use of the fan forced heater. It is capable of evenly distributing heat to a room's space that is not more than 250 square feet. Using the multifunctional handheld remote, you are able you control nearly all the settings. You can switch it on or on, adjust the heat, flame and brightness intensity of your faux fire.
If you fall asleep quickly and forget to switch this unit off, the timer comes as your savior. Set it up to 7.5 hours to automatically shut off. Better yet, you can mount it below your flat screen TV and enjoy the moment.
AKDY® 36 inch LED Wall Mount Electric Fireplace
- Automatically shuts off in case of emergencies
- Has a sleek and attractive design
- Lets you choose from 3 heat settings
- The remote control is small for convenience
- It is well built but heavy
The AKDY LED has been built with perfection and precision in mind. The 36-inch wall mounts electric fireplace will transform your house into a small paradise. This unit offers a contemporary feel and touch and will blend well with any decor.
Get a chance to delight in its realistic simulated gorgeous flame with a log set. Set it up in your bedroom, dining room or bedroom and brighten the mood. Speaking of installation, it is very easy. You will not require any special tools or a professional. Once out of the box, hang it on the wall and plug it into a standard power outlet.
Click here to view 58+Buyer Reviews
The star of the show boasts of a patented 3D flame technology. Its front glass does not get hot hence your kids are safe around it. When the unit senses Tip Over or overheating, it uses its safety mechanisms to shut off the machine automatically.
If you like to conserve the environment, then you will appreciate this fireplace. Just like all electric fireplaces, the AKDY LED does not emit pollutants and emissions. Thus making it eco-friendly and 100 percent energy efficient.
With a fully functional handheld remote control, you can adjust the flame intensity and heat options to your liking. Besides, you can also choose from the three flame effects levels: high, medium and low.
How we compiled these best wall mount electric fireplace reviews
Our customer satisfaction is our top priority. Determining the best quality products for our customers is our leading principle. Having done a small survey about people's shopping habits, we were able to conclude that customers want the best affordable items. Keeping that in mind, part of our team engaged consumers through questionnaires and interviews to give their opinions on different electric fireplaces.
From the list of 100+ fireplaces, we were able to narrow it down to the 12 best-rated wall mount electric fireplace. Our reviews are thoroughly researched and meticulously tested to give an honest review for each product. Besides, we not only concentrate on the products pros but also its downside. Therefore, you are guaranteed of the most informative and quality opinions of each fireplace.
What solution does a better wall mount electric fireplace offer?
A wall mount fireplace is the perfect choice for anyone on premium space or has limited space in their house. This hearth is usually compact and doesn't occupy your rooms physical space. Typically, they are mounted on the wall hence making them a safe alternative if you have pets and children.
Wall mount fireplaces offer a realistic flame effect and a glowing ember bed to create a cozy and welcoming ambiance in your home. Most come with a multifunctional remote for controlling the heat and flame effects. Hence, making it easy for you to adjust virtually any setting from anywhere in the room. A wall mount fireplace is a balance of performance and style. They are a great solution for setting up a striking bold statement in your room.
Related 12 Top Rated Best Electric Fireplace TV Stand Reviews
How affordable and worthy are the best wall mount electric fireplace
Affordable is a relative word. What you may find affordable may be expensive to someone else. So, you may ask, how do you define the price tag on a wall mount electric fireplace? Let me explain. These hearts cost as least as 200 bucks up to more than 1000 dollars. When it is time to buy an electric fireplace, always stick within your budget. Regardless of the unit, you pick, it will always serve you best. Of course, don't ignore the fact that the more expensive it is, the more the features hence better performance. However, how well you take care of your hearth determines its life span.
Which wall mount fireplace will be the best choice for you?
The Moda Flame Houston 50″ Electric Wall Mounted Fireplace is the best pick on our list. It costs a few bucks, and anyone who doesn't want to dig deep yet wants a great addition, should consider this one. It was quite competitive to picking the best of the best fireplace but eventually we settled on the 50 inch Moda Flame.
What makes this fireplace score highest amongst the 12 best-rated fireplace is its packed set of features. For a hearth in its class, it is doing more that great. It lets you mount a TV above it with a clearance of 36 inches. It is environmentally conscious and energy efficient. This fireplace is an excellent fixture that should miss in any household.
How to compare the best one that suits your need
There are various of factors to consider when buying an electric fireplace. The primary factor is the budget. Fireplaces cost as high as 1000 dollars hence you will need to determine how much you are willing to spend on one. After budget comes features and functions. Well, it would be right to say that this factor goes in handy with the cost. A fireplace that is highly priced tends to have more features and better performance than a low-end unit.
Related Best Electric fireplace stove reviews 2018 – Top 10 on users choice
You don't want to buy a fireplace that has all you wanted but is very difficult to operate. It is of paramount importance purchase a product that is user-friendly. Choose a fireplace with adjust-ability features and a control panel for convenience.
The best wall mount fireplace is one that can adequately heat up your room. If your room space is large, you might want to consider the heating capacity of 1000 square feet. Otherwise, 400 sq feet will do fine. The best wall mount fireplace is one that matches your needs.
Final Verdicts
If you are looking for a best wall mount electric fireplace, you can choose from the aforementioned list. Either of the 12 walls installed hearths has been meticulously tested and reviewed. Each of these fireplaces will create a bold and unique style on any of your rooms.
A fireplace will create a cozy ambiance environment every time you turn it on. You will even have an opportunity to enjoy flame effects without heat on. With a fantastic fireplace, you might not even tell the difference between the summer and winter season.


text:
Monday, May 21, 2007
Cold Hard Flash
My video artist statement is featured today on the ultra-great animation blog, Cold Hard Flash. The video was created by Evan Sussman and I provided the characters and animation.
Posted by Dave Schlafman at 10:57 AM
No comments:
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Cruise Control and Accidents
Since first becoming standard features on cars in the 1980s, cruise control has become so popular that virtually every car today comes with the feature. Cruise control has a number of benefits which make driving easier and less stressful. However, as with virtually all automated systems, the fact that cruise control takes away some of the control the driver has over the car can be inherently dangerous. Cruise control has been linked to a number of otherwise easily preventable accidents.
If you have been injured as the result of a cruise control-related accident, it may not be your fault. To learn more about how an experienced car accident attorney can help you get the compensation you deserve following your accident, contact the Wisconsin cruise control accident attorneys of Habush Habush & Rottier S.C. ® today by calling 800-242-2874.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Cruise control has a number of benefits, namely:
- Decreasing driver fatigue
- Reducing the likelihood of being issued a speeding ticket
- Increasing fuel efficiency
Unfortunately, cruise control also has several disadvantages which can present dangers to motorists, including:
- Cruise control encourages drivers to pay less attention to driving, increasing the risk that they'll be in an accident.
- Automating speed control means that it takes longer for a driver to respond to changing road conditions. Cruise control systems have contributed in the past to drivers losing control on turns or curves in the road.
Contact Us
If you or someone you love has been injured or worse in a car accident caused by a cruise control system, you may not be at fault. Contact the Wisconsin auto accident lawyers of Habush Habush & Rottier S.C. ® today by calling 800-242-2874 to learn more about how we can help you.


text:
The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points
The intentional ban on hunting whales shoud be lifted
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
|Voting Style:
|Point System:
|7 Point
|3 years ago
|Post Voting Period
|855 times
|Debate No:
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (6)
Votes (0)
I will define intentional as deliberately done, ban as a Marine Mammal Protection Act, whales as the marine species of mammal, and lifted as repealed or waived.
The weighing mechanism for this round is going to be indigenous culture; the judge should vote for the team that best represents the Natives of America's voice within this round, because it allows for an understanding of whaling practices beyond modern Eco-conservatism.
The first observation is the Makah Tribe.
The Makah Tribe is an group of American Natives who have cultural roots in hunting grey whales as a means of sustenance(Stevens 12). Recently due to the Marine Mammal Protection Act, also known as the MMPA, the tribe's whaling rights have been revoked and several of their members arrested by Coast Guard officials. This act violently silences the voice of the Makah people, because it attempts to whitewash their culture without regarding their input. This sustains colonial violence and sovereign domination that plagues native land by:
1. Revoking a practice that they use to sustain themselves
2. Erasing their culture, despite it being non-violent and eco friendly, more on that later
3. Violently apprehending their people without for seen warning.
I isolate two impacts.
First is sovereign violence.
This whaling ban repeats colonial violence that was present in the trail of tears and the biological warfare that we have harassed Native Americans with. This type of sovreign violence in which we, as outsiders, force our belief onto a non-normative group results in genocide and violence which can be seen in both the natives resistance to Manifest Destiny and the natives resistance to the MMPA. Further more this exact colonialism makes economic exploitation and eco-racism inevitable(Sciullo 8'). This form of violence must be rejected under the weighing mechanism because it makes the Indigenous voice invisible by reaping from them their culture and their belief systems.
The second impact we isolate is poverty
Makah poverty is high right now due to their inability to whale, however allowing the continuation of their whaling practice would boost their native economy, alleviating poverty(D'Costa 5'). This alleviation of poverty would increase education, allowing for more Native scholars to present the voice of the indigenous people. Thus under the weighing mechanism you have to reject poverty because it subverts the Indigenous voice by taking away their access to education. We can never gain the ability to access the Indigenous mind if we never can hear them.
My Second Observation is legalism.
Legally the Makah Tribe has the right to whale under the Treaty of Neah Bay(Stevens 12'). Despite their legal ability to hunt whales the MMPA is still being used to justify silencing their voice through violence, for example coast guard arrests, surveillance, and police violence. Thus the MMPA, the ban at hand, is being used to circumvent our legal recognition of Indigenous voice and must be rejected on face for sustaining colonial violence, go ahead and cross apply our impact of eco-racism and economic exploitation from our first observation.
My third and final observation is solvency.
Firstly repealing the MMPA wouldn't harm the environment due to population resiliency, if the population dips it will rise again(D' Costa 5'). That means their is no reason to take narratives of Eco-apocalyptism to evaluate. Not only that, but only the Makah Tribe is really into hunting whales in the Atlantic and they take a max of twenty whales a year, which means their will be no adverse environmental effects to worry about. And in the Pacific whaling is capitalized on by Japanese which means there will be no room for poachers to get there hands in to the business.
Secondly the pro acts on a rhetorical level by attacking the sovereign violence of colonialism by preserving the Indigenous voice. That is key to evaluating this round.
Resolution: The intentional ban on hunting whales should be lifted.
As you defined it "I will define intentional as deliberately done, ban as a Marine Mammal Protection Act"
So, therefore you have to convince the audience that we should lift the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and I will be arguing that we should keep the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
"The weighing mechanism for this round is going to be indigenous culture; the judge should vote for the team that best represents the Natives of America's voice within this round, because it allows for an understanding of whaling practices beyond modern Eco-conservatism." I disagree, the weighing mechanism for this round should be who speaks best for the greater good of the world.
Now onto your first impact: "This type of sovreign violence in which we, as outsiders, force our belief onto a non-normative group results in genocide and violence" This would be a possible outcome if we were a few hundred years back in history. This, however is not the case. This impact is overblown and is outright unrealistic. This is also proved by the fact that the ban has been in place for a long time, yet no genocide or mass violence has taken place.
Next: "Makah poverty is high right now due to their inability to whale" If this truly is the case, we can not reasonably be blamed, we are not stopping them from adapting nor changing.
Onto legalism
"Legally the Makah Tribe has the right to whale" No they don't actually. They lost it with the MMPA.
Now onto offcase
DA: International law
International law is strong and it helps us keep the peace. (MacCallum 14). If we remove the MMPA act we weaken international law which hurts international relationships and will be detrimental to our ability to keep the peace. When we lose our ability to keep the peace tensions, political instability and a possibility for war become very real (Weeramantry and Burroughs 05).
DA #2 Whales!
The MMPA was put into place for a reason. It is needed to protect the marine ecosystems and specifically gray whales.
Right now the population of gray whales is recovering thanks to the MMPA act, but if we remove the act the whales will be put at a serious risk, for they are still vulnerable. (Mulvaney 13) If the MMPA act was never put in place the population would be extinct. We need the act in place for the very reason to keep the gray whale population, and many other populations alive. (Jenkins and Romanzo 98) We need to protect whales for a few reasons. 1. They are so critically important to the ecosystem, for they recycle nutrients and allow the ecosystem to thrive. 2. Whales reproduce very very slowly, so if we do not protect them we risk losing them. (Zelko 13). Losing whales would be very bad because we would lose a very important part of the ecosystem. This is capable of causing a domino effect leading to a moderate to severe environmental collapse. Some believe that this could result in extinction, but whether you believe it will go that far or not, what you can't deny is that this cause some very severe impacts. This includes harming the fishing industry and hurting food supply for many people from all over the world.
CP: Make an exception for the Makah tribe without lifting MMPA. If the tribe's practice is as harmless as you say we can keep the act in place while making one exception without causing any harm. This Counter-plan solves for all of your impacts while avoiding all of the DA's I have.
Now back onto Framework: Within your framework I believe I should be considered the winner, for I spoke for the Makah people and other people from different cultures, because they would be harmed by harm or destruction to the ocean ecosystem. If I am not winning than I should be tied with you.
However in my framework I am the clear winner, because I speak for what is best for the human race as a whole, while you only speak for a small percentage on the population.
First let's look at the weighing mechanism.
The weighing mechanism goes virtual dropped by the con, meaning you as the judge are going to have to weigh the round in the terms of indigenous culture. While the con does say that the weighing mechanism should be who speaks best for the greater good of the world they provide no brightline for why this is substantially better than my weighing mechanism. This weighing mechanism is in fact inherently worse for natives because, it flood out there voice. When you have to speak for the entire world, the Native voice will not be heard over the voice of the white majority. Thus you lean pro on the weighing contention.
Next let's move into the CP.
1. This CP is abusive to the pro, because it avoids the role of the con. The con states specifically that they should prove to the judge why we should not lift the MMPA, but this CP cherry picks which parts of the MMPA are good and bad, which makes it impossible for the affirmative to win. If we are going to make this a debate in which both sides have decent ground to argue on you are going to have to reject the CP out right on abuse claims.
2. Perm do both: Do the pro and if any negative effects pursue do the CP; this solves any real offense on the CP anyways.
3. Historical Erasure DA- This CP exemplifies the rotten, corrupt legal system that erases history by still attempting to whitewash the Treaty of Neah Bay. This further promotes the exact colonial violence that the aff and the CP oppose and is not only a solvency deficit, but is also a disadvantage to the CP.
4. Native marginilization DA- The CP marginalizes other native groups by assuming that only the Makah want whaling rights; while the affirmative does isolate the makah in our impacts we will defend our ability to solve for all natives.
Thus in retrospect the CP actually further hinders the Native voice by undermining the Native groups and whitewashing a history of violence that lies within the legal system.
Next let's move onto to the IL DA.
1. International Sea law is not high right now in the U.S. because of our failure to sign the Law of the Sea Treaty that would bolster International maritime law. Thus the DA has no real impact, because International Law is already low.
2. MMPA hurts International law, because it is a federal law that is not in coincidence with any other world power like Japan and Russia that actually exemplify whale hunting. Thus the DA would trigger its own impacts.
Next let's move onto the Whales DA.
It is game over for the con on this argument, because they drop critical arguments from my last speech that cover the DA already.
1. Repealing the MMPA means no harm to the environment, because whale populations, especially the grey whale, are naturally resilient. That means there won't ever be a sever dip in whale populations. They concede this, it means you aren't going to be accepting any answers to it in future speeches.
2. Only Natives are really into hunting whales anyways and they take at max 20 a year. That means there is hardly any actual impact to whale populations and their internal link story is defunct. They also concede this, it means you aren't going to accept any further argumentation on that.
3. Grey whales aren't a keystone species that means a domino effect is impossible. No impact to the DA.
Let's go ahead and move onto case.
First on solvency; the entire solvency contention goes conceded so you are going to assume that the pro's rhetorical resistance to colonialism solves best for the weighing mechanism. This is game over for con because they have conceded that pro solves best for the weighing mech.
Let's move onto sovereign violence.
They say that the MMPA has not caused any genocide and violence and genocide can not occur because we are in a post colonial setting, however the MMPA is used to exclude natives from an economic opportunity, whaling, which causes them to starve and be exploited by other means, not only that but we commit genocides still to this day against native populations and it is the fact that their voice is no heard that we don't recognize this. We literally dump nuclear waste on native reservations which gives the cancer and countless other complications. A slow genocide is the worst genocide.
Onto poverty
They say we aren't stopping Natives from adapting or changing, but this statement further marginalizes the native voice. It shows that con doesn't care about native culture and in fact would rather have it done away with so that they can "adapt" that triggers all the impacts of the pro.
Onto legalism
Con concedes that under the Treaty of Neah Bay, which was never repealed, that tribes have a whaling right. That means we win this entire contention hands down. MMPA doesn't justify Indian giving. Pro wins because pro preserves the Indigenous voice.
We should still weigh this round on who speaks for the greater good of all people. We should weigh this round this way because the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. I speak for all people including Native Americans. Pro only speaks for native Americans which is a small percent of the population.
" this CP cherry picks which parts of the MMPA are good and bad, which makes it impossible for the affirmative to win. If we are going to make this a debate in which both sides have decent ground to argue on you are going to have to reject the CP out right on abuse claims." I am going to argue that the CP is not abusive and the fact that I can use the CP is on you, for you could have easily made the resolution specific to if the Makah should be allowed to whale or not. You could have easily avoided this situation, but did not and that is your fault. Therefore you should be given no lenience on the CP for you put yourself at a disadvantage and all I did was take advantage of it.
You wholly concede that the CP would solve for both of our offense and the only argument you have against it is abuse.
Whether the CP is abusive or not the judges should still vote for it, because it is better than the plan. Abuse should not be taken into account, because the Pro was allowed to write the resolution. This means he could have shaped it to be about the Makah and not about the MMPA, therefore any disadvantage my CP gives is entirely Pro's fault and responsibility. We should not give him any break or any lenience on abuse for something that is entirely his fault.
You defined the resolution as we should repeal and remove the MMPA, and you need to prove that we should do that and that the MMPA is bad itself. I am only going by your definitions.
You still have plenty of ground to argue because you can still talk about why the MMPA is bad.
"Perm do both" You can not do both because the resolution and the counter plan are competitive and would not work together.
" This CP exemplifies the rotten, corrupt legal system that erases history by still attempting to whitewash the Treaty of Neah Bay" This is not true, because the CP is actually helping to restore the agreements with the treaty and does nothing to erase it's history.
"The CP marginalizes other native groups by assuming that only the Makah want whaling rights" You only talked about Makah rights, so I did exactly the same. Saying my only talking about Makah rights is wrong is outright hypocritical and should not be taken into consideration.
Now onto the Whales DA
1. "especially the grey whale, are naturally resilient" False, as I proved before whales are not resilient and at risk by my Mulvaney 13 evidence, because they reproduce slowly.
2. "Only Natives are really into hunting whales" This is not true. There are many other hunters and people from other countries who hunt whales such as the Japanese. Also If you look at this article here: http://www.livescience.com... you will see that the MMPA has worked in protecting marine life.
3." Grey whales aren't a keystone species that means a domino effect is impossible" As proved by my Zelko 13 evidence whales are critically important to ocean ecosystems. Also whales keep ocean ecosystems running (Zimmer and Ferrer 07).
Because of this a domino effect is not every very possible but almost inevitable if whale populations were to collapse.
"They say that the MMPA has not caused any genocide and violence and genocide can not occur because we are in a post colonial setting, however the MMPA is used to exclude natives from an economic opportunity, whaling, which causes them to starve and be exploited by other means, not only that but we commit genocides still to this day against native populations and it is the fact that their voice is no heard that we don't recognize this. We literally dump nuclear waste on native reservations which gives the cancer and countless other complications. A slow genocide is the worst genocide." There really is no proof or evidence to any of this actually happening. Considering it is allowing the Makah to whale won't change any of this.
Let's break this down, we aren't saying it is bad to speak for everyone, but when it comes to the MMPA the Indigenous voice is particularly useful, because they are the group that is marginalized most by the decision. Not only that but my opponent drops the fact that if we speak for everyone we drown out the voices of minorities. Obviously a black minority wouldn't be represented very well in a white majority. Considering that settler-colonialism is still a widely accepted mind set the marginalized group in this circumstance would never get their voice out in the framing of the con.
Let's move onto the CP.
1. They argue the CP is not abusive, because I wrote the resolution, however this is fundamentally wrong. If I had framed this debate as only the Makah Tribe I would have been abusive; the way the topic is framed allows healthy middle ground for both the pro and con such as whaling disads and cultural kritks. Arguing that I should have made the topic narrow would have just forced a ground shift in the opposite direction. You are still rejecting the CP on abuse, because it simply cherry picks which parts of the MMPA are good and bad, positing my opponent between pro and con. Because they aren't actually assuming the role of con I can not have a fair debate on the CP.
2. We aren't going for the perm or the Native marginalization DA you can drop these.
3. Wholly extend across the flow the Historical Erasure DA. Even if you don't buy the abuse theory this is going to be the CP's fatal flaw. The say that the CP helps to restore the treaty of Neah Bay, but it obviously doesn't; read the CP text it is just to allow exceptions for the Makah in the instance of the MMPA. This is bad because it completely disregards the fact that the MMPA shouldn't even be necessary for the Natives to whale; you can consult our legalism observation here. Also BIG DEAL here they drop the impact story, so that means you buy that the CP further promotes colonial violence that is used to silence the Native; consult out sovereign violence impact. This is a solvency takeout to the CP and a DA to the con.
Let's move onto the Whales DA.
1. While the debater seems to think they have proved whales are not resilient, resiliency isn't just about reproduction speed and is actually more about adaptability. At the point in which the con hasn't proven that grey whales are bad at adapting you err pro. If you really want good evidence on this check out D'Costa 5' here http://www.animallaw.info...
2. They make the mistake of bringing up an article to show that the MMPA is working. This article actually talks about how whales are actually still endangered in U.S. water by numerous things such as disease, ship noise, and depleted food. This is going to wind up favoring pro, because it shows that the impact to the DA will occur regardless of the pro side winning.
3. We will concede more than just Natives hunt whales.
4. The problem with their domino effect argument is that it assumes grey whales are keystone species when in fact they aren't. Many other species of whale such as hump back, and sperm whales are considered keystone, but never grey whales, because they aren't a big enough power player in the marine world. This means the impact of the DA is impossible and there is no way you are considering it at this point, because it is just more Eco-apocalyptism.
Let's move onto case.
They only respond to one point of defense which is going to prove a tragedy for the con here.
They say:
1. There is no proof any violence is actually happening, but we isolate economic exploitation in which natives are forced to endure jobs outside of their culture to sustain living poverty, and nuclear wast being literally dumped on Native ground--If you really need proof look to Yucca Mountain, the biggest waste depository in the U.S. which also happens to be Native Land.
2. They say pro can't solve, but refer to out solvency contention that by rejecting the colonial violence of the MMPA on a rhetorical level we gain solvency for all imperialistic violence against Native. They concede that so that is going to be a pretty big deal. That being said even if you don't buy that We still solve at least economic exploitation through our first contention so you err pro on case.
Because they drop the entirety of case it shows the cons attempt to omit the Native voice which proves detrimental under both framings because it shows that they don't care for the Native voice or everyone.
Conceding case is also going to be game over for the con, because it means you HAVE to give pro access to all in round offense, such as economic exploitation, genocide, and poverty. Ultimately we remain holding the only standing internal links to offense, which means you vote pro on presumption if not anything else.
Thank you for this wonderful opportunity. I really enjoy it.
"Not only that but my opponent drops the fact that if we speak for everyone we drown out the voices of minorities" You seem to be ignoring the fact that I have spoken for the Natives just as much as you have with the CP. Also by speaking for everyone we are not just speaking for the majority. By everyone I mean everyone. By speaking for everyone I speak for minorities as well as majorities. This is a better framing model than your framing model because 1. My framing INCLUDES the indigenous people, and not just the Makah. 2. You leave out countless other minorities while I speak for all of them.
Now onto the CP
1. Idk why you use the word they, I'm only one person... I think. Now onto seriousness. "They argue the CP is not abusive, because I wrote the resolution, however this is fundamentally wrong. If I had framed this debate as only the Makah Tribe I would have been abusive". Well no, you wouldn't be abusive. You wouldn't be abusive because anyone who would accept the debate would be 100% aware of what they would be debating, therefore the debate would be completely fair.
In other words calling abuse on CPs is rather ridiculous in this model for debating because you can write the resolution however you want. If you leave a loophole that's your fault. If your opponent takes advantage of that loophole that's no one's fault but your own.
You also claim I am abusive because " it simply cherry picks which parts of the MMPA are good and bad, positing my opponent between pro and con.". Well that's true. I do pick the good parts of the MMPA and say we should keep that and say we get rid of the bad parts. However you are wrong that I am in-between pro and con, and here's why.
Resolved: The intentional ban on hunting whales shoud be lifted.
You defined this as The MPAA should be removed.
I am fulling on the con side to that. I am working within con ground in a way that fixes the problems you have as your advantages. That is not abusive. You gave me this amount of ground and I am simply working with it.
Onto that Historical Erasure DA.
Well with all due respect this DA is a little ridiculous. You are suggesting that by keeping the MMPA in place we are erasing history of a past treaty. 1. Even if this were true there is no impact. One treaty being forgotten will not cause any serious issues, therefore it's not a very valid DA. 2. My CP is not going to be erasing any history. 3. If anything my CP is actually restoring history rather than erasing it. This is because by allowing the Makah to whale I am restoring the action done during the Treaty.
Most importantly 4. Your argument here is outright hypocritical. You say that my CP hurts the natives because the CP shouldn't even need to be done. Well the same exact thing can be said about your plan. By your logic your plan should not need to be done so you promote colonial violence.
Now onto the Whales DA.
1a. While reproductive capability may not be the only important thing it is still critically important especially for species being hunted. You say that they are resilient because they can adapt. Well guess what no species has ever, throughout the entirety of history, adapted to advanced human hunting. If humans hunt the animal faster than they can reproduce, the species will become extinct no matter how well it can adapt.
1b. The evidence you give doesn't really support what you're saying. It just talks about the Makah and their whaling rights.
2. This doesn't actually show that, what it shows instead is that the species is endangered and at risk, and is only kept alive because of the MMPA. The article also talks about how the MMPA is causing previously endangered species to rebound and recover.
3. The thing is you have brought up no evidence that says Grey whales are not keystone species. But if you look at this source here you will see that they are: http://www.rewildingbritain.org.uk.... So because of this a domino effect is very possible.
4. More species than just Grey whales will be hurt.
Onto case
It is important to note that Pro admits and concede that the CP solves for all of this while avoiding my DAs
1. You still have failed to give any proof that this is both 1. Real, a reliable source would do this. 2. Maliciously intended due to racism.
2. You say this gives you solvency on a rhetorical level. The thing is having something on a rhetorical level does nothing. It does not solve any real issues. While you may help some of the economy you make it worse due to the whaling DA.
3. You say that I "don't care for the native voice" This is proven to be false because of my CP. If I didn't care about natives I would not have made the CP.
You should reject their offense because it is either 1. Overblown. or 2. Will have a very small impact 3. My CP solves for it all. 4. The impact to my DAs outweigh Pro's offense by miles.
Thank you for this debate. I rest my case.
First off my opponent seems to have completely misinterpreted my argument here;
1. If we speak for everyone minorities will not have the overwhelming voice they need; the indigenous minority is important in this instance because it is the minority that is marginalized. Empirically when we give everyone the chance to speak the people with the bigger voice drown out the people with the softest voice that is why you prioritize the indigenous voice. ANy other weighing mechanism forces them into the position of the subaltern.
2. Also the move by my opponent to finally bring up a bright line and define why their weighing mechanism is better is totally abusive, because it means I can not answer the weighing mech debate until to late in the debate. I said you can't accept this argumentation in my last speeches, so you are going to default pro on this flow.
3. They also say the CP speaks for the Natives best, but it really doesn't with the Historical Erasure DA on the flow, but more on that in a bit.
Onto the CP.
1. I use the word they to preserve word count and avoid gendered pronouns, which I disagree strongly with.
2. Just because we are writing a resolution, doesn't mean that all abuse is avoided. The main claim for abuse we are going to extend here is that the con is cherry picking only the good parts of the MMPA that means if anything they are assuming a role nearest to the pro side, that kills all of my ground. They define in the first round that they will defend that repealing the MMPA is bad, however there CP repeals the bad parts of it. That sounds like a pro argument to me...
3.The biggest reason you aren't voting for the CP though is on the historical erasure DA.
a. They say no impact, but this MMPA is just another act of whitewashing our history; Andrew Jackson's Indian Giving is the exact same thing. The con basically says "We can take away certain things if we give them back in other ways, right?" This is the logic of settler colonialism that leads to economic exploitation in poverty. You must reject that on moral grounds if anything.
b. They the CP isn't erasing history without giving warrants. That is the same thing as dropping the link entirely that means you believe this DA one way or another. And obviously MMPA is just another way of erasing the history of the Treaty of Neah Bay. The MMPA is passed and the Indians get reduced rights to whaling rather the government just honoring a treaty that was never overruled. Extend legality across the flow-- I win hands down on this flow.
c.They say they are restoring history, but they aren't. The trail of tears "restored the Natives land", but just led to reduced Native voice. I am not buying it and neither should you.
d. They say my arguments are hypocritical, but this is really non-responsive. Just cross apply the entire aff here. I obviously want the best for the Native voice and the fact that they erase history with the da means that they lose theri helping natives.
e. Also they drop that this is a huge solvency defecit to the CP and a disad to the con that means they can't win the CP regardless.
Now onto the Whales DA
1. They assume animals can't adapt fast enough, but algae which was nearly eradicated by humans in some forms learned to generate energy near volcanic vents, and species who have had low dips go of the radar and reappear decades later with new traits. That proves adaptability we win the DA had no uniqueness.
2. What the article actually says is that not even the MMPA can stop certain forms of environmental degradation that means the impact of the DA can't be stopped. The con doesn't solve a slew of things mentioned in the last round.
3. All that evidence says is that this keystone species practically dissipated 400 years ago that just further proves that there is no domino effect. That is literally the first thing the article say. 400 years.
Onto Case
1. We don't concede CP solves for case, that has been explained on the CP flow.
2. They say rhetoric doesn't solve anything, but that is a middle finger to all natives. That essentially is saying racism doesn't matter because you can't solve all instances. We do err pro.
3. The CP only further proves the negate Native voice
4. They say reject our offense because it is overblown and ridiculous, but this is insanely oppressive to Natives. Native oppression is never overblown and racism is never a small impact. Reject them based on blatant racism.
5. They say the DA outweighs, but give no impact calc once again we need a brightline for why. Obviously sovereign violence of tens of thousands of Natives outweighs the death of a few whales which can't be prevented.
6. Also I don't speak just for the Makah that is coming out of round 2.
That means hands down I win the round because I am the only one extending any offense from the first round. You have to side with the indigenous voice.
1. My argument for the weighing mechanism is we consider and address all groups' problems equally. You seem to think I come at this from a utilitarian standpoint, but I am not necessarily saying we view all the people as people with equal problems, but rather the groups as equal. This is a better weighing mechanism than yours, because we take into account the voices off all minorities while you do that with just one minority.
2. Me explaining this is completely fair. You have 5000 characters to explain why yours is better and instead of doing that you wasted them on explaining why you can't explain why yours is better. This argument should be disregarded off.
Now the CP
2. Yes it does. There is no abuse with resolution, because your opponent has the full choice to accept it or to not accept it. If you made a resolution only about the Makah that's no abusive, because no one HAS to accept the debate and if they do they fully accept what they will be debating. It's a similar instance. You gave me an advantage with the resolution and all I'm doing is taking advantage of it. That's not abuse, and if it's anyone's fault it's yours so you should be given no lenience.
3. a. The biggest logical fallacy here is the MMPA does no harm to the Makah if we give the Makah the right to whale. By doing this we are not erasing any history and are in fact helping preserve it.
b. You have given no warrants either so this argument should be disregarded off. Again, if we restore the Makah's right to whale which my CP is suggesting the MMPA is restoring the Treaty of Neah Bay and is not erasing any history.
c. By restoring the Makah's right to whale we are restoring the history of the Treaty of Neah bay. You have not proven or given any logical argument as to why restoring their right to whale is erasing history and not restoring it.
d. This DA is hypocritical because you say that the CP erasing history because we are restoring the Makah's right to whale. That is what your entire argument is trying to do, therefore the entire DA really doesn't make any sense and should be disregarded of.
e. I did not drop that this is a huge solvency deficit. I did not drop it because I stated and proved that we are not erasing history.
Whales DA
1. The example of Algae should be disregarded of because algae and whales are so incredibly different. You're partially right, some species do come close to extinction and then rebound. But even more species go straight to extinction and never rebound. The species that go extinct are often species that are hunted to extinction. If Gray whales continue to be hunted they will likely end up extinct.
2. That's really not true. While it is true the article mentions there are other issues like disease and food shortage it does not say that they will certianly drive the gray whale into extinction so Pro's argument here is pure speculation.
If you read this quote here: "More than 40 years later, a new report shows that the law has been effective: It not only prevented extinctions that seemed imminent, but also helped some species bounce back in strong numbers, researchers say." You will see that the article clearly supports my claims that the MMPA has helped prevent species from going extinct. Pro has done nothing to combat this so you can conclude that the MMPA has, in fact, helped marine mammals.
3. The date of disappearance refers to in the area. The evidence has not disappeared. The vast majority of your claims with the DA are pure speculation and you have no evidence for any of them.
Onto case
1. This argument is based on the History Erasure DA, but I have given plenty of reasoning as to why that DA is irrelevant.
The CP solves for all of Pro's offense, because all of it is based around the Makah's right to whale. My CP gives them exactly that, therefore Pro has no offense because I solve for all of it.
2. That's not what I said at all. I said you don't come close to solving what you claim to solve for. You claimed that by giving the Makah the right to whale you rhetorically solve for all instances of colonial violence. My argument is that doesn't mean anything, because you aren't actually solving for anything.
3. By making a plan to restore the native's right to whale this isn't true at all. I am completely taking the native voice into account.
4. The reason I say your offense is overblown and ridiculous, is well, because it's overblown and ridiculous. I am not saying racism is not relevant, but claiming that giving the Makah the right to whale solves for all racism against the natives is ridiculous.
5. The DA outweighs because if it's impact happens everyone will be tremendously effected. Your impact effects a small amount of people while my impact effects everyone.
Pro does not win the round, and I should because of the CP solving all of his offense and the whales DA.
Truly great debate.
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by tejretics 3 years ago
Posted by TheJuniorVarsityNovice 3 years ago
May I ask who you feel is winning at this point?
Posted by tejretics 3 years ago
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.


text:
Been feeling a little burned out after focusing so hard on the Red Cape image last week so I've just been moving back and forth between different pieces. I also picked up a new Wacom pen, and have really been enjoying it. Over the last few months I've found that if I push myself too hard my wrist starts to get rather sore, and my entire hand quickly follows. After last week I was ending each day not because I was done, but because I couldn't properly hold the tablet pen anymore, and it was causing me a great deal of pain to try. While comparing my sketching pencils with my pen it dawned on me that the grip pen that comes standard with the intuos 4 is oddly large (wide). After a little research I learned that the problem is fairly common, and that an easy solution was to pick up the Wacom Classic pen. So I did (man I love Amazon). Since it arrived on Wednesday I've been testing it out and I've gotta say it feels way better. My hand isn't nearly as sore after an evening of drawing, and I find it to be a more natural experience, much more in line with holding a pencil or brush pen than the other pen was.
As for the Turtles here, I was having so much fun testing out the new pen that I inked this up start to finish Wednesday night and then colored it Thursday afternoon. I've been dabbling with different compositions for a while now, but haven't really landed on anything I like, so you may see a few more before I start to take things to a more finished level. That said please let me know if you see anything that you're a fan of, as I'm finding this one to be a bit tricky.


text:
Fans of Emily Blunt can now stay in her former home when visiting Los Angeles.
The palatial pad the actress and her husband John Krasinski sold for $2.5 million recently is now being listed as a vacation or business travel rental on website Airbnb.
Visitors who want to stay there can do so for $600 a night.
The mansion features six large bedrooms, a huge patio and a Jacuzzi, as well as views of Hollywood.
The Devil Wears Prada star and Krasinski lived there for a year.


text:
With the warmer weather here, you and many others have possibly laced up sneakers (sorry … running shoes) and started running outdoors.
As beneficial as walking and running can be to your overall health, most runners know that you must pay particular attention to the health of your feet.
Anything from the wrong shoes to trying to run too much too soon can actually do more harm than good when it comes to your feet — potentially leading to injury.
Here's what you can do to ensure your feet are in tip-top shape for running season.
Find the right fit.
Running shoes come in so many styles, brands and colors, you could get hung up on how your running shoes look, but how they fit is the most important aspect of the shoes you choose to run in.
Poorly fitting running shoes can be a real problem for your feet, potentially causing numbness, blisters and calluses.
Some stores offer amazingly cool ways to analyze your particular running gait with video recordings of you running on a treadmill. Bringing in an old pair of running shoes can also help a trained advisor get an idea about what's best for you.
If your shoes are too short for your feet, they can hurt and damage toenails. Shoes that are too narrow in the forefoot can lead to pinched-nerve pain, corns, calluses or bunions. And shoes that are too wide will allow your feet to slide around, causing friction that can lead to blisters.
When you put on a sneaker, the ball of your foot should match where the shoe bends. If you rise up onto your toes with both shoes on and the shoes bend in front of or behind your big toe joint, it's not a good fit for you.
It's also very important to know what type of foot you have when buying new shoes — whether you have flat feet, high arches or neutral feet. Look for shoes that are designed for and accommodate your particular foot type.
If your shoes fit properly, they should feel comfortable and supportive. There should be about a half inch of space between the tip of your longest toe and the end of the toe box. You don't want your shoes to be too tight against the back of your heel either — leave an eighth of an inch of space at the back of your shoes.
Replace worn-out shoes.
Just like your car needs an oil change every 3,000 to 5,000 miles to keep running properly, your running shoes need to be replaced.
The average life of running shoes is approximately 350 to 500 miles, but if you're a heavy runner or your gait isn't as smooth, you may need new shoes sooner. The wear and tear that all those miles put on your shoes causes the materials in them to deteriorate, and, therefore, lose some of their all-important shock absorption.
Some shoes can shrink over time too, especially if you tend to get them wet with excessive sweat or by running in the rain.
Socks are important too.
No matter how well your running shoes fit, socks can make a big difference.
If your socks don't fit properly, they can cause blisters. Wet or cotton socks can also cause blistering.
Look for form-fitting socks made of acrylic materials that won't bunch up or become drenched in sweat while you're running.
Avoid too much too soon.
Despite wanting to train for a race or simply being excited to hit the pavement now that winter is over, running too much too soon can lead to foot injuries.
Trying to get in too many miles without working up to it in smaller increments can lead to stress fractures, plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinitis, and metatarsalgia, which is inflammation of the bones at the ball of your foot.
You may be tempted to clock miles with a long weekend run, but experts say the ratio of that run should never be more than half of your total mileage for the week.
Avoid too much too soon by increasing your weekly distance gradually with no more than a 10 percent increase in total distance per week, according to a sports medicine colleague. Your muscles, tendons and bones get stronger when you run, but you should let them adapt gradually — not to mention your heart and lungs!
Dr. Alfred Casale, a cardiothoracic surgeon, is Associate Chief Medical Officer for Geisinger Health and Chair of the Geisinger Cardiac Institute. Readers may write to him via [email protected]


text:
South Carolina commit "wasn't surprised" with Steve Spurrier's resignation
BATON ROUGE, La. — South Carolina commit Tre Jackson doesn't plan on leaving the program after Steve Spurrier resigned this past Monday.
In fact, the 3-star wide receiver wasn't shocked by Spurrier's decision to step down.
"I actually really wasn't surprised," Jackson told SEC Country. "I've talked to him a lot. He's getting up there. He's 70 years old. I mean, that's a tough job. Like he said, he did it for the better reasons. He wanted things to be more active in recruiting. The new coach get out there more. I respect him 100 percent. He's one of the greatest head coaches in college football history. He's made a lot of progress from Florida to South Carolina. It was a good decision for him. I think the program needs to move on."
Jackson says he remains 100 percent committed and will continue to monitor the coaching situation.
For those who don't know, Jackson tore his ACL earlier in the season. He had surgery on Thursday and should be fully healed before he enrolls at South Carolina.
In the video above, Jackson answers the following questions:
1) His dad, Jack Jackson, the 1994 SEC Player of the Year, was coached by Spurrier at Florida. What was Tre's favorite thing that coach Spurrier told him about his dad?
2) What was Tre's relationship like with Spurrier?
3) What is his relationship like with interim coach Shawn Elliot?
4) What's Jackson's message to Gamecocks' fans?


text:
Last summer, I got married to an amazing man (yay!). While we were planning our new life together, we knew that I didn't want to go out and get a s&b job, but that it would be awesome if I could make a couple hundred a month, just for discretionary spending. I had a Bachelor's Degree in Sociology and had experience building a website for our farm. I knew I loved website and graphic design, but I just didn't know what I could do with it. At the time, I had no idea what a Virtual Assistant was.
I have an entrepreneurial spirit so I knew there was SOMETHING I could do. And I was going to make it happen. I had been writing for a fellow blogger for a few months so, on a whim, I reached out and told her if she ever needed any help with anything else to let me know. She took a chance on me. She hired me for some introductory work and introduced me to several awesome VA groups on Facebook where, get this, people were SELLING CONTENT AND SERVICES. I had no idea that was a thing! People will PAY to have someone run their Pinterest account? Say what?!
So, I took a chance. I posted that I had a couple of spots open for social media management and I immediately got bites. (probably because my rates were so low….I have since learned..lol!)
The week we left for our honeymoon, I had a job making $500/month. I was so excited! I poured my heart into helping my client and she returned the favor by recommending me to other people!
Over the next few months, I started getting clients pouring in. Sure, I posted some services (like exclusive social media graphics), but the majority of the clients were coming from word of mouth.
I could feel myself getting famous!
Okay, maybe not famous, but the workflow was steady and within 2 months, I was making over 3k/month. I was doing all sorts of things: social media management was my number one service. Eventually, my hands were full. I had to hire help and raise my rates to be more competitive. (by the way, the higher the rates, the more people will take you seriously because that shows you have a quality product/service!)
To this day, I get 2-3 new client referrals a week from word of mouth. Not all of those are a good match, but having referrals constantly poor in is amazing.
I hardly do any advertising (I will still do some for small graphics jobs and scheduling jobs).
In February, I made $5,000 (before expenses).
So, what am I doing? How did I get here?
Well, first of all, I have been enormously blessed. There's no way I can take all the credit for this. God has had his hand on my business!
Am I charging outrageous prices? NO. I charge $200/month for management of a social profile (Pinterest, Facebook, Twitter, Etc) and I charge as low as $4 per social media graphic! (I have seen prices in the upwards of $500-$1000/month for social media management)
Do I have my hands full? Yes. But, I recently hired help and that allows me to really focus and drive my business forward.
Do I love it? Yes. It's a job unlike any other- I mean, I can work in my PJ's! Now, there are some tasks that I don't particularly like. But, you have to make a few sacrifices. The thing is, I choose to do those tasks. I don't have to. And you can choose what you want to do/sell!
What services am I offering? This is a question I get asked a lot. Here's the thing- I do anything. Really- I can design a brand new website, place ads, set up email campaigns, schedule your social media or design graphics. If there's ever something I don't feel I can adequately do, I'll let the client know. (honesty is key!)
My most popular services are social media management, graphic design, administrative tasks and web design.
With honesty, great communication skills and quick turnarounds, I have become a VA that people want to recommend.
I don't share these numbers to rub it in your face.
I share it because a year ago, I had NO idea what a Virtual Assistant was. I had no idea how I was going to make money from home, but I knew there had to be some way. I was able to take those most precious months of our newlywed life and not have to worry about going to work. I could turn off my computer whenever I wanted and walk away for the day. I want you to be able to do the same thing.
It's because of this job that my husband and I are able to start travelling full-time starting this summer (I mean, how many newlyweds get to do that!)
Having a remote job that I can do wherever I have internet has opened so many doors in our life, and created a sense of freedom like no other.
So, I encourage you. If you are struggling today trying to figure out how to make some extra money, this is one way you may be able to do it. It's a whole lot of work, but if you have the patience and are good at it, it can really make a difference in your life!
If you have any questions at all about becoming a VA, please let me know so I can try to help you!
Want some resources to jump start your VA career? Here are a couple books I've heard great things about! (click on an image to see the product)
Latest posts by Alexandrea (see all)
- How I Made 5k Last Month As A Virtual Assistant - March 8, 2017
- How To Use Board Booster Like A Pro - February 23, 2017
- Photoshop Basics Tutorial: 5 Tools to Get You Started - November 9, 2016


text:
Utah Real Estate
Thank you for taking the time to visit the "Real Estate With Tierra" website! I specialize in assisting buyers and sellers in your area as well as across the entire Wasatch Front! My website contains ALL listings from ALL Real Estate Agents, there's no need to look anywhere else for your next home!
Please feel free to explore the website and if you have any questions, would like to see a home in person or to discuss your home's value, please give me a call today! Please feel free to see my reviews on Zillow.com from past, highly satisfied clients by clicking the link below.
If you're looking to SELL or BUY, contact me to get your homes value and see how much I can SAVE YOU! I DON'T compromise my value or my services to my clients EVER! I simply help, direct and make sure their best interest are ALWAYS covered with the results they want!
Tierra McGonegal, Realtor, ABR, PSA, AHWD


text:
Send me an email
If you want to get in touch with me, you can do so on this page. I've setup a contact form down below. Please send me your messages, as I would love to hear from my audience. Let me know if you have any kind of questions about the pipe organ. I will do my best to answer them as fast as possible.
Fans of the website can also subscribe to my newsletter, if you want to receive my newsletters, that I try to send out on a weekly basis. As for the other social media accounts, I'm not into that kids, sorry. I might create a Facebook profile, if this website becomes more popular, but don't hold your breath. This website is still the best place for you to get in touch with me.


text:
Gotta love October. I mean with delicious Oktoberfest brews rolling out, pumpkin spice and candy corn laced munchies, crisp fresh weather, and people dressing up like ghosts, goblins, or even
Wicked October Vaporizer Giveaways: 4 Chances to Win Pens and Portables
Facebook Giveaways: E-Juice And Vape Pen Cartridges!
UPDATE: We've decided to continue these giveaways through January! With our vaporizer giveaways every Friday being such a blast we started doing daily giveaways of e-juice to all our Facebook fans out there. Now for the holiday season we are throwing in extra bonus giveaways in addition to the e-juice to show our love and […]
Sharing The Love: E-Juice A Day Giveaways!
UPDATE: We have decided to continue our daily e-juice giveaways through November! Get involved here! We have been getting some great prizes in the hands of our loyal Facebook friends every week. Well, lucky for you, we felt once a week just wasn't enough.
Facebook Giveaways: 4 New Concentrate Tool Prizes!
UPDATE: Check out our daily e-juice-a-day giveaways all through August! With a bunch of our Facebook friends already enjoying some sweet giveaways they were lucky enough to win, it's time for even more winners!
Facebook Giveaways: Win New Concentrate Tools Each Week
We just recently announced our newest giveaways for the months of June and July with 8 vape pens going out, one each week. But why stop there?


text:
Teen's body pulled from popular Georgetown pond
Friends ID victim as 17-year-old from Lawrence
The body of a 17-year-old boy was pulled from a popular Georgetown pond Saturday afternoon.
Fire officials in Beverly said four divers were sent to the Pentucket Pond at American Legion Beach after the unidentified Lawrence boy was reported missing.
"I thought he knew how to swim," a friend of the victim said. "He wanted to swim deep with me. I said, 'OK. Let's go.' The next thing you know, he said he was drowning. I turned around, and he was gone. Under the water."
His body was found a short time later.
"By the time I got to him, when they found him, I felt for a pulse. I couldn't find a pulse," witness Hillary Scheffreen said. "He was freezing. I put my hand on his chest. I closed his eyes, and I gave him a blessing. It was all I could do."
Friends of the victim said they are planning a vigil Saturday night to honor his memory.
It's unknown how long the victim was under water before being found.
No other information was immediately available.


text:
GreatAuPair has helped over 1 million families and caregivers find their ideal match. Here's what people have to say about our services.
Write your own review Caregiver Reviews Family Reviews
We found our au pair in less than one month of posting our job and she is awesome with our twins! I love that we were able to connect using this site. :)
"My experience on GreatAuPair has been surprisingly easy and I was able to find a family within a few days of setting up my account! Would defi..." more
Au Pair, Mollie of Findhorn, Scotl,
Aug 05, 2018
"Even though I didn't pay a membership, I still found GreatAuPair.com helpful and easy to use. "
Au Pair, Alex of Saltillo, Coahuil,
Aug 01, 2018
"GreatAuPair is a very useful tool. I found many eligible families straight away and had to make the very difficult decision of choosing betwee..." more
Nanny, Magdalena of Paris, Ile-de-,
Aug 01, 2018
"GreatAuPair gave a very good service either for the job seeker or care service seeker. I was using it for years and it helped me find a good e..." more
, ALFIANA SHOFIA of Jakarta, Jakar,
Jul 31, 2018
Tweed Heads, Australia
Live-in, Full- or Part-time
Oct 2018 - May 2019
Antequera, Philippines
Live-in or Live-out, Full Time
Nov 2018 - Jul 2020
Manasquan, NJ
Live-in or Live-out, Full- or Part-time
Aug 2018 - Sep 2018
Create your free profile. Post jobs for the help you want. It's fast, safe and easy. Sign up.
Find candidates with our fast, flexible search. Send secure, private emails. Search.
Get background checks, online interviews & references. Be informed, hire smart. Subscribe.
GreatAuPair, LLC
12600 Hill Country Blvd
Suite R-275
Austin, TX 78738
© Copyright 2001-2018 GreatAuPair, LLC. All Rights Reserved.


text:
Fr. Spadaro, S.J.: Pope Francis Thinks The Ten Commandments Are Optional
Pope Francis thinks that the Catholic Church can no longer issue general rules that apply to all people, according to Jesuit Father Antonio Spadaro.
During an October 6 address at Boston College, Spadaro claimed therefore that, according to Amoris Laetitia, people living in "irregular" family situations, such as divorce and remarriage [adultry], "can be living in God's grace".
Spadaro denied the existence of "a rule that is absolutely to be followed in every instance". And, "It is no longer possible to judge people on the basis of a norm that stands above all."
With such claims Spadaro implies that there are cases when murder, child abuse or genocide are morally acceptable and even praiseworthy.


text:
Live radio streaming. Plans from just €3 per month!
Plus, check out these great features:
Icecast v2
Up to 256 kbps
Easily scalable
Port 80 enabled
Free setup
Priced from just €3 per month
Want more? We're bringing out new features all the time!
Fat Cat Streaming uses the best of breed Icecast v2 servers built on a rock-solid Linux platform.
We have active monitoring 24/7 to ensure we can offer the best uptime stats.
Our sign up process could not be simpler. Select your plan, make payment, begin broadcasting.
We offer free email-based support with all plans.


text:
by Tana Frank
(Evansville, IN, USA)
I make children's hairbows, accessories, tutu's, bottlecap necklaces and bows, baby gift items, woven headbands in many 3-4 sizes, and many other children's boutique items. All hairbows are hand sewn and fray checked, and made with excellent quality. I am willing to travel up to 50 miles.
Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Indiana Vendors.


text:
In May of 2016, the Communication and Optimal Resolution (CANDOR) toolkit was released by Medstar under the direction of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The toolkit contains power points, videos and other resources to help participating hospitals communicate and resolve medical errors with patients and their families. While such an initiative comes as no surprise as the next logical step to compliment patient and family-centered care, it is of little consolation to patients who are seeking information about their loved ones from hospitals that continue to practice deny and defend strategies in order to avoid accountability for medical error. In order for this new initiative to be successful, Communication and Optimal Resolution (CANDOR) needs regulatory oversight.
Although the principles of CANDOR are sound, the shortcoming that undermines its success is voluntary participation in the program. No oversight of the implementation of CANDOR's basic principles is equivalent to no accountability. Hospitals may report that they are participating in CANDOR, but in fact, they may be actively practicing deny and defend strategies when it comes to conflict resolution. Health care institutions may choose to settle a case outside of court when, due to the grievous nature of the case, it would not have been advantageous for them to settle it in front of a jury. In other words, hospitals could elect to practice the principles of CANDOR only for those cases that they would have lost in court anyway. Some cases are so egregious that hospitals prefer to settle them outside of the courtroom to avoid paying out larger settlements and receiving unwanted negative publicity.
But how can patients identify which hospitals are participating in CANDOR, and as such, may be inherently safer, as opposed to those who do not? Without accountability and oversight, any hospital can claim to be participating in CANDOR, when in fact, they may only use it for those cases that meet specific criteria. In order for patients to asses the probability of whether or not their chosen hospital carries a good safety record independent of their stance on CANDOR, there are several measures on which they can rely. In any state in the union, patients can check their hospital's safety score before committing to a high risk procedure, and they may also obtain data from government agencies that keep track of hospital errors and adverse events through the Freedom of Information Act. However, some data collected remains confidential, and patients will need to contact their Department of Health and Human Resources for specifics on what types of data are available.
Another safety measure that patients can review before choosing a hospital is to check the nurse staffing to patient ratio at the hospital in which they wish to seek care. When financial budgets are stretched, administrators will sometimes try to control costs by reducing the number of caregivers on duty that may require nurses and doctors to take on unsafe patient loads that may result in a less than optimal patient to caregiver staffing ratio. In general, an ICU nurse should not have more than two ICU admissions at any given time, and floor nurses should not be in charge of more than four patients at any given time during the day. Evening and night shifts may carry slightly higher patient loads. Of course, there are situations that may arise to temporarily increase patient load that may be unavoidable, but if a hospital has higher than the recommended staffing ratios across the board, then it may be indicative of compromised patient safety.
In implementing CANDOR, hospitals need to develop policies and plans to address the informational needs of all patients—not just those who qualify for a financial settlement. Patients that have experienced harm report that the typical deny and defend strategy that has been in place for decades leaves them no other option but to conclude that hospital administrators and risk management officers have little or no interest in the harm that they or their loved ones have experienced. In their failure to be transparent, administrators further demonstrate their willingness to allow the same errors to occur to other patients rather than address the problems that allowed the harm to occur. Patients report that the refusal to acknowledge the medical error is to deny the suffering of the patient and family, and as such prevent the healing that would result from eliminating the same error from happening to other patients and their families. The emotional damage that patients and their families suffer from the failure to honestly disclose errors can be lifelong.
The advent of the CANDOR toolkit would greatly impact patient care if hospitals would buy-in and integrate its principles into the culture of medicine. However, the toolkit was designed for full implementation in order to make a difference in patient care—not partial implementation. One video included in the kit demonstrates an acceptable approach that a risk management officer may elect to utilize when offering monetary compensation to an injured party for damages. Providing compensation in this manner would incur the vehement objection of every hospital legal team in the country that currently relies on standard deny and defend strategies. In this aspect, the deviation from the norm is just too great. Short of an act of Congress, implementation of all components of CANDOR will not be something that voluntarily occurs in health care institutions across the country.
Hospitals that do not voluntarily participate in CANDOR, or who only participate when it is convenient for them may be ultimately orchestrating their own demise. The culture of medicine is changing, and health care institutions who try to hold on to archaic practices will have a hard road ahead. Patients are becoming more savvy about their health care and about their expectations from health care insritutions. Perhaps in the not so distant future, the implementation of CANDOR will become a mandatory practice. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality did not spend twenty-three million dollars to watch CANDOR self-destruct. Institutions who continue to place their bottom line before patient safety and human suffering will never be recognized as one that delivers optimal patient and family-centered care in the long run. The absence of transparency will identify those healthcare institutions who rely solely on dubious public relations campaigns to promote their image. If patient-centered care is the new norm, how will hospitals entrenched in deny and defend strategies pull themselves out of the muck in time to start practicing the polar opposite? It may take an act of Congress after all. It's something to think about, and the answer may be just around the corner.
Originally posted 2016-10-21 22:50:48. Republished by Blog Post Promoter


text:
Give your home a naturally rugged look with Bear Creek Gifts and Cabin Decor's outstanding collection of Aspen Log Furniture. These beautiful home furnishings are expertly hand-crafted from the finest natural woods available. This inspiring gallery features log wood tables, chairs and other fine furniture. Each gorgeous piece features a natural finish to bring out the best in the wood's color and design. Our wonderful Aspen Log Furniture Collection are ideal for any rustic mountain home, cabin, or western retreat.
Our low freight charge is 15% added to the price, however if you are looking to order multiple items please call our Toll free number (877) 644-1579. Give us your list of furniture items you want and your zip code. We will get the exact freight quote for your order and you would be charged the lowest rate not to exceed the 15 %.
Shipped direct from our manufacture, please allow 4-6 weeks. Our office will email or call you to let you know your furniture has been shipped and the freight line will give you a 24 hour notice before delivery. Please notify us if you don't see what you want or want a custom size on any Aspen Collection furniture piece.


text:
Two years ago there were rumors artist FKA Twigs and Twilight star Robert Pattinson were engaged [click here if you missed that].
Robert finally confirms the rumors...
This week on the Howard Stern show after Howard prodded Robert asking,"You're engaged right?" he replied, "Yeah, kind of."
No word on a wedding date.