text:
March 16, 2010 (SPOKANE, Wash.) --Police in Washington state say they nabbed a woman with a 'treasure chest' who used her undergarment in a forgery scheme.Investigators say they believe a team of suspects traveled across the state and used fake IDs to illegally get money from banks.
They were arrested after a teller reported a suspicious request for a large cash withdrawal.
When Lukeisha Harris was in the jail's booking area, the corrections staff made a lucrative discovery in her bra: $26,000 in bills, to be exact.
"I understand that this is a large suspect. She was described by bank tellers as heavy-set. The police report indicated that she was 6 ft. and 400 lbs.," said Sgt. Dave Reagan of the Spokane Sheriff Dept.
Harris apparently was an organized individual. Also inside the bra, officers say she stashed bank receipts to keep track of the cash.


text:
This session covers best practices that we have learned in the past two year of running the service. It discusses how to customize Project Online for better performance.Read More
Speaker: Chris Boyd
Learn how to quickly and easily deploy Microsoft Project Online and Server. This sessions will take you step-by-step through the deployment process.Read More

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Oregon's Death By Dignity Law.
|Voting Style:
|Point System:
|7 Point
|6 years ago
|Post Voting Period
|10,051 times
|Debate No:
Thank You (:
Looking forward to debating you!
I accept the debate, and shall be playing devil's advocate in this situation. However, I hope to still put forth a compelling case against Euthanasia. As CON, I shall wait for my opponent to post their argument before posting my own as a response. In the (unlikely) case that my opponent does not post an argument, this should be viewed as a concession by PRO for not fulfilling their burden of proof.
Argument 1: Oregon's death by Dignity Law re-inforces the inalienable rights of life and liberty granted to every human.
The Declaration of Independence reports for us, our right to life and liberty. These rights allow us the liberty to determine for ourselves how our life should be lived, to what quality it will be lived, and how long it should be lived. If asked, I doubt that any of us would ever agree to forfeit these rights to the government, although by opposing this "death by dignity act" forfeiting it is exactly what you are agreeing to do. The death by dignity act applies to terminally ill patients who request this "assisted suicide" option as an alternative to either living a low-quality life, or simply committing suicide. The "death by dignity act" gives the patient access to an death with dignity. It is not forced of patients, and once the patient requests this option the choice of following that path is also left to the patient, allowing them to turn back at any time. So, taking away the right for the patient to die with dignity and on their own terms, is a clear violation of these invaluable rights to life and liberty. As said in [ ACLU Amicus Brief in Vacco v. Quill
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU),Dec. 10, 1996] "The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. Thereby, this law and the idea of Assisted Suicide, support these inalienable rights, and should be protected by the government as oregon is doing, for if we support the execution of these rights in every other situation, there is no reason why those rights should end at the right to die a peaceful death.
Argument 2: Oregon's Death by Dignity Law gives patients a safer and more dignified option to ending their suffering.
The right of terminally ill patients to refuse their life preserving treatments exists, knowing that the refusal of these medicines will lead to death. If this is legal, then there is no logical reason as to why assisted suicide shouldn't be allowed, and left as a right for those who aren't willing to go through the pain of months of suffering. A study, [Emanuel, E.J., et al. "Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: Attitudes and expereiences of onocology patients, oncologists, and the public." Lancet 347.9018 (2006), 1805-10.] reported that 75% of the population they interviewed, including a large proportion of cancer patients reported that the severe and constant pain made the idea of suicide tolerable. By legalizing assisted suicide, and through this law, we are giving them a more dignified way to end their suffering, (a right that every person should have) without having to take extensive gruesome measures while being allowed a peaceful death.
Argument 3: Oregon's Death by Dignity Law, and Assisted suicide promote the other inalienable right to pursue happiness.
As John Mill said, "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain." This quote narrates the sentiment that the right course of happiness is one that causes the most happiness and prevents the most pain. We pride ourselves on the freedoms we as a people grant ourselves, such as the freedom of pursuit of happiness, but what is happiness for someone with a terminal condition who is being forced to live through the pain because the same government that allows other freedoms denies this one? Thereby, Assisted Suicide and Oregon's Death By Dignity Act, are doing justice, by promoting happiness and ending pain in the patients.
Assisted Suicide, and the Oregon Law isn't offered/ doesn't apply to simply anyone. Only those who are severely sick with terminal illnesses and have no hope of recuperating are granted this option, and of them, only those in deep suffering choose this option (about 2.25% in oregon in 2011). Therefore, assisted suicide and the Oregon Act, aren't social hazards, but rather the opening of a dignified opportunity to those who really need it. As Faye Girsh, -- Faye Girsh, EdD [Senior Adviser, Final Exit Network,"How Shall We Die," Free Inquiry,Winter 2001] said "...people who are looking ...to end their lives which have lost all quality should enjoy a right guaranteed in the European Declaration of Human Rights -- the right not to be forced to suffer." We are granted protection from cruel and unusual punishments, from unwarranted search and seizures; it's unjustifiable why we shouldn't be granted the right to not be forced to suffer.
Argument 4: Government shouldn't be granted the right to involve in end-of-life matters.
"We'll all die. But in an age of increased longevity and medical advances, death can be suspended, sometimes indefinitely, and no longer slips in according to its own immutable timetable.
So, for both patients and their loved ones, real decisions are demanded: When do we stop doing all that we can do? When do we withhold which therapies and allow nature to take its course? When are we, through our own indecision and fears of mortality, allowing wondrous medical methods to perversely prolong the dying rather than the living?
These intensely personal and socially expensive decisions should not be left to governments, judges or legislators..." [Los Angeles Times, "Planning for Worse Than Taxes," Opinion, Mar. 22, 2005] This explains this argument perfectly. The government has no role in end-of-life matters such as these. As stated in my first argument, the government's duty is to uphold our rights, our right to choose our method and time of death (life and liberty), our right to pursuit of happiness, and has no place determining these things FOR us.
Faye Girsh, Faye Girsh, EdD [Senior Adviser, Final Exit Network,"How Shall We Die," Free Inquiry, Winter 2001] said, "It should be considered as much of a crime to make someone live who with justification does not wish to continue as it is to take life without consent."
Before one argues that killing people is not the duty of doctors, one should first question, is it their duty to prolong life to the point where life has no quality, or to the point where living is a burden to the patient in question? Is it moral to force a person to live who, with justification, doesn't wish to continue it? Allowing Assisted Suicide does not mean that every terminally ill person is forced to take this option, and it never will. It does not mean that a doctor "assists" them after a moments notice. There are precaustions taken, a fifteen day reconsideration period to prevent on the whim decisions. The patient in the end is allowed the right to turn back from the process at any time, and in the end it is the patient who voluntarily takes the pills. All assisted suicide means, is the right to end your own suffering, peacefully, and with dignity. Thereby, I urge you all to vote pro; to grant this right to suffering patients.
Once going through my opponent's debate, and seeing the references to John Stuart Mill, and the respect for autonomy. This underpinning of the argument exists in both the first and third argument, where it is stated the right to liberty, used equivalently to a respect for autonomy. The third argument is clearly utilitarian, going as far to quote Mill's most famous statement of what Utilitarians believe. Thus, I shall question this underpinning predicate, and instead put forth the more rationally justified Kantian ethics as a solution. Indeed, this ethical theory holds many times more respect for human autonomy and human life: the argument necessarily respects autonomy.
The foundations
As my opponent has not done so, I wish to present what euthanasia is. (Due to word limit, and this being a backdrop to what euthanasia is, the information can be found here http://www.debate.org...)
Kantian Ethics and Euthanasia
Kantian Ethics originated from Immanuel Kant, a famous Prussian philosopher. His ethics were known as being a Copernican Revolution due to the level of rational thought that went into their construction. Skipping many of the details - observable in A Foundation for the metaphysics of morals - He creates the theory based on a duty to respect autonomy: autonomy being freedom and reason together. As we are all moral autonomous agents, we all have a duty to be moral autonomous agents. Further, nothing is good except a good will - that is, an act is good only when it has good intentions. However, this does not yet help us know what good is. Hence, Kant delivered the Categorical Imperative, which is "doing duty for duty's sake". Though this seems simply like moving the goalposts, Kant came to a much stronger definition of what our duty is. Duty is in line with the three moral maxims: that is, unviersalisation of actions, using people as ends only, and never a means. From this, we can interpret the third maxim: work towards a kingdom of ends.
Of course, this has not helped us yet: we must apply Kantian ethics. Let us go to what the Oregan Law states: in short, it claims that "If I am in a terrible condition, I have the right to kill myself, or (more importantly) give that right to another doctor or person)". But this would be open to abuse: we know for a fact that many will abuse this, and simply make the person die (or possibly keep living) for their own interest: they'd use the person as a means to an end. This is, of course, breaking the second maxim and, therefore, unacceptable to be a moral maxim.
In fact, there is no moral maxim that allows euthanasia. Kantian ethics holds that if one commits euthanasia because one believes that the remainder of one's life will be filled with more discomfort than pleasure, then one fails to treat oneself as an end. As long as you retain the capacities that makes you a person, then you have dignity and one ought to respect this dignity. Kantians agree that the point of life is the exercise of one's personhood capacities in moral deliberation and choice. When one stops being able to be autonomous, one stops being a person. Thus, the death by dignity law, or any law, no longer needs to apply, as one stops being a self-conscious, rational person.
If humanity is an end, no man has the right to take his life, even in whatever condition he finds himself. We must always act in a way which does not disrespect our fellow human man. It's disastrous if we act in such way as dehumanizing sourselves through euthanasia. I urge a vote CON, a vote for the respect of human life, and a vote for the respect of human autonomy. Thank you.
Before further refuting his argument, I would like to redefine the Oregon Death By Dignity Law, not as one that "claims that "If I am in a terrible condition, I have the right to kill myself, or (more importantly) give that right to another doctor or person)"". But rather as one the allows a person, who is in a terrible condition, to seek peaceful death as a viable option. This right to kill oneself is not given to a doctor or any other person. As I stated in my definition of the Oregon Death by dignity Law, the life is ended through the voluntary SELF administration of the drugs. I would like to remind my opponent that we are debating the Oregon death by Dignity Law, not general Euthanasia. Given my definition of the Oregon Death by Dignity Law, it is not then open to abuse. As the right to end the life is still left up to the patient himself, the doctor or family members are not given the opportunity to force death upon someone. Forcing life upon them for our own conscience is what my opponent is advocating, something he has yet to refute.
If the ultimate rule to righteousness and justice is to treat every human as an end, forcing life upon them in order to pacify our own conscience is not treating them as an ends, but rather using them as a means to justify ourselves. In order to truly consider each person as an ends, we must look upon each person and their life separately. If we are to treat ourselves as an ends, we must consider our life as a whole, and if our goal is to live a happy life, then we have the right to terminate our life as long as terminating our life leads to that end or goal that we have mentioned afore.
Essentially, the difference between Kantian Ethics, and Utilitarianism is that kantian Ethics focus on your drive, and Utilitarianism on the result. For a matter such as Assisted Suicide, the drive behind it will vary from person to person, so applying Kantian Ethics does not completely appropriate, although the general case according to Oregon records is that the agreement is signed by patients who claimed that their reasons were that the pain was too much to bear, and so we can assume that the Assisted Suicide law is being used largely to reduce pain to a zero, a cause that no moral maxim will disagree with. Especially, Mill's Ethics which say implicitly that any action that promotes pleasure and prevents pain is just. This is essentially the purpose of Assisted Suicide.
Our laws should, and are, for the most part, centered around Mill's theory. Increasing living pleasures and decreasing pain and suffering has been the objective of medicine, industry, and everything else since the beginning of time. If one has a smashed arm, we amputate it in order to lessen pain and increase pleasure. For those of us whose pain isn't relievable in such ways, it is only logical that we give another method. With the passage of this act we do not mandate it for all patients in their situation, we are simply offering it to them.
Suicide is legal in all 50 states, as of today, for anyone, sick or healthy or mentally retarded. Why then is it illegal for a legally monitored physician to give a pill to a sick and dying patient to help speed up their decline into death? To help make their suicide a fast and painless one?
The argument against assisted suicide is full of hypocrisies. One argues against letting a human have the right to take their own life, while arguing about human autonomy and the value of humans. They argue against assisted suicide by theorizing situations of abuse where patients are forced to die, while arguing for a situation where they are forced to live. They argue the injustice of a physician providing assisted suicide pills, in a world where suicide is legal. They argue justice while justifying the forcing of a person to live in pain.
I urge a vote PRO, for true autonomy and a true choice. For true respect of human life, and respect for people's own judgement.
I fought the law
I'd like to make reference to this quickly before anything. I'm going to define the law using the actual law as reference[1]: "An adult who is capable, is a resident of Oregon, and has been determined by the attending physician and consulting physician to be suffering from a terminal disease, and who has voluntarily expressed his or her wish to die, may make a written request for medication for the purpose of ending his or her life...". This is clearly an example of physician-assisted euthanasia. My opponent's definition, though somewhat accurate, is not the exact definition of what the law is. The law is much more closely related to physician-led euthanasia, rather than assisted suicide.
Use the force, luke
My opponent claims that I am forcing life upon people: rather, I am stating that people would not, under rational and free conditions, choose death over life. Kobler-Ross, the founder of the study of the terminably ill, created the Kobler Ross model, and other studies to learn more about the issues one has to cope with, if you have a terminal disease. These gave great insight to what someone goes through when they want to kill themselves. What it imparted what simple: that "None of [Kobler-Ross]'s patients request euthanasia. Given personal attention and the right medication, she says, people come to accept their deaths and die peacefully without pain"[2]. Rational people do not choose death, as we well know. My opponent, I am sure, would not desire that we kill people who just line up and say "yes please!" That's because we know that death is contrary to life: something we inherently want to promote and protect.
And we want to do this in all cases: we do not enthusiastically go forth trying to kill people, because we know that death is a terrible thing. When we have the alternative to life, and, as Kobler-Ross has shown, a pleasurable one.
Utilitarianism, Kant, Euthanasia
Even in a Utilitarian model, though, euthanasia should be restricted moreso than this law states. The most prominent Utilitarian in the compilation of the theory is Henry Sidgwick, who states that "only conscious (i.e., intelligent) beings can appreciate values and meanings. So, life is significant to conscious, intelligent, though finite, beings - because it is a part of some eternal goal, plan, process, thing, design, or being. [Euthanasia] flies in the face of Sidgwick's dictum. It is a statement by an intelligent and conscious being about the meaninglessness of life."[3] How can a dead man appreciate values and meanings of being released from pain? It makes no sense.
But following from the possibility that reduction of pain is what is important here: we have the problem of the pinprick argument. As my opponent is stating we should allow them to commit euthanasia to reduce the pain and not increase the pleasure, then the goal is simple: end all suffering. What's the easiest way to end all suffering? Kill all life! Without anyone to feel pain, and if we do it painlessly, then pain is infinitely at zero. The ludicrosity of this statement is obvious: we should go against Utilitarianism in practice, due to the conclusion it gives to end all life.
The argument against euthanasia is simple: Humans, when acting autonomously (free and rational) don't wish to die. Humans who wish to die are, by necessity if we accept the previous premise, acting either unfree or irrationally. Thus, by respecting autonomy, we should make sure we help our fellow man live.
We should not impose Utilitarianism, as it is treating people as a means to an end: we use ourselvse as a means to the end of lowering pain, or increasing pleasure: not to any moral good. We should be against euthanasia, though: we should not let people commit euthanasia as it is breaing the second moral maxim, it is treating people as a means to an end.
Of course, my opponent has put forth a new moral maxim as well: the respect for autonomy, that is, "we should allow people to make their own decisions for themselves". However, this has intrinsic flaws, as we can see examples where this is wrong, for example, random killing is someone's own decision, but they still should not be allowed to do so! We need to reform it to Mill's addendum, that is, "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others". But we see internal problems arise: for example, we see it as irrational that one should cut themselves over a relationship breaking up. Or irrational people would commit suicide or euthanasia due to school bullying. In short, we know inherently that the principle of respect for autonomy does not work as a moral maxim.
What does work? It is simple, we start removing the points that cannot be universalised, start removing the points that cannot be objectified. We would remove the point that states we base it on pleasure/pain, as the pinprick argument, where we should kill all life, is intuitively repulsive. We would remove the idea of the maxim for respect of self-sovereignty, as we see inherent times where the law can be broken, such as doing meth, or cutting oneself. We can, however, retain a promotion of autonomy: that is, free rational expression, as we know that rational people would do the right thing. For example, a theif will (and by definition has) stolen, but if they were in a rational, uncoerced state of mind, they would admit that stealing is wrong. This definition of promoting human autonomy is our moral maxim: "we should promote human autonomy". The death of people reduce and sacrifice human autonomy. Thus, the killing of others should be universally minimised. This, again, leads us to a rejection of the Death by Dignity law, which promotes euthanasia: the killing of others.
Finally, I wish to make the following statements about other laws. Firstly, suicide is legal because punishing it is pretty damn hard. If they succeed, then they're dead, so you can't really punish them. If they are alive, then they haven't killed themselves, so they haven't committed suicide, so there is a real lack of grounds to convict someone for suicide. However, in most nations, if one commits grevious self harm, then they are put into a psychiactric institute. The law itself would be more in line with Kantian promotion of rationality, than the Utilitarian promotion of sovereignty, due to the simple fact that irrational people do not have the civil liberties, nor should they, of others. For example, a dog does not have rights. Though it is sovereign, it is not rational, so it does not have the same civil liberties. This is straight forwards. To put it simply: the law promotes Kantian Ethics, not Utilitarian.
Quickly, regarding the state, the state's role is arguably to promote the pursuit of happiness. We cannot be happy by being dead. It may be to promote our own personal choice. I state those who prefer death to life should receive mental psychiactric help, not simply written off and allowed to die. The state should help those who wish to die. The way to do this is to help, not kill.
To summarise, the law promotes Kantian Ethics, which is against euthanasia. We personally are inherently promoting Kantian Ethics over Utilitarianism, which puts us against euthanasia. Utilitarianism itself promotes euthanasia: Kobler-Ross' studies show that pleasure can be increased among terminally ill patients to the extent that it is better to criminalise euthanasia, but instead have better health services. Finally, Kantian ethics, a superior moral stance, works with the law. For these reasons, I urge a vote CON.
1 - http://public.health.oregon.gov...
2 - Practical Ethics, p197
3 - http://samvak.tripod.com...;
4 - http://www.jaredstory.com...;
(note - Kobler-Ross is spelt differently to how it should, due to lack of the correct symbol for the "o" to a ":u".
aristotles-beard forfeited this round.
Extend all arguments.
First off, I would like to apologize for forfeiting the last round. I was in Chicago and things went awry, as my service project took longer than anticipated and my grandmother got terribly ill which wasn't anticipated at all. As a result, I have treated this speech as one from Round 4, and have brought in new points and refuted my opponents previous points. I invite him to use his conclusion speech as one to refute mine and bring in new points if he so desires.
Clarifying the Clarification
Although the two are ethically indistinguishable, this law isn't euthanasia because the patient themselves administer the treatment. "Euthanasia is a different procedure for hastening death. In euthanasia, a doctor injects a patient with a lethal dosage of medication. In the Act, a physician prescribes a lethal dose of medication to a patient, but the patient - not the doctor - administers the medication. Euthanasia is illegal in every state in the US, including Oregon. The Act has been legal in Oregon since November 1997."[2]
A quick story, with a valuable message.
Death With Dignity Patients aren't choosing between Life and Death.
First off, I would like to make note of the fact that the patients requesting Death With Dignity, are not, infact, choosing between death and life. Under Oregon Law, a terminal illness is an "incurable and irreversible disease that has been medically confirmed...[to]produce death within six months" [5] In other words, The patient's primary objective is not to end an otherwise open-ended span of life but to find dignity in an already impending exit from this world, and find a less painful way out. One cannot argue that Matthew Donnelly and his wish to die was irrational. Using the words of my opponent's philosopher , Kant, " To help others where one can is a duty...without any further motive of vanity or self intrest". When they cannot be helped through medication, and a painful death is impending, it cannot be reasonably argued that we prolong the death, and lengthen a life of suffering against the patients will.
Death with Dignity patients aren't Irrational or mentally unstable.
The majority of patients choosing death with dignity, are not clinically depressed.[6] Furthermore, Statistics show that "even many of the law's opponents admit the most aggressive pain management measures fail to alleviate the suffering of 5% of terminally-ill patients," [4]. One cannot argue that death with dignity is an unreasonable choice for those those 5%. Given a life of less that 6 months filled with such suffering and no alleviation, or a quick dignified hastened death, a reasonable human who isn't a masochist would be favorable towards Death with dignity. Furthermore in a practical sense, in order to be eligibe for DWD, you must be determined by a psychologist to be mentally stable and capable and having no judgement impairing factors. [7].
Dead Man can't appreciate physician assisted suicide, but a live one can.
Indeed, a dead man can't appreciate the alleviation from suffering, but the living, suffering man can. This man can appreciate the release from a life filled with pain. Just as a person stuck in a cast gets hope from the thought of getting his cast off, or someone with braces counting down the months to getting it off, or someone held hostage and being tortured longs to be rescued, allowing Death with Dignity or Physician assisted suicide, allows the patient another option and gives them hope. Spending the last few months of one's life in deep suffering MAY seem like a reasonable option to my opponent, but 75% of all interviewed realized the pain involved in that and recognized the value in giving the patients an option besides living their pain out.
PinPrick Argument.
Mill's theory of pleasure over pain, does not infer that we cure every pain with death. A young boy with a broken arm has a long life ahead of him and so death would only cause him pain. His pain can be cured by simple medications, a couple of ibuprofens after getting his cast on. The patients we are talking about do not have a long life ahead of them, they have merely six months, and furthermore if they are inflicted with a disease such as bone cancer, pancreatic cancer or lung disease it causes intolerable pain and suffering that cannot be managed. Offering these people Assisted Suicide, would not be unjust seeing as they are not ending an open ended life, and because the pain they are freeing themselves from is greater than the pleasure they are avoiding. In this example we can see how the pleasure versus pain argument does work if applied correctly.
Kant, my opponent's philosopher, says, "To help others where one can is a duty..." If they cannot be helped by medicine, then it is our job to help end their suffering. Competent, terminally ill patients are allowed to hasten death by treatment refusal. For some patients, treatment refusal will not suffice to hasten death, so their only option is suicide. To allow physician assisted suicide for these patients as well, is only just and logical. Kant also brought up the idea of Categorical Imperative and objectifying one's actions to determine whether it is just. This philosophy itself is inpractical as everything has an exception. A universally recognized moral maxim is to not lie. However none of us would condemn a man who lied in order to protect the location of his family in a murder. Just as this situation is an exception in an already flawed argument, so is physician assisted suicide. As a moral maxim, we should oppose anything promoting the harming of oneself. Giving these statistics, and given that the patient is suffering and merely has 6 months to live, the argument in forcing them to keep living, putting them in counseling, or further prolonging their death is irrational. We are not objectifying suicide, but rather being allowed to self-determine the means of an already impending death. We should not allow "autonomy" when its hurting others, but physician assisted suicide and Death With Dignity is not hurting any but yourself, in which case we should allow it. Should we objectify NOT being allowed autonomy?
I thank my opponent for a good debate.
[1] http://www.hospicecare.com...
[2] http://public.health.oregon.gov...
[3] http://www.scu.edu...;
Still definitions.
I maintain that this act legalises physician-led euthanasia, for two reasons. This is because of the nature of the act means that the doctor gives the patient the means to kill themelf. The distinguishment between suicide and euthanasia is irrelevant, though, as the contentions remain the same.
The Horror of the 5%
As my opponent constructed a case where Matthew wanted to commit suicide, we must look at his life very carefully. What would Matthew rather do? Would he rather be dead, or continue living painlessly, and with full autonomy? It is blatant that he would rather continue living without pain. As the work by Kobler-Ross showed, people can live without pain with ease in our modern society: thus, the law in place is a lazy solution. Instead, we can help Matthew continue living freely and autonomously: what my opponent puts simply is taking an emotional case, and capitalising on it: using matthew as a means to her end of convincing people with rhetoric, not facts. But here are the facts: 5% of people will die. Only 5% of people can be not saved (though my source, who is more respected and unbias states that all can be saved from death) will die, and can die without pain thanks to modern technology, without having to give them the means to die. This means 95% can be saved, but will die, due to the initiation from this law. My opponent is pleading to allow this extreme minority of 5% to die quickler, not less painfully. I am pleading that we allow the 95% to live freely and not die. I could similarly provide an emotional case like Matthew's, but where someone is pronounced terminally ill, yet the doctors were wrong, and the person comes out alive and brilliant. John Matzke was diagnosed with 18 months to live[1]. He could have, and wanted to, die. However, the law was not on his side: euthanasia was not legal. So he tried to fight for his life instead. After the fight, he fought the disease into remission. If he killed himself, then this could never have happened. Assisted suicide would have been this person's worst decision. And this is but one case of the 95%. The death by dignity law is unintelligent, irrational, and cold-hearted.
Death with "Dignity" is an unreasonable choice for those 5%
Again, I'd like to reaffirm this. We know there is a better solution for those with euthanasia: Kobler-Ross' work shows us that we can give great quality of life, free of pain, to all with terminal illnesses. We also know many recover from terminal illnesses. Finally, we know that people would choose life over death. My opponent did not refer to my thief analogy, so I will refer to it again: a rational, uncoerced man knows stealing is wrong. Similarly, a rational, uncoerced mind knows that life is better than death. Only pain leads us to make irrational decisions - something we all know well - and the fear of living with pain is what troubles us. However, without pain, people have always decided to pick life. Again, referring back to On Death and Dying (by Kobler-Ross): "Those in my care, when free [of pain], accept their time will come, and wait for it, not hasten it."[3] The only reason these people wish to die is the pain, which we can manage. My opponent has given no examples of any cases where the pain is uncontrollable: even the case of Matthew, with skin cancer, has simple and powerful control mechanisms to the pain to make it "minimal"[2], and patients have reported to "forget the pain entirely"[3]. Thus, the death with dignity is unreasonable for 5%, and unreasonable for 95%. However, we must finally state that hard cases make bad laws: the exception or two to the rule will open floodgates.
Further, Kantian ethics remains the strongest answer to the Oregon question. We should not make exceptions for this law, simply because of the connotations of making exceptions. We cannot make laws based on exceptional cases. Hard cases make bad laws. I wish to make a very long quotation to explain this idea. I usually just rewrite the statement, but I am low on characters, so...
"issue hangs on the "rarity principle." We all see the need for a law against murder. But do we need a law for a bad act that happens at one millionth the rate of murder? Probably not. Legality should offer only a blurry reflection of morality, not its mirror image. Whereas morals delineate complex fractal lines, laws should follow smooth contours free of singularities. As the saying goes, "Hard cases make bad laws." This is not a weakness of the law but a strength: that's how it can be both universal and enforceable. TBS theorists will agree but say: "Look, 1,000,000/1,000,000 = 1, so an action likely to cause one million deaths at one millionth the rate of murder matches the expected harm of murder, and hence merits its own law; ergo, legalize torture. QED." A three-word refutation: Break the law. No one's yet suggested a new speed limit sign: "55 — Unless You're Taking Your Dying Uncle To The Hospital." Speed up if you must, and pay the price later. Tucking exceptions into law is courting the same trouble as overfitting a machine learning classifier, ie, loss of generalizing power and diminished appeal to universality."[4]
The feeling of a pinprick...
This argument went untouched. Maybe the audience can interpret a response better than I can, but I cannot see a response, so I cannot discuss this myself.
To conclude, I shall end with a quotation by Bentham, a Utilitarian, as my opponent ended with Kant. "The question is...can [humans] suffer?" This is the important issue, and Bentham recognised this. Pain, not death, is what is important. Why? Because pain clouds judgement. By removing this pain, we address the problem. Oregon's law does not address the problem, it only ignores it: it hides it under the carpet. The problem is that these people are in pain, and it affects their judgement. We need to solve the problem of these people being in pain. People who aren't in pain don't want t die: it is irrational to kill them with this knowledge. Let us do the right thing, and ease their suffering, not just kill them off. Thank you.
1 - http://discovermagazine.com...;
2 - http://www.cancercenter.com...
3 - On Death and Dying
4 - http://www.cs.princeton.edu...
Con's three other points were very poorly structured and signposted, and came up too late in the debate to have significant impact. First came the question of whether euthenasia was a rational choice, which pro responded to by pointing out the need for a psychiatric assessment under Oregon's law. This led on to con's second point that, if I follow him correctly, 100% of people will choose euthenasia when dying, thus by pro's admission 95% will die when they could have been saved, or perhaps even 100% of people could be saved if pro was wrong. Pro wasn't allowed to respond to this new argument so I saw it as unfair, besides which it wasn't very clear. Finally, con used the old pinprick case. Pro's response was weakest here - he argued there are alternative ways to cure pain, but his counter-argument here wasn't very clear. I thought con won the pinprick point. Unfortunately what that proves to me is that utilitarianism is a strange kind of death cult. Since pro (oddly) used utilitarianism as the basis for his points, and was advocating death, I as a voter failed to understand why this was relevant to con's case. I think con could have done more to clarify his points in light of the resolution.
Pro had four points, one of which was very late. The late one was a twisted kind of precedent point about suicide, that con picked up on and merged into his own pinprick point. Pro, however, didn't run the point strongly and consistantly throughout the rounds and thus
What this debate came down to is pro's role of state point, that states ought to be utilitarian. Con made two counter-arguments. The first was that under pro's framework, death does not solve the problem for the patient. Pro had two good responses. First he argued the other people affected by the suffering would be impacted. Second he argued that the problem isn't solved either way as the choice for a terminally ill patient is not between death and life. Con's second response was that not all autonomy can be respected, such as a murderer's. What pro was able to establish, though, especially via his precedent point, was that this particular kind of act falls within a class that can be respected. Overall the role of state point wasn't as in-depth as it should have been. However, I think pro was able to defend it strongly enough to hold it, and thus ultimately carry the debate. 3:2 aff win.
And regarding the book source, of Kobler-Ross her work is easily checked anywhere else, and the book source Practical Ethics or On Death and Dying are both very famous books, and accessible online (http://www.utilitarian.net... for Practical Ethics, On Death and Dying accessible http://books.google.co.uk...)
That's just something you may want to read.
Basically, you are thinking up what you think are criticisms of my arguments, then placing them in my argument, then debating against it. I don't think you can say that I am wrong because I used arguments you think are fallacious, but PRO did not see them as fallacious. I thought common debating style was to not look at your own rationality and opinion. I'm going to message someone else who I know does public debating on this issue, but meh.
At least you read the debate and gave feedback, though. Orator seemed to have just voted.
1 Point for conduct to CON, because PRO forfeited a round. 3 points for arguments to PRO, because CON used a good deal of logical fallacies for his arguments. 1 Point to CON for arguments (though this was cast in the S&G section) because PRO has a responsibility to point out fallacies but failed to do so. This does not change the fact that CON used them, but it does alter the score a bit.
Now, moving on to the in depth...
CON's description of ethic systems was great, however, at no point was there any argument for why we should accept one over another. But the biggest issue was in his applying these ethics for the DWD law.
CON said, "...the goal is simple: end all suffering. What's the easiest way to end all suffering? Kill all life!" This is a slippery slope fallacy. Again, PRO should have pointed this out (the next round was the one she forfeited, so that may have been why it was not addressed).
Later CON commented that when people are free of pain, they would not choose death. This was a strawman argument, since this is not the case of reality. While CON presented a source (a book which could not be checked), PRO also presented a checkable counter source. This also goes against common sense and really anyone with medical knowledge would no this to not be true, since too much pain meds will either kill or comatose a person.
And Finally, CON said "This means 95% can be saved, but will die, due to the initiation from this law." This is also a fallacy since not all terminally ill will choose DWD and nothing will force them. It should also be noted, that they cannot be "saved" only that they will die at a later date. This was a complete misrepresentation of the original argument and source.
this got cut off the end of my speech :/
"To make this clear, this case is prima facie my opponents. That is, if we accept my argument, we cannot accept theirs. If my argument is correct, we cannot accept the foundation of my opponent's. That is, we cannot accept the foundation of utilitarianism."
|Agreed with before the debate:
|0 points
|Agreed with after the debate:
|0 points
|Who had better conduct:
|1 point
|Had better spelling and grammar:
|1 point
|Made more convincing arguments:
|3 points
|Used the most reliable sources:
|2 points
|Total points awarded:
|Agreed with before the debate:
|0 points
|Agreed with after the debate:
|0 points
|Who had better conduct:
|1 point
|Had better spelling and grammar:
|1 point
|Made more convincing arguments:
|3 points
|Used the most reliable sources:
|2 points
|Total points awarded:
|Agreed with before the debate:
|0 points
|Agreed with after the debate:
|0 points
|Who had better conduct:
|1 point
|Had better spelling and grammar:
|1 point
|Made more convincing arguments:
|3 points
|Used the most reliable sources:
|2 points
|Total points awarded:


text:
Need a dance resource? Look no further. Browse our community dance directory below. Want more? Visit our Community Calendar to view/post information about upcoming dance classes, special events, workshops and more!
Nina Reed Photography
Nina Reed Photography specializes in studio and outdoor portraits of dancers and other movement artists, and photographing live performance arts.Read More
Newman Center for the Performing Arts
Acclaimed as one of the nation's finest university arts centers, the 180,000 square-foot Robert and Judi Newman Center for the Performing Arts houses Virginia E. Trevorrow Hall, home to the…Read More
New Breed Dance Company
New Breed is a thriving professional Jazz dance company located in Boulder, Colorado. Driven by their desire to create artistic and entertaining dance theatre works, the company prides themselves on…Read More
Movement, dance, improvisation, performing arts classes. Classes for Young Adults thru Senior adults. Performance space available for dance, music, arts, etc. Space rental available for rehearsals and resident dance, theater,…Read More
Moraporvida Contemporary Dance
Moraporvida Contemporary Dance is a multicultural repertory dance company committed to the growth of the performing arts through live performance, residencies, workshops, classes, outreach and related events. Through the fusion…Read More
milehighhouse productions
MHH is a full service video and media production company. We offer video and still photography services.Read More
Mile High Blues
Mile High Blues is a Blues dancing festival held each year in Denver, Colorado at the end of June. We have lots of live music, dancing, workshops, and attending dancers…Read More
Metro State University of Denver IDP Dance Major
The Dance Major is offered through the Individualized Degree Program at MSU Denver in collaboration with Cleo Parker Robinson Dance. The partnership of these two organizations provides the perfect balance…Read More
Mercury Dance Academy
We offer classes for both children and adults in a multitude of styles and levels. Professional level classes are also being held through our Company program, available to active professional…Read More
Mary Wohl Haan / HAAN Dances
HAAN Dances serves as a vehicle for my creative work as a soloist and as a pick-up company for group pieces and projects.Read More
Mary A.Chase Doll /Chasedance
I am a performer, choreographer and teacher. Currently I am directing the dance program at Merrill and teaching at Between the Bones and Park Hill Dance Academy. I am performing…Read More
Marna Ares Movement and Dance, LLC
Marna Ares Movement and Dance provides classes in modern dance at the beginning and intermediate level, as well as offering classes in integrated dance that include people with and without…Read More
Disclaimer: Presenting Denver is not responsible for the accuracy of the provided directory materials. Please contact the individual or organization directly for more information. We encourage all community members listed in our directory to keep it current by resubmitting changes as they occur. To make changes to your existing directory listing, please submit a new form here and select "update my current listing" when completing the form.


text:
So I have a few shoots under my belt and it seems the more I do the better I get and also the more I enjoy it. I truly found my calling, my art. I love to take pictures in various scenes and I have been having so much fun editing and getting the best I can out of a photo.
Capturing the memories that will last long after I am gone. I honestly love my life. I can't wait to go to school and learn more. I can't wait to see how amazing my work becomes and I am grateful for the few of you that are along for the ride. I promise very soon I will be keeping up with this blog more often and posting more pictures. :)


text:
Diseases & Conditions
Forums & Chat
Join HealingWell
Neck Pain, headaches and facial numbness
Forum Rules
Password Help
Log In
HealingWell.com Forum
Diseases & Conditions
Migraine - Headache
> Neck Pain, headaches and facial numbness
Select A Location
****** Top of the Forum ******
==== General Information ====
Frequently Asked Questions
Forum Rules & Guidelines
==== Diseases & Conditions ====
Allergies & Asthma
Alzheimer's Disease
Anxiety - Panic Disorders
Bipolar Disorder
Breast Cancer
Celiac Disease
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Chronic Pain
Crohn's Disease
Cystic Fibrosis
GERD - Heartburn
Heart & Cardiovascular Disease
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Kidney Diseases & Disorders
Lyme Disease
Migraine - Headache
Multiple Sclerosis
Parkinson's Disease
Prostate Cancer
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Sjogren's Syndrome
Thyroid Disorders
Ulcerative Colitis
<< Previous Thread
Next Thread >>
New Member
Date Joined Mar 2011
Total Posts : 12
Posted 3/3/2011 1:17 PM (GMT -6)
Hi There,
I am new to this forum and would desperately like some advice.
For the last two weeks I have been having headaches which come and go many times a day with facial numbness around the eye, ear and cheek bone which also runs down the side of my left face. I also keep having facial pain which is not too painful but feels like a burning sensation beneath the skin.
I also have neck pain which when i tilt my head to the left tends to hurt a bit.
I have been to the doctors so many times and first doc told me to take paracetamol which didn't seem to help much.
Second doctor prescribed me 20mg of Amitriptyline which did absolutely nothing.
Third doctor sent me to hospital and once i got there they took bloods which came back normal so sent me home packing.
This morning the headaches were so bad i decided to go back to my doctor and he suggested that maybe the neck pain was causing me to have headaches and the facial pain and numbness and suggested I go to physio which i have booked straight away for this coming Monday. Also he prescribed me co-dydramol for pain relief.
The strange thing is when i got home from the doctors the hospital phoned me to ask how I was and when I told her I wasn't feeling good she told me if the Co-Dydramol doesn't ease the headaches she wants me to go to my GP first thing tomorrow morning.
So far I have taken Co-dyramol 3 times today and pain doesn't seem to ease.
I am really worried this could be something more serious so could anyone suggest what they think I should do.
I keep thinking of brain tumours but if there was some abnormality would the blood tests they took from me show something?
Also sorry to keep on but if I did go to hospital and they have to do some brain scans is this exposing me to Radiation as I have had a few x-rays (for other problems) a few months ago?
I really hope someone could tell me what might be wrong with me as I am so worried.
Thank You for taking your time to read my post.
Back to Top
Veteran Member
Date Joined Jan 2006
Total Posts : 1308
Posted 3/3/2011 5:26 PM (GMT -6)
Hi Sophia,
Welcome to Healing Well. Sorry to hear that you are suffering with all this.
First of all please do not worry, headache is usually the last symptom for brain tumours, and having further scans will be quite safe, please don't trouble yourself about
You need to go back to your GP and get yourself referred to a Neurologist who is a Headache Specialist. This may take some time and you may have to travel to see a good one, but it will be well worth it!!
Most Neurologists do not know very much about
headache, so one who specialises in headache will get to the bottom of this for you. As there may be a wait, the sooner you get the ball rolling the better!
Please let me know how you get on??
take care
P.S. Are you in the UK???
Co-Moderator of the Migraine/Headache Forum
DX: Hemicrania Continua, Chronic Migraine, IBS, Allergic Rhinitis and Heart Murmur
Meds: Imigran Injections, High Flow Oxygen, Mebeverine, Lansoprazole, Nasonex and Clarityn
Back to Top
New Member
Date Joined Mar 2011
Total Posts : 12
Posted 3/4/2011 4:20 AM (GMT -6)
Hello Ann,
Thank You very much for your reply.
I am 42 years old and live in the UK.
I have booked to see a physio this afternoon just to see if it may be a pinched nerve but also my GP is now referring me to a neurologist. The headaches are worrying me because I started to think what if it is a brain tumor which is silly really but every time something goes wrong with me i have a real fear of doom and gloom when probably it could be something very simple.
Unfortunately i also suffer with moderate oesophagitus due to two different doctors prescribing me with two different anti-inflammatorys but at the moment I'm taking 30mg lansoprazole which seems to help.
I'm so glad I found this website and reading peoples problems and I will keep you updated and once they found out what is wrong with me if I can help anyone else with same or similar symtons it would be an added bonus.
Thank You again.
Back to Top
Veteran Member
Date Joined Jan 2006
Total Posts : 1308
Posted 3/5/2011 1:33 PM (GMT -6)
Hi Sophia,
I work on a Helpline for Clusterheadache here in the UK, and through this have got to know many very good Neuros who Specialise in Headache. If you want to email me by clicking on the envelope under my name and let me know where you live I will let you have the details of the nearest one to you!!
Try not to worry about
the tumour thing, it is very unlikely that it is that, as usually headache is one of the last symptoms to emerge, by which time a diagnosis has already been made!!!
Look forward to hearing from you!
take care
Co-Moderator of the Migraine/Headache Forum
DX: Hemicrania Continua, Chronic Migraine, IBS, Allergic Rhinitis and Heart Murmur
Meds: Imigran Injections, High Flow Oxygen, Mebeverine, Lansoprazole, Nasonex and Clarityn
Back to Top
New Member
Date Joined Jan 2013
Total Posts : 6
Posted 1/6/2013 7:03 PM (GMT -6)
Hi I'm new to this , I don't know where to turn I was diagnosed with hemiplegic migraines and commenced on topimax this has been going on since April of last year.my experience of this drug was terrible so I stopped taking it some time ago
I have been fairly well for two months but now the symptoms are all back pain in my right temple numbness down my face to my cheek and eye.I have the feeling that something is about
to burst in my temple.I have seen a neurologist who seemed happy for me to take topimax , and let my gp deal with it , I don't know that hemiplegic migraines are what I have but I need help as the pain is terrible and is restricting my life , can anybody suggest what to do now.
Back to Top
Forum Information
Currently it is Sunday, August 19, 2018 4:15 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 2,994,288 posts in 328,118 threads.
View Active Threads
Who's Online
This forum has 161267 registered members. Please welcome our newest member,
110 Guest(s), 2 Registered Member(s) are currently online.


text:
'I feel like it's not just about women's rights, it's about rights as people'
COOS BAY, Ore. - Hundreds of people lined the streets of Coos Bay over the weekend for this year's Women's March.
In solidarity with the Women's March on Washington and other cities around the world, the march in Coos Bay tool place on Saturday along Bayshore Drive.
Peaceful protesters expressed their concerns about women's rights and the future under President Trump's administration.
"The past year has been pretty awful with the government and the amount of lies and deceit that's been imposed on the American people and the rest of the world," said David Strope, who attended the march. "I can't let it go on any longer without standing up for the oppression that is ever-present around us."
"I feel like it's not just about women's rights, it's about rights as people," said Octavia Kazaar-Shafer, who also attended the march. "You see this class warfare coming about, it's always been there but it's coming back again, which is not a good thing to have come back again."
The one year anniversary of the Women's March had a collective theme: "Power to the Polls."
Close to 400 people showed up at the Women's March in Coos Bay, and organizers say they plan to make it an annual event.


text:
Public Health Futures
Board Training
Contiguous Health Districts
Network of Care
Quality Indicators
Shared Services
Legislative Committee
LHD Home
In June 2012, the Association of Ohio Health Commissioners (AOHC) completed a report titled "Public Health Futures: Considerations for a New Framework for Local Public Health in Ohio." The 2012 mid-year biennial budget review created the Legislative Committee on Public Health Futures to examine the current local public health capacity, jurisdiction, services, and financing of local public health services. The committee reviewed the AOHC report and agreed to eleven recommendations presented to Governor Kasich and the State Legislature on October 31, 2012. The recommendations reinforce the connection between the Ohio Department of Health and local health districts and challenge public health to provide continued leadership in the areas of data, program and administration.
Based on the recommendations of the committee, there are several changes to Ohio Revised Code included in the SFY 2014-2015 budget which will improve and align public health services in Ohio. ODH will be convening a series of workgroup meetings with stakeholders to develop consensus in how to best implement the Public Health Futures items included in the budget. This effort will be divided into two categories: 1) issues requiring immediate attention due to timeframes, and 2) long-term issues requiring consensus. The Public Health Futures website will host information for meeting announcements and other updates by category as outlined below.
Category 1: Issues Requiring Rule Development
Category 2: Issues Requiring Consensus
Last Updated: 6/15/2017
Ohio Department of Health
Phone: (614) 466-3543 ~ Contact Us
Address: 246 N. High St., Columbus, Ohio 43215
To report a public health emergency, call your local health department.
Personal health questions? Contact your local health care provider.
For emergencies, dial 911.


text:
Steampunk Fairy Tales is an ongoing series of stories set in steampunk worlds and inspired
by fairy tales. Often, but not always, steampunk retellings of classic fairy tales, other shorts
are more liberal with their interpretation or tackle lesser-known fairy tales.
The books are produced by a great group of authors I know and work with and while both editions feature short stories by me (The Yellow Butterfly and Esmeralda respectively)
there are heaps of other ace stories you should check out :)
Thanks to the team for all the hard work and once again, thanks to
Louis of Indigo Forest Designs for two brilliant covers!
Leave a Reply.
Free ebook with every newsletter sign up in 2016
Ashley Capes is an Australian writer of fiction, poetry and very occasional non-fiction.
Progress Meter
Imperial Towers (Never Book 5) - draft 1
Moss Dragon - draft 1
Reed Lavender (working title) - draft 1
Unnamed Spec Fic - draft 1
Whisper of Leaves (sequel) - Outline
August 2018


text:
What Occupy Wall Street is angry about
Immediately relevant to my last link, Business Insider put together an excellent slideshow showing exactly why you should be pissed off. Some crazy, crazy stuff in there:
So what does all this mean in terms of net worth? Well, for starters, it means that the top 1% of Americans own 42% of the financial wealth in this country. The top 5%, meanwhile, own nearly 70%.
What's particularly scary is how many of the charts today look pretty similar to how they did around 1929.
(Via The Awl)
Am I doing it wrong?
Comments? I don't do open comments. Life is too short.


text:
It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CrapAsUsual
a reply to: Throes
A shirt with madonna blowing Trumps instrument would sell
originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: HUMBLEONE
She is not wrong though. We have become the laughing stock of the world because of the election


text:
Re: C E Abbot, London, England
I am searching for Charles Edward Abbott, an accoutnant by trade, married to Elizabeth (nee ??). They resided at 58, High Holborn, London, England and had one daughter Kate Montague Abbott.
Charles was gassed in WW1, survived, but subsequently died, presumably from gas inhalation.Apparently Charles was married before. Any leads would be most appreciated.
More Replies:
Re: C E Abbot, London, England


text:
A pizza delivery driver arrived just in time to save the life of a pregnant woman whose estranged husband allegedly broke into her Key West home Monday night armed with a knife, terrorizing her and her two children.
Taurean Roberts, 30, of 800 Terry Ln., faces 13 charges, 12 of them felonies. Some of the charges stem from warrants relating to previous drug-dealing arrests.
Monday's trouble started around 8:30 p.m. at a home on Stock Island when Roberts entered the house through a laundry room at the back of the house, Deputy Jorge Prince from the Monroe County Sheriff's Office wrote in his report.
Roberts' wife told Prince she was on the couch while a child in the house was doing laundry. The child heard the laundry room door open. Roberts was there holding a "large" knife. He walked into the house and started yelling "for his stuff," Prince wrote.
The two minors in the house tried calling 911, but Roberts reportedly grabbed both their cellphones and threw them against a wall. He then started choking one of the children and pushed his wife against a television, during which she knocked her head, Prince wrote.
At one point, one of the children told Roberts' wife that her husband "needed to go back to jail."
Roberts has an extensive criminal history in Monroe going back to at least 2003, including felony charges of dealing drugs, obstructing with violence, tampering with evidence and failure to obey a police officer, and multiple misdemeanors for violating probation.
He's also done two stints in state prison, from March 2008 to July 2012 for six felony drug convictions, and June 2004 to July 2006 for five felony drug counts.
At some point Monday night, the pizza driver arrived and Roberts' wife whispered to him to call 911. Roberts was still in the house. The delivery man phoned the sheriff's office and left the home.
After the police were called, Roberts got into a white Mercedes C230 and left. Police found the car at 5513 Fifth Ave. on Stock Island. One of two people at that address, Corianne Depoo, said she "never heard of a Taurean Roberts" and that she loaned the car to the other resident, Urick Grant. Grant told police he "dropped [Roberts] off somewhere."
It wasn't true: Roberts was found in a bedroom in the house, according to Prince's report. On his way to jail, he reportedly said "they better give me 50 years because I am going to make sure they get theirs."
Roberts faces felony charges of child abuse, aggravated battery by strangulation, aggravated battery of a pregnant woman and obstruction of justice. He faces a slew of other charges stemming from existing warrants.
Roberts is in the Stock Island jail with no bond allowed.


text:
Re: Thomas Parker Albertson
In reply to:
Re: Thomas Parker Albertson
Thomas Parker Albertson was the son of Nixon Albertsonand Easter Parker. Nixon Albertson was the son of Benjamin Albertson and Sarah Nixon of NC. Benjamin was the son of William Albertson and Sarah Pritchard.William was the son of Nathaniel Albertson and Abigail Nicholson. Nathaniel was the son of Albert Albertson Sr. and Mary Gosbey.
Thomas Parker Albertson married Hannah Davis daughter of Harmon Davis and Hannah Middleton.Harmon's parents were Thomas Davis and Elizabeth Knox. Hannah's parents were Joseph Middleton and Phoebe Vernon Beck


text:
Free Tips: How to Use a Fake Doctor Note to Miss Work
No matter how much you love your work, sometimes you just need to miss it. It's great if you have a legit excuse and an understanding boss who will give you a few days off. However, the vast majority of us aren't so lucky. My employer can be extremely demanding and getting any free time off is not an option. If your boss is the same, or your real excuse doesn't allow you to miss work legitimately, I suggest using a fake doctor's note.
This method has worked for me numerous times, and I'm sure it will help you as well. I like it because no one can fire you if you miss work because of illness. Today you can download a fake doctor note template with any kind of excuse, so you will definitely find the perfect fake medical template for you. The best thing is that a high-quality fake doctor note template you can download is not only printable but customizable. Therefore, you can make it look 100% believable. Go here to see my detailed post on how to make a fake template look authentic and check out some free samples.
Of course, if your boss catches you using a fake excuse note from a doctor to miss work, you will never return to it as you'll get fired immediately. You may even face charges, and finding a new job will be extremely difficult.
This tragedy can be avoided if you do the following:
- Download a high-quality fake doctor note template.
Just look up 'fake printable medical template' through an online search engine and you will get thousands of links to the services that offer free or paid quality templates. Only a select few of those printable medical excuse notes are reliable. To be sure that you get the best template, spend some of your free time to do the necessary research and find a company that will provide you with a phony medical note template that really looks authentic.
- Choose a reasonable excuse.
As you can find a template for any kind of doctor's note or hospital letter, you need to consider the exact excuse carefully. It must be believable and not cause you any lasting complications. For example, if you fake a food poisoning, you will need to stick to diet lunches in the office kitchen for at least a week.
- Customize the template properly.
Always buy printable blank templates as they allow you to make them more believable by adding extra info personally. Use your free time to research what kind of data a real excuse note from a doctor or hospital must include and 'make' your fake based on these requirements.
- Act cool when submitting the note.
To tell the truth, I don't have a poker face, so this is the hardest part for me. Whenever possible, I try to submit my fake medical excuse electronically. In this case, my acting shifty and upset when I return to work is considered to be a 'side effect' of being ill. When I can't do this, I just focus on the memories of being really sick. I try to act exactly as I did at that time so that my behavior seems natural. This seems to work for me.
Medical Excuses from the Hospital That Always Work
There are many reasons that might make you use a phony medical excuse to miss work. Personally, I used a fake printable medical template in the following situations:
- I really was at a hospital.
Sometimes, you just don't want everyone in the office to know why you visited a doctor. My colleagues are prone to gossip so even private information can 'leak'. I used a fake medical note stating 'flu' to return to work without my personal business being discussed in the corridors.
- I couldn't afford a doctor.
I'm sure that many will understand that going to a hospital isn't cheap these days. I see no reason to pay a huge medical bill because of a common cold. So I just use a fake note when I return to work.
- I needed some free time.
Yes, I really used a fake doctor note template to get some free time and just relax. I don't regret it as those two free days allowed me to pull myself together and become more productive at work.
Every person is unique, and it's OK if your reasons are different from mine. The point is that a high-quality fake printable doctor note template will work regardless of your actual reasons for missing.
Choosing the exact type of excuse presented in your fake doctor or hospital form template is the hardest decision you will have to make. It's essential to consider all the pros and cons of each option. Go to http://www.getfakedoctorsnote.com/how-miss-work/10-best-excuses in order to learn more about this subject.
I also strongly suggest looking at some labor stats to learn what kind of excuse will look most believable based on your age group, etc. Little things like this will determine whether you get caught using a fake doctor template.
Here are is some free advice I can give based on my own experience:
- Always have a fake printable template for a dental emergency.
This excuse works every time because people know what tooth pain feels like and feel sorry for you. No one will look at this kind of fake doctor note closely as they won't doubt the validity of it.
- Get a fake printable template for food poisoning.
A fake note that states you've been to a hospital because of food poisoning is another excuse that will work in the vast majority of cases. This condition is extremely common and your boss will understand that you really can't return to work if you don't have some free time to recover.
- Be sure to have a printable 'return to work from a hospital' note on hand at all times.
This is the kind of excuse to use in case you lost the track of time and are late from lunch break or running errands. The HIPAA privacy laws prohibit your boss from demanding to know what kind of doctor you visited, so presenting a fake note stating 'was at a hospital at XXX time' upon your return to the office is perfect.
Use the Right Fake Excuse and Return to Work Safely
Downloading a printable fake doctor note template is easy, so if you need to miss work, using this excuse will help you. It doesn't matter what your real excuse is as there is a fake template for any medical condition.
Pick your reason wisely and get the highest-quality fake doctor excuse note template you can find. This way, you will be able to enjoy some free time without running the risk of losing your job. Just remember to act sickly and weak for a few days after you return to work.


text:
Reuters Staff
1 Min Read
Jan 5 (Reuters) - Gentex Corp:
* ALSO ANNOUNCED RESIGNATION OF FRED BAUER FROM BOARD Source text for Eikon: Further company coverage:
All quotes delayed a minimum of 15 minutes. See here for a complete list of exchanges and delays.
© 2018 Reuters. All Rights Reserved.


text:
These Men's Canterbury Uglies Stadium Pants have an elasticated waist and chunky two toned contrasting drawcord giving you the perfect fit all year round. The pants also feature an enlarged Uglies CCC applique logo, full length side-leg zips and an open hem for easier removal.
These sport pants are constructed from 100% Polyester TZ Tactel, which is breathable, durable and lightweight being perfect for all sporting activities. These funky stadium pants have an Uglies print cotton lining adding colour and style to these essential items.
Buy Canterbury Clothing from Chain Reaction Cycles, the World's Largest Online Bike Store.
If you're not completely satisfied with an item you may return it within 12 months of purchase. We'll give you a full refund if the item hasn't been used or the component hasn't been fitted.More information on returns


text:
We need an app designed for our company
Bajet $1500-3000 USD
We need an app designed for our cleaning staff that shows the cleaning calendar, current inventory, links to our home photos, notes, etc.
We also need an app for our guests, to "check in" and "report a problem". SOmething that will generate a report for our homeowners, about common issues in their homes.
So there likely needs to be a few kinds of logins: guest, employee, manager, homeowner.
We need an app with likely multiple logins, would be my guess. This could turn into a very large project, if the developer is talented enough. Our ultimate goal would be to create software that integrates with an app to do a number of things:
- Uses our confirmations of bookings to generate cleaning schedule
- Puts that schedule out to our cleaners, who can "claim" them.
- Once claimed shows as such.
- Can include all details on our homes, including photos, links, door codes, etc.
- Can be logged into by our guests once they arrive
- Guest can "Check in" so we know they are there
- Guest can "report a problem" if they encounter one, which will generate a ticket for our maintenance manager
This can go on and on
23 pekerja bebas membida secara purata $2713 untuk pekerjaan ini
I have understood initial high level requirements of your App and this is very much doable but I am afraid that $3,000 is very low budget for this App. Secondly, do you want only iOS or Android too? Relevant Skills an Lagi
I have checked your requirement and would like to discuss into more detail for any other functions or payment in the app. We have developed many projects with good design and quality. Relevant Skills and Experience We Lagi
Greetings We have reviewed your given detail. Please interact with us. We have developed 500 apps. Please check my reviews on freelancer to get an idea of quality of my work Relevant Skills and Experience IOS/Android Lagi
"Smart & Senior Mobile & Web developer" I've got to know that you need to make a mobile app for cleaning staff and management. I think I can complete your app with my skills. Relevant Skills and Experience As I am a Lagi
Hello Sir, i have checked your requirements and we can sure that we can do it because we already developed some app which have functionality is used for handle company. We are working on Web, iPhone, iPad and And Lagi
Hi, I have read project details, I have one question. Do you have website for scheduling or we have to start from scratch? Thanks! Relevant Skills and Experience Check our portfolio : [login to view URL] Proposed Lagi
Dear Sir, Trust us we can do this project as we had done similar project of our clients. We want to work with you and build a healthy longterm relationship. Warm Regards, Om Infowave Relevant Skills and Experience D Lagi
Dear Hiring manager, I am writing in response to your post. We are having 3+ years' experience in Android and iPhone Mobile application development. This is our new profile hence would request you to review some of ou Lagi
Hi Mel, 1. SUMMARY OF Your app You basically might need more than one app or an app with multilogins. App will involve calendar,location check in , inventory status,text and [login to view URL] recommending obviously i'd Lagi
Dear ! I get to know that you need to make app designed for your cleaning staff that shows the cleaning calendar, current inventory, links to home photos, notes, etc. Relevant Skills and Experience As you see in Lagi
# I found that you are looking for "Experienced Mobile App Designer". It would be appreciate if you can share more detail about the scope of requirement with us so that I can have more idea. # Please find the Below Lagi
"Mobile development Experts" we are a leading mobile app development company. We have reviewed your project and we think we can surely do it. Relevant Skills and Experience we specialize in Android, iOS & Unity 3D gam Lagi
I've read your job posting carefully and understood what you want to make. I'm very interested in your project description. I'm sure that I can complete app as you want. Relevant Skills and Experience I'm high skilled Lagi


text:
Shoreline of Tahoe
You have no items in your shopping cart.
You have no items in your shopping cart.
Volcom TD2 Gore-Tex Jacket 2018
The warming power of our Thermal Defense System plus the weather protection of GORE-TEX® come together to create powerful winter wear in the TD2 GORE-TEX Jacket. Our built in thermal panels use your own body heat to keep you warm, mesh vents are built in to help you regulate, and our 3-Layer Stretch C-Knit™ fabric gives you maximum mobility to extend your day in every direction you're willing to go. We've also added our exclusive Face Tech™ protection, Zip Tech® jacket to pant interface and backcountry extras like a whistle zipper pull and Recco® Advanced Rescue Technology when your adventure takes you off the beaten path.
Tech Features:
GORE-TEX® 3-Layer Stretch
C-KNIT™ C-KNIT™ Backer Technology
Fully Taped Seams
Droptail Fit
Zip Tech® Jacket to Pant Interface Face Tech™
Recco® Advanced Rescue Technology
YKK® AquaGuard® Water Repellent Zipper
Hidden Toggle Cinch Hood
Peripheral Hood Adjustment
Goggle Clips
Super Suede Chin Guard
Mesh Lined Zippered Vents
Stretch Adjustable Powder Skirt
V-Science 2 Way Cuff System
Pressure Point LYCRA® Hand Gaiter
Pocket Access Hem Cinch
Goggle Pocket
Specialty Ticket Ring
Whistle Zipper Pull
Waterproofing - GORE-TEX®
Withstands heavy snow and rain under critical conditions At Volcom we rate our waterproofing on Dry, Drier, Driest scale.
Breathability - GORE-TEX®
For the backcountry and touring enthusiasts.
Fit - Droptail
Same as the Standard jacket fit with addition of a drop hem for pure powder performance.
Heavenly North(Main)
259 Kingsbury Grade
Stateline NV 89449
775-588-8777 -Map
Shoreline Adventure Center
193 Kahle Dr.
Stateline, NV 89449
775-580-7722 -Map


text:
On Monday's broadcast of the Fox News Channel's "O'Reilly Factor," Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski was a "good" and "talented" person, but "it's time now for a different kind of a campaign."
Trump said of Lewandowski, "He's a good man. We've had great success. You know, I got more primary votes than anybody in the history of the Republican Party, by a tremendous amount, not by a little bit. I think Corey is terrific. I watched him before. He was terrific toward me. Said I was a talented person, and he's a talented person. He's a good guy. He's a friend of mine. But, I think it's time now for a different kind of a campaign."
He added that his campaign would have a "little different style." And that office politics happens everywhere, and it "does happen here, too. It happens everywhere."
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett


text:
Season 2015
Bow Hunting: Fine Tuning The Gear (#295)
Bow Hunting Whitetails means making sure your gear is on target! The www.GrowingDeer.tv team tests arrows to see which weight they will use: lighter and faster or heavy with more punch power. Watch to see how and why they select their arrow choice. Plus check out how the food plots are handling the intense summer browse pressure!
- Filter By:
- Recent
- Popular Today
- Popular This Week
- Popular This Month
- Popular All Time
- Season 2014
- Season 2015
- Season 2016
- Season 2017
- Season 2018
Questions? See our CarbonTV Community Guidelines.


text:
Product Finder
DexTempTM 1000
Non-Contact Infrared Temperature Monitor
DexTempTM 1000 Real Time Temperature Monitoring & Alert
Protect your business investment. A temperature change can cost thousands, if not millions of dollars in damage and lost productivity. Rest easy with DexTempTM 1000.
DexTempTM alerts you when there may be something wrong - anytime, anyplace, and anywhere - by using globally enabled networking, Email, and SMS mobile messaging to ensure notification.
Monitor temperature of mission critical equipment - server rooms, A/C, HVAC, process controls, refrigerated goods, livestock, freezers, wine cellars, perishable products, or anything that may be affected by temperature.
- Get alerts of over/under temperature, and relay those alarm conditions anywhere in the world
- Get alerts visually or by email, pager, cellphone, iPhone, Android, Blackberry, and more
- No ongoing fees, no subscriptions, no required service plans
- Full logging of all data, plus onscreen graphing
|DexTemp® is small, quick to install & easy to use
|Only DexTemp® can be aimed to monitor
specific high-value products and equipment
Product Finder
- Temperature
- Security/Detection
- Laser Power and Targeting
- Gas Analysis
- Fire Suppression/Detection
- Imaging
- Specialty Items
- Digital Solutions
- DexTempTM 1000


text: Hi! I uninstalled our e-mail server, an exchange server and I bought another one. I reinstalled the new server and the exchange works good, but I have a single problem. Before this movement we new everybody's scheduled programs, but after installation the Outlook tell us that everybody's agenda is not reachable. How can I fix this problem? If you have some answer, please write me. Thanks a lot! Bye!


text:
A Chinaman interested in the less usual side of life & a dominatrix lost in an unusual underworld in America. Sound interesting? Baton Rouge, Louisiana's Uranium Orchid show exactly how magical such a pairing can be with the release of their new album, "Premonition". A highly produced combination of impeccably-glossed techno, pop and trance based electonica. The song list is very strong, and both the production and sound are magnificent.
The first thing one notices about Premonition is the electronic aspect of the album. This sound is more structurally realized than most of the electronica acts of the last few years, and it really shows that Jacquie-Oh! (vocals), and Dr. Hu? (composing, programming) have finally found a happy medium to their musical collaboration. After struggling for years to soildify their style, Uranium Orchid has done exactly that. To the nth degree...
Sensual vocals that seem to be lighter than air, rather than the traditional low-octave rasp most female singers use, creating an aural atmosphere that is not evident with similar artists. Jacquie-Oh!'s tormented lyrics and beautiful voice compliment the extraordinary monolithic beats and sequencing of Dr. Hu?, easily one of the smartest architectural producers in recent electronic music. The mix of sweet & low melodies, sophisticated dynamics, clever samples and lush, layered, soundscapes all contribute to the success of Premonition.
One of the best tracks on the album is "Fairytale". An excellent cut that packs power, enthusiasm and sex appeal into a radio friendly package. Jacquie-Oh! and Dr. Hu? seem to be flaunting the darker side of their psyches with the seductive and hypnotizing lyrics and background vocals. The title track, "Premonition" is the most electronic of the songs on the EP, featuring a cant-be-ignored tempo, definitive programming, and is filled with a whispery background vocal track that adds to its overall power. A great song.
Uranium Orchid is a great effort from one of the most talented, intelligently produced groups on the electronic/dance music scene today. And Premonition is in my opinion, a contender for the best electronic CD of 2004. It is a worthy addition for any music collection.
This is the Uranium Orchid . A beautiful sound for a dying world...
For more info, go to:
|< Prev
|Next >
Copyright 1999-2015 Grave Concerns Ezine, or by respective copyright owners.
Site by Espace Networks. Privacy Policy. Disclosure. Terms and Conditions.


text:
Welcome to
Seaham Harbour Marina
Installation of crane column
We're always working hard to ensure Seaham Harbour Marina is a fun and entertaining day out with plenty to see and do, as well as ensuring the marina is offering top facilities for berth holders.
Boat lifting crane
As part of Seaham Marina's long term investment and commitment to continually improve the facilities for boat owners, we have installed a lifting-out and lifting-in boat hoist.
This 4 hook 20 tonne lifting capacity crane, made by Roodberg of Holland and installed by Pontoon and Dock Company Ltd, is specially designed for boat lifting and proving popular worldwide.
Pontoon extensions
The extensions to the pontoons were complete in November 2015. A further 19 berths take the total to 96 which includes an additional mooring for the increasingly popular visitor berths.
Activity Centre
Work began on 18th July of the building of the Seaham Harbour Activity Centre. The centre on the edge of the west car park is now completed and open for business. Marina activities, such as kayaking, canoeing and paddle boarding, are the principle activities of the objective of the centre albeit land base activities and events will be an addition to its overall aims. See the Activity Centre page for details of courses on offer.
Weight testing with 25 tonne of water weights
Recently completed projects at the marina:


text:
Color BLUE TIDE
View size chart
View size chart
Expected To Ship On
A pair that loves long walks on the beach. An everyday staple, the cropped Shore Line skinny jeans feature a medium wash with sanding and whiskering and a button closure. Stretch denim delivers the perfect fit along with made-to-move function.
Alana is wearing Blue Tide in size 27.
All Access Pass
Throw your email in the box and get up to speed on all things Billabong! From the latest and greatest, to product releases and promotions... Take your Billabong Canada experience to the next level! You can unsubscribe at any time.
Follow Billabong Canada
Privacy Policyor
Contact Us


text:
trying to find my family roots
I do not know much about my Albee side of the family. My father was William E. Albee, born in 1929.I believe his father was either Cyril or Earl Albee.He did have some family in Loveland, Colorado.Possibly a sister Nina.
Cyril moved around a lot and my father, William, was actually born in Massina, NY, grew up in Loveland, CO, and graduated high school in Pittsburgh, PA.Does anyone know of this Albee family?


text:
Lead Mechanic
Your review: Good table for conference and meeting rooms.
Call us 7 days a week
Item #: WBB168782
Usually ships in 3 to 6 days (ships from US) Estimated lead times do not include weekends or holidays. Transit time is determined by shipping method and destination. Orders requiring credit information might take additional time.
Frequently Purchased Together
Basic Mesh Back Office Chair - Fabric - Black- Pkg Qty 1
Not Yet Rated
Sold in packages of 4
Product Specifications
Avg. Customer Rating: (2 customer reviews)
2 Results
2 Results
Can I see the video?
Question Asked By: anonymous
+ View 1 Answer
Question Answered By: anonymous
Click here to see the instructions.
2 Results


text:
Libya will get a hold of your imagination and shake it to its core. Ancient Roman cities shine alongside the crank-it-up-to-eleven blue of the Mediterranean, the Sahara glows rusty red to an impossible horizon and the city of Tripoli swings to an irresistible fusion beat.
- The only up-to-date Libya travel guide on the market
- GPS references for hard-to-find Saharan sites
- Vital tourist visa info
- Reviews of the latest new hotels
2nd Edition / July 2007
272 pp / 16 pp colour / 30 maps
Reiseführer Libyen


text: The lemon and honey goes really well together. I love making this cake with the children because it i sso easy to make. Prepare and grease a loaf tin 20cmx10cmx6cm.Rub butter and flour together. Add sugar, beaten egg, lemon juice and ½ of the lemon rind. Stir well with a spoon. Transfer the mixture into the prepared loaf tin. Bake in oven for 1hour at Gas 4 /180C 350F until a wooden skewer inserted into the centre and come out clean. Leave to cool.Dissolve the honey with 2 tablespoon of hot water. Add in the rest of the lemon rind. Heat in the pan till the honey goes thick and syrupy. Pour the mixture over the cake. Leave to cool. Please note: this recipe has been created and uploaded by a member of the Tesco Real Food online community. Tesco does not test customer recipes so cannot accept responsibility for the content, validate the results or answer queries regarding them.


text: Hi Guys, I think the title says it really. I have read of people having success changing their save games e.g Code: http://gbatemp.net/index.php?showtopic=191206 But none so far with monster hunter. From what i read, if i convert it normally, i will be banned online. But the thing is, whilst i dont mind getting a pal version of MH , if i can save myself a lot of time by converting my current NTSC save, id prefer to do that. This is mainly because i get a lot of disconnection problems (probably due to being in UK and it connecting me to usa server). Does anyone have any advice? Many thanks in advance. Edit: I checked the Wii game forum here on GBAtemp, and saw a newish member had posted a solution: Code: http://gbatemp.net/t223682-monster-hunter-us-save-to-pal Maybe this works, but from what ive read, it just results in capcom banning your account. So i would still like to have some advice if anyone can give me some please, or even confirm this method works. Thanks so much.


text: I've had problems with the more recent versions of Iomegaware software on some systems running Windows NT 4.0 which causes the operating system to lock up on boot. This is version 1.0 of Iomegaware for Windows NT 3.51 and 4.0. All it does is install the SCSI drivers to make Windows NT "see" your Zip/Jaz drive. No fancy tools or icons, just access to your drive. But then, that's all you really need, isn't it? -)


text:
- About Us
- Nanotechnology
- News
- Columns
- Products
- Directories
- Nano-Social Network
- Nano Consulting
- My Account
Home > News > What seems like obscure science may rock your world
June 27th, 2003
What seems like obscure science may rock your world
Nanotechnology has been big news in these parts the last year. It has certainly changed things around here. It has been less than a year since Sematech International decided to place a research and development operation at the state University at Albany NanoTech center.
|Related News Press
Preparing for Nano
How nanoscience will improve our health and lives in the coming years: Targeted medicine deliveries and increased energy efficiency are just two of many ways October 26th, 2016
Searching for a nanotech self-organizing principle May 1st, 2016
Nanotechnology is changing everything from medicine to self-healing buildings: Nanotechnology is so small it's measured in billionths of metres, and it is revolutionising every aspect of our lives April 2nd, 2016
Durnham University's DEEPEN project comes to a close September 26th, 2012
|The latest news from around the world, FREE
|Premium Products
Only the news you want to read!
Learn More
Full-service, expert consulting
Learn More


text:
Although we're Online Estate Agents, our local property consultants are on hand to answer all your queries and guide you through the selling process. Meet Paul, our consultant for South London.
Total sales in London £20,389,995 since 2006
Welcome to South London. Meet Paul, our local property consultant for South London. Paul is here to provide free valuations and free advice on how to sell your home.
Paul covers a vast area of London and surrounding areas, including Dartford, Kingston, Croydon, Bromley, Sutton, Twickenham, Central and Western Central locations. Request a free valuation today and Paul will come visit to value your home and advise you on online estate agency process.
South London Fun Fact - Croydon is big for "firsts". Croydon airport was one of the first airports to offer commercial flights and the first airport in the world to have Air Traffic Control. Croydon was also home to the first public railway.
We advertise your property on
Plus many more


text:
Brand Label: Golden Rabbit
Available for Purchase Online at Saks Off 5TH for $19.99Pin It
Polished enamel colander with abstract motif.6.25"W x 3.5"H.Enamel. Hand wash. Imported.
Shop other brand label items from Golden Rabbit on FashionStylist.com.
This item was published for sale online by Saks Off 5TH on July 1, 2018 8:17 pm and last updated by us July 16, 2018 11:30 pm.
Browse More Fashion Apparel by Golden Rabbit (view more)
- $86.90
Golden Rabbit 18 Quart Stock Pot Equipment
- $39.90
Golden Rabbit Enameled Serving Tray One White
- $20.90
Golden Rabbit Set Of 3 Nesting Bowls One Blue
- $31.90
Golden Rabbit Baking Pan One Blue Equipment
- $86.90
Golden Rabbit Old Bay 18 Quart Stock Pot One Yellow
- $31.90
Golden Rabbit Baking Pan One White Equipment
- $17.90
Golden Rabbit Sauce Pan One White Equipment
- $31.90
Golden Rabbit Baking Pan One Red Equipment
- $17.90
Golden Rabbit Sauce Pan One Red Equipment
- $86.90
Golden Rabbit 18 Quart Stock Pot One White Equipment
New promo codes and links offering limited time promotions, sales coupons, and special offers on Golden Rabbit designer fashions and accessories will be posted on each designer label apparel page. For the latest up to date information on this Golden Rabbit Swirl Petite Colander fashion item, including product specifications, ordering options, pricing, shipping details, high resolution pictures, shopper comments, and other sales media, visit the Saks Off 5TH Online Store.


text:
Kitchen and Bath Design Appointment Request
When you walk into our store and showroom, you'll be greeted by our friendly, helpful staff. Many of our store associates have been with us for many years, and in the building supply industry even longer. You can depend on us to help you find exactly what you need!
We carry complete kitchen and bath displays, featuring 14 of the finest nationally known brands of cabinetry available, including Omega, Dynasty, Kabinart, Merillat, Echelon, Contractor's Choice, Candlelight, Woodmode, Schrock, and others. Plumbing fixtures in-stock from Maax, Mansfield, and Danze, with other brands available to order.
Free design services with your purchase and free delivery! Using sophisticated computer aided tools, we can help you design your new kitchen or bath, right there in the store. It's easy to show you how your new rooms will look in several variations. Set up an appointment with one of our professional designers, browse through our displays, and we will be happy to help you create the space you've dreamed about!
Quality selection in stock and custom cut to your measurements. 36 Inches deep bartop (no backsplash and two rolled edges), in pieces up to 8 feet long 25 1/2 Inches E-Top (integrated backsplash and rolled front), in pieces up to 12 Inches long 4 colors available
We partner with several vendors in Maine to provide a variety of colors and styles. You can visit the warehouse and choose your slab. A list of many of the colors that we offer can be found here!
Many options available!
We offer 14 of the finest nationally known brands of cabinetry available, including Omega, Dynasty, Kabinart, Merillat, Echelon, Contractor's Choice, Candlelight, Woodmode, Schrock, and others.
We offer specialty cabinetry lines to compliment any style!
• Omega's Pinnacle
• Omega Full Access
• Wolf Transition
• Merillat Masterpiece
• Wolf Contractor's Choice
• Wood-Mode Brookhaven
Kitchen Cabinets From Kabinart
Exceptional Value / Fast Turnaround
We invite you to discover the exceptional value of Kabinarts' all wood construction, quality details, a wide range of specialty finishes, a variety of interior convenience features and the personal attention of your local kitchen specialist.
Available in 3-4 weeks.
Need It Even Faster?
Several options for you:
•Contractors Choice Cabinetry – Available in 7-10 days.
•Wolf Classic – Available in one week.
•Merillat Express – Ships in 7 days.
Click on the supplier and manufacturer logos below to see the wide selection of products available:
Stay updated with all our latest posts, products and offers! Just enter your information below.