text:
that's like…20 grand in cars, per pixel
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 84 other subscribers
Email Address
this website brought to you by The Tiki Web Group Unless specifically mentioned, we have no clue where this content came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
Username or Email Address
Remember Me

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Watching a movie is no longer limited to a weekend, it has become an everyday affair thanks to movie theatres with world class facilities .Sangam Theatre, Dondaparthy is a chain of theatres in India that exhibit a myriad of movies around the year.
Sangam Theatre, Dondaparthy is a renowned brand of cinemas, showcasing multiple movies at a time in several languages. Be it a Regional, Bollywood or Hollywood movie, at Sangam Theatre, Dondaparthy you can catch them all. Enjoy newly released movies in vizag through this seamless movie ticket booking website. This summer, make a movie outing at Sangam Theatre, Dondaparthy and indulge in leisure! Sangam Theatre, Dondaparthy makes movie going an experience, where you can relax, unwind and laugh along with your favourite stars. You can also snack on yummy food and drinks of your choice while you watch the movie.
Catch The Latest Action | Book Movie Tickets Online at Paytm
With Paytm, you can explore the show timings online for the movies in vizag theatre near you and grab your movie tickets in a matter of few clicks. Booking movie tickets in vizag online is now a speedy task with Paytm and you no longer have to stand in long queues, enjoy weekends to the maximum because you can book movie tickets at Paytm even at the last moment! At Sangam Theatre, Dondaparthy you can instantly book tickets online for upcoming & current movie in vizag at Paytm, also make your pocket happy with tremendous jaw-dropping discounts & cashback offers with every purchase! You can also choose the best-suited seat for yourself online.
So roll into the ultimate fun with Paytm, make a choice from the huge selection of movie theatres- PVR Cinemas, INOX theatres and Cinepolis online across India for booking tickets. Make every movie a special one with Paytm!
Have a query and need help ? Click here.
Your money is yours! All refunds come with no question asked guarantee.
At Paytm, we provide 100% assurance. If you have any issue, your money is immediately refunded. Sit back and enjoy your shopping.
Happiness is guaranteed at Paytm. If we fall short of your expectations, give us a shout.


text: GeneGornikAuctioneer.com About Online Auctions Live Auctions Feedback Terms of Sale Search Menu · Home · Calendar · FAQ · Feedback · Gallery · Legal · Search · Weather · Web Links · Online Auctions · Live Auctions · Subscribe Newsletter · Prices Realized · Consignments · Fabulous Finds · TV and Press Prices Realized 23 Halloween Postcards: $600.00 Newsletter Auction Notices by E-mailYour Email:SubscribeUnsubscribe Maps & Directions Maps and Directions New Stanton Fire Hall 108 South Main StreetNew Stanton, PA 15672 Survey What do you think about this site? Ummmm, not bad Cool Terrific The best one! ResultsVotes 1595 Prices Realized Gallery: Auction Gallery Album: Prices Realized 34 of 150 A.C. Wooster Oil on canvas $4,000.00 34 of 150 Gallery: Auction Gallery Album: Prices Realized Powered by Gallery v1.4.2 Copyright © 2019 GeneGornikAuctioneer.com, All rights reserved. Designed and Hosted by dnl-Webs.com Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.Page Generation: 0.187 Seconds


text:
|Mobile Site
|eMail Author
|Caption Comp
|Monthly Poll
|Sudden Death
|Colour Key
|Cookie Usage
|Series :
|The Animated Series
|Rating :
|Disc No :
|Episode :
|First Aired :
|20 Oct 1973
|Stardate :
|Director :
|Hal Sutherland
|Year :
|Writers :
|Walter Koenig
|Season :
|Guest Cast :
|These duplicates are described as clones, which means they were created from the DNA of the original person. So why on Earth are they 20 or 30 feet tall? Your height depends in large part on your DNA, if they are duplicates of the original they should be about the same size. Amazingly, the episode gives no hint of exactly what made the clone so huge.
|Worst Moment :
|Giant Spock!
|Body Count :
|Factoid :
| The Retlaw plant is named for writer Walter Koenig - Retlaw is Walter written backwards.
My year for this episode is estimated from the Stardate; it is one of a group of TAS episodes set between 'For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky' and 'Is There in Truth no Beauty?'
This episode is a winner of the DITL "Worst of Trek" award.
|Copyright Graham Kennedy
|Page views : 14,154
|Last updated : 4 Aug 2004


text:
Rose Meacham
- Title: Graduate Research Assistant
- Group: Organizational Intelligence and Computational Social Science
- Status: Beckman Graduate Student
- Home: Neuroscience Program
- 1432 Beckman Institute
- 405 North Mathews Avenue
- Urbana, Illinois 61801
Personal Links
No additional information is currently available for this profile.
The Communications Office maintains the information included in Beckman Institute's online directory listings. In order to update your directory listing, please submit the following information to firstname.lastname@example.com:
- a short bio including information on your educational background and your field
- any honors and awards you may have received
- a description of your research (approximately 200-400 words)
- a list of recent representative publications
- a photo of yourself (you can submit one or we can take one for you)


text: Visit Edmunds.com for a complete listing of local car dealerships in Maud, Oklahoma. Find the best deal on your next vehicle with online discount price quotes on car, truck, SUV, and minivan models. With the ability to compare prices on new and used vehicles in Maud, Edmunds.com makes the car buying process convenient and cost-effective. Search for car dealerships in Maud, Oklahoma with our comprehensive dealership network and avoid the common hassles associated with car shopping.


text:
Asia's Top 30 & Malaysia's Top 10 Wedding Photographer. Award Winning Wedding Photography From Penang, Malaysia. Talk To Us Today!
We are a Penang based (Malaysia) wedding photographer studio that provides professional photography services. We are passionate people who love to capture joyous moments in life and retelling them in our photographs, providing you with memorable collections of your life and love story. With our unique Classic . Artistic . Dramatic photography style, we bring you your life moments in emotional and sophisticated pieces of high quality art with a timeless quality that last eternally.
Everyone shares the same desire to freeze the joyous moments in their lives and to be able to reminisce or share the memories whenever they like with the collection of photos made. Alextan Artworks has the professionalism in providing you with your very own personalized memorable collection of photos, be it your engagement, wedding, or family photos. Get in touch with us today, be it to view our photography samples, book our schedule or just to have a cuppa with us.
We are reachable at,
mobile | +6012 208 7172 ( Gallery Manager )
email | info (at) alex-tan.com
gallery | Alextan Artworks Galleria 98-02-38 Prima Tanjung Business Center, Jalan Fettes 10470 Tanjung Tokong, Penang, Malaysia.
© 2019 Top Wedding Photographer Penang | Malaysia – Alextan Artworks|ProPhoto Photographer Blogsite by NetRivet Sites


text:
Kagawa Pref Hostels, Japan
See all Hostels in Kagawa Pref
Hostel | 33.3 km
Welcome to BED N CHILL Shippoya. Hope you will enjoy your stay here.from 32.04 USD
Hostel | 36.7 km
Hope you will enjoy your stay at Seatiger Island Inn Shodoshima.from 27.47 USD
Browse the list above for details on all our hostels in Kagawa Pref and book Kagawa Pref hostels with no booking fee! Kagawa Pref is one of over 3,500 worldwide destinations available on hostelbookers.
Why book with hostelbookers?
Thousands of beds and private rooms, close to the things you're planning to see and do.
With great value hostels and cheap hotels, everything you want to see and do is just a step away.
Group booking?
Group of 15 or more traveling to Kagawa Pref?Contact us directly
Find the best Kagawa Pref hostel deals using the search box on the top or select a hostel from the list at the side. Use the map tab to see the location of hostels in Kagawa Pref.
Explore the world
- Amsterdam Hostels
- Bangkok Hostels
- Barcelona Hostels
- Berlin Hostels
- Breda Hostels
- Brussels Hostels
- Budapest Hostels
- Chiang Mai Hostels
- Dublin Hostels
- Hanoi Hostels
- Lisbon Hostels
- London Hostels
- Madrid Hostels
- Melbourne Hostels
- Paris Hostels
- Prague Hostels
- Rome Hostels
- Sydney Hostels
- Tokyo Hostels
- Vienna Hostels


text:
Return to grid view, save or share map with family or friends.
Switch between various map layers to learn more about the land.
Keep your eye on this message box for helpful map hints.
Use these handy map tools to get location, draw search area, measure distance, get elevation, calculate acreage, and more!
These listings will update when the map updates.


text:
Send email to Nostell Priory Holiday Park
To send an email to Nostell Priory Holiday Park simply fill out the form below then click the 'Send Email' button. Your message will be sent directly to the site or park who will reply to you as soon as possible.
You can also subscribe to the FREE Campsite Finder Online monthly newsletter by ticking the box. If you change your mind later, every newsletter email has a removal link.


text:
Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos
Want to use this Free Facebook Cover Photo?
- Right click on the Facebook Cover Photo and save it to your computer.
- Log in to your Facebook account.
- From your Facebook News Feed, click your name in the top left corner.
- Hover over Update Cover Photo in the top left of your current cover photo.
- Click Update Cover Photo. If you don't currently have a cover photo, click Add Cover Photo.
- Click Upload Photo and select the Facebook Cover Photo you saved.
- Click Save Changes.
A Facebook Cover photo is a large image that is located at the top of your Facebook page and it normally displays your personal interests and closest people in your life. This is where you can get creative and post unique Facebook Cover photos. The Facebook Cover photo represents who you are and what you care about. You can show how unique and individualized you are for your friends and family to see. A Facebook Cover photo gives you a chance to express your life for everyone to see and to show them what matters to you. Since it is the largest photo on your Facebook page, it would attract a lot of attention, so you would want the perfect image. Facebook Cover photos lets you choose from many images and you can make any image your Facebook Cover photo. Your Facebook Cover photo is also probably the first thing a viewer will see when they view your page so you would want to make a good first impression about yourself.Why Should I get a Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos Facebook Cover?
Facebook cover photos were created specifically to decorate timelines so they are not bland, boring, and like everyone else's. It gives you a way to express your own thoughts, moods, dislikes, and likes via imagery. With Facebook cover photos timeline, everyone that comes to your page can learn what you want them to learn without you saying even one word. A Facebook Cover photo is a public image so it gives people an insight on your personality before they send you a friend request on Facebook. It also portrays itself as a second profile picture on your Facebook page. By choosing your own favorite Facebook cover photos, you will have a wonderful looking page that will certainly make your page different, instead of like everyone else. Why would you want to have a page that looks like everyone else's if you can have one with its own personality that will stand out in the crowd? There are many options with a Facebook Cover photo and creativity makes endless possibilities for Facebook Cover photos.How Can I get a Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos Facebook Cover?
Many free Facebook Covers are found on the internet on various websites. The one website that holds all the awesome and unique Facebook Cover photos is 99covers.com! At 99covers.com, you will find many different various Facebook Cover photos from specific categories that cater to your preference. There are hundreds of options to choose from and the possibilities go on and on! This website only has Facebook Cover photos so it would be your primary source to Facebook Cover photos. The text links on the left side help you find what Facebook Cover you want from animals to inspirational quotes. Once you click on the text link, you'll find yourself a list of various Facebook Covers for that category.What kinds of Facebook Covers does 99covers.com have?
There are hundreds of different various Facebook Covers to choose from at 99covers.com! The Facebook Cover photos are unique and creative and will allow your visitors to know what you are in such as sad, happy, and angry. There are many different Facebook Cover photos you can choose from to add color, fun, and excitement. Whether you are into sports, want to show your faith, or want to make others aware of a cause close to your heart, there are many different covers that will let you do just that. Of course, you can just make your Facebook timeline look better instead of choosing a cause, sport, or religion, you can choose from different creative or even fun themes to make your timeline stand out from others. With so many choices, you will be able to change the cover daily if you would like or just your favorite and keep it forever. You can have fun finding the Facebook Cover photos you like and use them as you see fit. Everyone will love seeing your new look and you will love having your timeline have some personality.Do you have Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos Facebook Cover?
Yes we do have Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos Facebok Covers at 99covers.com! There will be a lot to choose from within all the Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos Facebook Cover photos because there are hundreds of various different Facebook Cover photos. You can find out Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos Facebook Cover photos on the left side of our 99covers.com web page or use the search bar to find what you're looking for and you will find many options for Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos Facebook Cover photos! Most of the images will differentiate from each other so it gives you a more diverse pick for your choice of a Facebook Cover photo. Most of the Funny Computer Sign 2 Facebook Cover Photos Facebook Covers branches off into other similar Facebook Covers as well, so it may broaden your interests in other Facebook Cover photos.
Last updated on 2019/12/10


text:
Security Standards: What's in a name?
I had an interesting phone call recently with someone in a CISO-type position. They were looking for a consultant to help them keep a seat warm working with information security risk assessments and were hoping to find a resource with practical experience using the NIST 800-53 standard. It was the second such conversation I've had recently where a manager was looking for experience with a specific security framework (the other was ISO 27000). During the conversation I pointed out that while I've worked with the NIST standard previously I've also worked with the related ISO standard, PCI and all of the security related FFIEC guidelines. And of course beyond the frameworks and guidelines I've also been auditing since 1997 and have had to consider just about every known risk factor and dimension independent of an existing standard. So for me it's all mostly semantics in terms of which framework anyone is using.
In the days since that conversation I've put some thought into the frameworks because in the end the aforementioned CISO was committed to finding the NIST experience and eventually did. But what did that really mean? Having fairly recently had the occasion to have both NIST 800-53 and the ISO 27000 documents in front of me it was striking how similar they both were with only a few obvious distinctions to be made between the two. Essentially the differences reflected more on the cultures that created them than the risk factors they were focused on (NIST = U.S.A and ISO = European). But information technology architectures fundamentally are identical the world over so despite formatting and spelling they both are addressing the same challenges whether or not they realise it. And for those of us who have familiarity with both, to know one is to know both, even if those who are committed to either one disagree. If you've worked on audit/assessment projects leveraging ISO 2700o material you're immediately qualified to work on projects using the corresponding NIST framework and vice versa. And if you have experience working with PCI standards guess what? You can pretty much step in and work with either NIST or ISO content (except of course you have to expand your sights to include the entire infrastructure, not just on whatever touches PAN data).
My preference is that we would consolidate globally into the ISO frameworks where applicable and maybe even fit that in to the SSAE 16 process. I've read enough toothless SAS 70/SSAE 16 reports to know that it's easy enough to rig the system to your advantage. And unless you're a government agency that has to comply with NIST there's little meaningful value to using NIST whereas being ISO 27000 certified carries a great deal of weight within the audit/assurance community. Plus there's the added benefit of having InfoSec practitioners all getting trained and practiced at both building out ISO 27000 compliant solutions and also knowing how to test the related controls. Think about that, a single global security standard regardless of where you enter into the profession. Having run a few practices in my career and way more than my fair share of engagements I can tell you that has great appeal. Plus it would help eliminate awkward dialogues where my sixteen years of real and relevant experience is at least partially marginalized because it hasn't all been with one particular standard.
Ultimately in the end a frameworks only meaningful advantage is that it theoretically ensures consistency in how controls are identified and assessed. If you have someone who knows a framework but doesn't really understand the details within that sort of defeats the process anyway, no matter how robust or thorough it may be. Perhaps that's why I consider it a non-issue when it comes to which frameworks a practitioner has used. I'd much rather work with someone who understands the technology and has a good feel for the details rather than someone who knows that SDLC is addressed in SA-3 for NIST or Section 12.5 for ISO 27002. But than again, I've always been more concerned with real risk, not perceived risk so this shouldn't be surprising to anyone who's read my content in the past.
A security framework by any other name would be just as comprehensive, you know what I mean?
CFPB: Dodd-Frank at its best.
The campaign season that ended with last month's presidential elections generated more debate and rhetoric than any other in my lifetime. As I'm an outspoken person who has never shied away from a good argument I routinely found myself engaged in exchanges with a remarkably broad range of people from middle schooler's to octogenarians (and that was just within my own family) that delved into an even broader range of issues. I was amazed by how much misinformation was being spread about both candidates, what their platforms were, what their agendas were (both published and hidden) and how voting for one or the other was guaranteeing the downfall of our great nation. Generally I took most of what I heard with a grain of salt and tried to work patiently through things to get as close to the truth as possible. On a few occasion's though I was presented with an assertion or opinion that required a little less patience and a bit more slapping upside the head.
Right after one of the debates I found myself knee deep in a debate about Dodd-Frank. A close personal friend of mine, a very bright bulb who I've never found a reason to disagree with brought up Dodd-Frank as an example of horrible legislation that's crippling banks and contributing to our horrible economic conditions. Whoa, whoa, whoa…. rail against taxes, complain about government spending, assail the current administration for the dramatic escalation of our national debt. But leave Dodd-Frank out of it because that's not one of our bigger problems. I can offer a five thousand word defense of the best parts of Dodd-Frank without even pausing to organize my thoughts but I don't need to go that far. I can sell it's virtues in a single, simple sentence: Any legislation that created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is instantly more effective than anything that's come before it in my lifetime.
No, seriously… in my lifetime.
I've already screamed from the rooftops about how much I like the CFPB. In my own geeky, nerdy way I'm proud to admit that I look forward to getting their regular updates and announcements because they always seem either ridiculously relevent or illuminate how they're hot on the heels of yet another predatory business practice. In barely a years time they've pushed deeper into the heart of the issues that crashed Wall Street in 2008 than anyone could have hoped (that's my opinion but one I'm willing to defend). And their examiners appear to be freaky efficient. I've been hearing from our banking clients that they're drilling in on details and covering more territory than was expected and that they're discussing issues much closer to protecting customers (and members). Our practice recently issued a bulletin to our clients alerting them to the fact that CFPB examiners are expecting related oversight to be pushed down to external business parters and vendors. This is not a new consideration, it's exactly the same as what's supposed to happen with regards to GLBA (and one of the reasons we developed our related software and services for same) but still, we anticipated this would take several exam cycles to surface. CFPB cut right to that chase in a heartbeat, which is stunning for such things. It's almost like someone told them where to look and what to look for which to a certain extent is true.
The CFPB didn't start as most new agencies do. They didn't recruit green examiners and place them under the management of a few practiced hands. What they apparently have done is to hire well seasoned examiners from related regulatory agencies (e.g. FDIC, FRB, OCC) have them contribute to creating the necessary procedures and then send them out to bring it all to life. So on Day One they already know where the bodies are likely to be buried and what to do about it. It's brilliant, it's efficient and it's the very best example of your government doing its job.
Here are some snippets from my in-box:
- Regarding the three main credit reporting agencies, the CFPB released a report that said "Among the key takeaways in the report, which is one of the most comprehensive studies of credit reporting to date, are that credit card history dominates the information in credit reports and that debt collection items generate the highest rate of disputes". This becomes important for consumers who are trying to either establish or repair respectable credit ratings. The news release further explained about the report that it "will help educate regulators and consumers about how this important industry works," said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. "If consumers know how these companies handle their credit histories, they can make better decisions on how to handle their financial lives."
- This was another headline "CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU HALTS ALLEGED NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE LOAN MODIFICATION SCAMS". The news release explained that the CFPB is "taking on schemes that prey on consumers who are struggling to pay their mortgages or facing foreclosure," said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. "We are especially concerned with those who misrepresent government programs or websites to divert distressed homeowners from needed assistance."
- And even still, another headline "CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU PROPOSES ALLOWING COMPANIES TO RUN TRIAL DISCLOSURE PROGRAMS". And while this may seem dry to so many not close to the related issue this is signficant because right now most of us ignore all the small print. The CFPB is trying to figure out better ways to present disclousre information so that us consumers both think to read it and, more importantly, understand what it's telling us. Rather than try and stuff a once-sized-fits-all solution down the industries throat they're opening it up and authorizing institutions and lenders to explore different approaches.
And the kicker about these three items? This was all issued this month (December 2012) and we're not even quite halfway through it.
Hurricane Sandy: An epic storm and the ultimate DR test
I've written similar posts in that past where I start off by apologizing for appearing opportunistic when leveraging a significant news event to generate site content. However when considering roughly one-third of all my clients are dealing with Hurricane Sandy this represents a rare chance to drive home a point.
I've personally reviewed and/or audited somewhere close to fifty business continuity/disaster recovery (BCP/DR) plans over the past decade. I've also written or edited several of those as well in the past five years since moving into professional services for financial institutions. Furthermore I've participated in roughly a half-dozen tests while still working within the infrastructure during the first part of my career. Suffice to say I have at least an informed opinion regarding the viability of any such BCP/DR strategies.
Fundamentally there are a few varieties of BCP/DR plans: Those that are current and viable, those that convince your examiner that it's current and viable and those that may have been viable years ago but bear no resemblance to your current business profile. And beyond those there's the worst of BCP/DR realities, the non-existent one. But really in the end what your current state of preparedness comes down to is this – either you're ready for an event or you're not. And in the past forty-eight hours that's been made abundantly clear in the form of how many of my clients affected by Hurricane Sandy have navigated through what's now clearly one of the worst weather events in my lifetime.
Around noontime yesterday (October 29, 2012) as weather conditions worsened and major metropolitan areas were literally shutting down for business I started checking up on a few clients. The first thing I did was visit the website of every client that my practice has assisted with their BCP/DR strategy – each of them had updated their website to announce that branches in the affected areas were closed. Some had a pop-up window with the update, others had a message displayed in either bright red letters, bold font or both. As a standard design consideration each of them also had phone numbers clearly displayed and when I called a sampling real people answered and were available to assist me. I inquired of a few of them where they were physically located and they were all located remotely and not on site in affected areas (much to their credit they were reluctant to share too much information). The second thing I did was visit the website for a few clients whose BCP/DR plans were tagged during an audit/assessment as either being deficient or missing. The websites were not updated and in all but one case I only learned that they were closed for the day after calling into a branch (one had an 800 number that was redirected to a real person).
Now I know this wasn't a very deep or meaningful test of anyone's ability to continue operations in the event of a disaster. But what it did prove is that those institutions who had plans that were current and whose management team knew to rely upon had already thought through the little things that make a difference. Someone knew to update the website, management knew to reroute calls away from unmanned branch locations. I can only assume that the appropriate parties desginated to do so also contacted their regulators to inform them of their closing and that a phone chain was initiated informing staff thus keeping them off the roads and safe. And because an important part of the plan creation/update process is both training and testing stakeholders are able to navigate through the decision tree and take appropriate related steps without having to think through it – one of the biggest challenges confronting management during a crisis. The very best part of having a viable and current plan is that all the thinking has been done in advance and has been reviewed and validated which greatly reduces the chances that something (or someone) will be missed.
Here's a sanity test: If you didn't know exactly where to begin the decision-making process or who to engage you're in need of a new plan. And if you did know but can't be absolutely certain that others would be able to do the same in your absence, you're in need of a new plan. One of the rebuttals I've heard all too often when identifying a deficient or missing BCP is that management knows what to do should some manner of disaster strike. That may be true but what happens if key people are unavailable or can't be reached?
Seriously, when something like Hurricane Sandy occurs it's the best time to consider how you're institution would fare when navigating such an event. Block off an hour within the next week with your key people, pull out your BCP/DR documentation and try and step through how you'd handle things under similar circumstances. In a very short time you'll gain a sense of whether or not you're prepared and if necessary afford you the opportunity to improve.
Trust me on this – you don't want to be in the middle of a disaster scenario and find out that your plan doesn't work.
Are banks unfairly scrutinized?
A few years back when I first cut over to working somewhat exclusively with financial institutions I memorized an elevator speech that still somewhat defines who I am and what I do professionally. Part of the speech pointed out that my firm helped "banks and credit unions meet regulatory compliance with respect to GLBA 501(b) and NCUA Part 748 A&B". To this day when anyone inquires as to what I do for a living this surfaces in some form as an answer.
Truth be told, while I've spent somewhere near seventy-five percent of my time over the past ten years working for financial institutions I've also done a fair amount of work for insurance companies, mostly centered on SOX with occasional diversions into general risk assessment work. The drivers in the insurance industry are different in terms of oversight and requirements and so the volume of work isn't nearly the same. But that by itself begs a question: Why isn't the insurance industry as regulated as financial institutions?
I've now done major audit and assurance work for financial institutions, insurance companies and health care providers and for most of them the risk profile is almost identical in terms of non-public personal information. So why isn't the level of scrutiny equal across all three of them? While some might start spouting about how it is, about how states routinely audit insurance companies and how the health care industry has to comply with HIPAA the truth is that banks and credit unions are held to a much higher degree of accountability than any other vertical. Why is that?
I'm fond of routinely, almost incessantly beating the drum about how it's all about the risk. I get my initial client opportunities because I have a deep resume with relevant experience but I generate repeat business because I tend to whittle things down to what matters most both to my clients and to their oversight providers (auditors and examiners alike). Compliance exists because risks need to be addressed – if the risks aren't credible or likely the work should be adjusted to reflect that. But where the risks are real they're really real. The type of data shared with an insurance company is in many ways even more sensitive than anything shared with a bank and most of what's shared with insurance companies is also shared with health care providers. Yet there's no true Federal oversight for the insurance industry and HIPAA is about as much of a toothless tiger as anything I've ever encountered.
I recently completed a boatload of documentation to get my family on a new health insurance plan. I turned over every piece of sensitive information I have for every member of my family minus my bank account information because that's what was required. I had to provide all of this online and follow that up by sending them an impressive array of hard-copy documents with even more sensitive information that should never be kicking around in the public domain. In the past I've also been required to provide my bank account information because one plan in particular would only provide coverage if they could automatically deduct monthly premiums via ACH drafts. So now the insurance industry has access to it all; name, address, social security number, date-of-birth, maiden name, medical history and banking information. And yet there's no true oversight agency that's responsible for making sure they're protecting all of MY information.
To compound my frustration, of the four insurance companies I've conducted work for since 2006 (two of which are Fortune 5oo's) exactly none of them have something akin to a Chief Information Security Officer. They all have risk people focused on the business side of things (because that's necessary to protect profitability) but that's it. There's typically an information security manager who's part of the infrastructure team but who almost never reports right into the senior-most technology person (e.g. CIO, CTO). Any audit work that occurs is coordinated across multiple IT managers and on rare occasions there will be an audit/assurance manager. However in the one example I personally know of where that position exists the person in the role was really just a converted IT manager who obtained a CISA designation – no fundamental audit or assessment experience.
The question has to be asked: Why is it that banks and credit unions are heavily regulated regarding protection of non-public personal information but other industries with similar risk profiles are not? Why aren't insurance companies required to comply with FFIEC-type guidance? Why isn't there a Federal regulatory agency that is responsible for keeping an eye on the insurance industry the way the FDIC, OCC, FRB and NCUA do so for their financial institutions? And trust me, whatever oversight exists for the insurance and health care industry is largely ineffective. Why is my sensitive information considered more at risk within a banking infrastructure than it is within an insurance infrastructure? Having been on site for both and examined their internal controls I can't answer that question, that's for certain.
Are self-assessments the right way to go?
About a decade ago a family member chastised me for having an auto repair shop do my oil changes for me. She (yeah, you're reading that right – "she") pointed out how ridiculously easy it was to drain the old oil, replace it with the new stuff and check a wide variety of fluid levels, connections and filters without having to pay someone else to do it. On one hand she had a valid point, it sure didn't sound very difficult. On the other hand I immediately wondered how I would get to the plug where the oil needed to drain through in order to open it, where would I collect the old oil and how would I dispose of it once I did? And what the heck would I do if something went wrong? Plus I would need to remember to buy the new oil, perhaps a filter or two and then figure out how to check a myriad number of items to make sure the car was running right. Or I could keep going to my mechanic and pay him the $39 to take care of it for me. I've always had a way of considering things via the risk vs. reward formula and that was an easy one – have the professional do it. It would take me more than an hour not including shopping for the needed supplies and there was an increased risk that I would miss checking something, forget to tighten something or simply do a bad job. I've been earning more than $39 per hour for a long time and so I decided that I should just work an extra hour and use the proceeds to let the professionals do their job.
Which is why I don't much care for any manner of compliance-based assessments that are self-administered.
Companies have had this crazy notion for more than a decade now that the best way to identify and address risks inherent within the infrastructure is to ask key stakeholders a somewhat generic set of questions and use their responses to figure out what's what. Most of the time the people driving these initiatives are either information security professionals or corporate compliance people who either believe they already know where the problems are or are looking for the simplest and easiest way to satisfy some requirement. But what they often fail to grasp is that it's almost impossible to draft a common set of questions that either apply to the vast majority or worse, will be interpreted consistently across the stakeholder population. Plus the perceived benefit of using a self-assessment approach to reduce effort and required support resources is almost always an illusion. Most of the time saved in not having someone ask the questions and record the answers is instead consumed by needing to explain the format, explain the questions or trying to clarify and clean up the responses. While supporting one such program recently each assessment required a kick-off meeting, a follow-up meeting to review the status of the assessment, a third meeting to review the initial draft of the questionnaire, a fourth meeting to review the resulting report(s) and a largely untracked number of hours to help generate all of the related support documentation. Regardless of the size of the entity being assessed each one consumed somewhere close to eight hours. While that might seem like a scary large number, the really scary part was that based on which risk analyst was responsible for the assessment and the personality/mindset of the stakeholder completing it the results looked very different from one another. It was almost impossible to generate meaningful metrics across the assessment population because a "Yes" answer for one question might mean the same as an "N/A" in another; there was no way to know that.
Another issue I've always had with the self-assessment approach is that while some stakeholders take it seriously and do a remarkably thorough job, others race through it with little hesitation just to fill in the blanks and get it off their desk. Sometimes you can detect which is which, sometimes you can't. Plus the approach fails to capture much of the rich and relevant information related to each question and the underlying risk behind it. I recall conducting a team-driven risk assessment years ago where one stakeholder after the next covering a very broad sampling of the infrastructure kept lamenting on the lack of a proper disaster recovery plan. They had something to show auditors/examiners but to a person no one believed it was a truly viable plan. All but the CIO brought it up as a concern and when pressed a bit about why that was they all shared a common concern: If their main office was closed unexpectedly for twenty-four hours, regardless of the reason, they were likely out of business. A related self-assessment question would ask "Do you have a current and recently tested DR plan?" – most respondents on that engagement would simply have selected "Yes" and moved on to the next question without ever being challenged to share their concerns. Where's the value in having a repository of questions and answers when it fails to capture the true essence or dimension of risk?
And the biggest issue I've always had with self-assessment questionnaires and their related templates is that they're so often poorly designed. I can guarantee you that each of them has at least one question which makes zero sense to anyone who reads it. They either answer it based on what they think it's asking, answer with an "N/A" or require follow-up with the people managing the process to have it explained. And you'd be amazed how many times even the author is challenged to provide a meaningful answer (including this guy). One thing's for certain, a self-anything needs to be designed and written so that everyone understands what they need to do without having their hand held. Plus it's rare that questionnaires are customized so that each stakeholder is only asked those questions that truly make sense. An application owner should never be asked if their anti-virus solution is current and up-to-date. A business process owner should never be asked about software change management. Yet seldom have I encountered a self-assessment process which does anything like this and so the audience is burdened with time consuming yet unnecessary questions.
Really though in the end my overriding problem with the self-assessment approach is that it fails to capture the expertise and guiding hand of true risk and assurance people. The process is often supported by analysts who don't really have a feel for conducting assessments and are satisfied that all of the blanks are filled in. I have a nose for when there's something beyond a simple answer and know when to scratch at the surface to bring it to light. By not allowing expert hands to guide the process potentially huge amounts of valuable and possibly critical details are being missed thus undermining any perceived value of the process. When you consider that all tolled and tallied the self-assessment approach versus the guided assessment approach doesn't really save you much time (if any) and that it results in a weaker finished product, why would you elect to use it? One answer is that regulators push for it because perhaps it's better than nothing (I can't get any of those I know to comment). Another is that the people sponsoring these initiatives lack the fundamental comprehension to understand their options and chose what they perceive as the less complicated approach (again, I don't know for sure it's just a theory). What I do know is that when done right a risk assessment is managements best friend, a fundamental belief behind the recent spike in ERM activity.
While recently having my car serviced the mechanic discovered a nest of some sort in the engine block, he thinks it was probably squirrels. Because of this discovery he went searching for all the wired connections to make sure they weren't chewed up and destroyed, quite a few were as it turns out (the car had been idle for several months). The bill only added the cost of the replacement wires but nothing significant for the time it took to first find which were affected and then replace them. Had I attempted the repair myself I might have noticed the nest and likely would've cleared it but know for certain I never would've thought to check the wires, where to look for them or what to look for. I was smart enough to rely on a professional with a nose for that sort of thing and it saved me time, money and best of all the aggravation of having the car break down somewhere unexpectedly. Good thing I didn't go the self-repair route.
Has PayPal lost its collective mind?
I'm not much of a shopper. I decide what it is I need/want to buy, assess the market place to determine quality and price and once I have a generally strong sense for both make a decision and move forward. My wife on the other hand loves the constant trolling, scouring and scouting of just about any market and any product therein to find bargains, deals and steals. So for her eBay has been among the happiest distractions ever. She's a bit of a night owl and after spending the first few decades of life being handcuffed by traditional store hours has found both eBay and the Internet to be the great equalizer. And it's difficult to think of eBay without also thinking of its most important business partner PayPal, an online payment processor that has for all intents and purposes revolutionalized the way we spend our money.
Our family has had a PayPal account almost since PayPal has offered them. It's remarkably convenient, it provides us great flexibility to shop online using a single payment source and I love that we've been able to change funding sources several times over the years. It's always conveyed a certain sense of security; I've just always felt safe using PayPal. I've even gone so far as to suggest that at some point, if PayPal management grows things just right I could see a future state where paper currency and maybe even actual physical credit cards go away and are replaced by some version of their services. When I discovered this past year that Home Depot already allows you to use PayPal to make in-store purchases I was convinced I was right. Now I'm not so sure.
Over the past year or so I've been getting the occasional email ping from PayPal regarding our reaching a spending limit. It's a fairly high limit for most but considering that we've been using PayPal to make purchases going back nearly a decade maybe not as much. But the message has been quite clear; if we didn't verify our account before reaching this limit it would be " the maximum amount of money you can send or use for purchases before you need to become Verified". So how you become verified is quite simple – either give up your bank account information or apply for a privately owned credit card. No, seriously, those are the only two options.
My first thought was that although I liked having the protective layer of a credit card product buffering my PayPal account from my actual money I was okay with providing bank account information. It's not like I don't use that in other places to make payments and so there wouldn't be any enhanced risk by doing so again. I wasn't going to apply for a PayPal-based credit card because I don't want one or need one and I wasn't looking for a new credit source anyway, I just wanted to continue using PayPal. I clicked on the option to provide my bank account information and after the initial screen where they ask for the routing and account details and clicking on "Submit" I was presented with a screen that I still can't believe exists. Right there before my eyes was a screen from PayPal in which they ask me to provide my online banking user-id and password so they can verify a series of PayPal generated payments thus confirming my banking details. Let me repeat that one more time; PayPal asked me to provide them with my online banking user-id and password.
Has PayPal lost its collective mind? Seriously, have they?
I was stunned, almost to the point where I couldn't get coherent words to flow. I immediately fired off an email to PayPal customer support asking them how they could do something so outrageous. Within minutes I received an automatically generated reply which I always find insulting, as if though I'm not worth an actual intelligent and personal response. It was a complete regurgitation of everything stated on their website and completely ignored the gist of my email. I fired off a second email missive, this time way more specific. Here's what I wrote:
Metrics Reporting: Are pretty colors always pretty accurate?
I have an odd relationship with management reporting. I know it's a necessity and quite often see clear value in what's packaged for senior management and board review. But a significant piece of the reporting content comes in the form of metrics and, well, whenever I hear the term it conjures up this ghastly image of good and decent people sinking slowly to their deaths in the quicksand that such efforts often become.
Now I've designed and supported more than my fair share of related content. I understand that sometimes the best way to tell a story is to paint it in the form of a picture; I get that part. But way too many times I've witnessed such initiatives spiral out of control to the point where it takes an army of people working ridiculous hours to pull together a deck of metrics that either fails to answer anyone's questions or, even worse, generates requests for more metrics to provide clarity. And once a metric becomes a standard part of any reporting package it often stays there until management changes, and sometimes even beyond.
But I think there's a bigger issue with metrics that exceeds my simply not thinking they're "all that and a bag of chips". Where are the controls around generating them?
Seriously, we have this vastly complex framework wrapped around financial reporting (SOX) to provide reasonable assurances that what management is reporting to its investors is accurate. We have industry, federal and state legislation requiring all manner of controls around sensitive information. There are auditors (internal and external) and regulators from all over the place that comb over everything with a fine tooth comb (or at least claim to) to make sure everything being done is done right – but in my nearly fifteen years in the audit/assurance industry I have never heard of a finding or issue regarding the veracity of metrics. Which is only a problem if the people running an institution or company rely on them to make decisions.
The reason why it's a problem is because so much of the metrics out in circulation is pulled together from disparate sources, cobbled together in spreadsheets or non-production databases and manually generated. There's no easy way to verify the source data, or know that it's unaltered in any way or even know if it's the right information. And even if the data source used is from a secured production-like environment, still there's no real auditing conducted to ensure the information is accurate or better yet, is even the right information.
I once took over a change management process and assumed responsibility for a series of reports that were generated for the Managing Director who in turn used that as part of his reporting package shared with the CIO. One of the key metrics being reported on was scheduled releases and the IT departments on-time implementation percentage. The numbers looked great showing that they were on-time more than ninety-five percent of the time over a two year period. The only problem I could see with the metric was that it was misleading to the point where it was almost a lie. The scheduled release date was being pulled from the system used to migrate changes into production and that date was only determined once the development team had completed all of their work. So the scheduled implementation date was chosen once they knew they were ready to move into production. Of course the on-time numbers looked great, they always knew they were ready before committing to it. The Managing Director incorrectly assumed that there was a legitimate release schedule with forecasted dates and that the on-time numbers reflected on a well run process; wrong. No one ever questioned the numbers or their source and had I not inserted myself into what was described as a well honed, efficient process the problem might have never been identified; and there a few more just like it. My trust in metrics was permanently altered after that.
Metrics represents an excellent way for decision makers to quickly understand status and identify problems. I've quoted here before about how someone I respect quite a bit was fond of asking her team "If you can't measure it, how can you manage it" and she's absolutely right. Metrics is the ultimate management means of measuring key activities and issues within their world. But how far do you go and how much effort do you expend pulling the related reports together? And even if you're able to automate the process and shorten the time necessary to generate the reports, how do you know that you're either measuring the right things or that the underlying data is unaltered? Ultimately I think that senior managers should be provided with something akin to a cost-benefit analysis for each metric they're given. Have them understand the degree of complexity and the amount of effort required to generate a number before deciding whether or not it's worth it. Perhaps I'm being naive but I'd like to think that most C-level executives would eliminate a significant amount of their reporting if they could see how much it was really costing them.
Here's the part that should really concern you the most though: Metrics is a key component of Board reporting, they make all sorts of decisions based on what these reports tell them. How can that be allowed unless the process used to generate them is locked down and audited? Where are the regulators in all of this?
Credit Card Breaches: The times they need a changin'
If my blogging about credit card breaches has a bit of a deja vu feel to it you're not crazy, I last touched on it less than six months ago. Sadly I was handed a new update this week in the form of my bank card being cancelled from right out underneath me again. For those of you keeping score this would be the second time in 2012, a new personal record.
Here's the sequence of events:
Wednesday morning I received an email alert from a company I use that my automatic monthly payment was declined. Knowing full well it wasn't a balance issue I assumed correctly that my bank had cancelled the card. As I travel extensively and rely on the card exclusively I made my way to a local branch later that morning. Along the way I called into the service center and confirmed my suspicions, that Visa informed the bank that my card was part of a range of numbers that was possibly exposed via a breach. I asked if it was possible to learn the name of the offending vendor and was told (same as last time) that Visa doesn't share that information. As I am now a two-time victim it's easy to spot the trend and hard to ignore the possibility that it might have involved the same vendor both times. It wound up taking three visits to a branch to straighten me out and actually get a functioning card in my wallet. The inconvenience is more than benign as I use the card in several places and will now need to make manual, one-off payments with the temporary card while awaiting the permanent card so that I can update the affected accounts. By the time this is all said and done it will have resulted in my exhausting more than a half day of billable time trying to fix a problem I didn't create.
A few things need to change.
- First, as part of the breach notification the card issuer needs to share with the cardholder the source of said breach. I've been hit twice in six months, there's a better than even chance that it involved the same vendor and/or processor and I deserve to know if that's true.
- Second, affected cardholders should receive status updates providing details about the breach including the suspected source, the techniques potentially used and a description of any follow-up actions including investigative and (hopefully) criminal prosecution.
- Third, issuers need to have a better system in place to address breaches. The fact that I have to overtly take action in order to replace the card is a joke. I'm a billable resource and taking time out to wait to talk to a customer service representative results in loss of income; I'm being punished twice as a result. I should have been offered the option to have a card overnighted to me or have been able to receive a card at any teller window and have it activated right there and then (I had to first activate at an ATM before I could use the temporary plastic). The card replacement process needs to be streamlined.
We collectively as an industry and a society need to accept that both identity and card theft is a mainstream occurrence and adjust accordingly. Legislation is needed to further insulate the victims (like me) from any extended damage or inconvenience and ensure as smooth a process as possible to allow us to continue living our lives. Because right now I don't just feel like a victim, I feel like I'm being punished for being one and treated like I simply don't matter.
Hey Washington, make the industry tell us what's going on and to treat the consumers better!
Oh, and PCI Security Standards Council, how's that framework working out for you? I'm thinking the only one benefiting from your content are the practitioners making money by supporting it.
Seriously, something needs to change.
CFPB: Filling the regulatory void left by Sheila Bair
I was an unabashed fan of Sheila Bair and made no secret of that fact. She was a breath of fresh air in a line of work where everything is stale and always at least a little boring. Not that Martin Gruenberg is any less effective running the FDIC, he's just a whole lot less interesting to pay attention to. And in the time since Ms. Bair stepped down I've just not been finding much to blog about regarding things the government is doing.
Things are looking up a bit because I have a new favorite regulatory agency to follow, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). And here's why: They focus on things that impact my day-to-day life (and yours as well).
I started tracking what the CFPB was doing about five months ago by accident. Someone I know who used to be an examiner for the FRB switched over to the newer agency right at its infancy and I noticed this courtesy of a LinkedIn update. Because I consider the Fed to be the Big Kahuna of the regulatory agencies I was surprised (you don't leave the Yankees to sign with an expansion team unless you have to, or so I thought). Compelled a bit by the update I started poking around the CFPB website. For the first few months of this year it seemed to have potential but was little more than brochure-ware. But last month that all changed.
The first CFPB update that caught my attention was labeled 12 CFR Part 1070 and it was all about the protection of consumer data, only with a slight twist. Basically it was all about how any information they received as part of their field work would be protected exactly the same way that any third party vendor would be required to. Despite their being a Federal agency they weren't going to hide behind that as a means to simplify their lives. They spearheaded an update to the underlying regulation that frames their charter so that consumers and their institutions can be assured that all PII and NPPI would be protected. For me it was a rare win-win topic; protection of PII and NPPI combined with a reference to vendor management (these are a few of my favorite things). And really for me it was that much more significant because I've known of a few situations where representatives of Federal and State regulatory agencies were responsible for the outright loss of confidential and/or restricted data. Beyond a slap on the wrist there wasn't much else done to the offending examiner or their agency. And the affected institution couldn't really complain too loudly because it's always a bad idea to challenge your regulators, even when you're in the right. So I thought this was all at once a compelling and remarkably sensible update by a regulator, not something I'd expect to see. That was the first points on the board for the CFPB.
The second set of points were scored almost on the same day. I wanted to check one of the details related to the aforementioned update and noticed this one "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau report finds confusion in reverse mortgage market". Because I have a parent who is a senior citizen and who I think might one day soon be open to at least exploring a reverse mortgage I read with great interest. The report was in plain English, was oriented in such a way that I could share it with my family and have them understand the issues and concerns detailed within and most importantly it made sense. Reverse mortgages are growing in popularity and its main audience is the senior citizens segment of society. Seniors tend to be more easily misled, they're under greater pressures to find new money sources (courtesy of our recession) at a time in their lives where going back to work is often not an option. And because a parent would do almost anything rather than turn to their children for financial assistance they see a reverse mortgage as a way out of their predicament. So for me having this content available was quite the relief. I can caution and advise all day and night but the risks presented by a reverse mortgage are much more credible coming from an authorized source. And so I celebrated July 4th this year by declaring the CFPB my new FDIC (the Sheila Bair inspired version, not the current blah one).
Here's my really bizarro advice to any of you with even the slightest interest in regulatory oversight; if you haven't already done so visit www.cfpb.gov and take a look around. It's oriented towards lay people, not just lawyers and regulators (and practitioners like me) and addresses topics and concerns that affect the majority of our population. Basically it's what I would expect from a regulator that still has that new agency smell but nothing like I've come to know from those that preceded it. To those who have had a hand in defining its charter and organizing its content, great job! Now repay my kind words by going out and getting me some juicy enforcement stories to write about.
Risk: The core issue behind regulatory requirements
There's a joke of sorts within my personal circle of family and friends regarding what it is that I do these days. Ask me and I'll tell you that I'm a regulatory compliance expert who advises financial institutions on how to comply with the myriad rules and regulations governing information security. Ask my immediate family and they'll tell you that I work with computers. Ask my extended circle and they'll tell you that I do a lot of work with banks and credit unions. For those who aren't in the banking business it's difficult to understand exactly what it is that I do and so they find it easier to keep it simple; I do a lot of work with computers for places where people deposit their money.
Of course the truth is much more complicated. I don't just focus on computers, my scope expands to include anything that involves sensitive information. While that always includes a variety of devices it also includes paper-based and people processes as well. I frequently share stories about the enormous amount of printed content that's to be found throughout an institutions physical locations. I occasionally tell stories about how careless people can be when on the phone or in conversation and sharing all manner of sensitive information. It's never just about computers, it is however always about information and how it needs to be protected.
Truthfully though what I really do is search for controls that protect information, identify those that I find and try and measure their effectiveness and more importantly identify where controls are missing and work with my clients to remedy that. At the heart of the regulatory requirements I focus on it's all about the risk introduced by the presence of information, from personally identifiable (PII) to non-public personally identifiable (NPPI). Risk: It's what drives every single project I work on, it's what drives every product and process I help develop. And really, if you take the time to read through the literature, it's what's behind just about every piece of regulation known to the banking world. Risk, risk, risk and risk.
One of the reasons I've enjoyed spending so much time working with the community banking and credit union sector over the past few years is that it's a simple enough argument to make with fewer people to convince; everything you do to comply with the regulations should be risk-based. It doesn't really make a difference if it's complicated to do or time consuming, you prioritize based on where they are found and make decisions accordingly. But that gets much more difficult to do as the institutions grow in size and complexity. Over the fifteen years I've been building and supporting compliance initiatives I've worked with Fortune 50's, 100's and 500's and a whole lot of financial institutions that merely read Fortune magazine. But while their overall size varies widely risk is still risk and that never changes.
I wish more practitioners embraced this simple concept. While some do, many still don't. There's often a rush to come up with a standard set of decision criteria to drive the work based on factors not necessarily aligned with risk factors. Those who have worked with or for me will tell you that when presented with questions about which vendors or applications to assess or what to look for when conducting any type of assessment my first line of logic is to try and figure out where the greatest possible exposures to be found. Assessing a low risk application yields little value no matter how complete it may be. And reviewing a vendor where the dollar spend is high but the risk factors are low does little to protect the institution.
Beware the practitioner who wields a hammer for they only know to look for nails.
Your regulator doesn't want you to blindly implement compliance programs, they want you to identify and manage risks, real risks. They want to be able to understand the logic and approach being used and find credible evidence that you're focusing your efforts on the right things. Go back and read through the library of FFIEC documentation and pay close attention to the hooks inserted throughout where they talk about conducting assessments and talk about using approaches which are appropriate for the size and complexity of your institution. Then scan through your related program inventory and figure out if you've designed things accordingly. Are they actually protecting your institution from credible threats and risks or are they just filling binders on your compliance officers shelves?
For me, professionally I'd prefer to always only do meaningful work and in the audit and assurance world meaningful is code for risk-based.


text:
I do not like The X Factor, but during the series that has just passed I found reason to watch it (or at least some of it). Their names: John and Edward ('JEdward'). The young Irish brothers were not the best of singers, but they were performers. They danced their socks off (sometimes not in time to the music or each other) but it was clear to see that they were having great fun doing what they clearly enjoyed. However, every time they came on stage during the live shows the studio audience would boo and hiss as if Hitler had risen from the dead just to come on to perform 'I Did It My Way'.
John and Edward coped magnificently during their ritual humiliation each week. They did not once acknowledge the blood-hungry mob of an audience; they just smiled, soldiered on and did what they liked doing best. Even now (they are currently promoting their debut single 'Under Pressure') some people have the audacity to boo them. But why do people feel the need to boo?
There are always going to be people in life that we do not like, wish to associate with, or want to support. Yet this does not give us carte blanche right to berate them. If we do not wish to encourage or acknowledge someone, then we just do not clap (or clap less). There is no need to boo, hiss and shout insults. In doing this it does not make the booer more superior than the person they are booing. If anything, it makes the booed look vastly better and more righteous.
It must be something about the mentality of a crowd. Humans obviously feel that when en masse we can get away with doing things we would never dream of if we were on our own. Look at the proposed video the UK's Football Association (FA) were going to launch this week to combat homophobia at matches. The video uses the shock tactics of showing a businessman walking around his office shouting pejorative words at his homosexual colleagues. The caption reads 'this sort of behaviour is not acceptable here…' The action then switches to the same man in a crowd at the football match shouting similar words to players on the opposition and the referee. The caption changes to: 'so why should it be acceptable here?'
Presumably this mentality can be linked to the JEdward/X Factor situation. If we saw the pop stars walking down the street, we would not boo them as we passed, but if there are 400 other faces around us, we obviously feel like we won't get caught. Not only is this the height of cowardice, but also is it rude. If we do not agree with someone's view, believes, lifestyle or performance, then we should just be quiet and learn to deal with it. No one is asking anyone to convert to being a JEdward fan (for the record, I am) or switch their opinion on a certain matter, but just to respect other people's rights. There's something just not cricket about it all, if you ask me.
William Hanson
Tutor, The English Manner


text:
Mk4 Wiring Diagram
Mk4 Wiring Diagram
On this website we recommend many designs about Mk4 Wiring Diagram that we have collected from various sites of Just another WordPress site, and of course what we recommend is the most excellent of design for Mk4 Wiring Diagram. If you like the design on our website, please do not hesitate to visit again and get inspiration about Wiring Diagram in our website.
And if you want to see more images more we recommend the gallery below, you can see the picture as a reference design from your Mk4 Wiring Diagram.
Thank you for seeing gallery of Mk4 Wiring Diagram, we would be very happy if you come back.
Mk4 Wiring Diagram #1
Mk4 Wiring Diagram #2
Mk4 Wiring Diagram #3


text:
Bifocals at the Monitor Liberation Day
|Dec 1
|Bifocals At The Monitor Liberation Day -- Our hearts fill with compassion today for co-workers stuck wearing bifocals at the PC. Shed a tear as their heads bob up and down, in and out, trying to read the monitor, trying to decide which set of lenses to use.
Please note! All holidays created by Thomas & Ruth Roy, under the name of Wellcat Holidays & Herbs, are, indeed, copyrighted. If you wish to make use of them in any fashion, for profit, we respectfully request that you contact us for appropriate contract arrangements. If, on the other hand, you wish to use them in some non-profit fashion, we still would request you contact us, to ensure permission. Further, please be advised that we, a.k.a. Wellcat Holidays & Herbs, are under exclusive contract with Blue Mountain Arts and Excite.com for electronic transmission via greeting cards. Please do not violate United States copyright laws!
As you can
tell, we are still working on written copy to provideas so many of you have
requested over the yearsmore information in print. Please be patient as we co-author
much of the material which, collaboratively, Thomas and I would like to see published in a
book (Wellness . . . With a Grain of Salt). We began
offering that much sought after more information about this and all of our
other holidays, in interviewsmostly radio, often for magazine and newspaper
columnists. Thus, while we are both writers, lifes little distractions have kept us
from actually putting our thoughts on paper in any coherent, cohesive manner.
What we
will be offering includes:
Top 20
reasons and ways to celebrate this and each of our other holidays; recipes (after all,
what the heck is any celebration without food!?); some select rituals or traditions which
might suit you and your family, friends, or co-workers; some possibly irreverent humor
about the reasons each holiday came into existence. And whatever the heck other stuff we
think will amuse, entertain, provoke and somehow satisfy the many people who look at
Wellcat Holidays as the wacky but uplifting ways to celebrate human nature & life.
Want to
contribute your version of how to celebrate? Pick a holiday, jot down your own
thoughts about it and send your comments to us at firstname.lastname@example.com.
Well be glad to read what you send and might even (with your permission) publish
your contribution to our Wellcat Holidays After all, its merely a state of mind, my
Ruth &
~ Be sure to visit the wonderful pages of our Wellcat Herbs portion of this web site! We offer some truly fine products. Now accepting VISA & MasterCard ~


text:
Cookshack Get Smokin Cookbook
by Cookshack ID# 898 Model # LT163
Product Info Guide
Frequently Bought Together
Key Features
- Features 190 recipes compiled from customers, staff and winners of Cookshack's past recipe contests
- Includes information on time and temperature charts for slow-smoking and hot-smoking, brining, and curing
- Large 8x10 cookbook for easy reading
This Get Smokin Cookbook by Cookshack features 190 recipes that range from old-fashioned pit barbecue to gourmet wood-smoked dishes. It includes information on time and temperature charts for slow-smoking and hot-smoking, brining and curing. Many of the recipes even include helpful suggestions for making the right wood choice.
Legal disclaimers and warnings
Product packaging, owners' manuals, installation instructions, and/or operating instructions may include more information than what is shown on our website. The content on our site is intended to be used for reference purposes only. Please fully read all included manuals and documentation before installing or using this product. WARNING for California residents: this product may contain chemical(s) known to the state of California to cause birth defects, cancer, or other reproductive harm.
Product Information
- 980762410071
- Model Number
Need help? Our experts can help
guide you through your purchase.
|Grill Type
|All Purpose
Learning CenterBack to Top
Customer Reviews (0)Back to Top
Questions & Answers (0)Back to Top
Compare Similar ItemsBack to Top
Current Item
Cookshack Get Smokin Cookbook
Evo Grill Cookbook
The Official Backyard Hibachi Cookbook
|Price & Shipping Information
This item leaves our warehouse within 24 Hours
This item leaves our warehouse within 3-5 Business DaysView Item navigate_next
You Save: $6.00 (17%)
This item leaves our warehouse within 2-3 Business DaysView Item navigate_next
|Model Number
|Grill Type
|All Purpose
|All Purpose
|All Purpose
Proposition 65Back to Top
Per the manufacturer, this product does not require a California Proposition 65 Warning.
For more information, go to www.p65warnings.ca.gov.
Shipping & ReturnsBack to Top
Free Shipping on orders over $49.
Ship your entire order to your home for free, especially the big stuff! * Continental US only.When Will My Item Arrive?
Once shipped, items usually arrive within 3 to 5 business days. If your item is large it may ship via one of our third-party freight carriers (18-wheeler). If your order has an item that is shipped on a freight carrier, you will be contacted to schedule a curbside delivery time.
This item leaves our warehouse within 24 Hours$6.95 Flat-Rate Shipping
Anything under $49. ships at one low price. If your order increases, your shipping stays the same!45 Day No Hassle Returns
Return all new, unused and unassembled items in their original packaging, and we'll give you a full refund minus the cost of the original shipping AND return shipping.No Restocking Fee
Most companies charge a restocking fee. We think that is wrong.
About UsBack to Top
At BBQGuys.com we pride ourselves on being the grilling experts. From expert product reviews to free outdoor kitchen planning services, BBQGuys.com is dedicated to being your go-to resource for all things barbecue. Based in Baton Rouge with over 500,000 happy customers nationwide, we stand by our wide selection of grills, smokers, outdoor kitchen components and grilling accessories. Call us with any questions - we're here to help.


text:
Puzzle Levels
Puzzle Categories
Download a FREE Solution for your puzzles!
Click Image to Enlarge
Write your own review! Request the FREE solution for this item!
Shape Shifter
Product Information
|Disassemble and Reassemble the Wooden Pieces
|Level 9 - Gruelling
|Puzzle Master
|Puzzle Master Wood Puzzles
|3 in x 2 1/3 in x 1 3/4 in / 7.5 cm x 6 cm x 4.5 cm
Product Description
Customer Reviews |Write your own review!
Disclaimer: These reviews are written by our customers. Puzzle Master makes every attempt to keep these posts informative and relevant. If you find a post objectionable or inappropriate, please let us know by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.com
On Thursday February 26th mohammad reza wrote,


text:
Coming Soon
This county is up for Adoption please contact Margie Daniels
This site is hosted by USGenNet, a nonprofit web-hosting service solely supported by tax-deductible donations. If this website has provided you with useful information, please consider making a donation to USGenNet to help keep sites like this online.
Support Free-access Online History and Genealogy.
©2004 gagenweb.org , georgiagenweb.org.
Margie Glover Daniels, State Manager for The Heart of Dixie Project


text:
BUNNY 911 – If your rabbit hasn't eaten or pooped in 12-24 hours, call a vet immediately! Don't have a vet? Check out VET RESOURCES
The subject of intentional breeding or meat rabbits is prohibited. The answers provided on this board are for general guideline purposes only. The information is not intended to diagnose or treat your pet. It is your responsibility to assess the information being given and seek professional advice/second opinion from your veterinarian and/or qualified behaviorist.


text:
- News
- Business
- Sports
- Entertainment
- Lifestyle
- Health
- Travel
- Technology
With all the obstacles that could get in the way of a European getaway this summer -- volcanic ash, airline strikes and angry protests in the streets over the economic meltdown -- many of us might be thinking of playing it safe and staying on this side of the pond.
If you're casting about for a made-in-Canada trip, Gene Shannon, an editor at Frommer's, the popular travel guidebook company, has a few "beyond the usual" ideas.
Go north: A canoe trip through Nahanni National Park in the Northwest Territories' Dehcho region is what Shannon calls "the ultimate Canadian experience."
You don't have to be a hard-core outdoors type to visit one of the world's first UNESCO designated natural areas in the world. At 30,000 square kilometres, nearly the size of Switzerland, the pristine nature preserve is located along the South Nahanni River. Canoe enthusiasts have been paddling the wilderness waters for decades, and aboriginals have been doing the same for thousands of years. By night, it's a prime viewing spot for the northern lights. Wildlife is aplenty, but people are not with only about 800 to 900 people visiting per year. The most spectacular features of the park are Virginia Falls -- twice the height of Niagara Falls -- and four massive canyons.
Several guiding companies offer fly-in trips. Go to www.pc.gc.ca/nahanni for Parks Canada's list of licensed guide companies and outfitters.
Cruising Quebec: About 16 different cruise lines ply the waters of the St. Lawrence Seaway each summer.
Shannon recommends seeing Quebec this way because of the out-of-the-way places included in the trips, which range from three to eight nights.
"I think it's neat because you get to see cities like Montreal and Quebec City, but also native villages and fjords."
Montreal, Ottawa, Kingston and Quebec City are just some of the departure cities.
More information at cruisesaintlawrence.com
Whale watching in Churchill, Manitoba: Each summer, more than 3,000 beluga whales come to feed at the mouth of the Churchill River. It's a spectacular sight and one that's easily accessible through many outfitters by Zodiac, kayak and even snorkelling adventures.
Can't get there in summer? There are also polar bear watching trips in the fall.
Go to visitnorthernmanitoba.ca for a list of suggested guides and outfitters.
Maritime regatta: The Royal St. John's Regatta's claim to fame is that it's the "largest weather dependent municipal holiday that is not on a fixed date."
That's a mouthful of a title to hang your hat on, but according to Shannon it's one big party. "The whole city shuts down and 50,000 people come out," he says. "St. John's knows how to throw a party."
The historic event, which began in 1816, takes place at Quidi Vidi Lake. If the weather gods are co-operating, the rowing competition is held the first Wednesday in August -- this year Aug. 4. But the decision to hold the race isn't made until that very morning.
The main event is watching the rowing competition, but on shore it's a carnival-like atmosphere with vendors selling food and live entertainment. Meanwhile, around the same time as the regatta is happening, there are also several festivals going on, including the Labrador and Newfoundland Folk Festival.
Details at stjohnsregatta.org.


text:
"Arrived as advertised w/ very fast shipping... would be happy to deal with again!!"- Michael M
Home > Acer > Aspire One > Acer Aspire One D150 Parts > Keyboards
Part Number: AEZG5R00010
OEM keyboard unit, US-Intl version. Color: Black
This item is used, in great condition.
Additional Product Details:
Compatible part numbers: PK1306F0900, PK1306F0100, KB.INT00.513, NSK-AJE1D, NSK-AJA1D, NSK-AJJ1D, 9J.N9482.E1D, AEZG5R00010, PK130851000
Compatibility guaranteed.
30-day money back return policy & 90-day product warranty applies.
Compatible models include:
More keyboards for the Acer Aspire One D150 seriesAcer Keyboard - White (AEZG5R00020) (NL032649)
Laptop keyboards at Machina Electronics
When buying a replacement keyboard, we recommend matching one of the part numbers on the back of your original keyboard. Most keyboards will have several alternate part numbers and we will list them when we have confirmed the keyboards are interchangeable. If matching a part number isn't possible, Machina Electronics has identified the correct keyboard for thousands of laptop models, and any of the keyboards listed for your model are guaranteed to be an perfect replacement.
The keyboards we stock are OEM keyboards and are manufactured by the same factories that make the original keyboards for brand name laptops. All keyboards include the flexible ribbon cable to connect it to the motherboard. Some keyboards use screw posts on the back of the keyboard to secure it into place, and these need to match your original broken or faulty keyboard for the proper installation. Machina Electronics supplies keyboards that are an exact match for your model, and uses our direct exeperience opening and parting out laptops to surpass the competiton in knowledge and avoid costly mismatches.
Check out our guide on how to replace a laptop keyboard for more information.


text:
Load More
Get an edge with the best real estate agents in Maysville who have local expertise in the Maysville real estate industry. These top realtors in Maysville help you save time, money, and efforts when you buy, sell, or rent a property.
FastExpert is your local, qualified, and trustworthy real estate specialist that will help you find the best real estate agent in Maysville for your needs. All sellers agents in the US and buyers agents in the US registered with the directory are familiar with the Maysville area and will offer you customized realty solutions for selling, buying, and renting your homes efficiently. This real estate agent listing will also enable you to get connected with professionals who have local knowledge, will directly meet your needs, and have the ability to solve the puzzles involved in buying and selling.
There are lots of top realtors in Maysville registered with the real estate agent directory US. Our top realtors have a professional record and understand the value of your time. Our top real estate brokers are ready to answer your questions on buying, selling, and renting homes in any part of Maysville. They will be able to provide benefits that far surpass going at it alone. The best realtors can help you attract true buyers and sell the home at a the best possible price tag, in addition to saving you time and energy. A local agent with an expertise in a specific community will not only match your needs but will also save you time wasted on futile searches. Their detailed advice on pricing is a big advantage.
If you are searching for a top real estate agent in Maysville, Oklahoma, this directory will assist you in discovering and working with registered real estate advisers who promise you the best realty solutions.


text:
DENVER One snowboarder was killed and another was seriously injured in an avalanche near Cameron Pass in north-central Colorado.
The Colorado Avalanche Information Center says the snowboarders, whose names and ages have not been released, were navigating backcountry terrain when they were caught Saturday in a slide in the Paradise Bowl on the west side of the pass. Scott Toepfer, a forecaster with CAIC, says the injured person was flown to a Fort Collins-area hospital by helicopter.
The Denver Post reported the Jackson County Sheriff's Search and Rescue Team is looking for the other snowboarder. CAIC investigators also were at the scene Sunday, but the size of the avalanche has not been released.
CAIC says there have been four avalanche deaths in Colorado this season.


text:
Spend at least $25 for FREE shipping!
+ Expand
All jewelry is individually packaged in clear heat sealed bags that allow for a good visual inspection of size and color. Please take a good look at your jewelry and make sure it meets up with your expectations before opening the bag. Everything is guaranteed to arrive undamaged and free of manufacturer defects. Items can be exchanged or returned for a full store credit within thirty days of delivery confirmation, but only if the original packaging remains sealed. Original shipping charges will not be reimbursed, but replacements for any defective, broken or mistaken merchandise are always shipped free.
Click here to create a return or exchange ticket. Please contact us with any questions before sending jewelry back. We recommend that you recycle the original packaging when sending jewelry back to us. Returns will not be accepted if they arrive damaged or lack appropriate packaging. Mailing the jewelry in a regular envelope is almost guaranteed to result in damage or total loss when it's run through post office sorting machines. RETURNS THAT ARE SENT IN A REGULAR ENVELOPE WILL BE REJECTED.
Send returns to:
Tulsa Body Jewelry
1746 S Harvard Ave
Tulsa OK 74112-6826


text:
1,277 photos online in 30 galleries.
Home -> Browse Galleries -> Northern Rockies Region -> Muncho Lake Park
North of Fort Nelson, BC, along the Alaska Highway.
Motocross 8477-16
Motocross 8476-16
Motocross 8468-16
Motocross 8464 -16
Motocross 8457-16
Motocross 8453 -16
Motocross 8449-16
Motocross 8448-16
Motocross 8443-16
Motocross 8436-16
Motocross 8428-16
Motocross 8419-16
Motocross 8412-16
Motocross 8406-16
Motocross 8402-16
Motocross 8396-16
Motocross 8395-16
Motocross 8393-16
Motocross 8387-16
Motocross 8386-16
Latest news
RSS2 newsfeed
Gallery map
Gear notes
About DLP
Where are we?
Contact info
Purchasing info
Frames & Materials
Sizes & Prices
Custom Framing
Northern Light Show
Northern Light show out my back door. I took some shots with a fence and some hay bales in the foreground. [ more ]
Fort Nelson Motocross races
I took my camera to the motocross races in Fort Nelson this weekend. I was a new challenge for me as I haven't done any action shooting for years. I have been shooting landscapes and flowers. They don't move very fast!. Anyways, check out the new gallery. [ more ]
More FNNPF photos
As the construction winds down there is less scaffold in the way. This batch includes some interesting dusk and sunrise pictures. [ more ]
New FNNPF pictures
A few new pictures added to the Fort Nelson North Processing Facility. One boiler is running and we are doing steam blows to clean out the steam piping. [ more ]
New FNNPF aerial photos
A few new aerial shots taken from the helicopter on the way home. [ more ]
Gallery pages created by Exhibit Engine 2.04


text:
Karlu Photographic, Unit 15, Crestland Business Park, Bull Lane Industrial Estate, Acton, Sudbury,
Suffolk, United Kingdom CO10 0BD
Copyright © 2002 - 2016 Karlu Ltd
Sales Hotline 01787 312200 - Fax Order line 01787 377 611
or use your PayPal account
Payments secured by Comodo EV Certs
Refine your search
Reset Selection
Browse By Price:
|Available in the following sizes:
3m (9ft 10in) wide x 3m (9ft 10in) wide
3m (9ft 10in) wide x 6m (19ft 8in) wide
6m (19ft 8in) x 6m (19ft 8in) Super Wide
Long curtains that have been digitally printed from original high quality photographs onto a coated Nylon Material and competively priced. This enables the photographer to actually place a subject in an controlled environment free from the "curtain background" look - absolutely ideal for wedding photographers who wish to re-create the church look or have been "rained" out.
Currently available in:-
Standard Version - Constructed from printed sections that are then glued together to form the overall curtain. Economically priced, not washable, suitable for clean envirnoments or short term use. Joints may be visible on light/white sections - this an be overcome with the use of a white curtain or paper roll behind the Photo Realistic Backdrop.


text:
2420 W. Mason St. Send to Phone
920-497-1313 | Make Restaurant Reservations | Menu
OpenLunch & Dinner daily
- Dress code: Casual
- Kid-friendly
- Take-out available
* Click here for rating key
Schlotzsky's Restaurant Review: Schlotzsky's may sound like a New York joint, but the first link in this chain actually opened in 1971 in Austin, Texas. Their original sandwich on warm sourdough bread is still available, but today you can also choose from pizzas, salads, soups and a variety of other sandwiches such as the Texas Schlotzsky's on toasted jalapeño cheese bread or Angus Pastrami Reuben on toasted dark rye bread. (Sourdough is the most flavorful.) Their signature chips, though, are on the salty side. Other locations.
Sign up to receive the 2019 edition of GAYOT's Annual Restaurant Awards. We honor America's best chefs, a top restaurateur and more.


text:
CeeLo's reality show cancelled
CeeLo Green's reality show has been cancelled, just days after his shocking comments on social media about rape.
TBS spokeswoman Karen Cassell has confirmed the network isn't renewing The Good Life for a second series. She did not give a reason but said the decision was made earlier this summer.
The series, which premiered in June, averaged 650,000 viewers, considerably fewer than the 1 million to 2 million viewers the network averages in prime time.
Confirmation of the cancellation comes just days after CeeLo's tweets about rape that caused a public outrage.
CeeLo recently pleaded no contest to one felony count of furnishing ecstasy to a woman during a 2012 dinner in Los Angeles.
Following that, the former Voice coach posted a series of tweets, including one that read: "Women who have really been raped REMEMBER!!!"
He then deleted his Twitter account, before returning to the social media network and apologising.
He tweeted: "I truly and deeply apologize for the comments attributed to me on Twitter. Those comments were idiotic, untrue and not what I believe."
PA Media


text:
Battery Storage Companies in Perthshire
You have found installers of Solar PV Battery Storage in Perthshire. The following companies are all Solar Panel Battery Storage Companies serving Perthshire. View full company profiles for more details on their experience and to get a feel for their skills, accreditations and past work.
Over 40% of us get 3 or more quotes when thinking about significant home improvements.
Your Contact List


text:
Light Tracer Lite Box
by Artograph
The LightTracer offers a fast and easy way to trace designs and patterns for memory books, embossing, quilting, stenciling, sewing projects, and numerous other creative uses. This low cost, durable, laptop size light box features a conveniently slanted 10" x 12" illuminated work surface and a handy recessed tray for holding your tracing and embossing tools. A long-life 8-watt fluorescent lamp is included.
Available replacement bulb is an 8 watt, 12 in. fluorescent daylight tube. This replacement bulb has a 7500 hour life.
?Ask a question about this product | See all questions & answers (1)
Average User Rating: Based on (33 Reviews)
Shirley M from Cullman, All says:
The Light Tracer Lite Box is a handy, helpful tool to use in copying designs for all kinds of crafts. I also enjoyed the good price and speedy delivery.
Share this Product
Why is the VIP Price not displayed for this product? MisterArt.com's goal is to provide our customers the lowest prices on all products we sell. Some manufacturers restrict retailers from displaying or promoting certain products at any price lower than a Minimum Advertised Price (MAP). It is MisterArt.com's policy to offer these products at their MAP price as our Non-Member Price. VIP Members will see the VIP Price after adding the product to the cart without any purchase obligation.
Enter Quantity & Click 'Add to Cart'
Please wait...
You May Also Like...
How to get VIP Club Prices
Anyone can be a VIP Member with:
Only $25/year
Learn More »
Product Questions and Answers
I want to trace / duplicate one of my drawings onto Strathmore 300 medium surface drawing paper. Will I be able to see an original drawing in black ink through this paper weight with this light box?- Asked by KS on 15-Sep-13
You can use the Strathmore 300 sketch paper. However, we would suggest using the Strathmore 300 Series Tracing Paper for a more transparent paper instead.- Answered by MisterArt on 16-Sep-13
Ask a Question About Light Tracer Lite Box
Tips For Your Question
Your email will not be shared. We will only use your email address to respond to your question. When asking your question, please be as descriptive as possible, it will allow us to give you the most accurate answer possible.


text:
CRESTWOOD — The Rockford Aviators split a double-header Sunday, but won the series against the Windy City Thunderbolts behind an opening win powered by Kalaika Kahoohalahala, who set career highs in runs, hits and RBIs.
Kahoohalahala hit an RBI double that scored Mason Morioka to put the Aviators up 3-2. He also hit his first homer of the season, a two-run shot, to stretch Rockford's lead to 6-2 in the seventh. Kahoohalahala was a triple shy of hitting for the cycle and finished 3-for-5 with three RBIs, two runs scored and a stolen base.
The Aviators ended a 20-game hitting streak by Windy City's Kyle Robinson, who was 0-for-3 before he was ejected in the eighth inning as he was coming to the plate. Robinson had been warned in the seventh inning by home plate umpire Perry Costello for arguing balls and strikes and the arguing continued into the eighth when Robinson was ejected.
The lead changed hands four times in the second game. The Aviators took their last lead when their first three batters got hits to lead off the fourth. Kenny Bryant and Brian Bistagne scored to turn a 3-2 deficit into a 4-3 lead. However, the Thunderbolts regained the lead in the bottom of the fifth inning when they scored two runs off of Kyle Hassna and they added two insurance runs in the sixth.
David Wayne Russo got his first start of the season for the Aviators tonight and earned a no-decision after throwing 2.1 innings and surrendered three runs on six hits while walking two batters and striking out three.
The Aviators return home 7:05 p.m. Tuesday to open up a three game series against the Lake Erie Crushers.