text:
Also, today is the Feast of Saint Sylvester I who was the 33rd Pope. He fought against Arianism and presided over the council of Nicea. He was also the first pope to wear the tiara.
"See what love the Father has given us,
that we should be called children of God; and so we are."
-1 John 3:1
Sunday, December 31, 2006
On The Seventh Day Of Christmas
Saturday, December 30, 2006
I Felt The Same Way
-Ven. John Henry Newman in Apologia Pro Vita Sua.
Authority Is There For A Reason
-Ven. John Henry Newman
On The Sixth Day Of Christmas
Friday, December 29, 2006
Patristic Smorgasbord
In Newman's Own Words
"Only this I know full well now, and did not know then, that the Catholic Church allows no image of any sort, material or immaterial, no dogmatic symbol, no rite, no sacrament, no Saint, not even the Blessed Virgin herself, to come between the soul and its Creator. It is face to face, 'solus cum solo,' in all matters between man and his God. He alone creates; He alone has redeemed; before His awful eyes we go in death; in the vision of Him is our eternal beatitude....What I can speak of with greater confidence is the effect produced on me a little later by studying the Exercises of St. Ignatius. For here again, in a matter consisting in the purest and most direct acts of religion, -in the intercourse between God and the soul, during a season of recollection, of repentance, of good resolution, of inquiry into vocation, -the soul was 'sola cum solo;' there was no cloud interposed between the creature and the Object of his faith and love. The command practically enforced was, 'My son, give Me thy heart.' The devotions then to Angels and Saints as little interfered with the incommunicable glory of the Eternal, as the love which we bear our friends and relations, our tender human sympathies, are inconsistent with that supreme homage of the heart to the Unseen, which really does but sanctify and exalt, not jealously destroy, what is of earth. At a later date Dr. Russell sent me a large bundle of penny or half-penny books of devotion, of all sorts, as they are found in the booksellers' shops at Rome; and, on looking them over, I was quite astonished to find how different they were from what I had fancied, how little there was in them to which I could really object."
On The Fifth Day Of Christmas
"Arise, everyone! Mary invites us all -rich and poor, the just and sinners- to enter the cave of Bethlehem, to adore and to kiss the feet of her newborn Son. Go in, then, all of you devout men and women. Let us enter and not be afraid."
-St. Alphonsus Liguori
Do something special today on this fifth day of Christmas to celebrate. Go visit Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, say an extra rosary with your family,....or you could watch the movie Becket, since today is also the Feast Day of St. Thomas Becket!
Blessings and Happy Feast Day to all!
Thursday, December 28, 2006
Hans Urs Von Balthasar And The Mystery Of Holy Saturday
Christ's descent into Hell is the final act of obedience to the Father. This is the center-piece of the obediential stance for Balthasar. Only in the descent itself is the deepest and definitive "No" of the sinner against God made known. In Christ's descent, He brings the silent compassionate accompaniment of man in the extremity of solitude we call Hell, which is the absence of Faith, Hope, and Love. It is the loss of any human communication, whereby sinners are separated from God in their loneliness.
In Hell Christ must seek the Father, for he cannot find him under any circumstances. There is a seemingly separation of Christ from the Father. Seemingly, not actual. In this darkness the incarnate Son learns experientially what until then was reserved for the Father. The descent represents the final and deepest point reached by Christ in His self emptying. It is the Supreme expression of God's life and love; the consummate icon of what God is eternally like.
For Balthasar there is immense compassion on the part of Christ. Christ identifies Himself with the sinner so much so that he puts Himself in the place of the sinner. Balthasar tries to capture the sense of solidarity that Christ freely entered into alongside the damned. Christ's suffering is the result of Love. It is a freely embraced pain due to the suffering of Love. Christ goes to Hell because He loves all of mankind, even the damned. He cannot not love them. He wants to make His presence known among even the most damned of creation. And for the damned who has rejected all forms of love, this is the worst punishment of all. Not even in Hell can the damned escape the loving gaze of Christ. The descent is an act of solidarity between Christ and man. It is the ultimate paradox in that Christ who is sinless, experiences the effects of Hell as the "sin-bearer."
The Pastoral importance of Balthasar's theology is that it shows the endless love of God. That God loves us so much, He would send His own Son to the depths of Hell for us. And Christ goes out of obedience to the Father and love for man. There is no place we can hide from God's love. No matter how far away we think we have gone, we could never go outside the reach of the Love of God.
First Things has published an ongoing debate between anti-Balthasarian Alyssa Lyra Pitstick and pro-Balthasarian Edward T. Oakes, S.J. in its previous two issues. The first can be read here and the second here.
In Newman's Own Words
-Ven. John Henry Newman in Apologia Pro Vita Sua.
On The Fourth Day Of Christmas
"Let us ask the Holy Innocents to help us...to offer up our own pain and to have great compassion for all who suffer." - Francis Fernandez
"It is surely right to celebrate the death of the Holy Innocents: for it was a blessed one. To be brought near to Christ, and to suffer for Christ, is surely an unspeakable privilege; to suffer anyhow, even unconsciously. The little children whom He took up in his arms, were not conscious of His loving condescension; but was it no privilege when He blessed them? Surely this massacre had in it the nature of a Sacrament; it was a pledge of the love of the Son of God towards those who were included in it. All who came near Him, more or less suffered by approaching Him, just as if earthly pain and trouble went out of Him, as some precious virtue for the good of their souls; —and these infants in the number. Surely His very presence was a Sacrament; every motion, look, and word of His conveying grace to those who would receive it: and much more was fellowship with Him. And hence in ancient times such barbarous murders or Martyrdoms were considered as a kind of baptism, a baptism of blood, with a sacramental charm in it, which stood in the place of the appointed Laver of regeneration. Let us then take these little children as in some sense Martyrs, and see what instruction we may gain from the pattern of their innocence. "
-Ven. John Henry Newman
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Quote Of The Day
-Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen
On The Third Day Of Christmas
"Peter and John both run to the tomb. Christ's tomb is the Holy Scripture, in which the most hidden mysteries of his divinity and of his humanity are defended - if I am allowed to say, -by a wall of rock. But John runs faster than Peter, for the power of contemplation, which has been totally purified, penetrates the secrets of the divine works with a more piercing and sharper eye than the power of action, that still needs to be purified.
Nevertheless Peter is the first to enter; John follows. Both run and both enter. Here Peter is the image of faith and John represents intelligence...Faith then is the first one who must enter the tomb, that is the image of the Holy Scripture, and intelligence must follow...
Peter, who also represents the practice of virtues, sees with the power of faith and of action the Son of God enclosed, in a marvelous and ineffable way, in the limits of flesh. John who represents the highest contemplation of truth, admires the Word of God, perfect in himself and unlimited in his origin, meaning in his Father. Peter, led by the divine revelation, looks at once at the eternal things and at the things of this world, united in Christ. John contemplates and announces the eternity of the Word to make it known to the faithful.
This is why I say that John is a spiritual eagle who sees God; I call him the theologian. He is above the whole creation, visible and invisible; he goes beyond all intellectual faculties and he enters deified in God who shares with him his own divine life."
-Jean Scot Erigene
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
On The Second Day Of Christmas
When the snow lay round about, deep and crisp and even...."
Monday, December 25, 2006
Christmas 2006 Urbi Et Orbi Message Of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI
"Our Saviour is born to the world!" During the night, in our Churches, we again heard this message that, notwithstanding the passage of the centuries, remains ever new. It is the heavenly message that tells us to fear not, for "a great joy" has come "to all the people" (Lk 1:10). It is a message of hope, for it tells us that, on that night over two thousand years ago, there "was born in the city of David a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord" (Lk 2:11). The Angel of Christmas announced it then to the shepherds out on the hills of Bethlehem; today the Angel repeats it to us, to all who dwell in our world: "The Saviour is born; he is born for you! Come, come, let us adore him!".
But does a "Saviour" still have any value and meaning for the men and women of the third millennium ? Is a "Saviour" still needed by a humanity which has reached the moon and Mars and is prepared to conquer the universe; for a humanity which knows no limits in its pursuit of nature's secrets and which has succeeded even in deciphering the marvellous codes of the human genome? Is a Saviour needed by a humanity which has invented interactive communication, which navigates in the virtual ocean of the internet and, thanks to the most advanced modern communications technologies, has now made the Earth, our great common home, a global village? This humanity of the twenty-first century appears as a sure and self-sufficient master of its own destiny, the avid proponent of uncontested triumphs.
So it would seem, yet this is not the case. People continue to die of hunger and thirst, disease and poverty, in this age of plenty and of unbridled consumerism. Some people remain enslaved, exploited and stripped of their dignity; others are victims of racial and religious hatred, hampered by intolerance and discrimination, and by political interference and physical or moral coercion with regard to the free profession of their faith. Others see their own bodies and those of their dear ones, particularly their children, maimed by weaponry, by terrorism and by all sorts of violence, at a time when everyone invokes and acclaims progress, solidarity and peace for all. And what of those who, bereft of hope, are forced to leave their homes and countries in order to find humane living conditions elsewhere? How can we help those who are misled by facile prophets of happiness, those who struggle with relationships and are incapable of accepting responsibility for their present and future, those who are trapped in the tunnel of loneliness and who often end up enslaved to alcohol or drugs? What are we to think of those who choose death in the belief that they are celebrating life?
How can we not hear, from the very depths of this humanity, at once joyful and anguished, a heart-rending cry for help? It is Christmas: today "the true light that enlightens every man" (Jn 1:9) came into the world. "The word became flesh and dwelt among us" (Jn 1:14), proclaims the Evangelist John. Today, this very day, Christ comes once more "unto his own", and to those who receive him he gives "the power to become children of God"; in a word, he offers them the opportunity to see God's glory and to share the joy of that Love which became incarnate for us in Bethlehem. Today "our Saviour is born to the world", for he knows that even today we need him. Despite humanity's many advances, man has always been the same: a freedom poised between good and evil, between life and death. It is there, in the very depths of his being, in what the Bible calls his "heart", that man always needs to be "saved". And, in this post-modern age, perhaps he needs a Saviour all the more, since the society in which he lives has become more complex and the threats to his personal and moral integrity have become more insidious. Who can defend him, if not the One who loves him to the point of sacrificing on the Cross his only-begotten Son as the Saviour of the world?
"Salvator noster": Christ is also the Saviour of men and women today. Who will make this message of hope resound, in a credible way, in every corner of the earth? Who will work to ensure the recognition, protection and promotion of the integral good of the human person as the condition for peace, respecting each man and every woman and their proper dignity? Who will help us to realize that with good will, reasonableness and moderation it is possible to avoid aggravating conflicts and instead to find fair solutions? With deep apprehension I think, on this festive day, of the Middle East, marked by so many grave crises and conflicts, and I express my hope that the way will be opened to a just and lasting peace, with respect for the inalienable rights of the peoples living there. I place in the hands of the divine Child of Bethlehem the indications of a resumption of dialogue between the Israelis and Palestinians, which we have witnessed in recent days, and the hope of further encouraging developments. I am confident that, after so many victims, destruction and uncertainty, a democratic Lebanon, open to others and in dialogue with different cultures and religions, will survive and progress. I appeal to all those who hold in their hands the fate of Iraq, that there will be an end to the brutal violence that has brought so much bloodshed to the country, and that every one of its inhabitants will be safe to lead a normal life. I pray to God that in Sri Lanka the parties in conflict will heed the desire of the people for a future of brotherhood and solidarity; that in Darfur and throughout Africa there will be an end to fratricidal conflicts, that the open wounds in that continent will quickly heal and that the steps being made towards reconciliation, democracy and development will be consolidated. May the Divine Child, the Prince of Peace, grant an end to the outbreaks of tension that make uncertain the future of other parts of the world, in Europe and in Latin America.
"Salvator noster": this is our hope; this is the message that the Church proclaims once again this Christmas day. With the Incarnation, as the Second Vatican Council stated, the Son of God has in some way united himself with each man and women (cf. Gaudium et Spes, 22). The birth of the Head is also the birth of the body, as Pope Saint Leo the Great noted. In Bethlehem the Christian people was born, Christ's mystical body, in which each member is closely joined to the others in total solidarity. Our Saviour is born for all. We must proclaim this not only in words, but by our entire life, giving the world a witness of united, open communities where fraternity and forgiveness reign, along with acceptance and mutual service, truth, justice and love.
A community saved by Christ. This is the true nature of the Church, which draws her nourishment from his Word and his Eucharistic Body. Only by rediscovering the gift she has received can the Church bear witness to Christ the Saviour before all people. She does this with passionate enthusiasm, with full respect for all cultural and religious traditions; she does so joyfully, knowing that the One she proclaims takes away nothing that is authentically human, but instead brings it to fulfilment. In truth, Christ comes to destroy only evil, only sin; everything else, all the rest, he elevates and perfects. Christ does not save us from our humanity, but through it; he does not save us from the world, but came into the world, so that through him the world might be saved (cf. Jn 3:17).
Dear brothers and sisters, wherever you may be, may this message of joy and hope reach your ears: God became man in Jesus Christ, he was born of the Virgin Mary and today he is reborn in the Church. He brings to all the love of the Father in heaven. He is the Saviour of the world! Do not be afraid, open your hearts to him and receive him, so that his Kingdom of love and peace may become the common legacy of each man and woman. Happy Christmas!
Happy Birthday Jesus Christ!
Sunday, December 24, 2006
Christians Got The Date For Christmas From Pagans....
Happy Christmas Eve!
-St. Padre Pio
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Friday, December 22, 2006
Bring Forth Christ
-Saint Augustine
Patristic Typology
-Saint Aphrahate
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Rocky Balboa And Christ
-Francis Maier - Chancellor, Catholic Archdiocese of Denver, Colo.
I just got back from seeing Rocky Balboa (aka Rocky VI) and I must say that it was a great movie. It was a perfect wrap up of the Rocky franchise with beautiful cinematography and.... a Christian theme.
Actually, all of the Rocky films have had Christian themes of redemption and perseverance, but this one was the most explicit of them all. There is even a scene where the character Spider Rico reads a passage of the Bible to Rocky before his fight.
The reason for the strong Christian themes of the newest Rocky movie can be attributed to Sylvester Stallone's re-dedication to his Catholic faith. There is even a website made to promote the Christian elements of the movie.
Go see the movie. You won't regret it!
Friday, December 15, 2006
Luther Said What?
-Martin Luther. He also wrote his doctoral dissertation on the Blessed Virgin Mary.
(by the way, Luther, I'm still waiting for my hood!)
Thursday, December 14, 2006
Surprising Discovery
Of The Lord's Supper
"Transubstantiation (or change of the substance of Bread and Wine) in the Supper of the Lord, cannot be proven by Holy Writ; but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament, and hath given occasion to many superstitions.
The Body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten, in the Supper, only after an heavenly and spiritual manner. And the mean whereby the Body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper, is faith."
In all my years as an Episcopalian, I never noticed that the 39 Articles said this about the Eucharist! If I had, I would have left long ago. For some reason, this isn't a widely known or acknowledged article of faith, since many Episcopalians/Anglicans believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist (I shall leave out of this post the fact that they don't actually have it since they have not Apostolic Succession. Many believe they do have Apostolic Succesion and that the Real Presence is there). These Episcopalians/Anglicans who go by the name "Anglo-Catholics" would adamantly disagree with the 28th article. Yet it clearly states that they do not believe in the Real Presence.
Of course, one of the reasons may be that the Anglican Communion doesn't really follow the 39 Articles anymore and you can basically believe whatever you want in the Communion even if you have the exact opposite belief as someone else, even someone in your same parish. Priests in the same parish also have opposite beliefs. Yet they are all valid members of the Anglican Communion. (Something tells me though, that they have no idea what the meaning of "communion" really is!)
This should be a wake up call to all you "Anglo-Catholics" out there: The Anglican Communion does not believe in the Real Presence!
Come home to the Catholic Church! The REAL Catholic Church. Quit pretending to be "Anglo-Catholic." By definition one cannot be both "Anglican" and "Catholic"!
I don't know what Bible the writers of the 39 Articles were using, but in every Bible I've seen, Christ never says "This is my spiritual body and blood" or "eat my body and blood by faith."
Rather he says, "This is my body" and "This is my blood." There are no metaphors or symbolism. Christ actually gives us His body and blood so that we may be filled with His divine grace and become divine sons and daughters of God.
Christ is a king unlike all other kings. His kingship is one of service. He commits the ultimate act of service by feeding us with His body and blood, thus allowing us to dwell within the grace of the Trinity!
The Catholic Church is the True Church in which Christ our Savior Truly resides in the Sacraments. Where the Sacraments are, there is the Kingdom of God; the Church!
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
I am taking:
Theological Foundations
Mariology 2
Theology of Christ
Over the summer, I am planning on taking Greek and a class on the Apostolic Fathers.
Reading lists will be posted as soon as I get them!
Until then, Happy Advent everyone!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
God Wants Me To Be Rich!
It really sad that some people actually believe this.
Hat tip to Michael Barber.
One Doctor's Hood Coming My Way
"Many sweat to reconcile St. Paul and St. James, but in vain. 'Faith justifies' and 'faith does not justify' contradict each other flatly. If any one can harmonize them I will give him my doctor's hood and let him call me a fool."
To him I say:
"Faith Justifies, but it doesn't justify alone! C'mon Luther, you've got to come up with harder ones than that. Give me your hood, fool!"
Sunday, December 10, 2006
One Of My New Favorite Saints
The Advent of Christ
-Hans Urs von Balthasar
Friday, December 08, 2006
Feast Of The Immaculate Conception
"It is faith which reveals to us that the immaculate conception...is a pledge of salvation for every human creature. Again, it is faith which reminds us that by virtue of her unique position, Mary is our steadfast support in the arduous struggle against sin and its consequences." -Pope John Paul the Great
Today is the feast of the Immaculate Conception. This is a special day not only for Catholics (it should be for ALL Christians however), but especially for Catholics in America, since Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception is the patroness of the United States!
On December 8, 1854, Pius IX made the declaration:
"The Doctrine which holds, that the most Blessed Virgin Mary at the first instant of her conception was preserved immune from all stain of sin by a singular grace and privilege of the omnipotent God in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, savior of the human race, was revealed by God and therefore must be firmly and constantly believed by all the faithful."
The recipient of this privilege was the person of Mary at the first instant of passive conception (when God infuses the soul to the fetus). From conception, Mary is free from original sin, and its effects. To understand this privilege of Mary we have to go back to our first parents.
Adam and Eve were created with three sets of gifts: natural, preternatural and supernatural.
-Natural gifts are intellect, will, body, and soul.
-Preternatural (preter means above) are gifts above ordinary human nature.
They include:
1) Infused knowledge-greater knowledge and recognition of supernatural.
2)Integrity-perfect harmony between reason and the passions. What reason dictated, the passion obeyed.
3)Incorruptible and natural immortality of the body- immune to disease
-Supernatural gifts refer to justice within the family of God from the moment of creation.
Adam and Eve, with the fall lose the preternatural and supernatural, yet keep the natural gifts.
Thus we need baptism to restore grace. We are also born with a decaying body and an obscured knowledge. It is possible, yet hard, to see the light of God. Instead of integrity we have concupiscence: an interior inclination to evil. We are not totally evil. We are still good by nature, yet we have an inclination towards evil.
All this applied to Mary means that because of her immaculate conception, Mary retains all the preternatural gifts as well as supernatural gift with a plenitude of grace. She does not experience corruption of body (hence assumption is natural effect). She does not experience concupiscence.
Mary is truly saved by the merits of Jesus Christ! Even though Mary was born without the stain of original sin, She still needed Jesus. She needed to be saved and was saved by an application of graces by Jesus Christ. In fact, Mary owed more to her savior than any other saved creature, because she is saved in a more glorious fashion. Duns Scotus called this "preservative redemption." The Immaculate Conception is a singular privilege. No one else was conceived with a fullness of grace at moment of conception. Even though Adam and Eve were created in original justice, they did not have a plenitude of Grace as Mary did. It is a grace of vocation. Adam and Eve are not called to be the co-redemptrix and to suffer with Christ. Adam and Eve are in God's family, yet not God's greatest masterpiece as Mary is and are not in proximity of Our Lord as Mary was.
Immaculate Conception In Tradition
From the 1st to the 4th century, there was the model of Mary as the New Eve.
She is compared to Eve, but before the fall of Eve. Likewise, by the Eastern Fathers she is called, All holy, all pure, miracle of grace, purer than the angels, altogether without sin.
St. Ephraim (Syrian deacon d. 373), Says that Mary and Eve were created utterly equal, but afterwards one became the cause of our death, the other the cause of our life. He also refers to Mary being "immune from all sin."
St. Ambrose: (397) Refers to Mary as being "free from all stain."
St. Severus (bishop of Antioch 538) uses the word "immaculate." "Pure from all taint and immaculate."
St. Sophronius (patriarch of Jerusalem) in the 7th century, was first to talk about Mary receiving a unique grace, by being pre-purified.
St. Andrew of Crete (8th century) calls Mary the "entirely immaculate virgin."
Theognostes (9th century Greek Father) specifies that Mary had been "conceived by a sanctifying action.
Eastern Tradition is what contributed most to the development of the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. This being the case, it is interesting to note that Orthodox theologians only disagreed with the Immaculate Conception AFTER it was defined by the Pope!
It is important also to note the medieval controversy over the Immaculate Conception to bring forth more clarity in our own time.
Some theologians opposed the doctrine due to an erroneous concept of how Original sin is transmitted. They held that it is transmitted from an infected body to souls newly infused. The objection was that if Mary is the Immaculate Conception, than Anne would have to be and also her mother and on and on.
This erroneous view is clarified by Blessed Duns Scotus who later becomes the champion of the Immaculate Conception. In 1308, Scotus points out that Original sin is not passed from infected body to soul, but rather a privation of grace at the moment of infusion of the soul by God. Because Adam and Eve sinned, when God infuses the soul now, it is absent of grace that we would have received had Adam and Eve not sinned. That absence has bodily ramifications– bodily death.
The second objection concerned the universality of redemption and the Immaculate Conception. This is an issue that also concerns our Protestant brethren in modern times.
The concern was, if Mary is Immaculately conceived, then Jesus Christ is not a universal redeemer, because he didn't redeem Mary. Scotus responded with the concept of preservative redemption. He asked, "Is it possible that it could be done?" He presents that Mary was in fact saved by the merits of Jesus Christ. She is saved thru an application of graces of Jesus that are foreseen. Mary was saved by Jesus as a daughter of Adam and Eve. She would have inherited the effects of Original sin had she not been preserved from original sin. It is possible that Christ could preserve His mother from sin, AND HE DID!
Technically, Mary was not redeemed. Because to redeem is to buy back and to buy back presupposes bondage, or slavery. Mary never had a bondage to buy back. She was saved by the preemptive merits of Jesus Christ.
Pope Sixtus IV in 1477, approved the Mass and office of the Immaculate Conception of Our Lady. This was in the midst of a bitter battle between Franciscans and Dominicans on this issue. The Pope had a public debate commissioned in Rome by the leading theologians of each order. The Franciscan theologian was victorious in the debate, yet the Mass and office was still approved.
With the approval of the Immaculate Conception in the Liturgy, by Pope Sixtus, the Immaculate Conception became a doctrine of the Church.
From Sixtus IV to Pius IX, there was gradually increasing magisterial teaching on Immaculate Conception.
In 1849 Pope Pius IX sent a letter of consultation to the bishops of the world asking them if they would like the Immaculate Conception to be defined as a Dogma of the Church. Out of 665 bishops, 590 respond in favor of the definition! The Pope didn't have to consult the bishops, yet he did. Only 7 bishops are opposed to the definition. Others were unsure, because either they didn't think there were enough sources or because they didn't think that the time was right even though they agreed with the definition.
Two factors confirmed the definition for Pius IX:
1) He received a great number of petitions from priests, bishops, kings, and lay faithful asking him to make this definition. The country of Spain was prominent in petition drive.
2) Private Revelation of Our Lady of Grace in 1830 to St. Catherine Labouré. On the Miraculous Medal given to St. Catherine, the insignia around the first vision was "O Mary conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee. Pius thought that if Heaven is declaring the Immaculate Conception, he should too!
Go here, for the Scriptural Foundations of the Immaculate Conception.
For more on the Immaculate Conception go to Mother Of All Peoples.
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Brownback '08
Senator Sam Brownback announced his Presidential bid today. This is great news for Pro-life/Pro-Family/Pro-Christian values!
What's even better is that he is a Catholic! And I don't mean "Kerry-Catholic."
Brownback is the real deal!
I'm not a big fan of politics and I really don't like to get into them, but I put my full support behind Brownback and I encourage everyone else to do so!
All you students out there should go to the Students For Brownback website and find out how to help out.
For everyone else there is Brownback's campaign site.
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Church Bulletins
Funny Bloopers in Church Bulletins(Sent in by Frank Barnard)
They're Back! Church Bulletins! Thank God for church ladies with typewriters. These sentences actually appeared in church bulletins or were announced in church services:
The Fasting & Prayer Conference includes meals.
The sermon this morning: "Jesus Walks on the Water."The sermon tonight: "Searching for Jesus."
Our youth basketball team is back in action Wednesday at 8 PM in the recreation hall. Come out and watch us kill Christ the King.
Ladies, don't forget the rummage sale. It's a chance to get rid of those things not worth keeping around the house. Bring your husbands.
The peacemaking meeting scheduled for today has been canceled due to a conflict.
Remember in prayer the many who are sick of our community. Smile at someone who is hard to love. Say "Hell" to someone who doesn't care much about you.
Don't let worry kill you off - let the Church help.
Miss Charlene Maso n sang, "I will not pass this way again," giving obvious pleasure to the congregation.
For those of you who have children and don't know it, we have a nursery downstairs.
Next Thursday, there will be tryouts for the choir.They need all the help they can get.
The Rector will preach his farewell message after which the choir will sing: "Break Forth Into Joy."
Irving Benson and Jessie Carter were married on October 24 in the church. So ends a friendship that began in their school days.
A bean supper will be held on Tuesday evening in the church hall. Music will follow.
At the evening service tonight, the sermon topic will be "What Is Hell?" Come early and listen to our choir practice.
Eight new choir robes are currently needed due to the addition of several new members and to the deterioration of some older ones.
Scouts are saving aluminum cans, bottles and other items to be recycled. Proceeds will be used to cripple children.
Please place your donation in the envelope along with the deceased person you want remembered.
The church will host an evening of fine dining, super entertainment, and gracious hostility.
Potluck supper Sunday at 5:00 PM - prayer and medication to follow.
The ladies of the Church have cast off clothing of every kind. They may be seen in the basement on Friday afternoon.
This evening at 7 PM there will be a hymn singing in the park across from the Church. Bring a blanket and come prepared to sin.
------------- ---------------------------------------------
Ladies Bible Study will be held Thursday morning at 10 AM. All ladies are invited to lunch in the Fellowship Hall after the B. S. is done.
The pastor would appreciate it if the ladies of the congregation would lend him their electric girdles for the pancake breakfast next Sunday.
Low Self Esteem Support Group will meet Thursday at 7 PM. Please use the back door.
The eighth-graders will be presenting Shakespeare's Hamlet in the Church basement Friday at 7 PM. The congregation is invited to attend this tragedy.
Weight Watchers will meet at 7 PM at the First Presbyterian Church. Please use large double door at the side entrance.
The Associate Minister unveiled the church's new tithing campaign slogan last Sunday: "I Upped My Pledge - Up Yours".
Monday, December 04, 2006
The Pope's Trip To Visit Bartholomew I Is Already Bearing Fruit
Continue to pray that our separated Sister Church will come back home!
Saturday, December 02, 2006
Christ The Temple
-F.X. Durrwell in In The Redeeming Christ.
Golden Mouth On Free Will
And secondly the other explanation may be given, that he speaks of all as His, whose the greater part is. For it is ours to choose and to wish; but God's to complete and to bring to an end. Since therefore the greater part is of Him, he says all is of Him, speaking according to the custom of men. For so we ourselves do. I mean for instance: we see a house well built, and we say the whole is the Architect's doing, and yet certainly it is not all his, but the workmen's also, and the owners', who supplies the materials, and many others', but nevertheless since he contributed the greatest share, we call the whole his. So then it is in this case also. Again, with respect to a number of people, where the many are, we say ALL are: where few, nobody. So also Paul says, 'not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.'
And herein he establishes two great truths: one, that we should not be lifted up by what we do well: the other that when we do well, we should attribute to God the cause of our well-doing. Therefore even thou run (he would say), even shouldst thou be very earnest, do not consider that the well doing is thine own. For if thou obtain not the impusle that is from above, all is to no purpose. Nevertheless that thou wilt attain that which thou earnestly strivest after is evident; so long as thou runnest, so long as thou willest.
He did not then assert this, that we run in vain, but that, if we think the whole to be our own, if we do not assign the greater part part to God, we run in vain. For neither hath God willed that the whole should be His, lest He should appear to be crowning us without cause: nor again our's, lest we should fall away to pride. For if when we have the smaller share, we think much of ourselves, what should we do if the whole depended on us?"
-St. John Chrysostom
Christ Is THE Priest
There will be all throughout history, therefore, men incorporated in Christ the Priest, participating in the spiritual unction of his sovereign priesthood, drawn in the wake of his divine liturgy. The cultic mediation of the Head is transmitted to and diffused throughout the entire Body. Having been perfected in the Savior, it remains imperfect, or incomplete, in his members. These latter must now work through him, with him, and in him for the salvation of the world. This cultic mediation entered into time in order to remain really and continually present there, not in order to be immediately torn away from it, leaving men with only a memory -even if the most divine of memories! This, then, is the mystery of the primary priesthood of the Head, giving rise to a purely ministerial and secondary priesthood of the members -of the Body, which is the Church. The Church will exist in her fullness only where the priesthood of Christ -through Christian worship- continues to be exercised."
-Charles Cardinal Journet in Theology of the Church.
Divine Strength In Weakness
This mystery has been completely disfigured by two opposing heresies. In the second century the Docetae were scandalized by the passion of the Savior which they considered unworthy of a God, and they declared that Jesus' sufferings had been only apparent. According to them, Jesus had not really suffered at Gethsemane and on the cross, nor had He been a victim. The painful Passion, they said, had been only a sham. To support this senseless contention, which is contrary to the most soundly established facts, the Docetae maintained that the Word had not taken a real body in Jesus, but only the appearences of a body like a ghost. What errors we are led into when we are scandalized by the Cross!
In contrast to this error, there were other heretics later on, like Calvin, who held that Jesus had suffered so very much on Calvary that He had yielded for a moment to despair, and that He had endured the pains of hell at the moment when He cried out: 'My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?' Calvin seemed to think that Jesus redeemed us more through the intensity of His sufferings than through the infinite value of the love with which He endured them.
Thus error swings from one extreme to the other, because men do not know or choose to ignore the culminating point where apparently contrary truths are reconciled. The doctrine of the Church remains on the lofty levels where the diverse aspects of truth are harmonized. It maintains that Jesus on the cross was the most powerful priest by His oblation and the most annihilated voluntary victim. Far more, it holds that divine power has never manifested itself in such a sublime manner as in the passion of the Savior, for this was the greatest action of His life, the consummation of His mission. There is here an admirable law of the spiritual world, which is continually fulfilled in men's souls. 'Power is made perfect in infirmity,' saith the Lord."
-Fr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P. in Our Saviour and His Love For Us.
(as a side note, I learned last night at the Phenomenology of JP II conference from Cardinal Avery Dulles that Garrigou-Lagrange was John Paul II's dissertation director at the Angelicum. How cool is that?!)
Friday, December 01, 2006
The Priest
-Gregory of Nyssa
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
Christian Faith
-Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, in Pilgrim Fellowship of Faith.
Christ Our Great High Priest
"According to Leviticus 16 the Jewish high priest sacrificed two victims for sin, then entered the holy of holies, and sprinkled the throne of mercy with the blood of the victims. This final action was the decisive one for the expiation of sins. The death of Christ on the cross corresponds to the immolation of the two victims by the high priest, and the ascension of Christ corresponds to the high priest's entrance into the holy of holies as well as to the sprinkling of the throne of mercy with the blood of victims. In the eyes of the writer of this Letter [Hebrews], then, the climactic moment in the mystery of salvation is not the immolation of Christ on Golgotha but his glorious exaltation and entrance into the heavenly sanctuary where God greets him as high priest, 'living for ever to intercede for all.' Our heavenly high priest constantly prays to God for the Church. He is always offering and interceding, just as on Calvary he offered 'through the eternal spirit.'"
-Andre Feuillet in his book The Priesthood of Christ and His Ministers.
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Professor Quote
-Dr. Hahn
Traditional Mass Never Went Away
The notice, published on the web site of the Genoa archdiocese on November 27, does not specifically confirm the widespread reports that a motu proprio is imminent. However, after saying that "misleading comments that are in circulation" call for a response, the statement emphasizes that the Pope has the authority to issue new liturgical norms. In order to preserve full communion within the Church, all Catholics should follow those norms, the statement adds.
Regarding the traditional liturgy, the Genoa archdiocese states: "The Second Vatican Council did not abolish or ask for the abolition of the Mass of Pius V." Rather, the Council sought a reform of that liturgy.
The statement goes on to say that the traditional liturgy (the Mass of St. Pius V) and the post-conciliar "Mass of Paul VI" are "two valid expressions of the same Catholic faith." It is seriously wrong, the archdiocese says, to suggest that these two liturgical approaches are somehow in opposition to each other.
Echoing a theme that Pope Benedict XVI raised in his pre-Christmas speech to the Roman Curia, the Genoa archdiocese emphasizes the development of the liturgy should be seen as organic, with the decisions of one Roman Pontiff always interpreted in light of previous papal statements. Similarly, the statement continues, the actions of different Popes "and those of the Council of Trent and the Second Vatican Council, must not be presented as if they were in conflict."
The statement from the Genoa archdiocese seems to be an effort to prepare the faithful for the appearance of the motu proprio, deflecting the criticism that Pope Benedict intends a repudiation of the liturgy of Vatican II.
Istanbul, Not Constantinople
In my opinion, that isn't the most exciting part of the trip. For me, it would be the historic meeting on Wednesday with Patriarch Bartholomew I. Bartholomew has been a key player in the ecumenical movement between the East and the West. If it wasn't for the Russian Patriarch, who knows what would have happened between Bartholomew and JP II.
I really feel that if Orthodox churches start coming back home to Rome, then Protestants will be following quickly behind.
Let us continue to pray for Pope Benedict's safety and also for his meeting with Bartholomew!
For news on the meeting, go to this site.
Hat tip to Mike Aquilina for the website.
Thursday, November 23, 2006
This is my first Thanksgiving as a Catholic and I am very thankful for it.
Being my first Catholic Thanksgiving, is there anything special I should do? Like, leave a seat open for Elijah? ;-)
Wednesday, November 22, 2006
Digging Up Dead Dominicans
Sunday, November 19, 2006
Apologetics Advice From Origen
-Origen, in his 7th Homily on the Gospel of Luke.
A Saint Who Loves His Mother!
In the very first homily of St. John Damascene, he said of Mary:
"We serve thee today, O Queen. Yes, Queen I say, and I repeat it again and again. O virginal Mother of God, we cling to thee as we would to an immovable anchor, and to thee we consecrate ourselves entirely in mind and soul and body."
It's no wonder he's a saint!
I pray that all priests (and all Christians) would so honor Our Blessed Mother in the order of grace!
Saturday, November 18, 2006
Our Lady Of America
"Dear children, unless the United States accepts and carries out faithfully the mandate given to it by heaven to lead the world to peace, there will come upon it and all nations a great havoc of war and incredible suffering. If, however, the United States is faithful to this mandate from heaven and yet fails in the pursuit of peace because the rest of the world will not accept or cooperate, then the United States will not be burdened with the punishment about to fall.
Weep, then, dear children, weep with your mother over the sins of men… Intercede with me before the throne of mercy, for sin is overwhelming the world and punishment is not far away.
It is the darkest hour, but if men will come to me, my Immaculate heart will make it bright again with the mercy which my Son will rain down through my hands. Help me save those who will not save themselves. Help me bring once again the sunshine of God's peace upon the world.
If my desires are not fulfilled much suffering will come to this land. My faithful one, if my warnings are taken seriously and enough of my children strive constantly and faithfully to renew and reform themselves in their inward and outward lives, then there will be no nuclear war. What happens to the world depends upon those who live in it. There must be much more good than evil prevailing in order to prevent the holocaust that is so near approaching. Yet I tell you, my daughter, even should such a destruction happen because there were not enough souls who took my warning seriously, there will remain a remnant, untouched by the chaos who, having been faithful in following me and spreading my warnings, will gradually inhabit the earth again with their dedicated and holy lives."
The Church Fathers On The Queenship Of Mary
St.Jerome tells us "We should realize that Mary means Lady in the Syrian language."
St. Peter Chrysologus says "The Hebrew name 'Mary' means 'Domina' [Lady] in Latin. The Angel therefore calls her Lady so that the Mother of the Lord, whom the authority of her Son made and caused to be born and to be called the Lady, might be without servile fear."
St. Ephrem has Mary say:
"Let Heaven sustain me in its embrace, because I am honored above it. For heaven was not Thy mother, but Thou hast made it Thy throne. How much more honorable and venerable than the throne of a king is his mother."
He also says of her:
"...girl, empress and ruler, queen, lady, protect and keep me in your arms lest Satan who causes evil exult against me, lest my wicked foe be glorified against me."
St. Gregory Nazianzen calls her "the Mother of the King of the entire universe" as well as "Virgin Mother who brought forth the King of the entire world."
Epiphanius of Constantinople said that the unity of the Church would be preserved "by the grace of the Holy and the con-substantial trinity and by the prayers of Mary, Our Lady, the holy and glorious Virgin and Mother of God."
St Andrew of Crete tells us "His ever-virgin Mother, from whose womb He, being God, took on human form, He today transports from earthly dwellings as Queen of the human race."
also : "the Queen of the entire human race faithful in reality to the meaning of her name, who is exalted above all things save only God himself."
St. Germanus says to her : "Be seated, Lady, for it is fitting that you should sit in a high place since you are a Queen and glorious above all kings."
St. John Damascene calls her : "Queen, ruler, and lady"
An Anonymous Eastern Father calls her "the perpetual Queen beside the King, her Son...whose glorious head is crowned with a golden diadem."
St. Ildephonsus of Toledo proclaims "O my Lady, my Ruler, Thou who governs me, Mother of my Lord...Lady among the handmaidens, Queen among sisters."
Truly, Mary is the Queen of Heaven and Earth!
Friday, November 17, 2006
Three Arguments For The Actual Queenship Of Mary, Rather Than The Mere Metaphorical
"Jesus Christ is King of the universe, even as man, in virtue of His Divine Personality. But Mary as Mother of God made man belongs to the hypostatic order and shares in the dignity of her Son, for His Person is the term of her divine motherhood. Hence she shares connaturally, as Mother of God, in His universal Kingship. Our Blessed Lord owes it to Himself to recognise His Mother's title in gratitude.
A second argument is that Jesus is King of the universe by His fulness of grace and by the victory which He won over Satan and sin by His humility and His obedience unto death, 'For which cause God hath exalted Him...' But Mary was associated with His victory over Satan, sin, and death by her union with Him in His humiliations and sufferings. She is therefore really associated with Him in His Kingship.
The same conclusion may be arrived at by considering the close relationship in which Mary stands to God the Father, of Whom she is the first adoptive daughter and the highest in grace, and God the Holy Ghost through Whose operation the Word took flesh in her womb.
It has been objected that the mother of a king, the queen-mother, is not by that simple fact queen in the strict sense of the term: she has nothing of royal power. Neither then has Mary. We have answered this objection already. There is no parity between the two cases. A queen-mother is simply the mother of a child who later became king. But Mary is the mother of Him Who from the instant of His conception is King of the universe by His hypostatic union and His fulness of grace. Besides, Mary was associated closely with the victory by which He obtained universal kingship as a right of conquest, even though He possessed it already as Son of God. Mary is therefore associated with His Kingship in a true, even if in a subordinate, manner."
-Fr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.
Happy Birthday Mom!
Today is my mom's birthday!
She occassionally reads my blog, so leave her a birthday greeting in the event that she stops by today.
Happy Birthday Mom! I hope you have a great day today! Thanks for all you do.
Monday, November 13, 2006
The History of The Term "Co-Redemptrix"
Already in the tenth century, the title of 'Redemptrix' was used: 'Holy Redemptrix of the world, pray for us.' When in the fifteenth and sixteenth century, this familiar title was used, already an immediate cooperation of the Blessed Virgin in the work of our Redemption was recognized, and to the name, 'Redemptrix' is added 'co,' and therefore the Mother of God was called, 'Co-Redemptrix,' while Christ continued to be called, 'Redeemer.' From that time to the seventeenth century, the title Co-redemptrix was brought into use not only in devotional works of piety and holiness, but also in a great number of theological tracts. This also pertains to the Roman pontiffs, as it has occurred in certain texts of St. Pius X and Pius XI..."
-From the first schema on the Blessed Virgin Mary presented to the Council Fathers of Vatican II on November 23, 1962, as quoted in the book "With Jesus": The Story of Mary Co-Redemptrix by Dr. Mark Miravalle.
In My Mailbox
It's too bad I won't be able to read it until the break. In the meantime, I am reading Dr. Hahn's dissertation, Kinship By Covenant: A Biblical Theological Study Of Covenant Types And Texts In The Old And New Testaments.
So many great books to read, so little time in our short lives!
Man, I love being a Catholic and a Theology Major!!
Oh, and Jason...when I get my PhD, then I will get a dannygarland.com!
My Trip To The National Basilica Of The Immaculate Conception
Christ on a Celtic Cross. For obvious reasons, this is my favorite picture!
This isn't a painting. It is made entirely of mosaic!
This is the statue of Mary that was processed in.
This is one of the domes of the Basilica that is made entirely of Mosaic. They are working on another dome, that when completed, will be the largest mosaic in the world.
This is a long shot from the back of the Basilica. (By the way, it was completely filled for the reconsecration mass!)
Two outside shots of the Basilica. (In the left picture is the head of Fr. Jose, a wonderful priest from India who made the journey with me.)
This is the actual Papal Tiara worn by Paul VI at his coronation and the stole that John XXIII wore to open the Second Vatican Council!
I'm trying to find the text to the homily given by Fr. Andrew Apostoli, CFR. It was truly splendid. If anyone comes across it, please point me in its direction!
O, Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary: Ora Pro Nobis!
Friday, November 10, 2006
Salvation By The Cross
"The Mother stood near the Cross for this: that the restoration of mankind would correspond with the collapse of the world. As the fall of the world was accomplished by two, but especially by a man, so the salvation and redemption came about from two, but especially from Christ; for whatever excellence Mary has, she recieved from Christ, not only on account of a certain proper harmony, but also on account of the eminent capacity of Christ in redeeming, a capacity which with his mother (whose works He needed least of all) He wished to share as co-redemptrix, not only without her dishonor, but with the great glory of Christ Himself."
-Fr. Alphonsus Salmeron, S.J.
Hans Urs Von Balthasar's Three Laws For Christian Anxiety
Christianity is intent upon and capable of delivering man from sin-anxiety, provided that he opens himself up to that redemption and its conditions. In the place of sin-anxiety, it provides him with anxiety-free access to God in faith, love, and hope -which, however, because they stem from the Cross, can in and of themselves put forth a new, grace-filled form of anxiety that stems from catholic solidarity and shares in Christ's work of atonement.
Law #2:
Insofar as we are sinners and even as believers can always become sinners anew, the anxiety of sin is not simply taken away from us by the objective act of redemption on the Cross but rather is set before us even in the New Testament. We are permitted to leave sin-anxiety behind us to the degree that we appropriate in truth the living faith offered to us from the Cross, that is, a faith active in our lives. However, even when the grace of sharing in the anxiety of the Cross is granted, the distance between the one who suffered is maintained in its entirety, and the anguished soul is aware of it.
Law #3:
God grants a (mystical or even usual) participation in the anxiety of his Son on the Cross to no believer unless he has first granted to him the entire strength of the Christian mission and joy and the entire light of faith, love, and hope -that is to say, unless he has first taken from him the anxiety of sin. To consider a "synthesis" of both to be possible, or even worth striving for, does not conform to sound Christian doctrine.
Quote Of The Day
- Dr. Miravalles's explanation of Richard McBrien's theology of Mary (and basically all of his theology).
A Great Story
Back in August Catholics and non-Catholics alike were dismayed to hear the story of a priest who was issued a parking ticket while rushing to administer the Sacraments to a hospitalized woman. Several people responded with prayers, donations, and words of support for the priest and his ministry, but none had quite the same effect as 6-year old Brandon Rodriguez.
Young Rodriguez was at the family dinner table in Kissimmee, Florida listening to his father and mother recount the story of Fr. Cletus Forson--ticketed by the city of New York while he made an emergency hospital call to what he thought to be a dying woman. Despite Fr. Forson's placing a "Clergy on Call" placard in his window before rushing into the hospital, city officials ticked his vehicle alone among the many others left by hospital employees.
"I was very upset and sad," Rodriguez's father Izzy told CNA. In the middle of dinner, Brandon suddenly jumped out of his seat and ran to his room, returning with a t-shirt sagging with change and his suitcase."
"How much do I have?" Brandon asked.
Knowing what his son was up to, Rodriquez told him he had enough to do whatever he wanted.
Brandon replied, "I want to go to New York and help the Father!"
Rodriguez didn't think much of the idea until the next evening when he returned from work. Walking into the house from the auto shop he runs, Rodriquez was confronted by an insistent Brandon, "So, when are we leaving to New York?"
With that, Rodriguez's wife Karen booked a flight for father and son and soon they were off.
Priestly Inspiration
The Rodriguez pair met with Fr. Forson at his Brooklyn parish, offering their moral and spiritual support. Izzy also gave the priest a check which more than paid for the ticket.
But Fr. Forson told CNA that the financial support was not the most moving part of the story. "This 6 year old Brandon who came and said, 'well Father, carry on and good job,' that short sentence of encouragement…does more for me than the money they came to give."
The priest added that the wave of support he has received from around the nation has greatly moved him. "Its certainly revitalizing," he said. "It gives me a sense of hope and strength that I'm not alone in my ministry; there are people out there who support the ministry that I'm doing."
Fr. Forson is ordained for a diocese in Ghana, Africa, and is helping out at a Brooklyn parish while he works on his doctorate. He said that although the city went ahead with charges, he has nonetheless been inspired by the whole event.
"There has been so much said about the ticket… on our side, the story has been closed. For me it's a time to go ahead with vitality and hope that in spite of everything there are people out there who still value the work that we do as priests. In the midst of all the notes from among Catholics there are also not-Catholics who have spoken in favor of what I did. That really gives me and other priests a sense of edification."
If anyone is not surprised by the event, it's Brandon's parents. The elder Rodriquez boasted to CNA that "We have an awesome 6 year old son and are we blessed…Brandon is just a giver with God in his heart."
He recounted that Brandon, who is an asthmatic, "blesses his little brother every night with the sign of the cross on his forehead. He donates toys he buys on his own" to local charities and he "has collected over $3000.00 for the Children's Miracle Network in Orlando Florida--all on his own."
Prayer For Renewal Of Consecration
Most Holy Trinity: Our Father in Heaven, who chose Mary as the fairest of your daughters; Holy Spirit, who chose Mary as Your spouse; God the Son, who chose Mary as Your Mother; in union with Mary, we adore your majesty and acknowledge Your supreme, eternal dominion and authority.
Most Holy Trinity, we put the United States of America into the hands of Mary Immaculate in order that she may present the country to you. Through her we wish to thank you for the great resources of this land and for the freedom, which has been its heritage. Through the intercession of Mary, have mercy on the Catholic Church in America. Grant us peace. Have mercy on our president and on all the officers of our government. Grant us a fruitful economy born of justice and charity. Have mercy on capital and industry and labor. Protect the family life of the nation. Guard the precious gift of many religious vocations. Through the intercession of our Mother, have mercy on the sick, the poor, the tempted, sinners—on all who are in need.
Mary, Immaculate Virgin, Our Mother, Patroness of our land, we praise you and honor you and give our country and ourselves to your Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart. O Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary pierced by the sword of sorrow prophesized by Simeon save us from degeneration, disaster and war. Protect us from all harm. O Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, you who bore the sufferings of your Son in the depths of your heart be our Advocate. Pray for us, that acting always according to your will and the Will of your Divine Son, we may live and die pleasing to God. Amen.
If you want to come out to the event the address is:
400 Michigan Avenue, NEWashington, DC 20017-1566
See You there!
Thursday, November 09, 2006
Benefits Of Masters Theology Degree
A: You can feed a family of four with a pizza.
-Told to me by Tom Reagan who said he got it from Scott Hahn.
Quote Of The Day
-St. John Marie Vianney
The Immaculate Conception In Scripture
In Genesis 3:15 (also known as the protoevangelium, "the first Gospel"), God curses the serpent and says that He will put enmity between the serpent and the woman and between her seed and the serpents seed. We know from revelation that the seed of victory is none other than Jesus Christ, so the mother of the seed of victory can only be Mary. The word "enmity" means "a complete and total opposition." So just as Christ is in total opposition to sin and Satan, likewise is Mary. In order for Mary to be in total and complete opposition to Satan, she would have to be conceived Immaculate, without the stain of original sin. Otherwise, Mary, had she been born with original sin, would not be at enmity with Satan. She would have to be playing for both sides. She would be tainted by Satan, but also working for God. In the words of Dr. Miravalle, "Mary is not a double agent!" As Genesis 3:15 states, she is in complete opposition to Satan and thus not corrupted by original sin.
In Luke 1:28, at the Annunciation, the Angel Gabriel greets Mary with the words, "Hail, Full of Grace! The Lord is with thee." "Full of Grace" is Mary's title. The Angel doesn't say, "Hail Mary, Full of Grace," but "Hail, Full of Grace." The Angel testifies that Mary possesses a plenitude of grace and that the Lord is with her! The Angel's testimony is so true indeed, he gives her a new name: Full of Grace! She would not have a plenitude of Grace had she been born with original sin.
In the Greek, the phrase is in the passive tense and would be literally translated as "Hail, You who have been fully graced!" This implies that Mary has received a plenitude of grace prior to the Annunciation and that the grace is ongoing. If there was any sin in the Blessed Virgin, whether original or any thereafter, the greeting of the Angel would be false! (And since, Scripture is the Inspired Word of God, we know that it is not.) Thus, Mary had to have been conceived Immaculately without the stain of original sin…AND SHE WAS!
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Two Adams
As the first Adam's sweat surrounds my face,
May the last Adam's blood my soul embrace."
-John Donne
Satan Wins In South Dakota
SIOUX FALLS, South Dakota (Reuters) -- South Dakota voters overturned on Tuesday a state abortion ban that supporters had championed as the best chance to challenge a 33-year-old U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing the procedure.
"This means that there has been a rebellion against social, right-wing wedge politics that have been dominating this country," said Sarah Stoesz, chief of Planned Parenthood's operations in the Dakotas and Minnesota, key backers of the campaign to kill the measure.
Translation: Planned Parenthood poured millions of dollars into the effort to seduce voters to reject the ban.
"It is a very important victory for people who are open-minded and progressive in this country."
Translation: This is a very important victory for people who like to kill innocent babies.
Supporters of the abortion ban declined to comment.
With 81 percent of vote counted early Wednesday, those voting to overturn the law had an advantage of 55 percent to 45 percent, and CNN projected a victory for opponents of the measure.
Signed by Gov. Mike Rounds on March 6, the South Dakota law would have banned abortions at all stages of pregnancy, including cases of rape and incest, and offered no exception if a mother is in poor health. The law would have allowed a doctor to perform an abortion if a woman is dying but requires the doctor to try to save the life of the fetus as well as the woman.
The measure was to take effect last July, but a petition drive by abortion-rights groups forced the issue onto the ballot and delayed its implementation pending a voter decision on the issue.
Translation: Abortion was already banned, until baby killing-rights groups coerced the issue onto the ballot, in order to buy votes and ensure a victory.
Each side raised close to $2 million for the campaign, with contributions flowing into the state from individuals and organizations around the country.
The campaign turned into a bitter battle that sparked debate in religious and medical communities, homes and businesses.
Translation: Satan rallied all his baby killing supporters against all who believe that all life is sacred.
"The church teaches it's wrong to kill no matter what," said 39-year-old Martha Fiegen, a Sioux Falls home maker who voted in favor of the ban. "I believe life is sacred and every life is worth living."
Of course, common sense also teaches that it's wrong to kill and that life is sacred and every life is worth living. It's only the Satanic mindset brought about by secularization that makes people think that an innocent baby should die so a woman won't have to face up to the consequences of her actions.
Marianne Larsen, 65, a Sioux Falls retired business owner who voted to repeal the law, cast the issue differently.
"Women must have the right to make choices for themselves, not have a bunch of male legislators make the decision for them," Larsen said. "It's very much about women's rights."
Translation: "It's all about how selfish I can be. Women must think of only themselves. It's very much about women's rights to commit murder."
It's too bad that nobody has a "right" to kill innocent babies! Women and men DO however have the right to make the choice NOT to have sex if they don't want a baby! They DO NOT have the right to have sex for pleasure and when they end up with a baby that they didn't intend on having, to go and snuff out the life of the innocent and defenseless child.
What about the rights of the baby?
A mother is supposed to protect and defend her child at all costs. That is natural motherly instinct! It is unnatural, inhumane, and satanic for a mother to want to kill her child.
America with its child killing culture of death is beginning to resemble ancient pagan nations who sacrificed their own children.
If a person kills a pregnant woman, that person is charged for two counts of murder. One for the woman and one for the baby inside of her.
Or if the woman survives and the baby dies, the person is charged with attempted murder for the woman and murder for the baby.
Why then is it alright for a woman to kill that same baby?
Friday, November 03, 2006
More On The Reconsecration Of The United States
On Saturday, November 11, in the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, D.C., a re-consecration of the United States to the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary in the presence of the Papal Nuncio to the United States, His Excellency Archbishop Pietro Sambi, will take place.
In order to stress the importance of this act we wish to run the following article by Dr. Courtenay Bartholomew, which brings out with amazing clarity the efficacy of consecrating countries and peoples to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Consecration to the Immaculate Heart brought victory to the Allied side and an end to World War I; in fact, the armistice that ended the war was signed on November 11, the same date the Papal Nuncio chose for officiating at the Mass for the United States...
Election Day
I really hate politics but it's important to make your voice heard and protect the culture of life in America.
Remember Catholics out there to vote Pro-life and know the 5 non-negotiables:
-Embryonic Stem Cell Research
-Human Cloning
-Homosexual "marriage"
If any candidate supports any of these, it is your Catholic duty to NOT vote for them!
If you live in Pennsylvania the candidates that seem to check out on these issues are:
Senator: Rick Santorum
Representative: Tim Murphy
Governor: Lynn Swann
Lieutenant Governor: Jim Matthews
If I am incorrect that any of these guys are not Pro-Life, feel free to correct me!
Also, if you live in the Pittsburgh area and you know anything about Wayne Fontana (State Senator Dist. 42) or Bill Ogden (State Representative Dist. 27) I would appreciate any info I can get.
Remember on Nov. 7th, Vote For Life! For Catholic Answers Guide For Serious Catholics click here.
Mark Your Calendar
On Saturday, November 11, in Washington D.C. there will be a reconsecration of America to the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary!
Whenever a country is consecrated to Mary great graces flow forth. Just ask Russia!
I will post more as soon as I find out more about it.
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Feast Of All Souls
-St. John Chrysostom.
Let us pray for all the poor souls in Purgatory!
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Surrounded By So Great A Cloud Of Witnesses!
It's great to have this cloud of witnesses that is the saints as an example of how to love and serve the Lord.
For some great posts on the saints check out Mike Aquilina, St. Peter's Helpers, and those wonderful Dominican nuns from Moniales OP.
May all the saints intercede for us so that we may love Christ like they do!
All Saints Ora Pro Nobis!


text:
Guest bloged by Joesph Cannon
A little bird has chirped in my ear, telling me to look closer at the possible connection between shady Republican money-man Jack Abramoff and the 9/11 terrorists. Uncharacteristically cryptic, the bird said no more.
I knew about the Associated Press story (referenced here) which reported that Atta and company had hopped aboard a SunCruz casino ship on September 5, 2001. Abramoff owned SunCruz. He acquired the company under circumstances many consider strange --- so strange as to have resulted in his recent indictment. So strange as to involve the murder of the former owner, Konstantinos "Gus" Boulis.
The feds had long suspected that SunCruz ships have been used for money laundering, and perhaps even drug importation. The ships are beyond all regulation --- nothing stops criminals from operating them.
Al Qaida operatives have made many a strange visit to casinos --- visits that most investigators feel had more to do with criminal activity than with gambling.
So what further information was the little bird chirping about?

subset: commoncrawl


text: Grades Email to a Friend At the start of your course, you should receive a course outline. The outline will provide details about the grading system used for the course. Teachers have up to two weeks from the last class to submit grades. At any time after that, you can log in to your online student account and access your academic history to see your grade and print your grade report. (Grade reports will not be mailed.) Contact the department co-ordinator if your grade is not in your account's academic history after two weeks.


text:
Welcome! This website features my final project for my Rhetoric and Pop Culture class (Comm 2360). I chose to look at how women are objectified in advertisements, as well as some of the effects of this objectification. I became very interested in advertising when we learned statistics about how many advertisements we are exposed to each day--more than you could imagine! My project includes a research paper where I summarize four articles related to my topic. The other element of my project is a creative aspect. My creative aspect is a powerpoint video where I look at the different methods advertisements use to objectify women. Please take a look around! Thank you!
Women: Objectified
Even when we are unaware of it, we are being influenced by the messages of advertising. Advertising is such a great part of our consumer culture that we often do not register when we are looking at advertisements. I took an interest in the objectification of women in advertisements because I find it fascinating how advertisements are able to influence our subconscious. To guide my research, I focused on the question of how advertisements objectify women and the effect that this objectification has on society, especially as our culture grows accustomed to this objectification.
In her essay, "The Communication Function of Advertising," Sofia Bratu discusses how advertising communicates sexual objectification. She first looks at midriff advertising, where a women's midriff is the focus. Midriff advertising is supposed to represent empowerment and playfulness. However, Bratu argues that it shows a shift from women facing the judgment of the male's gaze to women internal, self-judgment. Bratu characterizes this as sexual subjectification, which is when women choose to be identified as sex objects. Bratu also looks at how advertising plays an important part in assigning sexual identities. Men have been socially trained to use their visual sense for arousal, and advertisements play on this fact. They appeal to men to take charge by being a consumer of the product, when the product is a woman. She says that the cultural messages in advertisements are often restrictive because they reinforce stereotypical gender roles. Bratu also explains how advertising and cognition work. Incongruities in advertisements act to excite the consumers. Advertisements utilize subliminal messages to reach consumers. The absence of a product is a tool in subliminal advertising. In advertisements that objectify women, women are often shown without the product the ad is trying to sell (11-16).
In their article, "Women as Sex Objects and Victims in Print Advertisements," Julie M. Stankiewicz and Francine Rosselli look at the prevalence of advertisements that objectify and victimize women, as well as the effects of these advertisements. Stankiewicz and Rosselli first mention that people do not often consciously attend to advertising. Therefore, advertising is not exceptionally as likely to have its social messages questioned. They argue that women as sex objects and victims in advertisements make violence against women seem more acceptable, and our culture can trivialize sexual violence. Stankiewicz and Rosselli propose that advertisements that sexually objectify women create an attitude that women are there for men's pleasure. Advertisements that objectify women give the message that submission is desirable. Some of the characteristics present in advertisements have been taken from violent pornography. In recent times, there has been an increase in advertisements where women have less sexual power than men and are shown as objects of desire. In Stankiewicz and Rosselli's study, a woman is a sex object "if her sexuality was being used to sell a product" (583). Their study looks at women in advertisements and classifies them as victims, sex objects, or both. This study looks at a total of 4136 full page ads from 58 magazines of various categories. Stankiewicz and Rosselli found that women are portrayed as sex objects in 51.8% of advertisements across magazine categories. In men's magazines, advertisements that included pictures of women showed them as sex objects 75.98% of the time. On average across magazine categories, 9.51% of advertisements with women depict them as victims. Women are more likely to be depicted as victims in advertisements in men's magazines. About 73% of the time, advertisements that showed women as victims also showed them as sex objects. The authors mention that the overlap of women as sex objects and victims reinforces a connection between a woman's sexuality and her experience of pain. The prevalence of these advertisements accustoms our culture to violence against women. Images where women are sexually objectified make men more accepting of the rape myth. The overlap of a woman's sexuality and her victimization suggests an association of sex and violence against women (579-589).
In their essay, "The Sexual Objectification of Women in Advertising: A Contemporary Cultural Perspective," Amanda Zimmerman and John Dahlberg explore how today's women are growing accustomed to being objectified in advertisements. Advertisements where women are sexually objectified are becoming more prevalent, yet women are becoming less offended by the advertisements. Zimmerman and Dahlberg conducted a study similar to one done by Ford, LaTour, and Lundstom in 1991. Both studies gauged women's interpretations to advertisements that objectified them. Zimmerman and Dahlberg found that college aged women today think that women are more often portrayed as sex objects compared to women in 1991. Even though the sexual objectification is seen as more prevalent, these women are still less offended by it than the women in 1991. Zimmerman and Dahlberg point out that the advertising has a large effect on culture because it can accustom us to things like objectification (71-79).
Dr. Saswati Gangopadhyay looks at anomalies in objectifying women in advertisements in his essay, "Use of Women in Advertisements and the Issue of Social Responsibility." Dr. Gangopahyay mentions that advertisers try to secure consumer confidence by appealing to the stereotypical hierarchy of gender. Advertisements that sexualize women make women look beautiful which evokes jealousy in other women, which is a demeaning emotion. He also mentions that women are used in advertisements even when men are the target consumers because sex is thought to help men recall brands. Dr. Gangopadhyay proposes that the media needs to scale down on the use of objectifying women in advertisements as a profit seeking method. He says that because the media is so influential, it has a social responsibility with how it portrays women in advertisements. The business of advertising will be better in the long run if it sticks to ethical practices.
Through my research, I arrived at the conclusion that the objectification of women in advertisements can have very serious consequences for both men and women. Women can start to objectify themselves, and men will become accustomed to viewing women as objects. When men view women as objects, they are taking a step towards violence. Dehumanizing someone for profit is not a safe or ethical practice.
Works Cited
Bratu, Sofia. "The Communication Function Of Advertising." Annals Of Spiru Haret University, Journalism Studies 14.2 (2013): 11-16. Communication & Mass Media Complete. Web. 21 Apr. 2014.
Zimmerman, Amanda, and John Dahlberg. "The Sexual Objectification Of Women In Advertising: A Contemporary Cultural Perspective." Journal Of Advertising Research 48.1 (2008): 71-79. Business Source Complete. Web. 21 Apr. 2014.
Gangopadhyay, Saswati. "Use Of Women In Advertisements And The Issue Of Social Responsibility." Global Media Journal: Indian Edition (2011): 1-7. Communication & Mass Media Complete. Web. 21 Apr. 2014.
Stankiewicz, Julie, and Francine Rosselli. "Women As Sex Objects And Victims In Print Advertisements." Sex Roles 58.7/8 (2008): 579-589. SocINDEX with Full Text. Web. 21 Apr. 2014.
The following ads are examples of the ways in which advertisements objectify women:
Fragmented parts:
Get a garage, you two.
"It's nice to have a girl around the house."
An ad for deodorant...men's deodorant
Stay classy, PETA
In competition for men:
Mmm...smells like a middle school boy
And just because...


text:
Some people are wary when it comes to shopping online. What if the product isn't what you expected, or as you had hoped? While it's always good to tred with caution, online shopping can actually make your life a lot easier, rather than cause stress.
An Easy Way to Buy Gifts
Shopping online is a really easy way to buy gifts, and it's very cost effective. Once you begin shopping online you will find that it's often cheaper to order online and have a product delivered to your door than it is to drive out to the store, spending your time waiting in queues and searching shelves for the items you came for.
When you shop online, you can browse through multiple stores from the comfort of your living room. You can even check out inventory while relaxing in your pajamas. Websites such as cashback.rewardit.com offer you a one-stop shopping opportunity. When you shop from legitimate retailers like the ones found on cashback.rewardit.com, you don't have to worry about stolen information or low-quality products. You can even get heavily discounted items from shopping online.
Earn Money and Rewards Online
In addition to discounts, you can earn money and rewards online so your shopping is not only easy, but you can even get some items for free. To do this, simply create an account with a site such as cashback.rewardit.com and shop or surf. You earn points that go toward rewards and cash back as you browse the Internet from the cashback.rewardit.com website. You can also fill out surveys to earn money and rewards online.
At first this might seem too good to be true, but really, cashback.rewardit.com makes a website that creates winning situations for everyone involved. Businesses expect cashback.rewardit.com to draw shoppers towards their products and to generate publicity. As shoppers, you get convenient shopping and browsing opportunities, and you get rewarded for taking the time to browse by earning money and rewards online, which you can use for gifts.
Types of Gifts You Can Get Online
One you start shopping online, you will discover that your shopping choices are practically limitless. You can get everything from gift cards to electronics, books, and clothing. When you purchase items from legitimate retailers such as the ones found on cashback.rewardit.com, you will find that return policies are very fair and realistic if a product isn't satisfactory. To find these retailers, just go to the rewardit store and select the gift you wish to purchase.
Thanks to programs that allow you to earn money and rewards as you browse and shop online, you will find a shopping experience like none other. Shopping for gifts has never been easier.


text:
The floods in Kerala that ravaged lives, property and lot else took a heavy toll. On August 21, when the monsoon took its fiercest form, it was nothing short of disaster. By the government's own admission, the disaster has claimed nearly 500 lives. In fact, Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan is on record to state that this flood is the worst ever to hit the state in the century.
Nearly 15 lakh people were shifted to relief camps though the number is steadily coming down. Many others moved to their relatives' homes when their houses got flooded. Free kits containing essential items like rice, atta, sugar and clothes are being distributed.
The chief minister has also said that the economic impact of the floods was immense with a large number of small and medium-scale enterprises being heavily affected by the floodwaters. The agricultural production of the state has also been hit, with 57,000 hectares of crops damaged.
The gravity of the situation can be assessed from the fact that the State Assembly began its one-day special session to discuss the rehabilitation of victims and reconstruction of infrastructure even as it explored the feasibility of environment-friendly constructions while rebuilding the flood-ravaged Kerala. The state government is looking towards the centre for relief and even while it is trickling in, more help is expected after the final assessment of damages is done.
The challenges of rehabilitation and reconstruction are huge but more importantly rehabilitation is not possible in areas prone to landslides and floods. Roads and bridges have been destroyed on a large scale. Procuring raw materials for construction works is an issue. Livelihood restoration is essential for bringing back people to normal life. The economy is virtually at a standstill.
The nation seems to stand together in this hour of crisis and people from across the country have come forward to help the people of Kerala who are trying to rebuild their lives bit by bit following the devastation that took place less than a fortnight ago. By available estimates, Kerala has suffered damages of nearly about Rs 20,000 crore, even while these are expected to multiply ten times over.
Help has come in different forms beginning with food, medicines, clothes and money.
The chief minister distress relief fund (CMDRF) has crossed the Rs 1,000 crore mark. It stood at Rs 1,026 crore on Thursday with 4.76 lakh people making online contributions. The break-down of the donations range from Rs 145.17 crores through electronic payments; Rs 46.04 crores made through UPI and Rs 835.86 crores through direct deposits and cheques. Corporates and private banks have adopted villages for rehabilitation.
However, it is the Central government that is in the eye of a storm. This is on to counts: One because of the extent of monetary relief it has given and two because it spurned the offer of accepting aid from a foreign country.
The Modi led government has so far allocated Rs 600 crores to the flood ravaged state against the demand of Rs 2200 crore. Kerala and politicians cried foul and alleged that the aid was far short of what was expected. This however led the Modi led government to explain
that the 600 crore given to flood-hit Kerala was only "advance assistance" and more funds would be released after another assessment by an inter-ministerial team.
The state government, ruled by the Left, is also at loggerheads with the Centre following its refusal to accept help from other countries. The United Arab Emirates reportedly offered assistance amounting to some 700 crores that the Indian Government politely refused in sync with its policy of not accepting help from other countries. This angered Kerala, both the government and its people, and accused the centre of depriving it of foreign funds. Other countries have also offered help but India has not accepted foreign aid. The Government has taken a decision to rely on domestic efforts to tide over the crisis.
Politics is at full play with the Congress asking the Modi government to rewrite the rules so that financial support can come from abroad for flood-hit Kerala.
There is an unwritten policy that has been followed since 2004 of India not accepting foreign aid towards disaster funds. The Congress was then in power therefore for the same party to now criticise the BJP for follow a laid down policy is bit of a stretch. Had the BJP government done so, the Congress, in all probability would have cried foul and damned it for going to other countries with a "begging bowl" as it were. In any case, unless necessary, foreign aid is a complete no-no and India is well equipped and financially sound to take care of its people and calamities without looking to the outside or depending on external aid. Self respecting Indians are in sync with the government's policy and feel that the government and the country is capable of handling the disaster, this neither being the first nor the last in the life of a nation. Therefore, this is not about money or the ability to rebuild Kerala. That is a given.
The debate should be about India's preparedness, in this case the lack of it, in comprehending possibilities of such disasters and often caught napping especially after the Indian Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) issuing a red alert a week before disaster struck. Even while the blame game is on, there is need to look within and assess where the slip up was and how to prevent it in future rather than shifting focus to trivialities.
The writer is a senior Indian journalist, political commentator and columnist of The Independent. She can be reached at: (email@example.com)
Editor : M. Shamsur Rahman
Published by the Editor on behalf of Independent Publications Limited at Media Printers, 446/H, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1215.
Editorial, News & Commercial Offices : Beximco Media Complex, 149-150 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh. GPO Box No. 934, Dhaka-1000.
Editor : M. Shamsur Rahman
Published by the Editor on behalf of Independent Publications Limited at Media Printers, 446/H, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1215.
Editorial, News & Commercial Offices : Beximco Media Complex, 149-150 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh. GPO Box No. 934, Dhaka-1000.


text:
Gojira return to North America for the first time in over a year with the new critically acclaimed album Magma under their belt. Don't miss your first chance to tracks from Magma performed live! Tickets are on sale now.
Date Venue Location
Oct 13 The Complex Salt Lake City, UT
Oct 14 Gothic Theatre Englewood, CO
Oct 16 Myth St. Paul, MN
Oct 17 Turner Hall Ballroom Milwaukee, MI
Oct 19 The Fillmore Detroit, MI
Oct 20 Sound Acadmey Toronto, CA
Oct 21 Metropolis Montreal, CA
Oct 22 Tha Palladium Worcester, MA
Oct 23 Terminal 5 New York, NY


text:
Ethiopia mourns 52 people killed in protest
BBC African News
Ethiopia's Prime Minister, Hailemariam-Desalegn
Ethiopia has begun three days of mourning after at least 52 people were killed during protest at a religious festival in the Oromia region.
The BBC says some died in a stampede Sunday, October 2, 2016 after police fired tear gas and rubber bullets.
Prime Minister, Haile Mariam Desalegn, said rioters had caused pre-planned mayhem that led people to fall to their deaths in rifts.
Prime Minister Desalegn has denied reports that the security forces had opened fire.
Thousands had gathered for the religious festival in Bishoftu, 25 miles from the Capital, Addis Ababa.
The Irecha celebration is an important festival held annually by the people of Oromo to welcome spring.


text:
However the teacher's actions may not have been as controversial as they at first appeared.
Although the song is illegal in Germany, there is an exemption when it is sung for educational purposes.
Moreover, the teacher has reportedly told police she was teaching a well-known parody of the song written by the playwright Bertolt Brecht.
Horst Wessel, German Nazi activist (Alamy)
She claims she only got her pupils to hum the melody and tap their feet to the rhythm
Entitled the Kälbermarsch, or Calves' March, the Brecht parody includes the lines "The butcher calls! The eyes tightly closed/The calf marches with quiet, steady step".
"The Kälbermarsch cannot be understood without the Horst Wessel Song," a spokesman for the Berlin Senate Department for Education told reporters.
Police say the case has been referred to be prosecutors, who will now decide whether to take any further action.


text:
Welcome to another Monday. I hope today finds you anywhere other than the upper Midwest, because oh my freaking lord is it cold up here today. As I write this at 1:30pm central time, the current air temperature is -4 degrees Fahrenheit. And with winds out of the west at 16 mph and gusting to 22 mph, the windchill factor is -25 degrees Fahrenheit.
Or as I like to call it "inhumanly cold".
Look, I've lived my entire life in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Been there, done that, I can take it. But why should we have to? Human beings weren't meant to live like this! Think about it. People moved out here and learned it gets inhumanly cold during the winter. Did they realize their mistake and leave? Nooooo. They invented means to try and mitigate their misery! What the hell is wrong with us? I know the summers are fairly nice, but come on! This is just wrong people. Wrong.
Weather rant, fin.
Thanks. I feel better.
On to the important stuff. We had the most legendary individual trophy in sports awarded on Saturday. And I have to admit, I was surprised! I'll discuss. Then it's the latest edition of The Sports Take Mailbag. It's a hockey-related question that some of you will already know the answer to, but I'll try to make it an entertaining read anyway! Off we go!
"I don't feel I have a concussion problem. I have a problem with people giving me traumatic blows to the head." - Dean McAmmond (1973- ), Canadian professional hockey player currently with the Ottawa Senators
Thanks to Renee in Minnetonka for the quote. Sort of a hockey version of the "chicken and the egg" bit if you think about it.
«Read More...»
First up today, we've got to talk Heisman. The 2008 Heisman Trophy Award winner was announced Saturday evening. And believe it or not, I was both right and wrong!
I gave you my ballot on Wednesday as: 1. Sam Bradford, 2. Colt McCoy and 3. Tim Tebow. I also told you that I thought McCoy was going to win it.
Turns out I got the order exactly right and McCoy didn't win it.
Here's the breakdown:
Heisman Voting
|Sam Bradford, Oklahoma
|Colt McCoy, Texas
|Tim Tebow, Florida
|Graham Harrell, Texas Tech
|Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech
|Shonn Greene, Iowa
|Patrick White, West Virginia
|Nate Davis, Ball State
|Rey Maualuga, USC
|Javon Ringer, Michigan State
Notice that Tebow actually received the most first-place votes, yet finished 3rd. Not that it's a distinction that you'd want, but he's only the second player in Heisman history to pull that off.
How does that happen, you ask? The best speculation that I've heard is that some voters (one would suspect mostly in the middle-south) made their 3-candidate ballot an all-Big 12 ballot using either Graham Harrell or Michael Crabtree in 3rd and left Tebow off their ballot entirely. Personally I'd argue that's a mistake, but they have actual ballots and I don't.
The important thing, obviously, is that I had the top 3 ordered exactly correct.
Did I mention that my ballot was dead-on? I just want to make sure I make that point clearly!
I did? Okay. Moving on...
Time for another edition of The Sports Take Mailbag! This week's question comes from Mary in Plymouth who asks:
"What the heck is with the point system in hockey? I think I understand it; it just seems a bit like trying to fix something that wasn't necessarily broken, whatever it was that The Powers That Be thought was broken in the first place."
Good question Mary.
First of all, let me give you the specific rules. If a team wins a game in regulation, they receive 2 points. If teams are tied after regulation, they each receive 1 point. They then play a 5-minute sudden-death overtime period. If a team scores a goal during that period, they get an additional point, giving them a total of 2. If neither team scores, then the game goes to a best-of-3 shootout with extra skaters added if the teams remained tied. The team that wins that gets the additional point, giving them a total of 2.
Straight-forward, the system is not.
It used to be that if the game was tied after regulation, they'd play an overtime period and if nobody scored, the game finished in a tie and each team got their one point. The problem was if a team scored in the overtime, they got 2 points, and the team that lost got zero. This created a condition where teams would play super-tight defensively in the overtime, figuring that 1 point was better than none.
So the NHL decided to try and create an incentive for teams to open things up a bit in the overtime by guaranteeing each team a point if they tie in regulation. So if a team scored in overtime, they got 2 points and the team that "lost" still got their 1 point. This led to the obnoxious standings line for the NHL which read: "Wins - Losses - Ties - Overtime Losses". See if you won in overtime, you could just put a tick in the "Win" column, but if you lost in overtime, well it wasn't really a loss, because you still got a point. Simple, right? Oof.
Then, starting in 2005, the NHL further "fixed" overtime by adding the shootout. On the plus-side, this meant that fans going to a game would be assured that they'd see a winner. But hockey purists hated the idea. And I certainly understood why.
If you think about it, it'd be the same if the NFL decided to have teams kick field goals from increased distances to decide a winner. Or if the NBA had teams shoot free-throws to decide a game. Or worst of all, if MLB had teams hold mini-home run hitting contests to decide games that go beyond 12 innings or something. It's taking one small part of a wondrously complex game, and having it decide who wins and who loses.
So back to Mary's question, "was the change really necessary"? That's a tough one.
At the time the NHL made the initial change, their ratings and attendance were starting to decline, so I guess they figured they had to try something to regain their stature in the sports universe. Unfortunately it didn't work. At best, you could currently say that hockey is 4th amongst the 4 major sports leagues. And though it pains me to say it, if you add NASCAR into the mix, the NHL is probably 5th.
So in that sense, the initial change probably wasn't necessary. But assuming that change is made, I'd argue that the 2nd change (the addition of the shootout) was absolutely necessary. As odd as the "Wins - Losses - OT Wins" line looks to some folks, it's far better than having to create a column for a special kind of loss.
The purists (and I know there are some that read this blog) will still say that they hate the shootout. I guess I've been moderately won over. I understand the casual fan's desire to have a definite winner and loser like the rest of the leagues (except the rare occasion in the NFL and certain MLB All-Star games). And the shootout does add a layer of excitement to the end of a game. Let's just say I've begrudgingly accepted it's existence. And while I'd like to see it changed to a best-of-5 skaters rather than best-of-3, I can live with the system as currently constructed.
Hopefully that clears things up for you Mary. Thanks for the question! Remember, if you want your question answered, submit it to the mailbag at: firstname.lastname@example.com!
That's all I've got for today. I'll be back on Wednesday, presuming I don't die of hypothermia before then. Did I mention it's inhumanly cold? As long as we're clear. Until next time, thanks for reading!