text:
Monday, May 26, 2008
And the whole world is watching...
One of the greatest challenges I have faced while writing this blog is finding balance and keeping shit real.
I often fall victim to calling the right out for shit that I give some asshole of the left the benefit of the doubt on…but trust that a bitch has learned the error of my ways during the Democratic primary season.
When I heard Senator Clinton's comments regarding why she is staying in the race citing the timing of RFK's assassination I was disturbed. My initial reaction was that her RFK reference was in poor taste and historically inaccurate. My next reaction was that it was irresponsible - the lesson of the RFK assassination is that there are people who would do harm to those who run for office.
Do I think Senator Clinton was calling for the assassination of…oh, I can't even write that shit.
No, I don't.
Do I think the use of that reference, much like Bill O'Reilly's comments about when it would be okay to lynch Michelle Obama, was dangerous and irresponsible?
My concern was quickly validated when Liz Trotta, while discussing Clinton's comments, casually endorsed the assassination of Senator Obama even as she pulled a FOX and accidentally on purpose misspoke Obama's name as Osama while appearing on FOX television.
That has been the sorry ass pattern of this shit.
Clinton supporter Bob Kerrey verbalizes rumors about Obama having attended a madrassa in his youth (a false statement that had been fully debunked) and conservative blogs explode with declaring Obama to be a covert Muslim with a secret agenda to destroy America.
"See! Even Democrats are saying it!!"
Bill Shaheen attempts to cast Senator Obama's candor over drug experimentation in his youth as covering up some sort of drug dealing past (because black man = drug dealer, right?) and conservative blogs erupt with racially offensive drug dealing stereotype laden attacks on Obama's character.
"See! Even Democrats believe it!"
Geraldine Ferarro asserts that Obama's political success is due exclusively to his luck at being born a black man ('cause life is just a 24/7 party for black people in America, right?) and I get anonymous comments with links to her quotes from freaks who just want to make sure I know that even white Democrats don't want a "n**ger president".
"See! Even Democrats feel that way!!"
And Senator Clinton pitches her success with "working, hard-working Americans, white Americans" with perfect marketing-based timing for the asshole selling those nifty Obama '08 t-shirts featuring a monkey peeling a banana (and some of y'all disputed a bitch when I went there over King Kong…I'm just saying…shit).
The fact that these people have found common cause in the spin coming out of Clinton's campaign is disturbing as hell.
Isn't it?
Or maybe the jokes on me…again.
Right now I'm marveling over just how gosh darn "lucky" Obama is to have been depicted as a monkey on a t-shirt, accused of covering up a non-existent drug dealing past, assumed to be a terrorist because of his name, subject to having that asshole at FOX casually discuss lynching his wife and then threatened with assassination by Liz fucking Trotta on national television.
Y'all be sure to smile, now.
The whole world is watching…
38 comments:
- billie said...
yep- the reason why i am changing to independent. i can't be associated with either party because if it wasn't so sad (for lack of a better word at this time) i might laugh at it. but i can't because they are serious as the grave. the fight to the death mentality means that there is no difference between the two parties and i won't be a party to either.
- bitchphd said...
I know what you mean about the challenge of "keeping it real" all the time. It's one reason I've backed off on the day-to-day political blogging and gone back to telling stories more. It's a lot easier to keep it real when it's my own bullshit I'm exposing.
Re. registering independent (Betmo's comment above mine): I did that when Bill did the whole welfare reform crap, but I've gone back to being a Dem, largely because of the primaries. - 9:34 PM
- Yankee, Transferred said...
I cannot imagine what people in other countries think of us.
Yeah Shark Fu,
It's crazy time in the primary now. Obama scares the crap out of the Rethugs because he's not quite as readable as the Borg Queen and didn't receive the Bush seal of approval. I think he'll pull a lot of evangelicals away. Also the Clinton wing of the party has taken a lethal hit. I'd like to see all those alleged party leaders - the super delegates- come out in support of Obama on June 3rd, but we'll see. For me it's an important day because rent control is up for grabs in CA. - 12:20 AM
I don't agree. I think that Hillary is being wronged here.
I hope that Hillary follows in the footsteps of other Great Democrats like Strom thurmond, George Wallace, and Harry Byrd, who when faced by such wrongs, ran as Third Party Candidates.
Snookie - 7:35 AM
- Sam said...
Here is what i posted last week.
Senator: despite what you may think words do mean something. They convey thoughts, they convey character, they convey inner musings.
What your words meant, on some level, is the rather bizarre notion, "I must continue here. I must continue in this pursuit of a now unreachable goal because, well, because, you know, someone might shoot Barrack Obama, and well then where would we be in the Democratic Party if our nominee has been killed?"
On some level, somewhere inside, she means this. This horrible self-justification of her nobility, "I'm here to pick-up the pieces."
What an enormous ego she has.
The problem for us is that to even give flight to this notion leads us to the darkest times in American politics. The politics of violence, the killings of John F. Kennedy, Rev. Martin Luther King and Senator Robert F. Kennedy. Not to mention others like Presidents Lincoln, Garfield, and McKinley. The attempted assassinations of Ronald Regan and Gerald Ford, and candidates Gov. George Wallace and Theodore Roosevelt.
I do not truly think she is hoping for this, again on some rational level, but words are windows on the soul, Senator.
Some of us have measured you in the past and have found things that have dissuaded us from you. Your politics of triangulation, your pragmatic strategy of giving them what they want, "I'll say anything to be anything to this particular group of folks". You're seeming Zelig-like chameleon attempts to blend in knocking back boiler-makers and shots, the stories of being under fire in Bosnia and gun hunting with your Daddy, threats of nuking Iran, reducing gas taxes, and drawling on in a Southern accent about how far the journey is and how untired you are to listeners at an African-American church.
You are incredibly tone-deaf to your messages and insensitive to what your messages say. You have apologized to the Kennedy's "hey sorry, your (fill in the blank) brother, father, uncle, was killed, but I have a race here to stay in in case they kill the black guy."
Where is the apology to Barrack Obama? or to his wife, Michelle?, to his children? to us the American public?
You cannot stay in this race, you cannot be Obama's VP, you cannot be a heartbeat away from the Presidency of the United States. - 8:02 AM
"Borg Queen"? You don't mean Hillary Clinton, do you? Because we're stopping all that crap, right?
Because the hydra of racism & sexism needs to be STOPPED, and if we don't stop it, who will? - 8:56 AM
- Mo said...
Isn't it funny how the closer he gets to winning, the more talks/"jokes" of assassination keep popping up? Call me paranoid but that secret service detail had better be on point.
- Shark-Fu said...
Christ Jesus, an anonymous Dixiecrat just jumped up in the comments to defend Clinton!
Somebody please hit the brakes because we are going in reverse fast as a motherfucker... - 9:15 AM
- Jeffrey Ricker said...
My stars and garters, we have George Wallace AND the Borg Queen in one comment thread? Clearly, I need to go get me some popcorn and watch the floor show, which is getting truly surreal.
(Could the Borg Queen run a convincing and persuasive campaign? And what party would she run under? Hmm.) - 10:31 AM
I believe that H.C. is cutting her own throat with all her insensitive 'Freud' slips...many people who were in her camp have been appalled by her flip/flop words. Is some of what she says scary, u betcha, for there is a lot of nuts out there looking for an excuse to take some b.s. & run with it. Sorry, I am getting sick of this & just wish O would take it, move on, and let the lady go back to the Senate with tail tucked!
I sincerely believe that what Mrs. Clinton (and I mistyped that as "Clingon" at first) meant to say is that primaries are not decided until June, for various reasons.
She picked herself a hell of a way to say it, though. I do not want a President whose speaking style is tactless at best and plain offensive at worst. Had enough of that for one lifetime. - 2:15 PM
Nancy said, "But there's nothing innocent about standing aside and not lifting a finger while one of the most liberal senators is routinely bashed for everything from her laugh to her "thick ankles (never mind the issues: what issues?), or the not-so-subtle suggestion that Clinton isn't "likeable" (i.e., she's a bitch), or Michelle Obama's suggestion that she wouldn't support Clinton if she won, or the suggestion that most of Clinton's support among white, red-state, and/or working class voters is motivated by racism. Nothing innocent at all."
So. . . Obama is under an affirmative obligation to defend Hillary Clinton's honor?
That's a very privileged position to take, isn't it?
Especially since I don't remember Hillary sticking her neck out to fight racism. In fact, she recently told the Washington Post that racism was not a factor in this campaign.
This argument basically condemns Obama for what he DOES NOT say, rather than for anything he actually does say.
And when a 1/4 of your voters say they based their vote on race, then the media (notice, Obama never said anything about this) has every right to raise questions of racism. (And before someone tries to turn this around on black folk, please note that we've been voting for white people our entire lives).
Hillary has burned a lot of bridges. That's on her. And she will have to come to grips with that. Unfortunately, she'd rather agitate her base and twist the facts to have them believe that Obama stole this nomination away from her. That's not unity.
So, while Obama praises Hillary's historic campaign as a trailblazing example for his daughters, Hillary alludes to Obama's assassination? She compares Florida and Michigan to SLAVERY. She says Obama can't pass the "Commander in Chief" test, but McCain can.
She poisons the well. She plants the seeds of doubt so that the media might repeat her talkingpoints.
It was her camp that said Latinos wouldn't vote for a black man back in January.
It was Ed Rendell (One of Hillary's chief surrogates) who said whites in PA wouldn't vote for a black person.
It's her camp that openly says she's staying in the race because. . . "anything can happen."
It's her camp that raised the idea of Obama as the affirmative action candidate (see Ferraro).
Add these to examples in Shark-Fu's post. Add those to the list of issues raised in Olbermann's special comment. Do that, and you'll get a taste of how disrespectful and divisive Hillary's been during this entire race.
No doubt, Hillary has faced her fair share of sexism. But she is not the victim she portrays herself to be. She started this race with all the money; the name recognition; the infrastructure . . . She's winning white male voters in many of these states; so much that she feels emboldened to brag about it to the USA Today.
She told people she'd have this nomination wrapped up by Feb. 5. She wasn't concerned about "letting every vote count" back then. Why the change of heart now?
And please don't compare "thick ankles" or "cackling" to assassination. Not all insults are created equal. It cheapens the severity of Obama's obstacles.
I'd rather have the media discuss my fat ankles than make jokes about my murder (Hillary's comment, Huckabee's comment, the comment on Fox News, the picture in that Georgia Newspaper. . . that's 4 assassination conversations in the past two weeks. . . something is terribly wrong).
Hillary needs to deal with her transgressions rather than point the finger at someone else. There is absolutely NO excuse for her latest comment. Forget intent, the effect of her words have potentially deadly consequences for Obama and his family. The fact that she can't see this. . . the fact that she won't acknowledge this. . . the fact that her campaign admits that they have no plans to apologize to Obama and his family, speaks volumes of her lack of character.
Bottom line: She raised the conversation this weekend. She put the idea out there. As a matter of mere decency, she should see it as her responsibility to try her best to dispel such thoughts before someone does something crazy. You don't dismiss concerns of assassination. Krugman can try to change the subject, but this is a BIG deal.
For what it's worth, Huckabee personally apologized for his comments. Why is Hillary so special? It's like she thinks she's above apologizing to Obama.
These were her words and no one else's. Yet she refuses to take responsibility for any of her actions and continues to point the finger at someone else. We already have a president who does that. . . it's not good.
One last thing. Here's Andrew Sullivan's quick response to Krugman's article:
Why Krugman is Wrong - 2:45 PM
Here's another great response to Hillary's comments:
A-Word Chatter and the End of Legitimacy
David Bromwich: (emphasis added)
"When a democratic society fails to honor the contract by which we elect our leaders in peace, and let them govern in peace, and show our approval or disapproval by keeping them or turning them out of office--when the incantation "He is not one of us" dips so far below sanity that we pretend the rules and decencies aren't in force any more--it is more than one person who is harmed. This loose way of talking and thinking of violence hardens us against real responsibility if the violent thing should happen. We are administering shocks to ourselves in advance so as not to be surprised by the actuality. But such preparations are in their very nature corrupt, and corrupting. And they are not less so when used against any person of dignity and estimation, on the public stage, than when they are leveled against an elected official." - 2:51 PM
- Homer said...
Clinton had every advantage in this race, Obama was an unknown. And yet somehow he is winning- and while doing so he has shown the skills that are necessary to be president. He has excellent advisors, discusses issues lucidly, doesn't get confused and say stupid things, etc., etc. I can't wait for President Obama to lead our country.
- jsb16 said...
If Clinton's motivation was simply to express why she's staying in the race, she should have cited another Kennedy. After all, Ted Kennedy took the nomination contest to the 1980 convention trailing Carter by a thousand delegates.
I'm willing to believe that Clinton is staying in the race because it's not mathematically over yet. I'm not willing to believe that she's the best candidate, or that she'd win if the worst happened to Obama. (After all, we all remember President Humphrey fondly, right?)
But that doesn't mean that I'm willing to overlook Obama's incidents of pandering or sexism or apparent willingness to throw feminists under the bus in order to win "swing voters" who have doubts about whether or not women should even be entitled to "some" control over our own bodies.
I started this primary season enthused, because I thought the Democrats had a two out of three chance of nominating a real progressive and a certain chance of nominating someone I could at least be content with. (Those two out of three would not include Senator Clinton, btw. I've known for a long time that she's not a real progressive.) Now I'm down to hoping the Democrats don't manage to either lose to McCain or foist another bait and switch on us the way Bill Clinton did by giving us "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" instead of actual reform. - 6:13 PM
- Jaelithe said...
I totally agree with your assessment, ABB. I saw this video before it hit the TV cycle because I happened to be plugged into Twitter when the story broke, so I had a close-to-blank-slate experience, absent pundit spin. Yet I, too was worried that I was injecting some of my Obama-favoring bias into my interpretation of her RFK comments. So I watched the video again. And again. Trying to un-see what I had seen. But it was still there. The tone of voice. The turn of phrase. Her emphasis on the word "assassinated" was particularly damning, in my view. I didn't think she was wishing for disaster. But she was planning for it. Out loud. Blatantly. Maybe even deliberately trying to remind people of the danger.
It was not cool. NOT COOL. And the fact that her "apology" afterwards did not reveal any true understanding of the real reasons for the NOT COOLness of what she had said only made her attitude seem worse, in my mind.
(And before anyone jumps on me, please note that I am a second-generation feminist, would love to see a woman president, and used to have tons of respect for Hillary. My respect, which was hers to keep or lose, has been dwindling.) - 10:21 PM
- Mac Daddy Tribute Blog said...
Shark-Fu, thanks for putting into words my feelings. I've just started blogging for real about a month ago; and already I've gotten so disgusted that I've had to diversify my writing. I've reviewed a musical, written about violence in our communities, talked about supporting our soldiers by getting out of this stupid Iraq war.
But when I do write about the sheer political stuff, I'm going to hit it hard.
I appreciate you. - 11:08 PM
- Julie The Vintage Goddess said...
For what it's worth, Huckabee personally apologized for his comments. Why is Hillary so special? It's like she thinks she's above apologizing to Obama.
Clintons do not apologize or admit mistakes....ever. - 11:22 PM
I just wonder how much Bill is behind all the Hillary stuff? So Bill – let's talk. Puh-lease let Hillary step aside with dignity. Okay, fair enough - when she is ready. But don't make it more difficult than what it should be. There is no "cover up". Except if we can call your spin since Monica and now the "Hillary working class hero" and "wrap up in June" bull. Back off Bill. You had your chance. No be a good ex-President and go talk to someone who cares. http://angryafrican.net/2008/05/27/bill-just-back-off-will-ya/
- E. Bunny said...
B-serious said:
"Hillary needs to deal with her transgressions rather than point the finger at someone else. There is absolutely NO excuse for her latest comment. Forget intent, the effect of her words have potentially deadly consequences for Obama and his family. The fact that she can't see this. . . the fact that she won't acknowledge this. . . the fact that her campaign admits that they have no plans to apologize to Obama and his family, speaks volumes of her lack of character."
I agree. I also think that it demonstates that she is more like Bush than not.
She running up a debt in pursuit of an unwinnable race while playing on people's fears.
Another thing, Sen. Clinton wanted this "possibility" to become an OPEN conversation. That is why she kept bringing it up. Perhaps (wink, nudge) she raised the "spector" in her earlier interviews because she is self-absorbed and couldn't see beyond her own objective.
...Okay (wink, wink).
However, her campaign's decision to resurrect the story after Sen. Obama gave them a pass is an attempt to sway superdelegates
with an unconcionable arguement.
It is time for George and Lurleen to leave Foster Auditorium. - 8:58 AM
I just love that the new tact is to blame Obama for not jumping to 'protect her' from the sexism of the media! Hillary wants to have it both ways- don't treat her special as a woman, oh wait treat her special because she's a woman! I even heard some get pissy over Obama saying she could stay in the race as long as she wants. They said he was patronizing!
Now she's stirring the die-hards up and they basically want you to beg them to vote for Obama. And making demands that he put her on the ballot- what gall. If the situations were reversed and SHE'D won 11 in a row, they would be screaming for BHO to drop out and you know what? He would've gracefully. Hillary kept saying it was about putting a Democrat in the WH but she's basically told her fans they should support McCain. A REAL feminist wouldn't support a man like that. So it was just about getting HER into the WH. And like I said before, throwing hissy fits and not supporting the ACTUAL Democratic candidate because the woman you adored ran a crappy campaign-that's not democracy, that's idol worship. - 9:25 AM
Of course she's not going to apologize to Obama and his family! She can barely say his name as it is- haven't you noticed she almost always refers to him as 'her opponent' (btw, Ms. Clinton, actually McCain is your opponent) - 9:30 AM
Everyone running for the presidency is at risk. When Benazir Bhutto was assasinated I was worried about Hillary Clinton. There are just as many sexist nuts out there are there are racist ones. Anyone who has not had even a faint glimmer of worry for any of the candidates feel free to cast the first stone. Until then, stop lying and criticizing.
One more thing, and this is a minor rant so please bear with me. But what is WITH the use of the passive voice in what's supposed to be an apology? I am so sick and tired of reading "I regret the event that happened." It just HAPPENED? And you just HAPPENED to be there with your mouth moving?
Okay done. - 10:24 AM
You just gave me this horrid vision of Hill running independent. Like a a pant-suit version of Nader, She takes away enough voters so that the insane portion of this country +undecideds=Bush3.
I expect Hill to campaign all the way to the comvention. Then, I hope, they'll group hug, sing Koom Bye Ya and sort it out on the Demo ticket.
FuB, I think you're a little off. Like just to the left of Ralph Nader. Who is, obviously, a pain in the ass. This campaign stuff is way, way overblown. Picking through Hills remarks while a rich pile of fresh manure is available to you daily on Major Media is just so wrong.
I fear Obama, at least for the biblical part about a slave becoming king. I've sure worked with and dealt with enough blacks who get a little power over the white guys. It's scary. But I can deal with that shit easier than I can deal with Fighting Johnny McCain.
My kid can get along with a black supervisor. He can't get along with an Iraqi bomb. Which is where McCain would be sending him. So, yeah, even though I fear injustice at the hands of black elected officials, I'd still vote for Obama if he made the dem. ticket. It probably wouldn't be Obama. It would be flunky#1187, buried in the landslide of new administrators, nursing some supersecret racial grudge for some stupid cracker who abused him as a child.
And for that, we must all be made to suffer. Bite me, bitch. - 11:23 AM
@ Nancy,
"It's about how easy it is to claim the high ground when the MSM does most of your dirty work, and how standing aside and watching other people do wrong isn't really innocent at all."
As opposed to Hillary who showed no hesitation in tag-teaming with McCain to label Obama an "elitist," after Obama's "bitter" comment?
As opposed to how Hillary jumped aboard the "Bill Ayers" wagon during that ABC debate (mind you, this was just a few minutes after Obama defended Hillary's "Bosnia" gaffe as nothing more than a media-obsessed distraction)?
As opposed to how Hillary, during that same debate, tried to link Obama's church to Hamas?
And where's there any proof to suggest that the media is "doing Obama's dirty work for him?" Is this part of the vast left-wing conspiracy?
You're beef still sounds like an anger at the fact that Obama didn't take a proactive stance to speak up against certain insults directed at Hillary. As a consequence, you label his silence as agreement.
That, to me, sounds like some type of affirmative obligation you pin on Obama, but don't hold Hillary to. As I said before . . . when has Hillary stuck her neck out to defend Obama against racism? I gave you a specific example of when Hillary flat out DENIED the existence of racism. That obligation (if it exists) should go both ways.
"Speaking of transgressions, how long should we hang Obama out to dry for calling a female reporter "sweetie" for the (gasp!) second time in the last few months?"
There is NO moral equivalency between "sweetie" and "assassination." That is an insult.
Sweetie is not the moral equivalent of "drug dealer." (as discussed in Shark-Fu's post).
Plus, Obama called that woman to personally apologize to her. Where's Hillary's apology to Obama? We're still waiting.
"4) The perception of Obama supporters that Clinton is a dirty fighter, or has "poisoned the well" is both inaccurate and naive. But don't believe me: wait until you see what the Republicans have cooked up for the Democratic presidential contender."
The poor behavior of one does not excuse the same from another. Republicans will fight dirty. That does not give Hillary a free pass to act the same way. The focus is on her. . . her actions and her words.
Bringing Republicans into it only seeks to change the subject and shirk responsibility.
Again. . . her camp said Latinos wouldn't vote for a black man. Her camp said whites wouldn't vote for a black man. Her camp says Obama can't get hard-working white voters. That's poisoning the well. That's making Obama's race a central theme of this campaign. It's telling people how they should vote based on ethnic and racial lines.
Obama has not done this with Hillary's gender. I've never heard him reference gender as an explanation to vote for or against Hillary. I've never heard him say, "You know, we have polling data that suggests men won't vote for a woman in the general election." or "There are a lot of men who won't trust a woman as Commander in Chief."
". . . ease up on the racism/sexism Olympics, and get to work on some coalition building."
Hillary engages in the "racism/sexism" Olympics every time she calls sexism the "highest glass ceiling," ignoring the fact that there are many other glass ceilings that are just as difficult (racism, homophobia, etc.).
She engages in said Olympics every time she dismisses racism as a factor in this election.
Her camp engaged in the "racism/sexism" Olympics when Ferraro said Obama was "lucky" to be a black man because we're supposed to believe life's harder for a white woman like Hillary.
She engages in the "racism/sexism" Olympics every time she doesn't recognize white privilege or the ways in which gender, race and class intersect.
And while I don't blame Hillary for the following, I think it's worth noting: Gloria Steinem played the "racism/sexism" Olympics when she wrote that article in the NY Times back in January, "Why Women are Never the Frontrunners."
She doesn't know what it's like to be a person of color. So she shouldn't take liberty to assume which group has it worse than the other. Especially not in some weird implication that the most "oppressed" holds some moral entitlement to the Presidency.
Racism and sexism are bad enough. I don't need a white woman telling me that I got it easy because I'm black. And I don't need Steinem distorting black history and struggle for political gain.
Re: "coalition building"
That "coalition" is called the Democratic party.
That "coalition" had a primary season to select its leader.
That "coalition" had two very strong candidates that fought for the nomination.
That "coalition" picked a nominee. That "coalition" picked Obama.
The question isn't whether some coalition needs to be built. The question is whether Hillary encourages her supporters to desert said "coalition" by continuing to imply that Obama stole the nomination away from her. The strength of that "coalition" relies on whether or not Hillary is willing to accept defeat (just like any other candidate) and recognize Obama as the legitimate winner.
But she doesn't do that. Instead, she goes compares MI/FL to slavery and the Civil Rights Movement (again, an insult). She bends the very rules she agreed to play by and then blames Obama for playing by said rules. She let's Bill go around talking conspiracy theories. She raises ghosts of Al Gore and the 2000 election.
This is NOT coalition building. On the contrary, this is stirring resentment amongst one's base of support. It's crafting an excuse to abandon the "coalition," so many speak of today.
Obama congratulates Hillary on every one of her victories. He refers to her by name. He praises her as a strong and capable opponent. He even praises her as an example for his daughters.
Hillary does not return the favor. What was the last good thing Hillary ever said about Obama?
For all this talk about treating Hillary with kid gloves, someone needs to tell her that she needs to play nice as well.
Step one: Don't talk about assassination. - 12:22 PM
Everyone running for the presidency is at risk. When Benazir Bhutto was assasinated I was worried about Hillary Clinton. There are just as many sexist nuts out there are there are racist ones. Anyone who has not had even a faint glimmer of worry for any of the candidates feel free to cast the first stone. Until then, stop lying and criticizing.
If I'm not mistaken, it was Obama who had to get SS protection right after he announced he was running. And when it comes to those 3 candidates, he's the one I worry about most. - 12:29 PM
jsb16 said, "But that doesn't mean that I'm willing to overlook Obama's incidents of pandering or sexism or apparent willingness to throw feminists under the bus in order to win "swing voters" who have doubts about whether or not women should even be entitled to "some" control over our own bodies."
This is a very serious charge with NO mention of evidence to support it.
Unless, perhaps, this is a reference to Ms. Ferraro who felt entitled to belittle Obama as some lucky black guy who would never be where he is if it weren't for the color of his skin (code: affirmative action) and white guilt. In that case, Geraldine threw herself under the bus.
Although it's worth noting that even Obama said he didn't think Ferraro was a racist. . .he limited his criticism to her comments, not the person (a point Ferraro conveniently ignores today as she calls Obama a sexist on every major news outlet). - 12:33 PM
- Shark-Fu said...
Anonymous, there are too many issues in that comment for me to address so I'm going to leave it at this - I explore issues of race, class, gender and orientation here.
You aren't on parole and reading a bitch isn't a condition of your release.
And I don't bite unitentified objects.
Next! - 12:43 PM
- E. Bunny said...
Jesus Wept!
Anonymous and the whole "slave becoming a king" thing is one of the most breathtakingly raw expressions of unearned privelage that I've run across in a long time (and I drank from a keg in the auditorium where Wallace blocked the entrance).
Um, how MF-ING dare you compare random black people in positions of authority to being sent to war? Let's preach individual responsibilty, but practice group blame.
Let's see, you linked white privilage to the bible, never seen that before (eyes rolling).
Then you implied that black people (yes, PEOPLE because you didn't name someone specifically)operate out of racial resentment. I.E. a black President is going to appoint black people who will in turn harass white people. Surprise, that scenario places randon melanin challenged people at the center of the universe-- again.
Watch for the price of sheets to go up in the next few weeks. I am starting to see a spike in the demand.
Tip: Don't use pinking shears to cut the eye holes. - 1:27 PM
Make my sheets rainbow.
I want to go after the anonymi, the gay-baiting politicians and preachers, the folks who think that Obama is Muslim or who spread the misinformation.
And yes, I do believe the sheets should be fancied up a bit. How about a bit of leather and some Pride beads?
NancyP ;) - 4:59 PM
- jsb16 said...
That was not a reference to Ferraro. That was a reference to Obama himself, answering a question from a fundamentalist who thinks that abortion is about "thousands of innocent, sweet babies" being killed, by saying that people "believe women should have some control over their bodies and themselves."
Let me repeat that.
Obama said people "believe that women should have some control over their bodies and themselves."
He said this in October 2007, and to my knowledge has never clarified beyond what he said later on, which included that there should be regulation of late-term abortions, which would seem to include the banning on particular surgical procedures by a group other than the AMA. He certainly doesn't have a section on his website that addresses the abortion issue. He seems to be perfectly willing to ignore a women's issue in order to have a chance of splitting the non-racist, fundamentalist, not-already-convinced-he's-a-Muslim vote.
I want to believe that my and my daughters' right to bodily self-determination would not be at risk under an Obama administration, but I haven't seen him try to reassure me. - 7:47 PM
To the person who objected to my term of affection for Hillary
"Resistance is Futile"
Black people don't count.
NO platform on policies to improve the lives of Black women.
Gee.....where does that leave us BLACK WOMEN?
OH I guess all her white feminists crying sexism, ignoring racism don't see us. They can't because we were thrown under the bus, see......
Now are YOU going to tell ME how I should feel or what I should say because you know better? I DON'T THINK SO SWEETIE!! - 10:51 PM
jsb16 said, "That was a reference to Obama himself, answering a question from a fundamentalist who thinks that abortion is about "thousands of innocent, sweet babies" being killed, by saying that people "believe women should have some control over their bodies and themselves."
You are faulting Obama for what he did not say rather for what he did say. Nowhere in your example does Obama say he would do away with or ignore a woman's right to "bodily self-determination."
In fact, Obama is on record as saying that he believes in a woman's right of choice (even in certain issues of partial or late-term abortion -- but I'll get to that later).
You also leave a lot of context out of your quote. In that same link you provided, Obama did say this (emphasis added):
"A lot of people have arrived in the view that I've arrived at, which is that there is a moral implication to these issues, but that the women involved are in the best position to make that determination. And I don't think they make it lightly.
This quote shows that Obama has a view and outlines it as such: that, although he understands the moral implications of abortion, he feels that "the women involved are in the best position to make that determination. And [he doesn't] think they make it lightly."
That's a pro-choice position. Which, to me, seems no different than Hillary's position that abortion should be "safe, legal and rare."
Both imply compromise. People could (and probably do) take Hillary's "safe, legal and rare" stance as a pander. But I notice that you're not taking her to task.
I personally think both Obama and Clinton are taking nuanced (though politically expedient) approaches to a very sensitive issue.
You criticize Obama's stance on partial-birth abortions without mentioning Hillary's position on the same issue.
In her October 8, 2000 debate for NY Senator, Hillary Clinton said that she was not opposed to the idea of a BAN on partial birth abortions. She specifically said that she "could support" such an idea if given the right circumstances.
In that debate, her opponent, Republican, Rick Lazio, accused Hillary of not supporting a ban on partial-birth abortions. Hillary Clinton responded by saying the following:
"My opponent is wrong. I have said many times that I can support a ban on late-term abortions, including partial-birth abortions, so long as the health and life of the mother is protected."
In her own words, Hillary is saying that she "can support a ban on late-term abortions."
Here's a link to the debate transcript
Here's another link that outlines Hillary on the issue of abortion
Her and Obama practically have the same position on this issue.
Here's a link to Obama on the issue of abortion
If you look at the link I provided, you'll see that, among other things, Obama voted against a partial-birth abortion ban in the IL Senate (in part because there was no safeguard for the health of the mother--like Clinton, herself, said); he views late-term abortion as a women's choice issue; and he voted AGAINST a measure that would define unborn children as eligible for SCHIP (as did Clinton).
Actually, Clinton's response seems to be par for the course as far as many pro-choice people are concerned. So does Obama's.
Quick diversion:
As you probably know, the definition of "life" is key to the abortion debate because it is directly tied to the issue of "choice."
Legally speaking, a woman's "choice" stops being unilateral once life is established. That's why pro-lifers want to define life at conception. People often dismiss this as pure religion or social conservatism when, in fact, it's actually a legal argument that they are trying to push.
As you probably know, it used to be a question of trimester analysis. It has since changed to a question that looks at the viability of the fetus(determined, in large part, by lung capacity).
The government has long held an interest in the health and well-being of the fetus after a certain stage in the pregnancy. Even Roe v. Wade recognizes such governmental interest. The private decision and right of "choice" that people often refer to focuses on the timeline before fetus viability and in matters of health and safety to and for the mother.
To the best of my knowledge, a woman doesn't have the "right" to get an abortion when she's 9 months pregnant. In theory, she could get an abortion at that point, but only if her health requires it (otherwise, the state interest in the health of the fetus would likely triumph over the woman's self-interest).
From a legal perspective, "health" is more a matter of necessity than "choice."
The reason for this is that, in late-term pregnancy, a woman's "choice" now has a competing interest. . . that of the state. The potential for a second legal interest lies at the heart of the abortion debate: the interest of the unborn (currently resolved by way of proxy in the state).
Not many question whether "life" exists at 9 months. Our medical technology allows us to see "life" (i.e., growth, response to stimuli, a heartbeat, etc.).
In fact, the Supreme Court (by way of Sandra Day O'Connor) is on record as saying that "abortion" is on a collision course with itself. This means that, as we advance further in technology, we learn more and more about the fetus and, thus, more about the capacity for life at potentially earlier and earlier stages.
Back to your post. . .
You said, "Obama said people "believe that women should have some control over their bodies and themselves."
You stressed the word "believe" in a way that implies you think Obama, himself, does not "believe" that women have control over their bodies. You say this when (as I've shown) there's a lot of evidence to suggest otherwise.
My earlier references already demonstrate that Obama believes that women "are in the best position to make that determination [about abortion]."
It's ironic that you'd take Obama's use of the word "believe," to signal disbelief (especially when he used the word "believe" as a third person reference). That's putting words in his mouth and ideas in his head without much evidence to support your position.
For the sake of consistency, here's a larger context to your Obama quote (from the same article):
Speaking to the pro-life questioner. . .
""The issue of abortion, I don't think, has gone away. People think about it a lot, obviously you do and you feel impassioned. I think that the American people struggle with two principles: There's the principle that a fetus is not just an appendage, it's potential life. I think people recognize that there's a moral element to that. They also believe that women should have some control over their bodies and themselves and there is a privacy element to making those decisions."
It's clear that Obama is simply recognizing two competing philosophies on the abortion issue. . . two competing philosophies that often co-exist within many people who compose the mainstream view on this issue.
Obama further goes on to express his own viewpoint (which, as I've previously shown, is pro-choice). That pro-choice viewpoint is later solidified as a contrast to the pro-life questioner when Obama says,
"If you believe that life begins at conception, then I can't change your mind."
Well, Obama wouldn't raise the idea of changing a pro-lifer's mind if he, himself, was pro-life.
Obama goes on to state a similar position as Hillary Clinton when he recognizes the desire many people have for some regulation regarding late-term abortions.
Both Obama and Clinton received a 100% rating from NARAL and, as we all know, Obama received NARAL's endorsement a couple of weeks ago. I'd say Obama has a pretty strong pro-choice position.
Regardless of whether one thinks Obama or Clinton's "pro-choice" stance is stronger (I actually think they're basically the same), it's a far cry to say Obama threatens a woman's right to bodily self-determination.
Again, both Obama and Clinton basically have the same stance on the abortion issue (I've given evidence to back this up)-- they're both pro-choice and they both see the need to reduce unwanted pregnancies as a progressive compromise on the abortion debate.
And let's not forget that McCain is pro-life.
Your conclusion that Obama panders to anti-choice voters is unwarranted. . . that is, unless you also think Hillary Clinton panders to those same voters.
If that's the case (if you see both Obama and Clinton as "pander-bears" on the issue), then I can appreciate you're principled stance.
But I'd assume that means you're going to vote for some third party candidate. . . because, by referencing your "late-term abortion" concerns, Obama, Hillary and, certainly, McCain might be too conservative for your taste. - 8:43 AM
- Shark-Fu said...
Okay people...
Help me help you.
I moderate comments so that the conversation remains on topic. I hate to have to reject one with a topic related opionion just because it also contains some shit that is only going to add another set of bricks to the wall. But I've rejected more comments to the post than published (wince) and that's just not cool.
So, please pretty please self regulate or a bitch will continue to do so for you... - 9:53 AM
- jsb16 said...
Did you miss everything in my first comment other than the part you objected to?
Let's recap: I don't like Hillary Clinton. I haven't liked Hillary Clinton since she failed to get decent healthcare passed during her first stint as a resident of the White House. So quit trying to persuade me that Hillary is worse than Barack is. I'm already convinced.
However, if Obama were not running, or if Clinton were the front runner by a ten times larger margin than Obama is now, I wouldn't expect anyone to be silent about her racism, even if she didn't express it as clearly as she has in this campaign. Heck, I haven't been silent about her racism, and I think she's essentially finished in this campaign.
But none of that means that I think my right to bodily self-determination is a matter of belief. I don't believe that it's wrong to force women to carry an unwanted or dangerous pregnancy to term any more than I believe that it would be wrong to force Black Americans to become bone marrow donors because there's a shortage of such donors. I know that both of these violate a fundamental human right, even if they might give life or save an already existing life.
As for who I'm voting for in November, that remains to be seen. I'm absolutely sure that I'm not voting for McCain. If there's a chance that McCain will win my state, we'realmost certainly doomed, but I'll vote (and campaign) for Obama if I think my doing so will make a difference.
But that doesn't mean that I think he's perfect in every way, or that I'm not noticing that, whatever his record says on women's rights, his website has sections for (race-based) civil rights, disability rights, immigrant concerns, rural concerns, urban concerns, seniors' concerns, the concerns of the poor, and veterans' rights, but not women's rights. Yes, women fall into many of the above categories, but everyone falls into multiple groups. Why shouldn't I question his decision not to make his position clear on his website?
And now I'll stop, with apologies to ABB for going off-topic. - 7:09 PM
jsb16 said, "his website has sections for (race-based) civil rights, disability rights, immigrant concerns, rural concerns, urban concerns, seniors' concerns, the concerns of the poor, and veterans' rights, but not women's rights."
Sorry Shark-Fu, but I just wanted to point this out. jsb16 said Obama doesn't discuss women's rights on his website. . . well:
Obama on Women's Issues/Rights
It's an entire web page listed under Obama's "Issues" tab, marked "Women."
It's there for all to see.
The page discusses issues such as:
- abortion rights;
- ovarian and breast cancer
- women and HIV/AIDS
- Domestic violence
- Pay equity
- Expanding Early Childhood Education
FYI. . . Obama mentions other women's issues, but I just wanted to highlight a few.
Given the abundance of evidence, I felt the accusation was a little harsh. I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that Obama has thrown feminists under the bus or pandered to sexists or threatened a woman's right to bodily self-determination.
I respect that we'll agree to disagree on some of this stuff. But I just wanted to provide evidence/information for the public forum.
Obama's not perfect. But he seems pretty damn good. I personally think we've got a great opportunity with him.
I know Shark-Fu wants to keep this on message. But I wanted to respond because (and the following is not directed at jsb16) it seems like people are LOOKING for any and every possible excuse they can find to NOT vote for Obama. . . especially since he has the nomination on lock.
People have begun to throw out blind accusations without any facts to back them up -- done in the hopes of de-legitimizing his nomination and/or derailing his campaign.
I don't doubt that there is a lot of constructive criticism. I don't agree with Obama on everything either (e.g., wish he had stronger stances on affirmative action and gay marriage).
But I'm also aware of the fact that we're in the "sour grapes" mode of this campaign. And some have begun to throw any accusation at the wall to see if it sticks.
That's a shame because I feel that, if we play our cards right, we've got a real opportunity for a paradigm shift in this country.
And Shark-Fu. . . I'm sure you get this a lot, but you've got a great blog. Truly impressive. - 11:49 PM
The Gumdrop Stage of Grief ...
So many of you have shared condolences and support after the death of my beloved brother Bill from COVID-19. I wish I could thank you indiv...
I was slightly illish this weekend and took to my bed Saturday, but I did rally for Brother Rob Thurman's fantabulous cookie decorating part...
Okay, so most of you know that this bitch has some evil assed fibroids . Most of them were successfully murdered with full premeditation se...
So many of you have shared condolences and support after the death of my beloved brother Bill from COVID-19. I wish I could thank you indiv...


text:
Following are a list of Rules/Guidelines that govern the use of these boards and will be strictly enforced by the owners/moderators of this forum. Failure to comply with these rules/regulations may result in the Ban of membership, email and IP access status. Please read and follow these rules in order to keep these forums open to the public. Thank You.
Showing blatant disrespect to moderators or staff
The moderators and staff here at TechPB are some of the most respected, most well known, most tolerant and most knowledgeable people in the paintball industry. They are helpful, they are patient, they work hard to make TechPB is a safe place for people seeking information. Arguing with a moderator, sending a moderator threats via PM or email, or anything that can be interpreted as disrespectful towards the TechPB staff is grounds for immediate banning from the website. Being a member of the TechPB community is a privilege, it is not a right. You do not have the "right" to be here, you are in OUR house as OUR guest. Freedom of speech is something you excercise on your OWN website, not on ours. If you come in here disrespecting the moderators or staff, you will earn an immediate IP ban.
Flaming, Bashing, and Trolling
Hate posts and personal attacks will not be tolerated. Treat others on these message boards as you would expect them to treat you. Talking trash about another user is a quick way to earn a banning, as is posting topics specifically to provoke a negative response from someone (aka trolling). Any threats will constitute a reason for banning.
Personal Information
You may not distribute private messages, instant message logs, e-mail, etc. unless both parties have provided consent.
Buy, Sell, Trade
TechPB is not responsible for any stolen, lost, misrepresented or fraudulent posts or transactions on our website. This includes moderators, staff, employees, advertisers, partners, etc. If you BST on this website, you are responsible for doing the due diligence required to ensure a safe trade. This includes the hiring of a third party service to handle the trade, tracking numbers, proper insurance, etc. All claims of misrepresentation are "civil" in nature, and will need to be handled in your local small claims court. We will provide any supporting information ONCE A POLICE REPORT HAS BEEN FILED, until then, please be careful!
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b252/Tenacious221/Graphs/BSTwkshtimg.jp g" alt="Posted Image" />
Please ensure your listing are noted properly, please read the rules in the BST located here - B/S/T LINK
Purposely spamming a message board with senseless, vacuous, or empty messages to gain more stars is highly frowned upon! This includes such things as party posts, chain letters, two-word "I agree" or "me too" responses, continually posting the same topic will more than likely result in LOSING post counts and/or bans. The practice of "Rick Rolling" will result in a consequence that is determined necessary. The posting of false and/or misleading links is grounds for suspension and depending on the content of the pages the misleading link goes to, a ban.
Impersonating Other Users / Accessing Another User's Account
You may not impersonate another board member or create an account specifically for the purpose of provoking other users. Also, accessing or using someone else's account or attempting to access another poster's account is strictly prohibited.
News Section
Contests are not news. If a company is having a contest, they can post it in their own section of the forum, or in Paintball Chatter. The news section is meant for the latest news within the paintball industry, a contest / giveaway does not qualify as news.
Please be aware that Signatures are under the same rules as regular posts. Attacking people in a Signature is also against the rules. No Adult Content. Images used in signatures are to be less then Width of 600px, and height of 160px. Only ONE image is allowed in the signature, and it must be 50k or less for members, 75k or less for Player's Club members and Mods. Only 5 lines of text are allowed (blank lines count). No text larger then size 3 is allowed in the signature.
Posting Huge Images / Fake Signature Pics
Out of respect for your 56k brethren, please let them know if your thread contains a number of large images. A simple **56kers Beware!** in the subject line will go a long way in helping those who are broadband-challenged know not to open a thread that might bring their web browsing to a crawl. Also if you must use signature pictures, please limit it to one 30k or less image since huge pictures slow down the boards.
Circumventing a Ban (aka Evading)
If you log onto the Boards and receive a message that you have been banned, please submit an unban request and wait for a Board moderator to get in touch with you. It is not acceptable to return to the boards under another username. If you do, your ban time most likely will be extended. You may not publicly complain about or demand a reason for another user's ban. Banned users have the responsibility of answering for themselves on their own. If you have an issue with a Ban, please PM a Moderator or the Forum Owner.
Profanity is allowed on this forum, but do not abuse this privilege. Remember, this is a privately run website, if you go out of bounds, you will be told. If you think it's to offensive, it is. Racial slurs are grounds for instant bans.
Money Making Schemes
Links to pyramid schemes, Money making schemes, or questionable 'Profit-per-Click' advertising sites are not allowed. Likewise, charity, donation, solicitation and begging threads posted by users are not allowed. Threads will be closed, and users may be banned.
You may not re-edit a post that has already been edited by a moderator (a mod's decision is final). You may not bait, insult, flame, or otherwise abuse a moderator; mods are here to make the forum a better place for everyone. If you have a problem with the moderation, please contact that mod or the TechPB Staff with your concerns (we take them seriously).
Questionable Content
These are public boards, so act like you would if you were in a public place. These issues are left to the discretion of the individual moderators, but may include any material that is knowingly false and/or deflamatory, misleading, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, that otherwise violates any law, or that encourages conduct constituting a criminal offense.
Religion and Political threads are subject to closure at staff's discretion. To paraphrase Mike: "If you want religion, go to church. If you want paintball, come to TechPB. If they want to debate religion, go to liveleak.com. Fuck that, not here, not on my site. Debate religion and politics on another site that actually cares about it."
NOTE: Posting links to graphic sites - either sexual, violent or containing illegal or invasive (i.e. massive window spamming) material will get you instabanned and may get you permabanned.
NOTE 2: These rules can and will be changed from time to time in order to better fit the needs of TechPB. Admins and Mods do have the right to take action against something they see is against the TechPB ideals. Loop holes in these rules, will not be recognized, and will still result in a disciplinary action that is determined appropriate by the forum admins and mods.
- TechPB Staff

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Find out how you can support our library.
Your support for the library will strengthen and expand our mission to serve every one in our service area. Your support is requested for outreach programs, for collections, and for special projects. Your support will demonstrate your appreciation for and understanding of the value in a civilized society of access to information. Ask the library staff what you can do to support our library.


text:
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Rhinestoned: Bedazzled and Confused
Owing to what has been something of a busy morning for me (meaning I actually had to put on pants and leave the house for a short period of time, which is a frightening proposition when you're an aspiring shut-in) the words you're reading may be somewhat disjointed and slipshod, like a homemade bamboo bicycle frame or an NYPD investigation of a driver-on-cyclist collision. Rest assured however that I will not be skimping on the inspirational stories, and a reader who was fortunate enough to meet the Lone Wolf informs me that as of late he has been "bedazzling his bike with 9,000 gems:"
He also deigned to pose for a portrait with the reader's friend, and it's shocking how much cooler the Lone Wolf's White Lotus of Truth is than than that MUSH Cannoli "collabo" fixie or whatever it is:
The reader even managed to gain some rare insight into the Lone Wolf's creative process:
Also, food for thought, I asked Lone Wolf if he sits in silence as he bedazzles or if he listens to some sort of music. Totally no shock, but he says he does it in silence.
I usually listen to classic Madonna while self-administering mani-pedis with lackluster results, and clearly I would be well-advised to follow the Lone Wolf's example and work in an atmosphere that was more conducive to quiet contemplation. I may try it when I move on to bedazzling the crotches of all my bib shorts. (The insides of the crotches, of course.)
Meanwhile, in Portland, another reader tells me that educators are finally challenging the white hegemony inherent in the peanut butter and jelly sandwich:
Evidently, the problem is that too many children feel alienated by this Western imperialist luncheon food:
"What about Somali or Hispanic students, who might not eat sandwiches?" says Gutierrez, principal at Harvey Scott K-8 School, a diverse school of 500 students in Northeast Portland's Cully neighborhood.
"Another way would be to say: 'Americans eat peanut butter and jelly, do you have anything like that?' Let them tell you. Maybe they eat torta. Or pita."
Yes, one culture's white bread is another culture's "white privilege:"
Through intensive staff trainings, frequent staff meetings, classroom observations and other initiatives, the premise is that if educators can understand their own "white privilege," then they can change their teaching practices to boost minority students' performance.
It's a good thing the people of Portland have the courage to expose these elitist schoolteachers for the one-percenters that they are, and when the revolution comes I hope that they're the first ones with their backs against the wall and their tongues stuck to the roofs of their mouths because they've been gorging themselves on haute cuisine like PB&J sandwiches. If I was a painter I'd render the Lone Wolf as a pan-cultural deity with many arms, dispensing tortas and pitas and falafels and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches to all the children of the world as he smiles beatifically with the bedazzled disc wheel of his Lotus creating a halo effect behind his head. But I'm not an artist, so instead here's a picture of a naked lady on a recumbent bicycle:
Of course, by censoring a naked woman on a recumbent we attempt to mute her seductive power, but we do so in vain. Similarly, yet another reader tells me there are people out there who think you can keep things from getting stolen by putting tape on them, which is similarly futile:
Make your bike ugly. Well, not too ugly, you still want to to love your bike! For example though, this author's bike seat has a hole in it that's covered up with a piece of electrical tape. This seat has no value whatsoever to a criminal because it's damaged. Why not put a piece of tape on your bike seat and deter criminals from ever taking it?
People seem to think you can "un-dazzle" a bike or component to the point where nobody will want it, but go ahead and put a piece of tape on your fancy-schmancy Brooks and see what happens. I suppose that depending on a thief's unique set of cultural references he may not steal a saddle with a piece of black tape on it because he thinks its a symbol of mourning and he fears divine retribution, but for the most part your typical workaday peanut butter and jelly sandwich-eating stealer of bicycles is not going to give a shit.
Speaking of stolen bikes, submissions continue to pour in for the Free Bio-Whatever Cable-For-A-Downtube Bike Contest (which ends at 12:01am on Friday, which is colloquially known as "tonight"), and here's someone who very well could find himself astride one of these things in the coming days:
I am Al Dimond, I live in Seattle, I write software, my favorite TV show is HBO's telling of George R. R. Martin's "realpolitik fantasy epic" Game of Butts.
My bike was stolen while it was locked at a bike rack with a "high theft area" sign at it. Um, overnight. I didn't intend to leave it there overnight, but when I went to pick it up in the evening I found that someone had tried and failed to cut the cable lock, and so instead had cut my brake cables. I had a party to get to and didn't want to be burdened with a brakeless freewheel bike in hilly Seattle, so I left it there. Went to pick it up the next morning and, naturally, it was gone.
My stolen bike was exactly like the one you're giving away except a few years older, with Puma branding, and glow-in-the-dark paint. I got it from a guy I met at a party who won it in a raffle at his office. He worked for an advertising agency and it had been used in a promotional photo shoot by Dr. Dre. Anyway, I'm pretty sure you can ride it with the downtube cable removed. I didn't test that extensively, but I rode it up and down an alley with the cable disconnected and the bike didn't fold up directly into my groin or anything like that. So I guess I need a folding bike so I can actually fold it up and take it places with me this time.
It's not like I should win this contest or something, but you should know that this bike
(LOL, fatfingered tab + spacebar). ... but you should know that this bike's built-in cable lock apparently doesn't deter theft in any meaningful way. This supposed anti-theft system won some kind of design prize a few years ago, so it's no surprise it's useless, right?
First of all, he watches TV, and even though I don't watch his favorite show I like that he likes it. (In this contest, passion counts for a lot, especially when it involves TV.) I also like that he locked his bike up to a rack with a "high theft area" sign on it (meaning he's not that smart) yet he also refused to ride a bike with cut brake cables (meaning he's not that stupid). Basically, he hits the intellectual "sweet spot" between surviving and flourishing, and as someone who occupies that same portion of the brainial spectrum I feel a certain affinity for him. Most endearingly, he's already owned the same bike, thought it was stupid, and doesn't really want another one--which makes me want to give him one anyway. It's the sort of cosmic joke in which I'd take great pleasure in participating.
Here's another promising contestant:
1. Who am I?
I'm Kurt Morris. I live just outside of Philadelphia and I grew up in Pittsburgh and travel there frequently. I work, all day long, with big and important powerful lawyers - I'm not a lawyer. I do their administrative work. I'm comfortable enough to admit that my favorite TV show is, and always has been, The Golden Girls.
2. How was my bike stolen? What did I learn?
My brand new bike (Scattante - purchased in May) was stolen out of my shed while I was sleeping earlier this summer. I have many suspects in my head - neighbors, hoodlums, Bea Arthur. Deep down, in the bottom of my heart, I can't help but hold myself accountable. My friends laughed at me - but I totally should have continued co-sleeping until the end of the summer. I'm not justifying my actions but I decided to park the bicycle in the shed, rather than in my bed next to me, because I do value the independence and personal freedom that my new bike gains by being parked in its own space. That should count for something, dammit.
That's all bullshit - I don't actually sleep with my bike. I parked my bike in my shed and didn't lock it to anything because I assumed that it was safe. Stupid stupid stupid! Anyway - my main take aways were - that it can happen to me; That my bike can be stolen right out from under my nose; And that I hate people who steal bikes... like.. a lot.
3. Why do I need a folding bike?
Honestly - who NEEDS a folding bike? Anyone? I don't... really. Should I admit that? Anyway - I'm just trying to be honest. I have, however, come up with several justifications as to why I FEEL like I need a folding bike. They are:
* It will fit in my bed with me much easier than my old bike (or a dead horse...)
* I commute to center city everyday on my bike (used to - hope to again). On days when it rains or snows, with a folding bike, I can more easily bike to the train station and fold it up to take public transportation into work. It is a bit of a pet peeve of mine that I can't take my bike on the trains or subways or other public transport during rush hour, if needed (more on that in a second). My office is a bit away from the train station in Philly so I would then bike to my office from the station. I'd much rather do this than drive into work or drive to the train station. I won't leave my bike at the train station all day - even locked up.
* Rather than drive, I frequently take the MegaBus to Pittsburgh from Philadelphia to visit friends and family. I'd really like to take my bike on the hills and trails rather than borrow one when I get there (or drive in order to take my own bike). One of my major complaints is that MegaBus will not accommodate bicycles on their buses.
A folding bike will allow me to bike to the bus stop in Philly, board the bus (with my folding bike collapsed), bus to Pittsburgh, and then bike to my destinations once I get there. MegaBus doesn't specify if I would be permitted to take a FOLDING bike on the bus - but if they don't, that would become part of my answer to question #4.
4. How would I make the world a better place with my fancy new folding bike?
Simply put, (in addition to changing the MegaBus policy) the world would see my joy in riding my new folding bicycle and every time I was asked about it, I would shamelessly promote your books and blog. (That can't hurt, right?)
Thank you for your consideration. Regardless of the decision, I honestly love reading your work (both books and blog). Thank you!
As a fellow Scattante owner I empathize with the fact that his was stolen, but at the same time I resent him because he owns a shed, which clearly means he's a one-percenter. (I bet he eats peanut butter and jelly sandwiches too). Nevertheless, he does have a clear need for a folding bike, since he does ride the bus (the "MegaBus," to be precise), and he also grew up in Pittsburgh and continues to visit there, which is good for sympathy points.
Anyway, between these two contestants and the one I've mentioned yesterday, I've now read a grand total of three (3) submissions which means I've only got about 197 to go.
Lastly, still yet another reader informs me that even in 2012 the art of fixie customization is sill flourishing, and here's a particularly stunning exaple:
Not only that, but you can own it for a mere $500:
Everybody knows that cyclocross bikes are the new fixie bikes, but this bicycle is uniquely designed to make sure that its owner stays loyal to fixiedom forever. This is because, should the rider ever be tempted to flirt with cyclocross by "portaging" the bicycle, the strategically-placed decorative chainrings will sever his arm at the shoulder in short order.
It's a touch lesson, but the fixie gods demand loyalty.
75 comments:
- September 13, 2012 at 1:28 PM
- babble on said...
oh yeah!
- September 13, 2012 at 1:28 PM
I've never had a bike stolen,
or been on the podium. - September 13, 2012 at 1:30 PM
Well, now I'm one for two.
- September 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM
- singlespeedwaster said...
More podium!
- September 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM
- singlespeedwaster said...
C'mon, just a bit more podium...
- September 13, 2012 at 1:32 PM
- September 13, 2012 at 1:34 PM
- leroy said...
My dog says that making my bike ugly won't work because, if I'm riding it, everything is relative.
I'm not sure what he means, but he told me he meant it in the nicest possible way. - September 13, 2012 at 1:35 PM
- September 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM
top ten
- September 13, 2012 at 1:37 PM
Made it; read it too; you're unconscionably late this morning, Snob. In fact your post was long past noon in Californi-aye, where so many of your loyal readers reside. Imagine how hard their workday was, deprived of the snob break, which is required by law, no?
- September 13, 2012 at 1:38 PM
What would make the world a better place is if comments were separated between those who read the entry first and those who did not. Commenting before reading is the blog reader equivalent of PED use. And yes, I'm bitter at missing the podium.
- September 13, 2012 at 1:41 PM
- babble on said...
It's a tough lesson in touch? Between the fixie bites, the bedazzled crotches, and Monday's 'Beaten into Submission' post, we seem to be in the midst of a Fifty Shades of Snob kind of week....
What more could a girl ask for? - September 13, 2012 at 1:43 PM
- JB said...
Me, yesterday: "I'll settle for a recumbabe tomorrow."
Praise Lob! With Lob, everything is possible! - September 13, 2012 at 1:44 PM
- babble on said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- September 13, 2012 at 1:46 PM
- September 13, 2012 at 1:47 PM
- JB said...
@ le: it's not even noon in Denver yet.
- September 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM
- recumbent conspiracy theorist said...
I'm gonna hold out for the Brompton giveaway contest. Hopefully snob you can work it so we can still pick our own colour.
- September 13, 2012 at 1:49 PM
- McFly said...
I am ready for Thursday Night Criterium World Championship. I have trained all week by not riding.
- September 13, 2012 at 1:50 PM
- September 13, 2012 at 1:58 PM
Love the seat angle on the Lotus...also, is it a rolling petition for more recumbabe or is that grafitti all over the Lotus? Perhaps the Wolf should pick a better storage location.
- September 13, 2012 at 2:04 PM
- JB said...
Look! I ruined an old Miyata. Pay me $500 for it!
- September 13, 2012 at 2:04 PM
- RANTWICK said...
Your second contestant basically said "if it rains take the bus" regarding using that folder. Surely that counts for something too?
- September 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Snobby - did you mean writer's friend? If so, you have a friend? Who knew!
cycle - September 13, 2012 at 2:07 PM
What kind of guy who says:
"...exactly like the one you're giving away except a few years older, with Puma branding, and glow-in-the-dark paint. I got it from a guy I met at a party who won it in a raffle at his office. He worked for an advertising agency and it had been used in a promotional photo shoot by Dr. Dre...."
actually reads this blog?
I call bullshit - quality bullshit but bullshit nonetheless.
Fred Nifacent, you may have some backstory to research - just sayin' - September 13, 2012 at 2:13 PM
Stolen biks are get sold.
- September 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM
Epic Lone Wolf update! Must have been wind tunnel testing with that saddle position. But is all right with the universe? Where are the White Shoes of Justice?
- September 13, 2012 at 2:37 PM
De-bedazzle, not undazzle.
- September 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM
- Billy said...
More Lone Wolf or imafuckinkillya
- September 13, 2012 at 2:50 PM
- jim cassa said...
Wow, white bread and govment cheese. I haven't eaten white bread in 60 years. As a dues paid in full retrogrouch I can't believe anyone does. As a proud Italian -American I do eat white breadsticks, after I dip them into my glass of wine. Watch out for those Cheetos Snobby, you can tell by the glow that they have a half life of about a zillion years, or that's what they looked like on acid in the 60's.
- September 13, 2012 at 2:53 PM
I've had 2 bicycles stolen; both were old Schwinns. Now, I have a new Chinese "Schwinn" which no one would want to take. I have been thinking about a folder, though... [but not considering entering the contest, because, alas, my good-luck quotient is crap].
- September 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM
ooooo, kurt has a shed & works in an office! hey, mr. 1%: i LIVE in a shed and work in a PAPER BAG! i'm so bad off if i had that bike i'd have to EAT it.
- September 13, 2012 at 2:59 PM
My name is Lance. I live in Texas. I had seven SEVEN yellow bikes stolen from me. All Treks. I learned nothing. I need the yellow folding bike so I can ride to the bank and count my over 100 million dollars. I can fold it up and hide in the basement of the Alamo.
- September 13, 2012 at 3:06 PM
Finally get to read the blog before lunch here in Portlandia, just before sitting down to a pb&j samwich consisting of Jason's chocolate peanut butter, organic strawberry premium spread (Crofters), on organic Killer Dave's Good Seed bread. Wow, just shot way past the 1% ceiling right into Romney territory! It wouldn't be fair to put in for the free 'bike' contest at this point. Also since I'm a biker in Portland am not allowed to watch any regular tv shows.
- September 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM
- Marcel Da Chump said...
There's a brand new shiny orange Mercier with only a small U-lock through its frame locking it to the bike rack. It has freshly chamfered Brooks.
If you read this, check your bike ASAP. - September 13, 2012 at 3:11 PM
- McFly said...
A torn saddle is like a torn condom. It can lead to nothing but uncomfortable rashes.
- September 13, 2012 at 3:15 PM
- Olle Nilsson said...
There are so many reasons to not enter this contest. First, the embarrassment of admitting to my favourite TV show. Fortunately, I had the foresight to never watch Jersey Shore - I mean, what if I couldn't look away? Second of all,my bike didn't get stolen so I don't *need* another bike, especially a crappy one. Thirdly, I already have a folding bike and I'm not making that mistake again. Lastly, the whole thing smacks of effort and this comment's already taxing me. I could go on, but that would be too hard.
- September 13, 2012 at 3:18 PM
have you noticed that whenever the lonewolf is photographed, his valve stems are magically alighted with the horizon?
I think you are mistaken in your vision, it's not the lonewolf who's a deity, it's the Lotus. Mr. lonewolf is only the messenger.
(btw, just like the Lotus is majestic next to the Peenelli, so is the Lonewolf beatific next to the geezer) - September 13, 2012 at 3:26 PM
LW is a bit "standoffish" in that photo no?
- September 13, 2012 at 3:27 PM
I fold my peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.
- September 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM
Canadian back bacon pemican helment ...
guaranteed to bring out the meatatarian in you!
Bet you can't only eat one! - September 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM
Why are there still people out there trying to create a custom bamboo and a whole lot of fiber bikes. Just looks like a needles waste of energy and fiber. Even Calfee and the pros make it look stoopid.
- September 13, 2012 at 4:23 PM
Tilford's comment section has degenerated to a discussion of Viagra.
- September 13, 2012 at 4:36 PM
"I had a party to get to and didn't want to be burdened"
Prospect of fun tends to win over crappy bicycles.
The thief can ride around on the PUMA bike with matching PUMA track outfit.
Maybe it was a Russian mafioso type that stole the bicycle. - September 13, 2012 at 4:39 PM
The great american bicycyle company known as TREK, would be happy to give you a new loaner, but you need to uglify it by scratching out the TREK logo before riding it though the plate glass UCI window.
- September 13, 2012 at 4:39 PM
- Billy said...
Bib short ladies are showing up on Amazon ads all over the internets now. It's almost as good as half the images on the internet being replaced with recumbabe.
- September 13, 2012 at 4:40 PM
- Billy said...
@Marcel Da Chump: Thanks for reminding me...
The new iPhone has chamfered edges. They show it off in their video. I bet Jony Ive learned his chamfering technique from Eric. Or maybe Eric programming the chamfering machines in the Apple factory.
Brits are the top chamferers in the world. - September 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM
- Billy said...
@anon 4:43:
Post your blog comment spam to my face and I'll make your day a little livelier with a bedazzler right up your ass! - September 13, 2012 at 4:45 PM
Is your school performing dismally?
Chances are that it is.
Well, try what Oregon Dept Ed is doing.
Convince the teachers that they are racists, assign them a coach, AND give them $5,000.00!!!!! - September 13, 2012 at 4:50 PM
PEANUT BUTTER & FRILLY! (Make a good one where stuff runs out when you bite into it)
- September 13, 2012 at 5:03 PM
...Lone Wolf's White Lotus of Truth is than than that MUSH Cannoli "collabo" fixie or whatever it is:
It's cool enough to make you stutter while typing. - September 13, 2012 at 5:09 PM
@Billy 4:40pm - Thank you!!!
- September 13, 2012 at 5:16 PM
Bedazzling a white full disc with the Olympic Rings is redundant and will only lead to confusion and suffering as observers attempt to parse the inherent contradiction/collision of rhinestones and coolness that results. Somethings cannot be made better.
Step away! Step away Lone Wolf, you've let your freak flag fly as high as possible already. Who would deign to bedazzle a harvest moon? Or a golden, crepuscular sunset?
Step away and just let it be! - September 13, 2012 at 5:38 PM
If you really want to learn about bedazzling done right, head over to vajazzling.com
- September 13, 2012 at 5:43 PM
I am guessing that the homeless guy's cart in the background of the Lone Wolf picture is the Lone Wolf's.
- September 13, 2012 at 5:45 PM
I am guessing that the homeless guy's cart in the background of the Lone Wolf picture is the Lone Wolf's.
- September 13, 2012 at 5:45 PM
Well, last week Time Magazine featured a Martin Amis book review. This week, Time Magazine featured a David Byrne album review.
If Sasha Frere-Jones shows up on the cover next week, I'm gonna puke. - September 13, 2012 at 5:47 PM
classic Madona.
- September 13, 2012 at 6:05 PM
- leroy said...
All afternoon, my dog has been muttering "I will give up my peanut butter & jelly sandwich when they pry my cold, dead fingers from around it."
But I know he's not serious.
He doesn't have fingers.
And he's giggling.
- September 13, 2012 at 6:24 PM
@Leroy; I'm so sick and tired of that trope that if it was my dog I'd reply, "I accept your proposal." Serious or not.
- September 13, 2012 at 6:58 PM
That is all - September 13, 2012 at 8:04 PM
- Bill Smith said...
If you remove the extra chainring pieces and scrape off that yellow recent paint job, I think you'll have a Bridgestone XO-1. Here is the catalog: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/1992/1992.pdf
- September 13, 2012 at 8:29 PM
Like a rhinestone Lone Wolf!
- September 13, 2012 at 8:31 PM
- Krys Hines said...
My barber informs me that Commie Canuck rides a folding bike...K
- September 13, 2012 at 8:32 PM
Wow. So those who don't eat PB&J are now not even Americans? I feel like she is the epitome of the problem she says she's trying to eradicate.
BTW's, I hope "Meanwhile, in Portland..." is the title of your next book. - September 13, 2012 at 8:51 PM
- McFly said...
A criterium is alot like Mordor. One does not simply walk into a criterium.
- September 13, 2012 at 10:23 PM
- Garrett said...
There is no question, you have to give the bike to the guy who has a picture taken with a lady wearing a shirt that says, "STOL A BIKE CLUB"
- September 13, 2012 at 11:57 PM
- September 14, 2012 at 12:14 AM
- Charlie Didrickson said...
This contest is rigged...
- September 14, 2012 at 7:56 AM
Esteemed Commentor D.O. - Thanks, I will have to get out my time trialing-time traveling way- back machine and do some archive diving, I must have missed that one.
- September 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Lone Wolf just puts life into perspective.
Bless his soul. - September 14, 2012 at 10:44 AM
Lone Wolf just puts life into perspective.
Bless his soul. - September 14, 2012 at 10:45 AM
qoute: "I'm not a big rule guy in general. But, there are some rules that aren't negotiable. This is one of them."
Apparently Steve only follows the rules he likes.
- September 14, 2012 at 11:34 AM
- Unknown said...
Hundreds of style and variety of handbags make it difficult to choose what suits your body and personality. When choosing handbags the priority should be what kind of handbag is matching up with your body size and shape.The tall and thin ladies can enjoy every style of bag. They can easily match up with clutched, over sized, and shoulder handbags. Small sized Lanvin handbag can also go well and make you look taller. But the short and plump type girls must pay additional attention on choosing handbags. Small sized handbags are really good as they can give taller look. The curvy body shaped women can enjoy handbags that fit in the curve such as medium sized Lanvin bag.
They look try some extra large and tall handbags to give shorter look and one can grab all these kinds of handbags from cheap designer handbags store or website. http://www.lanvinbagonline.com/
- September 17, 2012 at 9:53 PM
What A Witch Can Do
Do you have any idea what a witch can do when it comes to you on a dark lonely night? See the cartoon animated Maruti video for more details- http://bit.ly/BoyandtheWitch - September 28, 2012 at 10:14 AM


text:
Mailing Lists
If you have questions about Seaside join our mailing list. Any Seaside-related discussion is welcome, and we try to keep replies prompt and helpful. The list is medium traffic – a few messages each day – and has somewhere around 900 members.
Seaside mailing-list
About asking questions
A lot of people are asking question and we encurage you to ask your questions as well. There are some things however we would like to point out to make the whole process as efficient as possible, for people asking and answering questions.
- Always state the version of Seaside/Scriptaculous you are using. Also state the platform (Squeak, Cincom Smalltalk, GemStone/S, GNU Smalltalk, Dolphin Smalltalk, ...) you are on.
- Provide a minimal file-out with your mail that shows your problem. It is more likely to get your question answered if the problem can be reproduced without having to copy and past code around, register the application, guess missing code to make it work, etc.
- Don't write private mails to Seaside developers, they all have other things to do as well. Write to the mailing-list, unless you have a consulting contract.
In general the following article is a really nice reference on how to ask questions in a mailing-list: How To Ask Questions The Smart Way by ESR.
There are archives available. It's also mirrored to Usenet as gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.seaside.
Developer Mailing Lists
For those involved in the development of Seaside itself there are several available lists.
List | Description | Traffic | |
seaside-dev | Discussion list for core developers, committers, and porters | Low | |
issues | Updates from the Seaside issue tracker | Medium | |
commits | Notification of commits to Seaside repository | High |


text:
Title and statement of responsibility area
Title proper
General material designation
- Graphic material
Parallel title
Other title information
Title statements of responsibility
Title notes
Level of description
Reference code
Edition area
Edition statement
Edition statement of responsibility
Class of material specific details area
Statement of scale (cartographic)
Statement of projection (cartographic)
Statement of coordinates (cartographic)
Statement of scale (architectural)
Issuing jurisdiction and denomination (philatelic)
Dates of creation area
1990 (Creation)
- Creator
- Burley, Robert
Physical description area
Physical description
29 photographs : col. positives ; 2.5 x 2 inch
Publisher's series area
Title proper of publisher's series
Parallel titles of publisher's series
Other title information of publisher's series
Statement of responsibility relating to publisher's series
Numbering within publisher's series
Note on publisher's series
Archival description area
Name of creator
Biographical history
Robert Burley is a photographer and Associate Professor at Ryerson University in Toronto, Ontario. Born in 1957 in Picton, Ontario he obtained a bachelor of arts in Media Studies at Ryerson University in 1980 and went on to complete a Master of Fine Arts, with a specialization in photography at The School of the Art Institute of Chicago in 1986.
Burley established an architectural photography firm, Design Archive, in 1987 and acted as president and principal photographer for the company until 2000. He began teaching at Ryerson University in 1998 and by 2003, he became full time faculty. Here, he helped develop a new graduate program in Photographic Preservation and Collections Management and served as director of the program from 2003-2008 after which he served as director of Photography Studies from 2009 until 2012.
Burley's book, "The Disappearance of Darkness: Photography at the end of the analog era", released by Princeton Architectural Press in 2012 explored the dwindling analog photography industry. The corresponding travelling exhibition, curated by Dr. Gaëlle Morel, was exhibited at the Ryerson Image Centre, The National Galley of Canada, le Musée Nicéphore Niépce and other venues internationally. Burley was also instrumental in the Ryerson University Library and Archives acquisition of the Kodak Canada Corporate Archives and Heritage Collection when photographing Kodak Canada's Mount Denis factory closure in 2005.
Burley's photographic work is collected and exhibited internationally and he has been the recipient of numerous awards including a Senior Mellon Fellowship in at the Canadian Centre for Architecture in 2010. As an artist his work explores the relationship between nature and cities, architecture and the urban landscape. He is represented by the Stephen Bulger Gallery.
Robert Burley was names a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada's Academy of the Arts and Humanities in 2018. Established in 1883, the Royal Society of Canada (RSC) recognizes the country's leading scholars, artists and scientists through a competitive, peer-juried process.
Custodial history
Scope and content
File consists of photographs of the exterior of various houses and a barn.
Notes area
Physical condition
transfers ephemera
Immediate source of acquisition
Language of material
Script of material
Location of originals
Availability of other formats
Restrictions on access
Open. Records are available for consultation without restriction.
Terms governing use, reproduction, and publication
Finding aids
Associated materials
Signatures note
Writing on original envelope:
House + Home
Alternative identifier(s)
Standard number area
Standard number
Access points
Subject access points
Place access points
Name access points
- House & Home (Subject)


text:
(REPUBLIC, Mo., AP) – A southwest Missouri high school teacher says the state should add bass fishing as a high school sport.
Jim Huson, a teacher at Republic High School, says a proposal to add the sport will be on the spring ballot for high school administrators. He says bass fishing would become a sport if it gets approval from 50 percent, plus one, of the administrators.
KY3-TV reports that approval would allow students to fish for state and national championships.
If approved, schools could have up to two boats with two students fishing in each boat. Teams would have a five-fish limit, and the team with the five heaviest fish wins.
Story continues below advertisement


text:
It is the NBA Draft's biggest storyline: Should Greg Oden or Kevin Durant be the No. 1 overall pick? It's hard not to look at the last 15 years of non-Jordan NBA champs and not see the common factor of "Dominant Big
(Now the fallacy of that argument is that it wasn't a great big man alone: Hakeem was unstoppable, but had a great team around him.
If it's all about winning titles, then history says Oden is your guy. But I'd argue that the Finals this month introduced a radical shift to thinking in the NBA, at least FAN thinking:
Titles aren't everything. (Go ahead: Gag.)
No, what matters now is entertainment: There is a faction of fans out there, I'm sure, that would rather be oohed-and-ahhed with entertainment for seven months – without winning a title – than be bored en route to winning another ring.
Rings are how we measure the success of stars, but are they how we measure the satisfaction of fans? This is why we Wizards fans can live without NBA titles, but can't live without Gilbert Arenas.
The Oden-Durant debate tilting to Oden presumes that Oden will be winning gobs of titles. If you recognize that winning titles is a Jordanesque zero-sum game, Oden's titles will be at Durant's expense, along with every other player of Oden's era, including LeBron, Wade, Kobe, Dwight Howard, everyone. That's a tough list to out-perform, even for a dominant center.
So it has to be asked: What if Oden doesn't win titles? Even if Durant doesn't either, you have to further ask: In the absence of titles, wouldn't you rather have the super-thrilling swingman than the dominant (but snazz-free) center?
That's the case for drafting Durant. He may win titles. He may not. But, then again, Oden may not either. But at least with Durant, fans will likely be infinitely more entertained along the way.
Commenters: Who would YOU take, and why?
UPDATE: John Hollinger as an absolute must-read about Durant's place as the greatest college-to-NBA prospect of the last half-decade. I used to pimp Carmelo Anthony as that prospect (because of the title), but I concede the argument in the face of Hollinger's quant analysis. Count me a Durant believer. And if I was already leaning toward Durant going No. 1....well, you'll have to wait for my mock draft on Thursday a.m. (No, seriously, read the column. It's amazing. Undervalued: Fazekas, Dudley, McRoberts. Overrated: Brewer(?!?!), Thornton, Nick Young.)-- D.S.


text:
- New
- New
- NewMens Slide Black
by Collexion Italy Men's Style # S6001M Sku # COLLS6001M01
Regular Price CA$65.00 As low as CA$54.99 -
- Malwood Lace Navy
by Clarks Men's Style # 26171103 Sku # CLAMALWOODL03
Regular Price CA$140.00 As low as CA$129.99 - Gorwin Moc Sand NB
by Clarks Men's Style # 26164691 Sku # CLAGORWINM07
Regular Price CA$120.00 As low as CA$109.99 - Gorwin Step Navy NB
by Clarks Men's Style # 26164687 Sku # CLAGORWINS03
Regular Price CA$120.00 As low as CA$109.99 -
Shop men's shoes by style, from boots and clogs to sandals and walking shoes. Find comfortable, stylish and durable shoes for men from Mephisto, Rockport, Ecco, and more. With dressy styles, athletic walking and running shoes and casual sandals to choose from you will find shoes fit for any occasion.
Top 4 Qualities That Men Want in Footwear
When men go shoe shopping, they normally have something specific in mind. The goal is to find the right shoes for men that they need, make the purchase, and be on their way. That doesn't mean men will settle for the first pair they come across. In order to meet their needs, the shoes must offer four important qualities.
Durability is at The Top of the List
Quality construction coupled with the right type of materials is the best way to ensure durability. When considering any pair of men's shoes, a lot of attention is given to the way the shoes are produced. That's because the new owner wants them to hold up well to a lot of use over several years. You can bet that any male checking out men's shoes online will want to know if the brand and the design will provide the long-term performance he seeks before spending any money.
The Right Shoes for The Occasion
Men tend to be less likely to browse when they go shopping. It's more a matter of finding what's needed, paying for it, and moving on to other activities. That's also true when a man decides to buy men's shoes online. There's normally a specific type of shoe for a particular occasion in mind. Once the right one is found, that's all the shopping he needs to do.
The shoes in question could be for work or for play. They might be for golfing, running, or working out. In any case, shoes that won't work for the occasion will get little to no attention.
Comfort is a Must
Every man knows that the best men's shoes have a reasonable amount of room in the toe box, provide proper cushioning, and support the arches perfectly. No matter where the man will be or what he will be doing while wearing the shoes, they must be comfortable for as long as he wears them.
It's not unusual for guys to identify branded shoes for men that are consistently comfortable and stick with those brands. Since most men don't like to spend much time shopping, knowing a brand has a reputation for comfort will entice him to take a look at a new brand.
An Affordable Price
At some point, the price of a new pair of shoes will become a factor. Most men do understand that price should not be the first point to think about. At the same time, there's no reason to spend more money when a less-expensive pair provides all the desired qualities. When shopping in any men's shoes store, the best deal will be shoes that are durable, comfortable, right for the occasion, and are available at an affordable price.
Could you use a new pair of shoes? Visit an online store today and sort by size, type, and brand. You could find the perfect pair in a matter of minutes.


text:
Some of you in the forums and comments have been noting that you are getting a "bricked" Lumia 920's after doing a reset. The term is technically not correct here as you can revive the phone with a neat little trick. The fix reported so far was just returning the device to the store, which is far from ideal especially if you bought it online. Thankfully, the Windows Phone Central Forums came through with a trick that should get your bricked 920 back up and running.
The instructions are detailed and concise and include a video to help get you back in the game. Read on to fix it.
Download the following files:
1. NaviFirmPlus 1.7 (new link)
2. Nokia_Care_Suite_5.0_2012.45.4.5 (new link)
Unzip NaviFirm to a directory of your choice.
Install Nokia_Care_Suite_5.0_2012.45.4.5
Get the Windows Central Newsletter
All the latest news, reviews, and guides for Windows and Xbox diehards.
NaviFirm Directions:
1. Run NaviFirmPlus executable
2. Under Products window scroll down to Nokia Lumia 920 (RM-820) *AT&T Only!!!
3. Under Releases window choose 1231.2109.1242.1001
4. Under Variants window choose your color, in my case for RED i was file (RM-820_NAM_ATT_US_VAR237330_V1_Red (059N5T7)
5. Under files window make sure all the files are selected.
6. Click the Download Button
7. Wait for ALL the files to completely download, the FFU file will be 1.02GB in size.
8. When complete, browse to: C:\ProgramData\Nokia\Packages
9. Create a folder called Products
10. Create a folder called rm-820
11. You should now have a directory like: C:\ProgramData\Nokia\Packages\Products\rm-820\
12. Browse to the NaviFirmPlus folder you extracted
13. Open the FW folder and then the folder of the firmware you downloaded.
14. Copy the entire folder contents and paste it into the C:\ProgramData\Nokia\Packages\Products\rm-820\ directory.
Nokia_Care_Suite_5.0_2012.45.4.5 Directions:
1. Launch Nokia Care Suite
2. Click the Product Support Tool for Store 5.0
3. Click File
4. Click Open Product
5. Choose RM-820 (Nokia Lumia 920)
6. On the bottom left click Programming
7. Click Recovery
8. You should see the firmware you downloaded and copied earlier under the Properties field.
9. Click Start
10. The software will check the package contents, it will fail to find the phone, and ask you to reboot and give you a button to click retry.
Phone Directions:
1. Plug the phone into your PC
2. Hold the Volume Down and the Power button, click RETRY on the Product Support Tools Window
3. After you feel a vibration in the phone immediately release the Volume Down and the Power button and hold the Volume up button.
4. Continue to hold the volume up button, you will see the software say "Rebooting"
5. After about 15 seconds you will see a top NOKIA logo and the software will start flashing the phone.
We ourselves don't have any bricked 920's to try this on, but if you find yourself in a similar situation and are about to return the device, give it a shot and let us know if it works for you. Big shout out to itxjobe for doing this for the community.
Source: Windows Phone Central Forums, Image from Windows Phone Central Forums