text: Home - Catalog - Collections - Science - Science Collection Grade 3 - 5 - Science Bilingual (English - Haitian Creole) Tan ak Klima Koleksyon Syans by Conrad J. Storad $12.50 Quantity: Description Bilingual English / Haitian Creole. This Bilingual English and Haitian Creole Science Collection "Koleksyon Syans Mwen" includes 36 engaging and beautifully illustrated books correlated to the curriculum and specifically designed for the classroom. These titles include a wide range of science topics, including animals, plants, matter, energy, force and motion, earth and space, plate tectonics, weather, water cycle, rocks and various minerals in the environment. Each book contains a glossary, comprehension questions, 36 books, 24 pages each, 8 x 8 inches. Bilingual English and Haitian Creole.Cat. Number: B727KE ISBN Number: 9781626322806 Different themes of the collection: Matyè / Matter: SP066KE $67.50Lavi Plant / Plant: SP065KE $67.50Lavi Animal / Animal Life Circle: SP064KE $67.50 Metòd Lasyans / Science Method: SP069KE $67.50Latè ak Lespas / Earth and Space: SP067KE $67.50Fòs, Enèji ak Mouvman / Force, Energy and Motion: SP068KE $67.50 The collection is available in: Haitian Creole: SP049KE $299.50Bilingual English Haitian Creole: SP049K $299.50 Science Collection science Syans


text:
For more information, please send the following:
Please fill out the fields marked with an asterisk.
Alternatively, please email:
The Pacific S.A.L.T. course is a two week intensive Scripture Use workshop conducted in the village at the request of local church leaders.
S.A.L.T. seeks to encourage a love and wonder of the Scriptures among language communities and to equip local pastors and village leaders to effectively use the translated Scriptures.
S.A.L.T. encourages the study of the Scriptures in their own heart language in order that language communities may develop an understanding of the Scriptures and develop a Christian worldview.
Read the SALT Blog!
Bible Translation partners:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
© 2020 Four Seasons General Merchandise. All rights reserved.
Use of this site is subject to our Terms & Conditions , a legal agreement between you and Four Seasons General Merchandise.
Please review our PRIVACY/SECURITY POLICY.
Your order currently falls below our minimum purchase of $250. If you submit your order now, it will not be processed.
This order will only be accepted if you have another recent pending order. If you do in fact have another pending order, click "Continue".
Otherwise, please click "Shop More".


text:
The Anthropocene
Summary and Keywords
The Anthropocene hypothesis—that humans have impacted "the environment" but also changed the Earth's geology—has spread widely through the sciences and humanities. This hypothesis is being currently tested to see whether the Anthropocene may become part of the Geological Time Scale. An Anthropocene Working Group has been established to assemble the evidence. The decision regarding formalization is likely to be taken in the next few years, by the International Commission on Stratigraphy, the body that oversees the Geological Time Scale. Whichever way the decision goes, there will remain the reality of the phenomenon and the utility of the concept.
The evidence, as outlined here, rests upon a broad range of signatures reflecting humanity's significant and increasing modification of Earth systems. These may be visible as markers in physical deposits in the form of the greatest expansion of novel minerals in the last 2.4 billion years of Earth history and development of ubiquitous materials, such as plastics, unique to the Anthropocene. The artefacts we produce to live as modern humans will form the technofossils of the future. Human-generated deposits now extend from our natural habitat on land into our oceans, transported at rates exceeding the sediment carried by rivers by an order of magnitude. That influence now extends increasingly underground in our quest for minerals, fuel, living space, and to develop transport and communication networks. These human trace fossils may be preserved over geological durations and the evolution of technology has created a new technosphere, yet to evolve into balance with other Earth systems.
The expression of the Anthropocene can be seen in sediments and glaciers in chemical markers. Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has risen by ~45 percent above pre–Industrial Revolution levels, mainly through combustion, over a few decades, of a geological carbon-store that took many millions of years to accumulate. Although this may ultimately drive climate change, average global temperature increases and resultant sea-level rises remain comparatively small, as yet. But the shift to isotopically lighter carbon locked into limestones and calcareous fossils will form a permanent record. Nitrogen and phosphorus contents in surface soils have approximately doubled through increased use of fertilizers to increase agricultural yields as the human population has also doubled in the last 50 years. Industrial metals, radioactive fallout from atomic weapons testing, and complex organic compounds have been widely dispersed through the environment and become preserved in sediment and ice layers.
Despite radical changes to flora and fauna across the planet, the Earth still has most of its complement of biological species. However, current trends of habitat loss and predation may push the Earth into the sixth mass extinction event in the next few centuries. At present the dramatic changes relate to trans-global species invasions and population modification through agricultural development on land and contamination of coastal zones.
Considering the entire range of environmental signatures, it is clear that the global, large and rapid scale of change related to the mid-20th century is the most obvious level to consider as the start of the Anthropocene Epoch.
Keywords: Anthropocene, stratigraphy, technofossils, chemostratigraphy, extinctions, climate change
The Nature of Geological History
Given that the Anthropocene is typically considered as an interval of Earth history, or stratigraphy, rather than of human history, we need first provide some explanation of the ground rules of stratigraphy.
The enormous duration of Earth history—in excess of four and a half thousand million years—is made tractable by means of the construction of the Geological Time Scale and of its units. This involves separating out intervals of Earth history that are distinctive because they share recognizable combinations of the Earth's preserved biological, chemical, or physical characters.
Within stratigraphy there are two parallel means of classifying Earth history. There is a classification simply as time intervals within which certain events and processes took place (for example, the Jurassic Period). Then, there is also a parallel time-based classification of the material (stratal) record that preserves the evidence of that history (thus, the Jurassic System, comprising all the strata laid down during the Jurassic Period).
Both sets of time units are defined using a prominent and widespread environmental change. Typically for the last half billion years of geological time, this is through recognition of the appearance of a common and representative fossil species, which broadly coincides with that environmental change. However, such a species would not have appeared (or disappeared) everywhere simultaneously around the world and hence, cannot define a single time plane but it is a guide to the time boundary. Geologists circumvent the problem by selecting, at one place in the world, a single level at which this fossil first appears, and then define this as the instant when the time interval begins. Then, geologists try to trace this level within strata all around the world, by any means possible. This single level is the well-known "golden spike," more technically, a Global Boundary Stratigraphic Section and Point (GSSP). Importantly, the exact level chosen remains the reference point, even if the key fossil is later found to have appeared lower down in strata (i.e., earlier) at the same location (which has indeed sometimes happened).
The Geological Time Scale is also hierarchical, with smaller units of shorter duration and less markedly distinctive character, nested within larger ones. We currently live within the Phanerozoic Eon, the fourth eon of Earth time, which started some 542 million years ago, with the defining event being the evolution of multicellular animals from the single-celled organisms that had comprised life on Earth beforehand.
Within the Phanerozoic, we live within the last of its three subdivisions, the Cenozoic Era, which began 65 million years ago, at the mass extinction event that saw the disappearance of the dinosaurs (and of many other lifeforms across the planet). This dynastic change to the Earth system was abrupt and caused, or largely caused, by a large meteorite strike, which over large parts of the world is recorded as a thin layer with high concentrations of iridium, an element rare at the Earth's surface but common in meteorites.
Within the Cenozoic, we live in the last of its three subdivisions called the Quaternary Period (the strata of which comprise the Quaternary System). This commenced two and a half million years ago. In general, it is the time from when the world most recently entered a phase of overall bipolar glaciation. Within the Quaternary, we formally live within the Holocene Epoch. This is just the latest of some 50 marked oscillations of climate within the Quaternary Period, when the world emerged from a phase of glacial climate and high global ice volume (and therefore low sea level), into a warm (or interglacial) phase with higher sea level. Although it is just one of many interglacials, it is the one that has experienced a human population explosion, while its deposits (i.e., the Holocene Series) make up important parts of our landscapes—soils, river floodplains and coastal plains, deltas and so on.
The formal definition of the Holocene Epoch is also relevant to the consideration of the Anthropocene. The Holocene, until 2009, used to be defined numerically (as are, still, most of the geological time units prior to the Phanerozoic). Its beginning was placed at 10,000 radiocarbon years before the present (the present being defined as 1950 ce in this case). Studies of both Greenland ice cores and deep ocean sediments showed that the northern hemisphere last emerged from glacial cold into temperate warmth with extraordinary abruptness: a good deal of the change took place over a mere three years. This change can be identified in Greenland ice layers, which in this narrow time interval show chemical evidence of suddenly increased warmth and humidity (the ice layers become thicker and less dusty). Hence, the boundary level has been placed at the ice layer that shows the beginning of this change. As a historical event, it is thus located very precisely, with approximately annual resolution; however, because of the difficulty of working out precisely when this took place, there is a larger error bar (of a couple of centuries) of quite how long ago this happened. This uncertainty is expressed as the boundary in the "golden spike" ice core being dated to 11,700 years before present (the present now being taken to be 2000 ce) plus or minus 99 years. The resultant interplay between relative and "absolute" (numerical) dating is also of significance to defining the Anthropocene.
The Anthropocene: Historical Beginnings
We still live, formally, within the Holocene Epoch. However, the general idea that humans can cause significant change to the Earth has been circulating for a long time—since, the Comte de Buffon's 1778 work Les Époques de la Nature. In this, Buffon divided our planet's history into seven epochs, the last and current one being "when the power of Man assisted that of Nature."
The idea resurfaced intermittently. George Perkins Marsh, the "first American conservationist" catalogued human-driven environmental change in his 1864 Man and Nature; Antonio Stoppani, in his 1871–1873 Corsa di Geologia, suggested an "Anthropozoic Era," emphasizing that the human activity was changing not just the Earth's present, but its future also. In the early 20th century, the Russian scientist Vladimir Vernadsky developed the concept of the Earth's biosphere and, with Eduard Roy and Teilhard de Chardin, of the noosphere (a "sphere of human thought" now enveloping the Earth). At the same time, the geologist Robert Sherlock took a more material approach, counting up the impressive amounts (even then) of rock and soil moved and transformed into construction materials by humans.
These early ideas were, until recently, not taken seriously by geologists. Appreciation of the very great age of the Earth rendered the human timescale almost absurdly short by comparison. And, the very great geological transformations of the past, including the growth and erosion of mountain ranges, the creation and destruction of entire ocean basins, and extraordinary volcanic outbursts and meteorite strikes, seemed to make the transformations wrought by humans both superficial and fleeting.
A wider realization that human impact could be geologically significant came with the development of what has become known as Earth system science, in which it became clear that seemingly subtle changes (for example, in the levels of the trace gases, carbon dioxide and methane, in the atmosphere) could nevertheless have far-reaching changes to the Earth system, largely via changes in climate. The scale and long-term effects, too, of changes to the Earth's biology was becoming more widely understood, too, as was the scale of physical change to the Earth's surface.
Several "geological" time terms arose in the late 20th and early 21st century to express this appreciation. There was the Anthrocene of the environmental writer Andrew Revkin, the Homogenocene (to reflect the homogenization of the Earth's biological communities via human-driven species invasions) of the zoologist John Curnutt, the Myxocene of the oceanographer Daniel Pauly (to denote the future ocean of "microbial slime and jellyfish") and so on.
However, the term that caught on was independently created by two scientists, Eugene Stoermer and Paul Crutzen. At a meeting of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) in Mexico in 2000, Crutzen had been listening to debate where the present state of the Earth was continually being referred to as the Holocene. At one point he lost patience, and interjected that we were not in the Holocene but in—a and here he improvised the word—the Anthropocene. Much of the subsequent discussion, he recalled, revolved around this new idea.
He later researched the term, found that Stoermer had independently coined it, and wrote to him, suggesting they published jointly on it, which they did in the IGBP Newsletter (Crutzen & Stoermer, 2000), where this idea was first disseminated within an Earth systems science community. Subsequently, Crutzen restated the concept in Nature (Crutzen, 2002), which was when the term obtained global exposure.
From then, the term began to be used increasingly frequently in the literature, both within the earth sciences and also more widely beyond it. Commonly, it was employed simply as if it was part of the Geological Time Scale. However, the Anthropocene was (and remains) informal and it was rather vaguely defined, with a range of ideas about its duration, definition and hierarchical level, often being referred to somewhat interchangeably as either an epoch or an era—two very different things in formal stratigraphy.
Hence, the Anthropocene was discussed by the Stratigraphy Commission of the Geological Society of London, to see whether there was sufficient evidence for it to be formally considered as a time unit (Zalasiewicz et al., 2008). The majority view was that, at least on preliminary inspection, there was merit in the term, and it might be considered further with a view to eventual possible formalization. However, this national commission does not have any power over the international Geological Time Scale, which is not easily or lightly amended. As its terms underlie basic communication in the Earth sciences, there is a need for stability of nomenclature, and hence the approach taken to its modification is deliberately conservative.
In 2009, an Anthropocene Working Group, part of the Subcomission on Quaternary Stratigraphy, a component part of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (itself under the aegis of the International Union of Geological Sciences) was established, to gather and consider evidence regarding the Anthropocene as a formal unit. So far, it has produced two thematic sets of papers, published by the Royal Society (Williams, Zalasiewicz, Haywood, & Ellis, 2011), and the Geological Society of London (Waters, Zalasiewicz, Williams, Ellis, & Snelling, 2014) and a number of other articles. It aims to produce a body of evidence, together with (at least interim) recommendations, by 2016.
Stratigraphic Analysis of the Anthropocene
Analysis of the Anthropocene may partly be carried out by "classical" analysis of information contained within strata, particularly where these form well-ordered successions (annual layers of snow on ice-caps, or sediment laminae in lake deposits). However, unlike exploration of older Earth histories, there is also an increasingly sophisticated and detailed observational record over the past centuries and (especially) decades. So, analysis may also involve taking "environmental" evidence and translating this into geological, and more precisely stratigraphic, terms. The analysis is rendered yet more complex both by the very short timescales involved, and also by several novel aspects of human-driven geology, that have little or no precedent in Earth history.
In outline, the evidence may be ordered as in classical stratigraphic analysis, involving physical aspects of the deposits (within lithostratigraphy), chemical signatures (chemostratigraphy), and biological patterns (biostratigraphy). These together provide the basis upon which chronostratigraphic division might be attempted (to define a recognizable and correlatable Anthropocene Series), the material equivalent of a time unit of the geochronological time scale (a putative Anthropocene Epoch).
The mineral signature
The material record of the Anthropocene consists in essence of the rock succession that will result, albeit that much of that now consists of unconsolidated sediment. Rocks and sediments are made of component minerals, and hence the mineralogical signature of the Anthropocene is a fundamental part of its characterization.
Here a deep-time context may be provided by the review of Robert Hazen and his colleagues, who proposed a pattern of mineral evolution that showed an increase in mineral diversity from about a dozen or so minerals recognized in cosmic dust, to an increase through reactions that take place in the spinning debris disk around a young star (about 250 minerals that have been recognized in meteorites). Once a planet forms, the melting and crystallization taking place at different depths further increase the number of minerals, while on Earth the processes and diversity of mineral-forming environments associated with plate tectonics increased the number still further, to around 2,000 minerals. The origin of life, in particular the beginning of photosynthesis and resultant oxygenation of the atmosphere, known as the "Great Oxygenation Event" of the early Proterozoic, about 2.4 billion years ago, roughly doubled the number of minerals, to a little in excess of 4,000 by creating a wide range of new oxides and hydroxides. Most of these minerals are extremely rare. Subsequent changes, including the origin of multicellular animals, considerably increased the diversity of mineral shape (in complex shell-related forms, for instance) but added little to the total inventory of mineral species.
Humans have added a considerable, if poorly constrained, number of minerals to the Earth's inventory as detailed by Zalasiewicz, Kryza, and Williams (2014). Prominent among these are uncombined metals (which are rare in natural settings), including iron and steel, aluminium, titanium, copper, vanadium and others. These have been made in very considerable amounts. For instance, some 500 million tons of aluminum have been produced globally to date, almost all since the mid-20th century—enough to completely coat the United States (and part of Canada) in standard aluminum kitchen foil. The amount of iron and steel produced has been roughly an order of magnitude greater. Other novel minerals include boron nitride, an abrasive that is harder than diamond, tungsten carbide (that makes the ball in many ballpoint pens), novel garnets (for lasers), graphene, and so on. There are also common "mineraloids," notably glasses and plastics made in very large amounts (some 6 billion tons of plastics have been produced to date, for instance, again almost all since the mid-20th century) and widely distributed over the Earth's surface. There are also minerals that, relatively rare in nature, have now become much more widespread, such as ettringite, hillebrandite, and portlandite in cement and concrete. There are novel and widespread mineral forms too, such as fly ash (both spherical carbonaceous particles and inorganic ash spheres) that have been dispersed since the mid-19th century from the early industrialized countries, and in greater amounts and globally since the mid-20th century.
The scale of mineralogical novelty, the product of many active materials sciences laboratories, is increasing, but quite unknown in detail. However, the scale of this new phase of mineral evolution is almost certainly the greatest since the "Great Oxygenation Event." The longevity of these minerals fossilized within strata is untested in detail (given that by definition they have no precise natural analogues), but it seems likely that many can survive in some form buried within strata.
The rock signature
Minerals make up rocks, and humans have made a significant addition to Earth's inventory of rock types. The most widespread and conspicuous are those associated with construction of different types: concrete, brick, cinder-block, asphalt, plaster. There are also heterogenous "rock types" associated with garbage-dump fills, and more specific lithologies such as ceramics of different types.
Concrete is a major and distinctive component. It is a combination of cement (itself largely a combination of limestone and clay, fired to produce a mineralogy that transforms and hardens with the addition of water) and aggregate (typically sand and gravel). It is a cheap, easily moulded, and robust building material that has been used since at least Roman times (much of the Colosseum is made of it, for instance), but which in recent decades has been used in extraordinary quantities. The total amount produced worldwide is of the order of 500 billion tons, which is equivalent to about a kilo for every square meter of Earth, land, and sea. Of that, well over 90% has been made since the mid-20th century, and over 50% in the last couple of decades—and its production is still accelerating. Concrete blocks, invented in the 1830s, have seen technological innovation with development in the 1930s of lightweight cinder/breeze blocks which incorporate fly-ash wastes and reinforced concrete, with internal iron bars providing the reinforcement that allowed development of tower-blocks, the urban innovation of the 20th century.
Bricks are essentially metamorphosed clays with various admixtures of sand, where the heating process in kilns is taken to the point of melting. This scale of rapid heating is unusual in nature at the Earth's surface, and so bricks have a distinctive texture and mineralogy. Bricks have been made for several millennia (the early ones typically sun-dried), and their production now exceeds a trillion a year. Similar techniques were employed to produce ceramics and pottery. Important for producing food storage vessels and for artistic figurines, these materials form a common component, and are used to date, the archaeosphere (Edgeworth et al., 2015).
The global road network is about 50 million kilometers, the distance from Earth to Mars. Much of this is graded soils, but in Europe and North America tarmacadam, an asphalt/aggregate admixture, with an aggregate sub-base forms the dominant road type with some 1600 million tonnes of asphalt produced in 2007.
A particular form of "rock" is that in garbage dumps. Typically a highly heterogenous and poorly sorted conglomerate or breccia, its individual components reflect the human activities of the times, including unused food material, packaging, disused furniture and building material, clothes, nappies, and toys. The middens of archaeological times are often dominated by shell and bone material, while today's rubbish dumps have metals, plastics, and paper as major components (Ford, Price, Cooper, & Waters, 2014). These rock types can make up substantial strata.
Anthropogenic strata
Minerals and rocks are arranged into strata of various types and geometrical shapes, and the classification of rock strata is the business of lithostratigraphy. The classification largely reflects their physical nature and mineral composition.
While this account focuses on human-influenced strata, it must be recognized that the Anthropocene (formal or informal) is simply a time unit, which will include anthropogenic strata, strata which appear "natural" but which have some anthropogenic characters on closer examination, and strata which will have little or no human influence even upon close examination. Similarly—and depending where the Anthropocene boundary is placed—strata that remain within the Holocene may include a notable anthropogenic component.
The terrestrial realm
Human influence is most visible and pronounced in the terrestrial realm and humans have modified the ground surface in various ways: to provide habitation, to enable transport, to grow crops, to extract resources, to create agreeable (to us) landscapes in peacetime and degraded ones in war. These surface alterations almost always include a third dimension, hence a subsurface component.
Therefore these anthropogenic surfaces may be underlain by what geologists term as artificial ground, and what has recently been termed the archaeosphere (human-disturbed ground, often including artefacts, that lies above the "natural") within the archaeological community (Edgeworth et al., 2015). There are also soils of various kinds, which are strongly modified by humans in agricultural and urban settings, and where (particularly for the latter) the term "anthrosols" has been proposed.
Artificial ground of various sorts is common to ubiquitous in urban areas, and increasingly figures on geological maps because of its importance to engineers and environmental planners. It may be meters to tens of meters thick, and in general it is voluminous. In the United Kingdom alone, almost a billion tons of rock and soil are moved annually by human activities and the scale of this activity worldwide is now greater than that of natural processes of erosion and sedimentation—perhaps by as much as an order of magnitude.
These heterogeneous strata can be classified in great detail but there are some main general categories, recognized by such organizations as the British Geological Survey (Ford et al., 2014): made ground is material dumped on the surface, as in raised embankments; worked ground is simply excavations in the ground, such as quarries and road cuttings; infilled ground represents holes in the ground, that have been wholly or partly infilled, such as quarries that have become landfill sites; disturbed ground is rock that has been involved, say, in a zone of collapse around an old underground mine working; and landscaped ground is a general term used where it is difficult to distinguish the various other individual categories, such as is the case beneath much urban housing.
As well as deliberately moved rock and soil, and the soil moved in agriculture, there is the human impact of increased sediment transport in rivers in response to deforestation and introduction of agriculture; this has been evident for thousands of years and has increased with time. However, the great number of dam schemes across major rivers, most constructed since the 1940s (Steffen, Broadgate, Deutsch, Gaffney, & Ludwig, 2015) has caused large volumes of sediment to accumulate behind the dams (Syvitski & Kettner, 2011). There are more subtle effects associated with changes in land use. For instance, in the Fenlands of eastern England, there used to be a surface peat stratum up to at least four meters thick, extending over something like 2000 square kilometers. This has almost completely disappeared, mostly since the 19th century, by deflation (windblow) and oxidation following drainage of the ground.
Subterranean modifications
The human-modified areas have deep roots. Extending beneath urban, agricultural, and what may be otherwise considered "wild" landscapes are foundations and tunnels, underground wires and pipes, and mines and boreholes used for the extraction of resources including metals, coal, oil and gas, and water. These may be regarded as analogous to animal burrows, but whereas nonhuman animals typically burrow to a maximum of only a few meters depth, human burrowing—that has been termed anthroturbation—extends to several kilometers depth (Zalasiewicz, Waters, & Williams, 2014). It is extensive; oil boreholes alone in the United States have been calculated to total some 5 million kilometers in length, and a total for the world might reasonably be 50 million kilometers, roughly the same as the total length of the surface road network. There are substantial amounts of other boreholes, too—for water, mineral exploration, and for scientific purposes like those of the Ocean Drilling Project. In one particular borehole type, atomic bombs were lowered down along them, to be detonated as tests. Between 1951 and 1998, some 1500 underground nuclear explosions were detonated to produce large (up to hundreds of meters across) masses of radioactive breccia and melt rock up to two kilometers underground.
The scale and nature of this anthroturbation is geologically novel, and these traces, being well below surface erosion processes, will persist for many millions of years in the rock mass. Stratigraphically, however, it is not simple, as these structures always cross-cut older rocks, and hence behave geologically a little like the sheets of magma that inject along fractures (igneous dykes) underground.
Coastal lithostratigraphic signals
A range of specific human-driven lithostratigraphic signals are present around coastlines, partly because of the concentration of human habitation around the shore, where coastal plains and deltas have for centuries offered fertile ground with access to marine resources and communication. Phenomena here (often generated or accelerated in more contemporary times) include various harbor and breakwater structures and, more extensively, meters-scale subsidence caused by groundwater and hydrocarbon extraction, sediment loading by buildings and sediment starvation as a result of the building of dams upriver. Deltas worldwide, notably the Mississippi, Ganges, and Yangtze, have shown, as a consequence, a pattern of subsidence that broadly began in the 1930s and is at a rate that greatly outpaces current relative sea level rises associated with global warming (Syvitski & Kettner, 2011).
Other major changes resulting in large anthropogenic stratal bodies are the building up of shorelines in land reclamation including in a number of cases the use of garbage as fill material. Well-known examples include Palm Island and Hong Kong airport (Syvitski & Kettner, 2011), while a less well-known but even larger-scale example is the building of a sea wall along the Chinese coastline that will be ultimately 11,000 kilometers long, dwarfing the examples in, for instance, the Netherlands. These structures are not only very large rock bodies in themselves, but they also heavily modify the nature of sedimentation both in front and behind them.
The continental shelf and slope
The undersea realm has a far shorter history of direct human perturbation than the terrestrial realm. Physical anthropogenic change in this realm now includes such engineered structures as oil platforms and pipelines.
The most widespread impact is bottom trawling, the dragging of weighted nets along the sea floor to capture bottom-living fish, shrimp, and other edible marine creatures. This has been practiced in some shallow near-shore waters since at least the 14th century, but with the advent of powered fishing-boats has now impacted on most continental shelves, in recent decades extending into continental slopes down to depths of one kilometer. The effect is similar to that of plowing on land, and can be similarly destructive to native biota. The most obvious examples of major perturbation are the trawling of slow-growing deep-water coral stands, which are devastated by the practice. Elsewhere, the repeated scraping of the sea floor can smooth topography and redistribute sediment, typically releasing plumes of fine sediment that drift off into deeper water, leaving a reworked surface layer (often with a coarsening-upward pattern) in which the biological composition shifts toward those species that are tolerant of (or even favored by) repeated disruption.
Deep ocean anthropogenic signature
The deep ocean has so far been affected by little in the way of direct sediment redistribution or the siting of engineered structures. However, the deep-sea sediments, which range from relatively rapidly accumulated turbidite deposits to very slowly accumulating pelagic oozes, have been increasingly affected by the addition of anthropogenic debris of different types. Scattered shipwrecks have been landing on the sea floor since humans began seafaring, but their number has been increasing in tandem with the development of global trade in which now 90 percent by volume is transported by sea. There is material simply dropped overboard, and the garbage signature has changed as technology has changed. One characteristic element comprises the "trackways" of coal clinker along the routes of the old steamships. More modern elements, and more widely dispersed, are tins and glass bottles and (since the mid-20th century) plastic, ranging in size from microplastic particles (now recognized to be almost ubiquitous in modern marine sediments) to larger objects, not least discarded fishing nets. As exploitation of the marine realm continues, it seems likely that characteristic new strata will be formed in the near future, such as those resulting from the extraction of deep-sea manganese nodules across wide areas of the abyssal plains.
Chemostratigraphy in geology is a rapidly developing tool that can help correlate strata of all ages across wide areas by means of particular features of chemical composition. It may involve both organic and inorganic components, and a particularly widely used aspect is ratios of isotopes of various elements (such as carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, neodymium) because these can be expressed and maintain their pattern in rocks of widely different contents of the elements involved—and also because these isotopic ratios often reflect fundamental changes to the Earth system. A number of chemical changes and patterns are associated with the Anthropocene, because of the extent of human modification of surface processes, and some of these chemical signals may prove crucial in defining this time unit.
There are a number of surface-related reservoirs of carbon including living organisms, soil, permafrost, atmosphere, ocean waters (a much bigger reservoir than the atmosphere) and sub-seafloor sediments. Carbon is cycled through surface and subsurface environments on various time scales. Short-term cycling is associated with photosynthesis and respiration, and long-term cycles with carbon burial in strata and exhumation, and yet longer ones with carbon being taken into the Earth's interior via subduction zones and released by volcanism. Levels of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have been a primary determinant of climate over geological time, as exemplified by the variations in its levels between ~180 ppm in glacial phases of the Quaternary and ~260–280 ppm in interglacial phases. The bulk of this gas is taken into the deep ocean in glacial phases and released at the beginning of interglacial phases, with observed close correlation of global temperature and carbon dioxide levels seen in ice cores (Wolff, 2014).
Human perturbation of the carbon cycle, largely by the burning of fossil fuels, has seen atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rise from ~275 ppm at the start of the Industrial Revolution to ~400 ppm today, with the bulk of the rise since the mid-20th century (Steffen et al., 2015). Although this can be directly seen in ice cores, a much more widespread (and permanent) signal in rock and fossil material reflects the input into the atmosphere of isotopically light carbon (i.e., with a greater proportion of 12C to 13C) derived from hydrocarbons. This produces a large, rapid negative (i.e., light) carbon isotope shift in, for example, the shells of foraminifera (common marine protozoans that secrete a calcium carbonate shell and so provide a widely used palaeoenvironmental archive in Cenozoic deposits). This shift is already of some ~2 permil (parts per thousand) in size. Significant geologically, this isotope anomaly is similar to (if still smaller than) the negative carbon isotope anomaly that was produced in an ancient carbon release/global warming event at the end of the Paleocene and beginning of the Eocene epoch, 55 million years ago, and used to define the base of the latter. The developing carbon isotope anomaly for the Anthropocene can form an equally striking marker.
A 1610 dip in atmospheric CO2 has been linked to depopulation of about 50 million people following colonization of the Americas and has been proposed as a potential signature for the start of the Anthropocene (Lewis & Maslin, 2015).
There are other effects of the carbon dioxide input, including acidification of the oceans (Tyrrell, 2011) that also shows a marked change since 1950 (Steffen et al., 2015). This can produce physical effects (the acidification event at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary literally dissolved large areas of the ocean floor to produce a carbonate gap), but is of more significance as regards biological effects to organisms, including reef corals, that secrete skeletons of calcium carbonate.
Nitrogen and phosphorus
The doubling of the surface reservoir of reactive nitrogen, largely caused by the production of nitrogenous fertilizers from atmospheric nitrogen via the Haber-Bosch process, is a significant event in geological history. The relative scale is difficult to quantify, but this perturbation has been regarded by some scientists as the greatest change to the nitrogen cycle since the Great Oxygenation Event of the early Proterozoic, 2.4 billion years ago. Its reflection in strata is not straightforward, but a generally consistent change in nitrogen isotope composition has been detected in lakes far from direct human activity (Wolfe et al., 2013), presumably via long-distance transport of nitrogen-containing aerosols (which also fertilized the lakes to produce a change in the assemblages of diatoms—microscopic single-celled plants that secrete a siliceous shell). These changes began to appear after 1850, but accelerated in the mid-20th century, concomitant with the great expansion of nitrogenous fertilizers (Steffen et al., 2015), and have been suggested as providing the basis for a "golden spike" for the Anthropocene (Wolfe et al., 2013). Elevated ammonium concentrations are also found in mid-latitude glaciers in response to agricultural emissions and in Greenland nitrate levels rose by a factor of two during the twentieth century, mainly between 1950 and 1980 to levels higher than over the previous 100,000 years ago (Wolff, 2014).
The content of phosphorus in surface soils has also roughly doubled, though in this case from the excavation of phosphorus from ground-based sources by mining. Although a consistently detectable stratal "phosphorus anomaly" has not been reported, one effect of the increases in both nitrogen and phosphorus has been the creation and growth of "dead zones" in the ocean (Tyrrell, 2011). These are the result of runoff of excess fertilizers via rivers into shallow, poorly circulating coastal waters. These stimulate plankton blooms which, upon dying, sink to the sea floor and decay, using up dissolved oxygen and suffocating bottom-living faunas; these are generally seasonal kills, as autumn and winter bring storms which stir oxygen back into the waters (hence the surviving biota is that best adapted to rapid recolonization). Currently there are about 400 dead zones in the world, covering in total an area of some 250,000 square kilometers, the best known being in the Baltic Sea, the Gulf of Mexico, and Chesapeake Bay of the eastern United States. Although these phenomena are not yet on the scale of anoxic events of the geological past, further atmosphere/ocean warming will cause the seas to become more strongly thermally stratified, and so more prone to oxygen deprivation.
The importance of metals to the technology of human civilization means that there has been considerable "selective erosion" of them by mining, to bring them from subsurface (often deep subsurface) levels to the surface. Although much of the metals have been processed into artifacts of different kinds, the overspill from the mining, smelting, and production processes have spread metal-rich plumes into waters, soils and near-shore marine sediments. Working out the precise scale of these local metal anomalies is not straightforward, as pre-disturbance background levels need first to be evaluated, but clear enrichments in the environmental levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, and other metals have been widely recognized in industrialized regions (Gałuszka, Migaszewski, & Zalasiewicz, 2014). More widely, aerosols (particularly of lead, from smelting and formerly from lead additives in fuel) have changed the composition of peat bogs, glaciers and icecaps, and these changes may readily be detected. Indeed, various sources of lead have been discriminated in these stratigraphic archives by means of lead isotope ratios, and these patterns are significant to defining and recognizing the Anthropocene.
Organic compounds
In addition to the many thousands of new solid mineral forms that human industry has created, there are many thousands of compounds, notably complex organic compounds, which have been created for various purposes and have subsequently been dispersed through the environment. Among these are what have been termed "persistent organic pollutants" (POPs), which are only degraded slowly in the natural environment, some with half-lives of at least decades, which are only weakly soluble in water and tend to bind to sediment, especially clay particles. Hence, rather than simply traveling with water through the surface and subsurface environment, they can be preserved within sediment layers as an archive of the history of the arrival of these POPs into the local environment. Lake sediments are among the best of these archives, though these compounds have also been detected in sediments within rivers, estuaries, and seas.
POPs include organochlorine pesticides such as aldrin, dieldrin, and DDT, and industrial chemicals such as the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dibenzofurans. In parts of the world these chemicals were only used for a few decades, before adverse environmental effects caused them to be banned, while elsewhere their use persisted. Hence they can provide a complex stratigraphic pattern involving their invention, more or less widespread use, and termination of input through legal ban or obsolescence.
Stratigraphical analyses of POPs have come a distant second to environmental monitoring studies, but the research carried out to date have shown that, superimposed on geographical variability, many of the commoner and more distinctive POPs appear from the mid-20th century. How long will this signal last? This will clearly vary from compound to compound, and being novel compounds there are no direct analogues. Nevertheless some organic compounds can persist for millions of years in strata essentially unaltered, such as the "TEX" long-chain alkanes used for palaeotemperature analysis of Cenozoic ocean floor strata.
Artificial radionuclides
The explosion of the first nuclear ("Trinity") test bomb at Alamogordo, New Mexico, on July 16, 1945, began the dispersal of novel radionuclides into the surface environment (Zalasiewicz et al., 2015). This early test, and the only two (thus far) wartime uses, at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, only produced local effects (including the beginning of the formation of a fused radioactive sand rock type, trinitite, around the test site). However, many subsequent tests, from the early 1950s until the comprehensive test ban treaty in 1996 (albeit still not ratified), saw the global dispersal of these radionuclides worldwide, mainly in mid-latitudes, but with clearly detectable amounts in low-latitudes and both the Greenland and Antarctica icecaps (Waters et al., 2015). Other sources of widespread radioactive pollution include the nuclear accidents at Windscale (now Sellafield, Cumbria, U.K.) in 1957, Chernobyl, Ukraine, in 1986 and Fukushima, Japan, in 2011, and also events such as the fall of the SNAP 9 satellite off Mozambique in 1964 and the Soviet Kosmos 954 satellite over Canada in 1978, scattering radioactive debris.
The novel radionuclides involved—including caesium, americium, and plutonium—have different half-lives, the longest being that of plutonium 239, the signal of which can remain detectable for ~100,000 years (Waters et al., 2015). There was also significantly increased production of 14C above its natural abundance, a signal that was absorbed within many carbon reservoirs including wood and shell and bone material, to form another clear nuclear "spike" that will endure roughly half as long as will the plutonium signal.
This artificial radionuclide signal is not problem-free. Radionuclides can migrate within some sediments, rather than staying absorbed to the sediment lamina they were deposited in. And, particularly in deep ocean settings, the radionuclides can make a long (decades) journey before eventually settling to the sea floor. In deep-sea settings, too, the burrowing activity of sea floor organisms can disrupt the primary order of these slowly deposited sedimentary layers. Nevertheless, this particular chemical signal has a strong claim to be regarded as a primary marker of the Anthropocene, and there have been suggestions that the boundary may be placed either at the moment of the Trinity test in 1945 (Zalasiewicz et al., 2015), at the beginning of the main global "bomb spike" in the early 1950s (Waters et al., 2015), or at its peak in 1964 (Lewis & Maslin, 2015). If one of these is chosen, then the decision will reflect the total ensemble of stratigraphic signals at least as much as the precise pattern of the radioactive signal itself.
The use of the complex evolution of organisms, both single-celled and multicellular, has provided the main means of defining and using the Geological Time Scale in the Phanerozoic, within the strata of which fossils are generally abundant. However, in applying this technique to the Anthropocene, there are a number of reasons why "classical" biostratigraphy is difficult to apply. First, there is the short time scale of the Anthropocene, measured in thousands of years at most, compared with the millions of years over which normal processes of evolution and extinction take place. Then, there is the difficulty in comparing data collected by biologists and ecologists regarding the recent and current history of Earth's biota, with the kind of criteria used by palaeontologists, who mainly deal with skeletal remains only. And, there are some quite novel aspects in Earth's biological history that need to be taken into account in this analysis.
As regards gaining an idea of the Earth prior to human modification, a baseline state might be best represented by the last interglacial phase, 125,000 years ago. Considering the baseline state is not simple, as overall the Quaternary has been a ~2.6-million-year interval of considerable oscillatory climate change between glacial and interglacial states, with the glacial phases in particular (that make up the bulk of the time) showing complex and dynamic change. Nevertheless, it is notable that most of the Quaternary does not show a particularly elevated rate of either extinctions or evolution, suggesting that life overall had adapted to repeated climate change. It is only late in the Pleistocene that significant biotic change appears, suggesting that the human factor became significant from this time.
Following the unremarkable evolutionary pattern of most of the Quaternary, the late Pleistocene, from ~50,000 years ago to the early Holocene saw waves of extinctions of large mammal species, with most species (other than those in Africa) becoming extinct (Barnosky et al., 2011). The species affected included such as the mammoth, sabre-tooth cat, ground sloth, woolly rhinoceros, and there has been considerable debate about whether climate/environmental change or human hunting was the cause. However, there was commonly a close link between the arrival of humans to any geographic region and subsequent extinctions, suggesting that "overkill" by humans often played a large or crucial role.
Following this, extinction continued through the Holocene, although not on such a dramatic scale. Nevertheless, it is clear that many species became extinct (particularly on hitherto isolated islands) in part because of predation by humans, in part because of competition from or predation by associated invasive species (see below) such as rats and cats and in part because of habitat loss as natural habitat was converted to farmland or urban areas.
Extinctions have accelerated in recent decades, and there has been considerable debate about whether the Earth is entering, or has entered another major mass extinction (it would be the sixth recognized) in Earth history (Barnosky et al., 2011). The consensus seems to be that this mass extinction has not yet happened as, in most major groups of organisms, the number of species known to be extinct is of the order of 1 percent. However, current rates of extinction are far above background levels (perhaps by up to three orders of magnitude) and also the number of species known to be endangered or critically endangered (i.e., in very low numbers) is, within many different major groups, of the order of a few to several tens of percent. With current "business as usual" trends of predation and habitat loss, a mass extinction on the scale of the "big five" is thought likely within two to three hundred years, (Barnosky et al., 2011) even without considering the additional effects of climate change.
Species invasions
While species extinctions are not yet on a major scale, other biological changes are on a considerably greater scale. Species invasions, for instance (also termed neobiota), already comprise a widespread and (uniquely, in Earth history) global phenomenon. Homo sapiens, of course, is the invasive species par excellence, living on every continent—even Antarctica—and having reached, and mostly occupied, virtually every island on the planet. With humans have come a range of other species, either by design (pigs, goats, cats, rabbits) or accidentally (most famously, rats). For vascular plants, although native losses are great over at least half of the ice-free land surface, plant species have been enriched mostly because species invasions exceed native losses (Ellis, Antill, & Kreft, 2012). Species have now been translocated between every continent and every ocean, and invasive species now commonly form up to a half (locally more) of the species complements of many regions—with particularly successful invasives often dominating assemblages (the name Homogenocene having been suggested by John Curnutt to reflect this phenomenon). The global character of this process is unique, as previous invasions were confined to continents that became geographically conjoined (notably, the Americas some 7 million years ago)—or a landmass separated to allow the species from the oceans on either side to mingle. Such invasions can increase local biodiversity (as well as reducing it, by causing native species to become extinct), even while the total biodiversity of the Earth is undergoing reduction. As with extinctions, the effects are essentially permanent, as it is the successfully translocated and surviving species that will comprise the biology (and the palaeontology) of the future.
Population/assemblage changes
Part of the reason that so many species are in low numbers is the appropriation of a large proportion (currently ~40%) of primary productivity to support our own species. This is another unique signal of the Anthropocene. The distortion to the pre-human ecological pattern may be exemplified by land vertebrates. Prior to the late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions, resources were shared among some 350 large vertebrate species. Currently, about 180 of these still exist. Among these—considering just body mass—humans now make about one-third. Most of the other two-thirds is distributed among those few vertebrate species that we keep to eat—cows, pigs, sheep, goats, and so on—and these have been heavily modified by selective breeding. Less than 5%—and probably less than 3%—is distributed among the wild large vertebrates of the world: elephants, rhinoceri, hippopotami, lions and tigers, and others. In a further distortion, the total large vertebrate mass has been increased by about an order of magnitude over geological baseline levels, because of agriculturally hyper-fertilized primary productivity (via nitrogen, phosphorus especially—see above) that is now fed efficiently to our preferred prey species.
Researchers examining overall plant and animal communities speak of them in terms of biomes: large areas with particular patterns of ecosystems determined largely by climate. The increasing human influence on terrestrial areas has led to the concept of anthromes (Ellis et al., 2012), where these primary patterns have been transformed into human-dominated agricultural (dominated by a few selectively bred and genetically modified primary crops) and urban systems (of which the nonhuman biology is often largely invasive). The extent of this transformation means that it is no longer accurate to say that humans have created a variety of anthromes that are nested within the regional biomes; rather, with only a few percent of pristine landscape left, it is more appropriate to say that there are now patches of more or less undisturbed biome left within anthrome-dominated terrestrial biology.
Humans, uniquely among land vertebrates, have also changed the trophic structure of the oceans. Increasingly effective and widely applied fishing methods have reduced the numbers of top predators and those just below them in the food web—whales, sharks, tuna, and others—with most populations now decreased by one to two orders of magnitude, and some (such as the Newfoundland cod) having undergone even greater population crashes. With the main targets thus diminished, fishing effort is becoming focused on lower levels of the trophic structure—"fishing down the food chain."
Within nearshore settings, including lagoon and estuaries, microflora, such as diatoms and dinoflagellates, and microfauna such as foraminifera and ostracods respond dramatically to human-driven stresses (Wilkinson, Poirier, Head, Sayer, & Tibby, 2014). The changes locally occur at a range of dates, but when viewed globally the population and assemblage changes are most prominent from 1940 to 1945, influenced by increases in the release of toxins and pollutants, increased runoff of agricultural fertilizers and input of sewage, changes to water acidity and oxygen levels, increased water turbidity, and salinization. However, in areas where stresses on microbiota have reduced through environmental controls, populations show signs of recovery.
Human trace fossils—technofossils and the technosphere
Many animals leave not only body fossils, mainly of hard parts such as bones and shells, but also trace fossils, such as worm burrows and footprints. Some animals create more complex structures that are also capable of being fossilized: the casings of caddis fly larvae, or the nests of both solitary and colonial insects, some being extraordinarily sophisticated, such as termite nests. The structures created by humans—houses and factories, roads and cars, tools ranging from knives to computers, are also commonly potentially preservable, and may also be considered to be trace fossils. They have been termed technofossils (Zalasiewicz, Williams, Waters, Barnosky, & Haff, 2014), and have some unique attributes: their remarkable diversity (very many millions of types have been made, compared with the usual maximum of three or four traces made by any other species in the animal kingdom); and their rapid evolution, now on a scale of decades and years (sometimes less) which is now also completely decoupled from the biological evolution of the trace-maker.
They all, in one way or another, embody technology, and without this technology the Earth would not be able to support more than a small fraction of the present human population. The technology is produced by humans, but humans, being dependent on that technology, must also maintain it, and the entire technological system is now globally connected. The entire system has been termed the technosphere (Haff, 2014), an emergent system comprising both the technological objects ("hardware") and its human organizational systems ("software"). It currently needs a great deal of energy to power it, largely from fossil fuels. It has developed from, and is perhaps now in part parasitic upon, the biosphere. It is the system behind all the environmental changes of the Anthropocene, and the future of this time interval will be determined by the nature of its further evolution. It currently has some considerable instabilities—for instance it is extremely poor at recycling its constituent materials compared with the biosphere, and so risks being poisoned by its own waste products. But, it is evolving rapidly, so time will tell.
Climate Change and the Anthropocene
There has been rapid rise in major climate drivers (for example, carbon dioxide and methane), as noted above, and these are now outside Quaternary norms. With atmospheric carbon dioxide currently at ~400 ppm, it is at levels likely broadly typical of the Pliocene Epoch, 3 to 5 million years ago, when temperatures were 2−3 °C higher than today and sea levels 10−20 m higher.
However, there has so far only been a small rise in global average temperature, of ~0.8 °C globally over the past century. This is likely due to global lag effects, together with the storage of heat in oceans (which are much larger stores of heat compared with the atmosphere, and are measurably becoming warmer in their upper layers, with up to half of the last century's rise in sea level of ~30 cm being due to thermal expansion). Currently, therefore, the Earth is still well within envelope of interglacial conditions as regards global temperature and sea level. Indeed, in the last interglacial, peak temperatures and sea levels were a little higher than today, without anthropogenic forcing. Nevertheless, evidence of the beginning of anthropogenic warming and climate destabilization is now clear, with the temperature rise so far virtually certain to be the result of the rise of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. There have been clear signs too, over the last couple of decades of increased ice melt and freshening of seawater around both Greenland and Antarctica, with ice mass loss now a few hundred billion tons each year.
Thus, unless human energy supplies rapidly become decarbonized, there will over the coming decades and centuries be rises of global temperature and then sea level that will take the Earth system out of Quaternary interglacial norms and into conditions more resembling the pre-Quaternary Cenozoic. The temperature changes in themselves will lead to many extinctions as species are forced out of their habitable ranges. Hence, as regards the global climate and (especially) sea level signal, of the Anthropocene currently remains weak, but will likely increase considerably over future decades and centuries.
Synthesis, Definition, and Wider Significance
The evidence summarized above suggests that the Anthropocene hypothesis is founded upon a robust array of data indicating a major change in the Earth system (even if still larger changes lie ahead), also recorded as changes to strata, similar to signatures recorded in the geological past.
Hence, if the Anthropocene is real—how should it be defined? The boundaries of geological time units simply represent a temporal framework which captures, as well as possible, the main features of a complex and often protracted change from one state of the Earth system to another.
Three main candidate levels have been suggested for the beginning (or chronostratigraphic base) of the Anthropocene:
Firstly, an "early Anthropocene" or "Palaeoanthropocene" (Foley et al., 2013) that reflects early events, with ideas ranging from the great megafaunal extinctions to, more commonly quoted, events associated with the beginning and spread of agriculture in the early to mid Holocene, which produced significant changes to the landscape, though only marginal changes to the marine realm. Controversially, these landscape changes may have led to the slow rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (from 260 to 280 ppm) through the pre-industrial Holocene, and may have prevented the slide back into a glacial phase.
Secondly, at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, human population exceeded a billion (Steffen et al., 2015), and the development of large-scale coal burning, steam engines and industry that began the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels that continues to this day. This spread from Britain to Europe to North America between the late 17th and late 18th century, and subsequently more widely (Waters et al., 2014). It was this option that was favored during early descriptions of the Anthropocene by Crutzen and Stoermer (2000) and Crutzen (2002).
Thirdly, from the mid-20th century, there came a "Great Acceleration" in the scale and rate of population growth, energy use, manufacture, habitat/biotic change, and widespread change beginning in the marine realm (Steffen et al., 2015). This was the start of the oil economy and the beginning of nuclear age (Zalasiewicz et al., 2015; Waters et al., 2015) and of globalization, with rapid growth and sophistication of the technosphere (Haff, 2014). Most of the anthropogenic rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide took place in this interval.
Other levels have been proposed, including the 16th and early 17th centuries (e.g., Lewis & Maslin, 2015)—and also a future level, once climate has warmed and sea level has risen further (Wolff, 2014), but those three remain the main candidates. Of them, the "early Anthropocene" is historically highly significant—but the processes, and stratigraphic signals, were diachronous, taking millennia to spread across those parts of the globe they affected (Edgeworth et al., 2015). The same, in a more compressed form, may be said about the Industrial Revolution. It is the mid-20th century "Great Acceleration" that represents the most widespread and synchronous or near-synchronous signals, and also the greatest changes (so far) to the Earth system, and it is likely therefore that a level some time in the mid-20th century will become accepted as the beginning of the Anthropocene (Zalasiewicz et al., 2015), whether this new time term is formalized or not.
As regards hierarchical level, the Anthropocene is currently being considered as a potential epoch, although other levels are possible. Given that it combines features that are geologically striking and completely novel (for example the whole-planet species invasions and technofossils), with others that are still trivial (e.g., sea level change), this is probably a reasonable compromise—especially given that yet larger changes seem likely.
The question of formalization of the Anthropocene will hinge as much on the perceived usefulness of having this unit on the Geological Time Scale (and for whom it is useful, given the wide interest in this concept) as on its geological reality. This is a complex question, the answer to which is hard to predict.
Nevertheless, whether formal or informal, this term and this concept has succeeded in conveying something of the overall rate and scale of global change in the context of all of Earth history, and thus helping in the analysis—and dealing with the human consequences—of this change. Moreover, it has helped refashion the relationship between humans and nature—in effect intertwining them so that one now cannot change without affecting the other. Thus it has also brought the sciences and humanities closer, as inquiry from both sides will be necessary to fully understand—and perhaps even direct the course of—the Anthropocene. Geologists, looking at past major phases of change to the Earth, are used to analyzing driving forces such as major volcanic outbursts and comet strikes. Here it is humans currently driving change to the Earth system—a far more difficult, and more unpredictable, phenomenon.
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., et al. (2011). Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471(7336), 51–57.Find this resource:
Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Newsletter, 41, 17–18.Find this resource:
Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of Mankind. Nature, 415, p. 23.Find this resource:
Edgeworth, M., Richter, D. DeB., Waters, C. N., Haff, P., Neal, C., & Price, S. J. (2015). Diachronous beginnings of the Anthropocene: The lower bounding surface of anthropogenic deposits. Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 33–58.Find this resource:
Ellis, E. C., Antill, E. C., & Kreft, H. (2012). All Is Not Loss: Plant Biodiversity in the Anthropocene. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e30535.Find this resource:
Foley, S., Gronenborn, D., Andreae, M., Kadereit, J., Esper, J., Scholz, D., et al. (2013). The Palaeoanthropocene—The beginnings of anthropogenic environmental change. Anthropocene 3, 83−88.Find this resource:
Ford, J. R., Price, S. J., Cooper, A. H., & Waters, C. N. (2014). An assessment of lithostratigraphy for anthropogenic deposits. In C. N. Waters, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, & A. Snelling (Eds.), A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene (Special Publication 395, pp. 55–89).Find this resource:
Gałuszka, A., Migaszewski, Z. M., & Zalasiewicz, J. (2014). Assessing the Anthropocene with geochemical methods. In C. N. Waters, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, & A. Snelling (Eds.), A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene (Special Publication 395, pp. 221–238).Find this resource:
Haff, P. K. (2014). Technology as a geological phenomenon: Implications for human well-being. In C. N. Waters, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, & A. Snelling (Eds.), A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene (Special Publication 395, pp. 301–309). London: Geological Society.Find this resource:
Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519, 171–180.Find this resource:
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1): 81–98.Find this resource:
Syvitski, J. P. M., & Kettner, A. J. (2011). Sediment flux and the Anthropocene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A2011(369), 957–975.Find this resource:
Tyrrell, T. (2011). Anthropogenic modification of the oceans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A369, 887–908.Find this resource:
Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Ellis, M. A., & Snelling, A. (Eds.) (2014). A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene? (Special Publication 395, pp. 321). London: Geological Society.
Waters, C. N., Syvitski, J. P. M., Gałuszka, A., Hancock, G. J, Zalasiewicz, J., Cearreta, A., Grinevald, J., McNeill, J. R., Summerhayes, C. (2015). Can environmental radiogenic signatures define the beginning of the Anthropocene Epoch? Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 71(3), 46–57.Find this resource:
Wilkinson, I. P., Poirier, C., Head, M. J., Sayer, C. D., & Tibby, J. (2014). Micropalaeontological signatures of the Anthropocene. In C. N. Waters, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, & A. Snelling (Eds.), A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene (Vol. Special Publications 395, pp. 185–219). London: Geological Society.Find this resource:
Williams, M., Zalasiewicz, J., Haywood, A., & Ellis, M. (Eds.) (2011). The Anthropocene: A new epoch of geological time? (Vol. 369A, 833–1112). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.
Williams, M., Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., & Landing, E. (2014). Is the fossil record of complex animal behaviour a stratigraphical analogue for the Anthropocene? In C. N. Waters, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, & A. Snelling (Eds.), A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene (Special Publication 395, pp. 143–148). London: Geological Society.Find this resource:
Wolfe, A. P., Hobbs, W. O., Birks, H. H., Briner, J. P., Holmgren, S. U., Ingólfsson, Ó., et al. (2013). Stratigraphic expressions of the Holocene-Anthropocene transition revealed in sediments from remote lakes. Earth-Science Reviews, 116, 17–34.Find this resource:
Wolff, E. W. (2014). Ice Sheets and the Anthropocene. In C. N. Waters, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, & A. Snelling (Eds.), A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene (Vol. Special Publications 395, pp. 255–263). London: Geological Society.Find this resource:
Zalasiewicz, J., Kryza, R., & Williams, M. (2014). The mineral signature of the Anthropocene. In C. N. Waters, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, & A. Snelling (Eds.), A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene (pp. 109–117). London: Geological Society.Find this resource:
Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., & Williams, M. (2014). Human bioturbation, and the subterranean landscape of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 6, 3–9.Find this resource:
Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Williams, M., et al. (2015). When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal. Quaternary International.Find this resource:
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Smith, A., Barry, T. L., Coe, A. L., Bown, P. R., et al. (2008). Are we now living in the Anthropocene? Geological Society of America Today, 18(2), 4–8.Find this resource:
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Waters, C. N., Barnosky, A. D., & Haff, P. (2014). The technofossil record of humans. Anthropocene Review 1, 34–43.Find this resource:


text:
Ayman Al-Zawahiri By Global Security.org Profile: Ayman Al-Zawahiri By Lee Hudson Teslik February 2, 2006 Ayman al-Zawahiri: Jihad's Judas By Patrick Poole February 26, 2007 Profile: Ayman Al-Zawahiri By BBC September 27, 2004 Egyptian Doctor Emerges As Terror Mastermind By CNNAl-Qaeda Deputy Leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri in Message on Islamist Websites By MEMRI November 19, 2008 Al-Qaeda Deputy Head Ayman Al-Zawahiri in Audio Recording: Musharraf Accepted Israel's Existence By MEMRI August 13, 2008 The Party of Jurisprudence vs. The Party of Action By Daniel Lav May 29, 2008 Open Meeting with Sheikh Ayman Al-Zawahiri -- Part II By MEMRI April 23, 2008 Open Meeting with Sheikh Ayman Al-Zawahiri By MEMRI April 4, 2008 Release of New Book by Ayman Al-Zawahiri, in Response to Sayyed Imam By MEMRI March 4, 2008 The Putin-Osama Connection By Jamie Glazov January 16, 2008 Al-Zawahiri in Two Recent Messages: 'Iran Stabbed a Knife into the Back of the Islamic Nation By MEMRI December 18, 2007 Al-Zawahiri to the U.S.: 'Do Not Ask President Bush When The Soldiers Will Return -- Ask Instead How Many Will Return' By MEMRI September 21, 2007 Al-Zawahiri Threatens to Renew Terror Attacks in Britain, Urges Pakistanis to Wage Jihad Against Their Government By MEMRI July 13, 2007 Al Qaeda's No. 2 Issues Dire Threats against Two Government Heads By DEBKAfile July 10, 2007 Video Message by Al-Qaeda Deputy Ayman Al-Zawahiri: Overview of Some of the Main Themes By MEMRI July 6, 2007 Al-Qaida Recruiting Black Bombers By WorldNetDaily.com May 21, 2007 Seeking Sympathy from the Infidel By Raymond Ibrahim May 16, 2007 The Rev. Zawahiri and the Dems By Bob Tyrrell May 10, 2007 Al-Qaeda Deputy Leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri Interview By MEMRI May 8, 2007 Al-Qaeda's No. 2 Applauds Democrat War Bill By Amanda B. Carpenter May 8, 2007 The Looming Tower: Egyptian Ideological Origins of al-Qaida By Austin Bay December 27, 2006 Al Qaeda's "New" Ally By Thomas Joscelyn September 15, 2006 Officials: Al-Qaeda to Strike This Year By YnetNews.com February 23, 2006 Al-Qaeda Deputy Ayman Al-Zawahiri's Latest Video on Al-Jazeera TV By MEMRI February 1, 2006 Soy un Predator By James S. Robbins January 31, 2006 Newly-Released Video of Al-Qaeda's Deputy Leader Ayman al-Zawahiri's Interview to Al-Sahab TV MEMRI December 8, 2005 It's Real By Rita Katz October 21, 2005 Faking It By Andrew C. McCarthy October 18, 2005 Zawahiri 'Letter' Draws Increasing Skepticism By Sherrie Gossett CNS News October 18, 2005 Zawahiri Does the Media's Job By Dr. Walid Phares October 13, 2005 al-Qaida No. 2: U.S. 'Ran' From Vietnam By Katherine Shrader October 12, 2005 The al-Zawahiri Letter By Dan Darling October 12, 2005 London Suicide Bomber Before 'Entering Gardens of Paradise,' and Ayman Al-Zawahiri's Threats of More Bombings in the West By MEMRI September 3, 2005 Al-Zawahiri Promises More "Horrors" By MEMRI August 5, 2005 Zawahiri's Threats By Stephen Schwartz August 4, 2005 New Al-Zawahiri Tape Premieres on Al-Jazeera By Fox News September 10, 2004 Symposium: The Hunt for Bin Laden By Jamie Glazov April 23, 2004 Defector Says Iran Played Role in 9/11 By Kenneth R. Timmerman June 12, 2003
See also: al Qaeda Osama bin Laden Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian Islamic Jihad Abdullah Azzam Islamic Group International Islamic Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders
Ayman al-Zawahiri is both the personal physician and chief Lieutenant to al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Al-Zawahiri is second only to bin Laden in the al Qaeda hierarchy. Born June 19, 1951 to an upper-middle class Egyptian family in the Cairo suburb of Maadi, al-Zawahiri was grandson to Rabi'a al-Zawahri, who had been the grand imam at Cairo's Al-Azhar University. At age 14 al-Zawahiri joined the Muslim Brotherhood, and at 18 he joined the Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ), which would later carry out the 1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. (Al-Zawahiri would be among the hundreds of suspects arrested, but not convicted, for their possible role in the assassination.) Over time, al-Zawahiri became one of EIJ's chief organizers. Al-Zawahiri graduated in 1974 from Cairo University's medical school, where his father was a Professor of Pharmacology. Four years later he completed a master's degree in surgery. In 1979 al-Zawahiri made his first trip to Afghanistan to join the mujahideen struggle against Soviet occupiers. While there, he met Osama bin Laden, and the two worked together under the guidance of Abdullah Azzam. Returning to Egypt in 1990, al-Zawahiri trained the members of Islamic Jihad in the tactics of the Afghan conflict. Al-Zawahiri is believed to have collaborated with the Islamic Group terrorists who murdered at least 58 foreign tourists in Luxor in 1997. This was one of a series of lethal terrorist attacks for which al-Zawahiri was sentenced to death in absentia. During the 1990s al-Zawahiri traveled in Europe and resided for a time in Denmark and Switzerland. He also reportedly was twice smuggled into the United States for secret fundraising events at mosques and elsewhere, collecting between the two trips an estimated $500,000 from American Muslims. A 1998 fatwa introducing the International Islamic Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders was issued jointly by bin Laden and al-Zawahiri. This new organization, they wrote, was created "to eliminate all U.S. presence in Saudi Arabia, the U.N. embargo against Iraq and Israel's control of Muslim holy places in Jerusalem." In 1998 al-Zawahiri began merging Islamic Jihad into al Qaeda, a merger formally sealed in 2001. Both he and bin Laden would be indicted for allegedly masterminding the August 7, 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. When American al Qaeda James Ujaama became ill in 2000 while attending a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan, al-Zawahiri was the doctor who treated him. Subsequent to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States, two al Qaeda videos showed bin Laden in the company of al-Zawahiri. "Bin Laden has been al Qaeda's public face, and he is al Qaeda, as far as most people are concerned," said RAND Corporation terrorism specialist William Rosenau in April 2004. "In some respects, however, al-Zawahiri as a far more sinister figure ... a profound influence on bin Laden, helping to radicalize him and make him more violent and anti-American. Al-Zawahiri has also served as an ideological transmission belt by injecting into the al Qaeda movement the worldviews of individuals like Sayyid Qutb, the Egyptian theorist of jihad hanged by Nasser in 1966." Al-Zawahiri was not found when U.S. and allied forces swept into Afghanistan in October 2001 in "Operation Enduring Freedom." A London Arab-language newspaper reported that American bombing raids killed one of his wives and two of his children. While hiding in Afghan caves, al-Zawahiri wrote a second book, Knights Under the Prophet's Banner, about his career and philosophy as a terrorist. His first book in 1991, Bitter Harvest, gives what one biographer described as "a moral justification for nearly indiscriminate murder under the pretext of jihad." The U.S. Department of State offered up to $25 million for information leading directly to al-Zawahiri's capture or conviction. On March 18, 2004, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf reported that his troops had surrounded a group of al Qaeda fighters who, it was speculated, were fighting fiercely because al-Zawahiri was with them. After four days and the capture of about 100 al Qaeda and accompanying tribesman -- perhaps a third of their total number -- Pakistani officials agreed to meet with tribal leaders in a loya jirga. After this lull, soldiers discovered escape tunnels that apparently had given the most important al Qaeda members in this trap their means of escape. Four days later, Al-Jazeera Television broadcast what it reported was the voice of al-Zawahiri calling for the overthrow of President Musharraf. In an August 4, 2005 interview on on Al-Jazeera, al-Zawahiri made the following remarks:
In a letter dated July 9, 2005, al-Zawahiri wrote to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi (al Qaeda's top agent in Iraq at that time) that the American occupation of Iraq had provided Islamic radicals with a golden opportunity to win popular support. In this correspondence (which was obtained by American forces in Iraq during the summer of 2005), al-Zawahiri spelled out his views on how the battle against the U.S. should be prosecuted. "The aftermath of the collapse of American power in Vietnam," he wrote, "and how they ran and left their agents, is noteworthy. Because of that, we must be ready starting now, before events overtake us, and before we are surprised by the conspiracies of the Americans and the United Nations, and their plans to fill the void behind them." In short, al-Zawahiri was counting on America to succumb to its "Vietnam Syndrome" and eventually withdraw from Iraq. The al-Zawahiri letter also made clear al Qaeda's intention, as the first step in its maximalist agenda, to war against all secular nations in the Middle East. The long-term plan was to expel the Americans from Iraq, establish an Islamic authority, and take the war to Iraq's secular neighbors, including Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. The final stage, al-Zawahri wrote, would be a clash with Israel, which he said had been established to challenge "any new Islamic entity." Al-Zawahiri's letter also acknowledged that al Qaeda had lost key leaders; that its members had, to a large degree, resigned themselves to defeat in Afghanistan; and that their lines of communication and sources of funding had been severely disrupted. On July 27, 2006, Al Jazeera television broadcast a new videotape showing al-Zawahiri exhorting Muslims to wage jihad against Israel by joining the ongoing military conflicts in Lebanon and Gaza. Asserting that he viewed "all the world as a battlefield open in front of us," and that the Israeli-Hezbollah war could not be ended with "cease-fires or agreements," al-Zawahiri said: "It is a jihad for the sake of God and will last until [our] religion prevails ... from Spain to Iraq. We will attack everywhere.... My fellow Muslims, it is obvious that Arab and Islamic governments are not only impotent but also complicit ... and you are alone on the battlefield. Rely on God and fight your enemies ... make yourselves martyrs. … The shells and rockets ripping apart Muslim bodies in Gaza and Lebanon are not only Israeli [weapons], but are supplied by all the countries of the crusader coalition. Therefore, every participant in the crime will pay the price. We cannot just watch these shells as they burn our brothers in Gaza and Lebanon and stand by idly, humiliated." Al-Zawahiri further instructed Muslims to attack "crusaders and Zionists" and to support jihad "until American troops are chased from Afghanistan and Iraq, paralyzed and impotent ... having paid the price for aggression against Muslims and support for Israel." In a September 2006 videotape aired by Al-Jazeera, al-Zawahri warned that Persian Gulf countries and Israel would be al-Qaeda's next targets for attack. Addressing the West directly, al-Zawahri said: "You should not waste your time in reinforcing your troops in Iraq and Afghanistan because they are doomed to defeat and are already all but defeated. Instead, you have to reinforce your troops in two regions. First is the Gulf, where you will be thrown out after you are defeated in Iraq, at which point your economic ruin will be achieved. The second is Israel, because the jihad reinforcements are getting closer to it." On the same video, al-Zawahiri also impugned the United Nations peacekeeping force that was then deploying in Lebanon under the terms of the cease-fire resolution. "What is so terrible in this resolution," said Al-Zawahiri, "... is that it approves the existence of the Jewish state and isolates our mujahedeen in Palestine from Muslims in Lebanon." In other portions of the tape, al-Zawahri told the United States: "We have repeatedly warned you and offered a truce with you. Now we have all the legal and rational justification to continue to fight you until your power is destroyed or you give in and surrender. … Your leaders are hiding from you the true extent of the disaster. And the days are pregnant and giving birth to new events, with Allah's permission and guidance." In addition, al-Zawahiri criticized the West for giving aid to Israel, and he called on the Islamic world "to rush with everything at its disposal to the aid of its Muslim brothers in Lebanon and Gaza." According to the Middle East Media Research Institute, in July 2007 al Qaeda's media company Al-Sahab issued two audio messages by al-Zawahiri, wherein he: (a) called on the Muslims of Pakistan to "deal a fatal blow to the plans of the Crusaders and their helpers in South Asia"; and (b) warned that all those who were "collaborating with the Americans, Zionists, and Arab states" were "digging their graves with their own hands."In May 2007, Zawahiri said: "... I want blacks in America, people of color, American Indians, Hispanics, and all the weak and oppressed in North and South America, in Africa and Asia, and all over the world, to know that when we wage jihad in Allah's path, we aren't waging jihad to lift oppression from Muslims only; we are waging jihad to lift oppression from all mankind, because Allah has ordered us never to accept oppression, whatever it may be…This is why I want every oppressed one on the face of the earth to know that our victory over America and the Crusading West — with Allah's permission — is a victory for them, because they shall be freed from the most powerful tyrannical force in the history of mankind." On June 16, 2011 -- a few weeks after the death of Osama bin Laden -- al Qaeda announced that al-Zawahiri would be its new leader. The organization released a statement that said: "As the best form of gratitude for the righteous martyr and for the life of the mujahid Sheikh Osama bin Laden is to continue on the path of jihad . . . the General Command of Qaeda . . . announces that Sheikh Dr. Abu Muhammad Ayman al-Zawahiri . . . has assumed the responsibility of the leadership the group."On September 9, 2016, a new video by Zawahiri was made public. Echoing themes from his earlier videos, Zawahiri again praised 9/11 and portrayed it as a product of Muslim grievances and payback for Western crimes; he vowed a "thousand more" 9/11s; and he described apostates as being more dangerous than original infidels. Moreover, Zawahiri called on American blacks to convert to Islam, asserting that they would never receive justice and would always live in "humiliation" unless they converted to Islam and rebelled against the "white majority." He even showed footage of the Nation of Islam's Malcolm X preaching.
Since Feb 14, 2005 --Hits: 61,630,061 --Visitors: 7,024,052
Copyright 2003-2015 : DiscoverTheNetworks.org


text:
A certain casting office hired me for three days. They fitted me in a period costume and wanted my hair to be all one color; I had to be shorter than 5 feet 5 inches and of white European descent. They paid me Screen Actors Guild wages for the fitting, and I was under the impression I would be paid SAG wages for the days I was asked to work. They then proceeded to pay me nonunion for the day of work, and this was a long day (16 hours), with a $500 difference between the union and nonunion actors. I complained to SAG, and they told me that casting could do whatever it wanted.
I thought that was ironic, since I'm a single parent with a 5-year-old and need to pay a babysitter $10 per hour when I work, and this project is about women in the workplace and women getting a respectable salary. I don't believe this is the director's fault, nor do I believe it's the production company's fault. But this is the second time this casting office has hired me for a particular look, paid me SAG wages for the fitting, and then not paid me SAG wages for a day of work. Some of these casting directors seem to have lawless business practices. They seem to be prejudiced against white women in their 30s. Certain people in the film industry have told me that white women in their 30s don't get SAG waivers! Only pretty young girls in their 20s.
I have some friends who worked a 20-hour day last week. My SAG friends will get paid more than $1,000 for that day. My non-SAG friends will get paid $200. Why the discrepancy?
I am an attractive, reasonably young woman and would like to know what percentage of white women in their 30s are actually working on a daily basis on film and television projects in New York City like I am. I am a member of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. I understand that SAG doesn't have an open-door policy like AFTRA does. It's a very unjust system, and it seems as if they prevent women from joining SAG. I feel this is a women's rights issue, since I don't see men having the same difficulty in joining. I do not understand how women can continue to be discriminated against.
—Chosen for the Part, Not for the Pay
New York
Dear Chosen:
You wrote to us for advice. I'm assuming you want the truth. Here it is: You're way off base on this. If I understand correctly, you're a non-SAG background performer who has somehow concluded that you're entitled to SAG wages. And because you—as a nonunion performer—were not paid union wages, you now claim that you're being discriminated against because you're a woman.
If I've got that right, then I must tell you, you're suffering from a severely misguided sense of entitlement. None of the personal facts you listed—hair color, attractiveness, height, ethnicity, single parenthood—entitles a nonunion performer to union wages. You're right: SAG pay is higher, and there's overtime when the days are long. That's one of the things that a union does: protect its members and ensure fair pay. But you don't get to demand those privileges if you're not in that union. The logic of this is so obvious that I can't imagine how you've missed it. You asked, "Why the discrepancy?" Simple: You're not in SAG.
For the sake of your own sanity, you need to understand this: Show business doesn't owe anyone a living. If nonunion background wages aren't enough for you as a single parent, no one's obligated to compensate by paying you more—though it sounds to me, since you indicated that you work every day, as if you're already doing better than about 100 percent of the actors I know. And if you're seriously complaining about how hard it is for white women in their 30s to get a break in show business, you'll have to take a number and line up behind a whole lot of other folks for whom it's a lot harder.
Without revealing your identity, I asked Grant Wilfley of Grant Wilfley Casting in New York to explain why nonunion background actors might receive SAG rates for wardrobe fittings. He responds: "When nonunion go to a fitting, they do not have to be paid at all. We always suggest to the production that it's a good idea to give them some amount, in that they have gone out of their way to come in for the fitting. Some productions give them the same amount they give the SAG, some give them a quarter of the non-SAG rate. But this does not make them SAG or allow them to receive a SAG waiver."
You're not the victim of discrimination or unfair treatment. The casting people you dealt with were not guilty of "lawless business practices." True, assistant directors don't always dispense vouchers fairly. If you want to call that prejudice, knock yourself out. But lawless? No. And considering all the real examples of prejudice in our country, it's kind of an outrageous claim, as you were hired and then were paid at the union rate for a costume fitting. It doesn't sound to me like you've been wronged or mistreated at all, only that your ideas about what is owed to you are seriously skewed.
Playing the gender-bias card out of turn only diminishes the impact of legitimate claims. For generations, your foremothers have had to knock down walls, push against glass ceilings, and stand up to bullies in their struggle to be equally recognized as American citizens. The inequities, insults, and abuses against which these women fought (alongside the men who joined in their cause) were real. And for you to suggest that your situation is an example of discrimination against women—compared to the plight of those who fell sick and sometimes died in the unsafe working conditions of turn-of-the-century Lower East Side sweatshops—strikes me as an insult to the history of the women's rights movement.
A misguided sense of entitlement won't ever get you what you demand; it'll only make you miserable and bitter. I have never written this advice before in the Working Actor column, but here it is, the most helpful suggestion I can make: Get over it.


text:
Asia Pulp & Paper is planning to build a huge new pulp mill in South Sumatra, Indonesia, although the company is still trying to publicly deny it. This will reportedly be one of the world's biggest pulp mills, with a planned production capacity of up to 2 million tonnes per year. APP is already in contact with large machine building companies in order to source the required equipment.
Building new mills without sufficient sources of plantation fibre already being available will be a disaster for the forests, because history has shown that APP's pulp mills are not only fed by pulp plantations but by rainforests. If this pulp mill is built, it looks set to generate a huge pulp deficit, which the rainforests of Indonesia will be paying for, for years to come.
A new coal fired power plant locks us into a climate wrecking energy model. The danger is that a new mega-pulp mill will lock APP into a model of forest destruction. Because the financial investments required to build such a mill are enormous, and therefore huge debts are created. These debts can only be paid by running the pulp mill at a certain capacity and speed. APP has already gone bust once, more than a decade ago, by operating to just this expansion model.
APP will need banks and insurance companies to finance this mill. However, banks are risk-averse and are increasingly becoming aware of risks associated with forests and climate. And if there is one company that embodies 'environmental risk', it is APP.
A coalition of 60 NGOs and civil society groups have come together to send an appeal to the financial sector not to finance the mill. The appeal is supported by a large range of Indonesian civil society groups and international NGOs and has been sent to more than 40 financial institutions in 10 countries. We will be closely following what these banks do.
This pulp mill might well become the next battleground between APP and the broad coalition of civil society groups that defend the interests of the communities and the inhabitants of the forests. To avoid that, APP must demonstrate that it has access to sufficient plantation sources to both ensure that its existing mills use no rainforest fibre and that a new mill can do the same. But, APP is a long long way from convincing its critics of that.
APP is hugely influential within China, a country whose large new pulp and paper mills - with some exception - seem to have been funded without intern...
APP is hugely influential within China, a country whose large new pulp and paper mills - with some exception - seem to have been funded without international banks and insurance companies.
Your strategy will fail unless you are lobbying - in Mandarin - banks in China and provincial governments where APP has a substantial presence. Identifying those which are relevant is very simple.
Your strategy will also fail if you do not insist that Export Credit Agencies or their equivalent in countries which manufacture the machinery do not cover exports of that machinery. Such cover would further embed a global business model which will accelerate climate change, making it impossible to pay for the exceptional standards of welfare enjoyed in the countries of manufacture. The benefit of any "economic growth" which manufacture might generate will be wipped out very rapidly by the cost of consequent climate change.
If the advertisements for APP relayed on CNN morning news within the EU, particularly Brussels, are an attempt to deceive viewers and policy makers, please demonstrate this to the EU's advertising standards authorities with a view to halting them.
Please bear in mind that APP seems to have become influential within North America - not least because it has procured mills there. This would partly explain why illegal imports from APP in either China or Indonesia have yet to be investigated under the Lacey Act (which prohibits the import of illegal wood-based products).
However, if (during the few years since pulp and paper were included under the Lacey Act), no one has made formal allegations to the USA authorities concerning their presumed illegality, then this would imply that civil society and others do not actually believe that APP's business involves, let alone is premised on, fraud or other illegality. In which case, what's the fuss?
10 November, 2012 at 11:45
Flag abuse
To post a comment you need to be signed in.
Are you sure to remove this comment?
Are you sure to report this comment as abuse?


text:
Hello, I'm just wondering if there is anything for something like string.notequal(anotherString). Basically, in my while loop, I want it to keep asking the size of the pizza they want if the input string doesn't equal any of the three final Strings. Thanks so much for any help in advance! (I know != and == do not work with Strings, that is just there to help point out my question. I also tried something along the lines of:
while(input.compareTo(SMALL) == 1
import javax.swing.JOptionPane; public class TestPizza { public static String input; public static String pSize; public static String stringSize; final static String LARGE = "Large"; final static String SMALL = "Small"; final static String MEDIUM = "Medium"; public static void main(String[] args) { input = JOptionPane.showInputDialog("Enter the size of pizza you want" + "(Small, Medium, or Large:"); Pizza pizzaSize = new Pizza(input); while(input != SMALL) { JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "You've entered an invalid" + " size"); input = JOptionPane.showInputDialog("Enter width of room:"); } pizzaSize.display(input); } }
Thanks again for any help!