text:
Two years ago, writing after the end of Hannibal's first season, I called the show a rich but ultimately unsatisfying feast. I admired a lot about Bryan Fuller's take on Thomas Harris's novels and their sadistic, cannibalistic central character: its use of visuals and music to set an almost oppressively dreamlike tone, its willingness to flout the conventions of good storytelling, its clever reinvention and reuse of the central set-pieces of Harris's novels. But at the end of its first season, I still didn't have a strong sense of what Hannibal wanted to be, what story it wanted to tell. The show seemed to be having far too much fun staging gruesome tableaux of murder victims and letting its demonic title character (played with a perfect dry mischievousness by Mads Mikkelsen) pull the wool over all the other characters' eyes. What it wanted to achieve with any of those elements, what emotion it wanted to evoke, was utterly unclear to me.
Two years later, with Hannibal having recently aired what is almost certainly its final episode (Fuller has announced his desire to continue his story through TV movies, but production on the show has ceased and the actors have moved on to other projects), that complaint feels both prescient and out-of-date. At some point in its second season, Hannibal finally locked into the story it wanted to tell, in the moment when it realized that the conflict between its title character and the FBI profiler Will Graham (Hugh Dancy), whom Hannibal torments and, at the end of the first season, frames for his own crimes, was not a game of cat and mouse, but a demented courtship. In its second and third seasons, as Will first turns the tables on Hannibal and then pursues him halfway around the world, and as Hannibal's attacks on Will become more and more nakedly an attempt to keep the two men in each other's orbit, the show becomes an obsessive, abusive, incredibly destructive love story.
That this is a love story between two men has raised a lot of questions. What does it mean that Hannibal is so obviously abusive and bad for Will, who is otherwise attracted to women? Is it an issue that Will and Hannibal's attraction appears to be purely emotional, with no sexual component? What can we read into the fact that the fandom that reacted with revulsion when Clarice Starling fell into the same obsessive bond with Hannibal Lecter at the end of Hannibal the novel is now ecstatic over Will and Hannibal? Most of these questions probably can't be addressed by a show that is, at the end of the day, more about style than substance (and anyway, as this article by Aja Romano notes, most of these issues are only a problem because male romances are so rare on TV, thus forcing Hannibal to shoulder the burden of representation all on its own). But there's no denying that, in the queasy, codependent bond between Hannibal and Will, Hannibal found itself, far more decisively than I ever imagined it could when I wrote about it two years ago.
And yet, for all that my complaint about it has been addressed, I've come to the end of Hannibal feeling the same dissatisfaction I felt two years ago. I admire Hannibal a great deal; I never missed an episode; I think that it was unquestionably unlike any other show on TV, and that we are the poorer for its end. But I never really liked it, much less loved it as so much of the fandom (and the critics) now mourning it did. If I try to put my finger on why, I think it would have to be that though I recognized what Hannibal was doing with its two main characters, I never bought into their obsession with each other, much less wanted it consummated in the slightly sickened way that a lot of the fandom seemed to. And that, I think, has to do with the way that, in order to make the Will/Hannibal romance happen, Hannibal found it necessary to sacrifice--literally or figuratively--nearly all of its female characters.
Something that does not get said nearly often enough is that Thomas Harris is a feminist writer.
You can see the hints of this already in Red Dragon, a novel that, despite being thoroughly male-oriented, has some of the most unusual and independent-minded female characters in a genre that more often depicts women as disposable bodies and figures of motivation than as human beings. Molly Graham, who in all of her filmed adaptations has been transformed into the standard supportive, long-suffering wife of a troubled but determined law enforcement officer, is in fact the polar opposite of that figure in her original appearance in this book. Far from blindly supporting Will as he delves into the heart of darkness, Molly in the book pulls away from him when she realizes that he will always love his work more than her. When that work endangers her and her son, she leaves him and doesn't look back (both of the movie versions of Red Dragon elide the fact that Molly's son is from a previous marriage; Hannibal does not, but changes his name from Will to Walter; in the book both elements are clearly meant to send the same message--that Will does not belong in this family, and that he can be ejected from it as soon as Molly chooses). Reba McClane, the blind woman who falls in love with the killer Francis Dolarhyde, could have been a pathetic figure, but Harris quite deliberately makes her smart, resourceful, and confident. She's a woman who is determined to be self-sufficient, unabashed about wanting and asking for sex, and forthright in all her dealings. Both of them get heroic endings--it's Molly, not Will, who finally kills Dolarhyde, and Reba manages to escape the trap Dolarhyde lays for her. Harris even makes sure to include a scene in which Will reassures Reba that she attracted the man in Dolarhyde, not the monster, and that there is nothing wrong with her for doing so.
Harris's feminism comes to its fullest flower, however, in The Silence of the Lambs (which aside from everything else is a brilliant, impeccably written and plotted novel in which there isn't a single extraneous word and whose every scene lands with perfect effect). It's not just that this is a novel about a heroine, or even a novel about a woman who rescues a woman. The Silence of the Lambs is a novel about women. Clarice Starling and the kidnapping victim she is trying to rescue, Catherine Martin, both draw strength from the example of their mothers. Catherine, in fact, rescues herself as much as Clarice rescues her--if it weren't for her ingenuity and courage, she would have been dead long before Clarice found her. Clarice is supported in her work on the case by her roommate, the clever and compassionate Ardelia Mapp, and develops a strong empathy for two of the previous victims, Kimberly Emberg and Frederica Bimmel. Silence is a story about women moving through a man's world, but not on their own--they support and sympathize and talk to each other in a way that they never could with men.
Even more importantly, Harris is clearly cognizant of the fact that while the killer Buffalo Bill is his novel's main antagonist, he is far from the only danger that women face in the world. Every woman who gets a point of view in Silence--Starling, Catherine, Catherine's mother Senator Martin--is shown to be constantly evaluating her behavior for the effect it will have on the men around her. They're all aware of the need to be attractive enough to be noticed and considered human, but not so attractive that they're dismissed as nothing but a sex object. They've all had to put up with being leered at and catcalled, and learned to put up defenses and develop coping mechanisms against that. In a novel whose villain believes that he can become a woman by wearing women's skins, Harris makes it clear that none of the women he writes about are comfortable in their own skin, and that this is the fault of men--even well-meaning ones like Jack Crawford, who thoughtlessly throws Starling under the bus when he needs to make nice with a sexist small-town sheriff. That discomfort, Starling realizes, is what makes women like Kimberly and Frederica--women who were not beautiful, and thus had it repeatedly hammered in that they had no value--vulnerable to the likes of Buffalo Bill, and his death does not make them any safer.
Jonathan Demme's 1991 film version of The Silence of Lambs preserves some of the book's feminist subtext: Starling's rebuke to Crawford after he sells her out to the sheriff; the moment in which she calls on the memory of women who came before her to "do" for the dead when she's faced with Buffalo Bill's latest victim; Starling's friendship with Mapp; the very fact that Silence is a story about a woman rescuing a woman; Catherine's active role in her own rescue. But it also loses a lot, and most of what it loses is the notion that women have relationships with each other and draw strength from them. Starling's empathy for the previous victims is gone, and her memories of her mother are replaced with those of her father. In Demme's hands, Silence becomes a story about a single woman buffeted between good and bad men. In her brilliant essay about the movie (which you should go and read right now if you haven't already), Genevieve Valentine writes about the problems with Demme's conception of that goodness, and how so many of the men in the movie betray Starling and use her to their own purposes. Whether intentionally or not, Silence is a movie in which the only man--the only person--who fully respects Starling as a human being is Hannibal Lecter.
Perhaps for this reason, perhaps because of Anthony Hopkins's iconic performance as Lecter, the effect of the movie has been to warp both the popular perception of what Silence is about, and Harris's own grasp on his characters. His next novel, Hannibal, is a bad follow-up to Silence on several levels, most blatantly the way the previous two books' admirable economy of language is replaced with a florid style and an almost fawning need to describe every meal, bottle of wine, and European landmark the characters consume or come across. It's also a profound betrayal of Silence's central message, famously ending in a scene in which Lecter manipulates Starling into eating one of her enemies at the FBI, after which she joins forces with him and they travel the world together, enjoying the finer things in life. Having reread Silence in preparation for this essay, it was brought home to me yet again what a violation this is. Starling is defined in the earlier novel as someone who needs, more than anything else, to help and save people. To have given up on that is to have given up on herself, and there is no way to defend that failure.
Having said that, there is still a feminist core in Hannibal that is clearly a deliberate choice by Harris. Starling gives up on herself not because of an overpowering attraction to Lecter, but because the world gave up on her first. All of the "good" men who recognized Starling's value in Silence--Jack Crawford, the Quantico weapons instructor John Brigham--are gone or powerless. They've been replaced by the odious functionary Paul Krendler, who resents Starling for rejecting his sexual advances and has stymied her career ever since. The women she might have relied on for support, like Senator Martin, have also lost their power to help her. Krendler ends up allying himself with Mason Verger, a misogynistic caricature who is obsessed with killing Lecter, forcing Starling to either stand back and let evil take place, or destroy her career to save a sadistic murderer. If Silence presented a world in which women were threatened at every turn but still had enough allies to triumph, Hannibal's world is one in which misogynists like Krendler and Verger have the upper hand. Starling's choice to join with Lecter and eat Krendler thus becomes a feminist rebellion--if the world doesn't want her as a human being, she'll become a monster, and the novel's afterword suggests that she is a far more terrifying figure than Lecter ever was. I don't personally buy it, but the intent feels very clear.
All of this is forgotten in Hannibal the show.
Clarice Starling and the events of The Silence of the Lambs could never have appeared in Hannibal the show, because the rights to that book do not lie with the show's creators. Nevertheless, echoes of the character and the events of her story in Silence and Hannibal the novel recur throughout the show.
Starling appears in the guise of FBI trainee Miriam Lass (Anna Chlumsky) whose recruitment by Jack Crawford (Laurence Fishburne), seen in a flashback during the first season, is a direct quote of the scene in which Starling is recruited by Crawford in Silence. Crawford sends Lass to pursue the killer known as the Chesapeake Ripper, and the scene in which she recognizes him in Hannibal Lecter is taken from Red Dragon, where it happens to Will. Unlike Will in the novel, however, Miriam does not escape Hannibal. She's presumed dead, but in the second season Jack finds her in one of the Ripper's hideouts, at the bottom of a dried-out well (another quote from Silence--this is where Catherine is kept by Buffalo Bill). During her years of captivity, Miriam is manipulated and brainwashed by Hannibal. She identifies Fredrick Chilton as the Chesapeake Ripper, and shoots him (seemingly fatally, though hardly anyone dies for good on Hannibal). Her fate after this is unknown.
Starling also appears in the guise of Beverly Katz (Hettienne Park), an FBI forensic technician who befriends Will in the first season and is horrified when he's arrested for multiple murders at its end. Nevertheless, Will is able to persuade her to investigate Hannibal, and the relationship they develop becomes an echo of Lecter and Starling's "quid pro quo" relationship in Silence--Will gives Beverly insights into her current serial killer cases, and in return Beverly looks into Hannibal. When she becomes persuaded that Hannibal is a killer, Beverly goes to his house to find evidence, and is cornered by him in his basement. That scenario--a female FBI agent pointing a gun at a serial killer in his dungeon of horrors--is the final set-piece of The Silence of the Lambs, but unlike Starling Beverly does not emerge triumphant. When a shot rings out, it isn't her taking Hannibal out, and when we next see her he has left her body in a gruesome display for Jack and Will to find (Beverly is one of a few characters on Hannibal whose death is unquestionably real).
Starling appears in the guise of Bedelia Du Maurier, played by Gillian Anderson, whose most famous character was modeled on Jodie Foster's performance as Starling in the movie of Silence, and who was in the running to play Starling in the movie adaptation of Hannibal when Foster passed on the role. A psychiatrist who treated Hannibal, Bedelia claims to have been manipulated by him, as he did to Miriam and tried to do to Will, into becoming a killer. She starts the first season as Hannibal's semi-willing traveling companion, and there are multiple repetitions of the scene at the end of Hannibal the novel, in which Lecter and Starling sit down to a meal that consists of the third person at the table. By the end of the season, however, we learn that she's easily as twisted as Hannibal, and though perhaps not as eager a killer as he is, takes pleasure in observing the suffering of others.
Finally, Starling appears in the guise of Alanna Bloom (Caroline Dhavernas), who in the show's first two seasons plays the love interest, first to Will, and then to Hannibal. In the third season, embittered by her failure to see Hannibal for what he was and by the serious injury she sustained in the bloodbath that closed out the second season, Alanna undergoes a personal transformation. She becomes tougher, more cagey, more open to moral compromise (her wardrobe also gets a serious upgrade, soft sweaters and pencil skirts replaced by well-tailored suits in bold colors, always with a blood-red accent). In that new persona Alanna becomes entangled with Mason Verger (Michael Pitt in the second season, Joe Anderson in the third) and his sister Margo (Katherine Isabelle). Where Starling works against Verger, Margo helps him trap Hannibal, but like Starling she is forced to join forces with Hannibal when Verger threatens Will as well. For her trouble, Hannibal promises her to come back and kill her some day.
Hannibal scatters Starling liberally throughout its storytelling, but always with one consistent theme. Every moment where Starling achieved a triumph in the books is transformed into failure. Every moral victory is transformed into complicity and compromise. Even the moments in the books in which Starling loses her way are made lesser in the show--Bedelia runs off with Hannibal as Starling did at the end of Hannibal the book, but in this version of the story she's merely a paltry replacement for Will, who is the person Hannibal really wanted to run off with. Alanna is marked for death for her betrayal and rudeness, but that's of secondary importance in comparison to Hannibal's obsession with Will. If nothing else, you could always count on Thomas Harris to recognize that Clarice Starling held a special place in Hannibal Lecter's heart. Hannibal the show treats her like a distraction.
Will Graham is introduced at the beginning of Hannibal as a troubled, wounded person. "I'm on the spectrum," he tells Jack Crawford, and Alanna Bloom worries that he may not be able to cope with the horrors that working on serial killer cases would expose him to. It's for this reason that he's sent to Hannibal for treatment, and he spends the first season repeatedly demonstrating an inability to cope with the world. When he impulsively kisses Alanna, he immediately runs to Hannibal to obsess over the act. Throughout the first season, he is nervous, unfocused, unkempt (all of these traits are exacerbated when Hannibal begins manipulating Will's grasp on reality, for example concealing the fact that he has a serious neurological condition). It's a portrait of mental imbalance, but it is also decidedly unmasculine.
Will's realization that Hannibal has betrayed him, and murdered the young girl Abigail Hobbes (Kacey Rohl), for whom Will had conceived fatherly feelings, helps to focus him. Beverly Katz's murder fans his rage and lust for vengeance. Thomas Harris was never able to convincingly argue that Will had the same impulses towards violence as the murderers he hunted, but Hannibal finds a much more persuasive alternative explanation for his growing willingness to commit violence and murder--revenge. Driven by his rage towards Hannibal, Will comes into himself, and it's impossible not to notice how much that process of becoming involves adopting traditionally masculine behavior. When Will is exonerated and released from the mental hospital, he visits Hannibal to show off his physical transformation. His bird's nest haircut has been replaced with a slicked-back 'do; his clothes are sharp and stylish; his fidgety demeanor has given way to a controlled, commanding presence. The old Will was a wounded bird; this one is a man.
And a man is defined by engaging in violence on behalf of "his" women. Will can't do anything to help Abigail or Beverly, so the show gives him another woman to protect in the form of Margo Verger. Though she is a lesbian, Margo sleeps with Will in order to conceive the child that will help her secure her inheritance and independence from her odious brother, but when Mason finds out about this scheme he has Margo kidnapped and forcibly sterilized. This is done mainly in order to set up the subplot in Hannibal in which Margo schemes to steal Mason's sperm so that she can conceive a Verger heir with her girlfriend and claim the inheritance (as I said, it's a pretty bad book), but it also serves the purpose of letting Will deliver some good-old-fashioned masculine vengeance, when he beats up the Verger henchman who committed the deed and tries to kill Mason.
So, from a story about women gingerly navigating a world where notions of masculinity, even supposedly benign ones, are more often a danger than a shelter, Hannibal becomes a story about a man embracing those notions, while the women in his life suffer so that he can better embody them.
In the hiatus between Hannibal's second and third seasons, Bryan Fuller made several statements about having made a conscious choice never to feature rape or sexual assault on the show. This was around the time that the public discussion about the use of rape as a plot element in TV storytelling was at its most feverish pitch, spurred mainly by Game of Thrones, and Hannibal was frequently held up as an alternative to the perception that there was no way to "realistically" depict horror without indulging in rape. You'll still see a lot of praise for the show for not plumping for this trope, a lot of people holding that choice up as a reason why Hannibal is a progressive, even feminist series.
I have several problems with this meme. For one thing, just because none of the women on the show have been raped doesn't mean that sexual violence doesn't exist on it. I don't see how you can call what happens to Margo anything but sexual assault. Hannibal sleeping with Alanna under false pretenses (and largely to get back at Will) also verges on that territory, and might even be considered rape-by-fraud under certain legal codes. When Alanna learns the truth about the man she's been sleeping with, her reaction is not at all unlike that of a rape victim--she speaks of losing her sense of self, of being unable to think of anything but her violation, of feeling dirty and not knowing how to make herself clean. Bedelia, too, loses her sense of self under Hannibal's control, and it's hard not to read a sexual component to that loss.
But the most important reason why I don't feel that Hannibal deserves to be praised for not featuring rape is that it never for a moment occurred to me that it could. Hannibal bills itself as a horror show, but that horror is not rooted in the crimes around which its story revolves. Those murder victims are rarely anything more than props--often literally, used as components in elaborate sculptures left for the police to find. Harris's novels, particularly Red Dragon and The Silence of the Lambs, overflow with disgust at the cruelty that human beings can visit on one another, and with pity for the victims of that cruelty (who are sometimes, as in Red Dragon, also the killers). Neither of those reactions exist in Hannibal. It's a show in which violence is always beautiful and artful, not ugly and pointless (this is one of the reasons why the show's retelling of the Red Dragon story in the second half of the third season is largely unsuccessful, despite excellent performances from Richard Armitage as Dolarhyde and Rutina Wesley as Reba; Hannibal can't recreate the horrible mundanity of the Tooth Fairy killings, the sadness of Dolarhyde's belief that he is transforming, and of his desire to stop after he falls in love with Reba). Horror, in Hannibal, is found only in the wounds that Will and Hannibal inflict on each other, in the constant question of whether Will will finally succumb to Hannibal's coercion, or whether he will finally commit the ultimate betrayal and kill his tormentor-slash-beloved.
There's no room for rape in this equation. Rape is a fundamentally mundane, prosaic act. It can't be made beautiful or poetic (or if it can, I hope I never see it). And in a show in which the only characters who matter are two men, the rape of women wouldn't really register (and I rather doubt that anyone in the writers' room had ever considered staging a rape between Hannibal and Will). Fuller, it seems to me, was making a virtue out of a necessity.
In Hannibal's third season, as the romance between Will and Hannibal solidifies and begins transitioning from subtext to text, it becomes more obvious just how much the women in both their lives are mere stepping stones to its fruition. Hannibal and Will both spend part of the season in romantic or pseudo-romantic relationships with women. In the first half of the season, Hannibal and Bedelia pose as husband and wife in Italy, and their relationship often feels like a parody of a dysfunctional marriage in which one partner can't stop obsessing about their ex and the other would really like to stop being treated as a rebound. Will's marriage to Molly (Nina Arianda) is more functional, at least to begin with, but when Hannibal sics Dolarhyde on the family and she tells Will that she needs time before they can resume their marriage, it's hard to sense any real regret from him. He seems as relieved as the show to be rid of the encumbrance of his wife and child. Lingering over all this is the spirit of Abigail Hobbes, who turned out to be alive and completely under Hannibal's thrall in the second season finale, only to be killed again as yet another act of revenge against Will. It becomes clearer and clearer that any woman who gets between Will and Hannibal is slated for a sticky end.
The exception to this rule is also the oddest female character in the third season. Chiyoh (Tao Okamoto), an old friend of Hannibal's whom Will encounters, is a character from Hannibal Rising. It's the only Lecter novel I haven't read, so I'm not sure how accurate her depiction is to that story, but in the show, nothing we learn about her makes any sense. Chiyoh tells Will that she was the handmaiden of Lady Murasaki, Hannibal's mentor, and that she met him when he came to train with Murasaki as a boy. But Okamoto is a full twenty years younger than Mikkelsen, a fact on which no one remarks. Will finds Chiyoh in Hannibal's ancestral home, where she has lived for an unspecified number of years, guarding the man who, Hannibal has told her, killed his sister Mischa. She is doing this in exchange for Hannibal not killing this man, but somehow it doesn't bother her that he has killed literally dozens of people while out in the world. When Will reveals that it was actually Hannibal who killed Mischa--something that Chiyoh herself seems never to have considered despite it being quite an obvious logical leap--she leaves the estate and sets out to find Hannibal, not, as you might expect, to avenge herself on him, but to protect him from Will, whom she tries to kill several times. Chiyoh repeatedly announces that she is saving Hannibal's life because she wants him "caged," and yet she never makes any steps towards achieving this. It's possible that Fuller had plans to flesh out Chiyoh's story and explain her contradictory behavior in the fourth season that we will probably never see, but in the show as it stands, she is a character who literally appears to have no reason to exist except to extend the life of a vicious, sadistic murderer. This is presumably the reason why she gets to walk away from the season with her life and sanity still intact.
As strange as Chiyoh is, she's merely the logical extension of the thinking that seems to have gone into the writing for most of the female characters on Hannibal--whether they realize it or not, they all seem to exist in order to further Hannibal's existence and promote his romance with Will. The women who chafe against this role are cast as villains. This is the label placed on Freddie Lounds (Lara Jean Chorostecki), the tabloid reporter who has been dogging Will and Hannibal throughout the show. Freddie is one of the few characters who refuses to buy into the drama that surrounds the show's central couple, and though she isn't punished for this, the show definitely seems to want us to think that she's morally questionable. Will chastises her for publishing lurid stories about him and Hannibal in which she calls them "murder husbands." But while in the books Will's disgust with Lounds, who invades his privacy and invents falsehoods about him, makes sense, in the show it is mere hypocrisy. All Freddie is doing is putting a name to what everyone around her has already seen and is refusing to acknowledge--that Will and Hannibal are in a sick, codependent relationship whose collateral damage is closing in on the double digits (and nearly included Freddie herself, at the end of the second season).
Alanna, too, gets to question the primacy of Will and Hannibal's romance and be treated like a villain for doing so. In the second half of the third season, she has taken over Chilton's role as Hannibal's jailer, and though she approaches that task with significantly more intelligence and a sense of purpose--she believes that it is her job to protect Will from Hannibal--it's impossible for the story she's been placed in to make her seem anything but petty (she has nothing to threaten Hannibal with but the loss of his amenities) and ineffectual (he manages to communicate with Dolarhyde and endanger Will's family regardless). When Will conceives a foolhardy, thoughtless plan to lure Dolarhyde out, first by planting insulting stories about him with Freddie Lounds, and then by dangling Hannibal in front of him (which would involve removing Hannibal from the asylum), Alanna tries to distance herself from the proceedings. "I'm not a fool," she insists to Will when he tries to enlist her in his plan. But fool or not, Alanna is trapped in a story in which the only people who matter are two men, so she's caught by the ricochets no matter what she does, forced to go into hiding with her family when Hannibal, inevitably, escapes. Alanna gets all the disadvantages of being caught in Hannibal's maelstrom, but she doesn't get to be the heroine of her own story, or even to make important decisions about its progress--everything that happens to her happens because of Will and Hannibal's choices, not her own.
The third season, and thus the show, ends with Will and Hannibal killing Dolarhyde together and collapsing into an embrace. Then Will, who has seemingly accepted the inevitability of his and Hannibal's bond, pushes them both over a convenient nearby cliff. It's hard not to feel that this is for the best. At this point, Will and Hannibal deserve each other. Their utter indifference to anyone but each other seems to strongly suggest that a lot of lives could have been spared if only Will had done the deed--by which I mean either killing Hannibal or succumbing to him--a lot sooner. Whether or not Fuller planned for this to be the end of Will and Hannibal's relationship (if not, obviously, of Hannibal's life), it is probably the best ending that either of them could have hoped for, and certainly the best ending that anyone in their lives--that the women in their lives, in particular--could have achieved.
I go back and forth on whether any of this matters.
Hannibal's treatment of its female characters makes me very, very angry. It's largely the reason why I've never been able to love the show. But I also don't think it's fair to class it with so many other entertainments that forget that women are people in their own right. Unlike Demme's film version of Silence, Hannibal is not a story that finds it impossible to believe that women might have relationships and find friendship and solace and inspiration in one another. Its women, for all the frustrations of their roles, often feel more real, more rounded, than women in supposedly "empowering," female-oriented stories. When Jack Crawford's wife Bella (Gina Torres) holds off on telling him that she has terminal cancer because she wants to prioritize her own feelings about her condition, it's not a sympathetic choice. It goes against everything we've been told about how a loving wife should behave towards her husband, and Jack is horribly hurt by it. But it's a thoroughly human decision by a woman who is her own person first, and a wife only second. There are many moments like this in Hannibal, in which women refuse the nurturing, wise, strong roles that pop culture, whether progressive or regressive, confines them to, and get to be weird and twisted and self-absorbed. For all that women on Hannibal exist only to promote the show's central couple, they still exist, far more powerfully and memorably than on many other shows. (To put it another way, Hannibal is not Mr. Robot, another stylish, laddish show, whose female characters lack any interiority, and rarely behave like recognizable human beings.)
And then there's the fact that Hannibal is not queerbaiting. It's not dismissing women in order to glorify a friendship between two men that no woman could ever come between or understand, but don't worry, no homo. This is a show that has the courage of its convictions, a show that comes out and identifies itself as a love story between two men. I'd like to believe that it's possible to do this without treating women like means to an end, but once again, it shouldn't be Hannibal's responsibility to be all things to all people. It's already doing something incredibly rare and not a little bit brave, so does it really matter that it fails so badly on another front?
What it comes down to, for me, is this: I was twelve or thirteen when I first read The Silence of the Lambs. And then I went back and read it a second time because I was so wowed by it. And then I read it several more times over the next few years, because this perfectly written little book about a brave woman who rescues another brave woman, and is friends with other brave, smart women, and feels sympathy for women who weren't brave or smart but still didn't deserve what happened to them, and draws inspiration from the memory of a woman who was strong but still got pounded down by life, was like nothing else I'd ever read. I can't remember when I realized that most people don't see this book that way. That most people were more impressed by the clever, urbane murderer who makes jokes about eating census takers' livers with a nice Chianti than by the woman who constantly judges whether she's being too friendly or too aloof, who worries about not being taken seriously enough, who hoards her anger at a world that doesn't want to make space for her. But for as long as I've been aware of this fact, I've held the book a little bit closer, and treasured those people who realize what it's actually about. It breaks my heart that Bryan Fuller--an artist whom I greatly admire, and who in Hannibal has created something truly special--doesn't seem to be one of them.
Maybe there are people out there for whom Hannibal is special in the same way that Silence was special to me. I would never want to deprive them of that. But I have to believe that there's a way to do both: to tell a story that expands our notions of what a love story is, that imagines men in an obsessive yet oddly tender romance, without trampling the story about women trying to navigate a world built by and for men.
Tuesday, September 15, 2015
After-Dinner Conversation: Thoughts on Hannibal
Posted by Abigail Nussbaum at 8:15 PM 19 comments:
Labels: essays, hannibal, television
Tuesday, September 01, 2015
Recent Reading Roundup 38
For a number of reasons, I found myself neglecting my literary fiction reading in the first half of 2015. I tend to bounce back and forth between litfic and genre--too much of the mimetic stuff and I find myself longing for something about more than a few people and their emotional issues; too much SF or fantasy and I end up wishing for something more concrete to hold on to. So this last month I've been indulging in the "respectable" end of the literary spectrum (not all of the books below are properly litfic, but most of them are marketed that way), and, unsurprisingly, finding the same mixture of good and bad there that I do in genre.
- The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August by Claire North - There was some surprise when North's novel ended up on this year's Clarke shortlist. Or, at least, there was on my part, because the plot description for Harry August, in which a British man experiences his life during the middle decades of the 20th century again and again, eventually becoming embroiled in a mission to stave off the end of the world, fairly screamed "commercial potboiler with tangential genre connection" (it certainly doesn't help that in both its premise and its setting, Harry August feels like a genre-ified version of Kate Atkinson's decidedly literary Life After Life, though I suppose the two books' publications were close enough that North arrived at her premise independently of Atkinson, who anyway is hardly the first to have used it). As it turns out, North is more ambitious than I gave her credit for. She takes the time to work through the mechanics of her repeated life device, most especially in her invention of the Cronus Club, a society of repeaters (or "kalachakras," as they term themselves) who discover new members and teach them how to survive, send information back into the past for the benefit of curious researches and financial speculators, and most importantly, enforce the rule that no undue interference in the major events of history is allowed, lest it lead to the end of the world (as it already has in previous timelines). The main thrust of the novel is Harry's attempt to figure out the fundamental laws of time and space that make people like him possible, in which endeavor he's joined by his sometimes-enemy and sometimes-friend Vincent, who is advancing technology at a dangerous rate in order to achieve this goal. The last third of the novel, in particular, is a cat-and-mouse game between these two men, as they try to outsmart one another with their knowledge of the past and the future.
For all that, The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August still left me cold. Partly this is North's doing--where Atkinson made no attempt to work out the rules and implications of her repeated life device, North is rigorous with hers, which paradoxically only calls attention to the fact that it doesn't make any sense except as a contrived and hopelessly artificial literary trope. If you think for even a bit about the rules that North spells out for her novel's universe, the only conclusion you can reach is that they were laid down by a very present, interventionist, and rather capricious god (or an author), and yet none of the novel's characters acknowledge this--as they obviously can't, since trying to work out the laws of nature is the crux of the novel's story. (For example, Harry frequently wonders whether the world ceases to exist after his death resets it, but the fact that he remembers the deaths of older kalachakra surely puts the lie to that assumption. But if that's the case, then how is it possible that the woman who introduces Harry to the Cronus Club was on her twentieth life when she did so, when Harry was only on his fourth? They should both be experiencing the same iteration, even if hers starts before his on the linear timeline.)
But I think a bigger problem that Harry August reveals to me--one that can't be laid at North's feet--is that I just don't care for the repeated life device. I understand its appeal--it's fun to imagine how the same story might have played out if things had been just a little bit different. But to me, indulging in that impulse is almost inevitably depressing and demoralizing. The freedom to live your life over and over again comes hand in hand with the knowledge that no matter how well you arrange it, in the end it'll all reset to zero. Harry August, the novel and the character, are both aware of this fact, and much of the story revolves around Harry's attempts to find meaning in an existence that is empirically meaningless. But, well, that's not a lot of fun to read about (pretty much the only writer to have managed it is Harold Ramis in the screenplay for Groundhog Day, which uses humor to both defuse and acknowledge the paralyzing hopelessness of its protagonist's situation). Harry August tries to compensate for the bleakness of its story through spy novel antics, as Harry tries to outsmart Vincent and figure out his plan, but though these are well-written, they didn't do enough to distract me from Harry's own growing ennui. In the end, I couldn't figure out what I was meant to be reading this novel for, what I was meant to be hoping for. The premise of saving the world isn't enough to do it, since even Harry himself can't work up much enthusiasm for the project--he takes it on largely out of boredom, and even then he sets it aside for decades and even ends up working to bring judgement day closer for a bit. And Harry's victory over Vincent is achieved less through his being particularly clever or resourceful, and more because he manages to wait his opponent out, and largely due to a quirk of his biology that means that when Vincent subjects him to a procedure that should erase his memory, he still retains it. Perhaps if I found her premise less dispiriting, I would have been able to overlook these problems in North's execution in favor of what is still a smart and accomplished novel, but the combination of the two leaves me unimpressed.
- The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher by Hilary Mantel - There was a minor uproar over the title of Mantel's second short fiction collection when it was published last year. Even without any strong associations, positive or negative, with Thatcher's name, I thought the title was a bit provocative. Having read the stories in this collection, however, it feels entirely apt and earned, as nearly every one of them is deeply political and suffused with a profound and very specifically-aimed anger. In the title piece, the narrator's home is invaded by an IRA member who plans to carry out the titular assassination when Thatcher leaves a nearby hospital after minor surgery. Though the story engages with its counterfactual nature--the narrator pauses near the end to admit that, of course, the assassination never happened, but leaves it to us to decide whether it was aborted, or happened in a parallel universe, or was merely a wishful fantasy--its main thrust is the narrator's conflicted feelings about the unfolding events. It's not that she doesn't want Thatcher dead, she explains, but she's worried about her own life, or being blamed after the fact, or her political issues with the IRA. Other stories, like "The School of English" or "Winter Break," deal with the fraught and often abusive relationships between rich westerners and the poor, non-white people who wait on them, while "Sorry to Disturb" is a (probably autobiographical) narrative of a friendship between a bored British company wife in Saudi Arabia and a local businessman, which quickly develops unsettling undertones due to the expectations placed on both of them in a rigidly gender-segregated society. Though Mantel's convictions are clearly and strongly felt, I found them a little overpowering--or at least, a little hermetic. The best writing brings you into its writer's headspace, but for all that Mantel's language is beautiful and precise, I found myself shut out of most of the more political stories in Assassination--they were clearly written for someone who could remember themselves in that particular political context. I enjoyed much more those stories in the collection whose themes felt more universal--"Harley Street," a piece about working relations and class tension which ends up, surprisingly enough, telling a vampire story, and "How Should I Know You?", about a writer making a gloomy journey to a small-town speaking engagement. Even these, however, felt like a stopgap measure, while we wait for the third volume in Mantel's Thomas Cromwell trilogy to be published.
- Rustication by Charles Palliser - In 1989, Palliser published The Quincunx, a twisty, impeccably plotted melding of the Victorian sensation novel and the modern fashion for unreliable narrators and psychological realism. It helped launch a subgenre--we probably wouldn't have had Waters's Fingersmith or Faber's The Crimson Petal and the White without Palliser paving the way for them--but it must be said that a lot of the authors who followed in Palliser's footsteps have improved on his work, particularly when it comes to writing believably complex characters, and to peering beneath the surface of Victorian mores about class, gender, and sexuality. Nevertheless, Palliser kept plugging away. He published one short work of contemporary fiction (The Sensationist), one novel that completely defies description (Betrayals), and another piece of Victoriana (The Unburied). He returns to that last genre with Rustication, in which the young narrator, Richard, banished from Cambridge for unspecified crimes, returns to his ancestral home, where his mother and sister have moved after the death of his father and some dimly-referenced public shame. The novel's overall Gothic tone--Palliser never misses an opportunity to stress the dilapidated condition of the house, the depressed state of the family's finances which often leads them to skimp on candles and fires, the gloominess of the weather and of the surrounding marsh, the unfriendly, secretive behavior of the servants and neighbors, and most of all the obvious (to the reader, if not to Richard) conspiracy between his mother and sister--is augmented by obvious references to staples of 19th centry fiction such as The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, Bleak House, The Hound of the Baskervilles, and even the real-life George Edalji affair. In the foreground, meanwhile, the naive, opium-addled Richard is trying to work out why the women in his family have such extreme and changeable reactions to his presence in the house and what the various whisper campaigns in the neighborhood are about. When malicious, vulgar letters are delivered to the women of the neighborhood, and the local livestock are mutilated, he finds himself under suspicion, and has to work out the secrets his family has been keeping from him.
The actual mystery at the heart of Rustication isn't very hard to figure out--only the narrator's self-absorption and ingrained sense of entitlement keep him from working it out far sooner than he does. But Rustication is short enough that that lag between the reader and the character's understanding isn't too frustrating. What is frustrating, however, is that the novel is told from the perspective of a privileged, selfish young man who, even if he doesn't exactly deserve the nasty fate that is being cooked up for him, also doesn't do much to deserve the happy ending he actually gets. So many of the authors who followed Palliser used the template he laid out to examine how restrictive and corrosive Victorian social mores were, especially to people who weren't rich white men. Palliser himself did this, in fact, in The Unburied, which uses the revelation that its villain is gay to reflect on the fact that restrictive social conventions have forced this man to commit criminal acts, and even gives him a happy ending with his lover. In Rustication, however, Palliser seems to serving Victorian conventions more or less straight-up. The villains of this piece are all women, and there's only the faintest acknowledgment that what's forced them to behave so horribly is the marriage game in which they're compelled to sell their bodies, but also treated like damaged good if they do. Sex, in this story, is inevitably associated with evil and corruption, and the only "good" women are the one who abstain from it entirely--a naive and virginal old woman; the neighbor who reenacts the plot of The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, living in saintly seclusion and suffering slanders against her reputation because of the bad behavior of the abusive husband she abandoned--and the servant who makes herself sexually available to Richard, but does so because she really likes him, not for any expectation of marriage. Palliser clearly wants Rustication to be the story of its protagonist's moral awakening and coming to maturity, particularly when it comes to gender roles--he ends it with a more rounded understanding of the pressures that are brought to bear on women in his society, and learns to forgive the ones who victimized him in an attempt to save themselves. But this burst of empathy feels too sudden and unearned, especially at the end of an entire novel in which Richard treats every woman he comes across as a receptacle for his hurt feelings and sexual fantasies. Becoming a better person does not justify the nasty person he was for most of the story, nor does it change the fact that while he escapes and gets a second chance at life, the women he leaves behind are given no such shot at redemption.
- You Are One of Them by Elliott Holt - At the height of the Cold War, twelve-year-old Sarah and her best friend Jenny write letters to Yuri Andropov asking him not to start a nuclear war. Only Jenny receives a reply, which includes an invitation to tour the USSR, and she quickly becomes a celebrity and child ambassador for peace while the neurotic, needy Sarah is left behind. When Jenny dies a few years later in a plane crash, Sarah is left with nothing but questions: did her magnetic, adored friend really love her? Why did they drift apart after Jenny's rise to fame? What happened to Sarah's letter? Ten years later, Sarah receives a message from a woman who claims to have met Jenny on her Russian tour, and claims, additionally, that Jenny is still alive, and that her death was faked to conceal her parents' defection. You Are One of Them bills itself as a thriller--or perhaps was billed that way by its publishers, hoping to cash in on the post-Gone Girl craze for female-authored, female-oriented mysteries that play with perception and narrative reliability. This, however, is not to its benefit. The actual question of whether Jenny is alive turns out to be fairly unimportant to the novel, and the elements of the story that could be called a mystery or an espionage narrative appear only in its final third, by which point the solution feels both obvious and not very urgent. The heart of the novel is Sarah, a woman with serious trust and self-esteem issues who saw in Jenny everything she wanted to be but couldn't. The best parts of the novel are the ones that examine the sometimes nurturing, sometimes corrosive friendship between Sarah and Jenny, and the ways in which Sarah learns to cope with loneliness after Jenny's death. Holt writes sensitively about these subjects, and weaves them into the history of the Cold War and descriptions of post-Communist Russia in interesting ways. But for all that, it's probably to the novel's benefit that it is relatively short. If you leave out the backbone of its sensationalistic premise (which was borrowed from the real-life story of Samantha Smith, whom I hadn't heard about before reading this book), You Are One of Them tells a rather thin story. That it goes down quickly makes that thinness easier to stomach, but I hope that Holt finds something more substantial to write about in her next outing.
- The Blazing World by Siri Hustvedt - Disappointed by her reception in the art world and convinced that it is rooted in sexism, artist Harriet "Harry" Burden embarks on an ambitious project she calls Maskings. She engages three male fronts to present three different works, and plans for the revelation of her authorship to expose not only the sexism rife in the art world, but the effect that attaching a male face to it has on the work itself. When Harry's unmasking occurs, however, her final collaborator Rune, a renowned performance artist in his own right, denies that she had any input into his work, and her project fizzles into a damp squib that later takes a sinister turn when Rune kills himself as part of another work that borrows heavily from Harry's. The Blazing World, which presents itself as a scholarly work compiled a decade after Harry's death (and her posthumous rediscovery by the art world), is made up of excerpts from Harry's diaries, reminiscences from her friends and family, and various document fragments relating to her work and the controversy surrounding Rune and his death, all converging on their break and the reason that Maskings failed. Unlike other constructed narrative novels, however, The Blazing World isn't a mystery to be puzzled out. There's never any doubt that Harry created the final part of Maskings, and the question of why Rune killed himself (and whether that was his intention or an accident) isn't very central to the novel.
What The Blazing World seeks instead to achieve with its kaleidoscopic format is a fully-rounded, intimate portrait of Harry herself, a furiously intelligent, rage-filled, "difficult" woman who is riven between her burning desire for recognition and her disdain for the narrow-minded art world that could never figure out what to do with her. Though Hustvedt's topic is unabashedly feminist (and though Harry herself is a staunch feminist, frequently breaking into rants about the suppression of women's art and the ways in which her intelligence and talent were diminished by colleagues who saw her only as the wife of a renowned dealer), The Blazing World and its heroine are much spikier and more complex than the straightforward narrative of sexist dismissal that Harry spins. Harry is full of contradictions, as angry at herself for spending decades in her husband's shadow as she is at him for refusing to promote her art. And her hunger for recognition (and for the right kind of recognition; several of the characters interviewed in the novel point out that Harry could have sought out alternative, women-friendly venues to display her work, but kept plugging away at the laddish, newness-obsessed New York galleries) is as offputting as it is righteous, often bubbling over into fits of rage and even violence. For all these flaws, however, it's impossible not to fall in love with Harry, who is not just smart but endlessly fascinated with the world, full of snippets of information about art, philosophy, literature, history, psychiatry, neuroscience, and a myriad other subjects, which she weaves together into a fascinating, coherent artistic vision. (Rather gratifyingly for genre fans, one of her reference points is the story of James Tiptree Jr., which also allows Hustvedt to hint at Harry's own ambivalence towards her gender identity.) Flawed as she is, and frustrating as she is as a human being, there's never any doubt that Harry is the real thing as an artist, and perhaps the most profound feminist statement made by The Blazing World is that it allows a woman to embody those contradictions, so often reserved for men.
As well as constructing this vivid portrait of a brilliant, complicated woman, The Blazing World is remarkable for how joyously, effortlessly erudite it is. Nearly all the characters are artists, scholars, critics, or in some way immersed and fascinated by their chosen fields, and their narratives are dripping with references, quotes, allusions, and a sense of their love of knowledge. This is a novel about intelligent people talking intelligently about complicated and abstruse subjects, and while this might sound dry or hard to get through, it's actually the most fun I've had reading a book in a long time. I don't understand modern art at all, but Hustvedt's descriptions of artists creating and thinking about their work, of the thought and philosophy that go into installations that can seem random and cobbled-together, are endlessly compelling to me (in fact it's possible that I get more out of reading her describe how Harry's art comes together and the thinking that went into it than I would from seeing the actual work). They make The Blazing World a story about one of my favorite subjects--people hard at work on something that means the world to them, even if no one else understands it. It's impossible to put down The Blazing World and not want to remain immersed in its world of art and thought and creation, and impossible not to want to spend more time with Harry and her unusual, original way of seeing the world.
Posted by Abigail Nussbaum at 9:31 PM 4 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


text:
Parent Involvement
Parents assist at Cubberley through the VIPS program (Volunteers In Public Schools).
They volunteer in the classrooms, technology labs, library, copy center and school office.
Parents participate in special parent and grandparent days, Career Day and attend field trips and sporting events.
Cubberley parents are also active on school and LBUSD committees, such as PTA, Education Foundation, DCAC, ELAC, School Site Council,
Superintendent's Forum and Assistant Superintendent's Forum.
Special programs like Junior Achievement, Meet the Masters, Reading Club and Literature Club are successful due to the support of our devoted Cubberley parents.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
If you were to look at the most recent statistics, which show continued growth in membership sales and new club openings, perhaps you would think that the fitness industry is somehow insulated by current economic and world events. In fact, there is some truth to that belief. Past history has shown that, compared to many other industries, the fitness and entertainment sectors aren't as effected by a slowing economy. Because people may feel more reluctant to make a home, auto or vacation purchase, they find other ways to treat themselves while staying closer to home. Going out to dinner, the movies and the theater more frequently; spending more time at the country or health club and getting some pampering by way of spa services are just some of the ways to treat oneself.
However, talk to club operators around the country and you will find that, in fact, many are beginning to see changing sales traffic patterns — namely an increasing difficulty in getting prospects to walk through the club doors, and a reluctance on some people's part to make a contractual commitment to joining, citing job uncertainty as the reason. The end result of both of these factors is fewer sales.
When economic conditions create a difficult market, all businesses must respond quickly to weather the storm. One way is to cut the expense side by streamlining employee hours, reviewing all day-to-day operational costs and delaying non-vital capital improvements. Such tightening of expenses, however, only can go so far. The other way to respond is by closely evaluating the revenue-generating aspects of the business. For health clubs (even those with good non-dues revenue), this means a thorough evaluation of the sales department in an effort to uncover ways to boost membership sales.
Certainly the actual skill level of each salesperson on the club's team should be evaluated to ensure they are performing the necessary components to "close the sale." This, however, is really something that should be done constantly, not just in tough business times. As most industries know, staff development and training is not only critical to overall performance but also for employee retention, which is a huge factor in a club salespersons' success level.
Aside from looking at standard sales skills, one area that many clubs fail to evaluate is the amount of education that is provided to all prospects during the sales process. I'm not referring to discussions about club facilities or services, but rather educational information about health and fitness that impacts a prospect in a way that makes them feel more compelled to want to exercise — not simply join the club. Because this concept of "educating" a prospect at this level might be so new for some readers, let's take a moment to explain the reasoning behind such an approach.
When prospects visit a club, they have a certain level of interest. Most people don't wake up one morning and think to themselves, "You know, I feel so good about myself and my body that perhaps I'll go join a health club." No, what usually happens is something has motivated that person to consider starting an exercise program. Researchers who study behavioral change know that an individual goes through six distinct phases when creating any new behavior.
First is pre-contemplation, which is the phase when the individual doesn't recognize the need to change. Second is contemplation, which is when the person begins to think, "Maybe I should consider starting an exercise program." The third stage is a significant step, called preparation, when the person moves from thinking they should change to saying "I will." Interestingly enough, the preparation stage has a large spectrum as it relates to the time an individual moves to the next stage. For instance, some people will stay in the preparation stage for months or years while others move along much more quickly. Fourth is the action stage. This is when the individual begins his or her new behavior; therefore, they join the club. Upon taking action the person immediately moves to the fifth stage, which is maintenance. Maintenance is the period of time when an individual has to consciously work at sticking to their new behavior. An individual might never leave the maintenance phase, regardless of how much they like the results. The last phase is called termination, and this is when an individual has completely integrated his or her behavior so it is no longer an effort. For instance, when going on vacation, the person inquires what type of exercise facilities the hotel or local area has.
Although fitness departments have traditionally used this behavioral change model to help new members create long-lasting habits, the applications for the sales process are profound. Good salespeople recognize that when prospects walk through a club's doors they could be in any one of three stages: contemplation, preparation or action. If a prospect is in action, the sale is relatively easy, assuming the club meets his or her needs and the salesperson does a good job. If, on the other hand, the prospect is in either contemplation or preparation, the sale becomes more challenging.
What behavioral specialists have uncovered is that two primary things influence our movement down the six steps of change. The first is a significant emotional experience (SEE), which refers to an event or happening that literally rattles the person to change. Some examples of SEEs would be a doctor's visit that uncovered medical problems, a family member who suffers a disease or deadly health condition or perhaps something more superficial like not fitting into last summer's shorts. All of these things usually create negative or scary emotions in an individual, often motivating them to change. Unfortunately, except through advertising efforts, businesses are not in control of creating SEEs.
The second thing that influences change — that can be controlled by businesses — is education. Specifically, when an individual learns about a new product or service at a deep level, fully appreciating its nuances and impact, a buying decision can be influenced. For example, you go to the store with the intention of buying a new computer. You have a certain budget in mind but after spending an hour and a half with an associate who was incredibly knowledgeable and helpful, you decide to spend more because he helped you identify a future need that would be met by spending just a little more now. Not only do you walk away happy with your purchase, but you are grateful to the salesperson because he has in essence saved you money in the long run.
Throughout my years as a sales consultant in the fitness industry, I have worked with a handful of clubs that were committed to the process of educating prospects on a variety of fitness topics. These educational components — such as fully understanding the three aspects of a fitness program — were integrated into the qualifying and touring process, resulting in a higher closing percentage and a better-than-average retention rate. The theory behind this is that if people appreciate what and why they are doing something they will be more apt to stick with the activity. This theory holds even more truth today because with the amount of mixed and confusing messages regarding health and fitness, most consumers are confused. By helping them weed through the myths and realities, they will feel better about making a decision.
At all HEALTHY INSPIRATIONS Weight Loss & Lifestyle Centers, adding education to the sales process is the backbone of our presentation strategy. As the famous retailer, Cy Simms advocated, "An educated consumer is our best customer." Because we embrace this belief, each prospect is given a complete body composition analysis early in the sales process.
More important, an entire educational consultation is done with the person so he or she understands what each part of the analysis means to them, how the human body changes over time and how the process of healthy weight loss occurs. This presentation is done with an attractive, color flip chart as well as appropriate visual props to make the interaction interesting, compelling and realistic. Between the educational process, the qualifying, touring and membership presentation, most tours take an hour — minimum.
Some may argue that a fitness club tour shouldn't take that long, but my experience when mystery-shopping hundreds of clubs nationwide is that salespeople don't take enough time — the average tour lasts 15 to 20 minutes. The result of such short tours is almost always a focus on the physical features of the club. Unfortunately, for an individual in either contemplation or preparation, this type of tour does nothing to help move them toward the action stage. And, if a prospect is brought to the membership presentation stage without being in the latter stages of preparation, they won't feel comfortable buying, and if they do buy they often feel pressured. Of course, anyone in the fitness industry for a length of time knows how low the "be-back" ratio of missed guests is; it's terrible because the prospect leaves and has time to justify in his or her mind why he or she made a good decision not to buy.
Let's assume for a moment that you are attracted to the concept of adding education to the sales process at your club. The next question becomes how. Below is a general plan of action for you to follow, knowing that at each step you must take into consideration the sophistication, knowledge and desire of your current sales team.
Bring your sales team together and discuss the theory behind the behavioral change process, helping them to understand the general concept as well as its implications for the sales process. You may want to bring in outside resources to gain credibility. Dr. James Prochaska and Dr. James Annessi have written extensively on the topic.
Once everyone embraces the concept, brainstorm on fitness information and insights that the sales team thinks could have a significant impact on how a prospect views the importance of fitness. Create a list of as many ideas as possible, being careful to not belittle any thought or suggestion. One way to help the team answer this question is to ask, "What information makes prospects go 'Wow, I didn't know that?'" (Body composition, health risks, how one loses weight, heart rate training, etc.) Of course, another good source for this step would be personal trainers or individuals from the fitness department.
After establishing the list, have the team prioritize each idea in descending order of its potential for the "wow" factor. There will always be disagreement on this. Just go with the majority, letting everyone know that the top three to five topics will all be given attention.
Once the list has been finalized, the real work begins. Take one topic at a time and delegate the research fairly among the entire team. Find information on each topic and begin writing an outline of a presentation. Power Point is great but remember that the specific information must be captured in paragraph format if salespeople are going to learn the correct information.
After the writing is complete, circulate among other departments and members to find out if what has been written makes sense to someone who knows nothing about the topic. This is very important.
Once you have a final version of the writing, get back together with the team to brainstorm what visual effects and tools should be used to best convey this information. Be mindful of where this information should be presented to the prospect, i.e. qualifying, touring. Also, take into consideration realistic expectations for cost — fully anticipating that additional edits and modifications will almost always be done for a full 30 days after the tool begins to get used. This is normal and healthy.
Begin using these new sales tools (one at a time) and be certain to measure your closing rate, both first time visitors as well as be-backs because adding such information to your sales process often increases the return rate.
Continually evaluate and create new items, being mindful of new health and fitness information being released by credible sources like the Surgeon General, the Center for Disease Control or medical associations.
This is not an easy process. In fact, the reason that only a handful of the more than 300 clubs I have worked with use it is because it takes a lot of time, energy and commitment to put such tools in place. For those clubs willing to make the effort, the payoff is tremendous. Not only will you sell more memberships, you will probably positively affect your club's retention rate and do both those things in a time when economic uncertainty makes succeeding in business more challenging.


text:
By Vincenzo Ruocco, M.D., Sarah Brenner, M.D., and Eleonora Ruocco, M.D., from the Department of Dermatology, 2nd University of Naples, Naples, Italy, Department of Dermatology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Correspondence: Vincenzo Ruocco, MO, Department of Dermatology, 2nd University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 1-80131 Naples, Italy.
In dermatology, there are typical examples of disorders related to dietary factors. The pathogenic, links between nutritional factor(s) and skin disease may be different.
Nutrient deficiency and nutrient excess are the simplest causes of specific diet-related cutaneous changes: scurvy (vitamin C deficiency) and acrodermantis enteropathica (zinc deficiency) are examples of the first type, and caronenoderma (carotene excess) is an example of the second type. Genetic metabolic defects or enzyme deficiencies, although subtle, may pave the way for the onset of diet-related skin disorders, where a toxic effect is exerted by the dietary factor(s): alcohol intake is responsible for porphyria curanea tarda, and the ingestion of choline- and lecithin-containing foods is the cause of eccnine bromhidrosis, with the typical "fishy" odor that features trimethylaminuria. More often, an immune (and complex) mechanism is involved in the pathogenesis of strictly diet-dependent skin disorders, e.g. atopic dermatitis and food-induced urticaria (related to several foods), dermatitis herpetiformis (gluten), and allergic contact dermatitis (nickel). Finally, cutaneous disorders exist where the pathogenic interference of dietary factors has repeatedly been advocated, but without convincing evidence: psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, and acne are the commonest examples of this type.


text:
Let There Be Peace on EarthSy Miller & Jill Jackson/arr. Jay Rouse - PraiseGathering Music Group
Click to review
Peace has become a focus in everything we do. This stunning arrangement allows you to share those thoughts in a prayerful and worshipful way and is appropriate for many situations throughout the year. This breathtaking anthem offers many performance options and is perfect for choirs of any size. In a very troubled world, it is our prayer that peace, truly would begin with me! Highly recommended!
Select a Product
My Library
Powered by Rating-System.com


text:
Welcome to Watch List, where we identify five things on TV to watch while you stay at home and shoot your eye out. LET'S GO!
SNL – Saturday 11:30PM (NBC) Jeff Bridges has been a Hollywood stalwart for a good long time, but he's never hosted SNL before. UNTIL NOW! Yes, the Oscar winner (and star of the truly awesome-looking "True Grit") drops by Studio 8H for the show's last episode before the New Year, with musical guest Eminem featuring Lil' Wayne. That's a pretty impressive host-musical guest combination. Might even be better than the Will Ferrell/Queens of the Stone Age combination from a couple years ago. Note to Seth Meyers: If you have Jeff dress up as The Dude and make a lousy sketch out of it, you will pay the consequences. ANTICIPATION: NICE MARMOT!
GOLD RUSH: ALASKA – Sunday 10:00PM (TLC) TLC's new reality show profiles a group of down-on-their-luck Oregon men who decide to move to Alaska to become gold miners. Gooooolllllllldddd! Grabs yer pans and yer pickaxes, fellers! There's a river up north where we can hit the motherlode! We'll be able to buy all the rock candy and ether we like! YAHOOOOOO! ANTICIPATION: CINNAMON AND GRAVY!
SARAH PALIN'S ALASKA – Sunday 9:00PM (TLC) Continuing with the Alaska porn, the former governor and her family spend this week in an RV! Smart political move. If there's one thing Sarah Palin's constituency has in common, it's living in RV's. Then Sarah and Piper go dogsledding on a glacier. Because when you're traveling on a sheet of ice that may or may not have several dangerous crevasses to fall into, you always want to lash yourself to a sled of high-speed canines. ANTICIPATION: PARTISAN!
SURVIVOR: NICARAGUA – Sunday 8:00PM (CBS) Season finale time, followed by the reunion at 10PM. Learn who will win a million bucks, and then go to jail for not paying taxes on it. ANTICIPATION: SNAKEY!
THE GIRLS OF TEEN MOM 2 – Sunday 10:00PM (MTV) MTV plucks three gals from their "16 & Pregnant" series to follow for the second season of their "Teen Mom" series. Alas, that one girl who slapped the dickens out of her baby daddy and got arrested for it won't be among the chosen few. And that's too bad, because I like my low class parenting to come with a healthy dose of the ultraviolence. I wonder if they'll go dogsledding on glaciers. ANTICIPATION: USE PROTECTION!
Weekend Watch List: Jeff Bridges Really Ties "SNL" Together
Welcome to Watch List, where we identify five things on TV to watch while you stay at home and shoot your eye out. LET'S GO!


text:
Protect Mega-Populations
Protecting Sites in USA-Canada
Protecting Sites in USA-Canada
In collaboration with a wide array of partners, Bat Conservation International (BCI) strives to protect sites in the US and Canada where large mega-populations of bats reside. Our site conservation plans address the long-lasting protection and management of these populations of bats and their habitats and the abatement of serious threats that may put their survival at risk.
The mega-population sites identified for priority conservation include areas containing a high percentage of the total population of an individual species, including major hibernacula, roosting colonies, migratory concentrations, etc.
Texas Hill Country
The Texas Hill Country in the south-central portion of the U.S. contains at least 11 roosting sites for the Mexican free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis) that hold large (>500,000 bats) congregations of this species during some portion of the year. Although the species is wide-spread across western North America, southward through Central America, and into the arid and semi-arid regions of western and southern South America, central Texas and Mexico are home to the largest concentrations of this species.
This species was historically important to the local economy because of the guano market. Officials of the Southern Pacific Railroad estimated that they annually transported 65 carloads of 30,000 pounds each from Texas, making bat guano the state's largest mineral export before oil in the early 1900s. Bracken and Frio caves in Central Texas, on average, each produced 75 to 80 tons annually. Today these same bat populations are still an economic boon, saving central Texas cotton farmers about $74 per acre in pest control. A 2011 article in Science estimated the total value of bats to U.S. agriculture at roughly $23 billion a year. Additionally, local economies benefit from tourism related to bat emergence viewing at the 10 sites with public viewing opportunities.
Stay up to date with BCI
Sign up and receive timely bat updates
BCI relies on the support of our amazing members around the world.
Our mission is to conserve the world's bats and their ecosystems to ensure a healthy planet.
Please join us or donate so our work can continue.


text:
Thermal CCTV is the ultimate tool for central stations. It is also the ultimate tool for end users who a) want to reduce crime and b) want to reduce costs.
By using a combination of thermal CCTV and central station monitoring solutions the on site aspect of security can be removed saving many thousands of pounds a year for the end user and allowing manned guarding to… Continue reading


text:
When Do IndyCar Drivers Get Old?
As the latest chapter of the Brett Favre saga unfolded on Tuesday, Favre explained that his body is no longer up to it. Ultimately, Favre said in so many words, that he has gotten too old. This got me to wondering about today's IndyCar driver. When does an IndyCar driver get too old and what is it that makes them age?
First of all, without getting into an age-old debate, I completely believe that racecar drivers are athletes. Period. That being said, I fully recognize that what is considered old for an NFL player, may be the age that an IndyCar driver enters his or her prime. But the term "old" has changed in the last fifteen or so years in IndyCars. In the 1992 Indianapolis 500, there were five starters over the age of fifty and seven more drivers over the age of forty. That is more than one third of the field that was older than forty at Indy that year.
Fast forward to this year's Indy 500, where we found no driver in their fifties and only five in their forties – with Davey Hamilton being the oldest at age forty-six. Even more extreme was 2005 when only two drivers were over the forty threshold.
When did forty become too old to drive? Al Unser won his fourth Indianapolis 500 at age forty-seven. Emerson Fittipaldi was still winning races as he approached forty-nine. Michael Andretti won as he was nearing forty and Mario Andretti won his last race at age fifty-three. Of course, what did all of these drivers have in common? They were all driving for first-rate teams in top-flight equipment. Unser and Fittipaldi won their last races driving for Roger Penske; Michael won his last race driving for Team Green while Mario was driving for Newman-Haas when he won at age fifty-three.
So many times we see drivers who are competitive and still want to race, yet they are relegated to lower level rides because they are getting long in the tooth. Team owners are reluctant to keep older drivers around when there are young guns eager to prove themselves no matter what price. That is why we saw sad examples of great drivers such as Johnny Rutherford and Gordon Johncock wrapping up their careers in inferior equipment. Could Rutherford have made the 1992 field in a Newman-Haas prepared car rather than the second Derrick Walker car he failed to qualify in? No one knows for certain. But his chances would have been much greater in a top-level ride.
What is it that makes a driver age? Obviously if one stays fit, they can stand the rigors of an eighteen race season, provided they can still squeeze into the car. Is there a discernable drop-off in reflexes? At my ripe old age, I honestly cannot tell that my reflexes have slowed down a bit – then again, I'm not driving a four-wheeled missile down a straightaway at 230 mph. That may make a slight difference.
My thinking is that it may be a natural maturation process. As a driver gets older, his priorities naturally shift. Chip Ganassi, the compassionate soul that he is, has been quoted as saying that a driver suddenly slows down when he has children. That's why he was none too thrilled when Dixon and Emma announced they were expecting.
It is only natural to question how hard you should push the car, when you have a full household to go to after the race. The visions of Alex Zanardi, who lost both legs in 2001; or Paul Dana, who lost his life in 2006, are probably still present in most driver's minds. When you are twenty-four, single and trying to make a name for yourself – you take that chance to see how over the edge you can take the car. When you are thirty-four and married with a couple of young children, you tend to think twice if it's really worth going over the edge to gain that extra tenth of a second.
I have slowed down in my passenger car just in the last five years or so. I used to have a pretty heavy foot and had the speeding tickets to prove it. I still get a thrill out of going fast, but I've finally figured out that the thrill is not worth the fines and increases in insurance. Now if I need a thrill, I go to Disney World.
Certain drivers have become new fathers recently, and I question if we'll ever see some of them win another race. Even if Sam Hornish comes back to IndyCars, I'm not sure he has the edge anymore. The same goes for Dan Wheldon. Tony Kanaan's crew won't give him the opportunity to see if he still has the edge. They seem more intent on keeping him ablaze all the time. The biggest risk he takes these days is climbing into an AGR car. It still remains to be seen what fatherhood will do to Scott Dixon's lap times. Dario Franchitti is thirty-six but still fast. He also has no kids.
So what gives? Children didn't used to slow drivers down. How do you explain the drivers of my childhood having success into their forties and sometimes their fifties, while the drivers of today slow down shortly past age thirty? Do today's drivers put more emphasis on fatherhood than those of twenty and thirty years ago? I don't have the answer, but it is something to think about.
Today's drivers are more fit than any others in history. Their fitness should keep them driving well into their forties and fifties. Obviously, the aging process has no effect there. It's what is going on between the ears that is aging the drivers of today.
George Phillips
4 Responses to "When Do IndyCar Drivers Get Old?"
Clearly, Mike Schumacher is going to prove that 40's isn't to old to keep driving.
I watched a tape of the 1987 Indy 500 the other day (thank you, youtube) and was shocked at the number of drivers in their 40's and OVER 50! So, being a younger fan, I also wonder when 33 became the age when you start thinking of retirement. Similarly, Tracy is fast as ever (as he keeps proving) yet everyone today thinks he's far too old? why?
Being in the flying business I can tell you that a certain point weakened physical and cognitive abilities trump experience. You just get older and slower. Don't ever grow old, but know when you should let go and encourage the young bucks to take the mantle and press on!
Different people respond to the rigors of aging quite differently. Chuck Yeager was still flying high performance fighters in his '80s and some people shouldn't be driving in their '30s
I think one thing that has been overlooked in this discussion is the affect of having a viable feeder sytem. Pror to the rear engine revolution in the mid '60s, most drivers found their way to an Indy Car ride from the ranks of sprint cars and midgets. Once the rear engined car became the norm, most car owners weren't eager to put some hot shoe from a midget into a totally different kind of car than the fellow had ever driven before because when it did happen, the results weren't pretty. The drivers that came into Indy Cars fin the late '60s and '70s frequently came from Can-Am or some other sports car series where they were more familiar with road racing and rear engined cars. Things began to change in the late '70s with the advent of some lower tier open wheel series like Formula Vee, Formula Junior and others. Today there are plenty of feeder series as well as the Fireston Indy Lights which offer many paths to Indy Cars.
Could it be that the reason that so many of these guys raced well into middle age is that there just weren't that many young bucks clamoring to take their place.
Just a thought.
I don't watch NASCAR anymore, but I understand that Mark Martin has been doing well this year. Of course, he's in very good equipment.


text:
Process Server Credentials
Effective July 1, 2008, the Brevard County Clerk of Court assumed the responsibility of processing applications for individuals seeking to become a Certified Process Server in the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Pursuant to Section 48.27(1), Florida Statutes, each person whose name has been added to the approved Process Server list is subject to annual re-certification and reappointment by the Chief Judge.
Applications are available through the links provided above, or you may visit one of the Clerk of Courts Office locations to obtain the documents required. In order to allow for the processing of all documents, submission of applications should be 6 - 8 weeks prior to the expiration date reflected on the Administrative Order.
All applications must be filed with the Clerk of Court along with a non-refundable fee of $100.00 for new and renewal applicants. This fee is made payable to the Brevard County Clerk of Courts by cash, check, money order, cashier's check, debit card, Visa, American Express, Discover or Mastercard. A non-refundable $50.00($50 beginning 06/21/2014) payment to the Brevard County Sheriff's Office for a background investigation should be submitted along with the paperwork to the Clerk. You may submit your payments and paperwork by mail to:Brevard County Clerk of CourtsAttention: Kim ReynoldsP.O. Box 999Titusville, FL 32781-0999321-633-7782
Or you may submit all the paperwork and payments at any one of the Clerk of Court's offices. Do not send cash through the mail.
All new applicants must be fingerprinted by the Brevard County Sheriff's Office and the cost is included in the non-refundable $50.00 payment fee. Fingerprint cards may be obtained at any Brevard County Sheriff's precinct and fingerprints are taken by Sheriff's Office personnel. Contact should be made with the precinct for fingerprinting times.
North Precinct: 2290 COLUMBIA BLVD, TITUSVILLE, FL 32780 Phone: (321) 264-5208
South Precinct: 1515 SARNO RD, BLDG B, MELBOURNE, FL 32935 Phone: (321) 253-6658
East Precinct: 2575 N COURTENAY PKWY, MERRITT ISLAND, FL 32953 Phone: (321) 454-6652
West Precinct: 2725 JUDGE FRAN JAMIESON WAY, BLDG E, MELBOURNE, FL 32940 Phone: (321) 633-2123
Canaveral Precinct: 111 POLK AVE, CAPE CANAVERAL, FL 32920 Phonse: (321) 868-1113
Upon completion of all requirements, including receipt of the background checks from both the Sheriff and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, the Clerk of the Court will submit to the Chief Judge a proposed Administrative Order appointing or renewing a process server. Once the Chief Judge has signed the order, the Clerk will contact the individual for the finalization of the badge process.
The Brevard County Sheriff's Office oversees the Process Server Orientation Program conducted by a designated representative. Administrative Order 14-18-B includes new education requirements. For information regarding orientation or renewal classes please contact:
Avalon Legal Services
New Classes 16 Hours, 2 Day $180
Renewal Classes 8 hours $75.00
Here is the 2020 Schedule for Certified Process Servers Training Classes for annual renewals and new applicants (orientation). For any additional information you may contact Avalon Legel Services or the Brevard Clerk's Office at 321-633-7782 Kim Reynolds
All Classes will be held at the UF/Brevard County Extension Office 3695 Lake Drive Cocoa, Fl. 32926. All Classes start at 9:00 AM --8 Hours for renewal classes and 16 hours, 2 days for New Orientation.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Avalon has a new protocol for cancellation of classes. Effective January 2018 if there are not 4 paid applicants confirmed signed up by the Monday preceding each Friday class, then by Tuesday @ noon we will cancel the Friday class.
Class Schedule for 2020
June 3.......Renewal
June 4/5......New
July 8/9......New
July 10.......Renewal
Sept. 3........Renewal
Oct. 6.........Renewal
Oct. 7/8.......New
Nov. 13........Renewal
Dec. 2.........Renewal
It is recommended that you study Florida Statutes Chapter 48 as your knowledge of civil process service will be tested in orientation.
If you have any questions regarding this process, you may contact the Clerk of Court's Office at 321-633-7782 or e-mail your question(s) to firstname.lastname@example.com.
Certification Requirements
You must:
- Be at least 18 years of age.
- Have no mental or legal disability.
- Be a permanent resident of the State of Florida.
- Complete an application.
- Pay a non-refundable $100.00 processing fee payable to the Clerk of the Court.
- Pay a $50.00 background check fee payable to the Brevard County Sheriff's Office. (This fee includes the fingerprint card and the process of being fingerprinted by the Brevard County Sheriff.)
- Pass a background research investigation.
- Purchase and maintain in good standing a minimum $5,000.00 surety bond. Payable to the 18th Judicial Circuit.


text:
Take a look at our pill identifier search form for US medicines or post photos in this forum in case anyone can help identify unknown pills.
Use this control to limit the display of threads to those newer than the specified time frame.
Allows you to choose the data by which the thread list will be sorted.
Order threads in...
Note: when sorting by date, 'descending order' will show the newest results first.
Forum Rules
Terms of Use ¦ Privacy Policy


text:
Relationships with
Photo Credit: Angela Alioto's picture is courtesy of NNDB. Photographic illustrations of Angela Alioto are copyright © by their respective holders. The images are published with permission or as allowed by the copyright law's fair use or quotation provisions. If any copyright holder objects to an image being included, please notify us and it will be removed immediately.
Disclaimer: This information about Angela Alioto is derived from astrological interpretation of Angela Alioto's date, time, and place of birth.