text:
Mortgages are safer now than they were 10 years ago. That's the main effect the 2008-09 financial crisis has had on the mortgage market. The following �loan types were popular during
Mortgages are safer now than they were 10 years ago. That's the main effect the 2008-09 financial crisis has had on the mortgage market.
The following �loan types were popular during the housing boom in the early- to mid-2000s but are unavailable now to most borrowers:Low-doc mortgages allowed borrowers to get loans without documenting income and assets.Interest-only mortgages enabled borrowers to buy houses they otherwise couldn't afford �with an initially low monthly payment. But the loans were the financial equivalent of time bombs: The interest-only period expired after a few years, and then borrowers had to pay principal, catapulting monthly payments past many owners' ability to pay.Subprime mortgages " home loans for borrowers with poor credit " zoomed in popularity, going from 8% of mortgages in 2003 to 20% in 2005 and 2006.
You don't have to be an expert to see how a lot of those loans could go bad. But somehow investors were surprised when large numbers of borrowers stopped paying their mortgages. By September 2008, 5.3% of mortgages were delinquent, meaning �1 in 19 borrowers were at least 30 days behind on payments. In the first quarter of 2010, the delinquency rate topped out at 11.54%, meaning about �1 in �9 borrowers were late on their house payments.
Millions of those delinquent borrowers lost their homes. From 2007 through 2016, almost 7.8 million foreclosures were completed, according to CoreLogic. The homeownership rate decreased, and it hasn't recovered. In the second quarter of 2008, 68.1% of households owned their homes; 10 years later, 64.3% did.
� After the Great Recession, are we 10 years wiser? See more tips on preparing " and prosperingStopping it from happening again
People are still traumatized by the foreclosures. According to a recent NerdWallet survey, conducted online by The Harris Poll among over 2,000 U.S. adults, 31% of respondents said the financial crisis �would make them more conservative when estimating how much home they can afford. In addition, 7% of Americans said they delayed homeownership as a result of the financial crisis. For those under age 35, the figure was 13%.
To prevent a recurrence of the housing crisis, legislators and regulators created rules that limited the availability of exotic mortgages, and regulators and advocates created tools consumers can use to get a safe mortgage.Get a loan you can afford to repay
Even with these new regulations and consumer-friendly tools, �it's still up to you to inform yourself and know your limits. Here are some strategies.Know what you can afford. The first step toward getting an affordable mortgage is buying an affordable home. A home affordability calculator helps you figure out your price range before looking at any houses.Get preapproved for a mortgage. �A �preapproval �gives you an even more accurate picture of how much you can afford to borrow. Getting a preapproval gives you experience �collecting your documentation, which you'll have to do when you later apply for the mortgage. This marks a change from the early- to �mid-2000s, �when borrowers didn't always have to document their income and assets.
Keep debt payments under control. �When you apply for a mortgage, lenders pay close attention to your �debt-to-income �ratio, �or DTI. It's the percentage of your monthly income, before taxes, that goes toward your debt payments.
A rule of thumb is to hold your DTI to 36% or below, even though lenders may allow you to borrow up to 43% or even higher in some cases.
How affordability standards have changed since 2008: After the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created in 2010, a top priority was reforming the mortgage business. The agency adopted an ability-to-repay rule governing mortgages that requires lenders to:Verify income and credit information instead of just taking the borrower's word for it. During the housing boom, lenders had allowed borrowers to get mortgages without providing proof of their stated incomes and assets. This rule placed those low-documentation loans off limits for most borrowers.Cap the maximum debt-to-income ratio at 43%. (Some exceptions allow well-qualified borrowers to borrow up to 50% DTI.)Limit points and fees to no more than 3% of the mortgage amount.
These guidelines seem like common sense, but the CFPB implemented the rules to prevent lenders from ignoring common sense during the next boom.
The CFPB made other changes, too, to make mortgages safer. Lenders had introduced an adjustable-rate mortgage during the boom called a payment-option ARM, which had a frightening feature: In some instances, borrowers could make minimum payments that didn't even cover that month's interest, so they ended up owing more on the loan, even after making a payment.
Under the CFPB's qualified mortgage rule, those risky payment-option ARMs are no longer permitted. Neither are interest-only mortgages or home loans with balloon payments. And prepayment penalties are banned on most mortgages.Compare mortgage offers
To make loan comparisons easier, the CFPB created a three-page disclosure called the Loan Estimate. Lenders must provide Loan Estimates to customers who apply for mortgages.Use this Loan Estimate shortcut. �Place two or more Loan Estimates side-by-side. �Go to Page 3 of each Loan Estimate �and focus on the 'Comparisons" section, and specifically two numbers: how much the mortgage will cost in the first five years, and how much principal will be repaid in those five years. Those figures will clarify which loan is better.
The Loan Estimate helps with another task, too: �reducing closing costs.
How loan comparisons have changed since 2008: For decades, mortgage applicants received a disclosure called the Good Faith Estimate from their lenders. The document detailed closing costs, but it didn't make it easy for borrowers to compare loan offers.
The CFPB believed too many mortgage borrowers wasted money by applying with just one lender. The agency figured that if it created a disclosure that made it easy to compare loan offers, more borrowers would apply at multiple lenders.
The CFPB replaced the Good Faith Estimate with the Loan Estimate in 2015 after a 4 �-year development process.Where mortgages are now
In September 2008, the federal government took over government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by placing them into conservatorship. Ten years later they're still in conservatorship, with little political pressure to reform them.
Some researchers argue that mortgages are too hard to get. According to the Urban Institute, 'overly tight credit' prevented 5.2 million borrowers from getting mortgages from 2009 to 2014, plus another 1.1 million in 2015.
Credit standards have loosened, but slowly. The average credit score on all mortgages closed in August 2011 was 741, according to Ellie Mae. In July 2018, it was 725.
Unlike the precarious mortgages of the boom years, today's mortgages are benign. But standards are stricter, and the best-qualified borrowers have low debt-to-income ratios and high credit scores.
More From NerdWalletWhat DTI is and why it matters How your credit score affects your mortgage rate First-time home buyer programs by state
Holden Lewis is a writer at NerdWallet. Email: firstname.lastname@example.com. Twitter: @HoldenL.
The article Safer Mortgages Rise From the Ashes of '08 Financial Crash originally appeared on NerdWallet.


text:
We Are Esri
We are the world's leading mapping technology company and honored to be on Forbes' list of America's Best Midsize Employers. Using applied geography we help people understand the world and design a smarter future.COME JOIN US
We are the best in our fields from all walks of life and all over the world
We Come Togetherin Small Teams
With our geographic information system, anything is possible.
People Gain Insight
Our tools help people see data in new ways to design solutions for business, government, and the environment.
Cities Become Smarter
Mapping isn't just about travel. Our technology is used to plan and maintain cities around the globe.
The World Feels Smaller
The world is a big place made up of complex interactions.Our platform helps make sense of it all.
From Our Headquarters…
To Our
R&D Centers
And Across the Planet
We Have 49 Offices
Employees From 73 Countries
Software Touching 7 Continents

subset: commoncrawl


text:
March 2007 Satya Center Newsletter -- Healing the Wounded Heart of the World
By Curtis Lang and Jane Sherry on Mar 12, 2007
At the Cusp of Transformations
Welcome to the March 12, 2007 edition of the Satya Center newsletter. Warm greetings from your Editors, Curtis Lang and Jane Sherry.
Snow is melting here in the mid-Hudson Valley, patches of brown grass are appearing in a sea of white, and we have gone from below-zero nights to sunny fifty degree days this week. Neighboring farmers have begun greenhouse operations to prepare seedlings for spring planting.
It is a time of transition in our little world, and a time of transition for the world at large. The reality of global warming and the imminent end of the hydro-carbon economy have finally begun to penetrate the dense collective thought-forms that structure our mass media mediated consciousness, which supports and maintains the self-destructive status quo.
Over the next couple of years, you'll be seeing a stream of mainstream Hollywood movies in which human civilization stars as the black-hearted, slow-witted villain out to destroy Mother Nature. Big-budget movies already in the production queue include M. Night Shyamalan's "The Happening", "The Simpsons Movie", "The Transformers" and James Cameron's "Avatar", offering viewers variations on the theme of humanity's impending total self-destruction.
The good news is that most average people around the world understand the gravity of the situation, despite the best efforts of Fox News and the rest of the mainstream Anglo-Saxon media to misinform the global public.
There is no sign that political leaders in the US or UK have any clue about the urgency of the situation, however. If the history of the environmental movement gives us any indication, we can expect that it will take either a global financial crisis or an outpouring of popular rebellion, and millions of protesters in the streets, to capture politicians' attention and focus their minds on solving the problem.
China is set to surpass the US in the emission of atmospheric CO2, and despite the announced good intentions of Chinese leadership, there is no indication they are able to deal with the crisis. Last year was "the most grim year for China's environmental situation", Pan Yue, deputy head of the Chinese State Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), said in a statement in early January 2007. "The goals set out by the cabinet at the start of the year have (2006) absolutely not been achieved."
Meanwhile, the US war in Iraq is unraveling while Bush prepares for a nuclear strike in Iran, and sectarian violence threatens to engulf the entire Muslim world.
According to recent reports in "The New Yorker" and elsewhere, Bush and company originally saw the underdog Shiite Moslems in Iraq as their allies against the Sunni Moslem Baathites and Al Qaeda types who constituted the backbone of the Iraqi insurgency. This was very strange from a historical perspective, which is almost never given in the mainstream media.
A bit of the history makes this clear. Saudi Arabia is the most powerful Sunni dominated state and Iran the most powerful Shiite state. Bush and company have close political and family ties to the Saudi regime and America has a long history of doing business with Sunni Moslem monarchs and dictators, but almost no experience in dealing with Shiite leaders and states. American Presidents since the mid twentieth century have considered Shiites as crazed fundamentalists with a martyr complex and the fact that Moslem Communist parties always recruited heavily among Shiite populations did nothing to endear the Shiites to Washington.
The Shiites have been oppressed in Iraq, and throughout the Moslem world, for 1400 years, and were delighted to see democracy brought to Baghdad, since Iraq and Iran are the two largest Shiite majority Moslem states. In most other Moslem countries, the Shiites are about 10% of the population, and are considered heretics and worse. The Shiites historically have always been advocates for the poor while the Sunnis represent 1500 years of feudal authoritarian status quo in the Moslem world.
As a Shiite dominated freely elected government was installed in Baghdad, the Saudis and other Sunni Moslem leaders began to see red, and Bush and company began to fear that Baghdad would ally itself with Iran.
It is Sunni Moslem insurgents, who are responsible for the vast majority of attacks on American troops. The Sunnis are also attacking Shiite Iraqis of all political varieties, and casting the Shiite led Iraqi government as tools of the Imperialist Americans.
The Sunni insurgency has been receiving large amounts of foreign aid and an influx of foreign troops from Sunni countries including Jordan and Saudi Arabia throughout what is rapidly becoming an Iraqi civil war between Sunnis and Shiites.
The Shiites have been very restrained overall in their response to the Sunni onslaught, because they know that nurturing a successful democracy in Iraq could lead to democratic inroads across the Moslem world, which would enable Shiites to elevate their status and break the stranglehold on power exercised by their Sunni overlords.
Over the last few months, however, partially in response to a diplomatic initiative by Saudi Royals, Bush and company have focused on the Iranian threat above all, despite their problems in Iraq.
America has moved several aircraft carriers and other military platforms into the area near Iran, in preparation for war, and announced the possibility of using nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, despite the fact that the International Atomic Energy Agency says that Iran is nowhere near creating an atomic bomb.
More troubling, Bush and company have recently begun to assemble a Sunni-based anti-Iranian coalition of states including Saudi Arabia and Jordan to help "contain" Iran and the Shiite militias in the infant Shiite-led Iraqi democracy.
All this despite the fact that it was mainly Sunnis who blew up the World Trade Center, al-Qaeda is composed mainly of Sunnis, and Sunnis are the ones instigating the vast majority of terrorist and martyrdom actions in Iraq.
As part of this bizarre alliance, Bush and company have also delivered a few billion dollars to the Saudi Royals to use in bolstering the organizations of the most extreme Sunni Moslem guerrilla fighters, in the hope that they will be a counterweight to emerging regional Shiite power.
As a result, relations between nuclear-armed Sunni dominated and Saudi-allied military dictatorship Pakistan and Iran are at an all time low and the odds that the civil war in Iraq to become a regional Sunni-Shiite bloodbath extending from the Arabian peninsula into Pakistan and Central and South Asia increase every day.
Once again, both parties in Washington are utterly disconnected from American public opinion, which demonstrated in the 2006 elections and in many opinion polls before and since, that a large majority of the American people want to disengage militarily in Iraq.
I believe most Americans want peace with Moslem countries, while continuing multi-national efforts to counter terrorism in all countries and work peacefully to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. That's the good news.
The world is in crisis, but the crisis is precipitating an expansion of consciousness. The awakening of the vast majority of the world's population is already well underway.
To avoid environmental devastation, to manage the challenges of the era of peak oil, to avoid widespread world war and nuclear annihilation, requires a complete restructuring of human society.
To achieve world peace and to achieve a new post-hydrocarbon global society based upon political democracy, sustainable economies, localized agricultural production and energy efficiency, requires a new set of social and political relations and a new group of world leaders.
To achieve peace among the world's races and religions requires a new, more tolerant, ecumenical spirit and a total separation of religion and warfare. There can be no more widespread support for warrior religions if humanity is to survive.
Above all, there must be a healing of the wounded heart of the world. Right now, the vast majority of the world's people are locked into issues related to the lower chakras – survival, sexual gratification and conquest, personal and collective will to power and conquest, and perpetuation of ancient patterns of dominance and submission.
The human heart is wounded by the war between the sexes, by the inability of the average human being to open his or her heart to love. This war has all but destroyed the basis for the human family.
The human heart is wounded by the constant human war to subdue Mother Nature – and that war is wrecking the world's human-friendly ecology.
The human heart is wounded by the war of the priests, which has gone on for millennia, pitting one vision of God against another in bloody battles for the souls and wealth of entire peoples.
The human heart is wounded by the war of the rich against the poor, which has gone on for millennia, as those who have power use that power to exploit those whom they should be protecting and nurturing.
"Healing the Wounded Heart of the World"
There is only one way to heal the wounded heart of the world, and that way is the way that all true Spiritual Masters of both East and West have long traveled and taught. That way is the way of the open heart, the way of Love.
Only by opening our hearts to the suffering of our fellow human beings in countries and religions currently opposed to our own will we be able to understand them, forgive them, and work together with them to establish peaceful relations.
Only by opening our hearts to the suffering of the billions of people living in poverty around the world will be able to create social and economic systems that provide the necessities of life for all human beings.
Only by opening our hearts to the suffering of the billions of people who will be adversely affected by global climate change can we find within ourselves the strength to change our addictive patterns of behavior, engrained in our daily lives by the global hydrocarbon economy.
Only by opening our hearts to our fellowship with all living creatures, on land, sea and air, and only by opening our hearts to the web of life that constitutes the living, breathing heart and mind of our planetary Mother will we become sensitive enough to fashion a new human society that can thrive in co-operation with that web of life rather than seeking to subdue, conquer and exploit every element of life on Earth.
The solution to all our problems on Earth can be found if we have the courage to open our hearts to love. Love is the answer. Love is the way, and love will find a way.
It is not fashionable to speak in this manner. Love died in our mainstream discourse some time ago. Love is something that only hippies believed to be real. Too many of those hippies grew up to become yuppies and now strive unceasingly to defend and uphold the increasingly unlovely, deadly and deadening status quo. That is an index of how far we have gone toward a society that is based on Thanatos – on Death. For on this blue-green planet, in our human society, based upon the duality of human sexuality, human experience manifests within the polarities of Eros and Thanatos, Love and Death. It is up to us to choose – Death or Love.
I have every confidence that humanity will choose Love, in its many forms and guises, for Love is the evolutionary goal of humanity. The manifestation of that goal is the development within humanity of a Higher Consciousness, which will operate in a state of ever-Self-conscious Unity with the web of life and also of Self-conscious Unity with Higher Worlds. This Higher Human Consciousness has a Divine Purpose. That Higher Purpose is to do the work of a world-transforming Divine Will. That Divine Will requires that humanity consciously infuse every particle of the web of life on Earth, every sentient and non-sentient being, with the energy of universal unity, healing, affirmation and co-operation known as unconditional Love.
This is what is meant by Teachers who speak of Universal Brotherhood, by Wise Ones who speak of the establishment of the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth. As a species, we are currently in a process of recognizing the limits of our egoistic consciousness, prior to surrendering to Higher Consciousness. That surrender takes place when we open our hearts to love, when we make a choice to serve Love, to experience Love, to seek Love out.
In the course of human history, poets, lovers, prophets and priestesses have pointed out the many paths to love. In celebration of the many paths to love, and to inspire us all to open our hearts, I offer you a new version of an ancient story about the healing and redeeming power of love.
It's called "The Rishi, the Sadhu, the Fool and the Milkmaid".
This parable, a love story for all times and places, reveals a path of enlightenment that depends upon the opening of the heart and the acceptance of joy in the midst of earthly suffering.
Top Satya Center Stories of the Week
In a new article, historian, social scientist and visionary author Andrew Bard Schmookler explores "The Challenge of Affluence: A Root of America's Moral Crisis".
"The rise of the dark and dangerous forces now ruling America cannot be understood in isolation," Schmookler argues. "This Bushite regime should be seen, rather, as a symptom of a more general moral crisis in American society, of an erosion of the moral structures that historically have held American society together."
"The American ethic of self-indulgence born of our affluence enables people to saddle their descendants with their own debt, running up huge deficits in the national accounts," Schmookler points out. "The habit of yielding to baser impulses makes it easier to support baser policies in the collective realm" -- like wars of imperial aggression around the world.
In this article, Schmookler analyzes the last fifty years of American history, discusses the culpability of both right wingers and liberals, dissects the current culture of anything-goes self-indulgence, and places a great deal of responsibility for our current dysfunctional political system at the feet of the advertising and marketing machine that shapes popular culture and mass consciousness.
Social activist, Wiccan priestess and "Newsweek" commentator Starhawk explores what it means "To Be a True Friend of the Jewish People".
March 20, 2004 San Francisco Peace Rally
"I can think of nothing more unfaithful to the strong Jewish traditions of social justice than the current climate of vicious denunciation towards anyone who raises criticisms of Israel's policies," Starhawk, who was born and raised Jewish, argues.
In this article, Starhawk relates the lessons she's learned from many years spent traveling to the Holy Land, working as a peace activist,and offers some suggestions that might help heal the wounds on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Wise woman healer and author Susun Weed advocates "Using Herbs Simply and Safely".
"A simple is one herb," Susun says. "For optimum safety, I prepare, buy, sell, teach about and use herbal simples, that is: preparations containing only one herb."In this article Susun presents a set of simple guidelines for growing, buying and using herbal remedies that provide useful information and food for thought beneficial to novice herb lovers and experienced herbalists alike.
Poet James Bertolino offers a pair of exquisite poems that express the magical transition moment between winter's end and spring's ascent.
In "What Water Says" James' reflections on water's seasonal transformations guide the heart along the path to unity with nature, and through that unity, points a metaphorical finger at the ultimate goal -- self-realization.
In "Carrot", James gives voice to the humble root, offering an expectant vegetal viewpoint on the joys of an upcoming golden spring.
Top Spiritual Stories From Around the Web
Aquarius Papers
Eternity, Life and Death, and Our Conscious Evolution on Earth Ending Fear and Suffering
by Robert Wilkinson
In the venerable "Magic of Space" the author states repeatedly that all is "composed" of the substance of Universal Mind, also called Eternal Consciousness. That is the source of the Ten Thousand Things, in the classic sense. It is well established and accepted in the Wisdom Tradition that Nothingness morphs into Limitlessness while not losing its essential nature, and the resulting emanation (the Synthetic principle in all creation, cosmic and human) results in Limitless Light. All is Limitless Light, you and me included.
Limitless Light is the great Maya from which all comes and to which all returns. Infinite Emptiness (Spaciousness) is Infinitely Spatial, and is Luminous in quality. That's why many who go into very deep meditational states experience a sense of "Spaciousness and Luminosity" where all collapses into one dimensional Light. Ultimately, Light is all there IS, and can be experienced as both wave forms and particles in infinitely varied manifestations.
In our world of constantly shifting forms, everything is Originated, then Created, Formed, and Expressed. This process occurs first on "invisible" levels, then on "visible" levels. It is how nothingness comes to manifest as all that is, and why everything is composed of Light particles, also known as Prana, Ruach, Pneuma, or Spirit. Darkness arises because the nature of light is to form shadows when it hits dense fields. That is the origination of all "darkness." The light is still all that IS. The darkness shifts with the density and form of the field, thus demonstrating its inherent unreality.
. . .Fear is a pandemic that has never been adequately dealt with, though we have many examples of people who have overcome fear completely. We overcome individual and collective problems by getting our "spiritual immune system" in shape, which involves constant personal attunement, understanding growth is eternal yet always in the here and Now, perfection always down the Path, and the Eternal Beneficence always available.
Some say life on Earth is a realm in which limitation/darkness/fear is intrinsic, and that we've agreed to "balance" this realm with pathways of light/expansion/love. This admits the illusion is real, even though there is no intrinsic reality to darkness and fear. Actually, our life in human form is about us attuning to the Higher frequencies of consciousness, and ultimately leads us beyond being trapped in these into a constant remembrance to be that which we always are, i.e., Eternal Radiance whose nature is Love.
We're not balancing as much as unlearning delusions, attachments, and aversions that have put us all within a larger illusion of suffering that seems more real than it is, individually and collectively. Once we recognize the means not to get stuck in places of darkness and fear, then we simply can be the Eternal Radiance that we are unencumbered by negative states.
It is not a vain imagining to say that we can experience a unified, Higher Consciousness any time we want. To doubt that gives the illusion of unawareness more power than it deserves. I promise you – any time you directly ask for a miracle, or a "divine revelation," you WILL get one, usually pdq.
Receiving the Light
Satsang of Prabhushri Swami Amar Jyoti
Swami Amar Jyoti
LIGHT IN SANSKRIT IS JYOTI— "THAT WHICH SHINES." Light manifests on various levels, from the utmost, supreme Light—subtlest, absolute, invisible, that which you can only Be—to the most gross form. From the glowworm, as you go higher and higher, light becomes more intense and powerful, like the lightning that can destroy but is normally benevolent. Above that is the light of the sun, supernovas and quasars, etc. The sun you cannot look at directly; it is so powerful, its radiation will blind you. To us the sun is life-giving; we worship it as the Sun Deva, an exalted state, yet even the sun's light is physical, gross.
In the physical sense, Light comes into our eyes; that is why they are called "windows of the Soul." But this is only a tiny manifestation of Light; the physical apparatus of the eyes can hold only so much light or they will become blind. The creation has to balance. The physical body can hold only so much wisdom, so much occultism. If the Prophets, Enlightened Beings and Sages would radiate more Divine Light than they do, the body could not hold it; it would just explode or disintegrate. Yogis know that they can only project so much at their will. Ordinary people, whom we call ignorant, by contrast generally use their will instinctively, which manifests as imbalance and disharmony to the point beyond which, if they push themselves, will cause nervous breakdowns or other difficulties.
WE ARE FULL OF LIGHT. Our bodies cannot express the full impact of this, our bones and flesh and blood simply cannot hold it. When darkness increases in our bodies we become heavy, depressed, miserable, diseased; when Light becomes too much, our bodies also shatter. For this reason there is a self-contained mechanism within us to hold on to that part of the Light by which the body is sustained. When the body is not sustained, the Light is fading; in Yogic terms we say the pranas have become weak. Then the senses begin to lose their sense gratification, the blood does not course back youthfully, the nervous system becomes weakened. In Sanskrit this is called Shitheel, when the Light fades.
In ancient Vedic times the Aryans, which in Sanskrit means "noble or civilized ones," were worshippers of fire. Long before other Devas and Devis1 were recognized, the Fire Deva was considered the giver of prana or life. Prana is a higher Light than even the sun or moon, which fade before the Light of prana, jivan shakti. Prana gives us Light—to our eyes, our ears, our entire body. By that Light we live; with that Light we see the darkness, we speak, we exist. When prana becomes weak, it wants to be "fed" by further enkindling of that Light. Prana comes from Spirit, the nucleus of Light, which is beyond what we can see or feel. That inherent, intrinsic, fundamental, basic Light is the Substance; it is not objective or tangible. You can only indicate that Light—Jyotish, Jyotish Bhava—or merge into It and be fully Enlightened.
. . .Within you is the nucleus from which everything emerges, and that is where Light is. This nucleus of Light has been termed by yogis the antara guha.2 When you merge with That, you become Light—immortal, eternal, infinite, pervading. It not only liberates you, you no longer exist. You are Light. Light merges into Light, from which all other forms are born.
When your chakras are awakened and illumined, you will see dazzling Light—beyond words. Even though it is not physical, when that Ultimate Light flashes within you, you will glow. The Upanishad says, Lord, lead us from darkness to Light. That longing for Light is self-extinguishing love, like a moth mad after the flame. Compared to that attraction, charm and beauty, nothing else attracts. For those who are mad after God, it is not only the beauty or radiance that attracts them. They know: This is my True Self.
Breaking News Headlines 24/7 at Satya Center
Read breaking news stories updated 24/7 from Pacific News Service. Tune in to Satya Center's 24/7 environmental news headlines and listen to environmental news radio from Environmental News Network at ENN EarthNews.
Top News Stories From Around the Web
PEACE TRAIN: Destination Iran
A Short Musical SlideShow with Images of Tehran Americans Never See
The New Yorker
Annals of National Security
The Redirection
Is the Administration's new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?
by Seymour M. Hersh March 5, 2007
Efforts to curb Iran's influence have involved the United States in worsening Sunni-Shiite tensions.
In the past few months, as the situation in Iraq has deteriorated, the Bush Administration, in both its public diplomacy and its covert operations, has significantly shifted its Middle East strategy. The "redirection," as some inside the White House have called the new strategy, has brought the United States closer to an open confrontation with Iran and, in parts of the region, propelled it into a widening sectarian conflict between Shiite and Sunni Muslims.
To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia's government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.
Common Dreams
Published on Thursday, March 8, 2007 by WorkingForChange.com
Dems' Big Middle Finger to the American Voter
by David Sirota
One of my idiosyncratic little hobbies of late is to keep a tally on statements by Washington politicians and pundits that are express an open hatred for democracy. This hobby is a subset of a bigger collection of quotes I collect that show how Washington politicians are entirely divorced from the political reality they purport to be experts on - a classic example is Sen. Chuck Schumer's hilariously moronic declaration to New York Magazine that strengthening the Patriot Act is politically good for red state Democrats . . . Today, we get a beauty from South Dakota Rep. Stephanie Herseth (D).
In the Washington Post's solid writeup of the debate over Iraq in the House, a faction of Democrats continues to attack the very Election 2006 mandate they were vaulted into office on: opposition to the war. Justifying her opposition to bills that would stop President Bush's military escalation, we get this gem from South Dakota's lone House member:
"I don't think we should be overreacting to public opinion polls."
. . .Herseth, of course, is following the tried and true path of fellow politicians and pundits insulated comfortably in the Washington bubble. It was Cheney who said in November that the war "may not be popular with the public - it doesn't matter." It was David Brooks who said a few months ago that "voters shouldn't be allowed to define the choices in American politics." There was the Bush administration in August of 2006 telling the New York Times "that they are considering alternatives other than democracy" in Iraq - after repackaging the war as an exercise in pro-democracy nation building. The Times itself just recently said that Democrats pushing antiwar legislation strongly supported by the public are "fringe." And let's not forget The New Republic's Peter Beinart who trumpeted groups that - in an oxymoronic backflip - believe "the less beholden politicians are to grassroots activists, the better they will represent voters."
The message from Washington, D.C. to all of us out here in the heartland is very clear: Our government is the exclusive gated community of Big Money interests, their appointed pawns in Congress, and a select group of self-declared "experts" in the media and at think tanks (which are, of course, funded by many of those same Big Money interests). Inside this gated community, actually listening to or shaping policy on behalf of the vast majority of Americans is considered either laughably outdated or disgustingly unsavory.
This is why we have a House lawmaker running to reporters attacking efforts to end the war as "overreacting to public opinion." This is why we have a Vice President who goes on national television declaring that what the public wants "doesn't matter." This is why the largest newspaper in America continues to publish a columnist who says voters shouldn't decide elections. This is why, months after being elected to the majority on an antiwar mandate, we have a congressional Democratic Party that still refuses to do anything to end - or even slow down - the war. Because underneath all the platitudes and rhetoric, Washington, D.C. is a place that hates democracy.
A CounterPunch Special Investigation
High-Fivers and Art Student Spies
What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?
By CHRISTOPHER KETCHAM, March 7, 2007
On the afternoon of September 11, 2001, an FBI bulletin known as a BOLO - "be on lookout" -- was issued with regard to three suspicious men who that morning were seen leaving the New Jersey waterfront minutes after the first plane hit World Trade Center 1. Law enforcement officers across the New York-New Jersey area were warned in the radio dispatch to watch for a "vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack":
White, 2000 Chevrolet van with 'Urban Moving Systems' sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals.
At 3:56 p.m., twenty-five minutes after the issuance of the FBI BOLO, officers with the East Rutherford Police Department stopped the commercial moving van through a trace on the plates. According to the police report, Officer Scott DeCarlo and Sgt. Dennis Rivelli approached the stopped van, demanding that the driver exit the vehicle. The driver, 23-year-old Sivan Kurzberg, refused and "was asked several more times [but] appeared to be fumbling with a black leather fanny pouch type of bag". With guns drawn, the police then "physically removed" Kurzberg, while four other men - two more men had apparently joined the group since the morning - were also removed from the van, handcuffed, placed on the grass median and read their Miranda rights.
They had not been told the reasons for their arrest. Yet, according to DeCarlo's report, "this officer was told without question by the driver [Sivan Kurzberg],'We are Israeli. We are not your problem.Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.'" Another of the five Israelis, again without prompting, told Officer DeCarlo - falsely - that "we were on the West Side Highway in New York City during the incident". From inside the vehicle the officers, who were quickly joined by agents from the FBI, retrieved multiple passports and $4,700 in cash stuffed in a sock. According to New Jersey's Bergen Record, which on September 12 reported the arrest of the five Israelis, an investigator high up in the Bergen County law enforcement hierarchy stated that officers had also discovered in the vehicle "maps of the city with certain places highlighted. It looked like they're hooked in with this", the source told the Record, referring to the 9/11 attacks. "It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park."
. . . Vincent Cannistraro, former chief of operations for counterterrorism with the CIA, told 20/20 that some of the names of the five men appeared as hits in searches of an FBI national intelligence database. Cannistraro told me that the question that most troubled FBI agents in the weeks and months after 9/11 was whether the Israelis had arrived at the site of their "celebration" with foreknowledge of the attack to come. From the beginning, "the FBI investigation operated on the premise that the Israelis had foreknowledge", according to Cannistraro.
Common Dreams
Published on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 by CommonDreams.org
Ghawar Is Dead!
The Wide-Spread Use of Advanced Extraction Techniques is Killing the Mother of All Oil Fields
by Matthew S. Miller
I've watched in shock and awe in recent days, shaking my head and wringing my hands. Yet another unremarkable narrative of celebrity intrigue entered the echo chamber of the mainstream media system and its 24/7-positive-feedback-amplification-loop to emerge as biggest news event - no, the earth-shaking cultural event of the year. This time it is…Anna Nicole is dead!
Her mournful supplicants conduct vigils in her memory and quietly reflect upon her iconic life, wishing her soul Godspeed. Meanwhile, we are left to ponder the paternity of her unfortunate offspring and the symbolic meaning of her celebrity status for posterity. All the while we wait with bated breath as Wikipedia straightens out the facts of her untimely demise.
Hers was the quintessentially American tale of the technological metamorphosis of East Texas trailer trash into the bearer of the trophy titties for an oil tycoon. Her bare breasts in the pages of Playboy reaffirmed the greatness of our country! She pulled her self up by her bra-straps and made her way in the world. We imagine that the indelible image of her "candle in the wind" life will never be extinguished because she really lived the collective dream. Sometimes it's funny how fake-life makes contact with real-life.
It was also announced recently, without the same media feeding frenzy, that another queen of mass-culture is dead too. Few of us even know her name. Rather than being the personification of the contemporary zeitgeist, she is one of the cornerstones of what Marx called global capitalism's base. She was an integral part of the concrete material conditions that make our peculiar form of social organization possible. Her name is Ghawar, and she is the mother-of-all oil fields. She was once a veritable sea of light sweet crude 174 miles long and 12 miles wide, under the sands of the eastern province of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and now she is dead.
Ghawar is by far the largest conventional oil field ever discovered. Since first tapped in 1948, Ghawar has produced some 60 billion barrels of oil and accounted for 60-65% of Saudi production from 1948-2005. While actual field by field production numbers remain a SaudiState secret, Ghawar is estimated to produce more than five million barrels per day or 6.5% of the planet's daily production total of 84 million barrels.
Ghawar's obituary has already been written, but the Saudis have thus far prevented the appropriate authorities from entering the house to inspect the body.
New Heaven New Earth
THE PROPHET OF GARBAGE: Startech's 'Plasma-Gasification Plant'
By Michael Behar
Popular Science
March 2007
It sounds as if someone just dropped a tricycle into a meat grinder. I'm sitting inside a narrow conference room at a research facility in Bristol, Connecticut, chatting with Joseph Longo, the founder and CEO of Startech Environmental Corporation. As we munch on takeout Subway sandwiches, a plate-glass window is the only thing separating us from the adjacent lab, which contains a glowing caldera of "plasma" three times as hot as the surface of the sun. Every few minutes there's a horrific clanking noise—grinding followed by a thunderous voomp, like the sound a gas barbecue makes when it first ignites.
"Is it supposed to do that?" I ask Longo nervously. "Yup," he says. "That's normal."
. . .To put me at ease, Longo calls in David Lynch, who manages the demonstration facility. "There's no flame or fire inside. It's just electricity," Lynch assures me of the multimillion-dollar system that took Longo almost two decades to design and build. Then the two usher me into the lab, where the gleaming 15-foot-tall machine they've named the Plasma Converter stands in the center of the room. The entire thing takes up about as much space as a two-car garage, surprisingly compact for a machine that can consume nearly any type of waste -- from dirty diapers to chemical weapons -- by annihilating toxic materials in a process as old as the universe itself. Called plasma gasification, it works a little like the big bang, only backward (you get nothing from something). Inside a sealed vessel made of stainless steel and filled with a stable gas -- either pure nitrogen or, as in this case, ordinary air -- a 650-volt current passing between two electrodes rips electrons from the air, converting the gas into plasma. Current flows continuously through this newly formed plasma, creating a field of extremely intense energy very much like lightning. The radiant energy of the plasma arc is so powerful, it disintegrates trash into its constituent elements by tearing apart molecular bonds. The system is capable of breaking down pretty much anything except nuclear waste, the isotopes of which are indestructible. The only by-products are an obsidian-like glass used as a raw material for numerous applications, including bathroom tiles and high-strength asphalt, and a synthesis gas, or "syngas" -- a mixture of primarily hydrogen and carbon monoxide that can be converted into a variety of marketable fuels, including ethanol, natural gas and hydrogen.
Perhaps the most amazing part of the process is that it's self-sustaining. Just like your toaster, Startech's Plasma Converter draws its power from the electrical grid to get started. The initial voltage is about equal to the zap from a police stun gun. But once the cycle is under way, the 2,200˚F syngas is fed into a cooling system, generating steam that drives turbines to produce electricity. About two thirds of the power is siphoned off to run the converter; the rest can be used on-site for heating or electricity, or sold back to the utility grid. "Even a blackout would not stop the operation of the facility," Longo says.
It all sounds far too good to be true. But the technology works. Over the past decade, half a dozen companies have been developing plasma technology to turn garbage into energy.
World View of US Role Goes From Bad to Worse
The global view of the United States' role in world affairs has significantly deteriorated over the last year according to a BBC World Service poll of more than 26,000 people across 25 different countries.
As the United States government prepares to send a further 21,500 troops to Iraq, the survey reveals that three in four (73%) disapprove of how the US government has dealt with Iraq.
The poll shows that in the 18 countries that were previously polled, the average percentage saying that the United States is having a mainly positive influence in the world has dropped seven points from a year ago--from 36 percent to 29 percent—after having already dropped four points the year before. Across all 25 countries polled, one citizen in two (49%) now says the US is playing a mainly negative role in the world.
Over two-thirds (68%) believe the US military presence in the Middle East provokes more conflict than it prevents and only 17 percent believes US troops there are a stabilizing force.
The poll shows that world citizens disapprove of the way the US government has handled all six of the foreign policy areas explored. After the Iraq war (73% disapproval), majorities across the 25 countries also disapprove of US handling of Guantanamo detainees (67%), the Israeli-Hezbollah war (65%), Iran's nuclear program (60%), global warming (56%), and North Korea's nuclear program (54%).
Steven Kull, director of the Program on International Policy Attitudes comments, "According to world public opinion, these days the US government hardly seems to be able to do anything right."
Common Dreams
Published on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 by CommonDreams.org
Libbygate: Now Let's Get to the Real Story
by Dave Lindorff
So Scooter Libby has taken the fall.
Three and a half years and a long bloody war after he and a gang of war-mongers in the White House and Blair House, including President Bush and Vice President Cheney, set out to undermine and trash the reputation of an Iraq war critic, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, Libby has been found guilty of perjury, lying to the FBI and obstruction of justice by a Washington jury.
Now maybe special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald and what passes for journalists in the mainstream media can get down to the real business of finding out just why the entire White House smear operation was unleashed upon a minor state department official and why they went so far as to violate federal law and expose his CIA-operative wife, Valerie Plame, in the process destroying her entire network of contacts for monitoring the spread of nuclear weapons in the Middle East.
Because that's what this whole Libby story is really about.
The whole focus of the media in this case has been on the narrow, inside-the-Beltway question of who leaked information about Plame to the media.
Entirely forgotten or ignored has been what this leak was all about to begin with.
For that, you have to go back and look at what Wilson did in the first place that so enraged or frightened the Vice President and the President.
And that was to go to Niger, one of the poorest nations in Africa, to prove conclusively that there was no truth to a set of forged notes on the letterhead of the Niger embassy in Rome, purporting to be receipts for 400 tons of Niger uranium ore allegedly being sought by Iraq's Saddam Hussein.
Wilson knew those documents were cheap forgeries--the name of the mines official on the papers was someone who hadn't been in office for years--but he went to Niger anyhow, just to make doubly certain that no such purchase attempt had been made.
None had.
So the real question then is, who is behind those forged documents?
There is an interesting story here--and an important mystery to be solved.
As it happens, way back in early 2001 there was a pair of burglaries at the Niger Embassy in Rome and at the home of the Niger ambassador. Police investigating the crimes found that the only things stolen were official stationary and some official stamps, used to make documents official. A cleaning lady and a former member of Italy's intelligence service were arrested for the crimes. They were odd burglaries to be sure, since there is precious little one could use, or sell, such documents for, given the country involved. I mean, it might make sense to steal official stationary from the French Embassy in Rome, which a thief might use to finagle a pass to the Cannes Festival. But Niger?
Jump to October 2001. A few weeks after the 9-11 attacks, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, accompanied by his ministers of defense and intelligence, made a visit to the White House. There he reportedly handed over the forged Niger documents (they were on Niger government stationary, and had Niger government stamps!), which appeared to be receipts for uranium ore, made out to Saddam Hussein. Now forget the matter of why either Hussein or Niger's government would want paper receipts for such an illegal transaction, and forget the matter of how Hussein would have transported 400 tons of yellow dust across the Sahara to his country without somebody noticing. The simple fact is that Bush's own intelligence experts at the CIA and State Department promptly spotted the forgeries, and they were dumped.
We know this because we know, from the likes of onetime National Security Council counterterrorism head Richard Clarke and former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, that Bush was pushing for war with Iran almost as soon as he finished reading My Pet Goat following the attack on the Twin Towers. Surely if the White House had even thought those Niger documents might be legit, they would have leaked or broadcast them all over creation.
They didn't. The documents were deep-sixed, and mentioned to no one.
But according to some dedicated investigative reporters at the respected Italian newspaper La Repubblica, they resurfaced before long at a very suspicious meeting. This meeting occurred in December 2001 in Rome, and included Michael Ledeen, an associate of Defense Department Undersecretary for Policy Douglas Feith and a key figure in the White House's war-propaganda program, Larry Franklin, a top Defense Intelligence Agency Middle East analyst who later pleaded guilty to passing classified information to two employees of the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), convicted Iraqi bank swindler Ahmed Chalabi, then head of the CIA-created Iraqi National Congress, and Harold Rhode of the sinister Defense Department Office of Special Plans, that office set up by the White House and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld under Feith's direction to manufacture "evidence" to justify a war on Iraq. Also at this peculiar meeting were the heads of the Italian Defense Department and of SISMI, the Italian intelligence agency.
According to La Repubblica, it was at that meeting that a plan was hatched to resurrect the forged Niger documents, and to give them credibility by recycling them through British intelligence.
And that is what Bush was referring to when, in his 2003 State of the Union address, he famously frightened a nation by declaring, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
Bush lyingly implied that this was new information, when in fact he knew--had to know--that the "evidence" in British hands was the same set of documents he had been offered by Berlusconi almost a year and a half earlier, which had been declared to be bogus.
. . .Perhaps now that Libby has gone down for his part in this grotesque crime, some editor will ask the obvious question: Why did the White House and the Office of Vice President go to such extraordinary lengths to attack Wilson and his wife? And more importantly, who was behind those Niger embassy burglaries and the forged uranium ore sale documents? And what was OSP doing meeting in Rome in December 2001 with the head of Italian intelligence?
Make no mistake: this whole story has the odor of a "black op" designed to target the American people.
If so it was an act of high treason.
It is not just Libby who should go to jail for this crime. It is the president and vice president.
At this point, whether or not the mainstream media decide to do their job, one has to hope that Fitzgerald, with Libby in the bag, will take the next step and hold the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence recommendation over the convict¹s head in order to try and win from him a promise of cooperation with the prosecution.
Because Libby knows who was behind all of this.
And that's the real story that needs to be told.
Mar 6, 2007
Rocking the subprime house of cards
By Julian Delasantellis
Some stories, such as corpse custody battles between sleazy lawyers and semi-literate Texas trailer trash et al, the US news media handle really well. On others, such as goings-on in the world's financial markets, they don't have a clue.
Thus the media saw the big February 27 decline in the Chinese stock market followed by a big decline in the US and in other world financial markets that same day, and decided that being coincident equaling being causative was a concept that the US public could get its mind around pretty easily. Suddenly it's all China's fault.
Mind you, the US media know they will always do well by blaming foreigners, especially non-Western foreigners, for problems of essentially domestic origin; had he not died in 1991, you would have half-expected to see Khigh Alx Dheigh, the actor who played the nefarious Chinese communist operative Wo Fat in the 1970s US television crime drama Hawaii Five-O, displaying his trademark evil smirk while taking credit for the whole thing on Fox News.
People who make their living trying to ride and tame the living creatures that are traded in financial markets approach the issue of causation, of "why" something happens in the markets, with no small measure of trepidation. Sometimes determining cause is easy; if you see that a pharmaceutical firm's stock is down sharply, and then you see a report that the company's new chemotherapy drug kills more than it cures, well, in that case, putting one and one together is fairly reasonable. In other cases, and especially regarding the market as a whole rather than just an individual stock, "why" can be a fairly tricky question to answer. As then-US Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said in congressional testimony regarding the panic selling of the 1987 US stock-market crash, "Why were stocks going down? Because people were selling. Why were people selling? Because stocks were going down."
For those who make their living in markets, the logic is impeccable.
This time, was it China? For one to believe that it was would require that Chinese stock prices and values, and by extension the Chinese stock market in general, were so large and important as to occupy an absolutely central position in the world economy.
The Shanghai Stock Exchange, China's equity-trading benchmark, is divided into two sections. The A-shares, which took the big hit on February 27, consist of 825 listed share companies. Foreigners are mostly forbidden to hold or trade A-shares, which certainly makes it a bit harder to swallow the idea of a worldwide equity meltdown spreading out of the A-share market resultant from foreign investors selling equities on a global scale to cover their Chinese losses. The part of the market open to foreigners, the B-shares, is much smaller, comprising about 55 listed companies.
So a 9% one-day decline in a market that had doubled in the past year, taking prices back to where they were less than two months ago - a market that is in essence closed to foreign participation -caused a global stock market rout that, in the United States at least, wiped out US$630 billion of stock equity value just in one day?
Possible? Sure, anything's possible. But it's damned unlikely.
A 9% loss is bad, but you could always make it up. Markets do recover from losses. What's a lot worse is a 100% loss on your investments. Total wipeout - you don't recover from that. A lot of investors who thought they were making canny and sharp investments over the past few years are now facing this prospect, and the possibility of a cascading stream of successive defaults and bankruptcies is hanging over the financial markets like a specter.
In the US, it's called "subprime lending".
New Orleans Times-Picayune
LAST CHANCE: In New Orleans the fight to save a disappearing coast may already be lost
By Bob Marshall
Sunday, March 04, 2007
It took the Mississippi River 6,000 years to build the La. coast. It took man 75 years to wash away a third of it. Experts agree we have 10 years or less to act before the loss becomes irreversible.
The satellite map in Kerry St. Pe's office shows the great sweep of marshes protecting New Orleans from the Gulf in bright red, a warning they will vanish by the year 2040, putting the sea at the city's doorstep.
Coastal scientists produced the map three years ago.
They now know they got it wrong.
"People think we still have 20, 30, 40 years left to get this done. They're not even close," said St. Pe, director of the Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program, which seeks to save one of the coast's most threatened and strategically vital zones. "Ten years is how much time we have left -- if that."
That new time frame for when the Gulf could reach New Orleans' suburbs sharply reduces projections that have stood for more than three decades. Unless the state rapidly reverses the land loss, coastal scientists say, by the middle of the next decade the cost of repair likely will be too daunting for Congress to accept - and take far too long to implement under the current approval process.
New Orleans Times-Picayune
Since 1989, Louisiana has spent $600 million to stabilize 95 square miles of vanishing coastline barely making a dent in the 2,000 sq. miles lost in the past 70 years
Monday, March 05, 2007
By Bob Marshall and Mark Schleifstein
Second in a series
In 1989, after almost two decades of inaction, Louisiana finally began to address what had become the mortal threat of coastal land loss.
Voters approved a constitutional amendment that set aside oil revenue to rebuild wetlands, and the Legislature reconfigured state agencies for the task. The Gulf of Mexico had consumed about a third of the state's coastal wetlands since the 1930s -- more than 2,000 square miles -- but the tide would soon turn, experts and politicians said.
It never did.
Almost two decades and more than $1 billion later, the Gulf has eaten at least an additional 456 square miles of the state's coast, an area almost as large as Los Angeles. Meanwhile, meager restoration efforts have reclaimed or stabilized only about 95 square miles of wetlands.
Louisiana and the nation have known since the 1960s that the state's coastal estuaries -- the largest and most productive fishing grounds in the continental United States -- were turning into open water. And they knew the core causes: the taming of the Mississippi River for flood control and shipping and the dredging of canals for oil and gas.
The government built levees to protect communities from Mississippi River floods. It built jetties at the river's mouth to prevent sandbars from forming and blocking shipping traffic. Those projects worked, but they also accelerated land loss by cutting off sediment flow to the wetlands that once kept pace with subsidence, the natural sinking of soft marsh soils.
Still, the Louisiana coast might have survived another 1,000 years or more, Louisiana State University scientists said. But the discovery of oil and gas compressed its destruction into a half-century.
By the 1980s, the petroleum industry and the corps had dredged more than 20,000 miles of canals and new navigation channels from the coast inland across the wetlands. The new web of waterways, like a circulatory system pumping poison, injected saltwater from the Gulf of Mexico into salt-sensitive freshwater wetlands. Fueled by the advance of big business on the coast, the Gulf's slow march northward accelerated into a sprint.
People's Weekly World
U.S. ranks at bottom for child welfare
March 3, 2007
Author: Rosita Johnson and Teresa Albano
It's hard to be a child, but harder if you grow up in the United States, according to a recent United Nations report.
Despite claims by "free market" braggarts that unfettered capitalism is the pinnacle of human achievement, children's quality of life in the U.S. and Britain ranked at the bottom of the 21 wealthiest countries, according to the UNICEF survey.
Jonathan Bradshaw, one of the study's researchers, said the low ranking of the U.S. and Britain, in spite of their high levels of national wealth, was due to their greater wealth gap and poor levels of support for families. Bradshaw, a professor at the University of York in Britain, cited poor health coverage for children as an example.
The U.S. ranked 21st in the health and safety category because of its higher infant mortality, lower immunization rates, higher numbers of deaths from accidents and injuries before age 19, and more children reporting fighting in the past year or being bullied in the previous two months.
The research covered six areas: material well-being, health and safety, education, family and peer relationships, behaviors and risks, and young people's own sense of well-being. The U.S. and Britain were at the bottom in five of six categories. The Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Finland were at the top.
Published on Thursday, March 8, 2007 by the Guardian / UK
No, Capitalism is Not the Only Way to Order Human Affairs
by Andrew Murray
For nearly two decades, the Thatcherite dictum that "there is no alternative" has been used to stifle serious challenge to the way the world is run, and right now there seems to be an increasingly urgent insistence that there is only one possible social and economic future for us all. It isn't just the hard men of the moneyed right asserting that capitalism is the only way to order human affairs. Liberals are also now unshakeably convinced that there can be no alternative to capitalism - unless perhaps it is a collapse into some variety of barbarism.
. . .That is certainly true of many intellectuals - though, judging by opinion polls, less so of the wider public - but perhaps they have buried left and right and embraced the new world order too soon. As in most of the rest of the world, the gap between rich and poor in Britain has grown under a Labour government. Privatised industries have turned out to be ramshackle rip-offs. Women are still paid far less than men, Britain's children are the most deprived in the western world, fascists are winning council seats and workers can get sacked in a canteen by megaphone. And that's before we get on to the neo-colonialism which is making a catastrophic comeback, amid bloodshed and racism.
. . .Of course, the movie can't be rewound. Twenty-first century socialism in Britain or elsewhere cannot look east for inspiration, nor will it be the work of coal-miners and shipyard workers. But what could it offer?
For a start, socialism makes possible the re-establishment of democracy whether at national, multinational or global level. Capitalist globalisation has become synonymous with democratic powerlessness as all important decisions are taken further away from the people affected and concentrated in the hands of ever fewer corporate bosses, private equity and publicly traded alike, for whom the common weal cannot be their priority. It also raises the prospect of a more peaceful world. The idea that unchallenged capitalism meant universal peace - quite popular in the early 1990s - hardly takes much debunking now. A system that replaced fighting for scarce resources with the global management of them offers the chance both of sparing lives and of the decisive action necessary to save the planet.
And there is social justice. There is little sign of gender or race inequality within countries, or between the rich world and the poor, being eroded, much less eliminated, despite recent global growth. Rather the opposite. If you think greater inequality is fine, then you'd better get back to your hedge fund desk. But there are far more people in trade unions and the anti-war movement than there are selling guns to despots or trading oil futures. And of course there is an alternative.
Meditation Moment: Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places
Omraam Mikhaël Aïvanhov
"Why do so many people feel lonely? Because they themselves have created this solitude in their mind and their heart.
In reality, you are never alone. To complain of being lonely means that you lack love. But you lack love because you yourself do not love.
So many men and women are content merely to dream of love!
They are waiting for the prince or princess of A Thousand and One Nights, and this is why they feel lonely: because they wait for love instead of looking for it in themselves.
The love you are waiting for will never come, and you must not wait for it. It is inside you, so let it come out, express itself and shine forth.
This is the only way you will find it." -- Omraam Mikhaël Aïvanhov


text:
February 24, 2012
1985: Kelly Passes for 574 Yards as Gamblers Defeat Express
The opening week United States Football League contest between the Houston Gamblers and Los Angeles Express on February 24, 1985 featured two of the most highly-regarded young quarterbacks in the league. Houston's Jim Kelly (pictured above) had a remarkable rookie season in 1984, throwing for 5219 yards and 44 touchdowns. The Gamblers, coached by Jack Pardee and utilizing a run-and-shoot offense, went 13-5 and only a first-round loss to Arizona in the playoffs could put a damper on the outstanding year.
Steve Young of the Express joined the club after the '84 season was already underway and, while not putting together the spectacular numbers that his fellow rookie did in Houston, nevertheless performed capably and had a positive effect on the offense. LA was 2-3 and having difficulty generating points when the mobile lefthander out of Brigham Young took over, but rallied to finish at 10-8 and gain a spot in the postseason in the weak Pacific Division (and defeated Houston in the first head-to-head encounter between the two quarterbacks). Following a triple-overtime win over the defending-champion Michigan Panthers in the first round of the playoffs, LA had finally succumbed to the Arizona Wranglers.
There was a typically sparse crowd of 18,828 in attendance at the LA Memorial Coliseum for the untelevised game. The Gamblers took the early advantage as Kelly threw two one-yard touchdowns to WR Ricky Sanders in the first quarter to build up a 13-0 lead (the extra point attempt was missed following the second of the TDs). The Express responded with two field goals by Tony Zendejas, of 26 and 48 yards, in the second quarter and the score was 13-6 at halftime.
Zendejas added a 37-yard field goal in the third quarter, and then Young connected with WR JoJo Townsell for a 64-yard touchdown. RB Kevin Nelson ran for a two-yard TD and the Express, aided by Houston turnovers, was ahead by 23-13 after three quarters.
LA appeared to put the game away in the fourth quarter when safety Troy West intercepted a Kelly pass and returned it 42 yards for a touchdown, making the score 33-13 with less than ten minutes to play. However, two plays from scrimmage later Houston narrowed the gap in lightning fashion as Kelly threw to WR Richard Johnson for a 52-yard touchdown.
The Express played conservatively, trying to run out the clock, and the Gamblers got the ball back at the LA 43 following a poor 16-yard punt by Jeff Partridge with the clock down to 4:05. This time it took five plays to drive to another Kelly scoring pass as he connected with WR Vince Courville from 20 yards out. With the successful extra point it was now a six-point game at 33-27.
LA managed only a running play and two incomplete passes in its next series. Following another punt, the Gamblers had possession with just under two minutes to go. They only needed 40 seconds to cover 84 yards and cap their furious comeback as Kelly found Sanders open over the middle, beating West (who had two interceptions in the game and returned one for a score) for a 39-yard touchdown. Toni Fritsch kicked his fourth extra point of the game to provide a one-point margin.
Still, there was time on the clock for LA to attempt to drive into field goal range, and Zendejas had been successful on all four of his attempts. But Young was intercepted by LB Mike Hawkins to nail down the 34-33 win for Houston.
The Gamblers rolled up 585 total yards, with only 25 of that total on the ground, on a mere 8 carries. The Express ran the ball 20 times, but for just 49 yards while gaining a total of 267. Houston also had the edge in first downs (26 to 12), although the Gamblers hindered themselves by turning the ball over five times, to just one by LA.
Jim Kelly completed 35 of 54 passes for 574 yards and 5 touchdowns. In doing so, he not only surpassed Bobby Hebert's USFL record of 444 yards, but Norm Van Brocklin's NFL record of 554 and was just 12 yards short of Sam Etcheverry's 586 yards with Montreal of the CFL in 1954. It was the second time Kelly had tossed five TDs in a game, tying the league record that he shared with four others.
Three Houston receivers gained over a hundred yards, led by Richard Johnson with 174 on 11 catches, including one score, and followed by Ricky Sanders with 9 receptions for 108 yards and three TDs and RB Sam Harrell's 105 on 6 catches. Harrell led the almost non-existent running attack with 16 yards on four carries.
For the Express, Steve Young (pictured at right) was successful on 13 of 27 passes for 255 yards with a TD and an interception and was the leading rusher with 27 yards on five carries. JoJo Townsell gained 104 yards on his two catches, including the one long touchdown, while WR Duane Gunn had four receptions for 42 yards.
"I've been in some comebacks before, but never anything like that," said Kelly. "Pulling out that win was the best feeling I ever had in my life."
"He's a great quarterback; that's a great offense," summed up Steve Young, whose own efforts had come up short.
"I got too conservative in the fourth quarter," lamented Express Head Coach John Hadl.
It was the beginning of another outstanding year for Houston and Jim Kelly. While the second-year quarterback out of Miami missed several games due to injury, he still led the USFL in pass attempts (567), completions (360), yards (4623), touchdowns (39), and passer rating (97.9). The Gamblers finished third in the Western Conference with a 10-8 record but were the league's highest-scoring club with 544 points. They qualified for the postseason but once again lost in the first round, falling to Birmingham by a 22-20 score.
They were far ahead of the Los Angeles Express, who finished at a miserable 3-15 and wound up the year playing at Pierce College's small venue while unsuccessfully seeking new ownership. It was a tough season for Steve Young as well, who threw for 1741 yards with 6 TD passes and 13 interceptions and rushed for 368.
With the demise of the USFL, both quarterbacks made their way to the NFL. Kelly played for Buffalo, the team that had his rights after drafting him in the first round in 1983, and led the Bills to four straight AFC titles – although the club fell short in the Super Bowl after each. Young went to Tampa Bay and was then dealt to the 49ers, where he was a backup on two Super Bowl-winning squads, was the starting quarterback when San Francisco won the NFL Championship in 1994, and led the league in passing six times. They both eventually ended up in the Pro Football Hall of Fame – the USFL performances were just the opening chapter.
Posted by Keith Yowell at 7:35 AM 1 comment:
Labels: 1985 USFL season, Houston Gamblers, Jack Pardee, Jim Kelly, John Hadl, Los Angeles Express, Steve Young
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


text:
THE TOURNAMENT WAS SEEMINGLY OVER. Yani Tseng stood on the 18th tee at Carnoustie Golf Links with a three-shot lead over Brittany Lang. In a matter of minutes Tseng could claim her second consecutive Women's British Open and fifth major title at the age of 22 years, six months and eight days. No one had won five majors so soon, not even Tiger Woods.
That's when she was visited by ghosts of the past, if just for a moment.
In 1999 French golfer Jean Van de Velde walked to the 72nd hole of The Open Championship with a comfortable three-stroke lead. Then he strolled into history, but not at all like he or the aghast onlookers expected. Van de Velde splashed into the Barry Burn with his approach shot. All he needed was a double-bogey six and his name would be etched on the Claret Jug. He made a seven and lost the four-hole playoff to Paul Lawrie.
Tseng thought of Van de Velde as she walked to the final hole on Sunday. Maybe that was a good thing. She still had to take care of business. It was no time to get sloppy.
"When you come on this golf course, you're going think about him," Tseng said. "But I did think about it a little bit.
"I had a three-shot lead so I'd better hit a good drive here to win the tournament. I thought, okay, let's hit a good drive, finish here."
And she did, leaving herself about 135 yards to the hole. Still, the ghosts beckoned.
"I hit a 9-iron, and I was thinking about Jean Van de Velde."
But Tseng isn't Van de Velde. The Taiwanese star flew that "juiced" 9-iron straight at the flagstick and sank the short birdie putt for a four-shot victory.
Tseng is the new dominant force, not just in women's golf, but all of golf. With the LPGA Tour adding a major to put five on the annual calendar, Tseng is looking like a serious threat to catch Tiger Woods and even Jack Nicklaus. She is already on a record pace.
−The Armchair Golfer


text:
Friday, December 18
King of Golf Cartoons: 'Score'
Copyright © Jerry King. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Can you remember your highest 18-hole score? I'll go first. As a ninth-grader, I once carded a 109 in a high-school match.
−The Armchair Golfer
Jerry King is an award-winning cartoonist whose credits and clients include Golf Digest, United States Golf Association and Disney. His golf cartoons are a regular feature at ARMCHAIR GOLF.
2 comments:
- adamming said...
I'm sure I've done worse before but this was my first year golfing seriously and more than once or twice and my first outing with a high school buddy was absolutely tragic.
I lost more balls than I care to recall, but the final damages were over 120 (124 I believe).
My last round this year was an 85. So I've made steps in a good direction at least, but 109 as a high schooler beats my sorry butt all day.
- Tom Collins said...
I still remember my first 18 hole score ever: 144.
I was 10, so maybe this isn't really what you were looking for. My first competitive golf round was even funnier: a 40 for 5 holes.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)


text:
(CNN) -- This week on The Big Three, we tackled the George W. Bush library opening, frustration over flight furloughs (complete with congressional finger-pointing) and Dean Obeidallah's CNN.com column, "I'm a Muslim and I hate terrorism," which seems sadly necessary in the wake of Boston.
The opening of a presidential library is supposed to be a time for national unity. All the living presidents attend, standing together for a photo op and offering complimentary speeches about the newest inductee to the ex-presidents' club.
But during all the same pageantry in Dallas at the opening of Bush's library, a less civil debate on the Big Three (and across the country) was going on about 43's legacy. Margaret Hoover is a proud Bush administration alumna and attended the opening in Dallas. Dean, it is fair to say, is not a Bush fan. At all.
And so the debate raged, with Margaret citing his investment in foreign aid to stem the tide of AIDS in Africa and keeping the nation safe from terrorism after the attacks of 9/11. Dean acknowledged that Bush might be a nice guy to hang out with but asked whether the library would consist primarily of coloring books. As the card-carrying centrist in the group, I try to find common ground. And so it goes.
At the time of our discussions, the sequester cuts were kicking in, and airline travelers were feeling the pain, with 40% of flights delayed this week because of the furlough of air-traffic controllers. Congress has since overwhelmingly approved a measure to get the air travel system up to speed again after the delays provoked a round of the blame game on Capitol Hill, with conservatives accusing the president of "playing politics" with these particular cuts. Margaret agreed with this assessment. I ain't buying it.
The sequester was supposed to be so dumb and painful that it would compel Congress to reason together and find deficit and debt reduction to more strategic means. It didn't. And while the rhetoric of cutting government spending is popular, the reality is predictably less so. And so we're being treated to the absurdity of conservative activist groups such as Americans for Prosperity -- whose sole purpose is to argue for cuts in government spending -- complaining about the practical effects of those very cuts on which they insisted. This is the old dynamic we see too much of -- cuts for thee but not for me.
Finally, in the wake of the Boston terror attacks, America and the American Muslim community have navigated the tricky territory of confronting the ideology of radical Islam that apparently inspired the attacks without engaging in group blame.
Dean's excellent CNN.com column tries to clarify some of the bigoted myths by making the point that American Muslims might hate jihadis even more than typical Americans do because the murderers claim to represent their faith and cause a massive backlash against this growing American community. Read the column -- and then listen to our conversation, tackling subjects such as why extremists of other faiths tend not to blow things up.
Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.
Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion.


text:
The Clockwork Universe
The Clockwork Universe is the story of a band of men who lived in a world of dirt and disease but pictured a universe that ran like a perfect machine. A meld of history and science, this book is a group portrait of some of the greatest minds who ever lived as they wrestled with natures most sweeping mysteries. The answers they uncovered still hold the key to how we understand the world.
At the end of the 17th century, an age of religious wars, plague, and the Great Fire of London when most people saw the world as falling apart, these earliest scientists saw a world of perfect order. They declared that, chaotic as it looked, the universe was in fact as intricate and perfectly regulated as a clock. This was the tail end of Shakespeare's century, when the natural and the supernatural still twined around each other. Disease was a punishment ordained by God, astronomy had not yet broken free from astrology, and the sky was filled with omens. It was a time when little was known and everything was new. These brilliant, ambitious, curious men believed in angels, alchemy, and the devil, and they also believed that the universe followed precise, mathematical laws, a contradiction that tormented them and changed the course of history. The Clockwork Universe is the fascinating and compelling story of the bewildered geniuses of the Royal Society, the men who made the modern world.
- Jean
- 2016/09/19
A Concise Explainer
The book takes place in the 1600 hundreds in Europe. Superstition and belief in the supernatural were common place. To this background Dolnick tells us the stories of Isaacs Newton, Galileo, Kepler, Copernicus, Descartes, and Leibniz. These men discovered and described the forces that kept the earth, moon and all the planets spinning in their orbits, thereby ushering in the modern era. At the beginning of the book the author discusses the plague and life in the 1600s; he also discusses diarist Samuel Pepys and satirist Jonathan Swift. Dolnick provides a brief history of the Royal Society founded in London in 1660 to promote scientific inquiry. The last part of the book Dolnick reviews Isaac Newton's "Principia."
The book is well written and researched. Dolnick uses simple language and short chapters to explain complex ideas in math and physics. Dolnick is a journalist with the Boston Globe and the investigative techniques of the journalist come through in his writing. I am amazed how vividly he portrayed living conditions of the time. This is a great book that triggers the reader to want to read the biographies of these early scientist.
Alan Sktar narrated the book. Sktar is an actor and voiceover artist and an award winning audiobook narrator.
- Nelson Alexander
- 2011/07/09
Calculus Ergo Modernity
I hesitated to buy this one after reading the reviews, so I felt obliged to offer a counter opinion. I thought the book excellent and the narration quite tolerable. While the author centers on the great calculus debate between Newton and Leibniz and tosses in a lot of anecdotal history, the book also functions as a very good primer on the foundations of modern science, treating it as the elaboration and application of mathematics to physical phenomena. The crucial step represented by a mathematics of motion is a central theme. His descriptions of the calculus and the weird conceptual innovation Newton called ???gravity??? are really very good and surprisingly clear in narration without any visual aids. He also paints a vivid picture of the physical and metaphysical worlds of the 17th century, including a welcome insistence on the essential role of religious faith, even mysticism, in the thinking of the early modern scientists. As to the narration, I can see why some people might find it slightly irritating. The reader has a plumy voice that dips into avuncular chuckles at points of irony, which can be a bit annoying. But I found the pace and tone very good for comprehension overall. The lives of Newton and Leibniz make a marvelous story, and unless you are already familiar with them you will probably enjoy this book.
- Troy
- 2013/01/15
It's a Wonder We Left the Dark Ages
This book sets everything up with a concise account of the kinds of nonsense and "old wives' tales" people believed back in the Middle Ages. It's important to note that people in those times weren't stupid, but superstition permeated everything, and society kept locks on the doors of advancement for a long time, often out of fear. And then little by little, some brave and brilliant minds risked ridicule or worse and slowly unlocked the secrets that transformed our understanding and gave birth to modern science. This is that story of what they did, how they did it, and some of the drama that unfolded because of it. That drama is precisely why I make the remark in the title of this review. This book will reveal that the Dark Ages weren't quite so dark, the Enlightenment wasn't that enlightening, and yet we made it this far in spite of ourselves because of the chain of events that did transpire. It's an interesting account that fills in some of the story behind the story.
- Alison
- 2011/06/26
The Royal Society comes alive.
Featuring Kepler, Galileo, Newton, and Leibniz, the author explores the scientific golden age of the seventeenth century. The characters are lively, the science is fascinating, and the subjects diverse: geometry, calculus, physics, optics, and more. An absorbing read for anyone interested in the hard sciences and curious about their development.
- Mike From Mesa
- 2013/11/15
A laymans history of the scientific revolution
Mr Dolnick's book is basically about the scientific revolution which took place around the 17th century. It covers the discoveries of Kepler, Galileo, Boyle, Hook, Liebnitz, Newton and others. In an attempt to explain the science and the reasons the discoveries were of importance Mr Dolnick does what the reader would expect - he presents the mathematics and science in the simplest possible terms so that they are understandable to those with no scientific training.
In this he does a credable job and, for the most part, the explanations make sense and are presented at a level that can be understood by those not "expert" in the areas involved. Mr Dolnick also tries to present the history of the discoveries in context with the times so that readers can understand how and why the discoveries were of importance.
Some parts of this book work relatively well. Kepler's discoveries (the 3 Laws) are explained in simple terms, Galileo's work is explained in a way that readers can relate to and in a way that makes their importance to those in everyday life understandable. There is an extended section on infinite numbers and why they presented difficulties to early mathematicians and an even more extended section on the tragic, but inevitable, clash between Newton and Liebnitz. Mr Dolnick even mentions the problems this caused the British during the following years, although I believe he should have spent more time explaining why this was a serious problem for British scientists. Still he does make a stab at the issue.
On the other hand I believe that there are issues with the presentation as well. First, Mr Dolnick seems to have a problem with religion in general and with those who are religious in particular. The first part of the book fairly reeks of religious intolerance and those who are "believers" are sometimes treated as fools. Secondly Mr Dolnick sometimes raises issues that he does not bother to finish. For example, what happened to Kepler's mother?
While the book is not intended to be a scientific treatise on the issues I believe that those familiar with the science and mathematics are probably not going to enjoy entire sections of the book. In his attempt to make the issues understandable to the layman Mr Dolnick often uses terminology that is either incorrect or so "dumbed down" that it is difficult for those who know the subject areas to bear with. For example, no one in the Sciences has used the term "imaginary numbers" since I was in High School many, many years ago. The numbers are now referred to as "complex numbers" since they are not "imaginary" at all. And, in spite of Mr Dolnick's book, mathematicians today would almost universally say that they are involved in the discovery of "eternal truths" and that has not changed since the time of Kepler. Armithmetic is not, and never has been, part of modern mathematics past the 5th or 6th grade in school.
I can only review and evalutate this book in the light I see it. If I were a non-scientist I suppose my review might be different but I am not and hence I find this book "off-putting" in entire sections. While I believe it would be of interest to those without much of a scientific background I believe it is of only very limited interest to those who are trained in the "exact sciences". On the plus side I believe that Alan Sklar's narration is very well done.
- Abigail
- 2011/03/06
Entertaining History Narrated Suppurbly
This book is a great introduction to so many of history's most interesting genius's. The major characters are Newton and Leibniz but the author manages to familiarize the reader with a near exhaustive list of scientific greats from throughout history. Don't worry about hearing too much about stuffy intellectual types, these guys are far from boring. I didn't agree with all of the authors perspectives on these great men and the times in which they lived but all and all this is a solid and very informative book about a fascinating and turbulent time in history. The author covers a vast amount of material yet manages not to short change the subject. A light and fun history that manages to convey a large amount of information and leave the reader wanting more. Leaves much of the life, blood, controversies, feuds, and other interesting bits in. Makes you want to read biographies of just about everyone mentioned. The narrator is fantastic.
- Dan
- 2011/04/14
Fantastic narration complements entertaining book
This title is extremely entertaining. It covers and links historical figures and their achievements well but above all it's delivered in an entertaining and often amusing way. Highly recommended to anyone even remotely interested in historical events and discoveries.
The review would not be complete however without mentioning the quality of narration. Alan Sklar has become an instant favourite with me and I'll be searching out other titles he's worked on based on this book alone.
- Jacobus
- 2011/11/26
Introduction to the sitz im leben of Isaac Newton
Don't expect a history of Isaac Newton or the Royal Society. While you may find a lot of history, what you will hear is how people thought and understood the world in Newton and other great British and European thinkers' time. It helps you to understand the change in understanding our world. I think Edward Dolnick did a pretty good job in giving his listeners an understanding of the world from which the modern world sprang. Alan Skar also does a fair job of interepretative reading. I didn't find any reading down. I do think however Dolnick wrote as if he has futher evolved in his thinking than some other people, which could give certain people offence. All in all a good book but not really my cup of tea... or coffee.
- Andrew's wife
- 2015/08/18
Very Enlightening
Any additional comments?
This book was very enlightening. There was so much in it that I didn't know or had never thought about. Since I'm currently taking Calculus II as part of my Computer Science degree, I found this book to be doubly interesting.
- 2012/04/30
An interesting book
What did you love best about The Clockwork Universe?
This book captures the mindsets of great men and their contemporaries in a way that makes them believably human, rather than names thrown around in a science textbook. We understand their quirks, their theories and how they viewed the world.
Any additional comments?
As a parting thought about the book, I have a question about why people today are separating science from religion even though it's clear some of the greatest scientists in history did their research with the intention of understanding God's universe better.
Great food for thought.
- Mitko Lazov
- 2019/09/19
Very good!
Very interesting "read". Very different world the fathers ot science have been seeing. A must for a scientific thinker.
- David Haselden
- 2019/03/16
It concludes explaining how Newton established and set in motion the science that undermines a god and yet he was so devout in his belief of him. Many Christians I know see Newton in such an incorrect light I hope that more of them will read this fine book.
- dean
- 2013/04/07
some really interesting bits, but jumped about
I am interested in this period in history and this book provided lots of interesting details. However, at times it seemed to jump about a bit and I was not so comfortable with this lack of a strong flowing narrative
- Shane
- 2016/05/29
Informative but Simple
I really enjoyed this book for giving the gist of one of the most important periods in scientific history. While I think all of the things presented here are true, the tone is sometimes overly simplistic. In other words, it is a fantastic story, but not told with the proper degree of complexity and nuance.
- Alan
- 2019/11/26
Anti God Scornful Tirade
Early information in the book seems quite good and historically informative however the not so subtle anti God scornful attitude of both the author & narrator pervade. Evolution, an unproved theory with no extant indisputable evidence ever produced, is presumed by the author to be scientific fact such that statements with no supportive evidence contradicting the beliefs of the book's subjects are prolific. I persisted with listening, hoping for improvement/valuable information on the work of the scientists under discussion until chapter 20, but found little actual material on their work but ridicule of their attributing to God the amazing features discovered. Am returning this book. Don't waste your time on it, unless you want to stroke your materialistic leanings.


text:
With Spring Break less than a week aways, it suddenly dawned on me that most of my friends are going to be out of town on college visits, and since I was fortunate enough to get into my dream school that is just a short 30 minutes away, my schedule is pretty free. So what's a girl to do? Well in addition to going on some wonderful dates with Goose, I'm going to hopefully cross off some of the recipes from my ever-growing pinterest list. Here's are some of the foods that I'm hoping to whip up in the near future:
Sweet and Sour Cucumbers with Fresh Dill from Epicurious as a delicious snack for whenever my tummy starts grumbling between meals
Basic Tomato Sauce from The Curvy Carrot as a cheaper way to fulfill my obsession with Dave's Organic Tomato Sauce
Strawberry Shortcake Muffins from Dashing Dish to take full advantage of fresh spring strawberries
Roasted Vegetable Soup with Fresh Oregano from Good Cheap Eats to use some of the delicious herbs from our garden
Chocolate Chocolate Chocolate Mouse from Chocolate Covered Katie as a delicious, protein-packed sweet treat
Spinach Burgers from the Village Cook as a great freezer option to eat on a whole wheat bun with avocado or humus
Grapefruit Vanilla Pudding from Stetted as a delicious way to take advantage of the end of citrus season
Miso Roasted Asparagus from Big Girls Small Kitchen to enjoy asparagus while it's at its prime
Whole Wheat Almond Crumble Bars from the Realistic Nutritionist as a tasty breakfast, afternoon snack, or dessert
Hearty Italian Vegetable Soup from Vanilla Clouds and Lemon Drops as a great go-to lunch or dinnerMeyer Lemon Clouds with Lemon Whipped Cream and Fresh Blueberries from Steamy Kitchen as a delicious Passover treat
What is on your cooking to do list?