text:
Ernst Busch sings "Lob der Dialektik" (Bertolt Brecht)
Some more articles on theatre
T. Adorno / Notes to literature. Commitment
A. Baraka, James Hatch / Afro-american revolutionary theater
B. Brecht / Sports, Epic, et al
J. Butler / Performative acts and gender constitutions
H. Cruse / Revolutionally Nationalism anв the Afro-american
S. Dixon / Digital Performance
E. Diamond / The Performance and Cultural Politics
С. Fusco / The Other History of Intercultural Performance
M. Pearson / Theatre/Archaeology
P. Phelan / Onthology of theatre
J. Roach / Kinship, intelligence, and memory as Improvisation
R. Schechner / Between Theater and Anthropology
S. Ford / Situationist International
Taylor / The DNA of Performance
Taylor / The art and the repertoire
From the Perspective of Hope – A Conversation Between Alexei Penzin and Dmitry Vilensky
1. The Dialectic of Victories and Defeats
Alexei Penzin (AP): Hope, which we have decided to discuss with reference to the present political moment, would appear to be an important and attractive theme, but it simultaneously contains a number of traps. Hope has long been part of mass culture's standard set of sentimental banalities. It forms the basis for psychotherapeutic normalization techniques that aim to adapt individuals to the fragmented society of what has been called "late capitalism," a society replete with anxiety-inducing uncertainties, by persuading them of the need for "positive thinking" as a guarantee of personal and career success. Old and new populist politicians employ the rhetoric of promise and hope as a means of mobilizing the masses, exploiting their longing to belong to one or another (as a rule, national) identity.[1] But what is hope if not an abstract form that everyone can fill with their own content? Hope contains a transcendent, religious element primarily associated with the Judeo-Christian tradition. But it arises from our everyday secular experience: we hope for an important encounter, for an answer, for an inspiring collaboration, for the realization of our plans and expectations. We share our hopes with others, thus infecting them with our own enthusiasm. The question is how to make this general sense of hope something capable of transfiguring reality, rather than just a realm of passive, unconscious collective fantasies and utopias—or daydreams, as philosopher Ernst Bloch would have put it.
In contemporary societies, hope goes beyond religion: it has become a complex of affects associated with political struggle, although perhaps it continues to be informed by theology surreptitiously. In fact it is difficult to free oneself completely from the "theology" of hope, which always implicitly presumes an inscrutable, almighty Other (God, Master, savior, etc.) that must come to our rescue. But we can turn this attitude upside down by locating an activist impulse in orthodox theological thinking about hope, as philosopher Alain Badiou does in his book about Saint Paul. Badiou argues that Paul sees hope not in the promise of the Judgment Day, the promise of heaven or hell, but in the affirmation of persistence and faithfulness in the here and now, in the activist realization and universalization of truth despite everything, even the most desperate circumstances. Hope is not the hope for an "objective" victory, that is, for retribution or compensation in the future. On the contrary, it is "subjective" victory that produces hope, even if this victory is neither global nor final. This is definitely an important aspect that shapes the subjectivities of activists in modern anti-capitalist movements, for example.
The historical experience of emancipatory politics, however, is filled not only with victories but also with defeats. If we reject "victory" as a capitalist transaction, as compensation for expended effort, then can we rely on elusive subjective experience? If we reject all figures of the transcendent Other (including its theoretical equivalents such as the "ironclad logic of history" that should lead ineluctably to the realization of our emancipatory goals), can we rely only on ourselves? Doesn't this lock us—artists, intellectuals, and cultural and political activists—within ourselves by excluding the emergence of something new and unexpected, of radical subjectivities whose genesis might simply beincomprehensible to us? Even if our experience is a collective one, don't we always risk lapsing into purely sectarian enthusiasm? Should we limit our notion of the production of hope in politics to the heroic figure of "victory"? These are all quite tricky questions, particularly under current conditions, when many things that were once clear have become opaque. I think that in our conversation we could focus on two issues: attempting to define hope while taking all these contexts into account, and trying to understand what specific processes and events give us hope.
Dmitry Vilensky (DV): I once wrote a short essay entitled What Does It Mean to Lose? As you'll recall, this was the title of an issue of our newspaper dealing with the experiences of perestroika.[2] For me, perestroika is a vivid manifestation of a process in which the subjective experience of victory via participation in a liberation struggle ends up being co-opted by the forces of reaction.[3] Hence what is in the foreground is the issue of one's readiness for particular historical transformations, as well as the need to renew the struggle on the basis of a cogent analysis of what has happened. We should always be vigilant towards the dialectic of victories and defeats demonstrated by any liberatory process or revolution. Nevertheless, "leftist" political consciousness has historically tended to be heroically dramatic, and this has been its strength. It is based on the analysis of cruel and often bloody defeats: we learn from the experience of loss. Even the seemingly most vivid chapters in this history—the Paris Commune, the October Revolution of 1917, the collapse of the USSR in 1991, and a multitude of other particular episodes of the struggle—are simultaneously defeats and betrayals. But if humanity is still capable of contemplating it, the experience of these defeats is more important than capital's meaningless victories. It is through these defeats that we can genuinely question ourselves and the society in which we live. Each defeat that we have comprehended contributes to the potential for a renewal of the struggle, a potential that works toward creating a new historical breakthrough. But right now we find ourselves at a point where the most sublimely tragic interpretation of history is called into question. To a great extent this predetermines the crisis of the leftist position in general after the collapse of party politics, which has rejected the possibility of a grand, universal narrative right at the moment when reactionary forces continue to cynically employ it by exploiting patriotism, the idea of the nation, militaristic zeal, etc.
AP: I agree: we need not only to take the figure of victory into account, but also to think hard about the phenomenon of defeat itself and the possibilities for reviving a mobilizing, tragic vision of history. But the crisis of the leftist position in the past decades doesn't only have to do with a shift in ideological or narrative strategies. The ontology of late capitalism itself changed. Its historical foes (alternative social formations, which is what the countries of "actually existing socialism" were, for all their faults) quit the field, and capitalist relations have even more aggressively seeped into all the pores of society, subjugating it to their own functions. What matters is the question of the limits of this penetration by capital and the resources for resisting it and developing activist "spaces of hope," to borrow social theorist David Harvey's expression. Of course people do not want to be only machines for maximizing profit, as neoliberalism's primitive anthropology would have it. Between this unwillingness and an active anti-capitalist stance, however, there are a huge number of obstacles—from liberal ideology, which fosters the illusion that private space, ethics, and "human values" are beyond capital's power, to direct disciplinary and punitive interventions on behalf of our "alternative-less" order.
I'm more interested in a different question: in connection with all these transformations: how has the mechanism for producing mass militant subjectivity—a subjectivity that is optimistic, hopeful, triumphant, and simultaneously (as you correctly note) unafraid of defeat—been weakened or even partly destroyed? How is it changing now with the advent of new movements and experiences of resistance? As you know, I am partial to the approach elaborated by Michel Foucault in his final lectures at the Collège de France in which he analyzes the subjectivation techniques transmitted within various philosophical schools during antiquity. The subjectivation achieved via these practices involved self-possession, the establishment and formation of the self as a force set against externally imposed, institutionalized governance. Using this as our starting point, we can speak as well of contemporary subjectivity, which is bound up with the evolution of liberalism and biopolitics as doctrines and practices. This is a set of techniques for forming individuals and masses as objects of investigation and analysis, as well as the interiorization of control mechanisms such that power no longer has to resort to the mass application of harsh discipline and punitive measures. Departing from several uncompleted fragments in Foucault's work, we can also speak of the most important alternative model from our viewpoint—the model of revolutionary subjectivity, which is discussed in several passages in the lecture course The Hermeneutics of the Subject.[4] The entire ensemble for the production of militant subjectivity (agitation, collective action and struggle, protest techniques, self-education, alternative modes of daily living) is a vital part of nineteenth- and twentieth-century history, something that we still have to study, comprehend, and make relevant again.[5] In fact we can speak of the process by which the old mechanism of political subjectivation broke down by employing the coordinates of our "post-communist" society. The discourse about the "religious" or "messianic" character of communism has long been a liberal banality and propagandistic cliché. But perhaps we can use this ambivalent play of analogies in our own discussion. If the October Revolution was an incarnation of the hopes of millions of impoverished people, then the "Judgment Day" of Stalinism that followed (beginning with the notorious show trials of the 1930s) did not lead to the establishment of heaven's reign on earth. The thesis of a kind of political atheism springs out of this experience: "There is no communism!" In post-Soviet society, political "faith and hope" gave way to apathy and political disenchantment, and not just with communism but with capitalism as well, which after a short period of consumerist temptation and fascination with global mass culture suddenly revealed itself as the selfsame merciless "hell" that Soviet propaganda had so fondly depicted. Of course, this doesn't affect the ruling elites, who enjoy their exorbitant profits.
DV: I beg to differ with you when it comes to the merciless "hell" of the current period. I detect a certain traditional rhetoric common to many leftists, a rhetoric that in my view is quite bogus. I think that if contemporary reality were really like this— if a critical mass of people had nothing to lose—then these people would organize themselves and demolish the existing order immediately. The problem is that capital has learned from centuries of class wars and national-liberation struggles, and so now it quite subtly regulates the disposition of the masses by always leaving them with the sense that any change might deprive them of what little they have now. We need to understand clearly that even workers in a wretched third-world sweatshop, who labor for miserly pay, are grateful to have those jobs because there is no other work available. We face a situation in which it is quite hard to radicalize people in the struggle for their rights. When we conscientiously analyze the situation, it always turns out that everyone has something to lose. But I agree with you that one of the main problems today is that people are losing the horizon for imagining a different life. The Bolsheviks, say, had a much easier time producing ideas capable of mobilizing the working class, who lived in inhumane conditions and were simultaneously open to a broad spectrum of messianic ideas about final justice, harmonious cooperative living, and egalitarian labor.
2. The Symptomatology of Hope
AP: I recall that during a bitter argument with certain disillusioned members of the post-Soviet art scene, you said something like, "Let's wait and see: history will put everything in its place!" As an artist, do you perceive this connection to the history writ large of aesthetic experiments and political struggle we touched on earlier in the form of hope? Doesn't it seem to you (I say this mostly in jest) that this postponed-until-the-future putting of everything in its place is somehow reminiscent of Judgment Day?
DV: I'll explain what I meant. It's probably the case that we—the last artists raised in the Soviet dissident school—are guilty of a certain old-fashioned attachment to history. You find this in Ilya Kabakov's work, with his famous slogan "Not everyone will be admitted to the future," and his quite serious attitude to the history of art and thought as the most brilliant manifestation of the heights of the human spirit, something that many of us absorbed in childhood.
The seemingly endless stagnation of late socialism, when the viscosity of time left no chance for any sort of meaningful realization, forced us to think in terms of other temporal and historical categories. That is in part why our practices were always correlated not with the sad, gloomy "today" but were aimed at the future. And it was this future-directedness that produced such energy of struggle and rage—"We Shall Overcome." It is no wonder, by the way, that this song became the anthem of the 1989 Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia. Its lyrics, which were adapted from the refrain of a gospel song, are essentially a grammar for a subject-formation based on the cultivation of hope:
I do believe / deep in my heart / We shall be free / We are not afraid / We are not alone / The whole wide world around / We'll walk hand in hand / We shall overcome…Perhaps this is why, in the early 1990s, when Francis Fukuyama's notorious hypothesis about the "end of history" began to be discussed widely, we were so stunned by it. It seemingly deprived us not simply of reference points, but of the very hope that meanings and truths would one day take their rightful place. For me, hope is primarily the feeling that many things are possible, that many things are under our control. Despite everything, we create the future today. Genuine hope arises from the clear sense that not everything is determined and there is always a certain supply of freedom, of insubordination, that there are no such things as purely external circumstances. "Externality" does not come ready-made and immutable: it is the space of struggle, confrontation, and movement. Hence it is always the case that "all is not lost."
AP: This is quite important: to think of the situation not as static but emergent—that is, as something that is not closed, as something to be pried open. Many twentieth-century thinkers based their work on these premises. For example, in the 1970s Foucault conceived of the state of society as a shifting balance between the forces of power and resistance. Nothing is frozen; even the "stability" of the most reactionary order is just an ideological cover for millions of unseen clashes and conflicts. If we regard the term seriously, then hope is the subjective optics of a gaze shaped by this moment of emergence and dynamism in the present, not by the fantasies and pipe dreams of a desperate individual in search of consolation. This is a gaze founded on a view of society as a configuration of dynamic forces, not as a dead, petrified, and hopeless order that seems insurmountable. At any moment there exists a certain balance of power and the struggle against it, of constituent forces. The problem is that nowadays this struggle does not emerge onto the level of fundamental, "strong" schisms, contradictions, and subjects capable of radically changing society. Hence the importance of the capacity to distinguish hopeful symptoms: this makes it possible to plug into lines of struggle, to feel them out, and thus to work to strengthen them. If we look at society from the position of hope—that is, as a dynamic of forces, as becoming—then we are no longer hobbled by the melancholic, hopeless image of defeat.
DV: But I insist that defeat is not melancholy or hopelessness! It is the desire to gather strength, learn lessons, and "give as good as one got." This is what produces the formative effect.
AP: Here I should clarify: I was talking about a banal image, the representation of defeat. You're suggesting that we rethink it as an active state, and I agree. Capitalist management aims to secure itself against threats by neutralizing previous techniques and subjects of resistance. So you are right that each time the desire arises to fight back, and to concentrate one's forces and act in a new way in order to accomplish this, one can find productive potential.
I would say that as a political optics, a point of view, hope is a symptomatology. That is, it is the subjective ability to see and distinguish signs, social symptoms that point to maturing lines of struggle. We can single out several types of such symptoms. For example, there are symptomatic events, which might include large-scale events such as revolutions. Immanuel Kant's discussion of the French Revolution is well known: he regarded it as a "prognostic sign," referring to the history of progress and emancipation, which inspired enthusiasm and hope, moreover in subjects who were more likely to be in the position of observers (in other countries not affected by the revolutionary events). This same logic can be applied to the October Revolution, which at first provoked a rising of hopes for liberation throughout the world.
In our reactionary times, the logic of "progress" is far from obvious, although the revolutionary events of the past occupy an important place in our memory and thought. Therefore we should speak of symptoms smaller in scale. These are the symptomatic people who inspire hope, and if we speak of our own milieu, then we know many such people personally. Each particular activist "unit" is vital in our extremely reactionary post-Soviet conjuncture. It is not a question of the banal "role of the individual in history." These people or collectives, however small, bring something more than their own private identities. These are "disinterested" subjectivities that emanate prognostic signs.[6] They refer us to the history writ large of the anti-capitalist struggle—its past, present, and future.
DV: Doesn't it seem to you that this continuity amongst leftist movements has been disrupted by the radical self-criticism occasioned by the experiences of "totalitarianism" in the twentieth century? This self-criticism leads to a rejection of hegemonic politics, which is suspected of being always on the verge of switching to a politics of domination and violence. Can we say, for example, that in the context of post-Soviet forms of struggle this continuity with history is being thought in a new way and without nostalgia?
AP: To answer this complicated question about continuity with history under present conditions, I would like to recall our recent discussions about the practice of "communal life seminars" (obshchezhitiia) as an example of this renewed continuity. These are the temporary experimental communities that members of the collective Chto Delat?/What is to be done? have recently been trying to create in order to combine the experiences of activism, theory, and political art (which, strictly speaking, is the task our group posed itself from the very beginning).[7] On the one hand, the communal seminars attempt to alleviate the abstractness of critical theory by rejecting formal academic representation. On the other hand, they also attempt to inspire activists to eschew the anti-intellectualism common to many of them and to try and comprehend forms of political coordination in a new way. The figure of the artist is also important here: I would say that it is connected with what has been called the "art of political life," with sensitivity to the possibilities of living together.
We've only begun this experiment, of course, but it provokes some fairly interesting reflections. All three of these modes—activist, theoretical, and artistic—seem essential, whereas in the leftist tradition only the first two (theory and activist practice) have usually been taken into account. Using Jacques Lacan's terminology, we can relate activism to the register of the Real, and theory to the Symbolic register, while the artistic mode can be imagined as the register of the Imaginary. Each of the three modes links up differently with history, singling out different moments in it: activism has to do with the present; art (the Imaginary), with anticipation of the future; and theory, with interpreting the past experience of struggle. This configuration also enables us to rethink hegemony as a politics in which knowledge, action, and imagination act in concert, and not simply as intellectual struggle, the war of position, and the forging of alliances.
3. Dritte Sache
DV: I would like to take off from your reflection that our reference points are people or collectives who surpass their own private identities. During Soviet times practically all individuals lived with consciousness that their life was not of great value compared to a larger narrative. This "grand narrative" could be communism, art, your professional or moral development, or defense of the Motherland from fascism. All these and other ideas and notions were unambiguously imagined as common values whose significance surpassed the significance of a finite life inevitably doomed to death. Moreover, it goes without saying that then all this was articulated from a thoroughly atheistic stance. It is worth recalling Brecht's quite striking and simple description, in his book Me-Ti, of the existence of two people who love each other. This existence only acquires meaning and integrity when a third thing—dritte Sache—emerges between the two people. This third thing can only be some kind of cooperative action such as participation in a revolutionary struggle, the striving towards truth via the practices of knowledge and art, or something else that grows out of this relationship but renders it meaningful and overcomes its limitations. It is curious that Brecht did not include the raising of children in this list. Today, people are prepared to struggle for their hope that their children will be better off than they are. For this they are willing to sacrifice their own prosperity and career prospects so that their children have a chance to surpass their parents and have a better life. This cannot be reduced to competitiveness or the struggle for survival connected to "bare life." Here we can find a minimal guarantee of human dignity and even resistance. I think that this unconditional love and care is an important common cause, there is also a fundamental human quality in this projection of people within their own children, and we will hardly be able to understand anything about the contemporary world without taking this quality into account. Strictly speaking, all our speculations about education begin here, with the conditions in which our children are raised, with what we invest in that undertaking.
AP: I think that the dritte Sache is quite an important anthropological and political principle. It is definitely materialist: Brecht speaks not of abstract "ideas" that unite people, but of practices, causes, and things. This is especially important now, in an age that is reactionary in many ways, because it enables us to see—as in your example about children—that in the behavior of people seemingly crushed by the unshakeable hegemony of contemporary capitalism we can detect the desire for a different, more dignified life.
DV: Within what is conventionally called "western civilization" there is, of course, the recognition of serious values outside the limited framework of individual existence. Once again, Badiou provides us with a supreme example of the critique of this kind of consciousness: "Love teaches in fact that the individual as such is something vacuous and insignificant."[8] But such opinions are rare exceptions. In the contemporary world, ideas like these have begun to be reassessed as a kind of archaic "rudiment," as a factor that suppresses the radiant ideas of personal freedom and pleasure.
And here we arrive at a definite political dead end. Yes, of course one can easily argue that "supreme values" are what should be overcome. In the form of the hegemonic western construction of subjectivity, the "ironclad logic of history" has already succeeded in deconstructing these values. But then what remains? If we disregard the details, what remains is exactly that very same end of history, which presumes that our society has found its supreme, final meaning in the model of hedonistic bourgeois self-consciousness. If you think about it, this conception of the subject as something consumed by its own personal life and pleasure is, strictly speaking, the portrait of the bourgeois egoistical subject that all radical thinkers from Marx to our own time have criticized so furiously. From my point of view, it is exactly this conception that is hopeless. And today, to paraphrase Chekhov, we should engage not in squeezing out the slave within us drop by drop, but rather in destroying this very same petit-bourgeois subject within ourselves. This isn't a simple process insofar as we have still not entirely overcome the slave within ourselves. To do this, we need to undertake a radical revaluation of the entire concept of desire, to see that real desires arise where there is a place for "postponing" or delaying their fulfillment. I would say that capitalism is the destruction of all forms of sublimation. When it is consistently developed, it leads to a condition in which every desire has to be realized instantly, posthaste. Hence any form of non-realization generates near-childish hysteria. In its ideal form, capitalism is this monster of instant gratification. In this sense, the idea of hope might be interpreted as the constant demand for what cannot be realized right now. This means we should always demand more than we have. And even if we succeed at something, we should "think bigger" all the same.
AP: I welcome your ambitious theoretical passion! But here we're getting involved in the quite extensive and complicated philosophical debate about desire that arose in twentieth-century thought. I'm not certain that we can dot all the i's within the confines of this dialogue. . . But I like your intuition that desire has to be re-examined from the perspective of a new, non-repressive asceticism. On the one hand, desire is associated with prohibition and lack, which are conditions of desire. The paradox is that asceticism, usually understood as a system of prohibitions and rules, is ordinarily linked to repressive bourgeois culture. Hence one of the demands of 1968 was liberation from those constraints. As Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello proved in their well-known book The New Spirit of Capitalism, this critique of prohibitions, of critical-mindedness itself, was successfully integrated into contemporary hedonistic, innovative capitalism. Appeals to liberate desire were depoliticized and successfully realized instead on the economic level, having become part of the post-Fordist productive mechanism itself.
DV: This is an important observation: if we see everywhere the triumph of false desires which have no need for any prohibition, then probably our only hope is non-repressive asceticism! I say this not without a certain amount of bitter irony, as you understand.
AP: Today, it really is vital to rethink asceticism outside the hedonistic logic of the "liberation of desire" from prohibitions and as a means of politically transforming subjectivity.[9] For the activist subjectivity, hope is a way of controlling forces and energies. They are directed not toward the distant, abstract future, but toward the present, which is seen as implicated in history and the dynamic composition of society as a whole.
If we speak on a "fundamental" level, then the phenomenon of hope has to do with the human subject's anthropological structure itself, something about which many twentieth-century philosophers had a lot to say. Unlike animals, humans are not "programmed" in terms of strict rules and codes that govern their reactions to external, environmental stimuli. Humans are as it were dislodged from the structure of the world: they have no "place" of their own, a place that would belong to them according to the "natural" biological order. Hence they are not attached to their own "niche"—that is, they have no determinate, fixed habitat. Their habitat is the entire world, and their relationship to it is not set by precise programs; it is always bound up with uncertainty, with the play of possibilities. This reminds me of the description of the proletarian in Marx and the subsequent tradition, which, of course, is produced in a political rather than ontological context. The proletarian is deprived of everything, but the whole world lies open to him or her. That is, the human subject is a kind of "proletarian" of the world. It is clear that this is a risky hypothesis. Of course, on another level, the sociological, a specific individual or class of people might occupy a dominant, exploitative position. People have something to lose. The individual might have property, and it might exterminate those same animals, which have their own natural, territorial belonging, their own "property." Even more, the individual is capable of having a more or less fixed "habitat" (established networks, circles of friends). But, at the possible risk of coining a paradox, I hold that it is precisely the ontological proletarianization of humans that enables us to speak with hope of history writ large as the movement towards a more just order. And hope (whose instantiations are the possibilities of one sort or another that people see in a situation) is the subjective form of this human condition. (Its negative form is fear or anxiety.)
Moreover, the anthropological structure I've outlined comes to the forefront precisely in the contemporary age. Theorist Paolo Virno thus argues it is this "human nature" itself that is the "raw material" for contemporary capitalism. Anthropological "invariants"—first and foremost, the human subject's potentiality and openness to the world—become the sociological traits of the post-Fordist workforce, expressed as permanent precarity, flexibility, and the demand for the capacity to function in unpredictable situations. Previous means for alleviating the agonizing indeterminacy and instability of human behavior (via the ritual mechanisms and institutions of traditional society) are on the wane. Contemporary capitalism does not "alienate" human nature, but reveals it at the very heart of contemporary production, at the same time exposing it to the apparatus of exploitation and control.
4. A Paradoxical Hope
DV: In touching upon precarity, you've singled out a supremely vital trait of human beings—their "ontological proletarianization." This is because precarization means precisely a form of borderline, unstable existence where nothing is guaranteed to the individual—it turns out that all of us have been ejected from settled social, class, gender, and national frameworks. Yet we ought to regard this condition primarily as a challenge, not as a threat against which we should all close ranks with the demand to bring everything back (that is, the guarantees of the social welfare state, which are based on a dubious compromise between the classes). Even if we confine ourselves to the pragmatic logic of the development of productive forces, it seems more important to me to demand decent pay for temporary contracts instead of trying to revive long-term or lifetime contracts for the "aristocracy" of immaterial labor.
That is to say that I'm trying to understand why flexibility and the demand for the capacity to function in unpredictable situations provokes such a panic not only amongst "simple people," but also amongst creative workers. As I see things, they should realize that precarity is a chance, that it is precisely the pre-condition of hope. We shouldn't demand "stability," but rather more openness to the new, the radicalization of the struggle to reappropriate the commons produced by the "general intellect." We remember perfectly well that hope for salvation appears where there is danger.
AP: I agree that contemporary capitalism spotlights our ontological proletarianization while also enabling critics of capitalism to speak of the hope of overcoming it. Of course this overcoming doesn't mean a return to some absolutely reliable, guaranteed order of nature itself. It is a matter of liberating the colossal innovative and creative energy that has its origins in the "eccentricity" of human beings, its dislodgement from the natural order. We need to lead it out from its subjugation to the accumulation and expansion of capital and direct it towards the needs of everyone, not just those of the ruling class. That is, we really do have to stop being afraid of uncertainty, which after all is the source of the capacities that make us human! However, this fear can disappear once and for all only in a non-capitalist society. Sociologically speaking, in our time the all-embracing "creative industries" constantly exploit the hopes associated with unpredictability, invention, innovation, and risk. Leftist politics really must also activate these hopes, not to invest them in personal careers, but in that dritte Sache of which you spoke.
DV: I'm appealing here, rather, to the positive, constituent element that in my view exists in precarization. I have in mind those pre-conditions for the commons in the form in which they are now being produced. But I'm afraid that we risk lapsing into an apology for the contemporary model of capitalism by linking it directly to hopes for renewal. Like many people, I've always been bothered by Marx's argument about the inevitability of industrial capitalist development on the road to the "bright future," which is bound up with the emergence of the industrial working class. Of course Marx condemns the incredibly cruel ways in which peasants and artisans were herded into the factories (so-called primitive accumulation). But from his theory it also follows that this was an inevitable stage of development. The repressive collectivization of the peasantry in the USSR (a class that in many ways secured victory for the revolution in Russia) also fit into this logic of inevitability. And of course in Marx (as in Lenin) there was not even a hint of sentimentality towards the old way of life.
Can we project a similar position onto the current period? As I've already said, we have to take a paradoxical stance by, on the one hand, demanding that all working people be protected, while at the same time insisting on the historical necessity of being open to emerging innovations, instabilities, and new risks. It is right here that the main front of the struggle is located. It seems to me that a topic raised by Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt in their latest bookCommonwealth, when they speak of the forces of "altermodernity," wholly meshes with the logic of this paradox. It is a matter of striving to give up hope that a progressivist development of the means of production will inevitably lead to new forms of class conflict. I think that we need to reject such thinking, and the concept of altermodernity precisely shows the possibilities of thinking along these lines.
AP: That's quite an ambivalent claim… and I am not sure how to use Negri and Hardt's terminological experiments with "altermodernity" appropriately From their text on these matters one can hardly extract more than appeals to quote, "new values, new knowledges, and new practices" (understood as different both from capitalist modernity and conservative resistance to it), or a new "dispositif for the production of subjectivity," a notion that we already talked about in our context.[10] Yes, we all would agree on that! But how can we make a "real movement" from these values and dispositifs, which "abolishes the present state of things"? Could we imagine these hopes and values, affirmed not in a purely discursive context or in some presupposed ironclad historical "logic," but in subjectively articulated struggles and resistances—in short, in a multitude of conflictual relations of forces of labor and capital?
Thinking through these complex questions, I recently revisited an old text by Ernest Mandel called Anticipation and Hope as Categories of Historical Materialism, devoted to the memory of Ernst Bloch.[11] Written at the end of 1970s by an orthodox Marxist theoretician, it might appear archaic or trapped in the same developmetalist logic we discussed above. But Mandel clearly argues against any historical-fatalist interpretations of Marx writing, "Capitalism does not lead to the inevitable victory of socialism, only to the dilemma of a socialist victory or a regression to barbarism." Indeed, Mandel discusses hope as not something teleological but as "survival instinct," as an "unconscious correlate of the compulsion to produce and reproduce material life to which humans are subjected." I think this materialist positioning of hope in the context of not sublime "values" but the basic productive needs of "survival" understood broadly in the present historical conjuncture is very close to the focus of our talk now. Again, this understanding does not presuppose, as it might seem, a reactive, weak position of precarious "victims"—and here I fully agree with you—but makes hope an active, vibrant part of our struggles, open to the new and unprecedented. We are all survivors in contemporary neoliberal "disaster capitalism" and hope is to be our "basic instinct" in resistance to contemporary barbarism.
[1] Barak Obama's recent election campaign was based to a significant degree on a strategy whose main thrust is expressed in the title of his book The Audacity of Hope. After Obama's victory, the diffuse ideology of "optimism" has laid claim to becoming a new trend, despite the economic crisis.
[2] Chto Delat?/What is to be done?, "What Does it Mean to Lose? The Experience of Perestroika," no. 19 (September 2008), available online at: http://www.chtodelat.org/images/pdfs/19_perestroika.pdf.
[3] Here we drastically part ways with Badiou, who has totally condemned this process as lacking in political imagination. In my view, this shows his own lack of knowledge of the situation.
[4] The figure of "conversion to revolution" arose in the nineteenth century, when the anti-capitalist movement, as yet scattered and unorganized, was beginning to take shape. It was then that antiquity's practices for forming the self as a kind of "counterforce" began to sprout up again on the new soil of emancipatory politics and the mass movement. Subsequently, the formation of activists was defined by the emergence of revolutionary parties. And now, when the old models of party organization are mired in crisis, we finally come to the question of subject-formation within the new anti-capitalist movements. See Michel Foucault, The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982, ed. Frédéric Gros, trans. Graham Burchell (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 208–209.
[5] See Jacque Rancière's quite interesting analysis of emancipatory techniques in his book The Nights of Labor. The Worker's Dream in Nineteenth-Century France (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989) in which he examines how French workers sacrificed sleep and non-working hours to make time for self-education, creativity, and political work.
[6] Badiou recently voiced the notion of the "disinterested" stance of the activist. This is not understood as a passive, contemplative mindset, but as the absence of private, localized interest as the condition of radical subjectivation. Perhaps the place of hope as political affect can be imagined precisely here. Instead of private interest and a local, fixed identity defined by it, we need a transnational subjectivity guided not by local interests, but by hope. And this is not an abstract promise of a future without any guarantees of fulfillment, but a "real movement" in the present.
[7] One such example was Living Politically: A 48-Hour Communal Life Seminar, which took place at the Jan van Eyck Academie, Maastricht in July 2010. In this as with all such communal seminars, the fundamental principle is that its participants constitute a temporary community for the duration of the event. By combining research, creative work, and daily living, they are transformed into a commune.
[8] Alain Badiou, The Meaning of Sarkozy, trans. David Fernbach (London: Verso, 2008), p. 49.
[9] In our day, many radical leftists appeal, rather, to "desubjectivation": "Become nobody, do nothing" (Tiqqun). We believe that despite its apparent tactical effectiveness in the contemporary society of the spectacle, this is a false path strategically. Contemporary capitalism's entire ideological apparatus is constructed on desubjectivation: by neutralizing subjectivity, capitalism generates the appearance that its own system is "objective." We need, rather, to activate new mechanisms of subjectivation.
[10] See the chapter "Modernity (and the Landscapes of Altermodernity)" in Antonio Hardt and Michael Negri, Commonwealth (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009).
[11] Ernest Mandel, "Anticipation and Hope as Categories of Historical Materialism," in Historical Materialism, vol. 10, no. 4 (December 2002) pp. 245–259.
Dmitry Vilensky // Language at/of the Border – Editorial
The idea for this issue arose when we begin working on our film A Border Musical, whose screenplay is also printed here. This film is based on a study of the situation on both sides of the Russian-Norwegian border: we were interested in how a range of differences, which inevitably serve as sources of conflict in border areas, shape the subjectivity of people in daily contact with each other.
Borderlands always aggravate differences – political and social, behavioral, linguistic and economic, and so on. The border's physicality, particularly in the form of rigid paramilitary zones impeding the free circulation of people, causes anyone who becomes caught up in their force fields to re-examine the world and themselves. On the map of the world, such areas have always been not only the focus of geopolitical tensions, but also special habitats encouraging the development of new forms of language, behavior and culture. The border is a place for experiment, a zone of mobility and change.
The history of state borders has always been a history of violence: a history of wars, militarization, securitization, bureaucratic control, biopolitical regulation, forced displacement, flight and migration. Historically, state borders are shaped by the balance of violence. The winners dictate them to the losers, without taking into account either real geography or ethnicity. Borders separate "us" from "them," and these divisions are set down in documents determining state loyalties and citizenship. Paradoxically, borders, which are always artificial forms, are an essential factor of existence, shaping not only the lives of people, but also impacting the natural environment and the animal world.
Familiar to anyone who has ever participated in European protests, the slogan "No borders, no nations. . ." (which can be continued in various ways as tactics demand) is a radical utopian response to the current delineation of the modern world. It says that one and the same common extraterritorial border runs everywhere – the boundary separating the world of prosperity from the world of poverty. This border runs both along the real boundaries of the so-called First World (e.g., Fortress Europe) as well as within it, generating ever-new ghettos and zones of exclusion. The fall of the Berlin Wall was a celebration of the hope that the Cold War's division of the world was over, and the whole planet would be a single home for everyone, with people united by a common, global citizenship. It was a foretaste of the performative unity of the world described by Alain Badiou in his text "The Communist Hypothesis," which we have excerpted in this issue.
More than two decades have passed since then, and we see this beautiful utopia has turned into its opposite: borders and walls have multiplied, inequality has grown, and the freedom of globalization has given way to the total freedom of global financial speculation and the establishment of new forms of market colonization and imperialism. It is not worth indulging in pessimism, however; the true dialectician always strives at history's most depressing moments to identify those potentials that emerge despite everything (or are concealed on the flip side of all reactionary processes) and work on implementing the prerequisites for alter-globalism. It was this movement for as-yet-untested grassroots forms of globalization that, despite its current downturn, was able to outline a range of ideas and initiate a series of political processes that are still alive and evolving.
Constantly keeping in mind the sociopolitical problems of the modern border, in this issue we have decided to focus primarily on an analysis of linguistic differences and show that, in the fight for a new unified world, it is also important to take into account the structural features of human consciousness, its intrinsic limitations. And here our understanding of the dialectics of subjectivity is formed not only in the search for unity, but also by the insurmountable limitations imposed by one's body, one's language and one's finitude.
It is in this context that crossing the border is problematized not as a universal right to equality and a decent life, but as the fundamental human desire for another, unknown experience, the desire for an encounter which conceals the potential for love and the possibility of death, the possibility of arriving at a place where everything would be different. The experience of the border as an experience of sublime knowledge of the world is how Johan Schimanski describes this state of being in his text for this issue.
The desire for a harmonious existence with oneself, with others and with the world, in which all barriers and borders would be removed, is a vital trait of human beings as a species. Existing boundaries constantly remind us of how far we are from that lofty ideal. At the same time, it is their everyday oppressive presence within and around us that stimulates our search and our thirst for transformation. As the song has it, "If you press with your shoulder, / And you and I push together, / The walls will crumble, crumble, crumble, / And we will breathe freely."
Dmitry Vilensky
Tsaplya Olga Egorova and Dmitry Vilensky // The Script of A Border Musical
Radio broadcast and the song "I Love My Cold Land" by Jesper Alvaer
The Characters
Characters from the Russian side of the border:
- Tanya, wife of Ola Nordmann. Former director of the children's choir in the Russian town of Nikel, she plays the accordion. She still has a poor grasp of Norwegian.
- A Chorus of Miners. Manifestations of Tanya's conscience, her "inner miners," the men double as workers at the local mine and processing plant.
Characters from the Norwegian side of the border:
- Ola Nordmann ("John Q. Public"), Tanya's husband. Owner of a trucking company, Ola himself enjoys getting behind the wheel of a big truck from time to time.
- A Friend. Ola Nordmann's schoolmate, he currently works in the civil service.
- Child Welfare Inspector
- First Neighbor Lady
- Second Neighbor Lady
- Third Neighbor Lady
Scene 1
Starting on the Norwegian side of the border, the camera slowly pans across the scenery. It gently tracks over the quaint streets of Kirkenes and enters a cozy Norwegian house. First, we see a well-equipped workshop, equipment for underwater hunting hung on its walls, then a living room with a large window and, finally, a tiny kitchen. When the camera pans across the living room, we see two border posts, Norwegian and Russian. This is their first and last appearance in the film. After passing through the house, the camera enters the Russian side of the border and slowly tracks through the town of Nikel, whose landscape features black clouds of smoke puffing from the plant and trees disfigured by acid rain. The camera settles on the Chorus of Miners, who sing.
Our work is not for the weak.
Our work
Is for strong men.
Nickel forges our character,
The character of miners,
Of northern men.
Tell me, miner,
What do you have?
What wouldn't you betray
Or abandon?
I have everything
A man needs.
The shoulder of a friend
Who won't let me down.
The heart of a mother
Who waits.
And the hands of a loving woman
Who has graced me with her care
Every day, in grief and in joy.
Whence this pride
Of yours, miner,
In being a real man?
Nickel will not let
Our souls go to ruin.
Rust will not penetrate them
Nor corrosion consume them.
And all because
Nickel forges our character,
A firm character,
A northern character.
Tell me, Miner,
In what do you believe?
What gives you strength?
I believe my son will grow up
And take my place,
To maintain our character,
Our firm character,
Our northern character.
Tanya appears on camera, carrying an accordion.
Your songs are a pack of lies, enough!
Uh, hello, Tanya.
What a joke—
The masculine character!
Just look at yourselves, miners!
Your work is dangerous and tough,
But you're paid pennies.
The laws of survival are well known.
Shut up and work: it could be worse.
Everything's a lie,
But it isn't forever.
We are real men,
And we know what is fair and just.
The day will come when we rise up and. . .
It'll never happen!
You're lazy slugs!
And drunks to boot!
Miners (confused)
We drink on occasion
Because our work is hard. . .
You defend the family!
You hide behind your women's backs!
The things you say, Tanya!
The nickel you dig up, miners,
Has long ago corroded your souls!
You're only specters of mighty labor.
I've had enough!
I've had it!
I'm leaving town.
Where are you going?
To Norway,
The country where everyone is happy.
Who's expecting you there?
Tanya (takes accordion from case and gets ready to play)
My new husband is waiting for me.
A Norwegian!
Now there's a real man for you.
He doesn't drink
Or beat his kids.
He respects women
And goes to work in his car
As if he were going on holiday.
What about your son?
I'm taking him with me.
You can leave of course,
But you can never escape yourself.
You will always be
A girl from Nikel.
Don't kid yourselves.
We're the miners of your heart, Tanya.
Tanya (not listening to them, playing the accordion)
I'll be singing different songs
In that marvelous land
Where everyone is happy.
We are the miners of your heart.
We dig the ore of your soul
And bring to the surface
From out of your depths
Your songs, Tanya.
I've had it.
I'm leaving
For that beautiful country
Where everyone is happy.
Tanya leaves, taking her accordion with her.
Scene 2
A typical living room in Kirkenes. The photos and posters on the walls reveal the owner's commitment to the environmental movement. A Tom Waits concert tour poster is also visible. Ola Nordmann is alone. In a close-up, we see him tuning a radio. He finds a local news program. The announcer first reads world news—reports from Palestine and Russia—before segueing to local news—cute, insignificant events.
The news broadcast ends with a report about a concert the evening before by the local church choir. It featured the premiere of a song by a local amateur composer, "I Love My Cold Land."
Despite your long winter's night,
Home's warmth and embrace suffice,
And the aurora's rays;
You dance over us
Unity grows here in your arms,
In work and leisure, night's sleep,
Sea, mountains and barren soil;
With nature, we are one
Last stop, where ocean reigns
In cold silence; alone now,
I downshift, and you show me,
Stormy wind and plain warm us
We bear a common dream.
Diversity is when everyone has his or her place,
Even far from where townsfolk live,
In wilderness and by the sea
From underground you pour out
Your treasures that were hidden,
Gas and oil, iron ore, gold, yes,
From prehistoric times you give more.
Last stop, where ocean reigns
In white silence; alone now,
In new snow, the ruts show me,
North-northeast you show the way
Everyone gets an equal chance here,
Freedom responsible and boundless,
Daily chores and obligations,
The weekend free, and one's own time
Let's go. There is some (a little) difference:
Everyone cares for one another, it's common sense
Yes, you give a little and get some of mine,
We are a big family
Last stop, where ocean reigns
In comfy silence; alone now,
I look in the rearview mirror, and you show me
Here is where I'll be nor will I forsake you
We will tell our young
What they saw, your old ones now,
In the generations before us
Their hard work we now reap
Last stop, where ocean reigns,
Proud Finnmark, you rise up
My headlight shows me
My cold home, I love you!
All this time, Ola Nordmann moves about the room. He goes in and out of his workshop to fetch something, then hangs a framed portrait of Tanya (she is depicted with the children's choir and holding an accordion). As the music plays, Ola puffs up the pillows and straightens the curtains. He is waiting for Tanya.
It is evident he likes the song. There is a knock on the door and the sound of the radio cuts out.
Scene 3
Ola Nordmann meets Tanya at the threshold of the living room. They hug. Tanya speaks broken Norwegian.
Ola Nordmann
It's you! Finally!
I'm so happy!
Ola Nordmann
Me, too!
They kiss.
Ola Nordmann
Welcome to your new home. (He spreads his arms, proudly showing off the house.) I built it with my own hands, but without you it was empty. But now a happy family will finally live in it.
Tanya (uttering a phrase she has evidently memorized)
I'll be the best wife to you, and my son, the best of sons.
Ola Nordmann
Our son, Tanya. Our son. He'll become a real Norwegian. I'll teach him to drive a truck. What happiness it is, Tanya, to travel the snow-covered roads, delivering goods to people and being at one with nature.
Tanya looks at him admiringly.
How well I understand you.
Ola Nordmann
And I you!
Tanya (having trouble pronouncing the word "understanding")
Mutual understanding is the most important thing, right?
Ola Nordmann
Of course.
They look at each other, holding hands, and kiss.
Tanya (taking her instrument out of its case)
Here. This is my accordion.
Ola Nordmann
I wanted to ask you. Are you sorry you quit your job?
My children's choir? No, because my music is always with me. (She points to her accordion and laughs.)
Ola Nordmann
You can form a new choir here. We'll sing Russian songs.
Tanya (laughing happily)
How nice! Russian songs are good, yes?
Ola Nordmann
Tanya, play our favorite song. (He hands her the accordion.)
Tanya plays her own arrangement of Tom Waits's "Russian Dance" as Ola Nordmann dances passionately. As Tanya plays, she turns toward the window (and the camera) and sees the Miners standing outside. Continuing to play, she addresses them. (Ola Nordmann cannot see them, of course, and continues to dance.)
Is that you, miners? You see how happy I am without you?
The Miners say nothing, but they mock Ola Nordmann's fervent dancing. Tanya smiles and continues to play. When the song's last chord sounds, Ola Nordmann freezes.
Scene 4
The camera pans across the lovely townscape of Kirkenes: illuminated by different lights, the scenery imparts a joyous, festive feeling. The camera zooms in on the War Mother's Monument, where two women, the First Neighbor Lady (who is radically minded) and the Second Neighbor Lady (who is more thoughtful), are chatting.
First Neighbor Lady (continuing the conversation)
. . .yes, that's right. Not parents, but pedagogues. We have to get over our dependence on biology.
Second Neighbor Lady (haltingly)
I agree, of course. . .
First Neighbor Lady
All children in Norway are the property of the state.
Second Neighbor Lady
Even the children of tourists? Or of foreigners who've come here to work temporarily? There was recently an incident—
First Neighbor Lady (interrupting her)
Definitely! Every child's welfare is more important than the biological rights of parents.
Second Neighbor Lady
But how do we strike a balance between not interfering in people's private lives and society's responsibility for posterity?
First Neighbor Lady
Professionals should decide. Experts. They have special training and can best see what's best for the child.
Second Neighbor Lady
But parents aren't professionals.
First Neighbor Lady
And that is why they don't always understand what's best for the child. Our job is to find families where the children are having problems, remove them and place them with families who have a correct understanding of the child's welfare.
Second Neighbor Lady (ironically)
Then maybe we should immediately send the kids to children's homes?
First Neighbor Lady
Yes, to children's homes! I'm confident that children will be raised collectively in the wonderful future society we build.
Second Neighbor Lady
Well, you know, not all parents share your communist ideas.
First Neighbor Lady
What's communist about them? How else can we reconcile freedom, individualism and a sense of community?
Second Neighbor Lady
It's so simple, something our forebears have done for generations. Be like everyone else and you'll become an individual.
First Neighbor Lady
While we're still only building the future, we can't waste time: we also have to create the individuals who will live in it. We must focus on children.
Second Neighbor Lady
Maybe we need to begin by educating parents?
First Neighbor Lady
We don't have time to educate parents. We cannot risk children's lives. Imagine how a child who hasn't gotten a proper upbringing will feel in our future society. It will feel like an outcast!
Second Neighbor Lady
How awful!
First Neighbor Lady
We can't let that happen!
The Third Neighbor Lady runs up to them.
Third Neighbor Lady
Hi, girls. It's settled. I'm moving to the south, to Stavanger.
First and Second Neighbor Ladies (expressing their amazement and hugging her)
First Neighbor Lady (coming to her senses)
But I still don't get you. How can you trade our north country for the spoiled south?
Third Neighbor Lady
I'll come back for visits.
First Neighbor Lady
I'm certain you'll move back for good. Anyone who grows up in the north cannot betray it.
Third Neighbor Lady
I wouldn't leave for anything, but the offer was so tempting. It's such a good job.
First Neighbor Lady
The more so since such opportunities are opening up here. You can see yourself that money is flowing into the Arctic. With your experience you'll be in demand here.
Third Neighbor Lady
Well, we'll see whether the money comes or not.
First and Second Neighbor Ladies
Yeah, that's right. . .
First Neighbor Lady (after a pause during which each of them thinks about her future)
By the way, we were at a performance by a Sámi dance group yesterday.
Third Neighbor Lady
A Sámi dance group? But I thought Sámi dances didn't exist.
Second Neighbor Lady
Imagine, they recreated them the way they might have been in the past. It could have been that way, right?
First Neighbor Lady
It was great! I especially liked this dance. (Addressing Second Neighbor Lady) Do you remember?
Second Neighbor Lady
Uh-huh, like this!
She begins to dance and is joined by the First Neighbor Lady.
Third Neighbor Lady
How do you do it? Show me! Is it like this?
She joins their dance. All three women laugh, dance and goof around. Tanya walks past. She stops to look at them, and they draw her into the dance. Everyone laughs and falls in the snow.
Scene 5
Ola Nordmann is in his workshop going through his fishing tackle. The radio is playing a literary program entitled "The Life and Work of Aksel Sandemose: The Law of Jante."
Radio (begins in mid-phrase)
As you know, of course, the Law of Jante is a set of rules for the typical Norwegian. Aksel Sandemose described it in his 1933 novel A Fugitive Crosses His Tracks. Today we'd like to examine certain problems of growing up vis-à-vis the Law of Jante. Our first guest has recently published a book that has garnered a lot of reaction in the media. The book is entitled Humiliation: An Inconvenient Pride, and it deals with the dark side of the anti-individualism common in our society. What could be bad about wanting to be like everyone else? Writer Per Anders Juvik will help us answer that question. Welcome!
Hello! Thanks for inviting me.
The second guest in our studio is head of the national parents organization Respecting Children. Welcome to the program, Linda Ramm. My first question is to you. What is the place of the Law of Jante in today's society?
We see that the Law of Jante is, thankfully, on its way out of the Norwegian popular consciousness, but there are still many problems, especially with children and adolescents. . .
Tanya runs into the room, excited. When Tanya sings in Norwegian, she mangles the words in a Russian manner, so that they sound funny and unrecognizable. Ola Nordmann remains seated while Tanya whirls around him in happiness.
Dear! First prize! Imagine, first prize!
Ola Nordmann (looking at her puzzled, turning the radio down)
What did you say? There's an interesting program on the radio now. . .
Yes, yes. Listen, I just got a phone call. My choir took first place at the competition in Murmansk. I'm so happy.
Ola Nordmann
Your choir? The one you worked with in Nikel?
Yes, my kids from the culture center. I gave so many years to them. I put so much inspiration into them. The money was bad, but that's not even important.
Ola Nordmann
I still remember your concert in Kirkenes.
You remember?
Ola Nordmann
How could I forget? That's where we met.
You see how much music means? Music brought us together.
She twirls around the room, knocking things over. Ola Nordmann picks them up.
Tanya (singing in Russian)
Music brought us together. Music la-la-la-la-la. . . (Turning to Ola Nordmann) I'd really like to be with my choir.
Ola Nordmann
What's the problem? You definitely should go.
Do you think? What about my son? Will you look after our son?
Ola Nordmann (correcting her)
On the radio, they said it would be more correct to say our "nurturee," Tanya.
Yes, yes, I forgot. Will you look after him?
Ola Nordmann
I'll look after him, of course.
Tanya (singing)
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Ola Nordmann
By the way, have you noticed anything strange?
Strange? (Singing) Strange, strange, strange, la-la-la. . . Strange about what? (It is clear she is thinking about something else.)
Ola Nordmann
About the boy's behavior?
His behavior? No, I haven't, la-la-la. . .
Ola Nordmann
Nothing of yours is missing?
Mis-sing, mis-sing, mis-sing. Nuh-uh-uh-thing. . .
Ola Nordmann (looks puzzled at Tanya and realizes she doesn't understand him)
Okay, go. I'll take care of things here myself. I'll consult with someone I know.
Tanya (almost not listening to him; in Russian)
I'm going! I'm go-ing! I'm go-o-o-ing!
Ola Nordmann turns up the radio.
Ola Nordmann
Tanya, I caught a fish. Look, it's in the kitchen.
Tanya darts into the kitchen and sees a fish on the table. It is breathing. She gazes at it. Then she grunts and flies off in the direction of Nikel.
Scene 6
Ola Nordmann continues listening to the radio program on Aksel Sandemose and the Law of Jante while going through his fishing tackle.
So where is this place where we can enjoy success, our own or that of others?
Wherever it is, it isn't Norway! Even in the Old Norse Hávamál we find such admonitions as, "If you speak too softly, they will think you stupid; if you speak too much, they will think you a fool."
That means everyone should be the same, eh?
Social equality can play an oppressive role. We're talking about humility, when recognition of your outstanding abilities is experienced as "inconvenient pride," a sense of guilt.
For example, one should not seek to be too successful in school. . .
Ola Nordmann continues working for some time. Then he looks at the clock, removes his apron and turns off the radio. It is evident he is waiting for someone. The door opens and his Friend walks in.
Ola Nordmann
Thanks for coming. I really wanted to talk with you.
How could I not come? That's what friends are for!
They shake hands warmly and hug.
Ola Nordmann
Let's go into the living room. Would you like some coffee?
They go into the living room.
Sure, thanks.
Ola Nordmann brings in the coffee. It is clear he is a little embarrassed, so instead of getting straight to the point he talks about the radio program.
Ola Nordmann
There was a program on the radio just now about the Law of Jante. Do you remember it?
How could I forget? (Begins quoting the Law of Jante.) "You're not to think you are anything special. . . You're not to think you're smarter than others."
Ola Nordmann
Yes, yes. That's what I meant. What do you think about that?
I think it hasn't gone out of date.
Ola Nordmann
Well, yes. It needs to be reinterpreted, of course, but. . .
Ola Nordmann (working up his courage)
I wanted to get your advice. I really love Tanya, you know. And her son too. I meant to say our "nurturee." (Looks to his friend for support.)
Yes, you're right to say "nurturee." It's the new trend in child rearing.
Ola Nordmann
I keep thinking about what a complicated job I have, bringing him up to be a real Norwegian.
I have no doubt you'll cope. Your older kids are full-fledged members of society.
Ola Nordmann
Listen, it's not the same. This boy is completely different.
Oh, come on!
Ola Nordmann
It's true! He's not an open person somehow. . . He doesn't smile at people, doesn't look them in the eye, doesn't want to be friendly. He hit a boy in his class!
You don't say!
Ola Nordmann
He steals cigarettes from his mother.
That's not good.
Ola Nordmann
He doesn't like sports.
Ola Nordmann
He doesn't go snowmobiling with me.
He doesn't go snowmobiling?
Ola Nordmann
No, he doesn't. And I'm even afraid. . .Don't get me wrong, I might be mistaken. . . I'm afraid he doesn't like the scenery here.
No kidding. . . Have you talked with him?
Ola Nordmann
How can one talk to him? He doesn't say anything. And Tanya yells at him in Russian.
She yells at him?
Ola Nordmann (embarrassed)
Yes, she yells. It's quite awful.
It's forbidden to yell at children.
Ola Nordmann
Yes, I know. . . And there's another thing. . . I saw her hit him once. Well, not exactly hit him, but still.
Yeah. . . It's a tough situation.
Ola Nordmann
That's why I wanted to ask you what I should do.
Let me think.
Ola Nordmann
Please do.
Friend (after a pause, expressing his expert opinion)
Yes. . . First, you can't forget where the boy grew up. Have you been to Nikel?
Ola Nordmann
You ask? I've been there many times.
Then you know what things are like over there: total irresponsibility and environmental disaster. They're welcome to pollute themselves, but the acid rain splashes on our area too. (He gradually gets carried away, talking about what really worries him.) And they want to buy our mines to boot. Their church burned down, but they can't rebuild it. Our community gave them money for it. The mine owners buy themselves villas and yachts while the workers die in the mines. And no one could care less. (He calms down.) Whatever. Those are the conditions in which the boy grew up. Not particularly favorable ones.
Ola Nordmann
It's not right.
And his mother has been no help to him. Yelling at the boy! That's unmotivated aggression.
Ola Nordmann
Tanya's actually quite kind. . . Don't judge her too harshly, she's had a hard life: her first husband was an alcoholic, and her father was killed in a mine accident.
Friend (almost not listening)
Yeah, that's bad. . . So what must we do? We have to rescue the boy.
Ola Nordmann
You think it's that bad?
Yes, it's clear you can't handle this alone.
Ola Nordmann
Do you think?
I'm sure of it. The whole community needs to be involved in this.
Ola Nordmann (repeating his words)
The whole community needs to be involved. . .
The camera does a close-up of Ola Nordmann's brooding face.
Scene 7
Tanya and the Chorus of Miners stand with the Nikel scenery in the background. Tanya plays the accordion. She is happy.
Oh, how my soul sings!
Like a bird soaring into the sky!
My work, my love,
All the energy
I invested in the choir,
It's all been recognized: our choir was named the best!
The kids didn't let me down.
Well done, Tanya, of course.
We very much respect song,
But how did you prepare the children
For a miner's hard work?
The mine? No!
The road leading to success
Is open to them!
In the mine!
They will go work in the mine!
They'll sing on stage!
How does your music matter?
You think it has the power
To change the course of events?
I believe it does!
No, Tanya,
Our sons will go work
In the mines,
And continue our dynasty.
But the weaker ones,
The ones spoiled by a soft upbringing,
Will sink to the bottom.
They'll turn into
Drug addicts
And, maybe, murderers.
Then they'll go to prison.
The love I gave them
Will make them wonderful people!
The belt is the basis of a good education.
The father's hand is the key!
Children aren't beaten in Norway.
And that's a bad thing!
There's no violence there against the person.
Father and son are equals.
Miners (chuckling)
You don't find that funny yourself?
The father is the head of the family.
I'm happy I'm going home
To Norway,
Where everyone is happy.
And tell your husband
That the son should fear the father.
Otherwise he'll grow up a sissy.
No way!
See that you don't have to be ashamed of your son.
In Norway, it's people like you who make people ashamed.
I'm in a hurry now.
Good luck staying here!
Okay, see you later!
You'll be coming back.
Tanya walks off into the snowy-white distance; after a time, she begins to dance. Then she turns and shouts to the Miners.
Miners! Be a bit more positive!
Scene 8
Humming "Oh, How My Soul Sings," Tanya walks in the door and sees a confused Ola Nordmann and the Child Welfare Inspector.
Ola Nordmann
Dear, this is the child welfare inspector. She has come to check how your son is doing, but he is not home.
My son? What happened? Where is he?
Ola Nordmann
Don't worry. He just up and left, and I don't know where he is. He doesn't pick up his phone.
Tanya (worried)
But what happened?
Child Welfare Inspector
I'll explain everything. The thing is that your nurturee has serious problems at school. And, as we've learned, he also has problems at home.
Tanya looks inquiringly at Ola Nordmann.
Ola Nordmann
I didn't say anything.
What problems? Tell me what the problem is.
Child Welfare Inspector
He has hit a classmate.
A classmate? But all boys fight.
Child Welfare Inspector
He has been lying to his teachers.
Child Welfare Inspector
He steals.
Steals? Did I understood that word correctly?
Child Welfare Inspector
Yes, he steals. That means he takes things without permission. He takes cigarettes from
you without permission.
Tanya (confused)
Cigarettes. . . But that's not serious!
Child Welfare Inspector
It always starts with the little things. But don't you worry: we will not leave you in lurch now. We will monitor your family and help you, of course.
Our family is all right. We love each other, and everything is great. . . We'll show you how wonderful our family is.
Child Welfare Inspector (hands her papers)
Read these papers and sign them, please. We're counting on your cooperation with our agency.
Tanya freezes, turns towards the window (the camera) and addresses the Miners, who are standing there.
I know what you want to say to me, but I don't want to listen! I know who will help me. Tomorrow I'll go get help there.
The Miners shake their heads and sing wordlessly.
Scene 9
Tanya runs through the pretty Kirkenes scenery. She runs to the War Mother's Monument, where the three Neighbor Ladies are once again standing.
How good you're here! I need your advice.
The women are glad to see her. They interact half by dancing, half by speaking—as if they were continuing their earlier dance, and Tanya had again come to dance with them.
Tanya (switching from Norwegian to Russian as she becomes more excited)
The inspector came yesterday, but my son wasn't home. The inspector said he steals, but this is unfair: he only takes cigarettes sometimes. I got very upset, and when he came home, I gave him a slap on the face. (I'm his mother, after all.) We got into a big fight and shouted. (She switches to Russian.) But then we made up and cried. We asked each other for forgiveness, and my son promised me he wouldn't do it again and from now on things would be okay. Only I don't know how to convince the inspector of this, because she probably thinks we're wild, uncivilized people, you know? But we're actually really okay. Or at any rate, we're trying real hard. (Switches to Norwegian again.) But my son really wants to be a real Norwegian. Maybe it's not working out now, but it will work out! It's not clear who snitched on us to the child welfare agency. It's not a good thing to snitch, is it?
The women listen attentively to Tanya. They react dramatically to what she tells them. They repeat the movements she makes and do not interrupt her when she strays into Russian—everyone has the right to speak their own language. But then it turns out they have misunderstood everything.
First Neighbor Lady
Look, she beats her kid!
Second Neighbor Lady
Good God, it is her son who beats her.
Third Neighbor Lady
It appears she's happy about this.
First Neighbor Lady
We must do something!
Second Neighbor Lady
We cannot let this be!
They turn to Tanya, hugging and comforting her. They repeat her movements.
Third Neighbor Lady
Maybe it's her husband who is beating her?
First Neighbor Lady
You have to stand up for your rights.
Second Neighbor Lady
You have to throw him out!
Third and First Neighbor Ladies
Throw him out!
You get it? Throw him out!
The women all show Tanya that she needs to throw her husband out by making throwing motions.
Tanya (not understanding but pretending she does)
Throw? Throw what? Ah, throw. . . I get it. Thank you! I understand everything. I have to stand up for my rights. That's for sure! (Switches to Russian.) But who snitched? And what do I have to throw?
The scene ends with a close-up of Tanya. Snow is falling.
Scene 10
Tanya enters the house, lost in thought. Ola Nordmann is reading a newspaper.
Honey, I wanted to ask you something. How do you think child welfare found out my son steals cigarettes?
Ola Nordmann (slightly embarrassed)
You see, I asked my friend for advice, and he advised going to child welfare and getting help from them.
And you went?
Ola Nordmann
No, no: it wasn't me. No, I didn't go there. He must have gone there on his own.
But that's no good!
Ola Nordmann (huffily)
No, you're wrong! Here in the newspaper it says there are no uncaring people in our society. We are responsible for everything that happens in our society, what happens in every family.
Tanya (looking at him intently)
Now I know what I have to throw.
Tanya leaves quickly. Ola Nordmann goes back to reading the newspaper. Suddenly, he hears the sound of breaking glass. Alarmed, he goes to the window (close-up).
Scene 11
Tanya is outside. She throws open her coat and pulls out her accordion. As she plays a very shrill, tired tune, the Miners appear.
Why did you throw the stone?
Why did you break the window?
Oh, it's you, miners. . .
He's a traitor.
Didn't we tell you
There are no real men there?
Now they're going to take away my son.
How can one take away someone's son!
Now they're going to take away my son
And they're right to do it:
I'm a bad mother.
Grab your son and run back to Nikel!
Tanya (speaking mostly to herself)
You don't know what happens
When they come to take away children?
How many of them will there be?
Will there be police with them?
What if my son doesn't want to leave?
Tanya, come back home!
We won't let them hurt you!
I think he'll just disappear
In this lovely world,
And I'll imagine
How he's happy with other people.
A mother's love and one's own family
Are the most important things in the world!
I wonder whether he'll forget me.
Or will he never forget me?
Run while you still can!
Tanya (remembering they are there)
What? No, I won't escape to Russia.
Let my son become a Norwegian.
I can cope with that.
And now leave me,
My miners.
Farewell. . .
My soul's ore is exhausted,
And I'm no use to you anymore.
Now I will sing other songs.
I don't know their words yet,
But I know for sure
They won't be by you.
They won't come from my heart.
Farewell. . .
Snow falls on the Miners as the camera bids them farewell.
Scene 12
Tanya returns home, where all the Norwegians are waiting for her. Ola Nordmann is distraught, his Friend is grinning, the Neighbor Ladies are excited. The Child Welfare Inspector is calm and friendly: she has done her job.
Ola Nordmann
Tanya, just don't worry.
Child Welfare Inspector
I'm authorized to inform you that the child for whom you had nurturing responsibility will be transferred to another family for upbringing.
Tanya (exhausted and ready for this turn of events)
Child Welfare Inspector
For a variety of reasons.
Neighbor Ladies
Don't you worry. Your child will be fine with another family. And you can visit him.
Child Welfare Inspector
Of course you can—under supervision of child welfare agency employees.
Okay. I'll go along with it. I'm a bad mother. I really hope my child will be happy with another family.
Neighbor Ladies
See that! She admits it all! She's on the road to recovery!
They begin singing, with all the characters gradually assembling into a single, handsome chorus.
First Neighbor Lady
See that!
Second Neighbor Lady
She admits it all!
Third Neighbor Lady
She's on the road to recovery!
Neighbor Ladies
We know that everyone
Gets another chance.
First Neighbor Lady
Everyone can improve.
Child Welfare Inspector
We believe everyone
Can correct their mistakes
And join the family
Of impeccable citizens.
Ola Nordmann
Thank you, Norway,
For never leaving
Your citizens alone,
For always rushing
To the rescue.
Like a good mother, you are
Ready to lend us a helping hand.
Join the family
Of impeccable citizens!
Neighbor Ladies
Thank you, Norway,
For all that we have:
Third Neighbor Lady
For our educations,
Second Neighbor Lady
For the right to an abortion,
First Neighbor Lady
For our freedom!
Neighbor Ladies
How it hurts us to know
That not all of our sisters
In the world have it so.
All (addressing Tanya and waving invitingly)
Tanya! Come to us!
Join the family
Of immaculate citizens!
During the next stanza, Tanya goes to the window in which the Miners have previously appeared and draws the curtains shut.
Child Welfare Inspector
Thank you, Norway,
That each of us
Can do good.
Thank you
For teaching us
What is good,
And what is bad.
Child Welfare Inspector and Friend
The whole world
Looks up to us,
For we've got our hands
On the Nobel Peace Prize.
Tanya joins the chorus and begins singing with them.
All (including Tanya)
Join the family
Of impeccable citizens!
Thanks, Norway,
For our wonderful present
First Neighbor Lady
And for our belief in a future
That will be even more
Ola Nordmann
We will build houses that can walk.
Third Neighbor Lady
With the birds we will talk.
Second Neighbor Lady
We will find new meaning
In the simplest things.
We have things to do, Norway!
(addressing themselves directly to the audience, in close-up)
Filling our hearts with love,
We invite everyone
To join the family
Of impeccable citizens!
The End


text:
Washington Vacations - Travel guide to Washington accommodations and vacation packages. Visit Washington for getaways and adventure travel. Plan your Washington vacation today.
Page:1 of 1 | Sort By: |
South Puget Sound, Washington Sight-Seeing Tours - International Wildlife Adventures: Wilderness tours and adventure travel to some of the world's most unique destinations. Nature and wildlife experiences and photo opportunities await! This international tour company provides packages for Polar B
Olympia, Washington Sight-Seeing Tours - Our tours focus on beaches and rainforests in the Pacific NW and in Hawaii. We also off other specialized tours, such as a Green Car Tour. And we can customize a tour for you.
Ashford, wa, Washington Bed & Breakfasts - Historic inn and restaurant located in Ashford, WA --one-mile from Mount Rainier National Park. Queen rooms/tower suites. Breakfast, evening wine, hot tub & WIFI included. Two vacation rentals. Alexander's Restaurant on site.
Friday Harbor, Washington Whale Watching - Whale Watching & Wildlife with expert naturalist guides in the calm, Orca-rich waters of San Juan Is. Encounter Orca Whales, dolphin, porpoise, seals, eagles, sea lion, kelp forests & tide pool life. Small personalized tours. Safe, Educational & FUN
Freeland, Washington Bed & Breakfasts - An artfully decorated, fully contained suite situated on 70 acres of forest, marsh, and farmland. Organic garden, walking trails, a vintage converted schoolbus for group stays, covered patio w/stone fireplace, showers and a professional kitchen.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Antique Opal Diamond Cluster Ring
Petite and feminine, this Edwardian ring of 14k yellow gold offers a delightful variation on the typical cluster ring. A trio of lively white opals presents a cinematic display of prismatic and neon colors of green, yellow, blue and orange amidst a scalloped cluster of twenty (20) old single cut diamonds with an estimated weight of .30 carats.
Date: Circa 1900.
Measurements: 3/8 of an inch (1 cm) in length north to south on the hand by 5/8 of an inch (1.5 cm) in width. Weight of 2.6 grams (1.7 dwt).
Ring Size: US 5-3/4 (UK L; Euro or Int. Circum. 51.2 mm; Int. Dia. 16.3 mm; Japan over 10) and easily can be sized to fit most. Ring sizing information.
Hallmarks: 14k.
Condition: Excellent; evidence of previous resizing visible with magnification.
Origin: American.
Note: Diamonds have not been removed from their mounts to preserve the integrity of the setting. All diamond weights have been approximated by measurement and formula and may vary from actual weights.
Forms of Payment
- VISA and MasterCard, Discover and American Express credit & debit cards.
- Personal checks drawn on U.S. banks only - Please allow 7 business days for clearance.
- Money orders, cashier's and traveler's checks - Please allow 7 business days for clearance.
- PayPal.
Other Forms of Payment
Bank Wire - For international orders and orders of $5,000 and over. Please contact us for more details.
Layaway information and for full details see Payment Methods.
Same day shipping - Order by 1 pm CST!
FREE for All U.S. Orders - Standard 2-3 Day Shipping.
FREE for All International Orders - Standard 2-7 Day Shipping.
Full details at Shipping & Insurance.
Complete Money Back - No Risk Guarantee
If for any reason whatsoever you are not completely satisfied with your purchase, we will refund the FULL purchase price including U.S. shipping if charged. Remember, there is no charge for our regular shipping service!
International Orders - Due to customs and paperwork requirements, return shipping charges cannot be reimbursed.
Return Procedure
- Notify us of your intention to return the item within three (3) days of receipt. You may contact us by email or by telephone.
- Please ship back to us within another two (2) days after we receive notification from you.
- As soon as the item is received, a full refund is issued to you that same day.
More details at Full Guarantee including gift giving options.


text:
Nov 27, 2012 9:21 AM
Vault System Problems (Ps3)
Like (1)
Hey everyone. I have problems with rendering videos from Mw3 Online vault to elite page or youtube. When i try render 30 secs or less long video it do it to 100% but videos doesnt come to elite page or to youtube, i have tryed unlink and link then render again but just doesnt work. Does anyone else have same problem and does anyone know how to fix this?
this has been happening for ages, Activision f*cked it up, and now YouTube say its a illegal way of recording games, so the solution is. 1) use a camera to record or ") spend £200 on a hdpvr. Im sorry but f u c k that.
Sorry dude.
Ohh damn.. i dont have much money so i just hope they do something with this.
Any way to get more info on how this happened?
Damn, this is disgusting.
Yeah I know how to fix it. If you do it in between 10pm-12pm on wednesday they can't stop it. That's how I half to record my things.
If you have your Elite account linked with your YouTube account but the videos that you render do not show up on YouTube, then use this workaround:


text:
Divers will descend into the Hudson River next week as part of an ongoing construction effort to restore the Sinatra Park pier.
The park at 5th Street and Sinatra Drive was closed after a portion of the pier collapsed in September of 2009. Construction began in March, starting a long-term $7.7 million effort to restore the park to its previous condition, according to Brandy Forbes, the city's director of community development.
"In order for it to be safe it had to be restored," said Forbes. "We couldn't allow people on there knowing it had collapsed underneath."
Sinatra Park's facilities include a waterfront walkway, a gazebo, and soccer field. Forbes said that the turf along the field was recently rolled back to allow room for construction.
"This problem [shipworms] has become much more significant than it may have been ten years ago." – Community Development Director Brandy Forbes
"One of the biggest aspects of the job is the restoration of the seawall itself," said Forbes, adding that divers will be putting on the finishing touches this summer.
Forbes also said that the divers, who will be working only several feet down in the water, will have to work around the changes in tide.
"The most critical part is to get that structure [the pier] stabilized and rebuilt before they can do any of the final work," said Forbes. "So that's what they are focusing on right now."
Forbes and Mayor Dawn Zimmer acknowledged the lengthy process associated with the restoration of the park. Forbes said that permits had to be obtained from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), which took roughly a year. Permission then had to be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers before a construction company could be contracted.
"I fully recognize the hardship for Hoboken residents to not have as much field space as we truly need," said Zimmer. "I'm very pleased this project is moving forward and we're hopeful we can get it done ahead of schedule."
Beware the shipworms
Forbes explained that the pier's collapse could essentially be attributed to Teredo worms, or "shipworms," which tear away at wood-based structures like the Sinatra Pier.
Forbes explained that in recent years, the DEP has required that the Hudson River be held to higher cleaning standards, which ironically led to an increase in shipworms.
"These things have been thriving in [cleaner waters]," said Forbes. "[That's why] we put sleeves around [the wood] and pour concrete around it. They don't eat through the concrete structures."
"This problem [shipworms] has become much more significant than it may have been ten years ago," Forbes added.
In fact, town officials explained that many waterfront property owners are now taking measures to ensure their structures are protected from shipworms.
"When it collapsed, the city went through a process of evaluating the entire waterfront over that concern of whether [their property] is structurally sound," said Forbes. "Some of the private property owners are taking measures to improve some of their structures."
Clever clauses
Zimmer explained that during past construction projects, the city was often at the mercy of the contracted companies as to whether they would finish their projects in a timely fashion.
"We had a real challenge of completing Pier C [Park construction]," said Zimmer. "There was nothing [in the contract] to get the contractor to finish the job on time. If we [chose to] pull the contract away from them, it's hard to get somebody else to finish the project because they don't want to take on the liability."
Zimmer explained that for this particular contract, a "liquidated damages clause" was inserted to ensure that the contractor is motivated to finish the job in time. According to the contract, the clause holds that if the contractor fails to complete the work by December 21, the company must pay a fine to the city each subsequent day.
"I was adamant this would be in here," said Zimmer. "If they don't finish by December 21, they have to pay $1,500 dollars a day."
Zimmer later added that she is hopeful Sinatra Park will be finished by fall.
Stephen LaMarca may be reached at firstname.lastname@example.com.


text:
Please note: This wine is sold and shipped separately by Wine.com; Harry & David is the marketing agent. Click here for further details and restrictions, and a list of states to which this wine can be shipped. You must be 21 years of age or older to order, purchase or receive delivery of wine. Offer void where prohibited by law. Promotions, coupons and special offers do not apply to products containing wine. Gifts that include both food and wine will be sent in two separate packages.
- Cupcake Vineyards Chardonnay (750 ml.)
- Cupcake Vineyards Merlot (750 ml.)
- Cupcake Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon (750 ml.)
Standard Shipping and Processing: $17.95
For additional Shipping and Processing details click here.
Displaying reviews 1-3
- Good variety
- None
Best Uses
- Any occasion
Comments about Harry and David Cupcakes Wine Trio:
I was delighted by the cute name and great taste of the wine. I hope the other two bottles are as good as the first.
- Good value
- Recipient loved it
Best Uses
- Birthday Gift
Comments about Harry and David Cupcakes Wine Trio:
My Aunt loved this gift. I was trying to find something different then the usual flowers. this is a great value for Cupcake wine!
Comments about Harry and David Cupcakes Wine Trio:
Sent to the right person, on time. Almost unheard of in this day and age. Thank you very much.
Displaying reviews 1-3


text:
They were fiercely proud of their children's accomplishments.
They played together as a family.
They went to school plays, parent/teacher interviews, and helped with school work.
They co-parented, Gomez was just as active in raising their children as Morticia was.
When their children wanted something that they disapproved of, they were disappointed but relented because it would make them happy.
Plus, all TV married couples kind of hate each other and argue 90% of the time for the sake of comedy, but these two have always seemed to be forever and always in love, which is kind of sweet.
And if that's only possible because they're weirdos, what does that say about us?
Is it odd I actually really like this post?
Reblogging this every time I see it.
(via ohheyjill)
Thank you so much! I also never have money :/ Sucks! When it's pay day at my jobs, I always put aside some money for these kind of things! :)


text:
This page contains links to websites, school projects and lessons.
Bay Backpack - Chesapeake Bay Program/NOAAEverything Chesapeake is right here! Learn some creative ways to integrate the Chesapeake Bay and environmental issues into your classroom lessons. The Bay Backpack's books, multimedia, curriculum guides, individual lesson plans and online data sources help bring environmental education into the classroom.
Bayville Online Field Trip!Students become virtual research assistants for a video production company looking for significant stories about the science of the Chesapeake Bay.
Chesapeake Bay- Introduction to an EcosystemFull document from NOAA's Chesapeake Bay Program and EPA
Clean Air Partners On the Air curriculum featuring seven units on air quality, health and climate change. Sign up for the Air Alert or get the app from Clean Air Partners.
National Sustainability Education StandardsNational listserv for K12 educators focused on education for sustainability
JASON Project CurriculumCurriculum, professional development and live events in STEM education.
American Museum of Natural HistorySearchable catalog of lessons and learning materialsFor Kids and FamiliesScience Bulletins - Videos and data visualizations about global biodiversity, Earth & Space science, human biology and evolution
Growing NativeEvery October, thousands of Growing Native volunteers collect native hardwood tree seeds, such as acorns and walnuts. These seeds are donated to state nurseries, which grow them into seedlings. In the spring, volunteers plant seedlings grown from seeds collected two to three years prior along the banks of rivers and streams in their communities.
Social Studies middle school modules about Environmental History and Forests!
School & Classroom Projects
The Amphibian Project- multiple sources of amphibian curricula; conceptual and hands-on projects for all grades
DNR's School Check-Up Guide Get your free copy of the new guide with lessons on energy, waste, and water assessments for your school!
Project Wild Links to MD Curriculum
BALTIMORE OUTWARD BOUNDEstablished in 1986 as the first urban-based Outward Bound program in the United States, the Baltimore Chesapeake Bay Outward Bound Center focuses its programs on the youth and communities of Baltimore and the state of Maryland.
LINKS TO SCHOOL SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL PAGESNote: Some school systems use the State curriculum and do not list it separately. Contact the Science or Environmental Science Coordinator in that system for more detailed information. Environmental Education Centers are listed under "Organizations".
Baltimore City
Baltimore County Carroll Charles
Frederick Garrett
Prince George's
National Renewable Energy Lab (USDoE)Solar Sprint/Hydrogen Fuel Cell Car Competition for Middle School
National Atlas WebSiteU.S. Department of the InteriorCreate maps and layer them with data from agriculture, geology, hydrology, topography, biology, more.
National Park Service Curriculum Materials
Energy Star for K12 School Districts Success Stories, Resources and Recognition
NASA LandSat lesson plans Global climate change education modules
Environmental Education Resources
Geographic Information Systems Accessing the right data is the key to getting the most value out of your GIS enterprise. ArcData and Geography Network offer search tools, services, and software.
NASA's Exploring the Environment Global climate change education modules EPA Environmental Projects, Resources & Awards


text:
NEW YORK, April 29- Tax-advantaged 529 college-savings plans have been a huge help for many students and their families as the costs of higher education have soared. But if you're applying for financial aid you need to know how these accounts will affect your bottom line.
NEW YORK, April 22- Families saving for college poured billions of dollars into U.S. 529 education savings plans over the past five years, even as these plans' performance lagged behind other investments like mutual funds, investment research company Morningstar Inc said on Monday.
NEW YORK, March 12- Assets in 529 plans climbed to nearly $200 billion in 2012, but the number of families drawing from their accounts to pay for college was just a fraction of the growing student population, according to a report on the plans released on Tuesday by the College Savings Plans Network.
The Fast Money traders share their final trades of the day.
Tuesday, 18 Jun 2013 | 5:00 PM ETAhead of the Fed meeting, the S&P 500 appears headed toward 1,687, StockMonster's Guy Adami says.
Tuesday, 18 Jun 2013 | 6:40 PM ETYou say the name of a stock, and Mad Money's Jim Cramer tells you whether to buy or sell.