text:
Home » uReport » God Strikes Liberal Spring Breakers in Mexico with 7.9 Magnitude Earthquake. Your Son or Daughter May be Dead.
God Strikes Liberal Spring Breakers in Mexico with 7.9 Magnitude Earthquake. Your Son or Daughter May be Dead.
Share this Article
Author:Senator August Weisz
Tags:Acapulco Earthquake Earthquake Death Count Spring Break Girls
(chrisTwire)— Breaking News. A 7.9 magnitude quake has struck near Acapulco, Mexico, on Tuesday, the United States Geological Survey reported.
It is currently spring break for large portions of liberal America. And these liberal students flaunt to Mexico to partake in sins illegal in the United States. Acapulco is a popular spring break location for liberal college students who don't love America. Proper students visit locations like Lake Havasu, South Padre Island, and Daytona Beach. The popular lesbian movie series "Girls With low self-esteem" is filmed in Acapulco to subvert US laws and depicts girls partaking in lesbian sex acts with and without animals.
More details to follow….
- Excited
- Fascinated
- Amused
- Shocked
- Sad
- Angry
Retired Hydroelectric Engineer. Now spend my time helping others who won't help themselves. http://christwire.org/august-weisz-biography MA
Facebook Conversations
Comments are closed.
You guys seem to like the word "Liberal" since you throw it in front of everything.
Liberal students, Liberal America, Liberal college students…and countless examples in other articles…
You know more than just Liberals go completely insane on spring break right?
Praise or Condemn: 5 9
Reverend Billybob Cletusreplied:
Not true. I was in college in the 90s and member of a conservative Christian fellowship. We didn't spend our spring break drinking, fornicating and otherwise mocking God. We spent our break in a productive Christian manner, focusing on Bible Study, helping each other with homework and protesting the construction of a baby killing abortion clinic just outside our campus.
Praise or Condemn: 7 4
Sounds like soooo much fun…But take a look at your own statement: "member of a conservative Christian fellowship."
No duh you didn't party hard because you were in a Christian group…Bet you were a bunch of buzzkills…
Praise or Condemn: 3 8
Let's all read the bible, well the good parts at least.
Praise or Condemn: 1 6
Sooo…None of it?
Praise or Condemn: 5 6
What's that gays not to blame are you going soft?
Praise or Condemn: 2 6
Reverend Billybob Cletus
@ Celestial Deth: Wow, that is quite the encyclopedic knowledge of horror movies (I am partially admiring, partially horrified that you have watched so many violent movies about mass murder). I stand corrected in my earlier assertion that there was something even remotely moral about these movies. I see now that these movies have no redeeming features whatsoever.
Praise or Condemn: 5 0
Brother Johnathan Banereplied:
Absolutely Right! Rev. Billybob looks like you sniffed out the Deth broad too. I've been suspicious of her for along time. Her posts are not quite relevant and yet she seems to be an endless encyclopedia of worthless knowledge. All the violence & disguising sex in horror movies do that to a lot of broads. Mark my words!!!
Praise or Condemn: 4 2
@ Brother Johnathan Bane, did you not even read the comic. In A Nightmare on Elm Street Franchise, the most they ever did was allude to sex.
In Hellraiser, the only people who had sex was Uncle Frank and Aunt Julia, and they went to hell for it.
In Child's Play, there was never any sex AT ALL because the main hero was a six year old kid. They didn't feature any sex until Bride of Chucky and Seed of Chucky, but I don't count them because they are TERRIBLE movies.
The horror movie franchise that is FAMOUS for large amounts of sex was Halloween and Friday the 13th, but everyone eventually died.
Praise or Condemn: 3 2
Sorry I meant comment, in my first sentence, but horror comics have a lot of history too. Like in the ever popular growing Hack/Slash, the comic contains MANY sexual overtones. However, the main character, Cassie Hack, is a virgin, and she goes around killing all the serial killers, like Freddy, Jason, and Michael plus several others.
Praise or Condemn: 3 2
Cassie WAS a virgin in many of the earlier comics, it was revealed that she was when a demon cast a spell on a bunch of people that will only work on Virgins. Despite that, she kills the demon and saves the day, but my friend, (Who also reads the comics) just told me that Cassie, in a more recent comic, discovered a love interest and finally had sex. She's still saving people's lives and battling Satan, monsters, and serial killers, but yup no longer a virgin. Ah well, it was a nice thought though, wasn't it?
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
What?!?! Cassie loses her virginity?! Damn, I must go out and buy the comics to catch up!
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
I know, I was REALLY disappointed when I found out. My inner NO ARTEMIS ARCHETYPE COMPLEX NO! was very much saddened, because I looked up to her as an icon, pretty much, mostly because she had the whole Carrie thing going on, with her being abused and her mother being fucking crazy. In fact, I look up to a lot of strong female characters.
Like Alice in Resident Evil, or Nancy in Nightmare on Elm Street. OR CARRIE. I adore Carrie. I kinda just want to bundle her up into a mass of blankets and tell her things will be alright. But I can't. So I make up for it by drawing her often, and happy.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
Actually I'm kinda dissapointed as well…Cassie's character makes more sense as a virgin, sorta like a hint a purity amongst her dark side…
"…Alice in Resident Evil"
Ehhhhh….My gamer side is severly annoyed by Alice…She's a cool character, but she annoys the absolute hell outta me…
Honestly, I've yet to see Carrie all the way through…Just bits and pieces…I have a few days off before Kid Icarus comes out, I might sit down and actually watch it for once…
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
I know, I adore Cassie and her natural distrust towards human kind. I was kinda hoping that Evil Ernie would be her last shot at love, because despite the fact that he was a serial killer, he loved her for everything that she was, and even willing to help kill serial killers for her.
I like Alice more for her ninja skills more so than her actual personality. Although her single minded determination to get back at Umbrella is really impressive.
I read Carrie first, and then when I mentioned it to my mom, she said it scared the living shit out of her when she was a kid, so I naturally demanded to watch it.
Hey, it's her fault for making me watch Child's Play as a kid. She should have known I'd get her back.
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
I really liked Evil Ernie and was sad to see him go the way he did…
Considering they made up Alice for the movies when they could of used Jill Valentine (Awesome Resident Evil character!) is what annoys me most…Jill may not have the superpowers of Alice, but she is still a badass even without powers (So in the games, she has 1 power and that is she's completely immune to T-Virus)…At least they added Claire and Chris Redfield…Though I disliked how they made their characters in the movie…
Because of you, I might start watching some more horror…Theres a ton of horror movies on Netflix…That I keep ignoring….
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
Ooooh! Watch Blood Creek! It's a Zombiefied Nazi movie and although it's not very memorable, it's still pretty good for a horror movie.
My older sister, who plays Resident Evil games, HATES the Resident Evil movies. HATES them. The only one she likes is Degeneration. She can't stand the rest, but she'll watch them with me because she loves me and ZOMBIES!
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
If Netflix has it, I shall watch it!
I don't hate the RE movies…I just dislike them…
The only reason Degeneration was any good was because it actually tied into the game series a whole lot better than the live-action movies did…
Zombies are awesome! Too bad ever since Resident Evil 4, they haven't actually been zombies…Just people controlled by parasites (RE4: Las Plagas. RE5: Ouroboros)
The newest Resident Evil for 3DS has jusr ridiculous enemies…http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120303191803/residentevil/images/4/4b/240px-Ooze_scan.jpg
They are called "Ooze"…They're pretty cool, but they sure as hell ain't zombies…
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
@ Deth – "In Hellraiser, the only people who had sex was Uncle Frank and Aunt Julia, and they went to hell for it."
Muff said sister Frank & Julia are in hell as it should be AND ALL IS GOOD IN THE WORLD…
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
Well, in the sequel, they did come back…. but Kirsten just trapped them in hell again. Actually, in Hellraiser, there was never really any supernatural villain. The Cenobites, demons of hell, were merely doing there job, and if someone opened the puzzle box desiring more than what God had given them, they were given the pleasures of hell, where pain is pleasure and vise versa, so yeah, basically hell. In the second movie, all the cenobites were killed by an 'Evil Cenobite' desperate for power, and he kills the head Demon, Pinhead. Their real god is Leviathan, who just gets shut back into their world. In the rest of the movies, Pinhead comes back and turns 'Evil' because his so-called 'human side' was destroyed. He more or less reverts back in Hellraiser 5 and 7, where he punishes people for their sins.
The point in horror movies is that there is a balance. Yes, at the end of the movie the villain is defeated, but they always come back again for another round. Evil can never be truly defeated, but as humans we have the power to endure such things and strive on.
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
Well obviously. They were evil characters, and movie logic dictates that they had to be stopped.
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
Me and my mom love horror movies. All those movies I listed? I've seen every last one of them with my mom. Especially Hellraiser. ESPECIALLY HELLRAISER.
We also like Silence of the Lambs, Silent Hill (Which has religious overtones to the MAX. They burned witches. They burned a young girl who they thought was a witch, and so Satan saw an opportunity to get souls so he made a pact with a little Girl to kill all the people who tortured her) Battle Royale, It, The Shining, Carrie, Sleepaway Camp, and a lot more. What can I say? I love horror films. I loved them since I was a kid, and my mom likes them too but more for the Horrifying aspect of it and less of the Gross Interest that I have. In fact, at my old high school, I was in the School Newspaper, and I often ran a comic I made called, 'The Adventures of Horror Friends,' which featured Freddy, Jason, and Michael hanging out like regular dudes and getting into trouble.
If there IS an underlying moral of Horror movies, it's the fact that Evil will always lose.
Hey, in Nightmare on Elm Street 3, they were able to kill him by blessing his bones with Holy Water and putting a cross on his head.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
Eh…Silent Hill was okay by itself, but after playing the games, the movie is a bit disappointing…I mean the religious overtones were pretty much spot on…But quite a few minor annoyances irk me…Like Pyramid Head! Pyramid Head has absolutely NO reason to be in the movie besides fanservice, but even fans were annoyed by it…
Darn it CelestialDeth, you got me all worked up…My gamer geek is clashing with your horror movie buff…lol
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
I actually feel pretty awesome right now because I hardly ever get to take out my inner horror buff for a walk nowadays. Most people don't watch a lot of horror movies, and when they do they a) Don't like it as much as I do, or b) Are Nerds like I am and then I'm happy, but a is a lot more often than b, sadly enough.
Yeah, Pyramid Head was fanservice, but I just like the movie because FEMALE EMPOWERMENT FUCK YEAH ALL THE MAIN CHARACTERS WERE FEMALE
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
I'm a nerd…But in the sense of I know way too much misc. video game knowledge then I could ever need…I'm not even in the same bracket as you with horror stuff…
Do you know the actual reason why Pyramid Head makes no freakin sense in the Silent Hill movie?
Female main characters rock! But they killed off the one I liked most! The female cop who's name I can't remember for the life of me!!! Derp derp derp…Cybil! Cybil Bennet! I remember now because she's in the first Silent Hill game
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Hell yeah, I would take his job!
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Oops, put my comment in the wrong place, but yeah, I still want his job.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Lol, I noticed…
We shall take on his job together!
Fighting the abominations of Silent Hill!!!
Screw the pistol! I choose the crowbar!
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Thanks to Silent Hill: Homecoming I usually take the crowbar…MAinly because in one boss fight, if you missed the crowbar…you'd miss the chance to weaken said boss and the battle gets to be a pain…
That and Gordon Freeman in Half Life has a crowbar! 😀
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
oh yea! THat's awesome…I'm saving this!!!
I feel both sorry for the mail man…and I want his job!
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
battle royales II was not even considered a Horror movie it's mostly action based movie where a Bunch of Japanese kids must kill each other because the american government presure them to do so if not they nuke them all
( but it's also irrealistic)
as for battleroyal I it's rmeind me of the american version "condamned"
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
I consider it a horror film because Blood and Gore. Like how I don't consider Freddy vs. Jason as a horror movie, more like bad comedy.
Or the new Friday the 13th movie, I just consider it bad.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Oh wait, you meant Battle Royale II, I haven't seen it, my older sister said I would hate it and I trust her judgement.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
dETH -giT A life. All horror films are nothing more then Blood-Porn Trash. This haz Fed with ur head girl. Have you considered an Exorcism? BTW that fake mask looks like crap sister!
Praise or Condemn: 2 1
No, but me and my mom have seen The Exorcist. My mom told me that it gave her nightmares as a kid. Sad to say the first time I watched it, it scared the shit out of me too.
I watched horror movies to be scared. Not to base my life rules by.
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
Brother Johnathan Bane
I just noticed this… her face avatar is a chic mask! Spells phoney in my book.
Praise or Condemn: 4 2
OMG THAT WOULD MAKE SO MUCH SENSE if I didn't have her as a friend on facebook. Which I do. And she is very much 100% girl.
Why is that every time a girl is more knowledgeable about a topic that you don't know you assume they are a man in disguise? Wouldn't it benefit her more if she pretended to be a man instead of a girl, because sadly enough, you'd probably take her a lot more seriously if she was a boy rather than a girl? But because she is a girl she's either ignored for her comments, called stupid, or constantly hit on.
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
"because she is a girl she's … constantly hit on."
That's projection on your part, creeper.
Praise or Condemn: 2 1
Accept, you know, she's not a creeper.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
Crowley is a woman? OK, then. I'm just trying to look out for apathetic little self =)
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
* your apathetic little self =)
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
Oh yay I feel so much more secure.
How come you never come to my rescue when Bruce demands I go eat lunch with him despite the fact that I keep saying NO.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
Oh, Bruce? He's harmless.
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
And yet he stalks me on my tumblr and threatens to stalk me in real life. I feel so much better.
How about no? I don't care if he's harmless. When I say no, I expect decent human beings to knock it off.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
And I say "no" to you visiting this site, yet you persist.
Praise or Condemn: 4 2
Does the fact that me posting my art and pictures you in any way? No.
Does the fact that Bruce asking me to have lunch with him harm me? Yes. It does. It's hurtful, despicable behavior. I don't like his advances. It makes me feel insecure and ESPECIALLY when he says things like:
Do you think you will win? I better you jump around and celebrate with all your friends when you win, don't you? Do you use sparkling cider to spray all over yourself and your friends?
If you win your race, I hope you post a bunch of pictures! Ones of you jumping and hugging your female friends, spraying sparkling cider over each other in celebration. I will be so excited for you.
Praise or Condemn: 0 5
Why is somebody wishing you good luck make you feel uncomfortable? I was merely hoping that if you won, you would let us all join in your happiness by posting pictures of your victory. I am slightly offended. I have gone out of my way to make you feel welcome here, offering you free meals and jobs even, and then you take my words and twist them around and make it seem like I am hitting on you. All I wanted was to be a good Christian, and make you feel welcome on our site. They way you are treating me makes me feel very sad. I can't believe that you are so pompous and arrogant to just assume that I was hitting on you. You must think very highly of yourself. I still wish you the best of luck in the race, and now that we have cleared up my intentions, perhaps we can get that meal now? Or at least, the pictures of the celebration?
Praise or Condemn: 3 3
Sarah just messaged me on facebook to come look at this, and I'm horrendously disgusted. Leave her alone. All the things that she doesn't want from you are all compiled here in this one comment that you have just made. She told me that's she not going to comment on anything you say to her anymore, and I'm glad she decided that, because she doesn't need any more of your bullshit. So leave her the fuck alone. Because guess what? You're not making her feel welcome.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
I'm glad to see that she has some compassion for how horribly she made me feel. She doesn't need to hide behind you to apologize though. I don't have any ill will towards her, I forgive her for making me sad.
Praise or Condemn: 3 2
Crowley, CD made the choice to come here. To post hundreds of times. To ridicule our articles. To post pictures and animations many of which ony served to disrupt or offend us. She has the right to leave.
She is the creeper.
Praise or Condemn: 5 1
Oh no, she ain't leaving, she likes talking with Ouroboros and Thiefenz too much, and she'll gladly talk to anyone else. Just not Bruce, because everyone else will argue back at her and she's fine with it, but she's uncomfortable when she's being sexually harassed. She isn't apologizing for shit, you're the one who should apologize to her.
Praise or Condemn: 1 5
Congrats Bruce, you just scared a young girl into silence. I hope you're proud of yourself, you foul Coccydynia!
Praise or Condemn: 1 5
Ok, I apologize for being a nice man and offering her a free meal and a job and hoping she wins a race that she is really excited about.
Do you see how ridiculous you are sounding by asking me to apologize to her? I have been nothing but nice. She just misunderstood me, and now she feels a bit silly for the misunderstanding. We have all had misunderstandings before, and it is nothing for her to feel ashamed of.
Praise or Condemn: 3 1
She posted a naked picture today and she is claiming someone is harassing her? She needs to leave with that attitude. If she needs a place to chat with her friends she can go find one elsewhere. I am sick of her attitude and her pictures. And we back Bruce 100%.
Praise or Condemn: 4 2
Oh, so you're backing a potential rapist now? He threatened to start following her. Glad to see what kind of morals that you folks have. I have never been more ashamed of people of my own religion than I am today.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
You're hurting a person. I'm disgusted with both of you. You know who I actually like out of all these Christwire folk? Exbrony and ex-atheist, at least they don't fucking attack people like this.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Yeah I back him.
And potential rapist? My Lord… you are a complete an utter idiot.
Praise or Condemn: 4 0
I have never said I would "follow" her anywhere except on Tumblr. You are making things up now. You three girls are getting work up over a simple misunderstanding. So worked up that it makes me think you might all be the same person, or at least two of you. I have done nothing wrong here, and BTW, I went to Sarah's Tumblr one time. I don't even remember my Tumblr account's password, it has been that long since I have used it. Please stop whining about a misunderstanding and if you can't do that, I think August might be correct, maybe you all should leave. We are adults here, and I fully cleared up the misconceptions. Grow up and get over "yourselves".
Praise or Condemn: 3 0
FYI, Bruce, Crowley and Aziraphale are the same person.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
Sorry to correct you sir, but I'm a 48 year old man, I believe you need to grow up.
Crowley is 37. And she's more sensible than all of you put together.
Exbrony dear, why on earth would I pretend to be my own partner, just because we understand they same archetype certainly doesn't mean we are the same person.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
You know what I see? I saw a happy girl just chattering about something that interested her and talking to someone else about it, and then all this shit just spiraled here out of control. You can't let anything be nice here, can't you? Everyone has to shit.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Because the name of a cartoon proves everything, you foolish little man. You're behaving ridiculously.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
You guy's a good as phoney avatars maybe help out some day.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
"She just misunderstood me, and now she feels a bit silly for the misunderstanding."
FUCK NO ASSHOLE You don't GET to say what she is feeling. You NEVER tell anyone about what they are feeling. Ever! She's the one who says how she feels. Not you. Just because you're a man and she's a girl, you think you can tell her what her feelings are? Well, open your eyes, you cock, because right now she is hurt, and you are the one that has hurt her. Do you understand? YOU HAVE HURT SOMEONE. Stop talking to her, stop following her on tumblr, she wants you to knock it off. You want to be nice? That's what you do. Back off and leave her alone.
Praise or Condemn: 2 4
"FUCK NO ASSHOLE" No.
You simple minded cretin. You come here and post your hate and filth and yes, I know, Crowley_The_Snake = CelestialDeth@*********.com
Just leave us alone.
Praise or Condemn: 4 1
Bruce is a disgusting human being, and I will never stop defending people who need defending. Also, check again asshole. That ain't my email.
Praise or Condemn: 2 3
So you just use it (her email) for this account here? Give it a break….. Do you really not think we know what happens on this site?
And I remember you posting my email on tumblr asking people to send me hate mail. You are a bigger creeper than anyone.
Praise or Condemn: 5 1
Oh yeah, that makes sense, accept I don't have a tumblr. You just make shit up to justify yourself asshole, like you can ignore the fact that a girl is being harassed by one of your own, and you won't do anything about it. Protip: When someone keeps on asking for dates and pictures of someone else, and they keep saying No, No, NO, it's harassment. And it makes me sick.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Good luck with your superiority complex honey.
Praise or Condemn: 2 3
I think the better question, August, is why you feel the need to look up the IP address of other people and post it around. Aziraphale is right, you have a superiority complex and somehow, by revealing the location and identities of other people who disagree with you, you get off on that. Do you just hate it that people are sick of bastards like you? Are you mad that people are taking this site seriously when you try ever so desperately to mask it? Do you not think that other's can't do the same thing to you? Funny how you're only gunning after other people, I remember Claire posting evidence that Robert did a piss-poor job at hiding the fact that he's playing the roles of two different women at the same time. Why don't you go and reveal that faker? Oh, that's right, you have your head too far up your ass.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
Law, Who is Robert and what does he have to do with the fact Sarah is playing 3 different people on here and ganging up on me over a misunderstanding? It is not my fault that she misunderstood what I was saying and now she is too embarrassed to own up to her own stupidity and arrogance in thinking that I was hitting on her. I have fully explained myself and her 3 personalities won't leave me alone.
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
"Law, Who is Robert and what does he have to do with the fact Sarah is playing 3 different people on here and ganging up on me over a misunderstanding?"
Apparently you didn't get the memo, Robert is Susan and apparently Blanche as well, considering how while posting as one of them, he ended up referring to the same persona while responding to something meant for the other. What does that have to do with Sarah's shenanigans? The fact that August is more than willing to point that out rather than the actions of someone who's being doing it for much longer.
"It is not my fault that she misunderstood what I was saying and now she is too embarrassed to own up to her own stupidity and arrogance in thinking that I was hitting on her."
Except you do hit on her. I've witnessed several times where you tried to meet up with her (along with a number of other women who've posted here) and the fact that you were deranged enough to think that you were married to Claire for awhile is also evidence that you're a perverted creep. I'll at least give you this bit: you're nowhere near as bad as Billings is.
Praise or Condemn: 0 4
(I am not even going to respond to the Crowley/CD/AA/idiot all-in-one person)
Law, you noticed I blocked out the IP's. Nothing was revealed, and you know this. Your just desperately trying to inadequately defend someone on here. "Oh no her feelings were hurt" Yet you say worse to us every day. SO SHUT THE HELL UP LAW.
And if you think BB and Susan are the same person you are a bigger idiot than even we thought you were. And Robert? God you are a fool.
Praise or Condemn: 3 0
"Law, you noticed I blocked out the IP's. Nothing was revealed, and you know this."
Yet you're more than happy to reveal a good bit of the IP address and threatening to reveal the whole thing. You can't weasel your way out of that one.
"just desperately trying to inadequately defend someone on here. "Oh no her feelings were hurt" Yet you say worse to us every day. SO SHUT THE HELL UP LAW."
Ooooh, looks like I hit a nerve! Well, did you ever stop to think that you DON'T deserve the nasty comments aimed at you? Did it never occur to you that people don't like it when you try to trample over their rights and try to force your beliefs onto them? And before you try to being up anything about 'Christians being oppressed', let's take a look at some facts:
There are schools dedicated to teaching the ways of Christianity, i.e. that evolution is false and so forth.
There business's that uphold Christian views as the primary work ethic.
There are college courses and classes that talk and discuss religion, which can range from just talking about one religion's impact to a whole variety of them.
There are even business's that are geared specifically towards Christianity, meaning that if you aren't a Christian, you can't participate in it, or at least not receive certain benefits from it.
Each President that has lead this country was a Christian when they were alive (and don't try to side-track the conversation by playing word games, you moron).
I highly doubt that letting Americans marry one another or voting is oppressing or hurting your rights as an American, so don't say there's a war on religion when you're confusing that with not getting what you want all the time.
Now, with those facts in mind, think back to all the stuff you've said: you're more than willing to commit genocide against people who are different, you don't call people who are of different skin color human, you don't think women should have the right to vote or voice their opinion (and yet you'll let 'Blanche' or 'Susan' mouth off whenever 'they' want), you think any other form of religion or education or political belief is a sin that should call for action against others, and you're more than happy to declare war against the world because they aren't the same as you. Then there's the matter that you've gone and insulted quite a few people here personally, ranging from calling them fat just because you can't see the entirety of their rib cage, to insulting their education or job status, believing that someone is inferior to you just because they didn't take the exact same path in life as you did. Do you honestly believe that you don't deserve the hate and bile aimed at you?
Do you seriously think that you're exactly the kind of person that Jesus would want to represent his beliefs?
Do you honestly think that you're above others when you're guilty of doing the same things as them, just done in a different way?
"And if you think BB and Susan are the same person you are a bigger idiot than even we thought you were. And Robert? God you are a fool."
Hey, Robert's the one that fucked up his response by referring to the same persona he was already using once, it's not me who's the idiot.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Clever what you did there.
"Hey, Robert's the one that fucked up his response by referring to the same persona he was already using once, it's not me who's the idiot."
Show me this post, once. Just one time. You cant, it does not exist you fool.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
"Yet you're more than happy to reveal a good bit of the IP address and threatening to reveal the whole thing. You can't weasel your way out of that one."
Don't need to, I never threatened to reveal them. And even If I did, IP addresses are not Private info. Whenever you visit a site you reveal it. But if she doubted I had the correct info I could have emailed it to her.
Praise or Condemn: 1 1
Admittedly, Claire was the one who found that bit of info out and screen cap'ed it, but I'm far more incline to believe her than you fools, especially when you say you'll back Bruce up 100%, including the fact that that means that you can't add either and that you think he was married to someone he physically couldn't have gotten contact from. It doesn't help that the site is notorious for deleting posts that happen to reveal what hypocritical liars you bastards are.
"Don't need to, I never threatened to reveal them. And even If I did, IP addresses are not Private info. Whenever you visit a site you reveal it. But if she doubted I had the correct info I could have emailed it to her."
A word from the wise, never try to get your hands dirty in something you aren't prepared for. It's just as easy to get YOUR IP address, for instance, and find out quite a bit of information from that. Imagine what information like that would do to you if it were in the wrong hands, hm? It's best to not play a game you aren't ready to play, child, or else you'll seriously get hurt.
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
Oh, and is it me, or is there a particular post from August that was deleted? Seeing as how he was so high-and-mighty and proud of showing off someone's IP address, even partially, it looks like there be dissension in the ranks of Cultwire, since you don't possess admin powers, and even if you didn't, your ego would never let you delete your own posts that let you lord over others.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Of course you can't find it. You know the person you are referring to hates us so much she would say anything.
And yep, someone deleted it. Wasn't me. It was only the first two octet's meaning it was narrowed down to 1 in 70,225. Considering she posts her face and school, I don't see the big deal, but you obviously do.
So yeah, I have been censored by chrisTwire. Considering the fucking shit you say about my family and what others get away with that's pretty hilarious, don't you think?
Praise or Condemn: 3 1
"Of course you can't find it. You know the person you are referring to hates us so much she would say anything."
'cept I seen it before, and considering how you all don't like to use legitimate sources or tell us to do your own research, I fail to see how you have a point there.
"And yep, someone deleted it. Wasn't me. It was only the first two octet's meaning it was narrowed down to 1 in 70,225. Considering she posts her face and school, I don't see the big deal, but you obviously do."
The fact is you're still trying to hunt down the location of a particular person by revealing that information. You may have only posted information that would lead to a 1 in 70,225, but you certainly have the rest of that information which narrows down just where she lives.
"So yeah, I have been censored by chrisTwire. Considering the fucking shit you say about my family and what others get away with that's pretty hilarious, don't you think?"
What makes your family so damn special? What makes them immune to being harassed? You talk shit about other people and other families, why should yours get any kind of special treatment? Considering your attitude and how people already treat you, you were just asking for people to insult your family, ESPECIALLY when you start plastering pictures of that fat whore you call a daughter online. As for the why you got censored and others aren't? We aren't revealing information that could lead to the specific location of someone else, just because we're desperate for some form of superiority to them, unlike you. Do I find it hilarious? I fell out of my chair from laughing so hard, knowing that you're nothing but an idiot with a severe complex who was censored by the site you so love to spread your own hate on.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
"The fact is you're still trying to hunt down the location of a particular person by revealing that information. "
Not still trying to hunt anything down. Never had to try. She posted her face, her school, everything. I'm just calling her out on pretending to be someone she isn't. And you can have my IP. Every site I go to has it. Do you know it's even in email headers?
Praise or Condemn: 3 0
You are the biggest Hypocrite here LAW.
Praise or Condemn: 3 0
So I take it you're just going to ignore the fact that you're a giant hypocrite, August? Running away like all your fellow cult members when confronted with the truth? I suppose that's one value you instilled into that whore, that if she's ever proven wrong, to just run away in the other direction.
And how am I the hypocrite? I use your logic against you all to see how you like it, and yet you deny your own logic when used against you. I'm treating you all much like how you treat others, so how am I the hypocrite?
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
Were you picked last on the playground L.N?
Have I ever gone to someone else's site and spewed hate? No. Yet you come here, that is the difference. If you have some agenda, go create your own site. Say what you want. I guarantee, I won't bother you there.
And for this claim that we "run away". You seem to conveniently dodge questions or drop away. When do we ever run away? People may end arguments with you because you are inconsolable, or we may have to go tend to offline things, but we don't go away…. What's your excuse Hypocrite?
Praise or Condemn: 3 0
"Have I ever gone to someone else's site and spewed hate? No."
Actually, in a way, yes, yes you did. You came here, a site you were apart of, but not actually part of the ownership.
"Yet you come here, that is the difference."
Hey, like I said, you have the right to say whatever you want, but that doesn't mean you're protected from people talking shit about you because you believe they're inferior to you.
"If you have some agenda, go create your own site. Say what you want. I guarantee, I won't bother you there."
You're right, you won't bother me on another site, namely because you're too busy hating other groups to care. You became apart of this site because you agree with the genocidal and racist, sexist, xenophobic mindset that the creators have here and want to voice your opinions. There's no point to voicing your opinions if you don't have an audience though, and that's where people like me come in. We're your audience, and we decide we're going to boo you off stage.
"And for this claim that we "run away". You seem to conveniently dodge questions or drop away."
Oh? When and where? I'll admit, there are questions aimed at me that I don't get around to answering, but hardly ever will it be when I'm apart of an active thread that's still going on and isn't being flooded with messages every five seconds. You all don't exactly have that to fall back on.
"When do we ever run away."
For starters, you either don't provide proof that your right or you provide shoddy proof or tell others to do the research for you. There's also the matter that you'll change the subject whenever possible, just because you can't handle the fact that someone called you out, you try to find some way to lead the conversation away from the original subject in order to try to find some way of being victorious. Hell, you just went and did it now, you've yet to answer why you think you can talk shit about people and insult them and yet no one can do the same to you or your family? What makes you think you all can insult people based entirely on physical descriptions or obviously made up 'facts' and get away with it?
"People may end arguments with you because you are inconsolable, or we may have to go tend to offline things, but we don't go away…."
Yeah, yeah you do. I'll say this much, you tend to not do it as often as some of the others, Billings by far has this site beat on who the biggest coward is. Unfortunately, when you hold the man with such high regard, what does that end up saying about your own personal character, hm? What does that say about you when you have deep respect for a man who switches the conversation to something different, responds to his own replies, or just says 'STEAK SANWICH' (and yes, he did in fact leave out a letter in 'sandwich', what letter specifically doesn't come to mind) instead of having a coherent thought.
"What's your excuse Hypocrite?"
A hypocrite accusing someone else of being a hypocrite. It helps to NOT be a hypocrite yourself before calling someone else one, at least not such one that it's glaringly obvious when you don't bother following the rules you believe that all others should be following.
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
"Actually, in a way, yes, yes you did. You came here, a site you were apart of, but not actually part of the ownership."
If any single fellowship member says I am not welcome here I will leave. Owner or not. Can you say the same? That is the difference between you and me. I am at a site I align with. I am not out there bothering people like you are. I'm not out protesting funerals; people have to come here to read what I say.
The mission statement is right on top, if you don't like it, leave. If you chose to hate us, that is your problem.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
"If any single fellowship member says I am not welcome here I will leave. Owner or not."
Never said you weren't welcome here by your cult buddies, I just said that technically speaking, you don't own the site in any way.
"Can you say the same? That is the difference between you and me. I am at a site I align with. I am not out there bothering people like you are. I'm not out protesting funerals; people have to come here to read what I say."
And then you get pissy with them whenever they decide to fire back at you considering that all you have to say is insulting other people based on their skin color, gender, nationality, or religion. If the whole point of you opening up your mouth, literal or figuratively speaking, is to talk to an audience, you can't bitch when people start criticizing you, especially when you're completely unwilling to listen.
Praise or Condemn: 0 1
Cowardly Law, You ran away last night hypocrite. Please don't try to sound reasonable. You aren't good at it. Go back to calling my daughter a fat whore. You are best at that.
Praise or Condemn: 1 1
The conversation is still relevant, idiot. You all abandon topics completely and utterly.
Praise or Condemn: 0 1
The conversation will always be relevant. However you have proved time and time again to be the cowardly Law.
If you were a true goodwill of truth you would call everyone out equally for any injustice, but you pick and choose who you hate. At least I am consistent.
Praise or Condemn: 1 1
You're right, you hate non-white and non-American and non-Christian people and want to take away the rights of women while allowing your fellow cult buddies to do whatever the hell they want, regardless of laws set into place.
And before you go and try to call me a coward, you might want to have a better reason than 'you didn't post for several hours'.
Praise or Condemn: 0 1
Then Crowley, why are you telling me how I feel? Why are you claiming that I was trying to harass somebody, when you have no idea what I was feeling or thinking? Also, please stop swearing. I have explained my statements in full. It is not my fault that one of your personalities doesn't understand it.
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
Because you harass every girl with a pair of tits. You thought you were married to Claire once, and you keep telling other girls that you want to be with them in some way shape or form. People like you just scream out 'I'm a mental freak' when you behave the way you do.
Praise or Condemn: 1 5
How is inviting a young, sweet young woman out for a meal harassment? How is offering her a job at a very exclusive club where she would make a lot of money harassment? When have I ever said I "want to be with" anyone? You Liberals all just have filthy minds, and sex is always the first thing that pops into your awful brains. I am tired of all the filth and lies that are constantly posted here, not just about me, but all of the members of the Fellowship. You are visitors here, if you can't disagree with us politely and without swearing, then you should not be here.
Praise or Condemn: 2 1
"young, sweet young woman…"
THERE. THAT. RIGHT THERE. If I had a daughter and if someone said that to her I would beat the CRAP out of them. What is wrong with you?
Praise or Condemn: 0 4
So, you are saying that she is not young and sweet? I thought you were her friend, Crowley. Why are being rude to her now? I'm get so confused by you people sometimes. It is a simple compliment.
Praise or Condemn: 3 0
"How is inviting a young, sweet young woman out for a meal harassment? How is offering her a job at a very exclusive club where she would make a lot of money harassment?"
When you keep trying to get them to go with you after they've told you several times 'no' and when you start to follow them off the site and onto other places of the 'net.
"When have I ever said I "want to be with" anyone?"
You ask that immediately after you say you invite them for meals and jobs at your imaginary business which you claim is quite high in the business ranks.
"You Liberals all just have filthy minds, and sex is always the first thing that pops into your awful brains."
Yet you and your Cultwire buddies are constantly talking about gay people are having hardcore gay sex that you go and invent to outdo your previous attempts at making up hardcore gay sex.
"I am tired of all the filth and lies that are constantly posted here, not just about me, but all of the members of the Fellowship."
There are more exaggerations than lies, Bruce, especially when you all are nothing BUT a bunch of lies and hypocrites.
"You are visitors here, if you can't disagree with us politely and without swearing, then you should not be here."
Except, that's not how the world works. You may have a legitimate point that if we don't like it, we can just leave, but we also have the freedom of speech on our side. Much like you do, but here's the thing; you can say almost anything you want, barring something like 'I want to kill someone and here is a specific list of how I plan on doing it', and you can't be arrested for it, but that doesn't mean that others can't call you out on your bullshit. When you're suggesting that others just bend to your will without a fight, others are going to get pissed and fight back. When you suggest that limiting the freedoms of Americans is a good thing, others are going to fight back. When you get pissed off that people are getting pissed at you and saying nasty things, you have absolutely no room to turn to when you're telling them that they're inferior just because they're not apart of your specific branch of Christianity and Conservatism.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Because you don't call a woman that unless you're dating them. If someone said that to me on the street, I would punch them!
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
So now you are admitting that you openly condone violence, Crowley? Somebody should call the police on you before you hurt others or even yourself. You are a disturbed person.
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
Bruce, you're the one who forced himself to believe that you were married to someone who was living in a completely different state than yourself even though you never physically met them before.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Actually Law, I was married to a Claire at that time. She has just recently checked into a Mental Hospital for Mental Instability, by the way, so I would appreciate it if you would not discuss our marriage, as it might put her in a deeper depression. I still care deeply for her and would not want anything bad to happen.
Praise or Condemn: 3 1
And you still wonder why people call you insane and a stalking pervert when you claim that you were married to someone who you never met physically before.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Try reading my comment about Claire one more time. Law, You are a mental midget.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
Yet again, you fail to grasp the concept that you weren't married to her, and yet you'll continue to blither on about how you were, even though you're nothing but a pervert and apparently a stalker.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
I used to think you were one of the smarter detractors here, Law. I will try this one more time, and then just give up on you for ever. Read my comment about Claire again, there are no typos in it.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
You believe you were married to someone who not only hated you with a passion, but lived in a different state than you and has not met with you or had physical contact with you before. Apparently your too stupid and dense to realize that you weren't married to Claire.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Apparently you can't read. I will leave you to ponder your stupidity now. Bruce = 1,000,000 L.N. = 0
Praise or Condemn: 2 1
You can't call someone an idiot without actually trying to prove them wrong, retard.
How's this, do you or do you not claim to have been married at one point in time to Claire who posts on Christwire? Let's start from the top, and see how far you can go before tripping over your own feet and lies.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
He proved you wrong long ago L.N. You were just too embryonic to see it.
Praise or Condemn: 3 1
Law, I have never once lied on this website. I pride myself on that, can you say the same for yourself?
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
Bruce, are you going to answer my question or not? Do you or do you not claim to have been married at one point in time to Claire who posts on Christwire?
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Yes Law, I was 100% married to Claire who has posted on Christwire.
Like I said, I have never lied her, but you hide your identity and cry about the slightest thing we say. Why don't you introduce yourself fully to us now? I have shared my entire life on this site, yet you give us only your first name and shoe size. If you really want to argue with us and make your point, don't you think we should know that you are a real person?
Praise or Condemn: 1 0
"Yes Law, I was 100% married to Claire who has posted on Christwire."
You claim you never lie and yet you do go and say that. Let's go ahead and specify this moreso, just because I don't want you to have any wiggle room whatsoever; do you claim to have been married to Claire Snedecker who attends Mount Ida and loves cats, the same Claire who posted a response to you in which her response was positioned in between my post and your post in this very section of this thread, the same Claire who has said time and time again that you are NOT married to her?
"Like I said, I have never lied her, but you hide your identity and cry about the slightest thing we say."
Bullshit, you lie quite often.
"Why don't you introduce yourself fully to us now? I have shared my entire life on this site, yet you give us only your first name and shoe size."
You stalk people, being an insane moron and August apparently makes it a hobby to hold private information over the heads of people here, give me one GOOD reason why I should help you idiots do something horrible to me?
"If you really want to argue with us and make your point, don't you think we should know that you are a real person?"
What about me is making you think I'm NOT a real person? What, do you think I'm a sentient computer program made by a liberal scientist? Knowing how stupid you are, it wouldn't surprise me if you thought that.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Bruce Myron Danusreplied:
Never lied here. Come up with your own conclusions, Law (You seem to do that anyway).
Praise or Condemn: 1 0
Because, Bruce, you sick little Creep I have seen what you write to CD and quiet frankly I think you a sick and perverted little creeper. I my self am a girl and if you say any of that shit to me I will have people hunt you down personally, and they will paint the side walk with the insides of your head.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Death threats. Real classy. Nothing like keeping a sense of perspective, is there?
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
Nice to know CD has someone to look out for her… If I see that Creeper Bruce, I'll Deck him one for CD =)
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Do you have any photos of yourself? Are you attractive and fit? Do you do Tai-Bo? I hear it keeps your stomach flat. I'm only asking so I can avoid you on the streets.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
Christian Intellectual
Liberals love Mexico because rape and murder are legal in that satanic wasteland.
Praise or Condemn: 6 1
Sounds something more like a priest would partake in, considering how liberals are for the rights and protection of people from being sexually harassed or assaulted.
Praise or Condemn: 0 6
Christian Intellectualreplied:
Not true, liberals always want to protect the rights of child-rapists (gays) and criminals.
Praise or Condemn: 5 2
You confuse pedophilia with homosexuality too much, you should really look into going back to grade school to reeducate yourself.
And I don't recall liberals having as many hypocritical assholes as conservatives, seeing as how there's quite a few anti-homosexual conservatives, who end up with a boyfriend behind the backs of their peers.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
LN – You kiss ur mother with tht filthy mouth?
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
Brother Johnathan Bane
You know she wants it!
Praise or Condemn: 1 0
Real Merican
"Girls With Low Self-Esteem". A great movie series featured on an even greater television program.
Though I hear Hollywood might be making a movie adaptation? Glory!
Praise or Condemn: 3 0
Brother Johnathan Bane
Actual footage of 7.9 and 7.6 Mexican Earthquake!
Brought to you as a PSA from the Rapture News Network…
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
@Bruce Danus.
What worries me most is that you can't seem to see how creepy you are being. I blame your ego and that you seem to think everyone likes you…
If you had just wished CD good luck in her race and left it at that, it would've been a nice gesture. But then you had to ask for pictures of her, specifically while hugging her female friends, jumping up and down, and being sprayed with cider. An older man such as yourself should NOT be asking a younger girl for something like this.
As for the lunch, same thig applys. You're a grown man Bruce and shouldn't be trying to have random lunches with younger girls…It looks creepy as hell.
Hell, I'm not too much older than CD and even I wouldn't ask for pictures of her or ask her to lunch.
The fact you pushed her to the point where she dosen't even want to talk to you and yet you still think you're in the right is jacked up.
I'm with Crowley and Azi (Can I call you this? I'm afraid that if I type your full name that my phone's autocorrect would go nuts…) on this one…You're a creepy man who needs to stay the hell away from CD!
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
For heavens sakes, with the crap she posts she deserves every bit and more.
And she is Crowley and Azi.
Praise or Condemn: 4 2
So she deserves to be creeped out by Bruce? Are you fucked up in the head! At least the stuff she posts is a helluva lot more entertaining than the lies you guys spew on a daily basis! No one deserves to be stalked, especially by someone as stupid as Bruce.
And bullshit, what does she accomplish by being 3 different people? Nothing there's no point, you just don't like that 3 different people are fighting against you.
Also you have no proof, your little fake up address and putting up a made up email isn't proof either.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
Damnit, I meant "ip address" not "up address"
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
"Up a dress"? I think you can be forgiven for that little Freudian slip.
As your own divine creator said: "Be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth, and subdue it. Rule the fish of the sea, the birds of the sky, and every creature that crawls on the earth."
More power to you, you little satyr!
Praise or Condemn: 1 0
Her first week here she posted my info on her tumblr and asked people to spam me with email.
Even today she posted a naked picture on one of my articles. If you want her "entertainment" over our content then go follow her page.
And yes I have proof. I can see it on my screen. Obviously if I post it you go crazy and if I don't, I am a liar.
So how would you like me to show you the proof?
Praise or Condemn: 5 0
Aww, August is getting butthurt over the fact that people are doing the same thing to him that he does to other people.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
L.N. This is where you are a complete idiot. I never complained once. I only bring it up because you naysayers are defending her.
Praise or Condemn: 4 1
As for showing proof, you could just take a screen capture of it and send it to me if you don't feel like putting it up for everyone to see, from that I can tell I you're lying or not.
Or even simpler, post my ip address and email right here right now, I don't care.
Praise or Condemn: 0 4
Check your email.
Praise or Condemn: 4 0
Even though I replied via email, I figured I'd reply here to.
As I said in my reply, my email does in fact match…But the ip address dosen't…I have no idea how either…
Praise or Condemn: 0 4
Yet you think you're completely immune to the hate of others even though you yourself have posted quite a bit of it, August. Funny how your brain thinks.
Praise or Condemn: 0 3
No, people attack me all the time. I don't complain until they turn into hypocrites.
Praise or Condemn: 3 1
No, you're getting pissy now because you're trying to cover up your complex.
Praise or Condemn: 0 1
Oh, Azi, no one has ever called me that. Yes, that's quite fine. I'm not going to address all this other arguing. It's quite….ugly. To say the least.
Praise or Condemn: 0 4
Thank you, Brother August, for saving my life. I planned on taking a trip to Acapulco to try and convert the heathens that vacation there. If it wasn't for this article, I would have probably been hurt in the earthquake, then kidnapped by the homogays and forced to watch this "Girls with Low Self-Esteem" filth that you previously mentioned. God Bless You, Brother August.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
I too must say that I have been spared because you, Brother August. I was, much like FanOfJesus, headed down to the wastelands of Mexico (that means Homo-Gay Orgy land in Englis), but for an entirely different reason. I was invited by the pope to go Gay hunting. It is a past-time much like fox hunting. We get a bunch of the homo-gays and tell them to run. Then you get on your horse and chase after them. It's really fun!
Praise or Condemn: 1 1
I too was invited by the pope on the Homogay hunt. How many did you get? Me and the pope were tied with 12 Points
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
godlover82, are you saying that you and the Pope
each ass-bagged 12 homogays (assuming each gay butt-slam is equal to one point), can you clarify please?
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
No, The game of Homogay Hunt requires a team of players. In this case was me, The pope, And my Good friend Jesus Christ. The players grab assault rifles and round up the homogays. We then release them into the wilderness and after 5 minutes we chase them. Each homogay shot with Our Hollow point rounds are one point to the shooter. My score is 12 because I shot 12 Homogays. Hope I clarified it enough as the suggestion you gave was utterly disgusting coming from a fellow christian… Makes me wonder if you yourself are a homogay…
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
You all need to shut the fuck up. I am the chosen one… I have all the power. Remember what the bibe says. Isaac 8:23 "You will all listen to Isaac AKA Godlover82, Or you shall all get shot in the dome by the AK47 in the sky. This is my will. If you fail to do whatever the fuck Isaac says I will hunt you down you retarded african homogays and will kill you with my bare hands!" That was my favorite verse I believe we can all follow by this and live long happy lives. Now please shut the fuck up or I will shit down your throat you mother fuckers!
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
If any of you college students who are looking to go into medicine want, you can hang out with me here in LA. Claire, you may choose nursing over animal care so the offer is there. I think CD mentioned she was going into health as well. It'd be pretty good fun if either of you are interested!
Praise or Condemn: 1 1
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
Is where you and the rest of the Christwire followers are going =3
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
LMFAO Tupac? Tupac is a rapist? Really… Better watch out there's a 16yr old Zombie Rapist roaming America e.e
Billybob, you sir are not only a retard, but you are a Retarded Moron.
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Even your Damn site is Retarded with its dumb ass double posts… either that or Christwire its self loves you all being insulted that much it has to Duplicate comments insulting you
Praise or Condemn: 0 2
Reverend Billybob Cletusreplied:
Re"LMFAO Tupac? Tupac is a rapist? Really… Better watch out there's a 16yr old Zombie Rapist roaming America e.e
Billybob, you sir are not only a retard, but you are a Retarded Moron."
I realize you (like a lot of the anti-Christian bigots here) might be too young to remember the 90s, but I didn't know you were yet another liberal who doesn't know how to use a search engine:
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupac_Shakur#Rape_charge
Rape charge
In November 1993, Shakur and others were charged with sexually assaulting a woman in a hotel room. According to the complaint, Shakur sodomized the woman and then encouraged his friends to sexually abuse her. Shakur denied the charges. According to Shakur, he had prior relations days earlier with the woman; she performed oral sex on him on a club dance floor and the two later had consensual sex in his hotel room. The complainant claimed sexual assault after her second visit to Shakur's hotel room; she alleged that Shakur and his entourage raped her.[39][40] Shakur claimed that he fell asleep shortly after the woman arrived and later awoke to her accusations and legal threats. In the ensuing trial, Shakur was convicted of sexual abuse. In sentencing Shakur to 1½–4½ years in prison, the judge described the crime as "an act of brutal violence against a helpless woman."[41][42][43] After serving part of his sentence, Shakur was released on bail pending appeal. On April 5, 1996, a judge sentenced him to serve 120 days in jail for violating terms of his release on bail.[44]
Luckily, Tupac is burning in hell know and won't be raping anyone ever again. All the the other liberal hypocrites that I named in my last post will be joining him one day.
Praise or Condemn: 1 0
Stop saying retard. It's offensive to the intellectually disabled.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
Reverend Billybob Cletusreplied:
The hypocrisy from these liberal "humanists" never stops does it? If a good conservative like Rush Limbaugh had used the epithet "retard" to describe an opponent, we'd never hear the end of it from the politically correct crowd.
I will pray for our Sapphic liberal name-caller tonight, in hopes that she might recognize that all humans deserve dignity, even the mentally challenged.
Praise or Condemn: 2 0
Reverend Billybob, your compassion continues to shine like a light on a hill.
And we would never have known our sapphic friend's predilection had she not been vigorously rubbing it in our faces with her username.
Praise or Condemn: 1 0
Bruce Myron Danusreplied:
Didn't the Ellen DeGeneres boy get yelled at for using that word once? I find that word so horrifying, that I won't even type it. Liberals love to call Christians the "R" word, but if we ever used it on them, Armageddon would break out, but without Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck.
Praise or Condemn: 1 0
Sapphyreplied:View February 8, 2013
Sorry didn't mean to offend you there Exbrony…. oh wait, yes I did =3
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
Metalcore Fanreplied:View February 8, 2013
LOL. I can't say retard because my mother says the same thing as exbrony.
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
I'm spending my spring break with my family by camping out in the desert, drag race, conquer Olsmobile Hill, and playing chicken with Trains. And I have no political stance on anything.
I love my family.
Praise or Condemn: 3 7
My kids go visit TB3's ranch, then usually carpool up to Lake Havasu and then Las Vegas. Good times…
Praise or Condemn: 7 1
You don't know how to party til you've been to Yellowstone.
Hell yeah, surrounded by nature and shit, watching the bears and swimming in the rivers. That place is freaking awesome.
I still go with my parents. Hell, my older siblings still come with us. And my brother is 28 with his own family, and they come with us. Have your kids never seen a horror movie? DON'T GO ANYWHERE WITHOUT AN ADULT BECAUSE WHEN SHIT GOES DOWN IT GOES DOWN FAST.
Praise or Condemn: 3 3
Reverend Billybob Cletus
Quite a few horror movies have a valuable lesson to teach us and I suspect quite a few of the directors and writers must have been Christians. For example, in most of Freddie and Jason movies, the most sexually promiscuous whorelots and party animals were often the first to be killed while the good ones usually lasted till the end. A generally good message for potential sinners.
Praise or Condemn: 6 1
An equally important lesson to learn from horror movies:
Dosen't matter who you are, you are screwed
Praise or Condemn: 1 4
Yup, so true. In A Nightmare on Elm Street 5 Alice had her baby out of wedlock which was the plot baseline of the whole movie and she still lived while all of her friends died.
In A Nightmare on Elm Street 3, Good Girl Nancy from the 1st Nightmare on Elm Street finally dies. Three kids survived, and they all had psychological problems. Kristen was the only 'normal one', while Kincaid was prideful and Joey was a bit of a perv. All three of them were killed in Nightmare on Elm Street 5. In Nightmare on Elm Street 6, Maggie kept getting spared because she was Freddy Kruger's daughter. Shockingly enough, the first Nightmare on Elm Street movie was the ONLY MOVIE IN THE FRANCHISE to have a sex scene. In Nightmare on Elm Street 5, it was merely suggested because Alice was pregnant.
In 'A New Nightmare' the story focuses behind Heather Langencamp, who played the orignal Nancy in the first movie. Freddy kills her husband, her 'very conservative' babysitter, and goes after her son. It's meant to be taken as a real life happening, as Heather is playing herself, and not another character.
In the new Nightmare on Elm Street, Freddy spares Nancy because he raped her as a child and wanted to keep her in a coma so he could torment her til she died.
In Halloween, Laurie is also the good girl, but she suffers for the rest of her life, until Michael finally kills her in Halloween 8.
In Friday the 13th, the first person who dies, killed by Jason't mother, not Jason, was a Good Girl type. It was expected that she would live, but instead another Good Girl type lives. However, the girl who survives is killed by Jason in the beginning of the second movie.
In Hellraiser, the only person who dies is the lead girl's father. Her Uncle, the actual main villain, is dragged to hell along with her evil stepmother Julia. She returns in the sequel, but doesn't come back until Hellraiser 6 where she murders her husband and the five women he slept with and sends him to hell.
In Child's Play, teenagers don't even come into the mix until Bride of Chucky. In the first three films, Chucky goes after Andy and his mother. The only people who died in the movie was the mother's friend, a doctor, and Chucky's partner. He returns in the sequel to take revenge on Andy, while his mother is in a mental hospital, and Andy and his 'Punk' adopted older sister lives, while their adoptive parents die. Andy is eighteen in the third movie, and very few teenagers are killed, while many adults are killed.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
I apologize, Andy is sixteen in the third movie. My mistake, I haven't seen it in a long time.
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
Teal deer.
Praise or Condemn: 1 1
Well, it's not like the comment was directed at you. Why are you going to comment on something just to say you didn't read it?
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
And my offer to have you visit my hospital still stands. I'm just putting it out there if any students want the opportunity, we have openings. Only a handful have actually taken me up through my yearly offers on the site (for either spring time shadowing or summer internships/volunteering), which I find pretty sad but reflective on the increasingly lazy nature of the younger cohort of this country.
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
No, he just hopes he can get some action. The bum just wants to fuck someone, and rape isn't too far out of an option for the desperate sack of shit.
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
What hospital? You're a bum who stole a laptop from someone, why do you constantly tell people that you're a doctor?
Praise or Condemn: 1 2
This is why you are a coward.
Praise or Condemn: 1 3
Use words you know the definitions to, drunkard.
Praise or Condemn: 2 2
One does not know the definition "to" something; one knows the definition "of" something.
Use participles of which you know the uses, dumbass.
Praise or Condemn: 1 0
You're jealous of opportunity. Did you not get the chance for education, or maybe too lazy to get a proper job? Whatever the case, my offer stands to those interested. Nursing is a great field and offers a good level of job security, nationwide.
Praise or Condemn: 2 1
Reverend Billybob Cletus
Christians do not commit rape. All rapists are liberals and/or heathens: like Bill Clinton, William Kennedy Smith, Mike Tyson and Tupac Shakur.
Praise or Condemn: 1 1
You can stop the act, bum, we all know you aren't an actual doctor.
Praise or Condemn: 1 1
Stop saying "bum". It's offensive to homeless people.
Praise or Condemn: 0 0
LMFAO Tupac? Tupac is a rapist? Really… Better watch out there's a 16yr old Zombie Rapist roaming America e.e
Billybob, you sir are not only a reetard, but you are a Retarded Moron.
Praise or Condemn: 0 1


text:
Exam season is upon us, and nerves are inevitably in abundance. Izzy Nicol shares her guide to dealing with them — no Dutch courage required!
Nerves. We all get them in varying quantities, from butterflies to the feeling your stomach is going to implode at any moment. In spite of constant reassurance – "Use them to your advantage dahling, a little bit of nerves is only natural sweetie" — they can leave you standing lost for words and feeling as if you're going to projectile vomit at any second.
At least that's what it's like for me. I'm only too familiar with these buggers, and I'm more prone to the stomach imploding kind. I like to sing when I'm in a group of people, but singing on my own makes my body leap into panic mode, doing very little for my vocal chords. It's not just performing nerves, either. I would get into a right state in my GCSE maths lessons, not just because I hold a lifelong grudge against Pythagoras, but because being faced with a question I couldn't answer, under the pressure of a looming exam, made me unbearably anxious. It didn't fade when I escaped equations either; I took an exam this week, and right before it started I got a wave of nausea. It's as if my body is saying — imagine a gruff, scumbag accent here — "Oi love, I'm gonna mess you up proper," and then of course I get angry at the imaginary violent cockney of nerves and have a mental pub wrestling match with my stomach when I ought to be thinking about how on earth I'm going to deal with the question.
Fortunately, I managed to avoid any internal brawls this week. The most brutal inner conflict I experienced in the build-up to my exam was the question of which pen I would be able to write fastest with. This year, in the nick of time, I've just about managed to sort out how to control my nerves. Thus, ladies and gentlemen, this brings me to present to you my (potentially) fabulous guide: how to combat your inner saboteur and stop being a nervous wreck!
At this point I could pretend I've suddenly become the wonderful creator of a self-help guide, that I've deeply studied the human body and am about to bestow some expert wisdom. As a disclaimer, this is only what I've found through extensive trawling the internet trying to find a resolution for my own nerves, and these are some of the methods that have worked for me.
1) Visualise success
I know, it sounds horrendously cheesy, but it works. This is a tip I got way back when I was worried about a drama devised piece, and I completely dismissed it then. Recently, however, I've discovered the merit of going through exactly what I need to do to succeed in my head, step by step, and imagining it going well. With any luck, it can be replicated in the real thing.
2) Think positive
It seems so obvious, but when you're nervously anticipating something, it's easy to get into the whole, "Oh it's going to go dreadfully, my life will be over, I'm going to fail this exam and work in McDonalds for the rest of eternity." But if you're prepared, you've practised your part, gone over your moves or memorised those history dates you've got every right to think positive. Optimism is the best antidote to panic.
3) Chill out on the caffeine and sugar
I'm hardly one to talk seeing as I crawl desperately toward the kettle and instant coffee as soon as my alarm goes off, and I'm certainly no stranger to skipping lunch in favour of chocolate and cake. But, after trial and error, I've realised that this does absolutely nothing for your ability to handle your physicality or emotions. Nerves plus caffeine shakes result in human earthquakes, and performing on a sugar rush mixed with adrenaline can make you bizarrely erratic and leave you feeling a wreck afterwards.
4) Remember why you're doing it
Yes, it can be a little hard to remember why you've taken that subject to A2 level, but thinking about the possible benefits will stop you from dwelling on the now and tying yourself up in knots; it also works wonders for boosting motivation. This is also useful if you're doing a presentation on something really important to you. Focus on what you want to talk about, not on yourself.
5) Breathe
This is another one that seems obvious, but when you're standing outside of an examination hall or are in the midst of a debate, it's the one thing that sometimes escapes a person. When you remember to breathe — not just hold your breath or hyperventilate — you'll stop rabbling on like a madman, regain your composure and hopefully stop anxiously pacing back and forth making everyone else feel nervous!
So, ta-dah! Those are my top five tips for keeping nerves at bay, and I hope they prove somewhat useful. However, this really isn't a comprehensive list, and any further additions would be great to see in the comments section. Finally, good luck to everyone who has exams this summer on behalf of the A New Take team — we hope you manage to beat your inner violent cockney brawler.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Bright Nights Community Forum: Depression in Children & Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Diagnosis & Treatment
This event was held on September 23, 2008 at Downtown Library: Multi-Purpose Room
Alternate Formats
- Download High-Quality Version (MP4, 371.80 MB)
- Download iPod Video (MP4, 207.28 MB)
- Download Audio Only (MP3, 55.36 MB)
Runtime: 01:19:00
Viewed 3461 times.
Autism and related Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) affect an estimated 3.4 out of every 1,000 children ages 3-10. Studies have shown that more people with ASD experience anxiety and depression than people who do not have ASD. Early diagnosis and intervention can have a dramatic impact on reducing symptoms and increasing a child's ability to grow and learn new skills. Mohammad Ghaziuddin, MD, Director, UM ASD Program, and Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Psychiatry, will present a brief overview of the latest research on diagnosis and treatment of adolescents with ASD and depression. A panel discussion addressing questions from the audience will follow.
Panelists incude Judith Coucouvanis, MA, APRN, BC, and SunShine Mills, LMSW, of the UM Depression Center and the ASD Program, and Pamela Sohoni, MD, Clinical Director of Children & Adolescent Psychiatric Services at St. Joseph Mercy Hospital in Ann Arbor. For more information on the UM Depression Center, visit the website at www.depressioncenter.org, or contact Trish Meyer, 763-7495, or email@example.com.


text:
Regarding this question about the C language.
What's the answer for C++?
Regarding this question about the C language.
What's the answer for C++?
[Executive Summary: Use
For C++, the answer is a bit more complicated.
However, if
Since the compiler isn't generating code, but just calling an
(Thanks to Paul for inquiring about the difference between C and C++.)
Yes. There is.
The ++ operator may or may not be defined as a function. For primitive types (int, double, ...) the operators are built in, so the compiler will probably be able to optimize your code. But in the case of an object that defines the ++ operator things are different.
The operator++(int) function must create a copy. That is because postfix ++ is expected to return a different value than what it holds: it must hold its value in a temp variable, increment its value and return the temp. In the case of operator++(), prefix ++, there is no need to create a copy: the object can increment itself and then simply return itself.
Here is an illustration of the point:
Every time you call operator++(int) you must create a copy, and the compiler can't do anything about it. When given the choice, use operator++(); this way you don't save a copy. It might be significant in the case of many increments (large loop?) and/or large objects.
Here's a benchmark for the case when increment operators are in different translation units. Compiler with g++ 4.5.
Ignore the style issues for now
O(n) increment
Results (timings are in seconds) with g++ 4.5 on a virtual machine:
O(1) increment
Let us now take the following file:
It does nothing in the incrementation. This simulates the case when incrementation has constant complexity.
Results now vary extremely:
If you do not need the previous value, make it a habit to use pre-increment. Be consistent even with builtin types, you'll get used to it and do not run risk of suffering unecessary performance loss if you ever replace a builtin type with a custom type.
Premature optimization is the root of all evil. As is premature pessimization.
It's not entirely correct to say that the compiler can't optimize away the temporary variable copy in the postfix case. A quick test with VC shows that it, at least, can do that in certain cases.
In the following example, the code generated is identical for prefix and postfix, for instance:
Whether you do ++testFoo or testFoo++, you'll still get the same resulting code. In fact, without reading the count in from the user, the optimizer got the whole thing down to a constant. So this:
Resulted in the following:
So while it's certainly the case that the postfix version could be slower, it may well be that the optimizer will be good enough to get rid of the temporary copy if you're not using it.
The Google C++ Style Guide says:
I would like to point out an excellent post by Andrew Koenig on Code Talk very recently.
At our company also we use convention of ++iter for consistency and performance where applicable. But Andrew raises over-looked detail regarding intent vs performance. There are times when we want to use iter++ instead of ++iter.
So, first decide your intent and if pre or post does not matter then go with pre as it will have some performance benefit by avoiding creation of extra object and throwing it.
Obviously post and pre-increment have different semantics and I'm sure everyone agrees that when the result is used you should use the appropriate operator. I think the question is what should one do when the result is discarded (as in
After all that's the reason the language is not called "
[*] Insert obligatory discussion about
Mark: Just wanted to point out that operator++'s are good candidates to be inlined, and if the compiler elects to do so, the redundant copy will be eliminated in most cases. (e.g. POD types, which iterators usually are.)
That said, it's still better style to use ++iter in most cases. :-)
@Mark: I deleted my previous answer because it was a bit flip, and deserved a downvote for that alone. I actually think it's a good question in the sense that it asks what's on the minds of a lot of people.
The usual answer is that ++i is faster than i++, and no doubt it is, but the bigger question is "when should you care?"
If the fraction of CPU time spent in incrementing iterators is less than 10%, then you may not care.
If the fraction of CPU time spent in incrementing iterators is greater than 10%, you can look at which statements are doing that iterating. See if you could just increment integers rather than using iterators. Chances are you could, and while it may be in some sense less desirable, chances are pretty good you will save essentially all the time spent in those iterators.
I've seen an example where the iterator-incrementing was consuming well over 90% of the time. In that case, going to integer-incrementing reduced execution time by essentially that amount. (i.e. better than 10x speedup)
The intended question was about when the result is unused (that's clear from the question for C). Can somebody fix this since the question is "community wiki"?
About premature optimizations, Knuth is often quoted. That's right. but Donald Knuth would never defend with that the horrible code which you can see in these days. Ever seen a = b + c among Java Integers (not int)? That amounts to 3 boxing/unboxing conversions. Avoiding stuff like that is important. And uselessly writing i++ instead of ++i is the same mistake. EDIT: As phresnel nicely puts it in a comment, this can be summed up as "premature optimization is evil, as is premature pessimization".
Even the fact that people are more used to i++ is an unfortunate C legacy, caused by a conceptual mistake by K&R (if you follow the intent argument, that's a logical conclusion; and defending K&R because they're K&R is meaningless, they're great, but they aren't great as language designers; countless mistakes in the C design exist, ranging from gets() to strcpy(), to the strncpy() API (it should have had the strlcpy() API since day 1)).
Btw, I'm one of those not used enough to C++ to find ++i annoying to read. Still, I use that since I acknowledge that it's right.
An the reason why you ought to use ++i even on built-in types where there's no performance advantage is to create a good habit for yourself.
Both are as fast ;) If you want it is the same calculation for the processor, it's just the order in which it is done that differ.
For example, the following code :
Produce the following assembly :
You see that for a++ and b++ it's an incl mnemonic, so it's the same operation ;)
The compiler can elide the temporary. Verbatim from the other thread:
The C++ compiler is allowed to eliminate stack based temporaries even if doing so changes program behavior. MSDN link for VC 8:
The performance difference between
But the same cannot be said of
When there is no functional difference between pre-increment and post-increment, the compiler can perform optimization such that there is no performance difference between the two. However, if a composite data type such as a
It's also more intuitive:
This C example prints "02" instead of the "12" you might expect:


text:
Call Us
(877) 462-6700
(760) 208-6500
Don't want to call?
Service Questions
Amron International AMR-FLU Remote Field Lighting Unit
The Amron International AMR-FLU Remote Field Lighting Unit combines a dual cube mast mounted light assembly with a black polycarbonate waterproof case.Learn More
Surefire Minimus Variable-Output LED Headlamp - Black
The Surefire Minimus™ Variable-Output LED Headlamp features a high-efficiency LED that provides a brilliant white light, adjustable in output from zero to 100 lumens via the knurled no-slip right-hand output control knob. The proprietary refractive optic produces a wide beam optimized for your natural field of view, and an included red filter gives you the option of low-signature light that also preserves dark-adapted vision.Learn More
Power Flare Rechargeable 6-Pack Electronic LED Safety Light$585.84
PowerFlare Electronic LED Safety is great for landing zones, search and rescue kits and HAZMAT kits.Learn More


text:
CSS3 gradients are available to use in Webkit (Safari, Chrome) and Mozilla (Firefox) browsers. They're not exactly new but I only recently started using them consistently myself so I've put together this quick article.
FYI this isn't the holy grail of CSS3 gradients, it's more of a reminder for me or quick getting started guide.
Why use CSS3 gradients instead of images?
- Gives you more flexibility
- Less hassle
- Fewer http requests
- Scalable
The syntax
linear-gradient( [
|| ,]? , [, ]* )
radial-gradient( [ || ,]? [ || ,]? , [, ]* )
Mozilla (Firefox)
Same as W3C (but with -moz-)
-moz-linear-gradient( [
|| ,]? , [, ]* )
-moz-radial-gradient( [
|| ,]? [ || ,]? , [, ]* )
WebKit (Safari, Chrome)Bit different.
, [, ]?, [, ]? [, ]*)
Confused yet? Instead of trying to explain what everything means I'm just going to show you some very simple examples.
CSS3 gradient examples
Linear background gradient
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #b032cb, #440951);
background-image: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top,left bottom, from(#b032cb), to(#440951));
background-image: linear-gradient(top, #b032cb, #440951);
Radial background gradient
background-image: -moz-radial-gradient(center 45deg,circle cover, #b032cb, #440951);
background-image: -webkit-gradient(radial, 50% 50%, 0, 50% 50%,800, from(#b032cb), to(#440951));
background-image: radial-gradient(center 45deg,circle cover, #b032cb, #440951);
Body background height problem
Seems that gradients don't stretch the whole height of the browser window unless you declare the html height. Therefore this is needed:
But it doesn't work in Internet Explorer!
That's why we have a fall back value in for the background-color which should be enough although you can always use an image if you like.
Have you started using CSS3 gradients yet?
Further reading on CSS3 gradients
« Login vs Sign In 10 iPhone apps from Northern Ireland you should check out »