text:
When I tell people I make money online they tend to assume that I'm running some sort of Ponzi scheme. But I've never been a good enough liar to pull that off, so instead I blog. While I make pocket change compared to the biggest names out there, there are plenty of other people who have completely replaced their full-time jobs in favor of making a living online (and we're talking six-figure revenues).
Manage social media for businesses. If you have a knack for social media, you could potentially get paid to manage various platforms for others. Many businesses are too busy running day-to-day operations to stay on top of their Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest accounts – and will pay someone with the knowledge and time to do it for them. To find these jobs, ask local businesses and check sites like UpWork.com and Problogger.net.
Serve as an online juror. Some attorneys use large panels of online mock jurors to get feedback on their cases before they go to trial. However, the mock jurors must live in the county or federal district where the case will be tried. You can sign up at a couple of sites and receive e-mail notifications if a case is posted in your area. EJury.com pays $5 to $10 per case via the online payment system PayPal. You can't be an attorney, paralegal or legal assistant – or even related to an attorney – to participate. EJury says you're likely to have better luck getting picked if you live in a large metropolitan area, where more cases are tried, rather than a rural area. The average case takes about 35 minutes to review. At OnlineVerdict.com, where cases typically take between 20 minutes and one hour to review, fees range from $20 to $60. Payment is made by check.
What a book! Now, if you have an overly sensitive ego, this book may make you a little uneasy. However, if you truely want some honest insights into why very intelligent people can make some huge mistakes, then read this book. In some places the reading is a little tedious. However, the examples given and the corrective measures talked about to avoid mistakes have a lot of merit. I'm very thankful that I took a chance on this book. Personally, I think it is a very good and very insightful book.
You can also sell your own products. You can make music in Garage Band and sell it in iTunes, you could write an eBook and sell it within Amazon. You could also do your own crafts and sell them on Etsy or design a Tshirt and sell them on spreadshirt. Or you could do all of these things! Ecommerce is a great way to make passive income online, whether with a physical product or digital product.
Take it seriously. Yes, you're applying for an online job. Yes, you can do the work in your underwear, but that doesn't mean it's not a "real job". You must treat it as such or they aren't going to treat you as a serious candidate. You aren't the only one who wants to work in their underwear. In fact, the competition online is likely higher than it is in your local area.
What does that mean for you? It means Nielsen will pay you $50 a year to keep their app on your favorite internet browsing device. The app itself collects statistics on your internet usage anonymously, so you never have to worry about any data being linked to you. And the best part is, the app takes up barely any space and doesn't slow down your phone or tablet at all!


text:
Argued February 5, 1973
Decided May 2, 1973
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ANTHONY M. LIVOTI, J.
Peter M. Fishbein, Wilbert E. Bennett and Richard E. Hershenson for appellant. Thomas J. Mackell, District Attorney ( Cornelius J. O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.
As the aftermath to a casual pick-up acquaintanceship in a drinking bar, and a visit to another bar, defendant was convicted after a jury trial of larceny and assault upon his woman companion. She had been found, abandoned, unconscious, bloodied, and with a fractured skull, beside the gasoline pumps of a service station at 6:00 A.M. The Appellate Division modified, leaving only the assault conviction outstanding.
On appeal by defendant, the responsibility for the brutal crime is not contested; raised, among others, are issues on search and seizure and the prosecutor's inflammatory summation to the jury. Two Justices in the Appellate Division dissented only on the ground that the prosecutor's summation required a new trial. The primary issue dividing this court is that of the search and seizure of defendant's panel truck, the bloodstained vehicle in which the assault, accompanied by sexual abuse, undoubtedly occurred. Interestingly, and significantly, the issue divides the court not so much on the understanding of the highly-developed rules governing the warrantless search and seizure of property, including motor vehicles, permitted as incidental to an arrest, or of incriminating evidence and contraband within the plain view of police officers. Instead, it is the characterization of the undisputed evidentiary facts surrounding the arrest of defendant and the observation, seizure and search, in that order, of his panel truck which forks the issue in this court and inevitably leads to the different consequences drawn by the majority and which would be drawn by the dissent.
The conviction should be affirmed. It was the defendant who voluntarily led the investigating police officers to his panel truck, through the glass panes of which they saw the bloodstains on the dashboard, one woman's shoe, and a pair of glasses, confirmatory of the story told by the hospitalized victim. On the basis of the evidence open to their view, they arrested defendant then and there, placed a guard on the panel truck, and within a half hour to an hour and a half, with the aid of police technicians made a detailed search and analysis of the interior of the panel truck. The placing of the guard on the truck was the seizure of the vehicle, and the detailed search, as contrasted with the earlier consensual view of its interior and the seizure, occurred later, a delay of no legal consequence.
On January 7, 1966 the assault victim, Margaret Sullivan, went to a bar in Queens County between 8:00 and 9:00 P.M. There she met defendant and another man. At 2:00 A.M. of January 8, the three left the bar in a panel truck, dropped the other man off, and the couple drove on to a bar in Manhattan. The victim remembers returning to Queens in the truck, and that is all. At about 6:00 A.M. she was found when the gasoline station opened, clothed, but lacking one shoe. She was covered with blood and unconscious, and appeared dead to those who first observed her. Her body, particularly about the breasts, nipples, and genital area showed lacerations and tooth marks, with profuse bleeding. It was later determined that her skull had been fractured by a blow with a blunt object delivered with great force.
The delay in the appeal is unexplained. Defendant received a sentence on April 28, 1967 of 7 1/2 to 10 years as a second offender. The Appellate Division modified on March 31, 1969. Defendant has been released on parole.
By investigation at the Queens bar the police learned of defendant's identity and evening association with the victim. They went to defendant's home and asked him to show them his panel truck. He took them to a public garage across the street. Through the closed window of the truck the police saw a woman's single shoe and pair of glasses, and of greatest significance, the bloodstains on the dashboard. The incriminating circle was complete; the victim's pick-up acquaintance was tied to the assault by the evidence in the panel truck. Defendant was immediately arrested and a police guard placed on the truck to prevent its removal or the removal of its contents. The detective returned later following the seizure with police technicians to make a detailed search and analysis of the interior of the truck and its contents. The search yielded additional incriminating evidence, including a bloodstained automobile exhaust manifold.
Unlike the legion of automobile search and seizure cases which have occasioned interest and difficulty, in this case before the police took any action with respect to the panel truck, they had seen the incriminating evidence in the truck which identified it as the scene of the bloody assault and which linked the victim's last-known companion, the defendant, to its perpetration. The arrest followed the observation. In the cases relied on by defendant the arrest, for whatever other probable cause existed, preceded the taking of the motor vehicle and the delayed search of the vehicle yielded incriminating evidence for the first time, most often of a crime wholly unrelated to the arrest and the probable cause on which the arrest was based (e.g., Dyke v. Taylor Implement Co., 391 U.S. 216; Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364). It would be bootless to parse out these cases since the sequence of events in this case makes their rules irrelevant. Because, however, of its recency, heavy reliance on it by defendant, and the peculiar delays in the search that occurred, it may be useful to comment briefly on Coolidge v. New Hampshire ( 403 U.S. 443).
In the Coolidge case, the seizure of the automobile at the time of Coolidge's arrest, and while it was parked in his driveway, offered no visible circumstance that it had been used in the crime for which Coolidge was being arrested on independent probable cause. The vehicle was then taken to the police station and two days later, and up to 14 months later, the vehicle was searched and tested with highly-sophisticated techniques. No valid search warrant had ever been obtained. Obviously, this was not a search and seizure incident to an arrest dispensing with the need for a warrant; the defendant was arrested in his home, and the automobile, as noted, was parked in his driveway.
A case much closer in point is Price v. United States ( 348 F.2d 68 [D.C. Cir.], cert. den. 382 U.S. 888). In that case the police observed an automobile fitting a description associated with a recent burglary. It was unoccupied, but without entry police saw burglar's tools and likely loot from the burglary on the rear seat. When the defendant approached the vehicle and entered, the police arrested him. It was held that the incriminating evidence had been seen by the police prior to and when the police arrested the defendant, and that, therefore, the later removal from the car of the evidence at the police station was quite correct, even without a search warrant. (To like effect, see Theriault v. United States, 401 F.2d 79 [8th Cir.], cert. den. 393 U.S. 1100, where defendant was arrested in a motel room partly on the basis of incriminating evidence on plain view in his pick-up truck parked in front of the motel room before the arrest was effected; cf. United States v. Wickizer, 465 F.2d 1154 [8th Cir.]; Walker v. Beto, 437 F.2d 1018 [5th Cir.]; Wilson v. Porter, 361 F.2d 412 [9th Cir.].)
It is noteworthy that in this case, the police, after the arrest of the defendant, obtained a warrant to search his home. Among other things this warrant search yielded up the assault victim's purse with $151 in it. It is evident, then, that the police in this case were not warrant-shy, but were familiar with the rules permitting summary seizure of incriminating evidence on plain view or as incidental to an arrest.
Some of the difficulty in characterizing the operative facts in this case arises from a difference of opinion when the panel truck was seized: that is, whether it was seized at the time of the arrest, or at the later time of the detailed examination of its contents; or whether the seizure was of the truck or only of its selected contents some half hour to an hour and a half later. Of course, the bloodstains in the truck could not be seized separately from the truck, nor is it material whether after seizure the police retained possession of the whole truck.
The truck was seized when a police guard was placed over it in the public garage. The police had thus assumed control and dominion over the truck. It was no longer movable, nor was its interior accessible to anyone, including the owner or his agent. If the placing of the guard were unlawful, a cause of action for the tort would lie (cf. Jacques v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 30 N.Y.2d 466, 472-473). There is, moreover, no power in the police without sufficient reason to do less than seize and yet interfere with the use and possession of property. Indeed, the Supreme Court has realistically recognized that there is no difference between placing a police guard on property or taking into full possession and removing it to premises under police control ( Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42).
Thus, in the Chambers case, it was said: "Arguably, because of the preference for a magistrate's judgment, only the immobilization of the car should be permitted until a search warrant is obtained; arguably, only the `lesser' intrusion is permissible until the magistrate authorizes the `greater'. But which is the `greater' and which the `lesser' intrusion is itself a debatable question and the answer may depend on a variety of circumstances. For constitutional purposes, we see no difference between on the one hand seizing and holding a car before presenting the probable cause issue to a magistrate and on the other hand carrying out an immediate search without a warrant." (399 U.S., at pp. 51-52.)
In short, the seizure of the panel truck in this case was simultaneous with the arrest of defendant and came, therefore, under one of the classic exceptions to the general requirement that otherwise reasonable searches must be on warrant obtained from a Magistrate on probable cause (e.g., Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 453-454, supra; Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 46-49, supra). Moreover, the seizure as incident to the arrest, or independently, was justified because the police had observed in plain view, on consent of the defendant, incriminating evidence of the use of the truck as the scene of the crime and the paraphernalia relating the victim to the bloody scene.
Reaching this conclusion, it really should not be necessary to proceed to the "delayed search" issue. There is not and has never been any requirement that police must do all their searching at one time promptly upon seizure incidental to arrest or upon plain view of incriminating evidence or contraband. The requirement being confused is that an unauthorized summary seizure may not be justified by a delayed search (e.g., Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 463-464, supra). The cases are many in which there has been a delayed further search of property properly seized (compare, e.g., People v. Montgomery, 15 N.Y.2d 732, with People v. Lewis, 26 N.Y.2d 547, 552-553, citing the Montgomery case with approval). It is enough to cite but a few additional illustrative cases (e.g., People v. Teale, 70 Cal.2d 497; Knotts v. State, 237 Md. 417; People v. Jeffries, 31 Ill.2d 597).
The Teale case ( 70 Cal.2d 497, supra) is particularly instructive. In that case Federal officers had arrested the defendant and seized his automobile in which he had been sitting. An immediate perfunctory search yielded a pistol on his person, and nothing in the car. The automobile was sealed and shipped to the California authorities for close, technically-skilled examination. Such examination demonstrated that the victim had been in the automobile at the time he was shot; bloodstains and objects of clothing were found. It was held, and rather obviously it is suggested, that the car had been seized as incidental to the arrest when the defendant was arrested, and that the later examination of the car was simply a further examination of an object of evidence. The parallel to this case is marked, except that the further examination of the seized truck in this case was done at the site in the public garage while the truck was under police dominion (seizure).
Quite remarkably close to the facts here is the recent case in this court of People v. Brown ( 28 N.Y.2d 282). There it was held by a unanimous court in an opinion by Judge BERGAN that a delayed, detailed search of an automobile seized summarily in connection with an assault-robbery against a woman, was properly conducted. The more detailed search later that day yielded evidence of still another assault-robbery against a second woman-victim. In doing so the court distinguished between the probable cause for an arrest and the probable cause to search a vehicle seized independent of the arrest. Both kinds of probable cause were present as here. It noted the interconnection of the car, on evidence observed in the car, as the instrumentality used in committing both crimes.
Lastly, there is the matter of the trial prosecutor's summation. Reading it as a whole it was largely argument by epithet rather than by logic. The words stressed by defendant as improper are the references to defendant as a liar, an animal, a beast, that such a criminal should be removed from the streets, and that the victim sustained the serious injuries she received because she could not respond to his sexual and animalistic desires. Of course, a much stronger summation, and one more appropriate to a quasi-judicial officer as is a prosecutor, would have been to let the facts speak for themselves: defendant's contradictory versions of the events that night, the victim's unconsciousness after a night of drinking, the tooth marks about the breasts and genitalia, the profuse bloodstains on the victim's body and the vehicle, the skull fractured by a gross blow, and, finally, the abandonment of the victim at the gasoline station. The epithets could add little to these stark facts and, therefore, were hardly prejudicial. This was especially so in a case which established defendant's guilt of these acts, however the sensitive would characterize them, almost beyond any conceivable doubt, let alone a reasonable doubt. The District Attorney accepts the criticism that the summation was improper, but, on any view, it was hardly of sufficient forcefulness to influence the jury in the light of the overwhelming evidence and the stark facts of the brutal, irrational crime committed.
This is not to say that a strong case will always excuse an improper summation. On the contrary, even a strong case may be fatally impaired by unfairness (e.g., People v. Adams, 21 N.Y.2d 397, 402). The rule is that an improper summation, at least when the objectionable parts consist largely of abusive and intemperate language as here, should be assessed for its prejudicial effect, and it requires greater impropriety to produce that effect in a stronger case (see 5 Wharton's Criminal Law and Procedure [Anderson ed.], § 2078; cf. People v. Webb, 23 A.D.2d 893; People v. Fisher, 19 A.D.2d 613; see, also, for the effect of unfairness generally, People v. Kingston, 8 N.Y.2d 384, 387). In this case, it is at most only arguable that the prosecutor's misconduct could have produced a greater adverse effect on the jury than did the bizarre facts of the crime, and the overwhelming evidence of culpability.
Consequently, the motion to suppress the seized evidence was properly denied, and its receipt at the trial equally proper. As for the objectionable summation, although a troublesome issue, on balance a new and useless trial is not required.
Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
An attempt to apply the laws of search and seizure to this case illustrates the confusion which exists in that body of our law. Certain of our New York decisions have been invalidated by recent Supreme Court decisions, and we find little consistency in the Federal standards which are, at best, muddled. We should not seek clear cut rules at the expense of constitutional safeguards ( Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 483), but on the other hand, we should not be compelled to wander endlessly through this labyrinth of judicial uncertainty.
E.g., in People v. Brown, 28 N.Y.2d 282, 285, 286, a case relied on by the majority, we held that a law-enforcement official could search an automobile without a warrant if he had probable cause to search. This position was clearly overruled by Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 464, 468, 470, 471, 479. (See, also, Cash v. Williams, 455 F.2d 1227; Harless v. Turner, 456 F.2d 1337, 1338.)
In determining when a search warrant should be required, there are five basic standards which could be applied. The most simplistic would be to go to one extreme and say that a search warrant is never required and that every search should be judged ex post facto to determine if it was reasonable. Such an approach would fly in the face of both the New York and United States Constitutions (see, e.g., Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34) and would be inadvisable even if constitutionally permissible. The many valuable functions served by the search warrant requirements have been reiterated in almost every Supreme Court case involving search and seizures and need not be repeated here. (See, e.g., Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 613-616; Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 13, 14; Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 481, 482; Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 356, 357.) In the case at bar, the court below held the search was valid because, inter alia, it was a reasonable search. If we were to follow that reasoning, we would hold that warrants are only required for unreasonable searches, a clearly untenable position.
At the other extreme would be the demand that a warrant must support every search. This approach would fetter law-enforcement officials in cases where the officer might be exposed to great danger and like the "no warrant" approach is too facile a solution to a complex problem.
A third approach would be to declare "searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions". ( Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357, supra.) The Supreme Court has taken this approach, carving out exceptions for automobiles ( Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132), objects in plain view ( Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23), searches incident to a lawful arrest ( United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56), administrative searches ( See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541), hot pursuit searches ( Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294), street encounter searches ( Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1) and consentual searches ( Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624).
Unfortunately, as this case proves, the "well delineated exception" approach soon devolves into rule by rubric. District Attorneys are allowed to plead in the alternative in an ex post facto attempt to find a justification for the search that the court will accept. Although each exception has its own very technical requirements, the courts do not always articulate exactly which exception is being applied often combining elements from several exceptions, as was done in this case, by the majority and the Appellate Division, to reach a desired result. This is not surprising since it is often difficult to ascertain what these technical distinctions are. They are sometimes artificial and almost always confusing.
In this case, the District Attorney gave the court a panoply of possible exceptions to choose from including the "automobile", "search incident", "plain view", and "probable cause" exceptions. Many of the theories overlap and others are clearly in conflict with one another. For instance, the "probable cause" to search an automobile exception has to be intentional and knowing ( People v. Brown, 28 N.Y.2d 282, 285, supra) while a "plain view" seizure must have been effected after the evidence was come upon inadvertently ( Coolidge, 403 U.S. 443, 466, supra).
The majority summed up its argument by stating (p. 260): "Moreover, the seizure as incident to the arrest, or independently, was justified because the police had observed in plain view, on consent of the defendant, incriminating evidence of the use of the truck as the scene of the crime and the paraphernalia relating the victim to the bloody scene." This shotgun analysis of the case at bar in no way spells out a "tightly guarded" exception which would take the warrantless search out of the per se prohibition against warrantless searches and seizures ( Katz v. United States 389 U.S. 347, 357, supra). It merely confirms my fear that the "narrow" "tightly guarded" exceptions spelled out by the Supreme Court will be all but obliterated by the shotgun approach of well-intentioned prosecutors and courts attempting to justify an illegal search that has uncovered incriminating evidence.
After Preston v. United States ( 376 U.S. 364), it seemed clear that the automobile exception required exigent circumstances. But then in Chambers v. Maroney ( 399 U.S. 42, 47), Preston was distinguished on the grounds that in Preston there was no probable cause to search the automobile even though Preston clearly did not turn on that point. The court came full circle when Coolidge ( 403 U.S. 443, 463, supra) distinguished Chambers on the grounds that Chambers never held probable cause was enough to search an auto but was merely a logical extension of Carroll ( supra) even though Chambers did appear to establish a probable cause standard for warrantless searches of automobiles.
What is more unfortunate about the "exceptions" approach is that, as Justice FRANKFURTER pointed out in his dissent in United States v. Rabinowitz ( 339 U.S. 56, 80, supra) there is a disturbing tendency to enthrone the exception into the rule. The "exceptions" were supposed to be "tightly guarded", but it is impossible to hold the sentinel responsible for the numerous intrusions into the general rule when we are no longer certain of what rule he is guarding. Exception follows exception and soon the general rule itself is engulfed: "unconstitutional practices get their first footing * * * by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure." ( Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635.)
On a practical level the "exceptions" approach is a legal fiction which seldom relates to the real reason for a law enforcement official's failure to obtain a warrant. As Justice HARLAN accurately observed in his concurrence in the Coolidge case ( 403 U.S. 443, 490, supra): "State and federal law enforcement officers * * * must find intolerable the present state of uncertainty". We can hardly expect a law-enforcement officer to make a quick decision on whether or not to secure a warrant when his standard for judgment is a complex and highly technical set of legal guidelines such as "plain view", "automobile", etc. The natural tendency will be to adopt the caption and disregard the technical requirements underlying it. And even that assertion is based on the assumption that a law-enforcement officer has the requisite knowledge of all of the "tightly guarded" exceptions to the warrant requirement.
The fourth possible standard, and one which could probably support the majority in this case, is a type of "shocks the conscience" approach to the warrant requirement. (See Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 172.) That is, the court will not overturn a warrantless search unless the police acted unreasonably in not securing a warrant. This, of course, provides no standard at all. It leaves us with no guidelines for courts and no guidelines for the officer on the street.
I am also afraid that underlying a "shocks the conscience" approach will be an ineffable feeling that if the police did in fact find incriminating evidence, the search is presumptively not shocking. Although no court has suggested adopting such a result oriented theory, I am afraid that it is de facto a significant controlling element behind any search and seizure doctrine that is based on either a very intricate or completely vague rationales.
The "shocks the conscience" approach has the very dangerous tendency of considering the place searched in grading the reasonableness of the warrantless search which is to disregard the Supreme Court's admonition that the Fourth Amendment protects people not places. ( Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351, supra.) The fact that a car is somehow deserving of a lesser constitutional protection than a house was finally put to rest in Coolidge ( 403 U.S. 443, 461, n. 18, 479, supra; see, also, United States v. Payne, 429 F.2d 169, 171, 172). A person should have as great an expectation of privacy for something in the glove compartment of his car as in a dresser drawer in his home. Even if we were to accept varying levels of privacy in differing places as a sound constitutional theory, it would thrust the courts and the police into an inescapable quagmire. If a house is sacred and a car not so sacred, what about a mobile home? Or how does one compare the sanctity of a briefcase with that of a purse or a car for that matter? Opening a briefcase without a warrant may shock one Judge but be perfectly reasonable to another — a female jurist may find opening a purse quite shocking while her male colleagues may find it quite reasonable. And a policeman will have no idea as to what shocks the court until after he has conducted his search.
I believe the only workable and constitutional standard to apply in search and seizure cases is one which states that absent exigent or unusual circumstances, a law-enforcement official must first obtain a warrant to conduct a search. This approach discards the rubrics of the exceptions and looks instead to the reasons underlying those rubrics. A careful study of the "exception" cases will reveal that the rationale underlying the case where the exception was established was not that there was a good reason to search, but that there was a good reason why a search warrant could not be obtained. The exigent circumstances articulated in most of the cases that were the sine qua nons of warrantless searches and seizures, was that there existed a danger to the officer or a danger of the evidence being destroyed and/or spirited away. (See, e.g., Dyke v. Taylor Implement Co., 391 U.S. 216, 219; Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364 367, supra; United States v. Colbert, 454 F.2d 801.) Technical distinctions as to place (see United States v. McIntyre, 304 F. Supp. 1244, 1246) and time (see Kaufman v. United States, 453 F.2d 798, 802) should not be determinative factors if there was in fact no danger to the officer or the evidence involved.
An example of an unusual circumstance would be a voucher search. (See People v. Sullivan, 29 N.Y.2d 69.) It is an unusual circumstance in the sense that the "search" is not for the purpose of uncovering evidence against the accused ( id., at p. 75) and is justified by an overriding governmental purpose unrelated to the crime under investigation. However, even these searches should be viewed with great circumspection; a court is not and should not be bound by the mandates of a police administrative regulation. (See People v. Sullivan, 29 N.Y.2d 69, 77, supra [FULD, Ch. J., dissenting].)
The search and seizure law became uncontrollable when the rubric was adopted and the rationale discarded. So, in Carroll v. United States ( 267 U.S. 132, 153, supra) the Supreme Court allowed a warrantless search of an automobile stopped on a public highway because it was "not practicable to secure a warrant" (i.e., there were exigent circumstances — the car could have been moved away while the police were gone). Unfortunately, the Carroll case soon turned into the "automobile exception", and in Chambers v. Maroney ( 399 U.S. 42, supra) the Supreme Court went so far as to allow the warrantless search of an automobile that was safely parked in a police station, away from any danger of destruction, and without the possibility of severely impeding traffic or necessitating a substantial police guard. Coolidge ( 403 U.S. 443, 461, 462, supra) has helped restore reason rather than rubric by declaring that "The word `automobile' is not a talisman in whose presence the Fourth Amendment fades away and disappears". Coolidge made it clear that an automobile can only be searched when it is not practicable to get a warrant. ( Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 764, n. 9.)
It is also important that the scope of the warrantless search and seizure be only as broad as the justification supporting it. ( Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, supra; Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752.) So, exigent circumstances may make it necessary to seize a car that contains or is itself evidence of a crime, but once the car is secure in such a manner that the justification which gave rise to the warrantless seizure no longer exists, a warrant should be secured before proceeding with the search. As Justice HARLAN pointed out in his dissent in Chambers ( 399 U.S. 42, 63, supra) it is a far greater intrusion on privacy to search a car than to seize a car. It must be remembered, after all, that the Fourth Amendment protects privacy not property. ( Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294, 303-306, supra; see, also, Mozzetti v. Superior Ct., 4 Cal.3d 699 [search of a small suitcase seized pursuant to a voucher search disallowed].)
The case of Price v. United States ( 348 F.2d 68) relied upon heavily by the majority is probably inapplicable in view of subsequent Supreme Court decisions in the field. But to the extent that Price maintains its vitality, it supports the view that a search must be limited to the exigencies of the "exception" supporting it. Unlike the case at bar, the articles seen in plain view by the police officers in Price were "under defendant's immediate control" ( id., at p. 70). More importantly, though, the majority fails to point out that there was also evidence found in the car that was not in plain view (like the manifold, bottle, and sweater, in the case at bar). The items found by a search of the trunk of the car after it was secured were not allowed into evidence. Certain additional evidence in Price was considered properly seized as incident to the second and subsequent arrest of defendant's friend (not on the grounds that the seizure of the car after the arrest of the defendant gave the police a carte blanche to conduct a warrantless search of the entire car).
The Supreme Court may already have moved back to the standard that absent exigent circumstances, a warrant is always needed for a search ( Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, 33; see, also, McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 456; United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 51). In the Coolidge case
( 403 U.S. 443, 468, supra) the Supreme Court stated that "no amount of probable cause can justify a warrantless search absent `exigent circumstances'". We agree with the observation made by Justice BLACK in his dissent that the over-all effect of Coolidge is to hold that "if the police could have obtained a warrant and did not, the seizure, no matter how reasonable is void." ( Id., at p. 509; see United States v. Resnick, 455 F.2d 1127, 1131, 1132; United States v. Nelson, 459 F.2d 884, 888.)
This is not to say that laying down an exigent circumstances rule will make cases easy to decide. It will still be difficult to discern when exigent circumstances existed; but it is only the application of the standard that will be difficult. We are now in a situation where the standards themselves are incomprehensible so that an inherently difficult situation is made impossible. There is no policeman or court that can really put substance into technical legal jargon like "plain view" or "search incident to a lawfull arrest" or into a totally vague "shocks the conscience" test. A standard which says that you must always secure a warrant unless you can articulate a reason which made it impracticable to secure a warrant is easily understood.
It may well be that in almost every case of "hot pursuit" or "searches incident to lawful arrest" there will be exigent circumstances which make it impracticable to obtain a warrant, but even in these cases the justification can be articulated in terms of a common-sense reason as to why a warrant was not obtained and not in terms of some judicially-constructed catch phrase.
Turning now to the case at bar, and applying the standard I favor, the only question which need be asked is, "Was there any reason discernable from the record which would have made it impracticable for the policeman to get a warrant?" Since that question must be answered in the negative, I find this warrantless search of the vehicle to be unconstitutional.
Mere inconvenience is not enough to make it impracticable. ( Coolidge, 403 U.S. 443, 470, 481, supra.)
I believe this search and seizure is unconstitutional even under the "exceptions" approach. I do not wish to undertake as lengthy and complex an analysis as was undergone in Coolidge, though such an analysis is the inevitable result of an "exceptions" approach. It should be noted however, that the similarities between Coolidge and this case are striking: (1) In both cases the automobile itself was evidence of the crime. ( 403 U.S. 443, 502, supra.) (2) In both cases the police had prior eyewitness testimony tending to link the vehicle with the crime. In Coolidge there was eyewitness testimony placing the car near the scene of the crime (p. 464, n. 22). In the case at bar, two bartenders and possibly even the garage attendant where the truck was kept (the record is unclear if he saw the police before or after they "took charge" of the truck) had given the police a description of the vehicle and even identified defendant as having had the victim in his truck. In fact the record indicates that there were no other suspects. (3) In neither case were the police absolutely certain where the car would be (p. 522) though there is some confusion in the record in the case at bar that might lead one to believe the police actually viewed the vehicle before asking the defendant to lead them to it. (4) In neither case was the finding of the vehicle inadvertant (pp. 469-471). In the case at bar the police had the defendant lead them to the truck by a means which could in no way be considered as voluntary since it was done under a false presumption as well as under "`the shadow of the badge and threat of force'" ( Harless v. Turner, 456 F.2d 1337, 1339, supra; see, also, Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548; United States v. Smith, 308 F.2d 657; Pekar v. United States, 315 F.2d 319, 324; People v. Whitehurst, 25 N.Y.2d 389). In any event, the police were concededly looking for that which they found contrary to the "plain-view" requirement spelled out in Coolidge (p. 469) and contrary to the circumstances in the seminal New York "plain view" case of People v. Swanberg ( 22 A.D.2d 902, mod. and affd. 16 N.Y.2d 649) and the seminal Federal case of Ker v. California ( 374 U.S. 23, 43, supra). (5) In neither case did the police conduct an immediate search of the vehicle. And despite the contention of the court below, a later search is not justified even if we were to assume, arguendo, that an immediate one would have been justified. ( People v. Lewis, 26 N.Y.2d 547, 552 [n.]; Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364, 368, supra; Coolidge, 403 U.S. 443, 447, 457, supra.) (6) In both cases a guard was placed on the car (pp. 456, 461, n. 18) making it virtually safe from the danger of being spirited away. The minor factual distinctions between this case and Coolidge would not render a different result (see, e.g., Coolidge, 403 U.S. 443, 522, supra [WHITE, J., dissenting] the majority reasoning would make no distinction between a car parked on private property and one in a parking lot).
I find nothing in the record that would have justified the police officer's failure to secure a warrant. Even assuming arguendo that the police did not have the time to secure a warrant before approaching the truck with the defendant, they clearly had time to do so afterwards.
The Coolidge court implied that the posting of the police guard on the car was not a seizure in a Fourth Amendment sense since the court talked in terms of the search and seizure being unconstitutional. ( 403 U.S. 443, 478, supra; see, also, Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364, supra.) Justice BLACK in his dissent in Coolidge described the police action as "taking charge" of the vehicle. ( Id., at p. 495.) However, even were we to assume arguendo, that the posting of the police guard on the car in this case was a constitutionally cognizable seizure justified by exigent circumstances, the subsequent warrantless search of the car would still be unconstitutional as being unnecessarily broad in scope.
The defendant was put under arrest by the detective as soon as he viewed the glasses, bag, and blood through the window of truck. The detective testified that, after placing the defendant under arrest: "I didn't leave until someone came to safeguard the truck". The record is unclear as to exactly how long the detective was gone before returning to the guarded truck; the officer guarding the truck said one to one and one-half hours, but the record indicates it may have been considerably longer. In any event, the technicality as to length of time becomes unimportant in an analysis that merely attempts to determine if there was some overriding reason why a warrant could not be obtained.
The other evidence which was subsequently seized without a warrant could not be seen through the car window at the time of the arrest.
The truck was secure in a place where it could be easily guarded and where it caused no general disruption of traffic or undue strain on police manpower. The defendant — the sole suspect in the case — was under arrest and safely away from the truck. There was certainly ample time to search and not merely a fleeting opportunity. (See Coolidge, 403 U.S. 443, 460, supra; United States v. Day, 455 F.2d 454, 456; United States v. McIntyre, 304 F. Supp. 1244, 1245, 1246, n. 4, supra.) Interestingly enough the detective did obtain a search warrant for the house even though it was not under guard (see Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34, supra) and the defendant's brother-in-law was in the house during the time the police were obtaining the warrant. There can be no valid distinction for obtaining a warrant for the house and not for the car unless we wish to engage in the practice of grading places for degrees of privacy ( supra). The officer should have obtained a search warrant before searching the car. Therefore, we believe that even if the articles viewed through the window by the policeman are allowed into evidence, the evidence found in the car as a result of the illegal search (i.e., the manifold, the sweater, the soda bottle, and the photographs of the interior of the car, none of which items were in plain view prior to the opening of the car) should be suppressed.
If the shoes, glasses and visible bloodstains were found on the floor of the garage rather than in the car, the policeman could have seized them without a warrant not because "plain view" is an exception to the warrant requirement but because it is not a constitutionally cognizable search and seizure at all. If a person leaves something in a public place where it can be easily viewed, he has no legitimate expectation of privacy as to those items left in plain view. However, if we were to allow the police to enter the car to seize that which was in plain view, and then justify the police seizure of other items which suddenly came into plain view (once the police were "legitimately" inside the car) we would be justifying a full-blown search based on an initial theory that no constitutionally cognizable search had been conducted. The fact that the car was evidence of the crime and in plain view makes no difference. The police officer still could not search what was inside the car, and not open to public view since there was still a legitimate expectation of privacy as to the hidden portions of the car. A reasonable man would not expect something lying on his front seat to be considered as shielded from public view, but he would expect something hidden under the seat to be kept private.
The District Attorney claims that even if the search and seizure was illegal, it was harmless error (CPL 470.05). No one reading the record of this case could legitimately assert that without the tainted evidence there is no reasonable possibility that defendant would not have been convicted. ( People v. Baker, 26 N.Y.2d 169, 174.)
There was no eyewitness testimony in this case. The victim was totally inebriated and could not remember anything that happened after crossing the 59th Street bridge in defendant's truck. There was conflicting police testimony as to when various events occurred. The State's key witness, a night employee of the garage, testified that he drove defendant's truck to its final parking place where it was later found by the police. It is difficult to understand why the defendant would willingly turn the vehicle over to an unknown third party when, according to police testimony, there were "massive amount[s] of blood in the truck". The night attendant did see a pocketbook belonging to the victim wedged between the seats, and gave it to the defendant. Yet, despite the existence of an overhead light, the attendant did not see the "massive amounts of blood" or the other objects later viewed by the detective. Nor did the defendant at any time go back to the truck to check for evidence he might have left in the truck even though he had been put on notice of the possibility that such evidence was left there by the return of the pocketbook. There was also evidence which tended to cast some suspicion on another person who had access to the truck as well as evidence which could have cast a reasonable doubt in a jury's mind as to defendant's guilt. This is all evidence which the jury presumably had before it but found that it was outweighed by contrary evidence. We cannot say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the jury would have decided the same way had the evidence which should have been suppressed been excluded from the trial.
The District Attorney claimed that it was proper police procedure, after the truck was under guard, for the detective to get lab men to conduct the search of the car. I have no reason to doubt that assertion and intuitively agree with it. However, if there is no threat of the evidence being destroyed or of the officer being in danger and there are no other exigent or unusual circumstances, it is also proper police procedure to secure a search warrant before conducting a search and seizing evidence. The evidence unlawfully obtained should have been suppressed.
In addition I would reverse because of the prejudicial remarks made by the prosecutor during the course of his summation before the jury. I am in basic agreement with the dissenting Justices in the Appellate Division when they said:
"A prosecutor is not expected to relinquish the art of oratory or the powers of eloquence in his summation to the jury. But when his zeal to secure a conviction carries him beyond the bounds of fair play or into the heat of inflammatory language, due process is violated and a conviction so tainted cannot stand. The issue is not whether the guilt of the defendant was demonstrated in spite of the misconduct at the end of the trial, but whether the blatant violation of due process can be tolerated. [Citation omitted.]
"Here the prosecutor in his summation emphasized, with profanity, that the defendant was a liar, called him an `animal' and a `beast', accused him of having `sexual and animalistic' desires, though the defendant was not on trial for a sexual crime, and urged the jury to get `an animal off the streets.' Such tactics, pursued by the prosecutor despite the admonitions of the trial court, deprived defendant of his right to a fair trial [citation omitted]."
This court condemned both outrageous language and pleas to safeguarding the community in People v. Lombardi ( 20 N.Y.2d 266, 272). The prosecutor in the case at bar obliquely threatened the jury with popular disapproval should they return a verdict for the defendant. This was clearly improper.
I feel the prosecutor's misconduct, as was conceded by the respondent, amounted to "verbal crudities and rantings" which both inflamed the jury and degraded the "People". Accordingly, the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
I, too, am for reversal but on the ground that the prosecutor's remarks on summation were so prejudicial as to deny the defendant a fair trial and thereby violate the demands of due process. As the court declared in People v. Mleczko ( 298 N.Y. 153, 163), "Vicious though the crime was, convincing though the evidence of guilt may seem to be, we could affirm only if we were to announce a doctrine that the fundamentals of a fair trial need not be respected if there is proof in the record to persuade us of defendant's guilt. We are not prepared to announce such a doctrine. (See People v. Marendi [ 213 N.Y. 600], supra, p. 620.) It is for jurors, not judges of an appellate court such as ours, to decide the issue of guilt." (See, also, People v. Damon, 24 N.Y.2d 256, 260.)
Judges BURKE, JASEN and GABRIELLI concur with Judge BREITEL; Judge WACHTLER dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion in which Judge JONES concurs; Chief Judge FULD dissents and votes to reverse in a separate opinion.
Order affirmed.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
- Deutsch
- English – UK
- English – US
- Español
- Français
- Italiano
- 中文
- 日本語
- 한국어
Akamai wird dieses Transkript aufzeichnen. Weitere Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzrichtlinie. Durch Fortfahren erklären Sie sich mit der Aufzeichnung und Nutzung Ihrer persönlichen Daten einverstanden.
Cambridge, MA |
Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM), the leading global service provider for accelerating content and applications online, announced today that it will participate in the Morgan Stanley Technology Conference in Dana Point, CA. Chief Financial Officer, J.D. Sherman, and Senior Vice President of Networks & Operations, Robert Blumofe, will present an update on Akamai's service offerings.
|Monday, March 3, 2008,
3:20 p.m. (PT)
|St. Regis Resort Monarch Beach,
1 Monarch Beach Resort,
Dana Point, CA 92629,
(949) 234-3200
|Presentation: Review of company service offerings
A live audio web cast of the presentation and a replay will be available on Akamai's website at http://www.akamai.com/html/investor/index.html. Please go to the "Events Calendar" section of the Akamai Investor Relations Web page to access the presentation.
Akamai® is the leading global service provider for accelerating content and business processes online. Thousands of organizations have formed trusted relationships with Akamai, improving their revenue and reducing costs by maximizing the performance of their online businesses. Leveraging the Akamai EdgePlatform, these organizations gain business advantage today, and have the foundation for the emerging Web solutions of tomorrow. Akamai is "The Trusted Choice for Online Business." For more information, visit www.akamai.com.


text:
Neha Dhupia Photoshoot For FHM India (July 2011). Neha Dhupia is the cover girl for the FHM Magazine's Indian edition for the month of July 2011. Swiss Bank black money slashed by Indian Politicians and others is boiling topic at present and FHM want to encashed it so they rope bombshell Neha to glamorize the whole topic. Neha is hot as usual after long time and maxim photoshoot. Checkout Neha Dhupia FHM Photoshoot.
Last 5 posts in FHM Magazine
- Kriti Sanon - FHM India (February 2019)
- Swara Bhaskar - FHM India (January 2019)
- Yami Gautam - FHM India (December 2018)
- Urvashi Rautela Photoshoot For FHM India (March 2018)
- Urvashi Rautela - FHM India (March 2018)
Last 5 posts in Neha Dhupia
- Neha Dhupia - Maxim India (May 2018)
- Neha Dhupia - Grazia India (July 2017)
- Neha Dhupia Halloween Picture
- Neha Dhupia - Maxim India (July 2015)
- Neha Dhupia - Women's Health India (June 2015)


text:
ARCT1201 - Architectural Construction Documents I - CAD Application
Course Overview
An exploration of construction drawing techniques using a renovation and addition to an existing commercial building. The students will conduct a site measure, prepare site notes, and create As-Built drawings of a building. The course will also include the creation of building code compliant construction documents for a steel framed addition to the building as well as renovation drawings for the interior.
Credits: 3.00
OpenStudiesAvailable through Open Studies
CourseOutlines View course outlines
RequisitesCo-Requisite: ARCT1211. Pre-Requisites: ENDS1100 and ENDS1130 and one of ENDS1150 OR MATH1150.
Course Equivalencies
- None
Course Sections
Want to enrol in this course?
Log in to the MyNAIT Portal to enrol in this course. New to NAIT? Learn how to apply for full-time, part-time, or open studies.


text:
The Conservative Defence Critic is questioning the Trudeau government's decision to send peacekeeping troops to the troubled West African nation of Mali.
A senior government source, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed late Friday night that Canada will dispatch an aviation task force to Mali as part of a United Nations peacekeeping mission, in a move Defence Critic James Bezan said raises more questions than answers.
"Why did it take them so long to make this announcement and is this in Canada's national interest or is this in the Liberals' interest? Are they making this announcement because of all the criticism they've received for breaking the promise of deploying 600 troops and 150 police officers on UN missions, when we're at the lowest levels in history?" Bezan said.
The government source said the task force will be in Mali for up to 12 months and an official announcement on the deployment will be made Monday.
In terms of troop numbers, Canada is currently at a historic low for participation in peacekeeping missions. Canada had a total of 43 peacekeepers deployed around the world at the end of December, the most recent UN numbers indicate, down from 62 in November.
The decline, largely the result of a reduction in the number of Canadian police officers deployed to Haiti, means Canada has fewer peacekeepers in the field than at any point since the 1950s.
Bezan said the Conservatives want to see Canada involved in more peacekeeping, including in Ukraine, but said it must be in the national interest and troops must be adequately equipped to fight to protect themselves where terrorism exists. In some cases, he said that could mean its preferable to send them under the Canadian flag instead of UN command.
"Mali looks a lot like Afghanistan, so there is concern about how we are going to keep the peace when we have insurgencies, terrorism, failed states and multiple different missions going at the same time and no answers of how this is in Canada's national interest," Bezan said. "Is it just part of the nostalgia view Liberals have about blue helmets?"
Mali has been in turmoil since a 2012 uprising prompted soldiers to overthrow the country's president. The power vacuum that was created led to an Islamic insurgency and a French-led war that ousted the jihadists from power in 2013.
However, insurgents remain active and the UN has seen its multinational peacekeeping force in the region suffer more than 150 fatalities since its mission began in 2013.
In November, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made pledged during a peacekeeping summit in Vancouver to offer six helicopters and two transport aircraft, plus their associated pilots and support personnel, as well 200 strong quick reaction forces to the UN.
— with files from Nicole Thompson
Morgan Lowrie and Amy Smart, The Canadian Press
Related Articles
The post Conservative defence critic questions plan to Send Canadian Peacekeepers to Mali appeared first on The Canadian Parvasi.
This post first appeared on Canadian Parvasi News - Indian And Canadian News For You, please read the originial post: here


text:
Game Of Thrones Live Concert Experience Review You simply need to backtrack a bit to discover matches that don't contain an large vary of graphics and CPU energy to play , and you don't even might want to transfer that means again once more. To start out with, the game turned a race to earn mahjong, as a substitute of constructing points over most of arms on. Although it has a price ticket, it has amused an incredible amount of downloads. Thus, the three most popular games recorded beneath will not ever go out of trend they will have seen a permanent place in the course of each and every iPhone gaming fanatic. It's not exhausting to detect the Pokemon Card online game on the web. Downloadable i-pod games have been offered by a substantial collection of web sites. Figure out by means of my I pod weblog of which you can discover downloadable iPod games, music and films you'll obtain instantly.
Exactly similar to in Mafia Wars, attempting to earn revenue is completely important for a very good game. The match play thus grows more thrilling and intuitive together with this, that is the target of video games within the precise first place. It's also very easy.
A number of these matches might turn out to be fairly concerned. It's more likely to play with the modern-day plats and even the timeless dun matches also. It would be useful to personal on the internet play with completely different gamers to get the capability to battle their karps. Cellular online games possess the power to maintain on to maintain users participated utilizing the smartphone for a precise long minute. The reality is that an excessive amount of the game went this technique. You'll be able to readily subscribe to favorite games out there on appstore.
People that are having fun with Pokemon-go are at hazard of perishing or getting seriously injured just because they are not focusing whereas they really try to capture Pokemon species. Final but most definitely not least, a single fairly key aspect that will not be missing from just about any membership web web site to downloadable iPod games could be top-notch customer attention. The indicators of online game dependence are When kiddies have a tendency to dedicate numerous their absolutely free time holed up confronting the game and even computer keyboard. A contemporary research within the gambling industry states that the global gaming industry is known to show to a multi-billion-dollar market by 20 22. There definitely are a couple guides out there that are wonderful to grasp the best way to dominate the game, nevertheless yow will discover tons out there which aren't as terrific.
There are tons of women and men who wish to know more about turning right into a online game designer nonetheless are unsure if to make this type of career. Whenever you've bought money, you discover it potential to acquire issues like property. Maybe not only are you really undoubtedly going to be at a place to stop, nonetheless, you are most definitely to receives a commission a bit of cash out of your character too. Generally shifting from the match is not allowed, but in case which you still must proceed from the game, then it's necessary so that you can pay for a certain quantity for a nice. In a number of versions, you'll find lots of particular fingers which can win this match. Yow will discover amount of HD matches that are having a buzz available on the market.
When gaming surpasses normal and healthful durations and garners unusual responses, then it really is the exact first indication of dependency. Being an dilemma of fact, it could be in comparison with other gaming consoles just like the Sony ps3 or the x box 360. You probably by now perceive how simpler gambling is with the latest pc-games ideas and walk throughs to earn your individual life a lot simpler. You'll obtain from the game all right, and I will understand you could have a good time. Within the occasion that you would like to play with Dragon Ball Z matches you'll find there may be simply a wide range of names out there within the usa. Within the occasion that you'd wish to play Dragon Ball Z games amongst your friends it's important to make sure that you have harmonious gear and all of sides of setup are right. Actually satisfying to attract, erase and iterate the second you are feeling you have observed some factor wonderful.
As gambling software program could be probably the most favored collection of programmers to create an immense profit inside the business. Market predicament mobile-game development will be an immense discipline. There's one thing concerning their design that produces the Pokemon games virtually infinitely replayable, inspite of the fact you are simply capturing the exact same critters repeatedly. You will find likewise an array of websites to obtain pcgames right to a pc system.
Whereas heavily influencing the ads landscape, additionally, it introduced millions of inventive content material from people all over Earth, for example tens and 1000's of flicks linked to the overall game. Within the second, there are numerous matters that you must critically bear in mind when scouting to get a membership website for downloadable iPod games that you would possibly want to be a part of to obtain high quality games to iPod. There proceed to be many web sites online through which an even more conventional model is performed actual gamers all world wide. Choices and More Selections yow will discover quite a few online gambling retailers obtainable to go shopping out of. In some instances, a web-based computer game retailer will certainly will let you obtain right to your laptop as you will have to get the games shipped numerous distinctive events.


text:
Labour organiser suspended for blaming 'all wars in the world' on Jews
Mohammed Yasin, the party's West Midlands official, becomes the most senior figure to be suspended since Ken Livingstone
The Labour Party's West Midlands organiser has been suspended for blaming "all the wars in the world" on Jews.
Mohammed Yasin this week became the most senior party figure to be suspended since former London mayor Ken Livingstone, after a social media comment from him in February 2016 surfaced.
The party took action after being handed a dossier – not seen by Jewish News – on Yasin's past comments and social media shares by The Sunday Times, with topics ranging from Israel to the Holocaust and the Rothschilds.
The paper said one of the examples showed Yasin sharing a post from the Lord Dreadnought site, which quoted actor Mel Gibson saying: "Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world." The post, which attacked "Zionist madness," allegedly shows people laughing, under the line "when someone tells me it's not the Jews".
Another post Yasin allegedly shared considers "why Israel is a problem" before detailing how the US had funded the Israeli military "due to Holocaust propaganda" while another reportedly said US imperialism "needs Israel to keep the masses permanently at war".
The Times also alleges that Yasin shared a picture showing a rabbi next to the words: "Goyim [non-Jews] were born only to serve us. They have no place in the world, only to serve the people of Israel."
On the Rothschilds, Yasin allegedly shared a post describing the Jewish family as "the world's most wicked and wealthy" while in 2015 he reportedly shared a cartoon showing film crews ignoring massacred Palestinians while focusing on a crying baby wearing a Star of David.
A Labour spokesman said: "We take all allegations seriously and fully investigate them in accordance with our rules and procedures."


text:
Creekside Park Homes For Sale The Woodlands Tx 77389
Made iron patio tables appear in a variety of shapes and styles. Selecting iron patio tables is incredibly easy to do and finding the right you are quite easy. A wrought iron rectangle table is great for tiny patios and round records seem to compliment large patios very well. Rectangular wrought straightener tables seem to look good upon all types of patios. These types of trestle tables are a great way to get any patio ready for summer. Flat iron patio chairs are also an excellent buy and people who want to get the patio ready for summer should purchase some wrought straightener patio chairs. The recliners are comfortable, look great and they go with virtually any type of made iron patio table. The chairs are typically available in an array of sizes, so finding good size chairs to go with a certain table is not hard. A person must get these types of patio chairs for their patio.
Image Editor
Gugara - Creekside park the woodlands real estate zillow. Zillow helps you find the newest creekside park real estate listings by analyzing information on thousands of single family homes for sale in creekside park, texas and across the united states, we calculate home values zestimates and the zillow home value price index. Creekside park, the woodlands homes for sale. 136 homes for sale in creekside park, the woodlands, tx browse photos, see new properties, get open house info, and research neighborhoods on trulia. The woodlands village of creekside park homes for sale. The woodlands village of creekside park homes for sale, rent & price trends majic 102 1 under the stars featuring patti labelle lil pump the harverd dropout tour fall buzzfest 2018 lil xan creekside park has it all, as part of the woodlands master community,it is the newest and most. The woodlands creekside park homes for sale and rent har. Find the woodlands creekside park harris county details, real estate for sale, real estate for rent and more near the woodlands creekside park the average price of the homes for sale in the woodlands creekside park is $528,581 the average square feet of the homes in the woodlands creekside park is 3,489 sqft there are currently 21 homes for lease in the woodlands creekside park subdivision the average rent in the woodlands creekside park is $2,885. Creekside park homes for sale. The housing stock of creekside park is composed predominantly of single detached homes and townhouses a majority of the housing growth in this neighborhood has occurred since the year 2000 this neighborhood is primarily composed of three bedroom and four or more bedroom homes. Creekside park, the woodlands, tx real estate redfin. Most homes for sale in creekside park stay on the market for 185 days and receive 1 offers in the past month, 36 homes have been sold in creekside park in addition to houses in creekside park, there was also 1 condo, 5 townhouses, and 2 multi family units for sale in creekside park last month. Creekside park, houston, tx real estate & homes for sale. Homes for sale in creekside park, houston, tx have a median listing price of $489,990 and a price per square foot of $149. Creekside park the woodlands & homes for sale woodlands. Creekside park will have 5,516 single family production homes, 541 age 55 and over homes, 738 multi family residences, and 298 custom homes and estate homes in the gated community of carlton woods creekside. 3 creekside park homes for sale mt pleasant real estate. Creekside park in mount pleasant is a 17 acre community of single family homes located only minutes from downtown charleston the development dates back to the 1960's after the opening of the u s highway 17 bypass along shem creek. Creekside park real estate creekside park homes for sale. Customize your real estate search and view mls listings of new homes for sale, condos for sale, townhomes for sale, foreclosed homes for sale and land for sale in creekside park get more details by checking out home photos, maps, local school rankings, creekside park home values and more.
You can edit this Creekside Park Homes For Sale The Woodlands Tx 77389 image using this Gugara Tool before save to your device


text:
Your vacation is a special time: a gift to yourself for working hard, a time to celebrate perhaps, or simply a part of your retirement lifestyle. Spending a good part of your holiday running to and from the washroom is not a good idea—nor is it necessary when a few simple precautions will prevent most bouts of travellers' diarrhea.
More commonly known as turista, Montezuma's revenge or Delhi belly, travellers' diarrhea is a disorder of the digestive system caused by parasites or bacteria. These micro-organisms are ingested in contaminated water and other beverages, and foodstuffs. Although they usually do not affect the local population, whose systems have adapted to them, they can cause severe stomach upset, vomiting and diarrhea in visitors.
The risk of travellers' diarrhea occurs worldwide but some destinations pose a higher risk than others. High risk destinations include developing countries in Central and South America, Mexico, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. Moderate risk exists in Eastern Europe and some parts of the Caribbean.
While travellers' diarrhea is most commonly experienced when travelling to foreign countries, it can also be picked up when travelling locally, and is particularly common among campers who have used stream or rainwater for drinking or cooking.
The condition can be caused by a number of micro-organisms including the bacteria E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella and Campylobacter; parasites such as Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and Cyclospora, and viruses including norovirus and rotavirus.
Recognizing the symptoms
Symptoms of travellers' diarrhea vary depending on the particular micro-organism that has caused the illness.
In addition to loose, watery stools, symptoms usually include fever, nausea, vomiting, bloating, abdominal cramping and an urgent and/or frequent need to use the bathroom. (These are caused by the body attempting to rid itself of the pathogens.)
How to prevent it
Preventing travellers' diarrhea means being vigilant. Here are a few pointers that should reduce your risk. Be sure to read through them before you leave and several times while you are away as they are easy to forget when you're having fun.
- Remember to boil it, cook it, peel it or leave it.
- Always wash your hands before eating or preparing food.
- Carry alcohol-based hand sanitizer with you for use when soap and water aren't available.
- Only eat foods that are well cooked and served hot. Avoid raw shellfish, food served at room temperature and salads that you have not prepared yourself using safe water.
- Eat fruits and vegetables only if you have washed them in safe water or peeled them yourself.
- Never consume foods or unsealed beverages bought from street vendors.
- Only drink water that has been boiled, disinfected, or is purchased in a commerciallysealed bottle.
- Remember to use ice made only from purified or disinfected water and always ask the server to omit ice if this is not assured.
- Always brush your teeth with purified or bottled water.
- Avoid unpasteurized dairy products and fruit juices.
- When swimming in pools, hot tubs, or showering, be careful not to swallow water, which may not be properly treated.
- The same preventive action should be followed on the flight home, which will be serviced by a foreign flight kitchen. Avoid salads and drinks containing water or ice cubes.
When to see a doctor
Generally, the symptoms of travellers' diarrhea go away in a few days without treatment but, in severe and rare cases, the condition can lead to extreme dehydration, shock, coma, and even death. This is particularly true for children, the elderly and individuals with chronic diseases or weakened immune systems.
You should seek prompt medical attention if you have severe dehydration, persistent vomiting, bloody stools or a high fever, or if your symptoms last for more than a few days.
Always seek medical attention for a child if you notice the following: Persistent vomiting; bloody stools or severe diarrhea; a fever of 102° F (39° C) or more; dry mouth or lack of tears when crying; being unusually sleepy, drowsy or unresponsive, or if your child's volume of urine is decreased (or you notice fewer wet diapers in infants).


text:
The Best Scotland Photography Locations
Scotland, the country I now call home, is jam packed full of landscape photography opportunities. Whether you are visiting on vacation or have caught the photography bug like me, then you will want to visit many different iconic locations. But where do you start? The country is huge and full of potential round


text:
Pizza guy outruns robber
April 10, 2008
Johnstown police are looking for a man who tried to rob a pizza delivery driver late Wednesday, but the driver ran away.
The attempted robbery occurred about 9 p.m. Wednesday in the 1000 block of Jay Street in Johnstown, when a driver from Dominic's Pizza was walking to the door of a house.
"An Hispanic male in a black hoodie (hooded sweatshirt) threatened him with a knife and demanded his money," said Johnstown Police Chief Reggie Mayes. "The driver faked throwing the money bag to the ground, and when the robber turned to look, the driver ran back to his car and drove away."
Mayes said the pizza was ordered for the house, but the residents did not order the pizza. Apparently, the would-be robber was hiding nearby and confronted the driver as he delivered the pizza.
Mayes described the robber as in his mid 20s, and wearing the sweatshirt, blue jeans and tennis shoes.
Trending In: Local
- Shawna Nelson case revealed problems in police department that led to dark time in history
- Ignacio Garraus: 'I loathe myself'
- Sordid details emerge as Ignacio Garraus testifies in the Shawna Nelson trial
- Action Line: Mystery of Greeley's cinnamon chews solved
- Court witness: Ashley Fallis had lover, wanted divorce months before death


text:
New Zealand Deal
10% OFF Last Minute Contiki Deals!Contiki Nationwide Transportation From $539 Get 10% OFF last minute deals! -
New Zealand travel sets new standards for mind-boggling beauty. From the spellbinding glaciers of Franz Joseph to the rolling hills of Matamata, these islands have dramatic scenery in spades, and our New Zealand tours allow you to get the very best of the land of the long white cloud.
Click on GET THIS DEAL to check out all our latest specials and travel New Zealand with world-famous Contiki!
Claim this deal
New listings
Get 1 free night Waikato
$538 for Waikato
$65 Taranaki
$30 Waikato
40 Auckland
Work Tips & Essentials
Volunteering in New Zealand: What Are Your Rights?
Is your volunteer work in New Zealand fair? Working for free for [...]


text:
Coherent Acquires Laser Additive Manufacturing Machine Manufacturer
Coherent Inc. recently acquired German-based precision tool manufacturer O.R. Lasertechnologie to expand its portfolio of industrial laser-based machine tools.
Edited by
Hannah Mason
Assistant Editor
Assistant Editor
Related Topics:
Coherent, provider of industrial laser-based machine tools, has recently acquired O.R. Lasertechnologie GmbH, based in Dieburg, Germany. O.R. Lasertechnologie produces a range of compact, high-precision tools for laser additive manufacturing, including direct metal deposition (DMD) and selective layer melting (SLM) technologies, as well as systems for cutting, welding, marking and engraving. The company's products are used in the dental, medical, jewelry, automotive and aerospace industries.
"O.R. Lasertechnologie now gives us a complementary product line that specifically increases our solutions portfolio in additive manufacturing," notes Thomas Merk, executive vice president and general manager of industrial lasers and systems at Coherent. "Their products will integrate with our current offering because the O.R. Lasertechnologie approach is congruent with the Coherent philosophy: provide high-performance, precision systems which deliver unmatched value and ease of use."
Editor PickWhat Is it Like to Study Additive Manufacturing?
This article and video series filmed at Penn State University illustrate what the school's first master's students in AM are learning, and how they'll apply it to advance 3D printing.


text:
Arab Israeli Conflict
Middle East
Israel News
Hi Tech News
International news
The Vienna-based Four Paws International, which has long described the Khan Younis Zoo as the worst in the world, rescued the animals from desolate conditions last Wednesday.
Critics called the policy of shipping live cows and sheep by boat from Australia or Europe for slaughter in Israel animal abuse.
Meretz MK Tamar Zandberg says the practice "causes suffering to hundreds of thousands of animals annually and has not managed to lower prices."
The car was covered in pieces of dead chickens and blood dripped down the doors of the vehicle.
By MICHELLE MALKA GROSSMAN
Dr. Alex Hershaft is visiting Israel to deliver a series of lectures to the public, engage with animal rights activists and meet with various dignitaries, including President Rivlin.
By SHARON UDASIN
During the past six weeks, three poisoning cases have occurred, the most recent of which was discovered just last weekend.
Aiming to illustrate the suffering of cattle and sheep shipped to Israel from overseas, about 55 protesters took to the Eilat boardwalk on Wednesday night.
The company will also need to contribute NIS 1.5m. worth of food products to an organization that works to combat poverty in Israel.
Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Israel hosted "New Spring – New Hope," program held in conjunction with the Peres Center for Peace.
Two-year-old giraffe did not recover after undergoing surgery to correct a congenital defect in his penis.
The macaque monkeys were saved by Monkey Rescue, which saves animals from export for medical purposes.
Yael Arkin, general manager of Let Animals Live, described the "heartbreaking" conditions of the animals.
Three female rhinoceroses manage to wander outside the bounds of the zoo' facility.
Please insert a valid email address


text:
Angels' Nick Tropeano: Hindered by shoulder issue
Tropeano is unlikely to be ready for Opening Day after suffering a setback with his previous shoulder injury in December, Jeff Fletcher of The Orange County Register reports.
Tropeano missed the last two months of the 2018 season due to a shoulder injury, and it apparently isn't completely in the rearview mirror. The right-hander recently began light throwing, but he's now out of the running for a spot in the rotation to start the season. No word has come forth as to when the Angels expect him to be ready for regular duty, but more information will likely become available on that front once he gets back to mound work.
More News
Fantasy Baseball Today Newsletter
You're destined to gain an edge over your friends with advice from the award-winning FBT crew.
Thanks for signing up!
Keep an eye on your inbox for the latest sports news.
There was an error processing your subscription.
Fantasy baseball 2019 rankings, busts
SportsLine simulated the MLB season 10,000 times and warns of some potential busts
AL-only Rotisserie auction
Aces, steals and saves all came at a premium in this deepest in formats. Scott White reflects...
Fantasy Baseball breakouts, best picks
SportsLine simulated the 2019 MLB season 10,000 times and identified must-draft Fantasy Baseball...
Top 30 spring position battles
Will Garrett Hampson seize the starting second base job for the Rockies? Where's Nick Senzel's...
What changes in AL-only drafts?
Cutting the player pool in half creates a number of scarcities. Scott White highlights some...
Fantasy Baseball sleeper picks, sims
SportsLine simulated the 2019 MLB season 10,000 times and identified must-draft Fantasy Baseball...


text:
5/6 bedroom detached house
Unique 3 storey historic Georgian farmhouse dated 1711 situated near to Edinburgh city centre and located opposite Holyrood Park and Arthurs Seat. Set within an acre of mature garden. Private off street parking and double garage. 5 bedrooms, large drawing roomwith excellent woodburning stove (ClearView) , second sitting room/ 6th bedroom, dining room, kitchen, utility room, 2 bathrooms, downstairs wc, vinery/ conservatory, large studio room with mezzanine. 10 minute walk from the bottom of the Royal Mile, 15 minute walk to Waverley Station. Good bus routes on nearby London Road. Pet friendly - ideal for dog owners with ecxellent walks in park opposite.
Map & Street View
EPC Graphs
Contact Owner
The information displayed about this property comprises a property advertisement. LettingLinks makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the advertisement or any linked or associated information, and LettingLinks has no control over the content. This property advertisement does not constitute property particulars. The information is provided and maintained by Katinka Harrison. Prospective tenants are advised to confirm these details with the aforementioned person/agent before entering in to any kind of agreement.
Administration fees may apply when renting a property in England, Wales or Northern Ireland. For more details, please contact the agent/landlord.


text: Content Strategy: Get More Backlinks and More Shares Today! July 31, 2018 by Verna McCoy with no comment This video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cAg-PojFco, can also be seen at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCD-StTwgDMZovSSx8Dx2Ow. Previous Post Windows 10 at 3 years Will Microsoft Edge ever be popular one day Next Post Plants vs Zombies Plush Garden Warfare Pretend Play with Ryan ToysReview!!!


text:
Consumers make wise choices about how, when, and how much energy they use each day to power everything from smart phones and home appliances to office equipment and industrial machines.
In homes and businesses, the way we use energy is also changing rapidly. Just 20 years ago, home computers were still using dial-up to connect to the Internet. Home appliances like refrigerators, washers and dryers, televisions, thermostats relied on electricity, but not in the same way they do now.
Today, the devices we use are increasingly interconnected and smarter. Your refrigerator or washer and dryer likely use technologies as complex as your smart phone. That means they're more sensitive to, and more dependent on, a smooth, reliable flow of energy.
Fortunately, the tools consumers have at their disposal to help them use energy wisely—and more cost-efficiently—are also expanding.
Numerous things you can do at little to no cost can improve your personal energy efficiency and help keep your costs low. Technology innovations can help make it easier to monitor and adjust energy use in our homes and businesses in real time:
Using the energy we have more efficiently is vital to making our state's energy system stronger and helping it work better for all of us. Making smarter energy choices is also one thing we all have in our power to help Michigan usher in a cleaner, more reliable, and more energy-efficient future, together.
It's a new year and plenty of new opportunities to strengthen Michigan's energy future lie ahead. In 2019, local energy companies are making great progress toward a set of resolutions that bolster the reliability, affordability, and sustainability of our energy supply.
Believe it or not, it's about to get even colder in Michigan. The polar vortex has been described as "brutal," "dangerous," and even "the coldest weather in a generation." We can hold our own when it comes to winter weather, but the storm currently whipping its way through the Midwest is no joke.
Who doesn't love the sights, sounds, and smells that mark this time of year? All those festivities can drive up your energy costs, though. That's why AMP is sharing some quick tips to help you manage your holiday energy use.


text:
When you are renting a 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 or 40 yard dumpster, you want a company you can trust with prices that make you smile. Give us a call today and see the difference we can make in your next construction or clean out project.
Simply give us a call and we will help you figure out your dumpster rental needs.
Our dumpsters usually go out same-day or next-day depending on when you call.
We provide top-notch service, while going easy on your bottom line. What more could you ask for?
Our trained operators are here to give you a fast and hassle-free experience from start to finish.
Once you are done, simply give us a call and we will get your dumpster picked up right away!
Our staff is here to help whenever you need it. Simply pick up the phone and give us a call.
Most cities or municipalities do not have many regulations regarding dumpster rental as long as you keep the dumpster entirely on your own property during the rental period. If you need to place your container on the street in any way, you will likely have to obtain a permit from the appropriate building permit office in your town. You can check with your local public works department to be sure.
Most North Attleboro dumpster rental companies will take care of securing this permit for you if you rent from them. Make sure that if you're planning to put the dumpster on the street, the company has made the appropriate arrangements. You should also ensure that you get the permit in a timely manner and at the correct cost. If you thought the dumpster company was getting a permit and they did not, you will be the one who will have to pay the fine that is issued by the authorities.
Apart from comprehending the above info, you should seek the help of the squander management corporation in picking the right sized dumpster. This will likely save your funds besides occupying the much less space at your job area.
As of This year, televisions, pcs, laptops and monitors usually are banned from the garbage in accordance with Brand new Jersey's Electronic Throw away Management Take action (Act).
Arlington, VA is in the state of Arlington. Arlington District is just southwest of Washington, DC. The particular Potomac River is definitely across from Arlington County also. On 03 16, 1920, Alexandria County evolved into known as Arlington District. The population is definitely 210,000 respectively.
Nowadays not simply households but lots of corporate and business and private organizations make use of this kind of services. It is in reality all about convenience. So whether it be garbage from your property relocation or work place managing, just rest and see your garbage going away inn an eco-friendly technique.
The companies grab the garbage and reuse it that produces you get gone the trash in the green technique. These companies supply bins with respect to the garbage volume. Such receptacles can be easily viewed on building sites. These come in different size and shapes to carry garbage keeping that in mind. So with respect to your get together trash, you'll be able to select the suitable bin which may carry diverse quantities of garbage.
Wait to purchase any bigger you actually need. The majority of people think that even larger is better as it pertains to their waste Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA, and in some ways they're correct. When you've got a major ol' dumpster you will be never heading to run out of area. A 40 yard dumpster will go to cost you greater than a 20 lawn dumpster, however, and there's no impression in buying dumpster space you will be never heading to use.
It is necessary to know, however, that a roll-off Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA is just of which: a Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA. No automatically consist of property remove service to obtain stuff into your dumpster for you. This tends to come to be a surprise to some individuals, since many dumpster organizations state that the dumpsters are available for trucking trash, getting rid of garbage, and dealing using home cleanouts. You would like to read the fine print when you're thinking about dumpster firms to be sure you know if these are generally suggested employs or integrated services.
It happens to the best of home owners these days. Life gets occupied and goods starts to stack up. Before you know it, your own small safe-keeping areas are actually taken over from the remnants associated with cast-off possessions. And so stop producing excuses in regards to the clutter in your own life and start building a difference using one simple call to your home town junk trucking service. Well suited for cleaning out single-family garage areas or cellars, today's residential-sized dumpsters are the answer to all your household garbage and rubbish eradication needs, like: On leasing a throw off for your trash disposal on local community cleanup, you will note a mess free local community in no time. The many trash are going to be professionally handled and easily broke up with into the dumpster without demanding your own intervention inside the project. The best part of Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA organizations is they ensure that the disposed waste is recycled in environment friendly approach so, the likelihood of environmental pollution as part of your locality are going to be less and will also reduce the happening of disasters in your vicinity.
Find a company that could offer following day Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro for your developing project so you're able to quickly get the job done.
When comparing renting a dumpster, getting a Big Carrier is an excellent choice. A Big Carrier has a large volume--it holds about 6 cubic feet regarding rubbish, which is comparable to a traditional dumpster. Unlike a roll-off dumpster, which usually needs to be found so that it could be unloaded and reloaded to a pickup, the Big Carrier can be setup wherever you need it to be. You don't need a permit of any kind to utilize a Big Carrier, and you also won't risk virtually any damage to your home from the handbag itself, whereas a dumpster can easily tear up your lawn or maybe gouge your entrance fairly quickly. In addition to these kind of advantages, purchasing and using a huge Bag can be quite a lot less expensive Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro. Bags the reasonable volume, usually inside $30 range. With a bag, you opt your pick-up date for all your dirt, meaning it's not necessary to be ready after your Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro period of time or be liable for additional fees in the event you miss the deadline. As well as, because the handbag is your own house to keep, you only have to pay for your service to pick up your next load whenever you want to use it again. Many companies will even supply discounts on their hauling rates if you use the bag with greater frequency. When it's not utilized, you can simply fold your handbag: It takes right up about just as much space like a large book bag when it's stashed.
The style of environment concern is at this point echoed by amount of industries and also business companies across the US. Quite a few construction companies in the US are producing "green" product solutions, encouraging numerous others to go natural to protect environmental surroundings. Where do these companies receive the raw content from? They will use post-consumer and post-industrial throw away as unprocessed trash for output of these eco friendly goods. They can be engaged in offering second existence to the throw away disposed by simply residents regarding US.
When you know that you are going to accumulate either a large amount of dirt or large junk objects during the course of a new cleanout or diy project, planning a Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro before hand can make your lifetime much easier. With a dumpster, all you have to do is load it up and after that let your Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro organization take care of the relax.
If you are individually working on your home with regards to design, you want to help save as much cash as you can. Possibly your family and friends are helping you with all the remodeling of your house. This is a great path for family and friends to obtain together with this ever so occupied world.
Quite a few roll off companies promote the concept that larger is better, which means you will be up-sold into a container dimensions that properly exceeds the actual necessity. While it is surely better to make a mistake on the side of having a little more package than is essential, one quantity required potential is simply throwing away money.
If you are considering cleansing your downstairs room venue need to be reminded of which city waste pickup limits the amount of hand bags that can be put out for the regular trash pickup truck. If you would like to get the trash swiftly removed from the house and property or home without the need for possessing the extra hand bags until the a few weeks then you can think about next day Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA. The actual dumpster will be sent the very next day and you could even quickly order online. The garbage from the downstairs room will not even need to be plastic box or organized as it could for local trash pickup truck. Local waste pickup requires that carpeting be cut down in space and attached with a stringed; this requirement is not necessary by using a Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA inside Washington DC. Quick and simple trash elimination is provided throughout the convenience of dumpster accommodations.
This kind of waste has to choose immediate wholesale which in any other case will placed you to many difficulties. The trash accumulated in these circumstances will be very cumbersome in nature and difficult to handle. Speedy clearance of the huge tons of trash but not only keeps your self on the secure mode in the entire waste disposal difficulties and also results in an environment to step forward to take back the normal position.
Find Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA services in your surrounding area and start amassing quotes from their store. You can also find initial quotes from the internet by searching for dumpster accommodations in and around your locality.
Really don't trust your initiatives with just any organization. Find a dependable Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA partner to ensure all of your materials are disposed of in a timely manner. When you have a strong doing work relationship using a Rent a Waste Management Dumpster in North Attleboro, MA company, you can be positive that your initiatives will be punctually and particles free.
You may have to replace your old basis if you ordered an antique property. Dumpsters can retailer stones along with rocks along with dirt. Spin offs can also be used with the large amount of assorted trash that may be left in a foreclosed or abandoned residence. Often, wooden removed from a well used home is moldy or mildewed and just ordinary filthy. Obtain it into the throw off and then close the entranceway at night. This way, it won't be coming around the local community and producing people ill. You can also use a roll down for stocking brush along with grass removed from about a home or buildings. Disposing of this flame hazard you will save a lot of money spanning a fine in the county flame department! Spin off dumpsters are usually large waste cans enclosed with added wheels at the bottom and therefore are usually preferred for waste disposal in the large initiatives like property renovation, building projects commercial clean ups and environment friendly yard clear ups. Most of these roll offs are usually enclosed together with two checkpoint ways, one particular at the back side to get rid of in the major loads, one particular on the top to throw the tiny trash remaining at the work location. The actual wheels enclosed with the throw off assist in easy moving of the dumpster on to the truck. Spin off dumpsters can be bought in different sizes starting from 10 yard to 40 backyard.
Please use the form below to contact us. We look forward to working with you and will get back to you as soon as possible. All fields are required


text:
Your shopping cart is empty!
UK Stock is out of stock! We will ship from overseas instead, shipping will take a few weeks to arri..
This is a prank tongue prop.
The tongue looks real, made of non-toxic and environmentally-friendly ..
You get 3 pens in totalType:Gel PenGel Pen's Ink Type:Liquid-InkMaterial:PlasticErasable:NoUse:Offic..
Designed to hold cash, cards and other little things.You can simply hold it in your hand or put it i..
£7.69 £5.50
Type: Coin Purse
Style: Mini Size
Material: Canvas
Features: Zipper Closure, Cute Cartoon Animal ..
Size: Diameter 65MM × Height 195MM / 500ml Material: High-grade environmental..


text:
|Auction Type:
|Timed Online Auction
Upland, CA, 91786, USA
|Auction Date & Time:
|February 13, 2019 at 12:00 AM PST
Industrialauctionhub.com expressly disclaims any liability for errors, exclusions or changes regarding any information provided for this auction. Buyers are urged to verify auction details directly through the auctioneer's website or by contacting the auctioneer directly.
(1 Watching this)
Upland, CA, 91786, USAView On Larger Map


text:
You've seen the movies, you've played the games, and now you're ready to start creating the 3D animated characters, models, and worlds that you've been dreaming about. The Los Angeles Film School gets that, and we love it.
The Associate of Science in Computer Animation Degree Program starts by teaching you the fundamental principles and techniques of animation, and progresses into creating advanced computer-generated virtual models, characters, animations, and visual effects. You'll learn to create 3D computer graphics for video games, commercials, television shows, theme park attractions, and short and feature-length films, all while working through a process that mirrors the entertainment industry.
Located in the heart of Hollywood, the entertainment capital of the world, The Los Angeles Film School combines the latest in technology with an advanced curriculum that gets you immersed in the world of computer animation. Our experienced instructors share their expert knowledge and techniques to help prepare you for a variety of careers across the entertainment world.
Program offered is an Associate Degree.
Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges (ACCSC)
© 2010 The Los Angeles Film School. All rights reserved.