text:
Sanctions compliance & enforcement
April 2017 | ROUNDTABLE | GLOBAL TRADE
Financier Worldwide Magazine
The sanctions arena is complex and challenging, with a host of nuanced statutes, executive orders and country-specific regulations being implemented and modified across the globe. Among the most visible are the Ukraine-related sanctions that US and EU authorities have imposed on Russia, as well as longstanding US sanctions regimes concerning Cuba and Iran. Moreover, with the impact of the new US presidential administration and the impact of Brexit yet to be fully felt, the burdens of international sanctions compliance could increase exponentially.
FW: Could you provide an overview of the challenges and issues facing businesses when it comes to sanctions compliance? To what extent is the screening process for business partners, suppliers and customers becoming more complex?
Bittner: Sanctions are complex and challenging because they derive from many different types of law. They come in multiple variations and are more abstract than the export control laws. First, unlike the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) which comprise one set of regulations authorised by one statute, the Arms Export Control Act, US sanctions laws are based on a host of statutes, executive orders, country-specific regulations and now, with Iran, an international 'plan of action' implemented through licensing statements and frequently asked questions. It is often difficult to find the right answer or even to know where to look. Second, sanctions consist of full embargoes, limited restrictions that outlaw certain activities with a country but not others and list-based prohibitions that restrict all activities with just certain individuals of a country. With the implementation of the Russian sanctions, screening is even more difficult because the mere fact that an entity is listed does not necessarily mean that you cannot do business with them, if the business in question is not a prohibited activity. Sanctions often involve complex financial transactions and abstract concepts like facilitation that can be difficult to comprehend due to their intangible nature.
Lee: With an increasingly global landscape of sanctions policymaking and regulation, companies face a complicated balancing act of complying with EU, UK, UN and US sanctions, among others, in addition to the complicated domestic regimes of sanctions regulation and enforcement involving various legislative and regulatory bodies in each of these jurisdictions. Sanctions in the US, UK, EU and the UN are increasingly used as a response to a number of foreign policy problems. This complexity and uncertainty has been exacerbated in 2016 by the presidential administration in the US and the impact of Brexit. With the breadth of sanctions programmes, the correspondingly complex and changing number of designations of entities and individuals presents significant challenges for businesses seeking to maintain robust screening processes in light of their global supply chains and customer base.
Brown: The comprehensive trade embargo that was in place against Cuba, Iran and Sudan for many years was easier to comply with given that there were few exceptions to doing business with these sanctioned countries. However, as a result of the recent changes to sanctions regulations and policy with regard to these countries, global businesses face new compliance challenges. The easing of sanctions in these countries means that evaluating a potential business opportunity or engagement for regulatory compliance is highly fact dependent and may or may not be permissible. Businesses have to dedicate more resources to educating and training personnel so these critical determinations can be determined. Furthermore, since sanctions are a foreign policy tool, they are often rapidly deployed or modified in response to world events, such as a presidential election, the annexation of Crimea or a cyber attack on critical infrastructure. This uncertainty makes it difficult for businesses to anticipate or predict how sanctions might impact them. Businesses have to demonstrate flexibility in the type of opportunities they pursue and plan for contingencies. For example, clauses may have to be added to customer agreements involving sanctioned countries to ensure that a sudden change in events or sanctions policy enables a business to stop engaging in certain transactions without incurring liability for a breach of contract.
Goodale: Sanctions compliance has become increasingly complex for companies and financial institutions during the past year. This can be attributed to three main factors. First, major changes have been made to several sanctions regimes. For example, sanctions against Cuba, Iran, Russia, Burma and Sudan. Second, hundreds of entities have been added to or removed from various sanctions lists, but the lists often vary significantly depending on the sanctions authorities that maintain them. Third, various sanctions regimes have been amended in ways that require companies to screen not only the names of customers, but what industries they are in, where they are located, and who their owners may be. The combination of these factors has made it extremely challenging for companies and financial institutions to comply with all applicable sanctions regimes and has necessitated that they regularly evaluate and modify their compliance programmes.
Matthews: There are two closely related key issues for businesses. One is the absence of clarity, and only very limited guidance, as to the extent to which targeted sanctions apply to entities which are not themselves listed. In the EU, these are the concepts of ownership and control. The other issue is the absence of any reliable indicators as to the level of due diligence which sanctions authorities would regard as proportionate. The combination of these makes it very hard for businesses to have policies which can really ensure that they are sanctions compliant. A further issue at present is the increasing tendency for financial institutions, notably banks, to require of their clients different – usually higher and more cautious – standards than applicable law requires, thereby expanding the effective depth and scope of sanctions beyond what lawmakers may have intended.
Gatti: The challenges associated with sanctions compliance have become multi-dimensional, on both vertical as well as horizontal levels, and have evolved to such an extent that sanctions compliance procedures must now be equal parts art and science. It is no longer sufficient to rely exclusively on ad hoc or routine automated screenings of the names of business partners. Businesses also need to screen the addresses of their business partners while also attempting to discern and screen the beneficial owners of their business partners. Further, businesses must simultaneously evaluate the significance of the relevant sanction regimes, since not all sanctions regimes are equal – some involve prohibitions on all dealings with specific business partners whereas others merely trigger licensing requirements. Additional complexity is added to sanctions compliance when a transaction is subject to multiple international sanction regimes which often forces businesses to analyse sanctions at the least common denominator level.
FW: What do you consider to be the key developments and trends to have arisen regarding sanctions over the past 12 months?
Lee: The significant changes made to Iran, Cuba and Russia sanctions programmes have dominated the sanctions landscape in recent years. Tensions in the relationship between the US and Russia intensified in 2016, as did the sanctions imposed by the US against Russia, including the recent cyber sanctions targeting Russian actors associated with the alleged interference in the US election through cyber operations. With the election of Donald Trump in November 2016, the questions and uncertainties with respect to the sanctions landscape became quite pressing.
Brown: The sudden and surprising changes to the regulations and sanctions policy with regard to Sudan is a key development in the last 12 months. If Sudan continues to make progress in its cooperation with the US on counterterrorism and other areas identified in the recent executive order, then OFAC sanctions may be permanently removed in July 2017. OFAC in the meantime has issued a general licence authorising most transactions involving Sudan. The changes to the regulations and sanctions policy represent a trend under the Obama administration to engage directly with sanctioned countries, such as Cuba and Iran. The reopening of diplomatic relations with the government of Cuba and the negotiation of the JCPOA with Iran and other parties represent the most significant examples of this type of engagement. Though constrained by various statutes, the Obama administration eased Cuba and Iran sanctions by issuing general and specific licences authorising certain transactions involving these sanctioned countries. The real question is whether the Trump administration will continue this trend of engaging directly with sanctioned countries or reverse it.
Goodale: During the past 12 months, the continuing trend of compliance authorities to modify sanctions regimes on a frequent basis to reflect new or evolving policies has resulted in several key developments. On one end of the spectrum, new and more favourable policies of the US government toward Burma and Sudan have resulted in the termination of the US sanctions against Burma and the establishment of a general licence that permits many kinds of transactions with Sudanese entities. On the other end of spectrum, the adoption of more hard-line policies against North Korea and Russia resulted in a significant expansion of sanctions against those countries. In between those two ends of the spectrum, evolving policies towards Cuba and Iran resulted in the easing of certain US sanctions against those countries. Given this continuing trend, companies must be vigilant in monitoring sanctions developments.
Matthews: The JCPOA – and the consequent gulf between the requirements of EU and US sanctions – has served to highlight the issue of banks setting compliance requirements for their clients different from, and broader than, applicable laws outside of the US, to the apparent exasperation of those who agreed the JCPOA deal. In the UK, a notable further development has been the establishment of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) – and the likely forthcoming weaponisation of it in the form of administrative monetary penalties, with liability to be assessed to a civil, rather than criminal, standard. These developments significantly increase the enforcement risk for business subject to UK jurisdiction.
Gatti: From strictly a US perspective, a key development has been the much heralded sanctions relaxation that has been enacted with respect to Cuba and Iran. In both instances, the regulatory relaxation that has occurred is rather limited in scope but this limitation is widely misunderstood. Considerable confusion regarding the remaining Cuba and Iran sanctions exists among businesses that must comply with US sanctions. Further compounding this problem is the fact that the regulatory changes that have been enacted are not only limited in scope but also not very user friendly. Consider OFAC's General License H for Iran, which authorises the foreign subsidiaries of US companies to sell products not subject to US jurisdiction to Iran, provided that such sales are not made to OFAC SDNs, with the exception of those SDNs listed in Executive Order 13599.
Bittner: In the last 12 months, OFAC has issued multiple general licences and responses to frequently asked questions to clarify the JCPOA with Iran, which was implemented in January of 2016. The loosening of US sanctions against Iran was a huge change in US policy that had existed for nearly 40 years. While significant restrictions are still in place for US companies, and it would be helpful for OFAC to further clarify key aspects of the agreement, such as the scope of 'commercial passenger aircraft', General License H has allowed many foreign subsidiaries of US companies to conduct new business with customers in Iran. For months after the JCPOA and General License H were announced, many international banks were reluctant to conduct business in Iran, and it seems that financial institutions are becoming more and more comfortable with the law as time goes by and companies like Airbus and Boeing secure large transactions.
FW: How would you characterise current enforcement trends adopted by sanctions agencies? How are these being applied to global businesses?
Brown: The current enforcement trends adopted by sanctions agencies can be characterised as aggressive. In particular, OFAC has put industry on notice that it will not limit its enforcement actions to transactions involving financial transactions or financial institutions. The agency has devoted increased resources and attention to investigating alleged violations of its sanctions programmes by companies in industries outside of the financial sector. For example, the Trump administration has signalled that it will rigorously enforce non-nuclear sanctions – terrorism, ballistic missiles and human rights – in the Iran sanctions programme. In conducting a risk-based analysis for an engagement potentially involving a sanctioned country or person, entity or individual, global businesses should take the agency's recent enforcement actions into account.
Gatti: With respect to US sanctions, OFAC enforcement remains steadfast, although many of the monetary penalties levied recently appear to be more modest in amount than years past when fines of hundreds of millions of US dollars were rather common. A review of OFAC's published enforcement notices suggests that three global businesses have been fined since the start of 2017. This level of enforcement is noteworthy, given that total published enforcement actions against global businesses during 2016 and 2015 amounted to one and five, respectively.
Matthews: The US – notably OFAC – remains the most feared and most active sanctions enforcer. An interesting facet of its sanctions enforcement is that much of it has been by way of settlement agreements rather than court decisions. Outside of the US, sanctions enforcement is patchy at best. It is more rigorous in the context of export restrictions than in the financial sanctions context, where the main route by which sanctions compliance is ensured is that banks and other financial services businesses require it of their clients. However, at least for the UK, the establishment of OFSI and the application of the new penalties, expected in April 2017, may cause the UK to become a more robust enforcer of sanctions – and certainly tougher for now than the other EU member states.
Goodale: In recent years, two major enforcement trends have manifested themselves. The first trend relates to inter-agency cooperation on enforcement matters. The second pertains to the willingness of enforcement authorities to conduct extremely thorough investigations over multiple years and to impose massive penalties for sanctions violations. These trends can be seen most recently in the enforcement action that US authorities brought against Chinese-based Zhongxing Telecommunications Equipment Corporation and ZTE Kangxun Telecommunications Ltd., known collectively as ZTE. On 7 March 2017, US authorities announced that ZTE had agreed to a record-high combined civil and criminal penalty of $1.19bn. This enforcement action, which took place over several years, involved numerous US agencies that investigated illegal shipments of telecommunications equipment to Iran and North Korea by ZTE in violation of US export control and sanctions regulations and numerous false and misleading statements made by ZTE to US authorities.
Bittner: According to OFAC, in 2016, the agency entered into nine settlement agreements totalling $21.6m, and in the first two months of 2017 prior to the ZTE settlement, there were only four settlements for just over $1m. Despite ZTE's record penalties, the trend has been a sharp decline from 2014 and 2015 which saw 23 enforcement actions for $1.2bn and 15 enforcement actions for just under $600m, respectively. I can only speculate about the causes of the decline, but I would say it is a combination of increased awareness, training and dedication of resources to sanctions compliance, mixed with a healthy amount of fear.
Lee: Although 2016 was a busy year for sanctions-related policy, it was a light year for OFAC enforcement actions, with under $22m in collective civil enforcement penalties in nine enforcement actions. This might be explained by the significant turnover in personnel in the enforcement units of OFAC and the political factor of the US presidential election. However, history suggests that there is a pipeline of matters that could be resolved in 2017 and there have already been a number of enforcement cases announced. OFAC has recently settled several enforcement actions with a finding of a violation with no civil penalty, suggesting that potential findings of violation with no civil penalties might be issued against companies for purposes of informing the public and other businesses of conduct that is perceived to be a violation, yet not egregious enough to merit a monetary penalty. In addition to OFAC and BIS, we have seen the US Department of Justice (DOJ) releasing guidance on encouraging self-disclosure of criminal export controls and sanctions violations. Historically, OFAC would refer criminal matters to the DOJ, and the front-ending of the DOJ involvement and disclosure adds to the complexity of navigating compliance. Additionally, in 2016, the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) concluded several enforcement actions that included sanctions-related components, all involving the New York-based activities of foreign banks. The way in which enforcement by the DFS might interact and interrelate to enforcement by the federal agencies might present additional compliance complexity for certain companies.
FW: In your opinion, do the potential penalties for sanctions non-compliance constitute enough of a deterrent? What further measures, if any, are regulators considering?
Goodale: The potential penalties that can be imposed for non-compliance with sanctions do serve as a strong deterrent. In February 2017, the US government increased the civil penalties that can be imposed for sanctions violations. Pursuant to this change, with respect to most US sanctions programmes, the civil penalty that can be imposed per violation is the greater of $289,238 or twice the amount of the underlying transaction. Criminal penalties for sanctions violations are even harsher. With respect to most US sanctions programmes, criminal penalties can be up to $1m and/or 20 years of imprisonment per violation. Moreover, since the creation of the Export Enforcement Coordination Center (E2C2), there has been far greater coordination among US authorities on sanctions enforcement matters, which has led to numerous multi-million dollar settlements.
Bittner: The threat of monetary penalties constitutes a powerful deterrent and the sharp decline in enforcement cases from 2014 to 2016 seems to back that up. The ZTE case again demonstrated that US regulators are willing to impose huge penalties on companies that deliberately violate the US sanctions laws, and companies should understand that the imposition of independent monitors after settlement can impose an even higher cost in money and resources.
Lee: In addition to the potential criminal penalties, the potential civil penalties for sanctions have recently increased. OFAC recently issued regulations to implement the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, adjusting for inflation, and increasing, the maximum amount of civil monetary penalties that may be assessed under the relevant OFAC regulations.
Matthews: The level of penalties in the US has served as a more than active deterrent for some time. And because of the long reach of US sanctions jurisdiction, even before the added layer of secondary sanctions, this serves as a deterrent to businesses even where they, and their transactions, have only a relatively remote connection with the US. In the EU, businesses certainly take sanctions seriously, despite the perception of only a low enforcement risk. For many businesses, the reputational hit of being found in breach of criminal sanctions is enough of a deterrent, and for those with US exposure, the risk of US fines certainly makes businesses sit up. But in the UK, the various increases in penalties and enforcement options which are to be introduced this year will clearly add to the deterrence effect – and of those, the ability of OFSI to issue monetary penalties, having established liability only to a civil evidential standard, is likely to be the most used, and also to raise the greatest concerns.
Brown: Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, the recent increase in civil penalties for alleged violations of sanctions programmes does constitute a sufficient deterrent. It ensures that the civil penalties will keep pace with inflation. The potential penalties for sanctions non-compliance will continue to grow over time. OFAC has shown a marked increase in the issuance of Findings of Violations, which put industry on notice that certain transactions or behaviours are subject to sanctions. Likely to follow are significant penalties against and settlement agreements with entities that engage in the same or similar transactions or behaviours in the future.
FW: Could you highlight any recent examples of sanctions enforcement following noncompliance by an organisation? What lessons can we learn from such transgressions and the penalties that followed?
Lee: In the past year, we have seen the first OFAC enforcement against a company for violation of the 50 Percent Rule, where violations were based on clients that were not on the SDN List, but majority-owned by an individual or entity on the SDN List and the electronic customer records and sanctions screening did not accurately capture or screen for beneficial ownership for corporate customers. Broadly, the recent enforcement cases by OFAC demonstrate the political and historical independence of the agency and its willingness to bring enforcement actions against various businesses and actors. For example, OFAC brought enforcement actions against Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and PanAmerican Seed Co., even though the nature of the business of both companies arguably did not present any national security risks and the entities arguably could have complied by taking advantage of the general or specific licence processes.
Goodale: Two recent sanctions enforcement actions provide valuable insights into what is and is not viewed favourably by regulators. In one matter, following a thorough internal investigation in which it discovered that several of its non-US business units had committed over 3400 violations of US sanctions against Cuba and Iran, Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank) submitted a voluntary self-disclosure (VSD) relating to the apparent violations to OFAC. Subsequently, OFAC concluded that the apparent violations constituted a non-egregious case and allowed TD Bank to pay a settlement amount of $516,105, which was a fraction of the potential penalty that could have been imposed. In contrast, in another recent enforcement action, ZTE did not submit a VSD and made numerous false statements during the investigation, which ultimately led to US authorities seeking $1.19bn in penalties. These two dramatically different cases show the value of submitting VSDs and cooperating with regulators.
Brown: OFAC recently reached a settlement with ZTE in the amount of $100,871,266 for apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations over a five year period. ZTE, among other things, continued to export and re-export US-origin goods to Iran or the government of Iran even after the company learned of the US government's investigation into its business activities. OFAC found ZTE's nonexistent or insufficient compliance programme to be an aggravating factor in calculating this record-breaking civil penalty. The ZTE case thus underscores the importance of having a strong compliance programme within an organisation that promotes transparency and accountability.
Matthews: From the US side, perhaps one of the most interesting decisions in recent years was the Schlumberger decision, which highlighted that even a relatively remote US involvement can lead to liability, in that case for facilitation. In the EU, sanctions enforcement has been patchy at best, and very largely weighted toward enforcement of export restrictions, rather than financial sanctions. I am aware of a number of self-reports that have led to raps over the knuckles, but up until now, OFSI and its predecessors have not shown any appetite to commence proceedings against an entity which has self-reported. However, for the UK, the penalties for breach of financial sanctions are about to get tougher, and OFSI will be able to issue fines directly, without the need to go to court, and to a civil standard. So it will be interesting to see how the picture develops in the UK in the coming year or two.
FW: In your opinion, what should companies (especially those operating in multiple international territories) be doing to stay up-to-date with new sanctions compliance requirements?
Gatti: To stay up-to-date with new sanctions compliance requirements, companies operating in multiple international territories need to engage dedicated sanctions compliance teams that are assigned to track specific sanction regime changes, especially for those countries that apply sanctions as a foreign policy tool. Sanctions compliance requires companies operating in multiple international territories to be mobile, agile and always ready to react, especially since many sanctions changes are effective on publication date and frequently do not provide for a wind-down period or any grandfathering of transactions already in process.
Bittner: The first thing I would recommend is to ensure that your company devotes adequate resources to sanctions compliance, whether it is in the form of qualified, in-house professionals or dedicated outside support. Sanctions compliance is a complicated regulatory area full of pitfalls for the unwary where penalties are often measured in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Trying to manage a complex web of international sanctions laws with people who handle sanctions compliance as one of many different job functions could result in costly errors, loss of reputation and even criminal penalties.
Goodale: Sanctions compliance requirements are frequently modified by US and non-US authorities. Given this fact, it is critical for companies to monitor compliance developments on a regular, if not daily, basis. However, doing so can be difficult for many companies that are only able to dedicate limited resources to sanctions compliance efforts and often may require that their designated in-house compliance personnel wear multiple business hats that permit them to focus only a small amount of time on monitoring compliance developments. In light of these realities, companies should consider utilising outside experts to provide them with regular updates on compliance developments. Alternatively, companies should seek to use publicly available resources to monitor compliance developments, such as government agency websites and alert notification email lists and blogs and websites dedicated to sanctions developments that are maintained by law firms and other entities.
Matthews: For most businesses, sanctions compliance means simply not breaching sanctions. This is not straightforward, and the ambiguities about ownership and control, and also about what constitutes proportionate due diligence, cause real uncertainty. I would advise all companies to have a sanctions compliance policy, as this forces them to think up front what their sanctions compliance risks are, which countries' sanctions laws they need to comply with, and what procedures are needed to reduce or eliminate those risks. It also helps in any dealings with a sanctions authority to show that systems and controls are in place, even if they may have failed on a specific occasion, or failed to address properly a particular type of risk. The situation is different for FCA regulated entities which are under an obligation to have adequate systems and controls in place to prevent financial crime. For them, having a sanctions compliance policy is not merely good practice but is a regulatory requirement in itself.
Brown: First, multinational companies should sign up to receive alerts from OFAC when it issues a new penalty, finding of violation or settlement agreement. OFAC is required to post new penalties, findings of violations and settlement agreements on its website. The postings usually contain a summary of the facts and more importantly OFAC's use of aggravating and mitigating factors under the enforcement guidelines. They provide valuable insight into OFAC's enforcement priorities and its rationale in determining whether a particular case is egregious or not. Second, multinational companies should monitor the Federal Register on a consistent basis. OFAC and other agencies publish new regulations, amendments and general licences in the Federal Register as well as posting them on their websites. The timely dissemination of new sanctions regulations and policies ensures that significant gaps do not develop in a company's sanctions compliance. Following OFAC's enforcement actions, and the enforcement actions of similar agencies in other countries, and monitoring the Federal Register are the most effective ways a global or multinational company can stay up-to-date with new sanctions compliance requirements.
Lee: Keeping up with the almost daily changes in sanctions regimes is becoming increasingly difficult. There is no substitute for management commitment and dedication to this exercise, with the appropriate funding and staffing. Training and ongoing monitoring are critical.
FW: Are the costs of sanctions compliance increasing exponentially? How can companies manage these costs?
Bittner: I don't know if the costs of sanctions compliance are increasing exponentially, but I think companies are beginning to realise that they need to have dedicated, professional sanctions compliance resources to properly manage this risk area.
Goodale: The burdens of sanction compliance are increasing exponentially. This is due in large part to the more nuanced ways in which countries are implementing and modifying their sanctions programmes. For example, the Ukraine-related sanctions that the US and EU authorities have been implementing since Russia annexed the Crimea Region of Ukraine in 2014 are much more targeted than sanctions typically have been in the past. These Ukraine-related sanctions, which are frequently amended, do not prohibit all business transactions with all Russian entities, but only certain kinds of transactions with specifically identified entities in certain sectors of the Russian economy. In order to comply with such constantly evolving and complex sanctions in a cost-effective manner, companies, with assistance from outside sanctions compliance experts, should develop a holistic sanctions compliance programme that is predicated on strong and appropriate screening mechanisms and that is implemented and understood by all concerned company personnel.
Brown: The costs of sanctions compliance are increasing exponentially because the number of sanctions programmes has increased and targeted sanctions are often more complex than comprehensive trade embargoes. Companies can manage these costs by automating compliance as much as possible. To the extent that compliance processes can be built into existing fulfillment and procurement systems, companies can avoid dedicating additional resources, such as training and time, to it.
Matthews: The costs of sanctions compliance will vary significantly according to the nature of a business and its risk tolerance. A company could take a risk averse approach such that its compliance risk and compliance costs would be very low, but it would miss out on business which competitors with more targeted compliance policies and procedures are able to take. So there is a trade-off for firms in terms of ability to take on certain business and the consequential compliance costs. An illustration of this is with the entities targeted as subject to an investment ban under the Russia sanctions, as with SSI listings in the US. Some businesses will prefer to take a clear line that they will not deal with a sanctions-listed entity. But the restrictions which apply in relation to the entities on the Russia investment ban list are actually quite narrow, and businesses which are prepared to do so may develop a more sophisticated policy which enables them to recognise this listing, but still to proceed, perhaps with caution, with activities that the listing does not prohibit.
Lee: Costs are certainly increasing. Keeping experienced personnel at the company is important, as is a regular review of where sanctions compliance resources are being directed and whether the focus is still appropriate. This is where a yearly risk-assessment can be an important part of cost containment as well as sanctions compliance.
FW: What advice would you give to organisations that are looking to develop an effective sanctions compliance programme? What steps can they take to ensure company-wide adoption?
Goodale: Performing a risk-based analysis of a company's business operations is essential for the purposes of developing an effective compliance programme. Risk factors that should be analysed include, among other things: business and product lines, customer base, the number and variety of countries served, and the international merger and acquisitions activity of a company. Based on the risk-based analysis, the company should develop robust compliance policies and procedures, which should include effective screening mechanisms, and the policies and procedures should be set forth in a compliance manual. Training relating to the compliance policies and procedures, which should be updated as necessary, should be provided to all company personnel involved in international operations. To ensure that the policies and procedures are working effectively, compliance assessments should be performed on a periodic basis by internal or external entities that are independent of the sanctions compliance group.
Brown: I would advise organisations looking to develop an effective sanctions compliance programme to hire dedicated resources with the requisite knowledge, skills and drive to perform at a high level. Compliance personnel must fully understand the sanctions regulations and be able to communicate them to others within an organisation. The quality of the compliance personnel determines the effectiveness of an organisation's sanctions compliance programme over time. An organisation can ensure company-wide adoption by cultivating a culture of compliance. This cultivation has to start at the top of the organisation. The leadership or management of an organisation must demonstrate a commitment to sanctions compliance and set an example for others to follow. The compliance personnel also have to believe that they have management support in making the difficult decision not to pursue or approve deals that pose a high level of risk to their organisation's compliance with sanctions regulations or its reputation with the US government.
Matthews: Businesses come in all shapes and sizes and a good compliance policy will be well tailored to the structure, business and risks for that company. However at a general level, the key things I would focus on are ensuring genuine board level understanding and buy-in for the policy and identifying some clear key points and procedures for operational staff, while establishing a small core team within the business, headed by a senior person who will take overall responsibility for sanctions compliance and develop a fuller understanding of relevant sanctions requirements. In many cases, it is not necessary to try to make everyone in a business a sanctions expert. The small core team can take responsibility for keeping up to speed with sanctions risks and developments and can cascade the relevant bits to operational colleagues as necessary.
Lee: Because different offences may arise out of parallel investigations focused on related conduct, entities may benefit from integrating compliance reviews and allocating training and compliance resources according to the type of potential violations that are most relevant to the business. Because non-governmental agencies are increasingly involved in enforcing certain business conduct and publicising apparent wrongdoing, businesses must also understand that scrutiny into business practices may come from both government and non-government sources and understand the compliance requirements of the entities they are contractually obligated to.
Bittner: In addition to easy-to-access screening software that seamlessly integrates with the company's enterprise resource planning systems, successful companies have clear policies and procedures that explain the sanctions laws in all of the countries in which they operate. They also have dedicated professionals to explain in real time what the business can do in the areas that are subject to sanctions.
Gatti: First, consider expenses associated with developing sanctions compliance programmes as expenses associated with developing quality control programmes. It is always less expensive to develop quality control plans than it is to deal with problems that result from a lack of quality controls or deficient quality controls. Second, keep in mind that sanctions compliance programmes should be equal parts art and science. It is no longer sufficient to rely exclusively on pure science which generally takes the form of ad hoc or routine automated screenings of the names of business partners. Sanctions compliance has become so complex that scientific processes must be applied in tandem with judgment-based analysis or artistic based processes. Third, make sure to obtain clear, written support from corporate management. Without such support, no sanctions compliance programme will ever be able to take root on a company-wide basis.
FW: What best practices should organisations follow as part of their sanctions compliance? Generally-speaking, how would you characterise the quality of most organisations' compliance programmes?
Brown: As part of their sanctions compliance, organisations should follow best practices in recordkeeping. The sheer volume of transactions and engagements in a global business or organisation can be daunting. However, effective recordkeeping provides a document trail so that compliance personnel can conduct reviews of business units or sales teams to ensure compliance with sanctions regulations. It also permits a global business or organisation to continuously improve compliance processes and procedures in the event weaknesses or inefficiencies are identified during a compliance review.
Matthews: In many cases where a business has identified the need to have a sanctions policy, the policy ends up being confused and overcomplicated – with the effect that it becomes either ill-understood and therefore ignored or overly burdensome and expensive to operate. Sanctions is ultimately not a hugely complicated area, even if there are undoubtedly complications within it. Of course there are exceptions – the more a business deals with listed persons, or operates in or with countries subject to sanctions, and the more countries' sanctions laws a business has to respect, the more complex its procedures will inevitably become.
Gatti: Subscribe to an automated sanctions screening programme that screens sanctioned countries as well as sanctioned parties. For those companies that operate in multiple international territories, make sure that the sanction screening programme selected includes sanction regime screening for all countries where you have business operations. Also make sure that your sanctions screening programme permits ad hoc screenings as well as routine automated background screenings of all business partner names ever screened. In screening new business partners, also screen their beneficial owners as well as address locations for each party screened. Hire an experienced sanctions team and provide team members ongoing sanctions training to ensure that team members understand OFAC's 50 percent deemed SDN/SSI rules. Also comprehend that some sanctions regimes involve prohibitions on all dealings with specific business partners whereas others merely trigger licensing requirements. Lastly, develop procedures for blocking newly sanctioned business partners as well as filing required blocking reports with OFAC.
Lee: Because the same or similar conduct may be investigated by both local and foreign enforcement agencies, businesses need to understand the key differences between local and federal regulations and never assume that misconduct is limited to local business units. Instead, such conduct may be indicative of a global problem. At all levels of enterprise, most sanctions programmes can be improved. However, having a 'Cadillac version' of a compliance programme can actually be counterproductive, as it is so complicated that it is not being followed by the company. It might be better to have a more streamlined programme that people actually follow.
Goodale: Companies of all sizes should consider following these five best practices for sanctions compliance. First, perform a risk-based analysis of the company's operations periodically to determine whether changes to certain operations have occurred that warrant making significant modifications to the company's sanctions compliance policies and procedures. Second, monitor sanctions developments frequently and make changes to the company's sanctions compliance policies and procedures, as necessary. Third, provide training on the company's sanctions compliance policies and procedures to all relevant company personnel on a regular basis. Fourth, perform frequent testing to confirm that screening mechanisms are working effectively. Finally, have internal or external compliance assessments performed on a periodic basis relating to the company's policies and procedures. In addition, companies that export to certain countries and regions in which there are complex ownership structures should consider using sophisticated screening software or services to ensure compliance with OFAC's 50 Percent Rule.
FW: With sanctions compliance and enforcement now part of the day-to-day fabric of global trade, what advice would you give to organisations when dealing with third parties and external agents?
Gatti: Screen third parties, external agents and their respective beneficial owners in the same manner as all business partners are screened.
Lee: Third-party diligence is often the weakest part of a compliance programme. The importance of doing appropriate diligence on your partners, agents, customers and counterparties cannot be overstated. It is also important to periodically update that diligence to make sure that you are aware of significant changes.
Goodale: As an initial matter, companies must effectively screen third parties and external agents. For companies subject to US jurisdiction, such screening must not only ensure that third parties are not on any proscribed entities lists, but it also should rule out the possibility that the third parties are owned or controlled 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons in violation of OFAC's 50 Percent Rule. As a best practice, such screening should be performed prior to engaging in each transaction with a third party to ensure that the third party has not been added to any of the proscribed entities lists or become subject to OFAC's 50 Percent Rule since the last screening. Companies also should include compliance clauses in their contracts with third parties that require the third parties to comply with current and future US export control and sanctions regulations.
Matthews: Businesses should think carefully about how their business is protected from the risk of a third party breaching sanctions. What is appropriate will depend on the circumstances. Steps that are likely to be appropriate include a combination of ensuring that the third party has its own sanctions compliance policy, and asking to see it; contractual protections, including to allocate legal responsibility for doing each of the procedural steps required such as screening and obtaining licences, obtaining relevant warranties and undertakings; and active engagement, including from time to time doing the due diligence yourself even if you have allocated responsibility for it to the agent or third party. A common issue is that businesses think about these issues when entering into new relationships, but do not revisit existing arrangements which may have started when sanctions were a less prominent compliance issue.
Brown: I would advise organisations to do their due diligence. When dealing with third parties and external agents, organisations must take the time to find out with whom they are doing, or potentially may do, business. The reputation of an organisation could be adversely affected by transacting with third parties or hiring external agents to act on its behalf. Furthermore, an organisation could be held responsible by sanctions enforcement agencies if it knows or has reason to know that a third party or external agent is engaging in prohibited transactions.
FW: How do you expect the sanctions compliance landscape to develop throughout 2017 and beyond? Will organisations continue to improve their internal monitoring and compliance processes?
Matthews: In the UK, the introduction of OFSI's new monetary penalties power is likely to focus minds. I expect the monetary penalties power to be used relatively soon – OFSI will want to demonstrate that it has teeth – but will likely wait for a relatively clear case of breach. As the Trump administration settles in, we may see changes to various US sanctions regimes in 2017 – he has expressed contrasting views on the current US sanctions arrangements as regards Russia and Iran, although changes to either come with complications, so he may opt to live with the status quo a little longer. In any event, as seen with Iran following the JCPOA, bank caution and an imbalance with EU sanctions may slow any practical impact of any sanctions-easing with regard to Russia. Another issue on the horizon, although probably not for 2017, is Brexit. It is to be expected that the UK and EU will continue to adopt broadly the same measures after Brexit, and to cooperate, but this should not be taken for granted.
Goodale: It seems likely that 2017 will be a momentous year for sanctions compliance. President Trump has indicated that the US may review changes that have been made to US sanctions against Cuba and Iran in recent years, which could result in some or all of the eased sanctions being rescinded. Conversely, President Trump has suggested that the US may re-evaluate and remove some of the Ukraine-related sanctions, although various members of the US Congress have expressed opposition to such actions being taken. Less speculatively, as indicated by the $1.19bn in penalties against ZTE that have recently been announced, the US government has served notice to all that it will continue to enforce US sanctions vigilantly through multi-agency enforcement actions and will impose severe penalties against entities that commit sanctions violations. For all of these reasons, companies will need to monitor sanctions developments closely in 2017.
Lee: One thing is certain, 2017 is going to be a very interesting year for sanctions compliance. We can expect changes due to the new US administration and increasing focus on Iran, Russia and Cuba. Companies are going to continue to be constrained by limited resources. Being 'smart' about the ways to comply with 'smart' sanctions is the best way to survive.
Gatti: The sanctions compliance landscape will continue to evolve during 2017. It is possible that the recent change in US leadership may result in changed US sanctions policy, but that is far from clear at this point. As for organisations continuing to improve their internal monitoring and compliance processes, such improvement is well advised, especially with respect to OFAC sanctions, given that many recent OFAC enforcement actions have cited compliance processes as a mitigating, or sometimes aggravating, factor in penalty assessment.
Brown: I expect the sanctions compliance landscape to become more complex in 2017 and beyond. It seems likely that the JCPOA will survive, at least in the short-term. However, there are a number of bills in the US Congress that would mandate additional sanctions in response to Iran's recent behaviour related to terrorism, ballistic missiles and human rights. There are also bills in Congress that seek to codify existing Russian sanctions and limit the Trump administration's ability to remove them without congressional review and approval. One bill, which appears to have bipartisan support, would mandate additional sanctions against Russia for its interference in the 2016 presidential election in the US. Finally, the Trump administration could target Chinese state-owned enterprises and financial institutions pursuant to existing sanctions in response to North Korea's recent ballistic missile activity. Organisations will have to continue to improve their internal monitoring and compliance processes to navigate this sanctions compliance landscape.
Bittner: With the Trump administration now in charge of US sanctions, it is very difficult to predict what lies ahead in 2017 and beyond. As a candidate, Mr Trump declared that he would tear up the JCPOA with Iran in his first days in office. However, the deal remains in place and it does not seem that the administration has any plans of pulling out unilaterally. It is also impossible to say how the US relationship with Russia will evolve in the coming months and whether the changes will have any impact on the Ukraine and Russian sanctions programme. Companies will have to continue to monitor sanctions developments closely, and they should not assume that the US sanctions laws and regulations will be the same this time next year.
Roger Matthews is a senior lawyer in Dechert's international trade, EU and government relations practice. Mr Matthews advises on all aspects of international trade regulation, focusing particularly on economic sanctions and trade restrictions. He also specialises in EU law and practice, including trade and services regulation and issues relating to Brexit. He advises a range of multinational companies on both ensuring sanctions compliance and strategic and contentious matters. He was previously a sanctions policy officer at the European Commission. He can be contacted on +44 (0)207 184 7418 or by email: email@example.com.
Geoffrey M. Goodale is at partner at FisherBroyles, LLP. Throughout his career, Mr Goodale has assisted US and non-US financial institutions and companies in numerous industries develop and implement cost-effective strategies to accomplish their international business goals. His practice focuses on export controls, economic sanctions, import compliance, trade litigation, intellectual property rights protection, cyber security and foreign direct investment (e.g., CFIUS matters). Currently, he serves as co-chair of the ABA's Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee. He can be contacted on +1 (202) 261 6644 or by email: firstname.lastname@example.com.
Judith Alison Lee is co-chair of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP's International Trade Regulation and Compliance Practice Group and partner in the firm's Washington, DC office. She is also a former co-chair of the IBA's Export Controls, Sanctions and Anti-Corruption Subcommittee. Her expertise includes the USA Patriot Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), economic sanctions and embargoes, export controls and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). She can be contacted on +1 (202) 887 3591 or by email: firstname.lastname@example.com.
Kimberly N. Brown is responsible for reviewing potential engagements to ensure that IBM's business units comply with economic sanctions and export control laws and regulations in the delivery of services to internal and external clients. Prior to joining IBM, Ms Brown worked as both a senior enforcement officer and policy analyst with the US Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control. She can be contacted on +1 (202) 551 9523 or by email: firstname.lastname@example.com.
Margaret M. Gatti represents US and non-US companies, universities and financial institutions in matters involving economic sanctions and export controls. In representing clients, she conducts merger and acquisition due diligence, provides compliance counselling and training, drafts compliance procedures, performs compliance audits and drafts voluntary disclosures for submission to US government enforcement agencies. Before joining Morgan Lewis, Ms Gatti was a partner in the corporate practice of a national law firm. She can be contacted on +1 (202) 739 5409 or by email: email@example.com.
Bryce Bittner is the director of global trade compliance at Textron Inc., where he oversees compliance with the export control, sanctions and customs laws for Textron's family of companies, including Arctic Cat, ATAC, Bell Helicopter, Kautex, Jacobsen, Textron AirLand, Textron Aviation, Textron Financial, Textron Specialized Vehicles, Textron Systems, Textron Tools & Test and TRU Simulation & Training. Prior to joining Textron, Mr Bittner worked for Honeywell Aerospace and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. He can be contacted on +1 (202) 637 3815 or by email: email@example.com.
© Financier Worldwide
Dechert LLP
FisherBroyles, LLP
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP


text:
My Web'Art also povides extra services to its users, upon request:
1. PERSONAL ARTWORK ORDERS My Web'Art offers the opportunity to Art Buyers upon request to have an artwork just realized for them by an Artist who is already registered on My Web'Art.
2. INVITATION TO HAPPENING EVENTS My Web'Art offers the possibility to invite an Artist for an event. The Artist invited will realize a work of art during the event. The artwork realized will then be sold during the event or on the platform My Web'Art.
3. PRIVATE VIEWING OPPORTUNITIES Private viewing services are available to members of My Web'Art. My Web'Art works in collaboration with partners renowned for the quality of their services to provide private viewings services around the world (New-York, Paris, London, Hong Kong, etc).
4. VALUATIONS SERVICES Valuations services are only available to members of My Web'Art. Works of art have to comply with our selection criteria. Valuations are organized upon request.
5. STORAGE SERVICES My Web'Art proposes secure storage services while guaranteeing the best conservation systems and conditions such as climate-controlled, air-filtered private safe rooms and racked or archived storage.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Need some opinions
Hi am new here I am not sure if I have diabetes and going to go in for my testing on Friday to get to the bottom of my symptoms which I would like some more opinions from many that knows a lot about diabetes…
I am have been experiencing frequent urinations for over a year now and it is the worst at night, I could get up every 5-15 minutes to go which also gives me difficulty sleeping thru out the night. I have also been so hungry where my stomach keeps growling and will not stop until I eat something, I dont know if I should mention how many calories I eat a day but lets just say that I have kids and I eat more now than when I did when I was pregnant. I am not obese.
Lately I have been experiencing extreme thirst where I know for a fact I am not dehydrated as it would be impossible for the amount of water I drink sometimes even with some salt so I can cool down my frequent urination but that doesnt help either, but sometimes I am so thirsty I feel like I could pass out if I dont drink anything… My fault for not going in sooner with my irregular every 15 minutes bathroom break, but I am getting tired of going in to get checked and they only want to check for bladder infection which always turn out negative and getting the answer I am not looking for… Now it seems to be getting worse for me and when I google my common problems the symtoms come up as diabetes which wouldnt shock me if I do have it (my testing will be on Friday) as I have it on both sides of the family. What would throw me off is that I am active so this is what confuses me is I thought the more exercise you do the less you would have to worry about diabetes!?!
I thought that even though I am not sure if I do for sure have diabetes that it would be nice to know more about it since it runs on both sides of my family.
18 replies
Well no worries first. You are in the right place by what you have said thus far. It does sound like me. I was working out losing the weight and thirsty all the time. Hungry as a bear like you. Then found out I was diabetic. Ugh! Not what I wanted to hear let alone be happy with. So once you do find out let us know. We can help as well as your doctor(s). Just a few changes and watch what you do i.e. what you eat how much and etc. Just look at Halle Berry the actress. So beautiful and healthy looking but she has diabetes as well. So get back to us once you do find out whatever. Hugs
Oh wow that is very interesting I had no idea she had it either. I will for sure post my results hopefully will know by Friday!!!!
I got horribly thirsty right before my diagnoses. I drank non stop.
The bathroom goes with your drinking. You really need to go to a Doctor and test. I am glad you are going Friday! We are certainly here for you.
Thank you very much, I will post my results.
sounds like you may have it. What type runs in your family? There are dif, test one where they have you drink a Glucose solution they draw befor during and after at least twice to see how the gluecose reacts. u have to have it in your system for certain periods of time so it takes a few hours. A A1c is just a draw. and there are others. Will be thinking of you pray they find out soon so you get on your way to better health. Blessings to you and yours.
Both type 1 and 2, type 1 is on my mom side and type 2 is on my dad side. I am crossing my fingers but what I have going on is for sure not normal. I will let everyone know my results, I hope by Friday.
It sounds like you do. I did not have all those particular symptoms, my thing was I got up every night, (but had been doing that for yrs before diagnosis) once or twice to pee but I did not notice that as being unusual, I drink water off and on throughout the day. My thing was light headedness and sometimes getting a little dizzy. one time just before the test, (thinking I had it but not knowing for sure) I felt like I was going to faint. Scared me to death. I was not obese either, you don't even have to be much overweight to have type2. You could hve type1, I don't see your age…I was only 30 lbs. overweight, I had skinny arms and legs, and just a thicker waist, most excess weight in my midsection. lost it all. I was determined, it just scared me into losing and keeping it off. Good luck to you, and I hope it is not full blown , maybe pre-diabetic, you can head off diabetes with proper diet and exercise, or at least, put it off for many years. Hoping the best for you. I know how you feel, having to wait and see.
I am hoping to get the answer by Friday, I am not sure how long the test takes but I know I will be very anxious to know that day.
If it is not diabetes then I will be seeing a urologist to find out what it possibly could be… My mom was thinking maybe tumor, but, like she says that wouldnt really explain my excessive thirst and hunger eiither.
mishellasangel, i can imagine how worrysome this is to you ! Until your tests are done try to distract yourself with something that you love. You only have a few more days until you find out what the exact problem is. Just keep on drinkin,peein,and try to avoid sugar like the plague. At least if it is diabetes it can be controlled.
Very true. So far days are going fast for me which is a good thing, the slower the days go the more anxious I get, but so far feeling calm, I am sure Thursday night I will be nervous but I will just have to read myself to sleep for distraction. Good thing my appointment is in the morning :)
I had the same symptoms you had could not satisfy my thirst and then have frequent urination also. Diabetes runs on both sides of my family as luck would have it I also got it. I worked over 50 years of my life the last 35 years at Chrysler then I retired at the end of March, and in a few short months June 24 I was taken to a hospital and landed in ICU for a week with a BG reading of 724. So things are much better now I have it under control. Almost forgot welcome to DC family.
Oh wow!!! That is what exactly I am afraid of if I do not play it safe by getting to the bottom of my symptoms.
Diabetes has been stuck in the back of my mind all year, but I keep telling my self it is impossible so I kept ignoring the symptoms thinking it will get better but with me eating the way I do, still feeling hungry, and drinking water the way I am and still thirsty is for sure not normal for me.
Thank you so much for the warm welcome here, I really appreciate it :)
Do you have any diabetic friends with meters who could help you test your blood sugar (BG) after meals? Depending on your reading, this could help you and your doctor determine whether diabetes is what ails you. I weighed 120 lbs when I developed my type 1 at age 27. I had the frequent urination problems and dropped 10 pounds in two weeks. You feel hungry all the time because your body can't metabolize the food you eat for energy. If access to a BG meter is not possible, you can purchase urine test strips OTC at a pharmacy which will test for ketones which appear in your urine when you have high blood sugars over an extended period of time. Hoping you find out what the problem is so you can begin to deal with it. Sending you hugs and good wishes!
They live far from me so I think I will try the other option you mention to purchase the urine test strips and see what that says.
Thanks so much for your response!!!
Also thanks so much for the support, I am very glad I found this website!!!
Exercise is great for you, diabetic or not, but you can be healthy and active and still develop diabetes—it's just less likely. It sounds like you've got some serious symptoms, (though I'm NOT qualified to diagnose) and I know Friday must seem a long time away for you. It's hard when you don't really have instructions or the information you need. My suggestion, if they haven't given you any specific instructions, is to limit your intake of any sugary drinks (colas, tea, Kool-aid, Gatorade and such). It really sounds like you're drinking mostly water anyway, which is a good thing. Other than that, just eat sensibly until you know for sure. You don't want to go off on a protein kick and then find out you have any other issues. If you are diagnosed with diabetes, and you can find a CDE (certified diabetes educator), that is a great next step. They can explain about carbs (good and bad) and worlds of other things. There are a lot of people here who are kind and welcoming, and they'll offer lots of advice. I know it will seem overwhelming. I hope that the diagnosis is something other than diabetes for you, but whether it is or not, welcome to DC.
Thank you so much for the response. Information from real people is what I need and I am hoping I dont have diabetes, but will have to live with it if it does come true. I think it is more than likely in my best interest to get to know diabetes more since it runs on both sides.
I know what is going on with me is not normal and in my past with seeing 12 different doctors I notice they will not listen to me, instead they always write out a prescription for depression. But I have always asked how is it possible to be depressed when I am happy and I love my life? One responded that I dont have to feel down to be depressed it is the symptoms I am coming in for is the reason why they suspected it… So after being told this I stopped going in to the doctor. But things are going to change here on Friday, I am demanding what I want done this time. I hope they will listen to me this time…
Next Discussion: Eating Fast »


text:
Maria Casino Welcome Bonus
Maria Welcome Bonus
- No deposit Bonus: -
- First deposit bonus 200% bonus up to £20 + 40 casino spins
- New customers only. £10 min dep. bonus 200%. Bonus Wager, 35x in 7 days. Casino Spins credited on Starburst in batches of 10/day over the next 4 working days and carry a 15x wagering requirement.
- T&C's Apply +18
- Maria Bonus T&C's Apply
|Site Name:
|Casino Software:
|Microgaming, NetEnt, IGT (WagerWorks), Jadestone, Relax Gaming, Evolution Gaming, GTS, Nyx Interactive, Play'n GO
|Customer Support:
|Phone: 08081686638 | Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
|Bonus Info:
|200% up to £2040 spinsT&C's Apply +18
|Bonus Code:
|No bonus code needed
|Payout Percentage:
|Minimum Deposit:
|English, UK, Norwegian, Finnish, Danish, Estonian
|Deposit Options:
|Bank Transfer, Neteller, Skrill, Visa, Visa Debit, Visa Electron ClickandBuy, Mastercard
|Visit Casino, click here
Maria Casino, part of the Unibet group, has been up and running since 2010 and evolved from the very popular Maria Bingo. The website looks fresh and feels very smooth and crisp to use with nice big buttons, plenty of information but without creating the feeling of clutter.
The games are provided by NetEnt and because of this, they are flash games that do not require any additional downloads, you just play the game straight in your browser.
Whilst Maria Casino is a sold casino platform, and worth a whirl just based on that alone, what probably sets Maria Casino apart from the rest of the industry is the Maria community. The Maria Community is a fresh idea whereby everyone who is a member of the casino becomes a part of a community where members can write blogs, share posts and news and generally discuss issues, both about the casino and gambling itself but also about real world issues such as recipes or how to get out stubborn stains. Its an interesting take on the online casino but definitely a step in the right direction if the many active members of the Maria Community are anything to go by.
Maria Casino can accommodate a vast array of players from all over Europe thanks to a large selection of available languages. You can choose from English, Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian and Polish. Essentially, if you like gambling and you speak a European language, Maria Casino is a good place to start.
Maria Casino Spins
If you check your country section here at Free-Spins.org you might be lucky enough to claim even better Maria casino spins offer. Both no deposit casino spins upon sign-up and if you make a first deposit.
Maria Casino Deposit bonus
To make up for the distinctly unimpressive casino spins promotion Maria Casino have really pulled their fingers out with the bonus promotions, as well as a few peripheral promotions. Every time you make a deposit to you Maria Casino account they will give you a percentage bonus, up to a maximum limit. That's every single time! On top of this, every time you place a bet on Maria Casino you will receive player points. You can rack these up pretty quickly and they relate directly to cash. The more points you get, the more cashback you can earn.
It is also worthwhile you keeping an eye on the promotions page of the website as well because new promotions are added to their all the time. These are normally specific to a game or a group of games and don't necessarily require you to do anything, sometimes it's just a prize amount that they hand out for being a loyal customer, a Maria Community member.
Maria Mobile Casino
Maria Casino does have an excellent mobile accompaniment to its casino and the design and functionality of the mobile version is just as good as the browser version, no easy feat. As well as being simple to use, the mobile version is also lucrative as using it at the weekend awards you double player points, allowing you to earn cashback even faster.
Maria Casino Games
The games at Maria Casino are well designed and are run straight from your browser with no additional downloads, just as you would expect from a casino operating NetEnt games. Maria Casino doesn't have the largest selection of games in the world, only just over 100 games, but they do cover a wide range of different types and only the best games make the cut. You can choose from video slots, classic slots, jackpot games, table games and video poker, as well as many more.
The jackpots aren't crazy but they are pretty generous and the winning percentages are high, so you shouldn't be going too long without a decent sized win.
The support at Maria Casino, as you would expect given the community nature of the casino, is excellent. There is a live chat function that provides quick answers between the hours of 10 am and 10 pm and an email system that replies within an hour, very quick. The opening hours of the customer service would be an issue on other casinos but thanks to the Maria Community, you can pick the brains of a wealth of gamers and usually find a good, hands on solution to any queries without even going through the customer support channels.
Deposit and withdrawal methods
As you would expect, you can make deposits in a vast range of ways, including but not limited to; major credit and debit cards, iDeal, Neteller and Ewire. You can also withdraw you balance in the same ways but it does take longer to receive you money than pay it, typical. If you do it via Neteller for example it will take about 48 hours but more like a week through bank transfer.


text:
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Result for VTU 5th sem
Posted by Ashutosh Jha at 12:50 AM
Ashutosh Jha is Founder and Author of www.citystudentsgroup.com, He is a blogger, an Electronics engineer and technology lover. He has designed this website to help the students of different fields like Engineering and PSUs, you can connect with him on facebook and if you have any query related to this website then email us.
1 comment:
- AnonymousAugust 12, 2011 at 6:05 PM
authors for 5th sem EC ...plssss...!ReplyDelete
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)


text:
Two weeks ago, we provided some suggestions for the Blue Jays batting order.
Within that posting were suggestions to Josh Donaldson and Russell Martin to respectively not always swing for the fences and to hit to right field (or to the opposite field).
Since that posting, the Blue Jays bats have come alive. A lot more players are beginning to go with the pitch and instead of trying to pull the ball with every swing, they are hitting the ball to the opposite field…and with some power!
Donaldson smashed a couple of homers to right field shortly after our posting.
Meanwhile Martin has been hammering the ball into the opposite field alley.
Even Go-go smashed a homer over the left field fence.
And what about Pillar and Barney? A number of great hits into right field helped to sweep the Yankees last week.
Whether this blog had a positive impact on the team or whether it was purely a matter of time before the Blue Jays began producing runs like last year, we are extremely pleased that the Blue Jays have recently taken flight winning four series in a row.
They are three games above .500 as of June 3rd, 3.5 out of first and 2.5 out of a Wild Card play-off spot.
We hope that they continue their winning ways!
In the meantime, we will continue to provide our tips (when necessary) to help the team secure a play-off spot.


text:
Mobile Protection
Peace of mind, and a whole lot more.
Save money
Avoid paying full retail cost for a replacement phone if the unexpected occurs. This is especially valuable if you are leasing or paying off your smartphone.
Next-day replacement
Receive a replacement phone in as little as 24 hours. Rest assured, whether an Apple iPhone, Galaxy Note, Motorola Droid or more, we have you covered. Better yet, our replacement phones are backed by a one-year warranty.
Comprehensive coverage
We provide coverage for loss, theft, damage, liquid damage and defects after the manufacturer's warranty ends. We'll also cover the accessories that come with your device, including a standard battery, car charger, home charger, earbuds and more.
Easy claims
File a claim online 24/7 in less than 10 minutes. You can also track and monitor your phone insurance claim.
Asurion mobile phone protection apps also provide:
Track a lost phone via GPS or alarm with device recovery features
Back up contacts, photos, and videos over the carrier network or Wi-Fi
Protect your cell phone and personal data from viruses and other malicious software
Available with leading mobile carriers and providers.
Looking for the peace of mind that comes with staying connected to your life even when something happens to your phone? Our cell phone insurance plans are available at many carriers and retailers, including those below:
Already have mobile phone protection through your carrier?
Download the mobile app to unlock awesome features.
Note: Features vary by carrier and program. Check your terms and conditions for full coverage details.


text:
Download the authoritative guide: Cloud Computing 2019: Using the Cloud for Competitive Advantage
The Internet Security Systems' X-Force unit has sounded an alarm for an increase in hacker activity between July 6-7 to coincide with a contest encouraging defacements of Web sites around the world.
ISS raised its current threat level to 'AlertCon 2' to coincide with the site defacement competition, which awards prizes to intruders who successfully compromise an organization's Web server and deface its Web pages.
Analysts monitoring the so-called hacking challenge warned that it could disrupt normal Internet activity and cause mass defacements and shutdown of affected Web pages.
The competition in question appears to be targeting HP-UX, Apple and IBM-AIX systems, which have limited exposure as Web-hosting platforms.
The New York State Office of Cyber Security and Critical Infrastructure Coordination (CSCIC) also issued an advisory in anticipation of the attacks and recommended that certain preventative measures are taken to protect vulnerable systems.
The CSCIC recommendations include:
Submit a Comment


text:
Gilette Venus Razor with Olay
My favourite thing about this razor is the shower holder! I often worry about the children getting their hands on my razor and hurting themselves, a razor like this is perfect for a Mummy on the go like myself! It shaves really well and the Olay moisture bars means i don't have to bother applying any lotion to my legs after my shower, saving me a lot of time! Perfect!
Available from Boots priced £7.33
Gilette Venus Snap Razor
Designed specially for a "mum on the go", Venus snap is a portable razor which features venus' most advanced 5 in 1 razor blade all on a mini handle. Conveniently tucks away into any bag for the freedom to be spontaneous with silky smooth skin anytime!!
Available at Boots priced £5.00
Tasty Little Numbers Gluten Free Biscuit Bars
These yummy Chocolate coated Gluten free biscuit bars are available in dark, white or milk Chocolate. I don't get much opportunity to try Gluten free food as I have no reason to so I was delighted to try these Chocolate biscuits out for myself.
They are incredibly delicious and if it wasn't for the information on the package I would have no idea they were Gluten free as they taste just like any Chocolate biscuit bar! and best of all they are only 100 calories per bar!!
Perfect for any mum this Mothers day!
Available from www.tastylittlenumbers.com - prices may vary
Alphabook by IF Notebooks
All mums need a notebook of some kind to jot down any important info or phone numbers. This mothers day treat her to a quirky new or vintage chic letter shaped notebook spelling out her name or initial. Not only is it a useful gift but also looks great on show!
Available from all good gift and bookshops including NotOnTheHighstreet and LiteraryGiftCaompany Priced £12.99 each
Braun Face and Skin Spa
I was recently given a chance to sample some absolutley amazing Braun products. I am not one to go out and buy these kinds of products, mostly because i don't get much time and don't usually have any spare money!!
After using Braun face and the skin spa i really do think that all Mothers should have one, most mothers deserve to have at least one of these!
Braun Face (from £69.00)
Delivers the ultimate pampering experience from the comfort of your own home with the worlds first 2 in 1 facial device. The cleansing head tool works 6 times better than manual cleansing and the epilator removes hair 200x faster than manual tweezing to reveal revitalized, fresh gorgeous looking skin.
Braun silk-epil 7 SkinSpa (£169.99)
Features the most efficient wet and dry epilator designed to remove hair as short as a grain of sand! The skinspa features a pivoting head which follows the female contours for a closer, smoother and more efficient epilation experience and the unique exfoliation brush gives you results comparable to a professional peeling. With thousands of micro vibrations it sweeps away unwanted dead skin cells to restore natural skin beauty.
First Class Teddy from Me to You
This adorable Tatty Teddy holding a stamp featuring the words '1st Class Mummy' is sure to put a smile on your mum's face this Mother's Day.
Priced £10.00 Available from Clintons.


text:
David Sheff, best-selling author of the memoir "Beautiful Child" and "Clean" is in town to discuss addiction prevention and treatment. You can catch him on Monday night at a book signing and discussion in West Hollywood and/or Tuesday night in Westwood on a panel with the Director of UCLA's Addiction Medicine Clinic.
On Monday evening in LA, please join David Sheff for a conversation about addiction, America's greatest tragedy, at Book Soup, the awesome bookstore in West Hollywood. 7 PM. — at Book Soup. 8818 Sunset Blvd.
Dr. Timothy Feng and author David Sheff will be in conversation Tuesday evening, 7 PM, at UCLA, presented by the Friends of the Semel Institute. Please join us. They'll be talking about preventing and treating addiction, America's greatest tragedy. RSVP @ http://www.friendsofnpi.org in order to get free tickets.
David Sheff is a professional writer whose research and reporting on the science of addiction has placed him on Time Magazine's list of the world's most influential people. His writing is NOT clumsy (like mine) and no doubt hearing him speak will clear up any questions or problems you might have with the concept of addicts losing free will and the ability to make good choices in the moment.
I've never read him, but I just got a copy of "Clean" and the bibliography has 331 research citations!! For a research nerd like myself, this is as good as it gets. For those of you who don't have the time or inclination to digest 335 pages, plus 43 pages of appendix, bibliography and index, I'll be taking notes and boiling it all down as best as I can in future blog posts.
However, if you're in or near Los Angeles, there's no need to wait for me to do my homework. Go hear David Sheff for yourself!
FYI: Sheff has a Facebook page where you can find information about speaking engagements in other parts of the country.
3 thoughts on "Hey, L.A.! If you loved or hated my blog post on Philip Seymour Hoffman, go hear this guy!"
I got tears in my eyes just reading this post about David Sheff. I read both of the books you mention (not sure if he has written more) many years ago when my healing was an open wound. His stories put me right in the thick of the chaos, and eventually healing. And shows that addiction knows no boundaries. Too bad he is not coming to NY, would love to see him speak. Thank you for your post.


text:
San Diego Beach Wedding Ceremonies
Your "Something Blue" is Mission Bay
on Your Wedding Day
Our beachfront resort is the perfect setting for the most special moment in your life. Say "I do" in front of family and friends with your feet in the sand, on one of our beautiful lawns adjacent to the beach, or in our intimate gazebo surrounded by lush and colorful gardens.
All 4 of our wedding ceremony locations provide the tropical feel you're looking for and are sure to help elicit no shortage of tears of joy as you walk down the aisle.


text:
| The Baltimore Checkerspot is a
medium sized butterfly with dazzling coloration. Named after the early
American colonist George Calvert, the first Lord Baltimore (whose crest
was orange and black), the Baltimore Checkerspot is mainly black with
orange and white spots. Its underwings are also orange, black, and white;
with these three colors arranges in a checkered-like pattern.
The Baltimore's flight is slow and generally just above the vegetation. Like numerous other butterflies, Baltimores are poisonous to birds and they advertise their distastefulness by spreading their wings while feeding. Because they have little fear of being eaten by predators, they can often be approached closely while feeding on flower nectar.
Baltimores are found in the north central and north eastern regions of the United States. They generally fly from around mid June through late July. Baltimores are spotty in appearance due to the spotty occurrence of Turtlehead (Chelone), the Baltimore's host plant.
The Baltimore's life span is rather interesting. The female lays clusters of eggs (often several hundred eggs) in late July or early August. The eggs are always (as far as I know) laid on the undersides of Turtlehead leaves.
After hatching the tiny caterpillars crawl to the top of the turtlehead and spin a communal web around the leaves they will eat. They feed as a group, overwinter as half-grown caterpillars, and then complete their life cycle the next spring.
Being one of my favorite butterflies, I tracked the life cycle of Baltimores during the 1998-1999 season. Here is the information I compiled:
25, 1998:
At 1:30 p.m. I spotted a Baltimore Checkerspot butterfly laying eggs on the Turtlehead (Chelone lyonii) growing in our butterfly garden.
An hour later, the Baltimore was gone but she left behind a mass of yellow eggs, approximately 150 of them. Her egg cluster is triangular in shape and only about 1/2" across. Eggs are stacked on top of eggs near the center of the egg mass.
|June 29: The eggs have turned a reddish-brown color.
|July 17: The eggs have hatched. A tiny nest is being formed at the top of the Turtlehead plant.
|July 28: There are a few caterpillars on the outside of the nest. Through the nest, I can see many more. They are about 1/4" long now.
28, 1998:
The Baltimore nest has dramatically increased in size. The caterpillars have periodically enlarged their nest to encompass more Turtlehead leaves. The caterpillars are about 1/2" long now. On this warm, sunny day, many of them are crawling on the outside of the nest.
|September 28: The caterpillars are about 3/4" long. They still crawl around on the outside of the nest on warm days. Their nest has enlarged since last month, now being about 8" high and 8" wide.
|The winter of 1998-1999 comes and goes. The Baltimore Checkerspot caterpillars are probably hibernating just below the surface of the soil.
15, 1999:
I counted over 40 Baltimore caterpillars in the butterfly garden this afternoon. Some of them were feeding on Turtlehead but most were eating Beard Tongue (Penstemon) foliage. I saw an equal amount of caterpillars on Penstemon digitalis 'Husker Red' and Penstemon barbatus 'Prairie Dusk'. Most of the caterpillars are about 1" long.
Some years, the Baltimore caterpillars come out of hibernation before the Turtlehead begins to grow. At these times, I'm glad I have Beard Tongue in the garden too.
|June 1, 1999: The caterpillars are about 1-1/4" long. They seem to be decreasing in number every day, probably leaving their host plants in search of a safe place for pupating.
|Inside a butterfly pupa (chrysalis), remarkable changes occur as a caterpillar becomes a butterfly. A crawling insect transforms into a flying insect, one of the most beautiful flying insects of all. Its mouth parts change dramatically: a caterpillar chews foliage while a butterfly sips nectar with a straw like tongue (called a proboscis). Inside its pupa, it generally takes less than three weeks for the Baltimore caterpillar to become a butterfly.
18, 1999:
I saw two Baltimore Checkerspot butterflies in the butterfly garden this afternoon. Very bright in color, they must have just emerged from their chrysalides. As adult butterflies, Baltimores live for just a few weeks. In this short period of time, the adults will mate and then the females will lay eggs to begin the life cycle of the next generation.
Back to the Butterfly Host Plants page.
Back to the Articles on Butterfly Gardening page.


text:
Support Drogmi Buddhist Institute - Donations
You can support Drogmi Buddhist Institute and Khenpo Ngawang Dhamchoe's work in spreading the precious Dharma by sponsoring Khenpo-la and/or Lama Kalsang.
To set up a recurring sponsorship payment, please fill in the form below.
About sponsorship payments
Sponsorship payments are made periodically, depending on the frequency you nominate. Weekly payments are made on the same day every week following your first payment. Monthly payments are made approximately every 30 days from your initial payment. Yearly payments are made on the same day every year after your initial payment.
Sponsorship payments are made using PayPal and continue for a set duration or until you cancel your arrangement. The default duration of sponsorship payments is: weekly for 1 year; monthly for 2 years; yearly for 5 years. After this duration expires, you can set up a new sponsorship arrangement.
You will need a PayPal Personal Account - through this account, you can cancel your sponsorship payment at any time. You can also cancel your sponsorship by contacting us, or clicking the link below. To modify an existing sponsorship payment, please cancel the existing payment and create a new one with the revised details.
[Cancel your sponsorship payment...]
Set up your recurring sponsorship payment
|Sponsorship options
|How would you like your donation to be used (optional)?
|Can we list your name as a Drogmi sponsor?
Yes, you may show my name on the website
No, please keep me anonymous
One-off donation
To make a one-off donation, please click on the button below.
|Donate to Drogmi Buddhist Institute
Pay Now
|Merchant Policies
* Visa and MasterCard payments accepted for Australian payments. PayPal may accept other credit cards for bookings from other countries.
** Bank transfers may require a PayPal Personal Account.
About PayPal
PayPal is an easy, secure and free way to transfer money on the internet. You will be prompted for your details to complete your payment. You can choose to make a one-off payment using your credit card, or you can set up a PayPal Personal Account to pay by credit card or bank transfer. Transaction limits
To protect your security and the integrity of PayPal's payments network, the maximum amount allowed for any single transaction is US$10,000 for a PayPal account holder. If you do not have a PayPal account, you may send a maximum of US$4,000 for a single transaction. If the amount of your payment is greater than US$4,000, you will need to sign up for a PayPal account to complete your payment. PayPal Personal Accounts
A PayPal Personal Account allows you to pay by credit card or bank transfer. It handles your payment and enables you to make future payments or purchases from any website using PayPal, without entering your details each time.
Please ensure there are sufficient funds in your bank/credit card account for any payments. If a payment fails, PayPal will notify you and will reattempt payment. Neither Drogmi Buddhist Institute nor PayPal will refund insufficient fund fees charged by your financial institution.


text:
Submitted by CdMScott on
I do SO love a good dystopian future movie. Perhaps it's my natural pessimism, or feeling about how messed up the world is, and I like to see those the long-range results of current trends imagined in the future. And this movie has a particularly vivid and vision of a dystopian future, very tied into the current state of the world.
It's the London of 2027. People stopped being able to reproduce 18 years prior. The rest of the world, we are told, has absolutely collapsed, Britain being the only place left with any sort of functioning society. London is far from ideal, however, dirty and crumbling and garbage-strewn, with signs all over the place telling people to turn in immigrants. All immigrants are now illegal, and are shuttled off to camps where… we don't really know what becomes of them. The government gives out a free suicide pill called "Quietus," which is portrayed in an oft-running pharmaceutical-type ad that says "You decide when." And when the government is telling you that if you killed yourself, well, we'd appreciate it, things are pretty bad.
We open on the day that the youngest living person has died—killed by someone trying to get his autograph or something. Clive Owen as Theo visits hippie-type Michael Caine as Jasper for some character establishing, and the next day is kidnapped by this anti-government group, where he meets his ex-wife, Julian, played by Julianne Moore. She asks him to escort this woman to meet the Human Project, who are doing something… in favor of humans, apparently. We never find out exactly what. If you've seen the trailer you know that by some [also unexplained] circumstance this woman is pregnant and Julian asks Theo to escort her to meet the human project. The woman is named Kee. Kee, get it? Key? Kee? Get it?
And that's really about all I can tell you about the plot, because shockers come fast and come early. There are some real surprises, which keeps the viewer off-kilter and out of the 'safe' zone, and more able to absorb the disorienting changes of the future world conceived here. The ads for this movie have a quote saying it's "the Blade Runner of the 21st century," which is true insofar as that the environment this movie creates is at least equally important as its story. Its view of dwindling resources, collapsing infrastructure, everything falling apart due to having no money to repair it, increasing societal distrust focusing on a scapegoated population—immigrants, signs everywhere telling you to be suspicious, a conspicuous military providing for everyone's 'safety,' and large-scale social loss of hope or will for living all seem grown organically from today's world. Interestingly, this vision of a future world is quite similar to that of the dumped-to-video comedy, Idioocracy, in which everything has fallen apart because there's simply no money to make repairs, and people are too stupid and self-centered to make them anyway.
The other thing one may or may not notice is the technique. There are a LARGE amount of long tracking shots that are used non-ostentatiously and work to keep the action involving and immediate. One of them, including walks up and down to different floors of a building as it is being shot at and blown apart are flat-out amazing. Maybe there's some digital trickery making it less of an achievement as it appears to be, but it achieves its purpose, which is enough. I also really liked the seamless, non-ostentatious, and fully integrated nature of the special effects. They aren't flashy and they aren't showcased for maximum effect, which makes them seem more realistic and gives them more impact.
Finally, the last thing I liked is the open-ended nature of the story. We never find out what the Human Project, the destination for Clive and his charge, is. Are they good, or are they going to turn out to be bad? WHAT are they going to do with her, anyway? How do we know we can trust the people we trust? But all of this helps to emphasize the major theme of the film—the people of this future continuing to hope—and how, in this story at least, they have to continue to hope blindly, because they have no other option.
One last note: While the story of this movie didn't stay with me very long, it's vision of the future society was so vivid and plausible, it has pretty much become my standard when I think of how things will be in a few decades. I think often of this movie when reading the paper or just think about where the world is headed.
Yes, it's very good and well made, with a disturbingly plausible view of an unpleasant future.


text:
Before it was your friendly neighborhood park, the High Line was a spooky and sometimes dangerous no-man's land where trains ruled the tracks. Find out the truth behind the legends, at Friends of the High Line's annual family-friendly Halloween celebration. Caped and costumed kid explorers will trick-or-treat with characters like the Mad Cookie Man and the West Side Cowboy, make giant art creations, explore a haunted train tunnel, and discover how brave children helped make the High Line happen.
Free. From 11 a.m.–3 p.m. on Sat., Oct. 25. On the High Line (W. 14th St. to W. 17th St.). For info, visit thehighline.org. Follow the High Line on Facebook or @highlinenyc on Twitter for updates about these events.
It used to be unsightly and unsettling, but now it's lush and tranquil — and for an afternoon, it just might be a little scary. Celebrate the newly beautified Jackson Square Park at this Halloween party sponsored by the Jackson Square Alliance (who, along with students from Notre Dame School, are committed to Park maintenance and upkeep). Treats for the little ones and coffee for the big kids will be provided, as well as prizes for the 3 p.m. Pumpkin Decorating Contest and the 5 p.m. Costume Parade. Everyone is invited, even your dog (who'll go home with a snapshot, courtesy of the 4 p.m. Biscuits & Bath Canine photo shoot).
Free. From 3–6:30 p.m. on Wed., Oct. 29. At Jackson Square Park (Horatio St. & Eighth Ave.). For info, visit jacksonsquarealliance.org.
What a difference a day makes. Smash a pumpkin on Halloween night, and you're a mischievous punk — but do it on November 1, and you're an upstanding, green-minded member of the community. Give your favorite October gourd a second life, at Chelsea's annual Jack-O'-Lantern Composting event. Members of the 300 W. 23rd, 22nd & 21st Sts. Block Association, Citizen Grower and the NYC Compost Project will be on hand to supervise the purpose-driven destruction of pumpkins, then provide compost education and outreach (and free snacks!).
Free. From 10 a.m.–2 p.m. on Sat., Nov. 1, at Clement Clarke Moore Park (22nd St. & 10th Ave.). For more info, send and email to [email protected] Also visit citizengrower.com, nyc.gov/compostproject.
The Penn South Toddler Committee's annual Halloween Party takes place on Sat., Nov. 1 from 3–5:30 p.m. in Pinwheel Park (btw. 24th & 25th Sts. and Eighth & Ninth Aves.).
Free. This event is open to the general public. For more info, send an email to [email protected]


text:
Gizmodo has an Exclusive Microsoft Zune Picture, but it's not that interesting other than being a black and white photo:
The reason the shot is in black and white is because Microsoft assigned a unique color scheme to every Zune prototype in existence right now—all 150 of them—so any leaks could be traced to the employee who leaked it.
Of more interest is Gizmodo's Exclusive Microsoft Zune Details among which are:
First off, that scroll wheel you see? That's not a wheel. It's just four buttons arranged in a wheel formation. That kinda sucks if you're used to the scroll wheel, but it seems their engineers weren't too fond of it, or Microsoft didn't want to be accused of copying the iPod's wheel. Either way, it's just four buttons.
The UI itself has white text on colored backgrounds, with lots of textures. This could even be skinnable. While the song is playing, it will display album art or a Windows Media Player-like visualization.
FM support is fairly complete, with both an FM tuner and an FM transmitter so you can beam the music to your car. The FM transmitter also feeds up Song and Artist information so you can see what's playing from your car stereo (if it supports that feature, like in GM cars).
More by following the link, but the Wi-Fi features weren't enabled yet.
Finally, following up on the Zune video preload story from yesterday, EMI formally announced that they were providing preload content:
EMI Group, the world's third-largest music company said on Thursday it has signed a deal to provide preloaded music videos for Microsoft's soon-to-launch Zune player.
The London-based company said the deal would see artists including 30 Seconds To Mars and Hot Chip featured on the player when it goes to market later this year.
(A hat tip to Zune News Site for the above links).


text:
St. Louis GM, "Tkachuk's a fatty!"
Everyone knows that Keith Tkachuk was suspended by the Blues last week, but J.K. Sockey has obtained strong evidence that the former All-Star did in fact report to camp a hair over his normal playing weight, listed as 231 pounds in the Blues' 2003-04 media guide.
Blues officials declined to say whether Tkachuk -- the highest-paid player on the Blues this season at $7.6 million (US) - would be paid during his suspension, but said Saturday that the 33 year-old winger will not rejoin the team until he passes his physical, which means until he drops an unspecified amount of weight (approximately 80lbs. based on the documents obtained exclusively by J.K. Sockey).
The NHLPA has filed a grievance on behalf Tkachuk, who was refused to comment saying only, "C'mon, stop calling. I'm trying to eat dinner."
Keith Tkachuk (r) posed for this picture shortly after arriving at Blues training camp.
Check back for JK's MaleBag™ coming next week...
E-mail your questions, thoughts, and comments to firstname.lastname@example.com