text:
In the white glare of a hot summer's noon, the broad avenues of Islamabad, Pakistan's modern capital, are usually empty. But on a sweltering day this May the streets were crowded with noisily chanting protesters, all of them demonstrating against the military government of President Pervez Musharraf. Three separate protests were under way. Each one represented a slightly different vision of the future that Pakistan might have if—as now seems more likely than ever—Musharraf's government were to fall.
The largest crowd by far was made up of lawyers in starched collars, white shirts, and black suits. They marched in orderly ranks, three abreast, like emperor penguins in a nature film. Some held up very British-looking umbrellas, on which markedly un-catchy slogans, such as "Long Live Lawyers Unity," had been carefully daubed in white paint. In earlier demonstrations, the lawyers had clashed with riot police, and the country's most senior barristers, silk ties flying, had responded with surprising vigor, hurling back tear-gas cannisters at staff-wielding policemen and jabbing at them with furled umbrellas.
The lawyers began demonstrating when, on March 9th, Iftikhar Chaudhry, Pakistan's Chief Justice, was suspended, reportedly because Musharraf had accused him of using his position for personal gain and for trying to get his son a top police job. The first demonstrations, which consisted of a few hundred lawyers protesting against Musharraf's attack on the independence of the judiciary, escalated into a full-scale campaign against military rule when, a week later, riot police attacked first the protesters and then the offices of an Islamabad news channel that had broadcast images of police beating up barristers. By May, the demonstrations had turned into a countrywide protest movement calling for fair elections, a civilian government, and the return of real democracy.
On that particular May day, the overwhelming majority of the protesting barristers were men. Yet at the center of the group was a fragile-looking, diminutive woman in a crisp white shalwar kameez, a neat black jacket, and heavy tortoiseshell spectacles, named Asma Jilani Jahangir. She is in many ways a symbol of the values that the lawyers are fighting for. Pakistan is a notably patriarchal society, but Jahangir is its most visible and celebrated—as well as most vilified—human-rights lawyer. She has spent her professional life fighting for a secular civil society, challenging the mullahs and generals, and championing the rights of women at risk of "honor killing" and religious minorities accused of blasphemy. She has investigated alleged extrajudicial killings by the security forces, set up a shelter for vulnerable young women, and campaigned to end child labor. For Pakistan's liberals, she is a symbol of freedom and defiance, comparable to Aung San Suu Kyi, in Burma.
"These protests really have touched a chord," Jahangir shouted to me as the lawyers chanted around her. "There is so much pent-up anger. The country is beginning to stir."
Five hundred yards from the lawyers, a group of heavily bearded men wearing checked Arab kaffiyehs and black turbans were engaged in their own protest. These were the supporters of a right-wing alliance of religious parties, the Muttehida Majlis-e-Amal, or M.M.A., which has become a significant force in Pakistani electoral politics. The alliance's imposing patriarch, Liaqat Baloch, was standing on a jeep, exhorting his flag-waving supporters. "The friend of Bush is our enemy!" he roared. "The rulers should read the writing on the wall! Help give one last push to the falling wall! The only system that will come here is the system of the Prophet!"
The third group of protesters that day was not as conspicuous, but represented the greatest immediate threat to the government. Less than a mile from the Supreme Court, and not far from the headquarters of Pakistan's powerful intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence, or I.S.I., an angry crowd of students stood outside the Lal Masjid, or Red Mosque, a sprawling complex of prayer halls, classrooms, and dormitories. During the previous six months, the Lal Masjid had become the principal center of radical Islamist resistance to Musharraf's rule. The Islamists in the Lal Masjid were not interested in elections. They wanted to take direct and immediate revolutionary action against a government that they regarded as an American puppet, an infidel imposition on a state that should by rights be ruled entirely by Islamic law.
Under the leadership of two brothers, Maulana Abdul Aziz and Abdul Rashid Ghazi, the Lal Masjid had also become a base for Taliban-style vigilante squads, headed by fearsome, stick-wielding, burka-clad young women, which had been pouring out of the mosque and its two madrassas, one for men, one for women. For months, these women had been calling for the establishment of full Sharia law and the closing down of all "dens of vice." Jokes in English-language newspapers about "chicks with sticks" were quickly abandoned as the women began kidnapping suspected prostitutes, threatening video-store owners, and making bonfires of books, videocassettes, and DVDs that they regarded as un-Islamic. For months, the security forces did nothing to stop them, even after the women kidnapped policemen and ransacked government buildings, while the two brothers threatened holy war, and even issued a fatwa denouncing a female cabinet minister who had been photographed receiving a hug from a French skydiving instructor.
The Lal Masjid was also allegedly sheltering militants from some of Pakistan's most dangerous jihadi groups, so when I went to visit, in May, I took the precaution of arriving with a friend who is the owner of Mr. Books, Islamabad's best bookshop. He had known Abdul Rashid Ghazi since Ghazi was a left-wing student activist at Islamabad's leading university, Quaid-i-Azam. We were politely led inside the mosque by three men, two with walkie-talkies and the third with a Kalashnikov, and invited to sit on a carpet. Ghazi, in John Lennon-style glasses and a knitted woollen hat, looked more like an old hippie than like any sort of Islamic firebrand. As we sipped tea, Ghazi, speaking eloquently in idiomatic English, described his campaign to get rid of Musharraf's élitist and pro-American government and replace it with a more egalitarian Islamic regime.
According to Ghazi, the women in his madrassa reflected the true feelings of most Pakistanis, and particularly their resentment of the United States' influence over Musharraf. "After 9/11, Musharraf made an abrupt change in our policy that was not supported by the people of Pakistan," Ghazi said. "The attack on Afghanistan caused a lot of resentment, and in the name of the war on terror many innocent people were killed. In the name of 'enlightened moderation' vulgarity has been promoted—women running in marathons, brothels, pornography in CD shops. . . . All these things have been accumulating in the minds and in the hearts of the people of Pakistan. What we are voicing is the desires of the people. The system is the root of all the problems. . . . The rulers are living a life of luxury while thousands of innocent children have empty stomachs and can't even get basic necessities."
Six weeks later, Ghazi was dead. In early July, Musharraf's government, after months of apparently ignoring the regular provocations issued by the radicals in the mosque, suddenly laid siege to the Lal Masjid. Ten days into the siege, after negotiations failed, commandos from the Army's Special Services Group, backed by hundreds of troops, stormed the complex. Abdul Rashid Ghazi was killed in the basement of the building on July 10th, allegedly in the crossfire between his men and the commandos. Officially, seventy-six militants and eleven soldiers were also killed; local TV stations and newspapers gave figures almost double that. Although Pakistan is an unusually turbulent society, nothing like this had ever happened in the capital before.
Ghazi had predicted that any violent end to the siege would help speed an Islamic revolution in Pakistan. "We have a firm belief in God that our blood will lead to a revolution," he said in a statement issued three days before his death. "God willing, Islamic revolution will be the destiny of this nation."
All this upheaval would have been unimaginable even six months ago. Islamabad has long been viewed as a dull city where lobbyists and industrialists bribed politicians, and civil servants shuffled papers and wove great cocoons of red tape amid huge concrete courthouses, ministries, and palaces—a sort of Islamized version of the center of Washington, D.C., air-dropped into the foothills of the Himalayas.
Since 1999, when Musharraf seized power in a bloodless coup—he is still Commander-in-Chief of the Army—promising to bring "true" democracy, law and order, and economic revival, Islamabad has been unusually quiet, even by its own somnolent standards; indeed, across the country the government has faced surprisingly little opposition. So disastrous were the tenures of Musharraf's two democratic predecessors—Benazir Bhutto, who has confronted a litany of corruption charges, and Nawaz Sharif, her inept, unpopular, and autocratic successor, who brought the country to the edge of economic catastrophe—that until recently the only strenuous opposition to Musharraf came from extreme Islamists, who tried twice to assassinate him in suicide bombings.
The country's economic recovery has been perhaps the most remarkable achievement of Musharraf's government. Under Shaukat Aziz, a former vice-president of Citibank and now the Prime Minister, Pakistan is enjoying a construction and consumer boom, with annual economic growth of around seven per cent and one of Asia's best-performing stock markets (some of this prosperity has been generated by the lifting of trade restrictions and by substantial debt relief from the United States and other countries after September 11th). The effects can be seen everywhere: in new shopping centers and restaurant complexes, in building sites, in advertisements for the latest laptops and iPods. In 2003, there were fewer than three million cell-phone users in Pakistan; today there are nearly fifty million.
Despite elections in 2002 that were denounced by journalists and civil-rights groups as having been openly rigged, liberals have remained largely supportive of Musharraf, or at least quiescent, while most of the country's mullahs, normally stridently outspoken, have been relatively subdued. But Musharraf's treatment of the Chief Justice—and the lawyers' refusal to accept it—finally broke the eight-year status quo.
Few are convinced by Musharraf's explanation for his firing of the Chief Justice; many people believe that Chaudhry was suspended for his independence of mind—in particular, for blocking the sale of a state-owned steel mill, from which some government officials reportedly would have profited. It appears to be the first time that the judiciary had confronted one of the great scandals of Pakistani public life: the military's profitable economic empire. In a recent book, "Military Inc.," the political scientist Ayesha Siddiqa estimated that the military controls business assets of more than twenty billion dollars, with interests ranging from cement and dredging to the manufacture of corn flakes and the baking of bread. It controls a third of all heavy manufacturing in the country and owns nearly twelve million acres of land. As Asma Jahangir put it to me, "The Army is into every business in this country. Except hairdressing."
The Chief Justice had also raised the issue of the number of political activists who have disappeared and are thought to be held by the state intelligence agencies. Most damaging of all was his presumed opposition to Musharraf's continuing as both President and Army chief. Elections are due to be held soon, and Musharraf will require a constitutional amendment to continue to double as President and Commander-in-Chief. The military government needed a pliant Chief Justice if Musharraf was to stay in office without removing his uniform.
Imran Khan, the country's great sporting hero, who retired from cricket to enter politics and founded a party called Tehrik-e-Insaaf, or the Movement for Justice, in 1996, initially believed that Musharraf seriously intended to reform the system. But he has joined the lawyers. "This is the first time in our history that the judiciary has asserted its independence," he told me. "Normally, it just sides with whoever is in power. Change is irreversible. You can't have prosperity without genuine democracy and an independent judiciary."
Yet it is widely recognized that the lawyers' protests may be severely endangering the stability of the country. It is not just the violent Islamists of the Lal Masjid who have taken advantage of President Musharraf's predicament. The country's powerful religious parties have also tried to use the turbulence for their own ends. Historically, the parties received only a tiny fraction of the vote. That situation began to change, however, after the United States invaded Afghanistan. In the election of October, 2002, the M.M.A. ran a successful campaign under the slogan "It is a war between Islam and the American infidel." Several of its parliamentary candidates had been Taliban commanders. The religious parties more than doubled their representation. The M.M.A. won by a large margin in the North-West Frontier Province, one of the conservative areas bordering Afghanistan, and succeeded in forming a coalition government in Baluchistan. Both provinces now have pro-Islamist governments.
Some fear that Islamists could hijack the protests of the lawyers' movement, just as they hijacked the civil-rights protests against the Shah in Iran in 1979. The day after the demonstration in Islamabad, I asked Rashed Rahman, the editor of the Post, in Lahore, what he thought about the attempts of the lawyers—and particularly their spokesperson that day, Asma Jahangir—to bring down Musharraf's government.
"Asma Jahangir is brave and fearless," he said. "She has stood up for all the right causes. She has huge credibility, and has achieved what she has through integrity and hard work. She is also a great friend. But her political judgment is another matter. She is a supporter of democracy, right or wrong, and the situation in Pakistan is extremely complex at the moment. Will there be an Islamic revolution? I personally don't think the Islamists are on the verge of seizing power, but we cannot ignore the growing power of the militants. Asma is an idealist, and sometimes in this part of the world it is better to be a realist."
Lahore lies four hours' drive south of Islamabad. During the seventeenth century, from the fort of Lahore, the Mughal emperors ruled most of India, all of what is now Pakistan, and large areas of Afghanistan. At the time, Lahore dwarfed both London and Paris; in "Paradise Lost," the great Mughal metropolis is revealed to Adam after the Fall as one of the future marvels of divine creation. Today, strung between the marble domes of the Mughal mosques in the Old City, and the orderly colonial townscape of the Mall, Lahore is not only the most attractive city in Pakistan but also the most artistic and intellectual.
Asma Jahangir was born here in 1952, five years after the creation of Pakistan as a homeland for the Muslims of India, and it remains her base. Driving through the city to her house, I found it striking to see billboard after billboard filled with beautiful Pakistani models, all with their heads uncovered—something that would be unthinkable in the frontier provinces.
Mohsin Hamid, whose novel "The Reluctant Fundamentalist" was an international best-seller earlier this year, recently wrote about the dramatic cultural and economic revival of Pakistan. He had worked as a consultant in Manhattan for several years, and returned home to find Lahore unrecognizable. He was particularly struck by "the incredible new world of media that had sprung up":
I knew, of course, that the government of Musharraf had opened the media to private operators. But I had not until then realized how profoundly things had changed.
Not just television, but also private radio stations and newspapers have flourished in Pakistan over the past few years. The result is an unprecedented openness. . . . Young people are speaking and dressing differently. Views both critical and supportive of the government are voiced with breathtaking frankness in an atmosphere remarkably lacking in censorship. Public space, the common area for culture and expression that had been so circumscribed in my childhood, has now been vastly expanded. "The Vagina Monologues" was recently performed on stage in Pakistan to standing ovations.
When I arrived at Jahangir's home, in the residential district of Gulberg, I asked her whether Musharraf's rule had really been so dictatorial: wasn't it in some ways more liberal than the democratic governments that preceded it?
"Well, it's true that dictators have got more sophisticated at masking their military rule these days," she replied. "Musharraf's government has a civilian face—there are still elections and assemblies—and he has come to believe his own propaganda that he really is a democrat. There is a degree of press freedom. And it is true that these days we have better communications than used to be possible under military rule, thanks to the Internet and mobile phones. It's all more complex than it used to be."
We were in Jahangir's sitting room, and she curled her feet up beneath her on the sofa. "And don't misunderstand me," she said. "I have no illusions about our elected politicians. Pakistani democracy is anything but perfect. In fact I can't think of any other country in the world where the benefits of democracy are less immediately clear—even Nepal."
Jahangir's house was built in the nineteen-sixties but looks like something from the twenties, with beautiful dark-wood panelling and elegant chintz sofas. There are similar properties throughout Gulberg, where large houses with tropical gardens, carefully watered lawns, and expansive pools lie hidden behind high brick walls. It was a reminder of one of the paradoxes of Pakistan. Although the country is frequently depicted in the international media as a failed state, and India, its neighbor and rival, as a burgeoning superpower, the distinction is not always so clear on the ground.
Jahangir's mischievous affability and charm in private form a contrast with her steely public image and, along with her striking self-confidence, identify her immediately as a child of the Pakistani upper middle class. This was the élite that reaped the full benefits of a system that has always been more accommodating to the rich than its equivalent in India, where socialist laws, land-reform acts, and punitive taxes quickly reduced the status of the landowning classes after the departure of the British, in 1947.
The family of Malik Jilani, Jahangir's father, had extensive property in both the city and its rural hinterland; her grandfather even had a stud farm. But her father chose to enter government service, and much of her childhood was spent in his official bungalow, in Sahiwal, in the fertile plains of the Punjab, to the southwest of Lahore, where he was a senior local bureaucrat.
"In those days, a man of my father's position was God," she said. "It was a small town, and my mother relished the status my father's job gave her. We had a lovely bungalow, our own tonga"—horse and carriage—"and I remember having the only film projector in the district. It was a great cause of envy for my friends, though we had only one film, 'The Fabulous Señorita,' which we watched over and over again."
Jahangir remembers her childhood as idyllic, yet from an early age her life was touched by the anxieties, disappointments, and disillusionment that afflicted Pakistan from its birth. In 1958, General Ayub Khan seized power in the course of Pakistan's first military coup. To everyone's surprise, Jahangir's father, a man who until then had shown more interest in living the good life than in politics, resigned from the Civil Service in protest. "My mother was horrified and asked him why," she told me. "He replied that once a military government came it was a declaration that civilian institutions have failed. He was not really an idealist by nature, but he was strangely committed to the question of democracy and human rights."
The family moved back to Lahore, and Jahangir's father joined the opposition to the military government, becoming increasingly vocal in his criticisms. Life for the family changed: the secret service moved in across the street from their house, Jahangir told me, and began recording the license plates of visitors' cars; soon people became reluctant to visit. In 1961, Malik Jilani was arrested. "They came in the middle of the night with torches," she recalled. "Hordes of police surrounded the house and banged on the doors. It was terrifying. My young sister was crying, but my father appeared completely calm, and gave orders for the valet to bring the police tea. I remember him saying 'Ta-ta' very lightly to us as he got into the police van."
It was the first of a succession of arrests and prison terms, and Jahangir and her mother spent much of their time in court trying to challenge the various detention orders. On one occasion, after her father had witnessed what the family believed was a government-sponsored killing, there was an attempt to assassinate him. A man who looked like Jilani was shot dead walking up to the family house, and a second man was critically wounded. Jahangir, who was only thirteen at the time, was alone in the house with her two sisters, and had to take the badly wounded man to the hospital. Two years later, Ayub Khan confiscated the family's land in an attempt to pressure Jilani to stop his opposition activities. It didn't work.
"He would go into prison smiling and come out smiling," Jahangir said. "It was only in the nineteen-eighties, when he was dying of cancer and rambling because of the drugs that the doctors gave him, that we discovered he had been disgustingly tortured."
In 1969, at the age of seventeen, Jahangir began her own pro-democracy rebellion against Ayub Khan. She was a leader of a women's demonstration—one of the largest in the history of Pakistan—and risked gunfire to climb the gate of the Punjab governor's house to hoist a symbolic black flag. She was temporarily suspended from college. A few years later, she began studying law, teaching herself at home, as her professors did not think it suitable for women to attend law lectures. "I had been very impressed with the courts we visited to see my father," she said. "The judges wearing wigs, the lawyers, the legal arguments—it was all exciting stuff for a kid."
Although it was not unusual for a woman of Jahangir's class to take up a profession—a number of Pakistan's senior editors and politicians are upper-middle-class women—it was almost unknown for women to enter the law. In 1980, Jahangir set up a practice with her sister Hina Jilani and two other friends, which was the first free legal-aid center in Pakistan; it was also the first all-woman legal practice. Named A.G.H.S., after the initials of the four partners, it was soon dubbed Hags by the male legal establishment. The practice and its reputation quickly grew; by 1982, both Jahangir and Jilani were Advocates of the High Court.
T he establishment of Jahangir's firm coincided with a new period of ultraconservative military rule, under General Zia ul-Haq. Zia took power in 1977, in a coup that displaced Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the father of Benazir Bhutto. Although Zia became a hero in Washington when, in 1979, he gave full support to the United States after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, it was he who brought about Pakistan's rapid Islamization. The country had been set up as a homeland for Indian Muslims, but it had been a more or less secular state, as envisaged by its founder, the clean-shaven, tweed-jacketed, and Anglicized Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
Zia was responsible for initiating the alliance between the conservative military officers and the reactionary mullahs, both groups that tended to be drawn from the middle classes, in contrast to politicians, who mostly came from feudal landholding backgrounds. When Pakistan's Islamic radicals joined the anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan, their recruitment was controlled by the I.S.I. and funded by both the C.I.A. and the Saudi intelligence agency. Soon the I.S.I. became the paymaster of myriad jihadi groups. These were intended to be selectively deployed in Afghanistan and, later, Kashmir, where Pakistan has been engaged in a long-running dispute with India. The Pakistani Army saw the jihadis as a cost-effective means of dominating Afghanistan while keeping the Indian Army bogged down in Kashmir. As Hamid Gul, the director of the I.S.I. at the time, told me, "If they encourage the Kashmiris, it's understandable. The Kashmiri people have risen up, and it is the national purpose of Pakistan to help liberate them. . . . If the jihadis go out and contain India, tying down their Army on their own soil, for a legitimate cause, why should we not support them?"
Zia also transformed Pakistan's domestic policies, changing Jinnah's vision of an Anglicized Pakistan forever. Two years after the coup, he established the Hudood Ordinances of Sharia law. The Ordinances discriminated severely against women, asserting that women were not allowed to testify in cases involving crimes of the highest magnitude. They also made any sex outside marriage—known as zina—a punishable offense. Rape became difficult to prove and victims were often charged with adultery and imprisoned or flogged.
Jahangir helped organize protest marches against the Hudood Ordinances, and she was arrested and sent to prison for a month in 1983. There she met many women who had been arrested under the new laws, and, on her release, she took up their cases. She helped overturn a sentence of imprisonment and flogging issued against a blind woman who was raped and then charged with zina. In 1986, she helped establish the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. The H.R.C. defended women accused of adultery. It also took on a growing number of blasphemy cases filed against Ahmadis, a heterodox Muslim sect, and Christians: a single accusation could result in execution.
Jahangir's position as a human-rights lawyer made her especially vulnerable to the violent religiosity that had become more evident in the country. In 1994, Jahangir won the freedom of a fourteen-year-old Christian boy who had been sentenced to death for blasphemy. Soon afterward, her family compound was attacked by a group of jihadis who were determined to kill her as a defender of infidels and an enemy of Islam. They broke into one of the houses in the compound and took the family of one of Jahangir's sisters hostage. Jahangir managed to get the police; the siege ended when the jihadis escaped.
In 1999, two people were killed at Jahangir's office. A woman named Samia Sarwar, from Peshawar, who wanted a divorce from her abusive husband, was hiding from her family in the H.R.C.'s shelter. Under Jahangir's guidance, Sarwar agreed to discuss the situation with her mother. But the mother showed up at Jahangir's office with a hired assassin posing as her driver. As the two entered the office, the assassin shot Sarwar in the head. The assassin was killed by a policeman as he attempted to flee the building. Yet Sarwar's mother was never charged with being an accomplice to murder. Following the strictures of Sharia, the heirs of the victim—in this case the abandoned husband and the two children—exercised their right to forgive the murderer. It was a graphic illustration of the way that Sharia can be twisted to legalize the murder of women deemed to have "shamed" their families.
"Honor killings are not a specifically Islamic tradition," Jahangir said firmly. "They are just a bad tradition that must be stopped." Before Zia came to power, honor killings were restricted mainly to Pakistan's tribal regions and other remote areas. But the practice has since spread to the rest of the country, and is now widely seen as something linked with religion as well as with the old notions of tribal honor. "I was born a Muslim and that is still my identity," Jahangir continued. "Islam is no more violent or fanatical than any other religion—it's just that many Muslim countries have politicized religion for the benefit of the rulers. There are Christian fanatics and Hindu fanatics, too—put a gun in the hands of any of them and they will terrorize people. Religion should be something personal. It should not be the concern of the state, and no religion has a right to degrade women or erode their human dignity.
"I always ask these Islamists, 'What kind of justice do you want? Give me specifics.' Look how selectively Sharia law is applied here. When Zia started his Islamization, it was aimed first at women, non-Muslims, and the poor. That served his purpose. It is never invoked against the élite—we've never had an Islamic banking system here, for example. The poor understand this. I remember one woman in jail telling me, 'If there is a God, it's a God of the rich people.' It's not about faith. It's about political strategies."
The question of Pakistan's future is complicated by a fundamental flaw in the political system. Real democracy has never thrived here, at least in part because the landowning class remains the principal social base from which politicians emerge. In general, the educated middle class—which in India gained control soon after independence—in Pakistan is still largely excluded from the political process. In many of the more backward parts of Pakistan, the local feudal zamindar, or landowner, can expect his people to vote for his chosen candidate. The Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid told me, "In some constituencies, if the feudals put up their dog as a candidate, that dog would get elected with ninety-nine per cent of the vote." Such loyalty can be enforced. Many of the biggest zamindars are said to have private prisons, and some have private militias.
Behind Pakistan's swings between military government and democracy lies a surprising continuity of interests: to some extent, the industrial, military, landowning, and bureaucratic élites are all interrelated and look after one another. Recent rumors of secret negotiations between Musharraf and Benazir Bhutto—who, though in exile, continues to lead the Pakistan People's Party—are typical of the way the civilian and military élites have shared power. (Both Musharraf and Bhutto have denied such rumors, but some have suggested that an alliance between them is something that the United States would welcome, in the hope of uniting the two pro-American groupings in the country.)
This closed nature of the Pakistani political system has contributed to the strikingly poor performance of its democratic politicians. As Jahangir put it, "If Pakistan's dictators are sometimes less dictatorial than one might imagine, then its democrats have proved consistently less democratic than they should be."
In 1995, during Benazir Bhutto's government, the anti-corruption organization Transparency International named Pakistan one of the three most corrupt countries in the world. Bhutto and her husband, Asif Zardari—widely known as "Mr. 10%"—faced allegations of plundering the country; charges were filed in Pakistan, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. (Bhutto has consistently asserted her innocence. Two cases in Pakistan were eventually decided in her favor, and a case in Switzerland is still ongoing.)
It was difficult to imagine Bhutto's successor, Nawaz Sharif, making as big a mess of things, but he was soon harassing his opponents, physically intimidating the judiciary, and threatening journalists. In May of 1999, Najam Sethi, the editor of the Friday Times, was abducted from his home; a month later, after a series of demonstrations, in which Jahangir played a leading role, and an international campaign, he was released. Meanwhile, the economy came close to collapse.
"A return to democracy would certainly not be an instant miracle for this country," Jahangir told me. "But it would be a start. This military government has no direction, no plan, no schedule. In terms of human rights, this government is worse than any civilian government we've ever had. We estimate that there have been about six hundred disappeared since 2002. They are usually picked up by plainclothesmen in four-wheel drives—sometimes there are policemen with them, sometimes not. If the victims are ever seen again, they invariably say that they have been tortured with electric shocks, beaten, given injections, hung upside down by their ankles." (The government has claimed that "all efforts are being made to find the missing persons.")
Jahangir lit a cigarette, and continued. "Since 9/11 and Guantánamo, the security forces feel they have a free hand," she said. "And then there is the interference of the executive in the judiciary, which has been constant and unbearable. The sacking of the Chief Justice was the final straw. If we lose this one, it is all over for the rule of law in this country."
Pakistan today in many ways resembles pre-revolutionary Iran. A cosmopolitan middle class is prospering, yet for the great majority of poorer Pakistanis life remains intolerably hard and access to justice or education is a distant hope: just 1.8 per cent of Pakistan's G.N.P. is spent on education. The published literacy rate is forty-nine per cent, and in some areas the rate is estimated to be as low as fourteen per cent. Instead of investing adequately in education, Musharraf's government is spending money on a fleet of American F-16s for the Air Force. Health care and other social services for the poor have also been neglected, in contrast to the public services that benefit the wealthy, such as highways and airports—many of which are world-class.
It is this disparity perhaps as much as anything else that has fuelled the growth of the Islamist religious parties. Ayesha Siddiqa told me, "There is a breakdown of effective government. The political parties have all failed to create an environment where the poor can get what they need from the state. The laws are always twisted for the rich; in fact, there are effectively no laws for them. So the poor have begun to look to alternatives for justice." She went on to point out, "The religious parties and Sharia are increasingly seen as the one source of justice for them. In the long term, flaws in the system will create more room for the fundamentalists."
Paralleling the rise of the religious parties as the only effective opposition to the entrenched Pakistani élite—widely perceived as corrupt, Westernized, and decadent—there has been a growing number of Taliban-style Islamist vigilantes, particularly in the M.M.A.-ruled North-West Frontier Province. In the past few months, a rash of suicide bombings—something previously almost unknown in Pakistan—have left scores of people dead in the frontier region.
As the events at the Lal Masjid show, Musharraf has been unable to act effectively against the Talibanization of the country. Indeed, the presence of so many heavy weapons in a known center of militancy in the heart of Islamabad suggests at the very least that the intelligence agencies were turning a blind eye to what was going on, and has led to much speculation about the reasons for this. Was Musharraf trying to scare his Western backers by showing how much worse things could get if he was to go? And why, when the decision was made to confront the militants, was it done so heavy-handedly? As Jahangir told me during the bloody storming of the complex, the incident exemplified Musharraf's indecisiveness and his managerial ineptitude. He allowed the crisis to fester for months, she said, and then, without making much of an effort to solve the problem by peaceful methods, he sent in the tanks. "He didn't even attempt to cut off the water and electricity until the very end," she observed. "Any layperson can see how clumsily it was handled."
Dependent on the support of the mullahs as well as on that of the Americans, Musharraf is in an almost impossible position. He has replaced many of the more pro-Islamist I.S.I. generals, and he appears in many ways to be coöperating with the United States in the hunt for Al Qaeda suspects. But the Army continues to use jihadis in Kashmir, and the extent to which Taliban units are openly operating out of Pakistan's tribal areas implies that the I.S.I. is not doing all it can to prevent the Taliban's resurgence in Afghanistan. Musharraf cannot have the blessings of both the Americans and the Islamists, and he cannot continue to dismantle democratic organizations while claiming to be the savior of democracy.
Few people are predicting a happy resolution to this increasingly dangerous situation, yet Jahangir remains optimistic. "Musharraf is rapidly losing the minimum respect that gives you the moral authority to rule a country," she said. "We have the resilience to create new institutions and new systems. We have enough people of integrity. Given an opportunity, political parties can make a difference and new political leaders can emerge. But we civilians have to run the government ourselves. At the moment, it is not that the country has a garrison; it is that the garrison has a country.
"However flawed democracy here is, it is still the only answer," she continued. "Once there is a proper political movement, the religious parties will become marginalized. I am not at all gloomy. These protests have been a wake-up call."
Shortly after our conversation, I talked to Jugnu Mohsin, the publisher of the Friday Times, and the wife of its editor, Najam Sethi. "Is Asma naïve?" she asked. "It is true that the lawyers' movement, if it destroys Musharraf, could create more problems than it solves. The fall of Musharraf could well lead to the rise of violent political Islam. I certainly believe that no civilian government on its own can put that genie back in the bottle. But, if idealism is naïveté, then so be it. It is ideals that move history forward—think of Gandhi or Martin Luther King. Many thought they were politically naïve, but it was they, not the realists, who succeeded in changing the course of history." ♦


text:
Ted Blaylock "Canyon Guardian" Eagle Art Sculpture
Renowned wildlife artist Ted Blaylock's panoramic, full-color art marks the base of this handcrafted 3D eagle sculpture. Limited edition.
Measures 13" H
- Price:
- s&s◇
This item is part of a collection. Subscribe to receive each issue in the collection by clicking "Add Collection to Cart."
- Price:
Celebrate the winged monarch of the wilderness with this breathtaking collectible eagle art sculpture. A sweeping full-color image of an eagle in flight from acclaimed artist Ted Blaylock decorates the sculpture's base. Above, a three-dimensional sculpt depicts an eagle raising its mighty wings at the moment of takeoff.
Come face to face with the guardian of the wild with this captivating collectible eagle art sculpture, available exclusively from The Bradford Exchange. Standing a towering 13" high, this handcrafted sculpture is hand-cast and hand-painted for amazing detail when viewed from any angle. Makes dramatic tabletop decor and it's a thrilling eagle art gift. Heavy demand is expected for this dramatic limited edition, and you won't want to miss out. Order now!
- Pay tribute to the majesty of the king of the sky with this collectible eagle art sculpture, available only from The Bradford Exchange
- Renowned wildlife artist Ted Blaylock's panoramic, full-color portrait of an eagle soaring above a canyon decorates the base of this superb eagle sculpture
- Handcrafted, hand-cast and hand-painted for true-to-life detail
- This three-dimensional eagle art sculpture is exciting when viewed from any angle
- Majestic tabletop decor for you to enjoy in your home or office or a breathtaking collectible eagle art gift
- Premiere issue in the Ted Blaylock's Winged Protectors eagle art sculpture collection
- Edition is strictly limited to 295 casting days, so order now
- Hand-numbered with matching Certificate of Authenticity
- Measures 13" H; 33 cm H
©2007 The Bradford Exchange. All rights reserved.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
(Sips coffee)
Words like, "looks," "feels," "walks to," etc, are distancing, they take your reader out of the immediacy of the moment by not showing the reader what the character is experiencing directly. We've all heard that before: show donât tell. You can actually read my first post on placeholders here:
It's my sneaking suspicion that the placeholder doesn't only distance your language and lengthen psychic distance (that's just a fancy term for how close we feel as readers to the events and actions of the story) as Gardner coined in his book, The Art of Fiction. The placeholder might actually be standing in for an emotional moment within the manuscript.
Before I go on to an example, let me say this one caveat:
I recognize that when you are drafting, if you spend too much time refining language, you might turn on your inner censor. NO ONE wants that grouch to come to work with you. This inner editor can potentially stop you from writing from Robert Olen Butler's "white-hot center," or the unconscious where the truly great art is created. So I would say, maybe refrain from trying this tactic until a third draft. Try this when you've done enough drafts where you know the manuscript is almost submittable but something isn't quite right with your work.
So let's say, you're at revision two or three. Let's say your book is great but certain scenes lack emotional punch. Maybe you hear from your writer's group or editor that he or she just can't connect to the main character. Here's where I think the placeholder can help you dig deep and find out what you really wanted to say in the moment.
Le Technique:
1. Make a list of placeholders.
2. Go to the sentences. Go micro. What I am finding is that the sentences are really where the macro issues are hiding. To get to the big, you have to look at the small. Look to the construction of your sentences within key scenes.
3. Do you have some placeholders in one chunk of text? What is happening in that chunk of text? Could it be…a scene?
4. Now that youâve identified a core scene, ask yourself: is the scene actually scene? Is it summary? If it's summary and the emotional moment is not happening in real time, then ask yourself why, and consider if youâve purposefully distanced yourself from the moment because you are protecting your characters.
If it's summarization perhaps in the form of endless questions, backstory, or too much inner thought, this is a clue you are NOT connected to your main character and his or her conflict. My suggestion is to not only revise the placeholders to make the scene more immediate and to ensure you are showing and not telling, but to actually see if the placeholders are a clue that you've missed a major emotional moment in your scene.
So maybe, placeholders are the you inside the manuscript telling the you writing the damn thing that you haven't done enough with these characters. You owe them more! This is where you can break out the toolbox you've built as a writer and employ: imagery, objective correlative, inner thought dialogue, etc, etc, to make the scenes reveal even more about your characters.
So how about a totally embarrassing example of crappy, telling, distanced language from my newest WIP!? Sure thing. This is a first draft and I probably shouldn't even be thinking about placeholders, but I digress…
Here is an example in my current untitled WIP. So, my main character Penny has just gotten out of a car. The whole town has been taken over by lightning bugs. The section that I have italicized is the section under scrutiny!!
I extended a hand and a few lightning bugs landed on my fingers. The rest protected the tree and there, where the car had hit weeks ago were two words carved into the blackened bark. Because the tree was healing, the fresh bark was lighter, a sandy color. The words stood out with the fresh bark underneath.
"It must be from the warm weather," Dad reasoned.
"I'm calling the news," a neighbor said and walked back to her house. I got back into the car without looking back at that tree. Give in. Give in to what? That he was dead? That Kyle wondered why he didn't say I love you but that he said it to me every five minutes? What was I supposed to give in to? That my mother was a drunk and my father just ignored it so he could stay in his cocoon of false happiness? I crossed my arms . Mom and Dad joined me. We continued onto the End of Summer Gala.
1. Do a placeholder search. Once you find an overabundance of one or many placeholders in one particular scene, read through that scene. Does it lack energy or emotional punch?
Okay so I've identified that this scene. This moment doesn't feel very emotional. It isn't hitting the emotional note that I want.
2. So is this scene mostly scene or is it summary?
Geez, most of it is summary now that I really look at the emotional reaction. Wow, there are like 40 questions that the characters asks herself. Ack, why am I doing that? Where is the emotion? Where is the scene? Holy Baloney. All of those questions contain absolutely no subtext. Each one is so completely on the nose that my character is not experiencing anything emotional that my reader can feel. She is telling us how to feel. EW!
3. Go to the sentences.
"I'm calling the news,â a neighbor said and walked back to her house. I got back into the car without looking back at that tree.
In those two sentences, I have "walk" and "look" back-to-back. Sure, you need those words sometimes and occasionally look and walk, when they are verbs, are necessary. But they have no relevance in a placeholder scene. So make sure what you are editing is indeed a placeholder scene.
4. Does my character have an emotional reaction in this moment? What is that emotional reaction?
"I'm calling the news," a neighbor said and walked back to her house. I got back into the car without looking back at that tree.
Not only does Penny not have an emotional reaction, she just gets into the car without looking at the tree. So what is actually in scene here, is the neighbor speaking and then my main character getting back into the car. Oh yes, Rebecca, that's so emotional. I bet as she bent her leg to get back into the car, you reader just broke into hysterical cries and wept.
Or not (cheese sandwich, VCFA).
I need to get rid of "look"and "walk" and try to find out what my character is actually feeling here. Horror? Anger? She's just seen a tree covered in lightning bugs and when she went up to touch the lightning bugs, THEY MOVED FOR HER.
What I need to do is remove those words, find the emotion I am looking for, and bring it into scene. I also need to delete all those heinous "on the nose" questions. This way, my character can experience true horror and disbelief simultaneously with my reader.
That revising part is the hard part.
I will revise this scene and post it on the blog in a day or two. My brain is on snooze at the moment.
I'm probably missing a whole mess of important things I should be talking about but this is at least helping me to identify the consistent and overuse of language in my manuscript. I can't help but think there is a bigger reason why we keep using words like "looks," "feels," etc, other than lazy writing. Sometimes we're quite convinced we've written a very emotional scene and are surprised to find that it's not. Maybe this will help you. I hope it does.
Updated Placeholder list:
- Like
- Just
- Smiled
- Sighed
- As if
- Remember (any time a character says, "I remember the time…" and it's not in dialogue, almost always we've got telling instead of showing.
- Feel
- Hear
- See
- Glance
- Think
- Look
- Watch
- "I taste," "I smell."
- Notice
- Then
- Suddenly
- Adverbs in general
- Double verb "starting to, began to"
Placeholders!! Part Deux


text:
Oscar will show off a fresh face when nominations for the 82nd Academy Awards are announced early Tuesday morning.
Film star Anne Hathaway will join Academy President Tom Sherak at the podium to unveil 10 of the 24 nominations, according to a release from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
The Oscar announcing turn comes one year after the star received her own nomination for "Rachel Getting Married." And with a little luck, Hathaway will be eagerly awaiting next year's award announcements. 2010 will see her in the star-studded "Valentine's Day," followed by a turn as the White Queen in the eagerly-awaited "Alice In Wonderland" by Tim Burton. She'll then top it off with a return to working with her "Brokeback Mountain" co-star Jake Gyllenhaal in "Love and Other Drugs."


text:
This post was called House Exterior Painting and this post also have various image that can be your references on your inspiration. You can download all the image of House Exterior Painting for free. Below are the image gallery of House Exterior Painting, if you like the image or like this post please contribute with us to share this post to your social media or save this post in your device.
There are many plenty images of House Exterior Painting.


text:
GTA 5 Theme is designed to help you customize your desktop appearance by displaying wallpapers inspired by the Grand Theft Auto V game when your computer is idle.
The pack includes 9 high-quality wallpaper and 3 custom logon screen images. If you like GTA, you will surely enjoy this theme!
. Free download of GTA 5 Theme New, size 0 b.
All had troubles to cope with GTA 4, and these troubles were different: starting with the lack of money and weapons and finishing with the inability to pass the mission. The game itself is not for beginners. Game developers were focused on the experienced players and fans of the series, so, for the average casual player the game is not easy. We. Freeware download of GTA 4 Cheats 1.0, size 692.06 Kb.
GTA-MUD is a MUD based on the GTA "universe". It will designed to be a lot more detailed world, with more actions available rather than just the usual shoots perps and cops . Interaction between players will a major part, and it's designed to be fun!. Freeware download of GTA-MUD 091, size 243.32 Kb.
DevilliizBlackLisTz GTA:SA Online Server
DevilliizBlackLisTz GTA:SA Online Server 1.0 License - GNU General Public License (GPL). Freeware download of DevilliizBlackLisTz GTA:SA Online Server 1.0, size 0 b.
Files for online at GTA San Andreas
GTA San Andreas files 1.0 License - Public Domain. Freeware download of GTA San Andreas files 1.0, size 0 b.
With this simple, free and nice looking app you have the cheats for the popular game GTA V, the cheats are actually for 2 consoles, XBOX 360 and the Playstation 3. Do you want do spawn cars, or weapons for a too difficult mission this app helps you. Why did we need to say more? Download now!
The app is made by two youngsters, 15 and 17. Freeware download of Cheats GTA V edition 1.0, size 1.57 Mb.
GTA SAN ANDREAS Cheats, maps for the PS3, Videogame, PC or Computers, XBOX.
Boost your GTA SAN ANDREAS gameplay with this GTA SAN ANDREAS Cheats app!
- PS3(Play Station)
GTA SAN ANDREAS! Here are what. Freeware download of CHEATS CODES AND MAPS FOR GTA SAN ANDREAS 3.0, size 14.68 Mb.
This is the complete unofficial guide to GTA 5
This App Includes:
- Cheats for (Xbox 360 & PS3)
- Full Strategy Guide
- Interactive Map
- Character Guide
- Wallpapers
- Videos
- In App Game
- Plus Much More!
Legal Disclaimer:
This is not an official. Free download of Cheats for GTA 5 - Full Strategy Guide + Interactive Map 1.0, size 13.63 Mb.
Du hast dich geargert das es bis jetzt keine App mit Cheats fur GTA V auf Deutsch gab?
Nun diese Zeit IST VORBEI!!!
Jetzt gibt es Cheats fur GTA V auf Deutsch!
Diese App beinhaltet alle Cheats nach verschiedenen Kategorien sortiert und per Schnellzugriff erreichbar. Au?erdem sprechen die Bewertungen und die. Freeware download of Cheats for GTA V - German Edition fur PS3 und Xbox! 1.1, size 3.25 Mb.
XBOX 360 achievements, Cheats
PS3 Trophies, Cheats,
GTA Cheats provides simple quick and easy access to every cheat code for every Grand Theft Auto game on all consoles/platforms.
This app contains cheats for game in the GTA V
No internet connection required! All data is stored locally.
Cheats & Guide for GTA 5 fans - intended for entertainment purposes.
Provides simple quick and easy access to every cheat code for every Grand Theft Auto game on all consoles/platforms.
This app contains cheats for
Grand Theft Auto V - PS3/360
Guides & Tutorials for cars, guns, items, missions etc.
Quiz for. Free download of Cheats & Guides for GTA 5 fans 1.0.0, size 58.51 Mb.
Every single GTA V cheat!
-> All player cheats
-> All vehicle cheats
-> All item cheats
-> All world cheats
GTA V Cheats Visualiser guides you through the sequence of buttons to activate your selected cheat.
-> Animations make it easy to understand which buttons to press
->. Free download of Cheats Visualiser for GTA V - Every Cheat! 1.1, size 12.58 Mb.
Herzlich willkommen zur Komplettlosung von GTA V. An dieser Stelle sollen entgegen dem Titel nicht nur einige warme Begru?ungsworte folgen: Im Gegenteil. Dieser erste Teil der Losung beschaftigt sich mit diversen Hinweisen und Grundlagen, die das erfolgreiche Spielen wesentlich vereinfachen. Um das Abenteuer auf der Konsole erfolgreich. Freeware download of Cheats & Walkthrough fur GTA V FREE 1.0, size 29.78 Mb.
Best unofficial guide for Grand Theft Auto IV & Episodes from Liberty City.
This App is a summary of Grand Theft Auto IV Cheats & Maps.
Cheats guide for PlayStation 3, Xbox 360, PC.
You can read at anytime without the Internet connection.
-GTA IV cheat codes
-GTA IV Episode One: The Lost and. Free download of GTA CHEATS AND MAPS (IV) 1.2, size 15.10 Mb.
GTA Cheats provides quick and easy access to every cheat code for every Grand Theft Auto game.
Tap a game's logo to see all its cheats. Choose from different consoles/platforms if available.
No internet connection is needed to view cheats.
Thanks to the amazing. Freeware download of GTA Cheats - for All Grand Theft Auto Games 2.1.3, size 16.36 Mb.
With GTA Forum, you can access Global Technology Associates' forums directly from your iPhone/iPod Touch/iPad.
- Send and receive PM's
- Access and post to the most recent discussions
- Read and post to vBulletin blogs and articles
- View vBulletin profiles
- Customize your mobile account anywhere, anytime. Freeware download of GTA Forum 1.3, size 7.34 Mb.
From the GTA Junkies fan based website comes the dedicated app, your number one source for everything GTA related, from the latest GTAV News, to glitches, video and the best snapmatics
- Latest Grand Theft Auto News Feed
- The Latest on the NextGen & PC upcoming GTAV Release
- Latest GTA News, Trailers,. Freeware download of GTA Junkies - your number one source for GTA 1.1, size 10.80 Mb.
The "GTA Sounds" app was developed for fans of Grand Theft Auto to have fun with the common sounds that they hear during gameplay.
This app includes:
? 24 High Quality Sounds from GTA
? Gorgeous User Interface
? Legendary Customer Support--E-Mail us your suggestions, and you'll get a real response!
GTA Traffic helps to monitor the traffic status around you and gives you quick access to the traffic web cams in Greater Toronto Area.. Freeware download of GTA Traffic 1.5.1, size 20.13 Mb.
GTA V Cheats for XBOX and Ps3. Easy and quick to use. Developer is Amund Halgunset.. Freeware download of GTA V Cheats for XBOX Ps3 II 1.1, size 4.51 Mb.


text: Calvin Klein projects consist of various new construction, retail fit-outs, and open store remodels in various malls and locations across the the United States and Canada. Fit plans include rehabilitation of HVAC, electric, sprinkler, and plumbing systems along with new storefronts, framing, and painting. Coordination of owner vendors, graphics, merchandise, IT, and operations.


text:
>Siri is moving beyond the iPhone 4S. In today's WWDC keynote, Scott Forstall announced that it's migrating to the new iPad with iOS 6.
In fact, Siri has vastly improved with the next-gen mobile operating system. Apple has added some pretty cool features—movies, restaurant reservations, and Yelp reviews. Adding it to the iPad is going to make a lot of users very happy.
Follow along with the rest of the Apple news today with our WWDC liveblog.


text:
St. Mitch: Casting a long shadow
For the first time since 1981, Mitch Van Yahres is not running for reelection to his House of Delegates seat, and he doesn't mind at all. "It's nice to be watching someone else battling for the seat," he says, sitting on the back porch of his house, having a cup of coffee and a cigar, listening to Garrison Keillor and watching the sunset.
With the 57th District firmly in his grip for 24 years, Van Yahres ran eight of 12 races unopposed. The first, a special election in January 1981, was the closest.
"I nearly beat him," says then-Republican candidate Tom Albro. As for subsequent challengers to Van Yahres, "I can assure you he didn't lose any sleep over them after me," says Albro.
Van Yahres laughs when told the Albro remark. "You always lose sleep over races," he protests. But in truth, the closest a Republican came was in 1993 when recent-college grad Mike Brown garnered 35 percent of the vote.
Van Yahres is not surprised to see three Dems– Rich Collins, Kim Tingley, and David Toscano– angling for his seat. "I figured there would be competition," he says– just not necessarily these three vying for the nomination.
And he declines to endorse anyone. "I think that has to be settled by the primary itself," he says.
As for the Republican candidate, "It's an uphill battle," says the retiring delegate. For all the candidates, he sees more of a fight because there isn't an incumbent running with a known record.
What makes the 57th District such a strong Democratic district, says Van Yahres, is that people feel strongly about social issues and education– especially with the University of Virginia, Piedmont Virginia Community College, and strong secondary schools here.
"My legacy is I have stood for some of the values of this district that believes in social values and rights of minorities," he says.
He foresees more social-issue battles coming up in the House. Whoever is elected, "Hopefully they'll take the same stance I did," says Van Yahres. "It appears they will."
Any advice for the candidates? "They should run their own campaigns as they feel they should," he suggests. "Be themselves. Don't try to be too political– political in the negative sense."
After 24 years, Delegate Mitch Van Yahres enjoys letting others have the fun of getting elected to the 57th District.


text:
Next up in the "teams whose head coach owes their job to Ray Lewis" are the Cincinnati Bengals. Now we just need the Jacksonville Jaguars (Jack Del Rio) and the 2005-2008 San Francisco 49ers (Mike Nolan) to complete the "#52's head coach's tree." Marvin Lewis' team is still licking their wounds from that 38-24 drubbing at the hands of the New England Patriots (a game that wasn't nearly as close as the score) in Week 1, and will look to rebound against a team that they had plenty of success against in 2009.
Those 2009 losses to Cincy were especially surprising for the Ravens and their fans not necessarily because of the outcomes, but because of the manner in which the Bengals were victorious. Running back Cedric Benson rad roughshod over B'More's usually stout run defense, breaking their streak of 40 consecutive games without allowing a 100-yard rusher on his way to 120 yards in Week 5, and duplicating the feat with 117 yards just four weeks later. Benson managed just 43 yards on 15 carries in Week 1, but his opportunities were quite limited due to his team getting blown out of the water early and being forced to play catch-up.
The Ravens will be looking for some revenge against Benson Sunday. If rookie defensive tackle Terrence Cody is able to suit up (he practiced this week), it will go a long way to exacting said revenge. Along with Haloti Ngata and Cory Redding up front, Benson will be hard pressed to find even a sliver of daylight. Even without Cody, the Ravens did well against the Jets' vaunted rushing attack last week, as RBs Shonn Green and LaDainian Tomlinson managed 80 yards on 16 carries.
"Well, wait a minute, that's 5 yards per carry," you might be saying. The stat is a bit misleading, as Tomlinson ripped off two 21-yard runs in the game. Take away those two, and the numbers drop to 38 yards on 14 carries, a 2.7 ypc average. Of course, you can't just "take away" big plays – the Ravens need to avoid giving up similar big plays to Benson and Bengals' "change-of-pace" back Bernard Scott.
Which of course, isn't to say that stopping the run = Ravens win. Quarterback Carson Palmer has always done well against our Ravens, putting up a career record of 8-3. Even after throwing a pick-6 to Ed Reed last year, Palmer bounced back and led his team to a last-minute game-winning touchdown in Baltimore.
Palmer threw for 345 yards and 2 touchdowns last week in New England, but again – they were in catch-up mode all day after falling behind 31-3. He again has a full compliment of weapons to throw to, including two reality TV stars.
Along with those two, rookie WR Jordan Shipley is dangerous, and Andre Caldwell (though I ripped Mike Preston earlier this week for bringing him up) is set to return from a groin injury and has hurt the Ravens in the past.
Just as getting Cody back could help the run defense, a return from injury in the secondary could greatly improve the Ravens' chances Sunday. Lardarius Webb has been removed from the injury report, but is still "working out the kinks," after ACL surgery. With Webby in there, the much maligned Ravens' secondary is instantly better. Without him, newcomer Josh Wilson and safety Haruki Nakamura will be forced to line up against the Bengals' receivers, matchups that favor Cincy.
The Bengals also gave the Ravens fits on defense last year, holding them to 14 and 7 points, respectively, in the two meetings. This despite Ray Rice racking up 143 and 135 yards from scrimmage (mostly receiving). The problem was that Rice was the team's leading receiver in both games, as cornerbacks Leon Hall and Jonathan Joseph gave Joe Flacco and the Ravens' wideouts fits.
2010 is a new year, though, and now Hall and Joseph have to deal with Anquan "Q" Boldin and former teammate T.J. Houshmandzadeh, who weren't there last year. Hopefully Housh can also bring some "insider info" to the Ravens in practice this week – the offense and defense could both use all the help they can get after being swept last season. Tom Brady had no trouble finding his wideouts last week, as both Wes Welker (8 catches, 64 yards, 2 TD) and Randy Moss (5, 59, 0) had better days than any Ravens WR had against the Bengals in 2009.
Of course, he's Tom Brady. While Flacco looked like Brady on occasion last week, skillfully avoiding the Jets' pressure and converting key 3rd-and-long situations, but looked downright awful at other times, holding the ball too long in the pocket, overthrowing a wide open Le'Ron McClain in the end zone, and throwing from his back foot. To show that he really is ready to step into the next tier of NFL quarterbacks, as so many experts see him doing, Joe needs to start beating quality QBs – not just the likes of Mark Sanchez and Jay Cutler – in head-to-head matchups. He has the weapons to do it now, so the time for excuses is over. In his defense, he had a perfect touchdown pass dropped last week (by Todd Heap) and another likely touchdown just flat out missed (by Derrick Mason). But he also underthrew Mason on another deep route, underthrew Boldin from his back foot, and missed Ray Rice on a slant that would have given the Ravens a 1st-and-goal inside the 5. We know he can make the throws. What we need to see now is consistency from #5.
The Ravens have revenge on their minds after being embarrassed by Cincy in 2009. The Bengals have redemption on theirs, after being blown out in Week 1.
I think the Bengals do bounce back this week…just not quite high enough.
Ravens 24 Bengals 20


text:
When I see a mass of words I run for cover, even if I have to go through it to get what I need. newsletter marketing
Heres what actually transpired in my opinion just recently theres a Google and yahoo site owner instrument that I needed to use; however Google upgraded it recently, therefore you know I required more info.
- Absolutely nothing gets men and women smiling like a-lengthy-overdue burglary the regimen, it provides something to look forward to;.
- Do you really would like to know why this.
- Save your valuable readers through the.
- A lot of tough selections - - you dont want your people to make. Realise why I informed you.
Right from the start I used to be confronted with extended paragraphs and text-arrange variety written content; my interest was de-activate, it needed my about 3 tries during a period of about 4 weeks to last but not least survive through everything. Could they already have made it more and simpler straight... ? Sure!
Talk about boring; I endured it because after all; the tool was of extremely high value, and in my opinion wasnt quite available elsewhere, so I figured it was worth it.
The tool was of extremely
Many rough decisions - - you dont would like visitors to make. See why I informed you this tale; thats no knowledge I see personally practicing before long. emailliste
At some time news letters may get just a little dull; and its the tedious versions that run after individuals aside... its wholesome to modify the tempo each and every again and now who states you cant have a great time. Why shouldnt your information note be enjoyment?
Cant have a great time
Nothing receives men and women smiling like a-very long-overdue break in the regimen, it offers us something to anticipate; its the reason we change eateries, we require a thing to problem our creative imagination and stimulate us.
Save your viewers from the "similar-old-dreary-routine," believe me theyll reward you with their awareness.
Similar-old-dreary-routine believe
An excellent video recording usually does the key, aesthetic activation takes your head to sites; that simple words on a monitor could never ever do. If YouTubes numbers are anything to go by movie is especially effective and others enjoy it.
Ever observed people while theyre watching "TV," you should try it, its great fun; its almost as if they are transported to another world. They get rid of all sensation of whats approximately them, they go the time simply; thats the overwhelming electrical power of movie. webdesign gusel
Oh I pretty much forgot nobody wants to have a conversation together with the "Oxford Dictionary" dont discuss into me but I dont wish to see the words soaring above my brain often, lighten up it up apply certain vivid phrases offer a little lifestyle in your message.
Give a tiny humor and go ahead and show off your very own section: whenever you break the "an ice pack" try to remember; people would like to seem like they may be speaking with other folks, so put in a very little excitement present your personality and make use of terms that present all those feelings.
Tiny humor and
Do you want to know why this is so efficient? Its because people can relate with it.
When was the past time you informed an excellent Tale? A e-newsletter doesnt have to be just reports, never ever underestimate the fascinating engaging potential of the fantastic storyline. How otherwise would you like to get the attention in this overly hectic generation, you should be persuasive... you will need to be... "Sorry my cell phone is ringing, just a min... "
Inspire engagement together with your publication, after all you happen to be directing it towards men and women why not obtain them involved with contests, problems or competitive events: case of truth Im in a very obstacle; can come to think about it I dont intend on burning off. weiter lesen
- At some point newsletters may get a little unexciting; and its the uninteresting ones that run after men.
- From the very beginning I became confronted with extended text and paragraphs-arrange kind.
- Heres what went down to me not too long ago theres a Yahoo and google web.


text:
Cup of John necesitaba un nuevo diseño de logotipo y lanzó un concurso de diseño en 99designs.
Un ganador ha sido elegido entre 49 diseños de 9 diseñadores freelance.
My name is John, I live on Long Island in New York. I work for a large corporation in New York City, but try to find web-based ventures to fill the little extra time I have. I've been looking to start an internet site for some time now and hoping this one will be a good first start. I launched a parenting blog site - FunctionalFather.com last year and now I'm looking to try a bigger endeavour taking on a magazine-style site targeted at a specific, popular summer village.
My wife and her family are from Sag Harbor, NY which is a small, quaint, classic New England-style village in the heart of the ritzy getaway known as "The Hamptons." In the summer, sworms of people (mostly wealthy) flock to The Hamptons each weekend to enjoy the beaches, nightlife, and the constant celebrity sightings. While Sag Harbor is part of "The Hamptons", it's often considered the alternative to all the hustle and bustle. There is a very strong local presence - people who grew up here, live here, and work here, and who depend on the migration of all the elite to help keep the area prosperous.
At MySagHarbor.com we are targeting both audiences - the locals and the aristocratic visitors and providing an insiders guide to life in the area. We'll feature restaurant reviews, ideas of outdoor activities, tips for navigating around the area, parenting advice etc. - all written by locals.
More about Sag Harbor at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sag_Harbor
This is an online business - a weblog/online magazine, so I want to make sure we realize that the primary use of the logo will be for the web, but we will also plan to use it for print production (T-shirts, decals, stickers, cards).
We would like a professional logo, but one with some creativitiy and flavor to it.
Sag Harbor's most iconic landmark is an old fashioned windmill located directly near the docks. You can find pictures of this on Google's Image search (enter "Sag Harbor windmill"). I think one great design would be "MySagHarbor.com" with a sillouette of a windmill in the background or just the arms of the windmill.
It's also a very active port for fishermen and yachts, so perhaps a picture/graphic of water or boats or boat masts could be included.
I'd like to include the ".com" in the logo
I'm thinking the typeset will have the "My" in the name be different than the rest of the lettering - perhaps a script-style font for "My" and clearer block type for "SagHarbor.com"
The files we will require are:
Print file format - .eps (CMYK)
Web file format - .jpg and layered .psd (RGB)
Colors should reflect a summer-style or ocean-like theme, but nothing too far from earth tones or solid, traditional colors.
Example of a logo we like and is also a competitor in the space: http://www.hamptons.com/
Descubre cómo funciona un concurso de diseño u obtén más información sobre nuestros servicios de diseño de logo.


text:
Every week we get Down & Dirty, in which Nozlee Samadzadeh breaks down our favorite seasonal fruits, vegetables, and more by the numbers.
Tomatoes are the beauty queens of summer: beautiful, a bit high-maintenance, and occasionally prone to bursting. And they're not afraid to break your heart: tomatoes just aren't worth eating in any season but the summer. As red as a hothouse tomato looks, it can't compare to the juicy, intense flavor of a sun-ripened sungold at farmers' market.
As you probably know, tomatoes are actually fruit. But did you know that to keep tariff laws in order, in 1893 the Supreme Court unanimously decided to classify tomatoes as a vegetable? You can read the full decision here, if you'd like -- tomatoes may be fruit botanically, but legally they're vegetables.
If you're lucky enough to have tomato plants in your backyard, you know to water them well (but never let moisture touch the leaves!) and to keep them on the vine as long as possible to get the best of their sweet flavor once picked. For those of us who have to buy at market: most tomatoes are sold just a day short of peak ripeness, just for ease of transportation. Look for tomatoes that are unblemished, feel heavy in the hand, smell amazing, have clear, unwrinkled skin. If you need tomatoes for that day or are looking to make a big batch of salsa or tomato sauce, ask around until you find a stall with a "seconds" bin -- tomatoes that got smushed in transit, are partially split open, or are just a little ugly. Not only are these ready to eat, they're also less expensive!
The HeirloomsHeirloom tomatoes are the ugly ducklings of the family, with gnarled outsides and flavorful innards. With dozens of cultivars, most heirloom varieties originated when a genetic mutation held over a generation or two. Because they aren't bred for consistency, heirlooms have wonderful craggy shapes and come in all colors: yellow, orange, green, and even black. We gathered as many varieties as we could at the Union Square Greenmarket to photograph, but these are just a drop in the bucket:
1. Black Krim - This variety originated in Crimea, where the long, hot summers are perfect for growing tomatoes.
2. Black Heirloom - Originally from Russia, the reds and greens in this tomato make it almost mahogany in color.
3. Mr. Stripey - Intensely sweet and striped in red and yellow, the tomato we picked out was adorably heart-shaped!
4. Green Zebra - Conventional green tomatoes are just unripe, but in heirloom varieties it's just another mature color. This yellow-green tomato is less sweet than other varieties because of its striped green flesh.
5. It's a Mystery! - We couldn't figure out the variety of this tomato: pale green on its lower half and darkest black on top, it had sky blue mottling near the stem. Amazing. If you know what variety this could be possibly be, let us know!
The RegularsThese are the tomatoes you're used to: round, reliable, and uniform in color. Most of these tomatoes are hybrids bred for their consistent shape -- an heirloom tomato makes a gorgeous addition to a salad, but it's the plum tomato you go to when you need to make a sauce. There's room for all kinds.
6. Beefsteak - This is what you think of when you think of a tomato: round, meaty, and red to the core. (These are Merrill's favorite kind of tomatoes!) They're sweeter than heirloom varieties, are usually smaller, and have a much higher yield, meaning that you get more bang for your buck when planting them in the garden.
7. Plum - Plum tomatoes are ideal for grilling and sauce-making. With a high ratio of flesh to seeds, they don't break down when heated or turn to mush when simmered. San Marzano tomatoes, prized for their sauce, are a plum variety. (You can also find yellow plum tomatoes, like we have here.) It's worth mentioning that plum tomatoes are ideal for slicing into long, skinny sandwiches, just because of their shape!
8. Cherry - From Sungolds to "Yellow Pears," I would bet that most cherry tomatoes never make it out of their respective owners' gardens -- they're that irresistable eaten sun-warmed straight off the vine. If you manage to get them inside, though, cherry tomatoes are perfect for salads: bite-sized and ready to eat, they won't get watery on contact with dressing. (Need to cut them in half? Try this trick.)
9. The Inside Scoop - As pointed out above, the inside of a tomato is important once you start cooking. Big, pound-plus tomatoes are mostly composed of seeds and the membranes around them -- less than ideal for breaking down on the stovetop. Small, meaty plum tomatoes, on the other hand, leave more behind after seeding.
Whether you're making sauce, tomato pie, or anything else, you might also need to peel your tomatoes. Kristen has us covered: you can freeze them, blanch them in boiling water, or just use a food mill.
From the garden or the farmers' market, it's always a good idea to eat as many tomatoes as possible during the summer -- here are three tomato-forward recipes you'll still be dreaming about in December:
With Bacon Aioli
Fried Green Tomatoes
The Best Tomato Sandwich
See what other Food52 readers are saying.