text:
- Font:
- +
- -
Guests: James Clyburn, Joan Walsh, Mark Halperin, Robert Wexler, Chris Van
HOST: Targeting Democrats.
Let's play HARDBALL.
Good evening. I'm Chris Matthews in Washington. Leading off tonight:
Base politics. It's getting even uglier out there. Angry opponents of
health care reform are targeting Democratic House members with death
threats. Some Democrats have had their office windows smashed. National -
Democratic National Committee chair Tim Kaine said today the Republicans
have stoked that anger and now he's going to make them own the bad
Plus, Senate Republicans are not giving up on killing the actual
health care bill itself. They're offering up amendment after amendment,
hoping to pass at least one of them and send the bill back to the House and
then out of existence. One proposal, no Viagra for sex offenders. Now,
who could be against that one? Republicans want to force Democrats to vote
against this kind of common sense measure, then attack them for it in
November. A great example, I'd say, of politics for the purpose of
Next, the spoils of victory. America loves a winner, and President
Obama just got a big "W" on the board. Let's see what happens when he
tries to reform No Child Left Behind on education or he goes after the big
banks with financial regulation. Do Republicans look forward to being Wall
Street champions?
And Rudy Giuliani says just give Republicans a chance to reform health
care. Oh? You mean the way they did when they were in charge all those
years? That story's coming up in the "Sideshow," where it belongs.
I'll finish tonight, by the way, with some thoughts about Vice
President Joe Biden.
We start, however, with the big story, health care politics. It's
getting dangerous. Joining me now is U.S. Congressman Chris Van Hollen,
Democrat of Maryland, chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign
Congressman Van Hollen, these stories are growing. We've got a lot of
them out there now. Congresswoman Slaughter had her office windows
smashed. Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford's office, the same deal. Windows
were smashed at DNC or Democratic headquarters in Rochester, New York, in
Pleasant Ridge (ph), Ohio, in Wichita, death threats to Congresswoman
Slaughter and to Congressman Bart Stupak, vandalism at other lawmakers'
This doesn't look like it's going to stop, and it looks to me like
there's going to be more copycats as we get to the weekend, and then we
have booze on top of this craziness coming Friday and Saturday night. I
would expect more trouble from the red-hots on the right. Your thoughts?
REP. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN (D-MD), DCCC CHAIR: Yes, these are not isolated
incidents, Chris. You're seeing patterns. You're seeing this happen
across the country. You know, during the protests over the health care
bill up here on Capitol Hill, we heard a lot of ugly slurs. We heard a lot
of homophobic epithets thrown around. And that was outside the Capitol.
But unfortunately, some of that also took place on the floor of the
House, with the Republican member shouting out, "Baby killer." And what's
happened here is the Republican leadership, instead of saying to its
supporters around the country, Calm down, that this is a time to try and
put down the flames, they're pouring more and more gasoline on the flames.
And that is irresponsible.
It's time that there be some adult supervision within the Republican
Party, that some Republican leader say this is not acceptable, that we can
disagree with one another without this kind of outrageous conduct.
MATTHEWS: Well, here's what your leader, your party, Democratic
National Committee chair Tim Kaine—he's, of course, the outgoing
governor of Virginia—he told The Huffingtonpost, quote, "They're going
to—they're going to own part of the slurs cast at members of Congress,
people vandalizing members of Congress's offices. Twice Republican members
of Congress sitting in the well of the House have behaved in rude and
outrageous ways. When it's OK for leaders to do the rude, outrageous stuff
like that, it sure sends a signal that the followers should do it, too."
I get a sense that there's real license out there, Congressman, and it
began with that guy in the House who yelled, "You lie," the guy from South
Carolina, and—you know, Wilson. And I just wonder whether—can you
smell it on the floor? Do you sense this derision, this contempt for the
president of the United States and the Democratic Party, that's gotten
almost to the point of this sort of, I don't know what the word,
primordial, it's so deep?
VAN HOLLEN: Yes, no, this is the same kind of thing that happened
after the "You lie" comment. There was a brief apology and then people
went out and tried to raise a whole lot of money off it. Just like the
"Baby killer" comment, the guy says he's sorry, and then he goes and put
the a YouTube video together to try and raise money off it.
The fact of the matter is, they're playing a very difficult double
game, or at least they were. They were trying to say, Look, we want to be
able to use this energy that's being fueled by some of the—on the far
right here, and yet we want to be able to try and distance ourselves when
we can.
They've lost all pretense. These guys are united together. This is
now the face of the Republican Party. They have not taken responsibility.
They've not led by example. In fact, they're doing the opposite. I mean,
they're becoming examples of irresponsible behavior themselves. And when
they do that, I think most Americans, whether you're a Democrat or an
independent or a Republican, say, Wait a minute. This is out of bounds.
There's a time for people to disagree in a civil manner, but this kind of
behavior's gotten out of control.
And I think the danger is the Republican Party has been so kidnapped
and hijacked by the right that they're afraid that if they criticize this
outrageous behavior, they're going to lose the support that they're now
banking on. But I think it will boomerang on them because the price of
getting the support...
VAN HOLLEN: ... from the far extreme right is to lose the sensible
MATTHEWS: You have people—Congressman Neugebauer from—he's a
real birther from down in—down in Texas. He's one of these guys doesn't
believe Barack Obama was born her, not one of us. He's gone all the way to
that extreme. He's the one that yelled the other day "Baby killer" on the
floor against Bart Stupak. Bart Stupak has gotten death threats.
Would you say that this incitement from the Republican leadership is
criminal? I mean, seriously. If people are going to have windows thrown
bricks at, if they're going to get their lives threatened, if we're getting
criminal behavior resulting from their incitement, is the incitement itself
VAN HOLLEN: Well, it's a very dangerous game, Chris. I mean, I don't
know whether—look, people have to draw their conclusions as they want.
But I think the big giveaway here is that they are not coming out and
forcefully condemning these statements, and through them...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
VAN HOLLEN: Not just—they're not just being silent, they're also
making highly heated remarks that, obviously, in the case of "Baby killer,"
crossed that line. And so they have, in fact, joined in this kind of
activity. So people can characterize it how they want, but there's no
denying the fact that they are stoking the flames here and they are not
trying to separate themselves. In fact, they've embraced the benefits—
what they consider to be the political benefits from these activities.
MATTHEWS: Let's go to former governor of Alaska Sarah Palin. I don't
know whether you put her on the fringe. I think she's close to it. She
certainly appeals to those people on the fringe. I don't know if she's or
not. But she's put out a map targeting Democrats with these crosshairs
over it, these red crosshairs, I mean, the kind you do with target
practice, I guess, where they, you know, a mounted—what do you call
those things, sight on the top of your gun. She's put these things out.
There's a picture of it out there. What do you make of that, her putting
out this picture of Democratic seats and where you got to target them?
VAN HOLLEN: You know, I really think that in this environment, that
that is crossing the line because it's not the folksy sort of, "You betcha"
kind of thing that, you know, she's trying to portray, at least she tried
to when she was running for vice president.
In this particular environment, I think it's really dangerous to try
and make your point in that particular way because there are people who are
taking that kind of thing seriously. We've heard from a whole lot of
members who've received death threats not just to themselves but to their
families. We had to have a meeting today with the Capitol Police to go
over security procedures.
And again, we should be able to disagree on the floor of the House and
we should be able to have emotional debates, but when it crosses the line
into threats to the lives of people and their families, this has gotten out
of control. And this is why someone—someone needs to step up on the
Republican side and say, Enough is enough, rather than trying to play this
double game.
MATTHEWS: Well, maybe this violent language and violent behavior is
the result of the fact that the polls seem to be switching against the
right, at least temporarily. Let's take a look. I know that you know
these polls. The new CBS poll has a 7-point swing under way right now in
favor of health care—it's still not the most popular game in town,
obviously, but the approval number's gone up dramatically, from 37 percent
to 42 percent, and disapproval's come down a bit.
Do you sense that out in your Maryland district, which I'm quite
familiar with, since I live in there—do you have a sense that the
president has made his case this week, or is there a lot more selling to do
down the road for health care reform?
VAN HOLLEN: Well, I think both. I think the president has made his
case and I think he needs to continue to sell it and get that information
out there. But our members are sensing a big turnaround and boost on this.
It's reflected in the poll you mentioned. It's also reflected in the "USA
Today" poll. And people are beginning to feel it. I can tell you that the
morale and energy on the Democratic side has gotten an incredible boost.
There's a lot of invigoration going on as a result of this.
And here's the question I would have, Chris, for our Republican
colleagues, because they stopped debating the merits of health care a
little while ago and they began to focus on two things—one process, and
then the second one was polls. They kept saying, How can you be ramming
this thing down the throats of the American people?
Well, I have a simple question for them. Now that the polls seem to
show that the American people like this idea, if this trend and these polls
continue, we have to ask them, Are you supporting this bill now? Because
that became their whole argument.
MATTHEWS: Yes.
VAN HOLLEN: Again, it wasn't on the merits because we know that when
you devote—when you debate the pieces of this legislation, they were
very popular. And now that they're being implemented, people are going to
begin to like it. So they doubled down on this argument that we were
somehow ramming something through against the will of the American people,
when, in fact, the polling now suggests the American people like what we
see. So I hope our colleagues will—will come around and say they made a
MATTHEWS: Is it harder to recruit members to run for Congress now
that they're facing death threats, even though the polls may be slightly
turning into your direction? How's recruitment going?
VAN HOLLEN: Well, recruitment's going very well. And in fact, this
kind of new energy will give us a boost. As you know, there was a fair
amount of uneasiness that we weren't going to be able to implement
important parts of the agenda that we'd all run on. Especially after the
Massachusetts Senate race, a lot of people were, you know, feeling
dispirited. There were some people who wanted to throw in the towel on
health care reform or just take little baby steps. And the fact that we
were able to regroup, get this together and have the president sign into
VAN HOLLEN: ... an historic piece of legislation has given everybody
a big boost.
MATTHEWS: Are you glad Scott Brown won that race? He seems like he
woke up the Democratic Party from a long sleep. Would you say, all things
considered, that was a help?
VAN HOLLEN: Well, I'm not saying I'm glad he won it, but there was
that silver lining that everyone got an early wake-up call in time to rally
the troops, and also in time to send the message to the Senate that we
don't need to try and get 60 votes on every single piece of legislation...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
VAN HOLLEN: ... that a majority can get stuff done. And that was a
very important lesson, and I hope they will continue to recognize that
lesson as we go through other issues this year.
MATTHEWS: OK, thank you so much, U.S. Congressman Chris Van Hollen,
head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Coming up, much more on the anger on the right we're seeing out there,
lots more evidence. It's not talk, it's actions, and they seem to be
intensifying as this health care reform bill heads towards reality.
Democratic members of Congress have received death threats, as I said.
They've had their offices vandalized. And the brother of one congressman
has had his gas line on his home barbecue severed. What a strange way to
scare people. I don't know what this is, scary stuff. We'll talk to
Congressman Jim Clyburn, one of the leaders of the House, about whether
Republicans will own this behavior by their supporters.
You're watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.
REP. STENY HOYER (D-MD), MAJORITY LEADER: The incidences of threats,
either in person or over telephones or through other communications devices
(INAUDIBLE) great concern to members for the safety of themselves and their
MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL. House Majority Leader Steny
Hoyer—you just saw him there—he says he's concerned that at least 10
House members have received threats, serious threats—some of the ones
that you know about already, death threats to members, smashed windows in
members' offices and at local Democratic headquarters around the country,
vandalism at the homes of members' relatives.
Well, James Clyburn is the House majority whip, the top man.
Congratulations. I've never seen you so happy. I'm watching you there a
minute ago there, Mr. Clyburn, and you haven't seemed this happy since I
met you. So congratulations. You've won.
REP. JAMES CLYBURN (D-SC), MAJORITY WHIP: Thank you.
MATTHEWS: And in America, winning counts. Let me ask you about the
dangers of winning. You've incited some anger out there on the floor of
the House, lines like "Baby killer," "You lie," is inciting people out in
the streets to get violent.
CLYBURN: Well, thank you so much for having me, Chris. And yes, I am
pretty happy right now. You know, I think that one of the things we have
to be very, very careful of in our society is that we don't ruin the
possibilities of us operating the civil manner. I think that when you see
people on the floor, as we saw, cheering those people who are up in the
balcony jeering, there's something wrong with that. It violates the
decorum of the House, but it also helps to incite people.
And I think that what we saw on Sunday and Saturday is a throwback to
a time that all of us thought we had behind us. All of this is not about
health care. These people were ginned up in such a way, and had posters
that went far beyond whether or not this bill ought to not pass. Those
kinds of things we have got to stop, and they are being egged on by people
who ought to know better.
MATTHEWS: Well, you know, there's a lot of talk about whether tea
partiers are a separate partier or they're just Republicans at a meeting.
Let's take a look at these latest numbers. The Quinnipiac poll,
Congressman, shows that 74 percent of tea partiers are self-described
Republicans. Well, that's three quarters, Only 1 in 6 -- 16 -- say
they're Democrats. They must be conservative Democrats, I guess.
What do you make of that? I mean, are they—is this just another
name for Republican, tea party?
CLYBURN: Oh, I think so. Oh, there's no question about it. They are
an arm of the Republican Party. No question about that. And I think that
people should understand that more than anything else. If 75 percent of
them identify themselves as Republicans, I suspect that in that other 25
percent or 26 percent, whatever it is, you'll find a few Republican
leanings in there, as well.
So I believe we know that they came here to try to intimidate, try to
stop this vote. They had to know that we were not going to be intimidated.
I hope they know that. So there's something else going on here that's
churning up people for other activities down the road.
Look, we're going to soon get to deal with this issue of immigration,
and I'm afraid that if we don't tamp this down now, that controversial
issue could very well...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
CLYBURN: ... generate something that could lead to some catastrophic
MATTHEWS: Let's talk to a case in point. Here's the brick thrown
through the window of that Rochester, New York, Democratic headquarters.
The note attached says "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice."
That's, of course, the Barry Goldwater slogan from way back in '64 in a
different, more frightening context.
Now, the person who's apparently egged that person on, the person who
took credit for encouraging people to smash windows, said this in a radio
Let's listen to this fellow. Has name is Vanderboegh.
MIKE VANDERBOEGH, FORMER MILITIA LEADER: There are rifles being
cleaned right now. Do you folks understand that?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Being what? Claimed, from where?
VANDERBOEGH: There are rifles being taken out of the closet and
MATTHEWS: Well, there you have it.
CLYBURN: Yes.
MATTHEWS: He's talking about people, you know, locking and loading
and all that sort of stuff, and getting their rifles cleaned for action.
And he's encouraging it, this blogger. He's apparently the guy who got
behind this brick-throwing.
People are coming out of the closet, if you will. And they're saying
that they're dangerous people and they want to make other people dangerous.
CLYBURN: Well, you know, when you hear that kind of talk, and then—
and you look on Sarah Palin's Web site and see that she's got crosshairs
there targeting people who voted for this bill...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
CLYBURN: ... now, why not put a star there or a check mark? To put
the crosshairs there of a rifle tends to give credence to this sort of
And then we heard the head of the Republican Party, Mr. Steele, saying
something about shooting the speaker down. I forgot what it was, but it
implied a violent action.
MATTHEWS: Sure.
CLYBURN: This stuff is beyond the pale.
And they need to stop this, because, I can tell you, I have seen how
these things escalate. People out there in the streets get their signals
or what they think are their signals from the people in positions like we
hold. And, so, if we don't disown that and go get our people to move
beyond that, if we participate in it, either from the balcony or on the
floor of the House, you are aiding and abetting this kind of terrorism,
MATTHEWS: Well, you know, you're getting language from Bill McCollum,
the former member now running for governor of Florida. You know, he's
referring to the health care bill that you got passed, helped to get
passed, as an invasion of the sovereignty of Florida.
They're using secessionist language. I thought the Gadsden flag from
South Carolina flying over the balcony of the Capitol being waved by
members of Congress. The Gadsden flag was the "Don't tread on me" flag of
the republic...
CLYBURN: Absolutely.
MATTHEWS: ... that we used to fight the British with. They're
treating our central government in Washington as the enemy, as if it's a
foreign government. And that's the way Bill McCollum's talking. They're
using the language of—of nullification and even of secession in Texas.
CLYBURN: Yes.
MATTHEWS: And now Bill McCollum's using it. There it is, the Gadsden
flag. That was the flag we used to form our republic when we were fighting
the British. That's the way the—what's the—what's going on here?
This is real symbolism of—of a—almost a mutiny.
CLYBURN: Yes.
And, as you know, Bill McCollum is a former member of this body. And,
so, that, in and of itself, signals something to me. Let me tell you, I
think that the attorneys general that have been filing these lawsuits, it's
somewhat reminiscent, you know, of those people who resisted the
fundamental rights like voting.
MATTHEWS: Yes.
CLYBURN: All we're trying to do here is get rid of discrimination
against people with preexisting conditions, stop discriminating against
women, who are paying twice for their premiums that men pay for them, stop
discriminating against people who get catastrophic illnesses.
That's all we're doing, trying to say, let's put health care on an
equal footing for everybody, make it accessible, make it affordable, make
it accountable. This is not about anything that's foreign to what a
democracy ought to be.
MATTHEWS: You know, I'm just amazed. I'm like you. I study history.
And I realize that Richard Nixon, who was hardly a left-winger,
advocated an employer mandate back in the '70s. You know, it—I—and
Mitt Romney up in Massachusetts signed a bill that requires people to have
health insurance.
Out in California, Schwarzenegger's done it. I mean, this isn't left-
wing politics. This is—well, at most, it's center-left, if not center.
MATTHEWS: How do they get away with this socialist thing they keep
throwing at you guys?
CLYBURN: You know what's so interesting? I have had my staff chart
Bob Dole's plan back in 1994 that he offered up in alternative—as an
MATTHEWS: Yes.
CLYBURN: ... to the plan being pushed by President Clinton. We
tracked it. Except for Medicaid expansion in our plan and the absence
MATTHEWS: Yes.
CLYBURN: ... of medical malpractice, there are exactly the same
MATTHEWS: Yes.
CLYBURN: This plan is so close to Bob Dole's plan, it ain't funny.
And, so, this is nothing that's not been put on the table by
Republicans time and time again. It's just that these people have
MATTHEWS: Yes.
CLYBURN: ... to try to deny this president.
MATTHEWS: And now they have resorted to rock-throwing.
Anyway, thank you very much, U.S. Congressman Jim Clyburn.
CLYBURN: Thank you so much for having me.
MATTHEWS: Again—again, I know you are happy and proud because...
MATTHEWS: ... this is history that was made this week. And if you
are opposed to it, you still have to recognize it as history.
Anyway, thank you, sir, for coming on.
Up next...
CLYBURN: Thank you so much for having me.
MATTHEWS: ... another whopper from Rudy Giuliani. He said
Republicans are ready to reform health care if they can just get control of
the White House and Congress again. Of course, the former mayor may want
to ask why the party that he's from now has never done anything on health
care when they were in control under President Bush and, before that, under
President Clinton, when Newt Gingrich was calling the shots on Capitol
How come the Republicans never do health care when they get the
chance? The "Sideshow," where Rudy gets to be—coming up next.
You're watching HARDBALL on MSNBC.
MATTHEWS: Back to HARDBALL. Now for the "Sideshow."
First: Rudy's revisionism.
Yesterday, on FOX, Rudy Giuliani took a whack at Democratic health
care reforms. His point? That Americans should give Republicans a chance
at governing and doing things like that.
RUDOLPH GIULIANI ®, FORMER NEW YORK CITY MAYOR: You've got nothing
to lose. You give us a chance. Let us do the things that we wanted to do
that Obama completely stopped us from doing and Pelosi stopped us from
They keep accusing us of being the party of no. Put us in power, give
us a chance, and we will pass a major tax deduction for health insurance,
$15,000 for an individual—for a family, $7,500 for an individual.
We will pass the ability to buy insurance in every state, so you drive
down the price of insurance. We will pass tort reform.
MATTHEWS: Wait a second. Republicans had control of the White House
and both houses of Congress for four years, between 2003 and 2007. Why
didn't they try any of these reforms Rudy's talking about now?
Oh, by the way, here's some the things Republicans have given us in
recent years. Bush Sr. gave us Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court.
Speaker Newt Gingrich gave us a government shutdown. Bush Jr. gave us the
war in Iraq and eight years of deficit spending and nearly doubling the
national debt.
Next: making amends. Though the Republican—though the president
delayed his months—this month's trip to Indonesia to work on health
care, he did take time to do an interview with Indonesian TV.
Here our president is talking about the four years he spent growing up
in Indonesia.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Is it true you wrote a poem stating that your
dream is to become a president?
BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: That's not true. I
think that I—I remember reading one of my teachers saying that I was
planning to be president when I was 6. You know when I was 6, I wanted to,
I think, to be a fireman.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: A fireman?
MATTHEWS: Well, let me tell you, all boys wanted to be a fireman when
they grew up. I certainly did.
Finally, power to the people—that's apparently not the slogan
Republican Congressman Louie Gohmert of Texas, a big states' rights guy,
was trumpeting on the House floor yesterday. It looks like the congressman
is nostalgic for the old days, the time before the 17th Amendment. That's
right, before the popular election of U.S. senators, back when they were
picked by state legislatures.
Here he is, Louie Gohmert.
REP. LOUIE GOHMERT ®, TEXAS: Since the 17th Amendment took out the
last check and balance on usurpation of states' rights, it's time to get
the balance back in place.
We have 39 states upset, wanting to do something, and not have another
unfunded federal mandate coming down their throats. This will do it.
Let's get an amendment that gets the balance back into the country and the
Constitution, before this Congress destroys what's left.
MATTHEWS: Louie, I know just what you're talking about. I remember
when the Texas State legislature threw Sam Houston out of the U.S. Senate
because he believed in the Union.
Now for the "Number."
Statistician Nate Silver, the guy who predicted the 2008 popular vote,
is out with a new model about the midterm elections coming up this
November. Per his calculation, what are Republicans' chances of winning
back the U.S. Senate? Ten percent. Republicans have a 1-in-10 shot at
taking back the U.S. Senate, according to our expert, tonight's not-so-"Big
Up next: How does President Obama's big victory on health care reform
help him going forward, and what lessons can he bring to the looming fights
coming up ahead on other issues?
You're watching HARDBALL now, only on MSNBC.
MIKE HUCKMAN, CNBC CORRESPONDENT: I'm Mike Huckman with your CNBC
"Market Wrap."
And stocks slipping today, as a downgrade on Portugal's credit rating
sent the dollar higher and commodities lower—the Dow Jones industrial
average falling 52 points, the S&P 500 down six points, and the Nasdaq
sliding 16 points.
Fitch Ratings cutting Portugal's credit rating one notch and warning
that another downgrade could be on the way. That sent the dollar higher
against the euro, while oil prices fell and gold slid to a six-week low.
Here in the United States, new home sales falling to a record low in
February. Investors are increasingly concerned about the still struggling
housing market, with the Fed about to end its purchases of mortgage-related
And another report showing durable goods orders—in other words, big
stuff that's made to last a long time—ticked up half-a-point in
February, with January's numbers revised sharply higher.
And, in stocks, options broker M.F. Global soaring more than 10
percent today—its stock, that is—after naming former New Jersey
Governor, Senator and Goldman Sachs executive Jon Corzine as the new
chairman and CEO.
That's it from CNBC, first in business worldwide—now back to
MATTHEWS: Back to HARDBALL.
President Obama got a health care bill signed into law, so now what?
What can he do with his win and his party for the next issue? What will be
his issue, in fact?
Well, today, "The New York Times" reported—quote—here is the
line from "The Times" today—"Buoyed by passage of landmark health care
legislation, the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress said
Wednesday that an overhaul of financial regulations was the next
legislative priority."
Financial regulation reform, is that what the people want, what voters
want? Are they going to hear it as getting close to them and their
pocketbooks as we get closer to November? And what about the Republicans?
Will we hear them? Well, we will hear a lot more nos from them, perhaps.
Joan Walsh is editor in chief of Salon.com. And "TIME" magazine's
Mark Halperin is the co-author of the bestseller "Game Change."
Here is the question. How do you put bite into financial reform, so
it sounds like tough on Wall Street, something like the old Teddy Roosevelt
trust-busting, where the American people feel that the politicians, at
least some of them, are out there fighting for them against the guys who
screw around with their money on Wall Street and always end up rich, while
people end up poor.
Joan Walsh.
JOAN WALSH, EDITOR IN CHIEF, SALON.COM: Well, I think, you know,
Timothy Geithner came out today and has begun to sound—to sound a little
bit tougher on the issue of really having a specific agency that looks out
for consumers.
There's a lot of pressure to collapse it. Why can't the Fed do it,
FDIC? There are all these different agencies. And he's sounding—he's
sounding a little bit more populist. You know, he doesn't like that. He
doesn't like that word. He doesn't like to be a populist. But he's really
making the case in terms of consumer protection, protecting the little guy,
protecting the—protecting American families.
That—that can sell. You know, I—I think that—I think people
are waiting for them to get back to jobs. That's what I would like to see
them tackle. They did that jobs bill, and they actually got some
Republican support.
MATTHEWS: Yes.
WALSH: That was because it was mainly a Republican bill. It was
mainly tax credits. And liberals would have liked to see more direct
spending for jobs.
But I—I think that's going to come up again, and—and we will see
if they get any Republican help. I doubt they will.
MATTHEWS: Well, Mark, there's a lot of retired people, people with
401(k)s, not rich people, but people with—with some money in the bank,
some money in stocks, and they do get the word, if they don't get it
I got it from a wealthy friend of mine once, who said, you know, all
the money is made before somebody gets on the stock market. You don't
really make money in the stock market. And that seems to be increasingly
the theory people have. They're not making money out there. They don't
trust the system to protect their money and they—when they do invest it.
Is there political pay dirt in this president going after financial
MARK HALPERIN, SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST, "TIME": I think there's
three ways this could be political pay dirt for him.
One is to be more populist, to get not just people on the left, but
some people in the center, and even some people on the right, to frame the
the attack on Wall Street or the critique of Wall Street in a way that
gets people to think Obama understands their everyday problems.
And then, three, he was got to make this part of talking about jobs.
Joan's right, that's where they should be. There's obvious ways to connect
doing this with jobs, not just investments. I think if they do those three
things, they're in a much stronger position and can take advantage of the
momentum off health care.
MATTHEWS: Let's gets to jobs. I'm with Joan. I think we've got big
construction jobs, people working out there, lots and lots of jobs. I
don't understand why he hasn't done this. I think Republicans, who love to
appropriate for these kind of things, would jump their claim. They'd love
to be part of this.
Here's President Obama, by the way, on Tuesday with a larger point.
Let's listen.
OBAMA: There's still the work to do to rebuild this economy. There's
still work to do to spur on hiring. There's work to do to improve our
schools and make sure every child has a decent education. There's still
work to do to reduce our dependences on foreign oil. There's more work to
do to provide greater economic security to a middle class that has been
struggling for a decade.
So this victory does not erase the many serious challenges we face as
a nation. Those challenges have been allowed to linger for years, even
decades. And we're not going to solve them all overnight.
MATTHEWS: Joan, what do you think, in your reporting, tells you why
they haven't gone for some big WPA jobs bill, you know accelerate public
works? Take all the bridges that need to be fixed in this country, all the
potholes that need to be filled, roads that need to be redone. They're all
out there. These roads have gotten in terrible shape because of this
winter. And fix them.
WALSH: Yes. There's all of the infrastructure spending. The other
thing they could have done with the stimulus bill, Chris—they did a
little bit, but they didn't do it enough, in my opinion—is go to the
cities, go to the states, and prevent these awful layoffs of firefighters,
policemen, police officers, teachers. You know, really, really losing not
make work jobs, but jobs that are the backbone of our small societies, our
They put out the stimulus at the same time that certainly California
was laying off teachers, furloughing people. I didn't understand why they
didn't do that either. But I think they didn't do it because they didn't
think they had the votes, and that was very early in his presidency, when
he believed in bipartisanship. And he cut that stimulus back, remember, to
hope to get some votes. And he didn't—you know, he got none in the
House and two in the Senate from the Republicans. So that's why he didn't
do it.
Now what I'm hoping as a Democrat—I'm going to say that right out
front. I'm hoping that success breeds success. They've learned what they
can do with a simple majority. They've learned what they can do with an
up-and-down vote.
They've also learned how to message better. The messaging in the last
weekend of that health care reform was better than any messaging that you
and I had watched in the last two years. It was really about how does this
help you now? I think they've learned to how to sell themselves better.
And I'm a little bit optimistic that success will build on itself.
MATTHEWS: I think that the real message was from Massachusetts a few
weeks ago, when the voters up there said, it's not working. And they voted
for a Republican. Here's an interesting little fight along your lines. I
want Mark to respond to this. There's a really good talent in the White
House these days for dealing with John McCain, the guy they beat in the
last election.
Here he is, John McCain, telling an Arizona radio station about the
health care vote and saying "there will be no cooperation for the rest of
the year, that they have poisoned"—the Democrats have. "Poisoned the
well because of how they've done this."
Let's listen to Senator McCain. Oh here's—I'm sorry, here's White
House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs reacting to McCain. Let's listen to
ROBERT GIBBS, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: I find it curious that the
that the—that not getting your way on one thing means you've decided
to take your toys and go home. I don't think—it didn't work well for my
six-year-old. I doubt it works well in the United States Senate because we
have—we have issues that—that are important for his constituents and
for all of America.
MATTHEWS: Mark, you're an expert at games and game change. Your book
is unbelievable. Let me ask you this, what game is being played here?
Twice now in a row, White House staffers, starting with Axelrod and now
Gibbs, are referring to John McCain, the man who ran against their
candidate, the president of the United States, as a child. The other day,
Axelrod referred to him as being in the sandbox. Now they're referring to
him as a six-year-old. Are they systematically trying to drive John McCain
into being Mr. Wilson next door, trying to get him so mad that he starts
cranking around?
What are they up to with these patronizing comments about the senator
from Arizona, from the White House?
HALPERIN: Well, first, Chris, thank you about the book. Look, with
John McCain, he's a special case because they have practice from the
campaign of painting him as petulant and erratic. And the more they can do
that to any Republican leader—they'll do it to Rush Limbaugh and others,
as well—they want to do that because they want the public to see the
Republican party led by people who uncooperative and emotional and
I think, Chris, the biggest story in politics right now, in the wake
of health care, is the White House calculation for the rest of the year.
Do they things, substantively and politically, to try to build bipartisan
cooperation or do they do what I think Joan was suggesting, which is to
learn that they can ram things through with Democratic-only majorities.
On education, on financial reform, on economic development, they could
make the choice, rerunning the choice they faced in the beginning of the
administration, and they went the other way. they went with the all-
Democratic—to go for Republicans. I think they will.
MATTHEWS: By the way, to correct you, Joan didn't say totally
partisan. She knows that big works projects, jobs bills, are very hard for
Republicans not to join onto.
HALPERIN: No, but she also said --
MATTHEWS: -- love to appropriate just as much as the Democrats.
HALPERIN: She also said they learned how to ram things through.
MATTHEWS: Joan?
WALSH: Ram things through—I shouldn't have said that because
that's really a Republican talking point, Mark. I don't think that they
rammed things through. They worked and they worked and they worked to try
to get Republican support. Obama turned the whole caboodle over to the
Senate Finance Committee with those three Republicans. He really believed
that he was going to get some support, and then he didn't.
So I don't say ram it through. I think he had no cooperation, not
even from Olympia Snowe, in the end, which shocked me.
HALPERIN: Joan, would you like to see him work with Republicans on
education, on financial reform, and economic development or not?
WALSH: You know what? You know what, Mark? Actually not for the
sake of working with Republicans. I would like to see some Republicans
walk forward and work with him.
MATTHEWS: Got to go.
HALPERIN: I'd like to see Scott Brown make good on his campaign
promises, but not Obama working with Republicans just to do did.
MATTHEWS: Got to go. Out of time. Thank you, Joan. Thank you,
Up next, President Obama holds not one, but two closed-door meetings
with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. What's going on between Bibi and
Barack? We're going to find out in the thick of this biggest-ever diplomat
fight between the two countries. Can they get together and find common
ground. We'll be right back with that one. This is HARDBALL, only on
MATTHEWS: We're back. President Obama held two face to face sessions
with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House last
night, without cameras or public reception. Late today, the president's
special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, met with the Israeli
head of state to try to get—actually the head of government—to get
the peace talks back on track.
Robert Wexler is a former democratic Congressman from Florida. He's
now the president of Center for Mid-East Peace and Economic Cooperation.
I've got a faith in you, sir. I want to know, what's the best interests of
Israel, best interest of the United States? Can we get together?
think we can get together. We can get together because the bond between
the United States and Israel remains secure, unshakeable. We here in
America understand that in order to get to peace, the security interests of
the state of Israel must be secured.
But what it requires is both the Palestinians and the Israelis, also
the broader Arab world, to take risks for peace. The Palestinians can't
continue to name squares after terrorists. They can't complain about
synagogues being rebuilt when it's appropriate to do so. The Israeli
government cannot continue to build in the face of Palestinian complaints,
if they want to go to proximity talks or negotiations and create that kind
of dynamic that is required: trust and confidence.
MATTHEWS: Is it in the interest of Israel—forget the politics,
left wing, right wing, Likud labor, Khadima—for Israel to have a country
living next door to it called Palestine? Is that in the interests of
WEXLER: It is not only in the interests of Israel. I would argue
it's essential. It's essential if you believe, as I do, in a Jewish state
of Israel, that there be a Palestinian state.
MATTHEWS: Why? Explain that to the non-Jewish person, the person who
doesn't study this issue.
WEXLER: Because if there's no Palestinian state, then demographically
the numbers of people who are not Jewish within what would become the
broader Israeli state will begin to balance so that Jews are no longer the
majority. If you believe in a Jewish state of Israel, there must be a
Palestinian state, demilitarized one, created.
MATTHEWS: If that's obvious to you, why isn't it obvious to Bibi
Netanyahu, the prime minister?
MATTHEWS: I don't know that it isn't yet. He did come out for a two-
state solution. It was obvious Ehud Olmert, the former prime minister. It
became obvious to Prime Minister Sharon. It was obvious to the previous
Israeli prime ministers. Even those that started way strident on the
right, when you look at the demographics, it's a requirement. That's why
Sharon got out of Gaza.
MATTHEWS: Thank you. We'll have you back again with more time.
Robert Wexler, former congressman from Florida, knows his stuff.
When we come back, I'm going to have some thoughts about Vice
President Joe Biden. He's in the news. He may not want to be, but he is.
You're watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.
MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with a serious comment on Vice
President Joe Biden, a serious one. Last week at the annual dinner of TV
and radio correspondents he joked that, quote, "at least when I get caught
with my foot in my mouth, it's my own foot." It was a wonderful shot at
one of his critics, who was discovered several years back to have purchased
a somewhat unusual service from a Washington, D.C., sex worker.
It was, of course, also an admission by the vice president of his own
past embarrassments, that have tended to land more in the area of simply
that, personal embarrassments. You see, the great thing about Joe Biden's
gaffe is their lack of malice. If no harm, no foul were rule of the day,
the fellow would not have suffered so much grief.
There was, of course, that time when he singled out a certain African-
American candidate for president as, quote, "articulate and bright and
clean and a nice looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
Well, the man whose story that was, Barack Obama, got him off the hook
on that one, saying he had no problem with Biden, even though it was not
accurate to say he, alone, Barack Obama, met that positive description for
African-Americans that Biden had given him. By the way, he picked that
fellow as his vice president and running mate.
Then there was when Biden said he told members of his family during
the Swine Flu threat that he didn't want them going into confined spaces.
When he kidded Justice Roberts of the Supreme Court about getting the
presidential oath a bit it off on that day, Inaugural Day, or yesterday
when he used a locker room idiom, he just wanted the president to know and
feel, obviously, what an historic moment they were sharing, one that this
president had achieved so downright remarkably.
It was a classic Biden, innocent embarrassment with no malice
intended. Indeed, the opposite. With all the chuckles about the VP's bad
language, nobody pointed out the most obvious, how when the president came
out yesterday to sign the health care bill, he had Vice President Biden at
his side, just as he did when the bill passed Sunday.
Other presidents didn't do that. They were somewhat touchy about
having their vice president so close, so visibly their official deputies.
Eisenhower never even had Nixon upstairs to the White House to visit.
Kennedy was simply uncomfortable in Johnson's distance. Nixon kept Agnew
at a distance, which was smart. Carter and Mondale got along alright, but
were certainly cut from different cloth.
The Reagans and the Bushes were oil and water. Clinton and Gore
hardly ended as a duet. And Dick Cheney looked like he was young Bush's
disapproving headmaster.
This team makes sense. For all Joe Biden's over-enthusiasms, for all
his "wish I hadn't said thats," he balances well the president's coolness,
and they both know it. He's Barack Obama's liaison with regular people,
people like Joe Biden.
At that moment in the sun, when he picked Biden out there in
Springfield, Illinois that summer day, I was taken with the fact that a
regular guy with his heart on his sleeve had risen so high. Joe Biden,
bless his heart, hasn't changed a bit.
I was fortunate to travel with the vice president on that difficult
trip to Israel. I can say, having interviewed him on the record there and
chatted with him off the record on the way home, there's no more loyal
partner to this president, no more stalwart defender abroad, no better
representative to his fellow Americans. He's as loyal a number two as any
president could have. For my money, as good an American as they come along
these days.
That's HARDBALL for now. Thanks for being with us. Catch us again
tomorrow night at 5:00 and 7:00 Eastern. Right now it's time for "THE ED
SHOW" with Ed Schultz.
Copy: Content and programming copyright 2010 MSNBC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Copyright 2010 Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by
United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written
permission of Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark,
copyright or other notice from copies of the content.
Watch Hardball each weeknight at 5 & 7 p.m. ET


text:
Job Description
General Manager- St. Helens
up to 30K OTE 40K+
My client is currently looking for an experienced General Manager for an expanding health and fitness club in St Helens. Paying up to 30k with a generous OTE scheme I am particularly keen to talk to General Managers from a within Health and Fitness or those working within business development
The role will require energy, tenacity and a real drive to succeed. A pre-existing site with a large member base, you will lead a sales team, and 2 heads of department, along with a front of house team. You will need to be flexible, thick skinned and motivated to grow within a market leader within health and fitness, being really career driven.
An exciting time for the company, with huge expansion plans and growth in 2018, this is a great opportunity to join an expanding company and progress within in to senior general management and beyond.
If this role sounds like your idea role, please apply below.
**Please note sales experience is vitial for this role
Only candidates closely matching our requirements will be contacted due to the high number of applications for this type of role.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
VERMONT — Run by student volunteers, the nonprofit Vermont Sustainable Heating Initiative, or VSHI, since 2008 has helped install more than 20 pellet stoves in low-income homes across Addison and Washington counties. And the organization's work has not gone unnoticed.
Richard Moffi, fuel assistance chief for the state of Vermont, earlier this month allocated $25,000 to the organization, which was founded by Tom Tailer, a physics teacher at Mount Abraham Union High School. This will be enough money to provide 10-20 low-income households with pellet stoves.


text:
outsideshot necesitaba un nuevo diseño de banner publicitario y lanzó un concurso de diseño en 99designs.
Un ganador ha sido elegido entre 30 diseños de 9 diseñadores freelance.
ElephantDrive and CompliantData
We are a cloud-based backup, storage, and access service. We currently operate two brands and are in need of new ad creative for our online affiliate marketing...
ElephantDrive is simple, secure cloud backup and access service. It is great for protecting important documents, precious pictures, and valuable digital media. The service is live and available at http://www.elephantdrive.com, so you can get a good look at what is there.
CompliantData is an enterprise-class cloud backup, archiving, and file transfer service. Businesses with critical files and information that need business continuity in the event of a disaster are prime candidates for the offering. It can be used to protect laptops, desktops, servers, and NAS, and once data is stored in the cloud it can be easily shared and published. The service is live and available at http://www.compliantdata.com, so you can get a good look at what is there.
ElephantDrive is ideal for individuals who keep sensitive documents on their computers, generate lots of digital photos, or on often on the go. These are people of all ages who are technically proficient (i.e. understand the concept of a backup) but not experts and might be afraid of losing data. Good for Mac or Windows, and nice for users who need to move large files around the web.
CompliantData is ideal for small to medium sized businesses, especially those in fields that require some sort of data protection and regulation (e.g. finance professionals, medical professionals, etc...). The decision-maker is often a non-technical person or a technical consultant, since these companies are sometime without an internal IT department.
We need the following ad creative for this project:
125x125 ElephantDrive Ad
250x250 ElephantDrive Ad
125x125 CompliantData Ad
250x250 CompliantData Ad
If we get great designs, we will commission more in different sizes. These can be animated or static (though we suspect animated will be more compelling) and should be deliverable as gif or jpeg.


text:
Home » Qt World Summit 2017 » QtWS17, Modbus with Qt, Morten Winkler Jørgensen, Viking Software
While old, the modbus standard is very alive and kicking. Today you can still buy newly designed PLCs and frequency inverters with a modbus interface on top of RS-485, RS-422 or RS-232 as the primary, and sometimes only, interface. Attendees to this talk will get an overview of the modbus history, usage and standard. Different cabling topologies will be discussed and advantages and disadvantages of different physical layers are discussed. Attendees will get a demonstration of how to access modbus compliant devices, both ethernet and serial devices, using Qt's classes. Examples on how to implement both masters and slaves for modbus using Qt will also be given. When leaving this talk, attendees will have gained an overview of how the Modbus part of Qt works and will be able to go home and interface directly to existing hardware as well as creating new modbus slaves. And yes, there will be hardware, cables and flashing lights.
Previous Video
QtWS17 Qt for gesture control and body tracking applications, Sascha Klement, Gestion
Many advanced automotive concepts for the next decade make use of smart sensors. More and more imaging sens...
Other content in this Stream
Demo of lightning-fast booting embedded devices
Watch closely how fast this automotive instrument cluster boots up when Risto flips the switch, or you might miss it! Great for embedded devices, that rely on low energy consumption and great user ex
Built with Qt: Automotive instrument cluster demo, QtWS17
An inside look to automotive system clusters built with Qt Quick Designer and Qt Creator. Learn more and download Qt at www.qt.io Find Qt for Automotive at www.qt.io/automotive/
Built with Qt: Qt Quick Coffee machine demo, QtWS17
Thomas Hartmann shows how to build a fluid coffee machine UI with Qt Quick Designer. Read more on Qt for Device Creation at https://www.qt.io/qt-for-device-creation/
QtWS17 - Qt 3D as a Runtime Enabler, Laszlo Agocs, The Qt Company
Qt 3D is a framework for implementing data-driven 3D scenes with C++ or QML. However, building applications directly with this API can be a daunting task, especially for newcomers. Setting up frame gr
QtWS17 - First experience with Qt for Mobile: our journey, Bogdan Ogrean, FORTecH
As the smartphone slowly becomes a necessity (or is it already?) in our world, we are faced with the task of replicating the same app on multiple platforms. This always leads to development overhead:
Introduction to User Experience Design for Developers, Jeff LeBlanc, ICS
This session is an introduction to User Experience (UX) design, specifically focusing on issues that software developers encounter. While developers tend to focus on the implementation details of gett
QtWS17 Qt for gesture control and body tracking applications, Sascha Klement, Gestion
Many advanced automotive concepts for the next decade make use of smart sensors. More and more imaging sensors get into cars, today mostly focussing on the outside of the vehicle – road, traffic, pede
QtWS17 - Using Virtual Keyboards on Qt Embedded Devices, Jan Arne Petersen, KDAB
There is an increasing need to support text input via virtual keyboards not only on Mobile phones but also on embedded devices and in in-vehicle infotainment systems. Qt provides an input method API t
QtWS17 - Under the Hood of Qt Automotive Suite After One Year of Hacking, Johan Thelin, Luxoft
Qt Automotive Suite was released a year ago and development is making progress. This talk be focused on technical details of new features in the Qt Application Manager, the new plugin for Qt Creator,
LG Electronics – Intro to the WebOS QtWayland Compositor, Florian Haenel at QtWS17
A brief tour of the anatomy of the WebOS compositor. Using QtWayland and QtDeclarative, we give an overview of how Qt helped to ship Wayland with our acclaimed UI to a range of devices and formfactors
QtWS17 - Pointer Handlers for fluid applications in Qt Quick, Shawn Rutledge, The Qt Company
Over the last few years we have discussed adding a new way in QtQuick to handle events from pointing devices such as touchscreens, mice and graphics tablets. Now it is on track to ship in 5.10. This i
QtWS17 - KNX in the IoT world, Dries Verbrugge, KNX
Overview of current smart buildings interoperability options towards IoT systems, followed by future look to more native integrations with IoT and extensions to increase semantic understanding.
QtWS17 - Test coverage of Qt C++ and QML, Harri Porten, froglogic
Code coverage is a metric for the degree of testing that is being done. This talk will explain the various metrics from Statement Coverage to Modified Condition/Decision Coverage (MC/DC), depict their
LPWAN will make the IoT Revolution Real, Massimo Santoli, Gimasi at QtWS17
IoT devices have been around since a long time, but the multi-billion promise market explosion will really happen because we now have LPWAN networks. We will go through a brief overview of the major
QtWS17 - An IVI-System for Smart Buses developed with Qt/QML, Muhammet Ali Asan, STM
We are excited to see smart vehicles taking part in our life day by day. As well as private cars, public transport vehicles are evolving as intelligent machines. Of course, modern infotainment system
QML For C++ Developers by Bo Thorsen, Viking Software at QtWS17
This presentation is for those of you either have no previous Qt knowledge and need some help with getting started on the right track with QML. And it is for those of you who have been a Qt coder for
QtWS17 - Creating 3D User Interfaces with Qt 3D Studio, Sami Makkonen, The Qt Company
With the use of 3D technologies increasing significantly across all industries – especially in the automotive, healthcare and industrial automation sectors – innovative 3D user interface design tools
How CoAP standard makes your IoT talk with Qt, Adrien Leravat, Witekio at QtWS17
One of the big critical challenges of IoT is: How should these Things communicate together? Many standards emerged in the last years, but one seems to fit perfectly with Qt philosophy: CoAP protocol.
QtWS17 - What's new in Qt 3D? Sean Harmer, KDAB
Qt 3D is a rapidly evolving module within Qt. There are lots of new features appearing with each new release to continue expanding what Qt 3D can do out of the box. Engineers from KDAB and The Qt Comp
QtWS17 - Inside The Qt Object Model, Simon Hausmann, The Qt Company


text:
Peak Production From a Planet in Distress: Can We Keep It Up?
Worldwatch Institute's Vital Signs: Volume 20 showcases the planet's growing demand for food and energy, its shrinking resources, and the implications of these trends
Washington, D.C.—In 2012, global oil consumption reached an all-time high, the number of workers in vulnerable employment exceeded 1.5 billion people, and physical water scarcity affected some 1.2 billion people. The Worldwatch Institute captures the impacts of these alarming trends and the increasingly risky state of humanity in Vital Signs: Volume 20, the latest compilation from the Institute's respected Vital Signs project.
Vital Signs: Volume 20 provides up-to-date figures on many of the most critical global concerns. Drawing on a wide range of sources, the report provides authoritative data and analysis on significant global trends such as fossil fuel subsidies, agricultural commodities, and rapid urbanization in the developing world.
"Our economic systems and theories are programmed to squeeze ever more resources from a planet in distress," said Michael Renner, Worldwatch senior researcher and director of the Vital Signs project. "A mixture of population growth, consumerism, greed, and short-term thinking by policymakers and business people seems to be inexorably driving human civilization toward a showdown with the planet's limits."
Some of the trends highlighted in Vital Signs: Volume 20 are positive. Globally, sanitation and water access for 227 million people was improved between 2000 and 2010 to the point where these individuals are no longer considered slum dwellers. Within the agriculture sector, efficient irrigation methods have increased more than sixfold over the last two decades, and organically certified agricultural land has more than tripled since 1999.
Meanwhile, socially sustainable ways of doing business continue to emerge: about 1 billion people in 96 countries belong to a co-operative, whether as a worker, consumer, producer, or purchaser. Similarly, the emergence of so-called "benefit" corporations offers a more socially and environmentally responsible model for private firms.
"There is no shortage of alternatives to change the destructive trajectory that humanity finds itself on," said Renner. "Renewables and efficient irrigation are two practical options among many others. But we need to get serious about these tasks instead of consigning them largely to the margins."
Vital Signs: Volume 20 analyzes the above-mentioned trends and many more, using straightforward language and easy-to-read charts and graphs to explain global trends to governments, businesses, and consumers, helping them to make more informed decisions for our future.
Further highlights from the report:
- Coal: Global coal production increased by 6,941 million tons in 2011, making coal the fastest growing fossil fuel. Spurred mainly by rising demand in China and India, coal's share in the global primary energy mix reached 28 percent in 2011—its highest point since record-keeping began in 1971.
- Wind power: Global wind power capacity grew by 21 percent in 2011—lower than the 2010 rate of 24 percent and markedly lower than the 2009 rate of 31 percent.
- Automobile production: Passenger car production rose from 60.1 million vehicles in 2010 to 62.6 million vehicles in 2011—and 2012 brought a new all-time record of 66.1 million vehicles.
- Meat production and consumption: Global meat production surpassed 300 million tons for the first time in 2012; annual meat consumption increased just 0.4 percent to 42.5 kilograms per person.
- Women farmers: Women farmers produce more than half of all food worldwide and currently account for 43 percent of the global agricultural workforce, yet women own just 2 percent of global farmland.
- Natural disasters: During 2011, a total of 820 natural catastrophes were documented, causing an estimated 27,000 deaths and costing a record $380 billion in economic losses.
- Wage growth: Among the global workforce, wage growth has slowed from an average of 3 percent in 2007 to 2.1 percent in 2010 and 1.2 percent in 2011.
- Water scarcity: Some 1.2 billion people—almost one fifth of the world—lives in areas of physical water scarcity, which occurs when annual supplies per person fall below 1,000 cubic meters.
Notes to Editors:
For more information and for a review copy of Vital Signs: Volume 20, please contact Supriya Kumar at email@example.com.
About the Worldwatch Institute:
Worldwatch is an independent research organization based in Washington, D.C. that works on energy, resource, and environmental issues. The Institute's State of the World report is published annually in more than a dozen languages. Published annually, Vital Signs tracks key trends in the environment, agriculture, energy, society, and the economy to inform and inspire the changes needed to build a sustainable world. For more information, visit www.worldwatch.org.


text:
Phantom Phenom wrote:uscbucsfan wrote:Rumors are heating up that the Cavs could trade Irving for Thomas, Crowder, and some of their 1st round picks.
I think that could be a great deal for both teams.
Done deal
Celtics to final
Celtics will lose to the Warriors, lol, but I agree. They will make it to the final. I think the Cavs got a pretty good deal as well. They got Crowder, IT, Zizc, and I think Brooklyns 1st round pick.
Celtics starting 5:
PG - Kyrie Irving
SG - Gordon Hayward
SF - Jaylen Brown
PF - Marcus Morris
C - Al Horford


text:
- Home
- News
- Sports
- Opinion
- Obituaries
- Features
- Special Sections
- Classifieds
- Public Notices
It is alright to go ahead and cut your roses back and cover the bud union to protect it from winters chill. We have had enough cold weather now that roses have finally started down the road to dormancy for their annual long winter nap.
When cutting your roses back there is one very important thing to keep in mind, such as what kind of roses do you have? There are different pruning requirements for different rose types.
If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the The Lebanon Enterprise, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.
Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.
|ZIP Code:


text: It's not cheating if he didn't actually do it. Plus, i respect him a little more now knowing that he is the kind of guy that would do whatever it takes to win. Granted I am pretty sure if he had tackled Ginn on the way to the end zone the refs would have awarded Ginn a TD anyway.


text:
A kitsune enjoys a nice hot bowl of udon (perhaps even kitsune udon!). Design says "I Love Udon".
T-shirt details:
Ladies fitted shirt
Our fitted shirts run small, so be sure to check the size chart!
Click here for sizing
by Jill -
Gesshoku Designs
PO Box 888103
Grand Rapids, MI 49588
United States
All information is submitted securely through an encrypted SSL connection.


text:
Using Family Fist Logic on Gay Marriage
Using Family Fist logic on Gay Marriage, bars gaining the right to decide to let dogs into their bars will lead to horses, tigers & sharks being allowed to roam into any pub and maul patrons.
IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT? Tigers eating your uncle while he's having a quiet beer? Because that's what will happen if bars can let dogs into pubs!
This message brought to you by Family Fist - bring back the biff 2014!


text:
Learn how MacUpdate Desktop can install apps on MacUpdate with the simple click of the icon. Plus, keep all your apps updated.
Prosopagnosia matches the names of the people tagged in Faces with the contact information found in Apple's Address Book, Microsoft Entourage, Google Mail or Mozilla Thunderbird. The program automatically transfers email and full name of the contacts back into Faces in order to complete the information required for a successful tagging of friends when uploading pictures to Facebook.
The user can choose to transfer information from more than one address book
What's New in Prosopagnosia
- Added support for OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion)
- Added support for iPhoto 9.4.2
- Please note: This update drops support for the PowerPC architecture! Don't update if you are on a G4 or G5 Mac.
Requirements for Prosopagnosia
- Mac OS X 10.5.6 or later
- iLife '09 or iLife '11 with iPhoto installed


text:
Every now and then, a cultural or intellectual event pops up in Amman that reminds you that the endearingly chaotic city is not just about the food, the people, or even that breath-taking history surrounding it. It's probably one of those few cities left in the Middle East where you can witness, or take part, in a discussion on (well, almost) anything you want from religion to politics to fashion and, as the past two days have shown––on women and banking.
For the past two days, Amman has been host to a Women's World Banking conference entitled "Building Women-Focused Finance: The Global-Local Experience", which brought together more than 250 microfinance practitioners, commercial banks, investors, donors, and regulators from more than 40 countries. The conference was held under the patronage of Her Majesty Queen Rania Al-Abdullah who even made the effort to be part of the audience at some point!
And as you can probably tell from the title of the conference, women's financial inclusion was the main headline on the agenda and everyone's minds. But perhaps one of the most valuable lessons to be taken from the conference on feminist aspirations in the banking sector, especially in the context of our region, is that there are no neat lines to be drawn between "women's issues" and all the issues surrounding them. Maha Bahou from the Jordanian Central Bank cheerfully captured this lesson when she proclaimed, "Who needs a women bank when we have the planet? Don't get me wrong, I'm a feminist and I love women, but I also love men". What is to be taken from this light-hearted statement, and the conference in general, is that we can't really have a genuine conversation about women's prospects in the region without talking about the region's economic challenges as a whole, ones that females, along with their male counterparts, face on a regular basis.
And, ironically, amidst all the talk on the disadvantages women face in the world and the Middle East in particular, a breakout session on youth financial inclusion brought an un-gendered challenge to the floor. The session, purposely or not, went on an important tangent that addresses the Middle East's biggest threat and potential–– it's youth bulge. The numbers as quoted by Ryan Newton, a Women's World Banking specialist, are as follows: only 12% of the MENA's youth (aged 18-24) have accounts at formal financial institution, and only a dismal 2% actually have savings.
So why are the youth so uninterested in banks? One might say it's because they have very little funds to deposit, let alone save. But, I would argue, that it's because banks are not interested in them. Student loans have emerged as the norm to finance one's education in Europe and the US, but Middle East's banks have not developed financial products that bank on the region's future exemplified in its youth.
The Middle East's youth, despite stereotypes of being nothing but shisha inhaling Ferrari drivers, have proven themselves as one of the most important, if not the only force, capable of changing the the Middle East's economic and social landscape. This makes their exclusion from the financial system detrimental to any genuine reform Middle Eastern governments wish to take in the face of the unemployment that has given them the free time and energy to facebook plot protests, revolutions, or riots (whatever rocks your boat). Healthy access to credit can potentially shield the youth from the very same economic frustrations that brought down them to the streets. Social inequality and an unequal playing field can translate into a generation's worth of lost dreams, and sometimes a lack of finances is the only thing standing between the youth and their dreams.
And don't get me wrong, not every dream is worth financing. When I say credit, I don't mean the consumptions loans or credit cards that have been overly used in the GCC economies to bolster Eid vacations' spending or buy new cars.The last time I checked, a UAE bank was willing to offer those willing to take out loans a free vacation. Given the ease at which credit is accessed and spent in those 'highly liquid' economies, it is a shame that banks are more willing to finance vacations instead of loans that are likely to generate value-added activity to the economy. Hence, by 'healthy' credit, I mean loans that finance true social mobility and allow ambitions to materialize, be they educational or entrepreneurial, white collar or blue collar.
In any case, there's a huge regulatory role to be played by Central Banks to ensure that customers, regardless of the age group they belong to, don't get sucked into debts they can't repay. If anything, this an ideal chance for the region's ever-growing Islamic banking sector to take interest in non-traditionally commercial opportunities and truly distinguish themselves from their 'non-Islamic' counterparts. It is a genuine opportunity for banks to play a role that governments in the MENA region have desperately been trying to play- creating job opportunities and equipping their youth for competitive private sector jobs. It's about time banks get on board.
All in all, credit or loans put in the right place, is exactly what fosters healthy financial behaviour. Evidence presented at the conference argues that credit given at a young age increases one's ability to manage money, fosters confidence (especially in young girls), and promotes sound financial behaviour in the long run. Intuitively, borrowed money instils a higher sense of responsibility and motivation for success than any other free hand-out in the form of a parental or governmental transfer can foster.
As Lydiah Kiburu from Kenya Equity put it in one of the conference's sessions, "the youth is a constituency that no player can afford to ignore if they are looking at sustainability going forward…yet, the youth have been largely unbanked in emerging markets". And if the Arab Spring, or what is left of the Arab Spring, has taught us anything, it is that the youth is a constituency that no one can afford to ignore, banks and governments alike.
By: Mays Abdel Aziz
Via SyndiGate.info
© 2000 - 2019 Al Bawaba (www.albawaba.com)


text:
Windows Media Center provides a one-stop shop for your PC's music, photos, videos and movie. Attach a TV tuner and it becomes a fully functioning PVR too, helping you build up a library of your favourite TV shows too.
That's all well and good, but it's not exactly portable – everything is tied to one computer, and while you can easily copy files from device to device, it's not the most convenient solution out there. Remote Potato changes all of that. This free server software for Windows 7 makes it possible to access your media library, plus schedule and manage TV recordings from another computer or mobile device. Follow the instructions on the app's review page to get it up and running on your Windows 7-powered PC.
Once configured, it's possible to access your Windows Media Center library via a web browser, but it's not the most practical solution for mobile users because it's optimised to work with the Microsoft Silverlight plug-in, which isn't compatible with most mobile browsers. Thankfully, there are various mobile apps out there that don't just give you access to your media library remotely, but provide an optimised user interface for doing so.
Once the server is set up, install the app, provide the requisite log-on details (IP address, port number and logon details) and you're ready to roll. All you need to access your media collection plus configure your TV recordings is here, optimised for your device's touch-screen interface.
Typically you simply browse your various media collections for the photos, music or video/TV you wish to view, but be warned – some media, particularly certain video types – may not play on your device. Generally, though, most popular formats – including QuickTime, MP4 and AVI – should work.
Recordings can be scheduled using the EPG or by searching for specific shows – perfect if you're working late and are in danger of missing your favourite show.
This is the iPhone and iPod touch version. A separate, enhanced HD version is also available for iPad.
If you want remote access to your Windows Media Center library from your iPhone, this is the way to do it - albeit for a premium.


text:
0 Members and 1 Lonely Barbarian are spying on this topic.
"Ah, no chance on the daggers, then?"
"Good sirs, effendi, gentiles, my master's caravan was attacked, not far, a mile! I alone escaped, but others may live! Please help, he will not be ungracious!"
Page created in 2.005 seconds with 27 queries.


text:
Home Contact Us How You Can Help Photo Gallery Sitemap
Too Many Culverts, Not Enough Bridges
The 16 kilometre (km) eastern extension of the Highway 407 only bridges several of the 27 Rouge, Petticoat and Duffin's Creek wildlife corridors between Highway 48 in Markham and Brock Road in Pickering.
Twenty Wildlife Corridors Cut
The remaining 20 streams and wildlife corridors have been severed and buried in long pipes beneath the highway, creating dead-ends for pedestrian, bicycle and wildlife movement.
The private international 407 consortium used culverts instead of bridges. This decision saved private money but it will increase public costs in the long term.
Costly Deer Car Collisions Increase
During one month in the fall of 2003, more than five deer-car collisions occurred. Wildlife are being killed, human lives are being endangered, traffic jams are being created, and insurance and health care costs are soaring.
Additional bridges are needed to allow the safe passage of people, wildlife and fish along the north-south stream and wildlife corridors that Hwy 407 and other GTA roads and highways cross.
Why build bridges instead of culverts?
1. Avoid costly and potentially deadly collisions between hikers, bicyclists, deer and traffic;
2. Protect linkages and movement between upstream and downstream fish and wildlife habitat;
3. Allow safe movement along trails linking the Waterfront Trail to the ORM & Cross Canada Trail;
4. Plan ahead to avoid the need for costly and disruptive retrofits to re-establish safe corridors;
5. Avoid the creation of "islands of green" that cannot sustain their beauty or biological diversity.
More Photos
All external sites will open in a new browser.
FRW does not endorse external sites.