text:
No Wining & No Whining
Posted: November 14, 2011 at 10:45 amHey, friends! Ready to kick off a great week? I know I'm feeling determined to make it a good one. Just like I had to make this weekend a good one.
I was supposed to be touring beautiful scenery and sipping wine this weekend…
Last year my sister and I purchased a Groupon deal for a day tour to 5 North Georgia wineries and planned to go this weekend. Too bad the tour company closed down. No wine. Bummer!
I didn't let myself whine, though. Instead, I did other fabulous things.
Like get in a 12 mile frosty run on Saturday morning. At least being greeted by a cheerful note left out as a random act of kindness cheered me up at the end.
Isn't that nice?!
Despite the run being so cold, it actually felt pretty good. Almost refreshing. At the very least, it made the ice bath following the run not feel like such a drastic temperature change. Oh, who am I kidding? It still stunk.
It was only a brief low of the weekend because after that I had a rather important appointment with a testing center.
I PASSED!!!! I am now a NASM certified personal trainer!!! I don't know my final score since it just shows pass or fail, but I think I did really well. I 100% knew 100 of the 120 questions. There were only 3 I marked that I was really unsure of. The rest I felt mostly certain, but not 100%. A lot of the questions required applying small details of things I had studied, so it was harder than I anticipated, but overall still good. Although the only detail that matters is - I passed!!! It feels so good to say that after the months of preparation and work to make it final.
I finished up the test around 2:30 and hadn't eaten since breakfast, so the first thing I did was find some food. First place I saw that wasn't a McDonalds or Arbys? McAlister's Deli. That'll do. I did a half and half combo.
A Savannah Salad with mixed greens, tomatoes, cucumbers, blue cheese, cranberries, and almonds.
As well as a Cobb Club with turkey, avocado, bacon, lettuce, tomato, and a peppercorn sauce of some sort.
I originally planned to grab the food to go, but couldn't wait to eat, so I chose to sit and have a little lunch by myself. I don't ever typically do that (I'm like Rachel), but it was actually quite nice to have a peaceful solo lunch. I finished just in time to hang out with Peter's family and watch the UGA vs Auburn game.
That certainly topped off the day on a high note! Although not as great as passing my exam!!!!! <--- had to throw that in there
The rest of the weekend didn't hold anything too exciting, which was just fine by me. I had the chance to finish my Nicholas Sparks book.
If you like his books at all, then you will love this one. It was one of my favorites of his that I have read. Even though his stories aren't all that original, I find his writing very easy to read and never fail to find myself captivated by the characters. I recommend it. And now, I need some new book recommendations from you all! I'm kind of in the mood for a suspenseful read this time – like my favorite thriller novel Velocity by Dean Koontz.
You MUST read that one if you like edge-of-your-seat suspense! It's good!
Alright, enough chit chat. Time for me to hit the gym, then have my very first partent teacher conference for Makenzie. Oh, the excitement!
- Do you ever like to dine out alone?
- Any good suspense novels to recommend?
Tags: books, daily recap, personal training, weekend recap

subset: commoncrawl


text:
When this gorgeous arrangement arrives, your fortunate recipient may just jump for joy. Color almost literally explodes as hot pink Matsumoto aster, orange and red gerbera, purple statice and hot pink roses create a look to remember in a clear vase, wrapped with pink wire.
Order by 3:00 PM EST for same day pickup or delivery!
* Fee charged in addition to the Standard Delivery Fee
Enter full name. We'll ask for delivery information at checkout.
Box of Assorted Chocolates.
Add a cute plush from our plush selection. Selected plush will vary.
18" Happy Birthday Mylar Balloon. Styles may vary.
Huggable, adorable and ready to cuddle. Our Lotsa Love teddy bear wears a checkered brown bowtie to match his cream-colored, plush fur. This lovable friend is ready to deliver warmth to someone you care about. Plush bear wearing brown checkered bowtie Measures overall approximately 18′′H


text:
Unbiased reporting of state-of-the-art gluten-free food testing data for consumers!
Subscribe today and get the full text of all reports, and 8 new reports per month.
Sample Product Reports
Detailed reports of the gluten content of the selected products. In addition to the test results we provide other information including ingredients list, "Contains" statement, may contain statement, and how "gluten-free" is stated on product packaging.
The Safe & Fair Food Company
View the full product report
Gluten-free Watchdog is a fast, reliable and inexpensive way to see how "gluten-free" the foods we recommend really are. I highly recommend it. Some of the foods tested are NOT tested by the company that sells them. We need more sponsors so that more and more foods can be tested.
Wow, Tricia! This site is wicked cool! I have a feeling people are really going to like this.
I am loving the site. I am a working mother of 2 (under the age of 3) so I love the quick things I can make for dinner. We love the Ancient Harvest pasta and the Thai Kitchen soups - so I am thrilled to see the results from those tests. Thanks for providing this resource to the gluten free community.


text:
ITESIO(4) NetBSD Kernel Interfaces Manual ITESIO(4)Powered by man-cgi (2024-03-20). Maintained for NetBSD by Kimmo Suominen. Based on man-cgi by Panagiotis Christias.
itesio -- ITE IT87xxF Super I/O driver
itesio0 at isa? port 0x2e itesio1 at isa? port 0x4e
The itesio driver provides support for the Environment Controller and the Watchdog Timer on the IT87xxF Super I/Os, and may be used to monitor hardware sensors or setting up a watchdog timeout value for the system. The itesio driver has 15 sensors: Sensor Units Typical Use Temp0 uK CPU Temp Temp1 uK System Temp Temp2 uK Aux Temp VIN0 uV DC Vcore A VIN1 uV DC Vcore B VIN2 uV DC +3.3V VIN3 uV DC +5V VIN4 uV DC +12V VIN5 uV DC -12V VIN6 uV DC -5V VIN7 uV DC STANDBY VBAT uV DC VBAT Fan0 RPM CPU Fan Fan1 RPM System Fan Fan2 RPM Aux Fan The itesio Watchdog Timer is configurable via the wdogctl(8) utility and has a resolution between 1 and 65535 seconds. The Watchdog Timer is not supported on the IT8705 Super I/O.
envsys(4), envstat(8), wdogctl(8)
The itesio driver first appeared in OpenBSD 3.4 and was then ported to NetBSD 4.0.
The itesio driver was written by Julien Bordet <email@example.com> and Juan Romero Pardines <firstname.lastname@example.com>.
Interrupt support is unimplemented. NetBSD 10.99 April 2, 2008 NetBSD 10.99


text:
Priests, Pederasts and Privilege
First published April 2010
Henry II was regrettably given to childish tantrums during which his "grey eyes that glowed fiercely … grew bloodshot in anger". He also fell to the floor and chewed straw.
Perhaps it wasn't just emotional incontinence. He kept a large empire together in difficult times, expanded and, in many ways, improved it. It may not have been bad psychology for the people around him to fear his wrath.
Whether the rage was real, Henry's contribution to normalising and centralising the law of his kingdom cannot be doubted. He energetically travelled miles to supervise legal proceedings, championed the use of juries and established the Royal Magistrate Courts. He also oversaw the decline in the outmoded use of trials by ordeal and combat.
One of the key themes of Henry's legal efforts was the restrictions of the rights and privileges of the clergy and of Rome. Like a slowly rising dough, the Church tended to expand inconspicuously into all vacant crevices and proved remarkably intractable once it got into them.
However, an attempt to deal with 'crimonous clerks' in the form of the 'Constitutions of Clarendon' of 1164 proved all too much for Thomas Becket, who objected to the King's intention to try clergy for common crimes once they had been defrocked in an ecclesiastical court.
Beckett's issue was with 'double jeopardy' – the intrinsic injustice of being tried twice for the same crime. This, of course, could have been solved by just allowing the secular courts a judicial monopoly, but it's not an abandonment of privilege that Beckett or the Vatican would have stomached.
Two-Tier Justice
Henry's big issue was that there was a two tier system of justice: one for the clergy and one for the laity. Henry's motivation may have been the issues of fairness or of jurisdiction – it was more probably jurisdiction.
But the 'fairness' part really resonates with most moderns. Since this justice system systematically dispensed milder punishments to the ecclesiasts, it was unfair.
At the very beginnings of Christianity, the persecuted minority were theoretically subject to the laws of the Roman Empire in which they lived, yet St Paul seems to reserve the right of the Church to judge its own:
"Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to the law before the unjust, and not before the saints?"
1 Corinthians 6:1
The establishment of the Church within the Roman Empire under Constantine rendered this less of a dichotomous situation, but tension between the legal rights and jurisdictions of States and the Church have continued.
'Benefit of clergy' was the medieval notion that a clergyman could call for the right to be tried under canon law rather than in the secular courts
Popes reiterated their hegemony over justice to clerics. Innocent III maintained that even where the parties – clerical and civil – were both amenable to secular authority, that the ecclesiastical privilege could not be forfeited. It was a right of the whole Church body, not the right of an individual churchman to renounce.
The Catholic Encyclopedia phrases it thus:
"Likewise, not all persons are to be judged by secular courts. The Church could not permit her clergy to be judged by laymen; it would be utterly unbecoming for persons of superior dignity to submit themselves to their inferiors for judgment."
Eventually, the term 'benefit of clergy' became elasticated to include everybody – non-clergy and women too. It was, in effect, a way of getting a more lenient sentence for your first offence. We do similar things today, in the recognition that a first-time offender has the capacity to change and improve.
And a glance at European history tells us that the practice of two separate strands of law, one for the laity and one for the clergy, has been dissolving to the point that it had been imperceptible in modernity. A blizzard of changes has created a world where, one hopes, a priest could find himself in a secular court for burglary, driving while drunk or (eventually) failing to pay the HP agreement on his stereo.
But what about child rape?
And Now … ?
The arguments for and against 'Crimen sollicitationis' of 1962 have, in the last few weeks, been used by both sides of the child abuse scandal in the Catholic Church.
Defenders say it is a way of protecting the privacy of alleged perpetrators, victims and witnesses before the establishment of guilt or innocence. It does not preclude the surrender of the perpetrator to secular justice.
Others, like Father Tom Doyle, canon lawyer and ex Vatican employee says it is:
"… an explicit written policy to cover up cases of child sexual abuse by the clergy to punish those who would call attention to these crimes by the churchmen"
The personal role of Josef Ratzinger, in particular, has come in for a great deal of scrutiny. Should he be investigated as complicit in crimes against children? Or even be given or denied immunity as a Head of State?
So …
For me, the most interesting parts of the child abuse affair are the cultural attitudes that I see leaking out from around the edges of the public responses and behaviours of the Church, the kind of reflexes which betray more of the subconscious of the entity than its analytical output.
We are left with the suspicion that the Church has felt, on more than one occasion, that she could 'take care of her own'. This could be an edict from the highest, or an oft repeated behaviour from lower down; it could derive from a conviction that the Church is a self-contained magesterium of its own or be just a matter of PR expediency.
Whichever is the case, the fact is that instances of abuse have been 'occult' – hidden. It has exploded like a bloated corpse – well after the rot had set in. That's a mistake for which the dioceses of Wisconsin and Chicago are paying financially, and the wider Church will continue to pay in loss of respect.
It reveals a Church at odds with the rest of us – we who thought that the days of priests getting away with lighter penalties in ecclesiastical courts had melted away with the Black Death and tithes.
Bunny in the Headlines
It's incredibly anti-modern. If the Church appears to be caught like a bunny in the headlights (or should that be headlines?), it may be because it is struggling with a cultural norm which prevails within it but not without.
I also doubt that that the Church will own that its own peculiar attitude to sex may have contributed to the behaviour or selection of some of its priests. In an ad in the New York Times, Bill Donohue, the Catholic League President said:
"The Times continues to editorialize about the 'pedophilia crisis,' when all along it's been a homosexual crisis. Eighty percent of the victims of priestly sexual abuse are male and most of them are post-pubescent. While homosexuality does not cause predatory behavior, and most gay priests are not molesters, most of the molesters have been gay."
(Cited by Maureen Dowd)
It would be good to know where Donohue gets his figures from, especially since his attempt at a snow job conflates two very different sexual behaviours – one of them legal, consensual and between adults.
Actually, it would be nice to know a lot about the sexual attitudes and behaviours of priests so that we can get an empirical picture.
Perhaps Catholic priests are more likely than average to be homosexual and enter the priesthood as a rejection of their sexuality; perhaps more pederasts enter the priesthood because of the opportunities for intimacy which such a profession affords; perhaps there is no difference whatsoever between an average groups of Catholic priests and the lay population in their sexual preferences.
The point is we're unlikely to ever know because of the Church's strange attitude to this, one of our most basic human functions.
It is a great shame that Rowan Williams has today offered an apology for saying that the Church in Ireland has lost all credibility in the way it has handled the issue of paedophile priests. I don't know what pressure he has been under, and from whom, but it was a mild statement, considering.
The only sensible way forward is for the Vatican to make perfectly clear that it regards the idea of Benefit of Clergy in the same way that the rest of us do – as a fascinating entry in a history book.
As Father Tom Doyle put it:
"Cardinal Ratzinger, now as Pope, could tomorrow get up and say: 'Here's the policy: full disclosure to the civil authorities, absolute isolation and dismissal of any accused and proven and convicted clerics, complete openness and transparency, complete openness of all financial situations, stop all barriers to the legal process and completely co-operate with the civil authorities everywhere"
So why the delay?


text:
This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use and share information we obtain through your use of www.tapology.com and any affiliated web sites, subdomains, web or mobile applications, and online services owned or operated by Tapology (collectively the "Site"). We will not use or share your information with anyone except as described in this Privacy Policy. By using the Site, you consent to our Privacy Policy.
We collect several categories of information as a result of your use of the Site, depending on how you choose to use the Site.
Automatically Collected Information: We automatically collect certain information, including information pertaining to your IP address, browser type, browser language, operating system, computer type (including mobile device type), access time and duration, landing page, and the pages you accessed during your visit, as well as any web pages and URLs you utilized to arrive on or depart from the Site. We collect and store this information when you use the Site, even if you have not created an account on the Site.
Account and Profile Information: When you register as a Member of the Site you provide us with additional information, including a Site username and password and your e-mail address. As a Member of the Site, you may elect to use various Site features which provide us with additional information about you, such as a personal User statement and description, a personal photo or graphic, personal fight predictions and commentary, custom rankings and commentary, forum posts, and forum post ratings and replies.
Communications: If you correspond with us by e-mail or through our Site content submission forms, we may retain those e-mail messages or Site submissions. We do not publish personal user data that you supply to us via these communications.
Your Content: We collect and store the information and content that you post on the Site, including your posts, comments, fight picks, rankings, wiki entries and edits, and related information. We may also collect and store metadata further identifying information about the content you post, including the date and time as well as aggregate information about your content.
Cookies: We also use cookies, which are small text files containing a string of alphanumeric characters identifying your browser which are stored on your computer's hard drive. A cookie does not collect personal information about you. We use cookies to speed your Site login, validate your authorization, customize Site options and features based on your preferences, and otherwise facilitate your use of the Site and improve Site quality. In addition, third parties who place advertisements on the Site may also utilize cookies to ensure their systems work properly and to collect information. Cookies set by third parties are governed by the privacy policies of those third parties and not by this Privacy Policy. Generally, you can set your browser not to accept cookies or to notify you if you are sent a cookie, giving you the opportunity to choose whether or not to accept the cookie. Please note that if you set your browser not to accept cookies, certain areas of the Site may not function properly.
We do not sell your personal data, such as your name and contact information, to third parties to use for their own marketing purposes. We reserve the right to monitor the content you post on the Site. We have the right to modify or remove any such information or material for any reason or no reason. For more information, view our Terms of Use. We use the information we collect for the following purposes:
Provide our services: To provide you the services we offer on the Site and to communicate with you. By providing us with your e-mail address, you consent to our using it to send you site-related notices, including any notices required by law, in lieu of communication by postal mail. We may also use your e-mail address to send you other messages, such as news, updates, changes to the Site, or special offers. If you do not want to receive some or all of these e-mail messages (other than notices required by law), you may edit the settings on your preferences page. Please understand that these changes may not take effect immediately.
Personalization: We use your information to tailor the content and information that we may display to you on the Site or send to you, and to personalize your experience on the Site.
Advertising: To display interest-based advertising to you on the Site, to improve our advertising and measurement systems so we can show you relevant ads, and to measure the effectiveness and reach of ads and services.
Marketing and Promotions: For marketing and promotional purposes, such as to send you news and newsletters, special offers and promotions, or to otherwise contact you about products, events and information we think may interest you, including information about third party products and services.
Analytics: To gather metrics to better understand how users interact with the Site; to evaluate and improve the Site; and to develop new products and services.
Comply with law: To comply with legal obligations, as part of our general business operations, and for other business administration purposes.
Prevent Misuse: Where we believe it is necessary to investigate, prevent or take action regarding illegal or improper activities, threats to safety, or violations of our Terms of Use or this Privacy Policy.
Tapology does not lend or sell your personal information. We may provide information about you or your content to third parties without personally identifying you. We may do this for purposes such as managing data, analyzing how the Site is used, diagnosing service or technical problems, maintaining security, or personalizing advertisements and promotions. If we do this, such use of your information will be bound by this Privacy Policy.
We will not disclose personal information to any third party unless required to do so by law or subpoena or if we believe that such action is necessary to (a) conform to the law, comply with legal process served on us, or investigate, prevent, or take action regarding suspected or actual illegal activities; (b) to enforce our Terms of Use, take precautions against liability, to investigate and defend ourselves against any third-party claims or allegations, to assist government enforcement agencies, or to protect the security or integrity of our site; (c) to exercise or protect the rights, property, or safety of Tapology, its users or others; or (d) in the event we are acquired by or merge with another entity.
Some information and content that you post on the Site becomes available to the public. If you remove some of this content, such as your personal User profile information, copies may temporarily remain viewable in cached and archived pages or if other users have copied or stored the information. Other components of your Site usage, including predictions, rankings and post ratings you have supplied to the Site, may not be available for removal even if you choose to terminate your usage of the Site.
We may share non-personal information, such as aggregate Site data, anonymous usage data, trends and the like with interested third parties to help them understand the usage patterns for Site activities.
We may allow certain third parties such as ad servers or ad networks to serve advertisements on the Site. These third parties use technology to send, directly to your browser, the advertisements and links that appear. They automatically receive your IP address when this happens. They may also use other technologies to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and to personalize the advertising content We do not provide any personally identifiable information to these third parties without your consent. However, please note that if an advertiser asks us to show an advertisement to a certain audience and you respond to that advertisement, the advertiser or ad-server may conclude that you fit the description of the audience they are trying to reach. You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third parties. We do not control the activities of such advertisers.
This Site is affiliated with Publisher First, Inc. dba Freestar ("Freestar") for the purposes of placing advertising on the Site, and Freestar will collect and use certain data for advertising purposes. To learn more about Freestar's data usage, click here.
The data you provide to us or that is collected or created about you is stored on secure (non-public) servers. We engage certain third party service providers for this purpose. This data resides at various physical locations worldwide, including at locations outside the European Economic Area ("EEA"). The EEA consists of all European Union member states plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. The data may also be processed or modified at various waypoints prior to reaching its storage location. You hereby agree to this transfer, storage and processing protocol.
We use commercially reasonable physical, managerial, and technical safeguards to preserve the integrity and security of your personal information. We also ordinarily seek to require encrypted communication layers such as ssl/https in order for you to access and use the Site. We cannot, however, ensure or warrant the security of all information you transmit to us and you do so at your own risk. Once we receive your transmission of information, we make commercially reasonable efforts to ensure the security of our systems and those of the third party providers we engage. However, please note that this is not a guarantee that such information may not be accessed, disclosed, altered, or destroyed by breach of any physical, technical, or managerial safeguards of this Site or any third party provider.
To protect your privacy and security, we take reasonable steps (such as requesting a unique password) to verify your identity before granting you access to your account. You are responsible for maintaining the secrecy of your unique password and account information, and for controlling access to your e-mail communications with us, at all times. We may store information we collect in locations outside of our direct control (for instance, on servers or databases co-located with hosting providers).
In the event we should determine that your personal information has been compromised as a result of a breach of security, we will attempt to promptly notify you in accordance with this Privacy Policy, or as otherwise required by applicable law.
You may decline to submit personally identifiable information to us, in which case we may not be able to provide certain services to you.
You have the right to ask us not to process your personal information for marketing purposes. You can exercise your right to request that we cease such processing at any time by contacting us.
The law gives you the right to request a copy of the personal information we hold about you. You may do so by first contacting us. We first require that you prove your identity with two (2) pieces of valid identification. Upon receipt and confirmation we will then provide you with a copy of your personal user data.
In addition, you may request that your personal user information be erased from our records. We will comply with your requests in accordance with applicable law. Please note that some categories of information, including publicly available records and information, non-private site submissions and aggregate information, are not subject to removal. To make such a request please contact us.
Protecting the privacy of young children is especially important. For that reason, we do not knowingly collect or solicit personal information from anyone under the age of 13 or knowingly allow such persons to register on the Site. If you are under 13, please do not send any information about yourself to us, including your name, address, telephone number, or email address. No one under age 13 is allowed to provide any personal information to us. In the event that we learn that we have collected personal information from a child under age 13 without verification of parental consent, we will delete that information as quickly as possible. If you believe that we might have any information from or about a child under 13, please contact us.
We are not responsible for the practices, information or content of sites linked to or from our Site. Your browsing and interaction on any other web site, including those that have a link on our Site, is subject to that site's own rules and policies.
If we change our privacy policies and procedures, we will post those changes to keep you aware of what information we collect, how we use it and under what circumstances we may disclose it. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.
© 2024 Tapology. All rights reserved.


text:
Graphic rebuilding on ancient city Seuthopolis. |
In the course of seven years an extensive research team led by Prof. Dimitar P. Dimitrov conducted rescue excavations of a Thracian town. After the discovery of a large marble inscription it became clear that the name of the town is Seuthopolis. The inscription reflects the contractual relations between Seuthes` heirs and Spartok, dynast of Kabyle (near present day town of Yambol). The remains of Seuthopolis are located about 8 km west of Kazanlak. The town was built on the ruins of a prior existing fortified royal residence. It was lacated on a small peninsula surrounded to the west and south by Tonzor River (today's Tundzha) and to the east by its tributary, Golyama Varovite (Big Lime River). The fortress walls outline a irregular pentagon with an area of 50 decares. The urban plan is based on the Hippodamus cinstruction system typical of the Hellenic cities. Streets intersect at right angles, one of them running along the fortress wall. Two of the streets are wider than the rest and lead to the city gates. Neighborhoods lying in-between the interesecting streets are rectangular-shaped, each with 2 or 3 spacious residential houses with large patios. Their soundations are built of stones cemented with mud, the superstructure being rather flimsy. The floors are made of rammed clay, with broken tiles and broken pottery used at places. Almost every house has a clay ground above the floor level serving as an altar associated with various domestic cults. |
Southern fortress wall on Seuthopolis. Important place in the city plan is occupy by the agora (the square), where the two main streets intersect. According to another inscriptions discovered by the excavation works, in the agore there used to be a sanctuary of Dionysus. The Seutopolis citadel, erected in the northern part of the city, served as an inner fortress. At the far and if this neighborhood there is a fortified palace, which is the largest building in the city, featuring a complex structure and rich interior decoration. |
Ceremonial Hall in the palace of Seuthes III
Foundation |
The city, already explored, remains under the waters of Koprinka dam. It can however become a unique museum in the open. A draft plan for the exposition of Seuthopolis provides for recapturing from the dam an area of 60 decares by constructing an internal wall to create a kind of well, on the bottom of which one can see the ruins on the ancient city. Аrchitect Zheko Tilev. |
More for Seuthopolis... |


text:
Time with God - June 23
Tuesday 23 June 2020
"And when they say to you, "Inquire of the mediums and the necromancers who chirp and mutter," should not a people inquire of their God? Should they inquire of the dead on behalf of the living?"
God wants you to depend on him alone in your spiritual life!
There are many 'spiritual' alternatives readily available today. Tarot cards, palm reading, séances, auras, crystal energies, witchcraft, white magic, mediums, mystics—all these and more invite you to take part in their approach to life and power and the future. However, alternative spiritual pursuits are not an option for you as a Christian.
Notice that Isaiah does not say that there are no spiritual forces or reality involved in these pursuits. Some of them may be tied into demonic or other spiritual forces and offer real results. But that is not what makes something right.
"Should not a people inquire of their God?" Today God is saying to us, "I want you to come to me when you have concerns about issues in your life!" Pursuing those other things will only lead to "distress and darkness" (v. 22) in your life.
If you will begin consulting God about the issues of your life and bringing them to him in prayer, you will find that he is responsive to your prayers. He is ready to act for you! And remember when you pray about something, to trust in God's response, which may be different than you had hoped.
How could you use today's Scripture verse to help someone looking for answers in New Age and other 'spiritual' alternatives? Write your thoughts here:
For the iPhone app and more from John North and Ambassadors For Christ International, click here.


text: The Fluke 289 high performance multimeter is designed to meet the challenges of today's industrial and field service professionals involved in the installation, maintenance or support of facilities or critical systems. The Fluke 289 comes with a built-in data logger to record measurements unattended. Recorded data can be viewed on the meter in TrendCapture or transferred to a PC with optional FlukeView Forms Software. The Fluke 289 combines advanced features with a True-RMS 50,000-count ¼ VGA dot matrix display.


text:
Parts & Accessories
Alto Mitsubishi Pennant Hills stocks every Mitsubishi spare part/s you will ever need for your vehicle. So if you have a Mitsubishi Colt, Lancer, Aspire, Outlander, Pajero or Triton our friendly staff looks forward to keeping your car running in excellent condition.
Please call us directly on (02) 8817 7777 or simply order parts online by filling in the Enquiry Form and we'll contact you as soon as possible.
Why choose Genuine PARTS?
Mitsubishi Genuine Parts, Accessories, Lubricants and Chemicals are specifically designed for Mitsubishi vehicles and also provide you with peace of mind as they are covered by our one year/ 20,000km nation-wide warranty. Look for the Mitsubishi logo for your symbol of quality.
Always insist on Genuine Mitsubishi Replacement Parts, Lubricants, Chemicals and Accessories.
Enquire Now


text:
Myofusion Advanced
4 lbs / 1.81 kg Tub
3 Flavours
1 Store
4 lbs / 1.81 kg Tub
3 Flavours
1 Store
An email has just been dispatched to email@example.com
You will need to confirm receipt of it within the next 7 days otherwise you won't be added to the database.
The program will go live within the next several months.
We'll update you with more information as we get closer to launch.
We're just updating our database. Please check again in a minute.Don't go anywhere!


text:
Smith, Douglas | |
Moore, Philip | |
Miles, Dana | |
Submitted to: Soil Science Society of America Annual Meeting
Publication Type: Abstract Only Publication Acceptance Date: 11/1/2003 Publication Date: 11/1/2003 Citation: SMITH, D.R., MOORE JR, P.A., MILES, D.M., MAXWELL, C.V. EFFECTS OF MANURE AMENDMENTS AND DIET TREATMENTS ON SOIL TEST P WITH TIME. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA ANNUAL MEETING. 2003. Interpretive Summary: Technical Abstract: Recent data indicate that dietary modification may increase potential phosphorus (P) losses when manure is applied to pastures. This study was conducted to determine the effects of feed and manure treatments on P in soil with time. Manure was collected from studies of swine and poultry fed modified diets, aluminum amended manure was also used. Manure from these studies was added to either high or low soil test P (STP) soils, and samples were analyzed for Mehlich 3 (M3) and soluble P (SRP) for 16 weeks. Little change was noted for M3 P for high STP soil fertilized with manure, while as much as 68% reductions were noted for M3 P for manure added to low STP soil by the end of the 16 week study. While SRP decreased with time in swine manure treatments, increases were noted as great as 40% by the end of the 16 week study for poultry litter added to soil. Swine manure from pens fed phytase resulted in higher SRP in both high and low STP soils when compared to manure from normal diets. Treatment of manure with aluminum reduced both M3 P and SRP. This study demonstrates that use of dietary modification and manure amendments may prolong the ability of soil to accept manure applications. |


text:
New Thai Hospitality Brand Haven't Met Silom Opens
Bangkok (Thailand) – November 24, 2017 (travelindex.com) – The hip new technology driven brand offers comfortable yet practical city stays with integrated technology that connects guests with each other and city experiences with complimentary use of 4G connected, interactive in-room smart tablets loaded with a custom hotel app. The tablet has a dedicated chat room for guests to meet up in, chat with each other, and plan activities and trips around the Thai capital. It also features a local area map, a hotel directory, restaurant and room service menus, as well as music streaming via JOOX.
Haven't Met Silom features 70 smart, stylish rooms in two categories spread through 9 floors. The Awesome (20sqm) room and Sensational (24sqm) room offer comfort and convenience with practical layouts enhanced by quality furnishings and fittings. Room rates start from THB 2500.
Cloud 9 Restaurant offers guests a daily breakfast buffet, complemented by a la carte Asian and International dishes, with generous portions served at affordable prices. There is also a 24-hour lounge with complimentary soft drinks and snacks. Cloud 9 Casual Rooftop is the hotel's stylish al fresco pool bar with quality drinks, creative Thai fusion food and stunning cityscape views Mr. Chayaphon Hunrungroj, Chairman of Sincere Capital Land said, "We invested THB120 million in this new project to target millennial travellers from Asia and around the world. Thailand has a lot of new hotels launching, but not many of them target the real needs of millennial travellers. As a new Thai brand we aim to offer affordable, experience- led stays. Our target occupancy is 80% in the first year and we expect this to reach 90% in the second year."
Mr. Patrick Pratummanee, Executive Director explains the inspiration behind the Haven't Met concept. "Today's young, affluent travellers are looking for practical comfort in convenient location. They need a base to explore the city and they want to know the best things to see, to do, and what's new. They also want to share their travel experience with their social network and make new friends."
Haven't Met Silom offers these entire benefits and the hotel app lets them plan their trip together before they check in, share experiences during the stay and upload memories after their trip. The app gives them the inside track on what Bangkok has to offer, and they can then experience the city with a choice of specially selected travel experiences that can be booked directly on the tablet.
"The experiences are what really connect guests to Bangkok so we have selected the best and partnered with a range of operators to offer a wide range of memorable excursions and adventures. The experiences are all carefully chosen so travellers can really get under the skin of the city," adds Mr. Pratummanee
Haven't Met Experiences include everything from sampling local street food to the finest gourmet dining. Guests can choose to visit a pop-up market, or explore the city's sophisticated retail malls. They can relax with a sublime spa treatment to sooth their muscles after a session of Muay Thai boxing training, then head out on a party night to the city's coolest rooftop bars.
"In a city as varied as Bangkok the key to a memorable stay is being able to choose the experiences you will enjoy the most" adds Mr. Pratummanee. "Exploring local and international attractions, discovering the history and traditions of the city, or diving into contemporary culture. That is what travel is all about. Haven't Met Silom introduces the many faces of Bangkok," he adds.
The company expects to break even in five years and the team at Haven't Met Hotels is currently exploring new destinations in Thailand to launch owned and managed hotel properties in downtown, riverfront locations in Bangkok and other cities, as well as resort destinations like Phuket.
About Haven't Met Silom
Haven't Met Silom puts guests in the heart of the Thai capital and offers a hip, social, tech driven stay with a choice of 70 rooms and two room types, plus the Cloud 9 Restaurant, Lounge and Rooftop bar. Inspiring guided urban experiences reveal the best of Bangkok's food, shopping, nightlife, culture and adventure activities. For solo travellers or groups of friends HAVEN'T MET SILOM offers a convenient, stylish and comfortable base from which to uncover the secrets of Asia's City of Angels.


text:
When Ohio National Guardsmen fired sixty-seven gun shots in thirteen seconds at Kent State University (KSU) on May 4, 1970, they murdered four unarmed, protesting college students and wounded nine others. For forty-two years, the United States government has held the position that Kent State was a tragic and unfortunate incident occurring at a noontime antiwar rally on an American college campus. In 2010, compelling forensic evidence emerged showing that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) were the lead agencies in managing Kent State government operations, including the cover-up. At Kent State, lawful protest was pushed into the realm of massacre as the US federal government, the state of Ohio, and the Ohio National Guard (ONG) executed their plans to silence antiwar protest in America.
The new evidence threatens much more than the accuracy of accounts of the Kent State massacre in history books. As a result of this successful, ongoing Kent State government cover-up, American protesters today are at much greater risk than they realize, with no real guarantees or protections offered by the US First Amendment rights to protest and assemble. This chapter intends to expose the lies of the state in order to uncensor the "unhistory" of the Kent State massacre, while also aiming toward justice and healing, as censoring the past impacts our perspectives in the present.
The killing of protesters at Kent State changed the minds of many Americans about the role of the US in the Vietnam War. Following this massacre, there was an unparalleled national response: hundreds of universities, colleges, and high schools closed across America in a student strike of more than four million. Young people across the nation had strong suspicions the Kent State massacre was planned to subvert any further protests arising from the announcement that the already controversial war in Vietnam had expanded into Cambodia.
Yet instead of attempting to learn the truth at Kent State, the US government took complete control of the narrative in the press and ensuing lawsuits. Over the next ten years, authorities claimed there had not been a command-to-fire at Kent State, that the ONG had been under attack, and that their gunfire had been prompted by the "sound of sniper fire." Instead of investigating Kent State, the American leadership obstructed justice, obscured accountability, tampered with evidence, and buried the truth. The result of these efforts has been a very complicated government cover-up that has remained intact for more than forty years.1
The hidden truth finally began to emerge at the fortieth anniversary of the Kent State massacre in May 2010, through the investigative journalism of John Mangels, science writer at the Cleveland Plain Dealer, whose findings supported the long-held suspicion that the four dead in Ohio were intentionally murdered at Kent State University by the US government.
Mangels commissioned forensic evidence expert Stuart Allen to professionally analyze a tape recording made from a Kent State student's dormitory window ledge on May 4, 1970, forever capturing the crowd and battle sounds from before, during, and after the fusillade.2 For the first time since that fateful day, journalists and concerned Americans were finally able to hear the devastating soundtrack of the US government murdering Kent State students as they protested against the Vietnam War.
The cassette tape—provided to Mangels by the Yale University Library, Kent State Collection, and housed all these years in a box of evidence admitted into lawsuits led by attorney Joseph Kelner in his representation of the Kent State victims—was called the "Strubbe tape" after Terry Strubbe, the student who made the recording by placing a microphone attached to a personal recorder on his dormitory window ledge. This tape surfaced when Alan Canfora, a student protester wounded at Kent State, and researcher Bob Johnson dug through Yale library's collection and found a CD copy of the tape recording from the day of the shootings. Paying ten dollars for a duplicate, Canfora then listened to it and immediately knew he probably held the only recording that might provide proof of an order to shoot. Three years after the tape was found, the Plain Dealer commendably hired two qualified forensic audio scientists to examine the tape.
But it is really the two pieces of groundbreaking evidence Allen uncovered that illuminate and provide a completely new perspective into the Kent State massacre.
First, Allen heard and verified the Kent State command-to-fire spoken at noon on May 4, 1970. The command-to-fire has been a point of contention, with authorities stating under oath and to media for forty years that "no order to fire was given at Kent State," that "the Guard felt under attack from the students," and that "the Guard reacted to sniper fire."3 Yet Allen's verified forensic evidence of the Kent State command-to-fire directly conflicts with guardsmen testimony that they acted in self-defense.
The government claim—that guardsmen were under attack at the time of the ONG barrage of bullets—has long been suspect, as there is nothing in photographic or video records to support the "under attack" excuse. Rather, from more than a football field away, the Kent State student protesters swore, raised their middle fingers, and threw pebbles and stones and empty tear gas canisters, mostly as a response to their campus being turned into a battlefield with over 2,000 troops and military equipment strewn across the Kent State University campus.
Then at 12:24 p.m., the ONG fired armor-piercing bullets at scattering students in a parking lot—again, from more than a football field away. Responding with armor-piercing bullets, as Kent State students held a peaceful rally and protested unarmed on their campus, was the US government's choice of action.
The identification of the "commander" responsible for the Kent State command-to-fire on unarmed students has not yet been ascertained. This key question will be answered when American leadership decides to share the truth of what happened, especially as the Kent State battle was under US government direction. Until then, the voice ordering the command-to-fire in the Kent State Strubbe tape will remain unknown.
The other major piece of Kent State evidence identified in Allen's analysis was the "sound of sniper fire" recorded on the tape. These sounds point to Terry Norman, FBI informant and provocateur, who was believed to have fired his low-caliber pistol four times, just seventy seconds before the command-to-fire.
Mangels wrote in the Plain Dealer, "Norman was photographing protestors that day for the FBI and carried a loaded .38-caliber Smith & Wesson Model . . . five-shot revolver in a holster under his coat for protection. Though he denied discharging his pistol, he previously has been accused of triggering the Guard shootings by firing to warn away angry demonstrators, which the soldiers mistook for sniper fire."4
Video footage and still photography have recorded the minutes following the "sound of sniper fire," showing Terry Norman sprinting across the Kent State commons, meeting up with Kent Police and the ONG. In this visual evidence, Norman immediately yet casually hands off his pistol to authorities and the recipients of the pistol show no surprise as Norman hands them his gun.5
The "sound of sniper fire" is a key element of the Kent State cover-up and is also referred to by authorities in the Nation editorial, "Kent State: The Politics of Manslaughter," from May 18, 1970:
"The murders occurred on May 4. Two days earlier, [Ohio National Guard Adjutant General] Del Corso had issued a statement that sniper fire would be met by gunfire from his men. After the massacre, Del Corso and his subordinates declared that sniper fire had triggered the fusillade.6
Yet the Kent State "sound of sniper fire" remains key, according to White House Chief of Staff Bob Haldeman, who noted President Richard Nixon's reaction to Kent State in the Oval Office on May 4, 1970:
"Chief of Staff Bob Haldeman told him [of the killings] late in the afternoon. But at two o'clock Haldeman jotted on his ever-present legal pad "keep P. filled in on Kent State." In his daily journal Haldeman expanded on the President's reaction: "He very disturbed. Afraid his decision set it off . . . then kept after me all day for more facts. Hoping rioters had provoked the shootings—but no real evidence that they did." Even after he had left for the day, Nixon called Haldeman back and among others issued one ringing command: "need to get out story of sniper."7
In a May 5, 1970, article in the New York Times, President Nixon commented on violence at Kent State:
This should remind us all once again that when dissent turns to violence it invites tragedy. It is my hope that this tragic and unfortunate incident will strengthen the determination of all the nation's campuses, administrators, faculty and students alike to stand firmly for the right which exists in this country of peaceful dissent and just as strong against the resort to violence as a means of such expression.8
President Nixon's comment regarding dissent turning to violence obfuscated and laid full blame on student protesters for creating violence at Kent State. Yet at the rally occurring on May 4th, student protester violence amounted to swearing, throwing small rocks, and volleying back tear gas canisters, while the gun-toting soldiers of the ONG declared the peace rally illegal, brutally herded the students over large distances on campus, filled the air with tear gas, and even threw rocks at students. Twenty minutes into the protest demonstration, a troop of National Guard marched up a hill away from the students, turned to face the students in unison, and fired.
The violence at Kent State came from the National Guardsmen, not protesting students. On May 4, 1970, the US government delivered its deadly message to Kent State students and the world: if you protest in America against the wars of the Pentagon and the Department of Defense, the US government will stop at nothing to silence you.
Participating American militia colluded at Kent State to organize and fight this battle against American student protesters, most of them too young to vote but old enough to fight in the Vietnam War.9 And from new evidence exposed forty years after the massacre, numerous elements point directly to the FBI and COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program) as lead agencies managing the government operation of the Kent State massacre, including the cover-up, but also with a firm hand in some of the lead-up.
Prior to the announcement of the Cambodian incursion, the ONG arrived in the Kent area acting in a federalized role as the Cleveland-Akron labor wildcat strikes were winding down. The ONG continued in the federalized role at Kent State, ostensibly to protect the campus and as a reaction to the burning of a Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) building. Ohio Governor James "Jim" Rhodes claimed the burning of the ROTC building on the Kent State University campus was his reason for "calling in the guard," yet in this picture of the burning building, the ONG are clearly standing before the flames as the building burns.10
From eyewitness accounts, the burning of the ROTC building at Kent State was completed by undercover law enforcement determined to make sure it could become the symbol needed to support the Kent State war on student protest.11
According to Dr. Elaine Wellin, an eyewitness to the many events at Kent State leading up to and including May 4th, there were uniformed and plain-clothes officers potentially involved in managing the burning of the ROTC building. Wellin was in close proximity to the building just prior to the burning and saw a person with a walkie-talkie about three feet from her telling someone on the other end of the communication that they should not send down the fire truck as the ROTC building was not on fire yet.12
A memo to COINTELPRO director William C. Sullivan ordered a full investigation into the "fire bombing of the ROTC building." But only days after the Kent State massacre, every weapon that was fired was destroyed, and all other weapons used at Kent State were gathered by top ONG officers, placed with other weapons and shipped to Europe for use by North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), so no weapons used at Kent could be traced.
From these pieces of evidence, it becomes clearer that the US government coordinated this battle against student protest on the Kent State campus. Using the playbook from the Huston Plan, which refers to protesting students as the "New Left," the US government employed provocateurs, staged incidents, and enlisted political leaders to attack and lay full blame on the students. On May 4, 1970, at Kent State University, the US government fully negated every student response as they criminalized the First Amendment rights to protest and assemble.13
The cover-up adds tremendous complexity to an already complicated event, making it nearly impossible to fairly try the Kent State massacre in the American justice system. This imposed "establishment" view that Kent State was about "civil rights"—and not about murder or attempted murder—led to a legal settlement on the basis of civil rights lost, with the US government consistently refusing to address the death of four students and the wounding of nine.14
Even more disheartening, efforts to maintain the US government cover-up at Kent State recently went into overdrive in April 2012, when President Barack Obama's Department of Justice (DOJ) formally announced a refusal to open a new probe into the wrongs of Kent State, continuing the tired 1970 tactic of referring to Kent State as a civil rights matter.15
The April 2012 DOJ letters of response also included a full admission that, in 1979, after reaching the Kent State civil rights settlement, the FBI Cleveland office destroyed what they considered a key piece of evidence: the original tape recording made by Terry Strubbe on his dormitory window ledge. In a case involving homicides, the FBI's illegal destruction of evidence exposes their belief to be "above the law," ignoring the obvious fact that four students were killed on May 4, 1970. As the statute of limitations never lapses for murder, the FBI's actions went against every law of evidence. The laws clearly state that evidence may not be destroyed in homicides, even when the murders are perpetrated by the US government.
The destruction of the original Strubbe tape also shows the FBI's intention to obstruct justice: the 2012 DOJ letters on Kent State claim that, because the original Strubbe tape was intentionally destroyed, the copy examined by Allen cannot be compared to the original or authenticated. However the original Strubbe tape, destroyed by the DOJ, was never admitted into evidence.
The tape examined by Stuart Allen, however, is a one-to-one copy of the Kent State Strubbe tape admitted into evidence in Kent State legal proceedings by Joseph Kelner, the lawyer representing the victims of Kent State. Once an article has been admitted into evidence, the article is considered authentic evidentiary material.
Worse than this new smokescreen on the provenance of the Kent State Strubbe tape and FBI efforts to destroy evidence is that the DOJ has wholly ignored or refuted the tremendous body of forensic evidence work accomplished by Allen, and verified by forensic expert Tom Owen.16 If the US Department of Justice really wanted to learn the truth about what happened at Kent State and was open to understanding the new evidence, DOJ efforts would include organizing an impartial examination of Allen's analysis and contacting him to present his examination of the Kent State Strubbe tape. None of this has happened.
Instead, those seeking justice through a reexamination of the Kent State historical record based on new evidence have been left out in the cold. Congressman Dennis Kucinich, involved in Kent State from the very beginning as a Cleveland city council person, asked important questions in a letter to the DOJ on April 24, 2012, titled, "Analysis of Audio Record of Kent State Shooting Leaves Discrepancies and Key Questions Unaddressed":
"While I appreciate the response from the Justice Department, ultimately, they fail to examine key questions and discrepancies. It is well known that an FBI informant, Terry Norman, was on the campus. That FBI informant was carrying a gun. Eyewitnesses testified that they saw Mr. Norman brandish that weapon. Two experts in forensic audio, who have previously testified in court regarding audio forensics, found gunshots in their analysis of the audio recording. Did an FBI informant discharge a firearm at Kent State? Did an FBI informant precipitate the shootings?
Who and what events led to the violent encounter that resulted in four students dead and nine others injured? What do the FBI files show about their informant? Was he ever debriefed? Has he been questioned to compare his statement of events with new analysis? How, specifically, did the DOJ analyze the tape? How does this compare to previous analysis conducted by independent sources that reached a different conclusion? The DOJ suggested noises heard in the recording resulted from a door opening and closing. What tests were used to make that determination? Was an independent agency consulted in the process?
For more than a year, I have pushed for an analysis of the Strubbe tape because Kent State represented a tragedy of immense proportions. The Kent State shooting challenged the sensibilities of an entire generation of Americans. This issue is too important to ignore. We must demand a full explanation of the events.17
Concerned Americans may join Congressman Kucinich in demanding answers to these questions and in insisting on an independent, impartial organization—in other words, not the FBI—to get to the bottom of this.
The FBI's cloudy involvement includes questions about Terry Norman's relationship to the FBI, addressed in Mangels's article, "Kent State Shootings: Does Former Informant Hold the Key to the May 4th Mystery?":
"Whether due to miscommunication, embarrassment or an attempted cover-up, the FBI initially denied any involvement with Norman as an informant.
"Mr. Norman was not working for the FBI on May 4, 1970, nor has he ever been in any way connected with this Bureau," director J. Edgar Hoover declared to Ohio Congressman John Ashbrook in an August 1970 letter.
Three years later, Hoover's successor, Clarence Kelley, was forced to correct the record. The director acknowledged that the FBI had paid Norman $125 for expenses incurred when, at the bureau's encouragement, Norman infiltrated a meeting of Nazi and white power sympathizers in Virginia a month before the Kent State shootings.18
Even more telling, Norman's pistol disappeared from a police evidence locker and was completely retooled to make sure that the weapon—used to create the "sound of sniper fire" on May 4—would not show signs of use. Indeed, every "investigation" into Kent State shows that the FBI tampered, withheld, and destroyed evidence, bringing into question government involvement in both the premeditated and post-massacre efforts at Kent State. In examining all inquiries into Kent State, an accurate investigation has never occurred, as the groups involved in the wrongs of Kent State have been investigating themselves.19
The Kent State students never had a chance against the armed will of the US government in its aim to fight wars in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos back in 1970. Further, the First Amendment rights to protest and assemble have shown to be only vacuous platitudes. Forty-two years later, the Obama administration echoes the original drone of the US government denying the murder of protesters, pointing only to civil rights lost. When bullets were fired on May 4th at Kent State, US government military action against antiwar protesters on domestic soil changed from a civil rights breach to acts of murder and attempted murder.
Congressman Kucinich, in an interview with Pacifica Radio after his exchanges with DOJ by May of 2012, said,
There are some lingering questions that could change the way that history looks at what happened at Kent State. And I think that we owe it to the present generation of Americans, the generation of Americans that came of age during Kent, the students on campus, we owe it to the Guardsmen, who it was said opened fire without any provocation what so ever … we have to get to the truth.20
As long as American leadership fails to consider killing protesters a homicidal action and not just about civil rights lost, there is little safety for American protesters today, leaving the door wide open for more needless and unnecessary bloodshed and possibly the killing of American protesters again. This forty-two-year refusal to acknowledge the death of four students relates to current US government practices toward protest and protesters in America, as witnessed at Occupy Wall Street over the past year. When will it ever become legal to protest and assemble in America again? Will American leadership cross the line to kill American protesters again?21
In a rare editorial addressing this issue, journalist Stephen Rosenfeld of AlterNet wrote,
"History never exactly repeats itself. But its currents are never far from the present. As today's protesters and police employ bolder tactics, the Kent State and Jackson State anniversaries should remind us that deadly mistakes can and do happen. It is the government's responsibility to wield proportionate force, not to over-arm police and place them in a position where they could panic with deadly results.22
Though forty-two years have passed, the lessons of Kent State have not yet been learned.
No More Kent States
In 2010, the United Kingdom acknowledged the wrongs of Bloody Sunday, also setting an example for the US government to learn the important lessons of protest and the First Amendment.23 In January 1972, during "Bloody Sunday," British paratroopers shot and killed fourteen protesters; most of the demonstrators were shot in the back as they ran to save themselves.24
Thirty-eight years after the Bloody Sunday protest, British Prime Minister David Cameron apologized before Parliament, formally acknowledging the wrongful murder of protesters and apologized for the government.25 The healing in Britain has begun. Considering the striking similarity in events where protesters were murdered by the state, let's examine the wrongs of Kent State, begin to heal this core American wound, and make a very important, humane course correction for America. When will it become legal to protest in America?
President Obama, the Department of Justice, and the US government as a whole must take a fresh look at Stuart Allen's findings in the Kent State Strubbe tape. The new Kent State evidence is compelling, clearly showing how US covert intelligence took the lead in creating this massacre and in putting together the ensuing cover-up.
As the United States has refused to examine the new evidence or consider the plight of American protest in 2012, the Kent State Truth Tribunal formally requested the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the Hague consider justice at Kent State.26
Who benefited the most from the murder of student protesters at Kent State? Who was really behind the Kent State massacre? There is really only one US agency that clearly benefited from killing student antiwar protesters at Kent State: the Department of Defense.
Since 1970 through 2012, the military-industrial-cyber complex strongly associated with the Department of Defense and covert US government agencies have actively promoted never-ending wars with enormous unaccounted-for budgets as they increase restrictions on American protest. These aims of the Pentagon are evidenced today in the USA PATRIOT Act, the further civil rights–limiting National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and new war technologies like CIA drones.
Probing the dark and buried questions of the Kent State massacre is only a beginning step to shine much-needed light on the United States military and to illuminate how the Pentagon has subverted American trust and safety, as it endeavors to quell domestic protest against war at any cost since at least 1970.
LAUREL KRAUSE a writer and truth seeker dedicated to raising awareness about ocean protection, safe renewable energy, and truth at Kent State. She publishes a blog on these topics at Mendo Coast Current. She is the cofounder and director of the Kent State Truth Tribunal. Before spearheading efforts for justice for her sister Allison Krause, who was killed at Kent State University on May 4, 1970, Laurel worked at technology start-ups in Silicon Valley.
MICKEY HUFF is the director of Project Censored and professor of social science and history at Diablo Valley College. He did his graduate work in history on historical interpretations of the Kent State shootings and has been actively researching the topic more since his testimony to the Kent State Truth Tribunal in New York City in 2010.
1. For more background on Kent State and the many conflicting interpretations, see Scott L. Bills, Kent State/May 4: Echoes Through a Decade (Kent OH: Kent State University Press, 1982). Of particular interest for background on this chapter, see Peter Davies, "The Burning Question: A Government Cover-up?," in Kent State/May 4, 150–60. For a full account of Davies's work, see The Truth About Kent State: A Challenge to the American Conscience (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1973). For a listing of other works see Selected Bibliography on the Events of May 4, 1970, at Kent State University, http://dept.kent.edu/30yearmay4/source/bib.htm.
2. John Mangels, "New Analysis of 40-Year-Old Recording of Kent State Shootings Reveals that Ohio Guard was Given an Order to Prepare to Fire," Plain Dealer (Cleveland), May 9, 2010, updated April 23, 2012, http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2010/05/new_analysis_of_40-year-old_re.html; Interview with Stuart Allen analyzing new evidence who said of the efforts, "It's about setting history right." See the footage "Kent State Shootings Case Remains Closed," CNN, added April 29, 2012, http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2012/04/29/justice-department-will-not-reopen-kent-state-shootings-case.cnn.
3. Submitted for the Congressional Record by Representative Dennis Kucinich, "Truth Emerging in Kent State Cold Case Homicide," by Laurel Krause, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r111%3AE14DE0-0019%3A. For a brief introduction on the history and emerging historiography of the Kent State shootings, see Mickey S. Huff, "Healing Old Wounds: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Conflicts Over Historical Interpretations of the Kent State Shootings, 1977–1990," master's thesis, Youngstown State University, December 1999, http://etd.ohiolink.edu/view.cgi?acc_num=ysu999620326.
For the official government report, see The Report of the President's Commission on Campus Unrest (Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1970), also known as the Scranton Commission. It should be noted that the Scranton Commission stated in their conclusion between pages 287 and 290 that the shootings were "unnecessary, unwarranted and inexcusable" but criminal wrongdoing was never established through the courts and no one was ever held accountable for the shootings. Also, it should be noted, that the interpretation that the guard was ordered to fire conflicts with Davies's interpretation, in note 1 here, that even though he believes there was a series of cover-ups by the government, he has not attributed malice. For more on the Kent State cover-ups early on, see I. F. Stone, "Fabricated Evidence in the Kent State Killings," New York Review of Books, December 3, 1970, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1970/dec/03/fabricated-evidence-in-the-kent-state-killings.
4. Mangels, "Kent State Tape Indicates Altercation and Pistol Fire Preceded National Guard Shootings (audio)," Plain Dealer (Cleveland), October 8, 2010, http://www.cleveland.com/science/index.ssf/2010/10/analysis_of_kent_state_audio_t.html.
5. Kent State Shooting 1970 [BX4510], Google Video, at 8:20 min., http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3727445416544720642.
6. Editorial, "Kent State: The Politics of Manslaughter," Nation, April 30, 2009 [May 18, 1970], http://www.thenation.com/article/kent-state-politics-manslaughter.
7. Charles A. Thomas, Kenfour: Notes On An Investigation (e-book), http://speccoll.library.kent.edu/4may70/kenfour3.
8. John Kifner, "4 Kent State Students Killed by Troops," New York Times, May 4, 1970, http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0504.html#article.
9. Voting age was twenty-one at this time, until the passage of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution in 1971, which lowered the voting age to eighteen, partially in response to Vietnam War protests as youth under twenty-one could be drafted without the right to vote.
10. It should also be noted, that Rhodes was running for election the Tuesday following the Kent shootings on a law and order ticket.
11. "My Personal Testimony ROTC Burning May 2 1970 Kent State," YouTube, April 28, 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ppBkB4caY0&feature=youtu.be; Freedom of Information Act, FBI, Kent State Shooting, File Number 98-46479, part 7 of 8 (1970), http://vault.fbi.gov/kent-state-shooting/kent-state-shooting-part-07-of-08/view.
12. The Project Censored Show on The Morning Mix, "May 4th and the Kent State Shootings in the 42nd Year," Pacifica Radio, KPFA, 94.1FM, May 4, 2012 live at 8:00 a.m., archived online at http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/80293 and http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42635027/20120504-Fri0800.mp3. For Wellin on ROTC, see recording at 28:45.
Show description: The May 4th Kent State Shootings 42 Years Later: Justice Still Not Served with Congressman Dennis Kucinich commenting on the DOJ's recent refusal to reopen the case despite new evidence of a Kent State command-to-fire and the 'sound of sniper fire' leading to the National Guard firing live ammunition at unarmed college students May 4, 1970; Dr. Elaine Wellin, Kent State eyewitness shares seeing undercover agents at the ROTC fire in the days before, provocateurs in staging the rallies at Kent, and at Kent State on May 4th; we'll hear from investigator and forensic evidence expert Stuart Allen regarding his audio analysis of the Kent State Strubbe tape from May 4th revealing the command-to-fire and the 'sound of sniper fire' seventy seconds before; and we hear from Kent State Truth Tribunal director Laurel Krause, the sister of slain student Allison, about her efforts for justice at Kent State and recent letter to President Obama..
Also see Peter Davies' testimony about agents provocateurs and the ROTC fire cited in note 1, "The Burning Question: A Government Cover-up?," in Kent State/May 4, 150–60.
13. The Assassination Archives and Research Center (AARC), "Volume 2: Huston Plan," http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/contents/church/contents_church_reports_vol2.htm.
14. Associated Press, "Kent State Settlement: Was Apology Included?," Eugene Register-Guard, January 5, 1979, http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1310&dat=19790105&id=xvJVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=BuIDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3696,963632.
15. Mangels, "Justice Department Won't Reopen Probe of 1970 Kent State Shootings," Plain Dealer (Cleveland), April 24, 2012, http://www.cleveland.com/science/index.ssf/2012/04/justice_department_wont_re-ope.html; and kainah, "Obama Justice Dept.: No Justice for Kent State," Daily Kos, May 2, 2012, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/02/1086726/-Justice-Dept-No-Justice-for-Kent-State.
16. Mangels, "New Analysis."
17. Letters between the Department of Justice and Representative Dennis Kucinich, archived at the Congressman's website, April 20 and April 24 of 2012, http://kucinich.house.gov/uploadedfiles/kent_state_response_from_doj.pdf and http://kucinich.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=292306.
18. Mangels, "Kent State Shootings: Does Former Informant Hold the Key to the May 4 Mystery?," Plain Dealer (Cleveland), December 19, 2010, http://www.cleveland.com/science/index.ssf/2010/12/kent_state_shootings_does_form.html.
19. Freedom of Information Act, FBI.
20. The Project Censored Show on The Morning Mix, "May 4th and the Kent State Shootings in the 42nd Year."
21. Steven Rosenfeld, "Will a Militarized Police Force Facing Occupy Wall Street Lead to Another Kent State?," AlterNet, May 3, 2012, http://www.alternet.org/rights/155270.
22. Ibid.
23. Laurel Krause, "No More Kent States," Mendo Coast Current, April 21, 2012, http://mendocoastcurrent.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/13-day-for-kent-state-peace.
24. Laurel Krause, "Unjustified, Indefensible, Wrong," Mendo Coast Current, September 13, 2010, http://mendocoastcurrent.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/unjustified-indefensible-wrong.
25. Associated Press, "Bloody Sunday Report Blames British Soldiers Fully," USA Today, June 15, 2010, http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2010-06-15-Bloody-Sunday-Ireland_N.htm; and Cameron's direct quote from Henry McDonald, Owen Bowcott, and Hélène Mulholland, "Bloody Sunday Report: David Cameron Apologises for 'Unjustifiable' Shootings," Guardian, June 15, 2010, http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jun/15/bloody-sunday-report-saville-inquiry.
26. Laurel Krause, "To the Hague: Justice for the May 4th Kent State Massacre?," Mendo Coast Current, May 7, 2012, http://mendocoastcurrent.wordpress.com/2012/05/07/may-4th-kent-state-massacre-a-call-for-truth-justice; for more on the Kent State Truth Tribunal, see www.TruthTribunal.org.


text:
For The Complete Planet X Space "FULL MONITORS" Earth Researchers and FOR "Serious Researchers". Check www.SlavePlanet.net . Access To Exclusive Content Videos,Articles uncensored. Access To Private sections on both our Nibiru-Elenin websites, and access to "Exclusive" Content, Information on Earth Planet X and content You need to know but youtube google and the Media DO NOT Want you to know, and all New Findings reports which will only go on SlavePlanet, NOT on other Media..
Many people have asked what my own views on the McCartney being changed and that the original Paul McCartney is supposedly dead !! They ask if i have looked in to the Story? They say why have i not covered this issue before ? And many many other Questions on the subject.
My Reply tended to be Do Not be so silly ! Or well who cares !! The latter tends to shock people, here we are wide awake to the earths many many problems, the illuminati plans the alien infiltration of all levels of our Leaders, and the slow earth takeover, and the Mcartney story should maybe fit in to it all. I also do not believe it as there would be NO benefit anywhere to keep it secret !! also read the article below the video, read as you listen maybe ..
Well let me explain the reason why i do not care on the subject, is simply it does not affect me or others ! The music of The Beatles and Sir Paul McCartney which ever one you choose, has been giving me so much pleasure over the past 50 years !! That indeed Sir Paul McCartney if he was changed which like i say is very very unlikely, indeed, even since the initial early Twist & Shout era the music is just simply the best, the ability to have songs which can move you to tears or lift you from your seat, and compel you to dance or join in singing, is such a skill that i thank Sir Paul McCartney who ever he is , for bringing the music and giving me Thousands of hours top music.
The Beatles were and will always be simply the best and a legend which will carry on for eternity . The fact that this story does nothing or would make any difference is the fact i would never even bother or care if he was swapped or not !! The early Music is brilliant and the later Music is brilliant, so what would it matter even if its really Fred Smith in disguise ?
The Legend and my appreciation of Sir Paul McCartney for the music and even as a person, does deserve some recognition and so for this reason i was going to do a quick tribute and maybe my top 5 songs, put together in a small tribute video, but you know what ? I could not do just 5 songs ! My album collection of early stuff and later stuff, has something like 5 great classic songs per album ! The list grew and grew from 5 songs to 55 and only time of video constraints has stopped this one video tribute being 4 hours or so !! NO Other artist or group could rank such a great number of classic different stuff.
So to those who want to keep on with the conspiracy do what you like, we do not care !! I know when i want to feel good and have some blasting quality music , The Beatles stuff is right on the playlist.
Now sit back enjoy the long none stop music Compilation and see why i do NOT know of any other artist that is even in the same league !!
To Sir Paul McCartney if you ever read or see this, i say a BIG Thanks for giving me your music of which i and millions of others, have grown up on, a BIG thanks for the work you do in saving the Planet, sorry for your loss at losing Linda, she was truly a great woman, but you shall be together again in time, keep up the good work and God Bless You..
Below the Video is a Great article, whereby the Beatles admit they pulled the hoax, and NO Death occured so That dilemna sorted in a few copy and pastes, if only all problems could be sorted so easy...
by Bruce Spizer
(Originally Published April, 2004.)
While on a recent quick vacation in New Orleans, Paul McCartney let his guard down and admitted what some Beatles fans have suspected for years. He confirmed that the "Paul is dead" clues found in several Beatles album covers and songs were deliberately planted by the group as part of an elaborate scheme dating back to the summer of 1966.
According to McCartney, the plan was formulated by manager Brian Epstein. "Brian dropped by the studio to hear the playback of our latest single, 'Paperback Writer.' He didn't like it one bit. 'Not a love song,' he said. He was concerned that the press and our fans wouldn't get it. He told us, 'People want love songs. They won't spend money for a song about a novel writer. You boys are gonna blow it with this one.' But by this time, we were running the show, not Brian. We insisted that 'Paperback Writer' would be our next single and told him that the song represented the new direction our songwriting was going in."
When contacted in London, former Beatles press agent Tony Barrow confirmed Brian's concerns. "Brian was into traditional love songs. He had told Paul to come up with another 'Yesterday' or 'Michelle' for the next single. Imagine his shock when he heard 'Paperback Writer' and 'Rain.' Not only were they not love songs, but they were so loud! We didn't know it at the time, but the Beatles had recorded the first heavy metal single. Not exactly 'Till There Was You' or 'A Taste Of Honey.' I was worried, too. I wondered, 'Had the boys gone too far this time?'"
Brian became even more concerned when he imagined an album full of unconventional songs. While a fan might take a chance on a single, an album purchase was a big thing in those days. Due to its higher price, youngsters, particularly those in the U.K., were very careful about buying albums. That is why the Beatles often issued an EP from an album containing four of its best tracks. So Brian came up with a plan to help sell albums in the event he was right about the dangerous new direction the group was heading in. Paul explained, "When I told him our future albums would be dominated by songs about interesting people and places, his heart sank. He didn't think people would buy such albums and came up with this great idea to push sales in the event he was right and we were wrong. The idea was that we would plant clues in our songs and album covers that one of us had died in a car wreck. If after a few albums, our records weren't selling well, we'd leak out word about the clues and let our fans and the press take over. People would buy the albums to see and hear the clues. We thought, 'Wow, that's an incredible idea!' We realized it would be great fun to have all those clues sitting there undiscovered until people started going nuts looking for them all."
Tony Barrow also thought the plan was brilliant. "Nothing re-energizes a singer's career like his death. Do you really think Buddy Holly would have been so famous had he not died in that plane crash? Same for Richie Valens and certainly that one-hit wonder Big Bopper with his 'Chantilly Lace' song. And how about Otis Redding? He never had a number one hit till after he died in a plane crash. The fact that Brian came up with a car crash shows his genius. Airplane crashes were the norm."
Having sold the group on the idea, the Beatles had to decide which one of them was to "die." Brian wanted the victim to be Ringo because he was the most popular Beatle in the all-important U.S. market, but the drummer wanted nothing to do with it. Tony Barrow recalls, "Ringo flat out refused to be the one. He said, 'Being painted red in a movie is one thing, but pretending to be dead's another. I'm superstitious. Those clues might make it happen.' Brian was disappointed because he knew Ringo was the most sympathetic Beatle. You know Ringo got more mail from America than the other members of the group combined." [Author's Note: Ringo was unavailable for comment.]
After Ringo turned down the "opportunity" to die, the honor of being a dead Beatle was up for grabs. According to Paul, "George said right away he didn't feel comfortable faking his death. But it sure got him thinking. A few days later he showed up at a session with a new song called 'The Art Of Dying.' We didn't think it was that good a song, so we never recorded it. George later improved the lyrics and included it on his first album."
Paul's recollections are backed by the original lyrics to the song, which appear in George's "I Me Mine" book. The 1966 version of the song referred to Brian Epstein, who was the mastermind behind the death clues. It contained the line "Then nothing Mr. Epstein can do will keep me here with you."
With Ringo and George not willing to "die" for the good of the group, it came down to John and Paul, with both thinking it would be fab to be "dead." Paul recalls, "John wanted to be the dead Beatle, but this time I didn't cave in to John like I did on the songwriter credits. I thought it should be me because I was the second most popular Beatle. Brian agreed it should be me because he was worried that once the clues became known, people might think it was a John practical joke if John was supposedly dead. But me…Brian thought, 'No one would suspect Paul for rigging his own death. They think John's the clever one.' So I got to die."
A few days after the "Paperback Writer" listening session, the group was at Brian's office when photographer Bob Whitaker dropped by with the pictures from the butcher session. Brian asked Whitaker to shoot a picture of Paul in steamer trunk to symbolize his lying dead in a coffin. Paul picks up the story. "Bob thought it was too direct, so he suggested we stand the truck upwards and have me sit in it with the other standing around. That way, it would only look like I was lying in a coffin if the cover was turned sideways. Bob had Ringo place his hand on the trunk lid like he was closing the coffin. Brilliant! Brian told us to throw some clues into our songs. Right away John came up with 'I'm Only Sleeping,' as if 'Paul isn't dead, he's only sleeping.' Pretty subtle. Most people missed that clue, and that was one of the first!"
The "coffin trunk" photo was sent to Capitol to serve as the cover for the American album "Yesterday And Today." But when Brian saw the cover mock-up, he began having second thoughts about using the photo so early in the game. He was concerned that people might suspect Paul was dead a lot sooner than the group wanted to clues to be discovered. So Brian sent Capitol the butcher photo, knowing that it might ultimately be rejected, but at least it would deflect attention away from the provocative coffin trunk cover. The plan worked to perfection with the Butcher cover causing so much controversy that when it was "replaced" by the trunk cover, no one noticed it showed Paul lying in a coffin!
One of the casualties of the plan was Robert Freeman's unused cover for "Revolver." Paul explains that, "For 'Revolver,' Robert Freeman came up with a great cover image, but there was no death clue in it. I asked Klaus [Voormann] to do a pen and ink with a photo collage so we could throw in some clues. I had him place an image of my face in my ear. That represented a 'beetle' crawling out of the ear of my buried corpse. You know, insects get into coffins and mix with the dead bodies, crawling through eye sockets, ear openings and the like. Very creepy and very subtle. And the other clue came from Klaus drawing my face in a side profile looking to the left. The others were drawn looking forward. When you turn the cover on its side, I'm looking upward, just like I'd appear on a morgue slab or if I were buried underground. We really were into having clues appear when you turned our covers sideways. I'm surprised nobody caught those 'Revolver' clues."
According to Tony Barrow, there was one other clue planted on "Revolver." "John had this really weird song that had no title, so he called it 'Mark I.' Later he came up with 'The Void,' to symbolize the void left in the group by Paul's death. Ringo thought that was too subtle, so he came up with the perfect phrase for describing the direction the group would go in if Paul really were dead. And that was 'Tomorrow Never Knows.' Ringo was great at stuff like that."
By the time the Beatles recorded "Sgt. Pepper," the plan really took off. Tony Barrow recalls, "Brian thought 'Tomorrow Never Knows' was way out there. You can imagine his fear of an entire album of songs like that. He was terrified that Sgt. Pepper would be viewed as pretentious nonsense! He told the boys to throw in a bunch of clues on that one!"
The first song recorded for "Sgt. Pepper" was "Strawberry Fields Forever," though it ended up being used as a single. At the end of the song, John was supposed to repeat "I buried Paul" several times, but that was too obvious, so instead he said "Cranberry sauce" and then slurred his words so that "I buried Paul" sounded like "I'm very bored." The plan worked as it took over two years before anyone realized what he was really saying.
Later songs also had clues. Paul admitted that "She's Leaving Home" contained the time the car wreck supposedly occurred-"Wednesday morning at five o'clock as the day begins." The line "Meeting a man from the motor trade" tied in the motor vehicle. And, of course, "A Day In The Life" was about a car crash. According to Paul, "The drug references were just a smoke-screen to deflect attention away from the car crash, you know. 'He blew his mind out in a car' could mean his head was crushed or he was doing drugs. Take your pick."
The cover was full of clues: the crashing car; Paul's bass made of flowers; Paul having his back to the camera on the back cover; the hand over Paul's head; and the infamous "O.P.D." patch on Paul's uniform, which was McCartney's favorite Pepper clue. "We had to work hard on that one. Someone told John that in America the letters OPD stood for 'Officially Pronounced Dead.' I remembered I had this patch with the letters "OPP," which I got in Canada. I think it stands for Ontario Police Precinct or something like that. So I got the idea to put the patch on my uniform's sleeve and shoot the picture so that the lower part of the second 'P' would not be visible, thus making it look like 'OPD.' I was quite pleased with the way it came out."
Although the sales of "Revolver" and "Pepper" made Brian realize that the clues probably weren't needed to sell records, the group kept creating more and more clues. According to Paul, "It was so neat coming up with clues that we kept doing them even thought we never thought they'd be needed to sell albums. It was great mischievous fun! When Brian died, we really went wild with it! For 'Magical Mystery Tour,' I wanted to wear a black flower on my jacket. The florist thought Alistair Taylor was nuts when he insisted they send us a black carnation. We became worried people would catch on when they saw the 'Magical Mystery Tour' booklet because the clues were so obvious. The 4 or 5 musicians, the "I was" sign. But no one caught on."
Paul stated that placing the clues in the songs was even more fun than the visual images. "Ringo had this old song, 'Don't Pass Me By,' which we had refused to record for years. But I realized it could be used for a clue. I gave him the line 'You were in a car crash and you lost your hair' And we did great stuff with backwards tape loops and mumbling. John going 'Paul is a dead man, miss him, miss him.'"
Some of the clues were easy and obvious. John's "Glass Onion" even told the fans what was going on with its line "And here's another clue for you all, the Walrus was Paul." But some were quite intricate.
According to Paul, the toughest one was "Revolution 9." "We had to come up with a phrase to go 'Number 9′ when you played it backwards. Our plan was to have it go 'Number 9′ on the record, but when you played it backwards it would sound like 'Paul is dead.' When we recorded 'Paul is dead' and played it backwards, it didn't go 'Number 9.' It sounded more like 'Pythagorian Theorem.' The phrase 'Macca is dead' sounded like 'Thermo nuclear' when we played it backwards. We experimented for hours until Alan Parsons came up with 'Turn me on dead man.' When we reversed the tape, it sounded like he was saying 'Number 9, number 9.' So that's how we did it."
Abbey Road engineer Alan Parsons remembers the session well. "We spent hours recording different phrases until I lucked into 'Turn me on dead man.' When I played the tape backwards and heard 'Number 9,' well, it was one of the greatest moments of my life! We were all sworn to secrecy about the clues, but now that Paul's let the cat out the bag, I can talk about it. I later recorded my own song about looking for clues, 'Eye In The Sky.'"
The last batch of clues were planted on the album cover to "Abbey Road," which was designed by Paul. McCartney came up with the idea to stage his own funeral. George, in the role of the grave digger, dressed in work clothes. Ringo, the funeral director, wore a black suit. John, the angel, wore white. Paul was barefoot, as it is the custom in several cultures to bury people without their shoes. In a subtle touch, the left-handed McCartney held a cigarette in his right hand. This was to imply that the Paul who had been with the group since mid-1966 was a right-handed imposter.
Paul recalls the other major "Abbey Road" clue with fondness. "I've always liked puns, so I wanted to have a Volkswagon Beetle represent me. Alistair Taylor arranged for a friend of his to park his VW Beetle on the street by the studio. Alistair and I placed a special license tag we had made the night before on the car. It said '28 IF,' meaning that I would have been 28 if I had lived. Unfortunately, I out-thought myself on that one. I was only 27 at the time, but I told Alistair to paint it as 28 because I didn't think "Abbey Road" would come out until I was 28. That's because I was sure that the "Get Back" album would come out first. By the time we decided to put out "Abbey Road" first, I had forgotten about that clue, so we didn't have the picture altered to have the tag read '27 IF.'"
When John told the others he was quitting the group, Paul began thinking it was time to expose the clues. "I was always nervous before a record came out, you know. Would people like it? And, in this case, what if word leaked out that John had quit? We were all worried that the album would bomb, and when word spread that John was out, we'd be forgotten. No one would buy our latest LP or our old records. The clincher was a pair of bad reviews published in 'The New York Times' and 'Rolling Stone.' I thought, oh sh*t, no one likes the long medley on side two. So I had Mal [Evans] go to Detroit and tell some college kids about the clues. One of the guys phoned in some of the clues to a radio station there. That was all it took."
Once people started looking for clues, they were easy to spot. The American press was fascinated with the story. Brian's plan worked to perfection. Not only did sales for "Abbey Road" take off, but people began buying "Sgt. Pepper," "Magical Mystery Tour" and "The White Album" to see and hear the clues. Paul hid away at his farm in Scotland to further fuel the hoax. When a reported from "Life" magazine finally caught up with him, Paul dead-panned, "If I were dead, I'd be the last to know."
The Beatles and their inner circle kept the clue caper a secret for over thirty years. Not only do we now know that the Beatles deliberately planted the clues, but we also know that it was part of a brilliant marketing plan formulated by manager Brian Epstein back in 1966. As for why Paul finally revealed the secrets behind the scheme, we may never know if it was an accidental slip up on his part or a plan to reignite sales of the Beatles catalog.
In Early 2022 Our Youtube account has been Silenced by THEM as our information is Warning people of the Great Danger Humans on Earth are in. This is not a Major problem to our MAIN Website www.SlavePlanet.net as we have been streaming our own Films Videos on there for last few years, HOWEVER This website we control www.Nibiru-Elenin.com has been linking many films videos from YouTube as such many articles here will no longer be viewable as ScrewTube a NWO Owned operation has zapped them as you would see if you followed a old video Link, as below.
THEY However do NOT Word as accurate as above shows? What they are saying is,"This account has been closed" Making out to the dumb that we indeed closed it, as if right? THEY Know the Truth would make even the dumbest think hmmmm Hang on a bit, So the accounts closed for NOT allowing questions as to 911, Jews, WW2, etc, and now being injected with a EVIL None tested Vaccine for a Cold and sniffling runny nose ! . ALARM Bells would ring to even the thickest out there, and so they adopt the same old Lies and Lies as usual. NO Longer is Youtube or other media owned by them of any use for REALITY on whats going on on Earth. The Truth is if you research we are in deep troubles. SO While you can Get busy watching OUR In House streamed Videos Films UNCENSORED @ www.SlavePlanet.net .
IT IS IMPORTANT TO VIEW Over 1000 Hours of Films and Articles we hold and stream from our own Servers as after 16 years of research i assure you HUMANS are in the biggest danger the Earth has ever seen. Even the dopes MUST surely realize all is not well with both Health Issues such as Cancers NOW 1 in 3 as against 1 in 1000 years ago! The deliberate destruction of White Christian Nations with Paid for deliberate Immigration from Third worlds etc, then the phoney wars the Fake Viruses etc, etc, ALL This and more easily shown in Videos Films and years of research if only people look and warn others. So do your bit help us keep fighting against media censorship and waking as many as possible by watching sharing and even funding what is a very very expensive task.
Thanks For Watching and Helping...
We have 35 guests and no members online
Submit your Captures, and any Genuine News Worthy Earth Space Nibiru Mystery Planet and similar stuff to us , via our email Contact Section, We will give our honest initial thoughts, and then use and Broadcast the findings on your behalf, ONLY assuming its newsworthy of course. with credits going to you, unless you opt for keeping anonimity ? YOUR Choice, Contact us...
Had you snapped something weird ? and didnt know what to do with it ? Maybe your not sure what it is ? Give us a shout and lets check it for you...We welcome input and can create and promote your find worldwide..
We welcome your cooperation, what you may have captured could well fit to already known data, and help complete the Puzzle.. Do Not Be Shy...
UK Europe Worldwide (c) 2013-2022 For - Nibiru Earth Space UFOs Planet X Nibiru NWO Earth Enslavement News Latest Information.


text:
Your cart is empty
Lucie Brown Cherry Extendable Dining Room Set
Made entirely from genuine wood for durability and natural aesthetics.
Impress everyone who comes to visit with the fancy and stylish details of this sophisticated dining collection.
Shop the Lucie CollectionWith over twenty years of furniture industry expertise, you'll find the perfect piece from this line. Furniture of America specializes in creating high quality and stylish furniture that won't break the bank. We're proud to offer a large inventory of their pieces from some of their most popular collections. You'll find bedroom furniture waiting to create an escape in your master suite, a living room set ready for family movie night, and a variety of other pieces for all living areas and all décor styles. Discover coordinated sets from collections that are perfectly in sync or pick and choose individual pieces that will allow you to customize your room's motif. Free shipping and in-home delivery is available for all furniture orders in the United States.