text:
On Sunday, Nov. 8, 2009 at 16:34 UTC (10:34 a.m. CST) the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) instrument on NASA's Terra satellite passed over Hurricane Ida while it was situated between western Cuba and the Yucatan Peninsula. According to the National Hurricane Center, at 15:00 UTC, the hurricane had an estimated minimum central pressure of 983 millibars, with maximum sustained winds of 148 kilometers per hour/41 meters per second (92 miles per hour -- corresponding to a Category 1 storm on the Saffir-Simpson scale). Three hours later, at 18:00 UTC, the minimum central pressure had decreased to 978 millibars, and the maximum sustained winds increased to 157 kilometers per hour/44 meters per second (98 miles per hour) -- corresponding to a Category 2 storm. At 21:00 UTC, the storm reached it maximum intensity, with a minimum central pressure of 976 millibars, with sustained winds near 167 kilometers per hour/46 meters per second (104 miles per hour). Ida eventually made landfall in the United States as a tropical storm with maximum sustained winds of 72 kilometers per hour/20 meters per second (45 miles per hour) at Dauphin Island, Ala., on Tuesday, Nov. 10.
The first pair of images (figure 1) shows a visible image from MISR's nadir viewing camera, on the left, and a prototype retrieval of high-resolution (1.1 kilometers, or 0.7 miles) cross-track cloud motion heights and winds superimposed on this image on the right. The eye of Hurricane Ida is on the far right of the images and black regions indicate the extent of the MISR 380-kilometer-wide (236-mile-wide) image swath. North is toward the top of the images. The low clouds in the right image show the characteristic counterclockwise flow (from east to west for clouds north of the hurricane eye and the opposite to the south of the eye) associated with strong low pressure in the Northern Hemisphere. MISR uses a stereophotogrammetric technique to simultaneously retrieve the height and cross-track (east-west) motion of clouds. This technique relies on MISR's nine cameras that provide 275-meter (902-foot) resolution views of a single scene from different angles over a period of approximately seven minutes. An automatic pattern matching algorithm finds cloud top features that are common among the MISR camera images and determines the displacement of these features over time. Because the retrieval is purely geometric, the height assignment is very robust. For Hurricane Ida, the highest clouds are found at an altitude above 15 kilometers (9.3 miles) -- higher than a typical passenger aircraft flies. The prototype cross-track wind retrieval uses the time difference between different camera views to infer the motion of features orthogonal to the (north to south) motion of the satellite. The retrieval of both height and wind is done at a spatial resolution of 1.1 kilometers (0.7 miles). Observations of this type are extremely difficult to acquire from ground-based or airborne platforms.
The second set of images (figure 2) shows the detail of the clouds near the hurricane eye. At the time of the satellite overpass, Ida's eye was "closed," meaning that it was covered by clouds, so the typical dark eye caused by descending air in the center of the hurricane vortex is not visible. In this case, however, strong thunderstorms nearly reaching the stratosphere are visible as "bubbles." Upon reaching the stratosphere, the tops of thunderstorms rapidly spread out, as shown in the image on the right. The clouds to the west of the strongest storms are moving toward the west, while the clouds to the east are moving east. The speed this motion retrieved by MISR ranges from 10 to 30 meters per second (36 to 108 kilometers, or 22 to 67 miles, per hour).
The bubbling cloud tops observed by MISR are a relatively common feature of intensifying tropical storms, such as Hurricane Ida. They are associated with what are known as "vortical hot towers," which have been observed by other NASA satellite instruments, such as the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) that carries a precipitation radar that can look below the hurricane cloud tops. By rapidly bringing energy from the ocean surface up through the atmosphere, hot towers play an important, but not completely understood, role in storm intensification. The animation shows the development and spreading out of the clouds at the top of the hurricane over the seven-minute time period of the MISR instrument overpass. The spatial resolution of the images is 275 meters (902 feet) and the images are registered to the top of the hurricane to highlight the rapid development of the cloud features associated with the hot towers.
MISR was built and is managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington, D.C. The Terra satellite is managed by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. The MISR data were obtained from the NASA Langley Research Center Atmospheric Science Data Center. JPL is a division of the California Institute of Technology.


text:
Today, the NDP got down to business and discussed policy, policy and more policy. In fact, the difference with Liberal policy conventions and NDP policy conventions, is that at NDP policy conventions, policy is discussed.
I started following the day with interest as delegates debated building an oil pipeline from Alberta to Eastern Canada. The advantages — according to the delegates — would be that such a move would create hundreds if not thousands of jobs and it would maintain sovereignty over Canadian energy distribution as distribution channels now run through the US. The clear disadvantage? That would be a nod to the reality that Canadians consume oil and export oil from the oil sands — a sticky point to a party that ran on a moratorium on future oil sands development in the previous election. In the face of recognizing economic realities and lofty dreams, the party faithful sided with the latter firmly saying "no" to our own oil production and transport.
From there, delegates went onto women in "peace-building" (is this the same as Conservative "peacemaking" — or closer to Liberal "peacekeeping"?) The resolution carried as no controversy could be found in a feel good resolution for everyone. Then foreign aid came up and Libby Davies took the microphone to describe the conditions of the people in the Gaza strip after she had returned from… the West Bank. No mention of Israel, though one delegate found the Canada-Israel Committee's presence at the conference "interesting". There was some other drama as some delegates debated the highly generalized language of the foreign aid resolution which described aid to "countries". One delegate moved to discuss aid on a case-by-case bilateral basis. There were also some procedural debates. One French-language resolution was discussed which may well have been lifted by the Bloc Quebecois mandating the use of the French-language by all Quebeckers. Further, a policy resolution on EI firmed up the party's position closer to the 360 hour mark similarly being proposed by the Liberals.
Leo Gerard was one of the showcase speakers of the day. The president of the United Steelworkers certainly gave the best crowd-pleasing speech of the day but appealed to the worst elements of partisanship as he, at different times, called both Harper and Ignatieff "the prince of darkness" and called ideological opponents in the US healthcare debate "redneck jerkoffs". Frankly, if the NDP is to ever be taken seriously, this sort of language is unacceptable from a showcase speaker during the convention of a mainstream political party. In fact, to emphasize the fact that the NDP is still not taken seriously, there will be little to no critical coverage of this language in the MSM tomorrow, as there would have been screaming headlines if this had occurred at a Conservative or Liberal convention.
Next, the results of the party executive elections were announced. Peggy Nash replaces Anne McGrath as president of the NDP while Rebecca Blaikie was elected treasurer. A motion was made to destroy recycle the ballots. Nash served as an MP for the NDP in the 39th parliament and then most recently as an adviser to the CAW. Blaikie is daughter of the former NDP MP and Dean of the House of Commons Bill Blaikie.
Next, Marshall Ganz — a Harvard lecturer and labour organizer — spoke to the crowd about his experience as a community organizer and as a campaign organizer for the Obama campaign. Ganz gave the most informative speech of day for assembled delegates. Though Ganz spoke about the "politics of hope", the NDP would be better served going negative against Michael Ignatieff as the Liberal leader has left them a lot of room to maneuver on the centre-left. To stake out their place there, the NDP will have to define Ignatieff more aggressively than recent Conservative efforts did with the now famous Just Visiting ads. Particularly notable moments of culture shock were apparent from Obama speakers in their use of biblical parables to illustrate "teachable moments" at this convention. The party of prairie preacher Tommy Douglas has taken a long road eschewing social justice drawn from religious inclination to one taken from a more atheistic worldview and Obama campaigners seemed to be out-of-place making religious analogies to a largely secular party.
After Ganz, the party went back to policy debate and discussed a state-focused nuclear disarmament resolution in a "hey, remember the 80s/something happened on 9/11?" moment. As conflict has moved from cold-war area politics to one with asymmetrical non-state actors post 9/11, the NDP still seems bent on having the same "world without (US) nukes" policy discussion instead of addressing the real and present danger of global terrorism. Another striking moment came during the international policy discussion portion when NDP MP Paul Dewar (Ottawa Centre) suggested that Tamil actions in blocking traffic in Ottawa and occupying a highway in Toronto were legitimate methods for Tamils to get the attention of the Canadian government.
The keynote of the day was Betsy Myers, the COO for the Obama campaign. According to her agency website, Myers banks between $15-20k per speaking arrangement. Myers talk was relatively light and uninspiring for delegates, but involved a Q&A session hosted by NDP national campaign manager Brian Topp. During Myers speech to party faithful, union delegates were notably absent from the speech. While union organizers make up an important part of the NDP field operation, they may have been upset by the party brass importing some expensive American talent to tell delegates about the shiniest new campaign techniques.
Union delegates absent from Myers speech and Q&A
After the Myers segment, Dippers poured out to hospitality events including a Keith's brewery tour hosted by the NDP Nova Scotia Provincial caucus, that despite just forming government in that province, only managed to bring out five MLAs to the reception. Another big event of the evening was the Charlie Angus-sponsored Canadian Private Copying Collective gathering at the Delta. Of the federal caucus, only Angus and Bruce Hyer were present (a reader writes to inform that Claude Gravelle, Carol Hughes, Malcom Allen, Glen Thibault, Brian Masse, John Rafferty, Andrea Horwath, Ken Neuman, Leo Gerrard, and Andrew Cash also showed up during the event). They were joined by Canadian artists Eva Avila of Idol fame, Chris Cummings, Teresa Ennis, and Marie Denise Pelletier. The other free event was the NDP "tweetup" on Argyle street attended by Paul Dewar, Niki Ashton, Megan Leslie and Brian Masse. The VIPs, not at the brewery tour, copyright party or tweetup, must have been gathered at the Delta for a closed-door $300 "winner's circle" meet-and-greet with Betsy Myers where MP Olivia Chow reported that Myers said that the NDP "[gives] voice to the voiceless". Indeed.
Despite an initial setback after the party banned one of their leading activists, the eNDProhibition movement is making its voice heard at the NDP convention and is reportedly being more shrewd than the members of the Socialist caucus who are bluntly and clumsily pushing to nationalize everything. Dana Larsen, the NDP candidate who was fired during the last campaign for being pro-drug, was similarly barred from attending the NDP convention. The advocates for marijuana are looking for any small victory for their cause such as having the resolution on psychoactive substances debated on the floor. The eNDProhibition activists were seen lobbying GLBT delegates making the argument that they too once faced discrimination within their own party (Tommy Douglas' views on homosexuality).
Some eNDProhibition buttons seen at the convention
Tomorrow will be an interesting day as the convention closes and the NDP debates their convention-headlining moment: the possible rebranding of the party. Observers will note a blue colour has washed over the NDP website and former party communications guru Ian Capstick noted to me that orange is simply terrible on camera. During the keynote, Myers spoke against a blue backdrop complete with "Jack Layton" in large letters overtop a barely visible "NDP-NPD" sitting next to large Obama logo. The party of Layton seems dedicated to embracing the success of the new American president who is for everything from the death penalty, to nukes, to civil unions over same-sex marriage, to two-tier healthcare, to increased troop presence in Afghanistan, to free trade with Colombia, to keeping Omar Khadr locked up. Layton may be embracing the blue colour in a nod to the US Democrats who turned red states into blue states for Obama in the 2008 election. The NDP slogan "it can be done" is somewhat similar to "yes we can" but seems to be more "convincing a disbeliever" in tone rather than a collective and affirmative call to action.
If Marshall Ganz could have given one lesson to delegates it would have been that without a personal story from each and every person about why they believe in your candidate enough to work on your team, the slickest political package and most sophisticated social media operation will never win a campaign. You can fly in the top-paid political talent, but without a strong field team you'll be spending more time convincing people that "it can be done" rather than everyone believing that "yes, we can". This weekend, the NDP may yet illustrate that it will fail at its own expensive imported lesson.
UDPATE: The NDP will not change its name. But not for a lack of trying. The delegates were only given an hour to debate an omnibus resolution on party constitution matters. No time was left to discuss the name change. As James Moore says, "everything old is new again".

subset: commoncrawl


text:
If you're in the market for new hardware, PC or smartphone, now is the time to buy. All indications are that prices are going to be rising in the next year.
There are a few different factors in play here. This year is slated to be a big year for new smartphone releases, putting increased pressure on parts suppliers. The expectation is that smartphones will see a 4.3 percent price increase over the next twelve months as suppliers max out their production capabilities.
PC growth is still expanding, albeit more slowly, and much of the current growth is being driven by the demand for high-end gaming systems.
The people who buy systems like these aren't particularly price sensitive, and are much more interested in squeezing every ounce of performance they can from their systems, which explains why the prices for high-end components are slated to rise. Note, however, that PC prices aren't expected to see nearly as large an increase as smartphones. They will see only up about 1.5 percent over the next twelve months.
In any case, if you've been putting off buying new equipment, and you are looking to get the best price possible, the window is rapidly closing to make that happen. The time is now if you want to get the most bang for your budgetary buck.
If your IT staff is swamped with other initiatives and you can't spare anyone to make the investments you know your company will need to stay competitive in the long term, give us a call today and speak with one of our knowledgeable representatives. We can work with you to assess your needs and chart a course with you to make all the equipment acquisitions your company will need to grow without pulling your existing staff off of their tasks.


text:
Public speaking
(Redirected from Oratory)
Public speaking or Oratory is the process of speaking to a group of people in a structured, deliberate manner intended to inform, influence, or entertain the listeners. It is closely allied to "presenting", although the latter has more of a commercial connotation.
[edit]- In the tradition of popular oratory, Trash [a nickname] started a talk at random, moved confidently ahead in no particular direction, and, although he spoke very clearly, said nothing.
- William Saroyan, Madness in the Family (1988)
- LECTURER, n. One with his hand in your pocket, his tongue in your ear and his faith in your patience.
- Ambrose Bierce, The Cynic's Dictionary (1906); republished as The Devil's Dictionary (1911).
- ORATORY, n. A conspiracy between speech and action to cheat the understanding. A tyranny tempered by stenography.
- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary (1911).
- For rhetoric, he could not open
His mouth, but out there flew a trope.- Samuel Butler, Hudibras, Part I (1663-64), Canto I, line 81.
- Poetry, unlike oratory, should not aim at clarity... but be dense with meaning, 'something to be chewed and digested'...
- George Chapman, Preface to Ovid's Banquet of Sense (1595)
- He mouths a sentence as curs mouth a bone.
- Charles Churchill, The Rosciad (1761), line 322.
- We fear that the glittering generalities of the speaker have left an impression more delightful than permanent.
- F. J. Dickman, Review of Lecture by Rufus Choate, Providence Journal (Dec. 14, 1849).
- There is no true orator who is not a hero.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson, Letters and Social Aims (1876), Eloquence.
- Intererit multum Davusne loquatur an heros.
- It makes a great difference whether Davus or a hero speaks.
- Horace, Ars Poetica (18 BC), CXIV.
- Thence to the famous orators repair,
Those ancient, whose resistless eloquence
Wielded at will that fierce democratie,
Shook the Arsenal, and fulmined over Greece,
To Macedon, and Artaxerxes' throne.- John Milton, Paradise Regained (1671), Book IV, line 267.
- Very good orators, when they are out, they will spit.
- William Shakespeare, As You Like It (c.1599-1600), Act IV, scene 1, line 75.
- Be not thy tongue thy own shame's orator.
- William Shakespeare, The Comedy of Errors (1592-1594), Act III, scene 2, line 10.
- List his discourse of war, and you shall hear
A fearful battle render'd you in music.- William Shakespeare, Henry V (c. 1599), Act I, scene 1, line 43.
- What means this passionate discourse,
This peroration with such circumstance?- William Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part II (c. 1590-91), Act I, scene 1, line 104.
- I come not, friends, to steal away your hearts:
I am no orator, as Brutus is;
* * I only speak right on.- William Shakespeare, Julius Cæsar (1599), Act III, scene 2, line 220.
- Fear not, my lord, I'll play the orator
As if the golden fee for which I plead
Were for myself.- William Shakespeare, Richard III (c. 1591), Act III, scene 5, line 95.
- Bid me discourse, I will enchant thine ear,
Or, like a fairy, trip upon the green.- William Shakespeare, Venus and Adonis (1593), line 145.
- Charm us, orator, till the lion look no larger than the cat.
- Alfred Tennyson, Locksley Hall Sixty Years After (1886), line 112.
- There is nothing in the world like a persuasive speech to fuddle the mental apparatus and upset the convictions and debauch the emotions of an audience not practised in the tricks and delusions of oratory.
- Mark Twain, "The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg", ch. III, in The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg and Other Stories and Essays (1900).
- When a great orator makes a great speech you are listening to ten centuries and ten thousand men — but we call it his speech, and really some exceedingly small portion of it is his. But not enough to signify. It is merely a Waterloo. It is Wellington's battle, in some degree, and we call it his; but there are others that contributed. It takes a thousand men to invent a telegraph, or a steam engine, or a phonograph, or a photograph, or a telephone or any other important thing—and the last man gets the credit and we forget the others. He added his little mite — that is all he did. These object lessons should teach us that ninety-nine parts of all things that proceed from the intellect are plagiarisms, pure and simple; and the lesson ought to make us modest. But nothing can do that.
- Mark Twain, Letter to Helen Keller, after she had been accused of plagiarism for one of her early stories (17 March 1903), published in Mark Twain's Letters, Vol. 1 (1917) edited by Albert Bigelow Paine, p. 731.
Hoyt's New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations
[edit]- Quotes reported in Hoyt's New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922), p. 572-73.
- Solon wished everybody to be ready to take everybody else's part; but surely Chilo was wiser in holding that public affairs go best when the laws have much attention and the orators none.
- Ce que l'on conceit bien s'énonce clairement,
Et les mots pour le dire arrivent aisément.- Whatever we conceive well we express clearly, and words flow with ease.
- Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux, L'Art Poètique, I. 153.
- The Orator persuades and carries all with him, he knows not how; the Rhetorician can prove that he ought to have persuaded and carried all with him.
- Thomas Carlyle, Essays, Characteristics.
- Its Constitution—the glittering and sounding generalities of natural right which make up the Declaration of Independence.
- Rufus Choate, letter to the Maine Whig Committee (1856).
- I asked of my dear friend Orator Prig:
"What's the first part of oratory?" He said, "A great, wig."
"And what is the second?" Then, dancing a jig
And bowing profoundly, he said, "A great wig."
"And what is the third?" Then he snored like a pig,
And puffing his cheeks out, he replied, "A great wig."- George Colman the Younger, Orator Prig.
- Glittering generalities! They are blazing ubiquities.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson, remark on Choate's words.
- You'd scarce expect one of my age
To speak in public on the stage;
And if I chance to fall below
Demosthenes or Cicero,
Don't view me with a critic's eye,
But pass my imperfections by.
Large streams from little fountains flow,
Tall oaks from little acorns grow.- David Everett, Lines Written for a School Declamation.
- Allein der Vortrag macht des Redners Glück,
Ich fühl es wohl noch bin ich weit zurück.- Yet through delivery orators succeed,
I feel that I am far behind indeed. - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust, I. 1. 194.
- Yet through delivery orators succeed,
- Es trägt Verstand und rechter Sinn,
Mit wenig Kunst sich selber vor.- With little art, clear wit and sense
Suggest their own delivery. - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust, I. 1. 198.
- With little art, clear wit and sense
- The passions are the only orators that always persuade: they are, as it were, a natural art, the rules of which are infallible; and the simplest man with passion is more persuasive than the most eloquent without it.
- François de La Rochefoucauld, Maxims. No. 9.
- The object of oratory alone is not truth, but persuasion.
- Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay, Essay on Athenian Orators.
- The capital of the orator is in the bank of the highest sentimentalities and the purest enthusiasms.
- Edward G. Parker, The Golden Age of American Oratory, Chapter I.
- Præterea multo magis, ut vulgo dicitur viva vox afficit: nam licet acriora sint, quæ legas, ultius tamen in ammo sedent, quæ pronuntiatio, vultus, habitus, gestus dicentis adfigit.
- Besides, as is usually the case, we are much more affected by the words which we hear, for though what you read in books may be more pointed, yet there is something in the voice, the look, the carriage, and even the gesture of the speaker, that makes a deeper impression upon the mind.
- Pliny the Younger, Epistles, II. 3.
- When Demosthenes was asked what was the first part of Oratory, he answered, "Action," and which was the second, he replied, "Action," and which was the third, he still answered "Action."
- It is a thing of no great difficulty to raise objections against another man's oration,—nay, it is a very easy matter; but to produce a better in its place is a work extremely troublesome.
- Plutarch, Of Hearing, VI.
- Fire in each eye, and papers in each hand,
They rave, recite, and madden round the land.- Alexander Pope, Prologue to Satires, line 5.
Respectfully Quoted (1989)
[edit]- I was very glad that Mr. Attlee described my speeches in the war as expressing the will not only of Parliament but of the whole nation. Their will was resolute and remorseless and, as it proved, unconquerable. It fell to me to express it, and if I found the right words you must remember that I have always earned my living by my pen and by my tongue. It was a nation and race dwelling all round the globe that had the lion heart. I had the luck to be called upon to give the roar.
- Winston Churchill, address marking his 80th birthday, Westminster Hall, London, November 30, 1954. Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963, ed. Robert Rhodes James, vol. 8, p. 8608–9 (1974).
- One woman who managed to corner him, the story runs, said in a treacly gushing voice:
"Doesn't it thrill you, Mr. Churchill, to know that every time you make a speech the hall is packed to overflowing?"
"It is quite flattering", Mr. Churchill replied, "but whenever I feel this way I always remember that if instead of making a political speech I was being hanged, the crowd would be twice as big".- Winston Churchill, remark on a transatlantic tour. Norman McGowan, My Years with Churchill, p. 138 (1958).
- When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.
- Attributed to Richard Cardinal Cushing. Everett Dirksen and Herbert V. Prochnow, Quotation Finder, p. 55 (1971). Reported as unverified in Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations (1989).
- Then there was a maiden speech, so inaudible, that it was doubted whether, after all, the young orator really did lose his virginity.
- Benjamin Disraeli, The Young Duke (first published in 1831; republished 1859), chapter 6, p. 19.
- It is reputed that Mr. Disraeli when he was once asked by a new member whether he advised him to take part often in debate replied:—
No, I do not think you ought to do so, because it is much better that the House should wonder why you do not speak than why you do.
My advice in this matter is very much the same as that given by Mr. Disraeli; it is much better when a member resumes his seat after he has made a speech for the House to have the feeling that they wish he had gone on longer instead of wondering why he did not stop sooner.- Edward Algernon Fitzroy, remarks in the House of Commons, May 25, 1939, as reported by The Times (London), May 26, 1939, p. 7. FitzRoy, Speaker of the House of Commons, was quoting the nineteenth century Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, Lord Beaconsfield. Quoted in slightly different form in the Congressional Record, June 2, 1939, vol. 84, p. 6538–39.
- It is amazing how soon one becomes accustomed to the sound of one's voice, when forced to repeat a speech five or six times a day. As election day approaches, the size of the crowds grows; they are more responsive and more interested; and one derives a certain exhilaration from that which, only a few weeks before, was intensely painful. This is one possible explanation of unlimited debate in the Senate.
- J. William Fulbright, "The Legislator", lecture delivered at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, in 1946. The Works of the Mind, ed. for the University's Committee on Social Thought by Robert B. Heywood, p. 123 (1947).
- Every living sentence which shows a mind at work for itself is to be welcomed. It is not the first use but the tiresome repetition of inadequate catch words which I am observing—phrases which originally were contributions, but which, by their very felicity, delay further analysis for fifty years. That comes from the same source as dislike of novelty—intellectual indolence or weakness—a slackening in the eternal pursuit of the more exact.
- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., "Law in Science and Science in Law", address before the New York State Bar Association, January 17, 1899. Collected Legal Papers by Oliver Wendell Holmes, p. 230–31 (1937).
- The art of reasoning becomes of first importance. In this line antiquity has left us the finest models for imitation;… I should consider the speeches of Livy, Sallust, and Tacitus, as pre-eminent specimens of logic, taste, and that sententious brevity which, using not a word to spare, leaves not a moment for inattention to the hearer. Amplification is the vice of modern oratory.
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to David Harding, April 20, 1824. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Andrew A. Lipscomb, vol. 16, p. 30 (1904).
- Also the two-edged tongue of mighty Zeno, who, Say what one would, could argue it untrue.
- Plutarch, Plutarch's Lives, trans. John Dryden, rev. A. H. Clough, life of Pericles, vol. 1, p. 323 (1859).
- Middle-aged clubwoman, with a flutter in her voice: "Oh, Mr. Stevenson, your speech was superfluous".
"Thank you, madam. I've been thinking of having it published posthumously".
"Oh, won't that be nice. The sooner the better".- Adlai Stevenson, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, favorite anecdote on public occasions. Richard J. Walton, The Remnants of Power: The Tragic Last Years of Adlai Stevenson, p. 24 (1968).
- When the mariner has been tossed for many days in thick weather, and on an unknown sea, he naturally avails himself of the first pause in the storm, the earliest glance of the sun, to take his latitude, and ascertain how far the elements have driven him from his true course. Let us imitate this prudence, and, before we float farther on the waves of this debate, refer to the point from which we departed, that we may at least be able to conjecture where we now are.
- Daniel Webster, second speech on Foote's resolution, delivered in the Senate, January 26, 1830. The Works of Daniel Webster, 10th ed., vol. 3, p. 270 (1857). His opening remarks on the sixth day of debate.
- It was a bit of campaign oratory.
- Wendell Willkie, testimony, February 11, 1941. To Promote the Defense of the United States, hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, 77th Congress, 1st session, part 3, p. 905 (1941).
- A member of the Cabinet congratulated Wilson on introducing the vogue of short speeches and asked him about the time it took him to prepare his speeches. He said: "It depends. If I am to speak ten minutes, I need a week for preparation; if fifteen minutes, three days; if half an hour, two days; if an hour, I am ready now".
- Woodrow Wilson. Josephus Daniels, The Wilson Era; Years of War and After, 1917–1923, p. 624 (1946).


text:
Well, technically, me first. There was always only three of us in the nuclear unit, and Dad's been locked in the den for the past seventy-two hours. I've only seen him once, when he shuffled upstairs like a pajama-clad zombie and asked me if I'd eaten.
That was it: Did you eat?
Not: I prefer the cherry wood casket. Or: Let me make your grandma's travel arrangements. Or even: I know this was Mom's favorite dress, but isn't the neckline a little...low?
Did I eat?
Yes, Dad. I had soup from the can and microwaved pizza rolls and a bowl of cereal. The food sloshes in my stomach now as I walk down the runner to the casket I picked out because of its mauve tint.
Calla lilies pile in urns around the viewing room, and the air-conditioning wars with the sweat along my hairline. My mom smiles at me from a portrait erected behind the casket. Her eyes are hesitant and a little wary, as if she knew, somehow, some way, she would wind up here.
Lifeless. Pumped full of formaldehyde. About to be gawked at by a town full of gossips.
This was only going to end one of two ways—with Tabitha Brooks dead or in jail. I never thought I'd say this, but I'd give anything to see my mother behind bars.
I wade through the dense, chilly air and stop a few feet from the body. Behind me, my grandmother and aunt sit, a box of tissues between them, blowing their noses like it's a sport.
"Look at our Cecilia," Gram sniffs. "So brave. Not a single tear shed."
If she only knew. I'm not brave. Fifteen minutes ago, I was retching into the toilet bowl.
Five minutes from now, when the doors open for the visitation, I'll be long gone, leaving Gram to shake people's hands and deal with the bit lips, the knowing eyebrows, that inevitable speaking-in-a-funeral-parlor whisper. I can hear the titters: "Is it true? Tabitha's heart stopped while she was boffing the high school quarterback? Why, she must've been twenty years his senior!"
Twenty-three years, to be exact, and a high school English teacher to boot. But she didn't actually die during sex. Instead, a few days after Tommy Farrow came forward with their affair, my mother took her own life.
What could be a clearer admission of guilt? She might as well have been caught in the act. The investigation was shut down before it even began.
I take a shuddering breath. Two more minutes. A hundred and twenty seconds and then I can leave. I steel my shoulders and walk the final steps to my mother's body.
Oh god. It's even worse than I thought.
The room whirls around me, and nausea sprints up my throat. My hands shoot out to grab
the casket, stopping short of actually touching the corpse.
This . . . this thing . . . can't be my mother. She never smiled like that, all serene and peaceful-like. She never wore this much makeup; her red hair was never chopped so closely to her head. My mother was chaos and passion, devastation and joy. Dad used to say you could reach deep into her eyes and pull out a song.
Well, her eyes are closed now, and I'm not sure there'll be any music in my life, ever


text:
Matrix multiplication¶
Here is a naive implementation of matrix multiplication using a CUDA kernel:
def matmul(A, B, C):
"""Perform square matrix multiplication of C = A * B
i, j = cuda.grid(2)
if i < C.shape[0] and j < C.shape[1]:
tmp = 0.
for k in range(A.shape[1]):
tmp += A[i, k] * B[k, j]
C[i, j] = tmp
This implementation is straightforward and intuitive but performs poorly, because the same matrix elements will be loaded multiple times from device memory, which is slow (some devices may have transparent data caches, but they may not be large enough to hold the entire inputs at once).
It will be faster if we use a blocked algorithm to reduce accesses to the device memory. CUDA provides a fast shared memory for threads in a block to cooperately compute on a task. The following implements a faster version of the square matrix multiplication using shared memory:
from numba import cuda, float32
# Controls threads per block and shared memory usage.
# The computation will be done on blocks of TPBxTPB elements.
def fast_matmul(A, B, C):
# Define an array in the shared memory
# The size and type of the arrays must be known at compile time
sA = cuda.shared.array(shape=(TPB, TPB), dtype=float32)
sB = cuda.shared.array(shape=(TPB, TPB), dtype=float32)
x, y = cuda.grid(2)
tx = cuda.threadIdx.x
ty = cuda.threadIdx.y
bpg = cuda.gridDim.x # blocks per grid
if x >= C.shape[0] and y >= C.shape[1]:
# Quit if (x, y) is outside of valid C boundary
# Each thread computes one element in the result matrix.
# The dot product is chunked into dot products of TPB-long vectors.
tmp = 0.
for i in range(bpg):
# Preload data into shared memory
sA[tx, ty] = A[x, ty + i * TPB]
sB[tx, ty] = B[tx + i * TPB, y]
# Wait until all threads finish preloading
# Computes partial product on the shared memory
for j in range(TPB):
tmp += sA[tx, j] * sB[j, ty]
# Wait until all threads finish computing
C[x, y] = tmp
Because the shared memory is a limited resources, the code preloads small
block at a time from the input arrays. Then, it calls
to wait until all threads have finished
preloading and before doing the computation on the shared memory.
It synchronizes again after the computation to ensure all threads
have finished with the data in shared memory before overwriting it
in the next loop iteration.


text:
Highly credible UFO video from Japan surfaces
Michael Cohen email@example.com
Perhaps due to the fact that more people are carrying better quality camera phones or perhaps because visiting aliens are becoming more bold in terms of interacting with humanity as possible open alien contact draws nearer, the quality of new UFO footage over the last months has been better than ever.
This UFO clip below from Japan is one of the most convincing pieces of footage i have seen. The sighting occurred around a month ago. Unless someone debunks this video I would say it is conclusive proof that information about all the craft flying overhead is being withheld from the public.
The comments of the witnesses seem genuine and one can sense real surprise in their voices as they exclaim that 'it must be some kind of UFO'. This UFO video is a must see. UFOs are commonly seen in Japan and interest in alien / extraterrestrial subjects widespread. No official disclosure of UFO files has, however, occurred in Japan as of yet.
Original Link: http://www.allnewsweb.com/page1199999415.php


text:
Update, July 2, 2015: The oil giant BP has agreed to pay nearly $19 billion to settle civil cases brought against it by states and the federal government following its role in the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history.
The settlement largely puts the legal ordeal of Gulf spill behind the oil company, which has also sought to slim and refocus its operations over the last five years. But its too early to tell whether the company has fundamentally changed its approach to safety. As ProPublica detailed in 2010, BP had faced one disaster after another from the 1990s up until the Deepwater Horizon, many deadly, and often spaced just a few years apart.
Our original investigation was co-produced with PBS "Frontline." Watch the "Frontline" documentary, "The Spill," drawn from this reporting.
Original story, published Oct. 26, 2010:
Jeanne Pascal turned on her TV April 21 to see a towering spindle of black smoke slithering into the sky from an oil platform on the oceanic expanse of the Gulf of Mexico. For hours she sat, transfixed on an overstuffed couch in her Seattle home, her feelings shifting from shock to anger.
Pascal, a career Environmental Protection Agency attorney only seven weeks into her retirement, knew as much as anyone in the federal government about BP, the company that owned the well. She understood in an instant what it would take others months to grasp: In BP's 15-year quest to compete with the world's biggest oil companies, its managers had become deaf to risk and systematically gambled with safety at hundreds of facilities and with thousands of employees' lives.
"God, they just don't learn," she remembers thinking.
Just weeks before the explosion, President Obama had announced a historic expansion of deep-water drilling in the Gulf, where BP held the majority of the drilling leases. The administration considered the environmental record of drilling companies in the Gulf to be excellent. It didn't ask questions about BP, and it didn't consider that the company's long record of safety violations and environmental accidents might be important, according to Carol Browner, the White House environmental adviser.
They could have asked Jeanne Pascal.
For 12 years, Pascal had wrestled with whether BP's pattern of misconduct should disqualify it from receiving billions of dollars in government contracts and other benefits. Federal law empowers government officials to "debar"—ban from government business—companies that commit fraud or break the law too many times. Pascal was a senior EPA debarment attorney for the Northwest, and her job was to act as a sort of behind-the-scenes babysitter for companies facing debarment. She worked with their top management, reviewed records and made sure they were good corporate citizens entitled to government contracts.
At first, Pascal thought BP would be another routine assignment. Over the years she'd persuaded hundreds of troubled energy, mining and waste-disposal companies to quickly change their behavior. But BP was in its own league. On her watch she would see BP charged with four federal crimes—more than any other oil company in her experience—and demonstrate what she described as a pattern of disregard for regulations and for the EPA. By late 2009 she was warning the government and BP executives themselves that the company's approach to safety and environmental issues made another disaster likely.
A close look by ProPublica and PBS FRONTLINE at BP's explosive growth corroborated and expanded on Pascal's concerns. The investigation found that as BP transformed itself into the world's third largest private oil company it methodically emphasized a culture of austerity in pursuit of corporate efficiency, lean budgets and shareholder profits. It acquired large companies that it could not integrate smoothly. Current and former workers and executives said the company repeatedly cut corners, let alarm and safety systems languish and skipped essential maintenance that could have prevented a number of explosions and spills. Internal BP documents support these claims.
A ProPublica analysis of state and federal records revealed that BP has fared far worse in the United States than the rest of the industry in terms of spills and serious safety violations.
In Alaska, home to one of BP's longest-standing and most important business units, the company produced nearly twice as much oil as ConocoPhillips, the other major company operating there, but since 2000 it has also recorded nearly four times as many large spills of oil, chemicals or waste. In the Gulf of Mexico, BP had more spills than Shell between 2000 and 2009, even though Shell produced more oil there.
BP's workers also appear to be more at risk. In Alaska, it has had 52 worker-safety violations since 1990, compared with ConocoPhillips' seven. Nationally, according to an extensive analysis of data from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, BP had 518 safety violations over the last two decades, compared with 240 for Chevron and even fewer for its other competitors. Since those statistics were compiled, in 2009, OSHA has announced 745 more violations at two BP refineries, one near Toledo, Ohio, and the other in Texas City, Texas, where 15 people were killed and 170 injured in a 2005 explosion.
"They just weren't getting it," Jordan Barab, OSHA's deputy assistant secretary of labor, told ProPublica and FRONTLINE. In the last decade, OSHA records show that BP has been levied 300 times more in fines for refinery violations than any other oil company.
"BP's cost-cutting measures had really cut into their plant maintenance, into their training, into their investment in new and safer equipment," Barab said. "When you start finding the same problems over and over again, I think you are pretty safe in saying they've got a systematic problem."
According to documents obtained exclusively by ProPublica and FRONTLINE, some of the inspectors BP was using to monitor its pipelines in Alaska, where two serious spills occurred in 2006, weren't properly certified or trained.
Oil Company | Total OSHA violations from Jan. 1, 1990 to June 1, 2009 | Total Alaska Occupational Safety and Health Violations Jan. 1, 1990 - June 1, 2009 |
Chevron | 240 | 3 |
ConocoPhillips | 193 | 7 |
Exxon | 108 | 0 |
Shell | 217 | 13 |
Oil Company | Total OSHA penalties since 1/1/2000 for Refineries Only |
Chevron | $170,620 |
ConocoPhillips | $200,685 |
Exxon | $359,740 |
Shell | $306,675 |
Even today, four years after former CEO Tony Hayward pledged to keep a "laser-like" focus on safety, maintenance on the massive turbines that run the company's Alaska plants has been deferred. Many of these facilities operate without fire and gas detectors, because theirs are outdated and are expensive to replace. Workers in Alaska told ProPublica they fear another deadly BP accident could happen at any moment.
The pattern extended to BP's Gulf of Mexico operations. BP's flagship $1 billion Thunder Horse drilling platform nearly sank in 2005 after engineers installed ballast valves backward. And a federal lawsuit over safety concerns on another BP rig, Atlantis, was making its way through the courts even as the Deepwater Horizon exploded.
BP declined repeated requests for comment and for an interview with its new CEO, Robert Dudley. When sent a list of more than 30 questions, it replied with a three-paragraph statement saying that BP will establish a new safety division reporting directly to the CEO. Monday, in a press conference in London, Dudley said that he did not believe that BP is an unsafe company, and warned that the ProPublica and FRONTLINE report would be unflattering.
For Pascal, the explosion in the Gulf heightened the frustration she'd felt in the last months of her job. BP's Prudhoe Bay and Texas City units had been automatically blocked from government work on her watch—that's the minimum debarment action after a prominent air or water pollution crime in the United States—but she'd never been able get the company to change. She'd used all the normal tools to bring BP into what the government calls "compliance."
The only thing she hadn't done was bring down the big hammer: the EPA's power to ban an entire company from doing business with the federal government.
Many companies have been debarred, but never has one as large as BP, or as important to the U.S. economy and security. Debarment would have severed BP's contracts with the American military and jeopardized the company's long-term access to reserves that generated nearly $16 billion in revenue for the company last year. BP's stock price would likely have gone into a tailspin.
Now, with the Deepwater Horizon disaster unfolding on her TV screen, Pascal believed such a move was finally warranted.
Curious for more news, she called her old office in downtown Seattle. But the EPA was already in lockdown. Just weeks out of a 26-year EPA career, she was told she couldn't talk to her old team. She'd have to call the public affairs office if she wanted information.
Pascal then dialed another number, for Scott West, a retired EPA criminal investigator who had also worked the BP case. He, too, was enraged by what he saw happening in the Gulf, and reporters were pressing both of them for information. Together they decided they had an obligation to tell people what they knew about the company at the core of this unfolding tragedy. If the public had known sooner, Pascal thought, perhaps the Deepwater Horizon disaster might have been prevented.
BP's Historic Ambition
BP's ascent to the top tiers of the oil industry hit full stride in 1995, when John Browne became CEO. The company was founded as the Anglo Persian Oil Company in 1909 but languished after Middle Eastern countries nationalized their oil in the 1970s. By the time Browne took over, it was so far behind Exxon and Shell, the world's largest independent oil companies, that it could hardly feel their tailwind.
Browne was an engineer who had practically been raised in BP's business. But with a passion for art and the London Opera, he was hardly a typical oilman. He did, however, have a vision for a bigger, sleeker BP.
In 1998 he put together what was at the time the largest merger in corporate history—the $61 billion buyout of Amoco Corporation. By mid-2001 he had also bought ARCO and four other companies.
Company | Volume Spilled (Barrels) | Number of Spills | Oil Produced (Barrels) |
Shell | 5,546.97 | 21 | 1,339,203,125 |
Chevron | 3,465.77 | 19 | 592,998,061 |
Noble | 1,474.58 | 8 | 29,877,928 |
Apache Corporation | 1,118.63 | 7 | 144,674,625 |
Stone | 1,192.78 | 6 | 40,898,883 |
Murphy | 1,641.60 | 6 | 77,618,538 |
Anadarko | 2,107.30 | 5 | 93,437,525 |
Devon Energy | 704.20 | 5 | 89,445,419 |
Mariner | 2,322.62 | 5 | 28,055,560 |
Company | Number of Spills | Total Volume Spilled (gallons) | Oil Production 2000-09 (Barrels) |
ConocoPhilips | 107 | 234,403 | 1,035,279,479 |
Unocal | 21 | 9,359 | 55,709,224 |
Pioneer | 17 | 12,908 | 3,383,798 |
"We'll be the largest producer of oil in the non-OPEC world," Browne said when he announced the ARCO merger.
On paper, the company quadrupled in value and became a huge global competitor overnight. Browne was hailed in Britain as the "Sun King," and in 1999 BP's stock soared to what was then an all-time high.
BP's next challenge was not only to integrate its thousands of new employees and numerous industrial facilities, but to do it without increasing the company's already-significant debt.
Fadel Gheit, a managing director at the investment bank Oppenheimer, said that during the time of the mergers BP's debt ratio was at least 10 percentage points higher than was normal for the company.
"BP has historically maintained higher debt levels and debt ratios than its peers," he said. "It believed that debt is the cheapest source of capital." In contrast, he said, "U.S. majors Exxon and Chevron believe in low debt, or even no debt, and investors seem to like that."
Browne, with little wiggle room, brought the companies into the fold by slashing jobs and cutting costs. He squeezed out $2 billion in savings from the Amoco merger alone.
At the same time he steamed ahead with extracurricular projects that Tony Hayward would later describe as distractions. Browne delivered speeches on climate change. He rebranded the company from British Petroleum to BP and added the "Beyond Petroleum" tagline to put it in a more cosmopolitan, ecological light.
But Browne and other senior managers weren't deeply engaged in the day-to-day operations of their facilities, and the disparate corporations they acquired were never fully integrated. More than a decade later, employees still identified themselves as ARCO, or Amoco, or wherever else they came from. And each of those cultures approached safety and maintenance differently.
"Growth creates challenges to management," said Ronald Freeman, a former managing director for Salomon Smith Barney. "BP in this case just grows beyond its management ability to watch everything they need to watch when they need to watch it."
While Browne reveled in the spotlight—he was even knighted by Queen Elizabeth—cracks began to appear in his burgeoning company, cracks that Jeanne Pascal would be among the first to spot.
The Government Was Warned
Pascal was assigned to BP in 1998, when the company's Alaska division was settling a criminal case involving a contractor who had illegally dumped hundreds of gallons of toxic waste back into a well hole. It was the company's first federal felony, Pascal's first assignment to BP and the first dot in a crude portrait of what would shape up to look like a repeat offender.
Pascal was 49 at the time. An affable woman, with carefully coiffed hair and residual southern charm, she grew up in Tennessee and got a law degree from University of Memphis. After graduation she landed a job as a prosecutor in a small town north of Seattle and married a sheriff's deputy.
But Pascal wanted to "make a difference," and she decided to move into environmental law. She set her sights on getting a job with the EPA, and after sending her resume to the agency every month for a year, she was finally hired in 1984.
"I actually put the memo of hiring into a scrapbook," she said.
By the time she was assigned to the BP case, Pascal had handled at least 600 EPA cases against large and small companies, usually juggling 25 to 50 at a time.
Almost any time a company is convicted of a crime it faces the possibility of a ban on federal contracts, or debarment. When debarment kicks in—or in some cases to avoid it in the first place—companies reach a settlement with the EPA that establishes benchmarks they must meet, so the government can eventually lift the sanctions.
In Pascal's experience, most companies settled quickly and in good faith, and at first BP seemed to be following that path. After pleading guilty to felony charges, it avoided debarment by signing a settlement agreeing to five years of probation and promising to institute a "revised corporate attitude." It pledged not to punish employees who reported environmental concerns and said it would spend $15 million on an environmental management program for its operations in Alaska, Texas and the Gulf.
As part of the agreement, BP Exploration, the company's Alaska division, also agreed that its Health, Safety and Environment director would report directly to the division president, so top executives couldn't avoid hearing about serious safety concerns. The EPA identified this as one of the most important things BP could do to reform its safety culture in Alaska.
For several years, BP appeared to be complying with the agreement.
The monthly reports it sent to Pascal detailed the success of its maintenance and safety programs. Senior managers assured her personally of the company's progress when they met in the conference room of Seattle's Fairmont Hotel. There were a couple of accidents, but executives blamed irresponsible employees or assured her the problems had been fixed.
Then, in early 2004, Pascal was sitting at her desk at the EPA when she got a phone call from a BP mechanic who was a member of the United Steelworkers Union on Alaska's North Slope.
"There are awful things happening on this oilfield," Marc Kovac told her.
Kovac was referring to the facilities where he was working near the shore of the Arctic Ocean.
He described serious corrosion in some sections of pipeline and said BP was manipulating environmental inspection reports to show that the pipelines were fine. He told her that workers who complained about the problems had been fired. And he said that a leak—or worse, an explosion—could happen any day.
"I'm scared for my life," Pascal recalls Kovac telling her. "If you have a case against BP Alaska you don't want to let them go."
Pascal's phone kept ringing, and workers began sending her documents and internal company e-mails to support their claims. Among them were documents from the mid 1990s describing BP's decision to put off or cancel corrosion maintenance in order to save money and meet John Browne's budget targets. Other documents showed that BP had delayed replacing the gas detectors that warn of a potential explosion.
Pascal learned that a BP oil worker, Don Shugak, had been severely burned in 2002 after a well exploded in his face—and that BP had misled investigators about the cause of the accident. And she discovered that in 2003 the company had failed to report a small oil spill until after it had begun cleaning it up.
The BP case was turning into a case unlike any other she had handled. "I'd had whistleblowers come forth before, like one or two, maybe three," she said. "I've never had 35 to 40 people come before me."
Pascal was furious. It appeared that BP had deliberately misled her and had violated its compliance agreement, but she needed an investigation to find out for sure.
"I tend to take people at face value," she said. "One of the hardest moments of my life with BP was in the first six months of 2004 when I realized that I had been managed, and that I had been so easily manageable. They lied. I had swallowed their line hook, line and sinker."
Losing trust in BP was a hard lesson for Pascal, and the events of 2004 changed the way she approached the company in the six years that followed. For the first time she thought she might have to actually debar this company.
Pascal demanded that BP investigate the workers' claims. In a meeting in Seattle in late 2004, the company's lawyers from the firm Vinson & Elkins showed the EPA an internal investigation that—while critical of BP in some aspects—dismissed many of the concerns.
"We did not find any evidence that the allegations regarding data fraud in the CIC program had merit," the report stated, referring to the corrosion maintenance program.
Pascal remained convinced that an accident was inevitable. She shared her fears with the EPA's Criminal Investigation Division but said she was told that until an accident occurred, there was nothing to investigate.
Pascal then took her material to the Department of Justice.
"I said I had documents which showed the pipelines were in bad shape and that sooner or later there was going to be some kind of a failure," she said.
An agent from the Federal Bureau of Investigation traveled to the North Slope to poke around but found nothing that could be knitted into a prosecution. The federal government, Pascal was again told, didn't have jurisdiction to interfere with oil and gas infrastructure unless a crime had been committed or an accident had already happened. In the meantime BP's five-year probation period had run out, taking most of Pascal's leverage with it.
"I explored that with all kinds of people and I couldn't find a jurisdictional way in, other than to let it happen," she said. "So we had to wait."
A Deadly Disaster in Texas
It didn't take long for the disaster to happen—it just happened 4,600 miles from Prudhoe Bay.
On March 23, 2005 a tower used to boil hydrocarbons at BP's sprawling 1,200-acre Texas City refinery was overfilled as the system was being restarted. Fumes, and then volatile liquid, filled an antiquated "blow down drum" meant to catch the overflow and spewed from the top like a geyser. When the fumes reached the engine of a truck idling nearby, the place blew up.
The blast obliterated a nearby office trailer. Fifteen people died.
That night, in her quiet country home outside Seattle, Jeanne Pascal broke down in tears. This accident could have been avoided, she told her husband, Dallas Swank.
"She was fairly certain that when the dust settled that they were going to find out that this was due to lack of maintenance and all the same things happening in Alaska," he said.
Pascal was right.
Though Texas City was a refinery, not a production field, the circumstances were nearly identical. The BP executive responsible for refining at the time, John Manzoni, was managing maintenance issues in Alaska in the 1990s, when some of the cost cutting described in the e-mails that workers had sent to Pascal took place.
Texas City had been operating under budget cuts since BP took it over from Amoco in 1999. Workers—including the plant's manager—had explicitly warned top corporate executives that they didn't have the equipment or the resources to prevent a deadly explosion.
An internal BP safety report completed just months before the explosion said executives were "not in control of management of major hazards. The cost cutting has gotten to an extremely critical stage … there is not any slack in the system." It continued: "There is an exceptional degree of fear of catastrophic incidents."
Manzoni, now the chief executive of Talisman Energy, based in Calgary, Alberta, declined to comment. BP also declined to answer questions.
Investigators later found that Texas City's isomerization unit—the refining tower that ignited—was relying on what is called a "blow-down drum," a piece of equipment that was considered state of the art in the 1950s, to catch overflowing fuel. Amoco had been told to replace the drums as far back as 1977 but hadn't acted. BP considered switching them out in 2002 but held off because of the $150,000 cost.
"Capital expenditure is very tight," said an internal BP e-mail from management about the decision at the time. "Bank $150k in savings now."
The Texas City blast was the largest industrial disaster in the United States in decades. Former Secretary of State James Baker, who led an investigation into the accident on BP's behalf, said: "BP has not adequately established process safety as a core value."
The explosion knocked BP, and John Browne, off their meteoric trajectory.
"BP gets it, and I get it too," Browne would later say. "This has happened on my watch, and as chief executive I have a responsibility to learn from what has occurred. I recognize the need for improvement."
The Largest Spill Ever on Alaska's North Slope
BP was still coming to terms with what had happened in Texas when disaster struck again, this time in Alaska.
At 5:58 a.m. on March 2, 2006, an Alaskan field operator radioed in an emergency "code black." He had discovered an oil leak—a melted pool in a drift of pure white snow—near the central pipeline that gathers oil from the western half of the Prudhoe Bay oil field. Some 212,000 gallons—the largest spill ever on the North Slope—had leaked from a dime-sized hole in the line over three days. The pipeline's spill-detection alarm system had malfunctioned, failing to alert BP.
BP revealed that it had not "pigged" the line—the standard maintenance process, in which a bullet-shaped robot is run through the pipe to clean it and measure corrosion—in eight years, in part to save money.
Congressional investigators turned up a set of e-mails—including some of the same documents Pascal had taken to the Justice Department—explaining that BP had also stopped using chemical corrosion inhibitors on the pipelines, even though it knew that would increase the chance of a spill.
"Due to budget constraints, the decision has been made to discontinue the PW inhibitor," a manager with BP's corrosion program wrote in 1999. "The GC2 bulk tank should run out within the next two days and it will not be refilled."
Three days later, a colleague responded, "I thought the PW lines were the ones in least control and therefore the ones we are most worried about."
In an April 2005 exchange, BP's corrosion management team discussed three ways to meet budget cuts: stop pigging, stop using chemicals to control corrosion or cut back inspections.
"We have huge infrastructure that is hanging on with no margin for error," wrote Kip Sprague, a corrosion manager. "Bitch, bitch, bitch … I will try to wrestle down some middle ground between the reality of the situation and some feel-good placeholders." Sprague declined to comment on his e-mail.
Experienced oil workers said the Alaska spill was years in the making. Conditions in the 330-square mile drilling field are unusually harsh. Drilling operations are based in the town of Deadhorse, an industrial hashmark scratched out of the barren permafrost. It has an airport and thousands of temporary workers, but almost no year-round residents. In the winter, the sun never rises; in the summer, it never sets.
In the last miles before the shoreline of the Arctic Ocean, roughly 8 percent of America's oil supply flows through an extraordinary network of oil wells and pipelines and dozens of factory-sized facilities, down through the TransAlaska Pipeline, south to the port of Valdez. From there, it is shipped to California and beyond.
The drilling rigs and pipelines on the North Slope were built in the 1970s, when it was expected the field would last maybe 15 years. But the oil deposits were much larger than expected, and BP has reaped unforeseen profits by pushing existing equipment to handle production for decades longer than was ever intended.
Marc Kovac, one of the mechanics who first complained to Pascal, told ProPublica that the company follows what he called a policy of "run to failure"—minimizing maintenance as it tries to squeeze the maximum possible production from each link in its chain of facilities. Now that the output of the North Slope has peaked, Kovac said BP managers see little incentive to upgrade equipment that will eventually be sold or abandoned.
The March 2006 spill jolted BP into crisis mode. In August Browne flew to Alaska to do damage control, touring the field with reporters and showing them how BP was attending to the mess.
But just two days later, a second smaller leak was discovered in the field's major eastern oil artery. That pipe hadn't been pigged since 1991, and an investigation found that 16 miles of it were severely corroded and could leak at any time.
As a precaution, the company cut off the entire flow of oil from the North Slope overnight, sinking BP's stock and sending oil prices skyward.
"Shutting down the whole oilfield seemed a little extreme," Browne wrote in Beyond Business, his memoir. "I knew the repercussions would be massive. … I did not think things could get much worse."
Pascal was horrified—but not surprised—by what was unfolding. She also saw the opportunity she had been waiting for to help the North Slope whistleblowers.
"If a catastrophe has to occur to get others to belly up to the plate, it's regretful, but it may be necessary before real change will take place," she had written to Marc Kovac a year earlier. "I think this is win-able—the issue is at what cost."
Now that a spill had occurred in Alaska, the EPA could formally begin a criminal investigation of the workers' complaints. With Pascal's help, Scott West and the EPA's criminal investigation division quietly began work. Texas City was outside Pascal's jurisdiction at the time, but a separate criminal investigation had begun there, too.
Bob Malone, the newly appointed president of BP's American operations, told Congress there were "similarities" between the spills in Alaska and the Baker report on the explosion in Texas City. He acknowledged that the Prudhoe Bay spills were the result of "extreme" budget pressures and cost cutting that had discouraged preventative maintenance. He promised to create an independent ombudsman office so workers throughout the nation could communicate anonymously with management about safety concerns.
By the beginning of 2007, however, BP's board was growing impatient with Browne's now-numerous blunders. The scathing Baker report about the Texas City explosion came out just a week after BP learned that Browne had been having an affair with a man. According to news accounts and Browne's memoir, the company had already decided to replace him the following summer with Tony Hayward, a longtime BP executive who had worked closely with Browne for years. But before the switch could be made, news broke that Browne had lied under oath about meeting his partner through London's premier male escort service. He resigned the next day.
Years later, Browne wrote in his book that he still couldn't understand how the Alaskan oil transit lines had deteriorated so badly: "We had inspected the line regularly, so why had the corrosion accelerated so rapidly?"
BP's Inspectors May Not Have Been Qualified
One answer to Browne's question might lie in information that BP hadn't shared with Pascal, the public or congressional panels in 2006 and 2007: The inspection program the company relied on to check its pipelines was in disarray.
E-mails and letters obtained by ProPublica show that the main contractor BP was using to check its facilities, Acuren, employed inspectors who weren't certified to perform their jobs and may not have been properly trained. The certification issues affected at least 19 inspectors responsible for more than 13,000 locations along the line and were serious enough that they were reported to BP's board of directors in London.
Concerns about the inspectors were raised in early 2007 by Acuren's training supervisor, Marty Anderson, according to an e-mail last year from BP's deputy ombudsman. Acuren had hired Anderson after the 2006 spill, first to oversee the inspection program and later to audit the program's overall effectiveness.
"He revealed a significant quality control breakdown in everything from the company's procedures … to inadequate record keeping … to having actually unqualified inspectors in the field performing inspections," Billie Garde, BP's deputy ombudsman, wrote to BP's general counsel. "The concerns were serious, and although people try to downplay the significance of the issues, they reveal a complete breakdown."
Anderson, who has more than 20 years' experience and has worked with companies including Shell and Chevron, couldn't tell ProPublica about his findings because he signed a confidentiality agreement with Acuren. But he confirmed that the company had, indeed, employed uncertified inspectors, and he explained in general terms why this was significant.
"The worst problem is to be certified but not qualified, because that means the person did not meet the qualification standard but yet someone testified that they did," Anderson said. "To me, that's fraud and could be a criminal offense."
BP and Acuren didn't respond to Anderson's complaints until he contacted the ombudsman's office.
"The procedure did not move quickly enough or with enough rigor at the beginning both on our side and on Acuren's side," said an internal BP memo.
Pascal also learned of Anderson's complaint. But since the ombudsman's office had already taken on the issue, she decided to sit back to observe how BP would respond.
In October 2007—14 months after the shutdown and seven months after Anderson first reported his findings—Doug Suttles, BP Alaska's president at the time and now the executive responsible for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, began to act. BP hired an independent auditor and launched a three-part review of Acuren's inspection program that confirmed Anderson's claims. Acuren re-inspected more than 10,000 locations along the line. It also transferred two senior executives.
BP declined to answer questions about the inspection program, but BP later assured members of Congress that its inspectors were properly certified. Acuren did not respond to calls for comment.
Garde, the BP deputy ombudsman, said Acuren inspectors weren't responsible for the exact sections of the line that leaked in 2006 and that most of them were competent to perform their jobs. But she was troubled that BP hadn't uncovered the problems that Anderson found when it vetted the Acuren contract.
"BP has oversight responsibility of all of its contractors, and it should have identified these issues without the need for a worker to come forward and speak about them," Garde said. "It would be a rare occasion to have another Marty Anderson in other contracts, and you can't rely upon that."
Garde was also concerned about how Anderson was treated after he reported the problem. Instead of being praised for his vigilance, he suddenly had trouble finding another job.
"Marty became the subject of both overt and subtle retaliation by Acuren and BPXA personnel," Garde wrote in a letter to BP's general counsel. "There is no question that there remains a high degree of hostility toward Marty by Acuren for 'getting them in trouble.' "
BP was "Too Top Down, Too Directive, and Not Good at Listening"
By late 2007, BP's internal problems were no secret. They had helped push the company's celebrity CEO out of his job, and Browne's replacement, Tony Hayward, minced few words about why.
"We diagnosed … a company that was too top down, too directive, and not good at listening," he said in a speech to business students at Stanford.
"We failed to recognize we're an operating company. We had too many people that were working to save the world," he continued, in a clear jab at Browne's speeches on climate change.
Most famously, Hayward promised to turn the company around and to maintain a "laser-like focus" on safety. But it was unclear how he planned to do that.
In fact, soon after Hayward became CEO, BP's Alaska division made a bold change that deemphasized safety and was a direct affront to Jeanne Pascal and the EPA: It removed the division's Health, Safety and Environment director from a vice presidential position and dropped it several tiers down in the management hierarchy.
In Pascal's first settlement with BP Alaska back in 1999, the company had agreed that the HSE director would report directly to the division president. But now HSE was being put into what the company calls a "technical directorate"—a group tasked with corrosion management and balancing maintenance with budget priorities.
"When you have environment and health and safety reporting to a business unit, what do you think gets the first attention?" Pascal said recently. "Business."
Several former BP executives and managers say the move created a conflict because it meant that the person responsible for raising profits was also responsible for deciding how much to invest in safety. It also sent a clear message to employees that, in practice, safety was less important.
"Symbolism's important. The big stick's gone," said a former BP executive. Like other executives and managers interviewed for this story he declined to be named because he did not want to be seen as working against BP.
A spokesman for BP Alaska told ProPublica that the reorganization was meant to clarify leadership authority at the top of the organization, improve efficiency and emphasize safety rather than diminish it.
"For someone to look at a line on an org chart and determine that we had devalued the importance of HSE—that would just be wrongheaded," said the spokesman, Steve Rinehart. "I don't think that anybody could spend much time working around BP Alaska and not see pretty clearly how focused that organization is on safety and HSE."
In an October 2008 letter to BP's attorneys, Pascal and Carson Hodges, her junior co-counsel on the BP case, demanded that the HSE group be placed back under the president. They also wanted a specific BP staff member selected as their liaison in ensuring that the company complied with an eventual debarment agreement—a guarantee to Pascal that she wouldn't be duped again.
BP rebuffed the government's demands.
"BP was very recalcitrant," Pascal said. "It was turning into a major impasse."
The HSE issue was critical because the communication gap between BP's senior executives and its operational managers had caused problems for the company before.
"Good news traveled instantly and bad news didn't travel at all," Tony Hayward joked in that critical speech at Stanford.
When Bob Malone, the president of BP America, testified before Congress in late 2006, he swore that cost-cutting measures in Alaska hadn't been a factor in the pipeline spill. He looked sheepish six months later when he testified again and had to admit that he hadn't been aware of the extent of the cost-cutting program and that budget pressures had indeed compromised the pipeline.
After the Texas City explosion, BP's head of worldwide refining, John Manzoni, gave a sworn statement that he, too, had been unaware of the cost-cutting pressures on the Texas City refinery and that he hadn't been informed of the risks.
Pascal was beginning to wonder whether BP could be trusted to do business not just in Alaska but anywhere in the United States. A nationwide debarment had always been a possibility, but now it seemed it might actually be warranted. Such a move would cancel the billions of dollars in fuel contracts BP gets from the Department of Defense and prohibit BP from taking out new leases to drill on federal lands or waters. Since 39 percent of BP's oil and gas production comes from U.S. territory, a nationwide debarment would have a critical impact on the company.
But Pascal wrestled with the implications. BP paid the federal government more than $674 million in royalties in 2009 for its government leases, and it provides nearly 12 percent of the U.S. military's fuel supply.
"The question is does the environmental damage outweigh the government's need for and reliance on BP's oil and gas?" she said.
BP Focused on Safety but Didn't Make Things Safe
On the surface, BP appeared to be getting safer in the years leading up to the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
Signs went up warning workers to hang onto handrails. Employees were forbidden to run in icy conditions. Meetings started with safety sermons. And each time a BP employee parked a pickup truck, he had to place a small yellow raft under the drive train in case a drop of oil fell from the gear box.
The number of recordable safety incidents dropped. Even as its profits increased, BP managed to achieve an exceptional safety record in terms of lost man-hours, said Robert Bea, an industry veteran and engineering professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who is independently investigating the Gulf spill.
But something was missing.
In Alaska, many of the same system-wide maintenance issues the company had been criticized for ignoring in 2001 remained unfixed. The conditions of the pipelines were as much a concern to workers as they were before the Prudhoe Bay spill.
"Everything was around lost work days, or recordables," said one former senior executive. "That was what the board wanted."
While BP was focusing on slips, trips and falls it wasn't paying enough attention to "low-probability, high-consequence systems failures lurking in the background," Bea said.
Texas City was a good example, said Don Holmstrom, who headed an investigation into the refinery blast for the Chemical Safety Board, a government agency that investigates industrial accidents. In the months before the disaster there—just as on the Deepwater Horizon rig—BP had achieved an excellent safety record as measured by recordable injuries and lost man-hours. But after the blast—and after "safety" became the company's staple refrain—the dangers persisted at Texas City. Four more workers have died in accidents there since 2005.
"Citing personal safety statistics as an indicator," Holmstrom said, does "not necessarily speak to how well one is doing."
If the safety stats touted in annual reports were mostly window dressing, then the maintenance and reinvestment in the performance of BP's facilities—in what the company calls "operational performance"—were the structural studs holding up the business, and they were neglected.
Former BP executives say the company's top management made too many maintenance decisions while peering into a spreadsheet and that it was difficult for them to justify to their bosses making long-term, preventative investments.
"It's been a struggle," said a former BP executive who asked not to be identified because he still works in the industry. "I'm not going to make more money this quarter, but I have to increase spending in order to have a long-term viable business. That's hard. I was just always explaining or trying to explain what we were trying to do in a language that is not purely financial."
Nowhere were the risks created by underinvestment as palpable as at the company's Prudhoe Bay operations.
In September, 2008, Karl Massera was walking along a high-pressure gas pipeline when it suddenly blew apart. There was no fire, but a 28-foot-long section of steel vaulted through the air, landing with a thud on the Alaskan tundra a fifth of a mile away. Massera hit the ground, expecting to die, as the 10-ton steel pipeline whipped through the air like a wild snake. Shouting over the roar of the leaking gas, he radioed the control center to warn them not to shut down the field's electricity, because if they did, a spark could kill him. An electrical spark had once ignited an explosion in a similar incident and burned several nearby facilities to the ground.
Just 30 minutes after Massera radioed for help, another unrelated leak occurred on a separate line a couple of miles away.
A little more than a year later, a staging valve stuck closed at a large central compressor plant in Prudhoe Bay. Gas backed up, enveloping the facility in flammable fumes. Although flares had been installed to prevent a disaster like the one in Texas City, they weren't lit and didn't function. So the gas built up and spread around the plant. Sleeping barracks were nearby, and just a spark of static electricity in the bone-dry arctic air could have ignited an explosion that could kill hundreds of workers and shut down Alaskan oil production for years. That it never happened was just sheer luck.
Then, in November 2009, ice built up in a 25-year-old pipeline to the Alaska division's Lisburne Production Center—a facility so large that it dominates the horizon at the edge of the Arctic Ocean. The frozen line eventually split open, dumping nearly 46,000 gallons of crude oil, toxic wastewater and natural gas onto the frozen ground. BP had been warned by workers months before the spill that numerous problems at Lisburne were increasing the risk of such an accident.
The incidents enflamed Pascal's distrust, and she began to ratchet up her demands that BP agree to a set of rigid checks in order to fend off debarment. BP's progress reports on its maintenance projects were no longer good enough. Now she demanded receipts.
"I was no longer willing to accept their word," she said. "Show me, what did you maintain? I want to see what you paid, who you paid. What did you replace? I wanted the details."
"They did not like that at all," she added.
ProPublica gave BP a detailed list of questions about each of these incidents and asked for examples of how the company had strengthened operational safety in Alaska since 2001. But BP's response did not address the incidents or the Alaska safety issues.
The End of the Line
By the end of the decade Pascal again began to think that the only way to make the company improve was to debar the entire corporation. "There comes a point where the events conspire to basically show federal regulators that a particular company, for whatever reason, has no intent of complying with U.S. law and regulations," she said.
The company now had three criminal convictions—in Endicott Bay, Texas City and Prudhoe Bay—and a deferred criminal conviction in a price-fixing scandal. It also had a record of ongoing problems and employee harassment.
Pascal began carrying the completed debarment papers tucked under her arm as she made her way into work. Yet she still held to one last hope that a compromised compliance agreement could be reached.
By 2009 her demands included extra regulations and oversight of BP operations not just in Texas and Alaska, but also in the Gulf. It included moving the HSE group back up in the company command.
Pascal, at this point, was on the verge of retirement—she had promised herself she would leave at the age of 60. But she postponed her departure several times in order to see the BP case through. She said company executives acted confident—"arrogant"—as if they believed BP was so important that the U.S. government would never dare to debar it. "BP told me multiple times that they had direct access to the White House and they would go there."
In a last-ditch effort, she decided to call the company's bluff. If BP thought the Defense Department needed it so badly it would never allow debarment, Pascal would show them they were wrong.
In the spring of 2009 she called a meeting with BP's new general counsel, Jack Lynch, at the Fairmont in Seattle to show him an e-mail her office had received from the Defense Department. In it, an official with the Defense Logistics Agency, the division responsible for BP's fuel contracts, offered unconditional support for debarment.
"You could do anything you wanted to BP and we could deal with it," the official, Normand Lussier, wrote, adding that he didn't think defense concerns should play into Pascal's judgment.
The message was clear. The government was united in its concern about BP. Now the company needed to act.
Pascal thought she had reached a turning point with BP. Lynch was new to his job, and she said he seemed genuinely intent on a reaching a resolution.
But months passed, and still the agreement wasn't signed. Pascal began to suspect that BP was waiting her out.
Her concern grew when she learned that Marty Anderson, the inspection supervisor who had raised the alarm about BP's pipeline inspection program in Alaska, was accusing the company of blacklisting him. Here she was, working out a final agreement that pivoted around open safety communication between workers and their managers, and the company appeared to be punishing the man who had raised a flag about one of its worst spills in a decade.
"It appears that BP, regardless of its code of conduct and statements to the government, will do whatever is necessary to cover up the improper actions of its senior managers," she and Hodges, her junior co-counsel, wrote in an e-mail to Lynch and BP Alaska's new president, John Minge, on January 19, 2010. "This promotes intimidation, retaliation, blackballing and unethical behavior in the management ranks, and a culture of fear and lack of ethics in the employee ranks."
"Nothing has been done in TWO YEARS," the letter continued. "This is a current graphic example of why EPA does not trust BP."
When she wrote that letter, Pascal had all but made up her mind. If BP didn't sign the settlement agreement soon, she would double back on her case, make sure the documents behind her claims were rock solid and send the debarment papers up the flagpole for a final signature from the EPA's suspension and debarment official.
Two days later, Pascal was walking into the elevator at the EPA's downtown Seattle offices when her foot caught on an uneven lip at the door. She fell, hard, and was taken to a hospital, her face bruised, her rotator cuff so badly torn that her doctor said it was one of the worst shoulder injuries he'd seen.
For a few weeks, she tried to work from home. But she needed surgery and faced a six-month recovery period before she would be able to resume her full workload. She couldn't type. She couldn't drive. She couldn't even raise her arm to put a dish in the microwave.
On March 1, Jeanne Pascal submitted her retirement papers, leaving the BP case she had worked on for nearly 12 years unresolved.
The decision about whether or not to finally debar BP now falls to Carson Hodges, Pascal's former junior co-counsel. The EPA confirmed to ProPublica that it suspended its settlement negotiations with BP after the Gulf disaster and that it will add whatever findings result from the Gulf investigations to any future settlement. Neither Hodges or the EPA would comment for this story.
Pascal, for what it's worth, has finally reached her decision.
"I have to conclude that BP has a corrupt culture, and had I arrived at that conclusion while I was handling the case I would have immediately debarred them," she said last week. "I would have just let the chips fall where they may."
Contributors to this report include Ryan Knutson, Nicholas Kusnetz, Sasha Chavkin, Sydney Lupkin, Lisa Schwartz, Sabrina Shankman, Marian Wang, and Sheelagh McNeill at ProPublica and Martin Smith and Marcela Gaviria at PBS FRONTLINE.


text:
Tháng 1
OpenShot + Minecraft = Magic!
Written by
on .
In my presentation at SCALE 10x (on January 21st, 2012), I created and then debuted a fun, short Minecraft video. The video tells the story of Steve, a resident of Minecraft, who wakes up to find monsters invading his land. Steve looks for safety in an abandoned cave, and unknowingly stumbles into the real world ...


text:
Blackburne & Sons Makes Private Money Loans on Farms, Farmland, and Cropland
Let's suppose you own farmland, and you need to borrow some money. Perhaps you need to pay some delinquent real estate taxes or buy seed and fertilizer for this year's planting.
Normally you could just apply to a Farmer Mac mortgage company to refinance your property; however, what would happen if you were late paying your mortgage a couple of times last year? What if your tax returns did not show that you made enough money last year to make the new mortgage payments? In this case, you would not qualify for a loan from Farmer Mac.
Blackburne & Sons is a private money lender that specializes in making loans on cropland, even if the borrower's credit is poor or showed a loss last year on their tax returns.
To apply, please call Warren More at 916-338-3232 or email him at firstname.lastname@example.com


text:
Very rare This is another great one of the Thai phra. Were created by Phra Buddhachan Toh Phromarangsi. Among devotees he is addressed as Somdej Toh or Archan Toh, he is one of the most beloved and famous Buddhist monks during Thailand's Rattanakosin period in Thailand ruled under King Rama.
Somdej Toh started creating the very first batch of Phra Somdej amulets in B. Phra Somdej is one of the Five Grand set of BenjaPakee as the leading amulet.
Materials for making Phra Somdej amulets consist of :- Holy powder - Phong Vises, Shell lime from the sea, Assorted flowers from shine, Rice remains after consumption, Lotus flower, Banana rip, Ashes from incense urns, Holy water, Honey, Tang oil, Chanted sand, etc and chanted with great mass chanting ceremony. It is believe that the amulet will protects against evil spirits, harm, unknown danger and bring good luck to the wearer. It will be one of the best in your collection!!! I sell only genuine antique Thai Amulets , Pendants. In this world economic crisis, if you have Thai antique Amulets with you.It will help to prevent any Bad things and protect you from Evil. It also brings Luck, Wealth, Fortune and encourage you to fight any obstacle with a powerful help of Ancient Magic. It's also Beautiful and very nice for your Antique collections too. The item "Phra Somdej, Thai Amulet Buddha, holy power Talismans, Bangkonpom rare old A" is in sale since Friday, October 1, 2021.
This item is in the category "Antiques\Asian Antiques\Southeast Asia\Amulets". The seller is "wee_8475" and is located in Saraburi. This item can be shipped worldwide.


text:
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Joys of Winter Running
Since I still go to bed at 10pm on Friday nights, I can only sleep in until around 8am. It's still 10 hours of sleep. I woke up around 8:15am and settled in on the couch with my apples and cinnamon oatmeal and coffee. Around 10am I finally got up and changed into my running clothes.
After some dawdling, I finally got out the door. The pace felt effortless and I just glided along for 5 miles. Compared to yesterdays run (2.8 miles at 9:03 pace @ 5am), today was 5 miles at 8:21 pace and both runs felt the same. It is amazing how my early morning runs are so much slower which I think is a result of heading out the door 10 minutes after waking up.
Once I got back and showered, I did some yoga for about an hour which my legs hated but made me feel so much better. Then I had the best lunch ever - grilled cheese and tomato sandwich!
Now time to lay around for the rest of day! My cat definitely has the right idea!
Have a great weekend and happy running!
21 comments:
- Unknown said...
Wow your cat is such a gorgeous fluffball! Have a great day!
- January 29, 2011 at 2:25 PM
- Marci said...
Good start to the day, I agree the best part of winter running is sleeping in!
- January 29, 2011 at 2:36 PM
- Christine said...
Great pace on your long run! I like sleeping, but on the other side I enjoy being done with the run early. I can't wait for spring, best time to run!! :)
- January 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM
- Tracy Simmons said...
I am with you, I love outdoor winter running. I usually head out around 11am. I have been sick the past week and am itching to get back out there :)
- January 29, 2011 at 4:56 PM
- Amber said...
Haha! I was just saying to some ladies in my run group this morning that starting a run at 8 am feels SO EARLY in the winter yet last summer when I was marathon training I started several runs at 5:30 AM!!! Haha. Perspectiveee!
- January 29, 2011 at 5:25 PM
- Angie said...
Good job on your run!! I usually find that I run faster in the morning than I do around lunchtime.. not sure why that is! Everyone is different I guess :)
- January 29, 2011 at 6:26 PM
- Unknown said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- January 29, 2011 at 7:50 PM
- Unknown said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- January 29, 2011 at 7:50 PM
- Unknown said...
I commend you on running in that weather! I can not even imagine it. It's been sunny and in the 70s for about 2 weeks. Today was in the 60s and I thought it seemed chilly.
I wish I could run quickly in the morning but I run at a snail's pace. The world is definitely more peaceful at those hours. - January 29, 2011 at 7:51 PM
- Unknown said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- January 29, 2011 at 7:51 PM
- Unknown said...
Sorry!! My comment posted multiple times!
- January 29, 2011 at 7:52 PM
- Nicole said...
yay running & sleeping in! wahooo!
- January 29, 2011 at 10:27 PM
- Molly said...
wow, perfect morning!
- January 29, 2011 at 11:07 PM
- Amy said...
I agree, it's nice to be able to relax in the morning! I didn't go out until 3pm today! I'm supposed to meet my running group tomorrow morning at 9am, but I'm not sure if I'd rather run with people to distract me from the cold, or sleep an extra hour and head out when it's less frosty!
- January 30, 2011 at 2:01 AM
- Joanne said...
So glad you had a great run. I know what you mean about the Sat. run, so much easier when you have that extra hour of sleep.
Love the kitty. :) - January 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM
- Jamie said...
that cat rocks!
Sleeping in on winter mornings is definitely a plus side of winter running. Nice job on the Saturday run! - January 30, 2011 at 11:46 AM
- Glenn Jones said...
Is that a cat or a doorstop? Way to get your run in.
- January 30, 2011 at 1:40 PM
- Kim (Book Worm Runs) said...
Aww!! Your kitty is adorable!! :) I love being able to sleep in on the weekends!! Of course, sleeping in for me is 7 am but considering I get up at 4:30 during the week 7 is great! :) Nice job on the run!!
- January 30, 2011 at 5:27 PM
- Marlene said...
I love sleeping in a bit and taking my time with tea/breakfast before a run. We need more weekends...
- January 30, 2011 at 9:06 PM
- Kim said...
Ha! Love the cat pic!
And great pace. It is nice that you don't have to wake up at the crack of dawn in the winter! Pretty soon it won't be like that (trying out optimism here, ;) ). - January 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM
I would say that is the ONLY good thing about winter running!
- February 1, 2011 at 3:20 PM


text:
Chickens are invading the solar system and it's your job to save humankind. Just when you thought it was safe to eat chicken, these chicks are armed with Santa hats! Journey to the planets and fight to save the world! Advance through waves of invading chickens while avoiding falling ornaments and festive decorations. Collect power-ups to boost your spaceship's firepower. Hurry! This holiday season depends on you!TRY IT FREE, THEN UNLOCK THE FULL ADVENTURE FROM WITHIN THE GAME!
☆☆☆☆☆ Features ☆☆☆☆☆
✓Galactic adventures sprinkled with holiday cheer
✓Master your shooting skills to blast poultry!
✓Watch out for falling ornaments!
✓Challenging waves of Christmas chicken catastrophes!
☆☆☆ Discover more from Big Fish Games! ☆☆☆
We're big believers that everyone is a gamer at heart and that games are a great source of joy and relaxation. Founded in 2002, Big Fish Games is a developer, publisher and distributor of casual games. We offer a virtually endless selection of interactive games that you can enjoy anytime, anywhere — on your PC, Mac, mobile phone, or tablet. Renowned for offering A New Game Every Day!® on www.bigfishgames.com, Big Fish Games distributes more than two million games per day worldwide.
We have many other great iPad games including:
➠ Mahjong Towers Touch HD
➠ Doors of the Mind: Inner Mysteries HD
➠ Time Builders: Pyramid Rising HD
➠ Antique Road Trip: USA HD
➠ Flux Family Secrets: The Ripple Effect HD
➠ The Serpent of Isis HD
➠ A Witch's Curse: Princess Isabella HD
➠ Empress of the Deep: The Darkest Secret HD
➠ Haunted Manor: Lord of Mirrors HD
➠ PuppetShow: Mystery in Joyville HD
➠ Drawn: The Painted Tower HD
➠ Awakening: The Dreamless Castle HD
➠ Awakening 2: Moonfell Wood HD
➠ Ancient Spirits: Columbus' Legacy HD
➠ Amazon: Hidden Expedition
You can always find an updated list at www.bigfishgames.com!
Try out Big Fish Games' iSplash! newsletter and never miss a sale or new game again! Sign up at: http://bigfi.sh/isplash
Follow us on Twitter: http://bigfi.sh/BigFishTwitter
Become a fan on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/BigFishGamesMobile
Genre:Arcade, Simulation
Release:Dec 05, 2011
Updated:Nov 30, -0001
TouchArcade Rating:Unrated
User Rating:Unrated
Your Rating:unrated
Compatibility:HD Universal


text:
"500 million small farms worldwide, provide up to 80 percent of food consumed in a large part of the developing world. Investing in smallholder women and men is an important way to increase food security and nutrition for the poorest, as well as food production for local and global markets," UN Sustainable Development Goals.
In partnership with CARE Denmark, CARE Kenya and local organizations, Chr. Hansen is finding new ways to support smallholder farmers in Kenya.
"There is a need for new and well-performing tools for the farmers to increase the productivity of their land and strengthen food security in these areas. Chr. Hansen has the needed technical expertise and we are ensuring that the smallholder farmers get knowledge and value of technology such as the one from Chr. Hansen," Morten Fauerby Thomsen. Project Manager CARE Denmark.
The first step in the partnership has been to identify local partners and agree on the scope. The next step will be to test the natural plant solutions on local crops.
"CARE's focus area is primarily on those in most need - the smallholder farmers. While the smallholder farmers are likely to benefit most from products like our microbial solutions, they are also the most difficult to reach and with the least exposure and access to new technologies. Without the support from CARE Denmark, Chr. Hansen would not be able to reach smallholder farmers.
We look forward to developing the partnership and eventually helping farmers strengthen their business and increase yield through protection from pests and diseases." Kim Mueller Christensen, Commercial Director, Plant Health
The project is supported by DANIDA.