text:
Employee use of personally-owned computing devices for work-related purposes--known as Bring Your Own Device or BYOD--is not a new trend and security professionals have been concerned about it for some time, but there is a widely held view that the trend has been transformed of late. Why? Waves of mobile digital devices flooding into the workplace, threatening to overwhelm current information security policies, procedures, and controls.
A lot of organizations are still assessing the productivity benefits of iPads, iPods, iPhones, Android tablets, smartphones, and so on. At the same time IT managers are trying to weigh those benefits against the risks that come with these devices. But what is the real size and scope of the problem? Are current impressions of an onslaught of insecure mobile devices accurate? These are important questions with serious implications for information security. So ESET teamed up with Harris interactive to conduct a survey and provide some answers. Depending on your current perceptions the results may be very surprising.
First, there is the overall scale of the BYOD phenomenon:
- More than 80 percent of employed adults use some kind of personally-owned electronic device for work-related functions.
In others words, BYOD is not coming, it is here, in a big way. And that is not necessarily a bad thing. It means your staff can stay in touch with up-to-the-minute, real-time data, regardless of where they happen to be, creating a compelling advantage for your organization. The use of these personally-owned devices spans a wide range, everything from airplane navigation and scheduling to marketing lead-capture; the devices are everywhere, and they're here to stay. But what about when users are allowed, or even encouraged, to connect them to the corporate network, the company's information infrastructure, can that really be secure?
IT teams and executives alike shudder at the thought of a user's personal device accidentally (or unwittingly, or on purpose) running a rogue app and creating an entry point for scammers into the core intellectual property of the organization, thereby exposing the "crown jewels" to the bad guys. Scenarios like this keep the IT crowd awake at night. But how common is the practice of accessing and/or storing company information on personally-owned devices?
The answer depends on the type of device:
- About a quarter (24%) of employed adults use their own smartphone to access and/or store company information.
- The percentage rises to 41% for personal laptops and 47% for personal desktops.
- Only 10% currently use personally owned tablets to access and/or store company information.
Those numbers suggest that there is a fairly logical adoption curve, with more mature technology being used for company purposes more often. As we will see in a moment, there is a security curve as well, and it is not reassuring.
If you stand at the back of a commercial flight these days you can see rows of passengers staring at a wide variety of devices, sometimes running cute little apps and games, and sometimes running business critical processes. Aside from the danger of spreading critical information to snoopy shoulder-surfers, this perspective makes it easy to see the variety of roles that the devices play. And I'm sure you've seen this scenario: halfway through the flight a user switches from super-critical pieces of corporate work to checking out the app they downloaded while waiting in the airport terminal. Obviously that's a potential problem: bored users looking for cool things to install on their hip new piece of hardware. Maybe there's a compelling reason to get that app, but is there a security context in place whereby this activity is vetted, especially when they are connecting that device to the company network? Beyond that, are basic measures in place to protect the data on the device if it falls into the wrong hands?
You might expect newer mobile users to be slightly more naïve about device security, but slick new mobile devices are often used by more senior staff, so you'd hope they would act more securely by default, but do they really? Here are some of the worrying statistics our survey revealed:
- Across the entire BYOD spectrum, encryption of company data is only happening on about one third of devices.
- Less than 10% of people currently using their own tablets for work have auto-locking enabled.
- People were more security-savvy about their smartphones, with 25% using autolock.
- One third of laptop users have auto-locking enabled, whch means two thirds do not.
- Auto-locking with password protection was enabled by less than half of laptop users, less than a third of smartphone users, and only one in ten tablet users.
Clearly there is a lot of bad news here for BYOD security and you can sum it up like this: Right now less than half of all devices in the BYOD category are protected by the most basic of security measures.
If you are determined to take an optimistic view you could argue that a huge increase from current levels of BYOD security is possible, both cheaply and quickly, by doing the following:
- Turning on auto-locking
- Turning on password protection
- Enabling encryption.
These things are relatively easy to do on the most widely used BYOD devices where these features are often built in, so the cost is low: basically the price of a little security awareness and education. The cost of not taking these steps could be suffering the scariest kind of security breach, the kind that was easily preventable by basic BYOD security best practices.
Note: This survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive between February 8-10, 2012 among 2,211 adults (aged 18 and over) and 1,320 employed U.S. adults.


text:
Proud to be celebrating 170 years in business
Branded Goods Sold Without Authority Can Lead to Prosecution
It is well known that the sale of counterfeit goods is a criminal offence and prosecutions are by no means unusual. A recent case looked at the position in which goods protected by a registered trade mark are offered for sale with the brand owner's branding, but by someone who is not authorised to sell them.
Goods sold this way are called 'grey goods' and their presence in the market is normally the result of their being imported from foreign markets where they are sold at significantly lower prices.
The case was brought as a preliminary matter to ascertain if the Trade Marks Act 1994 could be interpreted to mean that a criminal offence is committed 'where the proprietor of the registered trade mark has given its consent to the application of the sign which is its registered trade mark, or has itself applied its own registered trade mark, to the goods, but has not given its consent to the sale, distribution or possession of them'.
It was brought because the owner of the trade mark alleged that another company had been 'unlawfully selling in the United Kingdom branded goods by Ralph Lauren, Adidas, Under Armour, Jack Wills, Fred Perry and others' which were manufactured in countries outside the European Union and which were sold to the grey importers by the factories which made them without the authority of the intellectual property holder.
The case ended up in the Court of Appeal, which ruled that an offence could be said to have been committed.
The counterfeiting and unauthorised resale of branded goods is a major headache for brand managers and this case confirms that there are criminal as well as civil (restitutive) measures that can be taken for breaches.
For further information or to speak to one of our experts, please get in touch

subset: commoncrawl


text:
- City Fajr Shuruq Duhr Asr Magrib Isha
- Dubai 04:12 05:36 12:28 15:51 19:14 20:38
Intelligence officials say the number of Pakistani soldiers killed in a roadside bombing of an army convoy in the northwest has risen to 14.
The officials say another 20 troops were wounded in the attack Sunday near Dosalli village in the North Waziristan tribal area. One vehicle was completely destroyed.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.
Pakistani military officials confirmed the bombing but said four soldiers were killed and 11 others wounded.
North Waziristan is the main sanctuary for al-Qaida and Taliban militants in Pakistan.
Follow Emirates 24|7 on Google News.


text:
Raw sardines or mackerel
Miso paste
Green leaves
Japan has a lot of great camping areas near the ocean where you can rent a pole and fishing gear at a local shop, drop a hook in the sea and try to catch the evening's meal. However, the size of fish you typically catch with rental gear usually limits the variety of dishes you can put together.
So this issue we feature a dish called namero that you can make with small fish such as sardines or mackerel. The name apparently takes origins from the word nameru (to lick) indicating you may find yourself licking the platter clean.
(1) Clean and filet the fish and mince finely. Dice the onion, ginger, myoga and green leaves.
Namero recipes were passed down among Boso Peninsula (Chiba) fisherman who appreciated the ultra-simple "chop and mix" style. The fishy smell is covered up by ginger, spices and green leaves, while the onion adds a flavor I personally like, although some would recommend scallions.
Cutting the ginger into long, thin pieces will help bring out the flavor, and it is popular to put the concoction atop a steaming bowl of rice. Some prefer to snack on the mix while having a drink, and others enjoy rolling it up into tiny balls, dropping it in ice water and downing the mix like a cold soup. Frying namero causes the dish to change names, becoming sanga, which is recommended for those not used to eating things raw.
(2) Mix the ingredients and dice with a knife until thoroughly minced (think "pound" rather than "cut").
(3) Add miso to taste and continue "pounding" until finely minced.
Without wanting to attribute more sophistication to the dish than is duly warranted, if you were to replace the fish with raw beef, you would have steak tartar or the Korean dish yukke. If you were to fry it, you'd have yourself a hamburger. It makes it a lot easier to stomach when you think of it this way, right?


text:
- Pharmacy
- Prescription Services
- New Prescription
- Refill Prescription
- Transfer Prescription
- Diabetic Supplies
- Over the Counter
- Home Medical
- Pets
IMPORTANT: HOW TO USE THIS INFORMATION: This is a summary and does NOT have all possible information about this product. This information does not assure that this product is safe, effective, or appropriate for you. This information is not individual medical advice and does not substitute for the advice of your health care professional. Always ask your health care professional for complete information about this product and your specific health needs.
COMMON BRAND NAME(S): Celexa
WARNING: Antidepressant medications are used to treat a variety of conditions, including depression and other mental/mood disorders. These medications can help prevent suicidal thoughts/attempts and provide other important benefits. However, studies have shown that a small number of people (especially people younger than 25) who take antidepressants for any condition may experience worsening depression, other mental/mood symptoms, or suicidal thoughts/attempts. Therefore, it is very important to talk with the doctor about the risks and benefits of antidepressant medication (especially for people younger than 25), even if treatment is not for a mental/mood condition. Tell the doctor immediately if you notice worsening depression/other psychiatric conditions, unusual behavior changes (including possible suicidal thoughts/attempts), or other mental/mood changes (including new/worsening anxiety, panic attacks, trouble sleeping, irritability, hostile/angry feelings, impulsive actions, severe restlessness, very rapid speech). Be especially watchful for these symptoms when a new antidepressant is started or when the dose is changed.
USES: Citalopram is used to treat depression. It may improve your energy level and feelings of well-being. Citalopram is known as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). This medication works by helping to restore the balance of a certain natural substance (serotonin) in the brain.
OTHER USES: This section contains uses of this drug that are not listed in the approved professional labeling for the drug but that may be prescribed by your health care professional. Use this drug for a condition that is listed in this section only if it has been so prescribed by your health care professional. This medication may also be used to treat other mental conditions (such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder).
HOW TO USE: Read the Medication Guide and, if available, the Patient Information Leaflet provided by your pharmacist before you start taking citalopram and each time you get a refill. If you have any questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist. Take this medication with or without food as directed by your doctor, usually once daily in the morning or evening. The dosage is based on your medical condition, response to treatment, age, laboratory tests, and other medications you may be taking. Be sure to tell your doctor and pharmacist about all the products you use (including prescription drugs, nonprescription drugs, and herbal products). The maximum dosage for citalopram is 40 milligrams per day. If you are using the liquid form of this medication, carefully measure the dose using a special measuring device/spoon. Do not use a household spoon because you may not get the correct dose. To reduce your risk of side effects, your doctor may direct you to start taking this drug at a low dose and gradually increase your dose. Follow your doctor's instructions carefully. Do not increase your dose or use this drug more often or for longer than prescribed. Your condition will not improve any faster, and your risk of side effects will increase. Take this medication regularly to get the most benefit from it. To help you remember, take it at the same time each day. It is important to continue taking this medication even if you feel well. Do not stop taking this medication without consulting your doctor. Some conditions may become worse when this drug is suddenly stopped. Also, you may experience symptoms such as mood swings, headache, tiredness, sleep changes, and brief feelings similar to electric shock. To prevent these symptoms while you are stopping treatment with this drug, your doctor may reduce your dose gradually. Consult your doctor or pharmacist for more details. Report any new or worsening symptoms immediately. It may take 1 to 4 weeks to feel a benefit from this drug and up to several weeks before you get the full benefit. Tell your doctor if your condition does not improve or if it worsens.
SIDE EFFECTS: See also Warning and Precautions sections. Nausea, dry mouth, loss of appetite, tiredness, drowsiness, sweating, blurred vision, and yawning may occur. If any of these effects persist or worsen, tell your doctor or pharmacist promptly. Remember that your doctor has prescribed this medication because he or she has judged that the benefit to you is greater than the risk of side effects. Many people using this medication do not have serious side effects. Tell your doctor right away if you have any serious side effects, including: shaking (tremor), decreased interest in sex, changes in sexual ability, easy bruising/bleeding. Get medical help right away if you have any very serious side effects, including: fainting, fast/irregular heartbeat, black stools, vomit that looks like coffee grounds, seizures. This medication may rarely cause a very serious condition called serotonin syndrome. The risk increases when this medication is used with certain other drugs (see Drug Interactions section). Get medical help right away if you develop some of the following symptoms: hallucinations, unusual restlessness, loss of coordination, fast heartbeat, severe dizziness, unexplained fever, severe nausea/vomiting/diarrhea, twitching muscles. Rarely, males may have a painful or prolonged erection lasting 4 or more hours. If this occurs, stop using this drug and get medical help right away, or permanent problems could occur. A very serious allergic reaction to this drug is rare. However, get medical help right away if you notice any symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, including: rash, itching/swelling (especially of the face/tongue/throat), severe dizziness, trouble breathing. This is not a complete list of possible side effects. If you notice other effects not listed above, contact your doctor or pharmacist. In the US - Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. You may report side effects to FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088. In Canada - Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. You may report side effects to Health Canada at 1-866-234-2345.
PRECAUTIONS: Before taking citalopram, tell your doctor or pharmacist if you are allergic to it; or to escitalopram; or if you have any other allergies. This product may contain inactive ingredients, which can cause allergic reactions or other problems. Talk to your pharmacist for more details. Before using this medication, tell your doctor or pharmacist your medical history, especially of: personal or family history of bipolar/manic-depressive disorder, personal or family history of suicide attempts, liver disease, seizures, low sodium in the blood, intestinal ulcers/bleeding (peptic ulcer disease) or bleeding problems. Citalopram may cause a condition that affects the heart rhythm (QT prolongation). QT prolongation can infrequently result in serious (rarely fatal) fast/irregular heartbeat and other symptoms (such as severe dizziness, fainting) that need medical attention right away. The risk of QT prolongation may be increased if you have certain medical conditions or are taking other drugs that may cause QT prolongation. Before using citalopram, tell your doctor or pharmacist of all the drugs you take and if you have any of the following conditions: certain heart problems (heart failure, slow heartbeat, recent heart attack, QT prolongation in the EKG), family history of certain heart problems (QT prolongation in the EKG, sudden cardiac death). Low levels of potassium or magnesium in the blood may also increase your risk of QT prolongation. This risk may increase if you use certain drugs (such as diuretics/"water pills") or if you have conditions such as severe sweating, diarrhea, or vomiting. Talk to your doctor about using citalopram safely. This drug may make you drowsy or cause blurred vision. Do not drive, use machinery, or do any activity that requires alertness or clear vision until you are sure you can perform such activities safely. Avoid alcoholic beverages. Before having surgery, tell your doctor or dentist about all the products you use (including prescription drugs, nonprescription drugs, and herbal products). Older adults may be more sensitive to the side effects of this drug, especially bleeding. Older adults may also be more likely to develop a type of salt imbalance (hyponatremia), especially if they are also taking "water pills" (diuretics). Children may be more sensitive to the side effects of this drug, especially loss of appetite and weight loss. Monitor weight and height in children who are taking this drug. During pregnancy, this medication should be used only when clearly needed. It may harm an unborn baby. Also, babies born to mothers who have used this drug during the last 3 months of pregnancy may infrequently develop withdrawal symptoms such as feeding/breathing difficulties, seizures, muscle stiffness, or constant crying. If you notice any of these symptoms in your newborn, tell the doctor promptly. Since untreated depression can be a serious condition, do not stop taking this medication unless directed by your doctor. If you are planning pregnancy, become pregnant, or think you may be pregnant, immediately discuss with your doctor the benefits and risks of using this medication during pregnancy. This drug passes into breast milk and may have undesirable effects on a nursing infant. Consult your doctor before breast-feeding.
DRUG INTERACTIONS: See also Precautions section. Drug interactions may change how your medications work or increase your risk for serious side effects. This document does not contain all possible drug interactions. Keep a list of all the products you use (including prescription/nonprescription drugs and herbal products) and share it with your doctor and pharmacist. Do not start, stop, or change the dosage of any medicines without your doctor's approval. Some products that may interact with this drug include: other drugs that can cause bleeding/bruising (including antiplatelet drugs such as clopidogrel, NSAIDs such as ibuprofen, "blood thinners" such as warfarin). Aspirin can increase the risk of bleeding when used with this medication. However, if your doctor has directed you to take low-dose aspirin for heart attack or stroke prevention (usually at dosages of 81-325 milligrams a day), you should continue taking it unless your doctor instructs you otherwise. Ask your doctor or pharmacist for more details. Avoid taking MAO inhibitors (isocarboxazid, linezolid, methylene blue, moclobemide, phenelzine, procarbazine, rasagiline, selegiline, tranylcypromine) during treatment with this medication and for two weeks before and after treatment. In some cases a serious (possibly fatal) drug interaction may occur. Before using citalopram, report the use of other drugs that increase serotonin, such as dextromethorphan, lithium, St. John's wort, sibutramine, street drugs such as MDMA/"ecstasy," tramadol, tryptophan, certain antidepressants including SSRIs (such as fluoxetine, paroxetine) and SNRIs (such as duloxetine, venlafaxine), "triptans" used to treat migraine headaches (such as eletriptan, sumatriptan), among others. The risk of serotonin syndrome may be more likely when you start or increase the dose of these medications. Tell your doctor or pharmacist if you are taking other products that cause drowsiness including alcohol, antihistamines (such as cetirizine, diphenhydramine), drugs for sleep or anxiety (such as alprazolam, diazepam, zolpidem), muscle relaxants, and narcotic pain relievers (such as codeine). Check the labels on all your medicines (such as allergy or cough-and-cold products) because they may contain ingredients that cause drowsiness. Ask your pharmacist about using those products safely. Many drugs besides citalopram may affect the heart rhythm (QT prolongation), including amiodarone, pimozide, procainamide, quinidine, sotalol, among others. Citalopram is very similar to escitalopram. Do not use medications containing escitalopram while using citalopram. This medication may interfere with certain laboratory tests, possibly causing false test results. Make sure laboratory personnel and all your doctors know you use this drug.
OVERDOSE: If overdose is suspected, contact a poison control center or emergency room immediately. US residents can call the US National Poison Hotline at 1-800-222-1222. Canada residents can call a provincial poison control center.
NOTES: Do not share this medication with others. Laboratory and/or medical tests (such as EKG) should be done periodically to monitor your progress or check for side effects. Consult your doctor for more details. Keep all regular medical and psychiatric appointments.
MISSED DOSE: If you miss a dose, take it as soon as you remember. If it is near the time of the next dose, skip the missed dose and resume your usual dosing schedule. Do not double the dose to catch up.
STORAGE: Store at room temperature away from light and moisture. Do not store in the bathroom. Keep all medications away from children and pets. Do not flush medications down the toilet or pour them into a drain unless instructed to do so. Properly discard this product when it is expired or no longer needed. Consult your pharmacist or local waste disposal company.
Information last revised August 2012. Copyright(c) 2012 First Databank, Inc.


text:
Home Top Ad
Saturday 30 July 2011
Hefty Rs 42,000 crore bill for combat aircraft may rise
77 comments:
- Anonymous30 July 2011 at 16:04
an F35 would cost $60m? Really? will be closer to 200m a piece after all the overruns.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous30 July 2011 at 16:13
There appears to be an inherent bias in your article towards the US and the F35 (note also your preious articles on F35 etc).
Why dont you disclose this and also if, for example, you have received any direct or indirect benefits (flights, entertainment etc) from any of the US companies or the US Govt.
Surely this would be the ethical thing to do especially if one of the pillars of your post is accountability etc.
Thanks - Anonymous30 July 2011 at 19:15
Shukla Sir, I only have one question for you and it doesn't even relate to the veracity of this article. Why is it that the official version of the article on Business Standard (released late on 30th night) end with the part about the Rafale price and has nothing on the F-35??
While you are entitled to lobby for or against products, please be honest about it. Articles like these insult the military and policy makers of this country-
The claim that the F-35 comes at 60-70 M a piece?? That's not what the US media is saying. And about getting them in 2016, the Israelis may have to wait until 2018 to get their first variants. - Heberian30 July 2011 at 19:55
Anonymous @ 4.43 -
Exactly what do you think you sound like? PR from one of the contestants..
The Colonel's article is stating some bare facts and numbers. Why does it have to be so hard to accept it for what it is, rather than twist it around so much?
As I have said before, the Typhoon and the Rafael both are excellent aircraft and probably take care of our immediate to medium term needs.
All this article is saying, to me at least, is:
1) After bench-marking, the price of the the Typhoon and the Rafael will come to between 110 - 130 million US$. Col. Shukla has not mentioned exchange rate fluctuations yet..
2) The F35, may cost around 150 or thereabouts if taken through exactly same benchmarking process.
3) If the MOD is unwilling to raise the contract value to factor in inflation and exchange rates, then the bids from Dassault and Cassidian may fall through. (Just have a look at the recent Mirage 2000 upgrade contract price and transpose those prices over to the Rafael and EFA)
4) And then what? Will Lockheed bring the F35 to the table?
5) If the F35 comes to the field, how will the GOI and IAF look at things?
These are the 5 things I get from this article. What is so bad about raising these questions instead of looking at it through jingoistic and rather narrow vision? we have waited over 10 years for the a/c, so if it gets delayed because of price, what should we do? Not buy at all, or look at ALL the availble options with price benchmarking, since capabilities are already quite well known...
Grow up people.
@ Hari Sud... why? - Anonymous30 July 2011 at 21:10
So when MOD is comparing life-cycle costs, why does Shooklaw ji throw in a "price" googly for the F=35 albeit at $60-70 Mill, when Wikipedia gives the fly-away cost of the F-35 at $122 Mill and $183.5 Mill life cycle. Given the amount of bias this article has towards the F-35 (and the earlier ones too)I can understand if as military journalist, you favor the F-35. But distorting facts to present your view? I am tempted to think that this blog has long lost its neutrality.
If you have publicly accepted a position in marketing at LM, please update us. - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 00:15
You raised a good question and highlighted a real risk for the process, until you exposed your real aim, which is the IAF to buy F-35. The first part of the article is a good analysis, the end is more disappointing. If you honestly believe LM's quotation of 60-70 m$ a piece and the first aircraft to be delivered in 2016, ahead of historical customers, what can we do against that? You have convictions, that's good, but I'm looking forward to F-35 fighting Rafale or EF during Red Flags to really believe it is such a great aircraft. So far I'm not convinced at all.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 00:23
10B $ were allocated keeping in mind our economy can afford then.One could easily have a look at the economic gains we have made in last decade.
10B were optimum allotment then.Guess, MoD has this thing in mind and they are open enough to judge the prices and benchmark them according to our current economy. - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 00:54
Ajay, for god sake think of IAF which desperately needs this fighters to be war ready. I hope you be more optimistic.Come out of your pessimistic approach for MMRCA and leave the debate of F-35.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 01:43
Ministry of Defence will not make a joke out of the whole thing only because they did not revise the 10 yr old benchmark price.
Rafale will be selected. - Mr. Ra31 July 2011 at 03:30
It is still not sure whether F-35 is definitely going to be superior than the J-20 and if so then India will be again back to square one.
So in case MMRCA deal crashes, it will be more prudent to purchase only two or three squadrons of any of the six MMRCA contenders (I mean even the F-16) at earliest.
The money so saved shall be diverted to hasten Tejas-MK2 and FGFA. - Deepak Datta31 July 2011 at 05:02
- Aggressively work with US government to get F35 - Joint Strike Fighter(JSF). This is where our focus should be and indications are that they might be willing to entertain the request. Remember, besides F22-Raptor, which US currently would not sell to anyone, F35 is a stealth fighter with tremendous capabilities. In addition, India needs to build close strategicm ties with US to counter the Chinese Dragon and its proxy Pakistan. We need this fighter to be facing the eastern front, with the upcoming deployment of Chinese J20 fighter jet. I do know that India has signed an agreement with Russia for the PAK-FA Fifth Generation Fighter aircraft.
However, Russian aircraft would never be able to matchup against US technology. Just name one war where the Russian jets have defeated American jets - Zero. Just in 1982, Israel flying F16 and F15 jets destroyed 86 frontline Soviet aircraft being flown by Syria in two days without a single loss of its own (wow!). Gulf war I & Ii, Kosovo operation, Libyan operations are all examples of superior US technologies. There was a time when US equipment was not available for obvious reasons. Now India should go for the best proven technologies. Pakistan's recent acquisition of F16 C/D Block 52+ aircraft with 500 potent BVR AIM120C-5 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile, in conjunction with Saab Erieye AWACs makes the skies more complicated. Block 52+ or older F16 are flown by US today. We must acquire F35 regardless of PAK-FA FGFA contract. - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 05:05
Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates put the Marine Corps version of the F-35 on probation last year because of cost overruns and schedule delays, saying it would be cancelled in two years unless Lockheed could fix the plane's test problems.
ReplyDelete - Deepak datta31 July 2011 at 05:11
I do not agree that original RFP was for a single engine jet. Only F16 and Gripen were single engine and considered unlikely winners from the beginning. Rest like F18, Mig 35, Rafale, Eurofighter were all twin engined. There is no brainer that with China coming up with J20 stealth fighter and Pakistan acquiring F16 C/D Block 52+ with 500 AIM 120 C-5 AAMRAM, we would need stealth aircraft ASAP.
There is no question of a bias for F35. It is the best available for sale out there.can any one name one time when a US aircraft has lost. In 1982, Israel shot down 86 Soviet front line jets being flown by Syrians for not a single loss of it's own. Gulf war I and Ii, same results. - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 05:11
Official Canadian government estimate of life cycle cost of 62 f 35s is 13 billion dollars and non governmental estimates are 29 billion. Therefore for 126 JSFs we will have to pay about 30-70 billion in life cycle costs.
Thanks for deleting my previous posts because they uncovered your factually wrong information on the JSF. - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 05:13
Mr Shukla it is becoming increasingly important that you clarify as suggested by others if you have any conflict of interest about the JSF. Has Lockheed Martin directly or indirectly compensated you in the last 3 years.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 05:24
i believe mr.shukla is being typically superficial about MMRCA. This is not as simple as scrapping the deal and going for another lone fighter. How do you suggest resolving the CISMOA and other agreements involved with F35 buy? There is no way india could leverage US if it gets F35 thru FMS. US will never lower its threshold. India will be bound to complete F35 restrictions including presence of american staff on indian bases and much more. There will be no technology transfer, that is for sure. The project will be delayed bu at least 4 to 5 years on condition that F-35 sees successful induction, which is not likely at this point. If india commits to F-35 it will commit to cost overuns in development of F-35 without having access to any special technology. India will own the aircraft only that it won't really. India will be technologically restricted. How do you suggest closing the squadron gaps in the meanwhile. India needs at least 200 MMRCA to start phasing out its obsolete migs. I mean for God sake, this is the ground reality. You have written earlier, F-35 is a great attack aircraft, even if its technological superiority is accepted (though its not like that), there are a thousand things involved before an air craft is air borne. To me, it looks like either you have been heavily bribed to please F35s case or you are really superficial in your thinking. MMRCA may not be the best buy for india, but remember, when you buy from outside, you don't buy dreams, you buy reality. And the reality is, MMRCA at this point, suits best for indian needs. Rafale or EF2000 may be more expensive but do you have a REAL option to consider? (not the F-35 again , please). India is struggling with LCA, india's own FGF is not likely before a decade. How will you make sure that india maintains its requirements. MMRCA is the only answer to india's needs and you will lead india into a massive disaster of airforce, if you keep hitting the same F-35 notes. By the way, F-22 export restriction will be up in 5,6 years. By the time F-35 time comes, even if MMRCA is scrapped, with this logic of yours, will you start pleading the case for F-22 scrapping the F-35. Airforces do not work like that sir, they have to act timely and in best circumstances. I request you, please stop this quest of yours for F-35. This is turning out to be a SCRAP-THE-MMRCA-TAKE-THE-F35 blog. Every 2 months you write the same thing, do you not see beyond your personal opinion or whatever you're writing for. Please open your eyes, practical please.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 05:30
Anon @ 10.34, shame for supporting USA? Are you kidding me? Are you saying that it is a proud thing to support the EU or France. Eitherways, the Col has only stated facts and made extrapolations from official quotes by a LM rep. And by the way, I know you don't care, but I am Indian and have lived in the USA for many years; the USA is a far more principled country than the EU and Americans judge you without prejudice.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 05:30
uk government has cut JSF purchase from 170 down to 50 airframes, it will not buy any vertical take off airframes, due to explosive cost growth and time delays.
ReplyDelete - Deepak Datta31 July 2011 at 05:32
It is hilarious to read comments that some how F35 may not be better than the humungous "stealthy" J20. F35 incorporates the latest and the greatest of the US stealth technology. Its radar as of today is the most powerful in the world. China which steals foreign military secrets has come up with this J20 designed and manufactured with the help of Russian engineers they have recruited.
Please do not even begin to compare Tejas. Like the last chief said, it is barely a Mig 21++. so let us not get carried away. Let us buy F35 if by God's grace MMRCA process is cancelled. Can any one tell me as to why all the nations operating the Eurofighter and Rafale and Israel are lining up to buy F35 and so are the rest of the Nato countries? - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 05:55
Heberian @ 8.25,
I think the person who needs to grow up is you. Numbers and statistics hide more than they reveal.
For one, do you think the MOD never factored in all the processes and stages of this deal when conducting this tender? For all their flaws, they are not a bunch of blundering fools. Claiming that a base price expectation would derail a contract is well-bogus thinking to say the least. There are numerous competitions (smaller of course) taking places across the world where the likes of the expensive Eurofighter take on the economical Gripen.
2. Do you or anyone honestly believe that the F-35 will be available by 2016? And that it will be released with technology transfer and license manufacturing agreements? It's one thing the IAF needs new aircraft and it is another that it can't wait. And the F-35 is at a disadvantage there.
3. If the US government snipes defense projects as is expected, the F-35 family is at real threat and that will affect its export prices.
4. In case people have not noticed, why is it assumed that only Lockheed Martin would benefit the MMRCA contract imploded?? The obvious beneficiary would be Russia which has more affordable wares to hawk. @ajai sir
What you say about the MMRCA deal and opting for JSF-35 it seems like shifting of goal post to me, remember we were looking for a high powered single engined aircraft to make up for MiG-21 obselecense and induction of Tejas.
The fact about MMRCA deal, it was meant to fill the gap between the availability of FGFA, AMCA and LCA Tejas start inducting and the 272 Sukhoi-30s are churned out.
In the case MMRCA deal falls off then its better we go for the Mirage 2000 the UAE is selling back to France and those the Greeks are selling off.
waiting for your response
@Heberian welcome back after long time. some more bites from you
Joydeep Ghosh- Anonymous31 July 2011 at 08:14
60-70mio for the f-35...
does that meet your benchmark? - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 09:24
We need this deal to be done. We need to get full TOT so that we can use it for our future. But this will be possible only when HAL (NULL) is not the only party involved. Or HAL (NULL) is headed or controlled by IAF.
What a bad thing, HAL is taking TOT from so many days, still not able to produce something by its own. @ Anonymous 04:43
Your comment: "There appears to be an inherent bias in your article towards the US and the F35"
Are you just slow? I have argued forcefully, and repeatedly, under my own name for cancelling the MMRCA contract and buying the F-35. I have made it absolutely clear to all but the most dim-witted that I believe that this will be to the great benefit of the IAF and the country.
But you still seem to be under the impression that I am being devious about this. What will I have to do to make your ilk understand that this is not a hidden agenda. THIS IS MY OPENLY STATED CONVICTION.
Your next question about whether I have received any benefits from the US government. I could just as logically ask you whether you are in the pay of Eurofighter or Rafale, but I won't ask. Since you are posting anonymously, there is no accountability expected from you. You are not an entity at all, just a name-calling anonymous poster.
But to set the record straight for other visitors to Broadsword, I have never received a single cent (in any currency) from the US government, nor have I ever been their guest.
To set the record even straighter, I have never received a single cent (in any currency) from Lockheed Martin, nor have I ever been their guest.
I have, in fact, done stories that Lockheed Martin believed to be most damaging to their interests, and to which they reacted strongly in letters to my editor. Those stories are posted on this blog, but name-calling, unreasoning, anonymous entities you will not be bothered to read them.
So don't ever argue a case on merit, Mr Anonymous. Just whine, as is the case with so many anonymous blog posters, that anyone with opposing views has been bribed by someone.Mongo:
We can laugh all we want at Lockheed Martin. But remember one thing: they are highly unlikely to have a top executive make a comment, on the record, under his own name, that the company believes to be untrue.
Lockheed Martin's claim about the cost of the fighter being 60-70 million is, similarly, an on-the-record claim by a top LM executive. But, as everyone who knows this business knows, figures can vary widely depending upon what you include in it. In this case, the LM executive is clarifying that this is the fly-away cost of the F-35 and that all the other components of a MMRCA-type contest would raise the price considerably.
The article also gives you a good idea about how the Indian contract will be costed.
This contract, and the benchmarking that is happening, is not about the "per piece" price of the MMRCA. As the article makes clear, it is about adding up all the components (the fly-away price is just one of seven components, and not even the biggest one!) and then reaching a grand total.
@ Pawan
About my having an interest in Lockheed Martin, I hope what I have written above clears your mind?- Anonymous31 July 2011 at 12:25
I have to raise few issues here:
1.)at no cost US is going to transfer full technology to India of F-35.
2.) there is no way that these F-35 going to cost just 60-70 million and there full cost after all the advancements might be double of this amount.
3.) Typhoon & rafale are giving India full technology & also stating that India can be partner in this project which could be very helpful for our aviation industry.
4.)after performing such a drastic process which the IAF personnel says that they want to patent, i don't think MOD would scrap this deal & making our national security at threat just because of cost.
I want to also ask if you have some profit associated with the Indian selection of F-35, as you seem to be a staunch supporter of F-35 all the way.
I want to say to all the Indians that they should have some trust in the MOD & IAF that they will not put national security in jeopardy just because the aircraft is breaking the ceiling cost, and lets wait for there decision. - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 14:16
the biggest overseas project in the world....why do you indians BS everything?
ReplyDelete - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 16:09
Colonel with due respect,
IAF guys are dumb..why don't they are not doing anything to bring lightning-2 home, and is it correct to trust USA considering their record with their allies i.e. Iran, Pakistan, Taliban, China etc to name a few. Won't they will get a direct access into Indian military policy. - Anonymous31 July 2011 at 20:31
You are being way too charitable to LM, not because of vested interests as you have clarified repeatedly, but perhaps you have not been following the JSF program consistently. Its in deep trouble. Please read through Aviationweek and Ares blog at Aviationweek, google for Aviationweek and Ares. You will see how problematic the program is, and why many JSF execs have made crazy announcements that didnt happen. Ajai sir
I request you to please write a column about comparison between JSF-35 Vs Eurofighter Vs Rafale.
Thats the only way to clear all the doubts in peoples mind (including me) as to why JSF-35 is best for India.
However in the current scenario, what we need is numbers and not superior technology for which we will have to wait for few years to materialize. Not to forget the restrictions like CISMOA, BECA, ToT and others.
I still feel there is no need to go for the 3rd 5th generation heavy JSF-35 as we will start inducting 2 new 5th generation aircraft by early coming decade
1. The 30 ton plus FGFA
2. The 20 ton plus AMCA
As you put forward your point about
JSF-35, I will put up the case for Mirage 2000 on sale from UAE and Greece.
These Mirage 2000 totaling about a 100 will be enough to keep 2 squadrons for SFC for nuke bombing and still we will be left will 100+
Mirage 2000 in fighter role.
We need to remember that IAF wants to numbers (being severly short) quickly. If at all MMRCA deal is scrapped, then Mirage 2000 is the way to go, to make up for delay in LCA induction, obselense of MiGs and arrival of FGFA, AMCA and 272 Sukhois.
This way we will save a lot of money. Instead we can invest this money to develop a 10 ton plus 5th generation single engine fighter.
We will have a 30 ton plus, 20 ton plus and a 10 ton plus 5th generation fighter gaurding our airspace well into late 2060s.
waiting for your opinion please
Joydeep Ghosh- Balllabh1 August 2011 at 00:42
i see that Ajai is heavily weighted in favor of the so called 5th gen JSF, well if i had the position to buy i would if at all JSF purchase would not take us another decade to just "approve" the bids, after tests etc.
what i mean is, we don't want to chase a future target and then another one and then another future one, we need to get something we can, that too immediately, drooling for the f35 is OK, but understand the need, we need the jets NOW, and after a long exercise that took us a decade we should not ink it ASAP.
OR-- another option is to buy more of something we have (it would've been wiser to buy the assembly lines of the mirage 2000-5MK2 when France was selling it to us)
like mirage, mig29(by simply ordering mig 35 govt-govt) but i would not say the su30 because that class can leave us vulnerable in many dimensions, eg: maintenance, cost to fly, same heavy type weaknesses that all may know. --- AND then buy the f35 or heck just make the PAK-FA instead.
so now that we see ourselves in this condition, i would rather buy the MMRCA out of these 2 than drool over F35, i feel strongly that Ajay ji's hated purchase of these 2 instead of the F35 is a childish "Jid" because both these jets are quite capable in smashing pakistani or Chinesze airplanes in thir service lives and for the future we do have more options.
so lets be practical and understand that this "patch fix" is important for the air-force. - phrank1 August 2011 at 01:35
I don't understand the process here. They spent years narrowing it down to 2 planes. Now they are asking price? While I agree that you want the best plane you can get. India is in need of a great many planes. Price could matter allot if you could buy 1.5 of one plane for the cost of one of the others.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous1 August 2011 at 02:03
@Deepak 18.02: "Can any one tell me as to why all the nations operating the Eurofighter and Rafale and Israel are lining up to buy F35 and so are the rest of the Nato countries?": well, far from that. Amongst EF nations, three intend to buy F-35: the UK, Italy and Spain. Germany has no plan for F-35, never. Rafale customers, so far only the French but UAE and Brazil may be on the way...none has any plan for F-35. Some other NATO nations may buy F-35: Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, perhaps some others but I don't find any. As a summary, your argument is a bit too much...
ReplyDelete - Anonymous1 August 2011 at 10:17
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program: Collapse is a "When" Question, not an "If" Question: Air power Australia.
Just because JSF is a 5th generation american aircraft does not mean it is the best available. American has produced duds before like the F-105 thunderchief, where half the fleet was shot down by migs in Vietman. It was a fat heavy unmaneoverable aircart like the JSF and it's pilots called it the "lead sled", others called it "thud" because of the sound it made when it hit the ground. - Nitish1 August 2011 at 11:24
But Mr. Shukla, are you not worried about what implications might be there if we buy US Fighters...Thats the single most hindering question in the mind of most of the skeptics..they want us to sign CISMOA, BECA and what not..I sniff CIA and US hidden agenda everywhere..Pardon my ignorance but this is my conjectural question, and would be happy to have an epiphany in this regard...thanks..hoping that you bother to answer this.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous1 August 2011 at 17:16
I apologize for posting anonymously, but why don't we cancel the MMRCA contract and use the money we set aside for it on the AMCA program? That way, we get our on 5th gen fighter, get a significant punch in our capabilities, and don't have to buy the F-35
ReplyDelete There is a very basic concept in Indian law. Innocent until proven guilty. Also the party making the allegation has to provide the basis of its allegation before the accused is expected to make its defence.
So Mr Shukla is a strident supporter of the F-35 and has been one for quite some time. As far as i know, it is not yet a crime to go against popular opinion [sic]. Instead of making wild allegations about supposed bias or underhand dealings, how about the "anonymous" posters come up with a reasoned argument about why Mr Shukla's analysis is flawed.- Mr. Ra2 August 2011 at 02:01
If Rafale is cheaper than the EFT, then Rafale should be purchased in only 126 Nos and nothing more. Apart from many other factors, Rafale at least suits better in the matters of logistics.
The process of purchasing F-16 may be like playing chess against Vishwanathan Anand, wherein we know the end result even before the first move.
The logic of succeeding in the air operations against the fourth world countries like Libya, Iraq, Afghan or even Vietnam does not justify much except providing some practical testing and experiences.
You see, in 1960 India liberated Goa from Portugal in festival mode against the wishes of the first world and within two years it got uprooted in retaliations at Northern and NE fronts as a part of a combination of clever moves. - Anonymous2 August 2011 at 05:10
MMRCA contect and F-35 info again...Brother Ajai,I pronounce you holier that the Pope!!
ReplyDelete - Anonymous2 August 2011 at 05:13
Your point is bang on but only for the benchmark... you have still not explained how the price of the F-35 would fit into all this. It is well known the f-35 is a lot more expensive than 4++ gen birds. And the MMRCA is an excuse for India to kickstart its nascent aerospace industry. How would the F-35 meet that need?. When you find out what TOT they will offer please put it up on your blog. This merry group of posters will then debate with you again.
Bit off topic, but this is also why ADA/HAL needs to surprise us with the quick release of LSPs, this would convince everyone that they can deliver aircarft 'ON TIME'. Maybe then the AMCA design and development can also be opened up. For this they need to take one[and only one] beautiful example from DRDO - PRAHAAR which was, First execute... then talk - those guys[DRDO] now have my respect. - Anonymous2 August 2011 at 05:33
Irrespective of whether or not anyone agrees with Ajai's JSF argument, the point is that the MMRCA shortlist is deeply dubious. Why select two of the most expensive radars both of which have underdeveloped desktop radars ? It makes NO sense.
ReplyDelete - Jholaman2 August 2011 at 11:29
Why don't we cancel the MMRCA contract, avoid the F-35 and spend the money on pucca housing and clean drinking water for the poor instead?
ReplyDelete - Anonymous2 August 2011 at 14:52
ajai, can you tell us how and how exactly, despite ITAR laws, US will give India TOT for the JSF? they are not willing to customize israeli planes with israeli eqpt, have haggled with UK (a closer ally than middle of the way india) for software codes. its not all about price but also about independence of choice when it comes to sustaining the product.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous2 August 2011 at 19:17
Cancelling the MRCA contest at this stage could drag this acquisition program on endlessly. In fact it could become like the artillery acquisition program for the Indian Army, where tenders are cancelled after extensive evaluation, and the soldiers are left with nothing to fight with.
As far as the F 35 goes Shukla's price quote of $60-$65 million is nothing but complete deception. it is difficult for me to believe that a smart and informed guy like Shukla can the so disconnected with reality when it comes to the price of this aircraft.
The price of this aircraft is at least twice as much even per Wikipedia. a number of countries which are acquiring this aircraft like Australia, Canada, the UK, Norway, and even in the US there has been widespread consistent and intense criticism of this program. The UK has decided to not buy any vertical takeoff and landing variant. It has reduced its order from 170 to 50 aircraft. the Harper government in Canada has come under tremendous political pressure and criticism for backing this deal. in Australia the government's decision to go for the F 35 and not wait for the F-22 has drawn intense flak. Norway is considering an open competition where the F 35 would be evaluated against other modern aircraft, which will surely reveal that it is an aerodynamic dud. The Defence Secretary in the US has made it official that the vertical takeoff variant of this program will be permanently cancelled unless all the technical issues are sorted out within 2 years.
And the currently estimated price of $120 million is only an estimate, it is not the final price. This is the price assuming that will suddenly start meeting all of its milestones, each and every one of which it has failed to meet in the past. Lockheed has gone back to the Pentagon 4 times to ask for more money than was sanctioned for the development of this aircraft.
The problem with the F 35 is that too much was demanded from the aircraft designer: a supersonic vertical takeoff tri-service stealth bomb truck. Not even America can defy the laws of physics.
When you design an aircraft to combine the qualities of multiple different aircrafts, sometimes you end up with an aircraft which combines the weaknesses of all the aircraft it was supposed to replace. That aircraft is the F 35. the one thing which truly destroyed the program was the requirement for vertical takeoff and landing, because that forces in a tremendous number of design constraints on the designer. They had to fit it with a massive single-engine to generate enough thrust to lift vertically. As a consequence the fuselage is extremely big to accommodate both the massive engine and enough fuel to give it at least some range. this creates tremendous drag. The turning performance of this airframe per official Lockheed Martin figures is worse than the big and bulky F 4 Phantom from the Vietnam War. the aircraft requires a hundred hours on the ground for every one hour of flight.
I could go on and on about why the F 35 program is a failure, but that information is freely available to all who are interested in looking at it. I am baffled by how consistently and intensely Shukla has made a case for the F 35 for for the IAF. No other journalist has done so. From the quality of his writing, I know that Shukla is a patriot, and an extremely sharp guy, therefore, it is logical for people to suspect that his case for the F 35 is not a case of simple and innocent misinformation. - Anonymous2 August 2011 at 19:25
On 11 March 2010, a report from the Government Accountability Office to United States Senate Committee on Armed Services projected the overall unit cost of an F-35A to be $112M in today's money.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous2 August 2011 at 19:25
In 2010, Pentagon officials disclosed that the F-35 program has exceeded its original cost estimates by more than 50 percent. An internal Pentagon report critical of the JSF project states that "affordability is no longer embraced as a core pillar". On 24 March, Gates termed the recent cost overruns and delays as "unacceptable" in a testimony before the U.S. Congress. He characterized previous cost and schedule estimates for the project as "overly rosy".
ReplyDelete - Anonymous2 August 2011 at 19:28
"In 2011, the Pentagon's top weapons buyer Ashton Carter said that the new $133 million price per aircraft was not affordable."
ReplyDelete - Nikita2 August 2011 at 22:48
@anon18.03: ask IAF to rewrite its QR ! Selection process, remember ? Read the DPP and you may understand.
ReplyDelete - Deepak Datta3 August 2011 at 04:56
Very very interesting blog post on Forbes.com regarding F35 that backs up the $65-70Million flyaway cost that LM rep in India quoted. It is still not too late to plavce the order with F35-World's only fifth generation stealth multirole fighter.
http://blogs.forbes.com/beltway/2011/06/27/massive-cost-estimate-for-fighter-program-is-misleading/ - Deepak Datta3 August 2011 at 05:28
Does it really matter what the amours in the market say about the F35 price, if India gets an iron clad guaranteed price and delivery schedule? No, it does not. Any new program incurs delays and hurdles in the development process. Luckily, the most technologically advanced country, United States of America, is leading the project to build it. The aircraft in all its three variants is making great progress. Two full production aircraft have already been delivered to the US Airforce 33rd. squadron for pilot training. 31 production planes are under construction at the LM plant in Texas.
Just an update. Now two F-35A Lightning II joint strike fighters have been delivered at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida during July 2011. The aircraft are the first two full production models and not prototypes, and were delivered to the 33rd Fighter Wing for immediate induction and commencement of training. This should take care of the naysayers who doubted if the JSF would materialise any time soon.
F35 JSF Lightening II, is the only fifth generation multi-role air dominance aircraft out there. Today is the world of BVR warfare. Long before F35 is even detected, it would vanquish its enemies and be long gone. Why give IAF second or third best, when THE best aircraft might be available, provided CISMOA and End User agreements are signed. There is a plan to produce over 4500 F35s. India is surrounded by enemies with growing capabilities.
Folks, there is no comparison between Eurofighter/Rafale/SU30MKI etc with the worlds most advanced stealth fighter/GA aircraft available out there for sale. F22 Raptor is not for export.
Eurofighter deal does bring EADS experience and technologies not just for the MMRCA for for across the board aviation related benefits. However, we need a strategic partnership with US to protect our strategic interests. India should sign the CISMOA and other enabling agreements for the transfer of most sensitive US technologies to India. There is no point getting the C130J-30s, P8I-Poseidon and other Technology platforms without the full fledged equipment.
No country would share their crown jewel technology without safeguards and end use monitoring to prevent it falling in the wrong (Russian) hands. In the event of any hostilities with China, Pakistan would surely jump in fro the West and the North, we would need inter-operability with US, which is the only country likely to intervene in our favor. Too much is being listened to the foreign policy wonks regarding lack of China's posture against us. These same people were wrong leading up to 1962 and they are wrong now - Deepak Datta3 August 2011 at 05:31
JSF Projected Sales.
9 participating countries in the F35- Joint Strike Fighter, world's ONLY fifth generation multi-role stealth fighter program, US, UK, Italy, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Canada, Australia, and Turkey alone have signed on for 3173 F35 variants through 2035, in the MOU signed in 2006. Israel is placing confirmed orders for 40 F35s with a projected need for 100 plus aircraft to replace its F16s. Japan, Korea, Singapore have all expressed solid interest. The remaining NATO countries and US allies would more than like will all end up buying F35.
Let me share my logic behind my initial estimate of F35 sales. It is based on the historical sales data of F15, F16, and F18 aircraft which F35 intends to replace in conjunction with the F22 Raptor.
Since 1975, 1534 F-15A/B/C/D/E/J/DJ Eagle and Strike Eagle Fighters were produced. Saudi Arabia has just placed an order of 84 F15SA jets
Since 1976, 4450 F16-Fighting Falcon multi-role aircraft were produced and production for export orders for Turkey, Pakistan, Morocco, Egypt, and iraq is underway.
Since 1978, 1478, F/A-18A/B/C/D Hornet multi-role fighter were produced.
In addition, 630 F/A-18 E/F/G Super Hornet versions have been produced.
Canadian has built 138 F/A F18 Hornets.
That brings the total number of F15s, F16s & F18s produced so far to 8230. Therefore a number of 4,500 F35s being produced is a credible estimate by me. Cheers! - Deepak Datta3 August 2011 at 05:55
That reaction is understandable given the pace at which cost estimates are rising. However, what got lost in the exchange was the distinction between estimates and actual costs. The more you examine the program's track record to date and the methods utilized to calculate future costs, the less clear the program's real price-tag becomes. In terms of the track record so far, the contractor has repeatedly delivered early production planes for less than the Pentagon estimated they would cost, and its internal projection is that it will be able to market the most common version of the p lane at about the same price that its F-16 fighter currently sells for overseas – about $65 million each..
The above is from the blog post on Forbes.com
http://f-35.ca/2011/massive-cost-estimate-for-fighter-program-is-misleading/ - Mr. Ra3 August 2011 at 07:26
If for a time everyone forgets about the problems and weaknesses of F-35 and starts talking in favor of the inclusion of F-35 in the IAF and cancellation of MMRCA, then the prices of F-35 may further go up with demand and the EFT/Rafale will be more and more stretched either to provide the better TOT or to reduce their bloated prices to the affordable levels. This may be a great service to the nation.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous3 August 2011 at 08:33
The A-10 is what India needs in addition to MMRCA: it will tear up paki tanks in the Thar desert by the dozen in minutes. It is going to stay in US service till 2028. Can get a 50 for a 1 Billion $ US.
It's performance in the Gulf war was spectacular. From Wikipedia:
"The A-10 was used in combat for the first time during the Gulf War in 1991, destroying more than 900 Iraqi tanks, 2,000 military vehicles, and 1,200 artillery pieces. A-10s shot down two Iraqi helicopters with the GAU-8 cannon. The first of these was an Iraqi helicopter shot down by Captain Robert Swain over Kuwait on 6 February 1991, marking the A-10's first air-to-air victory.[66] Four A-10s were shot down during the war, all by surface-to-air missiles. Another three battle-damaged A-10s and OA-10As returned to base but were written off, some sustaining additional damage in crashed landings.[67][68][69] The A-10 had a mission capable rate of 95.7%, flew 8,100 sorties, and launched 90% of the AGM-65 Maverick missiles fired in the conflict.[70] Shortly after the Gulf War, the Air Force gave up on the idea of replacing the A-10 with a close air support version of the F-16.[71]" - Deepak Datta5 August 2011 at 04:02
Just a reminder to every one, the Mirage 2000 was not that "potent" during Kargil "Safed Sagar" in 1999, became operation "Vijay" only after Israelis showed up with laser guide precision munitions for Mirage which "helped turn the war" in India's favour according to the Israeli Ambassador, Mark Sofer. We also must not forget that US gave its tacit approval for the Israeli action in a sign of emerging friendly relations between the two natural allies.
Sales of Phalcon AWACs and other high tech defence products have only happened due to US approval.
We must expedite our efforts to get F35A, the world's only fit generation multi-role stealth fighter. Every thing eels is just waste of time. If we truly wanted to upgrade Mirages, we would have bought Mirage 2000-9 available for sale from UAE and Mirage 2000-5 Mark 2 from Greece. Mirage 2000-9 being the most sophisticated Mirage 2000 vaiant and Mirage 2000-5 Mark 2 is what we would get starting in 4 years with all 52 being completed in 10 years. Is there a logic in MODs decision? Absolutely not.
CAG should investigate this matter now, before it is too late. Some one should raise this matter in the current parliament.
According to some reports, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, in her latest visit offered F35 to India on "unbelievable" both on price and delivery schedule. Eurofighter and Rafale, the down-selected MMRCA candidates are still going to be a non-stealthy 4.5 gratin aircraft. All we need to sign is the CISMOA and BECA enabling agreements necessary for hi-tech transfer. Over 60 countries have signed these agreements with US to access world class technologies. Even Pakistan has signed these agreements with US before they received the P3C Orion and F16 C/D Block 52 aircraft. All Nato countries, Japan, South Korea and every other country receiving US arms have signed it.
Some bureaucrats in Indian establishment do not support the growing strategic Indo-US relationship and thus are causing roadblocks Ike recommending against signing these agreements by propagating preposterous implications of signing these agreements, like our equipment would be turned off by US during a war with Pakistan. How dumb can some one be by suggesting these stories? Let me very clear, even if we use the sub-standard equipment from BEL etc, US has technologies to intercept any frequencies if it were to ever desire, which it has no reason to. India needs to step. Out and shake off coldwar paranoia and embrace in a strong strategic partnership based on equality and mutual trust.
Our continued reluctance in signing these routine agreements creates doubts in US regarding our sincerity in safe guarding their technology. Enough already! - Anonymous5 August 2011 at 06:21
Joydeep, I've also been suggesting the M2K purchase from UAE & Greece. Unfortunately, our view don't count and the IAF idiots still prefer to wait for 10-15 years for 'new' jets to come on line while their jets and pilots fall from the sky.
ReplyDelete - Deepak Datta5 August 2011 at 18:53
@ Anonymous Aug 3,2011 21:03
A10 Thunderbolt II -"Warthog" is a close air support, ground attack aircraft of the US Airforce. A10 was inducted in US Airforce in 1972, over 716 were produced and the last plane was manufactured in 1984. US is the sole operator of the aircraft, as they were never sold to another country.
A-10 Thunderbolt II uses the GAU-8/A Avenger, a 30 mm, seven-barrel Gatling-type rotary cannon as its main weapon. The plane carries 1150 of the uranium depleted rounds firing at either 3900 rounds per minutes bursts with devastating effects. The plane is also used as a forward air controller (FAC). 367 A10s are currently in service with the US Air force and Air force reserve. They are due to be replaced by F35-JSF in 2028.
Since, A10 is not an available option, we must conclude the trials for AH-64D Block III Apache Longbow helicopters along with AGM-114 HEllfire Longbow and Hellfire II missiles, Stinger air-to-air Block I-92H missiles.
Current projections of 28 helicopters is grossly inadequate. India needs 70-90 of these lethal helicopters to form a credible army aviation wings that would move with our strike forces. These helicopters have a proven track record of its unmatched lethality and performance. The Apache on offer to India is the latest version, with all current US Apaches being upgraded to this standard. @ Anonymous 18:51
Thanks for endorsing my point of view. I feel that the Mirage 2000 upgrade contract that has been signed for completion in 10 years has got some thing thats' not being said.
Even the Mig 29 upgrades are expected to be over by 2018, I strongly feel that this long period has been decided taking into account the sale of 68 Mirage 2000 from UAE by France to a 3rd country replacing them with Rafales (possibly India) as and when UAE agree to buy the Rafales.
As for 38 Greek Mirage 2000 (the last in production line) there is very good chance we can lay hands on them provided MoD does not procastinate like it did on Varyag (it went to China for US $20 million).
Add 52+68+38=158, after putting 42 upgraded planes exclusively for SFC we will still have more than 5 squadrons of Mirage 2000 at our disposal, till the time FGFA, AMCA induction starts and HAL supplies 140 LCA and 272 Sukhoi 30MKI.
This will also allow us to reduce the number of planes bought under MMRCA (post benchmarking)
As for our viewpoint not being taken in to account, thing is we are common man discussing things, an common mans view holds no place in power circles. sigh!!!
Joydeep Ghosh@ Deepak Datta
this is in reference to your last post. As you said not country will supply sensitive tech to other countries lest it falls into other countries hand (you say Russia, I say blah).
How can you expect India (IAF) to sign CISMOA, BECA and other agreements and give up operational independence, in return for technology.
As for what you said about Mirage 2000, please refer to what i said in my last post. I think that will be more plausible explanation.
Joydeep GhoshI totally Agree with you Me. deepak datta. I think india not buying F-35 is to do with paranoid and to some extend corrupt Babus of MoD.
Countries never have permanent friends or foes. Every country has to assess and change its outlook on basis of developing Geo-political scenario & economic trends for welfare and safety of its citizens.
American and Indian interest are converging and likely to remain same for at least next 3 to 4 decades. So It is opportunity to bolster Military ties.
India need american technology in all fields whether it is defense or agriculture or healthcare and deeping defense ties are always seen as evidence of trust between two nations. Israel followed this policy and used american technology to grow militarily and economically.- Deepak Datta7 August 2011 at 01:13
@ 6 Aug 10:15 Joydeep Ghosh
Could you please cite the "operational freedom" India stands to lose by Signing CISMOA, BECA, and other agreements?
These are baseless red herrings devoid of any facts. India must not miss the bus this time. In late 50's US offered India a seat in the security council, India refused, suspecting hidden agendas of US, which there were none. US was simply aligning and recognizing a democratic country. PM Nehru, asked US to offer that seat to China first?.
We continued our alignment with the soviets and turned into pseudo-communist socialist policies and that in turn brought US closer to Pakistan.
US stuck its neck out for India in the US India nuke deal. US truly recognizes the grave threat posed by brutal communist Chinese regime and is offered India these arms to defend her self when the Chinese attack would occur. It is not a question of when and not if Chinese would attack India along with Pakistan. India would do well to beef up its defensive capabilities.
200-250 F35s would go a long way in achieving that goal without giving up ANY operational freedom. This should be even if India inducts PAK/FA T-50 FGFA, which undoubtedly would be inferior to the F35 based on historical performance of Soviet/Rus/Ian aircraft.
The question to be answered if, does not want to be a true regional and global power? If yes, then US and her allies are the best bet for India.
Is it unfair for US to ensure that their world class technologies be protecting? Absolutely not. - Deepak Datta7 August 2011 at 01:25
There is some thing very interesting. In blogs, news web sites comments etc there seems to be a lot of US bashing or aspirations being cast on US's intention vis-a-vis India. But I have a million dollar question: if there are 10 green cards sitting on a table. Along with its Russian equivalents, how many US green cards would be left on the table after 10 persons are given an option?
The answer unequivocally would be ZERO. I do not wish to disparage Russia, which helped India in the past. However, in a indo-Sino conflict it cannot be counted on to assist India. Folks, the Chinese dragon and its proxy Pakistan are encircling India and preparing for a surprise attack. There would not be a Chinese attack with Pakistan jumping in to tie-up the focus in the North and Western borders.
Foreign policy wonks were wrong in 1962 and they are wrong today that Chinese have peaceful intentions. Chinese is becoming a threat to the wor,ld peace and is a grave threat to all its neighbors. - Heberian7 August 2011 at 19:25
@ Deepak Datta -
Sir, you have touched a very raw nerve by bringing up chacha Nehru's misplaced statesmanship vis-a-vis the UNSC seat :) :)
As for the greencards, there is now a thriving business in China for "birth tourism". Chinese women who are about 7 months pregnant go to visit the US for 3 months, and stay in Chinese run brithing centres, so that their babies are born with US citizenship. Tangential information, but interesting I think :) @Deepak Datta
It seems you absolutely gave my previous post a miss you dont seem to understand the logic of opposition to F-35 JSF. Let me give it another try:
1. FGFA, a 30 ton plus 5 generation aircraft will be in service with IAF from early next decade
2. AMCA, a 20 ton plus 5 generation aircraft will be in service with IAF from middle of next decade (possibly)
So it will not be viable to induct another 30 ton plus 5 generation aircraft, the F-35 JSF into IAF purely on economic reasoning as well as for logistical reasons.
If we do need to go for a 3rd 5 generation aircraft, then it should be a 10 ton plus single engine aircraft, then we will have
1. FGFA, 2 engine 30 ton plus
2. AMCA, 2 engine 20 ton plus
3. Future LCA 1 engine 10 ton plus
By the way who told you that US tech is far superior to Russian tech. Let me give you some instances
1. Entire F-35 JSF has been grounded last week because of some electrical failure in in-flight system
2. Entire F-22 (the costliest ever built) has been grounded for over 1 month for issues with oxygen support system.
I feel we should give it a new name 'F-22 Ostrich', a bird that cant fly.
3. You say Russian tech is inferior to US tech, its said some years back CIA stole the blueprint of Zhuk Phazotron AESA radar from Russia, if the US was so ahead of Russia why it steal the blueprints.
My giving these point a though
Joydeep Ghosh


text:
Product Description
This is a Bruno (Disney's Encanto) cardboard cutout. Easy to set up, it features a single-sided high quality print on cardboard with an easel on the back so it can stand on its own. Lifesize cardboard standups make great decor for parties, photo ops and events! It is a great product for fans of Disney movies! Order yours today!
Size: 70" x 30"
Availability: Ships to the United States and Canada


text:
Have you always dreamed of being a part of the fast-paced and rewarding field of medicine? Do you feel like years of intensive schooling and thousands of dollars stand in the way of your dream becoming a reality? Fear not, because ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur CA are the key to living your dream.
Ultrasound technicians, also known as diagnostic medical sonographers, are important members of the medical community in Larkspur CA or anywhere, really. They perform ultrasounds on patients in order to determine what is going on inside of the body. Ultrasound readings (sonograms) help physicians make diagnoses and to treat a variety of medical conditions. They are also commonly used on the bellies of pregnant mothers in order to check on the health and development of the fetus.
Most ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur CA train their students to work in hospitals while others work in physician's offices or in diagnostic laboratories. They work closely with other medical professionals including physicians and nurses, and their skillset is an asset to any medical team.
Job growth for ultrasound technicians in Larkspur CA has been steadily increasing in recent years and is expected to skyrocket in the near future. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has predicted demand for ultrasound technicians to increase by 24 percent between 2014 and 2024. That is much faster than the expected growth of all other professions. The BLS also states that as the technology continues to develop, and ultrasound technician schools continue to churn out students, ultrasounds will becoming increasingly important in the medical field, meaning that people who know how to produce and read them will also increase in importance.
If you are ready to start living your dream of working in the medical field, consider the possibility of becoming a sonographer. Don't waste time and money on a four-year degree followed by medical school when you can become a certified ultrasound technician in as little as a year at a great Larkspur CA technical school!
In the healthcare industry, the option of an ultrasound technician is a very prominent option, individuals aspiring to become ultrasound technicians you need to under formal training from the ultrasound technician schools. Basic criteria for the individual to attend the ultrasound technician schools would be to possess a high school diploma in hand along with good communication skills.
A few years back any treatment in the hospital would mean the physician examining the patient externally and prescribing the medicines accordingly. However, today there are facilities to internally access the patients' condition through ultrasound technology. Ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur CA train their students to perform this treatment. Here sound waves are passed through the patient's body to examine the organ at fault and to access the movement of the fetus inside the womb. As a common person, we would hear the term ultrasound many times in our day-to-day life.
The ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur CA train the aspiring prospective candidates to familiarize themselves to using the advanced ultrasound equipment for different types of imaging and the method of recording the images in paper for further reference of the physician. The students also have to undergo advanced study of human anatomy, medical terminology, physiology, ultrasound principles and procedures, mathematics and physics to name the basics. Proper care is another important subject to be studied by the technician as it is very essential to take utmost care of the patients who are already sick and proper positioning of the patients is required at the time of the sonography. Any wrong positioning of the patients can show an adverse imaging, which would affect the patient's future medication and treatment. This topic seems easy but is actually a very critical part of sonography and hence a very important course in Larkspur CA ultrasound technician schools.
Average Ultrasound Technician Salaries:
Ultrasound Technician Salary Data by BLS.gov(2008). |
Administering the ultrasound machine is very important in the field of ultrasound technology as the main job revolves around the ultrasound machine. The sound waves generated by the machine are if high frequency and hence correct and proper usage of the machines is mandatory. This requires proper training and practical experience from recognized ultrasound technician schools in and around Larkspur CA. The technician gets a complete hang of the working of the equipment during this course and will be able to handle the machines with accuracy and ease while he enters the actual field of the job. The technician should also be able to read the imaging clearly and record the readings. All this is possible only when he had attended a formal ultrasound school.
The ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur CA offer a courses ranging from two to 4 years depending on the need of the technician. There are many recognized sonography schools in Larkspur CA for the technicians to choose. As the technician completes the course, he would have a bachelors or associates degree in ultrasound technology. Following the degree, the technician can also opt for specialization in various fields like cardio sonography, gynecology sonography, neuro sonography just to name a few. The technician can choose from the specialization of his choice and study the specialization in an accredited ultrasound tech school. The specialization would help him from the career front, as it would give him to work in the area of his choice successfully.
It is mandatory for the student technicians to pass the accreditation examination through their ultrasound technician schools by registering with the American Registry for Diagnostic Medical Sonography (ARDMS) .no matter how many degrees the technician has to his credit it is useless without passing the registration examination by ARDMS. Only this certificate is considered useful from the career front.
The main aim of these ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur is give first hand training, experience to the technicians, and prepare them to perform their job with utmost care and accuracy. Anything and everything that the student technician learns at the ultrasound diagnostic school would be useful and applicable practically from the first day at work in a hospital or diagnostic centre as an ultrasound technician.
In fact, we can see that the ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur are a huge boon for those people aspiring to become ultrasound technicians. These medical sonography schools also teach the technicians the skills of management, which will help them down the line in case they decide to start their own diagnostic centre. This is a very profitable business giving the opportunity to the technicians to work on their own along with a few assistants. Therefore, a good education from a good ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur CA is sure beneficial for individuals with such ideas.
The ultrasound technician schools offer a complete training to the technicians along with the necessary expertise in advanced science subjects essential as a part of the job. It is sufficient for the candidates to undergo the associate degree program in case they are looking to make a career as an entry level ultrasound technician but in case the technician is looking at making a senior level career in ultrasound technology it would be viable for him to take up the specialization courses offered by the ultrasound technician schools. By taking up the ultrasound technician school training program in Larkspur CA it also enables the technician to climb the career ladder and earn a handsome salary alongside.
These sonography ultrasound tech schools also provide up to date information about the latest technology and research in the field of ultrasound sonography enabling the students to learn the latest research and inventions in the area. This would help them to understand the various images they take and provide a clearer report on the imaging done. Sometimes the technicians are required to point out the abnormalities in the imaging done and all this is only possible when the technician attends a recognized a good ultrasound technician school in Larkspur CA.
In fact, there are many hospitals itself offering this kind of ultrasound technician school training in Larkspur CA to the technicians through their specialized ultrasound technician schools. These schools are very similar to the other ultrasound diagnostic programs and offer the same courses and training necessary for the aspiring technician. These students are often absorbed by the hospital itself as their staff. The main aim of such ultrasound technician schools in Larkspur CA would be to prepare the new technicians for their ultrasound department within their hospital premises.
Comments are closed.


text:
Websites use cookies to help them remember things. Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer or mobile phone when you browse websites. We need cookies to make our website work and allow us to show you the right version of our website.
For more information, ask your parents to visit our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.


text:
Discover how a bimodal integration strategy can address the major data management challenges facing your organization today.
Get the Report →Natively Connect to Spark Data in PHP
Create PHP applications on Linux/UNIX machines with connectivity to Spark data. Leverage the native support for ODBC in PHP.
Drop the CData ODBC Driver for Apache Spark into your LAMP or WAMP stack to build Spark-connected Web applications. This article shows how to use PHP's ODBC built-in functions to connect to Spark data, execute queries, and output the results.
Using the CData ODBC Drivers on a UNIX/Linux Machine
The CData ODBC Drivers are supported in various Red Hat-based and Debian-based systems, including Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora. There are also several libraries and packages that are required, many of which may be installed by default, depending on your system. For more information on the supported versions of Linux operating systems and the required libraries, please refer to the "Getting Started" section in the help documentation (installed and found online).
Installing the Driver Manager
Before installing the driver, check that your system has a driver manager. For this article, you will use unixODBC, a free and open source ODBC driver manager that is widely supported.
For Debian-based systems like Ubuntu, you can install unixODBC with the APT package manager:
$ sudo apt-get install unixodbc unixodbc-dev
For systems based on Red Hat Linux, you can install unixODBC with yum or dnf:
$ sudo yum install unixODBC unixODBC-devel
The unixODBC driver manager reads information about drivers from an odbcinst.ini file and about data sources from an odbc.ini file. You can determine the location of the configuration files on your system by entering the following command into a terminal:
$ odbcinst -j
The output of the command will display the locations of the configuration files for ODBC data sources and registered ODBC drivers. User data sources can only be accessed by the user account whose home folder the odbc.ini is located in. System data sources can be accessed by all users. Below is an example of the output of this command:
DRIVERS............: /etc/odbcinst.ini
SYSTEM DATA SOURCES: /etc/odbc.ini
FILE DATA SOURCES..: /etc/ODBCDataSources
USER DATA SOURCES..: /home/myuser/.odbc.ini
SQLULEN Size.......: 8
SQLLEN Size........: 8
SQLSETPOSIROW Size.: 8
Installing the Driver
You can download the driver in standard package formats: the Debian .deb package format or the .rpm file format. Once you have downloaded the file, you can install the driver from the terminal.
The driver installer registers the driver with unixODBC and creates a system DSN, which can be used later in any tools or applications that support ODBC connectivity.
For Debian-based systems like Ubuntu, run the following command with sudo or as root:
$ dpkg -i /path/to/package.deb
For Red Hat systems or other systems that support .rpms, run the following command with sudo or as root:
$ rpm -i /path/to/package.rpm
Once the driver is installed, you can list the registered drivers and defined data sources using the unixODBC driver manager:
List the Registered Driver(s)
$ odbcinst -q -d
CData ODBC Driver for Apache Spark
List the Defined Data Source(s)
$ odbcinst -q -s
CData SparkSQL Source
To use the CData ODBC Driver for Apache Spark with unixODBC, ensure that the driver is configured to use UTF-16. To do so, edit the INI file for the driver (cdata.odbc.sparksql.ini), which can be found in the lib folder in the installation location (typically /opt/cdata/cdata-odbc-driver-for-sparksql), as follows:
DriverManagerEncoding = UTF-16
Modifying the DSN
The driver installation predefines a system DSN. You can modify the DSN by editing the system data sources file (/etc/odbc.ini) and defining the required connection properties. Additionally, you can create user-specific DSNs that will not require root access to modify in $HOME/.odbc.ini.
Set the Server, Database, User, and Password connection properties to connect to SparkSQL.
/etc/odbc.ini or $HOME/.odbc.ini
[CData SparkSQL Source]
Driver = CData ODBC Driver for Apache Spark
Description = My Description
Server = 127.0.0.1
For specific information on using these configuration files, please refer to the help documentation (installed and found online).
Establish a Connection
Open the connection to Spark by calling the odbc_connect or odbc_pconnect methods. To close connections, use odbc_close or odbc_close_all.
$conn = odbc_connect("CData ODBC SparkSQL Source","user","password");
Connections opened with odbc_connect are closed when the script ends. Connections opened with the odbc_pconnect method are still open after the script ends. This enables other scripts to share that connection when they connect with the same credentials. By sharing connections among your scripts, you can save system resources and queries execute faster.
$conn = odbc_pconnect("CData ODBC SparkSQL Source","user","password");
odbc_close($conn); //persistent connection must be closed explicitly
Create Prepared Statements
Create prepared statements and parameterized queries with the odbc_prepare function.
$query = odbc_prepare($conn, "SELECT * FROM Customers WHERE Country = ?");
Execute Queries
Execute prepared statements with odbc_execute.
$conn = odbc_connect("CData ODBC SparkSQL Source","user","password");
$query = odbc_prepare($conn, "SELECT * FROM Customers WHERE Country = ?");
$success = odbc_execute($query, array('US'));
Execute nonparameterized queries with odbc_exec.
$conn = odbc_connect("CData ODBC SparkSQL Source","user","password");
$query = odbc_exec($conn, "SELECT City, Balance FROM Customers");
Process Results
Access a row in the result set as an array with the odbc_fetch_array function.
$conn = odbc_connect("CData ODBC Spark data Source","user","password");
$query = odbc_exec($conn, "SELECT City, Balance FROM Customers");
while($row = odbc_fetch_array($query)){
echo $row["City"] . "\n";
Display the result set in an HTML table with the odbc_result_all function.
$conn = odbc_connect("CData ODBC Spark data Source","user","password");
$query = odbc_prepare($conn, "SELECT * FROM Customers WHERE Country = ?");
$success = odbc_execute($query, array('US'));
More Example Queries
You will find complete information on the SQL queries supported by the driver in the help documentation. The code examples above are Spark-specific adaptations of the PHP community documentation for all ODBC functions.


text:
This giveaway includes women's coffee run gloves, an eclipse StudioLux sports bra, black pants, a head wrap AND Speed Form shoes... This is a HUGE giveaway! Approximately a $250 prize! And this stuff is the best.
I love the way this gear washes up! Not only to I look good while I am running, but I also feel good. The sweat wicking material keeps me dry and warm!
Under Armour is a brand the inspires and motivates! There are many featured athletes who represent Under Armour. Our (my son and my) favorite Under Armour athlete is Steph Curry.
What is on your Fitness Bucket List? #FitBucketList
a Rafflecopter giveaway


text:
photo by blakevond
Buy, sell, and discover fashion, home decor, beauty, and more
Sign up now and join millions of people on the social marketplace for all things style
brand spotlight
Most Searched Brands This Week
trending now
popular collections
discover the community
Poshmark is more than just a shopping destination, it's a vibrant community powered by millions of sellers who not only sell their personal style, but also curate looks for their shoppers, creating one of the most connected shopping experiences in the world. Join us!
how it works
01list it
Closet full of clothes you never wear? Snap a photo, price it, and list it in less than 60 seconds—right from your phone!
02share it
Share listings to your network for shoppers to discover! More sharing = more sales.
03earn cash
Shipping is easy with our pre-paid label, and you'll get cash in your pocket when the item is delivered!
we've got your back
expedited shipping
All orders ship via USPS priority mail. With our pre-paid label, shipping has never been easier!
Learn Morefree authentication
Shop with confidence! Posh Authenticate offers free authentication on luxury items.
Learn More


text:
Ben Lewis' new film of that name is showing at the Trebica Film Festival in New York at the end of April. (Photo: see comment below)
Lewis writes a good (long) essay about the movie in this month's UK Prospect magazine. He looks at what function jokes played under communist regimes. It's not just about resistance, apparently.
Jokes, in deepest commie days, were seen as dangerous by paranoids like Joe Stalin.
Levis writes:
'Historian Roy Medvedev looked through the files of Stalin's political prisoners and concluded that 200,000 people were imprisoned for telling jokes, such as this: Three prisoners in the gulag get to talking about why they are there. "I am here because I always got to work five minutes late, and they charged me with sabotage," says the first. "I am here because I kept getting to work five minutes early, and they charged me with spying," says the second. "I am here because I got to work on time every day," says the third, "and they charged me with owning a western watch." '
Which reminds me of a joke Poles used to tell about the militia (government sponsored thugs) in the late 1970's.
Man comes up to very stupid looking young guy from the militia. "Excuse me Sir, but have you got the time?"
Militia thug peers at his brand new digital watch. He goes on staring at the watch for about half a minute, his forehead creased in concentration, his lips moving silently all the while.
Finally the man gets fed up waiting. "Is there something wrong with your watch?" he asks.
"No, no," says the militia, "I'm just having a bit of trouble dividing 7:24."
Boom, boom!
That's the thing about communist jokes – they just ain't that funny. Which is surprising when you think how utterly ridiculous, sidesplittingly hilarious the communist authorities' economic 'policies' were.
Maybe that's it: the jokes were the serious antidote to the very funny horror of reality.


text:
If you would like to support Anoka Community Mission, Please click donate button.
Anoka Community Mission (ACM) is a non-denominational, faith-based, and Christ-centered, social needs 501c3 non-profit organization that seeks to demonstrate the love of God to its surrounding geographical community through the intentional meeting of people's physical, emotional, spiritual, and social needs. ACM operates according to a sustainable ministry model with a "teach people how to fish" philosophy of ministry. This is done primarily through providing affordable, Christ-centered childcare at Little Blessings of Anoka Early Childhood Learning Center. ACM gathers and re-purposes donated resources from the surrounding area to provide private financial aid and practical material assistance to families in the Anoka area concerning their childcare needs. Support for families ranges from financial education and childcare scholarships to family personal hygiene items, meals, and donated food items. All assistance is given with compassion, grace, accountability, and dignity.
Click on the icons below to learn more about our ministries that support our community. We invite you to get to know us!
Click on the icons below to learn more about our ministries that support our community. We invite you to get to know us!
In accordance with federal law and the U.S. Department of Agriculture policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability.
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call toll free (866) 632-9992 (Voice). Individuals who are hearing impaired or have speech disabilities may contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339; or (800) 845-6136 (Spanish). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.


text:
Business Ethics
Business Ethics
Bluebird is committed to principles of business
ethics and lawful conduct.
On the basis of Bluebird way which stands for Transparency, Expertise and Devotion, our Code of Business Ethics expresses the
high standard of integrity that we require from our employees in conducting the Company's business.
Employees must at all times comply with Bluebird's Code of Business Ethics and related
guidelines. Conducting business with responsibility is critical to the continuing development of a
business that is successful and sustainable in the long term.
If you know of or suspect any unlawful or unethical situation, or know of or suspect a violation of any provision of our Code of Business Ethics,
you may report your concern by using Bluebird Ethics Line. Your report can be anonymous, and all such reports will be treated in a confidential
manner. By reporting misconduct, you help contribute to the ethical culture at Bluebird.
Report a Concerns
Bluebird Ethical Audit
3F, 115, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu,
Seoul, Republic of Korea (06355)
Bluebird Ethical Audit
Code of Ethics
We, Bluebird, intends to be trusted corporate through fair and transparent
management and active participation in the practice of the Code of Ethics.
1. We must retain our dignity as Bluebird employees and make efforts to maintain the company's reputation. | |
2. We must contribute to the improvement of the rights and interests of our customers and to the development of regional communities. | |
3. We must protect the confidentiality acquired in relation to businesses for individual interests or other purposes and preserve fairness and trust throughout all business relations. | |
4. We must be devoted to establishing a fair and transparent culture based on high ethical values and expertise through self-development and active learning. | |
5. We must not become engaged in activities in which there are conflicts of interests between the company and individual, and make efforts to achieve mutual trust. | |
6. We must try to contribute to regional communities and human society through responsible corporate activities. | |
7. We must make every effort to realize the above Code of Ethics, establish separate Ethical Rules, and make public announcements. |