text:
Saturday, December 29, 2012
What Exactly Do You Want From Me?
44 comments:
- Unknown said...
This posting is quite interesting, I have been in a YouTube discussion on Father Barrons (Fr. B) channel "Against the YouTube Heresies" with Fr. B and a user by the name of Philip from the UK. Fr. B and Philip defend the Catholic faith and I am atheist. Fr. B rigorously defends the argument from contingency.
Fr. B claims to have an S.T.D. (not the sexually transmitted disease) from the Institut Catholique de Paris. Philip was intelligent but apparently did not have a formal education in Philosophy or Theology. I have a minor in Philosophy with three terms of Philosophy of Religion. I could assert that we are epistemic peers.
I successfully defeated their contingency argument by showing that even if there is a necessary non-contingency grounding of contingency that does not lead to a triune God. My first argument was that if there is one non-contingency then there are many (Aristotle's third man argument). My second line of attack ,the cosmological argument does not get you to a God by itself, there has to be a successful ontological argument also (Gale 238, On the Nature and Existence of God). Neither Fr. B or Philip was able to develop this line of thinking (I did write a combined cosmological and ontological argument that lead to a conclusion that some sort of Deity was possible).
The conclusion to the exercise was for Fr. B to retreat without admitting defeat. Sharing evidence did not change any beliefs, neither theirs or mine. There is "Reasonable Religious Disagreements" (Feldman). - December 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM
- Ron Cram said...
Hi Matt,
You ask a number of interesting questions. I will give you my personal opinion.
1. Do you think 1) that once all the relevant arguments, evidence, and background issues are adequately considered, a reasonable person is obligated to conclude that God is real, or that Jesus was resurrected from the dead, or some other central tenets of modern orthodox monotheism are true?
No. I do not believe it is possible to prove the existence of God in a final sense. I do think it is possible to show that belief in the existence of God is reasonable is probably the best explanation for all the evidence as a whole.
2. Or do you think 2) that once all the relevant arguments, evidence, and background issues are adequately considered, it is epistemically permissible for a reasonable person to believe that God is real, or that Jesus was resurrected from the dead, or some other central tenets of modern orthodox monotheism?
Yes. Based on all the available evidence, it is reasonable to believe God is real, the creator of the universe who came to earth in the person of Jesus Christ and rose from the dead.
3. Do you think that I have made some serious error with regard to the total available evidence concerning God and that I ought to change my mind?
First, I do not think you are in possession of all the available evidence. That is not meant to be insulting. I don't think anyone is in possession of all the available evidence.
Second, yes I think it possible you have made an error or two. For example, if you think any of the Incompatible Properties Arguments put forward by Drange are valid, then you are mistaken.
Third, certainly I would like to see you change your mind in the same way Anthony Flew, CS Lewis, Francis Collins, Alister McGrath, Allan Sandage and Lee Strobel have. Since I do not believe absolute proof of God's existence is possible, I would advise you to consider taking Pascal's Wager - as Allan Sandage did - and the doubts then go away.
Are you willing to follow the evidence wherever it leads? - December 29, 2012 at 12:04 PM
- Unknown said...
The only reason an apologist can deny the incompatability of immutability vs. omniscience, is they have the option to change the meaning of each predicate. This is theology gerrymandering.
Pascal starts from a position of metaphysical ignorance. We just don't know anything beyond the realm of experience. The set-up of the wager presumes that we do know something. The wager is a prudential concept like flood insurance. PS, I would be really impressed if you can explain how Pascal solved the problem of the points.
- December 29, 2012 at 3:24 PM
- Ron Cram said...
Hello Bob,
I see you approve of the immutability vs omniscience argument. This argument fails because the nature of God and timelessness is misunderstood. You claim the only way to defeat the argument is to change the definitions of the predicates. i disagree. The only way to confirm the argument is to be able to show the definitions used are consistent with clear statements from the Bible or with the majority of Christian theologians.
Let's begin with the argument as Drange presented it:
1. If God exists, then he is immutable.
2. If God exists, then he is omniscient.
3. An immutable being cannot know different things at different times.
4. To be omniscient, a being would need to know propositions about the past and future.
5. But what is past and what is future keep changing.
6. Thus, in order to know propositions about the past and future, a being would need to know different things at different times (from 5).
7. It follows that, to be omniscient, a being would need to know different things at different times (from 4 and 6).
8. Hence, it is impossible for an immutable being to be omniscient (from 3 and 7).
9. Therefore, it is impossible for God to exist (from 1, 2, and 8).
The usual place at which this argument is attacked is its premise 4. It is claimed that a timeless being can know everything there is to know without knowing propositions about the past and future. Consider the following two propositions as examples:
A. The origin of the planet earth is in the past.
B. The end (or destruction) of the planet earth is in the future.
The claim is that a timeless being need not know propositions A and B in order to know everything there is to know, because such a being could know the exact dates of both the origin and the end of the earth and that would suffice for complete knowledge. That is, A and B would be "covered," and so it would not be necessary for the omniscient being to know A and B in addition to those dates.
But, of course, this claim can be challenged. To know the dates of the origin and the end of the earth does not entail knowing propositions A and B. To know A and B requires being situated within time (somewhere between the origin and end of the earth), so they are not anything that a timeless being could know. However, they certainly are things that an omniscient being must know. Thus, the given objection to premise 4 of the argument above is a failure.
End Quote
Premise 1 and 2 are fine.
Premise 3 is the first problem. It is nonsensical. It is not required by either logic or the Bible. It is not claimed by any Christian theologian. It is simply wrong.
Premise 4 is fine.
Premise 5 is unclear. Is this claiming that what is past and future is changing because as time passes, things once in the future are now in the past? If so, this is not a problem for a God who is timeless and knows everything that has happened or will happen within the spacetime we call our universe.
Premise 6 is completely muddled. A timeless God, while able to invade our spacetime, is not under the restraints of spacetime as we are. No Christian theologian in the history of the church has ever claimed God was under the restraints of time. If he was under the restraints of time, then he would not be omnipotent.
The argument is fatally flawed. It rests on an improper, unbiblical and non-theological view of God. Any argument that wishes to disprove the existence of the God of the Bible has to define God's attributes consistent with clear statements in the Bible or at least consistent with teaching agreed upon by Christian theologians.
Not a single one of Drange's arguments holds up to the slightest scrutiny.
- December 29, 2012 at 6:31 PM
- Ron Cram said...
I skimmed through the paper by Feldman you linked. It was an interesting read. Here's my position on the question:
When analyzing all of the evidence for God's existence and all of the evidence against his existence, there are four possible positions.
1. God's existence is proven fact.
2. God's non-existence is proven fact.
3. God's existence is not proven but is reasonable and I choose to believe it. (theist)
4. God's existence is unknown and possibly unknowable. (agnostic)
The final two position are reasonable.
The first two positions are unreasonable. I say they are unreasonable because in the history of philosophy no one has succeeded in proving either God's existence or his non-existence. As Feldman says, reasonable people can sometimes take unreasonable positions. - December 29, 2012 at 8:51 PM
- Unknown said...
You must have big cojones or be incredible naïve, to think that a PhD that wrote the entry for Atheism in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, would not under Pascal Wager, or the justification of knowledge regarding beliefs.
In a general philosophy of religion discussion, you cannot assume that your audience regards any
scripture as authoritative. Therefore... It is not appropriate to cite scripture or the Biblical God in an argument. Drange, as a philosopher, understands the standard theist conception of God. Therefore, Drange's argument is not only valid it is sound.
You have confirmed my criticism of apologetics. Apologist can define or redefine Gods attributes at will.
Please explain how Pascal and Fermat solved the problem of the points.
- December 29, 2012 at 10:31 PM
- Ron Cram said...
I am not familiar with the problem of the points.
Your first sentence is confusing. I believe a word or two may be missing, but I must admit to both charges. I have large cojones and I am sometimes naive. But I am not wrong on this argument.
Regarding sentence two, I am not assuming Matt has any regard for scripture. I am assuming he, and you, understand a straw man argument is invalid. You cannot say "Here is what Christians believe..." and then tear down the argument without making certain you state the Christian argument correctly. Drange has failed to understand the nature of God and timelessness.
Again, I am not attempting to redefine God's attributes. I am stating clearly that Drange has misunderstood them. If you believe Dranage has it write, then point to passages from the Bible or Christian theologians who use Drange's definition. You have thousands of years of church history and theological writings to use to show Drange's definition was held prior to my arriving on the scene. You cannot do it. Because you cannot do it, the argument fails. - December 30, 2012 at 5:29 AM
- Ron Cram said...
I hate homonyms when I'm typing quickly!
write=right - December 30, 2012 at 5:35 AM
- Unknown said...
Pascal is the father of probability. The points is an ancient problem in game theory. Anyone who is interested in the history of mathematics and probability will study the solution. I bring it up, because it shows how to think critically.
As a student of Philosophy, I do not consider any scripture as authoritative. Therefore, if you want to argue about God and time, you need to cite Boethius (c. 475-525), in his works The Consolation of Philosophy or Professor Wolterstorff's essay God Everlasting.
Epicurus (341-270 BCE) is credited with the first argument from evil. You fail to understand that Christianity is directly related to Hellenistic Athens (all extant MSS of the NT are written in Greek). If you read Augustine it is obvious he is a Neo-Platonist and Neo-Platonism was a major influence on Christian Theology.
Drange received his PhD from Cornell in 1963 and has been teaching Philosophy since 1960. I would bet on Drange knowing a hell of a lot more about matters of God than you do. - December 30, 2012 at 10:02 AM
- Unknown said...
Categorical Syllogism
1. All God's attributes are self-consistent. (∀x)(Ax ⊃ Cx)
2. Some predicates are not self-consistent (∃x)(Px ⋅ ~ Cx)
∴ 3. Some predicates are not God's attributes (∃x)(Px ⋅ ~Ax)
Mood and figure : AOO- 2 (Valid)
This argument is easily shown to be deductively valid in classical first order logic.
All God's attributes are self-consistent
Some predicates (omniscience, omnipotent, etc) are not self-consistent
Therefore, At least one predicate (omniscience) is not an attribute.
Since it can be shown that omnipotence is inconsistent, the God of theism is inconsistent and therefore God does not exist.
Can God create a being that knows' something that He God does not know? - December 30, 2012 at 10:22 AM
- Ron Cram said...
Regarding your comment at 10:02 am, you wrote:
"As a student of Philosophy, I do not consider any scripture as authoritative."
I don't expect you to accept scripture as authoritative. As a student of philosophy, I would expect you would understand my earlier explanation. If Drange is trying to disprove the God of the Bible, and he is, then he has to use definitions from the Bible or accepted Christian theology. If he fails to do that, he is using a straw man argument which is not valid. I am surprised you cannot grasp this simple point.
If Drange wants to disprove the Gods of Boethius or Wolterstorff or Epicurus, he is welcome to do that and he must use their definitions of God's attributes. You cannot expect Christians to be interested in the discussion because the discussion does not affect their beliefs. - December 30, 2012 at 1:49 PM
- Ron Cram said...
You write:
Categorical Syllogism
1. All God's attributes are self-consistent. (∀x)(Ax ⊃ Cx)
2. Some predicates are not self-consistent (∃x)(Px ⋅ ~ Cx)
∴ 3. Some predicates are not God's attributes (∃x)(Px ⋅ ~Ax)
The problem is that #2 cannot be shown. Check the history of philosophy. Every attempt has failed. - December 30, 2012 at 1:51 PM
- Ron Cram said...
Regarding you comment "Can God create a being that knows' something that He God does not know?"
This reminds me of the classic question "Can God create a rock so big he cannot lift it?"
Pure sophism. - December 30, 2012 at 1:54 PM
- Unknown said...
You do not understand the difference between Philosophy and Theology? Drange, Rowe, Gale, Everitt, and Martin are philosophers writing philosophy books and essays. What makes you think that any of them is setting up a straw man argument just to attack the triune God of Christianity? You obviously cut and pasted Drange's argument from http://www.philoonline.org/library/drange_1_2.htm. There is nothing in this paper that suggest he is directly arguing from the stand point of a Christian God. He is a philosopher and his arguments are well understood in the Philosophy of Religion community. The theistic God is well understood from the philosophers worldview, this is the God that Drange, et al are arguing.
You should define with precise attributes your concept of what ever God you are talking about. Are you using God as a proper name or a title, is he/she a triune God, is your God eternal or everlasting? After you have provided such a characterization of what you are referring, show some evidence such that an entity is an actual metaphysical reality.
My reply to your objection to my premise #2, which btw was support only by an opinion.
1. God essentially knows all and believes only true propositions (omniscience)
2. God essentially does not change from one time to another in respect to any nonrelational property (immutability).
3. There are true temporal indexical propositions (A-Prop) to the effect that certain events and or times are now past, present or future.
4. It is conceptually impossible for a timeless being to know an A-Prop.
5. God (by definition is timeless and eternal) does not know every true proposition (from 3 and 4)
Premises1 and 5 are a contradiction, God is and is not omniscient. (Gale 58, On the Nature and Existence of God).
My question regarding "Can God create" is not the paradox of the stone. A suitable defense has been given to the paradox, in that God can only do what is logically possible. There is nothing logically impossible about God creating a being that knows more than him. So how do you answer the question?
I have taken three terms of Philosophy of Religion, there is always at least one Christian who like you just can not get their head around the traditional idea of Western Theism and Atheism.
- December 30, 2012 at 3:46 PM
- Ron Cram said...
I have not read anything from Drange except the link provided by Matt. I have no idea what God Drange may or may not have been trying to refute. But Matt is obviously trying to refute the God of the Bible. His book is titled Atheism: The Case Against Christ. So it is ridiculous to try and argue that the God of the Bible is not the God in question. If the God of the Bible was not the God in question, then I would not even be here.
To answer your question, God can only do what is logically possible. Since God knows all, it is impossible for him to create a creature that knows more than he does.
I had really hoped I would get a higher level of discussion from this website. - December 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM
- Ron Cram said...
Since I really do want a higher level of discourse, I will help you think through your options.
My point regarding the immutability vs omniscience argument is that Drange has misunderstood the nature of God and timelessness. Here's your choices:
1. If you still think the argument is valid, then find some passage in the Bible that shows God is restrained by time... or find statements by Christian theologians that say the same thing. This is the only way to advance this particular argument.
2. If you still think the argument is valid but do not have the time to locate the needed passages, then say so and put the argument aside until you have the data in hand. Until you have the data, you can move on to your next strongest argument and we can discuss that argument.
3. If you see my point and do not believe it is possible to find passages in the Bible or in Christian theology saying God is restrained by time, then you can concede the point and move on to your next strongest argument. - December 30, 2012 at 4:15 PM
- Unknown said...
Quoting you "if you think any of the Incompatible Properties Arguments put forward by Drange are valid, then you are mistaken." and "I have not read anything from Drange", so you admit that you had an ad hoc bias and are epistemic bankrupt.
Why don't you directly refute Dr. McCormick, instead of just making up a bunch of non-sense. - December 30, 2012 at 4:17 PM
- Unknown said...
I referenced Augustine, Boethius and Wolterstorff's all Christian Theologians, which I have read and who address the concept of God and time. I understand their argument, but you sir do not! I have also read Aquinas, Anslem, Descartes and Hume. I have a basic understanding of Tertullian (160-230 CE) ( I believe it because it is impossible) and fideism, the belief that faith is independent of reason, in contrast to the more rationalistic tradition of natural theology."What indeed has Athens to do with Jerusalem?" This question of the relationship between reason—here represented by Athens—and faith—represented by Jerusalem.
Please show how the Bible and/or scripture is authoritative.
Finding something in Dr. McCormick book that you can actually argue against.
- December 30, 2012 at 4:37 PM
- Ron Cram said...
Each time you answer you fail to deal with the arguments I lay out. I have already admitted I am a Christian so, of course, I come to the discussion with a bias. So does Matt and so do you. My arguments are not bankrupt. You have just failed to consider them.
You have mentioned Augustine, Boethius and Wolterstorff, but you have not cited any passage by them that says God is restrained by time. And, even if such a passage was found, the requirement I set out was that the teaching had to be held by a majority of Christian theologians. There was much error in early Christian theology on some very basic issues. Several councils had to be called to hammer out basic issues such as the divinity of Christ and the Trinity. The possibility of God ever being constrained by time never made into one of these councils because there was never a time when enough people taught the position for it to be controversial.
The issue is not that the Bible is authoritative for your life. The issue is that the Bible is authoritative for what Christians believe. If you want to refute a Christian idea, you have to define it the way Christians define it. If not, you are refuting a straw man argument and your goal is not achieved. Why is that so difficult for you to understand? - December 30, 2012 at 5:14 PM
- Unknown said...
The first comment on this thread, details a YouTube discussion I had with a Catholic priest and another user. In that post I asserted that we were epistemic peers. During a very long dialog the Bible was not discussed or was an issue.
Regarding Augustine, et al, I am not going to your homework for you. A few comments ago, I challenged you to give some attributes of your Christian God and provide some supporting evidence of such a Deity.
I am only arguing in favor of a philosophical position of atheism. How can I setup a straw man position when I don't have any idea what your Christian belief systems entails.
At this point I would not consider you a peer. If you want to continue this thread, you can start by answering a couple of basic questions: 1) What do you believe and 2) why do you believe it.
- December 30, 2012 at 10:04 PM
- David Evans said...
Here's where I think Drange's argument fails.
If God is timeless and omnipresent, then time to him is like another dimension of space (cf the block universe of special relativity). Thus propositions such as
#1 "Christmas 2012 is now past" (uttered today by me) have the same status as
#2 "Edinburgh is to the North of me".
It's clear that #2 could be true, and known by me, but it could not be known by God, because its truth is relative to the person uttering it. What God can know is its non-relative equivalent
#2a "Edinburgh is to the North of David Evans".
In the same way God can know the non-relative version of #1, which is
#1a "Christmas 2012 is at an earlier time than the time when David Evans uttered #1" - December 31, 2012 at 5:51 AM
- Matt McCormick said...
I appreciate the time and thought that many of you are putting into this conversation. There is, in fact, a deep tradition of philosophers engaging in deductive atheology, or arguing that various properties alleged to be possessed by God are either internally incoherent or they are logically incompatible with some other property. At least since the Middle Ages, these debates have led theologians and philosophers to improve on their descriptions of what sort of being God might possibly be. The well known Stone Paradox, for instance, has led the vast majority of people who take this project seriously to abandon the claim that God, if he exists, will have the power to anything, including logically possible acts. The widespread conclusion among theologians, philosophers, believers, and non-believers, is that we must restrict omnipotence to mean the power to do anything that is logically possible (at the least.) But even beyond this revision, numerous problems have been uncovered with this new definition. Currently, the state of the discipline is in some chaos because we do not have a plausible account of omnipotence that is both suitably powerful to be attributed to God and that does not fall prey to serious counter examples and logical problems.
So if omnipotence by itself is currently a mess, you can imagine how difficult it will be for theists to argue that omnipotence combined with some other properties are consistent, plausible descriptions of God. And so goes it with several other properties. Drange's article, which is now a bit dated, is intended to be just a brief overview of the sorts of arguments we have in a vast literature. I'm not surprised that some of you find his definitions to be uncharitable. I use this paper to prompt my undergraduate students to write papers, and it serves as a good, provocative jumping off point. The bigger challenge for the theist is to come up with a broader, coherent description of this supernatural being that he thinks is real. This description must fit with the rest of the a priori and a posteriori facts as we know them, it must be internally consistent, it needs to be sufficiently superlative to warrant the "God" label," and, one would hope, it would have some semblance to the supernatural being that billions of traditional believers have advocated for centuries. My own take is that this project fails miserably on everyone of these fronts, and it is very rare that I find someone who knows this literature who disagrees. Not only do we not have sufficient evidence to think that God is real, we don't even have a description of such a being that makes sense. But that, as you can imagine, is a huge conversation. I have touched on it many times on this blog over the years. Here are a few other relevant posts. I also touch on it some in my recent book:
http://www.provingthenegative.com/2009/06/philosophical-atheism-bibliography.html - December 31, 2012 at 8:30 AM
- Unknown said...
Your statement: God is timeless and omnipresent. This statement is contrary. They both can not be true but both can be false.
Wolterstorff (God Everlasting) states God is temporal and not eternal in the strict theological tradition. He defends a position that God is everlasting. A different concept of an eternity is simply to be everlasting, existing in time but having neither a beginning nor end. God is fundamentally non-eternal (God Everlasting). Wolterstroff's discussion demonstrates God has a time-strand and his life and existence is itself temporal. Wolterstroff's thinking is in the traditional Christian theistic view that God's relationship to mankind is temporal, spatial, and anthropomorphic.
Drange's argument is immutability vs omniscience not timeless vs. omnipresent. If Wolterstorff's characterization is true then Drange's argument is sound because God can not be immutable and omniscient. - December 31, 2012 at 8:54 AM
- Brad Lencioni said...
Great way to frame the issue, Prof. McCormick!
I have a question, though: Given the Judeo/Christian/Islamic worldviews, and the vital importance of belief in the correct God they entail (see God's commandments!), Isn't anything but option (1) out of bounds on this issue? I.e., if it is a toss-up, and both "epistemically permissible" (EP) to believe neither in Jesus's resurrection nor God, but also just EP to believe in Jesus and God, then it seems the "problem of evil" becomes relevant and tips the scale of rationality towards non-belief (because of the contradiction between the theists definition of 'God' as both omnibenevolent and as a condemner of atheists to eternal Hell for holding epistemically permissible beliefs, and for convincing others to adopt their pagan rationality).
I.e., there appears no rational middle ground if theism is viewed seriously, given the detailed nature and (moral) seriousness of the theists proposed worldview; the theists needs a knock-down, home run of an argument, or else theism (and the Judeo/Christian/Islamic tradition) just seems to be one large cosmic conspiracy theory (and, rationally, almost certainly a false one at that).
(Note: I don't think it's acceptable to refer to epistemic skepticism, and the inability to fully understand God's will, to escape the problem of evil's headlock—I'm talkin' to you William Lane Craig!)
- December 31, 2012 at 10:22 AM
- Unknown said...
Professor Kirby, who is a secular humanist, thinks theist do have an epistemic right to their beliefs. If we take William James' 'Will to Believe", Richard Taylor on Faith, Wittgenstein's fideism, Plantinga on reformed epistemology seriously then Christians can not be considered insane. If two people are epistemic peers, say a student of philosophy and a seminarian student, the best that can be hoped for is a reasonable disagreement.
The problem is the everyday lay Christians (fundamentalist or liberal) does not defend their faith, with the justification for their beliefs with an understanding of the above mentioned source of knowledge. For the most part Christians just base their defense on the Bible or by God did it and that is that. Those Christians are delusional , suffer from cognitive dissonance and could be considered insane.
- December 31, 2012 at 1:04 PM
- Brad Lencioni said...
Hmm... Bob, I think you misinterpreted my comment.
To sum it it up, I argue essentially that the (Christian) Monotheist has an enormous burden of proof resting on his shoulders, and "epistemically permisible" does not seem to cut it; anything less than "rational obligation" triggers the "problem of evil", which then obligates one, rationally, to dismiss (Christian) theism.
If there is any reasonable "fogginess" over the existence of God, then God is either imaginary or Evil. (And so "once all the relevant arguments, evidence, and background issues are adequately considered...", then option (2) cannot be an option in this debate.)
Unless, of course, this POE is fatally flawed in some way (I know Prof. McCormick teaches a class dedicated to the POE, so hopefully he might weigh in on this). - December 31, 2012 at 2:37 PM
- Brad Lencioni said...
As a footnote, I take "epistemically permisible" to equal "plausability" or perhaps "logical possibility" and "rational obligation" to equal something like that of the belief that the Earth revolves around the sun--i.e. overwhelming rational evidence.
- December 31, 2012 at 2:46 PM
- Unknown said...
Hi Guys, Happy New Year!
We may as well start 2013 discussing theism versus atheism.
Dr. McCormick ends the first chapter of his book by stating:
We either have good reasons for thinking that Jesus came back from the dead or we don't. If we don't, as I allege, then Christianity is based on a grand mistake.
Dr. Richard Feynman says "I can live with doubt and uncertainty, it is more interesting to live not knowing than to live with answers that may be wrong".
A fundamentalist, my brother for example, will not except either of the above precepts. First, he has confirmation bias, and will only consider evidence that supports the God hypothesis. He does have a "rational obligation" (Brad) for his belief, and the justification is citing, as any smart theist would, what I call the big three Fs. Second, based on the three Fs he will assert that his answers to the ultimate concerns are true.
Here is my characterization of the big 3 F's: Feeling, Fact, and Faith.
Feeling : Religious experiences, for example the Self-authenticating witness of the Holy Spirit
Fact : Natural Theology, the cosmological, ontological, and teleological arguments.
Faith : Fideism, faith is in some sense independent of reason.
As atheist, we have sufficiently criticized each one of the three precepts. Unfortunately, any of the works of McCormick, Rowe, Gale, Everitt or Martin will be prima facie dismissed without consideration by the devout Christian. The theist will always have apologetic's and theodicy's.
My wife claims that I will never change my brothers mind. I agree, the least I can hope for is his retreat licking his wounds. One of the new Atheist (Harris, Hitchens ?) said you can not argue someone out of a position that they did not argue themselves into.
- January 1, 2013 at 11:15 AM
- Ron Cram said...
You write "Wolterstorff (God Everlasting) states God is temporal and not eternal in the strict theological tradition."
In making this statement you agree that Wolterstorff's position is not within the Christian tradition. Whether you are correctly representing Wolterstorff or not, I do not know. But I do know the Christian position on God's timelessness. The Christian position is logically consistent. You cannot take a random view by one theologian and claim it is the Christian position. It is a straw man argument. - January 2, 2013 at 8:07 AM
- Ron Cram said...
You write "Currently, the state of the discipline is in some chaos because we do not have a plausible account of omnipotence that is both suitably powerful to be attributed to God and that does not fall prey to serious counter examples and logical problems."
I cannot comment on the state of the discipline, but I can give you a Christian definition of omnipotence that I believe is unassailable.
God is able to do anything that is logically possible and is not contrary to his nature.
For example, the Bible makes it clear that God cannot lie. Being untruthful is contrary to God's nature.
Being the creator of time, God is not constrained by time. Omnipotence is an attribute that only applies to God.
If you show this definition of omnipotence is not logical consistent with his other attributes, please do so. - January 2, 2013 at 8:25 AM
- Ron Cram said...
David Evans,
You make a good comment. I agree completely. - January 2, 2013 at 8:27 AM
- Matt McCormick said...
There are lots of sources explaining the omnipotence problems. The definition that you're giving, Ron, has been widely rejected by philosophers for decades, perhaps centuries. Too many problems. I have discussed the issues in previous posts, and I have given a link to a bibliography with lots more sources. You'll have to do your homework. A good place to start would be the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy entries on omnipotence. Also Patrick Grim, Michael Martin, Drange, Sobel, Gale, Oppy, etc.
- January 2, 2013 at 9:18 AM
- Unknown said...
Good comment, however, you stated that "The Christian position is logically consistent", but did not assert what the position acutally is. In one of your previous post you said "The possibility of God ever being constrained by time never made into one of these councils". This seems to indicate that the Christian position is inconsistent.
Augustine, Boethius and Wolterstorff all have different claims regarding God, time, divine foreknowledge and how they justify freewill. Their postions are inconsistent.
- January 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM
- Unknown said...
RE: God is able to do anything that is logically possible and is not contrary to his nature.
This statement is an apologetics scape goat. It allows God to be anything, that anybody wants God to be. God can be defined at will.
RE: the Bible makes it clear that God cannot lie. Being untruthful is contrary to God's nature.
This statement indicates that hypostatic union of Jesus can not be true. If God can not lie, then if Jesus is God he can not lie, Jesus was not human, humans can lie.
RE: Being the creator of time, God is not constrained by time.
How is this logically possible? This needs to be developed into a logical argument. It can not be assert with out proof or evidence. - January 2, 2013 at 9:56 AM
- Ron Cram said...
Your answer is not helpful to me or to you or to anyone reading your blog.
If you provide me with a reason to reject the definition I have given, I will show what is wrong with your reason. That's how arguments work. Or are you afraid I will do exactly that?
- January 2, 2013 at 9:43 PM
- Ron Cram said...
You have spent a great deal of time looking at one side of the argument and no time looking at the other. Anthony Flew was a philosopher who knew all the arguments against God and wrote the book "There is No God." A years before he died, he changed his mind about God and wrote the book "There is a God."
I'm certain there is nothing new in the arguments presented here that was unknown to Anthony Flew. If Anthony was not persuaded by them, I see no reason to believe I will be.
You have made errors. I have attempted to point one or two of them out to you. Instead of attempting to further the argument, you say you are not going to do my homework. That comment does not fit the situation. If I was asking you to help me defend my side, it would be appropriate. I'm asking you to defend your side. You cannot tell me to do my homework to learn what your side it. It doesn't work that way.
You have failed to show what is wrong with my definition of the omnipotence of God. That debating style does not inspire confidence. - January 2, 2013 at 9:54 PM
- Ron Cram said...
After a brief email exchange with Nicholas Wolterstorff, I think I understand his viewpoint that God is everlasting but not out of time. I think the correct view point is more nuanced than that.
Time is a function of space and dimension. Just ask Einstein... or expert in general relativity.
When God created our spacetime in the Big Bang, God was outside of it and independent of it. God is not constrained by our spacetime.
2 Peter 3:8 says "But beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."
You do not have to accept this Bible verse as truth, but you do have to accept it as the historical position of the Christian Church.
The Christian position is that God is atemporal with regard to our spacetime. But that does not mean everything happens at once in heaven. The Bible does not speak of this issue clearly and so the Christian teaching on it has some flexibility, but I believe it makes sense for heaven to have an arrow of time without beginning or end. It is my guess most Christian theologians and philosophers would agree with this definition. - January 3, 2013 at 8:47 AM
- Matt McCormick said...
Wolterstorff, it appears to me, has made it clear that he is more committed to his religious convictions than believing those claims that are justified by reasoning. Reasoning is supposed to be subordinated to his Jesus beliefs, he maintains:
The result, I think, is that we cannot take him seriously if we are trying to figure out what's reasonable to believe. He's valuable, I suppose, for finding ways to sustain Christian beliefs in the face of all possible counter evidence and reasons, if you share that goal. But that precludes the rest of us from having any real rational exchange with him; he's left the playing field of rationality.
- January 3, 2013 at 9:36 AM
- Unknown said...
You clearly have done some homework.
But from a philosophy of religion position, not Christian theology there is a couple of problems with your posting:
1) It is circular. "When God created our spacetime in the Big Bang" you are assuming what your trying to prove.
2) We have been discussing God's attributes and have provide arguments that show that some predicates are inconsistent.
3) What is lacking in the thread is there is not evidence that is sufficient to demonstrate the certainty of a triune God.
One principle that is accepted throughout science and everyday life is that we should not believe in entities for which we have no evidence:
Let G = God exist.
Let P = God has confirmed his existence to man with conclusive evidence.
Gods confirmation is invalid/unsound, therefore the contrapostive is
Conclusion ¬G
- January 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM
- Ron Cram said...
You write:
"1) It is circular. "When God created our spacetime in the Big Bang" you are assuming what your trying to prove."
Not true. The argument is over whether God's attributes are compatible or incompatible. The argument itself assumes God exists for the purpose of trying to disprove his existence. If you want to refute the Christian position, you have to treat it honestly or you are refuting a straw man. I am simply explaining to you what the Christian position is.
2) We have been discussing God's attributes and have provide arguments that show that some predicates are inconsistent.
Not true. Arguments have been put forward but they fail as I have pointed out.
3) What is lacking in the thread is there is not evidence that is sufficient to demonstrate the certainty of a triune God.
True. Evidence for God's existence is lacking on this website, but that is not my fault. There is plenty of evidence for God's existence. That evidence is not found on these web pages. - January 3, 2013 at 1:37 PM
- Ron Cram said...
You write:
"One principle that is accepted throughout science and everyday life is that we should not believe in entities for which we have no evidence..."
You then go into an deductive proof which fails for several reasons. First, the standard is "conclusive conclusive." In the next post by Matt titled "Some Varieties of Disproof," he makes a case for a lower standard of evidence which I agree with. Secondly, your argument assumes you possess all knowledge and know that "conclusive evidence" (or possibly even "greater weight of evidence") for God's existence is not available. This is demonstrably false as rational people like Anthony Flew, Francis Collins, Allan Sandage, CS Lewis, Lee Strobel and many others have already been persuaded by the available evidence.
You should know that the history of philosophy is strewn with the attempts to disprove the existence of God. They have all failed.
- January 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM
- Ron Cram said...
Please explain your point of view to Bob. It was he who brought Wolterstorff into the conversation, not me. Although I invited Wolterstorff to comment here, I doubt he will.
More to the point, Matt, you have failed to engage any of the arguments I have made. Perhaps we should start with that. - January 3, 2013 at 1:51 PM
- Unknown said...
Dr. Matt, Ron,
When I cited Wolterstorff essay God Everlasting my point was to contrast his theology with Augustine and Boethius.
Matt's reponse was that Wolterstroff could not be taken seriously because of an ad hoc bias and he had left the playing field of rationality.
Dr. Matt's book Atheism and the Case Against Christ page 68 quotes Wolterstorff , " the Christian scholar ought to reject certain theories."
That does not say much about following the evidence where every it leads. - January 5, 2013 at 2:32 PM
- Unknown said...
This posting is quite interesting, I have been in a YouTube discussion on Father Barrons
http://thaimobileunit.com/ - December 13, 2013 at 12:37 AM


text:
{{#invoke:Template translation|renderTranslatedTemplate|template=PD Help Page/core}}
Special pages - Help | Merge history • New images • New pages • Preferences • Random page • Undelete • Watchlist |
Clicking on the My preferences link in the upper right while logged in allows you to change your preferences. You will be presented with the User profile section, as well as a bar of tabs across the top for changing other types of settings.
User profile
User profile
- Username: Your user name. Only bureaucrats can change your username, and the wiki must also have the Renameuser extension installed.
- User ID: A number assigned to your account when you created it (for example, if your number is 42 you are the 42nd user to sign up at this particular wiki). This number is used for internal purposes.
- Number of edits: How many edits you have made. Not all wikis will have this.
- Real name: If provided, this will be used for attribution (rather than using your username). Providing your real name is entirely optional. Some wikis do not have this option.
- E-mail: Your email address, if you have supplied one. You can also change or remove your address here.
- Nickname: When you sign your name (using
), what you enter here will be used at the start instead of a simple link to your user page. By default, anything you enter here will be wrapped with[[ ]]
; if you want to use special linking, enable Raw signatures (without automatic link). - Language: This controls what language the interface is displayed in. MediaWiki's default interface includes localisations for all supported languages, but this is not necessarily the case with extensions or custom skins. Page text will not be translated, nor will templates (unless the templates integrate text localisation).
Change password
To change your password, enter your old password in the first box and your new password in the last two. If you want this site to remember your login, check Remember my login on this computer. Note that this function requires you to have cookies enabled in your browser, and if your cookie is cleared or expires you will no longer be remembered.
If you have supplied an email address, you will need to click the verify address button in order to use these functions. You will receive an email; simply open it and follow the link to enable the following functions.
- E-mail me when a page I'm watching is changed
- E-mail me when my user talk page is changed
- E-mail me also for minor edits of pages
- Enable e-mail from other users
- Send me copies of emails I send to other users
From your preferences you can select what language you would like the interface to be in. Only the buttons like 'edit' and 'talk', in addition to a few pages in the sidebar, will be affected. The main text of the pages will not be changed by this for the vast majority of pages, although there are a few pages where it will, like some in the Wikimedia Meta Wiki.
Here you can choose the skin you want to use. You can preview the available skins before choosing them, by clicking on the (Preview) link next to each skin. Please refer to Help:Skins for more details.
Here you can control how mathematical equations described using the <math>
tag will be displayed. Mathematical formulae uploaded as images or written outside the math tag will not be affected by this setting. Note the math preferences will only be visible if Extension:Math is installed.
- Always render PNG
- Leave it as TeX (for text browsers)
Here you can determine how images will be displayed. Images displayed by direct pasting of a URL (if the wiki has it enabled) will not be affected by this setting.
- Limit images on image description pages to: This setting lets you choose how big image previews will be on the Image: pages. If you know what your current screen resolution is you may like to set this to one or two sizes smaller than your own screen. If you have a slow connection (such as dial-up) you may want to limit them to 320×240.
- Thumbnail size: Define how big you want thumbnails to appear. This setting will not affect thumbnails with dimensions determined by an editor, nor can it increase images beyond their original dimensions.
Date and time
The following is normally rendered depending on preferences:
[[2001-01-05]] (or [[2001]]-[[01-05]]) (with leading zeros) [[2001]] [[January 5]] ([[2001]] [[January 05]]) [[January 5]], [[2001]] ([[January 05]], [[2001]]) [[5 January]] [[2001]] ([[05 January]] [[2001]]) [[January 5]] ([[January 05]]) [[5 January]] ([[05 January]])
These are the settings to control editing pages, including the size of the edit box displayed, and whether to automatically watch pages that you have edited or created.
Recent changes
- Days to show in recent changes: Here you can specify how far back the recent changes pages will go. Note that the list will stop prematurely if the number of edits is exceeded (see below).
- Number of edits to show in recent changes: Here you can specify how many edits should be displayed.
- Hide minor edits in recent changes: This enables you to hide edits marked as minor (see Help:Editing pages). Since some users will rapidly make a lot of tiny tweaks to update templates or fix spelling errors you may find enabling this to be useful. You can also turn this on temporarily from the recent changes page (see Help:Tracking changes).
These are the settings to control the behaviour of the watchlist (See Help:Watchlist). Most of these options are also available on the watchlist display itself, but by setting them in your preferences, you control the default behaviour of the watchlist i.e., it will perform the same actions every time you visit the page.
Default settings for searches including how many results to display and how much context to show for each result. Check the boxes next to the namespaces which you want to show up, the first time that you search for something. You can override this when doing an actual search, by checking or unchecking the boxes at the bottom of the search results screen.
This section includes those settings which do not fall under another category, such as page numbering and justification.
See also
Language: | English |

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Instagram sharing app Instagraph gets priced, available later today for Windows Phone 8
The wait is over. Instagraph, the unofficial Instagram posting client for Windows Phone 8, will be available to be downloaded in the Store within the next 12-24 hours as it has now been published.
The app does have a nominal price of $2.49 with no free trial to help support the server investment by the developers. Currently, only Windows Phone 8 is supported but Venetasoft do plan on bringing Windows Phone 7.x backing in the future (see the FAQ printed below). In addition, at least initially users will only be able to upload 3 photos a day to Instagram via the service in order to ensure that capacity is not overrun, resulting in extraordinary upload times. That number will be increased as more servers are brought online in the coming weeks.
While the status of an official Instagram app for Windows Phone remains elusive, Windows Phone 8 fans will now be able to post to their pre-existing Instagram accounts using the Instagraph client. Later, the developers plan to support Instagram account-creation through the app directly.
The service works by indirectly posting your photos to Instagram via Azure servers, bypassing Instagram's locked-down API access. Surprisingly, the method they use does not violate Instagram's terms-of-service, meaning we do not expect this to be "shut down" any time soon (neither do the developers who have a lot riding on this financially, in addition to their reputation).
The app itself, as we detailed in our mini-review, does not allow one to browse or even directly edit their Instagram pics (there are numerous third party apps that already do this on Windows Phone). Instead, it serves merely as a conduit to post to Instagram natively from a Windows Phone 8 device.
The app is powered by Aviary photo editor, which is not the same filter as Instagram but in many ways better (more filters, more editing options) and let's be honest, it's not too hard to mimic Instagram's look.
A full FAQ has also been posted about Instagraph, which should go far in answering some user concerns of the app and service. Keep in mind, this is version 1.0, meaning this is only the beginning.
Get the Windows Central Newsletter
All the latest news, reviews, and guides for Windows and Xbox diehards.
Regarding versions for Windows Phone 7.x users and more, we can share the following:
- WP7 version is near to being sent to certification
- WinRT version has exited beta release
- WP8 and WP7 new versions with the Registration feature (WinRT will have it at initial release)
- All their (other) Apps are free for a week
We'll update this story when the link is live for the app, though it should not be too much longer now (due to concerns of being overwhelmed, the developers are being extra cautious about hyping the release too much).
Why it is not official Instagram?
- Well, we cannot do anything about it
- We asked them to release a WP version, as we are WP users and enthusiasts too, then we asked for the complete API set, but without success, so we felt abandoned and started working on Instagraph.
Why is it not possible to create a new Instagram via Instagraph ?
- Instagram accounts can only be created directly from iOS and Android devices currently, due to Instagram access restrictions.
- The next Instagraph update adds this feature for WP devices.
Why is it not possible to see post or comment ?
- Instagraph in its first releases will only cover important features missing from other Instagram Apps. You can use other beautiful Apps such as WPGram and Metrogram for this, or even the web browser. Once installed, Instagraph is integrated into the "share" and "edit" menus, so it is super easy to share pictures from other sources or Apps too.
Will a WP7 version be available?
- Yes, and a WinRT version is en-route too
Does Instagraph use Instagram API?
- No.
- We don't spoof, sniff, alter or "hack" Instagram calls to their web services in any way.
- Nor have we emulated, reverse engineered, disassembled or altered any Instagram App on iOS or on Android.
- Instagraph is completely compliant with Instagram terms and policies, as we did it legally.
Why do we need to enter username and password on settings page, and not on classic oath web page?
- Instagraph does not use Instagram API,so direct Oath authentication is not needed.
Is privacy preserved?
- Your data is HTTPS encrypted, all network communications between apps and services are SSL secured.
- We delete an image immediately after being successfully submitted to Instagram.
Have you been helped/supported/funded by Microsoft or Nokia to build this App?
- No, Microsoft only certified it to prove Instagraph is legal, secure, and it does not violate your privacy.
Daniel Rubino is the Editor-in-chief of Windows Central. He is also the head reviewer, podcast co-host, and analyst. He has been covering Microsoft since 2007, when this site was called WMExperts (and later Windows Phone Central). His interests include Windows, laptops, next-gen computing, and watches. He has been reviewing laptops since 2015 and is particularly fond of 2-in-1 convertibles, ARM processors, new form factors, and thin-and-light PCs. Before all this tech stuff, he worked on a Ph.D. in linguistics, watched people sleep (for medical purposes!), and ran the projectors at movie theaters because it was fun.


text:
Imprint and Legal Disclaimer
Zentralblatt MATH
FIZ-Karlsruhe GmbH
Abteilung Berlin
Franklinstr. 11
D-10587 Berlin
Legal Disclaimer
FIZ Karlsruhe offers to the informed public easy access to valuable specialized information through its website, as a fast and convenient way to topical and reliable information on the subject fields covered by FIZ Karlsruhe. When feedback from customers reveals faults in the information, we shall make suitable efforts to correct the faults. But FIZ Karlsruhe does not make any warranties as to the completeness, suitability or correctness of the information found on these sites that are freely accessible without password or login identification, and FIZ Karlsruhe shall not be made liable for any damages that may arise from the use of the information.
Liability according to the Product Liability Act is not affected.
Furthermore, links to third party sites are available in order to enlarge the reservoir of information that can be searched by the customers. As these sites do not belong to our web services and therefore are beyond our control, FIZ Karlsruhe assumes no responsibility for the contents of these third party sites and shall not be made liable for errors or omissions, lack of topicality or fitness for a particular purpose of the information found there.


text:
Special Instructions to the Contractors/Bidders for the e-submission of the bids online through this eProcurement Portal
Bidder should do Online Enrolment in this Portal using the option Click Here to Enroll available in the Home Page. Then the Digital Signature enrollment has to be done with the e-token, after logging into the portal. The e-token may be obtained from one of the authorized Certifying Authorities such as eMudhraCA/GNFC/IDRBT/MtnlTrustline/SafeScrpt/TCS. Bidder then logs into the portal giving user id / password chosen during enrollment. The e-token that is registered should be used by the bidder and should not be misused by others. DSC once mapped to an account cannot be remapped to any other account. It can only be Inactivated. The Bidders can update well in advance, the documents such as certificates, purchase order details etc., under My Documents option and these can be selected as per tender requirements and then attached along with bid documents during bid submission. This will ensure lesser upload of bid documents. After downloading / getting the tender schedules, the Bidder should go through them carefully and then submit the documents as per the tender document, otherwise, the bid will be rejected. The BOQ template must not be modified/replaced by the bidder and the same should be uploaded after filling the relevant coulmns, else the bidder is liable to be rejected for that tender. Bidders are allowed to enter the Bidder Name and Values only. If there are any clarifications, this may be obtained online through the eProcurement Portal, or through the contact details given in the tender document. Bidder should take into account of the corrigendum published before submitting the bids online. Bidder, in advance, should prepare the bid documents to be submitted as indicated in the tender schedule and they should be in PDF/XLS/RAR/DWF formats. If there is more than one document, they can be clubbed together. Bidder should arrage for the EMD as specified in the tender. The original should be posted/couriered/given in person to the Tender Inviting Authority, within the bid submission date and time for the tender. The bidder reads the terms and conditions and accepts the same to proceed further to submit the bids The bidder has to submit the tender document(s) online well in advance before the prescribed time to avoid any delay or problem during the bid submission process. There is no limit on the size of the file uploaded at the server end. However, the upload is decided on the Memory available at the Client System as well as the Network bandwidth available at the client side at that point of time. In order to reduce the file size, bidders are suggested to scan the documents in 75-100 DPI so that the clarity is maintained and also the size of file also gets reduced. This will help in quick uploading even at very low bandwidth speeds. It is important to note that, the bidder has to Click on the Freeze Bid Button, to ensure that he/she completes the Bid Submission Process. Bids Which are not Frozen are considered as Incomplete/Invalid bids and are not considered for evaluation purposes. In case of Offline payments, the details of the Earnest Money Deposit(EMD) document submitted physically to the Department and the scanned copies furnished at the time of bid submission online should be the same otherwise the Tender will be summarily rejected The Tender Inviting Authority (TIA) will not be held responsible for any sort of delay or the difficulties faced during the submission of bids online by the bidders due to local issues. The bidder may submit the bid documents online mode only, through this portal. Offline documents will not be handled through this system. At the time of freezing the bid, the eProcurement system will give a successful bid updation message after uploading all the bid documents submitted and then a bid summary will be shown with the bid no, date & time of submission of the bid with all other relevant details. The documents submitted by the bidders will be digitally signed using the e-token of the bidder and then submitted. After the bid submission, the bid summary has to be printed and kept as an acknowledgement as a token of the submission of the bid. The bid summary will act as a proof of bid submission for a tender floated and will also act as an entry point to participate in the bid opening event. Successful bid submission from the system means, the bids as uploaded by the bidder is received and stored in the system. System does not certify for its correctness. The bidder should see that the bid documents submitted should be free from virus and if the documents could not be opened, due to virus, during tender opening, the bid is liable to be rejected The time that is displayed from the server clock at the top of the tender Portal, will be valid for all actions of requesting bid submission, bid opening etc., in the e-Procurement portal. The Time followed in this portal is as per Indian Standard Time (IST) which is GMT+5:30. The bidders should adhere to this time during bid submission. All the data being entered by the bidders would be encrypted at the client end, and the software uses PKI encryption techniques to ensure the secrecy of the data. The data entered will not be viewable by unauthorized persons during bid submission and not viewable by any one until the time of bid opening. Overall, the submitted bid documents become readable only after the tender opening by the authorized individual. During transamission of bid document, the confidentiality of the bids is maintained since the data is transferred over secured Socket Layer(SSL) with 256 bit encryption technology. Data encryption of sensitive fields is also done. The bidders are requested to submit the bids through online eProcurement system to the TIA well before the bid submission end date and time (as per Server System Clock).


text:
printed July 25, 2024 See this page online at: https://www.phonescoop.com/phones/p_forum.php?ff=4668
Info Photos News Forum Reviews 3
Start a new discussion
You must log in to post.
No messages yet
new featured article
Motorola has a new phone specifically for "business" folks. It's a high-end phone with a design inspired by Lenovo's ThinkPad laptops.
Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram
All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.
Log In or Register
Forgot password
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Use. We value your privacy and will never share your email address. (full privacy policy)


text:
If you are doing business over today's Internet, security has to be a priority for your organization.
For those enterprises that could use a platform that provides an additional layer of security for their emails, InTegriLogic offers a full-scale email encryption solution. Our easily-integrated solution could be the difference between a seemingly benign transmission of information and a debacle that could put your business at risk.
Extra Protection
A comprehensive security solution for emails you send and receive.
With nearly three-quarters of all email categorized as spam, users get a significant influx of messages that they have no use for. Some of those messages seep through the spam filter and are delivered to your inbox; and some of those messages are carrying devastating malware that can wreak havoc on a workstation, server, or network.
You can now ensure the contents of your person-to-person emails can only be read by you and the parties they are designed for. The interoperability with your current email platform, whether you host your own infrastructure or use a hosted alternative, allows you the security you are looking for without the need to install software every time you want to send a secure message.
Regulations and Email
Send emails with information that you could not normally send
Many businesses need to meet the security standards outlined in Federal and industry regulations. With InTegriLogic's email encryption platform, we can ensure that all the protected information you send finds only its intended target. Our solutions prevent accidental exposure of:
- Healthcare Information
- Credit Card Information
- Social Security Numbers
- Other Financial Information
- And More
Email Security with Support
Get the IT support you need from the Tucson-area leader
Like all of the business solutions we offer, our encrypted email comes with full comprehensive support. If your technology isn't working properly, our technicians can fix problems remotely. To find out what makes InTegriLogic the top technology deployment company for businesses in the Tucson area call us today at (520) 545-0691.


text:
Mattress One Website
Did you know that it's proven scientifically the many restorative processes that occur during sleep? So, only ensuring a deep and uninterrupted sleep creates fantastic beneficial effects on your body.
Choosing a mattress that is most suitable for our body will be essential if we want to achieve that best rest.
A Puffy mattress has the reputation of permitting you to get an excellent sleep during the night.
Do you want that you and your family live in a great health condition? The first and most basic step is taking care of the way you sleep.
Puffy Mattress Review
The Puffy mattress, called by the community as "the most comfortable mattress throughout the Web", has been designed and developed using the state of the art technology.
It is handcrafted and manufactured 100% in america using superior quality foam layers.
Although it is excellent for all kinds of sleepers, the ones that have found the very best comfort are the side sleepers. Puffy offers two different models of memory foam mattresses: Puffy and Puffy Lux.
The Puffy
The Puffy mattress is a memory foam mattress with 2 layers:
4″ of Puffy's Patent Pending Cooling Cloud (TM) Foam
It is a gel-infused foam that increases airflow 8x more than standard foam mattresses, beating the reputation that memory foam has about overheated in the night.
This is a comfortable layer, super soft and has a very slow response to pressure, meaning you are most likely to sink deep for some extreme body contouring.
Although it's typical for all foam beds, this coating, in particular, is extremely thick and should bring some satisfying relief to the shoulders and hips. This is a fantastic benefit that let us sleep all night without any interruptions.
6″ of Business Core Support Foam
It provides you exceptional support and spinal alignment for improved sleep. This segment includes a quick response to pressure and can be quite firm, imbuing the arrangement with its firmness and shape.
Between both layers, Puffy measures of 10″ in height.
The Puffy Lux
The Puffy Lux mattress is an upgraded and higher quality version of the original Puffy mattress. It's a little thicker, and a little more expensive of course.
It includes some additional features when compared with the original Puffy mattress. Many individuals consider it an improved variant of an already terrific product.
The Puffy Lux is a memory foam mattress with three technical layers:
3″ Cooling Cloud (TM) Foam that increases airflow 8x more than standard foam mattresses.
You will never get any better sleep. Time to enjoy your nights as never before!
Two" Plus Cloud Comfort Foam
This shapes to the pressure points of your body for the best comfort.
7″ Firm Core Support Foam
To give exceptional support and spinal alignment for better sleep.
Between the three layers, Puffy Lux steps of 12″ in height. A little thicker than the original PuffyBasically, the Puffy Lux mattress can be viewed as the luxury edition of the original Puffy mattress.
The biggest benefits for the two Puffy mattress models are movement transfer and conforming. In addition, the fact of using softer foams makes Puffy mattresses the ideal selection for individuals of average weight and the lightest.
What Type of Sleeper is Best Suited For a Puffy Mattress?
According to 5,600+ reviews created by clients, Puffy mattresses will be the best option for side sleepers. Of course, they're subjective opinions. The most important factors when choosing a mattress are the relaxation of the sleeper and spinal support.
If you suffer from problems with your spine, 1 cause might be the way you are sleeping during the night, and your current mattress is not helping a lot. So, getting a mattress that supports a natural spine alignment will surely do.
You don't have any backbone ache yet? Consider that you will end up suffering this pain in the near future if you do nothing to avoid it. Especially if you're using an old mattress that's not beneficial for you whatsoever .
But it is not just about you: your loved ones may also make the most of it, primarily in the event that you have toddlers. Imagine how great and safe are their naps, with a mattress that is designed for great relaxation with Puffy's Body Adapting Cloud Formula.
For heavyweight individuals, more than 230 lbs, we do not suggest Puffy mattresses as a result of softer foams that are used to manufacture them, and most likely they won't support the weight they want. For them, we highly recommend a more suitable option.
Puffy mattresses are also recommended in these cases:
- You are looking for a memory foam mattress that is affordable.
- You love the memory foam atmosphere.
- You are a person who weighs less than 230 pounds.
- You sleep with a partner and you have a sleep.
As you can see, the Puffy is a solid mattress option for side sleepers and light sleepers. For heavier sleepers, this isn't the right choice.
Structure and Firmness
The Puffy mattress is a 10″ thick mattress with two layers of foam, the top layer is 4″ thick cooling cloud memory foam. This layer of memory foam is supportive and flexible. It really focuses on relieving pressure in the head to the feet, which in addition to being comfortable is also great support.
The foundation layer of the Puffy is a 6″ of foundation dense foam. This layer incorporates the Insta-Firm technology that delivers a much more responsive and supportive foam base.
These two layers work together to provide the proper balance needed to have a quality sleeping surface.
Puffy mattresses and Puffy Lux mattresses come with different elements, which are detailed in the table below:
The exterior of the Puffy is very soft and comfy, and the top comfort layers do an excellent job at providing a comfortable sleeping surface.
Puffy | 10" | 7" 1.5 PCF High Density Polyfoam | 3″ 2.5 PCF Gel Memory Foam | 100% Polyester |
Puffy Lux | 12" | 7" High Density Polyfoam | 3″ Memory Foam 2″ Polyfoam | 100% Polyester |
Puffy Royal | 14" | 7" High Density Polyfoam | 1.5″ Gel Memory Foam 2" Responsive Memory Foam 2″ Polyfoam | Stain-Resistant Oeko-Tex Standard 100 Certification |
The Puffy is a rather comfortable mattress. The top comfort layer described in this review provides a little responsiveness and bounce without causing too much sinkage down to the memory foam as anticipated.
Also, this is highly determined by sleeper weight: the heavier a person is the more will push down to the mattress and vice-versa.
A puffy mattress can be found on the Puffy site . Puffy doesn't operate any brick and mortar location. Which is a fantastic advantage because this way Puffy can maintain the prices low, compared if they would need to invest in physical stores.
Coupons and Reviews
Puffy is currently running a $200-off advertising, but by purchasing from the next link you may receive an extra discount of $50 on any Puffy mattress. Just use the code BESTPUFFY in the moment of checking out, so you will get a $250 off total!
One of the best benefits of Puffy mattresses is the guarantee that they manage:
Lifetime Warranty
First is the lifetime guarantee, which is among the most advantageous guarantees the sector of mattresses has in their mood: if any failure comes with a mattress, no matter how little it is, you will get a new mattress without any additional price. This applies as long as the mattress is under your name.
101 Night Sleep Trial
You've got 101 nights to try your new mattress! If for ANY reason you think that you haven't had your best rest, Puffy helps you to send your mattress into a local charity home. That applies even in the event that you have used it for just a couple nights. Then you get the full refund.
Mattress One Website
What Exactly Is Your Mattress Sent?
Puffy mattresses are compressed, vacuum sealed and packed for shipping
Where Are They Sent?
Puffy sends your mattress to any part of the United States and Canada. The shipment is made through FedEx. It's delivered from the factory to FedEx within two working days and arrives at the client's address between three or four working days.
The shipping is absolutely free to the continental USA.
Watch this video. You do not want to miss it:
- Avoids pain in your back and spine
- Affordable price
- You can try it for 101 nights
- Outstanding motion isolation. Ideal for folks who sleep in company
- Lifetime guarantee with exclusively non-prorated policy
- Free delivery
- If for any reason you don't like it, the mattress is given to a charity program near you
- Weak border support
- Sinkage for heavier sleepers
- Not recommended for heavyweight people. If you weight more than 230 pounds, consider this option
- Only one firmness option available per version
Sizing and Pricing
The Puffy mattress is available in six different sizes that are just like the standard USA mattress dimensions. This applies for Puffy and Puffy Lux types. The only difference between both is the height. Have a look at the next few tables.
Below are the prices for Puffy mattress along with the dimensions:
SIZE | DIMENSIONS (W x L x D) | PUFFY REGULAR PRICE | PUFFY DISCOUNTED PRICE |
Twin | 39" x 75" x 10" | $495 | |
Twin Extra Long (XL) | 39" x 75" x 10" | $525 | |
Full | 39" x 75" x 10" | $695 | |
Queen | 39" x 75" x 10" | $850 | |
King | 39" x 75" x 10" | $1,050 | |
California King | 39" x 75" x 10" | $1,050 |
And this table shows the costs and dimensions for Puffy Lux mattress:
SIZE | DIMENSIONS (W x L x D) | PUFFY LUX REGULAR PRICE | PUFFY LUX DISCOUNTED PRICE |
Twin | 39" x 75" x 12" | $1,145 | |
Twin Extra Long (XL) | 39" x 75" x 12" | $1,195 | |
Full | 39" x 75" x 12" | $1,295 | |
Queen | 39" x 75" x 12" | $1,495 | |
King | 39" x 75" x 12" | $1,695 | |
California King | 39" x 75" x 12" | $1,695 |
Additional Products by Puffy
A firm that Puffy also offers the following sleeping goods in addition to just mattresses:
Review: Our Verdict
if you're looking for a durable memory foam mattress, which is perfect for sleeping on your stomach or on your side. Or if you like a moderate level of stability -like most of sleepers desire -, then the Puffy mattress is a great choice. This mattress offers great comfort and perfect support with innovative and valuable materials.
According to a study by the University of New York, the best place to sleep is to the left side since that side has a better circulation. Considering that the heart pumps blood more readily, not one of the main arteries are blocked. Likewise sleeping on this side makes the blood to return back into the heart more readily .
Also, when sleeping on the left side, it improves your digestion because the stomach and intestines are somewhat situated to the left and in that way, food passes more easily. Focus on sleeping on your side and avoid dining food that is difficult to digest. Also try not to dinner too late: 8.00 pm maximum.
So, due to Puffy is better designed for side sleepers, it meets with what the study explained previously. Isn't this a sufficient reason to buy this high-quality mattress?
And just a final note, I will leave some of the comments that people have left on Puffy site along with the star prices. Every day new people are purchasing mattresses, and for a good part of them, Puffy is the brand they prefer, between other brands. Chances are, one of your neighbors or friends have purchased a Puffy recently!
Month in and loving our Puffy Lux mattress
Very comfortable mattress! We purchased a Puffy Lux after reading reviews that it is ideal for OA and back suffers, and we haven't been disappointed. Getting in and out of bed doesn't disrupt anyone's sleep.
Less aching with the our new puffy mattress. Love it
Love my Puffy
I received my Puffy mattress 4 weeks ago. I got a new pillowtop mattress last year and it was terrible. I slept poorly and my back always hurt. The very first night with my Puffy mattress I slept through the night, no tossing. It has been that way ever since. It is such a relief to continually get a good night sleep!
Beyond pleased!!
Let me begin by saying that I have had sleep problems for quite some time. I began using the an app to track my sleep cycle in order to gauge how well I was sleeping, and discover if I could improve my sleep quality. Prior to purchasing my Puffy mattress, my average sleep quality was between 50-60%. After discovering this amazing gift from the heavens and finally gathering the courage to make the investment, I..
The world's best mattress
This mattress is not only the most comfortable but it really does help control one's body temperature. I no longer perspire during the night but wake up feeling very comfortable and even body temperature. I love this mattress.


text:
We offer a Free quote and design service, get in touch today.
Looking to up your sports pitch game? Look no further because our skilled development team can help you out!
All sports pitches need some attention and regular maintenance to get the best out of them. Many seem tired and worn out, have waterlogging issues, poor grass coverage or unforgiving playing surfaces.
As sports pitch experts, we can improve your traditional grass pitch to create the ideal playing surface you desire. If you are interested in creating a brand new sports pitch from scratch, we are here to help.
Everyone on our team specialises in natural and artificial turf sports pitches design and project management, so you know you're getting the best for what you're paying for.
We have experienced professionals who can provide technical advice, designs and specifications, manage the whole project and procurement process and monitor the construction works all to suit your requirements and budget.
We are a newly established independent sports pitch consultancy with a head office in North Wales providing specialist technical advice, and services to sports clubs, schools and local authorities on all aspects of natural turf playing surfaces and sport pitch facilities.
Our aim is to improve the quality of sport pitch facilities for sports clubs, and communities by providing greater reliability, increasing player performance and safety, increasing player and spectator enjoyment and encouraging further participation in outdoor sports.
As a starting point for established pitches, we recommend undertaking a technical pitch assessment to investigate the current condition and quality of the playing surfaces and arena.
This exercise examines the fundamental performance and safety aspects of a sports field, using aspects such as its drainage capability, soil profiling, grass quality, pitch gradients and surface topography.
The report forms the basis of any remediation works needed by local authorities, identifying the issues and proposing solutions.
There are a variety of techniques and a range of specialised equipment available to support these works, and choosing the most appropriate will lead to better and more cost-effective results.
For new construction projects, we can discuss the options available.
Whether you want a top-quality hybrid turf product for stadium performance, a modest community recreational sports facility or a primary school playing field, we can advise you on the most appropriate choice and manage the whole project for you, from feasibility study to finished playing sports surface design.
If you have a project you would like to discuss or need further information, please use the contact form.
We work to FA guidelines and Sport England Performance Quality Standard (PQS), which provides a recommended minimum quality standard for maintaining and constructing pitches.
Sports turf consultancy offers numerous benefits for sports organisations, stadiums, and facilities. Here are some key advantages of engaging in a sports turf consultancy:
Sports surface design and turf consultancies consist of experienced professionals who possess specialised knowledge of sports surface design project management, and expertise in games areas of sports surface and turf project management.
They can provide valuable advice and guidance on a range of topics, including turf selection, maintenance practices, irrigation systems, pest control, and more.
Their insights can help optimise the performance, durability, and safety of sports fields.
A sports turf specialist advice and consultancy team can assist a football association in designing and implementing strategies to improve the quality and performance of football associations and sports fields.
They can assess soil conditions, conduct turfgrass analysis, and recommend appropriate maintenance practices to enhance turf resilience, traction, quality and playability.
By optimising field performance, consultancies help create better playing surfaces for athletes and reduce the risk of injuries.
Turf consultancies can provide cost-effective good management solutions and quality and safety solutions by analysing clients' existing maintenance practices and identifying areas for improvement.
They can assist in developing customised maintenance plans, optimising irrigation systems, and recommending efficient equipment and machinery.
By streamlining operations and reducing resource wastage, consultancies help organisations save on costs in the long run.
Sustainable turf management is a growing concern in all aspects of football foundation the sports industry.
Sports turf management consultancies can offer guidance to clients on eco-friendly practices, such as water conservation, integrated pest management, and soil health improvement.
By adopting sustainable strategies, every rugby football union, league, association and organisation can reduce their environmental impact, conserve resources, and contribute to long-term turf sustainability.
The average costs of sports pitch consultancy in the UK can vary between £50- £300 per hour.
However, the costs can vary depending on several factors, including the scope of work, the size of the project, the expertise and reputation of the consultancy, and the specific requirements of the client.
Sports pitch consultancies typically charge a consultancy fee for their services. This fee can be calculated in different ways, such as hourly rates, fixed project management fees, or a combination of both.
Get in touch with our team today for a free no-obligation quote.
Finding the right contractor to install a brand new pitch or facility is important as you want to get the perfect product at a good value price for your organisation, whether it's for a school, club or public sporting facilities near me.
A tender document would be prepared with all the specifications, pitch architects' drawings, and sports surface design details for the installation through the sports turf consultancy services. This document will then be sent out to several contractors, who will then each submit a quote for our work.
Once all the price quotations have been collected, the contractor with the most competitive quote will be selected to carry out the procurement process for the installation.
Sport pitch consultants are on hand to assist each client throughout the full construction and project management, by carrying out site supervision, assessing the quality of the contractor's work and holding regular maintenance meetings to ensure the installation is running smoothly.
Then, once the work has been completed, pitch testing shall be carried out on the surface to ensure that the highest standards for safety greater reliability and performance have been met and to check the client is happy with the final result.
This work can be done for various facilities, including multi-use games areas, full-sized football pitches, athletics areas and many more. If you're interested in installing a MUGA, please visit this page http://sportconsultants.co.uk/multi-use/somerset/alder-row/
Multi-use areas are a great way to improve spectator enjoyment of outdoor sports and facilities, and you can have these multi-use game areas installed at a reasonable price.
If you're thinking about having a new sports area installed and you're not sure where to start, using sports turf, project management and other project management and development consultancy services can offer you the help you need.
Please contact us using our enquiry form and let us know what sort of facility perfect sports pitch you're looking to have built. We can send you some further details on how the process of construction works, and help you make your perfect sports pitch a dream come true!
We have a range of top sports surface design contractors in Alder Row BA11 5 and surrounding areas who can offer specialist advice regarding the type of surfacing that should be installed for your facility.
We can look at the different sporting activities you want to play and help you decide on what sports surface design and type would be best for your facility.
We install a range of different surface types, including macadam, polymeric, artificial grass, and needle punch. To find out about our 3G pitch consultants, make sure to have a look at this page http://sportconsultants.co.uk/3g-pitch/somerset/alder-row/
As professional contractors, we complete the construction process from start to finish, including excavating the existing surface, laying the surfacing and maintaining the facility.
Our contractors have years of experience within the surfacing industry and expert knowledge in the installation of different surface types.
If you would like to speak to our advisors at any time, please complete the contact form, and we will get back to you as soon as possible with more details regarding the services our contractors can carry out.
Our sport facility installers can alter designs and specifications to meet individual needs and requirements.
If you have a specific budget which you need to remain within, do not hesitate to let our staff know; we may reduce the size of our sports facilities and surrounding areas to meet your specific budget and the space you have available.
Our consultants can also offer advice regarding the most appropriate surface types for the sports you wish to play.
As professionals in the installation of sports pitches, we can alter each surface spec. We also offer additional services like colour coating and line marking if necessary.
Asking yourself this is one of the first questions you should ask. The activities you choose will determine how much money you spend, how you create the physical place, and how you present yourself.
Take time to ask yourself if your space is more geared toward sports and fitness. Is it more about having a good time? Is it a more balanced mix of the two? All of this will have an impact on the image you project.
When synthetic turf is exposed to direct sunlight on hot sunny days during the summer months, certain synthetic turf fields have reported surface temperatures that are much higher than a natural turf field's surface temperature.
Many coaches will arrange practices and games during the cooler periods of the day and limit the frequency and duration of practices in such conditions.
The fastest-growing segment of the synthetic turf industry is synthetic grass for landscape, golf, and other recreational applications.
Over the years, about 35 million square feet of synthetic grass were deployed for landscape and entertainment purposes. So, safe to say it's a pretty great option to consider.
If you wish to talk to someone about installing a new sports area, please get in touch with our staff members.
Our sports pitch consultants in Alder Row BA11 5 will get back to you as soon as possible with all the information and details you need.


text:
Price match.
Our customers deserve the very best price/quality ratio. "Price Match" ensures that GFURN is the place to find design furniture & lighting at competitive prices.
Make an offer.
"Make an offer" gives us the opportunity to say there is no reason to shop elsewhere, just tell us what your price is.
Get the furniture you love today and pay later.
Easy and flexible monthly payments with PayBright.


text:
To protect Wellness businesses and professionals from fraudulent listings and misrepresentation, your identity and authority will be verified by publishing the Wellness Verified widget on your website.
We love to promote providers who are committed to excellence, embrace reviews and proudly display the Wellness Verified Badge.
Forward the simple instructions to your webmaster to select and publish the widget that will fit best on your website. This will verify your ownership.
Send this page to your webmaster and authorize them to add the widget. If you would like us to handle it all for you, just ask us.


text:
Love Stories @ RomanceClass
Love does exist! There are great loves in the world today, and they don't just reside in fairy tales. Often they have little to do with rich mansions and white horses. Real love has to do with an average person being truthful, honest, and loving against all odds. If you have a love story to share, Submit your own story! Recent Tales: Page 53 of Love Stories
Submit your own story You can also read through Tales of the Ex.
Theme by TheBootstrapThemes


text:
Everyone may need payday credits because expenses increase every day. Not everyone can save money, and when unforeseen situations happen, not everyone can resolve their monetary difficulties quickly. Relatives and friends are not always ready to help and to take a lending from a bank in San Marino of California; you need to prepare a lot of documents to obtain a lending there. You can't also take out credit from the banking institutions if you have a bad credit history. So, what to do in these cases and how to obtain payday loans San Marino no credit check? Let's make things clear.
San Marino payday loans are small amounts that are provided for a short time at a daily fee rate. These credits are convenient because they can be issued remotely and you can spend them on anything.
You can receive payday credits to the card when contacting the credit companies in San Marino of California CA. Such companies are much more convenient and simpler than banks because they have fewer requirements and provide more favorable lending conditions. Credit companies lend money without formal papers and even with a bad credit history, giving customers a chance to correct it.
Credit companies don't ask many questions, don't inflate the criteria and requirements for clients. They are more than loyal and convenient because the lending can be issued remotely; that means that you don't have to go anywhere. The loan contract is also concluded remotely, in contrast to banks where a borrower must be present personally.
Payday loans San Marino no credit check are issued in a few minutes and transferred to a bank card. To get a loan online, you have to make a minimum effort. Some credit companies have taken care of their customers and made mobile applications that can be used to obtain credits from smartphones.
What is important to remember when you take out credit?
The decision on your lending is being made within several minutes. "How can it be so fast?" — a borrower may think. The answer is simple. All processes are automated and a special program is applied. This makes the process of approval as fast as possible.
There are some requirements a borrower must adhere to obtain San Marino payday loans. First of all, a borrower's age must be 18 (21 in some cases). All appropriate papers must be provided. A person must have a permanent job to be able to cover the credits. Moreover, a person must reside in San Marino California CA because only the residents of San Marino can obtain cash loans online in this state. Violation of these rules can lead to the credit application annulment.
People apply to credit companies for the following reasons:
The above list can be continued. One thing is clear; you will not be able to solve pecuniary difficulties with the help of banking structures today. And even after all the steps taken, no one guarantees a positive decision concerning a loan from a bank.
Everyone can find themselves in the unpleasant financial situation. Now there is a way out of the situation — file for credit and quickly get cash on the card.
Most people became regular clients of credit firms and completely refused from the banking system. There are several reasons for this.
It takes several minutes from the moment the request is made to the moment the application is approved. A minimum number of documents and personal data are required. You can obtain credit regardless of your credit experience in other banking and financial institutions.
You don't have to supply the firm with a lot of documents to file for San Marino payday loans online. You must provide the documents confirming your age, income and the papers confirming your address.
If you had an unsuccessful lending experience, don't worry, your lending history is not important when applying for credit to a credit firm. Almost all credit companies provide their clients with the lending, herein, no credit check is required.
Most credit companies transfer funds to a bank card, which means you don't even need to leave your house. Don't forget to specify your bank details during the procedure of qualifying for San Marino payday loans online.
It's very easy to file for online payday loans San Marino. Following some simple stages, you will be able to complete all the procedures in just a few minutes. Ensure that you have a good internet connection and proceed.
It's very important to choose a reliable company that gives payday advance loans San Marino in California CA on favorable terms. Study the reviews of the clients, conditions the firm sets and the royalties the firm wants.
When the company is chosen, you need to calculate the sum you require and the terms the credits is provided to you. This can be done online with the help of a special calculator. After that, you will have to fill out a web form.
If you need money but you don't intend to borrow from relatives or colleagues, fill out a request form and obtain a pay day loan San Marino in California from a credit firm. To prevent any problems, provide only correct data. Don't forget to attach your card. You must use your personal bank card to be able to receive transfers from other persons.
Conclude the contract. The document can (and should) be read to know exactly about all the conditions needed to obtain 24 hour payday loans San Marino in California CA. The contract will be sent to the e-mail. After signing the contract, the money is sent by transfer to the card.
" Where can I find the best direct lenders to be able to obtain payday loans San Marino near me?" — you may think. Actually, it's not difficult to do. Just apply your computer, laptop or mobile telephone with good internet access to find the best lender near you. It's important to pay attention whether the company is state-licensed or not. If it has a license, read the reviews of the clients and conditions the company offers. Also, try to find out if the installment is provided.
24 hour payday loans San Marino are a great way to cope with the temporary monetary difficulties but are they legal in San Marino? All loans obtaining and taking out are regulated by the laws of the US states. Twenty seven states in the USA allow payday lending. They are also fully legal in San Marino of California CA. Draw attention that payday credits interests are rather high that's why think carefully before you use the service of any credit firm.
Getting instant credits online is beneficial for many reasons:
Credit companies have simplified the demands for their borrowers. So, if you think "I need a loan. Does a company provide me with it?" To obtain a credit, it's enough:
"Can I repay my loan near me?" — you may wonder. The answer is yes. But it's not necessary to do this personally, you can do this online. So, what are the methods to pay off a payday loan?
The following rules will help you to obtain payday loans San Marino no checking account successfully.
It's much more convenient to get the payday loans from the credit companies than from the banks. First of all, the credits are being given even if you have a bad credit history. Secondly, almost all applicants get the loan request endorsement. Thirdly, the lending is given fast. Qualify for a credit today, and obtain your money tomorrow.
Think about whether you will be able to cover your lending in time before you conclude a loan contract. The fee rates are rather high, besides you will have to pay penalties if you are not able to pay off your credit in time. If there are other ways to get cash, consider them. Remember, all borrowed money must be returned in the end. Measure twice, cut once.
aIt's the sort of credit you take when different emergencies happen. There are such examples as medical bills, house maintenance, car repair, etc. Of course, each customer has his own purpose.
Applying does NOT affect your credit score!
No credit check to apply.


text:
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page
To get access to the Age of Conan Forum you need to enter your retail version key on register page
The forum nickname and your password can be created and even changed in the accounting tool. After you create or change something it will take about 20 to 30 minutes before the changes get visible and active on the forum.
The administrator may have required you to register before you can view this page.


text:
Leather Sissy Bar Pad
Earn MotoMoney on every dollar you spend! There is a NO Minimum Order amount to start earning MotoMoney, and you earn 1 point for every dollar spent! (Sub-Total less any previous points redeemed)
For every 100 points you earn, you will receive $1.00 off of most items on our site (some Brands do not allow Rewards Points to be earned on their products). Your MotoMoney Points can be redeemed during checkout. [...Read More]
Fits the following models:


text:
"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty,or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds…[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers…And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from Principle in one instance becomes a precedent for [another ]…till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery…And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt.Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression."
Written by Thomas Jefferson in a letter from 1816