text:
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Antidepressant Effectiveness and False Dualism: It's Time for a New Psychiatry
As I review the various comments about the study, both on my blog and elsewhere, what strikes me is how polarized the debate has become. On one side are those who defend the efficacy of drugs, and on the other side are those who denigrate the medication option and argue that psychotherapy is the true cure for depression. This is yet another version of the old and tiresome nature vs. nurture debate, which has been a staple of the rancorous psychiatrist vs. psychologist turf wars ever since I started my residency at Mass General in 1992.
In one corner of the boxing ring are those "biological psychiatrists" who argue that depression is essentially a biochemical disorder that is logically treated using agents that adjust the biochemistry. In the other corner are those who argue that depression is a response to life stress and is best treated by therapy techniques that help people cope.
But this dualism is illusory. When people become depressed, yes, their brains are disordered in some still mysterious way. The idea that a serotonin deficiency is responsible is only a hypothesis and one that has been weakened over the years by studies failing to demonstrate such a biochemical imbalance. I have confidence that someday we will locate the brain circuits involved and that we will be able to rationally target them with biological cures. But we are still very far from that; the current crop of antidepressants work on neurotransmitters but they may help depression through mechanisms that have little to do with serotonin or norepinephrine.
Meanwhile, we know that many people recover from depression without taking antidepressants--via the passage of time, or psychotherapy, or a placebo pill, etc.... PET scans have shown that cognitive behavior therapy leads to distinct brain changes in patients who recover from depression. Clearly, there are multiple different pathways leading to a "neurobiological" cure.
So my question is, why don't we embrace all these potential cures rather than lining up behind our favorite technique to defend its merits? Drugs work. Therapy works. Time works. And placebos work. If psychiatrists and psychologists could possibly call a truce in their various battles over therapy effectiveness and prescription privileges, we might be able to imagine a different kind of practitioner--one who is skilled in both psychopharmacology and psychotherapy. Isn't this the kind of doctor we would all want to see when it's our turn to get help?
42 comments:
- Joseph Arpaia, MD said...
Absolutely agree.
Clinicians need to realize that you can't PROVE anything using experiments. You can only DISPROVE hypothesis.
What is happening is that each side points to experiments that supports their ideas and says "We are right".
That is not science. If we are going to use science we need to point to the data that disproves our ideas and say, "Our current ideas are not correct. How can we make them more correct?"
So the people who really need to look at the studies that disprove the effectiveness of antidepressants are the biological psychiatrists, NOT the therapists.
And the therapists need to look at studies that show that therapy has some serious deficiencies too. That way they can improve the effectiveness of therapy. - January 14, 2010 at 11:52 AM
That's how you read the comments? That's not how i read the comments. (I can't speak to comments not on your blog.) And it's not how i intended my comment...
I hate that in these discussions, i always have to point out that i am not against antidepressants, or psychotropic medications, that i am _on_ an antidepressant (weaning off of it) and i was helped by it. The possibility that SSRIs may often be prescribed unnecessarily does not suggest that they themselves may be unnecessary. They are one tool in the toolbox. They are an appropriate tool to use in certain situations. They should be used in situations in which they are likely to be the MOST effective treatment, balanced out by an acceptable level of side effects.
Acknowledging that SSRIs can have undesirable, unintended effects is not the same as saying SSRIs are bad. Nor is questioning your use of the placebo effect. I am sure that an experienced psychiatrist such as yourself can easily spot such unsubtle differences, and i'm hoping you will explain what, exactly, i am misunderstanding here. - January 14, 2010 at 1:34 PM
- djbaxter said...
An excellent post and an excellent summary of the issues and the public and scientific confusion that seems to surround those issues. Thank you.
- January 14, 2010 at 2:32 PM
Your premise that there is something wrong with a depressed brain is grossly flawed and at the heart of the failure of biological psychiatry. You think if you find differences in brain circuits you will understand "depression".If I beat my dog every day and he becomes depressed and then I look at his brain in a high tech scanner and it looks different than another dogs, do I really understand anything about what is wrong with my dog? No not at all.How can people be so short sighted as not to see this? The problem with psychiatry is it just does not want to face the fact that suffering can be suffering and nothing more than part of the human condition and studying the brain will never tell us anything about almost all the people who have sadly been seduced by the charade that is contemporary psychiatry. People will always be depressed and there is not a damn thing that psychiatry can do about that anymore than we can stop tsunami's or earthquakes. Psychiatry would never admit that because if it did there would be no place for all its pseudopathologising of normal human suffering.Instead we debate pills vs. paying someone for human contact as a TX for a disease that exists only in contemporary American culture. Maybe antidepressants will help all those victims in Haiti? Shall we send emergency truck loads of Paxil? I am sure they are "depressed". Shall we scan their brains for flawed circuitry?
- January 14, 2010 at 2:33 PM
- Joseph Arpaia, MD said...
I don't think Dr. Carlat was responding to your comment. I think he was responding to professionals who are demonizing those who disagree with them. Your comment was nothing of that sort. - January 14, 2010 at 4:34 PM
Dr:C: So you agree with Dr. Friedman about the alleged methodological problems of the JAMA study? Fair enough. But I wonder: Do you have any idea why it is that the two flagship journals of American medicine -- the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the New England Journal of Medicine (which published similar findings in 2008)publish such "flawed" research? Aren't these the "A" journals of academic medicine and public policy? Are you and Friedman basically saying that these are hack publications?
- January 14, 2010 at 5:46 PM
- Daniel Carlat said...
As Joseph said, I was not responding to any specific comment but rather to the overall tenor of the debate, both on this blog and elsewhere. Anonymous, who in the comments to today's post takes a very extreme position against the notion that there can be a biologically-based depression, is illustrative.
Overall, my point is that since psychiatrists have become accustomed to being medication providers, some tend to defend the value of meds to their dying breaths--even if, in their heart of hearts they know that most patients need some therapy to get better.
On the other hand, there are those therapists who feel the same need to defend the value of therapy by denigrating meds.
I see this, ultimately, as an artifact of a training system in psychiatry that makes little sense. By forcing people to go through full-fledged medical training in order to become a psychiatrists, we guarantee that the resulting practitioners will focus on a biological solution to problems, and will be ill-prepared to understand the mind.
Instead of medical school, I propose that psychiatrists-to-be should train in "mental health" schools that teach the basics of physiology and psychopharmacology--enough to learn the art of prescribing meds. This would free up time in the curriculum to learn about crucial topics such as therapy, family work, substance abuse treatment, behavioral treatment, etc.... In fact, for a brief time in the 1980s, such a training program existed in San Francisco, called the Doctorate in Mental Health, a five year program combining the first two years of medical school with three years of psychiatric residency. But ultimately, politics intervened and the graduates were not granted prescriptive privileges. Maybe it's time to try it again. Otherwise, psychologists will surely fill the gap, as they already have in New Mexico and Louisiana, and will soon in Oregon. - January 14, 2010 at 6:26 PM
I appreciate very much Dr Carlat's blog and comments. What I want to know is what exactly is a "biologically based depression" and how is one to know that is what exists, ever? How could one ever know such a thing even if one defines a biological difference in those who complain of being depressed? If I do not have this and say I am depressed, am I not depressed after all even if I say I am? This is grasping at straws by desperate folks supporting what is essentially a religious based belief system. This does not mean that I do not ever believe people cannot be helped by meds but we feel better after smoking weed or drinking booze. This tells us nothing. For the record I am a psychiatrist and I even prescribe these meds on occasion but I also drink booze and am ok with pts who say they feel better smoking weed. Does this imply they/I have a biologic defect that is being fixed? I find few if any psychiatrists ever even contemplate the limits of what can be known and the flimsy conceptual framework psychiatry stands on. I do believe in psychosis and emotion without context like mania but this is very rare and not what most Drs make there living caring for or why most meds are handed out. Dr Carlat do you really feel we should be lumping these people in as far as research and classification with the same groups that we are talking about in these blogs when you infer "biologic based depression"? The vast majority who feel just as good on suger pills. Do you really feel these people(most on anti-depressants) have a fundamental and consistent biological flaw at the core of there emotional experiences? If so what do you base this on other than hope for your field and a desire for legitimacy? Again I thank you for this blog. Dr John
- January 14, 2010 at 7:30 PM
- Gallucci-Neto said...
Once more a very good post. For those really interested in the debate of this post I strongly recommend the book "The Concepts of Psychiatry: A Pluralistic Approach to the Mind and Mental Illness" (Nassir Ghaemi MD MPH and Paul R. McHugh MD, authors).
Because most psychiatric illnesses are complex phenomena, no single method or approach is sufficient to explain them or the experiences of persons who suffer from them. In The Concepts of Psychiatry S. Nassir Ghaemi, M.D. argues that the discipline of psychiatry can therefore be understood best from a pluralistic perspective. Grounding his approach in the works of Paul McHugh, Phillip Slavney, Leston Havens, and others, Ghaemi incorporates a more explicitly philosophical discussion of the strengths of a pluralistic model and the weaknesses of other approaches, such as biological or psychoanalytic theories, the biopsychosocial model, or eclecticism. This book will be of interest to professionals and students in psychiatry, as well as psychologists and general readers who are interested in understanding the field of psychiatry and its practices at a conceptual level.
Enjoy! - January 14, 2010 at 8:45 PM
I applaud Dr. C for posting the obviously extreme views provoked by the JAMA study. In truth, conflict can be healthy-- it often leads to resolutions and, in science, paradigm shifts that are the engine of scientific advancement. Much like conflict resolution on the individual level, conflict can be a stimulus for personal development and hopefully happiness or greater achievement.
I also appreciate Dr. Arpaia's comments but disagree on one point: "Insiders" rarely see or are willing to acknowledge the flaws inherent in their models or systems. One needs "outsiders" to point these out. So I don't think it is a bad thing that therapists see the pitfalls of medication and vice versa regarding biological psychiatrists positions on therapy. The important point is that we TALK to one another.
Parenthetically, Dr. C, I don't see this as a MD versus PHD or LCSW issue any longer. It may have been discipline-specific in the past, but as a psychiatrist, I can tell you that I know many colleagues who are casting a jaundiced eye on what has been sold to us by the pharmaceutical industry and key opinion leaders in our field who have lined their pockets with drug money all the while failing to disclose their conflicts of interest to NIH, NIMH, and our residents who we are entrusted to teach and mentor! By the same token, I also know many non-medical colleagues who applaud the biological approach to alleviating pain and suffering-- why else would there be the push for prescription privileges for non-MD's? Excluding economic reasons, of course!
I think we can all agree on one point, however and this hearkens back to Anonymous' post regarding Haiti and Dr. C's nice intro on the tragedy in Haiti being more of a concern than academic contretemps over the effectiveness of antidepressants versus placebo. The science of psychopathology can probably best be advanced by doing brain imaging and neural networking on the brains of Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh! LOL. Just kidding... sort of. - January 14, 2010 at 9:00 PM
I'm curious, what reality am I living in that is based on multiple interventions to treat depression in 2009+ ? How many people are offered other options to impact on depressed features, much less a presentation that defines major depression, that is not meds first and basically only?
It is not about a "New Psychiatry" we should be looking for, but a return to the multifaceted model of illness that is applicable to somatic and psychological illnesses. And just you wait, if this health care reform garbage is passed, you think the evidence based models that will drive what interventions are to be applied will consider other options besides medications?
Is Rod Serling directing this blog of late? Spend some time in the trenches of every day psychiatry. The people I interact with are almost all and only medicated. And in encreasing numbers on 3, 4, even 5 med regimens with a working diagnosis of depression. What the hell is this!? Psychopharmacology gone mad, in my opinion.
Our profession is pathetic as a whole. And if I am the only one with the guts to challenge the state of affairs in psychiatry, then we are all doomed as providers! Because we will become obsolete when PCPs/family MDs/internists/OBGYNs/Nurse Practitioners who will be cheaper to reimburse because they can easily write prescriptions will dumb down psychopathology to a level that will only harm more than help.
What are we going to see next? Put every one in Haiti on Zoloft or Lexapro for PTSD issues? God, it is disgusting to watch the demise of my profession. - January 14, 2010 at 9:33 PM
I very much agree with the spirit of your posting, Danny (though I still favor psychiatrists going through medical school, I would like to see an expanded residency, enlarging on the "psychosocial" dimensions of illness).
I believe the philosophical roots of these so-called "turf wars" lie in the heritage of Descartes, with his mind/body dualism. This has led, in my view, to sterile debates regarding whether people have "mental" or "bodily" disease. The late R.E. Kendell MD argued that "disease" is properly predicated of persons--not minds, brains, or bodies. Maimonides said much the same thing eight centuries ago: we try to cure not a disease, but a diseased person.
Regards, Ron Pies MD - January 14, 2010 at 10:13 PM
Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't referring to my own comment only; several readers questioned Dr. Carlat's explanation of his use of SSRIs as placebo. Regardless of whether one agrees with Dr. Carlat, it's helpful to know that doctors do use medicines in this way!
I was unaware of this "therapy versus meds" mentality among mental health providers, which (perhaps?) speaks to the ability of providers those biases away from clients, which is a good thing. However... with regard to something you wrote...
"Clearly, there are multiple different pathways leading to a 'neurobiological' cure."
(That's a lovely summation, by the way.) Is it really the case that a large number of mental health providers do not understand the above concept? I would find that extremely worrisome. - January 14, 2010 at 10:36 PM
Very interesting discussion from a layman's point of view.
Thank you, doctors! - January 15, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Dr. Carlat, you said:
"Drugs work."
I asked this this in the previous thread but perhaps with all the comments, you didn't see it.
Can you provide a link to an accessible study that shows the effectiveness of an antidepressant over 5 years? If you're going to claim that drugs work, you need to be able to do this in my opinion.
Thanks! - January 15, 2010 at 5:36 PM
It was a milestone of sorts to see a study published in a medical journal that claims antidepressants are ineffective. Of course, as an opponent of the use of antidepressants in general, I was delighted to see this, even though I found it surprising because, like others, I am well acquainted with the anecdotes of people who claim the meds are "saving their life." And these are people who have all forms of depression, not just the most severe. So I was prompted to read the study in full to see what was up. Well, like practically every other medical journal study in psychiatry I've ever read and analyzed, I thought the evidence was pretty flaky and vague and the methodology inappropriate to the strength of the data; in general it was just pushing weak data around to come up with something that had poor relevance for real clinical practice. The sophistication of the statistical analysis hardly seemed merited by the quality of the data. And not one example from the clinical details. I'm not surprised there have been a flurry of articles by antidepressant supporters, like Judith Warner (quoting Peter Kramer), Richard Friedman, and Danny dissecting the study.
Yes, I admit, as Danny says that "Drugs work" at least in some window of time, but my question is at what price does that "effectiveness" come? I'm not buying it that they should be used just because they "work." Cocaine would probably work too. I think until we really understand all the things these drugs are really doing to our brain and our body they should be avoided. I don't think it's good enough that we see a sad person, give him a pill, and out the other side of some mysterious black box comes someone happier. All very well and good but if we don't really know what's going on I think it's a very risky way to achieve that happiness. It would be fine if things froze at that point but they don't. The drug continues to wreak changes that are ill understood and, from what I've observed, things don't get better over time. Other subtle (or not so subtle) things start to happen and if someone stops the mood problems from rebound -- not relapse -- can be worse than ever unless the withdrawal is handled extremely carefully. The drugs may actually lead to someone being crippled by depression for life when they might not otherwise have been.
It almost seems like this article was written to rouse the a/d supporters from their slumber and get them riled up and defending that wonderful stimulant effect that makes so many people feel "better than well" until they become so impaired they no longer know "well" from "ill." It's time to study what happens when these drugs are used over the long term and also to study withdrawal thoroughly and deeply. That would be a much more effective use of research talent than silly studies like this one. - January 15, 2010 at 7:52 PM
Jay Katz considered the layman's point of view in The Silent World of Doctor and Patient:
"...patients hope that physicians can be trusted to observe carefully, to treat them with care, to alleviate unnecessary suffering, to discuss with them the implications of uncertainty's inevitable presence, to give the unpredictable forces of nature a helping hand, and above all, to remain honestly present and not abandon patients when they need them most...the promise of non-abandonment, or a caring and honest presence that can underlie faith, hope, and reassurance in the face of the limitations of medical knowledge, may be what patients seek to find in doctors as therapeutic agents, and not doctors' promise to do the impossible. Impossible promises--even when only made implicitly as they so often are--leave patients with a sense of distrust that is difficult to reverse." - January 16, 2010 at 3:20 AM
Fascinating post and response comments; thank you. Regarding the notion of a biologic cause for depression; there DOES seem to be some "genetic" component...people more like to be depressed if an immediate family member struggled as well. What does this say about "biology"? And, wrt the meds, I also think we lose sight of significant side effects and difficulty people have weaning off of them.
- January 16, 2010 at 7:23 AM
I thought Judith Warner's piece about this was good because it acknowledges that therapy is often at least as ineffective as some pills for some people. To me the problem is our cultural view of depression as a medical disease as the New York Times Magazine piece last week discussed.
I think ssri's change mood for many people some of the time and for some people apparently all of the time and that our culture should be looking into why we think people need a medical excuse to get a happy pill, if eradicating bad feelings for the long term like these pills can do is good for the individual or for society....The biomedical model is a response to the over use of psychotherapy.
As for a new psychiatry, it sounds a bit Orwellian to me sort of like the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Old freedom is just fine and in someways pschyciatry is researching itself out of existence which not a bad thing. - January 16, 2010 at 10:47 AM
- Eileen said...
SSRIs and practically all other drug research is short-term (4 to 8 weeks). The groups studied are more seriously depressed at the beginning of the studies, and are not representative of the general population who are taking SSRIs. This is confirmed by the recent JAMA study and other research. The way of calculating success in clinical trials (50% drop in severity of symptoms) leaves people with ongoing symptoms, something we know from research and also from commercials for Abilify which tell us that most people do not get all their symptoms relieved, so they need another drug. Trials are suppressed, conclusions selected and modified to emphasize certain findings, etc. Our understanding of the effects of SSRIs is very poor. Also, most people in this country are on multiple drugs, which have never been studied together (with a couple of exceptions: Prozac w Zyprexa, lithium w Depakote, very recently Abilify and Seroquel with SSRIs). Those were also short term studies. For the Seroquel add-on studies, the difference between the two groups was so small that it did not even reach the small difference that the designers of the research projected. In terms of therapy, of course, good therapy is good and therapy only to keep people compliant with drugs is bad. Don't forget light, sleep, movement and exercise, essential nutrients not produced by the human body, unremitting and multiple stressors, neighborhood effects, adverse childhood and life experiences, etc. The HPA axis, the neuroendoctrine systems and the immune systems are all connected and impact overall health outcomes. People learn behaviors and beliefs in their families and cultures and this is what is passed down, not genes for most behaviors that we somehow have come to believe are under genetic control. Behavior and emotion is not like eye color, which is also governed by muliple genes. Plus, I think it is accepted even in psychiatry that these diagnoses (MDD, schizophrenia, etc.) are heterogeneous disorders, that is, are not one disorder, but many disorders, caused by different things (prenatal infections, birth trauma, other things mentioned previously). A broader framework is the social determinants of health and social determinants of mental health. Relying on one technology (drugs) for everyone and evey problem is not the common practice in health: think of the different technologies for problems in vision and for contraception. Think outside the pillbox.
- January 16, 2010 at 1:32 PM
- Rosiecee said...
There should be more studies on what is happening in real life to people on these antidepressants. I agree with Sara that cocaine might make a person feel less depressed. Freud loved cocaine and used it for 5 or 6 years until he realized the potential for addiction on it.
There is no doubt in my mind that antidepressants can change a person's mood and, quite often, their personality. These "studies" are only investigating statistics in a bland, sort of controlled manner.
We need physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, etc., who know how to ask relevant questions, especially to those who say they feel much better on antidepressants. Obviously, if the patient is feeling worse, then the expert is going to try something else. But what of those who feel better, especially those who claim the antidepressants "saved their life" and they have a glow about them - an entirely difference ambiance about them.
The expert needs to ask these patients questions such as, "Have you felt the need to shoplift lately?", "Have you decided you can go it on your own - you don't need your spouse and children anymore?", "Are you spending money excessively since starting on the antidepressant?" "Have you had any thoughts or dreams of violence?"
There are 51 [fifty-one] school shootings/incidents at www.SSRIstories.com Not one of the perpetrators was on cocaine. They were all on antidepressants. We need to consider the possibility that perhaps antidepressants, in the overall scheme, are worse than cocaine.
Of the 200+ murder-suicides [media articles] on SSRI Stories, not one perpetrator was taking cocaine or even meth or heroin for that matter. We need to rethink what is happening.
Away with the bland statistics and on into the Real World. - January 16, 2010 at 4:25 PM
There desperately needs to be a clear divide between psychiatry and psychology, if for no other reason than the very fact that as a provider trained in medicine, the psychiatrist should confine him/herself to the MEDICAL aspects of the case and not be doing therapy, which can clearly be given just as effectively by thousands of other (and less expensive) providers. There is no reason for someone with advanced medical training to do "talk therapy" in this day and age; it is a waste of resources and training. It would be nice if the psychiatric profession finally made a break from analysis, therapy and the like and forged headlong into the areas of medicine and brain science on the cellular level--sciences that they should be trained to understand more comprehensively than a psychologist. So too, psychologists have the advanced training to fully appreciate and apply the many varied methods of therapy, as well as provide the kind of support and access that a medical doctor has a difficult time providing. In this age of decreasing funding for expensive health care, it would be more advantageous to have these professionals look to what is the best use of their skills for the patients that need to be treated.
We see this kind of division at work already in the area of physical therapy; the neurologist and physical therapist have entirely separate roles to play and they are able to work together for the patient's interest. Medications are adjusted by the neurologist, and the PT is able to provide all the support that the patient requires on the emotional and (in this case) physical level. It works in this case, because each professional has a clearly defined role for the treatment of the patient.
Yet, in the case of mental health, to have this continued "duality" in treatment is damaging to patients. Both psychiatrists and psychologists want to have one foot in either camp, and neither is fully trained in both disciplines and therefore the resultant care is compromised. It may take a lifetime for an individual to fully study and appreciate their own discipline, so why try to attempt a second discipline? The very fact that the mind/body problem is so very complex is even more reason that these disciplines must break apart and intensify their research, training and treatment in their respective areas, BEFORE one can ever address the mind/body duality problem.
The time has come for psychiatrists to become DOCTORS again, and deal with the brain as an organ that must be investigated medically. Once true meaningful research into brain functionality and pathology is able to be determined with more certainty, both professions can begin to merge their respective data and responses to form a more comprehensive picture of the mind/body dualism which continues to vex both professions.
The difficult path of neuroscience requires that highly trained medical professionals to do the important work that will shed more light into the complexities of mind on the physical level. Any distractions and continued forays into the therapy arenas by psychiatrists are merely prolonging the suffering of patients who are desperately waiting for answers and good, reliable, CURES.
As long as REAL cures remain elusive for the vast majority of mental illnesses, the present way of doing things is flawed. If psychiatry can embrace a new paradigm and put all of its energies into becoming brain doctors, rather than mind therapists, then perhaps there would be hope for the millions who continue to suffer with diseases of the brain that affect their minds. - January 17, 2010 at 1:16 AM
Anonymous, I couldn't disagree with you more.
As far as I'm concerned psychiatrists trying to become medical doctors is exactly what's wrong with mental health treatment today. Psychiatry is not like any other medical profession (which doesn't mean it's inferior by any means) and the brain is certainly not like any other organ either. IMHO mental illness will never be able to be reduced to cellular mechanisms completely because life forces and choices are always changing the elaborate feedback mechanism in the brain. It's a dynamic responding organism. It is precisely because we have been trying to do this -- reduce mood to biology -- that we have gotten into so much trouble. - January 17, 2010 at 12:05 PM
Well, regarding Anonymous' post regarding the need for a separation between psychiatry and psychology, and the need for MEDICAL doctors to treat BRAIN illnesses, I have one question: Why would we need psychiatrists in this sort of system? Don't we already have neurologists to do this? Anonymous seems to be presenting a case for the end of psychiatry as a medical discipline to be handled by neurology.
- January 17, 2010 at 9:51 PM
Regarding Judith W's piece in the NY Times: I thought it was a bit bizarre. She basically stated the JAMA article was good news for the medical treatment of depression because it showed some benefit for medication with VERY SEVERE depression. But, as I read her article, she suggested that medication non-responders were not really afflicted by major depression! Well... suppose I go to my doctor and he says I have a 300 cholesterol reading and he puts me on Lipitor and I do not respond. If he then said I did not have high cholesterol, I would sue him!!! LOL.
- January 17, 2010 at 10:06 PM
Because antidepressants are so very dangerous for some people.
- January 19, 2010 at 4:19 PM
- David Port, M.D. said...
Several relevant considerations have not fully found their way into this exchange that was prompted by the JAMA article and Dr. Carlat's blog response to it.
Firstly, many (albeit perhaps not a majority of) psychiatrists fully embrace the "duality" of mind and body by using an "integrative" approach to their patients. These psychiatrists provide psychotherapy alone and, when appropriate, psychotherapy integrated with the administration of psychotropic medications. In this manner, beneficial (and adverse) effects of the medicines can be closely appreciated and quickly adjusted by a single practitioner in consideration of the patient's week-to-week overall progress.
Secondly, many psychotropic medicines are prescribed by non-psychiatric physicians. I recall an old statistic (but don't know if it was valid then or would be now), that psychiatrists are responsible for only about 20% of psychotropic prescriptions. This factor would need to be accounted for in regard to the overall use, for better or worse, of psychotropic medicines.
Thirdly, while many non-medical psychotherapists refer their patients to a physician when they feel medicines may be indicated, some will refer only to a psychiatrist while others may refer to a non-psychiatric physician. In this "splitting" of care between the therapist and physician, the frequency, depth, and sophistication of collaborative discussion, if any, between the medicine specialist (psychiatrist or otherwise) and the non-medical therapist is obviously highly variable.
Finally, we might consider that while the doctrinaire approach of some "biological" psychiatrists who provide only psychopharmacological services --offering medicines in the context of brief and infrequent meetings and relegating psychotherapy to non-medical providers-- may be entirely sincere, there are certainly commercial influences in this regard. A mental health center director may require short infrequent sessions. In private practice, the psychiatrist may earn much more, doing several "med-checks" (patients who are seen briefly and infrequently) each hour than by providing a 45-minute psychotherapy session to a single patient. - January 20, 2010 at 1:47 PM
- sarala said...
Dr. Carlat,
Interesting blog to be sure and I plan to read more but should you really allow Google to run weight loss ads on your blog? Promoting health quackery and body image problems for money isn't all that much better than promoting Saphris for money, is it? - January 21, 2010 at 4:45 PM
- Daniel Carlat said...
I agree--I can't stand the ads that pop up on my site. For the last several months I have been trying to discontinue the adsense program on my blog but Google makes this incredibly difficult to do. I suggest you use Firefox as your browser and install the Firefox extension Adblock, which eliminates most ads from web pages with the added advantage that pages load more quickly. - January 22, 2010 at 9:02 AM
- Unknown said...
Here is the precise language of the conclusion of the JAMA article
"..Conclusions The magnitude of benefit of antidepressant medication compared with placebo increases with severity of depression symptoms and may be minimal or nonexistent, on average, in patients with mild or moderate symptoms. For patients with very severe depression, the benefit of medications over placebo is substantial."
after having read the article carefully my conclusion would be worded as :
,,,"Conclusions The magnitude of benefit of paxil or imipramine on HDRS compared with placebo increases with HDRS score and may be minimal or nonexistent, on average, in patients with mild or moderate HDRS scores. For patients with low scores , the benefit of medications over placebo is substantial.The implications for treatment of depression need further study.
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this blog
Yitzhak Shnaps MD
www.PrincetonPsychiatrist.com - January 24, 2010 at 9:07 AM
So what is Dr. Yitzhak's point? That clinical depression and its severity cannot be measured by the HDRS? Or that it cannot be measured by any instrument? If so, what is the use of doing research? If you can't measure or quantify a supposed disease entity, and choose to go by your gut, then you move out of the realm of science to magic and quackery!
- January 27, 2010 at 7:38 PM
- wetnurse said...
In particular, I agree completely with Dr. Hassman's comments(except for the Rod Serling reference), and also the points made by Eileen.
Regarding the feeling of one of the Anonymous' that psychiatrists should restrict themselves to prescribing medications and not try to straddle both disciplines: I couldn't disagree more.
There are many, many psychiatrists who, in addition to being excellent physicians, are skilled analysts and therapists as well.
Indeed, I believe that the kind of psychiatrist that in this day and age is considered a dinosaur is the best equipped to determine when medical intervention is indicated and can better evaluate symptoms.
Rather than having doctors choose one track or the other, I believe that psychiatric residents should no longer be able to "opt out" of the type of clinical supervision that teaches them to practice psychotherapy.
I think psychiatry has suffered immeasurably because of the freedom to pursue such a duality. - January 31, 2010 at 12:26 PM
- David Port, M.D. said...
If a medication benefit is presumed only in cases of severe depression, when a patient with mild-to-moderate depression comes to see the psychiatrist, should he be told to come back for medicine if and when his depression gets severe? In other words, do we believe that severe depression arises suddenly in someone who until that moment was in a good mood? On the other hand, if severe depression has been preceded by some progression of increasingly impaired mood, would it not make sense to medicate the mild or moderate depression, if only prophylactically, so as to prevent worsening of the condition?
- February 2, 2010 at 7:39 AM
In the spirit of identifying covert conflicts of interest, it is worth noting that of the 6 randomized trials which the JAMA authors reviewed, 2 were by themselves which involved randomized comparions of structured psychotherapy vs. antidepressants or placebo -- the other 4 studies did not involve randomization to psychotherapy arms. Patients who seek and screen for treatments that could involve psychotherapy may be different from those who pursue only drug-versus-placebo studies. A more fair-balanced analysis would need to account for patient and clinician biases and expectations about outcomes from psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, or both -- and which types of patients are best suited to each type of intervention. -- Regards, Danny -- Joe Goldberg MD
- February 2, 2010 at 3:37 PM
- Gina Pera said...
DC wrote: "biological psychiatrists" who argue that depression is essentially a biochemical disorder that is logically treated using agents that adjust the biochemistry. In the other corner are those who argue that depression is a response to life stress and is best treated by therapy techniques that help people cope.
Funny, I never see the "biological psychiatrists" taking the black/white view equal, but opposite, to that held firmly by the "non-biological psychiatrists."
The "biological psychiatrists" take a combined nature-nurture view. The "non-biological psychiatrists" take the ridiculously unsupportable "all nurture" view. - February 15, 2010 at 4:40 PM
- jamzo said...
there is "fake dualism" and there is the
extraordinary impact of the proprietary me-too antidpressant era
the number of people getting antidepressant rx
the number of people getting antidepressant rx from primary care physicians
the staggering cost of the patent protected proprietary me-too antidepressants and the staggering profits
the number of pharma sales reps laid off as patents for proprietary me-too antidepressants ran out
the shift in pharma marketing from
now unpatent protected, now lower cost, proprietary me-too antidepressants for depression to still patent protected high cost proprietary me-too anti-psychotics for depression
GSK's recent decision to abandon antidepressant research because the market is not profitable - February 17, 2010 at 11:52 AM
- Alex Yufik said...
A very thoughtful and observant post. I completely agree, and I do not understand why there is still any debate over the issue of biological correlates of human behavior. Depression has a biological correlate in the brain, happiness has a biological correlate in the brain, and every human behavior has a neurological component. I am looking forward to the day when psychopharmacology and psychology will finally merge, and that programs will be available for future practitioners who feel equally adept at utilizing meds as well as therapy in improving treatment.
- February 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM
Read in the Jan '10 issue of Primary Psychiatry the interview with Stephen Stahl and his perverse comment to the question at the bottom of page 33, re 'Is it an unusual case where a single drug fixes a disorder': "Absolutely...in the area of MDD is, given the paltry remission rates with first line treatments, to treat from the very get-go with two or three drugs."
And this is an alleged leader in the field of psychopharmacology? Bah! This is the type of irresponsible thinking that just deepens the field in distrust and disgust by responsible clinicians.
You have a provider who is in the pockets of all of pharma, so he can't be accused of being a whore for just one or two companies, but people miss the point he whores for pharma as a whole.
Hey, Dr Stahl, you know who is going to take your message and screw it up further? The majority of psychotropic prescribers in this country, ie non-psychiatric providers like FPPs/NPs/GYNs/Internists and so forth. And to you, Dr Carlat, you should be concerned to either read directly or have this information brought to your attention.
With this kind of mindset, every illness presented in a doctor's office should be shot gunned: hypertension, diabetes, GERD, hell, even pain issues.
And you wonder why more people challenge the reliability of physicians these days. We have irresponsible KOLs like the above allegedly speaking for us.
Not for me, sir! - February 21, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Wow, what a great blog, I have been working inPsychaitry for approx 12 years, and I am confident to say that meds work 20% of the time , the rest is mindset and educating people the power behind Thought. Thought is under rated and 80% of Mental Illness is Thought Disorders, stop figuring out the Brain. If we focused on Implementing This Knowledge into the schools to educate the young, thoughts would not being left on the Back Burner.We have to start with the young.
But, what do I know.. - April 6, 2010 at 5:01 PM
- Laura Fisher said...
Can someone explain to me why psychiatrists continue to state that the SSRI drugs are anti-depressants? My understanding of Irving Kirsch's investigation is that they are "active placebos" at best. Also a person who has not read Kirsch's book seems to me unlikely to realize what the issues are here (FDA, corruption in the approvals process per Angell's recent review on NYRB, harmful side effects of SSRI's considering their supposed efficacy has literally not been shown, etc.). It just isn't science to rely on the anecdote (e.g., "MY patients get better...", etc.).
Help me out. I am a psychiatrist. I prescribed these agents for years. I stopped doing so when I realized they had not been shown to work because I was trained to avoid anecdotes as a substitute fdor data.
Laura Fisher - September 26, 2010 at 3:50 PM
- anonymous said...
psychiatry (which has lost ground in the medical world in recent years in addition to neurology and I'll add rx for psychologists -- need to stay on up on this research as the FDA (for many reasons) makes IRB and clinical trial approval so difficult (and expensive) for new drugs or "new uses" for old drugs -- can be almost impossible to research (see for example -- new = Reboxetine, not approved in US, appears to be for political/ lobby reasons and for old -- Survector an older - Dopamine Re-uptake Inhibitor (DRI) pulled of the market for fears of its addictive potential (uh, and kids get prescribed adderral, as young as 6 for ADHD what? But we can have just as powerful meds for depression in adults? I don't get that personally). Also, using meds like psycho stimulants to treat lethargy for atyical/ treatment resistant depression is arguable vs. behavioral activation as psycho-stim meds might be counter indicated (this is a complicated argument for another time; however -- I still like it as a creative approach in treatment for certain depression sxs), and meds like provigil for energy boosts might be better, which leads to my final point 5) there are many good meds, old, new, and progressive/ creative/ or even aggressive poly pharm approaches to treat psych issues (even for minor disorders like depression NOS), or more serious ones pain (Lyrics is new and promising actually), energy, sleep problems -- but we get down to this "art of prescribing issue," and good prescribes to MH patients/ and medical world or psychiatrist almost start to look like witch doctors (e.g. a "dash" of gabapentin, topomax, a little lexipro over zoloft, and maybe some ritilan to treat chronic pain, mood dysregulation, and low energy in a patinet); but the "why" gets hard to justify with these more "creative" drugs and/ also drug companies are hesitant to pursue (for instance) new clinical trials for off label uses to provide evidence or efficacy for these meds-- for ex. think seroquel for sleep (and allot can be said here, regarding legal issues as well -- the "black box" warning on SSRIs has basically been dis-proven scientifically/ and statistically, but the warning persists). What this comes down to is that there is a high degree of variability between medication prescribes (including psychiatrists) because there are not well articulated practice parameters (and psychologists don't even really have them for behavioral/ psychotherapy tx for that matter) -- that there are no true practice parameters -- for the more creative approaches for treatment resistant mental health/ BH conditions in terms of psychiatric medications. Thus, in conclusion, MH patients suffer. They might not be able to afford/ or understand who the "best" psychiatrists are, insurance won't pay for the best psychologists, and meanwhile they get 60mg of celexa from their PCM/ GP and ultimately their depressive or anxiety symptoms are not well treated. I think a way to somewhat resolve this is advertise the more creative poly pharm approaches and continue to push on the new research for clinical trials (as noted above).
- April 15, 2011 at 3:24 AM
- anonymous said...
As a psychologist, I actually like meds for patients (including SSRIs), but here is the catch = I think many docotrs/ providers prescribing meds (including psychiatrists) fail to approach treatment from an aggressive ploy pharm approach (this does become complicated with the more "complicated" the patient or when dealing with patients who have background with addition, but even some of the best treatments for addicts/ addition include kid of mood stabilizers or SSRIs plus some sort of BH counseling). I say take a look at Stephen Stahl, MD (book: "prescribers guide"). he is a psychiatrist who prescribes powerful cocktails outside of the FDA recommend range (e.g. California Rocket Fuel with up to 600 mg to 800 mg of Effexor to kick in dopamine effects). I'll say five things/ points in addition to the above: 1) I think most SSRIs, NDRIs, and other less powerful/ non additive psychotropic meds (e.g. Buspar for anxiety, etc.), just don't do or rather work that well; however, point 2) placebo and attitude/ expectancy effects in patients (especially those naive to treatment are powerful). I see a pipeline here with many of my patients-- they want meds, they get meds, meds don't work well and then they actually engage in CBT, etc. and poof they get allot better, 3) point bottom line: we don't know much about the science of these meds -- it seems to be that when you push down on one part of the brain, something/ somewhere else (neuron) pushes up somewhere else -- i.e. statis, etc. -and- the best evidence says this: meds vs. talk psychotherapy is about the same for most MH patients (not necessarily true for extreme bipolar, psychotic, etc.); and Benefit of no meds is that when you take them away, gains can generally be maintained (with brain imaging studies post BH/ CBT/ etc. treatment confirming this). Mechanism of action = unknown, still! Also, keep in mind that "time" (i.e. time heals all wounds) can also containment treatment effect (that is, for example SSRIs take about 4 to 6 wks to "build up" in someone's system if researchers put SSRIs against time (i.e. nothing) many times -- what might causing -- something like "depression," for someone has went away and thus they could better regardless of meds, -- point 4) there is some cutting edge research going on with dopaminergic vs serotonergic vs neuroadrelnalin as well as glutamate pathways for mood/ anxiety/ depressive disorders (see: http://www.biopsychiatry.com/glutamate-depression.htm - for instance)
- April 15, 2011 at 3:25 AM


text:
Schaumburg Commercial Building Contractor
Get someone you trust to monitor your next Schaumburg building construction project with Direct Steel and Construction, your neighborhood building contractor.
When we receive a project, we will assess how we can streamline the entire project. We will coordinate with you in every step of the building construction, from the design, permits, construction, and finalizing. You also won't need to stress out over finding the right suppliers for your building. We will get the right suppliers for building materials and other business requirements, and guarantee your building will match what your business needs and how you want it to look like.
When people think about buildings, they often think they are tall skyscrapers that will be used for housing or office buildings. But, buildings can actually mean a lot of things, and with the latest developments in building, we can make any building look attractive, functional, and unique to match any business purpose you may have for the building. Direct Steel and Construction takes into consideration what you need.
Whether you want a new building or expanding your current buildings, we can manage the project with no problem. Our building contractors and teams are ready to work with you at any time!
Call Direct Steel and Construction at (815) 421-1334 for a Free Consultation!
Ready For Any Project
Buildings come in various shapes, sizes, materials, and functions. If you have a particular preference for how your building should look like, no problem! We can work with any style, shape, and size, guaranteeing it fits your needs.
We can also work well with any material for buildings and check which one will work best for your budget and preference. In some of our buildings, we use steel framing since this will open a lot of floor space for what you intend to use the building for.
Aside from the building itself, our team can also design the exterior of the building to make it look unique. We can do brickworks, stucco, and others without affecting the integrity of the structure.
We work closely alongside your design and management teams to build your ideal building and ensure it matches your goals.
Customized Building Construction Projects
As a general contractor, we have developed numerous procedures to maximize our operations to fit any Schaumburg business and function.
From commercial buildings, schools, churches, government offices to retail spaces, we have done them all. We even did several unique buildings that matched various functions that you may not have considered for buildings.
When we work on buildings, we try our best to match your budget and ensure it is attractive, environmentally sound, and energy-efficient.
We also ensure that you know every aspect of the project, and the design caters to your project needs. We will also make your vision a reality with the help of partners and contractors.
When you are looking for an experienced, dedicated partner for your next commercial building construction project, Direct Steel and Construction is the local provider you can trust to advocate for you.
Managing The Entire Construction Process
With us serving as your building contractor, we will be with you in every step of the project.
We will first discuss everything we need to know about the facility, business operations, budget, and any other vital aspects so we can design your ideal building. Our Schaumburg team will also assist you to understand the building construction process and clarify whatever issues you may have. We will also join you during the on-site inspections and modify the project if needed.
We also follow a five-pillar plan to ensure the project is on time. Our team will do our best to cover every part of the project efficiently and make sure everything is high quality and safe to use.
Once we are done, your new building will be ready for use immediately.
Dedicated Building Contractor
When we receive a project, we will give our 100% to help you get the project done right and talk to the vendors directly for you.
We will organize the construction project from the schedule to how the construction will be done per step. We will also be the ones to handle any permit applications, contractor bidding, and other negotiations.
Our experience will help us give you great recommendations about what will work for your project. We can also suggest designs, materials, and other processes which you may not have considered before.
Here at Direct Steel and Construction, our Schaumburg experts are dedicated to providing high-quality and functional buildings that will support every business and their needs.
Let's Talk Now- Free Consultation
As a general building contractor, we know what to avoid to ensure projects stick to its schedule. We also understand that businesses need buildings that will function correctly to help with their operations. With our experts ready to hear your projects, we can help you run your business continuously as their new building is in the process of building built. We will also update you regularly to ensure that we are on schedule.
Since we have been experts in the commercial construction industry for years, we know how to get the best materials any project we work on for better prices and find the specific materials you will need for the building that you can't find easily.
If you want a building contractor that will get the job done without any problems, Direct Steel and Construction is here to assist.
Call Direct Steel and Construction today at (815) 421-1334 for your Free Consultation!

subset: commoncrawl


text:
About The Press Ganey Survey
At Hammock Gardens Dental Care, doing what is best for patients is our top priority. To ensure we are providing the highest level of care possible, a system to monitor patient experience (both positive and negative) has to be in place. This gives us insight into what patients are saying, what their expectations are and in what areas we could do better. To make this a reality, we have partnered with Press Ganey, the recognized leader in healthcare performance improvement.
Founded in 1985 by Irwin Press, PhD, and Rod Ganey, PhD, Press Ganey is the largest provider of healthcare performance improvement solutions, serving over 10,000 healthcare organizations nationwide, including half of all U.S. hospitals. Based in South Bend, Indiana, the company partners with a variety of healthcare providers to offer effective patient experience and performance improvement.
The Survey
Each Press Ganey survey includes a series of questions customized to our office, covering various parts of a patient's dental visit. This custom survey, featuring both rating scale questions and written comments, is emailed or mailed to patients within a few days of their visit.
Once the surveys are completed and processed by Press Ganey, we evaluate the feedback and use the results to enhance all aspects of our service and care.
What Questions Are Asked?
To give us a clear, effective understanding of what patients are looking for, the survey features a series of questions covering a variety of areas, such as doctor availability, convenience of office hours, facility details, confidence in staff, demonstrated teamwork and more.
What Responses Are Posted Online?
To give prospective patients an accurate representation of our office, we post both positive and negative responses on our website. However, we do monitor all responses received and will not post comments that are slanderous, libelous, profane or inappropriate. When completing the survey, patients can indicate whether or not they would like their comments posted. If a patient does not want to share their comments, we will not post them. Comments posted will also be anonymous.


text:
the xdiff functions require your initial string to end with a \n character.
When you use xdiff_string_diff, the initial string must either be zero-length or end with \n
eg. $patch= xdiff_string_diff($string,$string2);
if not, the patch will return an empty string.
This will not normally affect xdiff_file_diff, but it's annoying nevertheless. To prevent this unexpected effect, I append a \n to the string before applying the initial diff, as follows.
if (!ereg("\n$",$string)) $string.="\n";


text:
This is a signed edition print. I use the highest quality Photo papers and print with Epson Ultrachrome inks, to offer you a true Giclee archival print.
Choose from the buying options; framed, stretched canvas or print and mount. Then select size.
Frames come with high quality clear acrylic front.
Canvas is stretched over a deep profile (38mm) gallery quality frame, ready to hang.
If you have any bespoke print or frame requests, then please contact me directly on tel - 07746836659 or email email@example.com
Liverpool Skyline, Wall Art, Cityscape, Photography


text:
Former Arapahoe County (Colo.) sheriff Patrick Sullivan, who back in December was charged with trying to trade methamphetamine for sex with a man, "pleaded guilty on Tuesday to charges of meth possession and soliciting prostitution," Denver's KUSA-TV reports.
And he will indeed serve his 38-day jail sentence (with credit for 8 days already spent behind bars) in the county's Patrick J. Sullivan Jr. Detention Facility. Yes, it's named after him.
The 69-year-old Sullivan was sheriff for 18 years before he retired in 2002. As The Denver Post writes:
"Sullivan had a storied law enforcement career and was named Sheriff of the Year by the National Sheriffs' Association in 2001.
"In 1989, the sheriff drove a Jeep through the fence of an Arapahoe County home to rescue two deputies and a wounded 17-year-old boy who had been taken hostage by a rape and murder suspect armed with a machine gun."
Copyright 2020 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.


text:
macie floral romper
- Regular
- $ 36.00
- Sale
- $ 36.00
- Regular
- $ 36.00
- Unit Price
- per
how adorable is this floral onesie!! the perfect onesie for a photoshoot or any occasions!
USA handmade
fabric: 100% cotton
mode RETURN POLICY:
all online returns must go through our Returns Portal
short version:
Store credit or exchange only within 14 days.
Must have tags attached and receipt.
return shipping charges are customer's responsibility.
detailed version:
Merchandise may ONLY be returned for a STORE CREDIT or exchange within 14 days of the date you received order.
Returned items must remain un-washed and un-worn.
Tags must be attached.
All SALE items are FINAL sale and cannot be returned.
The customer is responsible for the shipping and handling of the returned item(s). Original shipping fees are non-refundable.
full return policy


text:
binance-bsc.vip Scam Review: Get Money Back
binance-bsc.vip is an offshore broker which is not regulated by any reputed regulation authority in its region. The broker may operate in many countries without the regulation required by the reputed regulation authority in its country like CySec, ASIC, FCA, CNMV etc. But regulation can't be the only reason for calling this broker as a scam. Many Complaints and negative binance-bsc.vip reviews and other possible scam features can also be the reason. Your funds may not be safe if you are trading with this broker.
binance-bsc.vip is an online trading platform that claims to offer the earning of passive income. But, the truth is, binance-bsc.vip is one of the potential tricks. If you do not want to lose your investment, it is better to keep your money away from this broker. binance-bsc.vip is a Trading Platform. It's an MLM company that operates in the crypto niche. The broker doesn't even share any information about its staff on its website. What makes the broker more suspicious is – they share stock pictures as staff members on its website. Also, they shared one video with a paid actor claiming him to be a staff member. All these things are the proof of – how fake and untrustworthy the broker is and how unsafe your investments are.
On the other hand, binance-bsc.vip can't get their deceptions straight. In an attempt to look authorized, they arranged an FINCEN certificate for an MSB registration. Generally, offshore scammers get this certificate using the wrong information.
Possible scam activities of scam broker binance-bsc.vip
Here are some of the possible reasons why we have flagged this broker as a scam broker in this binance-bsc.vip review.
- The broker may have made a number of false claims through its website.
- The rules and regulations, Bonus and Withdrawal policies are not legitimate and they are made for defrauding traders.
- The broker makes continuous calls to the traders and urge them to invest higher and higher amounts.
- The broker promises return which are too good to be true.
- The risk warnings may not be disclosed on their webpage or that would be hidden.
- The broker may be located in the countries or small islands where there is no proper regulation and registering a company is very easy. Usually, these countries are haven for the scam brokers.
- This broker provides you good chances of making profits and when you decide to withdraw your money, they will state their illegitimate rules of withdrawals and ultimately you are not able to make withdrawal.
- Broker remains operational for some time and suddenly you are not able to contact the broker or the website seems down. The broker also changes name and website URL without any notice to existing traders.
Is binance-bsc.vip a scam?
Despite what any binance-bsc.vip review has told you, binance-bsc.vip is a suspected scam. We don't recommend trading with them. If you are already trading with binance-bsc.vip we recommend you immediately cease depositing any amount of funds with them, in particular if they are asking for a fee to withdraw your money. DO NOT PAY IT.
Negative binance-bsc.vip Reviews and Complaints
binance-bsc.vip has gotten many negative reviews and traders who traded with this broker have raised many complaints against it. ReportScamBroker has investigated a lot about this broker and based on the negative reviews, complaints and other scam features, we have listed this broker in the list of scam brokers warnings.
Is binance-bsc.vip Legit or a Scam?
ReportScamBroker does not recommend traders to trade with this broker and your funds may not be safe with this broker and binance-bsc.vip review is negative. Instead look for regulated and reputed brokers who can really help in growing your investments.
When searching for brokers to conduct your trading activities with, the first and most important step should always be to learn about their certification(s). This will tell you whether they are regulated by a central authority or if binance-bsc.vip is an offshore and/or unregulated entity.
When a broker is unregulated or regulated by an entity outside of your jurisdiction, you have limited to no legal recourse in the event that your funds are compromised. In an event of theft, complaints can only be made if that broker is licensed by the regulator in your jurisdiction. Some examples of regulatory authorities that issue brokerage licenses are:
- The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
- The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
- The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
If a broker is not licensed by the regulatory authority in your jurisdiction, that likely means that they are unregulated and should be avoided. Even if the brokerage is regulated, it is best to avoid it if the regulator happens to be outside your jurisdiction.
Got Scammed by binance-bsc.vip ?
If you have lost money with binance-bsc.vip , don't panic. You are not the first and you likely won't be the last. Mistakes can happen even with the most cautious of investors, and should be used as a learning opportunity.
The good news is that there is help available. The team at ReportScamBroker – a specialist group dedicated to helping consumers recover funds lost online – is available 24/7 and has helped consumers all over the world recoup millions of dollars.
A chargeback is the retroactive cancellation and refund of a charge made using your credit card, wire transfer or some other payment methods.
By putting together a compelling chargeback strategy from beginning to end, victims of online fraud have a relatively high probability of recovering some of all of their funds lost.
Click the button below, and validating your eligibility for their programs, ReportScamBroker will help you build a solid case to regain your funds as soon as possible.


text:
Herrema's Marketplace Privacy Policy
Last Updated July 23, 2020
Herrema's Marketplace ("Company") is committed to safeguarding your privacy. This Privacy Policy applies to information we collect on our website located at herremas.com (the "Website") our SMS text messaging program and third party text message service (the "SMS Service") our digital coupon service (the "Digital Coupon Program") our customer loyalty program (the "Loyalty Program") and our mobile shopping app (the "Mobile App"). In this Privacy Policy, we refer to the Website, the SMS Service, the Digital Coupon Program, the Loyalty Program and the Mobile App together as the "Services".
We use this Privacy Policy to clearly disclose to you our privacy practices in a manner that is easy to understand. If there is something you do not understand about our privacy practices, please feel free to contact us at the contact information at the bottom of this Privacy Policy.
We may change this policy from time to time so please check back often. If we significantly change our collection, use, or disclosure practices, we will try to send you a notice via email if you have provided us with an email address. Please keep in mind that some of the services mentioned specifically in this policy may not be available on the site at this time.
What information do we collect from you?
We collect information in several ways. Some of the information we collect is personal to you. Other information is anonymous. We collect the following categories of information:
- During registration on the Website or the Mobile App, we ask for your name and email address
- When you sign up for digital coupons, we ask for your mobile phone number
- When you edit your profile on the Website or the Mobile App or sign up for our loyalty program, we collect your mailing address and birthdate.
- When you report a problem with our site or services we will collect contact information along with a description of your problem
- When you contact us via the company email address or the "Contact" link, we will collect your name and email address and any information you provide in the email or message field
- When you use our Meal Planner feature, we will save your meal plans for your convenience to use when you log into your account.
- When you complete a store survey, we collect your name, email address, location and information about your grocery shopping preferences.
- When you fill out an employment application downloaded from our website, we collect employment information, employment history, and education information.
- To customize our service for you, we and our partners may collect precise location data, including the real-time geographic location of your computer or device. This location data is collected anonymously in a form that does not personally identify you. We may obtain your consent on your first use of the service. On the Mobile App, for example, we will use your location to associate you with our nearest store to you. You can change your preferences in your profile.
- When you visit and navigate our site, use our applications or third party sites, or open our emails, we may collect technical information about your use of our site including IP address, device identifier, the type of browser you use, the files you request and the domain name and country from which you request information.
How do we collect information from you?
Direct Collection
We collect much of the information listed above directly from you when you submit it on our Website or in the Mobile App. This includes information such as registration information, contact information, and information used in our digital coupon and loyalty programs. If you do not want to share your information, you can choose not to participate in a particular service or activity.
Indirect Collection – Cookies and Other Technology
As part of offering and providing customizable and personalized services, many websites use cookies and other online tracking technologies to store and sometimes track information about you. We may use these technologies to:
- Provide you with personalized content based on your use of our site
- Enable you to more easily use our site by remembering and using contact information, purchasing information, and registration information
- Evaluate, monitor and analyze the use of our site and its traffic patterns to help improve our site and services
- Assist us with ad reporting functions such as to learn which ads are bringing users to our website
The types of technologies we use include:
Cookies. A cookie is a small amount of data that is sent to your browser from a Web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. Cookies enable us to identify your browser as a unique user. Cookies may involve the transmission of information from us to you and from you to us. Cookies may also be used by another party on our behalf to transfer information to us in accordance with their privacy policy. Some cookies are "persistent cookies." They are used by us each time you access our Website. Other cookies are called "session cookies." Session cookies are used only during a specific browsing session. We may use a session cookie, for example, to remember that you have already navigated through a particular menu, or that you have entered in age information for a portion of a site that is restricted by age. We may also use "analytics cookies" that allow web analytics services to recognize your browser or device and, for example, identify whether you have visited our Website before, what you have previously viewed or clicked on, and how you found us. This information is provided anonymously for statistical analysis only. Analytics cookies are usually persistent cookies.
Web Beacons. We also employ a software technology called a clear GIF (Graphics Interchange Format), also known as a pixel tag or Web beacon. A clear GIF is a line of code that we place on our Websites or in e-mails which allows us to analyze our advertising and the general usage patterns of visitors to our Websites. These help us better manage content on our site by informing us what content or promotions are effective. Unless you consent, we do not collect personally identifiable information from you through the use of web beacons. You may not disable Web beacons.
Log Files. Like most standard website servers, we use log files. Log files track Internet protocol (IP) addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, platform type, date/time stamp, and number of clicks. We utilize this information to analyze trends, administer the site, prevent fraud, track website navigation in the aggregate, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use.
Indirect Collection – Social Networking
The Website permits you to use a third party social networking platform such as Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest. This includes use of social media plugins such as Facebook "Like", Tweet, and Pinterest "Pin". When you use these social networking platforms and plugins, your username and password for the available service or collected from you on these services may be shared with us. When you use social networking platforms and plugins, you share your information with them and their privacy policy applies disclosure of such information. In addition, they may be able to collect information about you, including your activity or may notify your connections on the social networking platform about your use of the Company's Websites. Such services may allow your activity to be monitored across multiple websites for purposes of delivering more targeted advertising. Please note that their own privacy polices apply and we encourage you to read them. We may add new social networking plugins and buttons to our Websites from time to time.
Indirect Collection – Third Party Advertising Services
We may employ over time various different advertising or remarketing services that serve you targeted advertisements to make your online experience more focused to your interests. These services may place a remarketing pixel and/or on the Website in order to recognize your browser and serve advertisements that relate to prior searches and activities you participate in on the Website. We will not run interest-based advertising campaigns that collect personally identifiable information (PII) including, but not limited to, email addresses, telephone numbers and credit card numbers. We will not use or associate personally identifiable information with remarketing lists, cookies, data feeds or other anonymous identifiers. We will not use or associate targeting information, such as demographics or location, with any personally identifiable information collected from the ad or its landing page(s).
We will not share any personally identifiable information with Google through our remarketing tag or any product data feeds which might be associated with our ads. We may use third party services we to manage these technologies and to serve advertisements on our Website example, we may employ technology that pairs specific advertisements our site and others with searches that you run on our Website. In order to provide this type of targeted advertising. We will not run interest-based advertising campaigns that collect personally identifiable information (PII) other than anonymous persistent identifiers. We will not track your ad preferences by email addresses, telephone numbers or credit card numbers. We will not use or associate personally identifiable information with remarketing lists, cookies, data feeds or other anonymous identifiers. We also use Google Analytics and Site Master to analyze your use of our Website and the use of others. Analytical data is kept anonymous. We use Google Analytics to collect and analyze certain types of information across websites and KickFire to analyze traffic to individual store websites. This collection includes cookies, IP addresses, device and software identifiers, referring and exit URLs, onsite behavior and usage information, feature use metrics and statistics, usage and purchase history, MAC Address, mobile unique device ID, and other similar information.
How do we use your information?
Our main goal in collecting information is to improve the Services and provide you with the best possible experience on when using the Services. For example, by using the information we collect, we can provide you with an easy to use and readily available forum to make your grocery shopping experience more pleasurable and cost effective.
We will also use your personal information to:
- Notify you of other grocery deals, products or services available from Company and our affiliates
- Provide you with digital coupons and loyalty programs
- Personalize online content so that is applies to you and your interests
- Provide you with advertising targeted on your interests
- Make our Services better
- Compile, analyze and do research on our users' demographics and behavior
- Detect, investigate and prevent activities that may violate our policies or be illegal
Who is collecting information?
Except as provided in this Privacy Policy, only Company and our affiliates and service providers will have access to your personal account information. When you are on our site and are asked for personal information, you are sharing that information with Company and our affiliates and service providers. If personal data is to be collected and/or maintained by any company other than Company or its affiliates or service providers, we will try to notify you on the Website or in an updated version of this Privacy Policy. If you do not want your data to be shared, you can choose not to allow the transfer by not using that particular service. Other websites to which we link may collect personally identifiable information about you when you visit those sites. The information practices of other websites linked to our websites are not covered by this Privacy Policy.
With whom does Company share my information?
We will not disclose any of your personally identifiable information except when we have your permission or under special circumstances, such as when we believe in good faith that the law requires it or under the circumstances described below. These are some of the ways that your information may be disclosed:
Service Providers
We occasionally hire other companies to provide limited services on our behalf, including packaging, delivering, or mailing, website development and operation, answering customer questions about products or services, sending postal mail or email, analyzing website use, processing payments, providing investor information and processing data. We will only provide those companies the information they need to deliver the service, and they are contractually prohibited from using that information for any other reason.
Online Shopping
We may offer an online shopping service that enables you to order groceries online and have them delivered to your door. We currently use a third party online shopping service provider available at [INSERT URL TO ONLINE SHOPPING SERVICE PROVIDER] to provide you with this service (the "Online Shopping Service"). If you use this service, any information you provide is being collected by the Online Shopping Service and is subject to its privacy policy.
Digital Coupons
We offer the Digital Coupon Program through our Website and the Mobile App. When you use the Digital Coupon Program, we send your contact information, including phone number to our third party service provider, currently Inmar, Inc. who administers the program. We also send our third party service provider your coupon selections for use when you visit a store. When you visit a store and provide the mobile phone number that you used to register with us, your selected coupons are automatically applied.
Loyalty Program
We offer the Loyalty Program through our Website and the Mobile App. When you use the Loyalty Program, we send your contact information, your birth date and the date you first registered with us to our third party service provider, currently Loyalty Lane who administers the program. We may also collect and send information about your shopping preferences, pets and pet products and other such information to our third party service provider. When you visit a store and provide your mobile phone number to us, your loyalty points rewards are automatically applied.
Data in the Aggregate
We may disclose "blinded" aggregated data and user statistics to prospective partners and other third parties. Blinded data is data that does not identify an individual person. This includes shopping and coupon preferences for customers that does not include their name or identifying information but may include geographic information or store location.
We also may disclose your information in special cases. For example, when we believe that we must disclose information to identify, contact or bring legal action against someone who may be violating our Terms of Use, or may be causing injury to or interference with our rights or property, other website users or customers and their information, or anyone else who may be harmed by such activities. Company and our service providers may disclose, access or monitor your personal information when we believe in good faith that the law requires it and for administrative and other purposes that we deem necessary to maintain, service and improve our products and services and our information security. As we continue to develop our business, we may buy or sell businesses or assets. In such transactions, confidential customer information generally is one of the transferred business assets. In the event of a transaction involving the sale of some or all of Company's businesses, customer and site visitor information may be one of the transferred assets and may be disclosed in connection with negotiations relating to a proposed transaction. In such case, the transferred information may become subject to a different privacy policy.
How can I control my personal information?
We offer our customers choices for the collection, use and sharing of personal information. You may contact us at the email address below if you wish to view, edit, or delete your personal information from our database, and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to accommodate your request.
To ensure that you will not receive recurring marketing or other information from us unless you choose to, we will provide you with simple instructions on each marketing email from Company for you to let us know that you have chosen to stop receiving such emails from us. Emails sent from Company are different than emails sent from the third party service provider who administers our Loyalty Program. If you want to opt out of both general marketing emails and Loyalty Program emails, you need to opt-out separately.
You may disable browser cookies in your browser or set your browser to warn you when a cookie is being sent. You may lose some features or functionality when you disable cookies. Remember, also, that disabling cookies is browser specific. If you log on using Internet Explorer, you must also disable cookies in Safari if you use that browser at a different time.
You may also opt-out of other Google Analytics features using the Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on.
If you believe that any inaccurate or inappropriate information has been obtained or provided to others through your use of this Website, you should contact a representative of Company at the email address below.
What security precautions are in place to protect against the loss, misuse, or alteration of my information?
Your Company Account Information and Company Profile is password-protected so only you have access to this personal information. This is to ensure that others cannot access your account by using your computer when you are away from it. We use Transport Layer Security (TLS) technology for registration the My Account pages where your personal information can be modified. You can tell that a web page is secure by looking for "https" in the URL or for the padlock symbol in the URL. We use reasonable data security measures to protect your information while in storage. We limit employee access to your personal information to those who have a need to know to assist with the Services.
Because information sent through the Internet travels from computer to computer throughout the world, when you give us information, that information may be sent electronically to servers outside of the country where you originally entered the information. Unfortunately, no data transmission over the Internet can be guaranteed to be 100% secure. Except as specifically stated, this site does not use security encryption measures. Information that you disclose by use of this site (as with any site that is non-secure), by posting a message or using e-mail, potentially could be collected and used by others. This may result in unsolicited messages from third parties or use of such information by third parties for their own purposes, legal or illegal. As a result, while we strive to protect your personal information, we cannot ensure or warrant the security of any information you transmit to us or from our services, and you do so at your own risk. Once we receive your transmission, we use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure its security on our systems.
What else should I know about my privacy?
Please keep in mind that whenever you voluntarily disclose information online, that information is accessible to other customers and users. Ultimately, you are solely responsible for maintaining the secrecy of your passwords and/or any account information. Please be careful and responsible whenever you are online.
When you or we end your customer relationship with us, we will treat the information we have about you as if you were still our customer.
Your California Privacy Rights
California Civil Code Section 1798.83 permits our visitors who are California residents to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes. To make such a request, please send an email to or write us: using the contact information below.
Make sure to state that you are a California Resident.
Do Not Track
Do Not Track (DNT) is a privacy preference that users can set in their web browsers. While the United States Federal Trade Commission has endorsed DNT, our Website does not support DNT codes. However, except in the case of analytics cookies, remarketing and other features of Google Display Advertising described above, our Website limits tracking to the internal uses described above. Except in the case of analytics cookies, remarketing and other features of Google Display Advertising described above, our Website does not track your use across multiple websites, however, other websites to which we link may. Please review their privacy policies to understand how you may be tracked.
California Consumer Privacy Act
After January 1, 2020, California residents will have additional rights under the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA). If you are a resident of the State of California, you will have the right to:
- request what personal information we have collected about you, where it was sourced from, what it is being used for, whether it is being disclosed or sold, and to whom it is being disclosed or sold;
- "opt out" of allowing us to sell your personal information to third parties;
- require us to delete your personal information with some limited exceptions such as completing transactions, detecting security incidents and complying with legal obligations; and
- receive equal service and pricing even if you exercise your privacy rights under the CCPA.
The CCPA also provides that if a company has a privacy notice that allows you to opt-out or opt-in to the use of your personal information by third parties (such as advertisers or affiliated companies) for marketing purposes, the company may instead provide you with information on how to exercise your disclosure choice options.
We do not currently collect information from people located in California and Website and Mobile App are not for use by people located in California. We do not currently share your personal information with third parties for marketing purposes. Therefore, we do not maintain a list of third parties with whom we share personal information for marketing purposes. If that changes, we will update our privacy notice.
Your Nevada Privacy Rights
Nevada law (SB 220), permits customers in Nevada to opt-out of the sale of certain kinds of personal information. A sale under Nevada law is the transfer of this personal information to third parties for monetary consideration so these third parties can then re-sell or license the sold information. Company does not sell your personal information to third parties as defined in Nevada law.
Who do users contact with questions or concerns about our Privacy Policy?
If you need further assistance, please send an e-mail with your questions or comments to email@example.com or write us at:
Herrema's Marketplace
125 Pattonwood Dr.
Rochester, NY 14617
When you opt-in to the SMM Service, we will send you an SMS message to confirm your signup.
You can cancel the SMS service at any time. Just text "STOP" to 41570. After you send the SMS message "STOP" to us, we will send you an SMS message to confirm that you have been unsubscribed. After this, you will no longer receive SMS messages from us.
If you want to join again, just sign up as you did the first time and we will start sending SMS messages to you again.
If at any time you forget what keywords are supported, just text "HELP" to 41570. After you send the SMS message "HELP" to us, we will respond with instructions on how to use our service as well as how to unsubscribe.
We are able to deliver messages to the following mobile phone carriers:
Major carriers: AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Sprint, T-Mobile, U.S. Cellular, Alltel, Boost Mobile, Nextel, and Virgin Mobile.
Minor carriers: Alaska Communications Systems (ACS), Appalachian Wireless (EKN), Bluegrass Cellular, Cellular One of East Central IL (ECIT), Cellular One of Northeast Pennsylvania, Cincinnati Bell Wireless, Cricket, Coral Wireless (Mobi PCS), COX, Cross, Element Mobile (Flat Wireless), Epic Touch (Elkhart Telephone), GCI, Golden State, Hawkeye (Chat Mobility), Hawkeye (NW Missouri), Illinois Valley Cellular, Inland Cellular, iWireless (Iowa Wireless), Keystone Wireless (Immix Wireless/PC Man), Mosaic (Consolidated or CTC Telecom), Nex-Tech Wireless, NTelos, Panhandle Communications, Pioneer, Plateau (Texas RSA 3 Ltd), Revol, RINA, Simmetry (TMP Corporation), Thumb Cellular, Union Wireless, United Wireless, Viaero Wireless, and West Central (WCC or 5 Star Wireless).
As always, message and data rates may apply for any messages sent to you from us and to us from you. You will receive around 3 texts per week. If you have any questions about your text plan or data plan, it is best to contact your wireless provider.
For all questions about the services provided by this short code, you can contact the customer service desk at the store.
If you have any questions regarding privacy, please read our privacy policy above.


text:
If you're in your 20s, you might think that financial planning is just for old people. The reality is that your 20s is one of the most important times of your life for retirement planning. Find out how starting your financial plan early can save you thousands of dollars.
Starting a family can be both a wonderful and overwhelming experience. Financial planning can seem like just another task you have to juggle. However, now is the best time to buy life insurance because the younger you are, the lower the price. Find out other ways young families can plan for the future.
With more experience comes more confidence. You have more assets than you did when you just started out, so you have more options to consider. However, many middle-aged parents feel a cash crunch as they struggle to support both their children and their aging parents. Find out how you can meet your family's needs.
Most retirees are risk-averse. That didn't stop some of them from losing a third of their nest egg in the last recession. How can you avoid this nightmare scenario? Find out how a financial advisor can be your trusted guide to help you navigate the occasional stormy waters of retirement.
Once you get used to having your partner around, it can feel uncomfortable to find yourself at the center of a single-person household. All the bills are still there, but only half the income is available. Find out how a financial advisor can guide you through some important financial steps during this new life stage.


text:
Blue Poplin Cushion
Regular price Rs. 1,100.00A vibrant blue cushion cover with poplin lining making it a great choice for your living room
- In 100% cotton
- Same design front & back with bottom zipper
- 45 x 45 cm
- Includes cushion cover only
Shipping & Delivery: Free shipping is available for all orders above INR 1000. For orders below INR 1000 we charge a nominal fee of INR 150.
Standard Shipping: All accessories & home decor items are delivered within 5-7 working days. All clothing & made to order products are delivered within 15-20 working days.
During SALE, shipping time is longer than usual and will take upto 7-10 working days for delivery. No cancellation/exchange/return on sale items.
Express Shipping: We also provide the option of 1 day shipping in Mumbai only. For urgent shipping in other cities please contact us. We do provide a 2-3 day shipping option for metro cities.
For all express orders, a fee of INR 300 is charged.
International Shipping: We provide the option of international shipping to most destinations globally. For all international shipping orders kindly use razorpay secure for payments. International shipping rates are calculated directly at checkout. Orders will take ~7-10 business days for delivery.
For any queries regarding your order, please email firstname.lastname@example.com
Returns/Cancellation: Incase you would like to return a product, you can either exchange it for anything else in our catalog or take store credit for the same. You can return an item within 7 days of receiving the product.
Incase of exchange, once we receive the return, we will dispatch the new piece to you upon approval.
Incase of store credit, once we receive the return we will process store credit of the order amount to you. The entire amount of the product (excluding shipping cost) will be given as store credit. The credit is valid for 6 months applicable for online & offline purchase (directly from us).
We do not accept returns on made to order pieces like clothing, jewellery & skincare.
No returns/exchange on SALE items.
Your item must be unused & in the same condition as received. Return will be approved only after a quality check has been done on the returned products.
The customer has to courier the returnable items to our address. The customer has to bear the shipping cost of returning the items. Send all returns to:
The Yarn Story, 1B Standard House, 83 Queens Road, Marine Lines, Near Axis Bank, Mumbai 400002, MH India
Ph: +91 93211 25149
Email: email@example.com
Cancellation Policy:
Cancellation is only possible before an order is processed from our end. Once an order has been processed, we will be unable to cancel the order. For cancellation please email info@theyarnstory within 12 hours of placing your order. Store credit will be provided against cancellation of an order.
There is no cancellation, exchange or refund possible for any products on sale.
Manufactured & Marketed by -
The Yarn Story
1B Standard House, 83 Queen's Road,
Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002


text:
France says its military operations in the African nation of Mali have stopped the advance of Islamist militants.
"Stopping the terrorists, that's done," Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius told RTL radio on Sunday.
Without France's intervention, the Islamists would have advanced to Bamako, the Malian capital, he said.
French warplanes on Sunday bombed the town of Gao, in the east of the country. The Associated Press reports that the town's airport and training camps used by al-Qaida-linked rebels were targeted.
Here's more from the AP:
"The French-led effort to take back Mali's north from the extremists occupying it has included airstrikes by jets and combat helicopters on at least four northern towns, of which Gao is the largest. Some 400 French troops have been deployed to the country in the all-out effort to win back the territory from the well-armed rebels, who seized control of an area larger than France itself following a coup in Mali nine months ago."
Fabius also said that three-day-old intervention in Mali was getting support from the U.S. and other countries.
"We have the support of the Americans for communications and transport," he said.
Here's more from the BBC about the French intervention in Mali:
"France's decision to intervene in its former colony took many by surprise. A UN-backed international force had not been expected to deploy in the west African state until the autumn.
"The foreign minister made it clear that France was now targeting Islamist bases in the north and said Algeria, which shares a long border with Mali, had given permission for its air space to be used for bombing raids 'without limit.'"
West African nations on Saturday said they would send troops of their own, and work alongside French special forces.
Copyright 2021 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.