text:
Version 2 (modified by 6 years ago) ( diff ) | ,
Trac Ticket Batch Modification
Table of Contents
Trac supports modifying a batch of tickets in one request from custom query results.
To perform a batch modification, select the tickets you wish to modify and set the new field values using the section underneath the query results.
List fields
The Keywords
and Cc
fields are treated as lists, where list items can be added and/or removed in addition of replacing the entire list value. All list field controls accept multiple items, such as multiple keywords or cc addresses.
Excluded fields
Multi-line text fields are not supported, because no valid use-case has been presented for syncing them across several tickets. That restriction applies to the Description
field as well as to any custom field of type 'textarea'. However, future versions of Trac could support in conjunction with more suitable actions like 'prepend', 'append' or 'search & replace' (th:#2415).

subset: commoncrawl


text:
OH, imagine it with the optical illusion tights...omg eyesore omg revenge on school people omg iamwaytoospitefultobe12 omg.
I've decided that when I feel uninspired I'll look at weheartit instead of magazines or runway, because I always find a new artist or architect or photographer that blows my mind when I browse that place and for me the best inspiration for dressing is art itself.
That and cartoons. No seriously, try dressing like Dexter or something. It feels so liberating.
thrifted belt and skirt. shirt, gift. celeste stein tights via mytights.com. slow & steady wins the race shoes. forever21 cardigan. claire's hairbow.


text:
Page tools: Print Page Print All | ||
Contains the results from the on-going quarterly Survey of Tourist Accommodation. Data provide information on the supply of, and demand for, tourist accommodation facilities. Data include number of establishments, capacity and employment for the quarter and occupancy and takings from accommodation for each month; by type of establishment and by star grading. Document Selection These documents will be presented in a new window. |


text:
Don't brave the elements without the proper headwear. Good for winter, spring or fall, customize this knit beanie for your chilly weather go-to cap! For every task that takes you outdoors stay comfortable, stylish, and warm!
.: 100% Acrylic wool
.: One size fits all
.: Multiple color variations available


text:
Aluminum is the standard material used for our outdoor signs as it will never rust. All highway departments across the country use aluminum for their road signs. Steel will rust and plastic will crack, warp, fade and break in just a few months.
These signs are meant to last! Great for outdoor and indoor use!
Measures 9 inches by 12 inches. Manufacturer: Signs With an Attitude See all products from Signs With an Attitude Visit Manufacturer's website: www.signswithanattitude.com Sign No Pooping 9 x 12 inches Aluminum UPC: 053176794372


text: View from a Mountain CLS Summer School 2024 12. 7. 2024 - 21. 7. 2024Giant Mountains, Czech Republic Law of Sport 071 Bellow is a gateway to the past. Browse through previous years of experience, knowledge and wonder. Each year has been awarded its very own photobook. For your convenience, every gallery is divided into two or three pages, each containing no less than fifty pictures, making it a 100 or 150 per gallery. your location: Homepage » Previous Years » Photogallery » CLS Summer School 2019 » Law of Sport 071 Photo categorization: all categories CLS Summer School 2019 Available formats of photo: 1080x1919px (362.94kB)


text:
Nashua Office: 603-882-0311 Milford Office: 603-673-1330 Call or Text
Be Careful When Buying Costume Contacts
Colored contact lenses are sometimes the perfect final touch to take a Halloween costume to the next level.
Unfortunately, not all costume lenses are created equal — or with equal concern for wearer safety. With Halloween coming up, we want to give all of our costume-loving patients some guidance on how to find great costume lenses and care for them properly to protect their eye health.
Never Forget that Contact Lenses Are Medical Devices
Yes, that includes contact lenses that are only for appearance. Unlike a pair of glasses with no lenses, contact lenses are classified as medical devices whether they help you see clearly or not. Don't just assume you can buy some costume lenses without getting a prescription even if your vision is 20/20 or better, because contact lens prescriptions are about the fit of the lenses on your corneas as much as they are about vision correction.
Beware Unscrupulous Vendors
This brings us to a common red flag when looking at costume lens vendors. If they require a prescription before they sell to you, then they are likely trustworthy. It is illegal to sell contacts in the US without requiring a prescription, so if a vendor tries that, run! You don't know what other safety laws they're willing to break if they're already breaking that one, such as regulations on sanitation and quality of materials. It's worth the money to pay a little more for lenses you know are safe.
Eyes Come in Different Shapes and Sizes
We touched on this already, but human eyeballs don't all come in one identical shape and size. There's no such thing as a one size fits all contact lens. If you try to wear a contact that doesn't fit the particular curve of your eye, it might fall out or put you at risk of an eye injury. Just another reason that prescription is worth getting!
Take Good Care of Those Lenses Once You Get Them
After you've found a trustworthy vendor and purchased contacts that fit your prescription, it's essential to take proper care of them and use them as directed so that your risk of eye infection is as low as possible. Here are a few tips to follow:
- Thoroughly wash your hands before inserting or removing contact lenses.
- Touch or rub your eyes as little as you can while the contacts are in.
- Never clean your contacts with any substance besides fresh contact lens solution. (That means no water and DEFINITELY no saliva! Oral bacteria shouldn't go anywhere near your eyes!)
- We'll repeat part of that last one because it's important: only clean and store contact lenses in FRESH contact lens solution. Don't try to make your solution last longer by reusing it.
- Carefully read the instructions that come with your lenses. Don't wear them longer than the instructions recommend, and replace them as often as the instructions say to.
- Make sure to take your contacts out before falling asleep! This is a good idea with any contact lenses, but especially large scleral lenses that cover the whites of the eyes. Your eyes need to breathe!
- Also important for scleral lenses, make sure to stay hydrated and use contact-friendly eyedrops as needed.
Let's Get You That Contact Lens Prescription!
If you think your next Halloween costume could use a pair of cool contact lenses and you don't have a prescription yet, don't hesitate to schedule an appointment with us! We're also happy to answer any questions you might still have about costume lenses and give you a few recommendations on where to find some trustworthy vendors. Just make sure you send us pictures of your costume!


text:
More actions
I am surprised and delighted to find from numerous letters that so many people, both in England and across the Water, share my interest in this almost forgotten history; but it is not yet universally recognized as an important branch of study. It has indeed no obvious practical use, and those who go in for it can hardly expect to be assisted.
The Tolkien fandom is an international, informal community of fans of the works of J.R.R. Tolkien, especially of the Middle-earth legendarium.
There are heavily contrasted internal divisions within the current "movement", which have racked the fandom up to the present day and show no signs of reconciliation at any point in the future. Written preference for any one of a pair of two diametrically opposed internal factions can be met with swift reprisal, although the differences are not necessarily or in all cases divisive.
I didn't read [the books], and I normally don't like people who have! The people who love it, they're kind of scary. They talk all this gobbledygook and they think of it as the Holy Grail.
A Ringer is recent coinage for a fan of The Lord of the Rings — somewhat in the same line as fanboys, fangirls, otaku, and Trekkies, but markedly different. One of the differences is that, whereas also every Star Trek fan is called a Trekker or Trekkie, not all Lord of the Rings fans agree on the designation of the group. Many people who consider themselves fans of Lord of the Rings do not find the posthumously published works of Tolkien like The Silmarillion or The History of Middle-earth to be interesting. Therefore, in some cases Ringer might apply to someone who is a fan of the Lord of the Rings books or movies, but not of Tolkien's extended work.
A Tolkienist is someone who studies the work of J.R.R. Tolkien: this usually refers to students of the Elvish languages. A Tolkienist can also be described as a hard-core fan of Tolkien's work, one who studies the work with the same amount of interest (or more) that others study non-fictional subjects. Many fans prefer this term, as it isn't limited to Lord of the Rings. As with the term Ringer, there is no group consensus on this designation.
There are also other, less widely used terms describing Tolkien fans, such as Tolkienite, Tolkienophile or Tolkiendil (an Anglo-Quenya compound). A very early term which was never widely adopted was LotRian.
There is also a distinction between those who focus primarily on the books rather than the Peter Jackson movies and those who focus(ed) primarily on the Peter Jackson movies. The prior have typically remained steadfast Tolkien enthusiasts over decades whereas the latter in many cases experienced only a brief infatuation with Middle-earth. A case in point of diverging fandom was seen in the Netherlands where a traditional Tolkien society, Unquendor, existed alongside a movie based Tolkien society, The Fellowship. The prior is still very much active as at 2011 where the latter is now defunct. Similar movie based Tolkien societies have disappeared globally.
Mainstream and Media
The major divisions can best be explained in a chronological context.
Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings (LOTR) was published in 1954 and The Hobbit prelude in 1937, and bootleg paperbacks eventually found their way into colleges in the U.S.A. in the 1960s. The "hippie" following latched onto the book, but a great many did so for possibly misguided reasons; some openly stated that they felt that the Dark Lord Sauron represented the United States military draft during the Vietnam War; an impossibility given the fact that the work was written by a World War I veteran during World War II and published over a decade before escalations in Vietnam. This led to "mainstream" groups to label LotR as some sort of "hippie book", which was simply not the case: even Tolkien called them The Deplorable Cultus, stating that "Many American fans enjoy the books in a way which I do not".
Still, many people throughout the world simply fell in love with the book (as it has been translated into numerous languages), and although not everyone agrees that The Lord of the Rings actually created the entire fantasy genre of novels, it was certainly and undeniably a profound influence. It formed almost a "Myth of Er", in that it created a new genre where there was none before. Many fantasy series such as "The Sword of Shannara" and Dennis L. McKiernan's Mithgar series were created by fans of LotR.
Then, came what some Tolkien fans like to term the "Dark Times". Based on the hippie youth culture prevalent at the time, in the late 1970s Ralph Bakshi and others developed a series of animated films based on the Lord of the Rings. The problems that serious fans have with this movie cannot be fully listed: Period music and animation was used that didn't fit the work, the Hobbits were portrayed as childlike and in the case of Samwise Gamgee, like a troll. Pacing was poor, and the acting was wooden. Worse, it was marketed as children's fantasy, when The Lord of The Rings is meant for an older audience. The series of movies was never finished, as the first one was a critical flop and was thought by its distributor to be a financial flop as well, although this was not actually true. It should be noted, however, that fans, hungry for any material related to The Lord of the Rings at all, watched the movie anyway. The last effect was that the "mainstream" viewed LotR as "hippie-nonsense" even more, and the work that was probably one of the most mature fantasy novels became viewed otherwise.
Still, a massive fanbase of readers developed over the years. Many could be described as fanboys or geeks, under their Wikipedia definitions. Translated into dozens of languages and spread across the globe, The Lord of the Rings has never been out of print since its publication. The existing fanbase in the mid-1990s consisted of devoted fans, completely unused to having truly new material or any sort of mass-media acknowledgement, who paid strict attention to detail and continuity within the mythology.
With the release of the Peter Jackson live-action movie adaptations of The Lord of the Rings, each of the three movies release in serial from December 2001 to December 2003, The Lord of the Rings has gained a much broader audience.
Today, estimates vary wildly, but it would be fair to say that the fanbase is at least half female. A large number of fans have also arisen who have not read any of the books.
Organized Tolkien Fandom
Although there were active Tolkien enthusiasts within science fiction fandom from the mid-1950s, true organized Tolkien fandom only took off with the publication of the second hardcover edition and the paperbacks in the 1960s.
Articles on The Lord of the Rings appeared regularly in the 1960s fanzine Niekas, edited by Ed Meskys. The first organized Tolkien fan group was "The Fellowship of the Ring", founded by Ted Johnstone at Pittcon, the 1960 Worldcon. They published four issues of the fanzine i-Palantir before the organization disbanded.
The Tolkien Society of America first met "in February, 1965, beside the statue of Alma Mater on the Columbia University campus," according to a 1967 New York Times interview with Richard Plotz, the Society's founder and first Thain. By 1967, Meskys had become Thain and the society boasted over 1,000 members, primarily in the New York area, and was organized into local groups or smials, a pattern that would be followed by other Tolkien fan organizations. The society published a newsletter, Green Dragon, and The Tolkien Journal (edited by Plotz). In 1969, the society sponsored the first Tolkien Conference at Fort Belknap College. The Tolkien Conference was not a "science fiction convention" but rather a scholarly event.
The University of Wisconsin Tolkien Society was founded in 1966, and is best know for its journal Orcrist (1966-1977), edited by Richard C. West.
Across the continent, Glen GoodKnight founded the Mythopoeic Society in California in 1967 for the study, discussion, and enjoyment of fantastic and mythic literature, especially the works of Tolkien and fellow-Inklings C.S. Lewis, and Charles Williams. The society held its first Mythcon conference in 1970, which featured readings, a costume competition, an art show, and other events typical of science fiction conventions of the day. The society's three current periodicals are Mythprint, a monthly bulletin; Mythlore, originally a fanzine and now a peer-reviewed journal that publishes scholarly articles on mythic and fantastic literature; and Mythic Circle, a literary annual of original poetry and short stories (which replaced the Society's earlier publications Mythril and Mythellany).
Orcrist and The Tolkien Journal published three joint issues (1969-1971). The Tolkien Journal and Mythlore published several joint issues in the later 1970s and eventually merged.
The Tolkien Society was founded in the U.K. in 1969, and remains active as a registered charity. The society has two regular publications, a bi-monthly bulletin of news and information, Amon Hen, and an annual journal, Mallorn, featuring critical articles and essays on Tolkien's work. They host several annual events, including a conference held at Oxford, Oxonmoot.
Both the U.K. Tolkien Society and the Mythopoeic Society were and remain organized into "Special Interest Groups", focusing on one area such as languages, and into local or regional groups who continue to meet on a regular basis. The journal Parma Eldalamberon, founded in 1971, is a publication of one such special interest group of the Mythopoeic Society.
There is also a long tradition of organized Tolkien fandoms in Scandinavia. The Tolkien Society Forodrim was founded in Sweden in 1972, and has an especially active group interested in Tolkien's languages, Mellonath Daeron. Arthedain, the Tolkien Society of Norway was founded in 1981 and issues a journal Angerthas.
As at 2011 most developed, and some developing, countries have their own Tolkien societ(y/ies).
Internal categories
The major categories, in no particular order, are:
- Fans who read the books before the movies were released (or buzz about their release started in 2000), or at least not as a result of the ensuing hype.
- Fans who read the books after the first movie was released.
- Fans of the movies who have never read the books.
Fans who read the books before the movies came out fall into two or three categories (note that the terminology varies but the basic groups are the same):
- The Purists a.k.a. The Old Guard: Fans of LotR who felt the movies strayed too far from the books, and are nowhere as good as the books.
- On the other side of this "Great Schism" are fans of the books who also love the movies, and everything about them.
- Possibly the majority are those that like the books more, and disliked changes made in the movies, but on the whole could justify them for the medium of cinema and are willing to accept them on condition.
Further, there is a new wave of fans that did not read the books beforehand, but after hearing about or seeing the movie, have read the books and liked them. Although they sometimes lack the zealot-like devotion of pre-movie fans, they nonetheless seem "legitimate" fans to the Old Guard.
Finally, there are the fans of the movies who have not read the books. Some have just never had the time to read such a long work as the Lord of the Rings, but nonetheless understand that it is an adaptation. Many are (and are treated as) quite respectable fans. There are, however, exceptions.
One division of those fans that have read the books is:
- Fans who have read only the Lord of the Rings (and probably also the Hobbit)
- Fans who have also read the additional material such as the Silmarillion and the long series of uncompleted writings starting with the Unfinished Tales and culminating in the History of Middle-earth series.
This second group can be further divided:
- those who accept the published Silmarillion as Canon, and quantify or ignore the rest
- those who see the published Silmarillion as faulty in many parts, and who see stories from UT or the HoME as canon.
- those who accept that the mind of Tolkien was never fixed on a particular version, and who are happy to do without any "canon".
See Canon for an extended discussion on this second split.
There is also a subcategory, called 'Tolkienian linguists', which are people who are interested in Tolkien's fictional languages, mainly Elvish. These people study seriously the languages as if they were real ones (much like how Tolkien himself made them, with a virtual yet realistic etymology, evolution, grammar, vocabulary and alphabets).
A notable division occurred in that field among the purists and the reconstructionists. The former believe that Tolkien's languages, however sophisticated and well-made, are not intended to be regularised for practical use, but only for scholary study. The latter try to establish a standard and consistent system of the languages, often discarding Tolkien's experimental and abandoned forms, and often expand the vocabulary and grammar by reconstruction in order to translate names, phrases and poems. To the purists, these expansions are frowned down upon, as much as fan fiction, and they consider such attempts of systematisation futile.
The reconstructionists also prefer for this reason only the most later forms of Tolkien's creations, believing that earlier forms of his languages belong to a different universe (in a way that the The Book of Lost Tales Part One belongs in a different universe than The Silmarillion) and concentrate their studies on them. The purists prefer to regard all the forms of his languages as conceptual evolution of a single creation. Notable known reconstructionists include David Salo, the linguist who was mainly responsible for the reconstructed Quenya, Sindarin and other Tolkien languages in the movies.
An accusation from the purists against the reconstructionists is that the latter, trying to systematise everything according to logic and fit everything in their theories, come to hasty and biased assumptions that often contradict Tolkien's writings. Notable purists include Carl F. Hostetter, the editor of Vinyar Tengwar.
Effects of adaptations
The number of fans (and the number of people who admitted in public to being fans) increased enormously due to the benefits of mass media and advertising, as did the number of people who read or at least heard of the books.
However, some of the new "Tolkien fans" were apparently unaware or uncaring that the films were based on a book. On points where the books and movie diverge, many book fans more or less accepted changed scenes, but new fans who never read the books usually based beliefs about the mythology on the movie, beliefs which are contradictory to established canon. For example, fans of Peter Jackson's films might think Arwen is a warrior, which, while not entirely impossible within the actual story, is certainly not supported by any material published by Tolkien. Similarly, all Elves are not automatically strong warriors and archers. Arwen's strength in the book is emotional and possibly spiritual.
A special kind of "new fandom" centered around fangirls who tended to idolize the male stars of the movies: most notably Orlando Bloom, who portrayed Legolas.
Debatable issues
Then there are the divisions inherent to the story; the "Do Balrogs have wings?" debate had reached legendary and, to outsiders, often comical proportions. The books are ambiguous on the matter, but Peter Jackson's films follow the interpretation that they did have "wings of shadow". Could they fly? Did they even need wings to fly? The bad blood and joke caused by this debate persists to this day.
Other popular debates include "Do Elves have pointed ears?", "Who or what is Tom Bombadil?", and anything to do with any change or adaptation made for the Peter Jackson's films.
Smaller internal divisions (some would say "spirited discussions") of this nature have fueled the online community for as long as there have been online communities. Tolkien discussion took place in many newsgroups from the earliest days of Usenet and an alt.fan.tolkien group was created in 1992, followed by rec.arts.books.tolkien early in 1993.
Fans today
The most popular film focused fan-site is currently TheOneRing.net, which is very popular even with the cast and crew. TORn, as it is called, was originally a small movie-news site that gained in prestige as movie-rumors became reality. The filmmakers put special effort into winning over the fans, not simply tolerating but actually actively supporting fansites. Of these, TheOneRing.net is the most well-known and is probably responsible for popularizing the term Ringers. Fans who have avoided the hype surrounding the movie therefore may not use the term, so it is probably preferable to say "Tolkien fans" or "Lord of the Rings" fans when in doubt.
One of the most popular fansite in Brazil is tolkienbrasil and another popular fansite is LOTRPlaza, which is a role-playing site that doubles as a forum to discuss everything from whether balrogs have wings to the best way to learn Sindarin.
See also
- ↑ J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings, The Fellowship of the Ring, "Foreword" (first edition)
- ↑ "Billy Connolly Finds Tolkien 'Unreadable,' Stars in The Hobbit" dated 24 September 2012, BBC News (accessed 7 August 2022)


text:
When the Emperor of China issues a decree that one man per family must serve in the Imperial Chinese Army to defend the country from Huns, Hua Mulan, the eldest daughter of an honored warrior, steps in to take the place of her ailing father. She is spirited, determined and quick on her feet. Disguised as a man by the name of Hua Jun, she is tested every step of the way and must harness her innermost strength and embrace her true potential.
Stars: [Liu Yifei/Donnie Yen/Gong Li/Jet Li/Jason Scott Lee/Yoson An/Tzi Ma/Rosalind Chao/Cheng Pei-pei/Ming-Na Wen]


text:
Get 20% off when you buy 3 or more pasties!
FEATHER ME FABULOUS Glitter Wing Pasties, Body Jewelry, Burlesque Tassels, Nipple Covers – Last Chance
FEATHER ME FABULOUS Glitter Wing Pasties, Body Jewelry, Burlesque Tassels, Nipple Covers – Last Chance
Free Shipping on orders over $75 USD ($100 CAD) + Free Gift
Delicate and decorative feather-like design. Pasties from appeeling™ are hand-made and reusable. Be beautiful, fabulous you.
Wear under a beautiful top, blazer, lingerie, or even as a top on its own. They are even perfect as body art anywhere you on your body you choose to wear them. These are perfect when you want to make your love shine!
Usage: These pasties are perfect for your boudoir, a public or private stage, raves and festivals, and all fashionable one-of-a-kind moments. These pasties are self-adhering with the highest quality hypoallergenic, and latex-free adhesive. Easy and painless to remove. Each package contains one reusable pair of pasties that can be used again and again, with proper storage.
Female owned and Operated: appeeling is owned and operated by women and guided with a passion for body positivity. We value every voice and seek inspiration from our friends and fans around the world. In addition, we always strive to work with passionate entrepreneurs around the world who bring a unique creativity to all of our products.
Giving Back: We started appeeling through one of the owner's experiences with breast cancer. Through this journey and through the experiences of motherhood, friendship, and all the personas we have to embrace every day, we recognize the power of body positivity and deeply committed to our core principle that EVERYBODY deserves to be celebrated. We are strongly committed to organizations that promote body positivity and donate a portion of all proceeds to Cancer and LGBTQ+ charities.
Size is 9 cm x 10 cm /3.5 inches x 4 inches


text:
(Showing 1 – 12 products of 32 products)
High quality Jewellery by Gitano Collection
Get access to your Orders, Wishlist and Recommendations.
Remember me Lost your password?
Log in
New to Welcome to? Sign up
Your personal data will be used to support your experience throughout this website, to manage access to your account, and for other purposes described in our privacy policy.
Existing User? Log in
Shopping cart is empty!
Continue Shopping


text:
Webmasters have several ways to keep their sites' content out of Google's search results. Today, as promised, we're providing a way for websites to opt out of having their content that Google has crawled appear on Google Shopping, Advisor, Flights, Hotels, and Google+ Local search.
Webmasters can now choose this option through our Webmaster Tools, and crawled content currently being displayed on Shopping, Advisor, Flights, Hotels, or Google+ Local search pages will be removed within 30 days.
Posted by Matt Cutts, Distinguished Engineer
Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner


text:
$m = 9, -9$
Work Step by Step
$\sqrt {m^2} = \pm\sqrt {81}$
$m = 9, -9$
You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.
Update this answerAfter you claim an answer you'll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.


text:
Gwangju National Museum
역사와 문화가 살아숨쉬는 국립광주박물관Since its opening, the Gwangju National Museum has been carrying out a wide range of excavation and post-excavation surveys and publishing survey reports to document and preserve the findings. Starting with Wonhyosa Temple (1983), the museum has issued around 70 books such as Archeology, Art, Folklore, Archeological Field Survey, and Transfer and Restoration. In addition, various types of materials from seminars such as the international symposium on Gwangju Sinchang-dong Archeological Site have been published and distributed to a number of research institutes and researchers to be used in the research on the culture unique to the southwestern region of the Korean peninsula.


text:
Peckham Rye Station Gateway
- News
- Planning
- Transforming Central Rye Lane
- Peckham Town Centre
- Peckham Town Centre Forum
- Rye Lane and Station Action Group (RLSAG)
- Southwark Rail Users' Group (SRUG)
- Peckham Rye Station
- Peckham Rye Station stages
- Peckham Rye Station/station forecourt
- Art Deco Quarter
- Old Waiting Room
- Gateway comments
- Gateway model
- Gateway plans
- 1 Gateway project key documents:
- 2 July 2016 Council weblinks on this page
- 3 How to keep up to date
- 4 2024
- 5 2023
- 6 2021
- 7 2020 front of Peckham Rye station
- 8 2020 rear and access at station
- 9 2019
- 10 January-March 2017
- 11 October-December 2016
- 12 April-September 2016
- 13 January-March 2016
- 14 October-December 2015
- 15 July-September 2015
- 16 April-June 2015
- 17 2015 January-March
- 17.1 23rd March next stages of the station co-design consultation
- 17.2 17th March Peckham Rye Station square codesign workshop
- 17.3 13th March Station codesign - Questions to ask, Issues to watch
- 17.4 3rd March 2015 Update on the Station developments
- 17.5 20th February 2015 Co-Design shrinks to small consultation
- 17.6 9th February Architects announced
- 17.7 25th January architects selected
- 18 2014 October-December
- 18.1 9th December: Architects meet residents during tender period
- 18.2 19th November: WEEKLY meetings continue
- 18.3 10th November: Atlas of Aspirations v2 completed
- 18.4 5th November: deadline for comments
- 18.5 October 2014 Blenheim Grove corner feasibility study
- 18.6 September - October Some CoDesign comments
- 18.7 September - October 2014 CoDesign Process for comments
- 18.8 Thursday 16th October Community exhibition & Peckham Society symposium
- 18.9 Tues 7th October Community Discussion: Re-imagining Peckham Rye station area
- 19 Earlier dates 2007 - 2014
Gateway project key documents:
Some key official documents about this station redevelopment project were released under Freedom of Information in August 2013. These can be found here (at Item 5) along with some commentary papers by Peckham Vision on the issues raised by the project. Details of all the stages in the development of this project are below in date order.
To be incorporated below
- Planning application for the Station Sq & Blenheim Grove now submitted
- Council/Network Rail CoDesign statement Feb 2014: promising 'local people full partners in shaping scheme'
Peckham Vision is NOT and never has been part of Southwark Council, nor part of any organisation that has a contract with the Council to deliver any project. The 'co-design' consultation projects are run by commercial architects as Council's agents. Peckham Vision has had no role in how the projects are designed or run.
July 2016 Council weblinks on this page
Council planning weblinks have all changed. It will take some time to restore all the links. If the link on this page you want is part of the PNAAP process and is broken you can find the adopted Peckham & Nunhead Area Action Plan (PNAAP) here http://www.southwark.gov.uk/downloads/download/4444/area_action_plans
The Council says you can also access it from the Area Action Plans page by clicking on the relevant link, along with the supporting and background documents here: http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200211/area_action_plans which can be accessed from the main planning policy page on the left hand side.
How to keep up to date
There are three different projects at the station:
- Council - in front of the station, and the new square and public toilets.To be completed 2025-26. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/regeneration/peckham-and-nunhead/peckham-rye-station-square
- Network Rail - restoration of the listed station building and reconstructing the back to create a new second entrance with step free access and safer walkways and platforms. The start date not agreed yet but may be 2026/27 and may be completed 2028/29. https://www.networkrail.co.uk/running-the-railway/our-routes/kent/kent-and-south-east-london-railway-upgrade-plan/peckham-rye-station-redevelopment/ To keep up to date you should join the Network Rail mailing list to keep up with that news and join the public workshops. Click on the NRail link above and scroll to the end of the page to join their mailing list.
- Community - the rescue and restoration of the Old Waiting Room (OWR) above the ticket office. The OWR was included, in 2019, in the package of 150 year leases to properties not essential to running the railways, sold by Network Rail to the ArchCo. The community project began in 2006 many years before the ArchCo bought the head lease. Over those years there was significant community investment in securing support from the local community and from the Council and Network Rail in terms of time and effort, and finance raised by numerous relatively small grants to restore the OWR to a usable space. However this was not accessible directly by the public so the second phase has been to restore and extend the original staircase to enable public access direct from the forecourt.This was completed in 2017 with support and funding from the Railway Heritage Trust and Network Rail. The community project continues with the aim of setting up a Community Interest Company to secure a lease from the ArchCo to run the OWR as an events space for community benefit.
9 February 2024
Network Rail, with the help of Harriet Harman local Peckham MP, unveiled plaques at Peckham Rye station for the work that was carried out to restore the exterior of the Grade II listed Victorian station. The plaques commemorated the achievements, and can be seen on the external wall to the left of the door leading to the Old Waiting Room outside the main station entrance.
August 2023 restoration of station exterior
The external brickwork was cleaned, the station building roof renovated and the original staircase restored and extended to give public access to the Old Waiting Room. This work was completed by August 2023. Photos credited to Paul Childs.
May 2023 Three videos
Some of the long saga from 2006 in 3 short videos:
- 2023 Peckham Rye Station gets back its Victorian splendour
- 2016 Peckham Rye station's 'lost' waiting room to re-open after 50 years
- 2013 Businesses may have to relocate under £25m Peckham plan
Further material is being compiled to bring this long saga up to date.
21st April 2021 Third working group public meeting
The next public meeting from Network Rail will be on Wednesday 21st April 2021 6pm to 8pm on zoom. This meeting will be presenting and discussing the design options that have been developed. This involves removal of the 1960s stair arrangement replaced with new stairs and lifts to all four platforms. See summary and three images here. The workshop zoom link is on the Network Rail webpage: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/peckhamrye scroll down the page to: Design Public Workshop. No booking needed.
2020 front of Peckham Rye station
October 2020 Latest Council news
Latest timetable for works after delays caused by corona virus pandemic:
- phase 1: Blenheim Grove corner building completion September 2021
- phase 2: south side of Arcade/square start Spring 2021, completion Spring 2023
- phase 3: north side of Arcade/square completion Autumn 2023
2020 rear and access at station
21st October 2020 First working group public meeting
Calling all users of Peckham Rye station. This is the busiest interchange station in the entire country without step free access to platforms or accessible facilities for passengers. It is also now dangerously overcrowded at times. Even with the reduction in rail travel during Covid-19 the station remains overcrowded at times. Network Rail now has the go ahead from the Government to spend the money to redesign the station interior and platforms as necessary to make it step free and reduce overcrowding. They have set up a quarterly zoom public meeting to be updated on the design work as they look for solutions. The first meeting was this evening. The next one is on 13th January 6pm-8pm. It will be good if people who use the station can sign up for updates and get to the meetings. They are keen for feedback on the ideas.
- Email firstname.lastname@example.com to get on the mail list.
- Follow Twitter @NetworkRailSE
- Info: https://www.networkrail.co.uk/running-the-railway/our-routes/kent/kent-and-south-east-london-railway-upgrade-plan/peckham-rye-station-redevelopment
September 2020 First Focus Group meeting
Network Rail have set up a small 'Focus Group' of some local people to review the project work once a quarter. It met on 9 September and the meeting minutes will be uploaded on the Network Rail station access project webpage. These meetings will be interspersed with a quarterly public meeting to report on work progress in analysing the issues and creating designs for the new lifts and access arrangements. The first meeting is planned for Wed 21 October 6-8pm by zoom. Info will be sent by Network Rail to all those on their mailing list for the station and for anyone who signs up through their webpage (link to be loaded).
July 2020 Station access project approved
Finally the Department for Transport has achieved Treasury approval and given £1m to start the spending on the project to redesign and change Peckham Rye station to make it accessible for all. This news follows the Network Rail public meeting in February in All Saints Hall. See here for info on that. Follow up to that was disrupted by the Covid lockdown. They are promising good community consultation as the design work unfolds. But we are still waiting to hear how that will be arranged. The photo shows people queuing outside Peckham Rye station, before the COVID-19 pandemic. Photo credit: Craig Thomas from the Southwark News article.
March 2020 follow up to Public Meeting
The meeting spaces were booked out and people were turned away at the door. Though this was unfortunate, it showed the rail companies how significant were the issues about the station when so many people turned up in poor winter weather. Network Rail have sent to all who left their email addresses for the meeting a copy of the several rail companies' slide presentations, see here. They have also compiled a table showing their responses to all the points raised in the meeting. They have agreed to hold regular events with the community to get further input from rail and station users as the redesign for improving accessibility develops. Network Rail representatives have agreed to come to Peckham Vision's Open Studio on Saturday 14th March 2020 12pm-5pm drop-in. The Open Studio went ahead but Network Rail were unable to attend because of the increase in Covid infections in London. The national lockdown was imposed on 23 March 2020. It began to be lifted in June 2020.
18th February 2020 Public Meeting
IMPROVING PECKHAM RYE STATION ACCESSIBILITY - We know that Peckham Rye station is very inaccessible for anyone who has difficulty with stairs or has luggage or prams or small children. The rail industry has plans to change this. They are holding a public meeting on TUESDAY 18th FEBRUARY 7-9pm at All Saints Church, Blenheim Grove. The invitation says the meeting is about:
- How to make Peckham Rye Station accessible
- Agenda: • Update on the current station building. • Updates on train services provided today. • Long term growth and strategy to improve the rail service. • Plenty of opportunities to ask questions and talk to the following rail companies: • Network Rail, Transport for London (for London Overground services), Govia Thameslink Railway (for Southern and Thameslink train services), Southeastern
For more information and to book for a free ticket click here: http://www.tinyurl.com/rfydqn5
Station forecourt litter
- PECKHAM RYE RUBBISH PILES UP AFTER STATION STAND-OFF BETWEEN NETWORK RAIL AND SOUTHWARK COUNCIL 5 November 2019
- PECKHAM RYE STATION ENTRANCE IS A "NO-MAN'S-LAND" AS CONFUSION REIGNS OVER RUBBISH RESPONSIBILITY - Southwark News 13 November 2019
March 2019 work starts
Work has started on Phase 1 the reconstruction of the building on the corner of Blenheim Grove and Rye Lane to create new commercial units on the ground and first floors, and two new floors for work spaces above. The creation of the space between the viaducts will start when that Phase 1 work has progressed and the plan is to complete it by 2021. Further details from the Council are here.
January-March 2017
13th February 2017 Community discussion
Peckham Vision arranged a discussion of the Kaizen review report to enable people who had been involved in the co-design process for the Station or Library Squares to see if there was anything to add to the report and to discuss the follow-up actions. Jonny Zander from Kaizen Consultants, the author of the report, was present and took part in the discussion. The notes from the meeting are here.
12th January 2017 Council drop-in update
The Council will hold a drop-in event at former Barry's Café 3 Station Way for the latest news on:
- Programme for construction of the new square and the redevelopment of the Blenheim Gove/Rye lane corner building.
- Relocation of the businesses.
- Progress with the Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO)
- Update on the Co-Design Review
More Council information: about the event, and about the development The review report was available at the drop-in and is now on-line. Information is awaited from the Council about the follow up.
October-December 2016
Review of Co-design process
Consultants Kaizen conducted a review of the two co-design exercises. Their report will be published on 10th January 2017 (see copy above under **13th February 2017 Community discussion**). The consultants will be available to discuss the report at the Council consultation drop-in on 12th January 4-8pm at 3 Station Way. Some submissions to the consultants' review commenting on the co-design projects are available here: Eileen Conn, Clyde Watson. Some main comments are that much more work needs to be done to agree what co-design should mean in practise and how it should be conducted. Co-design is part of a set of mechanisms to bring about collaboration between different stakeholders. Successful collaboration cannot be imposed and so agreement on the remit and parameters of a co-design process seem essential. Also for successful codesign with communities a parallel process for communities to share and discuss the ideas and the work seems an important ingredient. None of this was present in the Peckham projects and their absence had a negative effect on the experience and the outcome. The review was conducted after local deputations to the Cabinet, Community Council and Planning Committee. To learn the lessons adequately, it will be essential for the community to be effectively engaged in discussing and reviewing the consultant's report into the process - as part of the Council's development of its response. Otherwise the key lesson about collaboration will still not have been learnt.
Co-design process 2013-2016
Following the rejection by the community in January 2014 of the Network Rail / Council plans for the Station Gateway site redevelopment, the Council adopted the suggestion made by the residents' deputation that there should be a rethink using a 'co-design' process. This new process was put to tender and the first phase began in June 2014. In December 2014 alongside the Station co-design process, the Council started a 'co-design' consultation on development ideas for the Peckham Library Square including the Peckham Arch and 91-93 Peckham High Street. The section below outlines the phases of the co-design process for both the Station and the Library Square projects. The experience of those who took part in various roles is now (October 2016) being reviewed by Council consultants.
Complete their survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SouthwarkCoDesignReview The survey is now closed.
Summary of process stages
Background The lead up to the Co-Design process started in 2013 when there were indications that the Council was planning to seek possession of all Network Rail's land around the station at once so clearing out all the businesses. This led to two deputations to the Council April 2013 and October 2013 and a Scrutiny Committee May 2013 seeking clarity about this. The Council said that was not the plan. But when the plans were unveiled at a public meeting in January 2014 it turned out that was the plan. The community rejection of the plan at that public meeting in Rye Lane Chapel led the Council to agreeing to hire new consultants to redesign the plan for the whole Gateway site involving the community, through a 'Co-design' process. Ash Sakula architects were appointed in June 2014. Because of this long community background which was led by Peckham Vision, this website has a detailed record of the process until September 2014, when the co-design process started. Thereafter, it is less detailed, and needs to be read in conjunction with the co-design web links. There were inadequacies in the whole process of 'co-design' which meant that a number of important matters were not adequately discussed during the process. This led to many objections to the detailed planning application which were unresolved when the plans were approved in March 2016. The list of events and happenings that were recorded at the time on this webpage can be viewed at the beginning of the following pages. Click on an item in any of the lists to view the entry for that item.
- April to November 2013
- January to September 2014
- October 2014 to October 2016 - http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station_Gateway
Co-design first phase - Ash Sakula, June to October 2014:
Peckham Rye Station Co-design Digital Communications:
- Website: http://peckhamcodesign.org/stn-sq-ph-1 This website was modified after the first phase so is not exactly as it was during the first phase of the Codesign exercise.
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/peckhamcodesign
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100006848925429&fref=nf
[July 2014 Peckham Vision launched the community built model of the station area at a public community meeting in Bussey Building.]
July 2014: Ash Sakula arranged event in Peckham Liberal Club for (about 30) residents to meet them.
August 2014: Ash Sakula launch the co-design project on roof of multi storey car park.
September–October 2014: Ash Sakula co-design process in operation including:
- Events during the week in the station forecourt and at foot of the old staircase, and 'Weekly' meetings on Tuesday evenings for creating a weekly publication.
- Some meetings in All Saints church hall on different topics.
- A digital 'Commonplace' map inviting people to offer comments on places around the station and elsewhere in the town centre: http://peckhamcodesign.org/stn-sq-ph-1/commonplace
- An email list of 'CoDesigners' for info about events and other co-design matters.
- 'Atlas of Aspirations', a report bringing together different aspects from the CoDesign process.
Interim stage between the first and second phases, November 2014 to February 2015:
- Council issues tender for work to draw up plans and planning application for new station square & Blenheim Grove corner building.
- No information about the remainder of the other land and buildings around station, including Holly Grove, Dovedale Court and access to station platforms.
- Four residents take part in architects selection process.
- Interviews of shortlisted architects in January 2015.
- Landolt & Brown architects appointed.
- co-design shrinks to small consultation Letter to South London Press 20 February 2015.
Co-design second phase – Landolt & Brown, February 2015 to March 2016
Peckham Rye Station Co-design Digital Communications:
There is no trace now of the website that was used in the second phase. The Facebook and Twitter pages set up in the first phase were continued in this phase.
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/peckhamcodesign
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100006848925429&fref=nf
- 4 evening workshops with presentations of info about the issues and designs of the new station square and the building on the corner of Blenheim Grove and Rye Lane.
- First workshop March 2015, final workshop in July 2015
- Co-design disappointing
- letter to Southwark News- "No 'co-design' for Peckham Rye station". 13 August 2015.
- October 2015 planning application submitted
- November meeting called by local resident to discuss concerns about designs.
- March 2016 Planning Committee grant permission.
Background: After the Station co-design process had started the Council decided to use a co-design approach for the development of the Peckham Library Square and 91-93 Peckham High Street, which is all Council property. Peckham Vision's reporting of the Library Square co-design process is covered on Peckham Vision Facebook
Peckham Library Square co-design communications:
- Website: http://www.peckhamsquare.co.uk
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/peckham_square
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Peckham-Square-Co-Design/349308741923851
- December 2014 First evening event by Carl Turner Architects in Peckham Platform.
- From January to November 2015 further six evening events where Carl Turner reported on design issues.
- Proposal to remove the Peckham Arch emerges in first half of 2015.
- Mountview development, also by Carl Turner, emerges during 2015.
- Mountview planning application submitted and approved in September 2016.
- Library Square planning application submitted August 2016, not yet decided.
11th October 2016 Co-design review
Council consultants start review of Peckham co-design process by web based survey. Deadline is 25th October. The Council's information message is: "Last year Southwark Council trialled a Co-Design approach to two development schemes in the town centre, Peckham Rye Station Square, and Peckham Library Square. The council is now keen to understand what you thought of the Co-Design process. The council have asked award winning social business Kaizen Partnership to carry out an independent review. We have commissioned this work to enable us to better understand how effective Co-Design was and what could have improved it. To gather as much information as possible, an online survey has been created. We would be very grateful if you were able to share your views and experience of the process through this short survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SouthwarkCoDesignReview Once the questionnaire responses have been evaluated, the Co-Design review will be shared not only across the council but will be publicly available and will be used to shape future projects in the borough, so we would be very grateful if you're able to spare a few minute to contribute to this important piece of work."
April-September 2016
Preparatory work for buildings works
The Council is continuing with the preparatory work of negotiating the sale of leases and the preparation for compulsory purchase where sale not agreed. Public Inquiry is to be held in early 2017 for several objections. See here for details.
January-March 2016
1st March 2016 Planning permission
On 1st March 2016 the Planning Committee gave permission to the plans to create the new square at Peckham Rye station and extend upwards two floors on the corner of Blenheim Grove on the basis of the proposals in the planning application. This was in spite of significant objections from a large number of objectors to the details proposed. This was evidence of a failure in the 'co-design' process, which local people say must be subject to an independent evaluation. Here are some comments on the planning proposals indicating the nature of the objections.
The planning report is available here. The Committee agenda and meeting details are here.
Watching the very poor implementation of the 'co-design' for the station developments was so exhausting and disappointing it interfered with our ability to keep the website updated on it. Some of the actions were posted on Peckham Vision Facebook.
October-December 2015
12th November 2015
South London locals question Landolt + Brown's Peckham Rye station revamp
29th October 2015 Planning application submitted
The planning application from Landolt & Brown for the new square and changes in Blenheim Grove is now in. This is just for the area in front of the station and the building on the corner of Blenheim Grove & Rye Lane. From the planning website: Case number: 15/AP/4337: Provision of a new public square between Peckham Rye Station and Rye Lane, created by demolishing the arcade buildings currently located between the north and south railway viaducts. Refurbishment of the railway arches to provide commercial units facing onto the new square. Refurbishment and erection of a two storey extension to the building at 2-10 Blenheim Grove / 82 Rye Lane, hard landscaping and other associated works. Further information and documents. Information from Peckham Peculiar.
July-September 2015
September 2015 'Co-Design' disappointing
The Co-Design process has been very disappointing. Following the wholly unacceptable plans from Network Rail in January 2014, local people suggested a co-design process to enable public discussions about the different parts of the whole site, and how they relate to the town centre. Unfortunately, it became instead just a consultation about design details of a small part of the site (pink on the map alongside - click to enlarge), and without addressing major issues which emerged in 2013 and 2014. Plans are being developed separately and without public discussion for the three other major areas of the site (blue, white and green). A planning application is expected in the autumn for the pink area, and possibly the other areas. There has been no monitoring and evaluation, and so no joint Council & community learning about the co-design process, its effectiveness or how it could be improved. See letter to Southwark News about this in August 2015, titled "No 'codesign' for Peckham Rye station".
29th July 2015 4th 'codesign' station workshop
This last event from Landolt & Brown the Council's consultant architects was on the design of the new station square and at the building on the corner of Blenheim Grove and Rye Lane on Wednesday 29 July 6.30pm-8.30pm at the Thomas Carlton Centre, Alpha Street, SE15 4NX. (note the change of address.) For more see: http://us9.campaign-archive2.com/?u=25fd80cafe3952ad0b146376c&id=146e79bdc2&e=83ef0156b7 The presentation is here: http://www.peckhamryestationsquare.co.uk/section/presentations/
April-June 2015
24th-27th June 2015
Peckham Vision held an exhibition and here in Peckham Vision Bussey studio jointly with MArch students from Brighton University. A new display panel was included which gave an updated report on the Station Gateway project.
4th June 2015 3rd 'codesign' station workshop
The next PR Station Square workshop will be on 4 June at All Saints Church, more details here: http://tinyurl.com/lns6yyu Here is a report on the workshop from the architect consultants Landolt & Brown: http://www.peckhamryestationsquare.co.uk/presentations/summary-peckham-rye-station-square-codesign-workshop-03 The consultants said there would be a further workshop in July to report on the proposals for the square, and that they are aiming for a planning application to be put forward over the summer.
16th April 2nd 'codesign' station workshop
The Council's consultants Landolt & Brown report on their workshop, including their slides.
Some highlights:
- the way the physical supports for Platform 3 are linked into the north side of the station Arcade building is still being investigated by the architects. This means there needs to be an extra workshop (so 4 instead of 3). Once the Platform 3 supports are clarified they can develop designs for the new buildings, and they will present them at the additional workshop during May, date to be announced.
- their ideas developing for the art deco building on the corner of Blenheim Grove and Rye Lane indicate a preference for an extension of two floors on top of the existing building.
- they reported that they are talking with Carl Turner architects about the plans for the Holly Grove buildings (Icelands & Hannah Barry Gallery), and expect those plans to be submitted at the same time as the station square and Blenheim Grove buildings (summer). But the Holly Grove buildings have been removed from the codesign process so the public is excluded from all information about those plans.
- they showed a slide of Network Rail's plans for new lifts to all 4 platforms, and said they were looking into these. It was not possible to examine these details to make any comments or ask probing questions.
- they asked us in table discussion groups to report back on several questions including:
- think about how the square should feel when you arrive during the day and at night. - what uses would you like to see in new premises in the square and Blenheim Grove corner building. - explain why anything should go in a particular place. - what could improve safety. - where could public WCs be located. - what gets left out but is important?
If you want to respond to these points or any others about this station project email them at: firstname.lastname@example.com.
11th April 2015 launch of Peckham Vision's art deco installation
At the event on 8th April, we launched Peckham Vision's art deco installation. Here above the community made model of central Rye Lane, we had the images of the seven art deco buildings which are clustered around the station. The images floated in an ethereal fashion above the information displays of the exhibition about plans to develop, redevelop, and regenerate their place in the town centre. A pause for thought and reflection about the nature of the Art Deco Quarter in the town centre while the Council's consultation proceeds inexorably towards a decision, possibly to demolish enough of the cluster to destroy this unique feature of Peckham. The installation was co-created by Corinne Turner, Clyde Watson, Sam Watson, Geoff Frosh, Eileen Conn, Benny O'Looney.
8th April 2015 Protect Peckham's Future community event
Pre-information: This event will cover art deco buildings, cultural economy, arts, music, architecture, commerce and more. This will be a community discussion about the changes in Peckham, what we all think about them, if they are good for our neighbourhood, and whose neighbourhood is it anyway? The discussion could touch on the impact of:
- rising housing prices, regeneration, gentrification, loss of social housing.
- heavy handed redevelopment wiping out local micro economies.
- tall buildings in Peckham & and loss of Peckham's character.
- possible demolition of almost half remaining art deco buildings in Rye Lane cluster.
Drop in at the exhibition in both PV and CLF studios any time from 3pm:
- latest news on key regeneration projects, & info on Peckham's history.
- Peckham Vision Art Deco installation.
- Exhibition of CLF history, role, music & creativity.
2015 January-March
23rd March next stages of the station co-design consultation
There will be 4 'periods' in the process.
- 17th March Period 1 – CoDesign the Brief
- 16th April Period 2 – Review options
- W/C 18th May Period 3 - Emerging proposals
- Mid June Period 4 – Planning, leading to submission of planning application.
For information on what will be covered in each period SEE HERE.
It appears that decisions on the following major issues may be taken in Period 2 around the end of April:
- the extent of the demolition or refurbishment in front of the station and the corner of Blenheim Grove and Rye Lane,
- location or relocation of existing tenants; location of public toilets, taxis, buses and drop-off's; greening extent & character.
17th March Peckham Rye Station square codesign workshop
Outcome: This 'workshop' reintroduced everyone to the project and explained the timetable going towards the planning application. Then the 100 or so people in 7 groups shuffled the 30 Aspirations into their top 13. Those 7 x 13 top ones will feed in to the architects' work to be reported week commencing 13th April.Consultants' report from workshop here.
Publicity: Southwark Council email with latest news about the Station Gateway developments:
"Landolt + Brown have been appointed to take forward the designs for Peckham Rye Station square. The Peckham Rye Station square project has been commissioned by Southwark Council in partnership with the Greater London Authority to transform the area around the Station. The project will create a new square as a focal point for the community, and include new and refurbished buildings to make the area more uplifting and less congested. The first co-design workshop of the design stage will be held on Tuesday 17th March 2015 at 6.30pm at All Saints Church Hall on Blenheim Grove (see map below). We want to build on the co-design work previously undertaken and hear from you about how we can work together as the project moves forward. The project design team, led by architects Landolt + Brown, would like to explain some of their initial thinking and observations in the first part of the workshop. This will be followed by a presentation from the Council on associated town centre projects. Please join us."
- Click here for flyer and map
- Further information about the Station and other town centre developments.
13th March Station codesign - Questions to ask, Issues to watch
'CoDesign' for Peckham Rye Station starts again 17th March 6.30pm-8.30pm, at All Saints Hall, Blenheim Grove. Main topics now include:
- the design for the station square.
- whether the Rye Lane corner buildings on Blenheim Grove and Holly Grove (Iceland), and 4 Holly Grove (Hannah Barry Gallery) will be demolished to be replaced with tall buildings.
- preservation of the Art Deco cluster of buildings.
- what Network Rail are planning for Dovedale Court.
- what Southern Rail are planning for improved access to the platforms.
- where the public toilets will be.
- and more…
If you want to hear the latest and contribute to the discussion, come along on Tuesday 17th March 6.30pm
3rd March 2015 Update on the Station developments
- There has been news from Brixton where Network Rail are planning a clear out of what are reported as successful long-standing businesses in railway arches for 'refurbishment', with promises of returning. It sounds familiar from a year ago at Peckham Rye station. This approach may yet return to Peckham as Dovedale Court and the Holly Grove buildings were not covered by the 'co-design' consultation that was conducted last Autumn. So it seemed worth remarking on that somewhere: see Peckham Vision letter to SLP.
- We may know more once the next 'co-design' process starts. The new station 'co-design' architects, Landolt & Brown, were announced on 9th February But there is still no news from them or the Council on how they are going to conduct the 'co-design' of the brief for developing the planning application, or what the new timetable is.
- Landolt & Brown were the architects hired by the Council and Network Rail in 2012, and they produced the option that became the 'preferred option' which was clearance of the whole site. The new architects Weston Williamson then used that option to develop the proposals for the planning application. They presented those proposals in January 2014 at the Rye Lane Chapel meeting, and they were strongly rejected by the many local people there.
- After that the idea of co-design was proposed by the deputation to the Council about the way forward. The idea was to have constructive and informed public discussions about the future of the whole of the Network Rail land around the station and the feasible options for it. Sadly the co-design process that finally took place last September and October was not that at all as it was focussed on details of the appearance of the new square in front of the station.
- This was an unexpected and disappointing outcome of what had been thought a promise to have a more collaborative process for developing ideas for the site as a whole. It leaves undiscussed the future of Dovedale Court, and the buildings in Holly Grove, and how it all fits into the town centre itself.
20th February 2015 Co-Design shrinks to small consultation
from Eileen Conn, Coordinator, Peckham Vision:
Dear SLP Letters,
You reported (13 February) the appointment of the architects for the design of a new square in front of Peckham Rye station, and asked for comments on the priorities. One priority is to hear what is happening about the plans for the buildings on Holly Grove, and in Dovedale Court behind the station. Both these areas were a key part of the site to be wholly demolished in the previous plans. The plans were stopped to enable a 'co-design' process where local people could engage in serious discussion about the options for all the different parts of the site.
It was perplexing to discover last autumn that the 'co-design' process had shrunk to a 'consultation' just about the design of the small area in front of the station. This defeated what we thought had been agreed last year for local people to take part in thinking about the whole site around the station on the west side of Rye Lane, and how it fits into the self regenerating dynamic of that part of town.
The silence on what is happening on the Holly Grove and Dovedale Court arches is worrying when we see the reports of Network Rail's plans to demolish and clear out the successful vibrant arches in neighbouring Brixton, and Herne Hill. It raises the same questions we wanted to explore in the 'co-design' - why does anyone think of demolishing an area to regenerate it when it is already self regenerating successfully, and in Brixton's case already self regenerated?
9th February Architects announced
Council announced the appointment of [http://www.landoltandbrown.com/ Landolt & Brown as the station square architects. 11 days later (19 February) there has been no news of the timetable or when local people will be allowed to say anything at all about either the consultation process or the design of the new square and buildings. This is the brief for the contract.
25th January architects selected
Four architects Ash Sakula Architects, Weston Williamson & Partners, Landolt & Brown, Henley Halebrown Rorrison were shortlisted and interviewed on 14th January. Two self nominated residents were part of the shortlisting and interviewing panel. The result is expected to be announced by end January. A public meeting is planned for early February in Peckham Vision Bussey exhibition studio on the process, the news and the way forward.
2014 October-December
9th December: Architects meet residents during tender period
Nine architects have been invited to tender for the contract to develop the design and planning application for the Peckham Rye Station development project. These are: Ash Sakula Architects, Weston Williamson & Partners, Landolt & Brown, Sarah Wigglesworth, Adam Khan Architects, Cottrell & Vermeulen (local consortium), Duggan Morris Architects, Peter Barber Architects, Henley Halebrown Rorrison. Submissions have to be made by 23rd December, and the architects will be selected in the early part of January. At Peckham Vision's suggestion, the Council invited the nine firms to meet on 9th December some 40 of the CoDesigners while they are developing their submissions. This event was held in Peckham Vision's studio in the Bussey Building, and was a successful first in bringing residents and architects together at this early stage.
website malfunction - pics to be uploaded again
19th November: WEEKLY meetings continue
The Atlas of Aspirations LINK has been submitted to the Council. This will accompany the tender document about to be sent in the next few weeks to architects who are interested in bidding for the contract for the Council's plan to develop the building around the station. In the meantime, local residents who volunteered to help produce the WEEKLY publication on the CoDesign material continue to meet on Tuesday evenings 7-9pm, now in All Saints Hall behind the church opposite Bar Story in Blenheim Grove.Two of the Weeklies have been produced and another 6 are in preparation. As well as editing the WEEKLY publications the Tuesday evening meeting is also the place where issues that have arisen and are arising, about the station development and about the process, are discussed
10th November: Atlas of Aspirations v2 completed
5th November: deadline for comments
The CoDesign process is ending this week. An 'Atlas of Aspirations' is being prepared, by the Council's CoDesign consultants Ash Sakula, summarising 'outcomes and findings' of the CoDesign process. The draft Atlas is here: http://goo.gl/y4rLBN. The deadline for Comments is WED 5th NOVEMBER.
- Ash Sakula will submit the Atlas to Southwark Council at the end of this week. They say: ""We need YOU...to give us feedback on the DRAFT ASPIRATIONS. Email us with your top 10 Aspirations from the list. If you feel that any Aspirations are not clear enough or that there are any Aspirations that have not been represented then please email with your comments and feedback."" Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
- The Council's consultants will be giving an update to the Peckham Community Council on Monday 10th November 7pm at Peckham Academy. Agenda: http://goo.gl/QZHhAO
- The CoDesign remit has been limited to the creation of a square in front of the station between the two rail viaducts. This has been a surprise as it left out the development issues that caused local people to protest very strongly in early 2014 against proposals put forward by Network Rail.
- It has emerged that plans are still being developed for the rest of the site, including new taller buildings on Blenheim Grove and Holly Grove.
- Comments on the other parts of the site and how it fits together have been recorded by the consultants. So if you have views on any of the site development and the area surrounding it,send them in as points to take into account in the Atlas. Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
As time is now very short, here is a summary list of topics that have stimulated comments, and which you can use to check if you have anything further you wish to say or need to be reflected in the Atlas:
- Design of the new square, & services & facilities, including public toilets.
- The station building & access to the station platforms.
- Future of Holly Grove & Blenheim Grove commercial buildings.
- Preserving & restoring the cluster of Art Deco buildings in that area.
- Future of Dovedale Court and improving forecourts in Blenheim Grove.
- Opening up Eastern arches, & green pathways along the rail lines towards Queen's Rd station.
- Public realm in central Rye Lane around the station site.
- Need for integrated town planning.
Links for more information on some of these in thinking about your comments:
- Other local residents' comments: http://goo.gl/mQ0yo9
- Art Deco Quarter: http://goo.gl/xkBfDi
- Green Paths: http://goo.gl/TD29p1
October 2014 Blenheim Grove corner feasibility study
In October 2014, the Council commissioned Weston Wiliamson & Partners to carry out a feasibility study for replacing the existing art deco building at 82 Rye Lane & 2-10 Blenheim Grove. The report on this is HERE. It concludes that four storeys is the optimum height for a new building. The question which was subsequently asked in the co-design process at this stage was whether the benefits of such a new building justified its cost, disruption and loss of the art deco quarter.
September - October Some CoDesign comments
Here are some extracts from comments posted up on the CoDesign website:
- I think we need a coherent plan for the whole area owned by Network Rail rather than a bitty approach. Personally I think all that needs to happen is a bit of painting and tidying up. We don't need any new tall buildings and I think we need to preserve the Art Deco buildings around the station. I think Dovedale Court and its businesses should be protected. Maybe just open out the front of the station a bit but please keep businesses that have been in Peckham for years! There is no need at all to turn Peckham into Clapham- peckham is beautiful as it is, it just needs a lick of paint. Olivia Brambill
- Why are the development issues that caused local people to protest very strongly in early 2014, against proposals put forward by Network Rail, not part of the scope of the Co-Design process? Planning issues in the central Peckham area need to be looked at in an integrated way. Extract from Sally Mcintosh & Kevin OBrien
- The new opened space in front of the station will be a core part of the town centre. So its design needs to take into account fully how it will function socially, physically, commercially and economically in relation to the area close by – notably Elm Grove, Holly Grove, Blenheim Grove, Rye Lane between Elm Grove, Cinema/Moncrieff Place, Bournemouth Road and the future potential developments in the eastern arches. We need to develop an overall holistic town centre plan for this central Rye Lane area for the day, evening and night time economies. Extract from Eileen Conn
September - October 2014 CoDesign Process for comments
Comments have been contributed in a variety of ways:
- in the shop at the station in interviews, and on cards;
- visits by CoDesign staff to local groups, traders and people;
- by email to CoDesign;
- on the CommonPlace map;
- at the Weekly Editorial in the shop at the station;
- on the CoDesigners webpage on the CoDesign web site;
- some of these comments have been posted on the CoDesign website Blog page.
Thursday 16th October Community exhibition & Peckham Society symposium
Tues 7th October Community Discussion: Re-imagining Peckham Rye station area
This event on 7th October 6-9pm was the first in our new temporary exhibition studio space, and was busy from the moment the doors opened. It displayed the community model of central Rye Lane, and also the Nicholas Cobb model of the multi storey car park in 100 years after some cataclysmic event. The Peckham Vision mobile exhibition displays were available as were specially produced wall displays of photos, maps and diagrams, about the station area, collected from a variety of sources including local people's imaginative sketches. They all supported lively discussions between local residents re-imagining the buildings and the spaces around the station.
Earlier dates 2007 - 2014
Click here for earlier dates:
April 2007 – January 2013 http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station_stages
April 2013 to November 2013 http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station_Gateway/2011-2013
January – September 2014 http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station_Gateway/Jan-Sep_2014


text:
My Account
My Cart
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Enter your truck info so we can recommend the right products for you.
Can't find it? Call us at 859-737-4966 for free advice.
Air Filters
Air Intakes
Cooling System
Drive Line
Engine Parts
Exhaust Brakes
Fabrication Components
Fuel Systems
Fuel Tanks
Injection Pumps
Injectors & Related Items
Intake Manifolds
Lift Pumps
Silicone Hoses
Water Meth Inj Kits
Thoroughbred Diesel has been your online performance headquarters since 2002. We know how to get the most performance out of your pickup truck and offer all of today's most popular diesel performance products.
Electrical Components
Engine Components
Fuel Pumps
Gaskets & Seals
Interior Replacement Parts
Oil Pumps
Thoroughbred Diesel offers OEM and diesel stock parts for your diesel pickup truck. At Thoroughbred Diesel, you can buy stock diesel replacement parts such as injectors, fuel pumps, ball joints, track bars, turbos, and more for your diesel truck.
Injection Pump
Turbo Charger
Bed Covers
Floor Mats and Liners
Mud Flaps
Nerf Bars
Running Boards
Seats & Covers
Shift Knobs
Spare Tire Carriers
Tailgate Nets
Tool Box
Truck Steps
Make heads turn with custom truck accessories from Thoroughbred Diesel.
Ball Mounts
Gooseneck & Fifth Wheel
Hitch Balls
Hitch Pins & Hitch Locks
Hitch Steps
Loading Ramps
Shackles & Tow Hooks
Tow Brakes
Tow Mirrors
Towing Accessories
Weight Distributing Hitchs
License Plates
Tank Tops
Show your support with a Thoroughbred Diesel t-shirt, sweatshirt, or sticker decal.
Advanced FLOW engineering (aFe) is a manufacturer of high performance cold air intake systems, high flow or stock air filters, fluid filters, intake manifolds turbochargers, programmers, differential covers, oil pans, and exhaust systems. aFe was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Corona, California, USA, in two facilities totaling 160,000 sq ft (15,000 m2) including their 77,000 sq ft (7,200 m2) headquarters and manufacturing facilities. An 87,000 sq ft (8,100 m2) warehouse and R&D facility was added in 2012. aFe products are dyno tested with their in-house DynoJet, and their airflow products are also flow bench tested, for performance you can count on. The aFe product line includes over 3,000 product applications, which are meticulously tested and manufactured in Corona, California.
Did you know a diesel engine requires 7X more air than a gas engine? The diesel engine is the hot set up in today's performance world, and many levels of performance are emerging from the mighty diesel engine - from extra power for towing, to all-out tire-smoking drag racing. Reaching those levels of diesel performance stats with increasing airflow. When diesel owners talk filtration and airflow they talk about aFe products.
Thoroughbred Diesel offers a complete line of aFe diesel performance products. Shop for aFe cold air intakes, full metal power intakes, bladerunner manifolds, pro guard D2 oil filters and fuel filters, scorcher tuner pro tuners, EGR cooler, bladerunner intercooler, exhaust tips, mufflers, ATLAS exhaust, exhaust manifolds, wastegate actuator, 68RFE transmission pan, air filters, pro guard 7 power packs, bladerunner turbo, torque booster tube, brakelogic modules, and diesel exhaust systems. Choose from the original aFe cold air intakes with or without pro guard 7 and stage 1 or stage 2. aFe now offers the new Pro Dry S intakes as well for your Cummins, Powerstroke, or Duramax diesel pickup. We offer free shipping on aFe products.
Our proud customers are a passionate group of individuals that demand long life from their diesel engines. The start of that long life begins with healthy clean air. To keep dirt out and performance in, only one company can meet the tough standards demanded of our customers and their diesel engines, aFe.
Those standards are what makes aFe stronger, quicker and smarter. Every air filter, intake system, and all other products are engineered with the passion of enthusiasts, and a racer's heart. aFe builds these products to fit like original equipment, perform better than stock systems, filter for long life, and last like a diesel engine.
Diesel performance is in its infancy, and aFe is leading the way in diesel performance airflow and filtration. In the following months and years, diesel engines are only going to get better, faster, and smarter. Not only will we develop increased performance in diesel trucks and SUV's, but cars as well. Many diesel vehicles are poised to hit the market, ready to be tuned up with blistering power. aFe will be there making it all breathe better.


text:
Kurt Vonnegut once said, "What makes life worth living are the saints. ... They can be longtime friends or someone I meet on a street. They find a way to behave decently in an indecent society."
And so it is with Gyanesh Kamal, a man I met at India's Kumbh Mela, one of the oldest festivals on Earth. To the uninitiated, this spiritual spectacle is a discombobulating din of prayers, loudspeakers and pilgrims so ceaseless it disorients the senses.
Tens of millions of Hindu pilgrims gather every 12 years for this festival that plays out on the banks of the Ganges and Yamuna rivers in the northern city of Allahabad. Considered to be the world's largest religious festival, the Kumbh Mela lasts nearly two months, with the final bathing day this year on March 10.
On a recent visit, I randomly wandered into the compound of one akhara, or Hindu sect, that dates back 800 years, in search of someone who could enlighten me on the mysteries of this noise and devotion.
Out of nowhere a voice beckoned: "Can I help you?"
I swirled around and found a bear of a man, bespectacled and wrapped in layers of clothes that accentuated his girth.
His invitation began what was to be an eight-hour lesson in Hinduism and humanity.
A Lesson About Fire
Kamal, 56, said the basic tenet of Hinduism is "to know what you are." That earth, water, sky, air and fire are the five elements that life embodies, including the human body.
"Fire?" I asked incredulously.
"Love is a fire," he said, "cruelty is a fire, affection is fire. ... Fire is the beginning and the end in Hinduism. When fire came, man became civilized."
Betraying a Westerner's skepticism, I asked how he came by this trove of religious knowledge. The answer startles: Kamal is a saint in the Hindu religion, born in Allahabad. I've met remarkable souls who would fit Vonnegut's description of saintly, but never an actual saint. The term "sant," or saint, is derived from the Sanskrit, its root meaning being "one who knows the truth."
The Hindu holy man seated me before a fire surrounded by his disciples, their faces aglow in the flame. When he noticed my eyes burning from the smoke, he offered cups of tea. The dizzying noise of dancers in the next tent distracted me, but not him.
"Every thinker shuts their ears, shuts their eyes, mouth, every sense," he said.
"How?" I asked, eager to know.
"Make silent your mind, and you can think fantastic things of this world. Practice," he said. "Whenever we become silent, then thinking starts."
There is an Obi-Wan Kenobi syntax to the speech of this saint who laughs easily, breaks into relaxing mantras readily and ratifies the observations of guests.
Living Beside The River
The Kumbh strikes me as the ultimate expression of simplicity, living on the ground, bathing in the Ganges River.
"If you have simplicity, there is no need for getting a lot of material things to live your life," Kamal said. "You can easily become a true person. If you lead your life by truth, you can get everything in this world."
As for the attraction the Kumbh holds for Westerners, he said, "People are bored with materialism. Materialism cannot fulfill you. ... Every season you get a new fashion. You're confused," he said with a smile.
"You are making yourself strong by this simplicity [here]. The whole night, we sit under the sky, beside a fire. We need nothing. This lifestyle is epic. This fashion," he said with certainty, "never fades."
India's holy men usually leave their families as children to be schooled in the rigors of religious life. The idea that Kamal would fix a date or a moment when the time came in his life for such devotion confounds him.
"I was born a sadhu," or saint, he said matter-of-factly, "like you were born a journalist" (to which I laughed).
It was well after midnight, and in a few hours the holiest day of Kumbh would dawn, the reason I came. Seeing that my team and I were exhausted after two sleepless nights, the saint of Allahabad gathered us beneath a tent, warmed us with blankets and disappeared into the darkness.
A Deadly Stampede
That Sunday evening, following a day of processions and holy bathing, a stampede at the train station killed three-dozen pilgrims and cast a pall over the Kumbh.
The next morning, I rushed to see our Hindu holy man to thank him and say goodbye. We had agreed to meet, but he was nowhere to be found. With a flight to catch and time running out, reluctantly I headed to the hospital to talk to survivors of the stampede. In the critical care unit, my phone rang. "I am here," said a familiar voice.
We dashed outside, and in the midst of a media scrum I spotted Kamal, who had just come from the morgue, angry and saddened.
"Bad administration is to blame," he told me. "I will file public interest litigation in the courts." And so he has.
I recalled the night before, as Kamal poked himself and said, "This body is immaterial. But your body and his body," he said, pointing to a follower, "everybody else's body is important to me."
A holy man at the site of the disaster, he had come to console the living, cremate the dead and remind us of Vonnegut's observation of the saints among us.
Copyright 2021 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.


text:
Residential Property management service for Single Family Residence (SFR), condo units, and 2 to 4 unit buildings.
Apartment Property management service for 5 to 15 or 16 to 100+ unit buildings with or without on-site management.
Commercial Property Management service for retail, office, and warehouse buildings.
When he was an undergrad, Justin began subleasing rooms in 1998 to UCLA students in Westwood. Justin later created JRealty in 2008, and now we provide professional property management services for numerous properties in and around Newport Beach.
Mission Statement
Our mission is to deliver high quality, low risk, and sustainable results for the benefit of landlords. We strive to maintain a high level of satisfaction with all stakeholders.
Our Toolbox
We are members of many industry organizations and stay current on news and legal issues that matter. We use many forms provided by the California Association of Realtors and have access to the MLS and other member features.
We use AppFolio for our financial accounting and reporting requirements. Our clients like the electronic reports and access their to online portal.
Our credit and background checks are provided by CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions which dramatically reduce risk and improve Tenant underwriting and screening.
We use Salesforce enterprise level cloud-based software to help manage sometimes complex maintenance requests among many different stakeholders.
We use DocuSign to help sign important lease agreements and other documents fast and easy. The entire process is available on by smartphone, tablet, or computer.


text:
Warranty: 1 years
Applicable Industries: Manufacturing Plant, Machinery Repair Shops, Energy & Mining
Customized support: OEM, Newest types of gear box helical gearbox company ODM
Gearing Arrangement: Helical
Output Torque: 5 N.M
Input Speed: 4,000 rpm
Output Speed: Depends on ratio
Product name: hollow rotating platform
Model: DTN200
Product Material: Aluminum, steel
Max.Torque: 80Nm~180Nm
Max.Load of Inertia: 100Nm~216Nm
Max.Axial Force: 2000Nm
Weight: 8.25kg
Ratio: 1:18
Degree Of Protection: IP40
Packaging: Carton
Packaging Details: Smaller Types: PE bag+ EPS box+ inner whitebox+outer export carton, WeiYou 2nd Planetary Sun Gear Carrier Assy R210 R210-9 R220-5 R225-7 DH220-3 Swing Gearbox Planet Carrier Assy XKAQ-0571 Bigger Types: PE bag+ EPS box+ inner whitebox+outer export carton+ Wood box,
Hot product hollow rotary motion controller platform for increase rotational speed rotary
Product name hollow rotating platform Model DTN200-L-18-STProduct Material Aluminum, steel Ratio 1:18 Degree Of Protection IP40 Weight 2.6KG
What Is a Gearbox?
There are several factors to consider when choosing a gearbox. Backlash, for example, is a consideration, as it is the angle at which the output shaft can rotate without the input shaft moving. While this isn't necessary in applications without load reversals, it is important for precision applications involving load reversals. Examples of these applications include automation and robotics. If backlash is a concern, you may want to look at other factors, such as the number of teeth in each gear.
Function of a gearbox
A gearbox is a mechanical unit that consists of a chain or set of gears. The gears are mounted on a shaft and are supported by rolling element bearings. These devices alter the speed or torque of the machine they are used in. Gearboxes can be used for a wide variety of applications. Here are some examples of how gearboxes function. Read on to discover more about the gears that make up a gearbox.
Regardless of the type of transmission, most gearboxes are equipped with a secondary gear and a primary one. While the gear ratios are the same for both the primary and secondary transmission, the gearboxes may differ in size and efficiency. High-performance racing cars typically employ a gearbox with two green and one blue gear. Gearboxes are often mounted in the front or rear of the engine.
The primary function of a gearbox is to transfer torque from one shaft to another. The ratio of the driving gear's teeth to the receiving member determines how much torque is transmitted. A large gear ratio will cause the main shaft to revolve at a slower speed and have a high torque compared to its counter shaft. Conversely, a low gear ratio will allow the vehicle to turn at a lower speed and produce a lower torque.
A conventional gearbox has input and output gears. The countershaft is connected to a universal shaft. The input and output gears are arranged to match the speed and torque of each other. The gear ratio determines how fast a car can go and how much torque it can generate. Most conventional transmissions use four gear ratios, with one reverse gear. Some have two shafts and three inputs. However, if the gear ratios are high, the engine will experience a loss of torque.
In the study of gearbox performance, a large amount of data has been collected. A highly ambitious segmentation process has yielded nearly 20,000 feature vectors. These results are the most detailed and comprehensive of all the available data. This research has a dual curse - the first is the large volume of data collected for the purpose of characterization, while the second is the high dimensionality. The latter is a complication that arises when the experimental gearbox is not designed to perform well.
The main function of a gearhead is to multiply a moment of force and create a mechanical advantage. However, backlash can cause a variety of issues for the system, including impaired positioning accuracy and lowered overall performance. A zero backlash gearbox can eliminate motion losses caused by backlash and improve overall system performance. Here are some common problems associated with backlash in gearheads and how to fix them. After you understand how to fix gearbox backlash, you'll be able to design a machine that meets your requirements.
To reduce gearbox backlash, many designers try to decrease the center distance of the gears. This eliminates space for lubrication and promotes excessive tooth mesh, which leads to premature mesh failure. To minimize gearbox backlash, a gear manufacturer may separate the two parts of the gear and adjust the mesh center distance between them. To do this, rotate one gear with respect to the fixed gear, while adjusting the other gear's effective tooth thickness.
Several manufacturing processes may introduce errors, and reducing tooth thickness will minimize this error. Gears with bevel teeth are a prime example of this. This type of gear features a small number of teeth in comparison to its mating gear. In addition to reducing tooth thickness, bevel gears also reduce backlash. While bevel gears have fewer teeth than their mating gear, all of their backlash allowance is applied to the larger gear.
A gear's backlash can affect the efficiency of a gearbox. In an ideal gear, the backlash is zero. But if there is too much, backlash can cause damage to the gears and cause it to malfunction. Therefore, the goal of gearbox backlash is to minimize this problem. However, this may require the use of a micrometer. To determine how much gearbox backlash you need, you can use a dial gauge or feeler gauge.
If you've been looking for a way to reduce backlash, a gearbox's backlash may be the answer. However, backlash is not a revolt against the manufacturer. It is an error in motion that occurs naturally in gear systems that change direction. If it is left unaccounted for, it can lead to major gear degradation and even compromise the entire system. In this article, we'll explain how backlash affects gears and how it affects the performance of a gearbox.
The design of gearboxes consists of a variety of factors, including the type of material used, power requirements, speed and reduction ratio, and the application for which the unit is intended. The process of designing a gearbox usually begins with a description of the machine or gearbox and its intended use. Other key parameters to consider during gearbox design include the size and weight of the gear, its overall gear ratio and number of reductions, as well as the lubrication methods used.
During the design process, the customer and supplier will participate in various design reviews. These include concept or initial design review, manufacturing design validation, critical design review, and final design review. The customer may also initiate the process by initiating a DFMEA. After receiving the initial design approval, the design will go through several iterations before the finalized design is frozen. In some cases, the customer will require a DFMEA of the gearbox.
The speed increaser gearboxes also require special design considerations. These gearboxes typically operate at high speeds, causing problems with gear dynamics. Furthermore, the high speeds of the unit increase frictional and drag forces. A proper design of this component should minimize the effect of these forces. To solve these problems, a gearbox should incorporate a brake system. In some cases, an external force may also increase frictional forces.
Various types of gear arrangements are used in gearboxes. The design of the teeth of the gears plays a significant role in defining the type of gear arrangement in the gearbox. Spur gear is an example of a gear arrangement, which has teeth that run parallel to the axis of rotation. These gears offer high gear ratios and are often used in multiple stages. So, it is possible to create a gearbox that meets the needs of your application.
The design of gearboxes is the most complex process in the engineering process. These complex devices are made of multiple types of gears and are mounted on shafts. They are supported by rolling element bearings and are used for a variety of applications. In general, a gearbox is used to reduce speed and torque and change direction. Gearboxes are commonly used in motor vehicles, but can also be found in pedal bicycles and fixed machines.
There are several major segments in the gearbox market, including industrial, mining, and automotive. Gearbox manufacturers are required to understand the application and user industries to design a gearbox that meets their specific requirements. Basic knowledge of metallurgy is necessary. Multinational companies also provide gearbox solutions for the power generation industry, shipping industry, and automotive industries. To make their products more competitive, they need to focus on product innovation, geographical expansion, and customer retention.
The CZPT Group started as a small company in 1976. Since then, it has become a global reference in mechanical transmissions. Its production range includes gears, reduction gearboxes, and geared motors. The company was the first in Italy to achieve ISO certification, and it continues to grow into one of the world's leading manufacturers of production gearboxes. As the industry evolves, CZPT focuses on research and development to create better products.
The agriculture industry uses gearboxes to implement a variety of processes. They are used in tractors, pumps, and agricultural machinery. The automotive industry uses gears in automobiles, but they are also found in mining and tea processing machinery. Industrial gearboxes also play an important role in feed and speed drives. The gearbox industry has a diverse portfolio of manufacturers and suppliers. Here are some examples of gearboxes:
Gearboxes are complex pieces of equipment. They must be used properly to optimize efficiency and extend their lifespan. Manufacturers employ advanced technology and strict quality control processes to ensure their products meet the highest standards. In addition to manufacturing precision and reliability, gearbox manufacturers ensure that their products are safe for use in the production of industrial machinery. They are also used in office machines and medical equipment. However, the automotive gearbox market is becoming increasingly competitive.