text:
After a scoreless first half, New York took the lead on a Chris Henderson goal in the 67th minute. The Dynamo responded quickly when Dwayne De Rosario buried a penalty kick just three minutes later to tie the game, the first goal New York had allowed in 397 minutes. De Rosario later scuffled with New York's Danny O'Rourke — formerly on the Houston roster — and both were ejected.
New York Red Bulls (5-6-9) vs. Houston Dynamo (8-4-8)
July 29, 2006 -- Robertson Stadium, Houston TX
Scoring Summary:
NY -- Chris Henderson 3 (Amado Guevara 1) 67
HOU -- Dwayne De Rosario 6 (penalty kick) 70
New York Red Bulls -- Jon Conway, Todd Dunivant, Carlos Mendes, Jeff Parke, Marvell Wynne, Amado Guevara, Chris Henderson (Elie Ikangu 74), Danny O'Rourke, Seth Stammler, Edson Buddle (Jerrod Laventure 87), Mike Magee (Steve Jolley 92+).
Substitutes Not Used: Tony Meola, Jordan Cila, Taylor Graham, Joe Vide.
Houston Dynamo -- Pat Onstad, Wade Barrett, Ryan Cochrane (Adrian Serioux 80), Eddie Robinson, Craig Waibel, Ricardo Clark, Brad Davis (Stuart Holden 84), Dwayne De Rosario, Brian Mullan, Brian Ching, Alejandro Moreno.
Substitutes Not Used: Zach Wells, Ronald Cerritos, Kevin Goldthwaite, Kelly Gray, Chris Wondolowski.
Misconduct Summary:
NY -- Amado Guevara (caution; Encrouchment) 26
NY -- Seth Stammler (caution; Obstruction) 58
NY -- Danny O'Rourke (caution; Tackle from Behind) 69
HOU -- Dwayne De Rosario (ejection; Violent Conduct) 71
NY -- Danny O'Rourke (ejection; Second Caution) 71
Referee: Tim Weyland
Referee's Assistants: Rob Fereday; Emiliano Monje
4th official: Colin Tait
Attendance: 10,334
Weather: Cloudy-and-93 degrees
All statistics contained in this boxscore are unofficial


text:
A private swim pond is the icing on the cake for garden enthusiasts. One thing is certain: If you are excited about near-natural swimming in your domestic idyll, you are well advised with an OASE SwimPond module 20 or 32. Each set consists of perfectly matched products and also includes services. Through professional consulting and high-quality products from OASE, construction of your SwimPond becomes a clearly laid-out project that can be conveniently executed.
Use the filter function to limit the displayed products.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
For many collectors, the 1950s represent a golden age of literature full of rich pickings. The decade is famous for producing books that have had a huge impact on readers and society in general.
The Chronicles of Narnia series began in 1950. The Catcher in the Rye was issued in 1951 and people are still carrying around battered copies of J.D. Salinger's novel. Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man came out a year later. Ian Fleming published Casino Royale in 1953 and that spy franchise is still going strong. William Golding's Lord of the Flies was published in 1954 and illustrated the frail nature of civilization. Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged, Jack Kerouac's On the Road and The Cat in the Hat by Dr. Seuss were printed in 1957 – and all three have been tremendously influential in different ways. And as the decade ended, William Burroughs gave us Naked Lunch and ensured literary boundaries were being pushed further than ever before.
The 1950s also saw massive growth in certain bookish genres. The world was changing fast thanks to a series of new technologies but readers were relishing science fiction – a genre that would never look back. Fantasy authors also enjoyed similar success. International travel was becoming affordable to more people and travel memoirs were in high demand. Crime and historical adventure were also snapped up by legions of enthusiasts.
One of the key aspects to collecting first editions from this era is the condition of the dust jacket. There are countless wonderful dust wrapper designs from the 1950s but always check condition.
True first editions of famous books like The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe or Atlas Shrugged are very expensive, but this selection of first editions - by famous and forgotten writers - from the 1950s showcases a broad variety of titles at varying prices. A first edition of a 55-year-old book does not have to be costly.
A spy drama from Christie based on her own experiences in Baghdad.
William Belcher designed the jacket of this famous novel about a day-dreamer.
Edward Bawden designed the jacket. Murdoch's second novel.
Durrell's third travel memoir.
A comprehensive but readable study - rituals, celebrations, exorcisms etc.
Historical fiction from Buck. Jacket by Robert Haberstock
Collection of eight short stories. Jacket illustrated by Edward Sweet.
Part of the Winston juvenile series – introduced many youngster to sci-fi.
Ninety full-page cartoons of macabre humor.
Posthumously published novel - won the 1958 Pulitzer Prize for literature.
A 15-year history of a salvage tug operating off the coast of Newfoundland & Nova Scotia.
A book about how to build computers - edited by W.W. Stifler.
Spark's first book – scarce to find one with its dust jacket intact.
Twelve short stories – dust jacket designed by Keith Vaughan.
A boy tries to save a kitten and is hit by a truck. He returns as a cat.
An adventure novel from the writer best known for Exodus and Trinity.
A 'Duke de Richleau' historical thriller. Wheatley's also famous for his horror.
Fiction – an Irish cavalryman leads freed slaves and Comanches on a buffalo hunt.
Dog stories, written and illustrated by Thurber.
Many first editions from the beloved Madeline series are available at a variety of prices.
Jacket by Richard Powers. Influential sci-fi novel about parallel time.
Van der Post immigrated to England over apartheid. Forgotten travel classic.
A five-star general's account of World War II, including photos, maps and charts.
Basis for Stanley Kubrick's break-through film noir, The Killing.
Golf memoir by the inventor of the modern sand wedge and one of the game�s all-time greatest players.


text:
Apple Announces Jan. 27 Special Event: "Come See Our Latest Creation"
Confirming a date first reported by Digital Daily, Apple (AAPL) this morning announced an invitation-only special event to be held at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts Theater in San Francisco on Jan. 27, a Wednesday. "Come see our latest creation," the invitation reads.
Hmm. Wonder what that might be? The invitation, below.
Given the invite's theme, one wonders if the "creation" to be unveiled is touch and pressure sensitive and might, perhaps, come accompanied by a stylus or other input tool that could be used by illustrators and designers. Wild speculation, I know. But worth mentioning.
- Major Apple Product Announcement Set for Wednesday, Jan. 27
- Apple Pitching Tablet to Publishing Industry; Spring Launch Expected
- Time (Finally) for the Tablet? Apple Developers Supersizing Their Apps for January Event.
- The Apple Tablet Is Delayed? So What?
- $1.9 Billion in Capex? What's Apple Planning?
- Apple's Tablet: Read Different?
- Imaginary Demand for Mythical Apple Tablet Exceeds All Estimates
- Apple Tablet Coming to AT&T?
- New From Piper Jaffray Analyst Gene Munster: The Apple iPad
- Rumored Apple Netbook Actually an E-Book?
- iTablet: Apple's Killer App for Higher Ed
- iFugly


text:
In essence, the preening and eye-rolling, the chest-thumping and sarcasm across the tense terrain of this presidential election reflects the difficulty of understanding the dimensions of the 2012 political universe.
It can be said Obama remade the known political universe in 2008 when he boosted turnout in Iowa and most other caucus states and held on to capture the Democratic nomination over Hillary Rodham Clinton. He similarly expanded the universe by boosting his 2008 vote total by nearly 10 million over John Kerry in 2004 (McCain managed to shrink GOP turnout to 59.9 million from Bush the younger's 2004 total of 62 million).
But even since Obama's 2008 victory, the universe he created has shrunk. It did so in 2009 in the gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia where Obama campaigned but Republicans Chris Christie and Bob McDonnell won. It shrank conspicuously in 2010 when Republicans reversed many of the Democratic congressional gains achieved in 2006 and 2008…
Obama's team believes it knows the political terrain better than Romney, that its voter contacts, outreach, registration, and mobilization can withstand any partisan tide. This is the core of its preening confidence and certainty. Romney has some data but also – and more importantly – an intuitive sense that American attitudes and temperament are primed for change.
In this, Obama bets on hard-bitten pragmatism and Romney the emotive punch of possibility. Obama the spread-sheet, Romney the romantic. Irony, thy name is campaign 2012.


text:
While it is still to early to reliably suss the future, there is definitely something clever about a partnership between three major audio companies. Started in April of this year, ACS and Etymotic joined forces to create force a bit of audiophile air into UK Apple Stores. Apple, undisputedly an audio company, happily obliged, and the HF2 + ACS custom sleeve was born.
More exciting is the buzz this product has created. Apple's ubiquitous retail presence has led to inadvertent audiophiles who, upon asking a few questions at the store, discover a latent desire to upgrade. The excellent combination has earned a well-placed 2009Â iPhone Accessory of the Year from Macworld.


text:
He's running a very sophisticated simulation.
"0 to Comedy in 60 seconds" The Crapshots are bizarre sub-minute shorts from the minds of the LRR crew. This is where we keep all the little ideas that can't be allowed to live on their own. Crapshots are for your own protection.
Crapshots Ep684 - The Pursuit
Cleanup in aisle nine.
Crapshots Ep683 - The Procedure
That's the noise it's suppose to make.
Crapshots Ep682 - The Gardening 8
Greg shares some thoughts on revitalizing your garden!
Crapshots Ep681 - The Self Critique
But maybe next week.
Crapshots Ep680 - The Presser
Whaddya mean Cobb Salad?!
Keep it up and you'll go all the way... to Regionals.


text:
S.F. considers banning sale of pets except fish
Sell a guinea pig, go to jail.
That's the law under consideration by San Francisco's Commission of Animal Control and Welfare. If the commission approves the ordinance at its meeting Thursday night, San Francisco could soon have what is believed to be the country's first ban on the sale of all pets except fish.
That includes dogs, cats, hamsters, mice, rats, chinchillas, guinea pigs, birds, snakes, lizards and nearly every other critter, or, as the commission calls them, companion animals.
"People buy small animals all the time as an impulse buy, don't know what they're getting into, and the animals end up at the shelter and often are euthanized," said commission Chairwoman Sally Stephens. "That's what we'd like to stop."
San Francisco residents who want a pet would have to go to another city, adopt one from a shelter or rescue group, or find one through the classifieds.
The Board of Supervisors would have final say on the matter. But not before pet store owners unleash a cacophony of howling, squeaking and squawking.
"It's terrible. A pet store that can't sell pets? It's ridiculous," said John Chan, manager of Pet Central on Broadway, which has been in business 30 years. "We'd have to close."
'Terrible for our business'
Joe Taylor, bird manager of Animal Connection on Judah Street, called the proposal "ludicrous."
"What difference does it make if you get a parrot at the SPCA or a pet store? If it doesn't work out, in either case, you just bring it back," Taylor said. "This would be terrible for our business."
The idea originated about two years ago, when the commission began looking into a ban on dog and cat sales as a way to discourage puppy and kitten mills. But the city's animal control staff said that excess puppies and kittens are not the problem at the city shelter, thanks to the plethora of rescue groups. In any case, only one or two pet stores in San Francisco sell dogs and cats. The rest stick to small animals.
The hamster problem
The real problem, staff said, is hamsters.
People buy the high-strung, nocturnal rodents because they're under the temporary impression that hamsters are cute and cuddly. But the new owners quickly learn that hamsters are, in fact, prone to biting, gnawing through expensive wiring and maniacally racing on their exercise wheels at 2 a.m.
So the animals end up at the shelter. Just about every species has its own rescue group in San Francisco, but no one seems to want hamsters. Hamsters are the No. 1 animal euthanized at the city's shelter, said San Francisco Animal Care and Control director Rebecca Katz.
"It's definitely a concern," she said. "They're an impulse buy, and we do sometimes get tons of them, especially babies."
Committed owners
On Wednesday, the shelter, which is on 15th Street in the Mission District, had six hamsters, nine rabbits, nine mice, nine rats, two guinea pigs, a bowl of goldfish, two birds, a leopard gecko, a bearded dragon and a hermit crab named Charlie.
But those shelter hamsters almost certainly did not originate at a pet store, said Michael Maddox, general counsel for the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council in Washington, D.C.
Studies by UC Davis and the National Council on Pet Population Study and Policy have shown that only a small fraction of shelter animals were purchased at pet stores, he said. People who buy animals at pet stores are just as committed, emotionally and financially, to caring for their pets as people who procure pets elsewhere, he said.
"This is an anti-pet proposal from people who oppose the keeping of pets," he said. "If their goal is to ban the ownership of pets entirely, then this is a good first step."
The commission plans to listen to testimony from pet store owners, among others, before voting. Among the items it will consider is the impact on small businesses, whether to allow the sale of feeder rodents for snakes and other reptiles, the sale of fish, owner education, penalties and rescue groups that host adoptions at pet stores.
"We're still in the information-gathering phase," said Commissioner Philip Gerrie, who is sponsoring the proposal. "We're trying to get at the problem of people buying these creatures with the best intentions, but then the reality turns out quite different."
Meeting tonight
San Francisco's Commission of Animal Control and Welfare meets at 5:30 p.m. today at City Hall, Room 408, to consider an ordinance banning the sale of pets, except for fish, in San Francisco.
Euthanized pets in S.F.
13% Percentage of dogs and cats at the San Francisco animal shelter that are euthanized, including aggressive, injured and sick animals.
35% Percentage of dogs and cats in shelters nationwide that are euthanized.
30% Percentage of hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits and other small animals at the San Francisco shelter that are euthanized.
Source: San Francisco Animal Care and Control


text:
Back row, from left: NRG team leader Adrian Lee, Clayton
Skelton, Jake Kirgan, James Rolewicz and Ethan Corbin.
Front: Mitch Rolewicz, Grace Skelton and Murphy Roate.
Local 4-H robotics team competes at regional
Send a link to a friend
[December 20, 2012]
The Logan-Menard-Sangamon County
4-H robotics team, NRG 12211, received two awards
Saturday at the FIRST Lego League regional tournament in Decatur.
They competed with 11 other teams in this year's "Senior Solutions"
robotics challenge. Each team presented a unique way of solving a
problem or dilemma that might be an issue for the elderly.
NRG competition team included Logan County 4-H members Clayton and
Grace Skelton, James and Mitch Rolewicz, Murphy Roate, Jake Kirgan,
Austin Killion, and Menard County youth Ethan Corbin. The team was
led by Adrian Lee.
They were awarded the Best Robot Design Award in their regional
tournament division. They were selected by the other competition
teams to receive the Best Pit Award as well.
Team sponsorship and support was provided by John Deere Corp.,
Verallia Saint-Gobain Containers, GMP Local 71, GMP Local 117,
Central Illinois Technology and Education Research Institute, and
University of Illinois Extension. They were also mentored by Chad
Yagow from John Deere.
[to top of second column]
Logan-Menard-Sangamon County 4-H thanks the sponsors and
congratulates the NRG team on their achievement.
For more information on the 4-H youth development program in the
Logan-Menard-Sangamon Unit, as well as how to involve your children
in Logan County 4-H, contact Patty Huffer or Amy Hyde in the Lincoln
office at 217-732-8289.
[Text from file received from
Patty Huffer,
County 4-H]
< Top Stories index
Back to top
News |
Sports | Business |
Rural Review |
Teaching and Learning
Home and Family |
| Obituaries
Community |
Law and Courts |
Leisure Time
Spiritual Life |
Health and Fitness |
Teen Scene
Letters to the Editor


text:
Version 2.0 of the Twitter Guide! Get a more in-depth look in to how to use Twitter to create your brand and curate your posting.
Tag: HESM
Student Affairs Twitter Resource Guide
Interested in getting your Twitter up and running? Not sure what it's all about? Check out this guide on how to engage in online communities via this social networking site!


text:
View All Brands
Sorry, we don't carry that brand.
Eurooptic Ltd
635 N. Loyalsock Ave
Montoursville, PA 17754
+1 (570) 368-3920
[email protected]
Monday/Tuesday: Closed
Wednesday-Sunday: 9AM - 6PM
Folding Stock - Short Action - Left Hand
Government Export Restriction This item may be regulated for export by the U.S. Department of State or the US Department of Commerce. Please see our Export Policy.
ITAR ProductBy adding to cart, I understand, acknowledge, and agree to the Export Policy. I am a US Person, and I do not intend to export this product. Please see our Export Policy.
Accuracy International (AI) remains on the cutting edge of excellence with two new additions to the company's long heritage of rifle chassis with the AXAICS and ATAICS for the Remington® M700®. Accuracy International introduced the first commercially available rifle chassis system to the shooting world in 1998. The Accuracy International Chassis System (AICS) and accompanying AICS magazines have become the industry standard and yardstick by which all others are judged. The AXAICS and ATAICS continue to raise the bar by incorporating the latest innovations of the AX and AT tactical rifle systems. This new generation of AICS incorporates operator-defined attributes such as:• Adjustable length of pull using 10mm and 20mm spacers. • Lateral and height adjustable cheek piece. • Six flush cup sling points for quick sling positioning. • Optional AT folding stock using AI's battle proven hinge system. • AX style pistol grip with traditional thumbhole stock sides available as an option. • AICS 5 round magazine and optional 10 round magazines. • KeySlot™ accessory mounting system on the 6:00 O'Clock forend surface. • Optional 9:00 O'Clock and 3:00 O'Clock KeySlot ™ accessory rails. • Optional STANAG 4694/Mil-Std 1913 accessory rails. • Optional Co-planer Night Vision mount with STANAG 4694/Mil-Std M1913 rail.
No reviews yet. Help other shoppers by reviewing this product!
EuroOptic, Ltd
| 635 N. Loyalsock Ave, Montoursville, PA 17754
Phone: +1 (570) 368-3920
Fax: +1 (570) 486-4037
© EuroOptic. All rights reserved.
About Us
Terms & Conditions
EuroOptic International Sites:
In an effort to better protect your personal account information we are requiring stronger passwords.


text:
- Font:
- +
- -
MR. CHUCK TODD: Our issues this Sunday: Disaster in Japan as a massive earthquake rocks the country, leaving hundreds dead and thousands missing. All eyes are on two nuclear reactors there, crippled in the disaster, as fears grow over a possible nuclear meltdown. We'll get the very latest.
Meanwhile, back at home, President Obama weighs the use of force in Libya. And the clock ticks towards a government shutdown as both sides dig in.
PRES. BARACK OBAMA: Here's what we know: The Republicans in the House passed a budget that has been now rejected in the Senate. They are not going to get 100 percent of what they want.
MTP online
Twitter: @davidgregory,@betsymtp,@meetthepress
Facebook: David Gregory, MTP
Download the iPhone app
Subscribe to newsletter
Get text message updates
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: Democrats want the president to fight with them, but so far they say he's remained on the sidelines. With us, one of the lead budget negotiators for the Democrats in the Senate, Chuck Schumer of New York.
Then, could this finally be the unofficial start of the 2012 campaign?
FMR. SEN. RICK SANTORUM (R-PA): We will reclaim this land, and we will make it greater and greater and greater.
FMR. REP. NEWT GINGRICH (R-GA): Nothing we have seen in our lifetime is comparable to the level of depth we have to go to get this country back on the right track.
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: Our exclusive guest this morning, another potential 2012 candidate and a governor on the front lines of the budget battles happening across the country, Mitch Daniels of Indiana.
Plus, insights from this very busy political week. With us, political reporter for The Washington Post, Dan Balz, and host of NPR's "All Things Considered," Michele Norris.
And finally, we remember a very familiar face on this program for the last 45 years, The Washington Post's David Broder.
Announcer: From NBC News in Washington, MEET THE PRESS with David Gregory. Substituting today, Chuck Todd.
MR. TODD: Good morning.
MR. CHUCK TODD: It's been 48 hours since the 9.0 magnitude earthquake and massive tsunami rocked Japan. The death toll officially now is around 1,400, but officials fear at least 10,000 could be dead in flooded areas in the northeastern region of the country. Search and rescue
operations continue. Millions are without power, hundreds of thousands in temporary shelters.
And on top of all that horrible news, increasing fears of a growing nuclear crisis and the threat of nuclear meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex, where yesterday an explosion occurred at the power plant's unit one reactor, and officials say that an explosion could occur at unit three, which may already be officially in partial meltdown. We have all aspects of this developing story covered this morning. We're going to get an official update from Japan's ambassador to the United States in a moment, as well as analysis about nuclear concerns on
the ground from the president of the Nuclear Energy Institute, Marvin Fertel.
But first we're going to go live to Tokyo, where NBC's Lester Holt joins us for the very latest.
Lester, tell us what's going on on the ground right now with rescue efforts.
LESTER HOLT reporting:
Well, Chuck, I can tell you, this is truly a three-pronged disaster. You noted it's a 9.0 earthquake. The U.S. Geological Survey had listed as 8.9; today the officials here, the Japanese, did their own analysis and determined it was 9.0.
On the ground, a very difficult search and rescue effort right now. There are areas still cut off by the floodwaters and the tsunami. There are reports of as many as--in one town, as many as 10,000 people missing. And that's why one official today said the death toll could go to
So while they deal with this massive cleanup and recovery and rescue operation, there is the nuclear disaster, the third prong of all this. Two of the reactors at this power plant have experienced what they believe are partial meltdowns, maybe in the process of that. Some
escaping of, of radioactivity, although the amount was less today, they said, in the measurements. A third reactor at that site still had risk of perhaps an explosion. How this all plays out in terms of the danger to the area, officials still have a 20-kilometer exclusion zone. That's about 12.4 miles, an area they've evacuated, involving over 200,000 people. Others nearby are being told to stay indoors, to keep wet cloths over their face, to seal their doors. We talked to someone who flew in here tonight on a Delta Airlines flight and say their pilot made an announcement that they were circling--or flying around that area en route to Tokyo, had been instructed to fly around the area where there might be this release of radioactivity. Scientists are all debating exactly what's going on. The main problem is these reactor cores, the system that was meant to cool them in a loss of power has failed. So, in that one reactor, they've actually been pumping seawater in a last-ditch effort to try and cool the temperature of the core before it begins to melt through the casing and suffer what is referred to as a meltdown.
There's plenty of relief getting into the country from the U.S. and other places. American warships off coast now are beginning to ferry supplies and relief into the area. American bases here are also supplying helicopters and personnel. This is going to be a very, very difficult
several days and weeks and obviously months to come, Chuck, as they try and get a handle exactly where the victims are, how to get to them and bring them to safety.
MR. TODD: All right. It's nightfall now in Tokyo, Japan. Lester Holt, thank you very much.
MR. CHUCK TODD: We turn now to the Japanese ambassador to the United States, Ichiro Fujisaki.
Ambassador, welcome to MEET THE PRESS. I want to start with the prime minister of Japan, just gave a speech to your nation, calling this the worst crisis since World War II. What else did the prime minister say?
AMB. ICHIRO FUJISAKI: Yes. First, thank you very much for having me. And yes, prime minister just spoke, and he said this is the worst challenge that Japanese people have to face, but we have to work together to cope with the situation so that we can overcome the situation. And he's on top of the situation for--since it started.
MR. TODD: What can you tell us about rescue efforts right now? I know there's been a lot of concern about the inability to get to some parts of the affected areas.
AMB. FUJISAKI: You're right. In this situation, there are three things most important. One, search and rescue, human lives is the most important thing. Second, we have to avoid that sort of secondary accidents, incidents. Third, we have to supply basic human needs--food,
water and housing, and other things--to those who have been suffering. And rescue search is most important, and we are mobilizing almost all the forces we have. What's, what's...
MR. TODD: Is that enough? Is that enough? Do you need more from the United States? Do you need more from the world?
AMB. FUJISAKI: We are very happy that United States is helping us. Your U.S. forces have been sending, for example, the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan up to the region and supplying food, emergency food to the region. As for rescue, our self-defense force--half of our self-defense force is mobilized in order to cope with the situation. Up till yesterday it was a quarter of, but now it's half.
MR. TODD: Let's talk about the situation with the nuclear reactor and this fear of a partial meltdown. First of all, what is the government saying at this point? Is it a partial meltdown?
AMB. FUJISAKI: No. There's two types of problem here. One is that within the container there's too much pressure, so we have to take out vapor through a filter.
MR. TODD: Mm-hmm.
AMB. FUJISAKI: The--that's one of the issue that some of the reactors are facing. The other is that because it's, it's heating up, we have to put in water. And we, we do not have enough clear water, so we're putting in seawater as well to cool down. So there are two types of
measures we are taking to different reactors. Now...
MR. TODD: Now, I want to talk, talk on the seawater...
AMB. FUJISAKI: Yes.
MR. TODD: ...because there's been some concern that that is, that is basically a desperate attempt here at this point. So is that a fair, fair way to describe it?
AMB. FUJISAKI: I do not know if you call it a desperate, but we have tried to take other measures. But now we think this is the right and--result to do that.
Now, as for what you call meltdown, it is true that part of fuel rod may have been deformed or melting. But it is not the situation where the core reactor, substantial part of reactor is melting down. And it is far from what you call a--the total symptom of melting down. We are trying to avoid that.
MR. TODD: Right.
AMB. FUJISAKI: And because--to do that, we are putting in water or trying to take out vapor.
MR. TODD: I understand that. How do you assess the risks right now to
the population in that area?
AMB. FUJISAKI: The--we're trying to make it a minimal. However, we have to be--take a--the precautions. So that is why government has ordered up to those people within the radius of 20 kilometers, 10 kilometers to move out.
MR. TODD: Right. About 13 miles, right?
AMB. FUJISAKI: Yes. And it's more than 200,000 people moving out of that region. It's a sizeable number. But in order to take the--at most precaution, that is the--we have to take quick action, we have to take a most cautious attitude, and also we have to mobilize all of our forces. These are the principles in meeting with these great challenge that we're
MR. TODD: Mr. Ambassador, how can folks watching help? What's the best
way to help?
AMB. FUJISAKI: This is the biggest challenge that we have faced, as prime minister said, but at the same time, we are so gratified that the international community is helping us. About 70 countries in the international organizations have said they would extending their help.
And United States is, as I said, is using their forces in Japan, sending air freight carrier and sending rescue teams, as well. And within the rescue team, there are experts of a nuclear reactor as well. And dogs and rescue teams are arising--arriving from many countries, regions. And I think we would be very gratified to accept these helping hands from the
international community.
MR. TODD: All right. Ambassador Ichiro Fujisaki, I know these are tough times for you and your family and your country, and we thank you for spending a few minutes with us this morning.
AMB. FUJISAKI: Thank you very much for having me, and I'd like to extend my gratitude on behalf of people and government of Japan to all the Americans who are with us and who are thinking of Japan and trying to extend help to us. Thank you very much.
MR. TODD: Thank you.
MR. CHUCK TODD: All right. For more on what a nuclear meltdown could mean for Japan and the rest of the world, we turn to the president of the Nuclear Energy Institute, Marvin Fertel. He's been responsible for heading up the organization's nuclear safety programs and has been in the industry for more than 35 years.
Mr. Fertel, welcome to MEET THE PRESS. I understand that you represent the industry's interests in this, but I want to start with what exactly happened with this reactor. We have a graphic of what happened. We know the reactor shut down, but the earthquake also cut off power and, therefore, made it so that there was no mechanism to cool the reactor. Explain some more.
MR. MARVIN FERTEL: OK. Well, good morning, Chuck, and I'm pleased to be here. And let me just take a second and tell the people of Japan that we--they have our sympathy and our support and also that we appreciate very much what the workers at Fukushima are doing to protect people off site. So your question, specifically--actually, after the earthquake, it appeared that everything worked like it should, and the diesels kicked on, and they were actually cooling the core, doing what they needed to do to keep the reactor under control and get to safe shutdown. We think that the tsunami then caused more damage and cut off their ability to continue to cool the core. So the reactor shut down safely. They did, they did get cooling going, and then they lost it about an hour later.
MR. TODD: Explain complete meltdown vs. partial meltdown and how much fear do you have watching this that we're going to see a complete meltdown.
MR. FERTEL: Well, what you're talking about is fuel damage. And as the fuel gets damaged, it gets hotter and hotter, and you begin to melt some of the fuel. To put it in some perspective, at Three Mile Island, which was the worst accident we ever had, about half of the core melted, so about 50 percent. It resulted in the machine never operating again. It
resulted in no releases off-site that threatened anybody. So you can have fuel melt, and if the rest of your safely systems, your containment works and your primary system works, and you manage to keep the reactor under control, the dangers for public health and safety are really minimal. And that's the thing the Japanese are trying to do right now.
MR. TODD: And we have a couple of nuclear power plants in earthquake zones, or at least in California. Is there a concern--should Americans be concerned about the fact that these power plants are sitting in earthquake zones? Are they safe?
MR. FERTEL: Yeah. All of our power plants, whether they're in California, which is a high earthquake area, or in the Midwest or other places, are required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to design to be able to withstand a maximum credible earthquake, and the NRC continues to update and upgrade what the requirements are.
MR. TODD: And you said post-9/11 that there were some extra upgrades put in to make sure that, that these nuclear plants could handle a total power shutdown, correct?
MR. FERTEL: Yeah. We, we've done things post-9/11 to make sure that if something happened to our plant, like happened in Japan, where you lost all power, that you could get water to the core and continue to cool it. That's correct.
MR. TODD: And before we go, how much--when will we know if they have the situation under control in Japan?
MR. FERTEL: I--it's going to probably still be days. They're doing everything in their power--I heard the ambassador. I'm sure our country is helping them. We, we stand ready to help in ny way we can as an ndustry in this country and I think in days, but I think they're doing verything remarkably well.
MR. TODD: Marvin Fertel of the Nuclear Energy Institute, thanks for coming in on short notice. Thanks for your expertise.
MR. FERTEL: Thank you, Chuck.
MR. TODD: All right.
MR. CHUCK TODD: Well, we're going to turn now to the senior senator from New York, Democrat Chuck Schumer.
Welcome back to MEET THE PRESS, Senator Schumer.
SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): Good morning, Chuck.
MR. TODD: I want to ask, I want to ask you about nuclear power. Just in January, you had been inching toward being in support of expanding nuclear power in this country. You said quote, "It makes a great deal of sense. It's clean, and now it's pretty safe." Watching everything unfolding, do you still feel that way?
SEN. SCHUMER: Well, we're going to have to see what happens here. Obviously, it's still, still things are happening. But the bottom line is we do have to free ourselves of independence from foreign oil. In the other half of the globe, Libya, showed that. Prices are up, our
economy is being hurt by it or could be hurt by it. So I'm still willing to look at nuclear. As I've always said, it has to be done safely and carefully.
MR. TODD: Senator, I want to turn to the budget debate. We know that there is a new short-term continuing resolution to keep the government open. The current one expires this Friday. House Republicans have put one out. A lot of Democrats have signed on. I just want to confirm your--you approve of this new short-term three week budget resolutionthat the House Republicans have put out.
SEN. SCHUMER: Yes. And it gives me some cause for optimism that we can finish this CR, the remaining six months, pretty well. There were negotiations between the president, Senate Democrats, House Republicans. And the proposal that was made, I'm, I'm for it. It takes cuts that Democrats have proposed.
MR. TODD: Right.
SEN. SCHUMER: Cuts that get rid of fat, but don't hit into the muscle the way HR-1 did, and it leaves out all these extraneous riders on things like abortion, global warming, other things that would cause all kinds--make it far more difficult to get to a budget decision.
MR. TODD: Senator, there's been a lot of criticism of a lot of players in this budget debate. Let me play you a clip of Senator Claire McCaskill who was not happy about the Senate Democrat proposal that was put out earlier this week. Here's what she had to say.
(Videotape, Wednesday)
SEN. CLAIRE McCASKILL (D-MO): I still think that there are way too many people in denial around here about the nature of the problem and how serious it is. And I don't think we're demonstrating to the American people that we understand the nature of the problem when we present an alternative proposal with such a small number of cuts.
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: Who is she referring to when she says there are too many folks around here that are in denial? Is she referring to you, Harry Reid, the more liberal members of your caucus?
SEN. SCHUMER: Claire McCaskill has, God bless her, she has been out there long before this election talking about budget cuts. And House Democrats, Senate Democrats, have moved in her direction. The McCaskill-Sessions Bill we supported last year, late last year, it didn't get enacted. The bottom line is this, though: Claire McCaskill voted against HR-1, as did every other Democrat--that's the Republican proposal--because I think we're united in one thing: We should make significant cuts, absolutely, we need to, but we can't cut into our seed corn. We can't cut into the things that help America grow and create jobs like education or cancer research or food safety, things like that. And I think what you're finding, Chuck, is you're going to find a turning point here. Now that every Democrat has rejected HR-1 and it clearly doesn't have the votes to pass the Senate, the ball shifts to Speaker Boehner. We've put some cuts on the table. We're willing to put more. But they have not said a single place where they would move off HR-1, and now it can't pass. So, actually, the action in the next week or two will occur behind the scenes. Speaker Boehner will have to meet with these 87 freshman Republicans.
MR. TODD: Right.
SEN. SCHUMER: Some have said they won't budge. But if they don't, he may have to make a coalition with some Democrats in the House because it's clear HR-1 can't pass, we have to go somewhat further than what we've gone, and we are willing to be reasonable and meet in the middle as long as it doesn't cut the kinds of things that help America grow. Because the American people gave us two missions: Cut unnecessary programs, but grow the economy and create jobs. We think we can do both. We think HR-1 only focuses on one.
MR. TODD: We are in our third set of short-term budget expansion--extensions here. Are you OK if, if you can't get a deal by April 8th, which is when the next continuing resolution would end, the next time we can see a government shutdown. Are you OK with another short-term, or is that it? Because Harry Reid had said last week, no more short-terms, and then all of a sudden you guys are saying, "OK, we'll take one more short-term." Is this it? Last one?
SEN. SCHUMER: Well, as I said, this short-term CR does meet our basic criteria--the president and the Senate Democrats--which is: Cut the waste, cut inefficiency, but don't cut the seed corn. And by the way, just parenthetically, the tsunami shows that as well. We proposed
cutting some earmarks out of the funding of NOAA, which has the regulation and watching out for tsunamis. They cut so much out of NOAA, which funds the tsunami warning center, that there would have to be furloughs there.
MR. TODD: Right.
SEN. SCHUMER: So we are sticking to where we're at. This short-term CR moved us in that direction, but now we should negotiate one for the rest of the year. We only have six months left. The president, Senate Democrats, House Republicans are sitting down and negotiating, and we should get it done already. You can't fund a business two weeks at a time.
MR. TODD: Right.
SEN. SCHUMER: You can't fund a government two weeks at a time.
MR. TODD: Senator, has the president done enough? I know behind-the-scenes that the relationship between you and the White House has been somewhat rocky during the lame duck and it's up and down. Has the president been involved enough?
SEN. SCHUMER: Oh, yes. First, I talk to the White House every day. We are talking to one another. We're not always on the same page, but we usually are. And the overall goal, again, cutting waste, using a smart short scalpel but not a meat ax. Senate Democrats and the president are on the same page, and I think we're moving in that direction. I'm optimistic that we can get there, particularly based on the negotiations and what happened in the short-term CR, which is something that we could support.
MR. TODD: And very quickly, on Libya, the Arab League has called on the United Nations to call for a no-fly zone over Libya. Are you supportive of a no-fly zone and should the U.S. Senate be put on the record on this? Do you believe that before the president agrees to anything that Congress should have a say?
SEN. SCHUMER: Well, I certainly think the Arab League's decision makes a no-fly zone more likely. I think the president's handling it very well, not taking a military option off the table, but being careful. We've learned in the past when we go in militarily there are all kinds of other
types of consequences, and at the same time, it's much better to do it in a multilateral way, with all the nations of the world on board, rather than do it unilaterally. The Arab League, NATO will get on board, and I think it makes a no-fly zone much more like to happen shortly.
MR. TODD: Does Congress have to have a say?
SEN. SCHUMER: I don't--I believe on these we should defer to the commander in chief on short-term immediate situations like this.
MR. TODD: All right. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, Democrat from New York, thanks very much for being on MEET THE PRESS.
SEN. SCHUMER: Thank you, Chuck. Nice to be with you.
MR. TODD: All right. Up next, the 2012 presidential campaign unofficially gets off the ground, with potential Republican contenders making stops in the key states of Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina all this week, all against the backdrop of a heated budget battle in
Washington and in the state Houses across the country. We're going to talk to a man on the front lines of these battles, and he's a potential 2012 Republican presidential candidate himself, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels.
MR. TODD: Coming up, we'll speak to potential 2012 candidate and a man on the front lines of the budget battles in his home state of Indiana, Republican Governor Mitch Daniels, up next after this brief commercial break.
MR. CHUCK TODD: Joining me now, the Republican governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels.
Welcome back to MEET THE PRESS.
GOV. MITCH DANIELS (R-IN): Chuck.
MR. TODD: All right. Well, I saw welcome back because you've been here before as budget director. And, in fact, it is as budget director I want to ask you something. During your confirmation hearings--we were talking about these budget shutdowns--you had talked about that you wanted to see some way to sort of change the way so that, that, that there wasn't
politics being used--the government shutdowns weren't being used as political leverage. And you also referred to riders this way, you said, "so that there aren't things like extraneous measures that could otherwise upset the normal appropriations process." We're watching that
right now. Is this the type of things you were warning about? And on these riders, are epublicans in the wrong for attaching these things right now?
GOV. DANIELS: You probably think I'm paying more attention to this than I am, Chuck, and your memory is a little better than mine. But, yeah, I think probably, as a general rule, it, it is better practice to do the people's business, try to concentrate on making ends meet, which
Washington obviously has failed to do for a long time, and, and have other policy debates in other places if you can.
MR. TODD: So your advice to Speaker Boehner would be, "You know what, we've made some political points here, but take these riders out. Take these political--have--save it for another part of the discussion."
GOV. DANIELS: He doesn't need any advice but me, but I would, I would simply say this: The financial and fiscal problems facing this country are of a level that, I believe, threatens, not just our prosperity, but the survival of our republic. And really, I'm hoping and I--that the
Congress and the administration will engage very seriously. I mean, to see them arguing over nickels and dimes like this is--especially from the vantage point of people who are making big changes to make end meet--in state Houses seems a little--it's almost comic.
MR. TODD: I want to go to the debt ceiling because in, in, the first time you were on MEET THE PRESS, you were asked about the debt ceiling, the fact that it needed to be raised. This was in June of 2002. You said it's a responsible government--what a responsible government must do. And you said, "You know, what, it's really a housekeeping matter." That's about to come up in about six to eight weeks.
GOV. DANIELS: Yeah.
MR. TODD: We don't know the exact time when it's going to happen here. Do you still think it's a housekeeping matter?
GOV. DANIELS: Well, less, less so now that we've doubled and we're on our way to tripling the national debt. And so it's a heck of a lot more serious than it was back then. But it is certainly true that these debt ceilings are rearview mirror exercises in paying for the, as I would see it, excesses of, of recent years. And at some stage you have to do it and honor the country's obligations. But I definitely think, in the really critical fiscal corner we've painted ourselves into, it's entirely appropriate to use that moment to surface these issues. And I hope for some leverage to get some real change and not just cosmetic.
MR. TODD: Did your former boss, President Bush, make a mistake about not trying to pay for the wars in some form of another, asking for some temporary tax hikes, if necessary, to pay for the wars? Or to pay for the prescription drug benefit? Because, obviously, you were there when, when the debt also went up, when the deficit went up. And it was because, among other things, those two things were not paid for then.
GOV. DANIELS: Well, we'll never know. If you'd done that and you'd hurt the economy, you'd have had less revenue than, than you expected, maybe less than you had, anyway. You know, by 2007, the deficit was tiny compared to now. It was well under 2 percent of GDP. So we would love, wouldn't we, to be back to that level now. So...
MR. TODD: But you're an executive now. If you--you believe in paying for things. If you are going to offer something, you should pay for it.
GOV. DANIELS: Yeah, don't offer what you can't pay for. That'd be a good principle to return to in the federal government.
MR. TODD: So the prescription drug benefit probably shouldn't have been offered without being paid for.
GOV. DANIELS: Well, it's cost a whole lot less than anybody thought. But it is part--there's no question--it is part of the biggest problem we face, which isn't even these massive annual deficits we're running, it's the unaffordable promises we have made to--in what we call the
entitlement programs.
MR. TODD: All right, let's talk about your record as governor of Indiana. I want to put up a basic thing here on jobs. When you took office, the unemployment rate was 5.4 percent. Now it's 9.1 percent. When you took office, nearly three million Indianan--Hoosiers were
employed, now it's 2.8. I say this--so it's a loss of 144,000 jobs. I say this because you have made a huge effort to pay down the state's debt, to really pinch the budget down. But that has--job creation hasn't come with it. And we've heard arguments among Republicans here in
Washington and across these statehouses that you shrink government, it will create jobs. When did--we're not seeing evidence of that in Indiana.
GOV. DANIELS: You could put up that same graphic for probably 48 or 49 states in America. A national, catastrophic recession will do that to you. Before that recession started, we were at essentially full employment. It was well below what it had been when we got there. But,
listen, you do what you can do. On every measure--everybody's survey, everybody's rating--of a great place to invest and do business and create jobs, Indiana is now in the top tier. It's the only state anywhere in our neighborhood. It's basically us and a few Sunbelt western states. And that's what government can do, create the best conditions you can. But just as tsunamis overwhelm the best preparations, so do economic tidal waves like the one that we experienced and which we're still recovering from.
MR. TODD: All right, I want to talk about what we saw--look at these pictures yesterday in Wisconsin. There were massive protests about these--this battle in Wisconsin, Republican Governor Scott Walker. He has won the legislative battle. He got what he wanted, he passed this. You made a decision on similar legislation. It wasn't quite with collective bargaining with public employees. This had to do with a right-to-work legislation, and you said something interesting. You said you chose not to pick this fight because you didn't campaign on it. And
you believed if you hadn't made a case to voters about right-to-work legislation that you shouldn't be trying to do it once you've--in office and in the legislative session. Governor Walker, do you think, lose the political fight here?
GOV. DANIELS: I have no way of knowing. I think the taxpayers of Wisconsin won. Seems to me that he committed to do the sorts of things he's trying to do, and we ought to--agree or disagree with people--we ought to respect them when they do try to live up to their words. But...
MR. TODD: But he didn't campaign on the, on the collective bargaining aspect of this. He campaigned on asking public employees to contribute more, but he didn't campaign on that aspect. Do you think that was a mistake?
GOV. DANIELS: I don't know. But I would say that from our own experience that if you have a serious fiscal problem, which we did six years ago and don't today, that having the flexibility to manage government, not only to save money, but to serve people better--and I could illustrate this in a hundred ways--is pretty important. And before we discontinued government union collective bargaining in Indiana, you really couldn't make any of the changes.
MR. TODD: Do you not believe in collective bargaining?
GOV. DANIELS: I do believe in collective bargaining in the private sector. And--but only within very...
MR. TODD: You don't believe public employees should have it.
GOV. DANIELS: Don't take it from me. Some of the greatest defenders and champions of labor--Samuel Gompers, George Meade, Franklin Delano Roosevelt--said it had no place in government. Now, it's there now in a very big way. In a, I think a very cynical fashion, it tilts our politics, and so I think there are very serious problems with it. But, you know, I would just say, it's not just about saving money. The Indiana experience says it's also about serving the public better.
MR. TODD: All right. I want to move to presidential politics a little bit and the...
GOV. DANIELS: Do we have to?
MR. TODD: ...and the Republican Party--oh, do we have to?
GOV. DANIELS: Mm-hmm.
MR. TODD: We'll twist your arm, we'll talk about that in a minute.
GOV. DANIELS: Yeah. Yeah.
MR. TODD: Somebody's been twisting your arm, clearly, there.
GOV. DANIELS: Right.
MR. TODD: I want to go to your comments about calling a truce on social issues. One thing that's happened with your comments is that it's certainly made some folks pay attention. This week in Iowa you had a few critics about calling for a truce on social issues. Take a listen.
(Videotape, Monday)
MR. RALPH REED: You know, some have suggested that we call a truce on the social and moral issues. I don't know about you, but I seem to remember Ronald Reagan fighting and winning the Cold War at the very time that he was restoring values and growing the economy.
(End videotape)
(Videotape, Monday)
SEN. SANTORUM: ...these moral issues that everyone says, "Oh, maybe we should set to the side and have a truce on." You can't. It is who we are. It is the purpose of our country.
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: Look, you have a great political mind. You were in--you were one of the--in the political shop in Ronald Reagan's presidency. Let's be purely pragmatic here. Can a Republican running for president ignore social issues and succeed in Iowa, in South Carolina?
GOV. DANIELS: I don't know. I--you know, I don't sit around calculating the political pluses and minuses of every little word I utter. I've--just sort of tell people what I think makes sense, and I'm prepared to respect disagreements. I don't have any disagreements with these
folks. I happen to share their views, and I respect their passion. You know, some of it, however, Chuck, comes to this: Are you more committed to results or to rhetoric? And in pursuit of the results that matter, that I think are fully consistent with a commitment to limited government and individual liberty and freedom in this country, I think we're going to have to do some very, very big things. We're going to have to make changes, at least moving forward, that will permit us to maintain a growing economy and the American dream of upward mobility for folks at the bottom. And we're going to have to get together people who disagree on other things. That's all I've said. So I respect those who disagree. And it's ironic because, as the record will show, I've done the things that they say they'd like to do.
MR. TODD: Let's get to your own future. In fact, politically you had said you weren't going to have another future. Take a look.
(Videotape, Mitch Daniel's political ad)
GOV. DANIELS: Whatever your outlook on politics, here's some good news. This is the last time you'll have to watch me in an ad like this. See, governor's the only office I'd run for, or ever will.
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: Is that ad going to be out of date and a lie by the time the Iowa caucuses come in January or February?
GOV. DANIELS: Well, I'm not sure. I, I wrote it, as I wrote, I guess, almost all my own stuff, and I meant it, every word of it. And others have said over the course of the last year and a half that I ought to consider something that never entered my mind. I've agreed to consider
it. That's...
MR. TODD: What's your time--what, what's the latest you think you can enter this race, in your mind, you know? I know you don't want other people setting deadlines, but what's your own deadline?
GOV. DANIELS: People have been asking me that question for over a year now, and they always thought the deadline was immediate. And here we are in the middle of March. I think it's a blissful occurrence that the darn thing hasn't started two years ahead of time. So I don't know. I will tell you...
MR. TODD: Can you wait all summer?
GOV. DANIELS: I have no idea. I will tell you this. I am completely committed to the job I'm in now.
MR. TODD: Sure.
GOV. DANIELS: We're trying to do some very exciting things in Indiana to make our state better, and that comes first. And if, if deadlines pass, they do.
MR. TODD: Quickly, you had said the field has--"the pickings are slim" when you were describing the field. Do you still feel right now, in what you've seen out there, that the pickings are slim in the Republican race?
GOV. DANIELS: Well, I said if people were talking about me, then the pickings must be slim. And, you know, I, I still think there's time. And there's some really good people running. I like them all.
MR. TODD: Mm-hmm.
GOV. DANIELS: And, you know, I'm hoping that our party will simply step up to the issues of the day. And it could be any one of those folks.
MR. TODD: Very quickly, Senator Lugar, your friend, Indiana senator, senior senator, running for a seventh term. I know you've said you were going to vote for him. Are you supporting him? Are you going to endorse him? Will you do whatever he asks you to do in his re-election effort? And he's facing a primary challenge from a state office holder and a tea
party favorite.
GOV. DANIELS: Yeah. Who's a good friend of mine, by the way, and been a good ally. But, no, I'm for Dick Lugar. He's the role model I've had in politics for a long time.
MR. TODD: You'll appear for him, if he asks?
GOV. DANIELS: Well, I've never intervened in primaries. I'm not sure what good it would do if I did. But folks in Indiana know that, that I am for him, and that I admire him, and think if he wants another term, he ought to have it.
MR. TODD: Well, we are packed this show. I wish we had more time. Governor Mitch Daniels, thank you for coming on MEET THE PRESS.
GOV. DANIELS: Good being with you.
MR. TODD: All right.
Well, it was a busy political week, as potential Republican candidates were all over the place, making the rounds in the key states. They were out testing their message, wooing activists, and already making some early mistakes. We're going to break it all down with our political roundtable: The Washington Post's Dan Balz and NPR's Michele Norris. And then, a special tribute to a dear friend here at MEET THE PRESS.
MR. CHUCK TODD: And we are back with our roundtable, host of NPR's "All Things Considered" Michele Norris and, of course, political reporter from Washington Post--grand poo-bah, I like to call him sometimes--Dan Balz.
Dan Balz, what did you hear from Mitch Daniels? Is that a candidate for president of the United States?
MR. DAN BALZ: Well, Governor Daniels is very interesting. This is a potential candidate who knows what he wants to say if he runs, he's just not sure if he wants to run. And I think you found, as others have who have talked with him, that he has a certain enthusiasm for delivering the message about the fiscal peril that he sees the country in. But he's got some other decisions he's got to make before he knows whether he's going to run. Some of those having to do with family, some of them having to do with just what you go through with the process, some of them I think with whether he has the driving ambition or the fire in the belly, as we say. And I think that those are questions that only he can answer.
MR. TODD: You know, Michele Norris, it's been interesting at the White House, they are shocked--David Plouffe, those guys, David Axelrod, and the ones that are going to run the president's re-election--they are shocked that some of these bigger candidates who are thinking about running haven't gotten in yet. Because they say if they hadn't gotten in
early, they never would've been the nominee, that they needed the work, frankly. At some point...
MS. MICHELE NORRIS: And they don't know who to position themselves with.
MR. TODD: Yeah. Well, forget that, but it's like they're surprised. Are these Republicans making a mistake by waiting too long?
MS. NORRIS: Well, time will tell. I mean, we, we frankly don't know if they're losing an opportunity to get their ground game together, to develop their message, to allow voters to get to know a candidate and, and really vet them. Because part of what Obama went through, it wasn't just the ground game that they put together, voters had a good long time
to vet a candidate who was unusual and historic...
MR. TODD: Sure.
MS. NORRIS: ...and someone that they weren't used to seeing in lots of ways. So, you know--and when you talk to Republican operatives, there are a lot of people that are sitting on the, on the sidelines right now trying to figure out who they're going to work for, who they're going to sign up for. I mean, we saw big news this, this week in Iowa with a candidate who helped launch Mike Huckabee's very successful Iowa campaign, you know, finally getting into the game and, and actually moving with another candidate.
MR. TODD: And going with somebody else.
MS. NORRIS: Yeah. But it, it, it is really interesting to see this, that, you know, that this--last time we thought it was too early.
MR. TODD: Right. And this time it feels too late.
MS. NORRIS: And now this, now, you know, it's...
MR. TODD: What--you know, but it's funny about the early subject, we do have some candidates who are trying to get their baggage out of the way. Newt Gingrich this week, Dan Balz, tried to explain--he went on a Christian Broadcasting Network to try to explain the infidelity, the three marriages a little bit, and tried to explain why it happened. And he blamed it partially on his drive at work, the drive that he had in Washington, how passionate he felt, and it made him ignore, I guess, his home life. Is that, is that going to work as a mea culpa?
MR. BALZ: I'm not sure that that's the last word we've heard from former Speaker Gingrich about his personal life. I think this will be something that will come up again and again and again.
MR. TODD: He's clearly trying to deal with it early.
MR. BALZ: Well, he clearly is and I, and I think all smart candidates try to take negatives off the table as early as they can. But voters begin to pay attention at different times. And so this, this that he said this week goes to a very small audience. There's a much larger and more important audience, and that's the voters who will begin to hear it at a much later time, and then we'll have to see, particularly in a state like Iowa where religious conservatives are an important part of the caucus process. We'll see whether that explanation works for them.
MR. TODD: Arguably, it didn't work for Rudy...
MS. NORRIS: You know, as you were saying that, I was thinking about those big mega churches in Iowa...
MR. BALZ: Right.
MS. NORRIS: ...and, you know, how he's going to sell himself. So...
MR. BALZ: Right.
MR. TODD: And Rudy Giuliani never really recovered from the issue of the same thing, the three marriages and the very public infidelity.
Michele Norris, I want to read you a quote--it's unbelievable--from Michele Bachmann this weekend in New Hampshire. It--clearly she seems to be leaning a little bit more into this idea of running for president. But she went up there and she says, "What I love about New Hampshire and what we have in common is our extreme love for liberty. You're the state where the shot was heard around the world in Lexington and Concord." Well, that's the state now where the historic gaffe on the Bachmann campaign was heard around the world. You know, how serious are Republicans...
MS. NORRIS: And not, not, not the first one at all.
MR. TODD: Yeah. She's had a series of these. Is she ready for prime time?
MS. NORRIS: The voters are the ones who have to decide that. And, you know, it's really interesting because, despite the gaffes, despite the fact that there are a lot of people who seem willing to dismiss her, there are a lot of people who also embrace her and her enthusiasm. She picked up a little bit of support in Iowa this week. She's from, you know, we're looking at Iowa first because it's, you know, it's where the starting gun goes off.
MR. TODD: Sure. Supposed to be first. We'll find out when.
MS. NORRIS: It's supposed to be first, you're right. But she comes from a neighboring state and among the growing but sort of loosely organized tea party federation in the state. They, they look at her and they see someone--they like her fighting spirit. But we live in difficult times. There are big budget issues, the economy is still stumbling, and people might like what they hear in terms of fighting spirit; but, in the end, you know, the measure that most voters are likely to reach for are who is going to right the economy, who's going to keep the country...
MR. TODD: Dan Balz, we know there isn't a front-runner in the same way that there's been front-runners in the past, but if there is a front-runner, it is Mitt Romney. And one way that I think you and I both notice that he's a front-runner was probably last night at the Gridiron, everybody took shots at Mitt Romney, whether it was Mitch Daniels, whether it was about--President Obama.
MR. BALZ: That's true.
MR. TODD: About the fact that, you know, Mitt Romney was debating Mitt Romney, or I think the president had the governor of Massachusetts and the former presidential candidate share the same host body. Mitt Romney really does have this perception problem that he's going to have to square at some point if he's going to stay the front-runner.
MR. BALZ: I, I sat down with two different groups of Republican activists in Iowa last month, and they see in Mitt Romney the ingredients that they're looking for somebody to take on the economy. They think he has the experience to do that. He fits that mold. But they are not sure that they trust him. And I think it is a hangover from the last campaign, and it's something that the minute he gets into this and voters begin to size him up, that's the question that they're going to be asking themselves: Do I trust this person?
MR. TODD: Michele, I want to ask you about another topic that came up this week at the organization you work at.
MS. NORRIS: Yes.
MR. TODD: Now, you have signed a letter basically denouncing what some of these executives did at NPR, the stuff that was caught on tape. Explain why or why not NPR should get federal funding at this point. And, frankly, are you expecting that you're going to be dealing in a
world where they're not going to have it?
MS. NORRIS: Well, it--let me take the first question first. You said explain why NPR should get federal funding. Many people want to make this about NPR, that it's just about NPR. We're talking about the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. It's bigger than NPR. NPR is a, a series of member stations, but it's also about public television. And it's also about small stations in particular. And when--what was stated by Ron Schiller was an opinion, and it very quickly turned into something that is fact, that NPR could live without federal funding. It is not established fact. One in five of the member stations receive 25 percent of their revenue from the Corporation of Public Broadcasting. These are small stations where people don't necessarily have access to news because a lot of the news stations and radio have fallen away. Take the state of Indiana. We just heard from Governor Daniels. If public broadcasting
went away, there are people in small towns, small stations, that would not have access to news. Not just about international news, but news about the statehouse.
MR. TODD: Right.
MS. NORRIS: You know, we are strong, we are committed to providing excellent journalism. And, at the end of the day, that is how we will be judged.
MR. TODD: We've got to remember. All right. We're going to have to take a break. Leave it right there.
Up next, we're going to remember a dear friend to this program here at MEET THE PRESS, The Washington Post's David Broder. He passed away this week at the age of 81. He appeared on this program as a panelist and roundtable member a record 401 times.
MR. CHUCK TODD: And we're back. And we wanted to spend some time remembering a great friend to this program over the last 45 years, Pulitzer Prize winning columnist and one of the most respected political reporters in our time, David Broder, who died this week at the age of 81. He was fixture here on MEET THE PRESS. He holds the record, by far, for the most show appearances, 401. That's eight years over his remarkable career. The first was on July 7th, 1963. And to mark the program's 60th anniversary in 2007, he spoke to the late Tim Russert about that first appearance.
(Videotape, July 15, 2007)
MR. TIM RUSSERT: Were you nervous?
MR. DAVID BRODER: I was terrified and nervous.
RUSSERT: You were 33 years old.
Mr. BRODER: And I had met Betty Dukert, who was the producer of the program, at a couple of press conferences. And I was astonished when she called and said we'd like you to be on the panel of questioners. And I thought, "What a break!"
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: A break that turned into a remarkable run.
(Videotape, July 7, 1963)
Mr. BRODER: Senator, Barry Goldwater has been in the Senate now about 10 years, a little better than 10 years. Has he accomplished anything there that you think is particularly noteworthy?
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: From that first appearance, what started out as terror quickly turned into tenacity as he earned a reputation for asking some of the toughest questions.
(Videotape, December 15, 1974)
Mr. BRODER: Why does the governor of Georgia, after two years in office, decide four years in advance that he's going run for president of the United States?
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: But it was this exchange with presidential hopeful and Texas businessman Ross Perot in 1993 that Broder later said stood out as one of his most memorable here.
(Videotape, August 1, 1993)
MR. BRODER: Mr. Perot, when I was coming on this program, a friend of mine said, "Why bother? He never gives you a specific answer." I want you to prove him wrong and help me win a bet. In your budget, you have $141 billion of savings on Medicare and Medicaid programs.
MR. ROSS PEROT: Mm-hmm.
MR. BRODER: How do you get it?
MR. PEROT: Well, if you had told me that you wanted that, I would have had come in with a very detailed list and given it to you.
MR. BRODER: In two months you haven't felt like you need to take up that challenge?
MR. PEROT: Yes, I have. I have it all written down, and I didn't bring with it me. And if you wanted it, if you had asked me to bring it, I would have been glad to.
MR. BRODER: Mr. Perot, do you...
MR. PEROT: Now, let's go, wait just a minute...
MR. BRODER: Do you think I've won the bet or lost the bet at this point?
MR. PEROT: What was the bet?
MR. BRODER: Whether--that I could not get you to give me a specific answer.
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: And sometimes the simplest questions were the hardest.
(Videotape, December 13, 1987)
MR. BRODER: What percentage of Americans do you think are without health insurance coverage?
VICE PRES. GEORGE H.W. BUSH: I don't know the percentage that are without it, but I strongly support the concept of categorical health insurance.
MR. BRODER: Do you have any horseback guess as to what percentage of Americans don't have health insurance?
VICE PRES. BUSH: Out of 250 million people?
MR. BRODER: Mm-hmm.
VICE PRES. BUSH: Well, I think some people don't have health insurance that can take care of their own needs. So I don't know the answer to it, no.
(End of videotape)
MR. TODD: Broder later said that exchange left a lasting impression on one member of the Bush family.
(Videotape, July 15, 2007)
MR. BRODER: The biggest backlash I ever got from questioning a candidate on, on MEET THE PRESS was with George H.W Bush. I never had a problem with him, but Barbara Bush never forgave me for embarrassing her husband that way.
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: Known as dean of the Washington press corps and a newsman who covered every major political story for the last five decades, Broder's political analysis was always on the money, like this observation he offered just weeks before President Bush ordered the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.
(Videotape, January 5, 2003)
Mr. BRODER: I think that's the beginning of his troubles and our nation's troubles, not the end. If we win the military victory, as everybody seems to assume that we can do quite readily, then we still find ourselves responsible for fine constructing a new government in a
nation in a vital part of the world that is the keystone to that part of the, of the globe.
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: Although he was an institution in Washington and on this show, he never let himself get trapped in the Beltway. He loved traveling the country, precinct by precinct, knocking on doors and talking to voters. All told, 13 presidential campaigns over 50 years. But as he said on his 400th appearance right here in the spring of 2008, perhaps the best was
saved for last.
(Videotape August 10, 2008)
MR. BRODER: It's the best election I've ever covered. I always thought that 1960, which was my first, was the best campaign, but all of the good parts of that came after Labor Day. And we've had so many wonderful, unbelievable moments already in this one, and we're not even to the conventions yet.
(End videotape)
MR. TODD: Anyway, we here at MEET THE PRESS also want to extend our sympathies to David's family and his colleagues at the The Washington Post.
TODD: We're going to spend some time with Dan Balz and Michele Norris, who both have worked with him for a long time, remembering David Broder in our Take Two Web extra up on our Web site this afternoon, mtp.msnbc.com.
MR. CHUCK TODD: That's all for today. David Gregory will be back next week. If it's Sunday, it's MEET THE PRESS.


text:
|Forum Rules
|Firearms Safety
|Firearms Photos
|Lost Password
|Email Changes
|Today's Posts
|Mark Forums Read
|Thread Tools
|Search this Thread
|July 10, 2012, 01:53 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Hotels
Posts: 3,667
Tactics for Home Defense: OC v. CC (NOT Politics...) from Trigger Time TV
Here is my segment from Trigger Time's 2nd Episode... including timed presentation demos... discussing OC v CC for Home Defense:
Trigger Time Episode Two, Segment 1
I.C.E. Training Company.
LinkedIn Profile for Rob Pincus
|July 11, 2012, 12:25 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
Interesting piece, Rob.
Given what people say here about home carry, might it be fun to add or try timing from pocket carry. I see folks who mention that they don't wear a full size gun and holster but drop a J frame, 380 or mini 9mm in their pocket.
Also, where I am a good deal of time - on the couch or at the computer! That IWB position didn't look couch friendly and a touch of a scary draw if one was sitting.
The point about diversion of gaze was well taken. While the child is long gone, having the kid plaster themselves to your leg in the emergency might slow down a draw. I was thinking of that in one of those endless unchambered carry debates where the proponent of such demonstrated his skill on the square range. I don't think you could be so nimble with the 5 year old or significant other grabbing you.
Thanks for the post.
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
|July 11, 2012, 07:43 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 2,863
I carry either my Glock 27 or my 640 Pro around the house, always concealed. I live in a semi rural area on a major US highway.
Retired Law Enforcement
U. S. Army Veteran
My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon.
|July 14, 2012, 01:05 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2007
Location: Lago Vista TX
Posts: 2,425
Thanks for sharing that clip, Rob ... raised points I've never thought of ... I normally have an NAA Pug in my stongside pocket if I'm wearing shorts at home ... If I'm in sweatpants or shorts without pockets, I move a larger revolver around with me, so it's sitting next to the desk as I type right now, or next to my side of the sofa if I'm reading or watching TV ... I've never actually considered that speed of draw would be an issue at home, where the access points are mostly visible to me and seemingly would take long enough to breech for me to obtain either my pocket gun or the traveling revolver and prepare to defend myself ... I'm retired and at home during the day while my wife is at work; at night I pocket carry and, when we go to bed, there's a 1911 on the nightstand within reach ... gotta chew on this ...
"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." Albert Camus
|July 14, 2012, 08:42 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,057
Rob, you mirrored my thoughts on open v. concealed carry (public or home).
No I'm not saying Open Carry should be banned. But I don't want to make people feel nervous seeing my gun.
I also liked the way you pointed out, the ideal of a bandit seeing a subject open carrying vs. one carrying concealed.
I like the ideal of people, bandits or otherwise, looking at me and thinking I'm an harmless old man.
If I can kick the dogs out of it I'll dig out the shot time and see how long it takes to get a shot off.
Anyway, Good Video. I think open carry deprives us of surprise on our part.
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School Oct '78
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
|July 14, 2012, 09:16 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: April 23, 2012
Posts: 139
I open carry but I always wear a long big coat so it is not noticeable. And I never take it off if I am in public.
Reason being is it is more comfortable for me and all my pants are made to fit me. When I bought them I never considered about carrying a gun IWB. I would rather conceal carry but right now open carrying with a coat over is my best option. Its more comfortable and the good IWB are a little on the spendy side until I buy some new pants that are a little loose.
|July 14, 2012, 10:01 PM
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 23,200
If I carry at home, I generally OC in an OWB at about 4-4:30. If someone comes to visit for any length of time, I untuck my shirt and cover the pistol, but I've found that for short encounters it's very simple to "conceal" by simply blading slightly away from the person.
Even in the video, it's pretty hard to see your gun in the 4-4:30 position when you're facing the camera making no attempt to use your body to shield the pistol. If you were actually trying to keep it concealed it would be very easy to do so without seeming awkward.
I do agree that if I were carrying IWB appendix at home, I'd probably be more inclined to conceal with a cover garment than with my current setup because you can't easily conceal with body positioning when employing that carry location.
IWB appendix doesn't work well for me and IWB in general restricts what I can carry and is less comfortable than OWB. I put up with it in public where "body positioning concealment" is totally impractical and where I'm required to conceal by law. But at home, when I carry, I generally carry a full-sized gun I'm more comfortable shooting and I go for OWB which is also more comfortable. Either way, I carry in the same position--4-4:30 to keep the gun positioning consistent.
...which brings up another point. I wonder if the video really does an apples to apples comparison. I say that because you point out that the IWB appendix position is your normal carry location. I presume that for that reason, you've practiced drawing from that position a lot. I know that if I were to compare drawing from my normal carry position to drawing from a carry position I don't usually use, I suspect that the results would tend to favor the position I normally use.
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|July 16, 2012, 07:03 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
Your comparison, between open or concealed carry, clearly demonstrates how little difference there is in the time to draw, between the two.
And the more important tactical advantage of concealed carry.
Very convincing and reenforces the choice for concealed carry.
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez:
"Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent."
|July 16, 2012, 07:57 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2005
Posts: 2,536
I often carry my P-64 in my right pocket at home. It's in a small IWB tuckable holster and you can see it with my shirt tucked. If I leave my property I simply transfer it to IWB.
Here's the thing. If someone stops by my house they will see the butt of that gun sticking out of my pocket. I really don't care, if it makes them nervous that is their problem. Maybe by the time they leave they will realize that the gun made no difference in anything. Maybe they will have a little less of that media induced phobia about firearms and owners.
Then again, Ohio is an open carry state. What has happened with people that open carry is that the cops say you induced panic. That would tend to make the gun owner responsible for someone else having a phobia.
|July 17, 2012, 10:46 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2001
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 1,521
I also agree with JohnKSa that my first impression is this isn't, by any means, an apples-to-apples comparison.
"...A humble and contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise." Ps. li
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." —Frederic Bastiat
|July 19, 2012, 08:20 PM
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 23,200
Admittedly, most often the persons were accessing guns hidden in the house, not ones that were being carried, but the fact remans that at some point in the encounter the opportunity may arise to access a hidden gun and make good use of it.
If the gun isn't hidden, that opportunity is unlikely to present itself as the attackers wouldn't simply allow it to remain accessible to the occupants of the house.
I do agree that an openly carried gun doesn't provide the same flexibility for the defender to choose a time. Once it's obvious that the gun is going to be discovered the defender must, at that point, choose to act or give up the gun.
If one makes the assumption that a defender will definitely freeze when the attack takes place and fail to respond immediately, then I could see why they would recommend concealment.
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|July 20, 2012, 07:53 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
Thanks for covering this topic, Rob. I have a few things to consider....
1. With either holster, you still effectively have a concealed weapon....your house is concealing it.
2. Referring to some of your prior advice, I would assume that you have hardened your home to prevent/delay such a forced entry. If so, the home invaders are slowed enough for you to draw, retreat to a safe room, etc. That makes the type of carry moot.
3. If the invaders are in your home and are advancing on you, you probably won't have time to draw from either type of holster. This is when your empty-hand techniques come into play. Also, if you can fend them off long enough to draw, that 0.15 seconds may come in handy, esp. from a holster you can blade away from the threat.
4. You did your experiment from a standing position, but you talked about being seated on the couch watching TV. Would you consider repeating the test using the seated position on a couch or recliner?
Thanks for the thought exercise.
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0......
|July 20, 2012, 11:04 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 2011
Posts: 1,755
Definitely some interesting things to consider. I will be watching more of the segments as time allows.
|July 24, 2012, 10:20 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2011
Location: WV
Posts: 938
In this state, you can't have a loaded gun in the car without a conceal carry license, and only handguns can be loaded in a vehicle. So if you don't have a license and you open carry, you're gonna have to load and unload your gun alot. I'm willing to bet if you're standing outside of a store loading a gun the cops will be called. It's not illegal, but that doesn't matter. So, might as well get a conceal carry license.
I really think the no loaded gun in a vehicle is a law to cut down on road hunters and spot lighters. Hard to catch someone spot lighting if everyone has a loaded .22 rifle in the back seat instead of just the guy shooting at a field full of deer.
|Thread Tools
|Search this Thread


text:
Adrenaline is calling
The Audi SQ5 seamlessly blends high-performance engineering with the versatility and practicality of an SUV. Featuring class-leading safety and infotainment technology, as well as a luxurious and spacious interior, you can discover the joy of sports-inspired driving on any journey.
The turbocharged 3.0 TFSI V6 engine develops its dynamic 260 kW of power harmoniously over a very broad engine speed range. The result is impressive acceleration of 0-100 km/h in only 5.4 seconds.


text:
: : Washington : Volcano Country
Packwood is a small town nestled in the foothills of the Cascade Mountain Range. It is surrounded by Mt. Rainier National Park, Mt. Adams wilderness area, Mt.St. Helens National Volcanic monument and
Always wanted to stay on lowbank waterfront? -we are offering: 1. our lower level bsmt as a Vacation Rental -it is1900SF,3 Bdrms, 1 Full Bath and large recreation room area with wet bar/kitchen. Has


text:
Thank you for your interest in our villas. We look forward to speaking with you!
A mix between an Indo warung and an international cafe, KZU serves cuisine varying from Japanese and Italian to Indian and Indonesian. Chef Kazyua Takami keeps his kitchen churning all day long, constantly bringing out fresh platters of food to be served warung style. A selection of more than 40 dishes are displayed behind the counter at any given time, where you can choose between croquettes, lasagne, cous cous, salads and vegan options too. Hours: 9:00 am – 10:00 pm Monday-Saturday | 9:00 am – 6:00 pm Sundays


text:
100% of our clients would recommend us to a friend or family!!
Winsted Hospital for Animals has a great opportunity for an enthusiastic veterinarian to join our small animal hospital. We are a three-doctor practice well-known for providing quality veterinary care for dogs and cats. The doctors believe in a great work-life balance with no emergency calls. Our friendly atmosphere and inviting work environment boasts a caring and experienced support staff, dedicated to our patients, clients, and the community. The practice also regularly sees clients from Guiding Eyes for the Blind and ECAD, Educated Canines Assisting with Disabilities.
We are located in Barkhamsted, CT, a bedroom community of Hartford and Waterbury. The area not only offers all that those cities provide but the Farmington River provides excellent kayaking and canoeing, while the state forests have many miles of hiking trails, open year-round for outdoor recreation.
We are part of a family of practices with a long history and reputation that separates us from others – see what all the buzz is about! We support our veterinarians with superior salary, benefits (including health and dental, 401(k), CE allowance, vacation, dues, and liability coverage), relocation assistance, outstanding practice teams, and a family friendly atmosphere.
Check us out:


text:
Visit us on Facebook or send an email!
sound clips
New Page
All Profiles for sale
Custom Footswitches
Brown Sound Profiles
Mesa 5-50 Profiles
Wizard Profiles
Bogner Ecstasy 20th Anniversary profiles
Ultimate Bogner Ecstasy profile set
Platinum Profiles set one - Vintage classics
Platinum Profiles set two - Vintage Marshalls
Splawn Quick Rod
Diezel Blueface VH4 profiles
Soldano Hot Rod 50 Profiles
Fuchs ODS profiles
Jubilee Marshall and Vintage Fender Profiles
Mesa Quad Preamp Direct Out Profiles
Fortin Modded Marshall profiles
1972 Marshall Super Lead profiles
Baron Custom Amps MII 100
Tone Match Set 1
Tone Match Set II
Tone Match Set III
Tone Match Set IV
Bogner JCM 800 G75 cab profiles
Trainwreck Profiles
Bogner Direct Out Profile set
1974 50 watt 6550 Marshall profiles
80s guitar hero profile pack I
80s guitar heo profile pack 2
Megadeth tone match I
Friedman Modded Marshall HBE
Friedman Modded Marshall BE
THD Univalve 6L6
Fuchs ODS XLS Panama profiles
VHT 100CL Profiles
Mesa Mark V profiles
Sansamp RBI Bass profiles
GTM Tone Match Five - Ozzy and more
Custom Tone Matching
Guitar Tone Matching System
Guytron GT 100 rev B profiles
Guitar Hero III Tone Match set
Profiling Tips and Tricks Blog
Profiles For Sale
Wilder modded JCM800 Marshall
Bogner Shiva 6L6 profiles
Diezel Herbert
Friedman Pink Taco
Platinum Profiles Set Three - Trainwrecks
Tone Match Page
Mesa Boogie Mark III Coliseum
Cameron Modded JMP Marshall
3.0 Firmware and you
1965 Vox AC30
5150 III 50 watt
Marshall Artist 4203 Profiles
VHT UltraLead
Powered profiler review
Pedal giveaway
Carvin Vintage Series
Cameron Jose Merged II
Bogner Helios
Rockman Sustainor profiles
Crossroads profiles
Personal Sound Clip Page
Soldano Avenger
Mezzabarba M-Zero
Voodoo Marshall
High Gain Madness
Free Bogner Profiles
All Profiles for sale
30 Green profiles download
30 Green profiles download
per item
Immediate download of 30 Bogner Ecstasy profiles.
Add to Cart
All amp brands and names, and band/song info used in descriptions are trademarked by their respective owners and are in no way affiliated with Pete's Profiles. KPA profiles found here are attempting to re-create the sound of the amplifiers listed. ANY use of brand names here or within the profiles is only for descriptive purposes and for those of comparison.
©2015 Pete's Profiles LLC | World Headquarters Tulsa OK 74129


text:
Founded around 1000 BC, Perge ranked as one of the great Pamphylian trading cities, despite the fact that it's nearly 20km inland. Its defensive siting was deliberate, to avoid the unwanted attentions of the pirate bands that terrorized this stretch of the Mediterranean. Later, when Alexander the Great arrived in 333 BC, the citizens of Perge sent out guides to lead his army into the city. Alexander was followed by the Seleucids, under whom Perge's most celebrated ancient inhabitant, the mathematician Apollonius, lived and worked. Most of the city's surviving buildings date from the period of Roman rule, which began in 188 BC. After the collapse of the Roman Empire, Perge remained inhabited until Selçuk times, before being gradually abandoned.
Perge's theatre, just outside the site entrance, has been closed for excavation for several years. Originally constructed by the Greeks, it was substantially altered by the Romans in the second century AD. Capable of accommodating fourteen thousand people on 42 levels, it was the venue for theatrical entertainment, poetry contests and musical concerts. To the northeast, Perge's massive horseshoe-shaped stadium was at 234m by 34m the largest in Asia Minor, with a seating capacity of twelve thousand. It was used not only for chariot races, but also wild beast hunts, public executions and gladiator spectacles.
Beyond the site entrance, stretches of the Seleucid walls have survived, giving some indication of the extent and ground plan of the original city. Just in front of the outer gates stands the Tomb of Plancia Magna, a benefactress of the city. Passing through the first city gate, you'll see a ruined Byzantine basilica on the right, beyond which lies the fourth-century AD agora, centred on a ruined temple.
Southwest of the agora, in the excavated Roman baths, a couple of the pools have been exposed. Across the cracked surface of the inlaid marble floor, the original layout of frigidarium, tepidarium and caldarium can – with the help of a few signs – still be discerned. Also visible in places are the brick piles that once supported the hypocaust floor of the baths, enabling warm air to circulate underneath.
Perge's Hellenistic Gate, at the northwest corner of the agora, is with its two mighty circular towers the only building to survive from the Hellenistic period. Behind, the horseshoe-shaped court and ornamental archway were both erected at the behest of Plancia Magna. The former was once adorned with statues – the bases of which were found during mid-1950s excavations. Beyond is the start of a 300m-long colonnaded street, with a water channel running down the middle and the shells of shops to either side. Walking along it, you'll be able to pick out the ruts made by carts and chariots in the stone slabs of the roadway. Also visible are reliefs near the tops of the columns, just beneath the capitals. One depicts Apollo, while another shows a man in a toga, offering a libation at an altar.
From the nymphaeum, an ornamental water outlet at the end of the street, a stream splashes down into the water channel below. Above here is the acropolis – probably the site of the original defensive settlement, of which little has survived.
The Pamphylian cities
Antalya to Alanya
Book through Rough Guides' trusted travel partners
Turkey features
The latest articles, galleries, quizzes and videos.


text:
Apartment For Rent
BestRentRome.com is one of the best places to start your search for Rent apartment in Rome. Plug in to our Apartments power search and discover a large range of accommodations from your comfort and convenience. You can search by apartment name, city area or range price.
Apartment Search - Online booking system
We can help you to discover the perfect Apartments for Rent in Rome by using our online booking system search. When beginning your apartments search, you can focus on certain date for the chek-in and check-out (arrival ad departure) . Click on the search to make your next apartment search easier.
Rome Apartments - Apartments for Rent in Rome - Rome Accommodation - Rental Apartment Rome - Wide choise of apartments
We offer comfortable apartments for every budget of expence.
Copyright 2008. Every contained, even partialy, on Best Rent can't be in any way reproduced without authorization.
BestRentRome is a registered trademark of UBS srl - P. IVA 09637351009


text:
Pique your students' curiosity about science, nature, and art with one of the many programs available to school groups and classrooms at The Morton Arboretum.
Field trips and school programs
Registration for spring field trips is now open!
The Morton Arboretum offers tailored programs for grades PreK-12. Guided programs and additional guided labs are available in addition to self-guided options. Bring your school group to the Arboretum for a half day or full day experience. School group field trips are available for the following grade levels:
- Field trips: PreK-kindergarten
- Field trips: 1st grade
- Field trips: 2nd-3rd grade
- Field trips: 4th-5th grade
- Field trips: 6th-8th grade
- Field trips: High School
Guided adventures: Available for grades PreK-12 in spring and fall school seasons
Trek through the Arboretum with your students and a master guide to learn firsthand about environmental science. Our guides use expert teaching techniques and deep science knowledge to make outdoor science fun and engaging.
Guided lab: Available for select programs for grades 3-12 in spring and fall school seasons
Investigate nature up close with your students, using microscopes or other scientific instruments. Labs are designed to extend scientific inquiry and to make connections with outdoor discoveries.
Self-guided adventure: Available for grades PreK-12 all year long
Conduct your own lesson plans among our woodlands, marshes, lakes, and prairie. Staff provide you with suggested itineraries, learning tools, and a variety of excursions to choose.
Classroom visits
Available for grades PreK-5.
Invite the Arboretum to your school this spring. Have an Arboretum master educator lead scientific inquiry and hands-on learning activities in your school classroom. learn more
School programs partially funded by
Additional school programs funding provided by


text:
A lender offers advice on what to monitor -- both on your dairy and beyond -- as 2014 yields dairy profitability.
By Lori Teigen, AgStar Financial Services
2014 has definitely started out with a bang for dairy producers. Between the challenges brought on by colder temperatures and a current average Class III milk price exceeding $19.30/cwt. for 2014, producers are left wondering what to expect next.
We've been hearing many questions from our clients, ranging from what to do for contracting milk and feed prices, to handling high costs of land rents with current commodity price levels, to wondering if they will have enough inventory on hand until next harvest.
Risk management: a critical conversation
Risk management, particularly margin management, continues to be a critical conversation every dairy producer needs to be having on your operation. Significantly higher milk prices over the past few months are offering opportunities for producers to lock in good margins throughout 2014. It is critical to remember, however, that margin management is not just looking at the price of milk and the price of feed. It's vital to look at the correlation between those prices. Margin management will be imperative to the long-term success of your operation. Simply cutting costs today to reduce expenses can be a short-term fix, but it's usually not the best solution for the long haul.
Remember, margin management requires discipline and consistency as markets can be volatile. In addition to knowing both your cost of production and cash flow requirements, understanding the markets is also important. This is key for being able to take advantage of margins at the right times. Utilize your team of advisors to help with marketing decisions and making sure you truly understand each of these factors.
Evaluate your feed inventories
With winter kill and prevent plant last year, many producers were able to get a good handle on their 2012 feed inventories as inventories were lower than they have been in quite a while. The effects of last year are still leaving some uncertainty among producers this year on how alfalfa fields will be affected by this winter. Unfortunately with weather conditions during our growing season, many producers are having feed-quality issues in forages, which are affecting production. The main thing to keep a close eye on is ensuring you have enough feed to get through until the 2014 harvest. Haylage inventories may need to get stretched this year, which will impact affecting rations.
Feed quality issues in the U.S. have played a role in the Class III prices due to the affects on production and, therefore, supply and demand. Furthermore, in the past, dairies raising all of their forages had the advantage over producers buying their feed. Will this shift going forward give producers buying feed the advantage?
Global economics impact milk prices
Lastly, continue to stay in tune with global dairy economics and how it affects our milk prices. U.S. dairy exports continue to remain strong and are currently over 15% of U.S. milk production, a gain of 2% since 2012. The U.S. export market is a big driver in the milk prices, making it critical to understand the impact of global markets. Cheese stocks have been declining and are 20% lower than they were recently, when cheddar cheese prices were at record levels. Many commodities are reaching low inventories. That, combined with unseasonably high prices, creates considerable volatility in the markets. Throughout 2013, U.S. prices were very attractive in the global markets; however, those competitive margins have started tightening.
Current markets are providing great opportunities for producers to take advantage of solid margins going forward into 2014. Continue to keep an eye on the margins available while keeping your own operation's cost of production in mind. Continue monitoring feed inventories and pay attention to what global dairy trade is doing, as it will affect your farm's profitability. Best wishes for a successful and profitable 2014.
Lori Teigen is a Dairy Industry Specialist at AgStar Financial Services. More content from Lori and AgStar's other industry experts can be found at AgStarEdge.com.