text:
XTERRA Trail Champs Up For Grabs
No defending champions are returning.
No defending champions are returning.
From: Running USA
UALOA RANCH, Hawaii – The XTERRA Trail Run World Championship is up for grabs this year.
This year's event is scheduled for Sunday, December 2 at Kualoa Ranch, Hawaii, and in the unpredictable sport of trail running, this much is certain – there will be new champions.
Oregon's Max King is the only runner to win the men's title at XTERRA Trail Run World Championship. The event was created in 2008, and he has won it every year. King's reign will come to an end this year, as he will stay in Oregon with his wife for the expected birth of their second child in early December.
In his absence, the list of contenders is impressive:
- Ben Bruce has placed in the top three of the XTERRA Trail Run World Championship in 2008, 2009 and 2011. He was a finalist for the steeplechase at the U.S. Olympic trials in 2012 (he placed sixth).
- Joseph Gray is a recognized name in the sport of trail running. He placed second at the XTERRA Trail Run World Championship in 2009, and is a three-time former winner of the USATF Mountain Runner of the Year award.
- Thomas Rivers Puzey and Jacob Puzey are brothers who placed fourth and fifth, respectively, at the 2011 XTERRA Trail Run World Championship. Rivers Puzey has somewhat of a home-course advantage, as he competed in college at BYU-Hawaii, which is located about five miles away from Kualoa Ranch.
- J. Marshall Thomson placed second to King at the XTERRA Trail Run National Championship in Utah in September.
- Will Christian placed second to King at the 2010 XTERRA Trail Run World Championship, and the margin of 1 minute, 20 seconds, for that year remains the closest any runner has come to King on the Kualoa Ranch course.
- Mario Mendoza placed second to King at the 2011 XTERRA Trail Run National Championship at Utah, and is a past winner of the USATF Trail Runner of the Year award.
Several other dark horse contenders could emerge, as more than 2,000 runners from around the world are expected to compete in this year's race. King said the eventual new champion will have to be "an all-around athlete" to conquer the field and the course. "It takes a little bit of everything," he said. "Strong technical skills and hill climbing endurance are a must, but parts of the course also require a high level of speed as well. The biggest thing that I've noticed is that the significant hill at mile 9 really wipes people out. Climbing ability is important from the gun but having climbing endurance in this race is even more important."
The women's division is also in search of a new queen, as 2011 champion Morgan Arritola will not enter this year due to injuries and other schedule conflicts. What's more, none of the other previous women's champions are entered. In their absence, there is also an impressive list of female contenders:
- Lucy Smith (pictured at right) placed second last year in her first try at Kualoa Ranch. She is considered one of the top masters (40-older) endurance athletes in all of Canada.
- Melanie McQuaid is a three-time former XTERRA World Champion for off-road triathlon. She placed fifth at last year's XTERRA Trail Run World Championship.
- Kim Kuehnert is a runner on the Hawaii Pacific University cross country team. She is originally from Germany, and placed second at the 2010 XTERRA Trail Run World Championship (she did not compete last year due to illness).
- Polina Babkina is another runner from the Hawaii Pacific University cross country team. She is originally from Russia and was the team's top-seeded competitor this season.
- Susie Stephen is considered Hawaii's top female distance trail runner. She placed sixth overall at last year's XTERRA Trail Run World Championship, and first in the 30-34 age group.
More than 2,000 runners representing at least 15 countries and 37 states are already registered to compete in the 2012 XTERRA Trail Run World Championship. In addition to the overall titles, the various age-group world championships will also be at stake. Every male and female age-group winner from the 21-kilometer championship will be crowned a 2012 XTERRA Trail Run World Champion.
Returning age-group champions from last year include: Keith Rieger (men 40-44), Ray Brust (men 50-54), Susie Stephen (women 30-34), Melanie McQuaid (women 35-39), Lucy Smith (women 40-44), Brigitte Stemmer (women 55-59) and Lee Saltonstall (women 60-64).


text:
Currently seeking News Personnel! If you like keeping up to date on transgender related news and enjoy sharing news articles - we want you to join our team! Send me, Devlyn, a PM to volunteer. Help keep our community up to date!
Topic: New and I would love some help please (Read 2030 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tags: S.A.S.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
3 Best Sujata Mixer Grinder in India 2021
Sujata Mixer Grinder: Sujata Company was established in 1980, and still running it means it has been producing the trustworthy products which adds the values in customer's life. There are many manufacturers who are producing the Mixer Grinders, hence all are good! In this article, we are going to explore the list of that mixer … Read more


text:
The Political Lowdown: Obama's sudden policy reversal leaves Congress out of the immigration picture
By Bekah Paxton, Staff Writer @bekahpaxton In an interview last year, President Obama expressed that he was proud of his protection of the "Dreamers"—those people who illegally immigrated to the United States as children. However, he posited that he would not be able to continue saving them and the expanding group of immigrants from deportation. […]Read More →


text:
Short-term fall risk up during 15 days after initiation, intensification of antihypertensive medication
FRIDAY, May 13, 2016 (HealthDay News) — For older adults, initiation and intensification of antihypertensive medication is associated with a short-term increased risk of serious fall injuries, according to a study published online May 10 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.
Daichi Shimbo, M.D., from the Columbia University Medical Center in New York City, and colleagues examined the correlation between initiating and intensifying antihypertensive medication and serious fall injuries in a case-crossover study of 90,127 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. The authors examined medication exposures for the 15-day period before the fall (case period) and six earlier control periods, each of 15 days.
The researchers found that 272 Medicare beneficiaries initiated antihypertensive medication, 1,508 added a new class of antihypertensive medication, and 3,113 titrated therapy (addition of a new class or increase in dosage of current class) within 15 days of their serious fall. There were increases in the odds of a serious fall injury in the 15 days after antihypertensive medication initiation, addition of a new class, and titration (odds ratios, 1.36, 1.16, and 1.13, respectively). Beyond 15 days the correlations were attenuated.
"Antihypertensive medication initiation and intensification was associated with a short-term, but not long-term, increased risk of serious fall injuries among older adults," the authors write.
Two authors disclosed financial ties to Amgen.
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


text:
This week the Year 5 and 6 have been exploring 3D shapes.
We have been finding nets of a closed cube. There are officially 11 different combinations of 'face' arrangements. The children had to make sure that they didn't double up – no reflections or rotations allowed! How many did everyone find?
We have also been building 3D shapes using Polydron and describing them in terms of number of faces, edges and vertices. We are using the Polydron to explore the nets of a variety of shapes – some of which have very long, complicated names!


text:
- 7 must-see stenciled and painted floors [Remodelista]
- We can't get enough cozy blankets and throws [SF Girl By Bay]
- How to make an original piece of art from a shower curtain (for real!) [Fair Share]
- Yay or nay: Faux bird taxidermy? [PopSugar Home]
- Color obsession of the week: Forest green [House Beautiful]
Photo courtesy of Remodelista
More hot posts from this week:
6 fab fall decorating ideas from Instagram »
16 must-have kitchen gadgets for less then $50 »
More From Country Living
7 autumn-inspired home accessories we've gotta have »
Must-visit website: Chairish.com »


text:
Early voting for the Nov. 4 general election runs through Friday, Oct. 31. The Houston Chronicle Editorial Board has interviewed all these candidates and has researched their qualifications and background. These endorsements are the result of that work. We will continue to publish recommendations throughout early voting. We list our endorsements here, roughly in the format they appear on the ballot. Some endorsements have not yet been published in print. We'll add the live links as they are published.
U.S. Senator: John Cornyn (R)
U.S. Representative, District 2: Ted Poe (R)
U.S. Representative, District 7: James Cargas (D)
U.S. Representative, District 10: Michael McCaul (R)
U.S. Representative, District 18: Sheila Jackson Lee (D)
U.S. Representative, District 22: Pete Olson (R)
U.S. Representative, District 36: Brian Babin (R)
Governor: Wendy R. Davis (D)
Lieutenant Governor: Leticia Van de Putte (D)
Attorney General: Sam Houston (D)
Comptroller of Public Accounts: Mike Collier (D)
Commissioner of the General Land Office: George P. Bush (R)
Commissioner of Agriculture: Sid Miller (R)
Railroad Commissioner: Ryan Sitton (R)
Chief Justice, Supreme Court: Nathan Hecht (R)
Justice, Supreme Court, Place 6, Unexpired Term: Jeff Brown (R)
Justice, Supreme Court, Place 7: Gina Benavides (D)
Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals, Place 3: Bert Richardson (R)
Member, State Board of Education, District 4: Lawrence A. Allen Jr. (D)
Member, State Board of Education, District 7: Kathy King (D)
State Senator, District 7: Paul Bettencourt (R)
State Senator, District 15: John Whitmire (D)
State Senator, District 17: Joan Huffman (R)
State Representative, District 16: Michael Hayles (D)
State Representative, District 23: Susan Criss (D)
State Representative, District 26: D.F. "Rick" Miller (R)
State Representative, District 27: Ron Reynolds (D)
State Representative, District 85: Phil Stephenson (R)
State Representative, District 129: Dennis Paul (R)
State Representative, District 132: Mike Schofield (R)
State Representative, District 133: Jim Murphy (R)
State Representative, District 134: Sarah Davis (R)
State Representative, District 135: No endorsement
State Representative, District 137: Gene Wu (D)
State Representative, District 138: Dwayne Bohac (R)
State Representative, District 144: Mary Ann Perez (D)
State Representative, District 148: Jessica Cristina Farrar (D)
State Representative, District 149: Hubert Vo (D)
State Representative, District 150: Amy Perez (D)
Chief Justice, 14th Court of Appeals District: Kem Thompson Frost (R)
Justice, 1st Court of Appeals District, Place 3: Russell Lloyd (R)
Justice, 14th Court of Appeals District , Place 7: Ken Wise (R)
District Judge, 55th Judicial District: Jeff Shadwick (R)
District Judge, 113th Judicial District: Steven E. Kirkland (D)
District Judge, 157th Judicial District: Randy Wilson (R)
District Judge, 180th Judicial District: Catherine Evans (R)
District Judge, 184th Judicial District: Mark Thering (D)
District Judge, 185th Judicial District: Susan Brown (R)
District Judge, 189th Judicial District: Bill Burke (R)
District Judge, 190th Judicial District: Patricia J. Kerrigan (R)
District Judge, 208th Judicial District: Denise Collins (R)
District Judge, 230th Judicial District: Brad Hart (R)
District Judge, 234th Judicial District: Wesley Ward (R)
District Judge, 246th Judicial District: Sandra Peake (D)
District Judge, 247th Judicial District: Clinton "Chip" Wells (D)
District Judge, 248th Judicial District: Shawna L. Reagin (D)
District Judge, 262nd Judicial District: Denise Bradley (R)
District Judge, 263rd Judicial District: Herb Ritchie (D)
District Judge, 269th Judicial District: Dan Hinde (R)
District Judge, 270th Judicial District: Brent Gamble (R)
District Judge, 280th Judicial District: Barbara J. Stalder (D)
District Judge, 281st Judicial District: Sylvia Matthews (R)
District Judge, 295th Judicial District: Caroline E. Baker (R)
District Judge, 334th Judicial District, Unexpired Term: Grant Dorfman (R)
Family District Judge, 308th Judicial District: Jim Evans (D)
Family District Judge, 309th Judicial District: Sheri Y. Dean (R)
Family District Judge, 311th Judicial District: Sherri L. Cothrun (D)
Family District Judge, 313th Judicial District: Glenn Devlin (R)
Family District Judge, 314th Judicial District: Natalia Oakes (D)
District Attorney, Unexpired Term: Kim Ogg (D)
Judge, County Court at Law No. 2: Theresa Chang (R)
Judge, County Court at Law No. 3: Gloria Cantu Minnick (D)
Judge, County Court at Law No. 4: Damon Crenshaw (D)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 2: Bill Harmon (R)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 4: John Clinton (R)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 5: Margaret Stewart Harris (R)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 6: Linda Geffin (D)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 7: Pam Derbyshire (R)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 8: Jay Karahan (R)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 10: Brad Walters (L)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 13: Don Smyth (R)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 14: David L. Singer (D)
Judge, County Criminal Court No. 15: Jean Spradling Hughes (R)
Judge, County Probate Court No. 1: Loyd Wright (R)
Judge, County Probate Court No. 2: Mike Wood (R)
Judge, County Probate Court No. 3: Jerry Simoneaux (D)
Judge, County Probate Court No. 4: Christine Riddle Butts (R)
District Clerk: Chris Daniel (R)
County Clerk: Stan Stanart (R)
County Treasurer: Orlando Sanchez (R)
County School Trustee, Position 5, At Large: Debra "Debby" Kerner (D)
County School Trustee, Position 7, At Large: Melissa Noriega (D)
County Commissioner, Precinct 4: R. Jack Cagle (R)
State of Texas Constitutional Amendment Election, Proposition 1: For
Katy ISD Bond Election, Proposition: For
Lone Star College System Bond Election, Proposition 1: For
Fort Bend County Judge: Robert "Bob" Hebert (R)
Fort Bend District Attorney: John Healey (R)


text:
U.S. and Turkey Launch New Effort to Combat Global Terrorism
New effort, dubbed the Global Counterterrorism Forum, will bring together 'traditional allies, emerging powers and Muslim-majority countries,' says Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The United States and Turkey are launching a new effort to combat terrorism in countries emerging from authoritarian rule in the wake of the Arab Spring, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday.
The new effort, dubbed the Global Counterterrorism Forum, will bring together "traditional allies, emerging powers and Muslim-majority countries," Clinton said in a speech in New York.
The effort brings together the US, Turkey and the European Union, joined by 27 countries including Algeria, Egypt, India, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, and will be launched in the coming weeks on the sidelines of the upcoming United Nations General Assembly meetings, according to a State Department statement released after Clinton's speech.
The forum appears to be an outgrowth of worries in the US, Turkey and elsewhere about the possibility of Islamist militants gaining footholds in countries like Libya, Egypt and Tunisia, which have swept aside repressive regimes. Clinton said that the US and Turkey will serve as founding co-chairs of the global forum.
The announcement comes just two days before the 10th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Late Thursday, US officials warned of "specific, credible but unconfirmed" terrorist threats around the anniversary events. On Friday morning, White House spokesman Jay Carney said that the information about the threat was "not corroborated, not confirmed" and said no changes have been made in US President Barack Obama'splans for Sunday, when the US commemorates the terrorist strikes against New York and Washington, which killed nearly 3,000 people.
The new counterterrorism forum will have more teeth than the UN Counterterrorism panel that was set up after 9/11 to maintain a list of terrorist suspects supplied by individual countries and a watch over funding of al-Qaeda and other terrorist initiatives.
Instead, the forum will work directly with countries that are transitioning from authoritarian rule to democracy to "identify threats and weaknesses ... mobilize resources ... and help countries address terrorist threats within their own borders," Clinton said. The forum will help countries write counterterrorism legislation and train police.
Some of the authoritarian governments toppled in the Arab Spring had been supported by Washington in exchange for their collaboration against terrorists, which provoked criticism among supporters of reform within those countries.
In some cases, by necessity, we are working with nations with whom we have very little in common except for the desire to defeat al-Qaida," Clinton said.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose country has taken a higher profile in the Middle East with its ongoing feud with Israel, is expected to make his first appearance at the UN General Assembly in the coming weeks.
US President Barack Obama will be in New York during the General Assembly and is expected to attend a September 19 symposium on counterterrorism sponsored by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon.
There was no date given for the formal launch ceremony, which will be chaired by Turkey and the United States during the General Assembly, a State Department official said. It was not clear if Erdogan and Obama would attend the launch.
The new forum, which is to work closely with the United Nations, is "based on a recognition that the US alone cannot eliminate every terrorist or terrorist organization," according to the official statement.
It will take a "strategic approach" to civilian counterterrorism work and help "increase the number of countries" with the political will and technology to combat terrorism, the statement said.


text:
Kern Medical and the Kern High School District are teaming up again this year to provide free sports physicals for high school athletes. They'll be available at the Columbus Street Clinic Saturday from 8am until 11am. Physicians at the county hospital perform over 15-hundred sports physicals each year.
David Martin/Suzanne Grant


text:
Dive Brief:
- Offsite design-build company Katerra acquired two architecture firms in the past two weeks – first Michael Green Architecture in Portland, Oregon, and then Lord Aeck Sargent in Atlanta. The two deals gives Katerra architect licenses in 31 states plus in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada.
- Michael Green Architecture is known for its use of mass timber. Founder Michael Green said his firm and Katerra provide sustainable, high-performance, affordable buildings, and that "Katerra's goal to accomplish this on a large scale aligns with MGA's long-term ambition." The architecture firm designed the groundbreaking T3 mass timber office building in Minneapolis, for example.
- The acquisition of Lord Aeck Sargent, which counts sustainable urban projects in its portfolio, doubles the size of Katerra's design staff. According to Katerra, LAS will continue its drive for "responsive design, technological expertise and exceptional service."
Dive Insight:
Along with expanding its practice through acquisitions, Katerra said that it plans to open six manufacturing plants by March 2019, including a 250,000-square-foot mass timber plant in Spokane, Washington. The factory, according to the company, should produce 4.6 million cubic feet of cross-laminated timber per year, while its other plants will produce standard wood panels and trusses.
More favorable building codes are bolstering the mass timber industry, although it has a few hills to climb before it gains industry-wide acceptance, primarily because of the perception that wood structures are not as safe as those made from steel or concrete. The financial community seems to be on board, however. In the last three years, the young company, valued at $3 billion, had investors clamoring to buy in through an $865 million Series D funding round led by the SoftBank Vision Fund this year and into an April 2017 round for $130 million.
Katerra is also on the forefront of a productivity push, an effort made more critical by the skilled labor shortage. Offsite construction and prefabrication gives contractors the chance to accelerate their schedules by performing traditionally consecutive tasks in parallel with each other. For example, Gaston Electrical in Boston told Constriction Dive that it can reduce its labor needs by 50% by collaborating with other trades and by using prefabricating mechanical, engineering and plumbing (MEP) racks — 20- to 30-foot panels that are pre-fitted with ductwork, pipes and raceways — that are easy to connect once they're delivered to the jobsite.


text:
How to Make a Cheerleader Costume
Cheerleader costumes are very popular in North America and Europe. These costumes can be put on different occasions and are very popular among girls. Cheerleader costumes are also easy to make. These dresses can be very expensive but still if you want to make them with different types of homemade accessories, they can be very cheap. This is important that we follow certain steps to make a cheerleader costume that will also look good and charming. There are different occasions on which cheerleader costume become very expensive and to avoid these types of mistakes, homemade cheerleader costumes are good choice and always look good when you represent your team on national level as well.
Choose right colour
Choosing colour can be a very difficult thing when making a cheerleader costume. Usually dark colours look good on cheerleaders. Red, Blue and green are the known colours which you can use to start a good initiative to make a cheerleader costume. A good colour can make your cheerleader costume even good.
Choose the type of dress
Once you have chosen a right colour for your dress, now is the time to choose the type of dress you want to make. If you are interested in skirt then choose the right material while the option is to make a shirt which will look more charming. You can also make a T. Shirt type dress or half sleeve shirt. Some cheerleaders want to wear full shirts as that will look good as well.
What type of team you represent
Making a cheerleader costume is another thing but even before when you thought to make a dress, certainly some team would have been in your mind as how you want to represent it. Girls around the world cheer for their city, state or national teams while these cheerleaders are also specialize in representing their team. This is also important that you should make a cheerleader costume with consideration of some type of representation of your city or state.
Right shoes
This is also important that should wear athletics shoes under cheerleader costume. Shoes are very important part of any dress and for cheerleader costume shoes is also very important and you wear good and matching shoes under the dresses.


text:
A straightforward process comes with exams for hearing and also these tests are things we must consider when we get to the age when our feeling of hearing is not comparable to it made use of to be. After carrying out numerous sound examinations, when you seek advice from an audiologist, you will certainly be able to determine whether you have issues that need to be dealt with when it pertains to your hearing skills. What an audiologist will certainly utilize to gauge how delicate your ears are to sound is a tool known as an audiometer. There are 3 offered hearing examinations for you to pick from and 2 more exams are offered other than this which makes uses an audiometer to inspect how delicate your ears are to sounds in numerous frequencies. It is the Weber examination that is the second option. The Rinne test is the third sort of hearing examination.
It is essential for you to be knowledgeable about the audiometer since it is a main factor in hearing exams. They will do audio examinations on you after you are placed inside a soundproof booth. It is important in this case for the person taking the test to wear a set of headphones that is linked to the primary audiometer mechanism and also the audiologist will certainly then run a series of audio tests and also this will certainly be done utilizing varying regularities to inspect the individual's hearing skills and also the person will certainly be advised to duplicate a few of the noises that can be listened to and if no noises are distinct after that the examiner should be notified.
Usually, this is the method to examine hearing. When it pertains to the auditonus forum, this is named after Ernst Heinrich Weber and the procedure includes the use of a vibrating adding fork which is positioned in various areas of the face. Right here, what touch the fork are the locations that are equidistant to the ears like the chin or the center of the forehead. The way this checks a person's capability to hear is by checking if the individual is able to listen to the noise originating from the resonance of the adding fork in both ears. Some people that undertake this test hear a louder sound in one ear and a softer one in the other. The only points you can discover when it comes to this are independent hearing problems. It was Heinrich Adolf Rinne, an otologist from Germany that was the name for the Rinne test. In comparison to the examination from Weber, this one contrasts a person's perception of audios making it more clinical. When it comes to appear transmission, it is done through the air or by bone transmission through the mastoid.


text:
Naples Daily News 2019 Boys Lacrosse All-Area Team
Boys Lacrosse Player of the Year Finalists
Trace Davidson
School: Gulf Coast
Year: Sophomore
Highlights: Davidson was the best player on a team that went undefeated all the way to regionals. He scored 65 goals in 14 games, adding 60 assists to lead the Sharks to a district championship.
Chris Kastroll
School: Community School
Year: Junior
Highlights: The attacker scored 40 goals for the Seahawks while handing out 32 assists. He did it in 13 games, giving him an average of 5.5 points per game. Kastroll was a big reason the Seahawks made it all the way to the district finals.
Shane Molloy
School: Barron Collier
Year: Senior
Highlights: Molloy was the backstop behind a defense that helped the Cougars win a ninth straight district championship. The goalkeeper had 172 saves and a 61-percent save percentage against one of the toughest schedules in the area.
First team
Will Asher
School: Barron Collier
Year: Senior
Highlights: Asher scored 24 goals this season and added 18 assists. He was one of the top scorers on a team that won its ninth straight district title.
Juan Chavez
School: Immokalee
Year: Junior
Highlights: Chavez was the leading scorer as the Indians went 11-8 and advanced to the district finals. He had 48 goals and added 19 assists and 76 ground balls.
Jake Davis
School: Barron Collier
Year: Senior
Highlights: Davis had 22 goals and six assists, but his biggest contribution came on faceoffs. He won 60 percent of his faceoffs with a season-best 95 percent ratio in some games.
Connor Doyle
School: Gulf Coast
Year: Senior
Highlights: Doyle was tied for leading scorer on a Sharks team that won a district title and was undefeated until regionals. The attacker had 65 goals and 41 assists in 16 games.
Zeb Fuller
School: Naples
Year: Senior
Highlights: Fuller averaged 18 saves a game in his fourth varsity season. A two-time All-American, he makes the all-area first team for the third straight year.
Macky Peck
School: Community School
Year: Sophomore
Highlights: Peck scored 54 goals, including all three scores for the Seahawks in the district finals. He added 13 assists to finish with 67 points in 13 games.
Raul Soliz
School: Immokalee
Year: Senior
Highlights: The senior captain was second on the team with 42 goals while leading the Indians with 25 assists. He had 71 ground balls and won 62.5 percent of his faceoffs.
Dylan Whelan
School: Gulf Coast
Year: Junior
Highlights: The Sharks goalie held opponents to an average of two goals per game. He did not allow more than eight goals in a single game and gave up two goals or fewer 11 times in 16 games.
Second team
Mike Binkowski, Community School
Dom Cupelo, Gulf Coast
Sam Drew, Barron Collier
Jack Laterra, Barron Collier
Noel Martinez, Immokalee
Yates Miller, Barron Collier
Chase Schroeder, Gulf Coast
Ty Taylor, Palmetto Ridge
Jacob Van Natta, Palmetto Ridge
Zach Woodring, Naples
Jake Zelahy, Gulf Coast
Honorable mention
Barron Collier: Jace Etchechury, James Leach, Adam Suid
Community School: Seamus O'Malley, Sebastian Youngs
Golden Gate: Billensky Riphin
Gulf Coast: Matt Foy, Patrick Hathcoack, Ben Jolly, Joseph McCray
Immokalee: Brian Lara, Carlos Lopez
Lely: Dominick Hangen, Elysee Garraux, Cooper Nettles, Justin Webb
Naples: Kenny Coloma, Grant Gordon, Zach McWilliams, Handel Victor
Palmetto Ridge: Colton Hubbard, Anthony Vasquez
Coach of the Year
John Sivillo
School: Barron Collier
Highlights: Sivillo put together a rigorous schedule that led to mediocre 8-6 record in the regular season but prepared the Cougars for the playoffs. Barron Collier played six teams during the year that went on to win district titles. The battle-tested Cougars won a ninth straight district championship and upset undefeated Gulf Coast to reach the regional semifinals.
How we select the All-Area teams
At the conclusion of each high school season, the Naples Daily News staff sends area coaches a nomination form to select and rank players for our All-Area first teams and to also nominate athletes for second team and honorable mention. A combination of Naples Daily News research and the coaches' player rankings lead to the teams being selected and three athletes being named finalists for player of the year. The three finalists are invited to The Southwest Florida Sports Awards to be held Tuesday, May 21 at the Barbara B. Mann Performing Arts Hall, where a player of the year for each will be announced along with other honors. Jacksonville Jaguars fullback Tommy Bohanon, a North Fort Myers High School graduate, will be the featured speaker. Tickets for the event can be purchased at sportsawards.news-press.com.


text:
Mission Statement
Core Power and Environment specializes in the design, construction, and testing of power and environmental equipment primarily used in data centers and mission critical applications. Our solutions go beyond simply furnishing and installing equipment, we insure the entire infrastructure is designed, tested and operates as an integrated system.
Representing the leading manufacturers in the industry allows Core Power to offer a comprehensive range of power protection, air conditioning, and distribution products.
Core Power also helps clients reduce costly downtime by providing monitoring solutions that range from a single infrastructure component such as batteries or leak detection to enterprise wide application that monitors all foundation equipment including power, environmental and other safety and security systems.
Our work is not done after the equipment is operational. We continue to support our end-users with comprehensive maintenance programs for both power and HVAC systems. Our cross-trained and experienced technicians are ready to troubleshoot any problem and are supported by factory trained professionals from Schneider, Russelectric, Bender, and Hitec.
Client List
Adams County National Bank
Citizens Bank
Fulton Financial
Citadel Federal Credit Union
JP Morgan Chase
Lincoln Financial Group
BNP Cooper Neff
Citadel Credit Union
South Jersey Credit Union
Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania
Kennedy Health Systems
Geisinger Health Systems
PHH Mortgage
TE Connectivity
Reimbursement Technologies
DirectLink Technologies
Philadelphia Insurance
Health Partners
Colonial Penn Insurance
United National Group
Philadelphia Navy Yard
Canaan Prison
Department of Home Land Security
Federal Reserve
Janssen Pharmaceutical
Merck & Co Inc
Lannett Pharmaceutical
Camden County Public Safety
New Castle County 911
Montgomery County 911
WL Gore
Hatfield Quality Meats
East Penn Manufacturing
First Energy
Buckeye Pipeline
Frontier Communications
Lockheed Martin
Temple University
Elizabethtown College
West Chester University
St Joes University
Philadelphia Water Department
Citizens Ball Park
PA Turnpike Commission
Wells Fargo Center


text:
David L. Franklin
Massey & Gail LLP
50 East Washington Street
Suite 400
Chicago, IL 60602
Office: 312.283.1590
Fax: 312.379.0467
David served as Illinois Solicitor General from August 2016 to January 2019. As Solicitor General, David oversaw a staff of more than 40 appellate lawyers representing the State of Illinois and its agencies and employees in civil and criminal appeals. He has briefed and argued cases in the United States Supreme Court, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Illinois Supreme Court. David's merits brief on behalf of the state respondents in Janus v. AFSCME won the National Association of Attorneys General's Best Brief Award in 2018.
A professor at DePaul University College of Law since 2004, David teaches and writes in the fields of constitutional law, administrative law, and conflict of laws. His writing has appeared in, among other places, the Yale Law Journal, Iowa Law Review, Chicago-Kent Law Review, Cardozo Law Review, The New Republic, Slate, Green Bag, Chicago Tribune, and Washington Post. David was the primary author of the latest edition of the leading Conflict of Laws casebook, co-authored with Larry Kramer and Kermit Roosevelt.
David graduated summa cum laude from Yale University and received his J.D. with high honors from the University of Chicago. He served as a law clerk for the Honorable Stephen F. Williams, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the United States Supreme Court. After his clerkships and before entering academia, he was an associate at Covington & Burling in New York.
- University of Chicago School of Law, J.D. with high honors, 1997
- Yale University, B.A. summa cum laude, 1990
- Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, United States Supreme Court, 1999-2000
- Judge Stephen F. Williams, United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1997-98
- Illinois
- New York
- United States Supreme Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Advisor, American Law Institute, Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws (2015-present)
- University of Chicago Law Review, Managing and Book Review Editor
- Member, Order of the Coif
- Winner, Edward W. Hinton Moot Court competition, (1996-1997)
- Thomas R. Mulroy Prize, with highest distinction, for excellence in appellate advocacy
- Board Member, Chicago Lawyer Chapter, American Constitution Society
- Conflict of Laws, Cases—Comments—Questions (10th ed. 2018) (with Larry Kramer & Kermit Roosevelt)
- "Origin Story," Slate (June 29, 2015)
- "Why Did Roberts Do It?," Slate (June 28, 2012)
- "Marbury v. Medicine," Slate (March 26, 2012)
- Two Cheers for Procedural Review of Guidance Documents, 90 Tex. L. Rev. See Also 111 (2012)
- Legislative Rules, Nonlegislative Rules, and the Perils of the Short Cut, 120 Yale L. J. 276 (2010)
- Justice Ginsburg's Common Law Federalism, 43 New Eng. L. Rev. 751 (2010)
- Looking Through Both Ends of the Telescope: Facial Challenges and the Roberts Court, 36 Hastings Const. L. Q. 689 (2009)
- Facial Challenges, Legislative Purpose, and the Commerce Clause, 92 Iowa L. Rev. 41 (2006)
- Briefed and argued Janus v. AFSCME in United States Supreme Court on behalf of State of Illinois as respondent, defending the constitutionality of public-sector union fair-share fees against First Amendment challenge.
- Briefed Trump v. Hawaii in United States Supreme Court on behalf of State of Illinois as co-lead amicus curiae (with New York), challenging the constitutionality of Executive Order banning entry of nationals from six predominantly Muslim countries.
- Briefed and argued Tennessee Wine & Spirits v. Blair in United States Supreme Court on behalf of State of Illinois and 34 States as amici curiae, defending the constitutionality of residency requirements for liquor retailers under the Twenty-First Amendment and the dormant Commerce Clause.
- Successfully briefed and argued an appeal in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of the members of the Illinois State Board of Elections, defending Illinois's election-day registration system against Equal Protection Clause challenge.
- Successfully briefed and argued an appeal in the Illinois Supreme Court defending the authority of the Illinois Governor under the state constitution to remove a member of the Illinois Prisoner Review Board.


text:
We currently serve East Moriches Long Island with our Landscaping Maintanence Services.
Weekly and Bi Weekly Lawn Mowing Service, Lawn Edging and Power Sweeping.
We also perform lawn seeding, lawn aeration, lawn thatching bush,
shrub trimming and tree pruning for homes and businesses.
If you are looking for a reliable reasonably priced landscaping company to cut your lawn and maintain your property,
please do not hesitate and call or contact us now by filling out and submitting our contact form below.
We are a full service fully licensed landscaping company.
Contact Form / Email Us
Name (Required)
Phone (Required)
E-Mail (Required)
Interested In...
Website Developed and Managed by


text:
This time, why did 8 OCDSB Trustees vote against instructing staff to clarify what is meant by religious accommodation?
A. THAT staff be directed to prepare a report for the May 2012 Strategic Planning and Priorities Committee meeting detailing policy and procedure(s) currently in place which addresses the subject of religious services within schools, during school hours and ensure all schools adhere to applicable law; – THIS FAILED
I don't get it. It was a simple request. No implications. Or are the 8 Trustees politically sensitive to what such a report might contain?
Trustee Fitzgerald – the sponsor of the motion – writes in today's Citizen:
When we allow a minister, rabbi or imam into our schools to conduct religious services during the school day, we bring in the thin edge of a wedge. Other religions rightfully ask to hold religious services in our secular schools and this is precisely what happened at Toronto's Valley Park Middle School. We may also find it increasingly difficult to say no to future requests for religious-based schools housed under the public board's umbrella. If and when this comes to pass, say goodbye to the greatness of our secular public schools as parents flock to ensure that their children's religious training is met during the school day.
I am sad that a fairly simple report could not be produced. I suppose I should say goodbye to the institution of the non-religious public school. Perhaps this is premature, but I would be far from alone in mourning its demise.


text:
Boston attorney Steven Ballard on recent developments in divorce & family law.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
To Spank or Not to Spank
The trend, throughout the US, is away from corporal punishment, even if there is no trend to outlaw it explicitly. While spanking is not clearly outlawed in Massachusetts, our case law does not clearly condone it either. And there is currently proposed legislation here that would indeed explicitly outlaw it; if the legislation is passed, Massachusetts could become the first state to prohibit parents from using corporal punishment.
I just read an interesting post on the subject in today's Massachusetts Law Updates, the Massachusetts Trial Court Law Library's blog: Spanking and the Law. Although I'm not sure a law banning parents from spanking their children is necessary or even a good idea, I am sure myself that spanking itself is a bad idea. I believe parents should act as though such a law is already in effect.
I say don't spank, first of all, because as a parent I don't believe spanking is a good means of discipline, I have never used it myself, never needed it, and never would use it. (Of course, my current aversion to spanking may have something to do with the fact that my son is now old enough and big enough to spank me back...)
Second of all, I say don't spank, because I am a divorce and family law attorney. As such, my clients are by and large parents who are in the process of getting divorced, parents who are already divorced, or parents or other parental figures in divorce, guardianship or paternity disputes. Such parents in particular often have to worry about potential or ongoing disputes with other parents or other rivals in custody and visitation matters, and it's not generally a good idea to be giving your potential enemies ammunition to use against you.
But finally, and most importantly - and this is strongly related to my own personal objection to spanking - I say don't spank because there is a fine line between physical discipline and abuse. Where there are children, there are mandated reporters. In our schools and hospitals, and elsewhere, there are officials, teachers, counselors, medics, medical and psychological professionals, who are mandated to report any suspected neglect or abuse to the Department of Social Services.
Really, it's just better not to spank. There's a better way.
Massachusetts Law Updates: Spanking and the Law
Monday, November 26, 2007
Coontz v. Marquardt on "Taking Marriage Private"
Do we need a new way to assign legal benefits and responsibilities for partners that used to be available only through traditional marriage, now that we have so many different alternative forms of domestic relationships and partnerships, both gay and straight, some legally sanctioned and others not? Chew on these two opinion pieces if you're interested in this oh-so-current issue.
Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support
"Delegates from sixty-eight States and the European Community have finalized the Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and other Forms of Family Maintenance at the 21st Diplomatic Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law.
Basically, the states that ratify the convention agree to assist citizens from other states who have also ratified the convention to recover child support.
The United States immediately signed the Convention, the first (and, thus far, only) State to do so...."
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Massachusetts Youthful Offender Law Challenged in Worcester
As mentioned in my recent post Deadly Delinquents, Deadbeat Dads, and the Dangers of Demonization, there is also international human rights law support available to challenge such laws. Unfortunately, state and federal courts all the way up to the US Supreme Court often do not show the appropriate respect for, or even attention to, international law. But I say pile it on. This looks to be an interesting challenge to a bad law, one that in my opinion is violative of human rights law and of US and state constitutional law.
"WORCESTER— Lawyers for a Milford teenager charged in a fatal stabbing are challenging the constitutionality of a state law requiring that juvenile murder suspects between the ages of 14 and 17 be tried as adults. Lawyers John G. Swomley and Kenneth J. King, who represent Patrick I. Powell, contend in a motion to dismiss the murder charge pending against Mr. Powell in Worcester Superior Court that subjecting their client to a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment if he is convicted would expose him to cruel and unusual punishment under the state and federal constitutions and deny him due process. Mr. Powell was 16 when he was charged with murder in the Jan. 6, 2006, stabbing death of 21-year-old Daniel Columbo during an altercation outside Mr. Columbo's home at 26 Carroll St. in Milford. Mr. Columbo died as a result of a stab wound to the chest allegedly inflicted by Mr. Powell.....
Mr. Swomley, who was appointed to represent Mr. Powell, now 18, and Mr. King, who is affiliated with the Suffolk University Law School's Juvenile Justice Center, argue in their motion to dismiss that a juvenile offender is less culpable than an adult who engages in similar misconduct because of 'psychological and cognitive immaturity.'
'Recent advances in neuroscience explain that a juvenile's lack of impulse control, inability to consider consequences of actions or foresee alternative courses of action and propensity to take risks that an adult would not take are products of the juvenile's incomplete cognitive development,' according to their motion. Mr. Swomley and Mr. King are seeking to introduce expert testimony at a Jan. 16 hearing on their motion, contending 'that when a juvenile's incomplete development is understood, it becomes apparent that juveniles are sufficiently different from adults that they cannot constitutionally be subjected to the same mandatory penalties as adults. That is, a life without parole sentence implies a determination that a juvenile offender is as culpable as an adult who commits similar acts and is irredeemable. Evidence from neuroscience demonstrates that neither premise can withstand scrutiny,' the lawyers wrote."
Legal Briefs of Supreme Judicial Court Cases Now Available on the Internet
Massachusetts Bar Association : Legal briefs of SJC cases available on court Web site: "Legal briefs of SJC cases available on court Web site As part of a continuing effort to make the court system more easily accessible to the public, the Supreme Judicial Court is now providing legal briefs filed with the full Court available on the Internet at www.ma-appellatecourts.org or at www.mass.gov/sjc. Lawyers, law students, or individuals who have an interest in particular cases can readily obtain the attorneys' legal briefs, which are filed in the Supreme Judicial Court's Clerk's Office for the Commonwealth. Previously, these materials could only be obtained in hard copies by individuals requesting them in person in the Clerk's Office. The briefs are scanned and posted with the case docket on the Court's website about a month in advance of the Court's scheduled sitting. The Supreme Judicial Court Clerk's Office for the Commonwealth maintains the court records, docket, and court calendar for the cases heard by the seven Justices of the Court. Approximately 200 cases are decided by the full Court each year from September through May. In addition, single justices hear cases throughout the year. "
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Natural Parents, De Facto Parents, Psychological Parents, and Confusion in the Courts
I just read the post West Virginia Mother Wins Back Legal Custody From … Babysitters in the Florida Divorce Law Blog, which described an unusual West Virginia Supreme Court case (for more, see the West Virginia Record article Supreme Court restores full custody to mother from babysitters) in which, remarkably, two trial judges and an intermediate appellate court got confused on this one, and gave custody to babysitters over the natural mother, until the West Virginia Supreme Court reversed these erroneous decisions of the lower courts. As Janet Langjahr of the Florida Divorce Blog aptly put it:
"It's a very strange case. The kind that is hard to believe had to go up to the highest court in the state of West Virginia to get straightened out … any court at all really. It was not disputed that the mother here was fit (or at least not seriously disputed). But two West Virginia judges actually ruled that a biological mother had to share custody with distant relatives of her child, who had acted as babysitters for the child. And an intermediate level appellate court upheld those rulings. (In fact, at one point in the case, the sitters briefly had primary physical custody and the mother had visitation!) The judges found the relatives to be coparents - and therefore ordered shared parenting and rotating custody (where the child "bounces" from home to home) - before the mother could relocate to another state. On the second appeal, the Supreme Court of West Virginia reversed the courts below, ruling that the relatives had no standing to intervene in the relocation case and ordering full custody restored to the natural mother. The high court affirmed that a natural parent has the right of custody unless that parent is unfit or willfully gave up custody."
This West Virginia babysitters case reminded me of a very recent case in Massachusetts, in which a very thoughtful and well-meaning judge here was similarly reversed by the Massachusetts Court of Appeals when he created a "co-guardianship" between both the natural father, whom the judge had not found to be unfit, and the maternal aunt and uncle, in its October 29, 2007 decision in the Guardianship of Estelle (decision available at http://www.socialaw.com/slip.htm?cid=17588&sid=119), which begins:
"The biological father of the minor child, Estelle, appeals from a judgment of the Probate and Family Court granting a guardianship of the child to the child's maternal uncle and aunt, with the father appointed as coguardian. The father asserts that, given the judge's finding that he is not an unfit parent, he is entitled to outright custody of the child without the limitations inherent in the vesting of guardianship authority in others. In support of the judgment, the uncle and aunt argue that they had parented the child for seven years by the time of trial; she is happy, well adjusted and developing normally; she visits regularly with her father; and a precipitous transfer of custody would be harmful to her.We credit the judge with a sensitive attempt to sort out the complexities of the case and arrive at a compromise that was in the child's best interests. His solution, however, cannot stand as a matter of law because the father is correct that, absent a finding of unfitness on his part, the judge is without authority to require that he share parenting decisions with others...."
When natural parents are not together, that is, if they are separated or divorced, they may fight between themselves over custody, and then the issue is what is in the best interests of the children. But if there is only one natural parent available to have custody, and he or she is fighting with a non-parent, whether an aunt, uncle, grandparent, other relative, or non-relative, the question becomes: Is this natural parent fit? If so, that parent gets custody, period. Judges occasionally are confused about this basic principle of parental rights. They are so accustomed to looking at the facts of a given situation and trying to do what they think is right, because in their normal course of inquiry, in the typical kind of case they have to resolve, between two natural parents, they apply the "best interests of the child" standard, which generally allows them to place the child or children in the best of the two home environments presented to them.
As the old adage goes, tough cases make bad law. Appellate courts are supposed to prevent "tough cases" from making "bad law." These two recent cases, one from here in Massachusetts, and one from West Virginia, illustrate this very well. Appellate courts in each case had to prevent seemingly tough cases from making bad law, by reaffirming this basic principle of parental rights, which sometimes does indeed conflict with what a fact finder may find to be in the best interests of children. Parental rights sometimes trump the perceived best interests of the children, because the legal standard of parental fitness is really pretty low. If any natural parent is minimally fit, the law says he or she should win custody over a non-parent, even if the court in its fact-finding role determines that the other would-be guardian, whether a "psychological parent" or a "de facto parent" (one who may actually have truly parented the children while the minimally fit parent has been on the sidelines, and one who has in fact created a strong parental bond with the children) would be a far better caretaker of the children than the natural parent. Doesn't always seem fair or right in some situations, but that's the law. Natural parents rule. And it makes sense.
Otherwise, if we expanded the use of the "best interests of the child" standard so as to put non-parents more on an equal footing with natural parents, we would be allowing the tough cases to create "bad law" - that is, a "bad law" that would make custody contests, already an unfortunate but necessary intrusion of the state into family life, more of a free for all. Such a bad law would lead to a situation in which parental rights and authority - already greatly eroded over the years by the increasing involvement of the government and other third-parties in the lives of children and by other social developments - would be further weakened. And this kind of further weakening of parental rights is something our society and our US Supreme Court (e.g., most recently, in the Troxel v. Granville grandparent visitation case), have thus far shown they will not permit.
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Noncustodial Parents and Access To Records: Problems On Both Sides of the Pond
"Other agencies such as doctors and teachers are not always familiar with the rights of a non-resident parent. They may know they have legal responsibilities to share information but may have practical constraints. Schools, for example, may have a duty to inform parents (whether or not with parental responsibility) but they tend to take the practical short cut. The child is given information in an envelope to take home to the main carer. This does not reach all the relevant people. Maybe you need to get in touch with the school directly and ask for arrangements to be made about copies of reports or the school calendar. GPs are under so much pressure. They do not want to produce anything in writing and do not usually do so when someone attends for an appointment. They have little or no access to legal advice and do not know what to do or what their legal responsibilities are. If in doubt, they will take the line of least resistance and will not necessarily put themselves out just because you share parental responsibility...." [ Note: "GP" (General Practioner) in the UK = "PCP" (Primary Care Physician) in the US; "non-resident parents" in the UK = "noncustodial parents" in Massachusetts]
It seems noncustodial parents have similar problems on both sides of the pond - well at least both in England and New England, I should say. Here in Massachusetts - just like, apparently, in the UK - many physicians and school officials often are confused about their responsibility to provide records to noncustodial parents ("non-resident parents" in the UK vernacular). Such information generally should be provided, so long as both of a child's parents share legal custody, as they most often do, regardless whether a parent seeking such information is the "custodial parent " (i.e., the one with physical custody) or the "noncustodial parent" (i.e., the one who usually shares legal custody but has visitation rights or "parenting time" rather than physical custody). Legal custody, which carries with it the authority to make important decisions about schooling, medical care, and other important issues not strictly tied to the day-to-day concerns of physical custody, is now generally shared between parents of divorce, and is quite often shared even between many parents of children born out of wedlock, even though physical custody is still most often granted to one parent alone.
However, many school officials and medical providers, accustomed to dealing more often with mothers than fathers, oftentimes assume that the separated and divorced mothers have custody and assume they have complete, sole authority over the children and their records; thus such officials are often reluctant or unwilling to give fathers records or information when these fathers seek such documents directly, and these officials are not certain whether they are required by law to do so. This confusion or reluctance most often happens, in my experience, to affect "noncustodial fathers" who have full legal custodial rights, but who are nonetheless denied access to such information due to the ignorance of the officials and/or due to the custodial mothers' attempts to prevent such information from being given to the fathers. I have on a few occasions encountered custodial fathers (those who have both legal and physical custody) who have experienced difficulty acquiring records that were required to be given to them. (I have not yet witnessed a case in which any mother, whether a custodial parent or not, has been denied access to information, but such a case is bound to have happened somewhere, and will likely happen more frequently, as more and more fathers gain sole or shared physical custody.)
Many separated or divorced parents fortunately do work with their counterparts and share information freely between themselves, thus manifesting the appropriate sense of cooperation that benefits their children. Also, many school systems make dual sets of information available to both parents, especially for joint physical custodial parents and for parents with a high level of conflict. But these duplicate arrangements are not automatic. It is usually easiest for teachers and administrators to give out the information to only one parent, the one who is most involved with the children, often the mother (it is certainly still the case that there are many more mothers, whether single, married, or divorced, who are the more active of a child's two parents, and who are the more directly involved with their children's schools, than there are fathers in such dominant parenting roles). However, the costs of such duplicative efforts are fast disappearing, as email and the internet are increasingly used for communication.
When my clients have trouble getting records, usually from school officials, I always point them to Massachusetts law and the Massachusetts Department of Education regulations promulgated pursuant to that law, which state that, generally absent a specific court order prohibiting the release of this information to a parent with legal custody but not physical custody (i.e., most of those whom we call "noncustodial parents") records should be given to such a parent. (See the exact wording of the education department regulation, below, which explains the procedure that is supposed to be followed by school administrators.) The ultimate burden is on the parent trying to prevent the other one from getting records to prove that the other is not entitled to such records. In practice, however, it often does not work out that way. A noncustodial parent is wise to be prepared to prove he/she shares legal custody, even if not physical custody, with the other parent, and also to show the law and regulations to the school principal and/or medical provider. The best family law practitioners in Massachusetts, furthermore, very wisely seek specific language in agreements and court judgments/orders that clearly spell out the precise rights of the noncustodial parent to such information, even at the risk of being superfluous and redundant.
The current applicable Massachusetts laws and regulations for school records in particular are as follows:
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS, Chapter 71, Section 34 D (Student records; maintenance, storage, destruction, etc.; inspection by parent or guardian): "The board of education shall adopt regulations relative to the maintenance, retention, duplication, storage and periodic destruction of student records by the public elementary and secondary schools of the commonwealth. Such rules and regulations shall provide that a parent or guardian of any pupil shall be allowed to inspect academic, scholastic, or any other records concerning such pupil which are kept or are required to be kept."
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS, Chapter 71: Section 34E (Inspection of student records; persons authorized): "Each school committee shall, at the request of a parent or guardian of a student, allow such parent or guardian to inspect academic, scholastic, or any other records concerning such student that are kept or are required to be kept, regardless of the age of such student. Each school committee shall, at the request of a student eighteen years of age or older, allow such student complete access to all school records relative to him or her."
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS, Chapter 71, Secton 34H (Noncustodial parents; receipt of information for child enrolled in public elementary or secondary schools; notice to custodial parent): "(a) Each public elementary and secondary school shall provide student records, including, but not limited to, the following information, in a timely and appropriate manner to the parents of a child enrolled in the school if the parents are eligible for information under this section and request the information in the manner set forth in this section: report cards and progress reports; the results of intelligence and achievement tests; notification of a referral for a special needs assessment; notification of enrollment in an English language learners program established under chapter 71A; notification of absences; notification of illnesses; notification of any detentions, suspensions or expulsion; and notification of permanent withdrawal from school. Each school shall also make reasonable efforts to ensure that other written information that is provided to the custodial parent but not specified in the preceding sentence be provided to the requesting parent if that parent is eligible for information under this section. All electronic and postal address and telephone number information relating to either the work or home locations of the custodial parent shall be removed from information provided under this section. Receipt of this information shall not mandate participation in any proceeding to which notification pertains, nor shall it authorize participation in proceedings and decisions regarding the child's welfare which are not granted through the award of custody. For purposes of this section, any parent who does not have physical custody of a child shall be eligible for the receipt of information unless: (1) the parent's access to the child is currently prohibited by a temporary or permanent protective order, except where the protective order, or any subsequent order which modifies the protective order, specifically allows access to the information described in this section; or (2) the parent is denied visitation or, based on a threat to the safety of the child, is currently denied legal custody of the child or is currently ordered to supervised visitation, and the threat is specifically noted in the order pertaining to custody or supervised visitation. All such documents limiting or restricting parental access to a student's records or information which have been provided to the school or school district shall be placed in the student's record.
(b) A parent requesting information under this section shall submit a written request to the school principal.
(c) Upon receipt of a request for information under this section, the school shall review the student record for any documents limiting or restricting parental access to a student's records or information which have been provided to the school or school district and shall immediately notify the custodial parent of the receipt of the request. Notification must be made by certified mail and by first class mail in both the primary language of the custodial parent and in English. The notification shall also inform the custodial parent that information requested under this section shall be provided to the requesting parent after 21 days unless the custodial parent provides to the principal of the school documentation of any court order which prohibits contact with the child, or prohibits the distribution of the information referred to in this section or which is a temporary or permanent order issued to provide protection to the child in the custodial parent's custody from abuse by the requesting parent unless the protective order or any subsequent order which modifies the protective order, specifically allows access to the information described in this section.
[There is no subsection (d).]
(e) At any time the principal of a school is presented with an order of a probate and family court judge which prohibits the distribution of information pursuant to this section the school shall immediately cease to provide said information and shall notify the requesting parent that the distribution of information shall cease.
(f) The principal of each public elementary and secondary school shall designate a staff member whose duties shall include the proper implementation of this section.
[There is no subsection (g).]
(h) The department of education shall promulgate regulations to implement the provisions of this section. Said regulations shall include provisions which assure that the information referred to in this section is properly marked to indicate that said information may not be used to support admission of the child to another school."
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REGULATION: 603 CMR 23.07(5): "Access Procedures for Non-Custodial Parents. As required by M.G.L. c. 71, § 34H, a non-custodial parent may have access to the student record in accordance with the following provisions.
(a) A non-custodial parent is eligible to obtain access to the student record unless:
the parent has been denied legal custody or has been ordered to supervised visitation, based on a threat to the safety of the student and the threat is specifically noted in the order pertaining to custody or supervised visitation, or
the parent has been denied visitation, or
the parent's access to the student has been restricted by a temporary or permanent protective order, unless the protective order (or any subsequent order modifying the protective order) specifically allows access to the information contained in the student record, or
there is an order of a probate and family court judge which prohibits the distribution of student records to the parent.
(b) The school shall place in the student's record documents indicating that a non-custodial parent's access to the student's record is limited or restricted pursuant to 603 CMR 23.07(5)(a). (c) In order to obtain access, the non-custodial parent must submit a written request for the student record to the school principal.
(d) Upon receipt of the request the school must immediately notify the custodial parent by certified and first class mail, in English and the primary language of the custodial parent, that it will provide the non-custodial parent with access after 21 days, unless the custodial parent provides the principal with documentation that the non-custodial parent is not eligible to obtain access as set forth in 603 CMR 23.07 (5)(a).
(e) The school must delete all electronic and postal address and telephone number information relating to either work or home locations of the custodial parent from student records provided to non-custodial parents. In addition, such records must be marked to indicate that they shall not be used to enroll the student in another school.
(f) Upon receipt of a court order that prohibits the distribution of information pursuant to G.L. c. 71, §34H, the school shall notify the non-custodial parent that it shall cease to provide access to the student record to the non-custodial parent."
Friday, November 16, 2007
The Battle for Same-Sex Marriage in California
(Tuesday, November 13, 2007, 11:01:29 AM Andrew Koppelman), Koppelman states his fear that a pending lawsuit before the California Supreme Court challenging Proposition 22, a law initiated by ballot initiative in 2000 ("Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California"), and seeking a ruling that same-sex marriage is required by the state constitution, may actually energize opponents of same-sex marriage and put in jeopardy even the decent domestic partnership laws already in place there.
This sounds a little familiar to those of us here in Massachusetts, but the roles now being played by citizens, the legislature and the judiciary in California are quite different from those that were played by their counterparts in Massachusetts. In California, so far it has been the legislature that has voted for same-sex marriage, only to be held back by the citizen initiative (Proposition 22) and Governor Schwarzenegger (through his vetoes), and the California Supreme Court has not yet been heard. Here in Massachusetts, it was our Supreme Judicial Court that created same-sex marriage, in the face of a divided, and relatively passive, legislature, and with no threat from any ballot initiative like that of California.
It should be interesting to see what ultimately happens in California.
"I just spoke on a panel in San Francisco, with a group of activists supporting same-sex marriage. (I'm also a supporter, and defend my views here.) Afterward the panelists had some conversations about what's been happening in California, and they explained their current strategy to me. I came away convinced that my allies are out of their minds.
Last month, the legislature for the second time passed a bill legalizing same-sex marriage in California, and the bill was vetoed for the second time by Governor Schwarzenegger. The governor argued that the bill was inconsistent with Proposition 22, a law enacted by ballot initiative and approved by a landslide 61 to 39 percent in March 2000, which states, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
Same-sex marriage proponents are now pinning their hopes on a lawsuit, now pending before the California Supreme Court, arguing that the initiative law is unconstitutional and that same-sex marriage is required by the state constitution.
All of the proponents with whom I spoke, including Assemblyman Mark Leno, the author of the marriage bill, acknowledged that if they win in court, it will certainly energize the other side and lead to a new ballot initiative that would outlaw all legal recognition of same-sex relationships in California. This would be a very big deal, because California now has one of the strongest domestic partnership laws in the country, giving same-sex couples all of the rights of heterosexual married couples except the name...."
Monday, November 12, 2007
Ballard's Best: The 11 Best Family Law Bloggers In the US
As part of my new adventure, I have read lots and lots of family law blogs over the last few months. I have done this for purely selfish reasons. I need to find the best blogs, so that I can shamelessly steal ideas from them until I can find my own way and maybe my own voice. So, here's the list of the best American family law blogs I've found, a list I'll call "Ballard's Best" (in the interests of alliteration and self-promotion).
Ballard's Best may not be the definitive list. I do suspect I have missed some really good blogs. However, all of the blogs on this list are excellent, among the best to be found on divorce and family law in the U.S. I have found other good family law blogs, but they are not on the list either because they have recently gone to sleep, or they are not based in the U.S. (I hardly feel competent to judge family law blogs based in the U.S., so I certainly wouldn't judge those in other countries - I have, however, included the International Family Law Blog, by a British blogger based in New York.)
These winning blogs are very different from one another but all have in common the following four characteristics:
1) They regularly contribute original posts about issues in their own particular family law practice, usually specific to their own state's jurisdiction.
2) Despite having that particular focus, they post articles that should nonetheless prove useful, relevant, and informative to others, both lawyers and non-lawyers, in other jurisdictions.
3) They post regularly.
4) They have been around for some time, usually a year or more.
The blogs that made my list are the family law blogs that appear on my blogroll. In case you're wondering, most of these bloggers have not put my new blog on their own blogrolls nor have I asked or expected any of them to do so.* Indeed, I don't meet the criteria for my own list. No matter. If you can't beat 'em, judge 'em.
Now, here they are, in alphabetical order:
1) California Divorce and Family Law
2) California Divorce Blawg
3) Family Law Prof Blog
4) Florida Divorce Law Blog
5) Georgia Family Law Blog
6) Indiana Divorce & Family Law Blog
7) International Family Law Blog
8) Kentucky Divorce Law Journal
9) New York Divorce Report
10) Pennsylvania Family Law
11) Updates in Michigan Family Law
*Of course, if anyone wisely decides to link to me, I won't complain - and I might just be more inclined to link to you and to put you on my next list - ha, ha, just kidding...I think.
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Heather Mills and Her Lawyer Call it Splits
Finally on Friday it was reported that her divorce lawyer from Mishcon de Reya Solicitors has called it splits with her, and that Mills has also lost her "media spokesman." Mills McCartney splits with lawyer - CNN.com ("Mills McCartney splits with lawyer/Story Highlights: Heather Mills McCartney parts company with law firm Mishcon de Reya /Mishcon de Reya had represented her in her divorce from Paul McCartney/ Mills McCartney has also split with her media spokesman").
Obviously Heather Mills doesn't need a spokesman. She needs a muzzle. Let's see who will be next in line to handle the damage control.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Dorf on Law: Controlling the Courts, American-style
Mike Dorf, Columbia Law Professor, reports today on his blog Dorf on Law about a very interesting conference being held tomorrow and Monday in New York, where he will talk, together with lots of national VIPs, about the US Presidency and the Supreme Court, and specifically about the "Culture Wars." Hopefully the conference will be recorded in some way and its contents broadcast or otherwise distributed after the fact. Big issues in the law, and lots of influential people weighing in. Click the above link and read Dorf on Law for more.
"Tomorrow (Sunday Nov 11) begins a two-day conference on the Presidency and the Supreme Court to be hosted by the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum. The program features historians, law professors, journalists and a keynote address by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. I'll be on a panel on Monday with Judge Michael McConnell and Yale Law Professor Heather Gerken, moderated by NPR's Nina Totenberg. We'll be talking about what the organizers of the conference have called The Presidency, the Supreme Court and the "Culture Wars", and part of our discussion will focus on what exactly makes something a "culture war" issue.For my part, I intend to say (among other things) that whether an issue is part of the culture wars is (rather obviously) subject to change over time. Today's issues include abortion, church-state relations and gay rights, but national politics has picked up and dropped various issues over the course of American history...."
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Kudos to Barney Frank for ENDA, from Dale Carpenter at The Volokh Conspiracy Blog
Let's join with Con Law Prof Dale Carpenter in giving kudos to Massachusetts' own Barney Frank for helping to get this historic, gay civil rights legislation passed in the US House. On to the Senate, with Ted Kennedy introducing the bill there. Yes, it's still Massachusetts leading the way on this important issue.
"Barney Frank's ENDA:
Yesterday the House passed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. The vote was 235-184, with 35 Republicans in favor and 25 Democrats against. It's the first time either house of Congress has ever passed a gay civil-rights bill.
Ted Kennedy is expected to introduce ENDA in the Senate soon. Some Senate Republicans are predicting it has a good chance of passing early in the new year, assuming it's not expanded. The bill would then go to President Bush, whose advisors suggested a presidential veto two weeks ago. But now the White House is telling the New York Times that it will examine changes made to the bill before a final decision is made.
However it comes out this session, the fact that the bill has passed even a single house of Congress is a sign of tremendous political progress for gay Americans. Similar attempts to pass employment-discrimination protection have languished in Congress for more than three decades. Now a strong majority of the House is on record in an actual recorded vote supporting the bill. This record can be used to reinforce their resolve should ENDA need to be reintroduced after the next election. The vote creates political momentum for eventual enactment...."
More Britney Woes: Britney Spears To Pay $120K of Kevin Federline's Attorney Fees
More Britney news. Tired of it yet? $120K more to Federline, this time for some of his attorney fees. Wouldn't it be great if everybody could afford to pay for that much justice in their own divorce cases and even have it paid by the other side? (Yeah, yeah, and it would be nice to be the lawyer getting those fees too - don't think I don't know what you're thinking I'm thinking...)
Disturbing Stats in "A Guantanamo Index" - From Human Rights Watch Lawyer Joanne Mariner
Disturbing stats on Gitmo from Human Rights Watch lawyer Joanne Mariner.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Sentencing Guidelines Revised for Crack Cocaine Offenses, New York Times Reports
LINK to Article by Solomon Moore, November 2, 2007, New York Times: Rules Lower Prison Terms in Sentences for Crack - New York Times: "Crack cocaine offenders will receive shorter prison sentences under more lenient federal sentencing guidelines that went into effect yesterday. The United States Sentencing Commission, a government panel that recommends appropriate federal prison terms, estimated that the new guidelines would reduce the federal prison population by 3,800 in 15 years. The new guidelines will reduce the average sentence for crack cocaine possession to 8 years 10 months from 10 years 1 month. At a sentencing commission hearing in Washington on Nov. 13, members will consider whether to apply the guidelines retroactively to an estimated 19,500 crack cocaine offenders who were sentenced under the earlier, stricter guidelines."
Monday, November 5, 2007
Deadly Delinquents, Deadbeat Dads, and the Dangers of Demonization
It is easy for most of us to forget that just as children are resilient as victims, they also are capable of redemption and rehabilitation as offenders. If they can overcome the trauma of abuse, and other horrible experiences, and go on nonetheless to lead healthy adult lives, as so many do, they can also redeem themselves and be rehabilitated, even when they themselves have committed horrific acts. But we are all too quick to demonize and discard them just as we do adult perpetrators.
In some circumstances, for example when children engage in inappropriate sexual contact with other children, contact that would be considered abuse if initiated by older individuals, we don't actually label these child actors "perpetrators" but instead treat all the children in the situation, both the actors and the acted upon, as the unfortunate "victims." But there is a line that can't be crossed, it seems. If a child's crime is too horrific, these days we just give up on the child, forever, and lock him up and throw away the key, just as we would do with an adult perpetrator of such a crime. Our favorite way to rationalize this approach is to pretend that the child is actually an adult.
There recently appeared an excellent article by Sherry Colb, in a Findlaw Column on October 29, 2007, exploring the question of why we are now so quick to lock children up and throw away the key: Why Does the U.S. Sentence Adolescents To Life Without Parole? As Colb points out in her article, we did not always have this harsh approach, and our attitude seems somewhat dissonant with our basic sense of optimism. She postulates that we are somehow afraid of our own optimism, and lock up the children out of a sense of fear of that optimism. I am not exactly sure I agree with this theory, if I even understand it correctly, but it may be right. But I think there may be a simpler explanation for our harsh policy toward deadly delinquents. It is in our entire criminal justice system, that is, in our system for actual adults (not just the adolescents whom we selectively and inconsistently treat as adults), that we have become less forgiving, more punitive, and more willing to give up on people. Demonize. Discard.
I'm not sure that we should blame our harsh penal approach on any fear of our own optimism. I think there is something more distasteful at work here. It is fear, Colb is right, but it is a kind of fear that is making us lose our humanity. The U.S., in permitting its states to lock up children for life without parole (and Massachusetts is one among the vast majority of US states that presently do this), is quite arguably in violation of international human rights law. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court finally outlawed, in Roper v. Simmons, capital punishment for juvenile offenders, but that hardly brings the U.S. in compliance with human rights law, as I understand it.
Colb in her article provides a history of the developments in international law on the specific issue of life without parole for children. For more information about the issues of juvenile justice and human rights law, see the Human Rights Watch report of 2005 http://hrw.org/reports/2005/us1005/. We have moved away from state-sanctioned killing of juvenile offenders, but we are still guilty of a lesser international human rights law violation by locking up children and throwing away the key. That is because we let our anger cloud our minds and we allow ourselves to demonize these children. We inevitably lose some of our own humanity when we do so. (Just as we do when we lock up "enemy combatants" as we did in Guantanamo. Just as we do when we commit acts of torture....but I digress.)
I have witnessed a lack of humanity in many prosecutors, who often find it easiest to view perpetrators, of whatever age, as purely evil, subhuman creatures for whom no punishment is too great. This inhumane, simplistic prosecutorial attitude was bizarrely evident in a recent guest article, on October 13, 2007, in the Washington Post by Wisconsin "deadbeat dad" prosecutor Mary Wagner - LINK to Washington Post article, Mary T. Wagner - Corralling Deadbeat Dads - washingtonpost.com, which is a tale about her experience prosecuting deadbeat dads.
Wagner seems to take delight in demonizing and punishing these men (I say men because we do not hear about the prosecution of any deadbeat moms in this article), and appears to lose all perspective. Particularly troubling for me was the following passage:
"The case is never about whether the deadbeat dad failed to make any payments for 120 consecutive days, earning himself up to a year and a half of 'maximum confinement' in prison and two additional years of 'extended supervision' reporting to a probation agent. It's about how the parent who stayed with the children had to work two jobs, never caught a break and sometimes had to take government assistance, and how the kids in the middle of it all felt abandoned -- how their world fell apart when Dad left.
Sometimes it's about a 10-year-old child coming to court with Mom, smiling but nervous with anticipation, wondering if the father who's been gone for years will recognize her in the gallery as he sits on a bench up front, wearing an orange jumpsuit and chains, waiting for our dance to begin. Those scenes never end well...."
It is terrible, Wagner says, that this dad has not paid child support. Yes, absolutely. But why not object to the sad fact that this child has been brought into the courtroom to witness her father in an orange jump suit and chains. The child, despite the child support arrears, apparently was fed and clothed while sitting in court, but how was that child feeling? It is horrible that the father doesn't know this child, agreed. But is it not also horrible that this mother brought her child into court to see her father in this circumstance? Have we all been desensitized by Jerry Springer?
I'm bothered that while Wagner can so easily demonize this dad, and discard him as a useless, evil deadbeat, there is not even the hint of the possibility that he might be worthy of some respect, and that after he finally gets out of jail, he might actually pay child support and even spend some time with his child.
There is a strong correlation between the payment of support by noncustodial parents and the degree of contact they have with their children. If we're really concerned about both support and parenting time, about the best interests of children, we should have a broader perspective. Sometimes there are deadbeat dads, and deadbeat moms as well, and sometimes they truly are demonic. Sometimes they never come around. But parents, and prosecutors, and judges, should always leave room for redemption, at least as long as these children are still children.
I'm reminded of a wonderful adult-like line of Lisa Simpson on an episode of the Simpsons, when her Aunt Patty was criticizing Homer in front of Lisa and Aunt Patty admitted she was "just trashing your father."
"I wish you wouldn't," said Lisa, "because aside from the fact that he has the same frailties of all human beings, he is my only model of manhood, and my estimation of him will govern the prospects of my adult relationships. So I hope you bear in mind that any knock at him is a knock at me, and I'm far too young to defend myself against such onslaughts."
Well said, Lisa.
Saturday, November 3, 2007
Heather Mills Finally Learns To Shut Up, But Was She Too Late?
The problem is when your strategy actually requires you to talk, to go to the press, as it sometimes does in a "Hollywood Divorce," by which term I mean a high-profile celebrity divorce, whether actually in Hollywood, or somewhere else, say in England, for example, where a certain super-famous billionaire musician happens to be getting divorced.
Sometimes you may say a little too much and shoot yourself in the foot. Saying the wrong thing can be costly.
Of course I am speaking of the case of Heather Mills and her husband Sir Paul McCartney, who is now thought to be in a better bargaining position in his divorce negotiations, both respect to financial settlement and maybe even custody issues, thanks to Heather Mill's recent TV rant in which she admitted she had been suicidal.
Heather now knows to shut up already, but is it too late? For the article today by Richard Simpson in the Daily Mail, check out this link: What have I done? Heather warned her TV rant could cost her dear in custody and cash fight
Friday, November 2, 2007
How Much Child Support Do You Pay if You Earn A Million A Month? Ask Britney Spears and Willie Gary.
The train wreck known as Britney recently lost temporary physical custody of her two kids to Kevin Federline, with whom she shared physical custody until her latest blunder. Apparently her spousal support obligation to Kevin Federline will end very soon, but not the child support obligation. In fact, if Kevin Federline ends up holding onto sole physical custody on a more permanent basis, that child support number could go up.
Meanwhile, trial lawyer Willie Gary apparently just got the bad news that his high child support order of $28,000 will continue, after an appeals court shot down a Georgia judge's recent reduction of his support from $28,000 to a mere $5000 per month. Sorry, Willie, but the $28K per month still stands, at least until you can argue your case again on remand.
LINK TO ARTICLE ABOUT WILLIE GARY on Law.com, from reporter Alyson M. Palmer, in the Fulton County Daily Report (Georgia), October 31, 2007: Lawyer Still on the Hook for $28,000 per Month in Child Support
LINK TO ARTICLE ABOUT BRITNEY SPEARS on Findlaw.com, from the Associated Press: Papers In Britney Spears' Custody Dispute Reveal Lavish Spending, No Investments
Thursday, November 1, 2007
Access to Justice Commission Proposes Role for Non-Lawyers as Advocates in Court
There are a number of good points made in the report, but I think many of the actual proposals are either not clearly articulated, or otherwise are unworkable or unwise. But read the report and decide for yourself. The full report of the Access to Justice Commission is available on the Boston Bar Association's website: http://www.bostonbar.org/prs/nr_0708/accesstojustice101607.pdf
"A statewide commission that has been examining barriers to access to justice in Massachusetts has recommended that trained non-lawyers be allowed to speak in court on behalf of low-income parties embroiled in certain civil matters — a recommendation that has ignited renewed debate over the use of lay advocates.
The 21-member commission, chaired by former Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice Herbert P. Wilkins, spent much of 2006 and this year conducting public hearings in Boston, New Bedford, Lawrence and Springfield and compiling a 47-page report for submission to the SJC.
The panel was charged by the court with suggesting ways for making legal assistance more readily available to poor people caught up in civil cases involving such issues as evictions and domestic violence. High on the panel's list of suggestions is permission for the use of non-lawyers in some court settings ....
Wilkins told Lawyers Weekly that the proposal dealing with non-lawyers is 'not talking about a general permission' for them. 'We're talking where a person is indigent, and no lawyer will take the matter.' ....
But Boston Bar Association President Anthony M. Doniger voiced reservations. 'The fundamental issue is that one of the great virtues of having lawyers do things is that lawyers are a regulated profession and there are standards they have to follow,' he said. 'As soon as you're talking non-lawyers, it's not at all clear what the quality control will be, what the training will be, who's in charge'.... "
Reported Domestic Assaults Are Up in Worcester This Year
"WORCESTER— Reports of domestic assaults in the city are up this year, an increase police officials say shows the need for a continued working partnership with a battered women's advocacy agency. Police Chief Gary J. Gemme and Ginger L. Navickas, director of the YMCA of Central Massachusetts's Daybreak program, said resources are in place to help victims of domestic violence and continue increasing awareness of the problem in the community. Crime statistics for Jan. 1 to Sept. 30 show 279 domestic aggravated assaults have been reported, which is a 24.6 percent increase over last year. There were 224 reported in 2006. The number is also 13.4 percent higher than the seven-year average.
The statistics also show simple domestic assaults increased by 20 percent so far this year, compared to last year. There have been 861 simple domestic assaults reported compared to 717 last year. This year's number is well above — or 29.5 percent — over the seven-year average of 665.... "
Note: One little correction to the Telegram article: it is of course the YWCA, not the YMCA, where the Daybreak Program is housed.


text:
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
comment on
|( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml )
|Need Help??
An alternative would be to only show unapproved nodes to logged-in users.
But aren't they a "legitimate" target market for the spammers?
The other thought that crossed my mind was a "spam" button in the Approval nodelet for anonymous posts.
Once clicked, the only place that post shows up is in the 'nodes to consider' list; where it can be restored with 'Keep' if the spam button has been abused.
The idea being to make the marking of spam a considerably simpler & quicker process than the current 4 present & cooperating monks + a downvote (== extended time when not many monks around).
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^2: Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!
by BrowserUk


text:
Historical Arms Collectors Society Membership Fees & Benefits
Annual Membership – $40 per calendar year
Lifetime Membership – $400 one time fee
Membership may be purchased at all HACS shows. Speak with Jennifer at the front desk and she will complete your membership application. Please have cash or a cheque. All our show dates are posted on this website.
Alternatively you can obtain your membership by mail; please enclose your cheque payable to HACS along with your full name, mailing address and phone number and a stamped self addressed return envelope and mail to:
HACS of BC
P.O. Box 221
Agassiz BC
Applications are processed and membership cards are mailed as soon as possible. Alternative methods of payment are NOT accepted at this time. Please do not contact us to ask otherwise. Thank you in advance!
– Free admission to all HACS sponsored shows including Annual March Show
– VIP entry at the Annual March Two Day Gun & Antique Show avoiding lineups
– Membership entitles you to rent trade tables at all of our HACS Gun Shows


text:
[Oregon Right to Life Release]
Salem, OR – 8/5/08 – House Majority Leader Dave Hunt has recently stated that under his leadership the 2009 Oregon House of Representatives will aggressively revisit their support of taxpayer funding for embryonic stem cell research.
In 2007, taxpayer funding measure HB 2801 was defeated. HB 2801 would have established a committee to oversee and issue taxpayer supported research grants to pursue stem cell research.
Gayle Atteberry, Executive Director of Oregon Right to Life said, "It's a shame that in the midst of a struggling economy, and when families have to tighten their budgets, the House Democrats want to fund research that's only proven results are false promises."
Atteberry continued, "Embryonic stem cell research is laden with scientific, ethical and moral concerns and in over 20 years has failed to produce a single human medical trial. However, adult stem cell research, which is being ignored by Hunt and others, has a history of not just clinical trials but proven treatments."
Lois Anderson, Political Director for Oregon Right to Life says, "The Democratic leader's fascination with embryonic stem cell research is completely politically driven. But voters are tired of politicians spending money on project they think will make them popular."
To harvest embryonic stem cells, researchers are required to destroy a maturing human embryo. Adult stem cells can be harvested from multiple places in a post-neonate body as well as from umbilical cord blood; the donor is not harmed or killed in the process.
According to the U.S. National Institutes of Health there are currently 2102 U.S. clinical trials on adult stem cell treatments. There's not a single embryonic stem cell treatment undergoing clinic trial.
"Many politicians have said they support embryonic stem cell research because they want to "˜help people'. If they really want to help people they will stop wasting people's tax dollars on failed research. If they really want to help people they will start supporting the research that's currently curing people. That research is adult stem cell research" said Gayle Atteberry
Additional information available at: