text:
Airport security
This house believes that changes made to airport security since 9/11 have done more harm than good.ENTER THIS DEBATE
|Opening (119 comments)
|Rebuttal (84 comments)
|Closing (37 comments)
|Latest updates
Economist Debates adapt the Oxford style of debating to an online forum. The format was made famous by the 186-year-old Oxford Union and has been practised by heads of state, prominent intellectuals and galvanising figures from across the cultural spectrum. It revolves around an assertion that is defended on one side (the "proposer") and assailed on another (the "opposition") in a contest hosted and overseen by a moderator. Each side has three chances to persuade readers: opening, rebuttal and closing.
In Economist Debates, proposer and opposition each consist of a single speaker, experts in the issue at hand. We also invite featured guests to comment on the debate, not to take sides, but to provide context and informed perspective on the subject.
Those attending an Oxford-style debate participate in two ways: by voting to determine the debate's winner and by addressing comments to the moderator. The same holds here. As a reader, you are encouraged to vote. As long as the debate is open, you may change your vote as many times as you change your mind. And you are encouraged to air your own views by sending comments to the moderator. These should be relevant to the motion, the speakers' statements or the observations of featured guests. And they must be addressed directly to the moderator, who will single out the most compelling for discussion by the speakers.HOW OXFORD STYLE DEBATES WORK
Rebuttal statements
Academics have performed some cost-benefit analyses on specific airline-security measures. The results: the security benefits of most post-9/11 security changes do not justify the costs.
Shoe removal and baggies are low-cost, immediate measures that work. Also, restrictions on liquids forced terror planners to move off into more exotic and less reliable explosive techniques.
Kip Hawley may well be feeling a bit bruised at the moment. I suspected he would have the trickier task in opposing this debate, but the antipathy many people feel towards airport security has still surprised me. After that opening round he will need a truly Lazarene response to claim victory on March 30th, though to that end, those of you who have already voted should remember that you are free to change your minds.
Mr Hawley's status as a former head of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is not helping his case. He points out in his rebuttal that this debate is not a referendum on the TSA, but with a lot of commenters complaining about the way they have been treated by the organisation, Mr Hawley is bearing the brunt. His case is made harder by the difficulty of proving that the absence of successful terrorist attacks over the past decade is down to changes made in airport security. It's a problem of asymmetric information. As reader Edward Dong put it: "Joe Public will never know how much the new security measures helped …The only people who will truly know if these measures have prevented security breaches are the terrorist cells who gave up on their plans after examining the security measures." Or in the words of bpc1995: "It may be horribly Rumsfeldian, but the truth is the 88% signalling agreement with the question at hand don't know what they don't know. Just because it's not on the front page of the Times, or the Enquirer doesn't mean it didn't happen."
The TSA is often described as a reactive outfit that alters its security measures only after the terrorists have acted. Mr Hawley responds to such charges by describing some of the circumstances under which the TSA has deployed procedures. The liquid-bombs plot that was stopped in August 2006 did not just emerge from an intelligence void. "Liquids were already on the radar," he writes. "In fact, the TSA trained its entire workforce on liquid explosives earlier in 2006, but this particular formulation was thought by experts to be too volatile to safely transport through an airport." The liquids ban may have been a reaction, but this does not make it ipso facto a bad idea. It has had a beneficial effect, forcing would-be terrorists into more exotic and less reliable explosive techniques such as the failed underwear bomb. And now that liquid-scanning technology is being developed, the time is approaching when the ban can be ended, and not continued as yet another temporary action that ossifies into standard procedure.
Both debaters cited the absence of a successful terrorist attack since 9/11 in their opening statements. Mr Hawley said the consecutive run of days without such an incident showed that new methods were working. In his rebuttal Bruce Schneier refutes Mr Hawley's logic and says the rarity of any such attacks makes Mr Hawley's metric meaningless. He also continues his attack on the procedures adopted in airports, saying several can be bypassed, and adds that TSA methods do not take into account the essence of probability: "if you're caught with a knife or a large bottle of liquid, the TSA agent will simply take it and let you through. This means that anything less than a 100% detection rate is ineffective, because a terrorist can repeatedly try until he succeeds."
Many commenters have made it clear how much they resent the impact that security-related procedures have had on their travelling lives; some even view them as abuses of their civil liberties. My question is still this, though: while we can be annoyed at the requirements these procedures make of us, what is the harm they are doing? Those voting for the motion need to have a clear idea of this harm, even as the good the procedures achieve remains hard to define. Commenter CCC had a go at this: "Hard to quantify the harm to our constitutional rights (unreasonable search and seizure), economy (delays, time lost in security lines, perfectly good water and toiletries seized, a massive and wasteful security employment apparatus), and health (stress, and radiation?)." But to my mind, airport security still belongs to the realm of the inconvenient. To vote with the proposal, I would want to think that new security measures were putting me at greater risk than would their absence (with the accompanying shift in expenditure). What is the risk to which I am being exposed? I'd like to see Mr Schneier tackle this point in his closing statement and offer his vision of the kind of airport-security operation he believes is most fitting to the modern world.
Many thanks to all those of you who have commented so far; your perspicacity is keeping me on my toes.
Kip Hawley's first sentence makes an impressive claim. "More than 6 billion consecutive safe arrivals of airline passengers since 9/11 mean that … airport-security measures … have been ultimately successful." Actually, they mean nothing of the sort. If anything, they mean the same thing as the more than 6 billion safe consecutive arrivals that took place before 9/11: the ones that were equally safe but happened without any annoying and obtuse security measures. They mean that terrorist plots are sufficiently rare as to make this a meaningless success metric.
Examining how effective individual security measures are at achieving their stated goals is more useful, and the results are not pretty. It is still—in America and much of Europe at least, Britain gets this right—trivially easy to bypass the photo ID requirement and fly while on the no-fly list. It is still trivially easy to bring as much liquid as you want through American—again, the trick does not work in Britain—security checkpoints. Full-body scanners do not detect the plastic explosive PETN (that's what the underwear bomber used) and you can sneak metal objects through them as well. I could go on.
Even the standard item-confiscation procedures fail. If you think about it, there are two basic kinds of contraband. If you're caught with a gun or a bomb, airport security will call the police and at the very least it will completely ruin your day. So it doesn't matter that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) isn't 100% perfect at detecting those items; the risk of getting caught is enough that terrorists can't build a plot around them. However, if you're caught with a knife or a large bottle of liquid, the TSA agent will simply take it and let you through. This means that anything less than a 100% detection rate is ineffective, because a terrorist can repeatedly try until he succeeds.
These vulnerabilities are many years old, and this isn't the first time Mr Hawley has heard them from me. In 2007, when he was still running the TSA, I interviewed him extensively over e-mail. From my point of view, it was a fascinating back and forth of probing questions and evasive answers. (I'm sure he has a different recollection.) But the TSA continues the tradition of ducking and denying even today.
An even more meaningful response to any of these issues would be to perform a cost-benefit analysis. These sorts of analyses are standard, even with regard to rare risks, but the TSA (and, in fact, the whole Department of Homeland Security) has never conducted them on any of its programmes or technologies. It's incredible but true: he TSA does not analyse whether the security measures it deploys are worth deploying. In 2010, the National Academies of Science wrote a pretty damning report on this topic.
Filling in where the TSA and the DHS have left a void, academics have performed some cost-benefit analyses on specific airline-security measures. The results are pretty much what you would expect: the security benefits of most post-9/11 security changes do not justify the costs.
Examining the recent failed plots against planes shows that it's not post-9/11 security that prevents terrorism, but instead pre-9/11 security. Consider the 2009 underwear bomber. Because security screened for obvious bombs, Umar Abdulmutallab had to construct a unreliable bomb. Instead of using a timer or a plunger or a normal detonation mechanism, he had to resort to an ad-hoc and much more inefficient system involving a syringe, 20 minutes in the lavatory and setting his pants on fire. Not only did the bomb fail to explode, but his actions were so obvious that the other passengers noticed what was going on and subdued him. The shoe bomber, Richard Reid, was foiled in the same way.
Consider also the arrest of the liquid bombers in 2006. Again, it wasn't airport security that caught them; it was intelligence and investigation. It wouldn't have mattered if they had been using liquids or solids or gases. It wouldn't even have mattered if they had been targeting airports or shopping malls or crowded movie theatres. And it's a good thing, too; their plot was specifically designed to bypass airport security.
This latter success speaks to what I think should be done, and Mr Hawley even hints at it: "An enemy like al-Qaeda incurs trivial cost by changing attack methods to get around regulation-based security, but defensive forces have to spend disproportionately large amounts of money and effort to close off increasing numbers of new types of attack." Unfortunately he doesn't follow that line of reasoning to its logical conclusion, that our focus on planes is itself a costly waste of our security dollars. As I said in my opening remarks: "Airport security is the last line of defence, and it is not a very good one." Investing in investigation, intelligence and emergency response will keep us far safer for much less.
These financial costs are enough to demonstrate that post-9/11 security has done more harm than good, but there's much more. I'll talk about the broader social harms of these ineffective security measures in the final instalment of this debate.
Abdulrahman Hilal Hussein ("AHH"), a sandy-haired man born on January 15th 1983 in Mödling, Austria, stalked commercial airline targets from 2005 to 2009. He rose through the ranks of al-Qaeda to become one of its top operational planners. AHH was technically gifted, spoke several languages with pitch-perfect street vocabulary, and in Pakistan camps trained dozens of western European and North American operatives who looked like main-street Westerners and were unknown to counter-terrorism authorities. AHH and other colleagues around the world tracked Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and other security measures, probing for ways to blow up commercial airliners.
Due to extraordinary teamwork among intelligence and law-enforcement services in several countries, AHH's plots and the dozens of others that sprang from his training camps were stopped. After al-Qaeda discovered a way to make extremely powerful liquid explosives that were undetectable to Western scanners, a team orchestrated by a Briton, Rashid Rauf, prepared to launch the 2006 attacks on more than a dozen flights from Britain to America and Canada. Al-Qaeda worked for years to come up with this explosive mixture to evade Western security measures. Up to that point, the shoe bomb had been developed as the most effective way to beat Western security. But that class of device was made ineffective by the low-tech, albeit irritating, security measure of checking shoes under X-rays.
After British security authorities arrested the cell members on the night of August 9th 2006, a team of scientists and security officials from America and the EU worked around the clock to understand the power of this new explosive. (Liquids were already on the radar. In fact, the TSA had trained its entire workforce on liquid explosives earlier in 2006, but this particular formulation was thought by experts to be too volatile to safely transport through an airport.) Within six weeks, American, Canadian and EU security authorities agreed on new measures that would allow common liquids on board but would stop a bomb that could destroy a plane. By year-end the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) adopted similar measures and al-Qaeda's prize liquid H2O2 bombs were negated. The plastic baggie may be epically unpopular, but since 2006 it has bought precious time for intelligence and law-enforcement agencies to disrupt al-Qaeda cells.
The baggie is a good example of the risk management I described in the opening of this debate. The single greatest threat to aviation was hydrogen-peroxide-based liquid explosives smuggled on board planes. Al-Qaeda's liquid H2O2 bombs were in the sweet spot, being compact, powerful and hard to detect, and we knew that terrorists intended to use them. Looking backwards at old plots is easy to ridicule, but what if you know that they are coming at you again with a refined version of an old weapon, and you can't stop them without some very unpopular measures? Shoe removal and baggies are low-cost, immediate measures that work. Also unappreciated is the fact that restrictions on liquids forced terror planners to move off into more exotic and less reliable explosive techniques such as the failed underwear bomb. The baggie did its job and bought us the time to deploy scanners that could find a wide array of novel solid, liquid and powder-based threats. However, more efficient measures are now in place so the baggie should be retired, not continued as yet another temporary action that ossifies into standard procedure.
There have and continue to be serious threats to aviation (and many other targets). TSA operations are required to stop the attacks in progress, for instance at checkpoints or with air marshals, but they also work with others throughout the American government and around the world to get ahead of future plots. "Airport security" is much more than the TSA and checkpoints; it has to be a connected network that links global intelligence, law enforcement, military and private-sector counter-terrorism resources.
I respect the deeply felt negative comments from readers about security since 9/11 and the TSA in particular. My comment about 6 billion safe landings drew out some vivid analogies and pointedly noted the difference between correlation and causality. Having lived it for almost four years, the dangers and close calls of plots against aviation loom so large for me that I forget that most travellers experience only the frustration of airport procedures and their foibles. I am, though, asserting that the post-9/11 security actions of the counter-terrorism community (intelligence, law-enforcement, military and private-sector players in many countries, including the TSA) have enabled attacks to be stopped.
The question here is not a referendum on the TSA; it declares that more harm than good has been inflicted by security measures since 9/11. Please consider that we have all been on flying targets for a decade and security measures, including but not limited to airport-security operations, have prevented literally thousands of deaths and the follow-on destructive effects on our economies and society.
A senior intelligence official once told me that AHH was one of a hundred guys like him. They are not done yet. However you decide to vote here, I respectfully suggest that at some point we need to come together and find a common way forward.
Featured guest: Olivier Jankovec
Comments from the floor
carl65 wrote:
Dear Sir,
I find it offensive to my countrys' national sovereignty that we are being required to submit to security screenings imposed by the United States of America. Neither Australia (my nation of citizenship) nor New Zealand (where I live) have ever had an air transport security problem, but we have to live with inane American rubbish every time we fly, even in the most remote areas.f
The government and people of the United States are welcome to have as intrusive searches as they like within their own territory, but please allow the rest of the world to live our lives in peace.
Neteye wrote:
Dear Sir,
Any terrorist, not even clutching ticket in hand, can walk into any crowded concourse of any airport with a suitcase, set off the bomb it contains and cause as many deaths and cause as much disruption as if he had set it off on a plane.
I used to just love it going through US Customs and Immigration when, after inspecting my passport, I was told: 'Welcome to America. Have a nice stay.' Today, whether entering or leaving the US of A, no such greeting. Instead, I often get surly if not actually rude treatment or the exercise of petty authority.
The terrorists have hurt America by bringing this about or, more accurately, America has hurt itself with costly, time-consuming measures and taking things too far with such requirements as taking off one's shoes. Point to the terrorists.
drf5n wrote:
Dear Sir,
Please let me extend my post a bit longer.
TSA's budget of 8B$/year, combined with the extra hour for screening that TSA recommends for the 2,000,000 passengers per day is far more than an insignificant inconvenience. On the benefit side, the best result that TSA could hope for is to divert the potential terrorist attacks into more vulnerable areas like the screening area itself, as happens in domains where they have real terrorists. A true fanatical terrorist isn't going to rethink his life's goals based on low cost measures like shoe removal and baggies. If fixated on airlines, he'll divert and do something similarly damaging but less protected like trigger a wheely-bag-claymore in the crowded screening line or bag claim.
Another important issue on assessing the benefit side of TSA is that armoring the cockpit doors and discarding the cooperate-with-hijackers policy has limited the risk of use a commercial airplane as guided missile. 9/11 was already in "never again" territory pre-TSA, so TSA cannot claim its actions prevent outcomes like 9/11.
Minor inconveniences multiplied by 2,000,000 people per day are significant, much more significant than any benefit TSA can creditably wave its hands towards.
Temjeito wrote:
Dear Sir,
I am perplexed by the remarks of Mr. Jankovec, who purports to oppose the motion even as he argues persuasively in support of it, providing a factual basis for the enormous additional cost of the "reactive regulation" he concedes is deeply and fundamentally flawed.
The sole basis for his "opposition" appears to be a misunderstanding of the motion itself, which Mr. Jankovec appears to understand as an indictment of airport security, full stop. Even if, as Mr. Jankovec hypothesizes, people would choose to fly with the current measures in place rather than fly with no security whatsoever, this does not mean that the same people would not choose to fly (and be better off with) with fewer, cheaper, and more effective security procedures in place.
I believe Mr. Scheier has persuasively established that the post-9/11 measures do not enhance security enough to justify their enormous cost.
Esprit in Vancouver wrote:
Dear Sir,
My concern is that of the focus of checking shoes and other items in carry on baggage can easily distract the security person from spending some time watching a person's face and body language. The Israelis have focused on
these more intuitive aspects of security and they would be a country we might want to emulate security measures from. The almost terrorist going by ferry in his car from British Columbia to Port
Angeles was caught because of the border guard's intuitive sense that he was hiding something in his car and he was, enough bombs to blow up the L.A. airport. Nancy Oberdorf, Vancouver, Canada
Travel Fan wrote:
Dear Sir,
I think that Mr. Hawley's rebuttal statement that this is not a referendum on the TSA, paragraph 23, shows one of the main reasons for this motion polling so high in the Yes'. The belligerent, rude, and surly behaviors of the TSA are indicative of officers who are more interested in their own power than in working with passengers to stop terrorists. Ask any good policeman how important it is for them to have a good relationship with their community and why this helps to reduce crime. Over 6 billion landings with no terrorist attacks shows that the overwhelmingly vast majority of travelers want the same level of security and protection that the TSA wants. Its time that they paid more attention to their community and worked with us to make flying a secure and enjoyable experience.
Calvin T Velander wrote:
Dear Sir,
I never remove my belt when traveling. Why? I simply tell the vapid TSA drones that it's the new generation of tactical pants, the belt is integrated.
I have an external hard drive velcroed to the top of my laptop. When asked, I tell the vapid TSA drones it's a new design, part of the laptop and doesn't come off.
I carry a Nook. It is basically a small computer, yet I never remove it and am never asked about it.
I never put my liquids in a baggie and thus, never have a baggie to put on the Xray. Yet, the liquids always go through, unquestioned and uninspected.
TSA, from its inception has been nothing more than security theater. 65,000 rather stupid, unionized, abusive former fry daddies, serving no useful purpose, other than to suck off the federal teat and revel in their pathetic power trips. Despite their best efforts to make themselves appear so, they are not "officers," they are nothing more than screeners. They have no law enforcement authority or training.
United Flight 93 taught the world one very important lesson. Passengers will no longer sit idly by. This position has been reinforced as evidenced by the subduing of Richard Reid and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
It is long beyond the time to disband TSA, take a more logical, sensible and effective approach to airport/air travel security and spend the billions of dollars more logically and judiciously.
Calvin T Velander wrote:
Dear Sir,
Mr. Schneier succinctly points out why there is little need for TSA's Security Theater in his opening remarks. "Reinforcing the cockpit door, and convincing passengers that they need to fight back.
drf5n wrote:
Dear Sir,
Kip Hawley's example of the zip-lock as a good example of risk management (Para 20) that works is defeated by Brice Schenier's explanation of the weak follow up procedures used by TSA.
If a potential terrorist does happen to put 4 ounces of explosive into a container in a magic baggie, (that's 40% more than the underwear bomber used), TSA will pass the bag without even opening the bag. If it fits in the bag, TSA has determined that doesn't even require any testing.
The next Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab doesn't need special underwear, he would just need to tuck his magic baggie into his shorts.
Since TSA lets folks avoid the liquid testing is they'd rather toss the bottle in the trash, the only terrorists they will catch is if the idiot terrorist is adamant about having a larger bottle of liquid explosives inspected. If forced, TSA will do the testing and ruin his day. Since TSA does not catch 100% of bottles of liquid in carry-ons, which I know for certain from personal experience,
Kip's Paragraph 20 is also self defeating: "However, more efficient measures are now in place so the baggie should be retired, not continued as yet another temporary action that ossifies into standard procedure." -- Why is TSA still using an inefficient, temporary action that effectively short circuits the other detection procedures? TSA touts their multi-layered security model as a method for backstopping the defects of its different layers, but as the baggie example demonstrates, the multiple layers are more like multiple links in a chain: the baggie rule's "if it fits, it flies" is a way to completely avoid liquid testing and underwear smuggling.
I do think TSA has done more harm than good. 8B$ a year and 2,000,000 person-hours-per-day are wasted resource that would be better spend doing something that would actually save lives, like repainting the stripes and signs on our roads that kill 40,000 people per year; or providing first-aid training to school age children to save some of the 325,000 heart attack deaths per year. If some alternative to TSA saves just one plane's worth of lives, wouldn't it be as least as worthwhile as TSA?
Popsmoke wrote:
Correction.. Make that Issa's Committee... I had Mica on my mind...
Popsmoke wrote:
Yesterdays removal of Bruce Schneier from the hearing on TSA Oversight Part III: Effective Security or Security Theater? ... Was totally bio solids by the committee...
Mica's committee should be ashamed of itself. The excuse that Schneier is part of a lawsuit against TSA as reasoning for his removal is happy horse-hockey. The squashing of opposition speech is never a good thing. We had enough of that during the 911 Commission Investigations.
Shame on you Mica!
jingBrit wrote:
Dear Sir,
Given how extremely difficult (to the point of basically impossible) it is to measure both the costs of a successful terrorist attack and the cost of enhanced security, it seems to me that the debate is pretty futile.
A more pertinent question is whether the constraints within which airport security is carried out are sufficient or not.
At the moment it seems as if the mandate to foil terrorist plots includes "at all costs." Perhaps not financially, but certainly in terms of the infringement on people's personal liberty and dignity.
Here's a poignant example: a friend, a 70 year old woman, was pulled over at security in a London airport. It was unclear what triggered the suspicion, but this lady was taken to a room and stripped searched. The humiliation was exacerbated by the fact that she had a stoma bag.
To me, this case - I'm sure one of of many out there - demonstrates that there are not enough constraints on how airport security is conducted, regardless of the ultimate cost of a successful terrorist attack.
MobiusHistory wrote:
Dear Sir,
In response to:
a previous commenter
"From the years 1992-2001 there were 22 hijackings. An average of 2.2 hijackings per year.
Since 9/11 there have been 9 hijackings.
The number of hijackings a year have decreased by almost 60% despite the number of flights per year increasing by almost 70%.
It is clear simply by looking at that statistic that heightened security at airports has improved the safety of our planes.
This argument makes an unwarranted logical leap. The real reason hijackings have decreased so dramatically is that they simply don't work any more, regardless of the TSA. The passengers are no longer going to behave and expect to live. The plane is no longer going to land where the hijacker wants it go. If you're a hijacker, the cockpit door is armored, and the passengers are getting ready to make a rush for you. It used to be a hijacker could expect to make it out alive and possibly even end up in his desired destination. Those assumptions are gone. Now only the thoroughly suicidal, with no destination at all, would attempt a hijack.
This does a lot more to explain the decrease in hijackings than body scanners and ziplock bags.
LACERNman wrote:
Dear Sir,
The deadly trio, Cheney, Rumfeld & Bush invented the war on terror, either from scratch or by seizing it and making it theirs. War on terror equals people-control and this is what I object to: I would not mind if it were true that being manhandled and insulted by poorly trained TSA officials did something positive towards my continued wellbeing. But it does not: the erosion of my civil rights that such "security" regime entails has made me more unsafe. This is because in this type of regime, abuses by the state can only get worse: the behaviour of Obama is a case in point: the champion of the people, he was to undo all the terror unleashed by the Bush gang. In fact Obama has behaved just like Bush, imprisoning whistleblowers, journalists and the like for telling the truth and killing even US citizens with the CIA drones. Some of the legislation recently signed by Obama would mark me as a dangerous individual just because my views are different. I can tolerate bad government but cannot tolerate oppression. Of course I stopped transiting though the USA after all this security buffoonery started simply because TSA were stealing sistematically from my suitcases everytime I transited through Miami to Panama. And they were good too,taking all articles of value and leaving the common items. I was never able to obtain a refund from TSA or even a reply, although when I talked to individual TSA supervisors at Miami, they aknowledged the problem. I do not know if it still exists. Security officers outside USA are more viable, perhaps because they are better trained or recruited with higher cognitive abilities. But the suspicion and mistrust and fear, thereby unleashed, is creating a litterally explosive world which can only culminate in WWIII. Our Western governments ought to engage in massive bridge building to repair relations between Muslims and the rest of the world. For a start, legislation should be passed calling it illegal to use/merge the words Muslim and Terror in the same sentence, much the same way, in some European countries, it is punishable to merely doubt the occurrence of the WWII holocaust.
MobiusHistory wrote:
Dear Sir,
Addressing the moderators position:"But to my mind, airport security still belongs to the realm of the inconvenient. To vote with the proposal, I would want to think that new security measures were putting me at greater risk than would their absence (with the accompanying shift in expenditure)."
To me the shift in expenditure is the true crux of the debate. It doesn't matter if it's convenient or not until it's been shown to be an effective way to spend money. Where would you spend an extra 5 Billion Dollars per year to make people more safe?
The death toll on 9/11 is estimated at 6000. Just as one example, every year on our roads, by number of deaths, we have five and half 9/11's. Every year. 33,000 traffic deaths. (Oddly, nobody has declared a War on Driving).
Except the TSA isn't really preventing another 9/11. The combination of non-compliant passengers and an armored cockpit door does most of that job. If we armed our pilots, that would really put a death nail in terrorists gaining access to flight controls.
So what we're really spending 5 billion dollars on every year is to prevent an airliner from blowing up on the tarmac or in the sky. A couple hundred tragic deaths for sure. But not 6000. And certainly not the 33,000 that die every year on our roads. I use roads as an example because driving is something we do every day at relatively high risk.
The question to me is, given 5 Billion Dollars annually (since that is how much "extra" we are spending since 9/11), how many deaths could we prevent per year?
How would you spend 5 Billion?
I voted yes to the motion because of the thousands of deaths we've failed to prevent by failing to spend this money in a more sane manner.
Ingenous wrote:
Dear Sir,
AS the technologies were developing and more sophisticated weapons developed ,and getting used by different terrorist groups , it is need to beef up the security system and security personals accordingly on the regular basis so no such incident like 9/11 , Ic 814 ,can happen in near future . security at airport doesn't make any harm for to any one ,because it not just for the one getting in flight but it is also threat to national/international security . Yes i know that people annoyed by such security check up but is is need of the hour .
rjnerd wrote:
Dear Sir,
I am reminded of the Maginot line, when the time came, the invading army simply went around it.
Today I dropped my SO off for a trip to DC. I saw an increased risk that the TSA's security theater created. Behind the check-in counters, was the result of a just completed year-long remodel of the terminal (Boston Logan terminal C). There it was, at least an acre of tension tape, a huge zig-zag field of waiting targets, oops, passengers.
Room for well over 1,000 people and their carry-on's. A potential yield far more appealing than a single aircraft's 1-300 souls. Just add a few standard issue suicide vest equipped zealots.
No need to worry about trying to get a likely unreliable explosive device getting thru screning, the target is on the non-sterile side. And while there is value on the mystery of a plane just disappearing from the sky, just imagine how much better the TV coverage will be, when it happens in a place conveniently located near a major city.
jangar wrote:
Dear Sir,
I do find it reasonable that I am not allowed to bring a machete onto an airplane. But why am I not allowed to bring shaving foam or plain water? That's just plain silly!
Cogito Ergo wrote:
Dear Sir,
It was the laziness, indifference, ineptitude, and incompetence of the Bush administration for failing to act on intelligence about 9/11 that has brought this situation upon us. Now the same buffoonery has led us into believing that continuing erosion of our civil liberties is permissible in order to make us safe. Soon our society will be comprised of the watchers and the watched, our own Stasi masquerading under the TSA and Homeland Security brands of the modern police state.
jfunk138 wrote:
Dear Sir,
Many of the comment posters that indicate a "no" vote are making a pretty steep assumption in arriving at their conclusion. The assumption they are making is that we would have experienced "at least one more successful terrorist attack" than the zero we experienced in the last decade. I don't believe there is any logical basis for this argument. Supposing the pre-9/11 security measures were in place just what object would these potential terrorists have brought on board to successfully carryout this attack? And what post 9/11 security innovation do you think would have stopped them? Recent news has made it abundantly clear that the body scanners are not even effective in finding the object they claim to protect against: "underwear bombs."
Second, supposing they did successfully use one of these devices, how many lifes would they have to take to equal the lifetime cost of the delays we've been forced to endure? Assuming 800 million passengers have to arrive at the airport 1 hour earlier under the new regime per year. This is equivalent to 1217 x 75 year lifetimes. That is SIX successful 200 passenger jet bombings per year in the US. They would run out of terrorists long before they would catch up to the number of people "killed" by TSA's delays.


text:
Movie News
You can watch Drafthouse Films' hilarious raunchy comedy Klown right now on your computer! Legally!
Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. I mentioned in the Before the Mask Robert Englund casting story I just posted that we life in a fascinating time of movie fandom. In that case it was the opportunity for a genre filmmaker with a known, if niche, franchise to pre-sell another entry in that franchise to the fans by offering an advance purchase of the DVD/Blu-Ray. With this story, about the next step in VOD distribution, we talk a little about a raunchy foreign flick called Klown.
Klown was a Fantastic Fest entry last year, way before Drafthouse Films picked it up, and I loved it. Those crazy Danish bastards cross lines that would cause heart attacks during the MPAA screening if it were made here. Two middle-aged guys on a graphic sexual vacation would be enough, but add in a kid witnessing their escapades on this "tour de pussy" and that's an immediate half-dozen faints in that screening.
At it's heart Klown's a sweet movie about a man accepting responsibility and proving himself a true father figure to his pregnant wife… it just has a lot of penises, boobies and wildly inappropriate humor on the way to that character shift.
It's one of my favorite things Drafthouse Films has picked up, so I'd be happy to sing its praises even if they weren't undergoing a rather fascinating experiment.
Usually Video on Demand (VOD) releases are hard to cover. It's not as easy as pointing to a specific link and saying "Go here!" I honestly don't watch hardly any VOD releases not because I'm cheap (while I do see many films for free at press screenings, I pay for a whole lot of regular screenings too), but because I can never find the damn things and I get frustrated and just end up waiting for DVD or Netflix.
Drafthouse Films is releasing Klown in theaters, on VOD and now in a streaming option via a new service called Distrify. No more searching for VOD content. You can plop down $6.99 and watch this brand new film right on your pretty Mac/PC screen (or send it to your even prettier TV if you have that amazing technology!).
To me, this seems like the logical next step for Day and Date VOD releases. With so much film viewing now done via streaming means like Netflix it just makes sense.
Technology aside, the movie's great. You can watch it now and be the smart-ass hipster in your group who saw the original by the time the Todd Phillips produced Danny McBride starring American remake!
Whatever you do, don't watch this at work, around your in-laws or in close proximity to that slightly restrained and conservative girl you've had a crush on for the last 3 years. If you can stay clear of those scenarios, then you're good to go.
Before you watch, here's an exclusive video interview with the stars of the film conducted by Alamo grand master Tim League himself! There's not as much exposed genetalia as the film, but it's a good primer nonetheless.
You can see this movie at all Alamo Drafthouses in Austin or at locations in LA (Cinefamily) and New York (The Village East) this weekend, at cinemas in San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Chicago and many more (click here for the full list) next weekend or you can just click on the embed below and check it out right now! The future is now!
-Eric Vespe
Follow Me On Twitter
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
+ Expand All
July 28, 2012, 5:14 a.m. CST
by Sir Pirvan
Awesome movie!! :D
July 28, 2012, 6:09 a.m. CST
I'm the Pee Wee Herman of Copenhagen. Starting out with a TV-show. Ending up masturbating in a movie theatre.
by Rasmus Starup Petersen
Those crazy Danes!
July 28, 2012, 8:59 a.m. CST
It would be nice if Netflix had a ppv system...
by maxjohnson1971
Just set up a different section on the website for the ppv or VOD stuff and tack the extra charge onto your bill. That'd make this sort of thing VERY easy.
July 28, 2012, 11:55 a.m. CST
I always thought VOD was easier than going to the theater or the store.
by Stereotypical Evil Archer
Not sure how Quint has a disconnect on VOD, Harry needs to pay the guy a real salary so that Quint can spend those few extra dollars. Quint's cheapness is related directly to his small paycheck. He loves his job, but Quint's gotta eat.
July 28, 2012, 12:34 p.m. CST
I live in LA, so my favorite theater in town is showing it.
by Ian Masterson
Looking forward to it.
July 28, 2012, 4:17 p.m. CST
I've had VOD for over 20 years now...
by jazzdownunder
First I had VHS, then laserdisc then DVD then bluray.. all sitting on my shelves ready to go whenever I wanted, delivering the best possible picture and sound quality for the technology of the day, no download/buffering issues and no worries about "data cap". All for one, convenient, up front payment per title for unlimited viewings... on demand. Yes, I had to pay to upgrade my favourite titles over the years as technology improved but with most titles getting many, many re-watches that still puts me way ahead of paying every damned time I want to watch one title even just once. And of course I was able to lend movies to friends, to introduce them to greatness that had somehow passed them by. Streaming / VOD... it's not about any benefit for the consumer, it's all about the content providers getting a stranglehold on your wallet. Anyone that tells you otherwise is selling something.
July 28, 2012, 4:33 p.m. CST
by wormcheck
I too live in LA...what theater are you talking about? :
July 28, 2012, 4:34 p.m. CST
Knew the film had to be Danish
by wormcheck
just by looking at the poster
July 28, 2012, 6:51 p.m. CST
You can also torrent it for free
by Redhead_Redemption
Not condoning it but it's a fact that these VOD premieres usually end up being available for free within hours Not sure if the studios can ever really prevent that but the music industry still makes billions so i don't think the movie industry is too concerned about it's profit loss. It seems to be just a few producers that get their panties in a bunch over torrents, and they usually come across as greedy millionaires when they cause a fuss It;s good to see Hollywood embracing VOD and online distribution, nothing will replace going to the theater but releasing a movie online shorty after its theatrical release can be a good source of income from those of us that don't always want to go out on a cold night to see a movie
July 28, 2012, 8:05 p.m. CST
If conservatives are so uptight in the workplace...
by Immortal_Fish
...then why are all the sexual harassment cases initiated by liberals?
July 28, 2012, 9:01 p.m. CST
wormcheck, i'm talking about the Cinefamily on Fairfax.
by Ian Masterson
July 28, 2012, 9:57 p.m. CST
Sorry to be that guy, but....
by Nichole
This movie looks like garbage. Don't quite get, what is so funny or brilliant about it. I mean, I'll watch it, but.... Think I will go see the Dark Knight Rises Again. What am I missing here.
July 28, 2012, 10:10 p.m. CST
by solvseus
Far be it from me to claim libs don't sexually harass, they do. But just off the top of my head, Herman Cain? There are more that came up after a quick Google search. It ain't pretty. To say nothing of the strippers and prostitutes who love it when the GOP comes to town. Overwhelming more than the Dems apparently. Difference being that most on the left don't talk about "family values" as much. Not seeing what this has to do with this movie though.
July 29, 2012, 1:28 a.m. CST
Free? But what about all those crewmen who will lose their jobs if I watch the film for free?
by Xen11
I may as well steal a car. Or kill myself. Or kill an old granny for her purse. And then kill myself.
July 29, 2012, 9:22 a.m. CST
Um. Ok. I guess. Maybe steal a car and run over your own head.
by UltraTron
July 29, 2012, 11:33 a.m. CST
by Uncle Charley
I got the joke. It was ALMOST as funny as the anti-piracy ads themselves.
July 29, 2012, 6:19 p.m. CST
Jesus F. Christ people, "conservative" doesn't just mean a political alignment
by Adelai Niska
it means someone who is traditional, preserves past conditions and resists change. A conservative person in your workplace would mean a person who thinks work is for work and not for watching movies. A capital C Conservative in your workplace is a person supporting a Conservative political party. Got it, meatheads?
July 30, 2012, 1:54 a.m. CST
Just saw it, loved it.
by Ian Masterson
Surprised at how much heart it showed towards the end. Dark, unsettling heart... but heart none the less.
July 30, 2012, 11:30 a.m. CST
It's a spin off film from a comedy TV series with that same name
by Ricardo
I've seen a couple of episodes from the TV series subtitled in english, it's pretty funny, in a european sort of way. It's like, a raunchy Curb your Enthusiasm filmed by a Dogma 95 director.
July 31, 2012, 1:54 p.m. CST
Dude, wash your underwear!
by SergeantStedenko
Especially if you're gonna walk around in it.
Aug. 1, 2012, 11:36 a.m. CST
adelai niska
by shiekybaby
I couldnt have said it better myself. Leave it to fucking Conservatives to not know what conservative actually means. Dumb shits.
Top Talkbacks
- HERCULES ON THE RADIO!! Learn What Ain't It Cool's TV Critic Thinks Of Tomorrow's THE STRAIN, The Next HOMELAND, Fox's GOTHAM, Showtime's THE AFFAIR, ABC's FOREVER, CBS' SCORPION & MADAM SECRETARY, Scott Frank's A WALK AMONG THE TOMBSTONES And The Latest MARVEL, DC & SNL News!! Plus The Return Of Horrorella!! Listen And Call In LIVE Saturday 10pm PT / Sunday 1am ET!! -- 41 total posts 41 posts
- After writing Gareth Edwards' STAR WARS flick, Gary Whitta will move on to Mark Millar's STARLIGHT! -- 190 total posts 34 posts
- DOCTOR WHO S08E05 'Time Heist' Reader Reaction Begins Now!! + HornOrSilk's 'Domain Of The Voord' Big Finish Audio Review, Synopses For Upcoming S8 Eps, And More!! UPDATE RE: UPCOMING UK TIME CHANGE!! -- 167 total posts 30 posts
- The GODZILLA Sequel Has A Writer!! -- 219 total posts 26 posts
- Capone says Kevin Smith's wonderfully grotesque TUSK falters when it tries too hard to be funny!!! -- 67 total posts 26 posts
- Papa Vinyard talks with Rose McGowan about her first project as a director and the DAWN Film Festival she's curating this week in downtown Los Angeles! -- 36 total posts 25 posts
- CBS, The Only Network Without A Superhero Show, Just Ordered To Series Berlanti's SUPERGIRL!! -- 68 total posts 22 posts
- Harry @ Fantastic Fest 2014: TUSK, REALITI, CUB, TALE OF PRINCESS KAGUYA, HIVE, MAN FROM RENO & FREE FALL! -- 15 total posts 14 posts
- Capone's Art-House Round-Up with THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ELEANOR RIGBY: THEM and Terry Gilliam's THE ZERO THEOREM!!! -- 26 total posts 12 posts
- The Additions of Sam Elliott and DEADWOOD's Garret Dillahunt Suggest That The Final Season Of JUSTIFIED Will Own Us All!! -- 31 total posts 12 posts

subset: commoncrawl


text:
DIY Primitive Crafts
I love love love to make things. I guess it is the one talent that God give me! lol I love going to yard sales and buying something that is junk to someone else and taking it home and making something out of it. I love taking scrap pieces of wood and making something or building something. I build cabinets, make old wooden signs, teastain fabric, and whatever else I can get my hands on. One of my favorite things to do.
Related Boards
Primitive Bathroom Cabinet Towel Rack / Toilet Paper Storage / Original Design / Color Choice. $45.00, via Etsy.
Homestead Decor: DIY Chicken Wire Frame
Chimney Cupboard
my new faux pies for your prim kitchen just spray with cinn refresher spray to keep the scent and your prim kitchen smellin great 11.95 ea
Country prim shutters with cutout Stars...homespun handmade primitive pillows with crows & stars.
always seeing these square sets at garage sales and antique stores, need to start buying them to makeover
Shabby Love: Rustic Tree Topper Tutorial
Furniture Archives - American Heritage Shop
DIY Picture Frame
New for 2013 Washstand Pattern - www.woodennail.com
Primitive Kitchen Island...can be made with vintage windows or chicken wire if you have little ones:) $150.00...SOLD... but can take orders:)


text:
Nice round booty stretched and fucked
Devong gets her sexy pussy and mouth fucked
Jessica's petite latina pussy gapes
Pussy stretching in the bathroom with cumshot
Ass pussy butt
Petite ass fucked honey
Medical porn with pussy stretching!
Big round ass gets oiled and fucked
Big ass ebony gets hardcore fucked
Young petite girl on hot anal fucking movie
Bbw got her pussy and butthole fucked
Sweet teen gets her pussy licked and fucked.
Ass fingered and than fucked hard
Ass to mouth threesome fuck
Petite teenie wakes up and fucks
Big ass slut hot anal fuck
Petite redhead pussy pounding
Cindy sterling toys pussy before hardcore fuck
Asian toys her pussy before he fucks her
Brunette babe gets her sweet pussy stretched
Hot teen pussy gets erotic fuck
Ebony hottie royce pussy stretching
Cute asian slut opens hairy pussy for hard fuck
Guy puts his entire face inside big ass pussy
Pink pussy stretching
Fisting and pussy stretching
Pussy whipping and fucking
Babysitter's pussy stretched by a huge cock
Soothing ass wax turned outdoor fuck
Summer daniels's ass gets stretched
Skinny blonde's pussy stretched
Raw ass rimming hard bareback fucking
Petite asian teen lily thai fucks peter north
Round ass ebony ghetto babe fucked
Tatooed babe's pussy stretching
Pussy pumping princess fucked
Yummy brunette opens ass hole for hardcore fuck
Lewd busty latina hardcore pussy stretching sex
Girl gets pussy fingered and fucked
Ass finger and tongue fucked
Ass finger and tongue fucked, blonde babe
Big ass blonde hardcore pov fuck
This big round ass is gonna get fucked
Pierced pussy brunette anal fucked
Skinny slut does some dirty pussy stretching
Naughty pussy teasing brunette fucked hard
Gleesome threesome: pussy and anal fuck
Blonde slut dirty pussy stretching closeups
Asian with trimmed pussy sucking and fucking
Big ass cindy hope gets fucked
Whorrific babe gets her pussy eaten and fucked
Fat ass marley mason interracial fuck
Horny blonde amateur toys pussy and gets fucked
Wet pussy licked and fucked
Smoking hot nurse pussy stretching closeups
Ebony hottie royce pussy stretching
Petite teen with braces gets fucked
Pierced pussy stretched open
Rikki gets pussy stretched
Juicy pussy stretching
Wifey toys pussy and gets fucked
Riley has her tight pussy stretched
More "Petite Ass Pussy Stretched The Fuck Out Kyd" movies on our friendly site Nude Vista
More "Petite Ass Pussy Stretched The Fuck Out Kyd" movies on our friendly site Porn MD
Stretching Out Her Pussy With A Big Dick


text:
People who are really interested in music intimidate me.
Like when someone has really specific tastes in music based on SOUND QUALITY and TONE and COMPOSITION it's kinda scary, like how people say stuff like Death Grips is incredible but I listen to it and it's just scary yelling and noise to me or Neutral Milk Hotel and I think the guy just sounds weird and whiny
I just hear a song and I like it or don't like it, I dunno anything else, so I guess I should just stick to Huey Lewis and The Beatles and Midnight Brown and game OSTs.
- fokkd20s said: You probably have quite specific tastes in music as well. You just don't know the terminology. You seem to like GOOD SINGING and POP ROCK BEATS.
- quidditchcapricious likes this
- networkandsharingcenter likes this
- emperordweeb likes this
- dayruiner likes this
- servbot42 posted this


text:
WordPress Analysis and Tune-Up
This $129 service includes:
- Backing up the WordPress installation after installing the required back-up plugin if it is missing
- Checking for out of date WordPress installations and upgrading to the newest release
- Updating any out of date plugins including inactive ones
- Installing any plugins missing that are included in my prescribed list – these include SEO plugins, data backup plugins, visitor interaction plugins, etc. 8 in total.
- An SEO evaluation and analysis of the entire site content including the background coding
- An SEO performance test based on the keywords scoring highest in the above evaluation
- Identification of competitors in these keyword results
- A summary explanation of the findings
The findings will be provided in a PDF attachment to an email once they are completed. This effort requires generally 4 hours to complete and most days we can get started within just a few hours if not immediately.
Through December 31, 2011 I will also include 2 SEO rich articles based around two key phrases of your choice. These will be between 250 and 500 words. You may use them anywhere you wish not just on the WP being examined. I will email them to you so you may post them at your desired time, reword them or whatever you wish. They will be your articles.
Also through December 31, 2011
The entire above for only $69


text:
|New Videos - Best Videos - Hot! - Hits - Tags - Porn Pics - Sex Stories - Pornstars - Adult Forum - UPLOAD
|Sex video sponsored by Freaks Of Cock (click here to download more of this porn): You have never seen a dick like this, trust us on that. When these girls get a glimpse of this dick, many of them go running scared, but the ones who choose to stick around and see how much of it they can take, end up with the biggest reward at the end - a monster sized pool cumshot thats impossible to swallow in1 gulp. This guy is 14 inches strong!
|pinto gigante putaria virtual
Length: 5 min - Viewed: XXX times... - Upload date: - Tags : cumshot facial hardcore latina interracial tattoo glasses bigcock pussyfucking
|Display / write / close (0) comment(s) for this sex video.
Terms of service - Content removal - Upload Porn Videos - Tool to download flash videos - Advertising.Return to XNXX Free Porn Videos Homepage .


text:
ATV Accessories
Kolpin Scout Box 93400$59.97
Product Description
- Low-profile front or rear box
- Rotomolded construction with snap closure
- 2.5 cubic feet of accessible storage
- Dimensions: 34" l x 14" w x 9" h
Kolpin Boottector Bracket 20035$49.97
- Fits Kolpin Gun Boot® IV and Gun Boot® 6.0 cases only!
- Compact design provides more room on the ATV rack
- Lightweight and extremely durable
- Mounts to nearly all ATV racks
- Adjusts without the use of any tools
- Offers precision gun angle adjustability
- Compatible with the Kolpin Utility Gear Rail System
Kolpin Gun Boot 6.0 Impact 20025$49.97
- Features the largest interior room of all Kolpin Gun Boot® cases
- Extra room for pistol grip type weapons and small bipods
- Easily fits firearms up to 51" in total length
- Provides ample room for 60mm scopes
- Hatchback design allows easy access
- Snap close cover with locking capability
- Ergonomically designed handle and molded attachment points for a sling
- Designed to accommodate left and right hand bolt action rifles and shotguns
- Utilizes all existing Gun Boot® IV brackets (sold separately) in order to mount to your ATV or UTV
- Not compatible with our UTV specific mounts (20036 and 20129)
- Compatible with the Utility Gear Rail System (20035 or 26510 required)
- Made in the USA
Impact™ model
- Includes a removable, shock absorbing foam and nylon Impact™ liner that provides superior interior protection
Great Day Inc., Power-Pak Gun Rack, 557$51.97
Product Description
The one thing that all hunters who use ATV's have in common is the need to free their hands for driving and to transport their firearms in a safe and secure fashion. Great Day's Power-Pak Gun Rack is a no-nonsense, absolutely fail-proof, total functional, totally dependable way to get the job done!
With so many choices of accessories to add to ATV's, sometimes you can unconsciously load your machine down with bells and whistles - things that look good but are basically useless in the field.
The one way to determine if an ATV accessory is worthwhile is to consider how many times you will use it and how important it is to the things you do.
The Power-Pak includes two sets of holding cradles that absorb the shock of rough terrain. Totally protecting the two firearms and scope settings.
The Power-Pack is constructed of rock solid aircraft aluminum and includes mountaing hardware for quick and easy installation.
Product Features
- Includes: 2 Sets of Holding Cradles and Mounting Hardware
- Cradles absorb the shock of rough terrain.
- Constructed of Rock Solid Aircraft Aluminum
- Fits: Honda, Kawasaki, Polaris, Bombardier, Arctic Cat, Yamaha, and Suzuki
***This item will fit any ATV with a front or rear metal frame rack. This item will not fit a Polaris with a plastic front or rear rack. This item also will not fit if the ATV has a basket where the item is to be mountedLearn More
Kolpin 2" Swingarm Receiver Hitch For Honda Foreman 85150$59.97
- 2" Swingarm Receiver Hitches are frame mounted
- Long lasting powder coat finish for ground engaging and heavy towing capabilities
- Kolpin hitches are the heaviest duty hitches on the market!
- For off-road use only
- Fits most Honda Foreman models (twin shocks) but please review our fit list for model specifics
Kolpin 2" Swingarm Receiver Hitch For Honda Rancher 85155$59.97
- 2" Swingarm Receiver Hitches are frame mounted
- Long lasting powder coat finish for ground engaging and heavy towing capabilities
- Kolpin hitches are the heaviest duty hitches on the market!
- For off-road use only
- Fits most Honda Rancher models (single shock) but please review our fit list for model specifics
Great Day Inc. Power-Pak ATV Treestand Rack 558$57.97
Product Description
Today's hunters are learning that getting to the hunting area as silently as possible increases the odds of success tremendously. The Power-Pak Treestand Rack is designed to transport a treestand on an ATV in total silence. The Power-Pak cradles the treestand in cushioned, camo covered holding arms in a way that no part of the treestand touches metal. The Power-Pak is designed to accommodate large or small treestands equally well.
Loading and unloading the treestand can be done in seconds! The last thing a hunter on the way to or from a hunt wants is to waste 15 minutes of precious hunting time dealing with complicated gadgets. The treestand and all of its components can be set into the cushioned holding arms and secured instantly. The Power-Pak's two holding straps keep the stand quietly in place even over the roughest terrain.
The Power-Pak is framed in aircraft aluminum and weighs only 4 lbs. It is designed to fit all popular brands of ATV's and off-road vehicles that include a rear cargo rack. The Power-Pak installs quickly on any ATV with ordinary hand tools.
Product Features
- Constructed of Aircraft Aluminum Frame
- Weight: 4lbs.
- Accommodates large or small treestands.
- Contains 2 Holding Straps
- Fits: All-Terrain Vehicles - Honda Rubicon, Honda Rancher, Honda Foreman, Suzuki KingQuad, Kawasaki Brute Force, Yamaha Big Bear.
***This item will not fit on any ATV that does not have a metal rear rack (not basket) to attach to.Learn More
Great Day Inc. Power-Pak Bow Rack ATV 556$54.97
Product Description
The Power-Pak Bow Rack was designed by bow hunters to secure, protect and transport the most important piece of equipment for the hunt. the Power-Pak Bow Rack provides maximum protection for both compound or recurve bows.
The first tension-powered Bow Rack ever for an ATV, the Power-Pak mounts conveniently on the front rack...secure and ready to ride. The Power-Pak Bow Rack is constructed of an aircraft aluminum frame. The Power-Pak includes all mounting hardware and features quick release loading and removal. Also, the rack can be adjusted to fit any length or style of bow.Transport your bow with confidence and peace-of-mind! Your bow handle, the sight and all the fragile, sensitive parts of the bow are held suspended in mid-air...nothing touching them or disturbing settings...even in the toughest traveling terrain.
With the Power-Pak, you can rest assured that your bow will arrive safe and secure, ready for the hunt!
Product Features
- Used with Both Compound and Recurve Bows
- Constructed of Aircraft Aluminum Frame
- Includes All Mounting Hardware
- Features Quick Release for loading and removing
- Can be adjusted to fit any bow length
- Fits All Popular Brands and Model with Metal Frame
***This item will fit any ATV with a front or rear metal frame rack. This item will not fit a Polaris with a plastic front or rear rack. This item also will not fit if the ATV has a basket where the item is to be mounted.Learn More
Kolpin 2" Receiver Hitch for Suzuki 85180$59.97
- 2" Receiver Hitches are frame mounted
- Long lasting powder coat finish for ground engaging and heavy towing capabilities
- Kolpin hitches are the heaviest duty hitches on the market!
- For off-road use only
- Fits most Suzuki (Eiger/Vinson) ATV models with straight axle, but please review our fit list for model specifics
Kolpin Heated Grip 96155$49.97
Product Features
- Keep your hands warm during those cold winter activities - plowing, hunting, etc.
- Comfortable rubber grips
- Handlebar mounted dial switch
- Plug and Play connectors


text:
Our beloved grandfather, Poppy Sol, started this business in an open-air market. Three generations later, we're still bringing smiles to our customers' faces.
Gluten Free Brownie Mix
Certified: Gluten-Free
A deep and intense dark chocolate flavor combined with a wonderfully moist cake texture makes gluten-free brownies made from our Brownie Mix an instant favorite. A must for all chocolate lovers!
Cooking Instructions:
Additional Ingredients: * 1 package of Gluten Free Brownie Mix * 3/4 cup Melted Butter or Margarine * 1 Egg * 2 teaspoons Vanilla * 3/4 cup warm (110 degrees) Water
Preheat oven to 350. Spray 13 x 9-inch pan with cooking or baking spray. Place Gluten-Free Brownie Mix in large mixing bowl.
Beat in butter or margarine, egg, vanilla and warm water with electric mixer on medium speed until just combined.
Stir in 1/4 cup chocolate chips and/or 1/4 cup chopped walnuts or pecans (optional).
Spread batter in prepared pan and bake for 20-25 minutes or until toothpick inserted in center comes out clean. Cool brownies thoroughly. Cut and serve. Makes 16 brownies.
*You can use 1/4 cup Applesauce or blended Silken Tofu as an egg replacement.
FUDGE TOPPING 1-14 oz. can sweetened Condensed Milk, 1.5 tsp. Vanilla Extract, 12 oz. Chocolate Chips
When your brownies are nearly done, combine all topping ingredients in heavy saucepan over low heat until chocolate chips are melted. Remove from heat. Spread mixture over warm brownies. Allow brownies to cool and then cut into bars.
There are approximately 2 1/4 cups per pound.
Customer Reviews
Leave online feedback and share your thoughts with other customers!
Barbara, Lutz, Florida May 13, 2014
"Yummy, yummy & yummy! My son was diagnosed as having gluten intolerance when he was a freshman at college. I was beside myself trying to find things that I could send him to eat...it was nearly impossible. He proceeded to drop 35 pounds in 8 months! Then I found your site with ALL the gluten free flours and mixes and snacks I could possibly want...and it's AFFORDABLE! I've been able to make cakes, breads, pancakes, cinnamon rolls, even pasta using the gf biscuit mix. I even made a decent pizza dough with the bread mix. They all turned out so very tasty and I was able to get my son healthy again. He just graduated Suma Cum Laude and is a healthy 170 at 6' tall!
Thank you all and please....keep making your goodies!"
Patty, Campbelltown, PA March 12, 2014
"Incredibly fast shipping. Thank you. The veggie chips are incredible. I don't even feel guilty snacking on them before bed because they are healthy, right? I made apple crisp with the almond flour and it was so good. It was very fresh. Can't wait to try the brownie mix and the chocolate cake mix. You are my new go to place for all my baking needs."
Michele, Plantation, FL January 4, 2014
"The brownie mix is freaking awesome! So tasty! You'd never guess the difference. I made mine in an 8x8 pan so the cooking time was about 30-35 mins."
karen November 13, 2013
"our restaurant Joes Dining uses your GF produces on a daily basis. THe almond flour for a lemon tart and GF chocolate cake mix for divine chocolate cake which our customers say can't tell that its GF. Thanks for due diligence in creating this product line."
theresa, florence, nj May 14, 2013
"Received my package today and it was full of love. Never experienced such care in a product before. Can't wait to get baking! I'm sure I will be ordering again from you. God Bless!"
Molly, Mystic, Connecticut January 5, 2013
"Ordered this and it came the next day! So glad that I can get gluten free baked goods quickly delivered to my door. I just made brownies for a weekend event. Since I went gluten free, it's been hard to find affordable gluten free items in the grocery store. Nuts makes it easy!"
Joan Kelly, Richardton, North Dakota September 15, 2012
"Amazing brownies and chocolate cake!! I will be ordering them again!"
Claudia, Englewood, NJ August 23, 2012
"These are the BEST brownies I've ever had!!! I am so so happy my friend told me about you Nuts! ;)
So far everything I've tried (bread mix, choco chip cookies & brownie mix) were insanely good! THANK YOU for making such amazing gluten free stuff!!!
BTW, my kids and husband LOVED the brownies too! ;)
Kathryn, Columbia, SC July 20, 2012
"This week I ordered several of the gluten free baking mixes to try. I made the homemade bread mix in my bread maker and yum! I am pretty picky about taste and this bread did not disappoint one bit! It made the best grilled cheese sandwiches. I also made the gluten free brownies and they are incredible! It is so nice to know that I don't have to sacrifice taste while eating gluten free! Too many gluten free products simply can't match their gluten laden counterparts, but the ones that I tried are just as good, or better! I will definitely be back for more!"
janie, sauk city, wi February 20, 2012
"I think these are the best brownies that I have ever eaten..No one would ever suspect that they are gluten free. Thanks Nuts."
Showing 1-10 of 15
Melvetta, Oceanside, CA May 16, 2014
"Just received my cookie mix, brownie mix, bread mix, and biscuit mix. My mouth is watering but since it is over 100 degrees outside and we are surrounded by fires I will have to wait."
Nutrition Facts
Serving Size 37g (~1.3 oz.)
(Approx. 12.3 Servings/Pound)
|Amount Per Serving
|Calories From Fat
|Total Fat
|Saturated Fat
|Total Carbohydrate
|Dietary Fiber
|Vitamin A
|Vitamin C
evaporated cane juice, Ghirardelli cocoa, potato starch, sweet white sorghum flour, tapioca flour, whole grain corn flour, sea salt, baking powder (sodium acid pyrophosphate, sodium bicarbonate, corn starch, monocalcium phosphate), xanthan gum
Packaged in the same facility as peanuts, tree nuts, soy, and milk products.
Store at room temperature for up to 6 months.
Country of Origin: United States
|1 Pound Bags
|1-5 lbs.
|6-10 lbs.
|11+ lbs.
|5 Pound Bags
|5 lbs.
|10 lbs.
|15+ lbs.
|25 Pound Cases
|25+ lbs.


text:
NEWPORT, Wash. -- Two men appeared in court on Wednesday for possession of stolen property. But authorities said they are facing additional charges.
Authorities in Pend Oreille County said they found guns, drugs, and stolen vehicles in a house outside of Newport. They are currently investigating to see if suspects Walter Todd, 49, and Robert Todd, 47, ran a chop-shop.
The property is in a secluded area five miles south of Newport off of Enchanted Forest Lane.
"I've been up here in this county for seven years and this was one of the first places I was told to watch out for," said Washington State Patrolman Kyle Witt, "and it hasn't changed since I've been up here."
More than 50 officers from Pend Oreille County, Bonner County, Kootenai County, Spokane County, and Washington State Patrol joined SWAT teams from two agencies to raid the property. They arrested Walter Todd and Robert Todd without a fight.
"We found a marijuana grow along with meth, weapons, ammunition. So we are still digging, trying to figure out what we can come up with," Witt said.
"There's dozens and dozens of scrap cars, parts of cars that we're trying to comb through, looking to see if they are stolen off other cars," he added. "There's so much stuff back there, it's gonna take a long time to comb through everything and figure out what's stolen and what's not."


text:
Hello my name is Johnny, I'm a new york based photographer. I'm a street photographer who also loves to do portraits and still lives. All photos displayed here are mine, thank you for viewing.
Catching Elephant is a theme by Andy Taylor
6 banana slices that was cooked and placed in a roll with cinnamon and caramel, strawberries, blueberries, and raspberries around them with pineapple coconut Ice cream in the middle and vanilla sauce around.


text:
Building Excellence Program
Address: 1700 E. Union Street, Seattle
Re-purpose and modernize the original 1940 building and the addition completed in 1960.
$14 million
Renovations will modernize the T.T. Minor building to provide a permanent home for the World School Program.
Modernization includes:
Design work start: May 2013
Estimated construction start: June 2015
Estimated school opening: 2016-17 school yearBack to BEX IV Overview


text:
Martin Baker Mk 17 - Ultra Lightweight Escape System for the G 120TP
Martin Baker is the world's largest manufacturer of ejection seats and is dedicated to the design, development and manufacture of life saving aviation equipment.
The Martin-Baker Mk 17 ejection seat is ultra-lightweight, compact and very simple in design and operation, specifi cally developed for primary trainer aircraft where seat weight and size are critically important. The seat provides safe escape capability for aircraft speeds in the range 60 knots (at ground level, on the runway) to 300 knots calibrated airspeed (KCAS) and pressure altitudes in the range sea level to 25,000 ft. The seat is capable of providing safe escape for aircrew in the weight range 103 to 245 lbs (47 to 111 kg) nude.
Full military mission training capability.
The optional Martin-Baker Mk 17 ejection seats add further safety to instructor and student while advancing into more dynamic manoevers during the training schedule. Especially designed for the G 120TP operation, the ejection seat is fully automatic and cartridge operated, providing safe escape for most combinations of aircraft altitude, speed, attitude and flight path.


text:
Its on Vimeo! Because I've been banned from YouTube.
Here is my tutorial, by Warhead, who is me.
I will give you 1,000 acres of land on Planet Orgy for your people if you aid us in this military conflict.
Tzan wrote:Warhead wrote:Question: Why are we mapping balls now?
I don't know. That guy, who was you, is totally nuts
Tzan wrote:Quantumsurfer wrote:I generally agree with TzanWarhead wrote:I agree with QuantumSmurfer.
I agree with Warhead.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


text:
Record Display
|Document Type:
|Tradition and modernity in Arabic literature / edited by Issa J. Boullata and Terri DeYoung.
|Added Author:
|Boullata, Issa J., (edt)DeYoung, Terri
|Fayetteville : The University of Arkansas Press, 1997
|xvii, 285 p. : ill.
|Includes index.c1997 by Issa J. Boullata and Terri DeYoungIncludes a bibliography of publications by Mounah A. Khouri
|Introduction : Mounah A. Khouri / Issa J. Boullata -- My demon and I (a poem) / Jabra Ibrahim Jabra -- Gibran's concept of modernity -- Antoine G. Karam -- The Greek cultural heritage and the odyssey of modern Arab poets / As'ad E. Khairallah -- Nasser and the death of elegy in modern Arabic poetry / Terri DeYoung -- Ibrahim Tuqan's poem "Red Tuesday" / Issa J. Boullata -- Conflicts, oppositions, negations : modern Arabic poetry and the framentation of self/text / Kamal Abu-Deeb -- Contesting languages : Tawfiq Yusuf 'Awwad's Tawahin Bayrut / Sabah Ghandour -- A different voice : the novels of Ibrahim al-Kawni / Roger Allen -- Instead of the song of the nightingale / Cornelis Nijland -- Modern Arab theater : the journey back / Joseph Zeidan -- Film and Pharaonism : Shadi 'Abd al-Salam's Eloquent peasant / Allen Douglas and Fedwa Malti-Douglas -- The last days of Imru' al-Qays : Anatolia / Irfan Shahid -- Imru'al-Qays praises the Prophet / Julie Scott Meisami -- Allegory of the soul : a reading of Rumi's Arabic poetry / Omaima Abou-Bakr.
|Author as Subject:
|Tuqan, Ibrahim, 1905-1941
|Modern poetry Elegy Novel Drama, Modern
|Bodleian Library, OxfordBOD Arab d. 11946
OxLit Literary Publication and Documentation


text:
International Film Festival calls for original works
Filmmakers, writers and students are invited to submit narratives, documentaries, short films, and animation to be featured at the 6th annual ION international film festival, to be held in Lagos, Nigeria in December. Deadline: September 30.
ION International Film Festival is a touring festival dedicated to promoting independent film, animation and narratives. It seeks to encourage new artists that are creating socially relevant art that positively affects the world.
As part of its effort to raise international awareness the festival takes place in a different country each year. Last year it was held in Dubai, UAE and this year the ION International Film Festival is coming to Lagos, Nigeria.
For more information, visit www.ionfilmfestival.com or contact Sara Bavar, Festival Director, at firstname.lastname@example.com.


text:
My fic "Tonight" removed from ff.net page by admin
This fic was rated K+ (one of the only fucking ones) and reported. Sigh… meanwhile there are ten year olds reading my M rating fics. Another reason for me not to post to this site anymore anymore.
I also can't post for a week. Look for my next two updates on Tumblr.


text:
If you must continue to abuse your readers with Bud Kennedy, would you please note in large type that he is an opinion writer? He should not be close to anything in the paper considered news.The only part of the paper I don't read is the comics; maybe you could put him there? — Kevin Reid, Colleyville
Have more to add? News tip? Tell us


text:
View Large Image
More Images
Bridal Chorus from Lohengrin
Item Number: #
Title: Bridal Chorus from Lohengrin, By Wagner, Richard, Edited by Wolfgang Birtel, Published by Edition Schott
Publisher: Edition Schott
Composer: Wagner, Richard
- Piano Trio
This item is available. This item is backordered.
You must be logged into your account to save items to your wishlist.


text:
Green jewelry and accessories are sure to bring you joy, no matter the season. During the warmer months, wear green to invoke the new life that blooms around you. Green accessories will carry you through darker, colder days. An alternative to yellow, wearing a vibrant green accessory will definitely lift your mood. MeDusa's Whale bag in bright green is ideal for weekend getaways, and Yoola's Green Swarovski Crystal earrings complement both day and night looks. Which green is your perfect match?
By creating an account you are subscribing to the Boticca newsletter, and you certify that you have read and agree to the Terms of use and Privacy policy


text:
Jaguars wants substantial return for No. 2 pick
Jacksonville, FL, United States (4E Sports) – Jacksonville Jaguars general manager Dave Caldwell said that the franchise will be happy to keep their No. 2 pick in the NFL draft on April 25.
There are two players the Jaguars like, and they are assured of getting the one that the Kansas City Chiefs does not select with the first overall pick.
But since the Jaguars don't have a sure thing at quarterback, they are open to wait until the later rounds to beef up the position currently headed by Blaine Gabbert and Chad Henne.
But it would have to be the right situation for the team to trade down and bypass the player they could draft for the no. 2 overall pick.
Caldwell indicated a solid trade offer for the No. 2 pick would qualify as a bit of a surprise.
"Obviously, it has to be worth your while to drop back," he said. "If there is somebody who you feel can come in and contribute right away and be a cornerstone of this franchise for eight or 10 years, what is really the value if a team is just going to give you a fifth- or fourth-round pick to bypass a guy that you really feel good about, have conviction about? I don't see that happening.
He added that if they can get a couple picks or future high picks, then they may discuss a trade.
Jacksonville has needs across the board after a 2-14 season in 2012 that resulted in the firing of both general manager Gene Smith and coach Mike Mularkey.
An impact defensive end could be a priority for Caldwell and Gus Bradley, his defensive-minded coach. The team's pass rush has been an issue for years, with no player recording double-digit sacks since 2006.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


text:
I am going to try to post each Monday about deals that I find. Many of these will most likely be through businesses that I am an affiliate for- but not all. The point is two-fold; you get alerted to savings or good deals and I earn a little for my time.
Monday's Money for 5/7/2012:
FareBuzz- take an additional $10 off booking a Memorial Day flight. FareBuzz offers reasonably priced flights to many destinations. Use code MEMORIAL10
Jack-in-the-Box: Get a coupon via email around your birthday for a Jack in the Box FREE birthday dessert when you join their club. To receive this offer click "Connect With Jack" on the left hand side of the page.
Precious Moments- Celebrate Mom with a special figurine from Precious Moments. Ends 5/13/12.
Or for the baseball fan in your life, get free shipping on the entire MLB collection. Ends 6/1/12. (click the image>)
Walmart- Create a FREE Walmart.com photo account and you'll receive an email for 25 FREE 4×6 digital photo prints. Choose in-store pickup to avoid a shipping charge.
Only Natural Pet Store- Save 10% using code FOOD10. Or get Free Shipping on Orders Starting at $60 (ends 12/31/12)
Amazon- Save 67% today (5/7/12)! Anne Klein New York Women's 122024WMTO Multi-Function and Gold-Tone Tortoise Resin Bracelet Watch, normally $195.00, right now it is only $64.99- a savings of $130.01!
Or Mother's Day Free 2-Day Shipping! Sign up for Prime membership and always get 2-Day shipping.
Target- Free Coppertone or Banana Boat sunscreen after coupon. Check the printable coupons page.
Since I'm just getting started on this, it's slim pickings for this week. I hope to be more scour-a-geous *wink* for the coming weeks.


text:
Two people were shot and injured during a birthday party at a house on Detroit's east side, police say. One male was shot in the abdomen and the second male was shot in the hand. Both victims are in their mid 20s. The suspected shooter escaped after firing shots from the house porch. Both victims are recovering in the hospital.
FOX 13 / WTVT-TV3213 West Kennedy Blvd.Tampa, Florida 33609Main: (813) 876-1313Newsroom: (813) 870-9630Fax: (813) 871-3135


text:
Why Grilling & BBQs Are Good for Your Mental Health
Need an excuse to throw a barbecue this spring? Say it's for your psychological well-being: Psychology Today reports that barbecues are actually great for your mental health for a few reasons.
For one thing, being outdoors helps refresh the mind after doing "knowledge work," which anyone who spends all day at the computer can understand.
Also, the food typically served at barbecues — hamburgers, grilled meats and vegetables, potato salad — are also comfort foods for many, and a new study shows that eating comfort foods can alleviate loneliness, even when eaten alone. (Solo barbecue, anyone?)
Finally, the music typically played at outdoor parties has a positive effect on mood. When the music we are listening to makes us feel happy, we perceive the world in a more positive way. In one experiment,
people saw more faces that looked happy in images shown to them when the music they were listening to made them feel happy and more sad faces when the music they heard made them feel sad — even when there were actually no faces in those images.
So unless your barbecues usually involve unfamiliar foods, depressing music and the indoors, going to an outdoor party is sure to make you feel good.
• Read more: Benefits of Barbeques - Psychology Today
Do you think barbecues are especially good for mental health? Or does any social gathering have the same effect?
Related: Patio Six-Pack: 6 Beers for a Perfect Spring Cook-Out
(Image: Sarah Rae Trover)
2 Comments
This makes sense to me. I, for one, love grilling outside; even if I'm not the one doing the actual grilling. There is just something incredibly relaxing about cooking outdoors.
The best part about grilling is the throngs of neighbors that stop by. We always throw an extra steak or extra veggies for the whole purpose of "neighbor grazing." On the rare occasions we drink we also keep a few extra beers cold. Our neighbors do the same for us. And the conversation and community fun is definitely good for well-being.


text:
Catching up with the Sony RX1, A99, NEX-6 and lenses [samples and opinions too]
Now that we caught up with the latest Nikon D600 happenings, it is time to catch up with the latest Sony Big Bang happenings... (New Updates) below refers to updates that we did not mention in any of the previous round-ups; but given the chaotic nature of Photokina announcements, some may slip through in either direction.
What Has Gone Before?
+ Announcement Day round-ups: Sony RX1 and Alpha A99 and NEX-6 and The Rest
+ The Day After the Announcement round-up: featuring the RX1, A99 and NEX-6
Opinions on the new Sony Gear (New Updates)
+ a divided path for Sony at Photo Club Alpha
+ NEX system reaches maturity at Serious Compacts
+ NEX-6 rekindled Sony interest at Alpha Mount World
+ RX1 distilled opinion by Bjorn Uptott
+ RX1 in historical perspective at Visual Science Lab
Sony RX1 (New Updates)
+ hands-on first impressions at Quesabesde which has great hands-on reports
+ hands-on at Tech Radar
+ pre-orders: $2800 at Amazon
Sony Alpha A99 (New Updates)
+ Alpha A99 samples (including ISO range and RAW) at Quesabesde
+ Alpha A99 hands-on at Ming Thein
+ pre-orders: $2800 at Amazon (body only)
Sony NEX-6 (New Updates)
+ NEX-6 hands-on at Ming Thein (bottom half of the post)
+ NEX-6 hands-on at Tech Radar
+ pre-orders: NEX-6 body only for $850, NEX-6 w/16-50 for $1000
The New Sony Lenses (New Updates)
+ 35mm f1.8 NEX full size JPEG samples at ePhotozine
+ 10-18mm f4 NEX full size JPEG samples at ePhotozine
+ 300mm f2.8G SSM II SLR hands-on at ePhotozine
+ pre-orders: 35mm f1.8 NEX for $450, 10-18mm f4 NEX for $850 and 16-50mm NEX for $350


text:
Skip to navigation
Skip to page content
delicious. magazine
Find a recipe for every occasion
Lizzie Kamenetzky
Serving instructions
Quick, simple and low in calories, this pork recipe is an ideal supper.
Per serving: 287kcals, 15.3g fat (6.4g saturated), 29.2g protein, 2.4g carbs, 1.8g sugar, 0.5g salt
Cut the pork into strips. Fry with the garlic and 150g chestnut mushrooms, thickly sliced. Follow the recipe, but swap the mustard for 1 tbsp smoked paprika for a speedy stroganoff.
If the recipe calls for wine, then use one that you can drink with the meal. If you don't fancy drinking wine, you can just use some extra stock in the recipe.
Please register or sign-in to leave a comment. We'd love to hear what you think.
December 24
very e3asy and really delicious. will be doing again
December 10
My friends Chris & Lucie made this for me last night - it was delicious!
Search delicious.
Forgot password
Remember me
Don't miss this exclusive subscription offer to receive the next 6 issues of delicious. for just £11.70. That's a fantastic 50% SAVING on the cover price.
delicious. mag recipe index
For those loyal delicious. readers who keep their magazines each month, you may find our downloadable recipe index useful...
delicious. shopping lists
Download these handy shopping lists from everyday delicious. In every month's issue: Everything you need for delicious shortcut suppers.
Cooking conversion tables
In this handy section, you'll find oven temperatures, weights for dry ingredients, liquid measures and tablespoon conversions for the UK, US and Australia – all in one tidy place.


text:
Either way, there is no denying that Yahoo Search is having a rough go. Take a look at this chart from the Business Insider and the story is pretty obvious.
So is Yahoo ever going to be a real player in search? With continued distance growing between Yahoo and the real two horse race of Bing v. Google it almost seems strange to refer to Yahoo as a search engine anymore even though they still generate considerable revenue (albeit declining) from their search efforts.
So be honest. How do you see Yahoo in search? Good? Bad? Ugly? Near extinction?


text:
|Teen Award Spotlight – The Robert Sibert Medal for best informational book.
|The Robert F. Sibert Informational Book Award is awarded annually to the author(s) and illustrator(s) of the most distinguished informational book published in English during the preceding year. Established in 2001 by the Association for Library Service to Children (ALSC), with support from Bound to Stay Bound Books, Inc., of Jacksonville, Illinois, the award honors Sibert, a long-serving president of Bound to Stay Bound Books.
|June Teen Giveaway
|Make sure to enter Bibliobabe's June Teen Giveaway – for a chance to win An American Plague by Jim Murphy.
|You can find the complete list of winners in:
| The complete list of Robert Sibert Medal winners can be found on page 127 of Read, Remember, Recommend for Teens: A Reading Journal for Book Lovers.
Robert F. Sibert Medal – Teen Award Spotlight
One Response to "Robert F. Sibert Medal – Teen Award Spotlight"
I don't think I have read any of the book shown. Looking at the covers, at least a few of them appeal. will have to browse more of that list. Thanks.


text:
By jakerocheleau
via blog.teamtreehouse.com
Published: Apr 18 2013 / 01:05
In this tutorial I want to demonstrate how we can build a simple homepage layout design using Bootstrap. I have included a myriad of popular components which you will likely use in other layouts.
Tweet SaveShareSend Tags: css-html, how-to, open source, web design


text:
Police are investigating an accident that happened around 2 p.m. Friday in southwest Lubbock County.
It happened just outside Wolfforth on Farm Road 1585 and Brownfield Highway.
Police say two vehicles collided at the intersection.
We're still waiting for details, but at least one person was taken to UMC.
We'll continue updating this story as details become available.
Copyright 2012 KCBD. All rights reserved.
5600 Avenue A
All content © Copyright 2000 - 2014 Worldnow and KCBD. All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.