text:
Oh get this. One of her buildings called and a lady complained that she had wet sand on her car and they must have got it on there. And get this. She doesn't know how to get it off....and wants to know what they are going to do about it......Unreal!! of course the property maintenance people must have put the wet sand on it. Might have nothing to do with the fact she parks next to the out door beach shower where everybody washes off towels, toys, beach chairs, etc etc etc what a bunch of dummys. i told you a story everyday and its only lunch time. She needs to write a book
Results 41 to 50 of 103
06-21-2007, 10:51 AM #41Scott
HMW [Heavy Metal welding]
I studied at the welding shop half the week and the other half I took GE classes to transfer to University. The lack of common sense by these supposed "smart people" in the "enlightened" classes was sometimes astounding, even the teachers were rediculous at times.
From my perspective, blue collar jobs are much more rewarding than sitting in a cubicle; white collar jobs. When you build something you have so much more pride at the end of the day knowing you worked hard. How many desk jockeys can say that?
I guess I can't really say for sure though as I have yet to have a white collar job. Soon enough though, when I finish my degree in product design. Hopefully I will be able to get my hands dirty on a regular basis though...
Some people are too educated. Where I work we used to have this maintence guy who was supposed to be the head maintence man who was educated in everything to here him tell it. One day my welder quit no power
lights or fans wire feed nothing worked he comes over taps on the regulator gauge and asked me if I was sure it had gas in it. I didnt even ansewer I walked away. This is also the same man who one cold winter day rolls the o/a torch outside to thaw out the lock on our propane tank I dont meen the lock on the cage I meen the lock right on the tank where the spout comes out. If this is what they meen by higher education. I think I will remain a slow country boy LOL.
06-21-2007, 06:11 PM #44Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 539
I was once told, long ago, the fastest way to get stupid, is go to school and drink and partake in other recreational pastimes. That is a sure fire way to spend the rest of your life stupid.
Grantid, I listen to some of the media reports talking about our educators, and I ask myself from time to time, why are we working so hard to pay taxes so they can get paid to do that?
Back to the subject, people will take what ever you give them. The ones good at it will take more than you give them.
I like to think, I was raised country dumb.
06-23-2007, 03:18 AM #46Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 5
"5 minute job"
Years ago I worked in a real nice automotive machine shop (some welding & custom machine fab. on the side). We had a great crew that could darn near fix anything, taking on stuff the other shops wouldn't touch.
When we quoted a job, we often got the "What do you mean two weeks and $200.00, my friend Barney says 10 minutes and 10 bucks". A few weeks later we would almost always see them again with a boogered up mess. Hence our clearly posted sign:
Shop rates:
$40.00 (Basic)
$50.00 if you watch.
$60.00 if you help.
$75.00 if you worked on it first!
my friend Barney says 10 minutes and 10 bucks".
isent he a purpel 6 1/2ft dinasore, what did he expect from a childrens puppet.
seems like too many people know that same guy, and most of them seem to think pro. welders should base there price around that of the hack with the bird pooo welds. and most of the time they get what they pay for. and then get to pay you again for doing it right. there are way too many Barney's out there.thanks for the help
hope i helped
feel free to shoot me an e-mail direct i have time to chat. firstname.lastname@example.com
summer is here, plant a tree. if you don't have space or time to plant one sponsor some one else to plant one for you. a tree is an investment in our planet, help it out.
Another 5 minute project.
I thought I would bring this one back to the top. There are more ignorant people out there than we need.
I got a call this morning and the guy says the tongue broke on his trailer, he has the new piece, all I gotta do is weld it on for him. Shouldn't take you more than ten minutes he says, I ask him where it is and he tells me the trailer is in Hollywood Fl. about 2 to 2 1/2 hours drive each way. He lives up here near me and I asked him why he doesn't have someone down there do the work, he says they want 400.00 to do the job and thats too expensive. I asked him what he thought it would cost him for me to go and do the job, he says I don't know but 400.00 is out of line. I tell him what I would have to charge him for the 6 - 8 hrs. plus mileage and expenses, not to mention it is a holiday and he would be screwing up my plans for the day.
He then has the nerve to ask what it would cost if I rode down there with them using their vehicle, we could load all my equipment in his van cause he's got to go and get the trailer anyways. Did I mention I have never met this guy and wouldn't know him if he walked past me.
These are the pictures he e-mailed me for the 10 minute project. DaveIf necessity is the Mother of Invention, I must be the Father of Desperation!
John Blewett III 10-22-73 to 8-16-07
Another racing great gone but not to be forgotten.http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...modified&hl=en
07-04-2007, 10:09 AM #50Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- Clark County, NV
- Posts
- 2,696
TEN minutes??
Dude, if you can't do that in FIVE, you need to give it up....
Actually, it's funny this thread got bumped because I'm just getting ready to leave for a friend's house to do a "30 minute job." I've not seen it yet, but he has a small fleet of tractor-trailer dump trucks, and has had me do lots of welding on them. It's an aging fleet in need of constant maintenance. Anyway, supposed some bracket on the bottom fell off, but he recovered it, and needs me to weld it back on.
At least he didn't say "five minutes," so we'll go see just how accurate he was...


text:
List Grid
13 Item(s)
Cerwin-Vega P1800X 18" Powered Subwoofer$999.00The Cerwin-Vega P1800X 18" Powered Subwoofer has an 18" woofer driven by a custom designed 2000-watt class-D amplifier. Matched with other P-series speakers, the Cerwin-Vega P1800X beautifully extends the low-frequency range packing a dynamic low end punch and response. Buy yours today from UniqueSquared.com Learn More
JBL PRX 418S - 18" Passive Subwoofer$749.00For a powerful sound, this passive subwoofer featuring an eighteen inch unit from JBL supports a frequency range of 35 Hz to 250 Hz and power in excess of 800 watts. The speaker is enclosed in DuraFlex polymer coating with an attractive screen backed grille with side handles for easy movement. Learn More
JBL PRX 418S Pair - 18" Passive Subwoofer Pair$1,498.00The JBL PRX 418S Pair - 18" Passive Subwoofer Pair package is an excellent addition to your live set up for extending your low end and providing a powerful punch of bass to your audience. Included are two JBL PRX418S 18" subs that are built to handle daily use and transport. Buy yours today from UniqueSquared.com Learn More
Mackie DLM12S 12-Inch Powered Subwoofer$999.99The Mackie DLM12S 12-Inch Powered Subwoofer is a 2000-watt, 12" heat-treated woofer with a 3" compression driver voice coil for packing extra punch. It features excellent low frequency extension, a DLP processor, incredible system controls and is stackable and/or pole mounted. Buy yours today from UniqueSquared.com Learn More
Mackie SRM1801 - 18" Powered PA Subwoofer (1000W)$799.99The Mackie SRM1801 - 18" Powered PA Subwoofer features 1000-watts of efficient Class D amplification and includes precision crossover and tuning filters for optimized bass response. It has dual XLR inputs for mono or stereo and user-adjustable control for levels and polarity. For a sub of this much power is it lightweight and will find a happy home with for you audio system. Buy yours today from UniqueSquared.com Learn More
Peavey PR Sub - 15" Subwoofer$249.99The PR Sub contains a heavy-duty 15" subwoofer in a vented enclosure. The portable yet sturdy high-quality plastic enclosure has a mount cup to affix the subwoofer on a stand, perfect for on-the-spot concerts, DJ sessions, or conferences. The blackened steel grille provides protects the hardware and provides a professional appearance. The PR Sub speaker system has a rating of 400 Watts and the woofer features a 2 3/8" diameter voice coil and a durable 50 oz. magnet. Learn More
Peavey PV118-SUB - 18" Vented Subwoofer$289.99The Peavey PV118-SUB - 18" Vented Subwoofer features a vented subwoofer enclosure with an 18" subwoofer with an internal low-pass crossover network and pole mount adapter with 400-watts of program handling. Buy yours today from UniqueSquared.com Learn More
QSC KSub - Dual 12" 1000W Active Subwoofer$1,079.99The QSC KSub - Dual 12" 1000W Active Subwoofer features a dual 12" bandpass design enclosed in a premium birch housing with low-noise casters that make this easy to move. It is lightweight with 1000-watts of continuous power and extensive DSP for system enhancing performance. Buy yours today from UniqueSquared.com Learn More
QSC KSub Travel Package - Powered Subwoofer 1000W with Cover$1,242.98The QSC KSub Subwoofers are lightweight portable speakers with unbeatable QSC power and reliability. They feature 1000 watt Class D power modules and extensive DSP processing as well as attractive and professional appearance and comfortable ergonomic handles. Threaded pole socket with speaker pole is included. Learn More
List Grid
13 Item(s)

subset: commoncrawl


text:
...for two reasons:
1; buffalo always play us tough...this is a team we hardly beat since the jim kelly, thurman thomas days..i hate this team..they robbed dan marino of superbowl rings.
2; they can score quick and often, something miami cant do and their defense is now coming together. Their wide recievers are realy fast and quick. I don't need to remind you of their two headed monsters at running back.
Te only thing is ryan fitzpatrick sucks and he is a pocket passer. The guy single--handedly lost the game for buffalo yesterday. The interception he throw was unbelievable. With 30 seconds to go,down by 6 and the ball near the opponents 20? If i was a fan, i would be wating for him in the parking lot. He is the most over paid, over rated qb in the league next to taco. Lol!


text:
Ridiculous. I find it hard to believe he really thinks gun violence is on the rise, contrary to FBI statistics. Apparently Snoop still enjoys being "their" puppet. Gotta love Drake throwing up the three sixes hand sign while rapping about gun violence:
Gun Criminal Snoop Dogg Releases Anti-Gun Song
Hypocritical gun-control ballad from man who previously said I wouldnt be the nigga that I am if I didnt pop niggas in their mouth
Paul Joseph Watson & Steve Watson
April 3, 2013
The latest hypocritical celebrity to jump on the anti-Second Amendment gun-control bandwagon, for no purpose other than increased notoriety, is rapper Snoop Dogg.
In his new video for the song No Guns Allowed, featuring Drake and Cori B., Snoop Lion, as he now refers to his reincarnated Rastafarian persona, interjects anti-gun lyrics with footage of mass school shootings and newspaper headlines regarding the tragedies.
The video even opens up with President Obama speaking during the memorial for the children killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings.
Its a powerful song and we hope to spread a positive message that hits home with people, says Snoop Lion. Weve seen too much bloodshed involving guns and we want to prevent the next incident from happening. Thats whats it all about, trying to bring awareness and push love and peace.


text: Employment Current Openings from the Office of Career Services are listed below Posted: 2/22/2012Assurgent Medical Solutions/ Neurosurgery PA/ PennsylvaniaAssurgent Medical Solutions is seeking a Neurosurgery Physician Assistant for a Locums Tenens assignment, for several months. Need someone with at least 1 year of Neurosurgical and O.R. experience (First Assist). Will work 2 to 3 shifts per week and be on-call 1:3. Compensation is commensurate with MGMA 2012 salary standards. We also provide A-rated medical malpractice coverage as well as travel and lodging. If interested: contact Venetia Griffin at 877-842-6833 or email@example.com Medical Job No. 1799


text:
The new .shop generic top level domain extension
Selling products or services online? Reach consumers with a .shop domain!
- Not just for online shopping
- Go Global - reach customers across continents
- Be found easily as a retailer
- Differentiate your shop from informative websites
The new .shop domain for your online store
Be at the forefront by registering a new .shop domain with 1&1
When you register a distinctive new .shop domain name with 1&1 you immediately distinguish yourself from your rivals. New top-level domains such as www.shoes.shop push your business to the forefront, giving you a critical edge in the competitive eCommerce market and providing an invaluable advantage. As traditional .coms become commonplace and ordinary, choosing a new domain from 1&1 will ensure your eShop remains in the limelight and will help you become the vanguard in eCommerce. Read the 1&1 extension FAQ page to discover even more benefits associated with the hundreds of new top-level domains available through 1&1.
At 1&1 your virtual shop window will appear more visible with .shop domains
Customers looking to purchase products rather than merely view images or product reviews will identify your business instantly - allowing them to shop with ease and comfort. Whether you are found on search engines or price comparison sites your new .shop or .store domain name will help your eShop stand out from the crowd and give your products a platform from which to shine. When you secure a top-level domain like the unforgettable www.furniture.store, your virtual shop window will become more visible to customers searching the internet for those all-important interior decoration pieces.
Register a .shop domain and create a cutting edge virtual store
Leaders in eCommerce know how important an innovative website and virtual store front is in the search for new customers. Registering with 1&1, your domain name will reflect your pioneering philosophies and build upon your burgeoning reputation. When your register a .shop or .buy domain name with 1&1 you choose a domain that best suits the products you offer. Customers heading over to www.cupcakes.buy will be under no illusion as to the sweet and tasty treats on offer. By following 1&1's simple reservation process detailed below you will own a domain that speaks to your customers in a few seconds.
Reserve your new top-level domain with 1&1 and distinguish yourself from other websites
1&1 offer a free, no obligation pre-reservation service that allows you to create a wish list of your favorite top-level domain names. Simply decide which domains suit you best and check their availability using the simple domain search function. Enter your choice into the field, select the category "Shopping & eCommerce" and click the "Check" button. The appearing list will offer you a huge variety of speaking domain endings open to your choice. For business specializing in style and trend, try www.fashion.shop for a domain name that expresses everything your eShop is about. Risk free and with no money up-front, pre-reserving your new domain with 1&1 is easy.


text:
E-M1 No Video?
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review
Based on a production Olympus OM-D E-M1 with Firmware 1.0
The E-M1 is the second model in Olympus's OM-D series and extends the range further into semi-pro/enthusiast territory. There are two main distinctions that set the E-M1 apart from its little brother (the E-M5) - a more sophisticated autofocus system and a 'buttons for everything' design approach. As such the two models will coexist, with the E-M1 sitting at the very top of Olympus's lineup.
The biggest technological step forward on the E-M1 is the addition of on-sensor phase detection elements, giving the camera two distinct focus modes. The phase-detection system is used when lenses from the original Four Thirds system, which were designed for use that way, are attached. With native, Micro Four Thirds lenses, the camera will mainly stick with the contrast detection system that has proved so fast and accurate on the E-M5. Only if you use tracking AF will the camera utilize phase-detection information with a Micro Four Thirds lens.
The E-M1 also gains the excellent 2.3M-dot electronic viewfinder panel we first saw as the VF-4 accessory for the PEN E-P5. Not only is the resolution very impressive, but the viewfinder optics give a viewfinder with magnification of up to 1.48x (depending on display mode), which puts it only a fraction behind the 0.76x viewfinder in Canon's 1D X and ahead of Nikon's pro-grade D4 DSLRs.
There's also a more advanced 'TruePic VII' processor in the E-M1 that conducts a variety of lens corrections, when creating JPEGs, leading the company to proclaim the best image quality offered by one of its cameras. Not only can the E-M1 remove the colour fringing caused by lateral chromatic aberration, Olympus says that it also tunes its sharpening to take into account the lens's sharpness, and to combat any softening due to diffraction (particularly at very small apertures).
The biggest difference between the E-M1 and the E-M5, though, is the degree of direct control on offer. We really liked the E-M5's twin-dial control system, but the E-M1 goes beyond that by providing button-and-dial combinations for quickly changing almost every imaginable setting on the camera. It's the kind of approach you don't usually get until the very top of manufacturers' lineups - it means you have to get used to where every function is, but can shoot fluidly once you have.
The E-M1 inherits the '2x2' dial approach Olympus previously used on the E-P5 - flicking a switch on the camera changes the dials from controlling shutter speed, aperture or exposure compensation to changing ISO and white balance. However, all this direct control doesn't come at the expense of the potentially slower but easier to find touch-screen interface - the E-M1 has this too. Overall the camera can be operated pretty much however you fancy.
Olympus OM-D E-M1 specification highlights:
- 16MP MOS Four Thirds format sensor with no low-pass filter
- On-sensor phase detection elements
- Twin control dials (front and rear) with '2x2' dual-mode option
- '5-axis' image stabilization with automatic panning detection ('S-IS Auto')
- ISO 'LOW' (100 equiv) - ISO 25,600
- Up to 10fps continuous shooting (6.5 fps shooting with continuous AF)
- 1.04M-dot 3" LCD touchscreen display - tilts 80° upwards and 50° downwards
- Electronic viewfinder: 2.36M-dot LCD, 0.74x magnification (equiv.), eye sensor
- Built-in Wi-Fi for remote shooting and image transfer to smartphone or tablet
- Dust, splash and freeze-proof (to -10 °C)
Gained over the E-M5
- True Pic VII processor, with lens corrections
- 1/8000 sec top shutter speed, 1/320 sec flash sync
- Built-in microphone socket (rather than optional accessory adapter)
- Flash X-sync socket
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Focus 'peaking' display
- In-camera HDR blending (two modes), previewed in viewfinder
Four Thirds is dead. Long live Four Thirds.
As well as representing the highest-end Micro Four Thirds camera yet, the E-M1's role is also about offering continued support for users of the original Four Thirds SLR system. Olympus created some very nice Four Thirds lenses, but the company struggled to make enough impact in the SLR market to justify the cost of continuing development for both systems in parallel.
The company claims to have studied what the E-M1 and a hypothetical 'E-7' SLR could offer, and concluded that, while image quality, durability and speed would have been the same, the OM-D design allowed both a substantial size advantage and a much greater viewfinder magnification than would be possible with an optical finder. As such the E-M1 should be considered the successor to the E-5.
We'll look at the performance of the camera with Four Thirds lenses in a little more depth later in this article. But in principle, the on-sensor phase detection autofocus system should be much more effective than contrast detection when it comes to controlling Four Thirds lenses, all of which were primarily designed to be driven by phase detection-based systems.
If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).
Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.
We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X, Y, and Z and ideally A, B, and C.
This article is Copyright 1998 - 2015 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.
Olympus OM-D M1 or Sony Alpha a6000. Trying to decide on which one. I have three Zuiko MF lenses, 50mm F/1.8; 35-70mm f/4; 85-250 f/5 I'd like to use.
I like taking shots of lightning and winter scenes, portraits, still life, landscape and macro.
The A6000 is about half price. something to consider. The crop factor on those old Zuikos is also less severe on the A6000 (your 50mm becomes a 75mm, for example). If you plan on shooting on daylight a lot and/or use manual focus a lot, you could maybe make due with the A6000.
The EM1 is more of a deluxe model. You get better ergonomics, better build, better viewfinder, better customisation, weather sealing (irrelevant if you're only using old non-weather-sealed lenses). One thing important to remember is that EM1, just like any Oly cameras from super cheap to expensive, stabilize all your lenses,
@bluevellet. TY for excellent comparison info to consider. After much deliberation decided to go Oly EM1. Will have 2x crop factor on my legacy glass but will still get good images out of them once I've figured out the ropes of using them. Added to the EM1 the battery holder and large eye cup, 12mm f/2.0, & 17mm f/1.8, for these focal lengths and manual focus control offered by these particular lenses - plus they look so good!
Will eventually add the Zuiko 12-40 f/2.8 pro and 60mm f/2.8 macro. Both are weather-sealed.
Recent firmware updates have users blown away with delight !
Tracking and frame rate improvements have turned it into a real all round sports and wildlife enthastics camera with all the other benefits of mft's !
These cons are somewhet nit picky in my opinion.
Interface and controls can be overwhelming initially
>That's Oly. People learn the system anyway.
In-camera Raw conversion interface is somewhat unintuitive.
>Isn't it whats done in PS that really counts?
Auto focus with Four Thirds lenses is slow in dim conditions with tricky subjects
>Yeah. So what? It really does not apply to a new user, who will be buying the new lenses.
Only one SD card slot
>With the size of cards now, is this really that big a deal?
Inconveniently-placed power switch
Oly must have thought it worthy enough to bring it to the new EM5 MkII.
Disappointing video quality
> The one thing in this list that will be important ...to videographers.
Multi-screen live view interface looks very dated (e.g. can't combine electronic level and histogram)
>Oh well ..even Oly is not perfect.
Many still cannot accept Oly taking the lead all the time, and with a smaller sensor to boot.
Traded in my Sony a900 with the thought of buying a7, and ended up going with EM1. I am aware the a900 was an early "full frame" camera, but I have to say I prefer the images from the em1
Also the handling of this camera is amazing, just makes you want to take pictures.
Have the 12-40 and 40-150 pro lenses which are both pretty much tack sharp.
Being an amateur I can't really comment on the depth of field issue that some comment on but in the real world I just don't get it, at f2.8 both these lenses give what I am looking for, with some latitude for operator error in focussing.
Just ordered the 45mm 1.8 to round off the system for low light and extreme depth of field
And all this along with a flash can fit in a small messenger bag, what a bonus
Just blown away !
Were you able to try C-AF, continuous tracking AF for sports with the 40-150mm/f2.8 pro lens?
I still have the E-M5 mark I and that is a fine camera, but not so good... for tracking fast moving subjects.
Wow. Why did you have an A900 in the first place? It's not a cheap piece of kit. I remember being tempted by the A850 at one time.
I would disagree with you that the EM1 IQ beats the A900. Maybe the Olympus JPEGs are more punchy, accessible and such, but you should, in theory, extract more RAW IQ from the A900 than the EM1, even if the Sony camera is a bit old now.
I also think the transition to the A900 and the A7 would have been easier in terms of interface and menus. They have a lot in common.
But who am I to argue with you? If you find the EM1 a better fit then so be it. :)
bluevellett: In answer to your questions:
Had sony a700 and bought the a900 with 24-70 zeiss in a mad moment of camera lust whilst in Gibraltar
i shoot in raw and jpeg at the time, I did not say the IQ was better, that I just preferred it. the a900 was very good to ISO 800, at iso100 would stand against anything out there. The noise performance from the Olympus is to my eye better and when there is noise it seems more filmlike. (though noise from a newer sensor FF is better) Dynamic range of a900 and Olympus are also similar.
Another key decision was I found that a lot of my photography was when travelling and hiking and the olympus gave me a far lighter kit bag, even lighter than the a7 when lenses are taken into account
WACONImages: the 40-150 is a superb lens, absolutely tack sharp even at f2.8, very fast to focus, nice contrast,
I don't do sport photography, but do photograph birds/wildlife and combined with 9fps shooting can track quite well and get some pretty good keepers. Not up there with a D4 but I would say as good as any sub £3k camera and lens combination
As i start to get my lens lineup. This camera shows more capability than I ever thought it had.
the 45mm 1.8 is the best lens I ever had. It is always on the camera now...
even with the lens hood.. :)
As of January 20, 2015, it camera is still amazing in feel and quality of images. I can't wait for second iteration of it.
The EM-1 looks gorgeous...but it's only slightly smaller than the FULL FRAME Sony A7...that's a pretty serious jump in sensor capability for almost no increase in physical size.
I suppose if low light and maximum subject isolation does not matter, the Olympus is the way to go, but if those things DO matter, go with the Sony.
UMMM have you cccchecked the body only pricing for the Oly $1300 [with rebate of $100] vs. $2500 for the Sony body.
That's a serious pricing differential for my photo budget.
Or go with the olympus for travel size and a regular nikon full frame for low light.
Along with a big price difference, I will state again since it seems we must say this every time someone compares the E-M1 to a Sony.
Look at the size of the lenses.
Nothing beats FF IQ but for some people like me
Lens Size
Matters over the IQ.
I really tried those FF lenses. And It looks so conspicuous.
It will be harder for me to enjoy my hobby with those huge lenses.
If you compare two cameras based on one factor it simplifies things considerably. Exit the overly simplified argument with a trump card like "you can't beat the physics of a larger sensor" and Ta Da you have a clear winner! Everyone should get the Sony.
If maximum subject isolation and low light trump everything else, no one would buy full frame 35mm. It would only be large format or for the poor masses--medium format. And of course the A5s would outsell every other since it's the best in low light. No one cares about resolution or for that matter, lens selection, price, or system size.
So yeah, in a world where we can take out all factors that don't support our perspective and no one has a budget,... where is this world?
Thats right when you compare the bodies only...
As soon you want something longer as 100mm the lenses for the A7 are HUGE.. Did you see the new lens announcements Sony did these last week(s). Great stuff, but so huge.
An A7 still is tempting, for myself too. Especially for reportage, wide angle and portraits.
But so far the best compromise for me is still m43. It is not perfect. Neither system is. I does however have the best mix in body, innovations and hq lenses.
Not huge like the new lenses announced for Pentax FF coming soon. Those lenses look like logs on a brick. (Not that I don't want to get some of that action). I just got an A7 though to add to micro4/3rds. Neither perfect, but very complimentary.
I am still happy with my E-620 the uk price of this camera seems rather high to say the least. Too high to make an upgrade as yet. https://flic.kr/s/aHsjZpc1so
I was surprised at the higher ISO image degradation compared to the E-M5. The difference between the two is noticeable beginning at ISO 3,200 in the test images. At ISO 12,800 all of the cameras images were equally bad.
Updated blog using olympus OMD EM-1 with 45-150mm f4-f6.3
First use of my Olympus OM-D EM1 using 50 mm macro four thirds lens. Replacing Olympus E620 from which I have never had great results even at ISO100 producing pixilated backgrounds. The image clarity and depth of field is outstanding on the EM1.
Another blog using OMD EM-1
There is something missing in the review about auto focus and shutter lag in the real life:
Good follow-up to add to this review of the E-M1 from several months ago. It's still an excellent mirrorless performer relative to newer cameras, like the GH4.
If I was still using a DSLR I'd never be in a position to afford a camera like the Nikon D4s, much less the better lenses you really need to add to the D4s to get the best possible performance out of it.
Yes, the GH4 ups the stakes with stunning AF (fast and stays fast in low light) and everything video.
But if still photography is your main priority, then the E-M1 is a better choice still. The better EVF, the IBIS and and better compativbility with 43 DSLR lenses make it more of an all-rounder for still photography.
So the "enthusiast videographer" would be perfectly OK with not being able to change any setting during (not even exposure compensation) during video recording? The AEL retention being available only when the camera was switched in movie mode beforehand is IMO a shortcoming due to bad software, almost a bug. I really don't see why this should not be available otherwise, and since it seems to be possible to affect exposure during video shooting, there seems to be no hardware limitation to having exposure compensation control while shooting video as well.
RAW vs JPEG
a histogram comparison!
After 5 months of use this are my best captures:
The grip is very sturdy but has a notch in the lower right corner that digs into the heel of my hand. My most serious gripe about this otherwise near-perfect camera.
is the EM1 HLD-7 vertical grip made of metal or plastic?
This Camera have rejuvenated my love for Photography.
I think theres a mistake on page 14 of the EM1 review, when comparing EM1 with EM5, right above the yellow pencils in the 3rd group of images: both columns indicates EM1 ISO 6400. Shouldn't the right column indicate EM5?
Thank you.
Can you adjust the focus point on the M1 while looking through the viewfinder?
Yes, this can be done simply by using the 4-way controller
Yes again, press FN1 and then use the front and rear dials for horizontal and vertical.
Are there any updates on the hot pixel/extreme noise issue in long exposures on the E-M1 yet? I havent heard anything new in a long time. Has Olympus fixed the issue? Were only early EM-1s affected? I want to buy one, but with this issue, that is unlikely.
For those of you who don't know what I am talking about, it is well known that the E-M1 produces an ocean of hot pixels on long exposures of 30 seconds or more at base ISO, and the exposure time needed to make them visible drops by one stop for every stop you bump the ISO. Turning on dark frame subtraction almost eliminates the issue, but this makes star trails, fireworks, bracketed long exposures impossible. Examples can be seen here : http://www.seldomscenephotography.com/2013/11/14/the-olympus-e-m1-and-long-exposures/
DPReview : PLEASE update your review to include information on this issue with sample images. This is a HUGE problem that big review sites need to address and let be known, or Olympus may never fix the issue.
Excellent link, thanks for posting. I too have been on the fence regarding the E-M1. I have rented it and loved it, loved the image quality, EVF, and handling, but this hot pixels issue affects more than just stargazers.
Great camera but sensor is too small to control dof or generate bokeh properly, I'll stick to my iPhone for everyday shooting and my D610 for the serious stuff
Cool. Have fun shooting with your iphone.
Unless you are a professional portrait shooter, or one of those amateurs who is hung-up on blurred backgrounds, dof is just one small ingredient in a good photo. Besides, there are other ways to get a shallow dof. If you like shooting posed portraits and have an addiction to shallow dof fine, but for shooting from the hip, spontaneous portraits or street shooting ... good luck sticking that bazooka full frame and giant lens in someones face. And if minimal depth of field is what you crave, dump the D610 soccer mom full frame camera and jump up to a medium frame Hasselblad. Meanwhile, if you look at the pro level photos on 500px, you will see that only a small percentage of them use a shallow dof to blur out the background. My point is .. shallow depth of field is not and should not be the single criterion for buying a camera.
Back as a teenager, I schooled my knowledge of photography from Aaron Sussman's book, written mostly in the 60's, wherein the statement is made to the effect of, 'Even the simplest camera is better than any photographer'. Still true after all the improvements. Still true with musical instruments, golf clubs, hunting rifles, etc. There is no best camera, just good and better. A better musician, golfer, shooter, or photographer will embarrass us with our own inadequate equipment. Consequently, we can use their better equipment to our same result.
Anyhoo, depth of field has more aspects than just format size. Camera to subject distance, subject to background distance, focal length are all examples of how to control depth of field. The physics of photography have not changed but apparently the knowledge of them has, sadly.
Interestingly, in the 60's, 35mm (same size as Full Frame today) was considered a amateur miniature format and one of it's advantages was it's deep depth of field.
Panasonic's 35-100mm f2.8 is sharp wide open and will give you great bokeh on the E-M1 as will the Olympus 75mm f 1.8.
Em-1 sensor sames as GH4 ? or inferior?
The Olympus OM-D EM-1 contains a Panasonic 34231 (MN34230 die markings) CMOS Image Sensor with on-chip phase detection pixel array http://chipworks.force.com/catalog/ProductDetails?sku=OLY-E-M1_Pri-Camera
It explains why on-sensor PDAF doesn't work so well on Sony cameras (so far anyway).
Previously, it was assumed the technology was from Sony and Olympus made it magically work better on their camera.
The in camera flash or flash add on has never been a viable solution. For that reason an external flash is recommended. Stronger flash and bounce flash are two good reasonsI am wondering if I will be able to use my Evolt 510 flash with this camera?
It has and always will be a viable solution, but not on every situation. Just like using a large flashgun is not always the best choice or a ringflash etc.
Like I use a lot the bundled flash because it fits to pocket and can be uses for portraits and macro very well by its nature.
People too often blame camera flash as terrible and advice it should never be used. But think about it. Olympus made a $1500 camera and then couldn't add a integrated flash because EVF so they bundled one small. Why? If it is so inferior, why to add? E-M1 is for professional use and why to add one when all pros has a flashgun? The fact is, do not tell what gear you can't use of you are a pro , because as creative photographer you are required to know all gear and what to use and when.
In so many situations you can't bounce flash or (red eyes). And you really don't need more than fill-flash so it doesn't need to be a huge. So often the required reason to use flashgun is because you just look pro.
You can get 2 batteries and a charger on Amazon for $22.00 for this camera making the battery issue mute.
I bought some for mine. So that gives you 1000 photos you can shoot.
You can
2-3 years ago I was trying Oly's(many of them) in a camera show, with not so challenging lighting situation.All Olympus cameras did struggle to focus...Pentax too.I do not know did this did improved lately. I know 3 years are like 1000 years in technology terms, passed.
Canon/Nikon did not had issues in focusing...My impression from Olympus that they struggle in that(focusing) department.
Ancient history (but partly true)
Funny I am selling my E-M5 OMD for just this issue, I don't know why everybody says it has great autofocusing, its crap in low light, hunts all the time back and forth in video low light, and i am talking sitting around the dinner table at a restaurant with full overhead lighting it hunts! A compact camera can do better. The Nikon D300s I have never has this problem. Does anybody own an OMD E-M1 is it any good at focusing in low light? I am wanting one for underwater photography, was going to buy a housing for the E-M5 but gave up on that idea because of this low light issue with autofocus
EM-5 slow to focus in low light?
NOT my experience
I got ten times as many keepers these evenings as The CaN IkSon bricks and bazooka brigade got (and a MUCH greater variety of shooting angles..
and HERE:
Other galleries under
.. shot mostly with the OMD-EM5
The thing focussed instantly and accurately almost all the time.
Often, I could not even see the subjects without the EFV.
The 5-axis IS also helped drive the keeper rate' up.
Sounds like "the low light issue" is user error...
Party last night - took the OMD as instead of my SONY or Panny P&S cams ...
Nothing critical.
I set the TOUCH screen up to SHOOT when pressed, press on display at the subject's head, WHAM!
Even in quite dim light, it nailed focus instantly (like the EM-5 does)!
Much faster than fiddling with the focus point adjustment.
It trounced the CaNikon users there and they WERE surprised.
I must use this feature more ...
Low light AF issues are NOT present with this camera OR the OMD.
Of course like EVERY cam I've ever tried, if there's strong enough backlight to cause FLARE, or there simply isn't any detail, it will hunt. If that's an "issue", learn how to use a camera!
The E-M5.E-M1 have excellent S-AF and as fast as any camera the weakness and it is a very real weakness comes when you need C-AF or tracking.Along with the poorer high ISO .I speak as a long term mFT user and I currently still have the E-M1 though it will probably be sold to make way for the GH4 as video is a major interest to me. The only way Nikon users were getting worse results { AF,DR,image quality, high ISO} was if they were using P&S. Despite all its wonders the E-M1 actually managed to have slightly worse high ISO than the E-P5 etc. The 5 axis IS or any for of IS , is only advantageous in low light if you are shooting static subjects as IS has zero value for moving subjects.
now the Fuji X-T1 is out. I feel that it will top EM-1 for IQ, and yet cheaper by $100. what do you all guy comment?
EM-1 usability looks superior - fewer needs for menus.
Depends if you ever need to shoot fast and not everyone does.
The X-T1 looks to be a super camera with clearly superior image quality to the E-M1 , pity the video sucks or I would ditch mFT completly.Though to be fair the E-M1 has pretty weak video compared to the Panasonics.
For a mirrorless camera, Micro 4/3 still has a better selection of lenses and to me that is a deal breaker. The lenses are also smaller. The Fuji lenses are too big, almost equal in size to a DSLR.
Having tried the X-T1, I must say it is attractive in terms of looks but the EM1 is much more user friendly. It is also more responsive.
For image quality, the EM1 will give a crisper look with better colours. Good for landscape and general photography. The Fuji will give a better "green" if one prefer this bias. It has to do with the different sensor used.
Overall, I would prefer the EM1. Unfortunately, for the moment, the EM1 is more expensive but it has a true weather proof body with the 12-40mm f/2.8 lens. The Fuji is still trying to make its first weather proof camera.
Question for EM-1 users: Has anyone tried using old C-Mount lenses? Also is there a list of 'lenses which work well' with the MFT mount cameras? I hear that some produce much better quality circles on the MFT sensor than others.
Note: I did try to search at the top of the page but it I didn't seem to bring up anything on the forums. Is there a dedicated forum search which I've missed?
Lossless compression - saves space.
Lossless means like a ZIP file or FLAC ..
ALL of the original data is recovered when opening the file and it therefore we have PRECISELY the original data with no loss at all. It has to work that way.
...and what battery life did you get? Is 350 frames ok for M1 since ..it is not a high profile camera as another one which too does 350 frames on a battery charge, but is evidently higher class and so is judged differently?
ha ha Kiril youj crack me up.
DPR doesn't fall in love with your A7 and you lose it, flooding other comment sections and forums with your "findings."
DPR also didn't really report about the limited bracketing (common Sony oversight) in the A7, yet I don't see you reminding them of that.
What is limited in the A7 bracketing?
You should pay closer attention to the NEX forum, it's common complaint. Not sure if there's an app that fixes all of this (don't think so), but I know those are striking oversights with the camera without apps:
Inability to set bracketing and steps separately.
inability to set timer with bracketing (only possible with remote and even that comes with its own limitations)
Inability not to hold the shutter button with multiple bracketing steps
Batteries are compact, easily three in a pocket.
If you are bracketing it is easy to get 500+ shots on one charge. Presumably the VF to shutter ratio alters the effective consumption.
Aftermarket batteries on eBay are cheap and there are even ones called full "process" or something like that - it means the original charger can be used.
They are $9 and work perfectly.
In the dark that VF dusts glass finders!
My competition could not even SEE some of the things I shot. Without the EVF, in some cases, I could not see THE ACTION either ..
OMDs are brilliant in the dark.
EVFs are a major weakness in low light becoming both laggy and super noisy
Just double up on the frame rate. drains battery quicker, but helps eliminate EVF lagginess. Besides as far as seeing what the result will (mostly) look like, just chimp a few shots and then the camera for the best possible settings and use the EVF for overall composition and pay attention to that histogram. It tells a story that most don't seem to understand.
I recommend against using after-market batteries. I had one expand inside my E-M5. It did some damage and I had to send it away for repair.
The good news is that the repair service from Olympus was excellent. They turned around my camera inside of a week: sent it on Monday, had it back on Friday.
BTW where is the section on compressed RAW that Olypus are using and analysis of the effects of this compresison? or this is only for high profile cameras? and M1 is a.. ..not so high profile?
Lossless compression saves space and like a ZIP file or FLAC file ALL the original is recovered when opening the file.
Lossless compression WORKS that way.
DPR where is the "Camera hangs when multiple live view effects are turned on" Cons? Did you even try switching on the Art filters and peaking together?
ohh or you just love the camera and did not bother go that deep in the review process?
Hasn't happened to me - ever.
I just retried it, latest firmware now, but I did not see this before, either.
I find nothing on flash photography in here. It appears you can only use flash when using the EVF. Using live view mode darkens the results.
.Just upgrading from the E-M5 after purchasing a couple of the 4/3 lenses off eBay before this camera was released. Opens up a whole new world of great lenses.
There are a lot of small APS-C cameras out there. Even some compact lenses to go with them.
Personally, I would not buy into 4/3'rds at this point in time. jmo
Granted, APS-C cameras can be smallish since the sensors are in the same size range. 4/3 is not that much smaller as the conversion to FF is 1.85 vs 1.6 for Canon and 1.55 for Nikon. BUT, with 4/3 you don't have to deal with that old, non standard, oblong, 3/2 format. Oddly enough, in the day when film medium format was cutting edge, there was always the argument of the merits of 6x9 over 6x7 as though the oblong format would somehow make a so so picture an award winning photograph. Personally, I will never again use 3/2 format, I despise it that much. If 4/3 goes the way of the Studabaker, I will use medium format digital or just use film large and medium format. JMO
APS-C fails in the lens department. There's a lack of choice from every manufacturer. Kit lenses there are plenty, but nice primes and constant aperture zooms are lacking across all manufacturers. For Canon and Nikon you constantly have to resort to full frame glass, particularly at the wide end and you end up with strange focal lengths and larger than needed lenses. For NEX it's adapted lenses because of the lack of choice and now that Sony's gone full frame all those holes in the APS-C lens line are likely never to get filled. Fuji has nice lenses, but again not many. It's hard to see that APS-C has any future at all (except as the nichest of players), too big to be small, and not supported by a decent stable of lenses.
Not true with Pentax. Pentax has a very extensive APS-C lens portfolio
And mostly BAZOOKA lenses ...
I carry and EM-1, 8 lenses, FL50 flash, filters, plenty batteries, PL-200 QR, and a few other bits in a LowePro 180 Nova AW bag.
There is NO apsc or FMF (Full Marketing Frame) camera that you could even remotely do that with.
I sometimes don't know the situation so I take ALL the glass with me. Sometimes an EM-5 too.
Both OMDs leave my RB-67 in the DUST.
It had an actual picture area of 56 x 69.5mm, or about - about 4.5 times the 35mm format
Both OMDs leave it in the dust for quality. When there's time, I'll dig out some 4x5 inch negs - about 14.2 TIMES as big as FMF.
I would comfortably expect the OMDs comfortably beating 4x5 IQ. With Zuiko pro or prime lenses I'd expect better sharpness and less grain "noise" - except maybe for unprocessed night shots.
A few samples:
... t b c
3:2 was made popular by good hardware, NOT by having usable ideal proportions!
... it was rarely useful without cropping. You had to "learn the proportions" and try to shoot according to its non intuitive nature.
The proportions were NOT chosen to make good pictures!
They came about by adding 2 movie frames together, and also explains WHY the 6x9 format had VERY few users.
The VAST majority of roll film users (pretty well the only film where you had any choice in negative proportions) prefered 6x4.5 (4:3) and 6x7 (about 5:4, actually) or Hasselblad's SQUARE format (and its nice portable cameras) -NOT- the 3:2 of 6x9 format.
I saw the boxes leave the store.
FEW film formats had such weird elongation, all used a more ART-like aspect.
Pity it wasn't a much better 25x35mm format. (1.4:1)
I'm starting an informal 4:3 lens sample gallery.
I plan to do an EM-1 and EM-5 comparisons of near identical shots soon.
Hello, I have an OMD EM5 and 75mm 1.8 lens. Most of my shots aure either out of focus or slow to focus small kids. Is this fast in OMD EM1? Is there a firmware or setting I should look at to make the focussing faster and accurate?
If you're using the lens at wide aperture (such as f1.8) then it has a very narrow depth of field, so fast, relatively close to the camera children will always be a challenge. Tracking auto focus will help - it isn't brilliant on the E-M5 and is reported to be much better on the E-M1 due to its phase detection autofocus. I'm not guaranteeing it'll solve your problem though. If you post in the Micro Four-Thirds forums there are a lot of helpful people there who may be able to offer suggestions.
a 75 is like a 150 on 35mmFF totally the wrong lens for children up close. A 45mm is a much better choice here as it is 90mm equiv. but imo a 25mm (equiv to the nifty fifty) is the best choice.
The DOF of the 75 is so narrow it's like 8 cm on a three meter distance a challenge for any camera, a 45 the DOF is 25 cm.
I guess you're a beginner that bought into an advanced system.
Learn to use it first before spending too much money on lenses that are not suitable for the job!
It's a great lens for kids. Make sure both Lens and camera are at latest firmware levels and narrow the focussing spots. Also yurm eye focus on.
Here .. shot with lowered sharpness/contrast, NO additional lighting.no problem.
Try to have the child move across the frame, as few longish lenses can cope with a child at close chil running towards the camera.
Gives the parents a hard time too :P
I can't help but wonder if the MFT consortium (Panasonic, Olympus) will be offering a larger sensor at these prices! (aps or larger)
ie: put all that extra space and money to work!
No they won't. Its at this price because of many other features. I also don't want any camera at this price that only has large sensors but without the features that E-M1 has.
By that 'reasoning', an F-150 is a "better car" than a BMW ... must be .. more materials.
Andy, thank you for all your info and help. On the Olympus OM-D E-M1 can the camera generate immediately after shooting a playback of the image you just took without pressing any buttons (like Nikon)?
Thank you for your help!
Yes, it can. It's configured in the Setup Menu (spanner icon), 'Rev View' - you can select how long the just-shot image will display from 0.3sec to 30sec.
Olympus in finally making some really excellent M4/3 cameras and glass. I'm almost in, but will wait to see if they will ever get around to adding a "Fully" articulating LCD on their cameras. It's almost as if they think having a limited articulating LCD is somehow a niche'. LOL...Weird...Hopefully, they'll get with the program.
I am really loving what I'm seeing, otherwise... :0)
I originally thought the tilt screen was a step backwards compared to the fully articulated screen of my E-620. However, on second thoughts, I feel the tilt screen makes more sense on a touch screen.since it provides a more stable platform when pressing buttons.
You know, the articulating LCD on the 620 was one of those "cool" features like the 'back lit buttons' that I thought would be really handy until day to day practice kinda proved differently. After moving the LCD around for a while first out of the box and saying "cool" a couple times, it rarely moves. I heavily rely on the veiwfinder, so typically, Im not going to-have time/feel like-moving it out and around. I know other's mileage may vary, but Im not sure that a non articulated LCD is a step back like an LCD that you cant see in daylight would be.
I think it's great we are living in a time where all of the camera manufactures are stepping up and producing some really fine products to choose from. Especially when the weakest links are basically subjective ones.
When I use my cameras on a tripod, the fully articulating LCD really shines, for me. When I'm handholding a camera, I prefer to have the LCD closed, which is actually another good reason I prefer a fully articulating LCD.
Still, the newer Olympus cameras are impressive... :0)
As far as street shooting is concerned, tilting screen is preferable: it is much quicker to deploy. As far as self-shooting, E-PL5 has tilting screen which flips ~180 degrees up. Of course E-PL5 doesn't have a built-in viewfinder hump.
The OMD-E-M! is a great camera except for one big problem. I want to shoot HD video with it and send the HDMI output to an external video recorder. like a Sound Devices Pix. This camera will not output a video signal through HDMI while shooting, only in playback mode. For me this is a serious flaw on an otherwise great camera.
Panasonic, I believe, introduced something called pinpoint auto focus with the GX1 or G5. Does the E-M1 have a similar auto focus setting? Is this what is refereed to as Single in the Specs? If either of these is true does it work the same way with Olympus as with Panasonic?
Has a nice weight/handling combo and feels comfy on my hands. Design reminds me of the Japanese Gundam... but I'm leaning towards the GX-7 at the moment.
I am struggling to choose from these two systems. May I know what is the factor you think GX 7 is over em-1 in your thoughts. Lol, just for my reference. Thx
The links to download the original videos haven't fixed yet. :/
This Oly, or its successor, will be in camera stable one day.
No built in flash. Even the silly add on does not bounce. So you have to be that guy...the guy that blinds everybody with no bounce. The flip LCD does not allow for self biographical.
I've discovered that using something like a "softbox flash diffuser" add on to the flash produces the same effect; I rubber band a kleenex to the flash and achieve the same result and costs less.
Hi, when I have made a picture with the M1, I always have to wait quite a long time to take the next. I use new very fast writing chips (90MBS/sec), but have to wait 2 sec until te camera is ready for the next picture.
Why? the last OMD was quicker.
second question: when I use an adapted telephoto lens (nikon IF-ED 4,5/300 or Leica Telyt 6,8/400) and use the magnification for focusing accuracy, I can't stabilize the viewfinder image, perhps I overlooked the user's manual? Is it possible to activate the IBIS with adapted lenses with minimum fuss? The viewfinder is not really usable without a stabilization because the image is much too unsteady.
With panasonic one have only to half-press the button of the shutter and the viewfinder is stable.
I have a EM5. Try turn off the "Reduce the noise" option. This will solve your issue.
Number one, make sure you turn off the "rec view". Also Noise reduction should be off.
As fore the IS, you go to SCP, select IS, press OK, then press info. Adjust the focal length to the closest focal length of the lens you are using.
Just had this yesterday with the 12-40 2.8 Still trying out everything but only one thing has really been bothering me, the EVF is so sensitive that it keeps activating and thereby shutting down the screen. This even happens when viewing the pictures in Play mode, a slight pass of anything (shadow, finger, hand) over the EVF turns the screen off and goes to shooting mode. I measured the distance from which the EVF activates and it is 41mm (1.6 inches) from the rubber cup. Anybody got a fix to this?
Just turn the auto-switch feature off, it's a nuisance. It's just as easy to go from viewfinder to LCD with a button push.
Or keep your fingers away from the eyepiece - it is seeing them and 'thinks' you've lifted the cam to your face!
I cured myself after half a dozen times. No problem now.
Connect with dpreview


text:
Call (888) 784-1722 Mon-Sat 8:30-5:00 PST
Thanks for Subscribing!
Use Code: at Checkout!
Hurry! Expires !
Give your plants the light spectrum they need, using less energy, with these LED grow lights. Each Standard Gro-Bar uses only 6 watts of power yet produces the equivalent energy of 100 watts of traditional grow lighting. Gro-Bars radiate very little heat making it much easier to maintain humidity and temperatures for plants. Low-voltage, low heat, low energy consumption. Perfect for the commercial indoor gardener and kitchen fresh herb-gardener alike. Use as a single unit, or in a chain of multiple bars on a SunMount Frame. No reflector required. Bulbs last 20,000–100,000 hours!
Plan on using 2 lights per square foot growing area. All Gro-Bars are 25"x5"x1", and are available in the One (includes 1 Gro-Bar and 1 power hook-up), Two, Four or Eight Gro-Bar Packages (each include that number of Gro-Bars and one power hook up, plus bar to bar connector cables). When mounted in the Sunmount frame the finished product measures 25"x22" regardless of the number of bars attached. Each package comes with an international power hook-up which powers up to 8 bars.
All SolarOasis products are certified RoHS (hazardous materials free) as well as DECA certified to free of harmful plastic additives. All SolarOasis products are 100% recyclable of can be directly disposed of in standard landfills. SolarOasis products can be sold worldwide without restrictions. Country specific power cords are available at additional cost to meet the plug in power needs of other countries.
SAVE BIG ON SHIPPING: Free shipping to Continental USA on all Solar Oasis Grow Bars and all complete Grow Light Kits (Reflector + Ballast + Bulb).


text:
View Full-Size Image
Famous Lined Ultimate Roping (one piece) Rein
Product SKU: LR2886/2887
Price: $63.50
|Ask a question about this product
Our Famous Best Selling Roping Reins, used for Roping or Rodeo Competitions.
See here for Our Famous quality Leather matching Headstalls LH264 and LH2641
Save 10% on your order when you buy matching items as reins and headstall, breast collar etc. USE CODE- set10 at checkout
Click here to watch this proud video testimonial from a rein customer.
"You should be very particular when choosing a pair of leather horse reins. They are used as the line of communication that passes your signals to your horse. Without a doubt the reins need to feel good in your hands and good to your horse. They must have life to them so when communicating thru them your horse has a clear understanding of what you are asking them to do.
There is no substitution for quality when choosing the correct set of reins for you and your horse. They are exposed to the elements on a continual basis, so poor quality reins will suffer by losing their life over time and diminish the feel between you and your horse.
Whatever phase you are experiencing in your horsemanship journey, good quality American made tack is an essential part in leading you and your horse to the next level. For a deeper and more refined alive communication choose Buckaroo Leather reins.".....John Brand
Customer Reviews:artichoke (Friday, 28 October 2011)
firstname.lastname@example.com (Sunday, 07 August 2011)
firstname.lastname@example.com (Tuesday, 25 January 2011)
You may also be interested in this/these product(s)
Famous Lined Ultimate Harness Split ReinsFancy Over The Neck Breast Collar Straps BC16c


text:
Cook the ham the night before and put half in the fridge. The leftover ham is perfect for this recipe for a whole new meal. Now that's cooking smart!
Buy this ingredient
1. Heat cheese sauce with milk over medium heat until bubbly.
2. Stir in sour cream, tortellini, broccoli and ham.
3. Cover and simmer over medium heat for 10-15 minutes.
Tip: Substitute peas for broccoli.
Next Service Date is determined at checkout.
Earn 5% back from every online purchase. On this order you could earn
0 points / $0.00
FREE Sign Up
About Us
Customer Service
Connect with Us!
© 2015 Schwan's Home Service, Inc. | Copyright Policy | Privacy Policy | Security Practices
Script section containing code for Liveperson Chat Solution


text:
i think he will have a pretty big impact. with tannehill actually having three wrs to throw to will make a big difference. ryan will actually have two sides of the field to to throw to. hopefully he gets the playbook down this week so we can see what he has against the rams.
what do you guys think?


text:
Wedding Florists near sharpsville,in
Other Wedding Vendors near sharpsville,in:
|Wedding Band (59)
|Wedding Beauty & Health (378)
|Wedding Catering (403)
|Wedding Ceremony Music (90)
|Wedding DJ (352)
|Wedding Dress & Attire (253)
|Wedding Event Rentals (124)
|Wedding Favors & Gifts (87)
|Wedding Flowers (348)
|Wedding Invitations (146)
|Wedding Jewelry (213)
|Wedding Lighting & Decor (28)
|Wedding Officiant (282)
|Wedding Photography (1087)
|Wedding Planning (200)
|Wedding Rehearsal Dinner (142)
|Wedding Transportation (64)
|Wedding Travel Agents (56)
|Wedding Venue (960)
|Wedding Videography (129)
You've chosen the maximum (5) items in this category. Compare your items or remove and replace with another.Compare Now
0 Vendors Selected. Select up to 5 vendors to compare in one of the following categories: Venues, Bands, Catering, Photography or Videographers.
Raspberry Bouquets3 Reviews
Zionsville, IN | 317-641-0146
Raspberry Bouquets provides chic floral designs to any wedding or event. We are dedicated to bringing a unique perspective to each client's event...(more)
One of a Kind Events45 Reviews
Florals, Design, and Planning
Indianapolis, IN | 317-662-4788
One of a Kind Events is a full service wedding design and planning company serving the MidWest area. Located in Indianapolis, Indiana, every...(more)
Violets Are Blue {floral design}26 Reviews
The proof is in the petals
Indianapolis, IN | 317-292-2336
Violets Are Blue Floral Design is an Indianapolis based floral design company that specializes in weddings, bar and bat mitzvahs, anniversary...(more)
Rhinestones and Roses Floral Design4 Reviews
North Manchester, IN | 260-578-8872
Rhinestones and Roses Floral Design is here to make your day memorable! We design flower arrangements for any special occasion from prom corsages...(more)
Blooms & Lace6 Reviews
Indianapolis Wedding and Event Florist
Indianapolis, IN | 571-232-0200
Blooms & Lace offers a fresh, creative approach to floral designs for weddings, events and special occasions in Indianapolis, IN and the...(more)
Lilly Lane36 Reviews
Indianapolis, IN | 317-989-9936
Welcome to lilly lane, where our mission and passion is to create innovative, affordable floral designs and detail-oriented events. We offer full...(more)
Contact Us Website
lilly lane offers 10% off to all our contracted brides on any "additional events" they book before their wedding- including events being thrown by or for the bride (rehearsal dinners, showers, and more!)


text:
This conversation is closed.
Driving a car is one of the safer things you can do.
The purpose is to challenge the perception that road accident risk is a high risk. It isn't. The talk "If cars could talk..." begins with the statement that driving is dangerous. The theme in this talk is common throughout popular media.
We are saturated with messages about how dangerous it is to drive. This is not true. The facts say otherwise. Hence my example that the fatality risk of using stairs is 100 times greater.
Rate of deaths from stairs = 56 fatalities per 100 million miles.
Rate of deaths driving a car = 0.56 fatalities per 100 million miles.
As the proposed title says "driving a car is of the safer things you can do" which runs totally counter to the common mis-perception.
Jun 23 2013: Driving a car appears dangerous because a lot people engage in the activity and it is well publicized. But a large societal risk does not mean that something is individually more dangerous than something else.Jun 22 2013: Hi Edward, yes, stairs are one such example.Jun 21 2013: Hi Karl, "Stairmageddon" from "The Office" sounds like it will be funny but I can't seem to find it online. Do you have a link. JohnJun 21 2013: I believe it's easier to die in a car accident than alot of other things besides stairs....
Why don't we have bumper cars on the road, I always wondered that. The padding is much more effective and useful on the street than it is on a race track, but that's just my silly logic.
Jun 23 2013: Hi Uniqea, It is easier overall because of the total amount, yes. But while the activity is being done, mile for mile, or hour for hour, the risk is less.Jun 23 2013: Hi Uniqea, Your padding idea is not silly logic. It is a good idea. A more compliant, crash friendly environment on the road has made a lot of difference and could do more.Jun 21 2013: The National Safety Council reveals almost 12,000 thousand deaths each year occurs at homes due to stair accident falls. Among unintended injuries stair fall is second after automobile crashes. If you are constructing a convincing argument regarding the relative safety of automobile travel you should compare it to underwater cave diving, or playing Russian Roulette. Do you have statistics for everyday activities that are more dangerous than travelling in an automobile?
Jun 21 2013: Hi Edward, Thank you for the comment. In total automobile accidents is higher than stair falls as you say. So for total society risk automobiles are greater.
But for individual risk on an incremental basis, stairs are more dangerous than driving a car. The individual risk when using stairs is greater per mile of travel (about 100 x) or per hour of use (about 10 x).
Jun 22 2013: Since you seem to like statistics and you have a desire to dispell the perception that car travel is dangerous I must ask again, do you have statistics for everyday activities that are more dangerous than travelling in an automobile?Jun 23 2013: It doesn't matter John, the fact is that people travel incomparably much more miles by car than by stairs. You are building a fallacious argument for the safety of cars by looking for an artificial way to make it sound as if they're safer than other familiar things. The probability of dying in a car accident are much higher than those of dying using the stairs.
Jun 23 2013: Hi "Entropy Driven". Fair enough. But probability according to what measure?Jun 21 2013: There is a catch on those statistics, I'm pretty sure the majority of the people that dies in a stair case is either too old, too sick or both, however most people dying in car accidents are either young, healthy or both, maybe if those statistics would take into account only the people with a driver's licence the numbers would yield a very different result. So, I'm not sure the statistics you present are accurate or even reliable, but even if they are I see nothing wrong with making cars even safer.
We are saturated with messages about how dangerous it is to drive for one reason: As a driver you are not in full control of the situation. You control only ONE car, all the other cars and people on the streets are out of your control, you cannot predict which car is been driven by a drunk, or tired, or irritated, or reckless (or all of the above) driver. When you drive you are exposed to all sorts of impressible dangers, from a careless biker crossing you way to a tree branch falling unexpectedly, not to mention natural phenomena that can block your visibility, including rain, snow, fog, dust storms, etc, and which can trigger all sorts of unpredictably dangerous reactions on the drivers ahead and behind you. When you drive just a one second distraction can be enough to get you killed, to answer you cell phone while driving can be the last thing you do.
Jun 21 2013: Hi George, You raise an interesting point.
In the case of falls they affect the the elderly disproportionately as you say but they also affect the very young in a "bathtub" curve shape so that will bring down the average age. For instance the NEISS data shows risk of injury (not fatality) from stairs, ramps, landings and floors (i.e. not just stairs) is highest for 0-4 and 65+ and about equal in between.
The figures I used for fatal risk (from NBS) are not split by age. The risk calculations are here: http://goo.gl/TFfX4
Jun 22 2013: Ok, thanks for the reference, but I still think the way danger is measured is incorrect or at least counter intuitive, as an average it might be accurate, but in order to feel secure at any activity you need to feel you have control, (healthy) people feel in full control when they walk stairs or get inside the bathtub, it seems very unlikely to get killed due to someone else's mistake, when you drive however you are (or at least should be) aware you aren't in full control of the situation and it seems probable to get killed because someone else's mistake. So even if the data you show is reliable and accurate, the general perception is not that.
But the regardless of statistics, I think trying to make cars safer is not a bad thing.
Jun 23 2013: Hi George, Yes, making cars safer is a good thing. But other things matter too.Jun 20 2013: To me, it seems there is some error in your statistics:
1. Cars will transport you much more distance in a time period then taking the stairs will. To clarify, if I drove for one hour in a car, I may travel 60 miles or more (maybe around 30 on streets I don't really know). But if I walked up and down stairs for an hour, I doubt I'd get anywhere close to even 10 miles. This point was just trying to show that you may reach 100 million miles in a car much faster than taking stairs and then it may be considered more dangerous.
2. People use cars much more than they use stairs, so it'd be hard to compare them with any statistic. For example, you may have to walk up stairs for work (like in The Office during Stairmageddon), but to get to work you'd have to travel several miles. This is again just showing you most likely will hit 100 million miles (or whatever distance or even period of time) in a car, before you hit that same distance or period of time taking the stairs.
Jun 21 2013: Hi Karl,
Thank you for the contribution. Yes, the total distance is greater in cars but that is related to total risk not incremental individual risk.
For example in total playgrounds are involved in 320,000 times more injuries to 5-14 year olds than chainsaws. But that does not mean that a 10 year old is safer playing with a chainsaw than on a playground.
To know individual incremental risk - how dangerous is this for me given a set amount of use - we need to divide the total outcome by the total exposure. Hence the calculation that traveling on stairs - per unit of distance - for an individual is 100 times greater than driving a car.
Jun 23 2013: But dividing both cars and stairs by mile does not measure the risk by exposure, but by mile.
Jun 23 2013: Distance is one form of exposure. It is the common exposure measure in transport and walking is a measure of transport.
Time would be an alternative.
For the time exposure comparison we need the ratio of the average speed of both methods. I think about 10:1 would be of the right order. Perhaps your trip computer measures average speed since new. Mine shows an average over 30,000 miles of about 25mph. Compared to say 2.5mph for walking - although probably a bit less on stairs - but close enough just for the sake of an order of magnitude estimation we have a ratio of something in the order of 10:1.
At that rate stairs are ten times more dangerous than driving a car per hour of use.


text:
dog.com > Treats > Natural & Organic Treats > Item # 492813
promotional discount applied. Cart total will reflect savings.
Quantity discount will reflect in cart.
Sometimes, manufacturers require that products be advertised only at their suggested prices.
When we choose to sell these items for less, we display the sale price only in the cart. To see the price, click Add to Cart.
One-time delivery
Save 20% with Auto Ship
Deliver Every:
2 Weeks
3 Weeks
4 Weeks
5 Weeks
6 Weeks
7 Weeks
8 Weeks
1 Month
2 Months
3 Months
6 Months
Dog.com Doggie Box
Now: $24.99
Dr Harveys Sweet Potato Chews Dog Treat
Now: $22.99
Product Summary:
Beefeaters® Sweet Potato Fries
If you're looking for a vegetarian alternative to rawhide, this is the treat for you. Beefeaters®dehydrated Sweet Potato Fries are chewy, delicious and nutritious. Full of vitamins and minerals for energy and eyesight, it's a wholesome, naturally sweet snack. Perfect whole for med-large dogs, or break into smaller pieces easily for smaller dogs.
· A tasty vegetarian alternative to rawhide
· Full of vitamins (A, B6, C) and minerals (manganese, copper, potassium, iron)
· Fully digestible
· No additives or artificial preservatives
· Low in fat
Item Specifications:
Sweet Potato, Glucose, Citric Acid (a preservative), Sodium Metabisulfite (a preservative).
Guaranteed Analysis:
Crude Protein 2.5% min
Crude Fat 0.3% min
Crude Fiber 3.0% max
Moisture 25.0% max
Beefeaters Sweet Potato Chips Bag
Starting at: $8.49
Pumpkin Crunchers Dog Treat
Starting at: $9.99
Greenies Dog Dental Chew Treats Teenie
Starting from: $16.99
Pet n Shape Chik n Skewers Dog Treat
Starting at: $19.49
StarMark Everlasting Dog Treats
Starting at: $3.49
Busy Buddy Gnawhide Refill Rings
Starting from: $4.79
Pet n Shape Chik n Dumbell Dog Treat
Starting at: $10.49
Pet n Shape Chik n Sweet Potato Dog Treat
Multipet Look Who's Talking Dog Toy
Starting at: $6.49
Greenies Dog Dental Chew Treats Regular
Chewy Louie Beef Flavor 20 Ct.
Now: $6.49
Pet n Shape Chick n Breast Dog Treat
Starting at: $18.49
Greenies Lite Petite Dog Dental Chew
Starting from: $29.99
Stewart Freeze Dried Beef Liver Dog Treat
Starting from: $4.99
Smokehouse Duck and Sweet Potato Dog Treat
Starting at: $9.49
Blue Dog Bakery Assorted Dog Treats
Now: $5.99
Zukes Mini Naturals Moist Dog Treats
Starting at: $11.49
Product Reviews by Customers
This item is not eligible for Canadian shipping.
Some items everyday price is so low we can't discount or we have marked down the item to a final sale price. These select items will not be included in your order total when determining if your order qualifies for a promotional event.


text:
National Louis University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA). NCA is one of six regional accreditation organizations recognized by the United States Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Founded in 1895, the NCA accredits public and private educational institutions serving 19 Midwestern, South-Central and a few Western states, including: Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
In addition to Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools accreditation, the following business and business-related programs of National Louis University's College of Professional Studies and Advancement (CPSA) have been reviewed by the Board of Commissioners of the International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education (IACBE). The IACBE review process requires the institution to develop and submit a self-study covering these programs, to have a site visit by a trained team of peer reviewers, and to be reviewed by the IACBE Board of Commissioners. The IACBE is the accreditor for business programs in student-centered colleges and universities throughout the world. The IACBE exists to promote, develop, and recognize excellence in business education. The IACBE's philosophy of accreditation is centered on student learning and operational outcomes, which makes it flexible and adaptable.
National Louis University has received specialized accreditation for its business programs through the International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education (IACBE) located at 11374 Strang Line Road in Lenexa, Kansas, USA. The business programs in the following degrees are accredited by the IACBE:
- Master of Business Administration
- Master of Science in Health Services Administration
- Master of Science in Human Resource Management and Development
- Bachelor of Science in Health Care Leadership
- Bachelor of Science in Management
- Bachelor of Science in Management Information Systems
Annual Report
2013-14 Annual Report (pdf)