text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|Feb 14, 1995
|Filing date
|Nov 27, 1990
|Priority date
|Nov 28, 1989
|Fee status
|Also published as
|Publication number
|Andrew J. Makoff, Michael A. Romanos, Jeffrey J. Clare, Neil F. Fairweather
|Original Assignee
|Evans Medical Limited
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (2), Non-Patent Citations (46), Referenced by (11), Classifications (30), Legal Events (4)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
The present invention relates to the production of tetanus toxin C fragment.
Vaccination against tetanus is effective in the prevention of this disease in most Western countries, although incomplete vaccination in some third world countries can account for up to one million cases of tetanus every year. Current tetanus vaccines are produced by formaldehyde treatment of tetanus toxin produced by the anaerobic bacterium C. tetani to produce the immunogenic toxoid. It has been suggested that impurities incorporated during formaldehyde treatment are partly responsible for the adverse effects sometimes seen with hyperimmunisation with tetanus toxoid.
The structural gene for tetanus toxin has been cloned and sequenced (Fairweather, N. F., et al, J. Bacteriol. 165, 21-27 (1986); Fairweather, N. F., and Lyness, V. A., Nuc. Acid Res. 14, 7809-7812 (1986). These studies have confirmed the structure of tetanus toxin as a 150kD protein of 1315 amino acids. The toxin can be cleaved by various treatments into several fragments. Fragment C, comprising the C terminal 451 amino acids, is a 50kD polypeptide generated by papain cleavage of toxin.
Fragment C derived in this way has been shown to be non-toxic and is capable of immunising mice and guinea pigs (Helting, T. B., and Zwisler, O., J. Biol. Chem. 252, 187-193 (1977); Helting, T. B., and Nau, H. H., Act. Pathol. Microbiol. Scan. Sect. C 92, 59-63 (1984)). Papain digestion also releases the 100 kD fragment B, comprising the N-terminal part of the toxin molecule. Fragment B is also protective, but has been reported to be toxic to animals at high doses (Helting, T. B., et al, J. Biol. Chem. 253,125-125, (1978)).
Portions of tetanus toxin containing fragment C have been expressed in E.coli (Fairweather, N. F., et al, J. Bacteriol, 165, 21-27, (1986));
Fairweather, N. F., et al, Infection and Immunity 55, 2541-2545, (1987); EP-A-0209281). These portions of tetanus toxin which were expressed were either fused to part of the E.coli trpE protein or comprised part of fragment B and all of fragment C of tetanus toxin. All the above were found to be expressed at low levels and were all insoluble in the cytoplasm of E.coli cells.
It has been found previously that when fragment C on its own is expressed in E.coli, it is soluble in the cytoplasm of the cells. Fragment C was expressed using two plasmids, pTETtac1 and pTETtac2 which were derived from the high expressing plasmid pIFGtac124A (Makoff, A. J., et al., Biochem. Soc. Trans., 16, 48-49, (1988)) Most of the coding sequence of pTETtac1 was provided by two restriction fragments. The rest of the sequence was encoded by a pair of synthetic oligonucleotides both 42 base pairs long, where the codon bias was optimised for expression in E.coli. Plasmid pTETtac2 was constructed from pTETtac1 by replacing the BglIIoSfa NI region by a pair of synthetic oligonucleotides (each 161 nucleotides long) which reproduced the sequence upstream of the initiation codon and optimised the coding sequence, at the beginning of the C fragment region, for expression in E.coli (Makoff, A. J., et al. Bio/Technology 7, 1043-1046 (1989)).
However, E.coli has the disadvantage as a host organism that it contains toxic pyrogenic factors (lipopolysaccharides from the cell wall) which must be rigorously excluded from the final product. The ease with which these factors may be excluded will depend on the protein product in question and the method by which it is purified from the cell. However, it would be preferable to eliminate the possibility of contamination altogether simply by using a non-toxic organism as the host, such as yeast.
In using the native sequence encoding fragment C, the inventors were unable to obtain expression in yeast and found that the barrier to expression was due to the fact that the mRNA transcripts of the gene were incomplete. Synthesis of the complete transcript probably involves at the 3'-end three closely linked steps: termination of the primary transcript, endonucleolytic processing and polyadenylation. (Platt, J.,Ann. Rev. Biochem., 55, 339-372, (1986)). The inventors have now identified the position of several "terminators" (termination/endo- nucleolytic processing/polyadenylation sites) present in the DNA. As a result the inventors were able to eliminate these and obtain successful expression in yeast of tetanus toxin fragment C.
FIG. 1 shows the position of at least six elements which are completely or partially responsible for the production of incomplete mRNA transcripts. The yeast terminator is poorly defined. Several different consensus sequences have been proposed (Henikoff, S., et al., Cell, 33, 607-614, (1983); Zaret, K. S., and Sherman, F., Cell, 28, 563-573, (1982); Bennetzen, J. L., and Hall, B. D., J.Biol. Chem., 257, 3018-3025, (1982a)), but it appears that there may be deviation from these sequences and it appears that other, undefined elements may also be necessary for termination (Osborne, B. I., and Guarente L., PNAS, 86, 4097-4101, (1989)). Yeast terminators occur in stretches of (A+T)-rich DNA, though not all (A+T)-rich DNA contains terminators. Our surprising finding was that the original fragment C DNA contained at least six elements which were responsible for incomplete transcription of the mRNA. The elements were eliminated by increasing the (G+C)-content at these positions thus providing for the production of a substantially complete mRNA transcript.
The present invention provides a novel DNA sequence encoding tetanus toxin fragment C and having a (G+C)-content that has been increased relative to the wild-type DNA sequence so as to allow the production of complete mRNA transcripts in yeast.
Tetanus toxin fragment C, as used herein, is defined as the wild type polypeptide having the amino acid sequence set forth in FIG. 2 and in Seq ID Nos: 1 and 2 or is a mutant polypeptide having an amino acid sequence that is at least 90% homologous with that set forth in FIG. 2 and that retains substantially the same biological and immunogenic properties as the wild-type polypeptide.
The amino acid sequence of fragment C may be varied by one or more amino acid substitutions, extensions, insertions and/or deletions provided the resulting polypeptide retains substantially the same biological and immunogenic properties as wild-type fragment C.
In the case of amino acid substitutions, one or more of the amino acid residues of fragment C may be replaced by one or more other amino acid residues which achieve this aim. Candidate substitutions include Ser for Thr and vice versa, Glu for Asp and vice versa, Gln for Asn and vice versa, Leu for Ile and vice versa, Ala for Val and vice versa and Arg for Lys and vice versa.
Mutant fragment C may be obtained by introducing nucleotide changes into the DNA sequence encoding wild-type fragment C, for example into the DNA sequence of FIG. 2 and SEQ ID No: 1. This may be achieved by any appropriate technique, including restriction of the sequence with an endonuclease, insertion of oligonucleotide linkers, use of an exonuclease and/or a polymerase and site-directed mutagenesis.
Fragment C wild-type DNA has a (G+C) - content of 29%, while the preferred DNA sequence in accordance with the present invention (see FIG. 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3) has 47%. The maximum possible (G+C) - content that can encode fragment C is 60%. A level of 40-60% (G+C)- content would thus allow the production of a complete mRNA transcript provided that were no localised concentrations of (A+T) rich DNA.
In designing a fragment C gene for expression in yeast, one route would be to use codons found in highly expressed yeast genes (Bennetzen, J. L., and Hall, B. D., J.Biol. Chem., 257, 3026-3031, (1982)) This would increase the (G+C)-content. Another important consideration would be to eliminate runs of (A+T) since these would raise the local (A+T)-content and might be sufficient to cause termination.
Since the elements responsible for the production of incomplete transcripts are only likely to extend over approximately 100 nucleotides, it is possible to achieve the same result by only increasing the (G+C)-content within these small regions.
Six regions were identified as being responsible for the incomplete production of mRNA transcripts by analysis of a number of different mutant DNA sequences containing differing lengths of DNA for which the (G+C)-content had been increased.
TABLE 1______________________________________Region responsible forproduction of incomplete Region to be altered so astranscript in C. tetani DNA to allow the production of(nucleotides into coding sequence) complete mRNA transcripts______________________________________1. 560 � 50 410-6102. 660 � 50 510-7103. 800 � 50 650-8504. 1000 � 100 800-11005. 1100 � 100 900-12006. 1300 � 100 1100-1400______________________________________
It is believed that some of the regions are more responsible than others for the production of incomplete transcripts. It appears that regions 2 and 4 are most important. In order to allow the production of complete mRNA transcripts which is being prevented by regions 2 and 4 the (G+C)-content of mutant fragment DNA is increased relative to the native DNA sequence from nucleotide 510 to nucleotide 700 and from nucleotide 800 to nucleotide 1100, the numbers corresponding to those set forth in the sequence of FIG. 2 and in SEQ ID Nos: 1 and 3. The next most important regions are 3,5 and 6. Similarly, in order to allow the production of complete mRNA transcripts which are additionally being prevented by regions 3, 5 and 6 the (G+C)-content is additionally increased from nucleotide 650 to nucleotide 850, from nucleotide 900 to nucleotide 1200 and from nucleotide 1100 to nucleotide 1400, the numbers corresponding to those set forth in the sequence of FIG. 2. Region 1 may be too weak to interfere with the production of complete mRNA transcripts; however, in order to allow complete mRNA production which is being prevented by Region 1 the (G+C)-content is additionally increased from nucleotide 410 to nucleotide 610, the numbers corresponding to those set forth in the sequence of FIG. 2.
It can be seen from Table 1 that because of the clustering of elements, it is advisable to increase the (G+C)-content from nucleotide 410 to the 3'- end nucleotide, the numbers corresponding to those set forth in the sequence of FIG. 2 so as to allow the production of complete mRNA transcripts.
The novel DNA sequence according to the invention may be chemically synthesised and cloned using methodologies well-known in the art.
The novel DNA may then be cloned into a suitable vector and used to transform yeast which is then capable of expressing the polypeptide which is encoded by the novel DNA.
The vector may be any appropriate vector which is suitable for the cloning of the DNA and which may be used to transform a yeast cell and thereby express the relevant protein. Such vectors include autonomously replicating plasmids and chromosomal integration vectors.
Vectors which may be used for cloning DNA include pWYG7 (see Example 1 and FIG. 3), pWYG5 (see Example 2 and FIG. 5) and PIC3 (Example 6) for use in yeast.
In yet another feature of the present invention there is provided an expression vector, which incorporates a DNA sequence according to the invention and which is capable of expressing fragment C in yeast (See Examples 4 and 5).
The expression vector incorporates control elements for transcriptional initiation (promoters) and termination. The coding sequence of the gene to be expressed along with its own translational start and stop codons is inserted between these control elements.
Examples of promoters for use with the expression vector of the present invention include GAL1, GAL7, ADH2, PGK, GAPDH, etc. (Kingsman, S. M. et al., Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews, Vol. 3, 377-416, (1985); Russell, D. W. et al., The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol 258, No.4, 2674-2682 (1983)); and AOX1 (Digam, et al., Dev. Ind. Micro. Biol, 29, 59-65, (MS8)). Use of the inducible promoter such as the GALl, GAL7 or ADH2 promoter may be preferred as it enables expression to be controlled. Expression of the GAL1 and GAL7 promoters is induced by galactose.
An appropriate expression vector may be obtained by cloning a DNA sequence according to the present invention into an expression vector. An example of a complete expression vector, containing the GAL1 promoter, is pWYG5-TET15 which contains the whole synthesised DNA encoding fragment C (see FIG. 12).
In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a yeast organism transformed with an expression vector according to the invention.
Examples of suitable host cells for use in the above-described method are yeast cells such as Saccharomyces, Pichia, Kluyveromyces or Hansenula and in particular the following species; Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Kluyveromyces lactis, Hansenula polymorpha, or Pichia pastoris.
A strain of yeast which can be used is Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain S150-2B.
The present invention provides a process for the preparation of fragment C of tetanus toxin which process comprises the steps of:
(i) preparing the DNA of fragment C to contain codons of increased (G+C)-content by chemically synthesising the entire coding sequence
(ii) inserting the DNA into a suitable vector
(iii)transforming yeast cells
(iv) culturing a transformed host to express fragment C of tetanus toxin
(v) recovering the product fragment C thus expressed
Recombinant tetanus toxin fragment C may therefore be obtained thus facilitating its use as the basis for an alternative vaccine to formaldehyde treated tetanus toxoid and tetanus toxin fragment C as expressed in E.coli.
Step (iv) of the process of the invention comprises culturing yeast transformed by the expression vector of the present invention such as to cause expression of fragment C. Fragment C may then be isolated from the yeast cells by for example breaking the yeast cells with glass beads or when the material is secreted by isolation from the culture medium.
The DNA sequence and corresponding amino acid sequence encoded by plasmid pWYG5-TET15 mentioned below is shown in FIG. 2 and in SEQ ID Nos: 3 and 4. The symbol , , , is shown under the translational stop codon. The nucleotide changes made in the synthesised gene are shown below the original C.tetani DNA sequence.
The fragment C that is expressed is recovered, in step (v) of the present process, from the yeast cells by similar protocols by standard purification procedures. (Makoff, A. J., et al., Bio/Technology, 7, 1043-1046, (1989a)).
The fragment C may be isolated to the desired degree of purity. Some minor yeast contaminants may also be present. Generally the degree of purity is at least 80%, preferably at least 90% and more preferably at least 95%.
The present invention also provides a vaccine for conferring immunity to tetanus comprising tetanus toxin fragment C prepared according to the invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. The vaccine may include other antigens to provide a multi-valent vaccine. Typically carriers and diluents are sterile, pyrogen-free liquid media suitable as vehicles for introducing a polypeptide into a patient. Isotonic saline solution may be employed.
The vaccine may also comprise an adjuvant for stimulating the immune response and thereby enhancing the effect of the vaccine. A convenient adjuvant is aluminium hydroxide. Conveniently the vaccines are formulated to contain a final concentration of fragment C or its derivative of from 0.2 to 200 μg/ml, preferably 5 to 50 μg/ml, most preferably about 30μg/ml. After formulation the vaccine may be incorporated into a sterile container which is then sealed and stored at a low temperature, for example 4� C., or it may be freeze-dried.
The vaccine may be administered by any conventional method for the administration of vaccines such as parenteral (e.g. subcutaneous or intramuscular) injection. The treatment may consist of a single dose of vaccine or a plurality of doses over a period of time. It is recommended that each dose is 0.1 to 2ml preferably 0.2 to 1 ml, most preferably about 0.5ml of vaccine.
The inventors have surprisingly found that it is possible to secrete fragment C into the culture medium using an appropriate secretion signal such as the alpha factor leader peptide. The protein was found to be secreted to a level of 5-10mg/l into the medium and was present in two forms in roughly equal amounts: a high molecular mass hyper-glycosylated protein (75-200kDa), and a core-glycosylated protein (65kDa). This glycosylated protein was found to be substantially inactive in vaccinating mice against tetanus toxin. However, if the glycosylated protein is de-glycosylated it becomes as active as the intracellular fragment C in immunising against tetanus.
As it should be possible to secrete fragment C to levels in excess of 100mg/l in high-density fermentations the de-glycosylated secreted product may provide a feasible production alternative to the intracellular protein production.
The invention will be described in more detail hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 shows the location of elements responsible for the production of incomplete transcripts identified in the four variants of fragment C DNA having different amounts of synthesised DNA. Coding regions for fragment C are boxed; regions that were chemically synthesised with codons optimal for translation in E.coli are hatched. The four versions of the gene, TET2, TET7, TET11 and TET15, had 12%, 50%, 73% and 99% synthetic DNA, respectively. The approximate positions of yeast polyadenylation sites found in the native sequence, estimated from the sizes of short transcripts in Northern blots, are indicated by arrows. (The 5' synthesised region in TET2 extends 16Ont into the gene, and the first terminator is at 560�5Ont).
FIG. 2 shows the sequence of C.tetant DNA encoding fragment C (top line), the nucleotide changes made in the fully synthesised version of fragment C (middle line) and the amino acid sequence (third line) (SEQ. ID Nos: 1 to 4).
FIG. 3 shows the construction of the yeast expression vector pWYG 7. Foreign genes are inserted between the Bam HI and Bcl I sites.
FIG. 4 shows the nucleotide sequence of the promoter region of GAL7 (SEQ ID No: 5). The synthesised promoter corresponds to the XhoI to BamHI fragment. Regions downstream of BamH1 are present in native GAL7 including the RNA start site (↓) and the initiating ATG (underlined). The two basepairs which were altered to give a BamHI site are underlined.
FIGS. 5 (i)-5(ii) shows the construction of yeast expression vector pWYG5.
FIG. 6 shows the map of pTETtac2
FIG. 7 shows the E.coli vector for expression of tetanus toxin fragment C (pTETtac2) with progressively more synthesised DNA containing optimal codons. Only the region between the EcoRI and AvaI sites is shown, the full map of pTETtac2 being given in FIG. 6. The fragment C coding regions are boxed and synthesised regions are hatched.
FIG. 8(i)-8(iii) shows the construction of pTETtac16. The oligonucleotides inserted into pTETtac7 to obtain pTETtac14 are shown in SEQ ID NOS: 6 and 7. FIG. 9i)-9(ii) shows the construction of pWYG7-TET2. The oligonucleotides inserted into pTETtac2 to obtain pTETtac2Y are shown in SEQ ID NOS: 8 and 9.
FIG. 10 shows a Western blot analysis of proteins from induced cells containing no plasmid, pWYG7-TET2, pWYG5-TET7, pWYG5-TET11 or pWYG5-TET15 (tracks 1 to 5, respectively). Track 6 was loaded with Met-fragment C produced in E coli. The proteins (50μg) were separated in a 9% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, blotted onto nitrocellulose, and probed with a rabbit anti-fragment C serum as first antibody. Track 3 contains a very faint doublet at about 30kDa which is not visible in the reproduction.
FIG. 11 shows a Northern blot of RNA extracted from induced cells transformed with pWYG7-TET2, pWYG5-TET7, pWYG5-TET11 and pWYG5-TET15 (tracks 1 to 4, respectively). The position of stained RNA size markers (size in kb) is indicated. The blot was probed with 32 P-labelled 1.4kb BglII-BamHI fragment of pTETtac2.
FIG. 12 shows the map of pWYG5-TET15
FIG. 13 shows the nucleotide sequence of the synthetic DNA fragments carrying the α-factor prepro region used in pWYG69-TET2 and pWYG59-TET15 (SEQ ID NOS: 10 and 11).
FIG. 14 shows a Western blot of secreted yeast fragment C. Lane 1, pWY659-TET15 culture supernatant treated with endoglycosidase H. Lanes 2 and 3, untreated pWY659-TET15 culture supernatant. Lane 4, pWYG9-TET2 culture supernatant. Lane 5, pWY69-TET2 culture supernatant treated with endoglycosidase H. Lane 6, culture supernatant from untransformed cells. Lane 7, culture supernatant from untransformed cells after endoglycosidase H treatment. Lane 8, molecular weight markers. Lane 9, fragment C produced in E.coli.
FIG. 15(a)-15(b) shows the construction of pP1C3-TET15. The oligonucleotides inserted in pA0804 to obtain pPIC1 are shown in SEQ ID NOS: 12 and 13.
FIG. 16(a)-16(b) shows fragment C production in different pP1C3-TET15 transformants. Part a) shows proteins from total cell extracts separated on a Coomassie blue stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Lanes 1-11 are loaded with extracts from clones 885C, 887C, 8811C, 8812D, 881D, 882E, 885E, 8811E, 881F, 8810F, 883H respectively. Lane 12, extract from fragment C expressing E.coli. Lane 13, molecular weight markers (phosphorylase b, 97,400; bovine serum albumin, 68,000; ovalbumin, 43,000; chymotrypsinogen, 25,700; lactoglobulin, 18,400). Lane 14, insoluble fraction from 881F. Lane 15, total extract from 881F. Lane 16, soluble fraction from 881F. Part b) shows a Western blot of these samples. Lanes 1-9, as in part a). Lane 10, extract from 889F. Lane 11, extract from 8810F. Lane 12, extract from 883H. Lane 13, extract from untransformed cells. Lane 14, molecular weight markers.
FIG. 17 shows a Coomassie blue stained SDS polyacrylamide gel showing fragment C production in a high cell density fermentation of clone 881F. Lane 1, molecular weight markers (β-galactosidase, 116,000; phosphorylase b, 97,400; bovine serum albumin, 68,000; ovalbumin, 43,000; carbonic anhydrase, 29,000). Lane 2, untransformed cell extract. Lane 3, 881F extract from an induced shake-flask culture. Lanes 4-14, extracts from cells taken from the fermenter at the following time intervals with respect to the beginning of induction, -15,0,2,4,6,8,24,28,30,32,52 hours.
The following Examples illustrate the present invention and are not intended to limit the invention in any way.
1. Construction of yeast expression vector pWYG7
The vector pWYG7, (Beesley, K. M., et al., Bio/Technology, 8, 644-649 (1990)), constructed at Wellcome, was used for the expression of C fragment. The construction of pWYG7 is outlined in FIG. 3. It is derived from the 2u vector pJDB219 (Beggs, J. D., Nature, 275, 104-109, (1978)) modified to contain a kanamycin-resistance marker (kanr) and the yeast galactose-regulated GAL7 promoter. First the kanr marker (HincII fragment from pUC4K; Vieira, J., and Messing, J., Gene, 19, 259, (1982)) was ligated into the unique SmaI site of pJDB219 to give the kanr tetr vector pJDB219K. Secondly, a synthetic GAL7 promoter fragment (XhoI-BamHI fragment, sequence shown in FIG. 4 and in SEQ ID NO: 5) was cloned between the unique SalI and BamHI sites of pJDB219K. The resulting vector, pWYG7, has the GAL7 promoter with unique BamHI and BclI sites upstream of the yeast 2u plasmid FLP gene transcriptional terminator (Sutton, A., and Broach, J. R., Mol.Cell. Biol, 5, 2770-2780 (1985)). Foreign genes to be expressed from pWYG7 are inserted between the BamHI and BclI sites. The design of the GAL7 promoter fragment is discussed below.
The smallest fragment of DNA upstream of the GAL7 gene which exhibits full promoter activity has been defined by deletion mapping (Tajima, M., et al., Yeast, 1, 67-77, (1985)). Based on this information a 260bp GAL7 promoter fragment was synthesised (FIG. 4 for sequence). The 260bp promoter was synthesised as four overlapping oligonucleotides using a Pharmacia Gene Assembler (protocol supplied by Pharmacia). These oligonucleotides were phosphorylated and annealed using standard techniques, then ligated into XhoI-BamHI cut plC-20H (Marsh, J. C., Gene, 32,481-485, (1984)). Positive clones were identified and their DNA sequenced using the double-stranded DNA sequencing method with universal and reverse sequencing primers (Hong, G. F., Biosc, Reports, 2, 907, (1982)). The sequence of the GAL7 inserts was confirmed, and then the XhoI-BamHI GAL7 insert was excised and cloned into pJDB219K as described above.
The design of the GAL7 promoter fragment in pWYG7 is such that the natural GAL7 DNA sequence has been slightly modified (2bp changed) in order to make the BamHI cloning site Upstream of the GAL7 mRNA start sites. The foreign gene to be expressed is then linked with synthetic DNA to the BamHI site, such that the GAL7 mRNA start sites are introduced, along with the GAL7 upstream untranslated sequences. Thus the first non-yeast DNA downstream of the promoter is the initiating ATG codon of the foreign gene, and the transcript produced will have a yeast GAL7 leader rather than a foreign leader which could reduce efficiency of translations.
Construction of yeast expression vector pWYG5
The vector pWYG5 is the same basic plasmid as pWYG7 but has the GAL1 promoter from pBM150 (Johnston, M. and Davis, R. W. Mol. Cell. Biol 4, 1440-1448 (1984)) in place of the GAL7 promoter. The 0.7kb EcoRI-BamHI fragment from pBM150, containing the divergent GAL and GAL10 promoters, was first sub-cloned between the EcoRI and BamHI sites of pIC-20H (Marsh et al., J. C., Gene, 32, 481-485, (1984)) to give pIC-GAL, then the 0.7kb XhoI-BamHI promoter fragment from pIC-GAL was isolated and placed between the SalI and BamHI sites of pJDB219K to give pWYG5 (the construction is outlined in FIG. 5).
The GAL1 promoter from pBM150 has a BamHI linker placed downstream of the RNA initiation sites and therefore pWYG5 is used differently from pWYG7. Foreign genes must be adapted to have a BamH1 or BamHI-compatible (i.e. BglII or BclI) site immediately upstream of the initiation codon. In order to conform with the consensus found in highly expressed yeast genes, the sequence upstream of the ATG should be rich in A residues and particularly have A at -3. As with pWYG7, the foreign genes are inserted between the BamHI and BclI sites of pWYG5.
Construction of E.coli expression vectors for tetanus toxin fragment C, including synthesised versions of the gene, and intermediate vectors for yeast expression.
Expression cassettes of fragment C DNA for transfer to the yeast vectors pWYG5 and pWYG7 were isolated from the E.coli expression vector pTETtac2 and its derivatives (Makoff et al., 1989; U.K. patent application No. 89141220.0,Ser. No. 07/777,337, filed Nov. 29, 1991. pTETtac2 is a tac promoter vector containing DNA coding for Met-fragment C (FIG. 6 for plasmid map); the first 161bp and last 42bp of the natural C.tetani DNA have been replaced by synthesised DNA which was altered to optimise codon usage for E.coli and to provide useful restriction sites. (All synthetic DNA was chemically synthesised as oligonucleotides of length 50-160, on a Pharmacia Gene Assembler, which were phosphorylated, annealed and assembled into the relevant plasmids). Expression vectors based on pTETtac2 were then constructed where progressively more of the C.tetani DNA, starting from the 5' end, was replaced by synthesised DNA whose codon usage was optimised for E.coli. The first vector pTETtac7, was constructed via the intermediate plasmid pTETtac 6, shown in FIG. 7; pTETtac7 contains an approximately 45% synthesised gene. This involved cloning two oligonucleotides between the BanI and MaeII sites of pTETtac2 in order to produce the two unique sites NcoI and AfIII in pTETtac6. Eight more oligonucleotides were then cloned between the two sites to generate pTETtac11, which contained a 75% synthesised gene.
A version of pTETtac2 containing the 99% synthesised gene (pTETtac15) for fragment C was actually first designed specifically as an intermediate vector (pTETtac16) for transfer of the expression cassette to the yeast vector pWYG5. The nucleotide sequence of the synthesised gene is compared to the original C.tetani gene in FIG. 2 from this sequence and the restriction maps in FIG. 7 the sequence of each version of the gene can be derived. The overall scheme for the construction of pTETtac16 is shown in FIG. 8. First, pTETtac7 was modified by replacement of the DNA between the BglII and SalI sites with oligonucleotides which provided upstream sequences compatible with the yeast vector pWYG5 (sequence of oligonucleotides in FIG. 8 and in SEQ ID NOS: 6 and 7). Secondly, the remaining 400bp of the DNA encoding fragment C was synthesised as four oligonucleotides of length 140 to 160. These were phosphorylated, annealed and cloned between the ClaI and BamHI sites of pIC-20H. Recombinant plasmids containing the 400bp insert were identified and further checked by sub-cloning into M13 and sequencing (Sanger. F., et al., Proc.Nat.Acad. Sci., 74, 5463-5467, (1977)). A plasmid with an insert of the correct sequence, designated pIC-TET, was used as a source of the 400bp ClaI-BamHI fragment to ligate to the 4199bp AfIII-BamHI fragment of pTETtac14 and the 325bp AflII-ClaI fragment of pTETtac11 in order to create pTETtac16. pTETtac16 then has the fully synthesised gene for fragment C with codons optimised for E,coli and considerably more (GC)-rich DNA than the C.tetani DNA, preceded by an upstream region suitable for expression in pWYG5.
Construction of yeast intracellular expression vectors for fragment C.
Four vectors were constructed, one based on pWYG7 and three on pWYG5. The pWYG7 vector, pWYG7-TET2, contained the largely unaltered form of the natural C.tetani gene from pTETtac2. The remaining vectors, pWYG5-TET7, pWYG5-TET11 and pWYG5-TET15 were all based on pWYG5 and contained the genes with progressively more synthesised DNA, from the plasmids pTETtac7, pTETtac11 and pTETtac16, respectively. Vector pWYG5-TET15 was deposited on 16th Feb. 1993 under the Budapest Treaty at the National Collection of Industrial and Marine Bacteria, Aberdeen, United Kingdom under accession number NCIMB 40538.
(i) pWYG7-TET2
The DNA between the BglII and SalI sites of pTETtac2 was replaced by two oligonucleotides to give pTETtac2Y in order to provide the GAL7 upstream sequences required for expression in pWYG7 (FIG. 9 for construction and sequences; sequences also shown in SEQ ID NOS: 8 and 9). The oligonucleotides also placed an NcoI (CCATGG) site at the initiating ATG, altering the second codon from Lys to Val. The 1.4kb BglII-BamHI fragment from pTETtac2Y was isolated and ligated with pWYG7 (dam-DNA) which had been digested with the BamHI and bclI and then with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. Recombinant plasmids with inserts of the correct orientation were designated pWYG7-TET2.
Western blot analysis of protein extracts from induced cells containing pWYG7-TET2 gave no detectable product reacting with the antibody (track 2, FIG. 10). An ELISA quantitation gave an exceedingly low, but positive, figure of less than 10-3 of soluble protein. Since the gene for fragment C was found to be efficiently expressed in a number of other host cells, the plasmid and transformants were rechecked and expression re-analysed extensively.
A gene encoding an unmodified fragment C was next tested.
(ii) pWYG5-TET7 and pWYG5-TET11
These plasmids were made by transferring the 1.4kb BglII-BamHI fragments from pTETtac7 and pTETtac11 into pWYG5, between the BamHI to BclI sites. The transcripts produced by pWYG5-TET7 and pWYG5-TET11 in yeast may be translated sub-optimally since the upstream regions between the BgllI site and the initiation codon are designed for E,coli expression, and do not conform to the consensus for highly expressed yeast genes.
Western blot analysis of the products from induced cells containing the plasmid pWYG5-TET7 showed the presence of two faint bands at approximately 29kDa and 30kDa (track 3, FIG. 10 - too faint to see in reproduction), but no full length fragment C (approximately 50kDa).
This result provided the clue that incomplete transcripts were being produced, therefore the fragment C-specific mRNA from pWYG7-TET2 and pWYG7-TET7 was analysed. The Northern blot (FIG. 11) showed that instead of a full-length transcript (expected size approximately 1655 nucleotides), pWYG7-TET2 gave rise to a major band of approximately 700 nt and a minor band of 600 nt and pWYG7-TET7 to two bands of approximately 900 and 1100 nt. Since these RNAs all hybridised to a probe from the 5' end of the gene (BglII to NcoI fragment from pTETtac7), incomplete transcripts were being produced within the gene for fragment C. The fact that the transcripts from pWYG-TET7 are larger suggests that the original C.tetani DNA contained sequences which do not allow the production of complete mRNA transcripts, and that these were destroyed as the DNA was synthesised. This idea is reinforced by the fact that the approximate position of the elements involved with the production of an incomplete mRNA transcript in pWYG7 -TET2 is within the region which was modified by synthesis in pWYG5-TET7.
Induced cells containing pWYG5-TET11 were shown to produce fragment C of the correct size on Western blots (FIG. 10), at a concentration of approximately0.5% of cell protein. The product was soluble in that it remained in the supernatant after centrifugation at 10,000 g for 15 min.
An analysis of RNA from pWYG5-TET11 (FIG. 11) showed that there were two major transcripts of less than full length (1200 and 1400 nt), and only a minor amount of the full length transcript (approximately 1700 nt). Thus efficient expression was still being prevented by the remaining 400bp of C.tetani DNA in the pWYG5-TET11 plasmid.
(iii) pWYG5-TET15
The 1.4kb BglII-BamHI fragment of pTETtac16 was isolated and cloned between the BamHI and BclI sites of pWYG5 as described above.
Plasmids with inserts of the correct orientation were designated pWYG5-TET15 (FIG. 12).
Cells containing this plasmid produced greater amounts of fragment C than before, to a level of 2.5% of cell protein (ELISA quantitation and see FIG. 10). Analysis of the RNA indicated that for the first time most of the fragment C-specific RNA was full length (FIG. 11). Thus it must be concluded from the RNA analysis that the C.tetani DNA encoding fragment C contains at least six elements which are fully or partially responsible for the production of incomplete transcripts in yeast. The positions of the elements are shown in FIG. 1. With the present state of knowledge about transcription of mRNA in yeast few if any of these could be predicted from the sequence of the DNA, and they could be removed by re-synthesising the DNA to have a higher (G+C)-content. Alternatively, the elements could be accurately delineated by mapping of the 3' ends of the truncated transcripts described above, and only those regions identified as being responsible for the production of incomplete transcripts being resynthesised.
Construction of yeast secretion vectors for fragment C
Two vectors were constructed for the secretion of fragment C, pWYG9-TET2 and pWYG59-TET15. These both contained DNA encoding the prepro leader peptide from the yeast mating pheromone, alpha-factor (Kurjan, J. and Herskowitz, I., Cell, 30, 933-948, (1982)).
(i) pWYG9-TET2
This vector is similar to pWYG7-TET2 but contains the coding region for the alpha-factor leader peptide between the BamHI site of the GAL7 promoter and the NcoI site at the initiating ATG codon of fragment C. The synthetic DNA fragment contains altered codons, in order to generate a XhoI restriction site to facilitate cloning, giving a conservative amino acid change (Asp to Glu) immediately upstream of the KEX2 cleavage site. GAL7 upstream sequences required for expression in pWYG7 are also included (FIG. 13).
In Western blots of culture supernatants from cells transformed with pWYG9-TET2 a broad smear of reactive material of heterogenous molecular weight (75-200kD) was observed. When de-glycosylated with endoglycosidase H the molecular weight of this was substantially reduced to a major species of approximately 26kD (FIG. 14). This result gave further support for the notion that the wild-type C.tetani fragment C gene contains sequences fortuitously recognised as being responsible for the production of incomplete mRNA transcripts. The size of this band is consistent with it being a run-off translation product of the major transcript characterised by Northern analysis (Example 4).
(ii) pWYG59-TET15
This vector is similar to pWYG5oTET15 but contains the alpha-factor leader peptide coding region between the BamHI site of the GAL1 promoter and the SalI site near the 5' end of the fragment C gene. The synthetic DNA fragment also contains the same NcoI site found at the initiator ATG of pWYG7-TET2 (see FIG. 13).
Two forms of fragment C were found to be secreted into the medium by cells containing pWYG59-TET15. A diffuse band of high molecular weight material was detected similar to that seen with pWYG9-TET2. In addition, a major band of about 65kD was detected (FIG. 14). A ladder of at least four other less intense bands of lower molecular weight was also visible. All of these species were reduced to approximately 50kD, the size expected for correctly processed full length fragment C, when treated with Endo H suggesting that the differences between them are due to differences in N-linked glycosylation. Fragment C contains seven potential sites for the addition of asparagine-linked carbohydrate and our data suggests that at least five of these are actually being used during alpha-factor signal directed secretion.
Secretion of full length fragment C by yeast cells containing the resynthesised TET15 gene was found to be efficient. The total amount of fragment C secreted to the medium by unoptimised shake flask cultures was estimated to be about 7μg/ml and none was detected in intracellular extracts from these cultures.
Construction of Pichia pastoris intracellular expression vectors for fragment C.
The vector pPIC3-TET15, which is derived from pA0804, was used for intracellular expression of fragment C in Pichia (Diagan, et al., Dev. Ind. Microbiol., 29, 59-65, (1988); Sreekrishna et al., Biochemistry, 28, 4117-4125 (1989)). This vector uses the promoter from the AOX1 gene to drive expression and can be integrated into the host chromosomal AOX1 locus.
To facilitate insertion of the fragment C gene the synthetic adapter oligonucleotides shown in FIG. 15 and in SEQ ID NOS: 12 and 13 were cloned between the AsuII and EcoRI sites of pA0804, to give pPIC1. A derivative of this plasmid, pPIC2, which lacks the EcoRI site was then constructed. This was done by digesting with EcoRI followed by filling in of the protruding single stranded ends with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I and the blunt ends were then ligated together. The 1.4kb BglII-NheI fragment from pTETtac16 containing the fragment C gene was then inserted between the BamH1 and SpeI sites of pPIC2 to give pPIC3-TET15 as shown in FIG. 15.
Fragment C production in shake flasks, by several pPIC3-TET15 transformants that grew slowly on methanol, was examined. FIG. 16 shows SDS-PAGE and Western blotting analysis of cell lysates. Expression levels were estimated by densitometric scanning of Coomassie blue stained gels and by ELISA and these varied between different transformants from 0.3% of total cell protein to about 11%. Even at the highest level of expression the product was soluble. The highest expressing strain, 881F, was used in high cell density inductions in a fermenter. Cells were grown to a density of 90g/l (dry weight) before induction. A time course for the induction is shown in FIG. 17. Production of fragment C began rapidly upon induction, rose to a level of about 20-28% of total cell protein after 24 hrs and remained at this level up to 52 hrs after induction. The final level of fragment C in the fermenter was estimated to be about 11g/l and again the product was soluble.
Transformation of yeast with fragment C expression vectors
The vectors were introduced into the Saccharomyces cerevisae strain S150-2B (a leu2 his3 ura3 trpl; (McCleod, M., et al., Cold Spring Harbor Symp., Quant., Biol., 49, 779-787, (1984)) using the lithium transformation procedure of Ito et al. J. Bact., 153, 163-168, (1983). Transformed yeast cells were incubated in YPD broth (Sherman, F., et al., Methods in Yeast Genetics, Cold Spring Harbour, N.Y., 1983) at 30� C. overnight prior to plating out on selective medium (YPD plus 500 ug/ml G418). This allows expression of G418-resistance and increases transformation frequency. Colonies that came up as G418r were tested on minimal medium lacking leucine (YNB, Difco+glucose+histidine+uracil+tryptophan, Sherman et al., 1983) to test for the Leu+ phenotype also conferred by the plasmids. Positive transformants (G418r Leu+) were used for expression analysis.
The vector pPIC3-TET15 was introduced into Pichia pastoris strain GS115 using the sphaeroplast transformation procedure described by Cregg et al, (1985). (Cregg et al., Molecular and Cellular Biology, 5, 3376-3385 (1985)) To direct integration into the host chromosomal AOX1 locus the vector was digested with Bgl II and then mixed, in the presence of calcium ions and polyethylene glycol, with sphaeroplasts generated by enzymatic digestion of the cell walls with zymolyase. Transformed sphaeroplasts were regenerated in osmotically buffered agarose containing YNB, glucose (2%), sorbitol (1%) biotin (400 μg/1) and His-assay medium (Difco). Transformed cells were tested for growth on methanol since those disrupted at AOX1 by insertion of the vector should grow slowly on methanol.
Galactose induction and preparation of cell lysates
Transformants were grown to the mid-logarithmic stage (107 cells/ml) in YP broth containing 2% raffinose and 500 μg/ml G418 at 30� C. in an orbital shaker. An aliquot of 40% galactose was then added to a final concentration of 2% and the culture was incubated for a further 24h. The cells were harvested by low speed centrifugation, washed once in distilled water, and resuspended in ice-cold break buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate pH7.0, 0.1% triton X-100, 4 mM phenylmethyl sulphonyl fluoride, 4 mM EGTA, and 2μg/ml each of pepstatin, antipain, leupeptin and chymostatin; 5ml for cells from a 250ml culture). Acid-washed glass beads (0.45mm) were added and the cells were broken by vigorous vortexing. In order to remove insoluble proteins, the crude cell lysate could be cleared by centrifugation for 15 min at 10,000 g. The protein concentration of the extracts was determined using the BioRad protein assay (BioRad, according to manufacturer's instructions) and the material was stored at -70�.
Methanol Induction of Pichia cultures.
Transformants were grown at 30� C. overnight to saturation in liquid minimal medium (YNB containing biotin, 400 μg/l, and glycerol, 2% v/v). lml aliquots of these cultures were used to inoculate shake flasks containing 10 mls of the same medium plus 1% casamino acids. After 6-8 hrs incubation at 30� C. the cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in YNB (Difco) containing biotin (400 μg/l) casamino acids (1%), and methanol (0.5% v/v). After further incubation for 2-6 days the cells were harvested and lysates prepared as described for Saccharomyces (see Example 8).
Production of fragment C by high cell density Pichia pastoris cultures was carried out using a 21 Braun fermenter equipped with monitors and controls for pH, dissolved O2, stirring speed, temperature and air flow. A 10ml YNB+biotin+2% glycerol overnight culture was used to inoculate the fermenter containing 1 litre of 5X basal salts (phosphoric acid, 42 mls/l; calcium sulphate.2H2 O. 1.8 g/l; potassium sulphate, 28.6 g/l; magnesium sulphate.7H2 O, 23.4 g/l; potassium hydroxide, 6.5 g/l) with 4mls of PTM1 salts (cupric sulphate.5H2 O, 6 g/l; potassium iodide, 0.08 g/l; manganese sulphate.H2 O, 3 g/l; sodium molybdate, 0.2 g/l; boric acid, 0.02 g/l; cobalt chloride, 0.5 g/l; zinc chloride, 20 g/l; ferrous sulphate.7H2 O, 65 g/l; biotin, 0.2 g/l; sulphuric acid 5 mls/l) and 5% (v/v) glycerol at 30� C. Dissolved O.sub. 2 was maintained above 20% by adjusting aeration and agitation, and the pH was maintained at pH5.0 by the addition of 50% (v/v) ammonium hydroxide. Growth was continued until the glycerol was exhausted (24-30 hrs). A limited glycerol feed (containing 50% w/v glycerol and 12 ml/l PTM1 salts) was then initiated at 12 mls/hr for 17-21 hrs. After this period the culture was induced by replacing the glycerol feed with a methanol feed (100% methanol plus 12 ml/l PTM1 salts) at 1 ml/hr. for 2 hrs. Then the methanol feed rate was gradually increased over a period of 6 hours to 6 mls/hr and the fermentation was continued using these conditions for a further 46-92 hrs.
Concentration of culture supernatants and glycoprotein analysis
Cells were induced and then harvested by centrifugation as described in Example 8. Culture supernatants were concentrated by ultrafiltration using Centricon 30 microconcentrators (Amicon), centrifuging at 4,000g for 45'. Supernatants from larger scale cultures were concentrated by ultrafiltration with Amicon PM30 membranes using a stirred cell. N-linked oligosaccharides were removed by digestion of concentrated supernatants with Endoglycosidase H (Endo H, Boehringer Mannhelm). Aliquots (25 μl) were taken and 5 μl of digestion buffer added (0.2M NaH2 PO4, 10 mM B-mercaptoethanol, 1% SDS). After boiling for 5 minutes samples were cooled on ice and protease inhibitors added to the same final concentrations as given above (Example 8). Endo H (9 mU) was added and the samples were incubated for 18hrs at 37� C. before analysis by SDS-PAGE (Example 11).
SDS-polyacrylamide gel analysis of proteins
Soluble or total protein extracts from induced yeast cells were separated by electrophoresis in SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Laemmli, UK., Nature, 227, 680-685, (1970)). The proteins in the gel could be visualised by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R. Alternatively the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose filter and reacted with rabbit antiserum to fragment C (isolated from C.tetani) and then goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horse-radish peroxidase followed by colour development with hydrogen peroxide and 4-chloronaphthol (BioRad). In this way the expressed fragment C could be specifically detected.
Immunoassay quantitation of fragment C
A two antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for fragment C was developed. Purified pepsinised antibody prepared from horses hyperimmunised with tetanus toxoid (Hughes et al., J. Appl.Bact. 38, 1974, 603-622) was used to coat flexible polyvinylchloride microtitre plates (Dynatech, Billinghurst, GB). Coating was performed overnight at 40� C. in 50 mM sodium carbonate pH 9.5 (12.5 μg pepsinised antibody per ml, 100 μl per well). Plates were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline pH 7.2, 0.12 (w/v) Tween (Trade Mark) 20 (PBS-Tween).
Non-specific binding was reduced by incubation of plates with PBS-Tween containing 12% (wt/vol) BSA or 5% (wt/vol) non-fat dry milk. Plates were then incubated sequentially with antigen, second antibody and anti-rat IgG peroxidase conjugate (Kinkegaard and Perry, Maryland, US) for 1 hr at 37� C. in each case. The second antibody was a rat monoclonal (TTO9) which binds with high affinity to fragment C (Sheppard et al., Infec. Immun. 43, 1984, 710-714) and it was used at a concentration of 2 μg/ml.
Anti-rat peroxidase conjugate was used at a dilution of 1:3000. Each reagent was diluted into PBS-Tween containing 5% non-fat dry milk prior to addition to plates. Plates were washed three times with PBS-Tween after each incubation. Bound enzyme complex was assayed using tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) as the chromogenic substrate. 1 mg TMB tablets (Wellcome Diagnostics) were dissolved in 10 ml of 0.0625M trisodium citrate containing 0.01% hydrogen peroxide. 100 μl of reagent was added to each well and the reaction terminated by addition of 100 μl 2M H2 SO4 after incubation for 10-15 mins at room temperature. Plates were read using a Titertek multiscan plate reader (MCC/340) at 450 nm.
For quantitation, fragment C prepared from C.tetani (Fairweather, N., et al., J.Bact., 165, 21-27, (1986)) was used as a standard. Several dilutions of this fragment C gave a narrow range titration curve with a linear portion between about 1 μl/ml and 10 μg/ml. Titration curves for the recombinant fragment C were comparable, with similar slope and range to the standard curve. The titre of unknown samples were determined either by comparing the midpoints of titration curves or more routinely by reading directly from the linear portion of the standard curve.
Protein was determined using the BCA assay reagent (Pierce) with bovine serum albumin as protein standard.
Preparation and analysis of RNA from yeast cells
In order to prepare RNA, transformed yeast cells were grown in YP+2% raffinose+500 μg/ml G418 to a density of approximately 5�105 cells/ml, then induced for 24 hr after addition of 2% galactose. Total RNA was then prepared from the cells and analysed by Northern blotting as described previously (Romanos, M. A., and Boyd, A., Nucl. Acids Res., 16, 7333-7350, (1988)). The Northern blots were probed with fragments of pTETtac2 DNA, and its derivatives, labelled by the random priming method (Feinberg, A., and Vogelstein, B., Anal. Biochem, 132, 6-13, (1983)).
Immunisation of mice
Fragment C was purified from lysates of induced cells harbouring pWYG5-TET15 by affinity chromatography using TTO8 monoclonal antibody (Sheppard, A. J., et al., Infect. Immun., 43, 710-714 (1984)) linked to cyanogen bromide - activated sepharose 4B. Fragment C was eluted with 0.1M sodium citrate pH3.0 and neutralised by addition of one volume of 0.1M sodium phosphate pH7.0. Secreted fragment C was prepared by concentration of supernatants from induced cultures harbouring pWYG59-TET15 without further purification.
Vaccines containing fragment C were prepared with 10% Alhydrogel (trade mark) and serial dilutions were prepared. Balb/C mice were injected with 0.5ml then challenged four weeks later with 100 LD50 of tetanus toxin. Survivors were counted after a further four days. The results, summarised in the table below, show that yeast intracellular fragment C has at least equal potency to E.coli produced material, whereas the secreted fragment C is inactive.
______________________________________ Concentration ofVaccine fragment C Survivors______________________________________1. Yeast intracellular 50 μg/ml 5fragment C 12.5 μg/ml 5 3.125 μg/ml 5 0.78 μg/ml 42. Yeast secreted 50 μg/ml 0fragment C 12.5 μg/ml 0 3.125 μg/ml 0 0.78 03. E. coli fragment 25 μg/ml 3C 6.25 μg/ml 1 1.5 μg/ml 04. PBS 0 0(negative control)______________________________________
Immunisation of mice (also using secreted de-glycosylated material)
Fragment C was purified from lysates of induced cells harbouring pWYG5-TET15 by affinity chromatography using TTO8 monoclonal antibody (Sheppard, A. J., et al., Infect. Immun., 43, 710-714 (1984)) linked to cyanogen bromide - activated sepharose 4B. Fragment C was eluted with 0.1M sodium citrate pH3.0 and neutralised by addition of one volume of 0.1M sodium phosphate pH7.0. Secreted fragment C was prepared by concentration of supernatants from induced cultures harbouring pWYG59-TET15 without further purification. To de-glycosylate this material for immunisation experiments the concentrate was treated with Endott as described in Example 10 except without the addition of mercaptoethanol and SDS and without boiling the sample.
Vaccines containing fragment C were prepared with 10% Alhydrogel (trade mark) and serial dilutions were prepared. Balb/C mice were injected with 0.5ml then challenged four weeks later with 100 LD50 of tetanus toxin. Survivors were counted after a further four days. The results, summarised in the table below, show that yeast intracellular fragment C was at least as effective as the E.coli derived material, which has previously been shown to be equivalent to C.tetani fragment C (Makoff et al., 1989a). In contrast, the secreted product was totally inactive. However, de-glycosylation of secreted fragement C with endo H rendered it as protective as the intracellular product, syggesting that important neutralising epitopes were masked by carbohydrate side-chains in the glycosylated form.
______________________________________Protection of immunised mice against tetanus toxin challenge Survivors after challengeaAntigen (dose in μg) 2 0.5 0.125 0.03 0.008______________________________________E. coli fragment C .sup. 4b 2 0 0 0Yeast intracellular 5 5 5 0 0Yeast secreted 0 0 0 0 0Yeast secreted, de- 5 5 3 0 0glycosylatedSaline 0______________________________________ a Groups of five mice were challenged with 100 LD50 of tetanus toxin. b Four mice in this group.
__________________________________________________________________________SEQUENCE LISTING(1) GENERAL INFORMATION:(iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 13(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:1:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 1359 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Clostridium tetani(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: CDS(B) LOCATION: 1..1356(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:1:ATGAAAAATCTGGATTGTTGGGTTGATAATGAAGAAGATATAGATGTT48MetLysAsnLeuAspCysTrpValAspAsnGluGl uAspIleAspVal151015ATATTAAAAAAGAGTACAATTTTAAATTTAGATATTAATAATGATATT96IleLeuLysLysSerThrIleLeuAsnLeuAspIle AsnAsnAspIle202530AATATCGATATATCTGGGTTTAATTCATCTGTAATAACATATCCAGAT144AsnIleAspIleSerGlyPheAsnSerSerValIleThr TyrProAsp354045GCTCAATTGGTGCCCGGAATAAATGGCAAAGCAATACATTTAGTAAAC192AlaGlnLeuValProGlyIleAsnGlyLysAlaIleHisLeuValA sn505560AATGAATCTTCTGAAGTTATAGTGCATAAAGCTATGGATATTGAATAT240AsnGluSerSerGluValIleValHisLysAlaMetAspIleGluTyr65 707580AATGATATGTTTAATAATTTTACCGTTAGCTTTTGGTTGAGGGTTCCT288AsnAspMetPheAsnAsnPheThrValSerPheTrpLeuArgValPro 859095AAAGTATCTGCTAGTCATTTAGAACAATATGGCACAAATGAGTATTCA336LysValSerAlaSerHisLeuGluGlnTyrGlyThrAsnGluTyrSer 100105110ATAATTAGCTCTATGAAAAAACATAGTCTATCAATAGGATCTGGTTGG384IleIleSerSerMetLysLysHisSerLeuSerIleGlySerGlyTrp115 120125AGTGTATCACTTAAAGGTAATAACTTAATATGGACTTTAAAAGATTCC432SerValSerLeuLysGlyAsnAsnLeuIleTrpThrLeuLysAspSer130 135140GCGGGAGAAGTTAGACAAATAACTTTTAGGGATTTACCTGATAAATTT480AlaGlyGluValArgGlnIleThrPheArgAspLeuProAspLysPhe145150 155160AATGCTTATTTAGCAAATAAATGGGTTTTTATAACTATTACTAATGAT528AsnAlaTyrLeuAlaAsnLysTrpValPheIleThrIleThrAsnAsp165 170175AGATTATCTTCTGCTAATTTGTATATAAATGGAGTACTTATGGGAAGT576ArgLeuSerSerAlaAsnLeuTyrIleAsnGlyValLeuMetGlySer180 185190GCAGAAATTACTGGTTTAGGAGCTATTAGAGAGGATAATAATATAACA624AlaGluIleThrGlyLeuGlyAlaIleArgGluAspAsnAsnIleThr195200 205TTAAAACTAGATAGATGTAATAATAATAATCAATACGTTTCTATTGAT672LeuLysLeuAspArgCysAsnAsnAsnAsnGlnTyrValSerIleAsp21021522 0AAATTTAGGATATTTTGCAAAGCATTAAATCCAAAAGAGATTGAAAAA720LysPheArgIlePheCysLysAlaLeuAsnProLysGluIleGluLys225230235 240TTATACACAAGTTATTTATCTATAACCTTTTTAAGAGACTTCTGGGGA768LeuTyrThrSerTyrLeuSerIleThrPheLeuArgAspPheTrpGly245250 255AACCCTTTACGATATGATACAGAATATTATTTAATACCAGTAGCTTCT816AsnProLeuArgTyrAspThrGluTyrTyrLeuIleProValAlaSer260265270 AGTTCTAAAGATGTTCAATTGAAAAATATAACAGATTATATGTATTTG864SerSerLysAspValGlnLeuLysAsnIleThrAspTyrMetTyrLeu275280285ACAAAT GCGCCATCGTATACTAACGGAAAATTGAATATATATTATAGA912ThrAsnAlaProSerTyrThrAsnGlyLysLeuAsnIleTyrTyrArg290295300AGGTTATATAATGGAC TAAAATTTATTATAAAAAGATATACACCTAAT960ArgLeuTyrAsnGlyLeuLysPheIleIleLysArgTyrThrProAsn305310315320AATGAAATAGATTC TTTTGTTAAATCAGGTGATTTTATTAAATTATAT1008AsnGluIleAspSerPheValLysSerGlyAspPheIleLysLeuTyr325330335GTATCATATAACAAT AATGAGCACATTGTAGGTTATCCGAAAGATGGA1056ValSerTyrAsnAsnAsnGluHisIleValGlyTyrProLysAspGly340345350AATGCCTTTAATAATCTT GATAGAATTCTAAGAGTAGGTTATAATGCC1104AsnAlaPheAsnAsnLeuAspArgIleLeuArgValGlyTyrAsnAla355360365CCAGGTATCCCTCTTTATAAAAAAA TGGAAGCAGTAAAATTGCGTGAT1152ProGlyIleProLeuTyrLysLysMetGluAlaValLysLeuArgAsp370375380TTAAAAACCTATTCTGTACAACTTAAATTATATGA TGATAAAAATGCA1200LeuLysThrTyrSerValGlnLeuLysLeuTyrAspAspLysAsnAla385390395400TCTTTAGGACTAGTAGGTACCCATAATGGTCAA ATAGGCAACGATCCA1248SerLeuGlyLeuValGlyThrHisAsnGlyGlnIleGlyAsnAspPro405410415AATAGGGATATATTAATTGCAAGCAACTGGTAC TTTAATCATTTAAAA1296AsnArgAspIleLeuIleAlaSerAsnTrpTyrPheAsnHisLeuLys420425430GATAAAATTTTAGGATGTGATTGGTACTTTGTACCTA CAGATGAAGGA1344AspLysIleLeuGlyCysAspTrpTyrPheValProThrAspGluGly435440445TGGACAAATGATTAA 1359TrpThrAsnAsp450(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 452 amino acids(B) TYPE: amino acid(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2:MetLysAsnLeuAspCysTrpValAspAsnGluGluAs pIleAspVal151015IleLeuLysLysSerThrIleLeuAsnLeuAspIleAsnAsnAspIle202530 AsnIleAspIleSerGlyPheAsnSerSerValIleThrTyrProAsp354045AlaGlnLeuValProGlyIleAsnGlyLysAlaIleHisLeuValAsn50 5560AsnGluSerSerGluValIleValHisLysAlaMetAspIleGluTyr65707580AsnAspMetPheAsnAsnPheThrVal SerPheTrpLeuArgValPro859095LysValSerAlaSerHisLeuGluGlnTyrGlyThrAsnGluTyrSer100105 110IleIleSerSerMetLysLysHisSerLeuSerIleGlySerGlyTrp115120125SerValSerLeuLysGlyAsnAsnLeuIleTrpThrLeuLysAspSer 130135140AlaGlyGluValArgGlnIleThrPheArgAspLeuProAspLysPhe145150155160AsnAlaTyrLeuAla AsnLysTrpValPheIleThrIleThrAsnAsp165170175ArgLeuSerSerAlaAsnLeuTyrIleAsnGlyValLeuMetGlySer180 185190AlaGluIleThrGlyLeuGlyAlaIleArgGluAspAsnAsnIleThr195200205LeuLysLeuAspArgCysAsnAsnAsnAsnGlnTyrVal SerIleAsp210215220LysPheArgIlePheCysLysAlaLeuAsnProLysGluIleGluLys225230235240LeuT yrThrSerTyrLeuSerIleThrPheLeuArgAspPheTrpGly245250255AsnProLeuArgTyrAspThrGluTyrTyrLeuIleProValAlaSer2 60265270SerSerLysAspValGlnLeuLysAsnIleThrAspTyrMetTyrLeu275280285ThrAsnAlaProSerTyrThrAsnGly LysLeuAsnIleTyrTyrArg290295300ArgLeuTyrAsnGlyLeuLysPheIleIleLysArgTyrThrProAsn305310315 320AsnGluIleAspSerPheValLysSerGlyAspPheIleLysLeuTyr325330335ValSerTyrAsnAsnAsnGluHisIleValGlyTyrProLysAspGly340345350AsnAlaPheAsnAsnLeuAspArgIleLeuArgValGlyTyrAsnAla355360365ProGlyIleProLeuT yrLysLysMetGluAlaValLysLeuArgAsp370375380LeuLysThrTyrSerValGlnLeuLysLeuTyrAspAspLysAsnAla3853903 95400SerLeuGlyLeuValGlyThrHisAsnGlyGlnIleGlyAsnAspPro405410415AsnArgAspIleLeuIleAlaSerAsnTrpTyrPhe AsnHisLeuLys420425430AspLysIleLeuGlyCysAspTrpTyrPheValProThrAspGluGly435440445TrpTh rAsnAsp450(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 1359 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: cDNA(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: Clostridium tetani(ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: CDS(B) LOCATION: 1..1356(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3:ATGAAAAACCTTGATTGTTGGGTCGACAACGAAGAAGACATCGATGTT48MetLysAsnLeuAspCysTrpValAspAsnGluGluAspIleAspVal1 51015ATCCTGAAAAAGTCTACCATTCTGAACTTGGACATCAACAACGATATT96IleLeuLysLysSerThrIleLeuAsnLeuAspIleAsnAsnAspIle20 2530ATCTCCGACATCTCTGGTTTCAACTCCTCTGTTATCACATATCCAGAT144IleSerAspIleSerGlyPheAsnSerSerValIleThrTyrProAsp35 4045GCTCAATTGGTGCCGGGCATCAACGGCAAAGCTATCCACCTGGTTAAC192AlaGlnLeuValProGlyIleAsnGlyLysAlaIleHisLeuValAsn5055 60AACGAATCTTCTGAAGTTATCGTGCACAAGGCCATGGACATCGAATAC240AsnGluSerSerGluValIleValHisLysAlaMetAspIleGluTyr657075 80AACGACATGTTCAACAACTTCACCGTTAGCTTCTGGCTGCGCGTTCCG288AsnAspMetPheAsnAsnPheThrValSerPheTrpLeuArgValPro8590 95AAAGTTTCTGCTTCCCACCTGGAACAGTACGGCACTAACGAGTACTCC336LysValSerAlaSerHisLeuGluGlnTyrGlyThrAsnGluTyrSer100105110ATCATCAGCTCTATGAAGAAACACTCCCTGTCCATCGGCTCTGGTTGG384IleIleSerSerMetLysLysHisSerLeuSerIleGlySerGlyTrp115120125TCTGTT TCCCTGAAGGGTAACAACCTGATCTGGACTCTGAAAGACTCC432SerValSerLeuLysGlyAsnAsnLeuIleTrpThrLeuLysAspSer130135140GCGGGCGAAGTTCGTCAG ATCACTTTCCGCGACCTGCCGGACAAGTTC480AlaGlyGluValArgGlnIleThrPheArgAspLeuProAspLysPhe145150155160AACGCGTACCTGGCTAA CAAATGGGTTTTCATCACTATCACTAACGAT528AsnAlaTyrLeuAlaAsnLysTrpValPheIleThrIleThrAsnAsp165170175CGTCTGTCTTCTGCTAACC TGTACATCAACGGCGTTCTGATGGGCTCC576ArgLeuSerSerAlaAsnLeuTyrIleAsnGlyValLeuMetGlySer180185190GCTGAAATCACTGGTCTGGGCGCT ATCCGTGAGGACAACAACATCACT624AlaGluIleThrGlyLeuGlyAlaIleArgGluAspAsnAsnIleThr195200205CTTAAGCTGGACCGTTGCAACAACAACAACCAG TACGTATCCATCGAC672LeuLysLeuAspArgCysAsnAsnAsnAsnGlnTyrValSerIleAsp210215220AAGTTCCGTATCTTCTGCAAAGCACTGAACCCGAAAGAGATCGA AAAA720LysPheArgIlePheCysLysAlaLeuAsnProLysGluIleGluLys225230235240CTGTATACCAGCTACCTGTCTATCACCTTCCTGCGTGACTTCT GGGGT768LeuTyrThrSerTyrLeuSerIleThrPheLeuArgAspPheTrpGly245250255AACCCGCTGCGTTACGACACCGAATATTACCTGATCCCGGTAGCT TCT816AsnProLeuArgTyrAspThrGluTyrTyrLeuIleProValAlaSer260265270AGCTCTAAAGACGTTCAGCTGAAAAACATCACTGACTACATGTACCTG86 4SerSerLysAspValGlnLeuLysAsnIleThrAspTyrMetTyrLeu275280285ACCAACGCGCCGTCCTACACTAACGGTAAACTGAACATCTACTACCGA912ThrAsn AlaProSerTyrThrAsnGlyLysLeuAsnIleTyrTyrArg290295300CGTCTGTACAACGGCCTGAAATTCATCATCAAACGCTACACTCCGAAC960ArgLeuTyrAsnGlyLeu LysPheIleIleLysArgTyrThrProAsn305310315320AACGAAATCGATTCTTTCGTTAAATCTGGTGACTTCATCAAACTGTAC1008AsnGluIleAspSerP heValLysSerGlyAspPheIleLysLeuTyr325330335GTTTCTTACAACAACAACGAACACATCGTTGGTTACCCGAAAGACGGT1056ValSerTyrAsnAsnAsn GluHisIleValGlyTyrProLysAspGly340345350AACGCTTTCAACAACCTGGACAGAATTCTGCGTGTTGGTTACAACGCT1104AsnAlaPheAsnAsnLeuAspA rgIleLeuArgValGlyTyrAsnAla355360365CCGGGTATCCCGCTGTACAAAAAAATGGAAGCTGTTAAACTGCGTGAC1152ProGlyIleProLeuTyrLysLysMetGlu AlaValLysLeuArgAsp370375380CTGAAAACCTACTCTGTTCAGCTGAAACTGTACGACGACAAAAACGCT1200LeuLysThrTyrSerValGlnLeuLysLeuTyrAspAspL ysAsnAla385390395400TCTCTGGGTCTGGTTGGTACCCACAACGGTCAGATCGGTAACGACCCG1248SerLeuGlyLeuValGlyThrHisAsnGlyGlnIleGly AsnAspPro405410415AACCGTGACATCCTGATCGCTTCTAACTGGTACTTCAACCACCTGAAA1296AsnArgAspIleLeuIleAlaSerAsnTrpTyrPheAsnH isLeuLys420425430GACAAAATCCTGGGTTGCGACTGGTACTTCGTTCCGACCGATGAAGGT1344AspLysIleLeuGlyCysAspTrpTyrPheValProThrAspGlu Gly435440445TGGACCAACGACTAA1359TrpThrAsnAsp450(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 452 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:4:MetLysAsnLeuAspCysTrpValAspAsnGluGluAspIleAspVal151015IleLe uLysLysSerThrIleLeuAsnLeuAspIleAsnAsnAspIle202530IleSerAspIleSerGlyPheAsnSerSerValIleThrTyrProAsp35 4045AlaGlnLeuValProGlyIleAsnGlyLysAlaIleHisLeuValAsn505560AsnGluSerSerGluValIleValHisLysAlaMetA spIleGluTyr65707580AsnAspMetPheAsnAsnPheThrValSerPheTrpLeuArgValPro8590 95LysValSerAlaSerHisLeuGluGlnTyrGlyThrAsnGluTyrSer100105110IleIleSerSerMetLysLysHisSerLeuSerIleGlySerGlyTrp 115120125SerValSerLeuLysGlyAsnAsnLeuIleTrpThrLeuLysAspSer130135140AlaGlyGluValArgGlnIleThrP heArgAspLeuProAspLysPhe145150155160AsnAlaTyrLeuAlaAsnLysTrpValPheIleThrIleThrAsnAsp1651 70175ArgLeuSerSerAlaAsnLeuTyrIleAsnGlyValLeuMetGlySer180185190AlaGluIleThrGlyLeuGlyAlaIleArgGluAspAsn AsnIleThr195200205LeuLysLeuAspArgCysAsnAsnAsnAsnGlnTyrValSerIleAsp210215220LysPheArgIlePh eCysLysAlaLeuAsnProLysGluIleGluLys225230235240LeuTyrThrSerTyrLeuSerIleThrPheLeuArgAspPheTrpGly245 250255AsnProLeuArgTyrAspThrGluTyrTyrLeuIleProValAlaSer260265270SerSerLysAspValGlnLeuLysAsnI leThrAspTyrMetTyrLeu275280285ThrAsnAlaProSerTyrThrAsnGlyLysLeuAsnIleTyrTyrArg290295300Arg LeuTyrAsnGlyLeuLysPheIleIleLysArgTyrThrProAsn305310315320AsnGluIleAspSerPheValLysSerGlyAspPheIleLysLeuTyr 325330335ValSerTyrAsnAsnAsnGluHisIleValGlyTyrProLysAspGly340345350AsnAlaPheAsnAsnL euAspArgIleLeuArgValGlyTyrAsnAla355360365ProGlyIleProLeuTyrLysLysMetGluAlaValLysLeuArgAsp370375 380LeuLysThrTyrSerValGlnLeuLysLeuTyrAspAspLysAsnAla385390395400SerLeuGlyLeuValGlyThrHisAsnGlyGlnIleGlyAsn AspPro405410415AsnArgAspIleLeuIleAlaSerAsnTrpTyrPheAsnHisLeuLys420425430AspLy sIleLeuGlyCysAspTrpTyrPheValProThrAspGluGly435440445TrpThrAsnAsp450(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 310 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: Clostridium tetani(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5:CTCGAGACGTCTATACTTCGGAGCACTGTTGAGCGAAGGCTCATTAGATATATTTTCTGT60CATTT TCCTTAACCCAAAAATAAGGGAGAGGGTCCAAAAAGCGCTCGGACAACTGTTGAC120CGTGATCCGAAGGACTGGCTATACAGTGTTCACAAAATAGCCAAGCTGAAAATAATGTGT180AGCCTTTAGCTATGTTCAGTTAGTTTGGCTAGCAAAGATATAAAAGCAGGTCGGAA ATAT240TTATGGGCATTATTATGCAGAGGATCCACATGATAAAAAAAACAGTTGAATATTCCCTCA300AAAATGACTG310(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 32 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: Synthetic(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: miscfeature(B) LOCATION: 1..4(D) OTHER INFORMATION: /function=sticky ends(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:6:GATCTAAACGATGAAAAACCTTGATTGTTGGG32(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 32 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: synthetic(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: miscfeature(B) LOCATION: 1..4(D) OTHER INFORMATION: /function=sticky ends(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7:TCGACCCAACAATCAAGGTTTTTCATCGTTTA32(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:8:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 63 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: SYNTHETIC(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: miscfeature(B) LOCATION: 1..4(D) OTHER INFORMATION: /function="STICKY END"/product="LABEL"(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:8:GATCTACATGATAAAAAAAAGAGTTGAATATTCCCTCAACCATGGTTAACTTGGACTGTT60GGG63(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:9: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 63 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: SYNTHETIC(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: miscfeature(B) LOCATION: 1..4 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:9:TCGACCCAACAGTCCAAGTTAACCATGGTTGAGGGAATATTCAACTGTTTTTTTTATCAT60GTA63(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:10:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 312 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: synthetic(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: CDS(B) LOCATION: 42..311(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:10:GATCTACATGATAAAAAAAACAGTTGAATATTCCCTCA AAAATGAGATTTCCT53MetArgPheProTCAATTTTTACTGCAGTTTTATTCGCAGCATCCTCCGCATTA GCTGCT101SerIlePheThrAlaValLeuPheAlaAlaSerSerAlaLeuAlaAla5101520CCAGTCAACACTACAACAGAAGATGAAACGGCACAAATTCCG GCTGAA149ProValAsnThrThrThrGluAspGluThrAlaGlnIleProAlaGlu253035GCTGTCATCGGTTACTCAGATTTAGAAGGGGATTTCGATGTTGC TGTT197AlaValIleGlyTyrSerAspLeuGluGlyAspPheAspValAlaVal404550TTGCCATTTTCCAACAGCACAAATAACGGGTTATTGTTTATAAATACT 245LeuProPheSerAsnSerThrAsnAsnGlyLeuLeuPheIleAsnThr556065ACTATTGCCAGCATTGCTGCTAAAGAAGAAGGGGTATCTCTCGAGAAA293ThrIl eAlaSerIleAlaAlaLysGluGluGlyValSerLeuGluLys707580AGAGAGGCTGAAGCCATGG312ArgGluAlaGluAlaM et8590(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:11:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 90 amino acids(B) TYPE: amino acid(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:11:MetArgPheProSerIlePheThrAlaValLeuPheAlaAlaSerS er151015AlaLeuAlaAlaProValAsnThrThrThrGluAspGluThrAlaGln202530IleProAla GluAlaValIleGlyTyrSerAspLeuGluGlyAspPhe354045AspValAlaValLeuProPheSerAsnSerThrAsnAsnGlyLeuLeu5055 60PheIleAsnThrThrIleAlaSerIleAlaAlaLysGluGluGlyVal65707580SerLeuGluLysArgGluAlaGluAlaMet 8590(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:12:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 75 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: synthetic(ix) FEATURE:( A) NAME/KEY: miscfeature(B) LOCATION: 1..2(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:12:CGAAGGATCCAAACGATGAGATTTCCTTCAATTTTTACTGCAGACTAGTCCCGGGTAAGT60AAGTAAGCGGCCGCG75(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:13:( i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 77 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: synthetic(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: miscfeature(B) LOCATION: 1..4(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:13:AATTCGCGGCCGCT TACTTACTTACCCGGGACTAGTCTGCAGTAAAAATTGAAGGAAATC60TCATCGTTTGGATCCTT77
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Oct 31, 1974
|Feb 1, 1977
|Behringwerke Aktiengesellschaft
|Method for treating tetanus toxin with a proteinase to produce an atoxic immunogenic product
|Title not available
|Bennetzen, J. L. et al (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257: 3018 3025.
|Bennetzen, J. L. et al (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257: 3018-3025.
|Bennetzen, J. L. et al. (82) J. Biol. Chem. 275: 3026 3031.
|Bennetzen, J. L. et al. (82) J. Biol. Chem. 275: 3026-3031.
|Bitter, G. A. et al. (1984) Gene 32: 263 274.
|Bitter, G. A. et al. (1984) Gene 32: 263-274.
|Eur J. Biochem. 156, 413 321 FEBS 1986 Belsham et al Expression of polyoma virus middle T antigen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae .
|Eur J. Biochem. 156, 413-321 FEBS 1986 Belsham et al "Expression of polyoma virus middle-T antigen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae".
|Fairweather, N. F. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 7809 7812.
|Fairweather, N. F. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 7809-7812.
|Fairweather, N. F. et al (1986) J. Bacteriology 165: 21 27.
|Fairweather, N. F. et al (1986) J. Bacteriology 165: 21-27.
|Gene 16 (1987) 265 275 Elsevier Cousens et al High Level expression of proinsulin in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae .
|Gene 16 (1987) 265-275 Elsevier Cousens et al "High Level expression of proinsulin in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae".
|Gene 46 (1986) 135 141 Kniskern et al Unusually high level expression of a foreign gene . . . Saccharomyces cerevisiae .
|Gene 46 (1986) 135-141 Kniskern et al "Unusually high-level expression of a foreign gene . . . Saccharomyces cerevisiae".
|Gouy, M. et al. (82) Nucleic Acids Res 10: 7055 7074.
|Gouy, M. et al. (82) Nucleic Acids Res 10: 7055-7074.
|Kingsman, S. M. et al (1985) Biotechnology & Genetic Eng. Reviews 3: 377 416.
|Kingsman, S. M. et al (1985) Biotechnology & Genetic Eng. Reviews 3: 377-416.
|Makoff, A. J. et al (1989) Biotechnology 7: 1043 1046.
|Makoff, A. J. et al (1989) Biotechnology 7: 1043-1046.
|Nucleic Acids Research vol. 17 No. 24, 1989, 10191 10202 Makoff et al Expression of tetanus toxin fragment C in E. coli: high . . . codoms .
|Nucleic Acids Research vol. 17 No. 24, 1989, 10191-10202 Makoff et al "Expression of tetanus toxin fragment C in E. coli: high . . . codoms".
|Osborne, B. I. et al (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 86: 4097 4101.
|Osborne, B. I. et al (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 86: 4097-4101.
|Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA vol. 80, 7461 7465 Dec. 1983 Biochemistry Urdea et al Chemical synthesis of a gene for human . . . in yeast .
|Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA vol. 80, 7461-7465 Dec. 1983 Biochemistry Urdea et al "Chemical synthesis of a gene for human . . . in yeast".
|Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA vol. 82, 7232 7236 Nov. 1985 Miyamoto et al Molecular cloning and regulated expression in the human . . . products .
|Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA vol. 82, 7232-7236 Nov. 1985 Miyamoto et al "Molecular cloning and regulated expression in the human . . . products".
|Robinson, M. et al (84) Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 6663 6671.
|Robinson, M. et al (84) Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 6663-6671.
|Sharp, P. M. et al. (88) Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 8207 8241.
|Sharp, P. M. et al. (88) Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 8207-8241.
|TIBTECH Aug. 1988 vol. 6, 196 199 Ernst Codon usage and gene expression .
|TIBTECH-Aug. 1988 vol. 6, 196-199 Ernst "Codon usage and gene expression".
|Weller, U. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 182: 649 656.
|Weller, U. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 182: 649-656.
|Williams, D. P. et al (88) Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 10453 10467.
|Williams, D. P. et al (88) Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 10453-10467.
|Yeast vol. 5: 187 198 (1989) Bettany et al 5 Secondary Structure Formation in Contrast to a Short . . . in Yeast .
|Yeast vol. 5: 187-198 (1989) Bettany et al "5'-Secondary Structure Formation in Contrast to a Short . . . in Yeast".
|Yeast vol. 5: 497 507 (1989) Loison et al High Level of Expression of a Protective Antigen of Schistosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae .
|Yeast vol. 5: 497-507 (1989) Loison et al "High Level of Expression of a Protective Antigen of Schistosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae".
|Zaret, K. S. et al (1982) Cell 28: 563 573.
|Zaret, K. S. et al (1982) Cell 28: 563-573.
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Apr 19, 1994
|Oct 27, 1998
|Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.
|Production of Bacillus entomotoxins in methylotrophic yeast
|Aug 7, 1997
|Nov 23, 1999
|Phylomed Corporation
|Polypeptide compositions and methods
|Jun 2, 1995
|Mar 6, 2001
|Medeva Pharma Limited
|Transformed Pichia expressing the pertactin antigen
|Mar 24, 1997
|Apr 16, 2002
|The Research Foundation Of Microbial Diseases Of Osaka University
|Tetanus toxin functional fragment antigen and tetanus vaccine
|Aug 5, 1999
|Dec 30, 2003
|Biotherapeutics, Inc.
|Compositions comprising bioactive peptides prepared without formation of native disulfide bonds
|Jul 30, 1993
|Jan 20, 2004
|Acambis Research Limited
|Expression of recombinant fusion proteins in attenuated bacteria
|May 19, 2006
|Aug 31, 2010
|The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army
|Recombinant vaccine against botulinum neurotoxin
|May 12, 2004
|Dec 20, 2011
|Vical Incorporated
|Severe acute respiratory syndrome DNA compositions and methods of use
|Mar 28, 2011
|Sep 10, 2013
|Pfenex Inc.
|High level expression of recombinant toxin proteins
|Jul 26, 2013
|Dec 9, 2014
|Pfenex Inc.
|High level expression of recombinant toxin proteins
|Mar 28, 2011
|Mar 8, 2012
|Pfenex Inc.
|High level expression of recombinant toxin proteins
|U.S. Classification
|435/69.3, 435/254.2, 424/190.1, 536/23.7, 435/254.21, 435/320.1, 435/69.1, 424/261.1, 435/252.3, 536/23.1, 435/254.11
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|Sep 30, 1994
Owner name: EVANS MEDICAL LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MAKOFF, ANDREW J.;ROMANOS, MICHAEL A.;CLARE, JEFFREY J.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:007150/0877;SIGNING DATES FROM 19940825 TO 19940921
|Aug 4, 1998
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
|Aug 8, 2002
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jul 21, 2006
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 12


text:
Bill 35 requires employers to report fires and explosions right away
Constable was shot while executing warrant in June
Two-fifths of Ontario workers experience major depression symptoms
Marcel Aubut issues apology in statement announcing resignation
Sharp decrease in safety inspectors in federal industries since 2005
Spruce Products fined $25,000 for May 2013 accident
Sudbury woman, 58, run over by road grader
Three women died while being transported to work in 2007
Woman, 61, murdered by teen at youth home in 2012
Olympic Committee head accused of inappropriate remarks to colleague
Gloria Kirouac, 60, receives conditional sentence, ordered to get counselling
Three-member commission to present findings to government by spring
Nurses' union says security at psychiatric facility insufficient
Brenda Steinnagel seeking more than $3 million in damages
Police now trying alternative means to catch wanted man
Dany Cléroux, 44, killed after platform overturns
Former tractor driver accused B.C. union of harassment, threats
Unionized firms submit more claims but fewer lost-time ones: IWH
New safety association for trucking industry created
Survey is first part of study of worker safety in B.C. libraries

subset: commoncrawl


text:
November 11, 2012
I write fantasy novels with a heavy focus on civil rights. The current novel I've been writing for too long now is about a therapist/lawyer and the people she meets throughout her career. For NaNoWriMo 2012 I wrote Part I of a novel about a doctor and an ex-soldier and their travels as they try to survive and make peace with their individual demons.
~2-year Bay Area veteran with a great fondness for tea, food, and writing.
Meetup members, Log in
By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy


text:
Shane Wayland Photographer
Summer5Model Female Toronto, Ontario, Canada My MM URL: http://www.modelmayhem.com/sugarbomb5
Mayhem # 1210367
About MeLooking forward to many fun opportunities!!
I am new to this so give me some time while i am busy as well!
Shane Wayland Photographer
Noyo Creative Photographer
Casper A Model
Painted with light Photographer
BlueVision... Photographer
Justin Lee - ZA Photographer
Loading Content


text:
Ratings based on 571 Verified Reviews
They paid and stayed. We double-checked.
4.3 Room cleanliness
4.3 Service & staff
4.1 Room comfort
3.8 Hotel condition
They paid and stayed.
We double-checked.
We double-checked.
for Everyoneby A verified traveler
RamsesPosted Sep 16, 2015
Muy bien ubicado, fuimos al maratón y nos toco el show principal justo enfrente, tiene muy buenos lugares para ir a comer y el servicio es increíble
for Everyoneby A verified traveler
Nice HotelPosted Sep 3, 2015
Pros: The friendliest staff ever!
I am extremely impressed with the my overall visit to the Sheraton Maria Isabel Hotel. From the moment I was dropped off till I checked out! Excellent Hotel!
for Everyoneby A verified traveler from Phoenix, AZ
Good central location and valuePosted Aug 24, 2015
Pros: Great location, and the price was a very good value.
Cons: The only problem I had was with the hot water in the shower turning cold.
Location: It's basically right in between the Zocalo historic area and Chapultepec Park and Castle, which makes visiting both areas easy.
I liked the hotel as a whole, the only problem I had was with the hot water in the shower, which would turn cold all of a sudden. Other than that, it was great. The concierge helped set me up with a tour to Teotihuacan that was convenient and inexpensive. I wish the WiFi had been free, but that seems par for the course at hotels like this. I'd stay here again.
for Everyoneby A verified traveler
Posted Aug 18, 2015
Loved the view from the hotel - Angel of Independence. The staff was very welcoming. The pool was very small. The breakfast and brunch was very good as well. Overall a nice experience and close to most things in the city.
for Everyoneby A verified traveler
Nice hotel in a centric areaPosted Aug 16, 2015
Pros: The location, cleanliness, and attentive staff.
Cons: They should offer free Wi Fi for the guests during our stay, the breakfast buffet needs a little more variety .
Location: Good location, I enjoyed walking to the Zona Rosa, great places to shop and entertain
I enjoyed my stay , most of the staff were friendly and helpful, the rooms are clean and housekeeping staff very respectful and professional .
for Business Travelersby A verified traveler from Guanajuato
立地も良く、食事も満足Posted Aug 11, 2015
Pros: 立地、食事、ベッドの快適さ
Cons: タクシーとハイヤーの違いを説明した上で、客を案内をした方が良いと思う。 我々はタクシーを求めていたのに、説明なしにハイヤーへ案内された。
Location: 独立記念塔
大使館などからも近く、ホテル内のレストランでの食事も美味しかったです。 アーリーチェックインのリクエストは通常15時からを13時からに変更してもらえました。
for Everyoneby A verified traveler
Maria IsabelPosted Aug 8, 2015
Pros: The location is excellent.
Cons: Even the weather was good.
The location on Reforma is very advantageous. You can hop on the city bus and get to Chapultepec Park, the zoo, the extraordinary Museum on Anthropology on one end and the area around the Zocalo on the other. The staff and others were very accommodating.
for Couplesby A verified traveler from california
Nice hotel close to everythingPosted Aug 8, 2015
My husband and I really liked this hotel. We traveled with our baby and we liked that it was quiet. They had a crib which was nice and the service was quick. The had mariachi and a band playing in the bar and we enjoyed that too! the entrance was free if you were a guest at the hotel. People that come from outside have to pay..We ordered room service a couple of times and ate at the buffet and we thought the food was good! We will definitely come back and recommend this hotel to our friends.
by A verified traveler from guadalajara
desagradable y para nunca regresarPosted Aug 3, 2015
Pros: el bar y el spa
Cons: todo, comida, habitaciones y servicio, ademas de servicio gratuito de internet
El hotel se sostiene por su ubicación, marca y fachada, pero en su interior se respira el aire de lo vetusto y la descortesía de su personal. Nunca se explica a los huéspedes que compramos por internet que existen dos áreas y dos mundos abismales: la torre danubio, con pisos y habitaciones viejas y con olor a drenaje en casi todas, y la torre de reforma, con algunas habitaciones remodeladas, que no te ofrecen en tu compra y que representan 100 dolares diarios si se quiere ascender a esa categoría, que solo consta de decoración y camas nuevas, cuando lo correcto sería tratar en igualdad de circunstancias a quienes por mera referencia tuvimos el desatino de caer en la torre de segunda clase¡
for Everyoneby A verified traveler
S. P. G. EXPERIENCIA DE HOSPEDAJEPosted Aug 2, 2015
Pros: Su imágen icónica de la Ciudad de México y lo acogedor de su interior.
Cons: Ojalá pudieran reconsiderar el espacio que hay entre la alcoba y el lavamanos. Creo que es innecesario y le quita privacidad.
Agradezco a Sheraton spg por el excelente alojamiento que dio a Mi familia. La atención y amabilidad del personal y la remodelación que hicieron al inmueble es magnífico. Quede invitado a alojarme con Ustedes, al igual que visitar la tienda de Sheraton.


text:
Tomato & feta pesto bites
Cooking timeCook: 45 mins Plus 20 minutes chilling
Skill levelEasy
ServingsServes 12
Tiny, tasty canapés - a perfect party treat
Nutrition and extra info
- Vegetarian
Nutrition info
Nutrition per serving
- kcalories
- 271
- protein
- 7g
- carbs
- 11g
- fat
- 22g
- saturates
- 8g
- fibre
- 0g
- sugar
- 0g
- salt
- 0.96g
Save to My Good Food
A printable version of this recipe will be downloaded to your device. Open it to print. Learn more.
Compare prices
Want to see what this recipe costs at different supermarkets? Compare in one place here:
- Roll out the pastry on a surface lightly dusted with the Parmesan to about the thickness of a ten-pence piece. Stamp out 12 rounds using a 6cm plain cutter and line a shallow 12-hole bun tin. Chill for 20 minutes. Preheat the oven to fan 180C/conventional 200C/gas 6.
- Prick each pastry base with a fork and bake for 15-20 minutes until golden. Remove from the tin and leave to cool on a wire rack. Meanwhile, tear the leaves from the parsley stalks and put all but 12 of the small sprigs in a food processor with the pine nuts, then whizz until coarsely chopped. Then add the feta, garlic and oil and whizz to make a thick paste. Keep the reserved sprigs in a bowl of water in the fridge. The pastry bases will keep in a tin for up to 2 days and the pesto will keep in the fridge overnight.
- To serve, dollop a spoonful of the feta pesto onto the tarts and top each one with two cherry tomato halves. Garnish with the reserved parsley sprigs. Arrange on a platter and hand round with a bowl of black olives and sparkling mint & lemon juleps.
Recipe from Good Food magazine, July 2004
Ads by Google
Comments, questions and tips
Sign in or create your My Good Food account to join the discussion.
Show comments
Haven't even tried the two together yet, but must write! The 'pesto' is DIVINE, and I am imagining it stirred into hot pasta as this must be heaven! The (my) bases are utterly ridiculous! Little towers of pastry, some of them leaning and can't even get away with being called vol-au-vents! Will use shortcrust or alternative next time, and will also try Jo's version with basil, that sounds good.


text:
The Professional Development Alliance (PDA) is looking for District Assistance Team Coaches to provide support directly to districts through Illinois CSI.
October 15th in Morris or October 20th at the PDA | 8:30am - 3:30pm
Science Foundational Services are designed to provide educators with information and tools as they work to develop, improve and align their science curriculum and increase their knowledge of the new Illinois Learning Standards for Science incorporating the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).
10/8 PDA & 10/15 Yorkville | This resource-rich professional development will provide educators with instructional practices to implement the New Illinois Learning Standards for Writing. The Writing Matters website will be used to facilitate the various writing tasks necessary to meet the standards and prepare for PARCC. Strategies and resources will be shared. Earn PD credit hours!
Looking to advance your career? In our cohorts you'll enjoy collaborative learning and lasting relationships!Find Out More
We understand the busy lives of educators. Let us help you find the program that is right for you!Explore Degrees
Explore our CCSS workshops to implement the new standards in your district, school, and classroom.View CCSS Workshops
Having a training or event at your location? We have expert presenters who can present a wide range of topics to your teachers and professional staff.What We Can Deliver
Our expert coaches and consultants can deliver information on the Common Core Standards, School and District Improvement Plans and Effective Meetings.Let Us Help You
Learn new skills and concepts you can use in your classroom or school and get the professional development you need.View Our Offerings
We are an agency of the Regional Offices of Education of Will County and Grundy-Kendall Counties.
We provide onsite staff development, public workshops, graduate education courses and degree programs, consulting services, meeting facilitation, event educational planning services and technical assistance to schools and other agencies.
The Professional Development Alliance is a one-stop source for all of your professional development needs. We will design, provide or arrange for any professional development programs, materials and/or services to help meet your goals.


text:
Booz Allen Hamilton Senior Consultant Level II Interview Questions
Interview Experience
Interview Experience
Getting an Interview
Getting an Interview
Interview Difficulty
Interviews for Top Jobs at Booz Allen Hamilton
- Senior Consultant (132)
- Consultant (128)
- Associate (121)
- Intern (24)
- Senior Associate (18)
- Analyst (14)
- Intelligence Analyst (13)
- Software Engineer (13)
- Engineering (12)
- Lead Associate (11)
- Senior Consultant Level II (10)
- Project Manager (9)
- Associate Consultant (8)
- Administrative Professional (8)
- Business Analyst (8)
- Financial Analyst (7)
- Consultant I (7)
- Systems Engineer (7)
- IT Consultant (6)
- Software Developer (5)
- Data Scientist (5)
- Management Consulting Associate (5)
- Management Consulting Senior Consultant (5)
- Summer (4)
- Associate III (4)
- Information Security Engineer (3)
- Instructional Designer (3)
- Intern - Hourly (3)
- Senior Software Engineer (3)
- Lead Technologist (3)
10 Candidate Interview Reviews Back to all InterviewsSort: Popular Date Difficulty
Senior Consultant Level II Interview
The interview was done with four associates from the prospective department of Booz Allen you were going to work with. It was done in a 2 hour period. Afterwards you contacted your recruiter. My process took three months from interview to hire. They had to find an opening for me.
Other Interview Reviews for Booz Allen Hamilton
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewAccepted OfferNegative ExperienceEasy Interview
I applied online. The process took 2+ months. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton (McLean, VA) in January 2014.
The hiring process was entirely too long. I interviewed previously for a contracts position. Several months later I was called about a completely different position. The interview process was deceitful in regards to expected day to day responsibilities and work environment. The interview consisted of several different groups of people asking basically the same questions. Standard behavioral and technical contracts questions were asked. However, in hind-sight the interviews seemed rushed, like they were too busy and needing to get back to their proposals. I should have noticed then that this was not a good sign. The schedule was scattered as I had finished and been escorted out of the building, only to be called 10minutes later on my way home to turn around and come back to speak to yet another level of management.
Interview Questions
- They did not ask many technical questions as they were too busy. They just wanted to make sure I was competent and able to explain my previous work experience. Answer Question
There was no negotiation as they offered the exact amount I had requested.
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewAccepted OfferNeutral ExperienceAverage Interview
I applied through a recruiter. The process took a week. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton (Washington, DC) in April 2011.
Initial phone interview from recruiter, then flown out to DC for group interview with multiple interviewers and many interviewees and you wait in line for 5-10 minute interview, After interviewers get together and decided if they like you are think you can help... Then offer is made with contention on background check, security clearance ect...
Interview Questions
- How does your military experience relate to consulting requirements 1 Answer
Salary was acceptable, unable to nego a signing bonus, however did offer relo benefits Was unwilling to adjust benefits because relo was not needed and did not want to give signing bonus...
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewAccepted OfferPositive ExperienceAverage Interview
I applied through other source. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton (Washington, DC) in February 2011.
Group interview session. A senior partner spoke then we went off to interview with individual project managers. I met with 2 different project managers who just wanted me to talk about my work experience. We then talked about the company and the benefits they offer.
Interview Questions
- Explain your work experience. Answer Question
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewDeclined OfferPositive ExperienceAverage Interview
The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton (Washington, DC) in June 2010.
The phone interview was very easy and no preparation is required. The in person interviews are set up at the Booz Allen headquarters in Virginia and take about 2.5 hours. A recruiter meets with you first to lay out who will interview you and to review your application. Three Booz Allen employees then interview you, each focusing on a different aspect of your background such as functional knowledge or leadership. They ask you repeatedly to tell them about a time when you used your skills.
Interview Questions
- Tell me about a time you used your leadership skills. Answer Question
Reasons for Declining
Salary was too low.
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewNo OfferNeutral ExperienceAverage Interview
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton (Washington, DC) in April 2010.
I had applied through a recruiter then Booz decided to come to my school to interview the candidates instead. I had my interview with the HR recruiter, it was mainly about your background and your past experience. I was also asked why should I picked over other candidates and examples of leadership etc. They will ask you your salary expectations at the end and if there were any specific teams you want to work for/with. the recruiter was very laid back and nice, taking lots of notes. I do not believe I'll be getting called back right now because of my availability. They need someone available asap and I can't meet that right now. Otherwise, the recruiter seemed to like my experience and academic background.
Interview Questions
- Tell me about yourself. Answer Question
- Walk me through your resume and tell me why you think you'd fit into BAH? Answer Question
- What are your salary expectations? Answer Question
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewAccepted OfferPositive ExperienceAverage Interview
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton (McLean, VA) in February 2009.
I found the Booz Allen Recruiter contact information from the Marines Executive Association job search web site. Once I submitted my resume to the Booz Allen Hamilton recruiter I was immediately contacted and had a 15 minute phone interview that asked generic questions (background, interests, what I knew about the Company). The recruiter then invited me to attend a Junior Military Officer (JMO) Recruiting Conference. Booz Allen paid for everything to fly me from the west coast to the east coast for the interview for two nights. The best way to describe the JMO Recruiting Conference was like speed dating, a one day event of round robin interviews. The first part entailed a quick introduction briefing by the recruiters and Senior Management, the second part was a break out group discussion with prior military officers who just got hired by Booz Allen Hamilton. They spoke of the Company environment, culture and their personal experiences. The third part was the "speed dating" process. Numerous internal BAH teams from all departments requested to speak with each candidate they were interested in (candidate resumes were sent out company wide prior to the event so teams knew who to speak with). Once you sat down with a team interviewer they asked general background questions, interests, experiences, availability. Once you were done with the interview you were asked to speak with another team. Each team had their own interviewing process and questions. After an entire day of interviewing we were informed of which teams were interested in the candidates and the candidates listed their top 5 teams they would like to be a part of. After the conference is was about 1 week after that I received a call from the BAH recruiter that informed me of which team I was being offered the job for, salary, location and start date. The negotiations were simple and reasonable. Following the offer the recruiter sent all the paperwork that needed to be filled. I also had to go online and complete their online application for the specified job title I was being hired for. After completing the application BAH did a background checking utilizing my application (which is very detailed, you need to remember where you lived 10 years ago and for a military personnel that can be a bit difficult). The overall process was extremely smooth and worth it leave taken.
Interview Questions
- No difficult questions! 1 Answer
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewAccepted OfferPositive ExperienceAverage Interview
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 3 weeks. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton (Los Angeles, CA) in June 2008.
A recruiter from the company contacted me about a job. I had a brief, friendly phone interview with the recruiter and then scheduled an on-site interview with her. They day of my interview, I was presented with a list of four or five Booz Allen managers that I would later then interview with. Each interview was approximately 30 minutes long and the questions were general. Mostly talking about what your prior work experiences are, getting to know me, why I want to work for Booz Allen. But it's always good to prepare.
Interview Questions
- What was your prior work experience and why do you want to go into consulting? Answer Question
I actually did not negotiate my pay because the salary was very reasonable. They also offered a generous relocation package.
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewAccepted OfferPositive ExperienceAverage Interview
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton in March 2010.
I participated in a number of phone interviews with department leads and HR specialists. Very quick interviews with general questions about my background and experiences. Was later called for an in-person interview at HQ. The interview process was two-hours, broken into four 30 minute sessions. The first 30 minutes was an overview of the organization and the last three sessions were interviews.
Interview Questions
- How does your past experience relate to this position? Answer Question
Senior Consultant Level II InterviewAccepted OfferPositive ExperienceAverage Interview
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 4+ weeks. I interviewed at Booz Allen Hamilton in December 2009.
The interview process was very positive. I had a phone interview with a hiring manager first, then was scheduled for interviews with 3 teams. HR representative discussed the company benefits with me and did my salary negotiation. The interviews with the teams were highly technical. Very organized hiring process.
Interview Questions
- Network scenerios were presented and RFC detailed technical questions were asked related to protocols and applications. Answer Question
Is this helpful? The community relies on everyone sharing – Add Anonymous Interview Review