text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|Feb 7, 2002
|Filing date
|Jun 26, 2001
|Priority date
|Jul 18, 2000
|Also published as
|Publication number
|James Foran
|Original Assignee
|Silicon Graphics, Inc.
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (26), Referenced by (45), Classifications (5), Legal Events (7)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/219,006, filed Jul. 18, 2000.
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates to computer graphics technology.
[0004] 2. Related Art
[0005] As with any type of information processing, computer graphics rendering as used for viewing a static data base has long been the subject of attempts to improve performance. Since the commoditization of computer graphic processing chips for personal computers, one method that has become particularly attractive is to use multiple numbers of these powerful (yet inexpensive) graphic processing units (GPUs) to render a single scene. Although in the archetypical rendering application, the graphic data move from frame to frame under the user's interactive control, a significant number of graphic applications can be characterized as "viewers".
[0006] In these applications, the data have been pregenerated such that their three-dimensional positions in space are not under the interactive control of the user. However, in a viewer application the user does have interactive control of the viewer's position, the direction of view, and the scale of the graphic data. The user also may have control of the selection of a subset of the data and the method by which it is rendered. This includes the effects of lighting, coloration, and other visual characteristics of the underlying data.
[0007] There are two predominant methods for rendering graphic data with multiple GPUs. These include time domain composition, in which each GPU renders the next successive frame, and screen space composition, in which each GPU renders a subset of the pixels of each frame.
[0008] Time domain composition has the disadvantage of having each GPU render an entire frame. Thus, the speed at which each frame is rendered is limited to the rendering rate of a single GPU. While multiple GPUs enable a higher frame rate, a delay can be imparted in the response time of the system to a user's input. This occurs because, while at any given time only one GPU is engaged in displaying a rendered frame, each of the GPUs is in the process of rendering one of a series of frames in a sequence. To maintain the high frame rate, the system delays acting on the user's input until the specific GPU that first received the signal cycles through the sequence and is again engaged in displaying its rendered frame. In practical applications, this condition serves to limit the number of GPUs that are used in a system. With large data sets another problem is that each GPU must be able to access all of the data. This requires either maintaining multiple copies of large data sets or possible conflicts in accessing the single copy.
[0009] Screen space composition has a similar problem with large data sets since each GPU must examine the entire data base to determine which graphic elements fall within its part of the screen.
[0010] These problems can become intractable as commercial graphics chips become limited by their ability to access data rather than by their ability to render graphic elements.
[0011] One method which allows each GPU to access only a part of the data base is depth composition. Using this method each GPU renders the entire screen and produces both a Z (or depth) buffer and a color buffer. Graphic elements are distributed to GPUs by some hueristic, which is designed to acheive good load balancing. At each pixel the depth values from each of the GPUs are compared and the value indicating the frontmost position is selected. Use of this method is inhibited by the fact that the commodity graphic parts do not output the depth values, which are internally generated. It also requires that the depth buffer be double buffered so that the next frame can be calculated while the current one is displayed. Otherwise performance is effected. This method also prevents the application of some features, such as antialiasing or transparency, which require more information per pixel than just color and depth. Furthermore, volumetric data stored as three-dimensional textures or as geometricly specific textures (such as phototerrain) must be duplicated at each GPU.
[0012] What is needed is a method whereby multiple GPUs can, without a latency penalty, render a subset of graphic data from a data base to combine their outputs to form a correct image. This method should permit three-dimensional and other geometrically attached textures to be stored at a single place. Furthermore, such a method should be scalable, so that systems of arbitrary power can be created, and flexible, so that a system can be configured to support a single user at maximum power or multiple users with the total power distributed amongst them.
[0013] The present invention provides a method and system for viewing three-dimensional computer graphics using multiple graphics processing units (GPUs). The image to be produced represents a three-dimensional scene. The rectangular volume in which the scene resides is decomposed into subvolumes. Multiple GPUs are used, where each GPU is assigned to a different subvolume. The graphics data base is preloaded such that each GPU has access only to the data which is relevant to its subvolume. If a graphic element spans multiple subvolumes, then it is preloaded to each of them. Geometrically specific textures, such as three-dimensional texture, are only loaded to the GPUs for the subvolumes to which they correspond. An identical copy of the viewing application can be run on each GPU.
[0014] All control inputs from the user are sent to all GPUs. As the graphic elements of each subvolume are rendered, they are clipped to the subvolume boundaries to prevent artifacts. An alpha value is stored with each pixel. Initially, the frame buffer, including the alpha value, is cleared. As pixels are written to the frame buffer, the alpha value is updated accordingly. Alpha may represent "clear", "opaque", or transparent (translucent) as determined by its numeric value. Both the alpha value and the color frame buffer are double buffered.
[0015] Each GPU renders an image for the entire screen. The resultant image data that are output by the GPUs are combined using one or more image combiners to produce a final image. The image combiners can be cascaded to an arbitrary degree to achieve scalability. Each image combiner accepts the outputs of two neighboring subvolume GPUs. The combining operation is based on the alpha blending of the output of the frontmost GPUs over the output of the rearmost GPUs. Frontmost and rearmost positions are determined for each frame by the relationship between the subvolumes and the viewing position in three-dimensional space. The output of a single image combiner stage represents the image produced by the combined subvolumes and is used as the input to the next image combiner stage where it is matched with a similarly received output from a neighboring image combiner such that a scalable tree of image combiners can be configured. Where the number of GPUs to be combined exceeds a multiple of the number of GPU inputs a combiner can receive, remaining GPUs can bypass first stage combining and directly input image combiners at the next stage. The number of subvolumes does not have to be the same in each of the three dimensions nor do the dimensions of the subvolumes need to be equal in each of the three dimensions. Image combiners can be aggregated into more than two input units as desired.
[0016] The invention has the feature of decomposing the volume containing the scene to be viewed. The invention has the additional feature of providing an array of GPUs to perform the rendering operations. The invention has the additional advantage of scaling geometrically specific texture without the need for replication across all GPUs. The invention has the further advantage of being scalable with respect to the number of GPUs and image combiners that can be used. The invention has yet another advantage of being transparent to the application program. The program need not be modified to take advantage of the architecture described above or the scalability thereof.
[0017] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form part of the specification, illustrate the present invention and, together with the description, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention.
[0018]FIG. 1 presents a sample collection of objects that could appear in an image.
[0019]FIG. 2 shows the objects of FIG. 1 enclosed by a rectangular volume.
[0020]FIG. 3 shows the rectangular volume of FIG. 2 decomposed into rectangular subvolumes.
[0021]FIG. 4 add representative dimensions to the volume and subvolumes of FIG. 3.
[0022]FIG. 5 presents a diagram of an embodiment of the present invention method.
[0023]FIG. 6 demonstrates different viewing positions of the objects in the image of FIG. 4.
[0024]FIG. 7 presents a diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention system.
[0025]FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example environment in which the present invention can operate.
[0026] The preferred embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the figures where like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Also in the figures, the left most digit of each reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number is first used.
[0027] Nomenclature
[0028] The present invention provides a method and system for presenting three-dimensional computer graphics images using multiple graphics processing units. The following section defines several terms that occur frequently throughout the application.
[0029] Graphics Processing Unit (GPU).
[0030] This refers to a device for rendering an image on the basis of received information, such as graphics primitives and texture data. The output of a GPU is rendered three-dimensional computer graphics data.
[0031] Image Combiner.
[0032] This refers to a device which takes the output of two or more sources of rendered three-dimensional computer graphics data and combines them. The combination process can take into account colors, opacity, and the relative depth of objects in a scene. The inputs to a combiner can come from a GPU or from another combiner. The output is rendered three-dimensional computer graphics data that is dependent on (i.e., a combination of) the inputs.
[0033] Memory Cell.
[0034] This refers to memory that stores data to be rendered by a GPU, and is accessible by that GPU.
[0035] Viewing Position.
[0036] This refers to the location in three-dimensional space of a point from which a rendered scene is viewed. Viewing position includes both the angle of the line of sight and the distance between the point and the rendered scene.
[0037] Operation
[0038] The present invention is a method and system for presenting three-dimensional computer graphics images using multiple GPUs. The present invention realizes a high degree of speed, fidelity, resolution, and scalability in the images that it renders by using multiple GPUs and cascading stages of image combiners. The present invention requires that the three-dimensional computer graphics data ("graphics data") undergo preliminary processing to prepare them for rendering by the multiple GPUs.
[0039] The image to be produced represents a three-dimensional scene. FIG. 1 presents a collection of objects that could appear in such a scene. The objects in this figure are included purely for example. The present invention can work with any objects that could be rendered in an image. One skilled in the art will recognize that such a three-dimensional scene could be the product of an application software program, information stored in a database, or other source for producing a digital image.
[0040] First, the dimensions of the scene are bounded by a rectangular volume as shown in FIG. 2. Next, this volume is decomposed into rectangular subvolumes as shown in FIG. 3 such that each subvolume includes a portion of the overall scene. The graphics data include graphics primitives and texture data. Each graphics primitive includes a set of vertices. The position of each vertex is compared with the positions of the planar sides of the subvolumes to determine the subvolume to which the graphics primitive should be assigned. Where vertices of a graphics primitive indicate that it spans a boundary between subvolumes, the graphics primitive will be assigned to each subvolume. Texture data are matched to the graphics primitives and assigned to the appropriate subvolumes. Finally, a GPU is assigned to each subvolume to render the graphics data that lie within the boundaries of that subvolume. Where parts of a graphics primitive exceed the boundaries of a subvolume, the GPU will clip that graphics primitive to the boundaries of the subvolume.
[0041] Note that the dimensions of the sides of the rectangular volume or subvolumes do not need to equal one another. Additionally, the dimensions of the sides of the subvolume do not need to equal a scaled down version of the volume. FIG. 4 illustrates this freedom in dimension sizes. The volume shown in FIG. 4 measures 8�9�10, while the subvolume measures, along the same axes, 2�3�5.
[0042] The present invention will now be described by referencing the operational flow diagram shown in FIG. 5. In FIG. 5, at a step 502, the graphics data that correspond to each rectangular subvolume is allocated to the GPU assigned to that subvolume. Typically, allocation occurs by loading each set of allocated graphics data into a memory cell that is accessible only by the GPU to which the graphics data have been allocated. Alternatively, the graphics data can be stored in a common memory accessible by all GPUs with allocation achieved by controlling the distribution of addresses for the graphics data such that certain graphics data are accessible only by the GPU to which they have been allocated. One skilled in the art will recognize that there are other methods by which one could control the allocation of graphics data to the GPUs.
[0043] In FIG. 5, at a step 504, a viewing position is determined. The viewing position controls which aspect of the three-dimensional graphics data will be presented for viewing. FIG. 6 illustrates this point. Item 602 replicates the example scene originally presented in FIG. 1 with the rectangular subvolumes superimposed on it as shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 6 includes two other illustrations that demonstrate how the scene depicted in item 602 would appear from different viewing positions. Item 604 shows one viewing position. Note that from this angle part of the tree is obscured by the image of the rabbit. Item 604 demonstrates another viewing position. Note that from this "birds eye" view that both the tree and the rabbit are visible, but the trunk of the tree and parts of the body of the rabbit are not. The ability to view all aspects of the scene by changing the viewing position is an advantage of the present invention. The viewing position can be determined by the application software either automatically or interactively via a command entered by the user.
[0044] In FIG. 5, at a step 506, the viewing position is communicated to each GPU. At a step 508, each GPU renders the graphics data that has been allocated to it. The architecture of the present invention supports the possibility that each GPU could render, by itself, the full image. In one embodiment, pixels rendered include channels representing the primary colors of red, green, and blue and an alpha channel that indicates the degree of translucence for that pixel. Translucence can range from transparent to opaque.
[0045] In FIG. 5, at a step 510, the rendered graphics data from each GPU are ordered. Ordering optimizes the process by which the outputs of individual GPUs are combined. Ordering is determined by comparing the viewing position with the positions of each of the subvolumes. At a step 512, the outputs of the individuals GPUs are combined by blending. Image blending accounts for the spatial relationships between the viewing position and the rendered images so that objects that are more near the viewing position overwrite those that are more distant. Typically, image combining is performed using image combiners where each image combiner stores the results of its combining process in a frame buffer.
[0046] Depending upon the application being executed and the number of GPUs used, image combiners can be configured in cascading stages where the output of one or more image combiners provide inputs for another image combiner. This would entail further image combining as shown in FIG. 5 at a step 514. At the first stage, an image combiner receives the output of adjacent GPUs. In subsequent stages, an image combiner receives the output of one or more image combiners from a previous stage such that combined GPUs maintain their contiguous relationship. Where the number of GPUs to be combined exceeds a multiple of the number of GPU inputs a combiner can receive, remaining GPUs can bypass first stage combining and directly input image combiners at the next stage.
[0047] An advantage of the present invention is its ability to scale the rendering and combining process to match the needs of the application being executed. An application requiring a high degree of resolution or fidelity can decompose the volume into more (and hence smaller) subvolumes. This would bring into service more GPUs such that the processing power of each GPU could be brought to bear on a smaller portion of the overall scene to be rendered. Alternatively, an application requiring a high speed of rendering could opt to use fewer GPUs and thus reduce the number of stages (and hence time) needed for image combining.
[0048]FIG. 7 illustrates this arrangement. In FIG. 7, images rendered by GPUs 701 and 702 are combined by image combiner 725. Depending upon the application, the output of image combiner 725 can be routed along bus 726 directly to an output device or along bus 727 to image combiner 761 for further combining. Image combiners can be designed to receive an arbitrary number of inputs. Note that in FIG. 7 image combiner 725 receives two inputs, one each from GPUs 701 and 702; image combiner 761 receives three inputs, one each from image combiners 725, 728, and 731; and image combiner 773 receives four inputs, one each from image combiners 761, 764, 767, and 770. The output of each image combiner can be routed directly to an output device or to another image combiner. This provides flexibility in the architecture to support scaling.
[0049] Returning to FIG. 5, at a step 516, the three-dimensional computer graphics image is presented for viewing.
[0050] Environment of the Invention
[0051]FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating an example environment in which the present invention can operate. The environment is a computer system 800 that includes one or more processors, such as a central processing unit (CPU) 804. The CPU 804 is connected to a communications bus 806. Various software embodiments are described in terms of this example computer system. After reading this description, it will be apparent to a person skilled in the relevant art how to implement the invention using other computer systems and/or computer architectures.
[0052] Computer system 800 also includes a main memory 808, preferably random access memory (RAM), and can also include a secondary memory 810. The secondary memory 810 can include, for example, a hard disk drive 812 and/or a removable storage drive 814, representing a floppy disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, etc. The removable storage drive 814 reads from and/or writes to a removable storage unit 818 in a well known manner. Removable storage unit 818 represents a floppy disk, magnetic tape, optical disk, etc., which is read by and written to by removable storage drive 814. As will be appreciated, the removable storage unit 818 includes a computer usable storage medium having stored therein computer software and/or data.
[0053] The computer system 800 also includes conventional hardware such as a display 830, a keyboard 832, and a pointing device 834. A digitizer 836 and a camera 838 can be used for capturing images to process according to the present invention. Alternatively, images can be retrieved from any of the above-mentioned memory units, or via a communications interface 824.
[0054] In alternative embodiments, secondary memory 810 may include other similar means for allowing computer programs or other instructions to be loaded into computer system 800. Such means can include, for example, a removable storage unit 822 and an interface 820. Examples can include a program cartridge and cartridge interface (such as that found in video game devices), a removable memory chip (such as an EPROM, or PROM) and associated socket, and other removable storage units 822 and interfaces 820 which allow software and data to be transferred from the removable storage unit 822 to computer system 800.
[0055] The communications interface 824 allows software and data to be transferred between computer system 800 and external devices via communications path 826. Examples of communications interface 824 can include a modem, a network interface (such as an Ethernet card), a communications port (e.g., RS-232), etc. Software and data transferred via communications interface 824 are in the form of signals which can be electronic, electromagnetic, optical or other signals capable of being received by communications interface 824 via communications path 826. Note that communications interface 824 provides a means by which computer system 800 can interface to a network such as the Internet. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the communications interface 824 can send control signals to the color digital camera and data from the color digital camera can be transferred back to the computer system 800. This interface can be parallel, serial, bi- or unidirectional.
[0056] The present invention is described in terms of this example environment. Description in these terms is provided for convenience only. It is not intended that the invention be limited to application in this example environment. In fact, after reading the complete description, it will become apparent to a person skilled in the relevant art how to implement the invention in alternative environments.
[0057] Software and Hardware Embodiments
[0058] The present invention is preferably implemented using software running (that is, executing) in an environment similar to that described above with respect to FIG. 8. In this document, the term "computer program product" is used to generally refer to removable storage device 818 or a hard disk installed in hard disk drive 812. These computer program products are means for providing software to computer system 800.
[0059] Computer programs (also called computer control logic) are stored in main memory and/or secondary memory 810. Computer programs can also be received via communications interface 824. Such computer programs, when executed, enable the computer system 800 to perform the features of the present invention as discussed herein. In particular, the computer programs, when executed, enable the processor 804 to perform the features of the present invention. Accordingly, such computer programs represent controllers of the computer system 800.
[0060] In an embodiment where the invention is implemented using software, the software may be stored in a computer program product and loaded into computer system 800 using removable storage drive 814, hard drive 812 or communications interface 824. Alternatively, the computer program product may be downloaded to computer system 800 over communications path 826. The control logic (software), when executed by the processor 804, causes the processor 804 to perform the functions of the invention as described herein.
[0061] In another embodiment, the invention is implemented primarily in hardware using, for example, hardware components such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Implementation of a hardware state machine so as to perform the functions described herein will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s).
[0062] Conclusion
[0063] While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|May 10, 1988
|Aug 14, 1990
|Battelle Memorial Institute
|Parallel processor-based raster graphics system architecture
|Jan 27, 1994
|Jul 18, 1995
|Kubota Corporation
|Image data processing device with multi-processor
|Jul 3, 1991
|Oct 17, 1995
|Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|Graphics engine for true colour 2D graphics
|Sep 27, 1994
|Apr 23, 1996
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and apparatus for managing concurrent access to multiple memories
|Aug 9, 1995
|Sep 17, 1996
|Hewlett-Packard Company
|Apparatus and method for volume rendering
|Feb 4, 1991
|Jun 17, 1997
|Medical Instrumentation And Diagnostics Corp. (Midco)
|Method and apparatus for management of image data by linked lists of pixel values
|Sep 28, 1994
|Mar 31, 1998
|Namco Ltd.
|Pipeline processing device, clipping processing device, three-dimensional simulator device and pipeline processing method
|Sep 30, 1997
|Jun 2, 1998
|The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York
|Apparatus and method for real-time volume visualization
|May 1, 1996
|Jun 9, 1998
|3Dlabs Inc., Ltd.
|Graphics pre-processing and rendering system
|Dec 11, 1995
|Aug 11, 1998
|Dynamic Pictures, Inc.
|Parallel-processor graphics architecture
|Mar 21, 1997
|Nov 24, 1998
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|Multiprocessor graphics system
|Jul 30, 1997
|Jan 18, 2000
|Microsoft Corporation
|Sprite compositor and method for performing lighting and shading operations using a compositor to combine factored image layers
|Oct 1, 1997
|Apr 18, 2000
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and apparatus for deferred clipping of polygons
|Jul 30, 1997
|May 16, 2000
|Microsoft Corporation
|Method for measuring the fidelity of warped image layer approximations in a real-time graphics rendering pipeline
|Oct 2, 1997
|Aug 8, 2000
|Silicon Graphics, Inc.
|System and method for performing high-precision, multi-channel blending using multiple blending passes
|Sep 24, 1999
|Jan 15, 2002
|Microsoft Corporation
|Using alpha values to control pixel blending
|Nov 9, 1999
|May 27, 2003
|Broadcom Corporation
|Graphics display system
|Aug 20, 1999
|Jun 10, 2003
|Apple Computer, Inc.
|Apparatus and method for geometry operations in a 3D-graphics pipeline
|Feb 3, 2000
|Jul 1, 2003
|Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
|Image processing unit, image processing system using the same, and image processing method
|Aug 20, 1999
|Jul 22, 2003
|Apple Computer, Inc.
|Graphics processor with deferred shading
|Nov 17, 2000
|Mar 22, 2005
|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
|Systems for compositing graphical data
|Oct 31, 2000
|Jun 7, 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|Compositing images from multiple sources
|Apr 6, 2001
|Nov 1, 2001
|Autodesk, Inc.
|Non-linear video editing system
|May 15, 2002
|Sep 19, 2002
|David Blythe
|System, method, and computer program product for real time transparency-based compositing
|Aug 23, 2002
|Feb 6, 2003
|Wei Tien En
|Method and apparatus for a video graphics circuit having parallel pixel processing
|Jul 31, 2002
|Feb 5, 2004
|Silicon Graphics Inc.
|System and method for decoupling the user interface and application window in a graphics application
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Sep 2, 2003
|Dec 18, 2007
|Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
|Method and apparatus for rendering three-dimensional object groups
|Jul 1, 2004
|May 13, 2008
|Paul Vivek Anand
|Method and system for intelligent scalable animation with intelligent parallel processing engine and intelligent animation engine
|May 24, 2007
|Jul 13, 2010
|Metrologic Instruments, Inc.
|POS-based code driven retail transaction system configured to enable the reading of code symbols on cashier and customer sides thereof, during a retail transaction being carried out at a point-of-sale (POS) station, and driven by a retail transaction application program
|Sep 18, 2007
|Aug 17, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|PC-level computing system with a multi-mode parallel graphics rendering subsystem employing an automatic mode controller, responsive to performance data collected during the run-time of graphics applications
|Oct 23, 2007
|Sep 14, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Multi-GPU graphics processing subsystem for installation in a PC-based computing system having a central processing unit (CPU) and a PC bus
|Oct 23, 2007
|Sep 14, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|PC-based computing system employing multiple graphics processing units (GPUS) interfaced with the central processing unit (CPU) using a PC bus and a hardware hub, and parallelized according to the object division mode of parallel operation
|Oct 23, 2007
|Sep 21, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|PC-based computing system employing a multi-GPU graphics pipeline architecture supporting multiple modes of GPU parallelization dymamically controlled while running a graphics application
|Oct 23, 2007
|Sep 21, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Graphics hub subsystem for interfacing parallalized graphics processing units (GPUs) with the central processing unit (CPU) of a PC-based computing system having an CPU interface module and a PC bus
|Oct 23, 2007
|Sep 21, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Method of providing a PC-based computing system with parallel graphics processing capabilities
|Nov 19, 2004
|Oct 5, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|PC-based computing system employing parallelized graphics processing units (GPUS) interfaced with the central processing unit (CPU) using a PC bus and a hardware graphics hub having a router
|Oct 26, 2007
|Oct 5, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|PC-based computing system having an integrated graphics subsystem supporting parallel graphics processing operations across a plurality of different graphics processing units (GPUS) from the same or different vendors, in a manner transparent to graphics applications
|Jan 25, 2006
|Oct 12, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|PC-based computing system employing a silicon chip having a routing unit and a control unit for parallelizing multiple GPU-driven pipeline cores according to the object division mode of parallel operation during the running of a graphics application
|Oct 26, 2007
|Oct 12, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|PC-based computing system employing a silicon chip implementing parallelized GPU-driven pipelines cores supporting multiple modes of parallelization dynamically controlled while running a graphics application
|Oct 26, 2007
|Oct 12, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd
|PC-based computing system employing a silicon chip of monolithic construction having a routing unit, a control unit and a profiling unit for parallelizing the operation of multiple GPU-driven pipeline cores according to the object division mode of parallel operation
|Nov 7, 2006
|Nov 9, 2010
|Microsoft Corporation
|Parallel engine support in display driver model
|Mar 22, 2006
|Nov 16, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Graphics processing and display system employing multiple graphics cores on a silicon chip of monolithic construction
|Apr 24, 2007
|Nov 30, 2010
|Metrologic Instruments, Inc.
|POS-based checkout system configured to enable the reading of code symbols on cashier and customer sides thereof, during a retail transaction being carried out at a point-of-sale (POS) station
|Oct 26, 2007
|Nov 30, 2010
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|PC-based computing systems employing a bridge chip having a routing unit for distributing geometrical data and graphics commands to parallelized GPU-driven pipeline cores supported on a plurality of graphics cards and said bridge chip during the running of a graphics application
|Jul 28, 2006
|Apr 12, 2011
|Microsoft Corporation
|Real-time GPU rendering of piecewise algebraic surfaces
|Sep 25, 2007
|Apr 26, 2011
|Microsoft Corporation
|Emitting raster and vector content from a single software component
|Sep 25, 2007
|May 10, 2011
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd
|Computing system having a multiple graphics processing pipeline (GPPL) architecture supported on multiple external graphics cards connected to an integrated graphics device (IGD) embodied within a bridge circuit
|Sep 26, 2007
|May 17, 2011
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Computing system having a hybrid CPU/GPU fusion-type graphics processing pipeline (GPPL) architecture
|Aug 30, 2007
|Jun 14, 2011
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Method of controlling in real time the switching of modes of parallel operation of a multi-mode parallel graphics processing subsystem embodied within a host computing system
|Aug 31, 2005
|Oct 25, 2011
|Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Wissenschaften E.V.
|Image processing device and associated operating method
|Jan 18, 2007
|Dec 27, 2011
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd
|Multi-mode parallel graphics rendering system employing real-time automatic scene profiling and mode control
|Sep 26, 2007
|Feb 28, 2012
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd
|Game console system capable of paralleling the operation of multiple graphic processing units (GPUS) employing a graphics hub device supported on a game console board
|Oct 30, 2007
|Mar 13, 2012
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd
|Computing system having multi-mode parallel graphics rendering subsystem (MMPGRS) employing real-time automatic scene profiling and mode control
|Aug 29, 2008
|Oct 9, 2012
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Method of generating digital images of objects in 3D scenes while eliminating object overdrawing within the multiple graphics processing pipeline (GPPLS) of a parallel graphics processing system generating partial color-based complementary-type images along the viewing direction using black pixel rendering and subsequent recompositing operations
|Nov 14, 2008
|Dec 11, 2012
|Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
|Apparatus and method for volume rendering on multiple graphics processing units (GPUs)
|Dec 31, 2006
|Jul 30, 2013
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Parallel graphics system employing multiple graphics processing pipelines with multiple graphics processing units (GPUS) and supporting an object division mode of parallel graphics processing using programmable pixel or vertex processing resources provided with the GPUS
|Oct 23, 2007
|Jan 14, 2014
|Lucid Information Technology, Ltd.
|Method of and system for time-division based parallelization of graphics processing units (GPUs) employing a hardware hub with router interfaced between the CPU and the GPUs for the transfer of geometric data and graphics commands and rendered pixel data within the system
|Nov 8, 2010
|Jun 17, 2014
|Lucidlogix Software Solutions, Ltd.
|Internet-based graphics application profile management system for updating graphic application profiles stored within the multi-GPU graphics rendering subsystems of client machines running graphics-based applications
|Nov 15, 2010
|Jun 17, 2014
|Lucidlogix Software Solutions, Ltd.
|Silicon chip of a monolithic construction for use in implementing multiple graphic cores in a graphics processing and display subsystem
|May 15, 2002
|Sep 19, 2002
|David Blythe
|System, method, and computer program product for real time transparency-based compositing
|Sep 2, 2003
|Apr 8, 2004
|Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
|Image processing method and apparatus
|Jul 1, 2004
|Oct 13, 2005
|Vital Idea, Inc.
|Method and system for intelligent scalable animation with intelligent parallel processing engine and intelligent animation engine
|Apr 26, 2006
|Mar 29, 2007
|Modviz, Inc.
|Scene splitting for perspective presentations
|Nov 14, 2008
|May 28, 2009
|Siemens Corporate Research, Inc.
|APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR VOLUME RENDERING ON MULTIPLE GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNITS (GPUs)
|Oct 26, 2009
|Jun 24, 2010
|Zebra Imaging, Inc.
|Rendering 3D Data to Hogel Data
|Dec 28, 2009
|Jul 15, 2010
|Cellius, Inc.
|Image generation system, image generation method, and computer program product
|Jun 25, 2002
|Jan 9, 2003
|Abgenix Inc
|Antibodies to opgl
|Jun 27, 2003
|Jan 15, 2004
|Hur Myung Jun
|Functional water with deodorization activity and sterilization activity against multi-drug resistent bacteria, and a preparation method thereof
|Nov 22, 2006
|Jul 5, 2007
|Microsoft Corp
|Texture resampling with a processor
|Feb 4, 2011
|Aug 11, 2011
|Microsoft Corporation
|Graphics remoting using augmentation data
|Jun 25, 2014
|Feb 19, 2015
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|Graphics processing apparatus and graphics processing method
|U.S. Classification
|345/679, 345/653
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|Jun 26, 2001
Owner name: SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FORAN, JAMES L.;REEL/FRAME:011937/0190
Effective date: 20010622
|Aug 19, 2005
Owner name: WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL CAPITAL, INC.,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. AND SILICON GRAPHICS FEDERAL, INC. (EACH A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:016871/0809
Effective date: 20050412
|Oct 24, 2006
Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018545/0777
Effective date: 20061017
|Oct 18, 2007
Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INCORPORATED,NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:019995/0895
Effective date: 20070926
|Jan 30, 2012
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 18, 2012
Owner name: GRAPHICS PROPERTIES HOLDINGS, INC., NEW YORK
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028066/0415
Effective date: 20090604
|Jan 4, 2013
Owner name: RPX CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GRAPHICS PROPERTIES HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:029564/0799
Effective date: 20121224