text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|31 Mar 1998
|Filing date
|25 Sep 1995
|Priority date
|3 Oct 1988
|Fee status
|Also published as
|Publication number
|Richard L. Dunn, James P. English, Donald R. Cowsar, David P. Vanderbilt
|Original Assignee
|Atrix Laboratories, Incorporated
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (69), Non-Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (126), Classifications (79), Legal Events (2)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/210,891, filed Mar. 18, 1994, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/788,032, filed Dec. 23, 1991, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,340,849 (issued Aug. 23, 1994), which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/513,782, filed Apr. 24, 1990, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,278,201 (issued Jan. 11, 1994), which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/252,645, filed Oct. 3, 1988, now U.S. Pat. No. B1-4,938,763 (issued Jul. 3, 1990; certificate issued Jul. 4, 1995).
The present invention relates to a method and composition for producing biodegradable polymers, and more particularly to the use of such polymers for providing syringeable, in-situ forming, solid, biodegradable implants.
Biodegradable polymers have been used for many years in medical applications. These include sutures, surgical clips, staples, implants, and drug delivery systems. The majority of these biodegradable polymers have been thermoplastic materials based upon glycolide, lactide, ε-caprolactone, and copolymers thereof. Typical examples are the polyglycolide sutures described in U.S.-Pat. No. 3,297,033 to Schmitt, the poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) sutures described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,636,956 to Schneider, the poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) surgical clips and staples described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,523,591 to Kaplan et al., and the drug-delivery systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919 to Boswell et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,887,699 to Yolles, U.S. Pat. No. 4,155,992 to Schmitt, U.S. Pat. No. 4,379,138 to Pitt et al., and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,130,639 and 4,186,189 to Shalaby et al.
All of the biodegradable polymers described in these patents are thermoplastic materials. Consequently, they can be heated and formed into various shapes such as fibers, clips, staples, pins, films, etc. Only when heated above their melting point do these polymers become liquid. During their normal use, they are solids.
Thermoset biodegradable polymers have also been previously described for use in medical applications. These polymers have been formed by crosslinking reactions which lead to high-molecular-weight materials that do not melt or form flowable liquids at high temperatures. Typical examples of these materials are the crosslinked polyurethanes described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,933,477 to Hostettler and U.S. Pat. No. 3,186,971 to Hostettler et al. Copolymers based on ε-caprolactone and L-lactide or DL-lactide crosslinked via peroxide initiators were described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,045,418 and 4,057,537, both to Sinclair. Crosslinked caprolactone copolymers have been prepared by incorporation of a bislactone into a monomer feed, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,379,138 to Pitt et al. Trihydroxy-functional copolymers of ε-caprolactone and ε-valerolactone have been crosslinked with diisocyanates, thereby affording biodegradable polymers, as described in Pitt et al., J. Polym. Sci.: Part A: Polym Chem. 25:955-966; 1987. These polymers are also solids when crosslinked or cured.
Although these two classes of biodegradable polymers have many useful biomedical applications, there are several important limitations to their use in the body where body is defined as that of humans, animals, birds, fish, and reptiles. Because these polymers are solids, all instances involving their use have required initially forming the polymeric structures outside the body, followed by insertion of the solid structure into the body. For example, sutures, clips, and staples are all formed from thermoplastic biodegradable polymers prior to use. When inserted into the body, they retain their original shape rather than flow to fill voids or cavities where they may be most needed.
Similarly, drug-delivery systems using these biodegradable polymers have to be formed outside the body. In such instances, the drug is incorporated into the polymer and the mixture shaped into a certain form such a cylinder, disc, or fiber for implantation. With such solid implants, the drug-delivery system has to be inserted into the body through an incision. These incisions are often larger than desired by the medical profession and lead to a reluctance of the patients to accept such an implant or drug-delivery system.
The only way to avoid the incision with these polymers is to inject them as small particles, microspheres, or microcapsules. These may or may not contain a drug which can be released into the body. Although these small particles can be injected into the body with a syringe, they do not always satisfy the demand for a biodegradable implant. Because they are particles, they do not form a continuous film or solid implant with the structural integrity needed for certain prostheses. When inserted into certain body cavities such as the mouth, a periodontal pocket, the eye, or the vagina where there is considerable fluid flow, these small particles, microspheres, or microcapsules are poorly retained because of their small size and discontinuous nature. In addition, microspheres or microcapsules prepared from these polymers and containing drugs for release into the body are sometimes difficult to produce on a large scale, and their storage and injection characteristics present problems. Furthermore, one other major limitation of the microcapsule or small-particle system is their lack of reversibility without extensive surgical intervention. That is, if there are complications after they have been injected, it is considerably more difficult to remove them from the body than with solid implants.
Therefore, there exists a need for a method and composition which provides a biodegradable, polymeric structure useful in overcoming the above-described limitations.
There exists a further need for a method and composition for providing syringeable, in-situ forming, solid, biodegradable implants which can be used as prosthetic devices and/or controlled delivery systems.
Moreover, there exists a need for such a method and composition which can provide implants having a range of properties from soft to rigid, so as to be usable with both soft and hard tissue.
The present invention relates to the production and use of biodegradable polymers as prosthetic implants and controlled-release, drug-delivery systems which can be administered as liquids via, for example, a syringe and needle, but which coagulate or cure ("set") shortly after dosing to form a solid. The implants are biodegradable because they are made from biodegradable polymers and copolymers comprising two types of polymer systems: thermoplastic and thermosetting.
A thermoplastic system is provided in which a solid, linear-chain, biodegradable polymer or copolymer is dissolved in a solvent, which is nontoxic and water miscible, to form a liquid solution. Once the polymer solution is placed into the body where there is sufficient water, the solvent dissipates or diffuses away from the polymer, leaving the polymer to coagulate or solidify into a solid structure. The placement of the solution can be anywhere within the body, including soft tissue such as muscle or fat, hard tissue such as bone, or a cavity such as the periodontal, oral, vaginal, rectal, nasal, or a pocket such as a periodontal pocket or the cul-de-sac of the eye. For drug-delivery systems, the biologically active agent is added to the polymer solution where it is either dissolved to form a homogeneous solution or dispersed to form a suspension or dispersion of drug within the polymeric solution. When the polymer solution is exposed to body fluids or water, the solvent diffuses away from the polymer-drug mixture and water diffuses into the mixture where it coagulates the polymer thereby trapping or encapsulating the drug within the polymeric matrix as the implant solidifies. The release of the drug then follows the general rules for diffusion or dissolution of a drug from within a polymeric matrix.
Another embodiment of the invention is also provided, namely, a thermosetting system comprising the synthesis of crosslinkable polymers which are biodegradable and which can be formed and cured in-situ. The thermosetting system comprises reactive, liquid, oligomeric polymers which contain no solvents and which cure in place to form solids, usually with the addition of a curing catalyst.
The multifunctional polymers useful in the thermosetting system are first synthesized via copolymerization of either DL-lactide or L-lactide with ε-caprolactone using a multifunctional polyol initiator and a catalyst to form polyol-terminated prepolymers. The polyol-terminated prepolymers are then converted to acrylic ester-terminated prepolymers, preferably by acylation of the alcohol terminus with acryloyl chloride via a Schotten-Baumann-like technique, i.e., reaction of acyl halides with alcohols. The acrylic ester-terminated prepolymers may also be synthesized in a number of other ways, including but not limited to, reaction of carboxylic acids (i.e., acrylic or methacrylic acid) with alcohols, reaction of carboxylic acid esters (i.e., methyl acrylate or methyl methacrylate) with alcohols by transesterification, and reaction of isocyanatoalkyl acrylates (i.e., isocyanatoethyl methacrylate) with alcohols.
The liquid acrylic-terminated prepolymer is cured, preferably by the addition of benzoyl peroxide or azobisisobutyronitrile, to a more solid structure. Thus, for an implant utilizing these crosslinkable polymers, the catalyst is added to the liquid acrylic-terminated prepolymer immediately prior to injection into the body. Once inside the body, the crosslinking reaction will proceed until sufficient molecular weight has been obtained to cause the polymer to solidify. The liquid prepolymer, when injected, will flow into the cavity or space in which it is placed and assume that shape when it solidifies. For drug delivery utilizing this system, biologically active agents are added to the liquid polymer systems in the uncatalyzed state.
In both the thermoplastic and the thermosetting systems, the advantages of liquid application are achieved. For example, the polymer may be injected via syringe and needle into a body while it is in liquid form and then left in-situ to form a solid biodegradable implant structure. The need to form an incision is eliminated, and the implant will assume the shape of its cavity. Furthermore, a drug-delivery vehicle may be provided by adding a biologically active agent to the liquid prior to injection. Once the implant is formed, it will release the agent to the body and then biodegrade. The term "biologically active agent" means a drug or some other substance capable of producing an effect on a body.
It is an object of the present invention, therefore, to provide a method and composition for producing biodegradable polymers.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide such a polymer which may be useful in producing syringeable, in-situ forming, solid biodegradable implants.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide such an implant which can be used in a controlled-release delivery system for biological agents.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide implants having a range of properties from soft and elastomeric to hard and rigid, so as to be usable with both soft and hard tissue.
FIG. 1 illustrates the synthesis of acrylate-terminated prepolymers and subsequent crosslinking by free-radical initiators;
FIG. 2 illustrates structures for the random copolymer of ε-caprolactone and L-lactide initiated with a diol;
Table 1 is a summary of the bifunctional PLC prepolymers synthesized;
Table 2 is a summary of the acrylic ester terminated prepolymers synthesized; and
Table 3 is a summary of curing studies.
The present invention relates to biodegradable, in-situ forming implants and methods for producing the same. The present invention also relates to a liquid biodegradable polymeric delivery system that can be injected into a body where it forms a solid and releases a biologically active agent at a controlled rate. Two types of biodegradable polymeric systems are described: thermoplastic polymers dissolved in a biocompatible solvent and thermosetting polymers that are liquids without the use of solvents.
A. Thermoplastic System
A thermoplastic system is provided in which a solid, linear-chain, biodegradable polymer is dissolved in a biocompatible solvent to form a liquid, which can then be administered via a syringe and needle. Examples of biodegradable polymers which can be used in this application are polylactides, polyglycolides, polycaprolactones, polyanhydrides, polyamides, polyurethanes, polyesteramides, polyorthoesters, polydioxanones, polyacetals, polyketals, polycarbonates, polyorthocarbonates, polyphosphazenes, polyhydroxybutyrates, polyhydroxyvalerates, polyalkylene oxalates, polyalkylene succinates, poly(malic acid), poly(amino acids), polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol, polyhydroxycellulose, chitin, chitosan, and copolymers, terpolymers, or combinations or mixtures of the above materials. The preferred polymers are those which have a lower degree of crystallization and are more hydrophobic. These polymers and copolymers are more soluble in the biocompatible solvents than the highly crystalline polymers such as polyglycolide and chitin which also have a high degree of hydrogen-bonding. Preferred materials with the desired solubility parameters are the polylactides, polycaprolactones, and copolymers of these with glycolide in which there are more amorphous regions to enhance solubility.
It is also preferred that the solvent for the biodegradable polymer be non-toxic, water miscible, and otherwise biocompatible. Solvents that are toxic should not be used to inject any material into a living body. The solvents must also be biocompatible so that they do not cause severe tissue irritation or necrosis at the site of implantation. Furthermore, the solvent should be water miscible so that it will diffuse quickly into the body fluids and allow water to permeate into the polymer solution and cause it to coagulate or solidify. Examples of such solvents include N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, 2-pyrrolidone, ethanol, propylene glycol, acetone, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, methyl ethyl ketone, dimethylformamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, tetrahydrofuran, caprolactam, decylmethylsulfoxide, oleic acid, and 1-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one. The preferred solvents are N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, 2-pyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, and acetone because of their solrating ability and their compatibility.
The solubility of the biodegradable polymers in the various solvents will differ depending upon their crystallinity, their hydrophilicity, hydrogen-bonding, and molecular weight. Thus, not all of the biodegradable polymers will be soluble in the same solvent, but each polymer or copolymer should have its optimum solvent. Lower molecular-weight polymers will normally dissolve more readily in the solvents than high-molecular-weight polymers. As a result, the concentration of a polymer dissolved in the various solvents will differ depending upon type of polymer and its molecular weight. Conversely, the higher molecular-weight polymers will normally tend to coagulate or solidify faster than the very low-molecular-weight polymers. Moreover the higher molecular-weight polymers will tend to give higher solution viscosities than the low-molecular-weight materials. Thus for optimum injection efficiency, the molecular weight and the concentration of the polymer in the solvent have to be controlled.
For example, low-molecular-weight polylactic acid formed by the condensation of lactic acid will dissolve in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone(NMP) to give a 73% by weight solution which still flows easily through a 23-gauge syringe needle, whereas a higher molecular-weight poly(DL-lactide) (DL-PLA) formed by the additional polymerization of DL-lactide gives the same solution viscosity when dissolved in NMP at only 50% by weight. The higher molecular-weight polymer solution coagulates immediately when placed into water. The low-molecular-weight polymer solution, although more concentrated, tends to coagulate very slowly when placed into water.
For polymers that tend to coagulate slowly, a solvent mixture can be used to increase the coagulation rate. Thus one liquid component of the mixture is a good solvent for the polymer, and the other component is a poorer solvent or a non-solvent. The two liquids are mixed at a ratio such that the polymer is still soluble but precipitates with the slightest increase in the amount of non-solvent, such as water in a physiological environment. By necessity, the solvent system must be miscible with both the polymer and water. An example of such a binary solvent system is the use of NMP and ethanol for low-molecular-weight DL-PLA. The addition of ethanol to the NMP/polymer solution increases its coagulation rate significantly.
It has also been found that solutions containing very high concentrations of high-molecular-weight polymers sometimes coagulate or solidify slower than more dilute solutions. It is suspected that the high concentration of polymer impedes the diffusion of solvent from within the polymer matrix and consequently prevents the permeation of water into the matrix where it can precipitate the polymer chains. Thus, there is an optimum concentration at which the solvent can diffuse out of the polymer solution and water penetrates within to coagulate the polymer.
In one envisioned use of the thermoplastic system, the polymer solution is placed in a syringe and injected through a needle into the body. Once in place, the solvent dissipates, the remaining polymer solidifies, and a solid structure is formed. The implant will adhere to its surrounding tissue or bone by mechanical forces and can assume the shape of its surrounding cavity. Thus, the biodegradable polymer solution can be injected subdermally like collagen to build up tissue or to fill in defects. It can also be injected into wounds including burn wounds to prevent the formation Of deep scars. Unlike collagen, the degradation time of the implant can be varied from a few weeks to years depending upon the polymer selected and its molecular weight. The injectable polymer solution can also be used to mend bone defects or to provide a continuous matrix when other solid biodegradable implants such as hydroxyapatite plugs are inserted into bone gaps. The injectable system can also be used to adhere tissue to tissue or other implants to tissue by virtue of its mechanical bonding or encapsulation of tissue and prosthetic devices.
Another envisioned use of the thermoplastic system is to provide a drug-delivery system. In this use, a bioactive agent is added to the polymer solution prior to injection, and then the polymer/solvent/agent mixture is injected into the body. In some cases, the drug will also be soluble in the solvent, and a homogenous solution of polymer and drug will be available for injection. In other cases, the drug will not be soluble in the solvent, and a suspension or dispersion of the drug in the polymer solution will result. This suspension or dispersion can also be injected into the body. In either case, the solvent will dissipate and the polymer will solidify and entrap or encase the drug within the solid matrix. The release of drug from these solid implants will follow the same general rules for release of a drug from a monolithic polymeric device. The release of drug can be affected by the size and shape of the implant, the loading of drug within the implant, the permeability factors involving the drug and the particular polymer, and the degradation of the polymer. Depending upon the bioactive agent selected for delivery, the above parameters can be adjusted by one skilled in the art of drug delivery to give the desired rate and duration of release.
The term drug or bioactive (biologically active) agent as used herein includes without limitation physiologically or pharmacologically active substances that act locally or systemically in the body. Representative drugs and biologically active agents to be used with the syringeable, in-situ forming solid implant systems include, without limitation, peptide drugs, protein drugs, desensitizing agents, antigens, vaccines, anti-infectives, antibiotics, antimicrobials, antiallergenics, steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, decongestants, miotics, anticholinergios, sympathomimetics, sedatives, hypnotics, psychic energizers, tranquilizers, androgenic steroids, estrogens, progestational agents, humoral agents, prostaglandins, analgesics, antispasmodics, antimalarials, antihistamines, cardioactive agents, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, antiparkinsonian agents, antihypertensive agents, β-adrenergic blocking agents, nutritional agents, and the benzophenanthridine alkaloids. To those skilled in the art, other drugs or biologically active agents that can be released in an aqueous environment can be utilized in the described injectable delivery system. Also, various forms of the drugs or biologically active agents may be used. These include without limitation forms such as uncharged molecules, molecular complexes, salts, ethers, esters, amides, etc., which are.biologically activated when injected into the body.
The amount of drug or biologically active agent incorporated into the injectable, in-situ, solid forming implant depends upon the desired release profile, the concentration of drug required for a biological effect, and the length of time that the drug has to be released for treatment. There is no critical upper limit on the amount of drug incorporated into the polymer solution except for that of an acceptable solution or dispersion viscosity for injection through a syringe needle. The lower limit of drug incorporated into the delivery system is dependent simply upon the activity of the drug and the length of time needed for treatment.
In all cases, the solid implant formed within the injectable polymer solution will slowly biodegrade within the body and allow natural tissue to grow and replace the impact as it disappears. Thus, when the material is injected into a soft-tissue defect, it will fill that defect and provide a scaffold for natural collagen tissue to grow. This collagen tissue will gradually replace the biodegradable polymer. With hard tissue such as bone, the biodegradable polymer will support the growth of new bone cells which will also gradually replace the degrading polymer. For drug-delivery systems, the solid implant formed from the injectable system will release the drug contained within its matrix at a controlled rate until the drug is depleted. With certain drugs, the polymer will degrade after the drug has been completely released. With other drugs such as peptides or proteins, the drug will be completely released only after the polymer has degraded to a point where the non-diffusing drug has been exposed to the body fluids.
B. Thermosetting System
The injectable, in-situ forming biodegradable implants can also be produced by crosslinking appropriately functionalized biodegradable polymers. The thermosetting system comprises reactive, liquid, oligomeric polymers which cure in place to form solids, usually with the addition of a curing catalyst. Although any of the biodegradable polymers previously described for the thermoplastic system can be used, the limiting criteria is that low-molecular-weight oligomers of these polymers or copolymers must be liquids and they must have functional groups on the ends of the prepolymer which can be reacted with acryloyl chloride to produce acrylic ester capped prepolymers.
The preferred biodegradable system is that produced from poly(DL-lactide-co-caprolactone), or "DL-PLC". Low-molecular-weight polymers or oligomers produced from these materials are flowable liquids at room temperature. Hydroxy-terminated PLC prepolymers may be synthesized via copolymerization of DL-lactide or L-lactide and ε-caprolactone with a multifunctional polyol initiator and a catalyst. Catalysts useful for the preparation of these prepolymers are preferably basic or neutral ester-interchange (transesterification) catalysts. Metallic esters of carboxylic acids containing up to 18 carbon atoms such as formic, acetic, lauric, stearic, and benzoic are normally used as such catalysts. Stannous octoate and stannous chloride are the preferred catalysts, both for reasons of FDA compliance and performance.
If a bifunctional polyester is desired, a bifunctional chain initiator such as ethylene glycol is employed. A trifunctional initiator such as trimethylolpropane produces a trifunctional polymer, etc. The amount of chain initiator used determines the resultant molecular weight of the polymer or copolymer. At high concentrations of chain initiator, the assumption is made that one bifunctional initiator molecule initiates only one polymer chain. On the other hand, when the concentration of bifunctional initiator is very low, each initiator molecule can initiate two polymer chains. In any case, the polymer chains are terminated by hydroxyl groups, as seen in FIG. 1. In this example, the assumption has been made that only one polymer chain is initiated per bifunctional initiator molecule. This assumption allows the calculation of a theoretical molecular weight for the prepolymers.
A list of the bifunctional PLC prepolymers that were synthesized is given in Table 1. Appropriate amounts of DL-lactide, ε-caprolactone, and ethylene glycol were combined in a flask under nitrogen and then heated in an oil bath at 155� C. to melt and mix the monomers. The copolymerizations were then catalyzed by the addition of 0.03 to 0.05 wt % SnCl2. The reaction was allowed to proceed overnight. The hydroxyl numbers of the prepolymers were determined by standard titration procedure. The Gardner-Holdt viscosities of the liquid prepolymers Were also determined using the procedures outlined in ASTM D 1545. The highest molecular-weight prepolymer (MW=5000) was a solid at room temperature; therefore, its Gardner-Holdt viscosity could not be determined.
The diol prepolymers were converted to acrylic-ester-capped prepolymers via a reaction with acryloyl chloride under Schotten-Baumann-like conditions, as seen in FIG. 2 and summarized in Table 2. Other methods of converting the diol prepolymers to acrylic-ester-capped prepolymers may also be employed.
Both THF and dichloromethane were evaluated as solvents in the acylation reactions. Several problems were encountered when THF was used as the solvent. The triethylamine hydrochloride formed as a by-product in the reaction was so finely divided that it could not be efficiently removed from the reaction mixture by filtration. Triethylamine hydrochloride (Et3 N-HCl) has been reported to cause polymerization of acrylic species (U.S. Pat. No. 4,405,798). In several instances, where attempts to remove all of the Et3 N.HCl failed, the acrylic-ester-capped prepolymers gelled prematurely. Thus, to effectively remove all of the Et3 N.HCl, it was necessary to extract the prepolymers with water. For reactions carried out in THF, it is preferred that one first evaporate the THF in vacuo, redissolve the oil in CH2 Cl2, filter out the Et3 N-HCl, and then extract the CH2 Cl2 layer with water. Stable emulsions were sometimes encountered during extraction. The acylations were later carried out in CH2 Cl2 instead of THF. The filtration of Et3 N.HCl from the reaction mixture was found to be much easier using this solvent, and the organic fraction could be extracted directly with water after filtration.
Both diol and acrylic prepolymers were examined by IR and 1 H NMR spectroscopy. The salient feature of the IR spectra of diol prepolymers is a prominent O--H stretch centered at approximately 3510 cm-1. Upon acylation, the intensity of the O--H stretch decreases markedly, and new absorbances at approximately 1640 cm-1 appear. These new absorbances are attributed to the C--C stretch associated with acrylic groups. Likewise, the presences of acrylic ester groups is apparent in the 1 H NMR spectra, the characteristic resonances for the vinyl protons falling in the range of 5.9 to 6.6 ppm.
The acrylic prepolymers and diol prepolymers were then cured, as summarized in Table 3. The general procedure for the curing of the prepolymers is now described: to 5.0 g of acrylic prepolymer contained in a small beaker was added a solution of benzoyl peroxide (BP) in approximately 1 mL of CH2 Cl2. In some cases, fillers or additional acrylic monomers were added to the prepolymers prior to the introduction of the BP solution. The mixtures were stirred thoroughly and then poured into small petri dishes. The dishes were placed in a preheated vacuum oven for curing. Some of the samples were cured in air and not in vacuo, and these samples are so indicated in Table 3.
This thermosetting system may be used wherever a biodegradable implant is desired. For example, because the prepolymer remains a liquid for a short time after addition of the curing agent, the liquid prepolymer/curing agent mixture may be placed into a syringe and injected into a body. The mixture then solidifies in-situ, thereby providing an implant without an incision. Furthermore, a drug-delivery system may be provided by adding a biologically active agent to the prepolymer prior to injection. Once in-situ, the system will cure to a solid; eventually, it will biodegrade, and the agent will be gradually released.
The following examples are set forth as representative of the present invention. These examples are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention as these and other equivalent embodiments will be apparent in view of the present disclosure, figures, and accompanying claims.
Poly(DL-lactic acid) was prepared by the simple polycondensation of lactic acid. No catalysts were used, and the reaction times were varied to produce polymers with different theoretical molecular weights. These polymers were designated as DL-PLA oligomers. A quantity of the solid oligomer was dissolved in NMP to give a 68:32 ratio of polymer to solvent. Sanguinarine chloride(SaCl), a benzophenanthridine alkaloid with antimicrobial activity especially toward periodontal pathogens, was added to the polymer solution to give a 2% by weight dispersion of the drug in the total mixture. The dispersion of drug and polymer solution was then injected into a dialysis tube (diameter of 1.5 mm) with a sterile disposable syringe without a needle. Each end of the 6-in. length of dialysis tubing was tied with a knot to prevent loss of the drug/polymer mass, and the tube with the injected material was placed in a pH 7 Sorenson's buffer receiving fluid maintained at 37� C. Upon immersion in the receiving fluid, the drug/polymer mass coagulated into a solid mass, and the drug began to be released from the polymer as indicated by an orange-red color in the receiving fluid. The quantity of solution injected into the dialysis tube was about 250 μL or about 100 mg of solids.
The dialysis tubing was selected to have a molecular-weight cutoff of about 3,500. With this molecular-weight cutoff, the SaCl released from the polymer could easily diffuse through the walls of the tubing, but any solid polymer would be retained. The dialysis tubing containing the drug/polymer matrix was removed frequently and placed in a bottle of fresh receiving fluid. The old receiving fluid containing the released drug was then acidified to a pH of 2.76 to convert all released drug to the iminium ion form of the drug, and the concentration of drug was determined by measuring the ultraviolet absorption (UV) at a wavelength of 237 nm. The cumulative mass of drug released and the cumulative fraction were then calculated and plotted as a function of time. Approximately 60% of the drug was released in the first day, 72% after 2 days, 85% after 5 days, 90% after 9 days, and 97% after 14 days.
Ethoxydihydrosanguinarine(SaEt), the ethanol ester of sanguinarine, was added to the same DL-PLA oligomer/NMP solution described in Example 1. SaEt dissolved in the polymer solution to give a homogenous solution of drug and polymer. Approximately 250 μL of the solution was added to receiving fluid and the release of drug measured as described in Example 1. The release of SaEt was slower than that for SaCl as expected because of its lower water solubility. After the first day, approximately 45% was released, 52% after 2 days, 60% after 5 days, 70% after 9 days, and 80% after 14 days.
Poly(DL-lactide) with an inherent viscosity of 0.08 dL/g and a theoretical molecular weight of 2,000 was prepared by the ring-opening polymerization of DL-lactide using lauryl alcohol as the initiator and stannous chloride as the catalyst. This polymer was then dissolved in NMP to give a 40% by weight polymer solution. SaCl was dispersed in the solution of this polymer in NMP to give a 1.5% by weight dispersion of the drug in the solution and the release rate determined as described in Example 1. The release rate of the drug from this higher molecular-weight polymer was slower than from the DL-PLA oligomer. After the first day, approximately 32% was released, 40% after 2 days, 45% after 5 days, and 50% after 15 days.
SaEt was added to the same polymer solution of DL-PLA in NMP as described in Example 3. A homogenous solution with the drug at 1.5% by weight was obtained. The release of drug from this solution determined using the same procedure described in Example 1 gave a much slower release of SaEt than from the DL-PLA oligomer. After the first day approximately 8% was released, 14% after 2 days, 20% after 5 days, 23% after 9 days, and 28% after 14 days.
The effect of drug loading on the release of drug from the polymer solutions were demonstrated by adding SaCl to a 40% by weight of DL-PLA oligomer in NMP. The drug was dispersed in the polymer solution to give 2, 7 and 14% by weight dispersions. The release of drug from these formulations using the same procedure as described in Example 1 showed that the higher drug loadings gave a lower fractional rate of release as normally obtained for matrix delivery systems with diffusional release. The 2%-loaded formulation gave 65% release after 1 day, 75% after 2 days, and 88% after 5 days; the 7%-loaded formulation gave 48% release after 1 day, 52% after 2 days, and 58% after 5 days; and the 14%-loaded formulation gave 38% release after 1 day, 43% after 2 days, and 49% after 5 days.
Poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) was prepared by the ring-opening polymerization of a mixture of DL-lactide and glycolide using lauryl alcohol as the initiator and stannous chloride as the catalyst. The proportions of the two monomers were adjusted so that the final copolymer(DL-PLG) had a 50:50 ratio of the two monomers as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectrophotometry. The initiator was also adjusted to give a copolymer with a theoretical molecular weight of 1500 daltons. The copolymer was dissolved in NMP to give a 70% by weight polymer solution. SaCl was added to this solution to give a 2% by weight dispersion of the drug in the polymer solution. The release of drug from this formulation was determined using the same procedure described in Example 1. A much lower release rate was obtained from the copolymer than from the DL-PLA oligomer or DL-PLA 2000 molecular weight materials. After 2 days approximately 7% of the drug was released, 10% after 5 days, 12% after 7 days, and 16% after 14 days.
SaEt was added to the same solution of DL-PLG in NMP as described in Example 6 to give a 2% by weight solution of the drug. The release of drug from this formulation was determined by the same procedure as described previously. The release rate of SaEt from this formulation was identical to that for SaCl described in Example 6.
Tetracycline as the free base (TCB) was added to the same solution of DL-PLG in NMP as described in Example 6. The drug dissolved completely in the polymer solution to give a 2.4% by weight solution of the drug. The release of the drug from this formulation was determined by a similar procedure to that described in Example 1 except the receiving fluid was not acidified to a pH of 2.76 and the concentration of TCB was determined by UV absorption at the wavelength appropriate for the drug. The release of TCB from this formulation was more linear and at a much higher rate than that for SaCl or SaEt from the same copolymer. After 1 day approximately 44% of the drug was released, 54% after 2 days, 68% after 5 days, 73% after 6 days, 80% after 7 days, 87% after 9 days, 96% after 12 days, and 100% after 14 days.
Tetracycline as the hydrochloride salt (TCH) was added to the same solution of DL-PLG in NMP as described in Example 6. The salt form of the drug also dissolved completely in the polymer solution. The release of drug from this formulation was determined as described in Example 8 and found to be similar to that for the free base except for a slightly lower rate. After 1 day approximately 32% of the drug was released, 40% after 2 days, 57% after 5 days, 64% after 6 days, 75% after 7 days, 82% after 9 days, 92% after 12 days, and 100% after 14 days.
DL-PLA with an inherent viscosity of 0.26 dL/g and a theoretical molecular weight of approximately 10,000 daltons was prepared by the ring-opening polymerization of DL-lactide using lauryl alcohol as the initiator and stannous chloride as the catalyst. The polymer was dissolved in NMP to give a 50% by weight polymer solution. A quantity of the polymer solution (100 μL) was injected subdermally into rabbits, and the tissue reaction was compared to that of a USP negative plastic. The test sites were evaluated for signs of local irritation, in accordance with the Draize method, immediately after injection, at 1 and 6 hours post injection, and once daily thereafter until scheduled sacrifice at 7, 14 or 21 days. The reaction at the test sites was equivalent to that at the control USP negative plastic. The polymer solution (100 μL) was also administered subgingivally into sites created by dental extractions in Beagle dogs. Control sites were flushed with saline solution. The dogs were examined daily for signs of mortality, pharmacotoxic effects, body weights, and local gingival irritation. The animals were sacrificed at 15 and 21 days. No distinct differences were noted between the control and test sites.
DL-PLA with an inherent viscosity of 0126 dL/g and a molecular weight of about 10,000 was dissolved in NMP to give a 50% by weight polymer solution. SaCl was added to the polymer solution to give a 2.4% by weight dispersion. This material was loaded into a 1-cc disposable syringe fitted with a 23-gauge blunted-end syringe needle, and the material was inserted into the periodontal pocket of a greyhound dog. The material flowed easily out of the narrow syringe tip. The polymer precipitated or coagulated into a film or solid mass when it contacted the saliva and fluid within the pocket. The dog was observed over a time of 2 weeks during which the mass of material remained within the pocket, adhering to tissue surrounding the pocket, and slowly changing color from a light orange to a pale white. The crevicular fluid from the pocket containing the implant was sampled during this 2-week period using Periostrips which are small strips of paper that are placed at the entrance to the periodontal pocket to wick up small quantities of the crevicular fluid within the pocket. The volume of fluid collected is determined using a Periotron which measures the changes in conductance of the paper strip. The Periotron is calibrated before use with a known volume of serum. The paper strip containing the collected fluid is then extracted with a solution of 0.5% by volume of hydrochloric acid in methanol and injected into a liquid chromatograph where the quantity of drug is determined by reference to a known concentration of the same compound. The quantity of SaCl extracted from the paper strip is divided by the quantity of crevicular fluid collected to calculate the concentration of drug in the fluid. With this technique, the concentration of SaCl within the crevicular fluid from the periodontal pocket with the polymeric delivery system was determined to be almost constant during the 2 weeks of observation. The SaCl concentration in the crevicular fluid was 63.2 μg/mL after 3 days, 80.2 μg/mL after 7 days, 67.8 μg/mL after 10 days, and 70.5 μg/mL after 14 days.
An illustrative method for the synthesis of an acrylate terminated prepolymer is described. To an oven-dried, 500-mL, three-necked, round-bottom flask fitted with an addition funnel, gas inlet adapter, mechanical stirrer assembly, and rubber septum was added, under nitrogen, 100.0 g of difunctional hydroxy-terminated prepolymer and 200 mL of freshly distilled THF (from CaH2). The flask was cooled in an ice bath, and 24 mL of dry triethylamine (0.95 equiv/equiv OH) was added via a syringe. The addition funnel was charged with 15.4 g of acryloyl chloride (0.95 equiv/equiv OH) in 15 mL of THF, and the solution was added dropwise to the stirred reaction mixture over 1 hour. The mixture was stirred overnight and allowed to reach room temperature. The precipitated triethylamine hydrochloride was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was evaporated in vacuo, affording a pale yellow oil, which was the acrylate-terminated prepolymer. The acylations employing CH2 Cl2 as solvent were conducted in a similar manner. However, the reaction times at 0� C. were shortened to 1 hour, whereupon the reaction mixtures were allowed to reach room temperature over 1 hour. Et3 N1 HCl was filtered out, additional CH2 Cl2 (approximately 800 mL) was added to the filtrate, and the filtrate was extracted several times with 250 mL portions of water. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 /Na2 SO4, filtered, and reduced to an oil in vacuo. The bottles of acrylic prepolymers were wrapped in foil and stored in a refrigerator to safeguard against premature crosslinking.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________SUMMARY OF DIOL PREPOLYMERS SYNTHESIZED Mole ratio of monomers Gardner Holdt to initiator Catalyst Hydroxyl No., viscosity, (ethylene glycol = 1.0) (SnClz), Theoretical meq OH (56.1)/g approx. StokesSample no. DL-lactide ε-caprolactone wt % Mn, daltons Observed Theoretical (T = 22.2� C.)__________________________________________________________________________C964-114-1 2.4 5.0 0.03 993 100 113 28.0C964-124-1 6.1 32.8 0.05 5036 19.7 22.3 SolidC964-128-1 2.5 5.0 0.03 993 103 113 28.2C964-136-1 8.0 8.0 0.03 2128 48 (est.) 52.7 1375__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________SUMMARY OF ACRYLIC ESTER TERMINATED PREPOLYMERS SYNTHESIZED Estimated Diol concentration precursor of acrylic groups, Reaction conditionsSample no. sample no. meq/g Temp, �C. Time, h Solvent Comments__________________________________________________________________________C964-118-1 C964-114-1 1.78 O-RT 17 THF No problems, stable.C964-125-1 C964-114-1 1.78 O-RT 17 THF Gelled. Overnight exposure to Et3 N.HCl at RT.C964-132-1 C964-128-1 1.84 0 2 THF 100 ppm MEHQ added before workup.C964-137-1 C964-128-1 1.84 0 2 Et2 O Difficult workup. Low yield.C964-139-1 C964-136-1 0.81 0 2 THF Gelled. Overnight exposure to residual Et3 N.HCl in refrigerator.C964-144-1 C964-136-1 0.81 0 1 CH2 Cl2 No problems, stable.C964 146-1 C964-124-1 0.33 0 1 CH2 Cl2 No problems, stable.__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________SUMMARY OF CURING STUDIES Acrylic Benzoyl Other Initial prepolymer peroxide additives, Curing conditions Shore ASample no. sample no. wt % wt % Temp, �C. Time, h hardness Comments__________________________________________________________________________C964-120-1 C964-118-1 2.0 none 82 16 NDa Rubbery, breaks when bent 180�, weak.C964-120-2 C964-118-1 1.0 none 82 16 83 Less brittle than C964-120-1.C964-121-1 C964-118-1 2.0 none 82 16 77 Rubbery, breaks when bent 180�, weak.C964-121-2 C964-118-1 1.0 none 82 16 80 Slightly stronger than C964-121-1.C964-121-3 C964-118-1 0.5 none 82 16 78 Slightly more elastic than C964-121-2.C964-121-4 C964-118-1 0.1 none 82 16 69 Same as C964-121-3.C964-122-1 C964-118-1 1.0 TMPTETAb 46 82 2.5 94 Less rubbery than C964-120 and C964-121; brittle.C964-122-2 C964-118-1 0.5 TMPTETA 46 82 2.5 91 Same as C964-122-1, more flexible.C964-122-3 C964-118-1 1.0 TMPTETA 175 82 2.5 95 Not rubbert at all, brittle, weak.C964-122-4 C964-118-1 0.5 TMPTETA 175 82 2.5 93 Similar to C964-122-3.C964-123-1 C964-118-1 0.1 TMPTETA 46 82 2.5 89 Rubbery, stronger than C964-120 and C964-121, not flexible.C964-123-2 C964-118-1 0.25 TMPTETA 46 82 2.5 83 About the same as C964-123-1, may be more brittle.C964-123-3 C964-118-1 0.1 TMPTETA 175 82 2.5 92 Not rubbery; strong, brittle.C964-134-1 C964-132-1 0.05 (AIBN)c none 60d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-134-2 C964-132-1 0.10 (AIBN) none 60d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-134-3 C964-132-1 0.25 (AIBN) none 60d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-134-4 C964-132-1 0.50 (AIBN) none 60d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-134-5 C964-132-1 1.00 (AIBN) none 60d 17 Liquid Slightly thickened.C964-135-1 C964-132-1 0.05 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-2 C964-132-1 0.10 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-3 C964-132-1 0.25 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-4 C964-132-1 0.50 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-5 C964-132-1 1.00 none 80d 17 Liquid Slightly thickened.C964-135-6 C964-128-1e 0.05 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-7 C964-128-1e 0.10 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-8 C964-128-1e 0.25 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-9 C964-128-1e 0.50 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-10 C964-128-1e 1.00 none 80d 17 Liquid No cure.C964-135-11 C964-124-1e 0.05 none 80d 17 ND No cure.C964-135-12 C964-124-1e 0.10 none 80d 17 ND No cure.C964-135-13 C964-124-1e 0.25 none 80d 17 ND No cure.C964-135-14 C964-124-1e 0.50 none 80d 17 ND No cure.C964-135-15 C964-124-1e 1.00 none 80d 17 ND No cure.C964-141-1 C964-137-1 0.10 none 80 1 66 Flexible elastomer.C964-141-2 C964-137-1 0.25 none 80 1 71 Flexible elastomer.C964-141-3 C964-137-1 0.50 none 80 1 72 Flexible elastomer.C964-141-4 C964-137-1 1.00 none 80 1 72 Flexible elastomer.C964-141-5 C964-128-1 0.10 none 80 1 Liquid No cure.C964-141-6 C964-128-1 0.25 none 80 1 Liquid No cure.C964-141-7 C964-128-1 0.50 none 80 1 Liquid No cure.C964-141-8 C964-128-1 1.00 none 80 1 Liquid No cure.C964-143-1 C964-137-1 0.25 Cab-o-Sil PTG, 80 1 74 No cure. 5.0C964-143-2 C964-137-1 0.25 Cab-o-Sil PTG, 80 1 73 No cure. 2.5C964-143-3 C964-137-1 0.25 L-PLA (IV = 0.8), 80 1 75 No cure. 5.0C964-143-4 C964-137-1 0.25 L-PLA (IV = 0.8), 80 1 78 No cure. 2.5C964-148-1 C964-144-1 0.05 none 80 17 Liquid No cure.C964-148-2 C964-144-1 0.10 none 80 17 Liquid No cure.C964-148-3 C964-144-1 0.25 none 80 2 66 C964-148-4 and C964-148-6 were about the same in toughness, and both were better than C964-148-3 and C964-148-5.C964-148-4 C964-144-1 0.50 none 80 2 68 C964-148-4 and C964-148-6 were about the same in toughness, and both were better than C964-148-3 and C964-148-5.C964-148-5 C964-144-1 1.00 none 80 2 67 C964-148-4 and C964-148-6 were about the same in toughness, and both were better than than C964-148-3 and C964-148-5.C964-148-6 C964-144-1 2.00 none 80 2 69 C964-148-4 and C964-148-6 were about the same in toughness, and both were better than C964-148-3 and C-964-148-5.C964-149-1 C964-144-1 0.15 none 80 2 64C964-149-2 C964-144-1 0.20 none 80 2 64C964-149-3 C964-144-1 0.25 none 80 2 66C964-149-4 C964-144-1 0.15 Cab-o-Sil N70-TS 80 2 ND Samples too porous, did not have any flat area 5.0 for hardness measurement.C964-149-5 C964-144-1 0.20 Cab-o-Sil N70-TS 80 2 ND Samples too porous, did not have any flat area 5.0 for hardness measurement.C964-149-6 C964-144-1 0.25 Cab-o-Sil N70-TS 80 2 ND Samples too porous, did not have any flat area 5.0 for hardness measurement.C964-150-1 C964-146-1 0.05 none 80 17 ND Only partially cured.C964-150-2 C964-146-1 0.10 none 80 2 72 Elastic, flexible, moderately strong.C964-150-3 C964-146-1 0.25 none 80 2 57 Elastic, flexible, moderately strong.C964-150-4 C964-146-1 0.50 none 80 2 56 Elastic, flexible, moderately strong.C964-150-5 C964-146-1 1.00 none 80 2 50 Elastic, flexible, moderately strong.C964-150-6 C964-146-1 2.00 none 80 2 51 Elastic, flexible, moderately strong.__________________________________________________________________________ a Result not determined. b TMPTETA = trimethylolpropane triethoxy triacrylate. c AIBN = azobisisobutyronitrile. d Cured in air at atmospheric pressure. e Diol prepolymer used.
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|29 Dec 1936
|25 Apr 1939
|Chemische Forschungs Gmbh
|Surgical and medical preparations
|27 Mar 1957
|11 Dec 1962
|Du Pont
|Composition comprising a synthetic linear polymer, organic solvent, and an inorganic salt
|26 Jul 1962
|16 Nov 1965
|Monsanto Co
|Novel solutions of poly-(acrylic anhydride) and poly-(methacrylic anhydride) polymers
|17 Jun 1963
|23 Nov 1965
|Loyola University
|Peridontal pack or dressing composition
|18 Sep 1963
|27 Jun 1967
|Bicrex Lab Ltd
|Dental compositions and methods of making same
|9 Jan 1967
|26 Aug 1969
|American Cyanamid Co
|Polyglycolic acid prosthetic devices
|26 Jul 1966
|21 Jul 1970
|Nat Patent Dev Corp
|Hydrophilic polymers,articles and methods of making same
|17 Jun 1971
|10 Oct 1972
|Squibb & Sons Inc
|Periodontal bandage and backing therefor
|23 Feb 1971
|28 Aug 1973
|Du Pont
|Polylactide drug mixtures for topical application atelet aggregation
|26 Jan 1971
|18 Sep 1973
|Union Carbide Corp
|Graft copolymers of lactone polyesters
|1 Dec 1970
|23 Oct 1973
|S Gluck
|Composition for the protection and treatment of injured body tissue and method of utilizing the same
|29 Dec 1970
|3 Jun 1975
|Yolles Seymour
|Biodegradable polymeric article for dispensing drugs
|24 Sep 1974
|13 Jan 1976
|Loctite (Ireland) Limited
|Dental filling method and composition formed thereby
|8 Aug 1974
|27 Jan 1976
|The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy
|Wound covering and method of application
|1 Jul 1974
|17 Feb 1976
|The B. F. Goodrich Company
|Stable polyurethane solutions
|11 Oct 1977
|10 Apr 1979
|Pitt Colin G
|Sustained subdermal delivery ofdrugs using poly(ε-caprolactone) and its copolymers
|16 Jan 1978
|24 Jul 1979
|Battelle Memorial Institute
|Synthetic membrane for wound-dressings
|14 Jun 1982
|4 Oct 1983
|Tyndale Plains-Hunter, Ltd.
|Polyurethane diacrylate compositions useful for contact lenses and the like
|16 Nov 1982
|27 Mar 1984
|Ethicon, Inc.
|Absorbable hemostatic composition
|16 Nov 1982
|17 Apr 1984
|Ethicon, Inc.
|Synthetic absorbable hemostatic agent
|30 Sep 1982
|8 May 1984
|Ivani Edward J
|Amino-polysaccharides and copolymers thereof for contact lenses and ophthalmic compositions
|11 May 1981
|22 May 1984
|Arthur D. Little, Inc.
|Biodegradable, implantable drug delivery depots, and method for preparing and using the same
|10 Nov 1983
|1 Jan 1985
|Lauchenauer Alfred E
|Shaped semi-solid articles
|8 Feb 1985
|4 Feb 1986
|Ethicon, Inc.
|Controlled release of pharmacologically active agents from an absorbable biologically compatible putty-like composition
|21 Sep 1983
|18 Feb 1986
|University Of Illinois Foundation
|Hydrophilic biopolymeric copolyelectrolytes, and biodegradable wound dressing comprising same
|22 Oct 1984
|15 Apr 1986
|Collagen Corporation
|Injectable cross-linked collagen implant material
|22 Jan 1985
|17 Jun 1986
|Hexcel Corporation
|Medical putty for tissue augmentation
|31 Aug 1984
|23 Dec 1986
|S.K.Y. Polymers, Ltd. (Kingston Technologies)
|Injectable physiologically-acceptable polymeric composition
|28 Oct 1985
|17 Mar 1987
|Ethicon, Inc.
|Controlled release of pharmacologically active agents from an absorbable biologically compatible putty-like composition
|11 Jun 1984
|5 May 1987
|Morton Thiokol Inc.
|Microbiocidal compositions comprising an aryl alkanol and a microbiocidal compound dissolved therein
|16 May 1985
|30 Jun 1987
|Feinmann Bernhard P P
|Material and method for dentistry
|18 Nov 1985
|27 Oct 1987
|Research Triangle Institute
|Porous bioabsorbable polyesters
|9 Feb 1987
|29 Dec 1987
|Teijin Limited
|Method of treating an injured part on the oral mucosa and the covering material for use thereof
|21 Jun 1985
|17 May 1988
|Imperial Chemical Industries Plc
|Biodegradable amphipathic copolymers
|1 May 1987
|30 Aug 1988
|Merck & Co., Inc.
|Drug delivery device which can be retained in the stomach for a controlled period of time
|4 Aug 1987
|30 Aug 1988
|Vipont Laboratories
|Recovery of benzo-c-phenanthridine alkaloids
|25 Apr 1986
|20 Sep 1988
|Nitto Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
|Oral bandage and oral preparations
|14 Feb 1986
|27 Sep 1988
|Collagen Corporation
|Collagen compositions for bone repair containing autogeneic marrow
|29 Apr 1986
|25 Oct 1988
|Pharmetrix Corp.
|Controlled release drug delivery system for the periodontal pocket
|5 Dec 1986
|27 Dec 1988
|Wang Paul Y
|Wound coverings and processes for their preparation
|28 Apr 1988
|24 Jan 1989
|E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company
|Polylactide compositions
|28 Aug 1987
|14 Feb 1989
|Richards Medical Company
|Method for making a biodegradable adhesive for soft living tissue
|2 Aug 1988
|24 Apr 1990
|Allied-Signal Inc.
|Medical devices fabricated from homopolymers and copolymers having recurring carbonate units
|3 Oct 1988
|3 Jul 1990
|Dunn Richard L
|Biodegradable in-situ forming implants and methods of producing the same
|20 Nov 1989
|1 Jan 1991
|E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company
|Polylactide compositions
|12 Dec 1988
|8 Jan 1991
|Yu Simon H
|Process for making macromolecular monomers of polylactones with terminal acryloyl unsaturation and block copolymers thereof
|29 Aug 1989
|7 May 1991
|Vipont Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|Drug delivery devices
|24 Jul 1989
|31 Dec 1991
|Vipont Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|Biodegradable system for regenerating the periodontium
|24 Apr 1990
|11 Jan 1994
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Biodegradable in-situ forming implants and methods of producing the same
|23 Dec 1991
|11 Jan 1994
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Biodegradable in-situ forming implants and methods of producing the same
|30 Jun 1992
|15 Feb 1994
|Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
|Bioerodible polymers for drug delivery in bone
|28 Oct 1991
|28 Jun 1994
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Biodegradable polymer composition
|13 Apr 1993
|28 Jun 1994
|Vipont Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|Intragingival delivery systems for treatment of periodontal disease
|23 Dec 1991
|23 Aug 1994
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Biodegradable in-situ forming implants and methods for producing the same
|29 Jun 1993
|29 Nov 1994
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Biodegradable system for regenerating the periodontium
|12 Jul 1985
|26 Sep 1989
|Saeid Seyedin
|Polypeptide cartilage-inducing factors found in bone
|Title not available
|4 Oct 1984
|8 May 1985
|The Forsyth Dental Infirmary For Children
|Intra pocket drug delivery devices for treatment of periondontal diseases
|1 Apr 1985
|23 Oct 1985
|Battelle Memorial Institute
|Film-forming polymeric material for use in dressings, and its production
|8 Jul 1985
|22 Jan 1986
|Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|Polypeptide cartilage-inducing factors found in bone
|24 Mar 1987
|14 Oct 1987
|Rohto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
|Pharmaceutical composition for treating periodontal diseases
|14 Apr 1987
|4 Nov 1987
|Pharmetrix Corporation
|Controlled release drug delivery system for the peridontal pocket
|1 Oct 1992
|21 Apr 1993
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Polymeric compositions useful as controlled release implants
|1 Oct 1992
|5 May 1993
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Biodegradable polymer composition
|13 Jan 1993
|15 Sep 1993
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Biodegradable film dressing and method for its formation
|24 Aug 1994
|26 Apr 1995
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Biodegradable implant precursor
|Title not available
|29 Aug 1984
|14 Mar 1985
|Sky Polymers
|Injectable physiologically acceptable polymeric compositions
|9 Nov 1984
|23 May 1985
|Bio Mimetics Inc
|Bioadhesive compositions and methods of treatment therewith
|Billmeyer, Textbook of Polymer Science (Third Edition), pp. 390-391, John Wiley & Son, New York (1984).
|Billmeyer, Textbook of Polymer-Science (Third Edition), pp. 390-391, John Wiley & Son, New York (1984).
|Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 236-237 (Biodegradable Polymers), John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1985).
|Gilding, Biodegradable Polymers (Chapter 9), pp. 210-232, Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials, (1976).
|Gilding, Biodegradable-Polymers (Chapter 9), pp. 210-232, Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials, (1976).
|Hawley s Condensed Chemical Dictionary (11th Ed.) pp. 224, 555 and 567, Van Nostand Reinhold Co., NY, NY, (1987).
|Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary (11th Ed.) pp. 224, 555 and 567, Van Nostand Reinhold Co., NY, NY, (1987).
|Holland, Polymers for Biodegradable Medical Devices, 1. The Potential of Polyesters and Controlled Macromolecular Release Systems, J. of Controlled Release 4: 155-180 1986).
|Holland, Polymers-for Biodegradable Medical Devices, 1. The Potential of Polyesters and Controlled Macromolecular Release Systems, J. of Controlled Release 4: 155-180 1986).
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|18 Dec 1997
|10 Oct 2000
|Alza Corporation
|Gel composition and methods
|7 Jul 1998
|12 Jun 2001
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Filamentous porous films and methods for producing the same
|18 Dec 1997
|18 Dec 2001
|Alza Corporation
|Injectable depot gel composition and method of preparing the composition
|27 Aug 1999
|2 Jul 2002
|Southern Biosystems, Inc.
|High viscosity liquid controlled delivery system and medical or surgical device
|13 Jul 2000
|22 Oct 2002
|Alza Corporation
|Gel composition and methods
|5 Jun 2001
|25 Mar 2003
|Atrix Laboratories, Inc.
|Filamentous porous films and methods for producing the same
|4 May 2001
|29 Apr 2003
|Micro Therapeutics Inc.
|Methods for treating urinary incontinence in mammals
|10 Oct 1997
|27 May 2003
|Micro Therapeutics, Inc.
|Methods for treating urinary incontinence in mammals
|9 Jun 2000
|8 Jul 2003
|Cytyc Health Corporation
|Gel composition for filling a breast milk duct prior to surgical excision of the duct or other breast tissue
|9 Sep 1998
|5 Aug 2003
|The University Of Western Australia
|Chemical supplementation of bone
|2 Feb 2001
|9 Mar 2004
|Incept Llc
|Dehydrated hydrogel precursor-based, tissue adherent compositions and methods of use
|18 Mar 1999
|11 May 2004
|Merck & Co., Inc.
|Liquid polymeric compositions for controlled release of bioactive substances
|24 Dec 2002
|23 Nov 2004
|Ap Pharma, Inc.
|Bioerodible poly (orthoesters) from dioxolane-based diketene acetals
|30 Dec 2002
|12 Apr 2005
|Micro Therapeutics, Inc.
|Methods for treating urinary incontinence in mammals
|24 Jul 2003
|20 Sep 2005
|A.P. Pharma, Inc.
|Block copolymers based on poly(ortho esters) containing amine groups
|30 Dec 2002
|4 Apr 2006
|Micro Therapeutics, Inc.
|Kit of parts for treating urinary incontinence in mammals
|26 Oct 2000
|30 May 2006
|Durect Corporation
|High viscosity liquid controlled delivery system and medical or surgical device
|31 Jan 2000
|29 Aug 2006
|Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
|Transdermal thermal polymerization
|9 Jul 2002
|9 Jan 2007
|The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois
|Injectable system for controlled drug delivery
|2 May 2003
|9 Jan 2007
|Yu-Ling Cheng
|Thermally reversible implant and filler
|15 Mar 2001
|20 Mar 2007
|Yu-Ling Cheng
|Environment responsive gelling copolymer
|6 Sep 2001
|22 May 2007
|A.P. Pharma, Inc.
|Degradable polyacetal polymers
|5 Jun 1998
|4 Dec 2007
|Bertex Pharma Gmbh
|Multiphase system
|4 Nov 2003
|6 May 2008
|Guohua Chen
|Controlled release depot formulations
|25 Feb 2003
|20 Jan 2009
|Guilford Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|Phosphorous-containing compounds with polymeric chains, and methods of making and using the same
|16 Jan 2009
|9 Mar 2010
|Eisai Inc.
|Phosphorus-containing compounds with polymeric chains, and methods of making and using the same
|21 Dec 2007
|17 Aug 2010
|Incept Llc
|In situ materials formation
|14 Nov 2002
|9 Nov 2010
|Durect Corporation
|Catheter injectable depot compositions and uses thereof
|10 Dec 2002
|16 Nov 2010
|Durect Corporation
|High viscosity liquid controlled delivery system and medical or surgical device
|8 Aug 2007
|14 Dec 2010
|Coll Partners Ltd.
|Reshapable device for fixation at a dental site
|13 Apr 2007
|29 Mar 2011
|Incept, Llc
|In situ materials formation
|10 Jul 2002
|19 Apr 2011
|Laboratorios Farmac�uticos Rovi S.A.
|Implants, particles
|25 Jan 2006
|5 Jul 2011
|Tyco Healthcare Group Lp
|Method and apparatus for impeding migration of an implanted occlusive structure
|29 May 2008
|23 Aug 2011
|Incept Llc
|Biocompatible hydrogels made with small molecule precursors
|19 Dec 2008
|6 Sep 2011
|Tyco Healthcare Group Lp
|Method for permanent occlusion of fallopian tube
|24 Feb 2005
|1 Nov 2011
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for conduit occlusion
|29 Sep 2008
|1 Nov 2011
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for conduit occlusion
|29 Sep 2008
|8 Nov 2011
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for delivery of compositions to conduits
|15 Dec 2003
|13 Mar 2012
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|31 Jul 2007
|3 Apr 2012
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|22 Feb 2003
|10 Apr 2012
|Degradable Solutions Ag
|Porous biocompatible implant material and method for its fabrication
|31 Jul 2007
|10 Apr 2012
|Durect Corporation
|Controlled delivery system
|31 Jul 2007
|10 Apr 2012
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|31 Jul 2007
|10 Apr 2012
|Durect Corporation
|Controlled delivery system
|6 May 2004
|24 Apr 2012
|Degradable Solutions Ag
|Biocompatible bone implant compositions and methods for repairing a bone defect
|31 Jul 2007
|1 May 2012
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|13 Jan 2009
|29 May 2012
|Dunn Research & Consulting, Llc
|Low viscosity liquid polymeric delivery system
|11 Jul 2007
|26 Jun 2012
|Foresee Pharmaceuticals, Llc
|Pharmaceutical compositions for sustained release delivery of peptides
|14 Nov 2002
|28 Aug 2012
|Durect Corporation
|Injectable depot compositions and uses thereof
|22 Jan 2010
|4 Sep 2012
|Eisai Inc.
|Phosphorus-containing compounds with polymeric chains, and methods of making and using the same
|25 Jan 2006
|11 Sep 2012
|Tyco Healthcare Group Lp
|Structures for permanent occlusion of a hollow anatomical structure
|27 Sep 2010
|2 Oct 2012
|Durect Corporation
|Short duration depot formulations
|3 Nov 2010
|16 Oct 2012
|Colldent V.A. Ltd.
|Reshapable device for fixation at a dental site
|15 Feb 2007
|20 Nov 2012
|Tolmar Therapeutics, Inc.
|Sustained delivery formulations of rapamycin compounds
|27 Nov 2012
|Femasys Inc.
|Method and devices for conduit occlusion
|27 Nov 2012
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for conduit occlusion
|31 Oct 2011
|4 Dec 2012
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for delivery of compositions to conduits
|1 Jul 2011
|18 Dec 2012
|Covidien Lp
|Method for permanent occlusion of fallopian tube
|18 Oct 2010
|18 Dec 2012
|Covidien Lp
|Method and apparatus for implanting an occlusive structure
|31 Oct 2011
|25 Dec 2012
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for conduit occlusion
|3 Feb 2012
|15 Jan 2013
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|12 Feb 2010
|2 Apr 2013
|Incept, Llc
|Drug delivery through hydrogel plugs
|5 Dec 2008
|9 Apr 2013
|Durect Corporation
|Oral pharmaceutical dosage forms
|3 Feb 2012
|16 Apr 2013
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|28 Jul 2003
|6 Aug 2013
|Guohua Chen
|Injectable multimodal polymer depot compositions and uses thereof
|5 Mar 2004
|20 Aug 2013
|Incept, Llc
|Dehydrated hydrogel precursor-based, tissue adherent compositions and methods of use
|16 Nov 2007
|17 Sep 2013
|Incept, Llc
|Biocompatible polymers and hydrogels and methods of use
|26 Feb 2013
|22 Oct 2013
|Incept, Llc
|Drug delivery through hydrogel plugs
|26 Nov 2003
|18 Mar 2014
|Depuy Mitek, Llc
|Arthroscopic tissue scaffold delivery device
|24 Nov 2012
|15 Apr 2014
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for conduit occlusion
|25 Nov 2012
|20 May 2014
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for conduit occlusion
|3 Mar 2005
|20 May 2014
|Polynovo Biomaterials Pty Limited
|Biocompatible polymer compositions for dual or multi staged curing
|15 Sep 2005
|17 Jun 2014
|Durect Corporation
|Controlled delivery system
|25 May 2012
|23 Sep 2014
|Foresec Pharmaceuticals, LLC
|Pharmaceutical compositions for sustained release delivery of peptides
|7 Mar 2013
|30 Sep 2014
|Durect Corporation
|Controlled delivery system
|3 Jun 2009
|4 Nov 2014
|Tolmar Therapeutics, Inc.
|Controlled release copolymer formulation with improved release kinetics
|5 Mar 2013
|3 Feb 2015
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|5 Mar 2013
|10 Feb 2015
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|16 Nov 2012
|17 Feb 2015
|Durect Corporation
|Transdermal delivery systems
|1 Jul 2011
|3 Mar 2015
|Covidien Lp
|Method and apparatus for impeding migration of an implanted occlusive structure
|5 Mar 2013
|10 Mar 2015
|Durect Corporation
|Oral drug delivery system
|25 Jan 2006
|28 Apr 2015
|Covidien Lp
|Expandable occlusive structure
|20 Apr 2006
|28 Apr 2015
|Covidien Lp
|Occlusive implant and methods for hollow anatomical structure
|29 Dec 2011
|5 May 2015
|Biodegradable drug delivery compositions
|24 Nov 2012
|19 May 2015
|Femasys Inc.
|Methods and devices for conduit occlusion
|6 Sep 2001
|27 Jun 2002
|Brocchini Stephen J.
|Degradable polyacetal polymers
|10 Dec 2002
|27 May 2004
|Gibson John W.
|High viscosity liquid controlled delivery system and medical or surgical device
|22 Oct 2003
|24 Jun 2004
|Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|Pulsatile release compositions of milnacipran
|23 Oct 2003
|24 Jun 2004
|Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|Modified release compositions of milnacipran
|22 Oct 2003
|8 Jul 2004
|Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|Modified release compositions of milnacipran
|24 Jul 2003
|29 Jul 2004
|Ap Pharma, Inc.
|Block copolymers based on poly(ortho esters) containing amine groups
|4 Nov 2003
|5 Aug 2004
|Guohua Chen
|Controlled release depot formulations
|15 Dec 2003
|19 Aug 2004
|Yum Su Il
|Oral drug delivery system
|5 Mar 2004
|30 Sep 2004
|Incept Llc
|Dehydrated hydrogel precursor-based, tissue adherent compositions and methods of use
|28 Jan 2004
|18 Nov 2004
|Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|Multiparticulate compositions of milnacipran for oral administration
|15 Mar 2001
|27 Jan 2005
|Yu-Ling Cheng
|Environment responsive gelling copolymer
|28 May 2004
|14 Apr 2005
|Guohua Chen
|Implantable elastomeric depot compositions and uses thereof
|26 Nov 2003
|26 May 2005
|Orr Keith M.
|Arthroscopic tissue scaffold delivery device
|25 Feb 2003
|18 Aug 2005
|Guilford Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|Phosphorous-containing compounds with polymeric chains, and methods of making and using the same
|29 Mar 2005
|8 Sep 2005
|Micro Therapeutics, Inc.
|Kit of parts for treating urinary incontinence in mammals
|3 Mar 2005
|8 Sep 2005
|Mayadunne Roshan T.A.
|Biocompatible polymer compositions for dual or multi staged curing
|22 Feb 2003
|22 Sep 2005
|Maspero Fabrizio A
|Porous biocompatible implant material and method for its fabrication
|6 May 2004
|10 Nov 2005
|Maspero Fabrizio A
|Biocompatible bone implant compositions and methods for repairing a bone defect
|10 Nov 2004
|22 Dec 2005
|Guohua Chen
|Excipients in drug delivery vehicles
|29 Jul 2005
|5 Jan 2006
|Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|Pulsatile release compositions of milnacipran
|19 Aug 2002
|19 Jan 2006
|Brodbeck Kevin J
|Gel composition and methods
|24 Mar 2005
|2 Feb 2006
|Burns Patrick J
|Compositions suitable for controlled release of the hormone GnRH and its analogs
|9 Sep 2005
|8 Jun 2006
|Warren Stephen L
|Formulations for cell-schedule dependent anticancer agents
|19 Dec 2005
|29 Jun 2006
|Guohua Chen
|Injectable non-aqueous suspension
|3 Apr 2006
|27 Jul 2006
|Guohua Chen
|Short duration depot formulations
|24 May 2006
|21 Sep 2006
|Gibson John W
|High viscosity liquid controlled delivery system and medical or surgical device
|4 Oct 2005
|21 Sep 2006
|Eric Dadey
|Ocular delivery of polymeric delivery formulations
|25 Jan 2006
|21 Sep 2006
|Karabey Halil I
|Expandable occlusive structure
|25 Jan 2006
|21 Sep 2006
|Karabey Halil I
|Structures for permanent occlusion of a hollow anatomical structure
|22 Apr 2005
|26 Oct 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Embedded method for embedded interaction code array
|29 Mar 2004
|23 Nov 2006
|Regentec Ltd.
|Porous matrix
|20 Apr 2006
|14 Dec 2006
|Taheri Syde A
|Temporary absorbable venous occlusive stent and superficial vein treatment method
|20 Apr 2006
|14 Dec 2006
|Taheri Syde A
|Temporary absorbable venous occlusive stent and superficial vein treatment method
|8 Sep 2011
|Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
|Methods for Stabilizing Femoral Vessels
|28 Jul 2003
|4 Mar 2009
|Alza Corporation
|Injectable multimodal polymer depot compositions and uses thereof
|25 Jun 2003
|20 Apr 2011
|ALZA Corporation
|Short duration depot formulations
|25 Jun 2003
|4 May 2011
|ALZA Corporation
|Bupivacaine-containing injectable depot composition
|5 Jun 1998
|10 Dec 1998
|Bodmeier Roland
|Multiphase system
|14 Feb 2001
|23 Aug 2001
|Niina Kaarina Ahola
|Biodegradable material
|16 Jan 2007
|26 Jul 2007
|Quest Pharmaceutical Services
|Pharmaceutical compositions with enhanced stability
|17 Jul 2009
|21 Jan 2010
|Merial Limited
|Long-acting injectable analgesic formulations for animals
|U.S. Classification
|523/113, 525/413, 424/78.38, 604/506, 424/422, 523/115, 525/450, 524/96
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|6 Jun 2000
|Reissue application filed
Effective date: 20000328
|28 Sep 2001
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4


text:
Can't say enough about this property. Thoroughly enjoyed my stay there and eagerly await my next visit. The villa was clean, comfortable; a little bit of paradise without the paradise price tag. The staff went above and beyond to make our stay pleasant. You can't go wrong by booking your stay with them. Highly recommend; you won't be sorry.
- Reservation Options:
- TripAdvisor is proud to partner with Booking.com, Expedia, Travelocity, Wyndham, Hotwire, Low Cost Holidays, Orbitz, Odigeo and Hotels.com so you can book your Days Inn & Suites Islamorada reservations with confidence. We help millions of travelers each month to find the perfect hotel for both vacation and business trips, always with the best discounts and special offers.
- Also Known As:
- Days Inn And Suites Islamorada
- Days Inn & Suites Islamorada Hotel Islamorada
- Days Inn Hotel Islamorada
- Days Inn Islamorada
- Islamorada Days Inn

subset: commoncrawl


text:
bluezoo Girl's black sequinned dress
Item No.2320201904
Item No.2320201904
Up to 70% Off - Save up to £16.80
From bluezoo, this stylish black dress is perfect for parties. This sleeveless dress comes in classic black with stunning sequinned detail at the bodice, with a voluminous chiffon skirt. Wear over skirts with pumps to complete the look.
UK Home Delivery Free (UK orders over £30) or £3.49
Delivered within 5 working days
Next or Named Day Delivery
7 days a week between 8am - 6pm
Sunday to Friday - order by 9pm - £3.99
Saturday - order by 6pm - £3.99
Next or Named Evening Delivery
7 days a week between 6pm - 10pm
Monday to Sunday - order by Midnight - £6.99
Collect from store the next day - FREE
Order before 9pm for next day collection after 12pm midday
Show participating stores
Show full delivery details
Subject to exceptions, Debenhams is happy to exchange or refund your purchase within 28 days of delivery. Please check here for more details on our returns policy and exceptions.


text:
Searched for: "white paper on bandwidth management"
Content Types
About 4 results for "white paper on bandwidth management"
Leveraging the network for your virtualization and cloud intiatives
A though leadership white paper discusses how virtualization, cloud computing, and the proliferation of smart devices are helping companies meet their goals and be more effective w...
The Benefits of Private High Bandwidth Managed WANs (Wide Area Networks) for Educational IT Infrastructures
Today, educational IT professionals are being asked to shoulder increasing responsibility for the delivery of key services to schools and school districts. Yet many financial and o...
Configure SNMP on a Cisco router or switch
Configure SNMP on a Cisco router or switch
Consultant guides small businesses through VPN maze
VPN activation, security, and management often require more expertise than an enterprise can handle. If you'll be taking on the responsibility for your clients, take this advice fr...


text:
Trevor Loudon's New Book!
Category Archives: Civil War
Forgotten History — Black Slaves, Red Masters
A look at a little known part of American history in a story that aired on WJLA-TV Washington in February 1990.
Posted in American Culture, Bill of Rights, Civil War, Democrats, History, Prejudice, Racism, Slavery, War 1 Comment
By: Stephen Bowers It's starting to rain. I love the rain. It gets dark and somber and everything seems to slow down. I called a buddy yesterday to see if I could buy him lunch. He's a veteran. I knew … Continue reading
Posted in Afghanistan, American Culture, American Patriotism, American Sovereignty, Bill of Rights, Civil War, Conservatism, Gulf War I, History, In Memoriam, Iraq, Korea, National Defense, National Security, Revolutionary War, Sacrifice, U.S. Military, Vietnam War, War, Word War II, World War I Tagged Memorial Day 2015 Leave a comment
Thousands of Bikers in Washington for Rally on POW-MIAs
(AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE) — WASHINGTON — Thousands of bikers roared through Washington for the annual Rolling Thunder rally Sunday, given added fervor this year amid anger over an ongoing scandal concerning medical care for veterans. Organizers estimated around 750,000 bikers and spectators … Continue reading
Posted in Afghanistan, American Culture, American Patriotism, American Sovereignty, Bible, Bill of Rights, Christianity, Civil War, First Amendment, Foreign Policy, Gulf War I, History, House of Representatives, In Memoriam, Iraq, Judaism, Korea, Legal/Judicial, Main-Stream Media, National Defense, National Security, Religion, Revolutionary War, Sacrifice, Senate, Totalitarianism, Tyranny, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Military, Vietnam War, War, Word War II Leave a comment