text:
6 Mind-Blowing Ways Zombies and Vampires Explain America
Here's the weirdest graph you'll see all week. It's graphing the popularity of zombie movies versus vampire movies, split out by whether the president at the time was a Republican or a Democrat. There are exceptions, but in general when a Republican is in office, it's all about zombies. When it's a Democrat, it's all about vampires:
Via mrscienceshow
And apparently all our apocalypses started with Eisenhower.
Night of the Living Dead shambled into cinemas during the Nixon era. Carter gave us two adaptations of Dracula. See that massive red spike in the '80s? That's when conservative superhero Ronald Reagan occupied the highest office, and a Night of the Living Dead remake, one sequel, two Return of the Living Dead movies and Reanimator occupied the cinemas. Then Clinton gave us Anne Rice. The connection is confirmed by academics who study the subject. What the hell?
Actually, it makes perfect sense. Horror plays off of social anxieties of the times, and it's all about what the left and right are afraid of. For instance ...
#6. The Right Fears Vampires Because They're Immoral Sexual Deviants ...
Vampires represent a combination of all the things the right fears about the left -- a breakdown of traditional morality and sexuality, a rejection of religion (there's a reason you can ward off a vampire with a cross), and the seduction and corruption of the innocent. It's everything Mom and Dad fear when their little girl goes off to college. When a Fox News viewer sees this:
They're really afraid of this:
Via Time
To be fair, we're pretty sure this crew could whoop the cast of Twilight hard.
It's the sexual seduction aspect that's driving the whole vampire phenomenon right now, so let's start there. Vampires are so damn sexy right now, advertisers have even started using vampire imagery to help sell their shit, from razors to cologne.
Via mydisguises
No, vampires wouldn't need razors. Let's not start that argument.
The idea of the sexy vampire is something Bram Stoker essentially invented -- before that, vampires in folklore were basically walking corpses. Dracula reinvented the vampire as someone whose bones you would walk over your mother's grave to jump. It worked then for the exact same reason they work now -- they were the absolute inversion of conservative Victorian ideals. Prim and proper English ladies, after being bitten by the Count, became oversexed slutbags who abandoned their maternal duties to indulge in depravity. The motive of the vampire invasion was to turn England into the Jersey Shore.
A fate worse than crumpets.
And it's never about traditional, monogamous, heterosexual relationships. From Buffy to Anne Rice to Twilight, part of the whole concept of vampires is that they're not just sexy as hell, but aren't too picky about which warm hole they decide to probe.
Count the number of characters in True Blood who are gay, or at least display bisexual tendencies. You'll see our point when you run out of fingers. There's pretty much nothing about the vampire that doesn't directly oppose the conservative ideal, and although being conservative doesn't necessitate being Christian, a hell of a lot of American conservative ideals are rooted in religion, as they were in Britain in Bram Stoker's time.
"We believe in love, forgiveness and staking the shit out of vampires."
And that brings us to the fact that ...
#5. ... They're Foreigners ...
Bram Stoker's Dracula was the book that first took a bunch of campfire stories and cultural myths and constructed the modern incarnation of the vampire. It's about a guy from Transylvania (which we're betting you probably couldn't place on a map) who decides he wants to leave his dark, lonely castle at the edge of some obscure European village and enjoy the comforts of Western society.
But when he arrives in England, he starts "converting" people into the same kind of monster that he is. What really stirs the heroes into action is that the new legion of ex-humans are aggressively loyal to Dracula, not to Britain. Shit, if Dracula had been written today, he'd be wearing a turban.
"Sure you can go out with that murderous vampire. Wait, is he a Muslim?"
Daniel Bernardi points out that vampire movies tend to crop up whenever immigration becomes a hot-button issue in the United States (along with alien invasion movies). In the late '80s and early '90s, an important era for the immigration and multiculturalism issue, we got a crop of movies such as 1989's Vampire's Kiss, in which the vampires were all model minorities like African and Asian Americans (on an unrelated note, it contains some of Nicolas Cage's finest moments):
Vampires tend to have their own language (as in the Blade universe), and their own weird rituals and government (True Blood). But in every incarnation, a vampire is not one of us.
"It's agreed then. We like drinking blood and talking in unspecified European accents."
#4. ... And Parasites.
When Rush Limbaugh said that "individualism, to a liberal, is like showing Dracula the cross," he wasn't just making a random analogy. He could easily have said that it's like showing Superman some kryptonite, or like showing Ke$ha a bar of soap. No, commentators like him love the vampire analogy. He often says "vampire" is just another word for a Democrat -- a parasite, who "sucks the blood out of capitalism."
Via billingsgazette
Well, this can't possibly be a political cartoon. Where are the labels? We don't know what this means.
Or, consider the 2009 vampire movie Daybreakers. In it, vampires have taken over the world, and installed their own society and government. But with no more humans to bleed out, the people begin starving in the streets, leading to harsh, Soviet-style rationing and mass vampire riots. It's the exact kind of bleak, dystopian hell that people like Limbaugh imagine will become reality if the Democrats win another term in office. No one in society is producing, everyone is just bleeding their neighbor dry.
Or, you have Vampire Nation by novelist/Ayn Rand aficionado Thomas Sipos, which just openly makes the vampire/leftist connection (the cover features a blood-drinking Lenin).
Or as they say in Russia, better vampire-Lenin than zombie-Stalin.
Even True Blood, where the good guys are vampires, puts them on that side of the equation, the heroes always being denounced and hunted down by gun-toting conservative caricatures.
Via arynstary
"Say NO to brooding, dangerous and sexually attractive young people!"
So, let's take this from the opposite side now. The more conservatives come to power and prominence, the more zombie novels/movies/video games people buy. Why? Well ...


text:
Tel: (34) 971 402511Fax: (34) 971 405852
N +39º 32' 37.60" / W +2º 35' 45.39"
Exclusive, personalised service, superior rooms with the finest views, private areas, breakfast with the most excellent quality products.
Selected sea view deluxe rooms and Suites with VIP service, indulge in your wishes.
THE LEVEL Deluxe double or double for single use rooms are located on the upper floors of the hotel. In total the hotel offers 18 Deluxe double or double for single use rooms, 8 Gran Suites and 3 Junior Suites (The Junior Suites and Suites are located between the 1st and 7th floor). All rooms offer fantastic sea views.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
'The Fog of Scandal'
Just posted, an important article by Ana Maria Catanzaro, chair of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia's review board.
Eight years ago, Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua asked me to join the Archdiocese of Philadelphias sexual-abuse review board, which he was putting together to help him determine the credibility of allegations against priests. His invitation provided an opportunity and a challenge. If I wanted to be a part of the solution, here was my chance. And so, after much prayingand hand-wringingI accepted.
Given the nature of the cases wed have to review, I never imagined the work would be easy. Board members have worked hard to help the church address the crisisand keep children safe. We thought we were making a difference. So, when a 2005 grand jury strongly criticized the archdiocese for its handling of abusive priests, the board was as surprised and dismayed as anyone. But none of us was prepared for the news that broke this past February, when a second grand-jury report resulted in the indictment of four priests and claimed that it had found substantial evidence another thirty-seven, all still in active ministry, had abused. (Subsequently, twenty-seven priests have been suspended, pending further investigation.)
The February 2011 grand jury criticized the review board for not recommending the suspension of several priests. In cases where the archdioceses review board has made a determination, the grand-jury report states, the results have often been even worse than no decision at all. That sweeping judgment stunned review-board members. The grand jury had never asked us to testify about how we arrived at recommendations. In fact, the board had reviewed just ten cases involving the thirty-seven priests. None of the evidence we saw concerning the ten led us to conclude they had sexually abused minors. But until the grand-jury report came out, the board was under the impression that we were reviewing every abuse allegation received by the archdiocese. Instead, we had been advised only about allegations previously determined by archdiocesan officials to have involved the sexual abuse of a minora determination we had been under the impression was ours to make. The board still doesnt know who made those decisions.
Within a week of the February reports release, Cardinal Justin Rigali, now archbishop of Philadelphia, suspended three priests and announced the hiring of former prosecutor Gina Maisto Smith to review the cases of the thirty-seven priests in the grand-jury report. Meantime, the media had been reporting that the review board recommended leaving the thirty-seven with credible allegations in ministry. So the board requested a meeting with Cardinal Rigali and his auxiliary bishops to voice our concerns. When that happened, about a week after the grand-jury report came out, the bishops were apologetic about the way the media had treated the review board, but, for fear of being misinterpreted, said they would not make any public statements defending the review board.
Even more surprising to the review board, on March 8 Cardinal Rigali issued a press release announcing the suspension of twenty-one priests. The press release seemed to imply that the board had reviewed the cases of all twenty-one priests, which it had not. So we again requested a meeting, this time with Gina Maisto Smith and Bishop Michael Fitzgerald, who oversees the Office of Child and Youth Protection. We expressed our displeasure with the implication in the press release, and informed them of our intention to speak publicly about how the review board functions. We agreed not to discuss specific cases and Bishop Fitzgerald agreed to release us from the confidentiality agreement we had signed in 2003.
This article is my attempt to answer the question being asked by Catholics in Philadelphia and across the nation: What went wrong?
Read the whole thing right here.
About the Author
48 comments
- All
- Editor Featured
It is not exactly Tom Doyle all over again. It is worse because at 26 years after the Vatican sent Doyle to investigate sex abuse by a priest, the bishops have no choice for outright lying and deceit. It seems to me that some of the appointees on the Philadelphia Review Board were hacks of the Archdiocese. Nine years after the Boston Globe, when Cardinal Law was sent packing for fear of indictment by a civil authority, how could anyone think it is only a matter of canon law? Especially since the the coverupees make the determination as to what is reviewed and/or deemed culpable acts.I feel for Cantanzaro. She is us in a sense in that we continue to allow malfeasance by the bishops. The reason is we just do not have the guts to confront the bishops. Another head of a review board, the national one, Governor Keating said the bishops were like the Mafia.Is there anyone who believes the bishops have any integrity left. Perhaps in isolated cases. There is no vision and the people are perishing.
I am glad that Cantanzaro has decided to defend herself and the review board rather than silently suffering all the blame to be laid upon them. Good for her! Let's see the truth and find out how much blame belongs to each party.It looks as though the final straw was that "the [March 8] press release seemed to imply that the board had reviewed the cases of all twenty-one priests, which it had not." Even the most respectful lay Catholic can only be taken advantage of up to a point. I fear that the threshold for priests is much higher, and that they are much more willing to take the blame to protect their hierarchical superior.
How long, O Lord, how long?
Outstanding article. Thank you, Ms Catanzaro and Commonweal.
See the comments accompanying the article:http://commonwealmagazine.org/fog-scandal-1The naivete of board members about episcopal governance is truly depressing. How long before people wake up? Lord willing, may this be a clarion call to end the deference. Catanzaro is on the right track, but I am lacking in patience after all this time.She writes, The board still doesnt know who made those decisions about which cases it would evaluate. I ask, Why not? Why hasnt the board to this day apparently insisted on clarification, and full disclosure? BTW, the canon law that diocesan officials cite unendingly says that they in their duties must "never act contrary to the intention and mind of the diocesan bishop." (canon 480). Also, having an office in the archdiocese concerns the "function" that is performed, not whatever title is used. (canon 145) So, whether an episcopal vicar or secretary for clergy or whatever, the responsibility applies.Translation: the buck stops with Rigali; his underlings would never dare presume action independent of his wishes in such vital matters.Further, Cantanzaro writes, A canon lawyer argued that until 1994 the age of majority according to canon law was sixteen; therefore, canonically, a minor had not been involved. So what? And the board accepted that rationale? God help us. Didnt the board realize that neutral, generally applicable laws to protect minors do not create a privileged class (priests, bishops) immune from that obligation, regardless of any canon laws? Where was the civil lawyer on the panel?One must not reject wisdom even if late. Let's see what an awakened board does to implement its recommendations, or not. My best wishes to them. "The actions of men (and women) are the best interpreters of their thoughts. John Locke
I agree with Carolyn, and yet the board could demand anything and still get nothing, because they have no power. Like so many others, they believed they were part of a real effort to stop abuse and that the bishops could be trusted.When I left the Catholic church seven years ago, I felt guilty about being so cynical, and yet I could not trust, because I saw that the proposed reforms had no real weight and no possibility of enforcement. The guilt is gone, and I now see I was not cynical. I wish it were otherwise.The people on the board in Philadelphia had hope, trust, and faith, and their archbishops used those virtues against them. The board thought they were changing an abusive system, and instead they were being used as a shield by it. Their insistence on continuing is noble, but sadly, it could lead to another round of deception and disillusionment, because nothing in the power structure has changed. There is precious little evidence of any desire for real change.
Carolyn's comment (as usual) is quite germane: how the canonical is used to subvert justice.The problem extends beyond Philadelphia and even sex abuse matters to broad issues of governance in the Church we've often discussed.Those canonical trappings are a major part of the tool box of what Mr. Steinfels talks of as the "comand and control" Church of today (I prefer "power and control" which I think is significant to the culture of sex abuse issues here.)Fr. Martin over at America roots this issue in clericalism and that's surely germane as a context of what's hapened in Philly (and Ireland and Belgium and so on.)Come June, USCCB will take up the isue again but how much credibility and trust will they really have, when they are part of that command and cpntrol group bequeathed us by JPII, Law and carried on by Chaput, George, Dolin et al.?So sad......
I think that what's happened in Philadelphia illustrates that review boards are a dead end in the quest to address the sexual abuse of children by the clergy. The bishops have a demonstrable conflict of interest in this matter since they have made it abundantly clear that the prestige of the priesthood is their highest priority. The irony is how badly that priority has bitten them and continues to do so. But even if they do change their ways, sexual abuse is a criminal matter and is best referred to local law enforcement. Members of the review board in Philadelphia are learning this at much personal cost.
Molly Roach - because of statutes of limitations, some incidents of sexual abuse aren't able to be criminally prosecuted. But those incidents are still (or should be) subject to the remedies available through the review board.When bishops do the right thing, review boards aren't a dead end. Obviously, review boards depend on the cooperation of the bishop in order to be effective. We need to keep using whatever levers we have (publicity, criminal law, financial, etc.) to persuade the bishop that it's in his personal interest and the best interest of the diocese, the people of God and the mission of the church to be open, transparent, cooperative and determined to root out the evil of sexual abuse.
The diocesan review boards were created to deal with allegations of sexual abuse. Yet the review board has no control over the information it receives and cannot enforce its recommendations. It can only advise. In this and in all other matters, the bishop has first and final say. This was built into the Dallas Charter from the get-go. That bishops have continued to exercise their autocratic power should be no surprise.If the records and reports of a diocese were to be audited in a way that met the standards of the modern public audit, the bishop would not be able to control scope, access to information, the audit process itself or the final outcome. But this would mean that the bishops power to govern autocratically would be compromised, so such authentic audits have not happened, despite the best efforts of the review boards. The perpetuation of the power of the bishop trumps all.The situation is inherently irreparable under current structures of governance. Autocracy cannot co-exist with operations that are designed based on principles of accountability, transparency and modern standards of justice. Its one or the other. The only real solution is a reformation of the structures of governance.
We all now know that well known Catholic laity who were appointed to national and archdiocesan review boards ended up holding their noses and some were thrown under the bus. Names such as Gov. Keating, Judge Burke, San Francisco's review board chairman under Cardinal Levada, Dr. Jim Jenkins, and even Leon Peneta, now CIA chief and future Sec of Defense, all had the dis-pleasure of being treated as flunkies and being thrown under the next bus. These people were appointed by the highest levels of the US hierarchy. So anyone from now on who takes a position with these diocesan boards is simply stupid. All over the country, all board members should resign; they are just providing cover for the clerical club. The buses are still coming down the road.
"Apparently Philadelphias bishops dont fully grasp that by failing to speak openly from the outset they will continue to pay a higher price, in terms of both credibility and cash. If only they would have followed the example of the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin of Chicago. Confronted with an accusation against him, Cardinal Bernardin openly, humbly, and without a prepared text, answered all the questions he was asked. Thats the sort of response the people of Philadelphia expect and deserve."This paragraph captures the problem succinctly, IMO. Cardinal Bernardin detailed the accusation of child abuse against him (later admitted by the accuser to have been false), and his reaction and actions in response to the accusation, in his book "The Gift of Peace," which I heartily recommend. (The book also addresses the Cardinal's thoughts about the diagnosis that had pancreatic cancer about his battle with the terminal illness.) The Cardinal eventually met with his accuser and provided pastoral care to the man, who was also fighting a losing battle with disease. (BTW, Peter Steinfels's article in the current Commonweal on Cardinal Bernardin--generated in response to George Weigel's hatchet job on the influence and memory of the Cardinal--is truly excellent.)
Some weak points in the article:In the wake of the February grand-jury report, board members discussed the possibility of resigning. We decided against it because we have nothing to hide. Furthermore, the archdiocese has responded to some of our recommendations. [...] If we had resigned, we concluded, the archdiocese would no longer have to listen to us.... and how would that be different? The archdiocese does not have to listen to the review board, as is. It's amply demonstrated by the rest of the article.Then, the end is also weak:The board offers the following recommendations to the Archdiocese of Philadelphia [...]. Then, a long list of "should"s, followed by: The solution to the sexual-abuse scandal rests on being honest, acting promptly and transparently, being open to constructive criticism, and being committed to protecting minors. [...] Breaking free of [a culture of clericalism] wont be easy. It will require a change of heart and practice. For if the bishops resolve to see this tragedy never happens again is not firm and sincere, [...].That is still based on goodwill. The author recognizes that her recommendations amount to nothing if the bishops don't follow take them to heart. So, what to do? She's counting on "a change of heart" for that to happen. She no longer trusts Abp. Rigali, but sees no alternative than tell him what he should do and hope that he does it. Hoping for a miracle, in other words. Jeanne has it exactly right, I think. While we wait for God to change the heart of the bishop, what is needed is to take some power away from him. For example, the review board should make decisions, not mere suggestions. When the review board decides that a priest must be suspended, that decision goes through, regardless of whether the bishop wants it or not. That would be more progress than any recommendation on the list!
"Useful idiot" is the phrase that comes to mind.After reading this, I conclude the grand jury's castigation of the board's shortcomings is entirely justified.
Claire --Clearly the review board had no power and has no power to change how abuse cases are handled by the diocese. The only de facto power it has is the power to shame the bishop -- accuse him publicly of specific wrongdoings and call on him to resign immediately. Ads in the Philadelphia Inquirer and the NYT should do it.I doubt he would' resign, but Rome might notice.
What Ann said about ads. And even more...I don't get why the logical decision, after what the author describes has been the review board's experience, is to continue serving on the board! They should call a press conference and resign as a group. And anyone who gets contacted to form a replacement board should respectfully decline, publicly. A week or so ago, someone wise on another thread (can't remember who, pretty sure it was a woman) used the analogy of abusive relationship dynamics to discuss the hierarchy's attitude/actions regarding the exercise of power and control. Recognizing the analogy is not exact, it nevertheless seems to me that the decision to stay on the review board starts to sound a lot like the "S/he's really a good person, except when..." "S/he truly cares about me, it's just the stress of the job," "I know s/he can change, if only I can explain myself better," kind of rationalizations people give for staying in awful relationships.
Ann,Sadly, all those measures have been tried and have failed resoundingly. Ample publicity that exposes shameless conduct, even the filing of a well-researched canon case in Rome by laity (first of its kind) achieved nothing.Way back, a very conservative, highly-educated and well-placed Catholic told our group not to waste our (bloody) time seeking meetings with bishops, and so forth. Instead, leverage the power of institutions outside the church that indeed do have the power to force bishops to reform.Working from the inside is useless, since as so many comments here note, the laity has zero power in the final analysis. The answer is to work through legislatures, the courts and the media, which indeed can get bishops to sit up straight, and fast.The criminal prosecution of Lynn, and (I'm dreaming) quite a few bishops/dioceses, carries outstanding promise for changes in episcopal behavior. Grand jury investigations are perhaps the most effective means to root out criminal activity. Possibilities for criminal and civil RICO prosecutions, with no statute of limitations, and potential triple damages are striking.SOL windows to allow past victims to come forward, as in CA and Delaware, could open files and minds in astounding ways.Remember the bishop who quipped to about 40 laughing Jesuits that as he entered court he would mentally rehearse his line, "I'm sorry, Your Honor, I do not remember" - well let's find measures to jar those memories, as secret archives in their own hand are wont to do when under oath on cross examination. See http://ncronline.org/blogs/examining-crisis/surely-rome-can-do-better The outside avenues for reform must be advanced. And that happens when the laity ignores the likes of Dolan and Chaput with their anti-Catholicism red herrings. Enable DA's, AG's, prosecutors, the Justice Department, and legislators everywhere to take action --- knowing the local bishop's influence cannot endlessly spin the facts, or end their careers.More than one commenter has noted that the sight of bishops and chancery folks entering lock-up would yield the quickest imaginable about-turn. Which is why every diocesan legal hardball trick in history will be on display in Phila, and why Lynn's conviction is potentially so meaningful.Our power is to empower those civil officials/institutions to do the work of justice. Is the laity awakened enough to do so?
"Integrity," as explained long ago in my high school Religion class, "means doing what is right even when it's hard." This article, Mrs. Catanzaro, epitomizes integrity. I hope others follow your direction.
Carolyn --I agree that the civil measures must be pursued. But there is also a principle in psychology (or there used to be) that people cannot take being booed for very long. I would hope that the worst of the bishops might be booed out, or if that doesn't work, the Pope might see that they must be removed (if the DAs don't get to them first). What didn't work early in the campaign against the enablers might work now. Early on I don't think people realized just how bad the problem was, and many were still making excuses for the enablers. I don't think that happens very often these days. And if the clergy could be persuaded to join in demanding resignations, it would have an even better chance of working. Yes, I still have some hope that Pope Benedict has been sincere in his condemnations since he met with some victims. If the message can get to him how awful some bishops are (I'm not sure how many particulars he gets) , he just might act.. And if he does, then that would be be as effective as the civil courts. Anything to get the enablers out of office!I still wonder just how much specific info the Pope knows about *any* issues. He's quite old, works half a day, and there are people around him who don't *want* him to get the particulars. But his new communications office seems to be much more able, and I don't doubt that if there were a concerted effort in the American press to get rid of Cardinal Rigali, Fr. Lombardi would know about it and would get the news to the Pope. But who know what really happens in that sinkhole of information called the curia.
If I could, I would remove the last paragraph of my 12:28 comment. I can imagine no scenario leading to review boards having power over bishops, so that was pointless.I would also like to back William Hill and say, just in case Mrs. Catanzaro is reading, that I think that, by that article, she is helping transparency and making a significant contribution to the future protection of children against sexual abuse by clergy. In my opinion, her concluding recommendations are not effective, but all the information in the article is invaluable. It must have taken a good bit of courage to expose the dysfunction as she witnessed it herself.
Great article. The hierarchy "gets" it. They are using you too...they didn't give you critical information because if they opened all the files to the review board, there would have been a revolt. ( I hope.) Sadly, the review boards are pawns. Yes, some good things have taken place...in SPITE of the hierarchy, not because of it. Are you just now understanding how pervasive this immoral, unethical (and criminal) behavior is in the Catholic Church? The diocese we live in has a review board that is an absolute laughing stock. Their hands are tied and the hiearchy likes it that way...in fact, they set it up to be so. Thanks for a great read. Too bad this isn't going to be read at all masses on Sunday to get the "complacent catholics" to shift in their seats a bit.
And one more thing...the Pope knows. He's at the helm. Don't be that naive. All the bishops know, the cardinals know...and so does the Pope. Meeting with a couple of victims simply puts a band-aid on cancer.
Ann, I just talked to a friend the other day, a man who is very sharp and opinionated and would brook no nonsense from anyplace except the Church. He still has a complete blind spot about what is going on. He only listens to the party line coming from the clergy and he really thinks the crisis is over and everything is fixed now.When people are uncomfortable with a topic, they will take any reassurance in order to stop thinking about it.
Joe McFaul 05/13/2011 - 1:00 pm Useful idiot is the phrase that comes to mind.After reading this, I conclude the grand jurys castigation of the boards shortcomings is entirely justified.John, after reading this article again, and again...I conclude the same. How long does it take an intelligent group of people to realize they are being used as well? And why speak out now Ann? Is it because you realize victims have been right all along and you're willing to stand with them and take the heat? Or, is it because you needed to defend yourself as a member of the review board against the mean ol' media who didn't get it exactly right? I'll give you this...you let the whole world know that civil attorneys (hired by the diocese) were sitting in on review panel meetings gathering as much info as possible from the victim in case they decided to take it legal. Very calculated move. And all the diverse people you listed were there? It's true what my husband has said all along..."they listen to their lawyers instead of their Lord." One word: CORRUPT.
Tammy and desertdweller ==If you had been around this blog longer you'd know that after Carolyn Disco I'm about the second loudest complainer about the enabling bishops. And I haven't just complained here. I've complained in person to an archbishop face to face in no uncertain terms. I've also made myself known in person to another bishop. How many have you managed to make yourself known to personally?I do think that the Pope might not know the exact accusations made against Cardinal Rigali. There are a billion Catholics in this world and several thousand bishops, and the Pope doesn't open the mail himself. Most significant, there are those around him who *want* him not to know the particulars and are quite capable of preventing him from knowing. Of course, I could be wrong. But it would be worth it to stir up some media attention in the hopes that the Pope will surely see what has gone on in detail.
Dr. Catanzaro's contributions have been substantial and she has done a fine service by publishing this article. I reviewed her CV and see that she is a nurse and a theologian with both an RN and a Ph.D. Her background is very impressive, and both her nursing credentials and her doctorate would both be of very great service. However, she has, in my view, disqualifying credentials--she is active in her parish and is a practicing Catholic. The review boards, frankly, need people who are more jaded and willing to seriously consider the possibility that they will be deceived by the bishops whose files they should be reviewing. In short, the laity considered for those positions are often clerical "insiders" and suffering from an extended clericalism themselves. Dr. Catanzaro might have been an ideal candidate for the Baptist review board, not a Catholic one.She was appointed in 2002. By then, depositions of several bishops had been published and these were clearly perjurious. I would have assumed that all review board members would have been reading depositions of bishops from across the country from 2002 on. Also in 2002, the Diocese of Manchester essential entered into an "Alford plea" with the Attorney General, conceding criminal activity at the diocesan level. Any review board member was on notice after December 2002 that the their own diocese should be treated as potential criminals under supervision and to presume that the board will be misled by the diocese as a matter of course. A few "tests' of the communications being made to the board would quickly have revealed if the diocese was being candid or not.As it turns out the board was simply window dressing intended by the bishops to allay the suspicions of faithful Catholics.
@Ann, I agree and would piggyback that additional media coverage of which you speak would also help educate more Catholics (the ones who don't read blogs, who don't see scandal coverage in the diocesan papers, etc).
Joe McF --I agree that Dr. Cannizaro has done the Church a favor by going public about Philadelphia. I don't think, however, she should have automatically been suspicious of Cardinal Rigali because of the bad behavior of Cardinal Bevilaqua.i. It was right not to hold him guilty by association. However, now that the board has had experience with C. Rigali, I don't see how he can possibly continue in office. From what I've read he probably belongs in jail. Philadelphia needs a new bishop now, and the whole review board == not just Dr. Cannizaro -- should demand one..
Let me put in a good word for Ann Olivier, whose supportive posts I do appreciate, with many thanks. We may differ on some particulars, but IMHO she has opened her eyes and heart remarkably to the realities of episcopal corruption. Now, I happen to think B16 knows very well what Rigali and his confreres have done. It is to B16's discredit that he refuses to act against Sodano, Castrillion Hoyos, Sean Brady and several bishops in Ireland, not to mention others in his administration who have certainly damaged themselves and the Church. Meanwhile Diarmuid Martin struggles alone.B16 seems constitutionally incapable of doing anything that might embarrass a hierarch, almost no matter what. The clericalist system is intact and prospering; it's the only world he knows from the age of 12, and nostalgia rules. So much the worse - more Latin and reform of the reform only hastens the retreat from the Gospel the world of the 21st century really needs. Such blindness is heartbreaking.
Did you see the AP story linked by Grant in a more recent post? She directs the graduate nursing program at Holy Family University. Also, I saw elsewhere that she works at Lasalle nursing center and Lasalle university. She may be risking her job by this article. How can she make demands from someone who could try to get her fired? (Maybe not right now, but as soon as the media's attention is somewhere else.)
Dr. Catanzaro (should you be reading this blog) --I apologize for misspelling your name. Tthank you for having the courage to go public. You are in very select company, and I'm sure the children will bless you. Would that the rest of your board had had the courage to join you.
Thank you, Carolyn :-)You could be right about the Pope, of course. I just think of the people around him as, well, the way Dan Brown thinks of them, and I didn't even read the da Vinci Code. Intrigue seems their way of life. I've just been impressed by Benedict's sanding up to JP II about Maciel, though he was over-ridden. In any event, I think we should not give up trying to reach the hierarchy. I doubt that all of them are evil, though wise and courageous ones are scarcer then hen's teeth.
Speaking about the rest of the board:James Amato, L.S.W. , Deputy Secretary, Catholic Social Services, Angelo P. Giardino, M.D., Pediatrician, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Mary Louise Johnson, an Attorney in Private Practice, and Reverend Thomas J. Owens, Pastor of Saint Alphonsus Parish. http://archphila.org/protection/DocArchive/Reports/imple_03.htm
I've met with two bishops, one archbishop and one cardinal...ate lunch at a posh restaurant with a high ranking person in a very influential position within the Catholic Church...and that official advised my family on how to sue our diocese because "the system will betray you in every way possible." (And they did). That official told us the real inner workings of a broken system, including the powerless role of the review boards, the ineffectiveness of an "audit," the fine line everyone walks with errant hierarchy, political influence, and the parishoners who are none the wiser. While there was never an attorney retained, at least we knew what we were dealing with. I don't understand how anyone can say B16 may not "know." He KNEW when he was the head of the Office of The Congregation For The Doctrine Of The Faith....did he all of a sudden develop amnesia? He may not know the specifics...but, something tells me, these issues land on his desk repeatedly...so the PR can be properly handled.I actually find comfort knowing the board can be identified. Where I live...the people that serve on that board are a deep dark secret.
I am a priest of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, a canon lawyer, and a member of our archdiocesan review board. Hence, I truly appreciate the concerns and frustrations that Ana Maria Catanzaro raises in this article. At the same time, however, I would explain the role of a diocesan review board somewhat differently for the authors presentation.The Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People and its related Essential Norms for Diocesan/Eparchial Policies Dealing with Sexual Abuse of Minors by Priests or Deacons are Church documents that are governed by Church law, not civil law. Thus, civil law provisions regarding sexual abuse of a minor (which can vary from state to state) are not part of the charge given to a diocesan review board, nor should they be. Civil authorities are the competent persons to determine what civil law action can be taken, if any, coming from an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor by a priest or deacon. Furthermore, this civil law determination should precede any investigation or development of recommendations by a Church diocesan review board.So, it can be asked, what is proper material for the work of a diocesan review board?A diocesan review board is a consultative body that assists a diocesan bishop/eparch concerning an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor by a priest or a deacon. But, what is meant by sexual abuse? As originally established by USCCB in 2002, the Charter (in a footnote to Article 1) states that sexual abuse of a minor includes sexual molestation or sexual exploitation of a minor and other behavior by which an adult uses a minor as an object of sexual gratification.Thus, the norm to be considered in assessing an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor is whether conduct or interaction with a minor qualifies as an external, objectively grave violation of the sixth commandment. When the Charter was revised in 2005, this 2002 wording was removed and replaced with sexual abuse, for purposes of this Charter, shall include any offense by a cleric against the Sixth Commandment of the Decalogue with a minor. Actually, I would expect that the statement any offense by a cleric against the Sixth Commandment of the Decalogue is broad enough to include all statements in civil law statutes that define sexual abuse of a minor.Both the 2002 and the 2005 versions of the Charter and Essential Norms indicate that If there is any doubt whether a specific act qualifies as an external, objectively grave violation of the sixth commandment, the writings of recognized moral theologians should be consulted, and the opinions of recognized experts should be appropriately obtained. I would add that the Catechism of the Catholic Church provides a foundation for the identification of grave violation when it discusses lust, masturbation, fornication, pornography, prostitution, and rape as violations of the sixth commandment (CCC 2351-2356).Ultimately, of course, it is the responsibility of the diocesan bishop/eparch, with the advice of a qualified review board, to determine the gravity of the alleged act. Thus, the work of a review board is to assist the diocesan bishop/eparch in deciding if an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor against a priest or a deacon actually is a matter of sexual abuse as presented in the Charter (not civil law), and if the allegation seems to be true or has the semblance of truth. In addition, making a recommendation regarding the suitability of a cleric for ministry and making recommendations regarding related policies are, according to the Charter, within the competency of a diocesan review board.It also should be noted that both the Essential Norms and Vatican directives establish that, once the diocesan bishop/eparch understands that the allegation seems to be true or has the semblance of truth, the case must be forwarded to the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome where further Church action will be determined.Now, with this overview of a diocesan review board in place, I would like to address four appropriate concerns raised by Ana Maria Catanzaro in this article.First, does the review board see all the cases? By design, nothing in the Charter or the Essential Norms provides for a diocesan review board to review cases that had been reported to the diocese prior to creation of these documents in 2002. Rather, a review board addresses cases that arise after the implementation of the 2002 Charter and Essential Norms. Furthermore, something that might be surprising to some people is that even though both the Charter and the Essential Norms require each diocese to have a functioning review board, the diocesan bishop/eparch does not have to follow the advice of the review board and even can decide which cases, if any, require consultation with the review board, simply because a review board is consultative. This is not a good approach, it seems to me. Hence, I agree with the author that all cases that have arisen since 2002 should be brought to the attention of the review board. In addition, if there had not been such a review process in place before 2002, the bishop/eparch should ask the review board to review all the cases that predate the Charter and Essential Norms. Moreover, I would add to the discussion the need for a thorough audit of each diocese each year to review the effectiveness of the controls and procedures that are in place to assure that all cases are properly addressed. The related audit report should be made public in its entirety by the auditor, who then should be open to questions and comments from the public.Second, are boundary issues actually part of grooming a potential victim and, therefore, an integral part of sexual abuse? I am referring to actions and words that under many circumstances would be considered appropriate behavior, but within the context of interaction between a cleric and a minor might or might not be appropriate, depending on the intent of the cleric (e.g., hugs, pats on the head or shoulder, and expressions of feelings). Indeed, understanding the intent of the priest or deacon is key to evaluating the behavior, yet the intent is unknown, unless actually indicated by the cleric. Consequently, it is very difficult to establish matters of boundary issues as being sexual abuse. But, if an allegation of boundary issues arises against a particular priest or deacon, even if it cannot be established as sexual abuse, the review board can address the suitability of the cleric for ministry and can recommend to the bishop/eparch a partial or complete restriction of his ministry.Third, what is the route to transparency and a public display of the complete truth regarding the clergy sexual abuse scandal? In the absence of full disclosure of the facts and complete explanations from bishops and other Church leaders about the clergy abuse scandal, I hope that a thorough investigation, authorized by the pope, would study the systematic issues that have gotten the Church into this mess, and provide detailed recommendations to the Church community as a whole about how to resolve the scandal and to prevent its reoccurrence. Actually, however, I hold little hope for this investigation to happen unless the laity speak-up clearly and frequently for such action. Fourth, what is going on within the religious orders concerning their problems of sexual abuse by their members? This seems to be one of the best-kept secrets in the clergy abuse scandal. So, I add my voice to the authors call for bishops/eparches to require the superiors of religious orders in their diocese/eparchy to make public the status of sexual abuse of minors by members of their community. These religious communities are a very important part of the Church and should be held accountable along with the dioceses.Thus are my thoughts.Reverend James E. Connell, JCDArchdiocese of Milwaukee
I hesitate to criticize Fr. Connell in view of his continuing brave wise contributions. However, it is worth noting that his checkoff list from the Catechism does not include either frequently reported fondling or seduction/grooming of a minor. Are these to be excluded, or does the Catechism or Sixth Commandment of the Decalogue need to be revised if they are to be invoked as authoritative guides? (Ask a few parents)On the conveniently amorphous category of "boundary issues", it is worth noting that the ex-prosecutor hired by Cardinal Rigali after the 3rd Grand Jury report was published said recently that she was unable to provide a definition of the term until her investigations were completed. Regrettably, Fr. Connell's explanation of the role of a review board does as much as Dr. Catanzaro's to display the hollowness of the vaunted concept. His four concerns add valuable, experienced insights to understanding what has been foisted off on the citizenry.
Jim Connell is indeed a shining light amongst clergy, and his experience is wide. I value his contributions highly. Still, questions abound. (Jack Barry's comment is outstanding.)Definitions of sexual abuse under canon law, the Charter, the catechism, moral theology, etc. may indeed include anything under civil law, but I believe implementation may be more in theory than in practice. For example, despite mention of pornography in the catechism, the Vatican itself did not recognize it as a grave sexual offense until a few months ago; likewise it did not include molestation of a mentally handicapped person as sexual abuse unless the abuse occurred before ones 18th birthday. Abuse by seminarians who do not go on to ordination is still not counted by bishops in their annual audits; the same for religious brothers. Catanzaro also implies the Board encounters narrow technical approaches in canon law that offend reason. What sticks in my throat is the Phila canon lawyer insisting that 16 was the Vatican's age of majority at the time of abuse, so his priest client should be exempt from any sanctions proposed by a Review Board. Bad enough that criminal prosecution is off limits, now even canonical restrictions are to be avoided under such numbing rationale? Is that the level of discourse?The integrity of those in administration, namely bishops and chancery officials, amply demonstrate by their records that their first concern is not the safety of children. We cannot rely on them or their naive appointed advisers. Again, the most effective resort I see is to civil institutions with the power to force compliance. In the main, the clerical management system and those in it are too secretive, corrupt and self-absorbed to do the job right. Isn't that what experience tells us? A few Phila DA's accomplish more than 300 USCCB bishops in a decade of obfuscation and cover-up. Where is one's energy more productive?Even Bob Bennett and Anne Burke from the original National Review Board surmise Phila is much more the norm than the exception. Look at all those government investigations in Europe, which are the only way we learned anything. This is not to abandon pressure for reform from the inside, just know its very burdensome limits.
Bernard Haring called for a moral theology that calls for a way of life away from legalisms and absolute authority. A German, Haring learned how absolute authority ruined a nation and almost the world. Ratzinger has not learned that lesson. The kind of postings in this thread were unthinkable even a couple of years ago here. It shows how Catholics are increasingly realizing that the gospel is not the hierarchy and that the bishops too many times work against the gospel of Jesus Christ.
"Jeanne Follman 05/13/2011 - 11:46 am The diocesan review boards were created to deal with allegations of sexual abuse. Yet the review board has no control over the information it receives and cannot enforce its recommendations. It can only advise. In this and in all other matters, the bishop has first and final say."That is so very Catholic:"The parish and diocesan finance councils were created to deal with matters of fiscal control and management. Yet the finance council has little control over the information it receives and cannot enforce its recommendations. It can only advise. In this and in all other matters, the pastor or bishop has first and final say."
And, you know folks, we enable this by going along. Oh, we throw up our hands and say: "But what can we do? They have all the power." Rottenness is best cured by exposure to heat and light. Duplicity and skullduggery should not and cannot be funded. Stupidity should be immediately challenged whenever it is uttered, no matter who is doing the uttering. Goodness in people and actions needs to be recognized, publicized and fostered as the right thing to be and do.That's a start.
Our "bishop's fund drive'" begins next weekend. We will not be contributing. A first for us. Our bishop is pre-JP2 appointment. He's intelligent, pastoral and not a blowhard. This is not a move against his service. We just can no longer enable this corrupt system. I feel badly that my wonderful parish will have to pony up the $ to meet its quota, but the blowback has to start somewhere. My blog crush Ed Gleason notwithstanding (they have boatloads and he's undoubtedly correct), money is what talks here. I have no illusions that our dollars can meet the contributions of the true believers in the system, but at least we can feel that we are maintaining our integrity in some way. The $ that we contribute will be split between VOTF and Bishop Accountability. The folks in the pew who turn up every weekend at mass may be uncomfortable about the sexual abuse crisis and its cover-up but IMO, they will stay in denial. Life can be hard and if your church leaders are undermining you and your family and well, lying, it may just be one more existential blow that you cannot handle.
Thank you, Holloway.My money goes to VOTF, SNAP and BA.org in various turns. They certainly need it.
Holloway: I do almost what you do, except for some money for the St Vincent de Paul society. VOTF and Bishop Accountability money is for church reform --- the equivalent of giving for church administration and maintenance.St Vincent de Paul money is for charitable purposes. The church governance may be giving us headaches (or nightmares), but in the meantime, the poor still need housing and food and heating. I wanted a Catholic lay organization in which bishops had no power. The St Vincent de Paul society has no clerical oversight (priests are welcome to join, but they have the same rights as anyone else, no more). It's a compromise that works for me, for the present.
I actually still give to CCHD. I like the idea that the Catholic Church in the US supports grassroots groups and poor peoples' movements. I also feel sympathetic towards it since it is a special target of attack by some fringe Catholics.
Ms. Catanzaro's piece is informative, but I think it would have been more compelling if it were written/endorsed by the entire review board, or was it?
My $ formerly donated to church now go 1/3 each to SNAP, Catholic Worker and Project Rachel.
I respect Ms. Catanzaros integrity and commitment to child safety, and I am offended by the attacks on the Review Board which she chaired. As so many have voiced here, review boards have no power to execute change of any kind. By definition they are advisory only, and they can only advise based on the information they are given. I dont believe that any lay person working on a review board is there for any reason other than sincere concern for protecting children. However, I do NOT believe that about the priests, bishops, canon and civil lawyers, or private investigators hired by the Church. These people have only one agenda: protecting the Catholic Church. The Churchs reputation was once the greatest concern in the cover-up process, but I am not sure how the reputation of the Church could get any worse. The only things bishops have left to protect are the Churchs assets and their own personal asses. So is Ms. Catanzaro a fool for remaining in the Church? Is her continued commitment a sign of navet or courage? I dont think anyone on this blog or elsewhere has the right to judge her. Many, many Catholics still believe in the possibility of change from within. Even if you or I do not share that optimism any more, we need to resist slipping into the cynicism and callous disregard for others that has characterized the worst of our bishops. Lets be better than that.


text:
6 People Who Faked Their Own Death (For Ridiculous Reasons)
#3. Alastair Liddle Has No Idea How To Quit a Job
The Dearly Departed
In 1997, a 43-year-old successful Scottish attorney named Alastair Liddle called his wife on the way to an important meeting to say that he had arrived safely, and then vanished without a trace. For the next year, rumors sprang up that he had been killed in some kind of gangland hit and dumped into one of Scotland's many lochs, which are the nation's leading source of retarded rumors.
Ever heard of it?
The Cause of "Death"
Despite Liddle's apparent O.G. reputation, he hadn't been murdered by the fierce, kilt-sporting, Scottish mafia. In fact, he wasn't even dead. Way back in 1997, after he called his wife to say everything was OK, he tossed his cell phone into a trash can, withdrew some money and escaped to Cornwall, England. Why Cornwall? Well, besides being as far away from Scotland as possible while still in Britain, there is also a large flower growing industry in the county, which is the real reason Liddle fled there. That's right, Alastair Liddle, a wealthy attorney, abandoned his practice and family and faked his own death in order to become a minimum wage, migrant, flower picker.
Unrecognizable from the grossly overweight and downtrodden man he was when he "died," Liddle's old life finally caught up to him a year later when he was forced to give his real name during general police questioning regarding a murder. Since the murder wasn't imaginary, it turned out Liddle had nothing to do with it, but when the police computer returned a hit on an unpaid traffic fine, he was forced away from his dandelion dream back to Scotland where he faced charges of embezzlement. Why he had to embezzle money to become a migrant farm worker is unclear, but after spending 12 sad months in prison without a daffodil in sight, he immediately returned to his floral occupation where he claimed he had never been happier. Why he couldn't just change jobs and move to Cornwall without faking his own death like all the other flower pickers remains a mystery.
#2. Alan Abel Loves Pulling Pranks, Looking Like a Douche
The Dearly Departed
Early in 1980, well known humorist, filmmaker and hoaxter Alan Abel died from a sudden heart attack at the age of 50. He was scouting locations for an upcoming film in the mountains of Utah when the tragedy struck near the Sundance ski lodge. Abel had been skiing at the time, and some reports said he was found in a snow bank with his skis ominously forming a cross, which may or may not be the sinister calling card of the abominable Jesus.
The Cause of "Death"
Well that's what Alan Abel wanted The New York Times to think, anyway. The professional prankster hired a dozen friends to help him carry out his joke, including a fake funeral director who "collected" his belongings; fake witnesses who corroborated the story; and even a woman who posed as his widow when the Times was notified of his death. The plan--which involved 12 people playing different parts that took over six months to plan--was all orchestrated by Abel to see if he could fool one of the biggest newspapers in the world into printing his obituary on what he later called a "slow news day."
And print it they did. Alan woke up the following morning to find his death notice printed in the Times for the world to see, and after a few giggles, he held a press conference to announce that he was still alive and the whole thing had been a scam.
"Mom and Dad are going to think this is hilarious!"
The ultimate joke may have been on Abel in the end. Because of his highly public death, his credit cards were canceled, his bank accounts frozen and even when he showed up at the bank in person, they pointed to the Times obituary as evidence that he was in fact dead. But he probably got to put that obituary clipping up on the wall in his office (hoaxsters have offices right?) which must have been neat. Well, until his landlord kicked him out for being too dead to pay the rent.
#1. Bennie Wint is an Idiot
The Dearly Departed
September, 1989 was supposed to be a great month for 29-year-old, Bennie Wint. He and his fiance had traveled down to Daytona Beach to be married, with their four-year-old daughter in tow. But instead, tragedy struck when Bennie went out into the water, never to be seen again. Bennie was presumed to be either drowned or eaten by Jaws, leaving behind the love of his life and a little girl. And then he was pulled over by police in North Carolina for having a tail light out in January of this year. If you were wondering, no, zombies are not here, and they haven't learned to drive. Still.
The Cause of "Death"
Back in 1989, Bennie Wint found himself in a sticky situation. He believed that he was wanted on drug charges, and so he weighed his options. He could either go ahead and marry his sweetheart and risk prison time, or he could take what he deemed was the only other option and fake his death in order to evade the police. He chose door number two. So imagine his embarrassment when, after having destroyed every last piece of his former identity and living in hiding for the past 20 years, he discovered that he was wanted by the police for precisely jack shit.
That's right, he put his fiance and young daughter through the hell of having thought they'd lost him for what amounts to a whole lot of no reason whatsoever. Wint, naturally, was shocked when the police informed him in January that there were absolutely zero charges pending against him, and that he basically destroyed his own former life for nothing. During that time, he'd fled to Alabama and started a new life, married a new woman and had a new kid. It's kind of weird that, in avoiding crimes that he wasn't even wanted for, he accrued counts of faking his own death, lying to the police, using a fake ID and driving with a broken tail light. So sure was Wint, that he acted like a giant flaming douche by abandoning his old family and lying to his new one, and it's utterly hilarious that the idiot had blown his own notoriety to ridiculously out of whack proportions, but hasn't he suffered enough? We mean seriously. Alabama? Poor bastard. We didn't know you could go to Hell by only fake dying.
Do you have something funny to say about a random topic? You could be on the front page of Cracked.com tomorrow. Go here and find out how to create a Topic Page.
For people who actually faced death and laughed at it, check out 7 People Who Cheated Death (Then Kicked It In The Balls). Or check out the people who faced death and then stupidly stumbled into it, in 6 People Who Died In Order To Prove A (Retarded) Point.
And stop by our Top Picks to see what the leading cause of sick days are from the columnists (hint: it's "death").
And don't forget to follow us on Facebook and Twitter to get dick jokes sent straight to your news feed.


text:
Main Content
Order as many items as you like with our $4.99 flat rate shipping.
This item ships within two business days.
Order as many items as you like with our $4.99 flat rate shipping.
Need it faster?
Just being a Richard Childress Racing fan is not enough. You need to boast your loyalty to Childress. This metal license plate frame from WinCraft features domes acrylic graphics that will stand out on any car. Make sure your car is as bold of a Richard Childress Racing fan as you are with this license plate frame!
- Bolts not included
- Domed acrylic graphics
- Fits standard license plate
- Made in the USA
- Made of metal
- Measures approximately 6.5'' x 12.25''
- Officially licensed
- Made in the USA
- Brand: WinCraft
Racing Customers also liked:
Special event items are produced by manufacturers only after the outcome of a game or event. These are advanced sale items and will ship immediately after they are received in our warehouse.
Manufacturer direct items are shipped directly from the manufacturer. These items are not available for international or expedited shipping.
Customized items can be personalized with options such as your name, your favorite number, and/or designs. Some options may be limited by league rules.


text:
In Citadels, Ann has the crown and Bill chooses the king. The assassin kills the king. Who keeps the crown at the end of the turn?
Sign up
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
The King gets the crown when his character is revealed whether he is alive at that point or not.
Otherwise the king would be exceptionally weak IMHO as whomever had the crown could continually pick the assassin, assassinate the king, keep the crown, and first pick the assassin again. You can argue that they should be assassinating other characters besides the king, but seeing as there are fewer yellow districts than any other color the King needs all the help he can get...
The crown goes to the player that chose the King role card at the end of the round.
Fantasy Flight Rule book (page 14).


text:
Late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel is known for making classic YouTube hits. In his newest video, which USA TODAY has exclusively, he's pranking people at tailgate parties.
Jimmy is sharing completely fake products with people. Watch in the video above.
First, he brands regular Tostitos chips as Superbos, and people find reasons to praise the exact same product as better under the Superbos name.
Next he presents a bag of crushed Tostitos in pieces, and calls it Smashers. In the video, you can see people try their best to find reasons to like Tostitos' "new products."
The last product is Tostitos chips with gummy worms and it's largely hated by everyone. But whether's it's Jimmy's charm or the fact that he is so famous, they seem to be willing to lie to anyone watching.
Tweet sharing your favorite using #ZoomIN.
Follow @shannonraegreen on Twitter.


text:
Create a one-of-a-kind outdoor living space with the 36" La Palma Copper Auto Ignition Fire & Water Bowl with Closed Hood - NG around your outdoor living area, pool or landscape. This copper unit combines fire and water - creating a charming and relaxing atmosphere. Bring the attention you desire to your property with this fire and water bowl.
- Water Flow of 10-12 gpm
- Heat Output: 60,000 - 80,000 BTUs
- UL Listed control panel
Custom built from copper with a manual ignition system - this fire bowl is shedding light on what it takes to make a truly sophisticated fire feature.
Equipped with a commercial grade stainless steel burner, the 36" La Palma Copper Auto Ignition Fire & Water Bowl with Closed Hood - NG is a match lit system and comes with a manual key valve for convenience and safety. In order to ensure consistently reliable ignition, the stainless steel burner ring hood must be pre-configured between either fire glass or lava rock. Once your decision is made, this unit is easily used with the fire media of your choice – and for added peace of mind, all burner and mechanical parts are covered under a one year warranty.
For 0.25" – 0.5" fire glass, a protective fire glass screen is recommended to ensure that no glass slips down into the base of the fire pit. Also, for additional safety, a low voltage electronic shut-off valve is available for all propane units to protect against any wear or leaks that could otherwise be dangerous.
If you desire to install more than one unit in your outdoor area please contact one of our technical sales team members at (800) 919-1904.


text:
Suppose a group $G$ acts faithfully on a set $X$, or equivalently, $G$ is a subgroup of ${\rm Sym}(X)$.
By functoriality, $G$ acts on $P(X), P(P(X)), P(P(P(X))),$ etc. ($P(\cdot)$ means powerset.) Henceforth, I'll omit parentheses.
One can recover $G$ from ${\rm Fix}_G(PPPX)$ because, for example, one can encode a well-ordering of $X$ as an element of $PPX$.
Generally, one cannot recover $G$ from ${\rm Fix}_G(PPX)$. For example, the alternating group and symmetric groups on a finite set will give the same set of fixed elements.
Write $G\sim H$ if both groups act on $X$ and ${\rm Fix}_G(PPX) = {\rm Fix}_H(PPX)$. Equivalently, $$\forall u,v \subset X (\exists g\in G, gu=v \leftrightarrow \exists h\in H, hu=v) \ .$$
When does $G\sim H$ imply $G=H$?
Are there nontrivial examples of $G\sim H$ for infinite $X$? for $X$ of any infinite cardinality?
Is there a classification of such pairs for finite $X$?
Does this phenomenon have a name?
Can one always recover $G$ from ${\rm Fix}_G(PPPX)$ in ZF?


text:
October 06, 2012
Pre-sunrise on the beach – Flickr pic of the day
This photograph was taken near Rooiels by our Cape Town. Live it. Love it. Flickr group member Paul Perton.
He captured the soft light of the morning, just before the sun rose over Rooiels along the False Bay coastline.
Do you have images of Cape Town you'd like to share with us? We'd love you to join the Cape Town. Live it. Love it. Flickr group!
Image © Paul Perton


text:
HOPKINSVILLE, Ky. (AP) -- A U.S. Army soldier based at Fort Campbell has been convicted of sexual abuse and sodomy with a child under 12-years-old
Spc. Nery J. Ruiz was given a recommended sentence of 20 years in prison for first-degree sodomy with a child under 12 years of age and five years for one count first-degree sexual abuse.
The Kentucky New Era reported that the 28-year-old Ruiz will be eligible for parole in 17 years, after having served 85 percent of his sentence.
Ruiz took the stand and denied all charges.
The child involved in the case, a 6-year-old girl, testified against Ruiz. The 10-woman, 2-man jury in Christian County Circuit Court, reviewed video of her testimony about the November 2012 crimes after deliberations started.
(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)


text:
Training program policies
Enrollment policy
The IT Short Course classes are provided free of charge to all faculty, staff, and students --- with the exception of the Banner classes. Students are not eligible to register for Banner classes unless they are student workers for a department and their job duties require Banner access. Supervisor approval is required.
Cancellation policy
If you register for a class and cannot attend, please cancel at least 24 hours before the class or you will be charged a $10.00 processing fee. The processing fee will also be charged if more than 25% of the sessions are missed in a multi-day class. IT reserves the right to cancel any class with fewer than five people registered. Registrants will be given 24 hour advance notice before the class is cancelled.
Course location
All classes unless otherwise noted will be held in the IT training facility located in the Liberal Arts building, room 139.
If you have any questions, please call IT Central at 243-HELP (4357) (press option #2) or email us at firstname.lastname@example.com.


text:
So, there it is: Daedalus Touch 1.2 — available now at every iTunes App Store known to man. Only on iPad. Only on iOS5.
This is the second feature-update we've put out since the original release. We've added lots of stuff, but the two most prominent new features are Markdown support and ePub export. So allow me to elaborate on these a bit.
First off, we've added Markdown as an export option, available if you export to PDF or ePub. You can choose it by switching the "style" setting from "none" to, well… Markdown. We support most of Markdown's syntax: Six levels of headers, ordered and unordered lists, links, emphasis, code, block quotes, line breaks, you name it.
There's no support for images, as Daedalus can't handle images and iOS won't let you access anything outside of an app's own space. There's also neither support for tables nor for nested lists or nested block quotes within nested lists of block quotes. More on that in another post.
Then again, you'll be pleased to know that we now *do* support all kinds of special file.extensions. So if you're in the camp of .mdown or .md, we got you covered — during import, synching and export.


text:
The question is in the title. The category $\bf pSet$ of partial functions has sets as objects and $\hom(X,Y)$ is the set of all triples $(X,Y,f)$ such that there exists $D\subseteq X$ and $f\colon D\to Y$. Composition of arrows is composition of relations.
If I'm reading your definition correctly, this category looks equivalent to the category ${\bf Set_*}$ of pointed sets and basepoint-preserving functions (the equivalence is by removing the basepoint from each pointed set: you're left with an ordinary set and possibly partial functions). So you should be able to take the ordinary product in ${\bf Set_*}$ and then pass it through the equivalence: the product of $X$ and $Y$ in ${\bf pSet}$ should be the disjoint union of the cartesian products $X\times Y$, $X\times\{*\}$, and $Y\times\{*\}$. The partial projection to $X$ is given by projection from $X\times Y$ and $X\times\{*\}$ and undefined on $Y\times\{*\}$, and the partial projection to $Y$ is similar.
And indeed, this works: if $C$ has partial functions $f$ and $g$ to $X$ and $Y$ respectively, then we get a partial function to $(X\times Y)\sqcup (X\times\{*\})\sqcup (Y\times\{*\})$ given by $c\mapsto (f(c),g(c))$ if both exist, $(f(c),*)$ or $(*,g(c))$ if only one does, and undefined if neither exists.


text:
Suppose I have two tables, each of unknown size, and I'd like to estimate the average of their true sizes. I hire 2 contractors: one guarantees good precision (i.e., her measurement normally-distributed about the true value, with a standard deviation of 5mm), while the other is a dimwit (i.e., his measurement is also unbiased, but with a standard deviation of 100mm). What's the optimal way to combine the two measurements to form a final estimate of their true average size? The formal way to ask this question is, "Given a sample from a normally-distributed random variable with known variance, and another sample from a second normally-distributed random variable with known (but potentially different) variance, what is the best guess as to the expected value of the average of the two random variables?" Is the answer "Just average them."? Ideally, I want to prove the answer, whatever it is.
EDIT: I'm not sure if it was clear, but one contractor measures table 1, while the other contractor measures table 2.


text:
U.S., Israeli Leaders Seek to Bridge Divide
Obama and Netanyahu Make Public Displays of Affection and Air Newfound Agreement on How to Deal With Iran
JERUSALEM—President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu exchanged hearty back pats, smiles and jokes as they sought to showcase a mended relationship on the first day of a visit by the American president.
The displays of newfound warmth extended to closer public agreement on the most pressing issue they discussed, Iran. After openly clashing during Mr. Obama's first term on how best to curb Iran's nuclear program, the two leaders closed ranks Wednesday, hours after Mr. Obama arrived for his first visit to the country as president.
Mr. Netanyahu issued his clearest threat yet to bomb Iran, citing assurances from Mr. Obama that Israel has a right to defend itself.
"Israel can never cede the right to defend ourselves to others, even to the greatest of our friends," Mr. Netanyahu said at a joint news conference at his Jerusalem residence.
"There is not a lot of daylight between our countries' assessments in terms of where Iran is right now," Mr. Obama said.
The two men said there was little difference between their timelines for Iran's nuclear program, which both countries believe is aimed at building an atomic bomb, despite Iran's denials. Officials with Iran's United Nations mission didn't return a call seeking comment on Wednesday.
Mr. Obama said each country needs to make its own decision to engage in military action. In turn, Mr. Netanyahu endorsed Mr. Obama's handling of the Iran issue, sidestepping a history of public criticism. "I am absolutely convinced the president is determined to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons," Mr. Netanyahu said.
The comments came at the end of day one of Mr. Obama's first visit to Israel as president and the first foreign trip of his second term. Both leaders recently won re-election campaigns and appeared determined to show the public they have put old grudges aside.
Both leaders had faced domestic criticism for letting the relationship sour. Israeli officials publicly declared warm U.S. relations to be vital to national security. For the U.S., rocky relations complicated Mr. Obama's efforts to convince Israel to advance the peace process.
Throughout the day, Mr. Obama struck themes aimed at winning Israeli hearts and minds. He began his opening statement on the tarmac of Ben Gurion Airport speaking in Hebrew.
He emphasized the Jewish people's 3,000-year-old connection to the land of Israel and used terminology, biblical references and turns of phrase similar to those used by ardent Zionists. In his opening speech, he made no mention of the Palestinian conflict.
In doing so, Mr. Obama appeared to have taken to heart criticism leveled at him by many Israelis after his 2009 speech in Cairo, in which he seemed to suggest that Israel's legitimacy was as a haven for Jews fleeing the Holocaust, instead of in Jews' ancient ties to the land itself.
During their joint news conference, Messrs. Netanyahu and Obama nodded while the other spoke, lingered during handshakes and embraces, and gently ribbed each other.
"Everything is warm and cuddly," said a senior Israeli official. "There is apparently a tacit agreement between both leaders, if not coordination, to engage in very intense PDA," or public displays of affection.
Mr. Obama's standing among Palestinians appeared to fall as he moved to patch up his relationship with Israel. Many protested his overtures to the Israelis. "Palestinians have realized Obama is just like every other U.S. president and is never going to take on Israel," said Diana Buttu, a former adviser to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
Mr. Obama was set to travel to Ramallah on Thursday to meet Mr. Abbas, before returning to Jerusalem for a speech that White House officials billed as the centerpiece of his visit.
On Wednesday, protesters in Ramallah tried to march on the headquarters of Mr. Abbas and scuffled with Palestinian police. Posters in Ramallah with Mr. Obama's face on them were defaced.
White House officials tried to lower expectations of a breakthrough on the peace process during this trip, stressing that peace issues were likely to take a back seat to discussion of Iran and Syria. Yet Secretary of State John Kerry arrived in Israel two days ahead of Mr. Obama. On the eve of Mr. Obama's arrival, Mr. Kerry met with Isaac Molho, an aide to Mr. Netanyahu in charge of the peace process for the Israeli leader.
Mr. Kerry is scheduled to travel to Jordan with Mr. Obama on Friday, and back to Jerusalem Saturday to meet again with Mr. Netanyahu to discuss the peace process, according to a senior Israeli official.
"He is trying some sort of shuttle diplomacy," said the official.
—Adam Entous contributed to this article.
Write to Charles Levinson at firstname.lastname@example.com and Colleen McCain Nelson at email@example.com


text:
Call us toll-free
Affordable and utilitarian, custom tire pressure gauges are great way to promote repair shops, car dealers, insurance companies and travel agencies. Tire pressure gauges are also an ideal gift for business travelers. Order your logo tire pressure gauges now for a gift they will use!
Rectangular Sponge
Wipe away the competition with these Sponges. Our super absorbent poly-foam Sponges are available in many different colors. Printed sponges are ideal for fundraisers, car washes, dealerships, trade-shows and more.
From: $0.78 | Min Qty: 250 | Production Time: 5 Days
View Details »
One Pint Funnels
One pint Automotive Funnels are unique giveaways for car dealerships auto shops or gas stations. These Funnels are available in several different colors. Ordering is easy - call today!
From: $0.92 | Min Qty: 200 | Production Time: 5 Days
View Details »
Key Chains, Tire Tread Gauges
Get daily exposure for your brand with thesecustom auto tire measurer key chains. These tread gauges measure tire tread with an easy to use gauge. A safety mark indicates minimum tread depth.
From: $1.81 | Min Qty: 200 | Production Time: 3 Days
View Details »
All Purpose Cleaner & Lubricant Pen
With over 300 uses, this pen is a must have for your next promotion! These pens remove, lubricate, clean, and prevent messes, making it an incredibly useful and highly visible promotional item! Click to learn more!
From: $1.02 | Min Qty: 150 | Production Time: 3 Days
View Details »
Plastic Tire Gauges
Is your automotive promotion at peak performance? Ideal for car dealers, automotive merchants, rental car dealerships and insurance companies, logo tire pressure gauges keep your brand in hand. Gauges measure up to 75-PSI.
From: $1.42 | Min Qty: 150 | Production Time: 5 Days
View Details »
Mini Tire Pressure Gauge Key Chain
Don't leave home without these tire pressure gauges! Easily attaches onto key chains, these custom printed tire gauges are made of aluminum and calculates PSI up to 50 lbs.
From: $1.23 | Min Qty: 150 | Production Time: 3 Days
View Details »
Quick View Tire Gauge
Useful and affordable custom tire pressure gauges are great items to put your imprint on, whether you are giving them away or adding to a larger promotional package. These logo tire gauges feature an aluminum body with zinc alloy head.
From: $1.26 | Min Qty: 100 | Production Time: 3 Days
View Details »
3-in-1 Portable Digital Tire Gauge
If you are looking for a promotional auto gift that's a little more upscale, consider these custom tire pressure gauges that measure in three modes: PSI, BAR and KPA. Also features Philips and flat head screwdrivers.
From: $10.80 | Min Qty: 48 | Production Time: 1 Days
View Details »
|Images are not necessarily shown in proportion to other products.
|Images are not necessarily shown in proportion to other products.


text:
Common Problems Encountered by Breastfeeding Women
In This Article:
Persistent nipple pain sometimes results from a yeast infection of the nipples. The problem occurs more commonly than appreciated, as few medical personnel are familiar with yeast infection of the nipples. Most women know about vaginal yeast infections, and new mothers soon learn that a persistent infant diaper rash can be due to a yeast infection. Yeast, also known as candida, thrive in moist environments, such as the mouth, the vagina, the diaper area, and the nipples of a breastfeeding woman. Although yeast commonly are harbored in these areas, they normally live in balance with bacteria and cause no symptoms. Certain conditions make a yeast infection more likely to occur. For example, treatment with antibiotics diminishes the growth of normal bacteria and allows yeast to overgrow and produce symptoms. Yeast aren't likely to invade normal skin, but once the skin barrier has been broken, damaged skin is more susceptible to a yeast infection. An ordinary diaper rash might develop when a wet/soiled diaper is left on too long. Once the rash persists for a few days, you should suspect that a yeast infection is now present.
Because some yeast are present in every infant's mouth, candida can easily be transferred to a mother's nipples. A yeast infection is more likely to develop if a mother has chronic nipple trauma from improper infant latch-on or incorrect suckling or if she has a crack, fissure, or opening in the nipple skin. A crack that has been present for several days may become infected by yeast, which can keep it from healing. Most breastfeeding specialists recognize the symptoms of a suspected yeast infection of the nipples. Unfortunately, relatively few obstetricians, pediatricians, or family physicians are familiar with the problem, which is seldom mentioned in traditional medical textbooks. An awkward situation often arises when a lactation consultant suggests the diagnosis, and the mother's physician is reluctant to prescribe treatment since he or she is unfamiliar with the condition. Some dermatologists will diagnose and treat yeast nipple infections.
The diagnosis of a yeast infection of the nipples is often based on circumstantial evidence. Proving that yeast are the culprit can be difficult, as culture results may be inconclusive. The following clues will help you suspect that your nipple pain is due to a yeast infection:
The timing and nature of the pain
The pain from yeast nipples typically starts after the first couple of weeks, although it can begin anytime. Usually, the mother has weathered early, mild sore nipples and has been nursing comfortably before pain starts anew. Mothers frequently describe their discomfort as burning, shooting, or stabbing pain that radiates from the nipples deep into the breast. Pain is present both during feedings and after nursing. Often, discomfort is so severe that the mother decides to wean. Nipple pain can be very chronic, sometimes present for weeks or months, virtually spoiling a woman's breastfeeding experience.
Appearance of the Nipples
Yeast infection of the nipples may cause surprisingly little change in nipple appearance. In fact, some practitioners wonder how a mother could complain of severe pain when her nipples may look relatively normal. Occasionally, they will appear pinkish. Rarely, the skin is inflamed with reddened bumps, typical of a baby's yeast diaper rash. I tend to suspect yeast if a crack, fissure, or other irritated area has been present for several days. Any break in the skin can be invaded by yeast.
Previous Problems with Yeast
Yeast infection of the nipples occurs more commonly among women who have experienced vaginal yeast infections during pregnancy and previous problems with yeast. Some women seem to be more yeast-prone than others. o Recent treatment of mother with antibiotics. Yeast infection of the nipples often starts during or after a mother's treatment with antibiotics. The antibiotics promote an overgrowth of yeast by destroying bacteria. A woman may have received a course of antibiotics to treat a uterine infection, breast infection, or other illness before she began experiencing nipple pain.
The Presence of Yeast Diaper Rash or Oral Thrush in the Baby
The possibility that nipple pain is due to a yeast infection should be considered whenever a baby has thrush (yeast in the mouth) or a yeast diaper rash. Yeast infections in the baby often occur after a course of antibiotics, for example to treat an ear infection. Oral yeast, called thrush, causes white patches on the baby's tongue (often assumed to be milk). It also can look like stringy white matter inside the baby's lips or cheeks (see photograph page 246). A yeast diaper rash looks bright red (common in the thigh creases and between the buttocks), with red bumps at the margins.
Other Risk Factors for Yeast
Diabetic women suffer more yeast infections than others, making them more prone to yeast nipples. Yeast infections are also more common among women taking birth control pills.
Treatment for Yeast Infection of the Nipples
If you suspect that you could have a yeast infection of one or both nipples, you will need to see a practitioner who can diagnose the problem and prescribe medication, such as your obstetrician or family physician. Although a lactation consultant may be more familiar with the problem, she may need to ask your doctor to write a prescription for you. A few pediatricians are willing to treat the problem in lactating women, and occasionally women seek help from a dermatologist. No studies have been conducted to determine the most effective treatment for yeast nipples, but several therapies are commonly prescribed, including a topical antifungal cream or ointment and/or an oral antifungal medication widely used to treat vaginal and other yeast infections (brand name, Diflucan; generic, fluconazole). Sometimes a topical cortisone cream is also recommended to reduce inflammation.
If the baby has a yeast diaper rash or oral thrush, proper treatment of the infant's yeast infections should be considered an essential part of your own therapy. Some practitioners recommend treating the baby even when no infant symptoms are present. Other things that will help combat a yeast infection of the nipples include the following suggestions:
Exercise good hygiene
- Wash your hands often, including after changing your baby's diaper or using the toilet and before and after breastfeeding.
- Keep your nipples free from surface moisture. Remember, yeast thrive best in a moist environment. Change your breast pads as soon as they become wet. Allow your nipples to air dry a few minutes after nursings.
- Boil pacifiers and bottle nipples at least once daily. Pacifiers and bottle nipples can harbor yeast and reintroduce it into your baby's mouth while you are trying to treat a yeast infection. If you use a breast pump, boil the breast shield that is placed over your nipple and the bottle at least once a day.
- Observe your baby for any signs of a yeast diaper rash or oral thrush. Ask your pediatrician or family physician to treat a possible yeast infection in your infant. Creams and ointments are available for diaper rashes and an oral medication is available for thrush. Babies and mothers often reinfect one another, so simultaneous treatment of the breastfeeding dyad is best.
- If you have any signs of a vaginal yeast infection, ask your obstetrician or family physician to prescribe treatment for you. Women with vaginal yeast infections are more prone to nipple yeast problems. One advantage of oral therapy is that it can eradicate yeast from other sites as well as your nipple infection.
- Consider interrupting breastfeeding temporarily by using a hospital-grade rental electric breast pump. Sometimes, when nursing is too painful to tolerate, pumping proves to be a comfortable alternative. Temporarily pumping instead of nursing also can speed your recovery from yeast nipples by breaking the mouth-nipple cycle of reinfection.
- It is popularly believed that yeast infections can be prevented by making dietary changes. Advocates of this belief recommend reducing one's intake of sugary foods and eating more yogurt with acidophillus.
Sore Nipples Caused by Infection with Bacteria
Sore nipples can also become infected with bacteria. When bacteria invade the broken skin barrier, the result can be worse pain, delayed healing, and the risk of progressing to a full-blown breast infection. The offending germs that invade a crack or break in the skin usually are those found in the baby's mouth, including staph germs. Germs found in feces also can cause nipple infections, especially when breastfeeding women forget to wash their hands after diaper changes. Yellowish drainage and surrounding redness may be evident in the infected area. A bacterial infection of the nipple is more likely to be present when a mother's nipple pain is severe, when a break in the nipple skin is present, and when the baby is less than one month old. A bacterial infection is also likely when an older nursing baby bites the mother's nipple and breaks the skin. Your doctor can confirm such an infection by taking a culture with a swab or make a presumptive diagnosis by judging from the appearance of the nipple. In addition to correcting any problems with the baby's latching technique, bacterial infections of the nipple should be treated with a course of oral antibiotics to assure prompt healing and to prevent mastitis. If you are prone to yeast infections, your health care provider may prescribe an anti-fungal medication to be taken simultaneously.
Sore Nipples Caused by Sensitive Skin
In addition to the causes of sore nipples just described, differences in skin sensitivity make some women more prone to nipple discomfort during breastfeeding. In the past it was commonly accepted that redheads and fair-skinned women were more likely to have sore nipples. While some experts dispute this popular belief, others, including myself, find some truth in it. In my experience, women who have very sensitive skin on other parts of their bodies often have more trouble with sore nipples. I think seasonal and geographic differences have an influence as well. In Denver, we see more women with nipple complaints in the fall and spring. Our humidity is so low that excessive drying of the nipples contributes to nipple breakdown. You might accurately guess that lanolin is very popular here!
From Dr. Mom's Guide to Breastfeeding by Marianne R. Neifert. Copyright © 1998 by Marianne R. Neifert. Used by arrangement with Plume, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
To order this book visit Amazon.


text:
UPDATE: 4:30p.m.
A jury has found Lindsey Lowe, 26, guilty of murdering her two newborn twins.
She is found guilty on six counts, those counts include two counts of felony murder, two counts of premeditated murder and two counts of aggravated child abuse.
The jury deliberated for about 2 hours.
More information on WBKO at 5,6 and 10.
A jury has begun deliberating the murder case against a suburban Nashville woman accused of smothering her newborn twin boys.
In closing arguments Tuesday, both sides agreed that Lindsey Lowe did not act like a pregnant woman.
Friends, family and even her fiance did not realize that she was pregnant. She was a bridesmaid in a wedding two days before giving birth and a sorority sister spent the night with her one day before.
Prosecutors argued that Lowe's actions show she intended to go on with her life and not let children interfere.
Attorneys for 26-year-old Lowe contended those actions prove she was in denial about being pregnant. A psychiatrist testified that Lowe was delusional when she gave birth in the bathroom of her family's home on Sept. 12, 2011.


text:
December 13, 2012
Mother City Queer Project 2012: Are you ready for queens and fairies?
If you have dallied about going there is still time to buy tickets which are available at R290 and R450 for a VIP ticket. Tickets can be purchased via Computicket.
The MCQP is the largest and zaniest costume party in the city and has received many accolades over the years, cementing it as a festive season must-do.
The theme for this year's MCQP is Fairy Tale Fantasy – so have you and your consorts found the perfect shade of blonde wig? Is the huntsman armed with his axe? And perhaps more importantly, does the evil queen have an apple?
Perhaps there are a couple of frogs in the wings, hoping to be kissed by pretty princesses – or princes, or a clutch of dwarves ready to rescue a damsel in distress ... Tweet pics of you in all your finery and mention @CapeTownTourism.
After weeks of agonising over costumes and whether or not one's feet are going to fit into those glass slippers, the time is almost here for fairy godmothers to wave their wands and make wishes come true.
Saturday is going to be magical. The stadium, all sparkly and white during the day and like a lit-up castle at night, is going to be host to up to 11 000 revellers.
As usual, the madness of the MCQP would not be complete without a stellar line-up of performers. Lady Gaga and Britney Spears impersonator Derrick Barry is taking a break from his Las Vegas show Divas Las Vegas to cast a spell on MCQP fans, while international and local DJs will also pump up the volume on the dancefloors and four experiential areas, each with its own theme and music style.
Different areas of the stadium are being transformed into the magical and the mystical, and promise to please even the most pernickety Queen, who will have her choice of swanning down the Red Carpet Entrance, being charmed at the Enchanted Garden, or dance at the Live Band Stage. Other areas include Alice's Winter Wonderland main house dancefloor, the Little Mermaid-dedicated disco dancefloor; then there is the Manhunt Ali Baba entertainment floor with Health 4 Men's X Factor room, the Tom Thumb Trance Dance floor, a Fairy Godmother Fag Trash Anthem Cabaret area, dedicated Smokers Lounge, food concessionaires as well as stalls and funfair-based revelry where one can take a magic carpet ride to Neverland.
Live performances start at 9pm. Event director Ian McMahon has urged partygoers to not be fashionably late, but rather to be on time and avoid the rush.


text:
Joseph D'Aleo
Joseph D'Aleo is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin BS, MS and dis his doctoral studies at NYU. Joseph D'Aleo was the first Director of Meteorology at the cable TV Weather Channel. Mr. D'Aleo was Chief Meteorologist at Weather Services International Corporation and Senior Editor of WSI's popular Intellicast.com web site. He is a former college professor of Meteorology at Lyndon State College. Mr. D'Aleo is a Certified Consultant Meteorologist and was elected a Fellow of the American Meteorological Society (AMS). He has chaired the American Meteorological Society' Committee on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, and has co-chaired national conferences for both the American Meteorological Society and the National Weather Association. Mr. D'Aleo was elected a Councilor for the AMS.


text:
May 11, 2011
A bright evening at the V&A – Flickr pic of the day
This photograph of a misty Table Mountain was taken by our Cape Town. Live it. Love it. group member Steve Crane.
Says Steve Crane, "For most of last year, I spent several hours twice a week at the V&A Waterfront killing time while my son attended classes nearby. On many of these days I brought my camera along and wandered around, taking photos.
This one was taken one evening in early May as night was falling. The sky was moody and overcast and I hoped to capture this, but this photo was not one of my chosen photos from that day. It had been languishing in my photo library until I recently decided to try some different processing to see what I might be able to make of it. I ended up brightening the image considerably to arrive at this somewhat creative interpretation of the original scene."
Do you have images of Cape Town you'd like to share with us? We'd love you to join the Cape Town. Live it. Love it. Flickr group!
Image © Steve Crane
Vote for Table Mountain
Table Mountain has been shortlisted as one of the New7Wonders of Nature, but needs YOUR vote if it is to achieve this status. You can play your part by sending the word "Table" by SMS to 34874, or by casting your vote online. For more information, visit www.votefortablemountain.com


text:
Co-workers, friends and family members attended an open house Friday in honor of retiring Sturgis deputy fire chief Scott Hopkins.
Guests included Jimmie Barnes, St. Joseph County's retired emergency services coordinator. Hopkins takes over that job beginning next week in Centreville.
Dave Northrop, Sturgis director of public safety, praised Hopkins for his accomplishments. He presented Hopkins with a 40-year service pin.
City Manager Mike Hughes also complimented Hopkins and presented him with a $200 gift certificate to Fiebig Jewelers.
Hopkins was emotionally moved by the large crowd and the numerous positive comments.
Location, ST | website.com


text:
Through November 12th, Tanga is taking up to 88% off Nike products. Choose from over 35 products including wallets, shoes, sunglasses, belts and bags. Shipping starts at $5. The pictured Nike Golf P1400 Red Travel Toiletry Bag is on sale for $13 + $5 shipping = $18 shipped.
Up to 74% off Honeywell Fire and Theft Protection Safes
Deal has expired