text:
Judge Karlin
08-41213 Davenport (Doc. # 92)
- Details
- Category: Judge Karlin
- Published: 08 December 2011
- Written by Judge Karlin
In Re Davenport, 08-41213 (Bankr. D. Kan. Dec. 7, 2011) Doc. # 92
Click here for the pdf document.
SIGNED this 7th day of December, 2011.
In re: )
Larry Eugene Davenport and ) Case No. 08-41213
Freda Gail Davenport, )
Debtors. )
_______________________________________ )
Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Trustee's
Motion to Compel Turnover and Granting, in part, Trustee's
Motion for Post Confirmation Amendment of Plan
This case requires me to determine how best to remedy a situation where
Debtors rapidly spent a significant postconfirmation windfall, obtained without
required court approval, before the Trustee could seeks its turnover for the benefit of
creditors. I am presented with the Chapter 13 Trustee's Motion to Compel Debtors to
Turnover Proceeds from Sale of Property 1 and his Motion for Post Confirmation
1 Doc. 61.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 1 of 19
Amendment of Plan. 2 I have jurisdiction to decide this matter, 3 and it is a core
I grant the motion for turnover and require Debtors to immediately turnover the
remaining $15,000 to the Chapter 13 Trustee. I also grant the motion to amend the
plan, postconfirmation, in part, to provide for the turnover of the $15,000 and to allow
the Trustee to disburse the $15,000 to pay administrative expenses and unsecured
I. Findings of Fact
Debtors filed their Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition in August 2008. Their
Schedule A disclosed that Mrs. Davenport was the owner of a one-sixth interest in real
estate located in Wyandotte County, Kansas. Debtors estimated the value of her
interest at approximately $10,000. This value was based upon a 2002 county appraisal
that valued the land at $50,900. Divided by six, Mrs. Davenport's interest was thus
worth approximately $8,500 six years prior to filing of the bankruptcy. There is no
evidence that the Davenports had any reason to believe the land was worth more than
$50,900 when they filed bankruptcy.
2 Doc. 74.
3 This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and(b), and by operation of a Standing Order dated August 1, 1984, effective July 10, 1984,
referenced in D. Kan. Rule 83.8.5, wherein the District Court for the District of Kansas
referred all cases and proceedings in, under, or related to Title 11 to the District's bankruptcyjudges.
4 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E) and (L).
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 2 of 19
Debtors originally proposed to abandon to the trustee their interest in the real
property "in order to satisfy the 'best interest of creditors test'" under 11 U.S.C. §
1325(a)(4). 5 Debtors discussed this abandonment with the Trustee at the initial
meeting of creditors. Because he did not consider himself a "liquidating trustee,"
however, the Trustee informed them that he would not accept the transfer of the
property, and liquidate it, for the benefit of creditors. The Trustee did, however, inform
the Debtors that because the plan payments proposed by them (and required by
Official Form B22C) were sufficient to satisfy the best interest of the creditors test
without the sale of this property, there was no need to liquidate Mrs. Davenport's
interest in the land. Debtors agreed to amend their plan to remove the "abandonment"
language, and that plan was confirmed in December 2008 without objection.6
Two years later, in 2010, Mrs. Davenport and her siblings were contacted by the
Kansas Department of Transportation ("KDOT") because KDOT intended to acquire
the land for a highway project. In a letter dated November 2010, KDOT offered Mrs.
Davenport and her siblings $776,895 for the land—more than 15 times the previously
appraised value of the land. Although KDOT had the authority to use condemnation
5 The "best interest of creditors test" is found in § 1325(a)(4), and requires debtors toprovide at least as much money to general unsecured creditors as those creditors would havereceived under a liquidating Chapter 7 proceeding. All future statutory references are to theBankruptcy Code as amended by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer ProtectionAct of 2005, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101 - 1532 (2005), unless otherwise specifically noted.
6 There were three objections to confirmation of the amended plan, but they all involvedamounts required to be paid to secured creditors, and did not involve the best interest of thecreditors test or the real estate. By agreement, Debtors agreed to pay $27,500 to CoreFirst ontheir mobile home, $13,262 to Toyota for a Toyota Tacoma, and $10,212.50 to Toyota on aCamry. These were the debts requiring most of the $1,560 plan payment.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 3 of 19
proceedings to acquire the land, the evidence shows that Mrs. Davenport and her
siblings simply agreed to sell the land to KDOT without requiring judicial action.
KDOT eventually paid $797,495.00 for all the property; Mrs. Davenport received
$132,915.83 as her one-sixth share in late December 2010; she then paid
approximately $19,000 in taxes on that distribution, leaving her with about $113,000.
Mrs. Davenport did not seek Court approval to sell her 1/6 interest, and the
Davenports did not disclose their receipt of the money to the Trustee. He learned of the
sale upon a routine review of Debtors' 2010 tax returns. When the Debtors declined to
return the money to the estate, the Trustee filed a motion for turnover of the funds
and, in the alternative, a motion to modify the plan payments to require them to repay
the funds over time through a plan.
At trial, Debtors testified that because they thought this was their money (as a
result of the Trustee's decision not to require it be sold prior to plan confirmation), they
had spent all but approximately $15,000 of the $113,000 they had received only eight
months earlier. Debtors provided a very rough itemization of how some of those funds
were spent, including:
2008 Pontiac Torrent
Taxes on new vehicle
New tires and service on new
Amount Spent
Garden shed
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 4 of 19
Sleep Number Bed $1,877
Guttering $620
Trip to Hawaii $3,500
Mobile Home Repairs $4,100
Taxes on inheritance $19,000 (approx.)
Washer and Dryer $3,358
Chapter 13 plan payments $14,850
John Deere installation of PTO $1,416
Furniture $622
Total $68,818
Debtors were unable to itemize how they spent the remaining $49,000, only noting that
it had, in fact, been spent, and claiming that most had likely been used for
miscellaneous items such as doctor bills, utilities, vehicle upkeep, entertainment,
groceries, lot rent, mobile home payments, and car insurance.7
Debtors' actions have been contrary to statute and orders, resulting in
prejudice to their creditors.
The Trustee requested turnover of the entire amount Debtors received from
KDOT, but in the alternative, requested Debtors repay that money over time, through
an amended plan pursuant to § 1329, recognizing that they have managed to spend
7 Debtors' Trial Exhibit 26. Mrs. Davenport testified she used $12,700 to buy a 2008Pontiac (plus another $800 for tires and service for it) because she had many miles on herother car, which I assume was the 2004 Camry to which she had stipulated the value to be$10,212.50. There is nothing to reflect that plan payments are not still being paid on theCamry claim, so it appears these two Debtors may now have three vehicles—the ToyotaTacoma, the Camry and the Pontiac.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 5 of 19
most of it. The Trustee notes that only $27,000 in unsecured claims were filed in this
The best interest of the creditors test must be re-evaluated upon
the filing of a motion to amend the plan.
The starting point for any modification of a confirmed Chapter 13 plan is §
1329(a). That statute allows the trustee, after confirmation, but before plan
completion, to seek modification of a plan to increase the amount of payments on
claims, or to extend the time for such payments. Section 1329(b)(1) then specifically
provides that "Sections 1322(a), 1322(b), and 1323(c) of this title and the requirements
of section 1325(a) of this title apply to any modification under subsection (a) of this
One of the "requirements of section 1325(a)" is that "the value, as of the effective
date of the plan, of property to be distributed under the plan on account of each allowed
unsecured claim is not less than the amount that would be paid on such claim if the
estate of the debtor were liquidated under chapter 7 of this title on such date." Section1329 makes it clear, and the parties do not contest, that the best interest of the
creditors test must be met before any amended plan can be confirmed. The issue I must
decide is whether the liquidation value of a debtor's estate should be measured as of
the effective date of the initial plan, or whether the value should be measured as of the
effective date of an amended plan to account for any changes in the value of the
debtor's property.
8 § 1325(a)(4).
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 6 of 19
This issue was recently addressed by Chief Judge Nugent in In re Auernheimer.9
In Auernheimer, the debtors calculated their Chapter 13 bankruptcy estate's
liquidation value at just under $15,000. Because the plan proposed to pay more than
that to general unsecured creditors, the court confirmed the plan. A year later, the
debtors moved to amend their plan, asserting that the liquidation value was drastically
less than they had originally estimated. The loss in value was due to the fact that three
accounts receivable held by the debtors—totaling $13,000—were essentially
uncollectible and because other property had greatly diminished in value since
confirmation of the original plan.
The debtors thus sought to "reestablish" the liquidation value of the estate and
proposed to instead pay approximately $3,100 to general unsecured creditors. The
Trustee objected, arguing that the value of the debtors' non-exempt assets was
determined at plan confirmation and that the "'effective date" is, and always remains,
the effective date of the original confirmed plan, not the modified plan. Recognizing a
split of authority on the issue of the "effective date" of a plan modification for the
purpose of confirming the plan under § 1329(b)(1), Judge Nugent adopted the majority
position, which is that the effective date of the modified plan controls, not the original
plan, when determining whether the best interest of the creditors test has been met.10
9 437 B.R. 405 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2010) (Nugent, C. J.).
10 Id. at 409.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 7 of 19
The seminal case for this majority approach is In re Barbosa,11 which has
similar, but significantly less egregious facts, than those before me. In Barbosa, the
debtors owned investment property they originally valued at $64,000. Two years after
confirmation, the debtors sold the property for $137,500. The trustee moved to modify
the plan to increase the dividend paid to unsecured creditors. The court agreed with
the trustee, noting that § 541(a)(6) would have made the profits from the sale of this
property part of a Chapter 7 estate had the case been converted, and that the same
result should apply in determining the hypothetical liquidation value of the estate.
The minority view on the "effective date" issue is lead by the Eighth Circuit
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's decision in Forbes v. Forbes (In re Forbes). 12 In Forbes,
the court focused on language contained in § 1329(b)(2), which states that the plan as
modified "becomes the plan." Under the Forbes approach, the plan "is a unitary
constant that exists throughout the case and brings with it a constant effective
date—that relating to the initially-confirmed plan."13
I agree with the Barbosa/Auernheimer approach. The purpose of § 1325(a)(4) is
to ensure that creditors are not treated any worse in a Chapter 13 proceeding than
they would be treated in a Chapter 7 liquidation. Section 1329 recognizes the
importance of this requirement in any plan amendment by incorporating § 1325(a)(4),
11 236 B.R. 540 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1999).
12 215 B.R. 183 (8th Cir. BAP 1997).
13 In re Auernheimer, 437 B.R. at 408 (citing In re Forbes, 215 B.R. at 183).
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 8 of 19
which requires that unsecured creditors should get as much in a Chapter 13 as they
would get under a Chapter 7 liquidation. If this case were converted to a Chapter 7
proceeding, the property would be revalued, and any prepetition nonexempt property
remaining in the hands of the Davenports would be subject to liquidation—including
the proceeds from the sale of the land in question.14 Because such a result would occur
if the property were actually liquidated at this time, it is most logical to read § 1329
to require such a result in a hypothetical liquidation under the best interest of the
creditors test.15 And, as at least one court has noted, the legislative history of § 1329
shows that Congress intended just such a result.16 I find that both the language and
the legislative history of § 1329 support a holding that it is the effective date of the
amended Chapter 13 plan that controls the calculation of the best interest of the
creditors test, not the effective date of the original plan.
14 See § 348(f)(1) (prepetition property held by debtors on date of conversion is property
of the estate in a good-faith conversion from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7, and valuations of theproperty under Chapter 13 are not effective) and § 541(a)(6) (proceeds from the sale ofproperty of the estate are also considered property of the estate).
15 See In re Nott, 269 B.R. 250, 255 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000) (quoting H.R.Rep. No. 595,
95th Cong., 1st Sess. 431 (1977) U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News pp. 5787, 6386, 6387 whenstating "[i]n applying the standards of proposed 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(4) to the confirmation ofa modified plan, 'the plan' as used in the section will be the plan as modified under thissection, by virtue of the incorporation by reference into this section of proposed 11 U.S.C. §
1323(b). Thus, the application of the liquidation value test must be redetermined at the timeof the confirmation of the modified plan.")
16 Id.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 9 of 19
Admittedly, and as Judge Lundin notes in his Chapter 13 Bankruptcy treatise,
numerous problems could arise under either interpretation of § 1329(b).17 From a
practical standpoint, a Trustee or creditor could seek an upward modification in
payments every time an asset even minimally increases in value—or a debtor could
likewise seek a downward modification in payments every time an asset decreases in
value. I note, however, that those same concerns could be raised with numerous other
common changes in a Chapter 13 debtor's financial situation, such as minor increases
or decreases in income, adjustments to payments on variable interest loans, or changes
in the amounts of normal monthly living expenses. Absent significant and generally
unexpected changes in a debtor's income or expenses, modifications under § 1329 are
seldom sought by trustees, debtors or creditors, nor should they be. I anticipate the
same will hold true regarding increases or decreases in the value of non-exempt estate
property. In any event, "the Court is bound by Congressional enactment"18 and any
potential issues that may arise under this interpretation will be decided if and when
they arise.
B. The Trustee's motion for turnover will be granted, in part.
I have found that Debtors must account for the postconfirmation appreciation
in the value of the KDOT real estate. Ordinarily, that would occur by the debtor
seeking to modify his plan, in good faith, before spending the money, to account for the
17 See Keith M. Lundin & William H. Brown, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, 4th Edition, §
254.1, Sec. Rev. June 15, 2004, available at www.ch13online.com.
18 In re Auernheimer, 437 B.R. at 409.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 10 of 19
additional funds through a recalculation of the best interest of the creditors test. That
recalculation would be based upon the value of the property as of the effective date of
the amended plan.
That is not how the Davenports elected to proceed. They instead chose to spend
money that was not theirs until they were caught, at which point they had spent all
but $15,000.
The order confirming their amended Chapter 13 plan specifically ordered that
all of the Davenport's property would re-vest in the Davenports, as their own property
instead of property of the estate, only after completion of their plan and approval of the
Trustee's Final Report and Accounting.19 In addition, Debtors' own amended Chapter
13 plan, which resulted in that confirmation order, also clearly provided that "property
of this bankruptcy estate includes all property acquired after the filing of the
bankruptcy petition, including earnings."20 The increase in the value of the land is such
property acquired after filing.
The confirmation order also provides that the Davenports are "enjoined and
prohibited from selling, encumbering, or in any manner disposing of assets without
prior court order of the Court, except as required in the course of Debtor's business, if
19 Order Confirming Plan (Doc. 39) at ¶ 13. See also Vannordstrand v. Hamilton (In re
Vannordstrand), 2007 WL 283076 (10th Cir. BAP Jan. 31, 2007) (holding that propertyinherited more than 180 days postpetition became property of the Chapter 13 estate, and hadto be turned over, because the court's confirmation order delayed vesting of estate propertyback to the debtor until the entry of discharge).
20 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Doc. 25) at ¶ 21, entitled "Property of the Estate."
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 11 of 19
Debtor is engaged in business."21 There is simply no doubt that Mrs. Davenport was
barred from selling her 1/6 interest without court approval, and there is also no doubt
that the Davenports were prohibited from spending the KDOT money without court
approval, since they had not completed their plan and there had been no final report
at the time of the sale or disposal of the funds. The money was not theirs to spend.
Their protestations that they did not know this was not their money to spend are belied
by the language contained in their own plans and in the confirmation order.
I also disagree with the Davenports' claim that because the State of Kansas
approached them to purchase land as an initial step to a condemnation proceeding,
they had no choice but to sell and were thus not required to obtain Court approval.
First, the Davenports presented no evidence that the land ever went into condemnation
proceedings. Instead, the evidence showed that the sale to KDOT was purely
voluntary. Although KDOT could have commenced a condemnation proceeding had the
Davenports declined to sell, it never got that far. Second, the Davenports' appropriate
request for court approval of the sale would have given the Court, the Trustee, and all
creditors not only the ability to ensure that the Davenports had negotiated a
reasonable price for this estate asset, but also the ability to ensure that the proceeds
of the sale were properly administered.
By failing to seek and obtain the required court approval, or to even
affirmatively inform the court or the Trustee of the sale, the Davenports gave
21 Order Confirming Plan (Doc. 39) ¶ 5.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 12 of 19
themselves a 4-5 month head start that allowed them to spend nearly all of the
proceeds before the Trustee learned of the sale through a routine review of tax
returns.22 Had the Davenports complied with their clear responsibilities, the Trustee
would have been in a position to ensure that all the proceeds from the land sale were
accounted for in the new best interest of the creditors analysis.
Instead, by the time the Trustee made this discovery and filed his motion, the
Davenports had depleted almost $100,000 of estate assets.23 In addition, even after the
motion seeking turnover was filed in May 2011, Debtors elected to continue to spend
the money they were now on very clear notice that the Trustee believed was not theirs
to spend. And although the money was spent over a short period of time, Mrs.
Davenport was a poor historian and record keeper of when (and how) all the money
was spent. She admitted that even after the motion for turnover was filed, they spent
over $4100 on repairs and $12,700 plus $800 on the new car, tires and service, but she
could not remember what else they had purchased with the funds after May 2011. She
did, however, admit that even more was spent after the Trustee filed the motion.
Based on the fact Debtors elected to go on a spending spree with money that was
not theirs to spend, simply requiring Debtors to turnover the $15,000 remaining for a
re-calculation of the best interest of the creditors test is insufficient to remedy the
22 The Davenports received the settlement from her father's estate in December 2010and the Trustee's motion for turnover was filed in May 2011.
23 Debtors' Exhibit 26 indicated they had to pay $19,000 tax on money received, leavingapproximately $113,000 as estate assets.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 13 of 19
damage caused directly by the Davenports. Had they sought court approval of the sale,
all of the net proceeds would have been available for that best interest of creditors
analysis instead of merely $15,000. But the evidence shows the rest is gone, and
ordering turnover of the full amount would be futile, since there is no evidence they
have the ability to repay that full amount. Therefore, I will order the immediate
turnover of the remaining $15,000 the Davenports testified they still had in their bank
account, and which I directed them not to spend pending further order.24 Although this
turnover does not make the estate whole for the Davenports' actions, it will provide at
least some relief to the unsecured creditors.25
C. The Davenports' defenses are unpersuasive.
The Davenports filed a brief in opposition to the motions to compel turnover and
to amend the Chapter 13 plan. In that brief, they attempted to distinguish
Auernheimer, and also claimed that the Trustee should be estopped from attempting
to collect the proceeds from the sale of the land under the principle of equitable
First, the Davenports' attempt to distinguish Auernheimer is not persuasive.
Rather than addressing, or even mentioning, the legal basis for the decision, the
Davenports focus entirely on what they perceive to be procedural flaws unique to that
24 This decision requiring turnover of the $15,000 remaining from the sale of the landis without prejudice to the Trustee seeking additional remedies in light of the evidencereceived at trial, or otherwise.
25 In fact, it should result in more than a 50% dividend to those unsecured creditors
that filed claims in this case.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 14 of 19
case, ill-advised decisions by the debtors' counsel in that case, and the motives of that
Chapter 13 trustee. Although I acknowledge that there are certainly factual differences
between Auernheimer and this case, the legal analysis and holding in Auernheimer are
squarely applicable here. In addition, Auernheimer relied extensively on the line of
cases led by In re Barbosa, the facts of which are nearly indistinguishable from ours
(minus the elements of bad faith that exist with the Davenports' actions).
Similarly, I find that the Davenports' contention that the Trustee should be
equitably estopped from pursuing these funds is entirely without merit. First, this
argument is based on the Trustee's alleged "abandonment" of the property at the first
meeting of creditors. As the Trustee explained during his testimony, he did not
abandon the property. Instead, he informed the Davenports that they could not
abandon the property to him to liquidate and administer for the benefit of the
creditors—as was provided in the Davenports' initial Chapter 13 plan—because he is
not an operating trustee. The Trustee informed the Davenports that the amount they
proposed to pay to unsecured creditors, as required by Form B22, was sufficient to
satisfy the best interest of the creditors test given the value of the land at that time.26
I find nothing improper about the information provided by the Trustee to the
Davenports, and the Davenports elected to amend their plan instead of litigating that
26 The Amended B22C calculations (Doc. 47), filed on March 27, 2009, show that theDavenports' monthly disposable income available for general unsecured creditors was $196.41per month, or $11,784.60 over the life of the 60 month plan.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 15 of 19
Second, because equitable estoppel is based in a court's equitable powers, the
doctrine of unclean hands is applicable. "The clean hands doctrine is based on the
maxim that one who seeks equity must not himself be guilty of inequitable conduct."27
As noted by the Kansas Supreme Court:
"It should also be emphasized that in applying the clean hands maxim,
courts are concerned primarily with their own integrity. The doctrine ofunclean hands is derived from the unwillingness of a court to give itspeculiar relief to a suitor who in the very controversy has so conductedhimself as to shock the moral sensibilities of the judge. It has nothing todo with the rights or liabilities of the parties. In applying the uncleanhands doctrine, courts act for their own protection, and not as a matterof 'defense' to the defendant."28
I find the Davenports' decision to spend these estate assets, especially after the Trustee
filed his motion for turnover, simply inexcusable.
When they filed this case, the Davenports reported their total liabilities to all
creditors at approximately $92,500. Their net monthly income was $3,566.66
(approximately $42,800 per year), and they had monthly expenses of $2,247. In
contrast, after deducting taxes, the Davenports received almost $114,000 from the land
sale. That is equivalent to two and one-half year's income for these Debtors. They could
have paid 100% of their claims, which totaled $89,596, and still emerged from under
27 Cox v. Countrywide Home Loans (In re Cox), 408 B.R. 407, 417 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2009)
(citing Fuqua v. Hanson, 222 Kan. 653, 656-57 (1977)).
28 Id. at 418 (quoting Green v. Higgins, 217 Kan. 217, 221 (1975)).
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 16 of 19
this Chapter 13 proceeding completely debt free (including their home and two or three
cars), and still had $24,000 (or over six months of net income) remaining.29
But that was not how the Davenports elected to proceed. Instead, they took a
vacation in Hawaii, purchased a newer vehicle, fixed up their home, built an expensive
garden shed, bought new furniture and high-end appliances, and even used some of the
proceeds to make their Chapter 13 plan payments and cover their monthly living
expenses—begging the question what they did with their ordinary monthly income of
at least $2,225.30
In approximately eleven months, the Davenports managed to spend almost
$100,000 from the sale of the land, plus at least $24,475 from their ordinary earnings
(not counting any amount earned by Mr. Davenport as a part time bus driver). The
only effort they made to pay any of this windfall to their creditors was to make their
required monthly Chapter 13 plan payments in a total amount of $14,850.
29 They likely would have had significantly more than that, because the Trustee's
Interim Report (Doc. 71) dated August 2, 2011 shows the Trustee has paid claims of $41,995.
30 I understand that the Davenports' income has decreased somewhat since the filingof this case, but the evidence showed that Mrs. Davenport is still bringing home approximately$1,300 per month from her employment and Mr. Davenport is receiving $925 per month in SSIplus additional income from a driving a bus part time. Frankly, one would think in light ofthese financial problems, which they knew of when they made these spending decisions, thewiser course of action would have been to file a motion to use some of the windfall on anythingthey could demonstrate was necessary, and turn over the rest to the estate. It is hard to feelsorry for the situation the Debtors find themselves in, especially in light of their poor,
voluntary choices.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 17 of 19
To make matters worse, the Davenports did not inform the Court or the Trustee
of the sale of this land or seek the required Court approval. This deprived the Trustee
and creditors of the ability to capture more of the funds for the benefit of creditors.
The Davenports are, in no way, entitled to the Court's equity under these facts.
Their contention that the Trustee's decision to not sell the land at the outset of this
case should in some way prevent him from now seeking to claim the property for the
bankruptcy estate is unpersuasive.
III. Conclusion
Debtors, Larry and Freda Davenport, are like the children who have been
caught eating the prohibited cookies from the family cookie jar. Although at the point
they were caught they had eaten 90% of the cookies, they wish to eat the few that
remain even though that will deprive the rest of the family of their share. This I will
not, and cannot, allow.
It is, therefore, by the Court ordered that the Trustee's Motion to Compel
Debtors to Turnover Proceeds from Sale of Property is granted in part. Debtors are
ordered to forthwith turn over $15,000 to the Trustee. The rest of that motion is denied
because $15,000 is the only portion of the proceeds that remain liquid, and the Trustee
has not sought other relief regarding assets purchased with the remaining funds.
It is further ordered that the Trustee's Motion for Post Confirmation
Amendment of Plan is denied, except for granting the request to amend the plan to
require Debtors to immediately pay $15,000 to the Trustee for distribution to
unsecured claims and administrative expenses.
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 18 of 19
# # #
Case 08-41213 Doc# 92 Filed 12/07/11 Page 19 of 19


text:
The Zone System was originally used with B&W film photography. With colour digital photography, though, couldn't you get much the same results by keeping an eye on the histogram? I think I might have missed the point, so let's ask: would I gain anything by learning to use the Zone System with my DSLR?
I'd say it's worth it. My friend Nick has written a fairly decent overview of the zone system which uses an example that was taken in colour on his digital SLR.
The wikipedia article on this has some good information. Basically, yes, it is probably still worth the time to learn the system, but you probably won't use it in it's original form. The Zone system will tell you what the exposure and dynamic range should be, and the histogram will tell you what the exposure and dynamic range is. The benefit is in knowing the difference between the expected and actual results, which allows you to adjust to get what you want.
Learn the system, it's a way of seeing. It'll make you a better photographer overall, even if you never shoot black and white.
Search Amazon, there are books about using the zone system with digital cameras and colour photography.
The complete zone system is a method for controlling the contrast in photography by adjusting development of film versus final print contrast using an enlarger and paper printing. Aside from it's historical significance in the history of photography, it has no bearing in digital photography. Contrast and tone value, to some extent, is independant of camera exposure values. All one really needs to do today is keep the highlights from blowing out, beyond that all the variables ansel had to control so tightly, are simple sliders in post processing.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
I suddenly found an enchanted bow with Power I in my inventory. I did not craft it myself since I don't have an enchantment table. I'm playing on a private server with 2-3 friends and none of them made one either. And I'm pretty sure I did not find it in a chest somewhere. I just randomly found it. Lucky me! Now I would like to know where it came from :)
- Can mobs drop special items?
- If so, at what rate does it happen?


text:
The function $f(x) = e^{-x^2}$ has a bell-shaped peak at $x=0$ and then approaches an asymptote at $y=0$. I need to achieve a similar result, but with a polynomial function.
I can use a series approximation of $e^{-x^2}$: $$1 - x^2 + \frac{x^4}2 - \frac{x^6}6 + \cdots,$$ but I need my function to be accurate over the domain of $[-20000, 20000]$, which for this method requires a polynomial of a very high degree.
How can I create a polynomial function of the lowest degree where the area under the curve from $x=-2$ to $2$ accounts for 99% of the total area on the domain of $x= -20000$ to $20000$?
Some additional background info:
My intention is to investigate the feasibility of a type of additive sound synthesis wherein the sine waves are not stored as discrete waves, but instead as a spectrogram that represents the amplitude of each partial within the signal and converting that directly into the resulting waveform, which allows for evaluating the partials by only calculating the sine of one angle, no matter how many partials there are.
So the first thing I need is a function that peaks at a specified input value and quickly drops to near-zero, which I'll call $R(f)$. Each partial will also be capable of changing amplitude and frequency over time, so each partial, p will be represented by $A_p(t)R(f_p(t))$, where $A_p(t)$ represents the amplitude of the partial at time t and $f_p(t)$ represents its frequency.
Now what we do is add several of these together to get a function where each x-value corresponds to a frequency and the y-values correspond to its amplitude: $y(f) = \sum_{p=1}^n R_p(f)$
Finally, to obtain the waveform, multiply by $\sin(2\pi f t)$ and integrate with respect to f and sample to result at distinct values of t to recreate the waveform: $\int_0^{20000} y(f) sin(2\pi f t) df$ (20000Hz is about the limit of human hearing)
Some interesting things happen if $R(f)$ can be represented as a polynomial of f. Namely, y(f) will also be a polynomial of f of the same degree. Then if we instead approximate its multiplication by $sin(2\pi f t)$ with another polynomial function, evaluating the integral is trivial. There are some optimizations that can be applied to make this not so computationally demanding. For example, if we assume that the amplitude and frequency of the partials remain fairly constant, the integral can instead be evaluated by integrating by parts and only recalculating the value given by the part involving y(f) every few-hundred samples.
Now if you're wondering why I need the function to be valid from -20000 to 20000, that's because a function peaking at +20000 must still be near-zero at x=0, 20000 units to the left and when centered at x=0, in should be near-zero 20000 units to the right. So the function should extend 20000 units on either side.
Also, the requirement for 99% of the area to be within $[-2, 2]$ comes from the fact that each partial should ideally be just 1 frequency. In the case of it actually being spread across a full 4Hz, it creates an interference pattern with itself that causes its amplitude to be modulated in undesirable ways, although it can be somewhat countered by an intelligent $A_p(t)$


text:
Workflow TV - Lab Introduction to WF4: Exercise 7 - If/Else Logic
- Posted: Jul 22, 2010 at 2:05PM
- 10,897 views
- 6 comments
Loading user information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading user information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click "Save as…"
In this exercise, you will modify your SayHello activity to provide a generic greeting if the name is blank, otherwise it will provide a personalized greeting. The requirements for the SayHello activity are now
Intro To WF4 Hands On Lab (Visual Studio Gallery)
Intro To WF4 Hands On Lab (MSDN Code Gallery)
Lab Exercises
Oops, something didn't work.
Solid introductory series overall. If you guys do future WF series, it would be interesting to see labs like this on WCF+WF and maybe even the various testing options available.
Thanks - I'm already working on some others like this. Please take a moment to go to Visual Studio Gallery and Rate/Review the lab - that will help to insure that we can do more of these.
Will there be any lab on hosting workflow or communication services on AppFabric? As there is ISS Express for easing the development/debugging process in VS2010, will there be an AppFabric Express also? Is there any way of turning the bottom right webcam off. Watching such webcasts (tutorials) at office are allowed but webcam catches so much attention.
Yes - I'm going to update the Workflow Services lab. I don't know about an AppFabric Express.
As for the webcam in the picture - there is no way for you to turn this off. I've tried different strategies with this. There are basically 3 options
I've gone with option 1 because it is less work
However I'd be interested in the feedback - if you think that option 2 or 3 would be better let me know.
Ron, great work. A lot of time and work went into that, and it was most helpful.
For an upcoming project, I can see where WF4 would make a lot of sense, however this is not exactly an enterprise client and would need to run in a very sparse environment ... web server, db and whater-hosts-the-work-flow on the same machine. Given that, what would you recommend to host the workflow? A Windows Service? Something else?
Also, you're using Microsoft Blueprints and the Guidance Browser. They seem to have taken it off of Codeplex. Anywhere that can still be downloaded? I create tutorials for developers (even have created some for Microsoft) and would like to see how to deliver training using that tool.
Thanks again, and please continue to create this level of quality in upcoming lessons!
Blueprints is now known as Feature Builder Power Tool
I prefer hosting workflows in IIS where possible - that is how you will get the maximum benefit of AppFabric.
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums, or Contact Us and let us know.


text:
LORENA (November 28, 2012)—A construction crew hit a steel-encased 12-inch water main under Interstate 35 Wednesday, leaving schools daycares, homes and businesses west of the highway in Lorena without water.
Several hundred people were affected, Lorena's city manager said.
The crew struck the line at around 10:30 a.m. Wednesday near exit 322.
Water service was restored Wednesday night, but a boil order issued early Wednesday evening remains in effect for water customers who live west of Interstate 35.
Water intended for consumption, cooking or ice making should be boiled vigorously before use.


text: Clarissa Whiteman, 9, of Tiltonsville watched with volunteer Bobby Taylor of Hopedale as her cousin, Hainiah Crowe, 4, of Keyser, careens down an inflatable slide before going down the slide herself at the Ohio Valley Down Syndrome Support Group's 11th Annual Buddy Walk Saturday at Jim Wood Park. More than 500 participated in the event, which was held to encourage everyone to include and accept children and adults with Down Syndrome in everyday life. In addition to taking laps around the park's walking track, adults and children enjoyed games, music, pumpkin painting, door prizes and a Chinese auction. The Jefferson County Sheriff's Department also was on hand to fingerprint children and Sheriff Fred Abdalla presented medals to children with Down Syndrome participating in the walk. — Warren Scott


text:
9 Predictions for This Year's Super Bowl Broadcast
Prediction 1 Phil Simms, Jim Nantz or both will exaggerate how many people are watching.
Analysis: You hear it every year: "Welcome to the Super Bowl, currently being watched by all 6 billion human beings on planet Earth." Even putting aside various Third World regions of our planet where people don't "gather 'round the TV" so much as swat flies and eat each other's hair, that still leaves Europe. These are people brought up on a sport where the only thing standing between a player and a broken thighbone are a pair of snug shorts. Helmets, pads and mandatory 35-second breaks between plays are a hard sell.
Odds Super Bowl XLI Commentators Phil Simms and Jim Nantz Will Exaggerate The Ratings: 3:1The fact that most countries don't have running water, let alone reliable Nielson ratings, enables network executives to pretend that everyone in Darfur is watching the game on a high-def plasma screen on wheels instead of completing their 14-day trek to a UN refugee camp. Much like the idea of the Texans ever winning a Super Bowl, it theoretically could be true, but that doesn't make it any less stupid to say out loud.
Prediction 2 Jim Nantz or Phil Simms will make a huge deal about the fighter jet flyover during the national anthem.
Analysis: Sure, it's probably spectacular if you're actually there. For the 6 billion of us watching on TV, though, nothing's quite as underwhelming as two stationary, screeching specks hovering in the sky above the stadium. Those jets look like they're traveling at about three miles per hour, tops—so it's a mystery why, every year, whoever's doing the game gets misty-eyed describing the scene. Maybe they're considering how colossally fucked we'd all be if we ever had to get in an air battle with those alien planes from Independence Day.
Odds Jim Nantz Will Do It in XLI: 5:1Football commentators love to use military terminology and compare football to all-out warfare. And what better place to start than by describing actual fighter jets?
Prediction 3 Phil Simms will compare whatever team is winning to the Giants team he took to the Super Bowl.
Analysis: It's a scientific fact: once a fan's actually gone to a live Super Bowl, they will be physically incapable of watching subsequent Super Bowls on TV without mentioning the one they went to three or four times an hour. Take this phenomenon, and now throw into the mix a player who won MVP honors in Super Bowl XXI, who's been asked to watch the upcoming Super Bowl with a microphone in his face the entire time. Basically, it'll be a lot like asking John Goodman to describe his thoughts on eating steak—chances are he has a wealth of knowledge on the topic.
Odds He'll Name Drop Ex-Teammate Mark Bavaro: 7:1
Odds Anyone Remembers Who the Hell Mark Bavaro Is: 100:1


text:
Joseph A. Kowalec Jr.
Burgess for Bantam
Joe was born to Joseph Kowalec and Genivieve Olander on Dec. 29, 1940, in Bristol, Conn. Joe attended Bristol schools and enlisted in the Army after graduation, serving most of his time in Panama. After leaving the Army, he went to work for Kimberly working there until his retirement in 1995. He enjoyed being part of the First Litchfield Artillery; his specialty being the creation of the projectiles that lead the First Litchfield Artillery to many awards. Joe was ever the fixer – had the mechanical ability to figure out the fix or the creation of just about anything just by looking at it or drawing it out.
Joe served many years as a burgess for the Borough of Bantam and was instrumental in the rebuilding of the town hall after the tornado of 1989. In his retirement, he was able to split his time between his home in Ocala, Fla., and Bantam, Conn. While in Connecticut he enjoyed attending many of the local fairs to catch the "tractor pulls" and "eat" his way through the fair.
He will be best remembered for his sense of humor, practical jokes, uncanny mechanical ability, his French toast on Christmas morning and bizarre culinary combinations. He was an animal lover of all creatures and he was loved by them as well. No matter how many times he would say "no more!" to the many strays brought home, they were always welcomed.
He is survived by his loving partner and wife, Toni (Brown) Kowalec. They enjoyed 40 wonderful years together. He is also survived by his children, Joseph Kowalec III of Washington Depot, Jacqueline Lombardi of Hartford, and Justin Kowalec and his wife, Christina, of Rocky Hill, Stephen Partrick of Sandy Hook, and Lisa Partrick of Litchfield. He is survived by four grandchildren, Jennifer Lombardi of Glastonbury, Jonathon Lombardi of Torrington, Cameron Partrick of Sandy Hook, and Catherine Partrick of Litchfield who gave him much joy and love. He had a beautiful and special relationship with his granddaughter, Catherine, who was his sunshine and partner in crime doing all they could to drive Nana crazy. He is survived by two brothers, Raymond Kowalec of Harwinton, Andrew (Sam) Kowalec and his wife, Nancy, of Bristol, and two sisters, Carol Anderson and her husband, Bill, of Bristol, and Beverly Knox and her husband, Louie, of Bristol. He is survived by several nieces and nephews. He is also survived by many friends who will miss him terribly. He was predeceased by his parents and his brother, Gregory.
A funeral service will be held at 11 a.m. on Saturday, Jan. 5, 2013, at St. Michael's Episcopal Church, 25 South St., Litchfield. Burial will follow in Bantam Cemetery. Friends and family may call on Friday, Jan. 4, from 5 to 7 p.m. at Rowe Funeral Home, 283 Torrington Road, Litchfield.
Memorial contributions can be made to the Bantam Volunteer Fire Department, 92 Doyle Road, Bantam, Conn.
To send an online condolence to the family, kindly visit www.rowefuneralhome.net.
Follow Us
Post a comment
We encourage your feedback and dialog.
Please be civil and respectful.
If you're witty, to the point and quotable, your reader comments may also be included on the Around the Towns page of The Sunday Republican.
Registered users comments will be posted automatically.
All other comments will be reviewed by our staff before appearing on the Web site. Click Here to register.
Please be civil and respectful.
If you're witty, to the point and quotable, your reader comments may also be included on the Around the Towns page of The Sunday Republican.
Registered users comments will be posted automatically.
All other comments will be reviewed by our staff before appearing on the Web site. Click Here to register.
Colleen Peter wrote on Jan 2, 2013 9:18 AM:
" Joe, we will all miss you terribly. Your wit, warmth, and wisdom brightened the lives of everyone around you. You had the unique ability to make everyone around you feel safe--no problems (especially mechanical misadventures!) were too big or too small for you to fix. We know you'll continue to be nearby, looking out for everyone (especially Cat). XOXO "
Maureen Stockwell wrote on Jan 2, 2013 7:39 PM:
" I am so fortunate to have been welcomed as the new accross the street neighbor (in 1996) when I had left the lights on in my car....from then on I felt like he was a guardian angel....his help encouragement guidance and humor was ever ready ....he loved his family dearly....I so enjoyed the car he built for Catherine.....I will miss him......... "
July 28th, 2016
July 27th, 2016
July 26th, 2016
July 25th, 2016
July 24th, 2016
July 23rd, 2016
July 22nd, 2016
July 21st, 2016
July 20th, 2016
July 19th, 2016
July 18th, 2016


text:
Shop Swap
Project Name
Jarrod Hicks firstname.lastname@example.com
I propose to switch the location of the Church classroom and the Dirty Shop.
What Will Be Done
See Drawings.
File:Noisebridge - Sheet - A501 - Shop Swap.pdf
Enclose (E) Church classroom, move sliding door from (E) shop to (N) enclosing wall. Remove rear door in turing and fill in wall. Move Shop equipment and case work to shop. Install electrical and ventilation equipment (TBD). Fill in slider opening to (N) Church. Install door from Turing in (N) Church. Finish and Paint walls in (N) Church. Move classroom equipment to (N) Church.
The church room is 27' long 16' wide and 12' tall. Wall perimeter = 86 Ft. Wall area = 1032 SqFt.
In terms of soundproofing the shop I expect I could: add soundproofing material to the walls, fur them out them out hat channel, and add a 5/8 layer of sheetrock. If we can soundproof:
Pricing Estimates:
Expensive Option
7/8" Drywall Furring Channel: $9.95 per 12' length. Placed 16" on center to hang 5/8" sheetrock. Estimate 9 rows. 9 x 86 = 774' >> min. 65 lengths = $650.00
dB-Bloc: ultra thin, ultra dense soundproofing membrane. 54" x 30' rolls (135 SqFt) Min 8 rolls at $300.00 per roll = $2400.00
5/8" gypsum board: 8' x 4' piece at 10.00 per. Min 33 pieces = $330.00
Fasteners 100.00
Total 3480.00
So.. I will do more research and see if there is a better solution in terms of price/performance.
Cheaper Option
This appears to be a common strategy. Sound dampening sealant and compound between the existing wall and a new layer of 5/8" sheetrock.
QuietGlue Pro sound dampening compound. 1 five Gallon bucket of compound should cover 12 sheets of gypsum board. 5 Gallon bucket is $200.00, need 3 buckets so $600.00
Green Glue Noiseproofing Sealant - 6 Tubes = 60.00
5/8" gypsum board: 8' x 4' piece at 10.00 per. Min 33 pieces = $330.00
Fasteners 100.00
Total = $1090.00
Fasteners and equipment = $100.00
I also wonder if this will work
Two additional layers of 5/8" sheetrock and sealant.
Green Glue Noiseproofing Sealant - 6 Tubes = 60.00
5/8" gypsum board: 8' x 4' piece at 10.00 per. Min 66 pieces = $660.00
Fasteners 100.00
Total = $820.00
What Areas in the Space Will This Affect
Dirty Shop, Church Classroom
Who Will Be Doing It
Jarrod Hicks, so far.
Why This Will Be Good
We will move the noise of the shop to the perphery of NoiseBridge. The shop will be easier to ventilate using the skylight and east windows. It will be closer to the kitchen for cleanup. Church classroom will be near the entrance making classes in church more visible to attendees and other visitors of the space. We will have more control of lighting and noise levels in the classroom.
Why This Will Be Bad
It will be alot of work. Both rooms will be unuseable during some of the transistion.
Soundproofing and painting the new room will be costly.
How Long Will It Take
Most of the work can be done while Noisebridge is open. Timeline TBD.
In A Fantastic World, What Extra Budget Would You Like
Funds to pay for lumber, sheetrock, paint, electrical equipment, and ventilation fan(s) will be needed. Estimate TBD.
Are There Any Other PFAs This Would Work Well With
Most Likely, specifics to be added.
Are There Any Other PFAs This Would Contradict
Currently Unknown, I will provided updates as needed.


text:
Main Content
Superbe...the composition...
nothing can defeat the beauty of nature, beautiful.
beautiful - would love to have this printed on a giant canvas on my living room wall
Is that a mermaid?
Amazing. One of my favorites.
A beautiful part of the world. Great photo!
cut into 3 parts
the water seems have layers
muy hermoso
realmente muy hermoso
So Lovely and beautiful
Once again a photo that puts humans into perspective when compared to the massive power of the earth. Great photo.
Woooow -_-
Claire comme du crystal...
Inner space...to float weightless in this peaceful, stunning environment.
Wow !!!!
Île Europa Atoll
#Photograph by Thomas Peschak #NatGeo
Beautiful photo.
I like the shot because one can almost sense the weight of the water on the diver. Nice shot.
Most amazing picture i have ever seen in my whole life.Wish i could take a picture like that.
I like summer and freedom
Just... significant photo. The waves underwater look amazing!
Otherworldly,....... the diver appears to be some kind of creature under the sea. A strange blue world there, striking and a little eerie.
A flat tailed sea-cat ?
The blue and bluegreen colors are beautiful in a magnificent photograph. Above the diver it looks like a wall of water is about to come down on him, yet he is in the water! Looking to me like some kind of unknown underwater creature! j.e.s........
Awesome...so beautiful! Thank you..
unbelievable !!!!!
Beautiful scene. Love it. Two thumbs up.
hats off to that diver and the photographer. we all would freaked out over there. Just awesome!!! speechless.
yes impressive....
Impressive, frightening and attractive at the same time.
It feels like summer and freedom
Spectacular ...!!!
I just adore that, what a calm world.The person in the background looks very intriguingly, very good shot !
Oh so amazing
Oh wow, I would freak under such waves. Brilliant photo.
what a beautiful world. thank you for the reminded.
@Liberty Smith You can, you have to be there, of course, but have the camera ready at all times. If you hesitate, the shot is gone, and never to be again. I carry a camera of some quality at all times. Photo's show us things that we can share with anyone, memory is just that.
Browse Photo of the Day Images
Special Offers
National Geographic
Subscribe to National Geographic magazine and save. Print and digital editions available for as little as $12.
Nat Geo Photo Workshops
Shop National Geographic
Victorinox Swiss Champ Multitool


text:
PREVOT, Elizabeth M., 89, of Colliers, WV, formerly of Piney Fork, OH, passed away Monday, December 24, 2012 in the Weirton Medical Center.
Elizabeth was born on August 25, 1923 in Bannock, OH, daughter of the late George and Mary Rickwalter Staso.
Elizabeth was Catholic by faith; a retired LPN Nurse at the former Reynolds Nursing Home in Piney Fork, OH; she was a former member of the CWC of St. Therese Catholic Church and a Life Member of Pine Valley Sportsman's Club.
In addition to her parents, Elizabeth was preceded in death by her husband, Henry J. who passed in 2001; her son Gary who passed in 1966; her sister Helen Malyrick; her five brothers, John, Dick, Jeff, Mike and Emro.
Elizabeth is survived by her two sons, John (Janice) Prevot of Malvern, OH, and Paul (Karron) Prevot of Bowerston, OH; her daughter Mary (Harold) Folden of Colliers, WV., with whom she resided, her twin-sister Marge Dickerson of Cadiz, OH. She also leaves behind her seven grandchildren and 12 great-grandchildren.
Elizabeth's visitation and funeral service will be held on Friday, Dec. 28 where family and friends will gather from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the J.E. Foster Funeral Home in Smithfield, OH. Her funeral service will start at 1 p.m. at the funeral home with Pastor Lori Jones officiating and burial will follow in Northern Cemetery in Smithfield, OH.
Condolences may be offered to the family on our website www.jefosterfh.com


text:
I mostly work on C language for my work. I have faced many issues and spent lot time in debugging issues related to dynamically allocated memory corruption/overwriting. Like malloc(A) A bytes but use write more than A bytes. Towards that i was trying to read few things when i read about :-
1.) An approach wherein one allocates more memory than what is needed. And write some known value/pattern in that extra locations. Then during program execution that pattern should be untouched, else it indicated memory corruption/overwriting. But how does this approach work. Does it mean for every write to that pointer which is allocated using malloc() i should be doing a memory read of the additional sentinel pattern and read for its sanity? That would make my whole program very slow. And to say that we can remove these checks from the release version of the code, is also not fruitful as memory related issues can happen more in 'real scenario'. So can we handle this?
2.) I heard that there is something called HEAP WALKER, which enables programs to detect memory related issues? How can one enable this.
thank you.


text:
Progress Lighting P5550-20 Antique Bronze Ashmore Three Light Ambient Light Pendant
Offer Ends
Technical Specs
|Specification Sheet
|Progress Lighting Catalog
|Base Color
|Black, Bronze
|Bulb Base
|Candelabra (E12)
|Bulb Included
|Bulb Type
|Compact Fluorescent, Incandescent
|Canopy Length
|Canopy Width
|Chain length
|Taper Candle
|Glass Features
|Seedy Glass
|Light Direction
|Ambient Lighting
|Location Rating
|Damp Location
|Number of Bulbs
|Pendant Size
|Mini Pendants
|Pendant Type
|Single Pendant
|Product Weight
|Shade Color
|Shade Shape
|Suggested Room Fit
|UL Listed
|UL Rating
|Damp Location
|Watts Per Bulb
|Wire Length
- Candle covers match fixture finish
- Die cast aluminum construction
- Water-seeded glass panels
- Each glass panel replaceable individually
- Solid brass interior components
- 24" steel painted chain
- Includes 10' of wire
- Matching canopy with mounting strap for outlet box
- Covers standard recessed 4" octagonal outlet box
- Canopy diameter: 5"
- Phenolic candelabra base sockets
- UL-CUL Damp location listed
- Number of Bulbs: 3
- Bulb Base: Candelabra (E12)
- Bulb Type: Incandescent or Fluorescent
- Bulb Included: No
- Watts Per Bulb: 60
- Wattage: 180
- Dimmable: Yes
- Height: 18.75"
- Diameter: 9.63"
- Canopy Length: 5"
- Canopy Width: 5"
- Chain Length: 24
- Wire Length: 120
- UL Listed: Yes
- UL Rating: Damp Location
Additional Progress Lighting Links
- View Manufacturer Warranty
- Shop All Progress Lighting Products
- Shop All Progress Lighting Ashmore Collection Products
Our SKU: P5550
This product is listed under the following manufacturer number(s):
- Antique Bronze
- Cobblestone
- Textured Black
*Denotes a finish or option that has been discontinued
3 Questions from the Community
Lower wattage bulbs can be used with the P5550 unit.
Can lower wattage bulbs be used?
A. Lower wattage bulbs can be used with the P5550 unit.
The Progress Lighting P5550 is a pendant, meaning it hangs from the ceiling. The canopy, which is the plate that's connected to the ceiling, has a 5" diameter.
What is the size of the back plate?
A. The Progress Lighting P5550 is a pendant, meaning it hangs from the ceiling. The canopy, which is the plate that's connected to the ceiling, has a 5" diameter.
This will fit candelabra based bulbs, so you would have to get the candelabra base version of the energy star bulbs for it to work.
can energy star light bulbs be used in this fixture? (I am wondering whether there is room)
A. This will fit candelabra based bulbs, so you would have to get the candelabra base version of the energy star bulbs for it to work.
Product Reviews
Progress Lighting
Progress Lighting Ashmore Collection
Other Products In The Progress Lighting Ashmore Collection
Progress Lighting P5562
Ashmore 2 Light Flush Mount Outdoor Ceiling Fixtur...$128.25-$128.25(3)
Progress Lighting P5250
Ashmore Single Light Path Light$153.09-$153.09
Progress Lighting P2636
Ashmore 2 Light Outdoor Medium Base Bowl Light Kit$102.51-$102.51
Progress Lighting P5450
Ashmore 3 Light Post Light with Seedy Glass Shade ...$306.63-$306.63(1)
Warranty Info
Progress Lighting
1 Year Product Warranty
When properly installed and under normal conditions of use, Progress Lighting, Inc. ("Seller") warrants its manufactured products, including their metal finishes ("Product(s)") will conform to its catalogue specifications and be free from defects in materials or workmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of sale to end user, as specified in Seller's shipment documents for each Product (extended warranties may apply to Seller's fan motors and Energy Star® Products as indicated in Seller's Product manuals). Warping of wooden or plastic blades is not covered by this warranty. This warranty excludes fluorescent ballasts and high intensity discharge (HID) components, and Buyer agrees to make all claims regarding defects or deficiencies therefore according to the warranty of the manufacturer thereof as its sole source of recourse or compensation. Seller's obligations under this warranty and Buyer's sole remedy for its breach to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be limited to the value of the cost of repair or replacement of the Product, pursuant to a written warranty claim validated in writing by Seller. IN NO EVENT SHALL SELLER BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSSES OR ACTUAL DAMAGES TO ANY CLAIMANT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, MULTIPLE, OR OTHER SUCH INDIRECT DAMAGES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOSS OF REVENUES OR PROFITS), WHETHER ARISING OUT OF OR AS A RESULT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT, WARRANTY (EXCEPT THOSE SET FORTH HERIN), TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT OR OTHERWISE. In no case does this warranty extend to anybody other than Seller's customers, and no one is authorized to extend warranties or remedies on Seller's behalf. To be valid, the warranty claim must be made: (a) in writing according to Seller's procedures existing at the time of the claim, (b) within thirty (30) days of discovery of the defect, (c) within the applicable warranty period, and (d) include the dated store receipt or invoice evidencing purchase of the Product. Warranty claims should be sent to: Progress Lighting, Inc., P.O. Box 6701, Greenville, SC 29606. Products may be returned only after a Return Authorization Number has been issued by Seller's customer service department. Any unauthorized return, repair, replacement, modification or misuse of the Products by Buyer shall void the warranty. THIS WARRANTY IS THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR SUCH PRODUCTS, AND IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER EXPRESS AND IMPLIED WARRANTIES. SELLER SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


text:
In many popsci articles it is claimed that String Theory (ST) birthed SUSY. Yet ST was originally invented as a bosons-only theory, that later on brought fermions into the fold. This was only possible After SUSY was incorporated. Hence the old moniker, Superstrings. My understanding is that string theory (ST) is a `house of cards' i.e., collapses & dies if SUSY is falsified. Is this true?
It is crucially important to distinguish between local supersymmetry -- supergravity --and global supersymmetry -- a solution to supergravity which has at least one Killing spinor. What the LHC looked for is the latter. What string theory predicts is the former.
The remarkable story of the superstring goes like this:
First, one should observe that an ordinary spinning particle (e.g. an electron or a quark) in its worldline formulation already has local supersymmetry. Essentially, in 1+0 dimensions there is "not so much room" and putting both bosons and fermions on the worldline in the evident way just happens to enjoy (1+0)-dimensional local supersymmetry, whether one intends this or not, see the references here.
So local worldvolume supersymmetry has been experimentally observed since 1922, when Stern-Gerlach observed spin.
But the worldline supersymmetry of spinning particles turns out to have no implication on their effective second quantized background theories. This changes as we move up in dimension to the string.
Second, mimicking the worldline formulation of the spinning particle and increasing to worldsheet dimenion by one to 1+1, one obtains what was originally indeed called the spinning string, a worldsheet action with bosons and fermions. The latter are such that they induce fermions in the second quantized effective target space theory, which is what is necessary to match observation.
Now, as before for the particle, it turns out that the evident action involving bosons and fermions on the worldsheet already happens to be supersymmetric, whether one intends it or not, there is still not "too much room" in these low dimensions, in a sense. That is how supersymmetry was discovered in the West: people noticed that the "spinning string" worldsheet action just so happens to enjoy a super-extension of the local Poincare-symmetry. Ever since the spinning string is known as the superstring.
And now a miracle happens. As opposed to the spinning particle, the local worldsheet supersymmetry on the string, which is "automatic" in that it is hard to avoid, implies that also its second quantized effective target space theory is locally supersymmetric, that it is supergravity instead of plain gravity, as for the bosonic string.
And this is how string theory predicts local supersymmetry:
In short
So this is generic.
But now low energy global supersymmetry of the kind that the LHC is looking for is a rather different story. A global supersymmetry is a solution to local supersymmnetry, hence to supergravity, which has a global Killing spinor. As in the relation between global supersymmetry and Calabi-Yau manifolds.
The existence of a global Killing spinor in a solution to supergravity is something entirely non-generic. It is the direct super-analog of the existence of a Killing vector, of course. The existence of a Killining vector on spacetime means that spacetime looks the same no matter how far we translate in a certain direction. This is not what one expects to happen generically. The existence of a Killing spinor is like this, but even a bit stronger. There is no a priori reason for this to exist. It could, in some approximation maybe, but there is certainly no principle which would imply that it does.
So global supersymmetry as in the MSSM is a non-generic preservation of a global supersymmetry, which will not be enjoyed by the generic solution to a locally supersymmetric theory. So string theory, which predicts local supersymmetry, does not predict global supersymmetry. Some of its solutions do have global supersymmetry, but generically they do not.
Global supersymmetry instead was motivated phenomenologically. It is/was thought to be phenomenologically suggested by naturality and by gauge coupling unification. Since string theory predicts local supersymmetry, it is able to accomodate for such globally supersymmetric models. But it does not predict them.
For more on this see at String theory FAQ -- Does string theory predict supersymmetry?
"Falsifying supersymmetry" is a phrase that has to be properly qualified. Our ability to falsify with experiment is limited. We can rule out the existence of supersymmetry only at accessible energy/distance/density scales. LHC, for example, is not able to resolve physics at distance scales much smaller than $\frac{\hbar c}{7\mbox{ TeV}} \simeq 300000000000000000 \mbox{ Planck lengths}$. It isn't seeing any supersymmetry, but that doesn't prove that physics isn't supersymmetric at about $1$ Planck length. (It does prove that some theoretical physicists made wrong predictions. Too bad for them. But that's actually what theorists normally do. You're doing quite well if you're right once.)
The existing versions of string theory require supersymmetry at roughly 1 Planck Length. We are not able to do the kind of experiment that rules out supersymmetry at this scale. (I personally find somewhat unconvincing the arguments that the string theories we know of are the only possible kind.)
This isn't true. A counterexample can be constructed as a twist of the heterotic string, including discrete torsion. The resulting theory is a nonsupersymmetric theory, but has no tachyons and is therefore consistent. This is described in Chapter 11 of Polchinski.


text:
We are excited to welcome Matt Brouwer as our guest today! His songs "Sometimes" and "I Shall Believe" are some of our favorites. Any comments for Matt today?
Click the links below to listen to the interview with Matt Brouwer.
Matt Brouwer talks about growing up on a farm, his calling & sings "Sometimes" live
Matt talks about meeting Chris Tomlin in Houston & about his mission trip to Guatemala
Matt talks about the differences between the US and Canada
Matt talks about Tim Hortons
Now Playing: Mighty To Save
Artist: Michael W. Smith
On-Air: Kelli Caldwell
Thanks for listening to the Scott and Kelli Show! You can listen online weekdays from 5-9pm Eastern at www.klove.com/listen.
Like Us
Scott Smith
Kelli Caldwell


text:
Stroller footmuff inspired by New Zealand's natural environment.
Not currently available in this region.
stand out features:
- luxury duck down and feather fill inner
- the ultimate in comfort and warmth for your baby
- elasticated hood - no exposed cords
- front opening for a more comfortable fit
- non-slip exterior grip pads
- enhanced durablity in high-wear spots
- safety harness compatible
- zip front pocket for small objects
- base opening for ventilation in changeable weather
- hidden zipper to eliminate drafts


text:
Details are available on our website: http://www.sigames.com/news/14114/Fo...+Android+debut
GooglePlay link - http://bit.ly/Iz05nq
Details are available on our website: http://www.sigames.com/news/14114/Fo...+Android+debut
GooglePlay link - http://bit.ly/Iz05nq
Last edited by Marc Vaughan; 11-04-2012 at 15:51.
Just to clarify from the press release - it'll work on any Android device which is Android 2.2 and above WITH a resolution of at least 480x320 (most Android phones are above this but there are a very few below it so its worth mentioning imho).
best decision ever!!!
i had sold my laptop so hadntbeen able to play fm
now i can play on my phone or tablet
well done for seeing how good android is lol
Any chance FM researchers get a free copy?
Nice work, looking forward to playing FM all day, all night. Literally.
How many Football Manager options are actually available on handheld devices? I am aware that it is a stripped-down version but what it's like?
(you have fairly deep training, tactics and transfer options but not the minutae of items which are present in the PC game)
Glad I didn't buy FMHi12 if it's coming to Android soon
Can't wait, but the timings wrong being released just weeks before my GCSEs
Awesome!! Cannot wait till next week!!
That was quick! (officially)
Last edited by atcdelay; 05-04-2012 at 15:54.
if only the pc game was still like that, please keep it like that forever, sorry this is @marcvaughan
Omg mark and the development team you are GODS! Will it work on my galaxy tab 10.1? If not I have my desire HD! So pumped for this!
Great news for si and android users, but don't forget about the more important iDevices Oh and the PSP
yessssss finally i'll be able to play something in school.
Ah sweet that'll be good for when I'm bored at work. Will I have to pay for it once or twice?
I have never encountered an Android app/game where you had to pay twice to have the game running across 2 devices. Apps/games are usually tied to your Google account, not device. I assume this would be the same with FMH?
this was a question tht I have already found out.
Last edited by ri916; 06-04-2012 at 13:57.
So when we were all pleading on the android thread, the crafty development team were already hard at work on it?
Best News Ever!! Well done SI :-)
(my mum taught me to be a good boy and not lie .... but I'm allowed subtle misdirection )
Haha very sly mark, roll on Wednesday!!! What time will it roughly be available from?
Marc** stupid auto spell
Will it be the same on tablets as on phones, or do you use the additional space for a more detailed UI?
(the main thing for the initial release was to get the game ready, stable, playable and 'fun' tbh - something I'm pleased to say we've done )
How difficult was it in the end to move it onto Android? I'm intrigued lol, even though you were playing us the entire time. I'm just curious how you got around the different versions each manufacturer has of Android?
(with regards to specific issues with manufacturers, versions etc. - I won't go into detail but there were a fair few 'surprises', some nice ... some not so much )
I'm really pleased with how the game has turned out and I've learnt a heck of a lot about the platform while doing it and am confident that a lot more functionality can be shoehorned onto the platform going forward as I continue to experiment with it ...
I don't read/post on here that much, so my apologies if this question has been asked, but with tablets becoming more powerful, especially with the dual and quad core devices out there, is it reasonable to say we will be seeing a 3D match engine anytime soon or is this not feasible at the moment?
Appreciate all the hard work you put in to getting the Android version of this out there, i've been a fan of this game since the original Amiga 500 release back in the early 90's, back in the days of the great Darius Spetyla and Nii Lamptey. Amazing how much the game has evolved since then.
AAAAAAAAAA finally!! will it work on my Motorola Droid RAZR and Motorola Xoom?!
One last question from me. Can I play as my local team Truro City who play in the conference south?
Yes you can. It includes the same leagues as iOS.
http://Vibe.Community - Football Manager Mobile Discussions, Downloads, Help and Guides.
Thanks for the info, I'm not sure what leagues iOS has, never owned anything apple, not my cup of tea. Looking forward to dominating the prem with Truro haha
Australia - A League
Belgium - Division 1, Division 2
Brazil - Serie A, Serie B
England - Premier League, Championship, League 1, League 2, Blue Square Premier, Blue Square South, Blue Square North
France - Ligue 1, Ligue 2, National
Germany - Bundesliga, Bundesliga 2, 3. Bundesliga
Holland - Eredivisie, Eerste Divisie
Italy - Serie A, Serie B, Serie C1 (4 divisions)
Portugal - Division 1, Division 2
Scotland - SPL, Division 1, Division 2, Division 3
Spain - Liga BBVA, Liga Adalente, Liga 3 (3/4 divisions)
Wales - Premier League
Apologies for the names/any I may have missed I did it off the top of my head.
http://Vibe.Community - Football Manager Mobile Discussions, Downloads, Help and Guides.
Its got all the decent leagues so I'm happy. Roll on Wednesday!
I'm really really really bad at making jokes ..
(MV - Edited to prevent instaban from occuring, be sensible in future please)
Last edited by Marc Vaughan; 07-04-2012 at 18:47.
Will it be possible to sync a game between two devices? Perhaps using Dropbox and/or Tasker?
@ conchie, same here, i actuallly sold my laptop and ended my love affair with fm, for me it was becoming too much, i then fell in love with android, and even better i can now have both again lol
(in a similar way you'll be able to swap tactics, shortlists and suchlike if you want to - either between your own devices or with friends)
If a save game just consists of one file and the save location can be customised then dropbox should be able to do it no problem.
I provide what people want, it is a popular file so I get members in by giving it them . Cheers for the answer, I will get someone to try on release day and tell you.
http://Vibe.Community - Football Manager Mobile Discussions, Downloads, Help and Guides.
Marc, is there any option to test the bèta version of FMH. Just can't wait to play it, and if there are some issues I can give some feedback. Thanks in advance! Cheers
This is sensational news, i have to admit to being very jaded reading all the previous threads about it not being likely for the moment. I hope the demand (almost) crashes the play store!
I don't think I can wait anymore lol
I would expect both games to be extremely similar if not exactly the same. Either way I can't wait :-)
I've been waited so long for this football manager in my android. In FM PC , I played since 2001.
by the way, will this FM work on my LG optimus black?
Thank you for the answer
(it hasn't to my knowledge been tested specifically on that device - but I'm very confident it'll work without issue, obviously if anything does play-up then let me know and I'll get things tweaked asap)
Well, damn. Now I have no use for my iPhone!
Galaxy Y has a lower than minimum res, so I imagine it wont work.
"I'm afraid it won't work on that device - as the resolution is below the minimum supported (320x480) sorry.
The main reason is that the vast majority of devices on that resolution have very small screens which wouldn't make the touch input required for the game particularly usable imho, if enough people request it though then I would be open to reconsidering this at some point in the future."
@Neil Train - We do try to make sure the db includes some of the higher reputation and high potential players regardless of which nation you have active. However, as Denmark is not a playable league - the pool of players is likely to be limited in that regard.
The only point stopping you from playing is the screen resolution, otherwise it is very similar to the Galaxy Ace.
Will th dynamic league reputation be in the game? Or in the very least, if I do successful in a league, will the other teams tend to do better as well?
Not entirely related, but I remember on FMHi10 I bought a newport co. player for 1m to see what would happen. They made no further transfers and got relegated again...
Depends entirely on the club, board and situation - with a lot of smaller clubs who might run at a loss and have unambitious chairmen they could well just bank the money against future losses (or to recoup past losses).Not entirely related, but I remember on FMHi10 I bought a newport co. player for 1m to see what would happen. They made no further transfers and got relegated again...
(the manager at the club could have splurged some - but often the clubs in question are at a competant level already and they don't bother to, I can look at making them a bit more agressive in this regard, but the smaller inactive clubs in FMH tend to run a streamlined transfer AI to keep the game processing quickly - as such they aren't as active as clubs in active divisions)
I just tried again on my Luton Town save (FMHi11, y: 2015). I bought a player from AFC Wimbledon for £7.5million (BSP was an active league). They made no other transfers for the whole window, but were correctly called rich. Small clubs surely aren't making losses of 7.5m?
As I said I'll take a look into it ... does sound unusual (although so it could be said is your spending 7.5m on a Blue Square player ).
PS - Do bear in mind that the transfer system has been tweaked a lot since FMHi 2011; so this might already be improved in that version, I can't know 100% if thats the case obviously until I've looked into it, but each update we try and rebalance and improve all of the game engine as much as possible based on the feedback we receive - what you're doing is a very unusual case and I can't honestly remember if its something our QA has covered previously (but will be doing so in the future ).
Last edited by Marc Vaughan; 10-04-2012 at 14:39.
Marc, FMH 2012 will be available on Google Play tonight, after 12pm or tommorow in the day?
No chance of an early release then? *whistles*
I haven't played much FM lately, I've got too little time and when I do get playing, it feels like too much so this should be perfect.
You're in Florida now? Don't you have to abandon your interest and knowledge of football at customs?
Release it now, you'll have your whole evening to do super fun support!
I don't think it is Marc's choice and even if it was he's too busy crying in a corner at Brighton losing .
http://Vibe.Community - Football Manager Mobile Discussions, Downloads, Help and Guides.
You'd better lose that game, otherwise I'll get angry xD
Can't wait till release tomorrow, should be ace! Also means I can finally put my iPod to rest as it's only use is FMHi.
At this rate Liverpool are going to have a greyed out, made up player as our sub keeper in the semifinal
Edit: Oh bl***y hell Jones!!
Last edited by Quboid; 10-04-2012 at 20:31.
Out of curiosity, will this be shipping with two databases?
(Oh, and I'm still liking the score =])
Will there be the ability to have the original database as well? I generally prefer playing on that one :P
Will there be a pre-game editor?
No there won't but you could always start a save, save the game and load it into the FMHVibe Save Editor.
http://Vibe.Community - Football Manager Mobile Discussions, Downloads, Help and Guides.
Will the player ratings /stats be identicle to the PC version or different
Sigames doesn't seem to be working at the mo? When is the store meant to update?
until no in google play . when we finally will have Football Manager ?


text:
In the beginning of 2005, Volvo introduced its most powerful North American truck model ever: the VT880. The new premium truck was mainly intended for the most demanding customers, like Owner Operators who live in their trucks for long periods of time and who demand performance which minimize the transport time through a very high average speed, even in hilly landscapes and with fully loaded vehicles.
The VT880 were based on the same chassis and cab components as the Volvo 780, which was previously the most spacious and ergonomic truck ever built by Volvo. But the front design, with an impressive bonnet which combines good aerodynamics with a grille which provides very good airflow for the radiator, in order to give good cooling abilities for the very powerful engine.
A spacious sleeper cab
Initially, Volvo launched the VT880, with a very spacious sleeper cab giving enough interior space for the driver and his co-driver, as well as an office option during transport operations spanning several days or weeks. Later, complimentary versions of the VT truck range were presented: the VT800, featuring a daycab for demanding transport tasks where overnight accommodations not needed, and the VT830, with a lower sleeper cab, contributing to good aerodynamics while still preserving good driver´s (and sleeping) environments.
The VT trucks featured (for the first time in a Volvo truck in North America) the powerful 16-litre engine, the same as in Volvo´s premium European truck; the FH16. This power option combines very high performance with the prestige of Volvo´s premium truck engine.
The VT is exclusive intended for highway operation, as a three-axle 6x4 tractor for semitrailers.


text: Historians, politicians, feminists, critics, and reviewers everywhere have praised Blanche Wiesen Cook's monumental Eleanor Roosevelt as the definitive portrait of this towering female figure of the twentieth century. Now in her long-awaited, majestic second volume, Cook takes readers through the tumultuous era of the Great Depression, the New Deal, and the gathering storms of World War II, the years of the Roosevelts' greatest challenges and finest achievements. In her remarkably engaging narrative, Cook gives us the complete Eleanor Roosevelt— an adventurous, romantic woman, a devoted wife and mother, and a visionary policymaker and social activist who often took unpopular stands, counter to her husband's policies, especially on issues such as racial justice and women's rights. A biography of scholarship and daring, it is a book for all readers of American history.


text:
6 Ways to Make Waves
Think a curling iron is just for curling your hair? How quaint. The newest models have more bells and whistles than a Brazilian carnival. Here's how to tell which ones you need.
- Keywords
- Jessica Alba,
- Sultra,
- Salma Hayek,
- Kate Bosworth,
- Tigi Bed Head,
- Remington,
- Reese Witherspoon,
- Goody


text:
8 Apr 2009 12:35 AM #11
Hello Arnold!
your extension is really great! It is almost exactly what I was searching for (and could not easily figure out how to do it). So you helped me very much.
I have a few suggestions for future development:
1, extract() works for standalone checkboxes and radio buttons, but only gets values true/false. Example: I have 3 radios named "fldA" and the third one is checked: extract() will return: {fldA:[false,false,true]}. Config option "inputValue" of the radios is not taken into account. (Compared to Ext.form.BasicForm.getValues(), which will for 3 radios return one string value specified by "inputValue" of the checked radio field.)
2, radios wrapped in Ext.form.RadioGroup are not be included in extract(). Same for CheckBoxGroup. Although I don't need "dynamic" checkboxes/radios it would be nice if extract/populate could support them.
3, horizontal alignment of the plus/minus icons doesn't work for TriggerField (requires just include of 'trigger' xtype in alignIcon())
4, populate() now requires that even the fields with blank values to be specified in the first parameter (or unlisted fields are not reset to blank values). It may be better if the loop in populate would be over all fields found in specified namespace. Example: form contais 4 fields in namespace XY, incoming parameter for populate specifies only 2 of them, populate should setup 2 listed fields and clear the 2 remaining fields.
5, it would be more intuitive for the user, if the plus icon were present always on the last clone of the specified field.
Example: master field is created with "+" icon. After the 1 clone is created, the icon for the first field changes to "-",
a "+" icon moves to the clone. That means always the last field (master or the last clone has "+") and all previous have "-" icons. But I understand, that it would be more difficult to code.
8 Apr 2009 12:54 AM #12
Thanks for your extensive and indepth feedback!
Your absolutely right on the radio buttons and checkboxes. I will look into this
and include it in the next release. About remark 5. That's doable.
Just let me know when you have already implemented some of these features.
When your interested I will merge our implementations and make this a joined effort.
24 Jun 2009 8:02 PM #13
FieldSet modified to be similar to gmail Contacts
Great plugin, didn't quite do what I wanted so I've changed it somewhat.
Perhaps my changes can be integrated to compliment what you've done with the fieldsets rather than replace it. But I replaced it for now as it was easier to get my head around how it all worked.
My changes have altered the way the fieldset cloning works, in short the fieldset + tool doesn't clone a fieldset. Instead it clones a row of column, form, fields within a fieldset. Very similar behavior to gmail 'Contacts' edit form.
Changes have been made to field.js to allow multiple columns within a fieldset
fieldsets are still configured as dynamic, however they have layout:'column'
dynamic : true, maxOccurs:5, xtype : 'fieldset', layout:'column', nameSpace:'person', autoHeight:true, width: 600, listeners : { 'maxoccurs' : {fn: function(fieldset) { Ext.example.msg('maxoccurs', 'Implement behaviour of maxoccurs'); }}},
items :[{ layout:'form', columnWidth:.5, defaultType: 'textfield', items:[{ fieldLabel: 'First Name', name: 'first', //dynamic:true, }] },{ layout:'form', columnWidth:.5, defaultType: 'textfield', items:[{ fieldLabel: 'Last Name', name: 'last', }] }]
More updates to come possibly, need to discuss with arnold.
26-Jun-2009 - updated FormPanel extract so fieldset extract returns array(rows) of objects(fields)
Last edited by jamie.nicholson; 25 Jun 2009 at 1:15 PM. Reason: Updated dynform.zip
24 Jun 2009 10:37 PM #14
Hey Jamie!
Looks great! I also didn't like the dynamic fieldsets, because the duplicated frame taken too much space.
I implemented diffent aproach to this - trigger field which duplicates as single field and clicking on the trigger open pop/up window which then can be used to edit one "fields set repetition".
This is handy if the fieldset contains many fields.
It could be really nice if we can some way merga all the changes!
24 Jun 2009 10:42 PM #15
Demo of the dynamic trigger fields - another approach to dynamic fieldsets
25 Jun 2009 1:19 AM #16
Tried a bound grid?
You're right I agree, cloning a whole form would be nasty.
However wouldn't it be better to display that information in a grid and at least have a form popup to edit the info? My preference for 'maintenance' would be to display the summary in a grid and then bind the other information to a form and just have it on an entirely seperate tab, which takes up most of the screen.
My rationale is if you put everything on one page for 'maintenance' it will get to cluttered and confusing for a new user. However if you seperate it out in a new tab it be easier to understand.
On the display front you could use a portal to summarise the viz information in a protlet->grid or make multiple portlets each containing the relevant viz information.
That's just my five cents.... don't take it too seriously
2 Jul 2009 1:29 PM #17
This is exactly what I was looking for!
Thank you
8 Jul 2009 10:52 AM #18
rendering JSON objects into a proxy url
Hey all,
I just used this. It works great but taking the values was such a pain for me. I wanted to give a tip if you were taking the values of this and trying to loop through them to put in a url. It might also help if you were trying to do anything with the values. The main point is that 1 JSON is a string obj and 2 items(clones) are a array.
I had a form with 2 fields in a fieldset named 'parameters' and 'userInput' using the nameSpace property and 'paras' and 'daInputField' for the names property. this is what i had to do to get the values of those fields...
var panel = Ext.getCmp('panel'); var fparams = panel.extract('Parameters','field'); var fuserInput = panel.extract('userInput','field'); var t_url = ""; var sep= ""; //This is what took me forever to figure out because 1 JSON object is a string and 2+ JSON objects are a array!!!! if(typeof(fparams.Paras) == 'string'){ //i'm a string t_url = fparams.Paras + "=" + fuserInput.daInputField; }else{ //i'm a array for(var i=0; i<fparams.Paras.length; i++){ t_url += sep+ fparams.Paras[i] + "=" + fuserInput.daInputField[i]; sep = "&"; } } //this is for my project but maybe you do something like this... var z_url = proxy.url; proxy.url += t_url; ds.load(); proxy.url = z_url; t_url = "";
12 Sep 2009 9:06 PM #19
Removing clones on form reset
Thank you for a great extension!
There's a few changes I would like to do for it to apply to what I am doing. First was just removing clone labels and that wasn't too bad (just add hideLabel : true to cloneConfig). Another change I would like to do is to delete all clones on a form reset. I've tried adding a removeClones function for Ext.form.formpanel but my limited experience (about a month) in extjs (and javascript) isn't helping me at all. I would greatly appreciate it if somoene could take a look at what I have below and point me to the right direction.
What I added into Ext.form.FormPanel is removeClones and findFieldsets.
removeClones that will find fieldsets and then remove them.
removeClones : function(ns, xtype) { var fieldsets = this.findFieldsets(); //iterate through fieldsets and remove clones for (var col = fieldsets.length; col > 0; col++) { if (fieldsets[col].isClone()) { fieldsets[col].remove(); } } },
findFieldsets : function () { return this.findBy(function(cmp) { return cmp.isXType('fieldset'); }); }, //rest of code
isClone : function() { if (this.clone) { return true; }else { return false; } }, remove : function() { if (this.dynamic) { if (this.clone) { var panel = fieldset.ownerCt; panel.remove(fieldset,true); panel.doLayout(); } } },
16 Jan 2010 9:19 AM #20
I can't explain why but the code no longer seems to work with Ext 3.1 ( FF and Safari ) as there will be a JS error when removing a field. A quick fix seems to be to perform the remove on the panel first, then remove the item. Below is the modified code for Ext.form.Field.js .
listeners : { 'onIcon' : {fn: function(field) { var item = Ext.get(field.el.findParent('.x-form-item')); panel.remove(field); item.remove(); panel.doLayout(); }}
Can anyone else confirm this, or offer a better solution?
Thread Participants: 18
- jamie.nicholson (2 Posts)
- robert7 (3 Posts)
- Frenky (1 Post)
- anjuprema00 (1 Post)
- dizor (5 Posts)
- lamasgergo (1 Post)
- tcp (1 Post)
- k_lib (1 Post)
- rsgjenny09 (2 Posts)
- mc2mac (1 Post)
- sonnyg95 (1 Post)
- anandejju (2 Posts)
- sagardash (1 Post)
- Joanne (1 Post)
- kkavitha05 (1 Post)
- jaibeee (1 Post)
- parsbin (2 Posts)
- darestyan (1 Post)


text:
My Princess And The Pea Cake
This is my version of a 'princess and the pea' cake. It is chocolate cake filled with cookies and cream buttercream. The headboard is modeling chocolate. The princess is fondant and modeling chocolate. The cake is covered with fondant detail.
No Comments Yet
Login To Leave A Comment


text:
Pretty self explanatory. Some say at chatzot all week and some in the morning. Why davka on the first night does everyone say at night? This minhag does not seem apply on the second Saturday night (when there is one) or on Motzaei Shabbat Shuva. Sources always appreciated. Thanks
Sign up
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
Because it has a slicha begining with "Bmotzei Mnucha" (At the end of the day of rest) and we can't say slichos and 13 midos before midnight.
The source mentions Magen Avraham 525:5 which cannot be true (there is no such sif katan 525:5, and in general this siman is about borrowing on Yom Tov). Most likely it is referring to http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14327&st=&pgnum=301 (581:1)
Although most places I know of do say it at Chatzos on the first night only, I do know of places that say it every night at Chatzos, and I do know of places that even the first night say it at 5:30 AM. I have heard from my rabbi that the reason many people say it the first night at Chatzos is because Zerizin Makdimin L'Mitzvos, and as the Magen Avraham 565:5 says the earliest time for Selichos is at midnight. The reason it is not done by most people the rest of the week is since practically it is a difficult time as most people are sleeping then.


text:
Main | Risk Factors | Symptoms | Diagnosis | Treatment | Medications | Other treatments | Screening | Reducing Your Risk | Talking to Your Doctor | Resource Guide
The type of treatment depends on the kind of infection you have. Infections caused by bacteria will be treated with antibiotics. Your doctor will prescribe antibiotics that are safe to use during pregnancy. If you have a viral infection, such as herpes or hepatitis, your doctor will give you antiviral medications. For some infections, particularly viral infections like CMV and fifth disease , there is no medication available. Your doctor will carefully monitor your health and the health of your developing baby.
Treatment options include:
Bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. American Pregnancy Association website. Available at: http://americanpregnancy.org/pregnancycomplications/bacterialvaginosis-2.html . Updated May 2005. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Chorioamnionitis. Cleveland Clinic website. Available at: http://www.clevelandclinic.org/health/health-info/docs/3800/3857.asp?index=12309 . Accessed July 29, 2013.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and congenital CMV infection. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/cmv/index.html . Updated July 28, 2010. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Group B Strep (GBS). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/groupbstrep/index.html . Updated May 23, 2012. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Listeria and pregnancy. American Pregnancy Association website. Available at: http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancyhealth/listeria.html . Updated June 2011. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Nielsen GL, Sorensen HT, et al. Risk of adverse birth outcome and miscarriage in pregnant users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based observation study and case-control study. BMJ. 2001;322:266-270.
Pregnancy and HBV: FAQ. Hepatitis B Foundation website. Available at: http://www.hepb.org/patients/pregnant_women.htm . Updated October 18, 2013. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Pregnancy and fifth disease. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/parvovirusB19/pregnancy.html . Updated February 14, 2012. Accessed July 29, 2013.
STDs and pregnancy. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/pregnancy/default.htm . Updated July 10, 2013, Accessed July 29, 2013.
Toxoplasmosis. American Academy of Family Physicians Family Doctor website. Available at: http://familydoctor.org/familydoctor/en/diseases-conditions/toxoplasmosis.html . Updated January 2011. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Urinary tract infection during pregnancy. American Pregnancy Association website. Available at: http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancycomplications/utiduringpreg.html . Updated April 2006. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Varicella. EBSCO DynaMed website. Available at: https://dynamed.ebscohost.com/about/about-us . Updated April 13, 2013. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Last reviewed May 2015 by Andrea Chisholm, MD
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © 2012 EBSCO Publishing All rights reserved.
What can we help you find?close ×