text:
The Council that might have been
On July 23, 1962, the Secretary General of the Second Vatican Council sent out to all those with a right to participate in the Council a book that contained the first draft-texts that were to be debated when the Council opened on October 11th of the same year. The following texts were included:On the sources of revelationOn defending intact the deposit of faithOn the Christian moral orderOn chastity, marriage, the family, and virginityOn the sacred liturgyOn the communications mediaOn the Churchs unity.(A second book, containing the drafts on the Church and on the Blessed Virgin Mary, would be distributed only after the Council had opened.}I offer here my translations of the first four of these texts, prepared by the Theological Commission, which expected that they would be the first ones debated. Instead, the Council first debated the fifth text, on the liturgy.One very useful way of studying the conciliar process and of its products is to compare these prepared texts with the final texts issued by the Council, to note similarities as well as differences in orientation, style, and content, and then to account for the differences.As far as I know, no other English translations of these texts are available.
About the Author
Rev. Joseph A. Komonchak, professor emeritus of the School of Theology and Religious Studies at the Catholic University of America, is a retired priest of the Archdiocese of New York.
41 comments
- All
- Editor Featured
This is very helpful to see. Thank you for the work on it.
Thank you, Father! What a great resource. I remember looking at one of these (on revelation, if memory serves) back when I took your Foundations class 5 years ago. :)
Thank you. I am going to enjoy comparing the fruits of your labor with the final drafts.
JAK --Thanks. Most of this reads like a t950 catechism for adults. Useful, perhaps, but not what the Church needed most.
For example, the following passages from "On the Christian moral order" and from Gaudium et Spes seem to correspond. Christian moral order:6. Errors are rejectedThe Sacred Synod rejoices over the great number of children of the Church who by observing the moral order and the law of the Gospel cling with all their hearts to God and to his only-begotten Son. It grieves, however, that many people are transgressing the divine law, more from weakness than from wickedness, though rarely without grave guilt. It notes with great horror that errors are being spread everywhere, errors that open the way to perdition and close the gate of salvation. There are those who deny a personal God and so deprive the natural law of its foundation;12 there are those who, repudiating the mission of Christ, reject the law of the Gospel;13 there are those who rely only on human principles in explaining the moral order and therefore rob it of its genuine and ultimate obligation and sanction;14 there are those who deny that the intellect can enjoy true certitude in moral matters;15 there are those who maintain that the moral law is subject to changes and to evolution even in fundamental matters;16 there are those who teach that the human person has been endowed with so exalted a dignity that he is not subject to any law imposed upon him by God or by the Church or teach that he can embrace and fulfill the Christian law by his own powers without the help of grace;17 there are those who claim that the moral law has no validity except by an agreement that proceeds either from the collectivity or from the "totality,"18 whether this is considered to be the majority of the citizens or the State or the people or the race or the nation or a faction or a social class. There also are those who think that the moral law proceeds merely from naked, crass, and brutal power and who put this ideology of theirs into practice.19 Although all these people disagree among themselves on many matters, they have it in common that by their views they close the gate of the kingdom of heaven and do not allow others to enter (see Mt 23:13). Creeping error has many colors and many heads; but the truth which will free us (see Jn 8:32) is one as Christ is one. But the same thing that the Founder of the Church once testified about himself, he can today profess to the Church before the world: "I came in the name of my Father and you do not accept me, yet if another comes in his own name, you will accept him" (Jn 5:43).Gaudium et Spes:19. The root reason for human dignity lies in man's call to communion with God. From the very circumstance of his origin man is already invited to converse with God. For man would not exist were he not created by Gods love and constantly preserved by it; and he cannot live fully according to truth unless he freely acknowledges that love and devotes himself to His Creator. Still, many of our contemporaries have never recognized this intimate and vital link with God, or have explicitly rejected it. Thus atheism must be accounted among the most serious problems of this age, and is deserving of closer examination.The word atheism is applied to phenomena which are quite distinct from one another. For while God is expressly denied by some, others believe that man can assert absolutely nothing about Him. Still others use such a method to scrutinize the question of God as to make it seem devoid of meaning. Many, unduly transgressing the limits of the positive sciences, contend that everything can be explained by this kind of scientific reasoning alone, or by contrast, they altogether disallow that there is any absolute truth. Some laud man so extravagantly that their faith in God lapses into a kind of anemia, though they seem more inclined to affirm man than to deny God. Again some form for themselves such a fallacious idea of God that when they repudiate this figment they are by no means rejecting the God of the Gospel. Some never get to the point of raising questions about God, since they seem to experience no religious stirrings nor do they see why they should trouble themselves about religion. Moreover, atheism results not rarely from a violent protest against the evil in this world, or from the absolute character with which certain human values are unduly invested, and which thereby already accords them the stature of God. Modern civilization itself often complicates the approach to God not for any essential reason but because it is so heavily engrossed in earthly affairs.Undeniably, those who willfully shut out God from their hearts and try to dodge religious questions are not following the dictates of their consciences, and hence are not free of blame; yet believers themselves frequently bear some responsibility for this situation. For, taken as a whole, atheism is not a spontaneous development but stems from a variety of causes, including a critical reaction against religious beliefs, and in some places against the Christian religion in particular. Hence believers can have more than a little to do with the birth of atheism. To the extent that they neglect their own training in the faith, or teach erroneous doctrine, or are deficient in their religious, moral or social life, they must be said to conceal rather than reveal the authentic face of God and religion.20. Modern atheism often takes on a systematic expression which, in addition to other causes, stretches the desires for human independence to such a point that it poses difficulties against any kind of dependence on God. Those who profess atheism of this sort maintain that it gives man freedom to be an end unto himself, the sole artisan and creator of his own history. They claim that this freedom cannot be reconciled with the affirmation of a Lord Who is author and purpose of all things, or at least that this freedom makes such an affirmation altogether superfluous. Favoring this doctrine can be the sense of power which modern technical progress generates in man.Not to be overlooked among the forms of modern atheism is that which anticipates the liberation of man especially through his economic and social emancipation. This form argues that by its nature religion thwarts this liberation by arousing man's hope for a deceptive future life, thereby diverting him from the constructing of the earthly city. Consequently when the proponents of this doctrine gain governmental power they vigorously fight against religion, and promote atheism by using, especially in the education of youth, those means of pressure which public power has at its disposal.21. In her loyal devotion to God and men, the Church has already repudiated(16) and cannot cease repudiating, sorrowfully but as firmly as possible, those poisonous doctrines and actions which contradict reason and the common experience of humanity, and dethrone man from his native excellence.Still, she strives to detect in the atheistic mind the hidden causes for the denial of God; conscious of how weighty are the questions which atheism raises, and motivated by love for all men, she believes these questions ought to be examined seriously and more profoundly.The Church holds that the recognition of God is in no way hostile to man's dignity, since this dignity is rooted and perfected in God. For man was made an intelligent and free member of society by God Who created him, but even more important, he is called as a son to commune with God and share in His happiness. She further teaches that a hope related to the end of time does not diminish the importance of intervening duties but rather undergirds the acquittal of them with fresh incentives. By contrast, when a divine instruction and the hope of life eternal are wanting, man's dignity is most grievously lacerated, as current events often attest; riddles of life and death, of guilt and of grief go unsolved with the frequent result that men succumb to despair.Meanwhile every man remains to himself an unsolved puzzle, however obscurely he may perceive it. For on certain occasions no one can entirely escape the kind of self-questioning mentioned earlier, especially when life's major events take place. To this questioning only God fully and most certainly provides an answer as He summons man to higher knowledge and humbler probing.The remedy which must be applied to atheism, however, is to be sought in a proper presentation of the Church's teaching as well as in the integral life of the Church and her members. For it is the function of the Church, led by the Holy Spirit Who renews and purifies her ceaselessly,(17) to make God the Father and His Incarnate Son present and in a sense visible. This result is achieved chiefly by the witness of a living and mature faith, namely, one trained to see difficulties clearly and to master them. Many martyrs have given luminous witness to this faith and continue to do so. This faith needs to prove its fruitfulness by penetrating the believer's entire life, including its worldly dimensions, and by activating him toward justice and love, especially regarding the needy. What does the most reveal God's presence, however, is the brotherly charity of the faithful who are united in spirit as they work together for the faith of the Gospel(18) and who prove themselves a sign of unity.While rejecting atheism, root and branch, the Church sincerely professes that all men, believers and unbelievers alike, ought to work for the rightful betterment of this world in which all alike live; such an ideal cannot be realized, however, apart from sincere and prudent dialogue. Hence the Church protests against the distinction which some state authorities make between believers and unbelievers, with prejudice to the fundamental rights of the human person. The Church calls for the active liberty of believers to build up in this world God's temple too. She courteously invites atheists to examine the Gospel of Christ with an open mind.Above all the Church knows that her message is in harmony with the most secret desires of the human heart when she champions the dignity of the human vocation, restoring hope to those who have already despaired of anything higher than their present lot. Far from diminishing man, her message brings to his development light, life and freedom. Apart from this message nothing will avail to fill up the heart of man: "Thou hast made us for Thyself," O Lord, "and our hearts are restless till they rest in Thee."(19)
The first thing that strikes me is that the final text is much longer than the draft. The draft, almost simplistic, describes atheists purely from the outside, as aliens to be looked at with horror. The final text is much kinder and more sympathetic, but more complex and much less usable. I can't help but wonder: what is the point?
What a difference in tone! No contest as to which opens hearts more.It notes with great horror that errors are being spread everywhere, errors that open the way to perdition and close the gate of salvation. There are those who deny...there are those who, repudiating...there are those who rely only on human principles...there are those who deny...there are those who claim that the moral law has no validity...Creeping error has many colors and many heads My head is aching already. versusThe Church calls for the active liberty of believers to build up in this world Gods temple too. She courteously invites atheists to examine the Gospel of Christ with an open mind.
I appreciate the document on revelation's recognition that apostolic preaching preceded the penning of Scripture but the extent to which the document characterizes Holy Scripture ought not be missed. Still, it is a skeletal draft; thank Heaven for the full, promulgated texts of the Council.
There is a famous saying about the clunched fist of logic versus the open hand of rhetoric (understood as persuasion).The original drafts as translated by Fr. Komonchak certainly represent the spirit of the clunched fist of logic.In contrast, the revised and amended texts represent the spirit of the open hand of rhetoric (understood as persuasion).
Claire: When Pope John read the paragraph from the draft you cited, he is said to have counted the number of centimeters of condemnations. In his opening speech, of course, he proposed that the Council refrain from condemnations and instead offer a positive statement of the faith. The discussion of atheism in GS is longer and more diffuse, but an effort was made to take the phenomenon seriously in all its complexity, including some responsibility Christians may have for its rise and spread. Henri de Lubac worked on these paragraphs.Teresa: The first drafts were not "skeletal" if by that you mean they were to be filled out later, as one might an outline of a talk. Those were the full texts that the Doctrinal Commission expected the bishops to approve. The drama of the first session of the Council was in good part that the bishops made it clear that these were not the sort of texts they wished to issue, and so work had to begin on a kind of "second preparation" of the Council, beginning with the intersession between the first two sessions.
My impression of the text on Sacred Scripture is that it is addressed more to Protestants than to Catholics -- it's a defense of the Church's sole duty to authoritatively interpret the texts and a defense of tradition in doing those interpretations. Not a bad project, but not what the Catholics needed. To me the "defense of the deposit of the faith" sort of starts to justify the traditional scholastic epistemology (based on reason and the acceptance of certain metaphysical principles such as 'a thing cannot both be and not be at the same time in the same respect). However, it then merely repeats the time-honored theological conclusions. What was -- and is still needed -- is a complete theological epistemology which takes into consideration the criticisms by modern philosophers of the old basic theological/philosophical assumptions. Such a project, i think, was much too vast for one document, or even a whole council. But it would have been good if the Council had supported such a project. I mean a re-statement and defense of what used to be called "the preambles of faith". Only when the Church can make clear the reasonableness of belief can it begin to talk to the unchurched. And then it must convince them to accept the faith on grounds that go past simple logic. I do see a beginning of such a project in the Court of the Gentiles project. At least some in the Vatican (Cdl. Ravasi) is beginning to talk to the non-believers themselves. And because so many Catholics have lost the faith or are in process of losing it (or at least their old understanding of it), the project can help the fading Catholics too.
What are the Vatican II documents good for?Once in a while I hear a sentence used in a homily, but it is always the same small handful of sentences that are quoted. More than 99 percent of the documents remain unquoted, and perhaps unread.I tried to use a couple of paragraphs in teaching catechism, as a way to honor the 50th anniversary: it was a complete flop.When I want a quick and trustworthy exposition of the church's official position on some topic, the simple go-to reference, the equivalent of the English dictionary, is the Catechism. Whatever may be in the council documents would instead have to first be found, then be digested. They can only be read slowly, and it takes work. If one is ready to put in that kind of effort, why not start directly with the bible, or with a text on the topic by some favorite writer instead?Perhaps those council documents have value for those who write pastoral letters or design catechism textbooks, but for the rest of us, the benefits are indirect. I am not sure that it is worthwhile to read texts that are neither concise nor particularly clear nor, it seems to me, particularly beautiful for the most part. (Except those few phrases that get quoted regularly).
Claire --If you had experienced the Church before the Council you'd appreciate what it did. It changed the minds not only of the laity but the priests and bishops themselves. Before the Council there were many Catholics who thought Protestants, etc., were going to Hell and that they should be shunned. The Jews were still insulted dreadfully as "Christ killers". Yes, a lot of those prejudices remain, but things are far, far better. Some of the hierarchy still thought that the Church should official state churches or at least favored politically. Maybe most important, 'the Church' was defined as 'the people of God" and not as the hierarchy, and we, the laity and lower clergy, haven't forgotten it.. It seems to me that the latter point has been the main cause of our subsequent polarization. The Vatican hierarchy especially does not want to accept the fact.That the documents aren't quoted doesn't mean that they have not had and are not still having their effect. We don't quote the Constitution very often either.By the way, the Pray and Tell blog about the liturgy is discussing "Bible services", some very popular services in many parishes centered on bible study and lectio divina. I don't think that would have happened without the Council, and long may that movement flourish.
Oops -- should have been: Some of the hierarchy still thought that the Church should have official status as the state Church or at least be favored politically.
Ann, I have some idea of the impact. But I have a concrete question, whose answer is not clear to me. What would be the point of requiring today's Catholic teenagers, who have never even heard of Vatican II, to read a little bit of the council documents? There might be historical interest, but is there any other reason beyond that? I wonder if those texts are not unsuitable for Catholics who do not have specialized interests.
Claire ==I see your point. As I see the "state of the Church" (a notion so simple it is bound to distort a lot) the problem with the young is that they often don't know the simplest teachings of the Church, much less the more elaborated ones of the Council. But I doubt that just telling them the catechism would be an effective form of evangelization. Unlike the problem of evangelizing the West in, say the 6th century when the European peoples at least believed in some sort of gods, people today are suspicious of any teachings about a god or gods by an organization. The Irish missionaries had an easier job at St. Gall than the bishops meeting there now do. The latter can't just go out and tell the people "This is what is best to believe, what is the best way to live a good life, the best spirituality". It's no longer a matter of people comparing, say, the Holy Spirit or God the Father with Thor or Zeus. It is first and foremost a matter of whether or not they should believe in *any* god and only following that consideration will they consider whether or not God as described by the Christians is the best description available.In other words, the pagan culture of today is different from that of the 6th century. I don't think Pope Benedict and the bishops realize that. Their notion of Evangelization is just ot go out and "tell it like it is". That won't work anymore. They have to engage the people with the people's own questions.The contemporary world doesn't want to have anything to do with dogma, that is, with what other people say about God. We live in a do-it-yourself religious dimension.
Claire,You always ask such interesting questions. I am sure there is much to be gained, but I can't grasp how to even start. What point is there to requiring teenagers to read anything?I suppose we read things to know what people think. Or thought. Historical context is important to establish meaning, but the meaning is not just history. How different reading these preparatory documents is from reading the final documents! It is the difference of a Church that dispenses truths from a Church that struggles to engage and understand. That they "are neither concise nor particularly clear nor, it seems to me, particularly beautiful for the most part" is a sign of the messiness of life; this is very different from the lesson learned by reading the preparatory documents, with their clear, precise and irrelevant answers.So one point would be to encourage people to not accept easy answers. The Church is here to share our hopes and joys, our grief and sorrow, not to wrap things into neat packages.
Claire --Some Canadian young people have started an internet site to celebrate the VII anniversary and to make it better known to the young people. It will also be at Facebook and Twitter. I wonder how it will pan out -- how much interest it will generate. It's emphasizing understanding the documents. (I also wonder if this was a spontaneous project of those kids. Cynical of me, I know.))http://www.eglise.catholique.fr/actualites-et-evenements/dossiers/annive...
Hello All,First I'd like to thank Fr. Komonchak for making these texts available.After an admittedly quick first read of some of the salient passages, I have several reatcions to the texts Fr. Komonchak has shared and some of the responses here. In my opinion, perhaps the most important condemnation in the passage from On the Christian moral order that Claire quoted from in her response is:there are those who maintain that the moral law is subject to changes and to evolution even in fundamental matters; My impression is that the final version of Gaudiem et Spes does not deal with this specific matter at length, and that the emphasis in the passages that Claire identified as parallel to th equote form On the Christian moral order focus primarily on atheism and the Church's relationship to atheism.Maybe it's because I do so much research on the possibility of evolving morality but I am struck by how in On the Christian moral order the "evolutionist" view of morality seems to be regarded as a product of atheism. I think nothing could be further from the truth, although I would concede that some of the greatest philosophers who could be fairly called "moral evolutionists", such as David Hume, were not orthodox Christians. In fact, Aquinas himself argued that the natural law can change by means of the addition of new requirements, so even he would grant that in a certain sense morality can evolve.Starting with Veritatis Splendor if not earlier we've seen a renewed series of condemnations of views from the Church hierarchy that basic principles of morality can change or evolve, but the key question always seems to be: What principle are the basic principles of morality (and what are the secondary principles that could be open to revision)? I think we badly need a real debate in the Church about this, but I am not hopeful that we'll be allowed one that will have any practical import.
Hello Claire (and All),Hust a very quick follow-up on Ann's response: I certainly agree that not many read the original documents of vatical II but that does not diminish their import. While it may seem odd some of the most influential documents are documents that have mostly indirect influence. One of my favorite examples is Sidgwick's "Methids of Ethics", which very few prhilosophers study but which has had a huge indirect impact since some of the philosophers who have had the most direct influence in recent years, from John rawls to peter Singer, were themselves influenced by Sidgwick.I'm also struck by how almost all of the influence of the so-called frenchj catechism is indirect - When I bought my copy a few years ago I was struck by the advertising blurn obn it saying "Over 7 million copies sold". I thought for a moment and realized that even if each of those copies had been purchased by different househlds (which is obviously untrue) then this boiok would be in less than 1% of Roman Catholic homes. But I would never underestimate the influence of this catechism.
I join Peter in thanking Fr K for translating those texts. Thanks to Ann for the pointer, which could be useful. Thanks to Jim for the compliment, much appreciated, and for his comment. I wish I had something interesting to say in return. "Clear, precise and irrelevant answers": ha!
The opening lines of Gaudium et spes: "The joy and hope, the grief and anguish of the men [and women] of our time, especially of those who are poor or afflicted in any way, are the joy and hope, the grief and anguish of the followers of Christ as well. Nothing that is genuinely human fails to find and echo in their hearts. For theirs is a community composed of men [and women] who, united in Christ and guided by the holy Spirit, press onward toward the kingdom of the Father and are bearers of a message of salvation intended for all men [and women]. This is why Christians cherish a feeling of deep solidarity with the human race and its history."That was News! and apparently remains News.
Hello Again All,I've had just a little more time to look at parts of Father K's remarkable translations (between writing the solutions to my latest midterm). I'll make one very general (and maybe not that helpful?) further comment: I find it truly remarkable that, given that one of these preliminary documents was dedicated to discussing morality (and titled 'On the Christian moral order'), in the end the council fathers did not produce a dedicated document on morality. (Of course, I was well aware before Fr. K's post here that the documents of Vatican II contain much that is terribly important regarding specific moral issues. But the specific council teachings on moral questions I have studied are scattered in various VII documents).I suspect that in the end there was no council document dedicated to the subject of morality, and specifically Christian morality, because the council participants (including the auditors) were probably at some point worn out from all their other work, not because they did not think such a document was needed. I can't help but wonder what they would have produced had they chosen to produce such a document.I had known the council fathers decided not to issue a dedicated document on the Blessed Virgin Mary, although I don't know the reasons for their decision. It is indeed fascinating to compare even the titles of the preliminary documents with the titles of the final VII decrees.(BTW my apologies for my somewhat garbled tying in my two earlier posts - I was writing in a great hurry during a break before class, shame on me!)
Peter --I wonder if the Council didn't do a document on morality because the foundations of Catholic morality are somewhat disarrayed at this time. Yes, the medievals did some splendid work on the very foundations (see, for instance, MacIntyre's After Virtue for the most fundamental, metaphysical principles), and they did some fine work on particular issues and in philosophy of law and political philosophy. But as you point out, there is something to be desired in the mid-range -- in the application of general principles to the secondary ones, or should I say the derivation of the secondary from the primary. In my less than well-informed opinion, there is one very fundamental problem that keeps reasserting itself in Catholic moral teaching, the problem of the principle "Never do evil to accomplish good". In the first place, there are many instances in which the Church de facto does allow us to do physical evil for a greater good, which should tell the CDF that something is drastically wrong somewhere. Neither have I ever seen how that principle, NDETAG, is derived from the more fundamental principles, and I suspect that, while generally applicable, it's not an absolute norm. Another mid-range problem concerns the need for a decision procedure in choosing which moral norms are relevant to a given set of circumstances. This problem is part of what I see as a gigantic problem with the whole notion of prudence.In other words, the whole mid-system of Catholic morality needs to be re-thought and the problems there must be recognized.
Ann: Since you admit that your opinion is "less than well-informed," permit me to say that the two issues you raise have been much, much discussed in the tradition of moral theology. I don't think any "decision procedure" (what an odd phrase!) is ever going to do away with the need for the virtue of prudence, which, of course, is simply one illustration of the Aristotelian axiom that the norm of justice is the just person. Just people recognize the just thing to do; the unjust don't. Augustine said that you had to be a lover to discern what love requires. There is no objective "decision procedure" that can substitute for personal virtue in discerning the next good thing to do. That idea of objectivity is simply a myth. E.g., how would you decide among alternative "decision procedures"?
The phrase "decision procedure" originated in modern logic and math. It is a sure, step-by-step procedure for reaching a sound conclusion. The notion was developed in math in response to the problem of "decidability", that is, the question of how to discover whether or not any given arithmetic statement is true or false. See the controversy which Godel's proof inspired. He proved that given certain axioms arithmetic is either incomplete or inconsistent -- that is, either 1) not every arithmetic statement can be proven to be either true or false or 2) the arithmetic he postulated is inconsistent. (Another mathematician, using different arithmetic axioms, proved that that his system is not inconsistent, thus possibly rescuing arithmetic but complicating the issue.)The notion of a decision procedure can be extended to moral thinking. Today such procedures might be called "sure moral discernment procedures". There is already the classic but crude decision procedure of Augustine, "Love God, then what you will", but it's too simple. I would guess that St. Ignatius must have offered at least some hints. I was to;d that Aquinas had a very general one for deciding what one ought to do. The steps were these:1. Consult the experts on the issue.2. If the experts differ, consult persons who have actually faced the actual moral issue in their own lives.3. If those who have faced the issue differ, do what you want to do.My friend didn't have a reference, but it does sound like Thomas, except that the last step sounds too simple for him. I suspect a very limited decision procedure could be expressed in the terms of Aristotelian logic\. It would not be a universal procedure -- it could be applied only to moral problems having to do with class relationships and you'd have to add the proviso that singular statements are admissible. But the real world of ethical problems extends beyond class relationships into the either-or, if-then relationships of the real, wider world, and those problems include the severe epistemological problems we find when we try to interpret what the facts of a given moral situation truly are. And, of course, there is the problem of deciding which moral principles obtain in any particular situation.You say, "Do what the virtuous person would do". And how do you discover who is in fact a virtuous person? What if the two virtuous person whom you know disagree? I bet you'd ask them *how* they reached their different conclusions -- your'd ask for their reasoning. But -- notice carefully -- what you have done is ask for their decision procedures. See? We need decision procedures. Summoning up "the virtuous man" or "prudence" is not adequate to existential situations.. Moral: the moral theologians need to learn a lot more logic than Aristotle's so they can appreciate the utility of decision procedures and get a clearer idea of just what they are. When they do they'lll have a clearer idea of which decision procedures are adequate to the moral tasks they're designed to do.What I"m talking about are called "axiomatic systems". The philosophers of math and logic have done a tremendous amount of foundational work on the subject. Since natural law theory claims to be an axiomatic system (yes, it does, though not using the contemporary vocabulary), it seems to me that the natural law moralists ignore the contemporary developments at their peril. You know that I'm an Aristotelian. But I know that a lot has been done of value in both logic and ethics since his time and since the medievals. Time for the Church to catch up and use some of these modern tools.(Peter vande
OOPS Should be: Peter Vandershraaf, where are you?
JAK --Actually, I've over-simplified enormously. Merely deducing the relationships between general principles/descriptions about the world and individual facts is not the sum total of moral thinking (that is more like science). There additional general requirements concerning what ought to be done . As I understand the problems, these are related to the problem of 'deriving ought from is'. There are special logics for deriving "ought statements" and statements of permissability. They're called "deontic logics". But, from what I've read, there are still some theoretical problems with them, though maybe they've been solved. Again, I don't know a very much about this area, but I know enough to know that it's extremely important and many philosophers consider the general area to be quite useful.
Hello All,To add to some of Ann's observations, I'm seeing a rise in interest in the intersection between philosophy, politics and economics in a number of North American universities in recent years that I think is driven in large part by the promise of making some real progress on tough moral issues using both concepts from philosophy old and new and the formal methods of the social sciences. (Full disclosure: I lead a Philosophy, Politics and Economics course and I do some research in PPE, so I hope my comments don't seem to self-serving.)I'm somewhat sympathetic to Ann's views expressed here because like Ann, I think I see signs of real strain in the classical natural law tradition of Augustine and Aquinas that plays a dominant role in Church moral teaching (and which I contrast with the modern natural law tradition of Grotius, Hobbes and Locke). One example: I think Ann's observations about the traditional "do no harm to produce good" principle are related to the well-known and always controversial doctrine of double effect (which I think was first explicitly proposed by Aquinas) and is occasionally discussed in this forum. My own opinion is that the classical natural law theorists rely upon the DDE as a device meant to allow individuals to perform certain acts such as fighting and possibly killing that might be acceptable according to the natural law in done in self-defense, but would otherwise be violations of the natural law prohibitions against violence and homicide. But the DDE has always been fraught with difficulties because critics are prone to try redescribing all manner of moral offenses at as to make them "acceptable". Many contemporary philosophers a lot better than I am have argued that the DDE in the end just does not always work the way it "ought" to, and I agree with them. But without the DDE, some important moral positions endorsed by the Church would be in real jeopardy. Some of the most recent work on analyzing moral norms as defining social equilibria (and which uses the formal methods I mentioned above) opens the door to reformulating certain natural law precepts such as the prohibition against homicide so that one may still fight and possibly kill in self defense but without incorporating the controversial DDE. So I'll use this example as a small bit of evidence in support of Ann's view - the classical natural lawyers might profit from a look at some of the recent developments outside their own tradition.
Thanks, PEter. Would you like to tell us more about the modern developments, both as to theory and methods of moral thinking that you think are valuableI don't know much contemporary ethics, but do think there is some value in Rawls proposed method of surveying a population to discover what they think is fair. It seems to me that, while the method cannot yield a solid foundation for an ethical theory, it could help as a means to discover just what the are which which will make us flourish. I'm saying that a natural law theory has an empirical part, and Rawls might be relevant in it.
I don't know how that procedure works in maths, Ann, but I doubt very much that in moral discernment there's "a sure, step-by-step procedure" that doesn't require intellectual and moral virtues in the inquirer. It's not very Aristotelian to ignore this. I didn't write: "do what the virtuous person would do." It's more like: You won't know what to do unless you are a virtuous person yourself. Isn't "Love and do what you will" rather like Aristotle's justice is what just people do? I know, I know the objection: If I don't know what justice is, how do I know who the just are? But that's life, isn't it. You have to be fortunate enough to have grown up among just people, virtuous people, to be able to learn from them, but if you grow up among thugs and cheats, you're not likely to learn what justice is, or virtue. There's no logical first point at which you enter the inquiry and from which all things can be deduced by some sort of unfailing "procedure." I don't believe that there is any "objective" procedure that makes the possession of intellectual and moral virtues unnecessary. And to lob you objection back at you: What if there were more than one procedure offered, how do you choose between or among them? Is there a decision procedure for choosing decision-procedures?
Is there a decision procedure for choosing decision-procedures?Nice question! The answer is no, because that's an example of an undecidable problem. I think. (Not completely sure, because I'm not 100% sure exactly how to model it mathematically.) But you've seen this before, haven't you?
JAK -No, it's not ARistotelian to criticize the "virtuous man" criterion. I don't automatically agree with any philosopher. (Women, unlike men, don't seem to have a need for heroes.) I think that criterion it's a big flaw in his work. Not that it affects the his metaphysical foundations of his natural law theory. But it's an appeal to a norm that he cannot justify because it is neither an a priori given nor a justified a posteriori one.Yes, "Love God and do what you will" is a lot like the virtuous man norm. But the meaning of "love" is just as undefined as the meaning of "virtuous", and both criteria fail for the same reason -- they beg the question in the old sense of the phrase."But that's life isn't it" is not a philosophical response! Nor a theological one!! Just because we don't have the answers we think we need is no reason not to criticize our own thinking, and it's certainly no reason to ignore the help that the more recent philosophers offer. Don't be so pessimistic.Yes, there must be a logical first point from which we enter an ethical system. As I see it, ethics begins with metaphysics and psychology as axiomatic. I'm not at all convinced that there really is some universal decision procedure that can grind out perfect solutions to actual problems. But I think we're ethically bound to look for one -- or at least for a set of consistent procedures that will giv us reliable answers. You ask: "What if there were more than one procedure offered, how do you choose between or among them? Is there a decision procedure for choosing decision-procedures?"I answer: that is related to my point about the need for some way to judge which ethical principles apply to some given circumstances! Ethical principles (gleaned from the combo of metaphysics and psychology) will necessarily be part of an ethical decision procedure (that's what ethical decision procedures are -- applications of eth. principles to facts). I don't think that you can assume that there might be at best *many* of them. Neither can you assume that even if there are many that they will be inconsistent with each other, thus requiring us to decide what to use in deciding an ethical issue. (This does get us into the foundations of ethics, which I find thoroughly fascinating. But as it stands it's terribly murky.)I hope Peter tells us more. He knows all the modern stuff. Contemporary Anglo-speaking philosophy is at a very interesting point right now, I think. The neo-atheists have prompted some serious and even open-minded thinking about the possibility of the non-material dimension(s and the possibility of God/spirit, and even Thomas Nagel, who has done a lot on consciousness, has come out recently with a strong criticism of materialism, though I'm not sure he'd use that terminology. The time is ripe for the classic philosophies (or at least their questions) to be reconsidered, I think. Even the NYT's philosophy section ("The Stone") often has op=ed contributorss from the classic traditions, which is an extremely healthy sign to me. But the admirers of the ancients will have to talk the contemporary analytic language of the empiricists/materialists and will have to understand the strengths of the latter to make a dent in their thinking.
You wrote: But thats life, isnt it is not a philosophical response! Nor a theological one!! Just because we dont have the answers we think we need is no reason not to criticize our own thinking, and its certainly no reason to ignore the help that the more recent philosophers offer. Dont be so pessimistic.Yes, there must be a logical first point from which we enter an ethical system. As I see it, ethics begins with metaphysics and psychology as axiomatic. Im not at all convinced that there really is some universal decision procedure that can grind out perfect solutions to actual problems. But I think were ethically bound to look for one or at least for a set of consistent procedures that will give us reliable answers.My comment was not an expression of despair or of pessimism. It was an effort to return us to the real world. In fact, we do not enter an ethical system from a logical first point. From our first breath, we are within an ethical system, the one of the persons and communities who give us birth and rear us and who introduce us into the worldview and ethos treasured in their societies. If we are lucky, they tell us of the world as it is, urge us to the genuinely valuable, and train us in the intellectual and moral virtues needed in that world of meaning and value.Im glad to hear that your procedure will not mechanically grind out solutions to ethical problems. But I still think that its naive to expect to find a set of consistent procedures that will give us reliable answers. If this procedure is not to work mechanically or automatically in order to generate consistent answers, it will involve the use of intellectual and moral virtues, and youll be right back with Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas.
If at birth you enter a world which includes an ethical system, but you are not taught its metaphysical and scientific foundations, then the theorems of that system which you are taught become your axioms -- your initial starting point. The decision procedures you are taught (e.g., Love God and do what you will) are more less clear and more or less adequace, They are analogous to the rules of a deductive system. So you've still got a system, primitive though it might be.So long as the Church holds that our ethics must be rational, it is requiring that we treat the application of ethical norms as a deductive system. You can say that this is too mechanical, but logic *is* mechanical in a sense. It is why we cannot escape certain logical conclusions, and, I might add, why we sometimes really hate logic for leading us to unwanted moral conclusions. But that too is de facto human life.When I said that a valid decision procedure would not "grind out" conclusions mechanically, what I had in mind was the fact that sometimes the conclusions we reach contradict norms which didn't enter into our calculation. In such cases our norms and/or decision procedure(s) need revision. What to do? I say look for better norms and decision procedures, but do not abandon logic. It is our best means of discovering truth and of necessary self-criticism as we pursue what is true and what is good..
Speaking of human reason and its uses, there has been a great deal of argument among the psychologists lately about just how good people are oraren't at reasoning. Some, like Jonathan Haidt, scorns the old idea of man as a "rational animal", holding that reason was meant by the evolutionary process to confirm our biases, and it rarely is the great tool many philosophers claim it to be. Others psychologists disagree withHaidt, and Daniel Kahneman, in Thinking Fast and Slow, takes a middle position. He holds (as I understand him) that, yes, we do use reason largely to confirm our biases, but not necessarily so. It is true, he says, that "gut" reactions often reach a useful intuition quicker and even better than reason might. But he also holds that the quality of gut reactions are dependent on the slower process of getting to understand a subject, and the more we reason carefully about a subject, the better we will do, both in our reasoning about it and in our gut reactions about it. In today's NYT's The Stone, Gary Gutting of Notre Dame considers Haidt's and Plato's positions about reason's part in a good human life. Gutting points out that Plato (and many other great philosophers) was very well aware that though we are capable of reasoning, we often do not use reason, or we do not use it well. In other words, Haidt oversimplifies Plato badly. Gutting makes two pleas: 1) that Haidt pay more attention to the philosophers and 2) that the philosophers pay more attention to the fine empirical work being done by the contemporary psychologists on the nature of human reason.
I have read Lonergan's Insight and read it carefully because I knew it might be an issue when I defended my doctoral thesis. Lonergan barely mentions Hume in that whole work. Yes, he describes how he thinks judgments are made, but he never answers Hume's powerful criticisms of all sorts of knowledge. He doesn't seem to have thought that it was necessary to engage Hume. I call that naive.As to scientists crying over epistemological problems, granted, I was really just thinking of the limited number of scientists who are interested in philosophy of science. Science students are not required to study it, so criticisms of its foundations of it is not generally an issue for them. It is only scientists like Kuhn (of The Structure of Scientific Revolution fame), who are curious about it, who know what those foundations are and aren't, and who are concerned about the strength of the foundations who see that science ain't what it's been cracked up to be.In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn says that the greatest scientists have formed new scientific paradigms which explain scientific data, but most scientists practice what he calls "normal science". They (unlike the inventors of new paradigms) do their research without considering the justification of their own ultimate principles. Such science serves only to enlarge the current paradigm which is generally accepted as "true". But Kuhn saw that because it is theoretically possible that there are any number of possible paradigms to explain given scientific data, and because none is intrinsically preferable to any other, no one paradigm can be said to yield *the* truth in the classic sense. They are all at best hypotheses which *might* be true, but cannot be definitely known to be. It follows that no paradigm can be said to be "objective" in the ordinary sense of the term. Other theorists of science are still trying to get out of the "relativism" he is accused of establishing. Kuhn is what finally threw the theoreticians of science into fibrillation. (Previously, in the '30s, the Vienna Circle's realized there was a fundamental problem with their scientism, so logical positivism began to crack apart back in the '30s.) With Kuhn the crisis in the foundations of science was in full swing. (Not to mention the long-standing contradictions among favored physical theories.) It hasn't recovered yet -- Richard Rorty even gave up on both philosophy and science and looked to literature (fiction!) for wisdom.At this point even some scientists are willing to grant a truce between "science and religion", matter and spirit. See, e.g., scientist Steven Jay Gould's theory of "non-overlapping magisteria". I say the time is ripe for dialogue, but only if the spirit side is willing to recognize the power of the opposition -- and vice versa.Sorry to go on so long about this, but it's an old and hugely complex history.
Thank you very much, Joseph A. Komonchak. I've let people on Fisheaters and Bellarmine fora know about it.Also, what was your primary source for these translations? Was it:Vatican Council. 1969. Acta et documenta Concilio Oecumenico Vaticano II apparando. Civitate Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Thanks
Also, Dr. Komonchak, where can I find Vatican II Preparatory Commission's ~20-page draft on the authority of St. Thomas? I'm sure it's in the Acta et Documenta I referred to above, but I would need to know exact page numbers to have my library digitally deliver it to me.Thanks for the help
Thank you for providing these translations. They are a great resource for studying the Council. I would love to see a translation of the drafts on the church and the BVM.


text:
Enter your zip code for product availability and pickup options at your nearest store or select a store by state.
Give your child a place to store toys, games, and books with our InterMetro Shelving Toy Storage. Four roomy shelves can be placed to suit your needs now and adjusted in the future to accommodate changing circumstances. Create the perfect environment for your children to express their creative genius with the addition of our elfa Kid's Coloring Table. Use Metro Clear Shelf Liners to prevent smaller items from slipping through. Light assembly required; hardware included.
We can help! Chat now with an expert.
Enter your zip code for product availability and pickup options at your nearest store or select a store by state.
InterMetro® Shelving inherits its strength and style from the original Metro® Commercial Shelving. Our black, white, and exclusive silver epoxy-coated steel components can be customized for countless storage solutions. Shelves can be adjusted in 1" increments, each supporting 300 to 500 pounds each without sacrificing clean lines and good looks. Combine shelves, posts, rails, hooks, tops, baskets, drawers, and casters to create a shelving solution suited to your individual needs.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Welcome to Comfyearplugs.com. We are excited to offer you an exiting range of earplug products. Providing you with the very best in ear protection to compliment your active lives. Whether you; live next to noisy neighbors, want to enjoy a comfortable swim, perhaps you are a music professional, or work around noisy machinery... Comfyearplugs.com, your One Stop Earplug Shop have everything you need.
Sleeping Ear Plugs
Swimming Ear Plugs
New Products
Macks Dry and Clear Aid£4.79
Alpine Flying Ear Plugs£11.99
Mack's Ear Dryer£54.95


text:
7 Mind-Blowing Chemical Reactions You Won't Believe Are Real
#3. Reigniting a Candle Via Its Smoke Trail
Maryna Maschewsky/iStock/Getty Images
Here's a trick you can try at home without the risk of exploding your living room (well, without any more risk than usual; we don't know what your living situation is, Methew McConaughey). Light a candle. Blow it out. Now set fire to the smoke trail. Congratulations: You're a Level 1 firebender.
And you now possess more entertainment value than a $150 million movie.
It turns out that fire just loves itself some candle wax, which you probably knew, because, well ... candles. But it turns out their love is much deeper than you expect. Stalker levels, even: It doesn't matter if the wax is solid, liquid, or gas -- fire will still find it, chase it down, and burn the hell out of it. Notice that the above link is for a basic grade school experiment. Now notice our intense envy, as none of our grade school teachers bothered to tell us about apprentice fire mastery. Man, one little "incident" and suddenly all the cool stuff is off limits forever. We don't know what the big deal even was -- Mrs. Davis' hair grew back. For the most part.
#2. Crystals That Light Up When You Crush Them
Leigh Prather/iStock/Getty Images
This is a chemical called europium tetrakis, demonstrating the effect of triboluminescence. Eyes glazing over yet? Are you daydreaming of puppies already? All right, we'll hype it up some: This is how you create a thunderstorm in a bottle by smashing things.
If you look reeeeeal close, you can see a miniature Christopher Lambert in there.
The effect happens when crystals don't bother to generate electricity or heat, but rather skip a step like the lazy crystal bastards they are and convert kinetic energy directly into light.
If you want to see it for yourself but you don't have any europium tetrakis lying around (if you're out, just ask the neighbor to borrow a cup!), the good news is that another, more common substance can do the same thing: sugar. Just sit in a dark room, put some sugar cubes in a blender, and watch the fireworks.
This is what Daft Punk sees every time they close their eyes.
Back in the 18th century, when many folks still thought scientific phenomena were caused by ghosts or witches or the ghosts of witches, scientists used this effect to prank "simple people" by chewing sugar in the dark and laughing as they scrambled away from the man with the fire-mouth. Although they probably weren't laughing when the simpletons returned with pitchforks and drowned them in a river.
#1. A Hellbeast Emerging from a Volcano
Julien Grondin/iStock/Getty Images
Mercury (II) thiocyanate is an innocuous-looking white powder. It doesn't do much, just sits around doing powder stuff. You know -- piling up, maybe drifting about for a little bit. Then you set it on fire, and it opens a gateway to the Old Ones so that they might escape from their Eternal Tombs.
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!"
It starts out innocently enough, kind of like a slightly bigger version of those lame snake fireworks you give to the littler kids on the Fourth of July. But as the reaction continues, you start to realize it has no intention of stopping, growing into a Lovecraftian tentacle beast that threatens to consume you and, indeed, the world itself:
Play for full effect.
Have you survived the emergence of mercury thioCthulhu? Has the madness taken root in your mind, and now you want -- nay, must -- light some other powder on fire to appease Those Who Slumber? Try ammonium dichromate: It turns into a miniature volcano, like a slightly turbocharged version of that terrible soggy baking soda one you made in grade school. You know, the one that was so bad, it made Dad stop loving Mom and caused the divorce.
Brandon Albright
His parents celebrated 33 years last May.
Kind of a letdown, wasn't it? After the creeping madness we showed you earlier, this grade school science fair fare just won't cut it. But we warn you: Don't do it. It's not worth it. It's not worth it to mix the two and light the whole mess on fire. We mean, sure, you'll get a goddamn Balrog sending his flaming whips up from the Ember Dimension ...
Albert Schweinstein
We've edited the part where it devours the cameraman's soul.
... but both substances are toxic as hell, and the fumes could do you serious harm. Also, you have literally no contingency plan for taming that Balrog, do you? What are you gonna do, ask him to sit down and play Mario Kart?
Are you? Because that would be awesome.
Daniel has a blog where he often dispenses dubious advice. For a completely different kind of fun with dangerous chemicals, like Jason's Facebook page.
We all have our shameful pleasures. But moreover we all have those shameful pleasures we'll defend to the death. In our latest podcast, Daniel O'Brien hosts Cracked Columnist Soren Bowie and Riot's Liana Maeby to discuss their terrible tastes in pop culture. You can download it here and subscribe to it on iTunes here.
Related Reading: Ready for more science? Click here and read about the shit plants get up to when we're not around. Next read about how plastic is shrinking our dicks, and other horrible penis-related discoveries. Wind down with a thrilling expose of all the retarded food myths you believe RIGHT NOW!


text:
30% Off All Single & Double Hammocks & 15% Off All Accessories (Rain Fly, Bug Net, Hanging Kits)
30% Off all Single & Double Hammocks
Discounted Prices:
Double: $52.47
Single: $45.47
15% Off all Accessories (Rain Fly, Bug Net, Hanging Kits)
Discounted Prices:
V9 Strong Tarp: $59.46
Bug Free Hammock Shield: $59.46
Rope & Carabiner Bundle: $17.81
Go Anywhere Rope Kit: $10.16
*$8 flat rate shipping. Woot Coupons can be used together on the same order, but can't be combined with any other coupons or promotions.
5 Comments add a comment
Happy Wooting everyone. We'll be packaging and shipping orders as quickly as possible so you should see them on your doorstep in just a few days. As always, if you have any questions or there's anything I can do to help just let me know!
Seth Haber
Trek Light Gear | Founder, CEO
A bit cold in my neck of the woods for hammocking... but it's never to early to get ready for next summer!
I picked up the double hammock and the robe & carabiner kit a while back and love it.
My only complaint is that when in the double by myself, the sides really wrap up and around you like a cocoon!
However, the thing is VERY light, very well made and goes back into the bag easily. So far I've just left the ropes and hardware outside for a few months now and they are still fine so durability shouldn't be a problem. Shipping was super fast and they even included a little handwritten "Hope you like it!" note which was a nice touch :)
If you've been on the fence I say go for it and I don't think you'll be disappointed.
The issue with the wrapping up around you can be resolved if you lay in the hammock the "proper" way. You need to lay across the spine of the hammock at a slight angle. It'll level the hammock out a bit and it shouldn't wrap up so much.
I love my double hammock! The wrapping around you is pretty great when it's a bit chilly outside too!
(Not trying to be condescending or anything. Just trying to be helpful.)
Lotsa people will use a good sleeping bag in them with camping for superlight backpacking. My zero degree bag would be perfect for my hammock and the Rockies... soon as I get my bravery on to walk out there solo, any day now!


text:
TTI Inc. is the number one distributor of KEMET capacitors offering our customers the deepest inventory and most knowledgeable sales force in the electronics industry. Should you need additional assistance, TTI's customer service team is ready to help at 1-877-645-4TTI.
New! Flex Suppressor® - An EMI suppressor sheet that insures clean electromagnetic environments.


text:
Periodization is a training technique that attempts to time workouts in accordance with the body's ability to recover, so that new stimulus occurs whenever the body is at an optimum state of recovery, and never when the body is still strongly weakened from a previous effort. Typically the term is ...
565 views
What should I do if I can't complete my program's prescribed workout?
This is a general question, but I'll give some specifics to fill it in. I'm on the Texas Method periodization program. On Monday, I was unable to complete the prescribed workout of a 5lb increase in ...


text:
By MARY BARKER
High school classes in Cheboygan, Indian River and Onaway are entering their second year of a highly popular video production and broadcast program provided through the Michigan Interscholastic Connection, (MIC), and in conjunction with the Michigan High School Athletic Association, (MHSAA).
Sparky Nitchman, founder of MIC, said last year the three schools together produced more than 120 videos and created tens of thousands of hits on Web site pages. Students record and produce sporting events, which are available on-demand within hours or a day after the event by visiting www.mhsaa.tv and looking for the link to the specific school.
"Most of the production is on-demand. Students produce and record and upload after the game. The events are archived and available for up to a year," said Nitchman.
Students have broadened their production into other areas including band concerts, class projects, teacher interviews, plays and holiday events. In addition, a live-streaming production of graduation ceremonies provided at all three schools in the spring was very successful, said Nitchman.
"The live-stream graduations were a huge hit. Hundreds were able to tune in and watch their family members and friends graduate in real time," said Nitchman.
Under the MIC program, schools pay an initial fee for equipment and technical support. MIC invests money to get the programs running and maintained and generates revenue by offering local advertising on the Web sites. Among the businesses that have partnered with MIC to make it such a big hit in just two years are Citizens National Bank, Awakon Federal Credit Union and Presque Isle Electrice & Gas, (PIE&G).
Barb Kowalewsky is teaching a first-year video broadcasting class for 10 students in grades 9-12 in the Onaway school district that was developed out of the success of last year's MIC program. With the experience gained last year, she was able to secure a $5,000 grant through PIE&G to purchase two computers and software that will allow the students to expand their production skills and capabilities.
This year students will take it to the next level, delving into events outside of the sports arena that reach a broader audience, which could include happenings in the Onaway community.
"They will shoot video of their own and create features; do in-house productions and maybe even documentaries. I think that is achievable," said Kowalewsky.
"Video editing is so much fun. Kids really get into it. They can add music, rearrange things. A lot of it is new for me too. The kids pick it up so fast and I learn fast," said Kowalewsky.
In Indian River, Nathan Jacques' video production class is in high demand with 36 students in grades 10-12 enrolled. This year, he said students will beef up their production and editing work with more pre- and post- development. More projects will be done in class creating commercials involving sponsorships, which can be aired during down time on some of the other events being aired online.
Page 2 of 2 - "I'm incredibly excited. It's incredibly popular. I'm loving that there is so much enthusiasm only three days into the year. It's a great creative outlet for them... Some of them look forward all day to get to this class," said Jacques.
In Cheboygan, the work achieved in last year's media literacy class taught by Sandy Safford was so impressive it created buzz far outside of the district. Nitchman said Cheboygan has one of the best programs of all 18 districts involved in the MIC program in Northern Michigan. Fox Sports Detroit even selected one of the football productions from the Cheboygan class to air on its network last year.
"The success hinges on the quality of the teachers and Sandy Safford does a tremendous job. She tries new things and is the main reason Cheboygan has one of the highest quality and most complete programs," said Nitchman.
Location, ST | website.com


text:
A daughter, Etta Luna Catherine, to Annie Townsend of Waterbury, March 4, at Waterbury Hospital. Grandparents are Catherine Coviello and Ted Townsend of Waterbury. Great-grandparents are Kenneth and Lucille Coviello and Jon and Theresa Noble of Waterbury.
Read more of this story and more!
7-Day Subscribers have FREE access to everything on rep-am.com and our E-Edition.
CLICK HERE to register and activate your access,.
Not a subscriber?
You can purchase a single-day subscription for only $0.75 to read this and access all of our content and our E-Edition.
CLICK HERE purchase a single day subscription.
Become an electronic subscriber to the Republican-American for only $8 a month. CLICK HERE.
Follow Us
Post a reader commentWe encourage your feedback and dialog.
Please be civil and respectful.
If you're witty, to the point and quotable, your reader comments may also be included on the Around the Towns page of The Sunday Republican.
Readers must be registered and logged in to post comments on the site. Registration is free. Click Here to register.
A Subscription is not required to post comments only a Registration.
Log In
|Register / Forgotten Password?
More stories from Births


text:
Several thousand people gathered in Paris Sunday in a low-key ceremony to mark a year since a million and half citizens thronged the French capital in a show of unity following jihadist attacks on satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish supermarket.
A man who attacked a Paris police station last week had lived in a centre for asylum-seekers in Germany, German investigators say, a finding likely to fuel criticism of Chancellor Angela Merkel's liberal stance towards war refugees.
France on Saturday paid homage to four Jewish hostages killed at a kosher supermarket in Paris a year after a spate of jihadist attacks that began with a deadly assault on the Charlie Hebdo weekly.
Hundreds of French mosques are participating in a major open-house event this weekend, offering visitors the opportunity to come in for tea and a chat about Islam in a country shaken by militant attacks.
One year on, Yohann Dorai, one of the Jewish hostages who hid for four hours in a shop freezer from terrorist gunman Amedy Coulibaly, speaks out for the first time about his ordeal in an interview with The Local.
One year after the coldblooded terror attack on a kosher store in Paris, the Jewish community still live in real fear despite the protection of thousands of soldiers, writes Ben McPartland.
A French daredevil died when a mid-air acrobatic stunt went tragically wrong and he fell to his death from a hot air balloon, his colleagues revealed.
While the average French person is unlikely to speak advanced English, many aren't afraid to lie about their competencies, according to a new study.
In the middle of the night and in the pouring rain, a five-year-old French boy jumped on his bike and pedaled to get help for his father who had suffered from a heart attack.
UPDATED: A picture was emerging of the jihadist who attacked a Paris police station with a meat cleaver but on Friday investigators were still trying to determine his true identity.
Get ready: French shops will open their doors on Wednesday for their six-week winter sales. Here's everything you need to know.
A British comedian has produced what is probably the most cutting critique of the French greeting kiss and it's gone viral in France. Warning: Video contains strong language and may offend fans of 'la bise'.
While 90 percent of the French population support the move to strip convicted terrorists of their nationality, a leading human rights chief tells The Local the reform is doomed to fail and is just what the jihadists would have wanted.
A mammoth operation begins on Monday to drain and clean out the picturesque Canal Saint-Martin in Paris. But what will happen to the fish and what will the cleaners find?
January 2016 sees the introduction of numerous new rules and law changes in France. Here's everything you need to know.
One year after France was rocked by the attacks in Paris The Local looks at how the country has changed.
Police probing the November terror attacks have found three suicide vests in a Brussels flat and a fingerprint belonging to fugitive Salah Abdeslam.
Celebrated French marine explorer Jacques Cousteau's iconic ship the Calypso - out of commission after an accident 20 years ago - will sail again in a few months, its owners said on Thursday.
The mayor of Paris announced that from January 2016, creches and nurseries in the capital will be covered by the city's counter-terrorism operation to help prevent attacks.
Paris authorities have moved tens of thousands of fish to clean up the Canal Saint-Martin, a popular waterway commissioned by Napoleon that attracts hordes of tourists and revellers.
Vienna's police chief has caused outrage by advising women in the wake of sexual assaults over New Year not to go out on the streets alone.
Swiss artist Milo Moiré took to the streets naked in 4C temperatures outside Cologne cathedral on Friday in a bid to show that women should not be molested under any circumstances.
Men of 'Arab background' were likely responsible for mass sexual assaults in Cologne over the New Year, police said on Monday - as a social media storm accused police and media of a cover-up.
One high-performing foreign student left Denmark on Thursday and another is facing the same fate soon. Their crime? Working too much.
One republican-minded town in Catalonia came up with a nifty way around a law that requires the portrait of the monarch to be displayed in every council chamber.
Ex-hostage at Jewish store breaks silence one year on from attack
Here's how France has changed one year on from the January attacks
In pictures: The Canal Saint-Martin in Paris reveals its dirty secrets
Man with Isis emblem attacks Paris police on Charlie Hebdo anniversary
A French woman's baby died while she was being deported for Isis links
What really needs to change in France in 2016
British comedian rips apart the French greeting kiss
C'est parti! France's winter sales have begun, here's all you need to know
Charlie Hebdo publishes special edition a year after jihadist attack
Who is the forgotten victim of France's 2015 terror attacks?
Probe in France after rape shown on Snapchat
Galette des Rois: The French tart with a tiny charm
France is falling into terrorists' trap: Plan to strip nationality is absurd
Charlie Hebdo victim's name misspelled on memorial plaque
Sponsored Article
TTIP: Why France should follow Sweden's example
France mosque attacker wanted to become a 'martyr'
The famed Canal Saint-Martin in Paris to be emptied for cleaning
Six quick tips for finding a job in France in 2016
Islands, wine and Euro 2016: Ten reasons to visit France in 2016
Business & Money
French stores to ban plastic bags from March 2016
Paris attacks: Wife of Bataclan shooter 'proud' and 'happy'
TOP TEN: France's most unbelievable stories of 2015
Year in review: France's best moments of 2015
Opinion: 2015 is the year that France will want to forget


text:
Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies
On leave of absence for the 2013-14 academic year and the fall semester of the 2014-15 academic year.
Hubbard Hall - 19
Current teaching schedule available on the public course finder.
The Government of Social Life in Colonial India: Liberalism, Religious Law and Women's Rights, Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming April 2012.
"Gender and the Human," Gender & History 23, 2 (August 2011).
Invited contribution: "Marriage & Family in Colonial Hindu Law." In Hinduism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge Companion Series. Edited by Timothy Lubin, Donald R. Davis, Jr., & Jayanth K. Krishnan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 89-104.
"Marriage and the Morality of Exchange: Defining the Terrain of Law in Late Nineteenth Century Western India." In Decentering Empire: Britain, India, and the Transcolonial World. Edited by Durba Ghosh and Dane Kennedy. Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 2006: 51–75.
"Property and Attachments: Defining Autonomy and the Claims of Family in Nineteenth-Century Western India." Comparative Studies in Society and History 47, 3 (July 2005): 611–637.
Review of Marriage and Modernity: Family Values in Colonial Bengal, by Rochona Majumdar, Asian Studies Review, 35, 1 (March 2011).
Review of Bengal in Global Concept History: Culturalism in the Age of Capital, by Andrew Sartori, American Anthropologist, 112, 3 (September 2010): 491-2.
Review of Sex and the Family in Colonial India: The Making of Empire, by Durba Ghosh, Journal of Asian Studies, 68, 2 (May 2009): 650-1.
"Indian Indentured Labor and the History of Citizenship and Human Rights." [Article under revision for The American Historical Review.]
Genealogies of the Human: Indian Labor, Migration and the Idea of Emancipation
[Monograph manuscript under preparation.]


text:
Anyone used these together yet? I'm going on a trip around the U.S in january and want to shoot some 360 hdr's
Need the settings ASAP so i can practice and make sure i'm not doing anything wrong.
Any links anyone has to stitching 360 HDR's will also be much appreciated.
cheers fellas


text:
A new study, released today by the Harvard Kennedy School's Program on Crisis Leadership, takes a look back at the Boston Marathon bombings of last year, and the aftermath of the manhunt in Watertown for alleged bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
The report, titled "Why Was Boston Strong? Lessons from the Boston Marathon Bombing," was the result of extensive research and interviews with 25 senior-level officials.
The Havard Gazette quotes the report:
"Boston was strong in the face of a horrific terrorist bombing of an iconic city for a host of interrelated reasons," the report finds. "A few must simply be attributed … to infusions of good luck that favored the response and reduced the consequences of the attack. Others were the result of careful planning and fully intentional action, but are nonetheless unique to the Boston setting, and would be hard to replicate elsewhere." But most "were intentional and are replicable elsewhere. … We seek to understand both what worked best, why it worked, and what worked less effectively — all with the aim of assessing what can be done going forward in Boston and elsewhere to prepare even better for future events."
A copy of the report (PDF) is available at the HKS website.
Location, ST | website.com


text:
Atm I do use my R1 with an Tokina 10-17 @12mm, doing 6 shots at 60°. 6 because I get the best results in PTGui. I came across other threads and the Canon 15mm 2.8. Now I thought why don't use my Tokina at 15mm.
1. The question I have is, what will be different from using 12mm apart from fov. Will I do get higher resolution because less overlapping?
Well I'd have to do nad. and zen. which was not a must at 12mm.
2. How would you set up the R1? At 0°, doing 6 shots, portrait + zen. and nad.?


text:
I always know that Australia Day and our first barbie of the year is approaching when Lou starts to plan the guestlist and food (this is no ordinary BBQ) and I get the annual Meister email explaining the meaning of Un-Australian behaviour; which is nothing to do with the cricket.
If this raised a smile, spare a thought for those less fortunate Aussies this year. No not their cricket team. Do what you can and donate a little.


text:
1. Ketchup, one of the most popular condiments in the US, is a half a billion dollar industry.
2. Ketchup is originally a spicy fish sauce called Ke-Tsiap from east Asia. It was brought west in the 17th century and by the early 1800′s recipes for ketchup as we know it started to appear in cookbooks.
3. H.J. Heinz Company is the world leader in ketchup sales, with a 60% market share in the US. It sells over 600 million bottles of ketchup annually.
4. Nutritionally, ketchup , as well as other cooked tomato products, is a good source of the anti-oxidant lycopene. Lycopenes are beneficial in the prevention of prostate and colon cancers. This is one of the rare cases where cooking a raw vegetable actually improves the bio-availability of a nutrient instead of reducing it.
5. 25% of ketchup is sugar!! Now you know why kids love it, and consider ketchup the main part of a meal, with the rest of the food serving as a condiment.
6. Ketchup is also high in salt. a single teaspoon contains almost ten percent's worth of the daily maximum recommended value of sodium.
7. The ingredient list for Heinz ketchup is:
Tomato Concentrate , Distilled Vinegar, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Corn Syrup, Salt, Spice, Onion Powder, Natural Flavoring.
If you were wondering why corn syrup (a cheaper sugar than table sugar) appears twice, a possible answer could be that by splitting the sugar ingredient into 2 separate ingredients, it doesn't appear in the second place in the list, psychologically reducing the fear of buying the product. We're still trying to figure out what that Natural Flavor is. Spice too.
8. The FDA strictly regulates what products may be called ketchup; especially important are viscosity and the presence of tomatoes and tomato solids.
9. In 2005, after urging by Heinz and several other tomato product manufacturers, the FDA allowed tomato product labels to tout health claims, due to the aforementioned lycopenes. The ruling includes ketchup as well as tomato pasta sauces and marinades.
10. Squeeze bottle were introduced in the 1980′s to solve the problem of ketchup not flowing out of glass containers.
11. Not everyone is a big fan of ketchup. In the Netherlands, mayonnaise is the condiment of choice with french fries.
What to do at the supermarket:
It seems that ketchup is a staple in every household. If you are concerned about sugar, look for ketchup products artificially sweetened as a way to reduce sweet calories. There are also reduced sodium ketchups available in most supermarkets.
Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription
Help us test our new food comparison tool: alpha.fooducate.com


text:
MOSTI, Betty Jane, 84, of Steubenville, died Monday, Dec. 17, 2012, at Trinity West ER.
She was born on April 15, 1928, in New Cumberland, WV and is the daughter of the late William and Grace Brewer Carroll.
Betty Jane was also preceded in death by her sister, Joan Loving of Columbus in 2011.
Article Photos
Betty is survived by her husband, Donald R. Mosti whom she married on June 9, 1956, one son, David (Marilyn) Mosti of Steubenville, one daughter Susan (David) Mavromatis Reese of Hammonton, New Jersey, a sister, Kathleen "Katie" Carroll, of Steubenville, four grandsons, Christopher and George Mavromatis of Hammonton, New Jersey, and Jared and Justin Mosti of Steubenville.
Betty Jane was a graduate of the Steubenville High School Class of 1946 and a graduate of Ohio University. She was a member of Alpha Xi Delta National Sorority. After graduation, Betty was an elementary schoolteacher in the Cuyahoga Falls School System and later in the Steubenville City School System for a number of years at McKinley School. Betty Jane was a member of the former Belleview Town and Country Ladies Golf Association. She was an avid bowler and a former member of the Steubenville Women's Bowling Association. In later years, she assisted her husband and son in the operation of the Mosti Funeral Home.
Calling hours will be on Thursday, Dec. 20, from 2-4 and from 6-8 p.m. and on Friday, Dec. 21, from 10 a.m. until the time of services at 12 noon at the Mosti Funeral Home, Sunset Chapel, 4435 Sunset Blvd. with Msgr. William Cornelius and Fr. Thomas Nau, officiants. She will be laid to rest in Mt. Calvary Cemetery.
Memorial contributions may be made to Steubenville High School, 420 North Fourth Street, Steubenville, OH 43952 or Catholic Central High School, 320 West View, Steubenville, OH 43952.
Share tributes and memories online at www.mostifuneralhome.com.


text:
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Device failover on ob1
From: Pavel Shamis (Pasha) (pashash_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-03 11:49:44
> I have not, but there should be no difference. The failover code only
> gets triggered when an error happens. Otherwise, there are no
> differences in the code paths while everything is functioning normally.
Sounds good. I still did not have time to review the code. I will try to
do it during this week.
> Rolf
> On 08/03/09 11:14, Pavel Shamis (Pasha) wrote:
>> Rolf,
>> Did you compare latency/bw for failover-enabled code VS trunk ?
>> Pasha.
>> Rolf Vandevaart wrote:
>>> Hi folks:
>>> As some of you know, I have also been looking into implementing
>>> failover as well. I took a different approach as I am solving the
>>> problem within the openib BTL itself. This of course means that
>>> this only works for failing from one openib BTL to another but that
>>> was our area of interest. This also means that we do not need to
>>> keep track of fragments as we get them back from the completion
>>> queue upon failure. We then extract the relevant information and
>>> repost on the other working endpoint.
>>> My work has been progressing at
>>> http://bitbucket.org/rolfv/ompi-failover.
>>> This only currently works for send semantics so you have to run with
>>> -mca btl_openib_flags 1.
>>> Rolf
>>> On 07/31/09 05:49, Mouhamed Gueye wrote:
>>>> Hi list,
>>>> Here is an update on our work concerning device failover.
>>>> As many of you suggested, we reoriented our work on ob1 rather than
>>>> dr and we now have a working prototype on top of ob1. The approach
>>>> is to store btl descriptors sent to peers and delete them when we
>>>> receive proof of delivery. So far, we rely on completion callback
>>>> functions, assuming that the message is delivered when the
>>>> completion function is called, that is the case of openib. When a
>>>> btl module fails, it is removed from the endpoint's btl list and
>>>> the next one is used to retransmit stored descriptors. No
>>>> extra-message is transmitted, it only consists in additions to the
>>>> header. It has been mainly tested with two IB modules, in both
>>>> multi-rail (two separate networks) and multi-path (a big unique
>>>> network).
>>>> You can grab and test the patch here (applies on top of the trunk) :
>>>> http://bitbucket.org/gueyem/ob1-failover/
>>>> To compile with failover support, just define
>>>> --enable-device-failover at configure. You can then run a
>>>> benchmark, disconnect a port and see the failover operate.
>>>> A little latency increase (~ 2%) is induced by the failover layer
>>>> when no failover occurs. To accelerate the failover process on
>>>> openib, you can try to lower the btl_openib_ib_timeout openib
>>>> parameter to 15 for example instead of 20 (default value).
>>>> Mouhamed
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


text:
WACO (November 14, 2012)- He's been sentenced to death and has now appealed, but Ricky Cummings, who's an indigent defendant, hasn't and will not pay a dime for the efforts to prove his innocence.
So who picks up the check after a capital murder trial? How much did justice cost?
McLennan County Assistant District Attorney Michael Jarrett weighs in, saying, "I think the goal of this office is to ensure justice."
"We must make sure it's there for our community, and you can't put a price on justice."
Jarrett helped convict Ricky Cummings. He battled Cummings' court appointed defense attorneys on a daily basis. The bill for Cummings' defense lawyers rolled into the 19th District Court Tuesday.
The totals are as follows:
Defense Investigators: $20,780
Defense Attorneys: $168,164
Experts: $117,829
One of the biggest defense expenses was for a cell phone expert who examined Cummings' cell phone prior to the trial.
The defense hoped the findings would prove where Cummings' was the night of the murder, but the experts' findings were never used in court and he was never called to take the stand.
"A judge and the court has to give a lot of deference to the opinion of the defense attorneys," Jarrett said.
"They have to tell the court what's important in their preparation and I think Judge Strother really helped them get what they needed."
Yet, District Judge Ralph Strother told News 10 he's never seen a county pay so much to an expert who was never used in a trial.
He said he plans on trying to find ways of how to get a refund for the county.
But in the end, dollars and cents isn't what the McLennan County DA's office really cares about.
"If it had cost $308,000 dollars should we have tried the case? Absolutely. Because in the end, justice was served," Jarrett said.


text:
In transformers, the ratio of the voltages equals the ratio of the turns - so double the output coil's turns and the output voltage doubles. Then, in order to conserve energy, current halves.
This makes perfect sense in terms of P=VI, but what happened to V=IR? Doubling voltage and halving the current seems to completely contradict this basic law. That is, of course, unless the resistance in the output circuit changes, with R proportional to V^2 - but I don't see how this is possible.
So how can a transformer obey both laws? Can resistance change or am I missing something else?


text:
15 Sep 2009 12:00 PM #1
[2.3.0] Chrome hangs - EditorGrid,JsonStore, ComboBox
Hi all,
Chrome: v126.96.36.199
ExtJS: v2.3.0
I've been struggling for a few days with a bug in Chrome. At first I thought it was my error, but I've got an idea today and I was able to reproduce it in the edit grid example.
I think it might be a bug in Chrome, but I think it's better if somebody more educated decides that.
Basically, the bug comes down to editable grid, combo with jsonstore and doubleclicking / clicking on the 'no more rows area' (imagine you have a grid with only 2 items inside, the 'no more rows area' is below the 2nd row, no more data/rows after that). It's the yellow area on the picture.
I've created an example based on edit-grid example.
There are also picture with what to do, to reproduce the bug.
Also, are my combobox options ok... maybe there's somewhere a problem?
This + shortening plants.xml is the only thing I've changed
var cm = new Ext.grid.ColumnModel([{ id: 'common', header: "Common Name", dataIndex: 'common', width: 220, editor: new fm.TextField({ allowBlank: false }) }, { header: "Light", dataIndex: 'light', width: 130, editor: new Ext.form.ComboBox({ allowBlank: false, displayField: 'al_name', valueField: 'al_code', store: new Ext.data.JsonStore({ url: 'res.php', baseParams: { start: 0, limit: 5, sort: 'al_code', dir: 'ASC' }, fields: ['al_code', 'al_name'] }), mode: 'remote', enableKeyEvents: true, editable: true, resizable: true, forceSelection: true, triggerAction: 'all', selectOnFocus: true, emptyText: '-', listWidth: 'auto', minListWidth: 'auto', typeAhead: true }) },
[ { "al_code":"00", "al_name":"Janet" }, { "al_code":"01", "al_name":"HLX (Hapag-Lloyd Express)" }, { "al_code":"02", "al_name":"Viva Aerobus" }, { "al_code":"03", "al_name":"WebJet Linhas Aereas" }, { "al_code":"0A", "al_name":"Amber Air" } ]
Please see pictures.
15 Sep 2009 6:47 PM #2
it's a Chrome 2.x bug (though google claims to have fixed it).
i've had it hang on me on other javascript-heavy non-Ext pages, as well as the editorgrid.
i can't find the old issue i starred (also had to do with facebook and some other sites), but here are some of the facebook-related issues reported for Chrome 2:
one thing you could try for now is the Chrome 3 beta channel.
once i switched my users over to Chrome 3.x from 2.x stable, the problem disappeared.
even Chrome 1.x didn't exhibit the problem.
16 Sep 2009 12:46 AM #3
Thx for the tips! It's good to know I am not the only one
I will give a Chrome v3.x a try.


text:
Calgary Flames vs San Jose Sharks (Cancelled Due to NHL LockoutTue, January 15, 2013 - 7:00 PMScotiabank Saddledome in Calgary, AB
We are sorry, the date for this event has already passed. This event took place on 1/15/2013. Click here to view upcoming events for NHL Lockout Season.
Still unsure? Check out our user reviews for:
Have a question? Need help? Call us at 800.477.5285


text:
Is there any option to make a custom login page to facebook from my app? i know that i cant customize the default login page on the facebook SDK.
my proggramer sais that we can use it by php.. do apple will agree my app if it will have such connect like that? My iPhone Proggramer said to me that it is possible to set up login window that send the username and password by "get" method and then connect to facebook by php facebook sdk, is it correct? thanks alot, Ive been looking long time for an answer.


text:
Monday, March 10, 2008
Simple Risotto
8 comments:
- Romina said...
Hey Vegan Dad,
I was wondering what brand of Nutritional Yeast you use.
- March 10, 2008 at 10:42 PM
- Veg-a-Nut said...
I love it! I am rolling in my chair laughing. I can't stand the smell of Mc Donalds or any fast food for that matter. I have wanted to make risotto for so long.I wonder what I can sub the white wine for. Any ideas? White grape juice may be too sweet.
- March 11, 2008 at 2:24 AM
- lao80 said...
You're tagged.
- March 11, 2008 at 3:24 AM
- Sharon R said...
I'm not a fan of McDonald's either.
I love peas and rice together and your recipe looks really good; I like to use your recipes because they're easy to follow as well. The only thing I don't have is the nutritional yeast (I'm wondering if it would make a huge difference in the taste).
- March 11, 2008 at 7:39 AM
- Vegan Dad said...
Romina: I get my yeast at the bulk food store (Bulk Barn, a Canadian chain). I don't really like it, though, since as of late it has had a very strong roasted/burnt flavour. I am thinking of ordering some through the co-op.
Veg-a-nut: Just add more stock and forget the wine. It gives a more complex flavour, but is not needed to get the right texture. Don't they have de-alcaholized wines? Or are all those "sparkling" wines?
Sharon: Nutritional yeast is also optional. It gives a cheesy flavour and I use it instead of parmasean.
Lao80: this is the second time I have been tagged. I guess I should do the survey thingy. The people demand it!
- March 11, 2008 at 11:30 AM
- Anonymous said...
I needed a good laugh this afternoon and your McDonald's story gave me just that! My husband and I used to eat it all the time, but now can't stand it either. The same goes for Taco Bell and Del Taco - shopping late one day we did not realize we were near a facility where they cook the meat mix up before sending it to individual stores. My husband asked me if I had seen an open dumpster nearby because it smelled like some meat had been thrown out and was rotting!
Rissoto looks great by way - love the peas in it - only way I can get the hubby to eat them!
- March 11, 2008 at 6:30 PM
- Lisa said...
I've been lurking around your blog for a while, and just had to comment today! My cat used to eat dry food, and one day I was carrying a new bag of it into my apartment building. I was kind of annoyed that the hallway seemed to reek of McDonalds, but then really got annoyed when I could still smell it once I got into my apartment. And then I realized it wasn't McDonalds at all - it was the cat food I was carrying! It's amazing, but it really does smell like McDonalds. :)
- March 11, 2008 at 7:04 PM
- Eesh said...
That was a great story! I just laughed out loud reading it. I just loved the innocence behind your wife's comment. I remember once when I was younger I was sitting in my grandmother's car and eating doritos. She suddenly said out loud. "What is that smell?? It smells like dirty socks!" and I stopped and said. "It's Doritos, it's food" but I never forgot that and ever since every time I smell Doritos I think of dirty socks lol.
- March 11, 2008 at 8:59 PM