text:
Skip to main content
Search the history of over 498 billion pages on the Internet.
Search the Wayback Machine
All Texts
This Just In
Smithsonian Libraries
Lincoln Collection
Additional Collections
eBooks & Texts
American Libraries
Canadian Libraries
Universal Library
Shareware CD-ROMs
Community Texts
Project Gutenberg
Biodiversity Heritage Library
Open Library
Children's Library
Kimberly Kubus
All Video
This Just In
Prelinger Archives
Democracy Now!
Occupy Wall Street
TV NSA Clip Library
TV News
Animation & Cartoons
Arts & Music
Community Video
Computers & Technology
Cultural & Academic Films
Ephemeral Films
Understanding 9/11
News & Public Affairs
Spirituality & Religion
Sports Videos
Videogame Videos
Youth Media
All Audio
This Just In
Grateful Dead
Old Time Radio
78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
Live Music Archive
Audio Books & Poetry
Community Audio
Computers & Technology
Music, Arts & Culture
News & Public Affairs
Non-English Audio
Librivox Free Audiobook
Radio Programs
Spirituality & Religion
All Software
This Just In
Old School Emulation
MS-DOS Games
Historical Software
Classic PC Games
Software Library
Internet Arcade
Community Software
Software Sites
Tucows Software Library
Vintage Software
Console Living Room
Atari 2600
Magnavox Odyssey 2
Bally Astrocade
Sega Genesis
Sega Game Gear
Atari 7800
Sega Master System
All Image
This Just In
Flickr Commons
Occupy Wall Street Flickr
Cover Art
USGS Maps
Metropolitan Museum
NASA Images
Solar System Collection
Ames Research Center
Brooklyn Museum
Toggle navigation
10:00 am
here's a better idea. pillsbury grands! flaky layers biscuits in just 15 minutes the light delicate layers add a layer of warmth to your next dinner. pillsbury grands biscuits let the making begin. [ malcrrkkhshziiiizzlllee. to this symphony of flavor: beautiful. shhhhshshshshhshshhhhhsshhhshs. gorgeous! here comes the crescendo. kkerrrrbbuuuuuucraaackkk. just...incredible. pillsbury toaster strudel. if beethoven made breakfast.
10:01 am
with a free breakfast made just the way you like it. with a breakfast like this, you could pretty much handle anything. anything? anything. [ screams ] a rambunctious toddler? of course. uncle ralph? sure. a roman gladiator? you bet. the thing under my bed? why not? ♪ yes. [ female announcer ] get more with embassy suites. book early and save up to 20%. >> chris: i'm chris wallace. the debate over guns gets even
10:02 am
more intense. ♪ >> too many children are dying. too many children. we must do something. >> chris: a dramatic hearing on capitol hill underscores the deep divisions over how to prevent mass shootings. we'll ask two of the leading advocates to make their cases: mark sekelly, husband of former congresswoman, gabrielle giffords, and wayne lapierre, head of the national rifle association, kelly and laperriere, only on fox news sunday and senate republicans go after one of their former colleagues who wants to be defense secretary. >> we write, that is a direct question, i expect a direct answer, yes or no. >> chris: we'll ask the panel if chuck hagel's nomination is in
10:03 am
trouble and our power player of the week, a cheerleader for poetry, all right now on fox news sunday. >> chris: and, hello, again, from fox news in washington. president obama travels to minneapolis tomorrow to con his push for new gun control. and saturday the white house released this picture of the president skeet shooting at camp david which he says he does all the time. meanwhile, the national rifle association is fighting any new limits on guns. the first big legislative battle this year and today we will cover it in-depth. we'll talk with wayne lapierre, head of the nra in a moment. but, first, mark kelly, retired astronaut, navy captain and husband of former congresswoman gabrielle giffords who was shot two years ago. he and his wife launched a new group, "americans for responsible solutions." captain, let's start with your wife's dramatic testimony before a senate committee this week.
10:04 am
>> you must act. be bold. be courageous, americans are counting on you. >> chris: how is gabby doing? >> she's doing great, chris. you know, she enjoyed being there. in front of the senate. it was a little bit of having her former job back, in a sense. being on capitol hill. >> chris: let's get to this debate. because your wife's shooting raises some of the questions at the core of the gun control controversy. jared loughner had been suspended from college because of concerns that he posed a danger to others and yet he was able to go to a store in tucson, pass the background check and buy the gun he used to shoot your wife. so, the question is, what good does it do to make more people go through these background
10:05 am
checks when jared loughner with his problems was able to pass a background check? >> that is a good question, chris. he was clearly mentally ill. the school knew it, his parents knew it and he was expelled from community college because of his mental illness. if his condition was entered into the system, into the criminal background check system, and he went to do that background check, i would assume that he would have been rejected. so, in the case of jared loughner, if arizona would have entered 121,000 records that they had not entered into the system, if his record was one of those, and the he probably would have been rejected, like, since 1999, 1 million criminals and mentally ill have been rejected when trying to buy a weapon. the other point we need to make is, there is a gun show
10:06 am
loophole. so in the case of the rejection at the gun store, he could have easily gone to a gun show or private seller and get a gun, so this is a problem but we can solve it. >> chris: let me ask you about another part of the issue, of the debate. he shot your wife and all the others at that shopping center that morning, with a gun with a magazine that held 33 rounds. if there were a limit on the number of rounds, the president wants it to be ten rounds, what difference would it have made? >> i think it would have made a big difference, as he tried to reload one 33-round magazine for another 33-round magazine he dropped the magazine and it gave him for a woman to grab it and time for a couple of people to restrain him. if, let's say, for a second, that that was a ten-round magazine and the same thing
10:07 am
happened. you would have had a lot less people shot and a lot less people murdered. even nine-year-old christina taylor green, born on 9/11 and didn't live to see her tenth birthday likely would be alive today, because she was shot with a bullet after round number 13. >> chris: as you know, captain, ray laperriere will be on in the next segment and i want to deal with the arguments he makes. he said he had an assault weapons ban for ten years and it didn't work. >> well, i don't know if it worked or not. i haven't looked at all of the statistics. common sense tells me that if it is much more difficult for criminals and the mentally ill to get assault weapons and high capacity magazines and guns in general we'll save lives. i served in the military for 25 years. i mean, i know the value of having an assault weapon, a gun that can kill many people, many
10:08 am
quickly. i personally don't believe that we should have, you know, the average person on the street, including criminals, mentally ill and terrorists should have easy access to those weapons. in cases of mass shootings when an assault weapon has been used, we know typically twice as many people are shot and that means more people die and are severely injured. >> chris: all right, the nra says there are already 9,000 federal gun laws on the books. the problem is the government doesn't enforce them. >> yes, i agree with wayne lapierre on that point. there are gun laws on the books that are not enforced, specifically with regards to background checks. there were 1.7 million people that failed the criminal background check since 1999. and, not enough of them are prosecuted. they should be prosecuted and there should be stiff penalties but at the same time, we can't give those people a second option as to where to go get a
10:09 am
gun. and, right now, that is the gun show or the private seller. if we were to close those loopholes, it would be much more difficult for criminals and the mentally ill to get a gun. you know, gabby and i know it will be a hard problem to solve. i mean, she was somebody in congress who worked with republicans and worked across the aisle and that is what we need to do here today. you know, these are difficult problems. but, in the united states of america, we solve difficult problems. i mean, we sent men to the moon and built the international space station and cured diseases and we can fix this. >> chris: the basic question, the basic argument, the nra makes, is they say, and the supreme court upheld, that there is a constitutional right to bear arms and they say government doesn't have the right to say what kind of gun, how big a magazine, according to the nra, that is tyranny. >> well, i don't agree. you know, i do agree that every
10:10 am
american has the right to own a firearm, to protect himself, to protect his family, to protect his property. gabby and i are both gun owners and i don't think will find a person stronger a supporter of the second amendment than me and i defended it my life over iraq and kuwait but this isn't about the second amendment anymore. it is about public safety. we had 20 first graders die in their classrooms because we don't have sufficient gun violence legislation in the country. in 1934, we banned automatic weapons, i argue the semi-automatic assault weapon with a high capacity magazine is too dangerous to be on the street where criminals and terrorists and the mentally ill can get them. >> chris: let's talk political reality. as we mentioned you and your wife are starting a political group and the president is making a push and mayor bloomberg and other mayors are
10:11 am
making a push. i don't have to tell you the nra has a lot of clout on capitol hill and the last election cycle, they contributed $20 million to campaigns last year and 50% of the members of the new congress have an a-rating from the nra, realistically what do you think you can actually get through congress, this year? >> well, certainly, sitting in front of the senate judiciary committee, you know, i saw on both sides of the aisle that members of the senate, of that committee, really feel that we need to do something. now, sometimes, you know, it wasn't clear that everybody agrees on exactly what needs to be done. but i certainly saw that there is certainly a feeling, i believe, that a criminal background check is a necessity to keep criminals, the mentally ill and terrorists from getting weapons. and i think that is very possible to get that done.
10:12 am
i mean, gabby and i are going to work as hard as we can to do whatever we can to get common-sense solutions. i think the first thing, i mean, along with some, you know, help for the mentally ill and addressing this mental illness problem, is a universal criminal background check. >> chris: well, i want to ask you, because you did not mention the assault weapons ban and vice president joe biden said something quite interesting this week, i want to put it on the screen: "i'm much less concerned, quite frankly, about what you call an assault weapon than i am about magazines and the number of rounds that can be held in a magazine." has your side already given up on the idea -- not whether you think it is right or wrong -- but whether it is politically practical, realistic, have you given up the idea of banning assault weapons this year? >> first of all, gabby and i don't have a side. our organization is -- supports gun owners, responsible gun owners like ourselves and people that are strong supporters of the second amendment. i mean, i think that is really a
10:13 am
priority here. but another priority is to protect americans. and, there are common-sense things we can do to make this country a lot safer. a universal criminal background check. identifying the mentally ill and getting those records into the system, the high capacity magazine issue needs to be addressed. it saves lives. and, assault weapons. i mean, i -- like i said, chris, i mean, i spent 25 years in the military and know the value of having an assault weapon. and it is to kill a lot of people, very quickly. and i think they are way too readily available and i think in time we'll be able to address those issues. >> chris: and, finally, we have less than a minute left, as you know, wayne laperriere will be on right after the break, in the next segment. man-to-man, what do you want to say to him? >> well, certainly, he's going to say that background checks don't work. but, that is not true. i mean, he'll tell you that in a couple minutes. since 1999, 1.7 million people
10:14 am
were prevented from getting a firearm because they had a criminal record or a history of mental illness, we have stopped those people from getting a gun and now we have to make sure they don't have a second option to get the gun and that is getting the gun from a private seller or the gun show loophole without having a background check. we need to close that loophole so i hope that he can think about what would his members want? you know, 74% of nra members think it is a very reasonable thing to do, to have a background check before buying a gun. so what i would tell wayne lapierre, is i hope he'd listen to his membership, members of the nra tend to be very reasonable on this issue. >> chris: captain kelly, thank you, thank you for joining us and we wish you and your best the very best, sir. >> chris: you are very welcome, chris, thanks for having me on your show. >> chris: up next the head of the nra, wayne lapierre.
10:15 am
♪ it doesn't matter which of our great states folks visit. mississippi, alabama, louisiana or florida, they're gonna love it. shaul, your alabama hospitality is incredible. thanks, karen. love your mississippi outdoors. i vote for your florida beaches, dawn. bill, this louisiana seafood is delicious. we're having such a great year on the gulf, we've decided to put aside our rivalry. now is the perfect time to visit anyone of our states. the beaches and waters couldn't be more beautiful. take a boat ride, go fishing or just lay in the sun. we've got coastline to explore and wildlife to photograph. and there's world class dining with our world famous seafood. so for a great vacation this year, come to the gulf. its all fabulous but i give florida the edge. right after mississippi. you mean alabama. say louisiana or there's no dessert. this invitation is brought to you by bp and all of us who call the gulf home.
10:16 am
well, dad, i spent my childhood living with monks learning the art of dealmaking. you've mastered monkey-style kung fu? no. priceline is different now. you don't even have to bid. master hahn taught you all that? oh, and he says to say (translated from cantonese) "you still owe him five bucks." your accent needs a little work.
10:17 am
>> chris: we're back now with more on gun control. wayne lapierre joined the staff of the national rifle association in 1978. for the last 22 years, he has been the nra's chief spokesman at the center of the debate over guns and mr. lapierre, welcome to "fox news sunday." >> thanks, chris, good to be with you. >> chris: captain kelly specifically brought up the background checks and the fact since 1999, 1.7 million people
10:18 am
have failed background checks and have been denied guns. now, i know you point out, criminals are not going to go through the background checks and there are other ways, and there will always be a black market to get guns but if 1.7 million people have already been denied guns by a partial background check doesn't that make people safer? >> chris, i have all the respect in the world for captain kelly and what happened to his family should never happen to any family, we all want to stop it. but, let me talk about the proposal president obama and people like mayor bloomberg are putting forward. one, let me answer your question: i don't think you can say that those 1.7 million people have been stopped from getting a gun at all. because the government didn't prosecute virtually any of them. they let them walk in, they were denied and let them walk out and who really thinks if they wanted to commit a crime they didn't go on and get a gun. >> chris: i don't know, seems to me if 1.7 million people were denied. i understand the hardened
10:19 am
criminal but the disturbed person, adam lanza, and james holmes in aurora, colorado, those are not hardened criminals. >> the instant check, we offered as an amendment to the brady bill, to put it on dealers, and i have been in this fight for 20 years and we supported it and put it on the books. but, i have finally become convinced after fighting to get the mental records computerized for 20 years, and watching the mental health lobby, usurp the laws and the ama opposes it and i don't think it will happen. the fact is -- >> worked enough 1.7 people were denied. i completely agree with you, i mean, as captain kelly pointed out, jared loughner was able to pass the test and there are holes in it but it doesn't mean, because it is not perfect -- >> the hole in it is the fact we have been fighting 20 years to get the records computerized and
10:20 am
i know what goes on behind the scenes in this town, they won't do it. the mental health lobby will not do it. the hipaa laws won't do it. it will not -- i wishing it would happen. we are all for it but it's not. >> chris: you are for universal background checks? >> universal, but, now that is what president obama is now putting forward and let me talk about that. it is a fraud to call it universal. it is never going to be universal. the criminals will not comply with it. they could care less. you are not going to computerize -- you have seen you will not computerize the mental health records. so here's what will happen. we ought to quit calling it now universal check. the real title ought to be the check on law abiding people all over the country and then let's talk about how it will work. they'll take a failed system. if you in nebraska or selma, neck and are a hunter or a rancher, if i want to sell you a shotgun or something like that, the federal government, we'll have to go find a dealer, walk into a police station, who will
10:21 am
do the check? there will be fees and paperwork and law-abiding people caught up in a bureaucratic nightmare, and, there is going to be abuse in terms of prosecutions. and, it is all going to affect only the law-abiding people them. criminals could care less. >> chris: i want to move on to another subject. what do you make of the picture -- we'll put it on the screen -- the white house released saturday, of president obama skeet shooting at camp david? he says he respects hunting. >> well, the same thing during the campaign, he said to people i will not take away your rifle, shotgun, handgun and, have flyers like this, obama will not take your gun and will protect gun rights, and, now, he's trying to take away all three. i mean -- >> chris: he's not taking away shot guns. >> have you look at the feinstein bill, he is supporting? that is exactly what it does. i mean, i think what they'll do is turn the universal check on the law-abiding into a universal
10:22 am
registry of law-abiding people and law-abiding people don't want that. i mean, my -- >> absolutely do not -- forgive me, sir, you take something that is here, and you say it will go all the way over there. there is no indication, i mean, i can understand you are saying, that is a threat but there is nothing anyone in the administration has said that indicates they are going to have a universal registry. >> and obamacare wasn't a tax until they needed it to be a tax. >> chris: the supreme court decided that. >> you cannot trust these people. my god, dianne feinstein, said, if i could go door-to-door and pick 'em all up, i would do it. can i tell you what i think will work -- >> i'll ask you a couple of questions, the murder today, one of the things that concerns people, it seems every day we talk about a shooting. oftentimes, mass shooting. >> right. >> chris: day after day after day and the frustration is you don't think that the answer is, limiting guns has anything to do with the and i understand there
10:23 am
is some things you think will work and we'll talk about that. the murder yesterday of former navy s.e.a.l. chris kyle, a man who wrote american sniper and credited with the largest number of confirmed kills of any american soldier ever, he and another man gunned down at a texas gun range. >> if you want to stop violence in this country, here's what you do, okay? first, if you want to protect or kids, you put armed security in schools. i'm not talking about arming teachers, i'm talking about police officers and i'm talking about certified professional security people. there is not a parent that sends off their kid to school that wants those kids to be unprotected. just in atlanta this past week armed security stopped a shooting in an atlanta school. stopped it. >> chris: here's the problem, but here's the problem, respectfully, sir: if you arm people at schools, a lot of these people aren't just motivated to kill people in schools. they want to kill people.
10:24 am
and, forgive me, and, if it is -- school is too tough they'll go to a movie theatre, they'll go to a shopping center. they'll go to a gun range and kill chris kyle. >> let's talk about the rest of it. fix the mental healthsystem. every police officer knows people on the streets that should be institutionalized becau. they are walking around in the the street, we need to change the commitment laws and the mental healthsystem and get them -- interdict them and get them into treatment. i'd like to see mental health records computerized and we can't get that done. senator schumer, from 20 years ago, on face the nation, i begged him to help us do it and they still haven't done it. and, the nra has been fighting to get it done. >> chris: you oppose gun control as a form of government tyranny. but in the senate hearings, this week, you offered a different reason for it. let's take a look.
10:25 am
>> right. >> what people all over the country fear today, is being abandoned by their government. if a tornado hits. if a hurricane hits. if a riot occurs, they'll be out there alone. and the only way they will protect themselves, in the cold, in the dark, when they are vulnerable, is weather a firearm. >> chris: do you really think that that is a more serious threat, marauding bands during a hurricane or a tornado is a more serious threat to the average american than the steady drum beat of gun violence and sometimes mass gun violence? >> we want to stop gun violence, that is what we're trying to document here's the threat. there are 2500 violent crimes a week in this country. take a city like chicago and nobody wants to do it but the american public will get it when i say it, chicago, 89 of 90 in the country in terms of enforcing the reasonable federal gun laws nra supports on the
10:26 am
books against felons and drug dealers and gangs with guns, the people doing the killing. we are obsessed with the taliban and we ought to be. what about the gangs? they are ruining neighborhoods all over the country? we need a federal task force, if it takes 500 agents, a thousand agents, go into chicago. i know, eric holder doesn't want to it. a cookie cutter approach and rahm eman nell doesn't want to do it. and he says they cannot be concerned with drug dealers with guns and every gang member on the street of chicago, starting tomorrow morning, let's pick 'em up, we have a federal law to get 'em off the street and put 'em in prison and that would cut crime and we're not doing it. >> chris: well, that is a perfectly legitimate point and, it wouldn't have saved the people in newtown or aurora, colorado or clackmas county, oregon. i want to talk about the question of rights. this heller case is the case, a victory for the nra in which the court affirmed, the second
10:27 am
amendment, means what it says, but here's what justice salia wrote in the majority opinion: the second amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms. of course, the right was not unlimited. not unlimited. scalia talked in his majority decision how what kinds of weapons people can buy and who can buy them and where they can be carried. the right is not unlimited, mr. lapierre. >> we have all kinds of reasonable laws right here, the nra supports and if they enforce them in chicago it would cut crime but the basic right is to protect yourself and the -- semi-automatic technology has been around 100 years and if you limit the american public's access to semi-automatic technology, you limit their ability to survive. if someone is invading your house, i mean, you shouldn't say you should only have five or six shots, you ought to have what you need to protect yourself, a woman should, not what a
10:28 am
politician thinks is reasonable. >> chris: a couple of weeks ago the nra started running an ad that created a great deal of controversy. here's a clip: >> are the president's kids more important than yours? why is he skeptical about putting armed security in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their school? >> chris: mr. lapierre, do you regret putting up that ad? >> the point of ad was this, not -- >> you mentioned the president's kids. >> they are safe and we are thankful for it. the point -- >> they face a threat most children do not face. >> tell that to people in newtown -- >> do you really think the president's children are the same kind of target as every school child in america? that is ridiculous and you know it, sir. >> you know, unfortunately, i think there are parents all over the school that think, all over the country that think their kids are entitled to the same amount of protection when they go to school and they --
10:29 am
>> they should have secret service? >> police officers or certified armed security in those schools to keep people safe. if something happened, the police -- despite all the good intentions, police time is 15-20 minutes and it is too long and will not help those kids. certified armed security in schools, like -- >> that will not protect them in the shopping mall, the movie theatre, on the streets. >> why we need to do everything else i'm talking about. enforce the federal gun laws which we did not do now against gangs with guns and felons with guns and the shadow of where we are sitting now, gangs are in washington, d.c. and you can buy drugs and guns and trafficking in 1-year-old girls... >> chris: i understand there are lots of problems out there and -- but you can't say, that -- first of all the gangs don't commit the mass murders, adam lanza was not a member of a gang and james holmes was not a member of the gang, and one of the points of the ads, you made
10:30 am
it a class argument, rich and elite have bodyguards and security. >> sure. and mayor bloomberg has bodyguards. >> chris: i'll tell you who else has security. you do. >> sometimes. yes. >> chris: and, you have security. today you have security. >> yes, and you talk about hypocrisy in the open, we have had all kinds of threats... >> chris: does that make you an out of touchy elite. >> i don't deny security to anybody who needs it. what i'm saying, it is ridiculous for all the elitings -- elites and titans of industry, who have security and access to semi-automatic technology... >> chris: i don't know anybody elite who sends their kids -- my children went to the same school that the obama children went to, many years ago, and there were no armed security there. >> schools -- >> the idea of an elite class, it is nonsense, sir.
10:31 am
>> capitol hill, right now, they are all protected by armed security, with high-cap magazines while they sit there and try to limit the average citizen, to ten, because they think that that is reasonable in their opinion -- >> one last question, we are running out of time. president obama is making it a big issue and is going to minneapolis tomorrow and captain kelly and gabrielle giffords make it an issue and mayor bloomberg bill launch a big campaign and in fact running an ad during the super bowl in the washington area pointing out the fact in 1999 you supported a universal background check. >> not universal. we supported a check at gun shows. >> chris: okay. all right, not universal. expanded. stand corrected. question: do you think in this environment with this new effort, after newtown you will still be able to convince congress not to pass any new gun controls? >> i think the majority of the american public sees through this and want the current laws enforced and don't want more laws imposed on what is only going to be the law-abiding and see how bill all of this has to
10:32 am
do with keeping our kids safe and how much it has to do with decades or two decades long agenda to drag out the same old gun ban proposals they've tried 20, 30 years and piggy back them onto the tragedy and that this is tragedy. let's make chicago safe and put federal task force in there tomorrow morning. >> chris: thank you. >> thanks, chris. >> chris: thanks for coming in today and it will be a debate, the first big political debate of this year. thank you, sir. >> thank you. >> chris: up next, chuck hagel stumbles his way through the senate confirmation hearing. we'll ask the panel whether his position as defense secretary is in trouble.
10:33 am
10:34 am
10:35 am
10:36 am
♪ >> i support the president's strong position on containment. i have been handed a note that i misspoke and said, i supported the president's position on containment. if i said that, it meant to say that i -- his position on containment, we don't have a position on containment. >> to make sure your correction is clear, we have a position on containment, which is we do not favor containment. >> chris: wow. defense secretary nominee, chuck hagel struggling in his senate confirmation hearing this week. when asked about the u.s. policy on iran's nuclear program. and it is time for our sunday group. republican strategist kevin madden, nina easton of "fortune" magazine, radio talk show host
10:37 am
laura ingraham and former democratic senator evan byah. senator, you served in the senate 12 years, have you ever seen a nominee for a top cabinet post at a worse confirmation hearing. >> he didn't bring his a-game, and everybody would concede this, chuck among them but at the end of the day it will not matter. he'll be confirmed because there is a strong presumption the president gets to choose his own cabinet, unless something disqualifies him from a personal standpoint and, the republicans will vote no, because it an easy no vote and, he gets his cabinet and they get to express their reservations, and, unless there is a filibuster, it would raise the bar but i think he'll be confirmed but it will create heartburn for moderate republicans and in the final analysis i think the ultimate take away is the next time secretary of defense hagel comes before congress or has a press conference he needs to bring the a-game to project the sense of command and confidence people
10:38 am
expect -- >> at the end of the day it doesn't matter, you say. should it matter he didn't seem to know what administration policy was and didn't in some cases know what his own policy was, i mean, he'll be the head of the pentagon. >> well, it raises questions on shows like this but -- >> senator, it wouldn't raise a question in your mind? >> he corrected his answers and he watch as -- i think he misspoke and it wasn't as if he was projecting a real difference on policy with the administration. but, ultimately in matters, chris, it is how he performs as secretary of defense. on gates, leon panetta set the bar pretty high and i think he'll clear the bar and is better prepared the next time. >> chris: laura, at various point, in hagel's testimony he didn't seem to know or thought much about major issues, about the pentagon, about mondaying, at one point called the iranian government legitimate and elected. are you as forgiving as senator bayh. >> the russians and the chinese
10:39 am
were probably watching how this played out, because, i -- as bill kristol -- he was right when he said it wasn't just a second rate performance, it could have been the worst performance that ever took place at a confirmation hearing and that is saying something, when you're the secretary of defense it shouldn't be the fact that you won two purple hearts, were awarded those in battle, pat tip is not questioned. merit should count for something and he'll have to stand up against a, frankly, a american military that will be cut back and will have to stand for that and be able to stand strong on the world stage and the fact that he didn't know where sequester came from. he didn't -- when questioning him he didn't realize it came from the budget agreement. that in and of itself it was disturbing, you expect an aide to him to know the answer to these questions and he seemed completely out of his depth, surprising, knowing that people like mccain were going to be very tough on him. it couldn't have come as a
10:40 am
surprise to him. i thought it was a shocking performance. really, shocking. >> chris: and then, nina, he had to deal with past remarks such as his 2006 comment that the, quote, jewish lobby had intimidated people on capitol hill, to do, quote, dumb things, which led to this exchange, with senator lindsey graham: >> give me an example of where we have been intimidated by the israeli jewish lobby, to do something dumb. regarding the middle east, israel or anywhere sneeelse. >> i can't give you an example. >> chris: which raises the question. why does barack obama want him in the pentagon in the first place? >> here's the thing, i think his stumbling, we're focusing on how he stumbled. the trouble was the peek into his world view and it is the president's world view we are seeing in the second term and that containment exchange was frontal and centre in this. what does -- front and center in
10:41 am
this. containment means we'll allow a nuclear iran and contain it and not prevent it and people are concept cam whether the white house will actually use -- keep the military option on the table to prevent a nuclear iran. y it goes to the question of, does hagel see the u.s. military, a strong u.s. military as a force for good, for leadership in this world? and you get the sense from this and his comments, ala bob woodward and the "washington post" and the exchange he had with president obama, he doesn't, he sees it as a new world order and we are, leading from behind and he didn't exactly say it and it comes when leon panetta points out the threat of the man-pads, the anti-aircraft attack missiles that are coming out of iran, that we need to intercept and, it there are dangers in places like that, al qaeda expanding in north africa and it is a dangerous world and you can't put you a pause button on it. >> chris: let me be blatantly
10:42 am
political with you. what is the smart play for senate republicans? should they filibuster hagel -- and we should point out we can't find any history of a top presidential cabinet appointment ever being filibustered by either party. should they try to filibuster him or say, you want him, you got him? >> i expect, having talked to many folks up on capitol hill, there is not a very big appetite for filibuster. i think that they are more inclined to use this as a vehicle to, again, argue where they disagree with president obama's national security policy and where they disagree with his foreign policy. so i think that is probably the better play. you know, one of the really interesting things here is, to senator bayh's point, a lot of peeks up there believe that the president does get his nominee, but, that there were a number of instances where his qualifications, senator hagel's qualifications, came into play and it was a very big problem that you have somebody who is
10:43 am
not even qualified enough to have really important and distinct opinions, on some very big national security policies. so i think that is something that the folks up on capitol hill, again will use that as a vehicle and that is probably more a political play to litigate the differences they have, with the administration. >> chris: all right. we have to take a break, when we come back, serious movement on immigration reform. but will congress pass anything? ♪
10:44 am
>> chris: still to come, our
10:45 am
power player of the week. >> poetry has a way of saying, this is my experience, and you can share in it with me. >> chris: her job this year is to spread her love of poetry. >> being impassioneded about something that means a lot to me, i'd like to convey to other people. >> chris: stay tuned, we'll be right back. ♪ using cloud computing and mobile technology, verizon innovators have developed a projective display for firefighters. allowing them to see through anything. because the world's biggest challenges deserve even bigger solutions. powerful answers. verizon.
10:46 am
♪ >> president barack obama: yes, they broke the rules. they crossed the border illegally. maybe they overstayed their visas. those are the facts. nobody disputes them. but, these 11 million men and women are now here. >> if this endeavor becomes a bidding war to see who can come up with the easiest, quickest and fastest pathway to green card as possible, this will not
10:47 am
go well, folks. >> chris: the president and marco rubio leading the discussion on what to do with immigration reform, we're back with the panel. i bipartisan group of 8 senators, four republicans and four democrats, on the screen, agreed to a statement of principle, not legislation but principle on immigration, 11 million illegals would get legal status but the path to citizenship is linked to tougher enforcement at the border and the workplace. reasonable compromise? >> i don't think so. i think what you are seeing here is, the republicans are kind of cautiously optimistic, and, because marco rubio is up there and who doesn't love him if you are a conservative and the problem is we have seen the movie and know how it ends. with enforcement an promises of enforcement, when it is linked together and in one bill, enforcement usually never happens and what we know from the administration and the democrats when states try to enforce what they can of
10:48 am
immigration law, they are thwarted and arizona and, amnesty, by executive fiat... they are not thrilled with spending money on en form and making it difficult and david vitter this week on my radio show called marco rubio and, you are nuts if you think you can do it in a bill. you have to establish border security first and then i think the american people who are compassionate and giving, then deem with the people, probably more, closer to 18 million, not 11 million, by the way, that is the number everyone throws around and deal with though people who are here illegally. >> chris: senator bayh, i'm not saying whether she's right or wrong in terms of the policy prescription, that is completely unacceptable to the hispanic community and to president obama. >> that's true, chris. but there are areas where the consensus overlaps here. the democrats want to do it from a policy perspective and also want to placate part of our base that is very important and the republicans need to do this for reasons of self-preservation.
10:49 am
they can't have a conversation with the single most rapidly growing part of the american electorate. the hispanic community, unless they address the issue. and the business community leaves strongly that resolve on this issue is important to growing the economy. i think there is some reason to believe a consensus can, formed. it may be a narrow one and i think one of the main issues, what do the administration and the advocates want, take martin luther king's approach through civil rights reform, step-by-step or make compromises to get something done with the republicans or insist on everything and say, legislation, we will have an issue in the midterm election. that is one of the big issues. >> chris: you don't think the president and democrats would agree to decide the idea a lot of conservatives suggest of, enforcement and border security first? >> well, that is going to depend on the semantics and the structure, chris. enforcement, sure. i don't think many democrats -- not all democrats -- >> you do that before you move at all on the 11 million -- >> those are details, the question is, what is this timing
10:50 am
and metrics used and yes, enforcement but, not saying there is no practical hope of having a permanent status. >> kevin, you saw the group, bipartisan, gang of 8 we put up there, that is only four republican senators, let alone the full republican caucus in the senate, let alone the house republican majorities. what they're chances that republicans would go for something close to what the gang of 8 came up with, this -- because, one of the key things we should point out is under this bill you would get, not a path to citizenship but before enforcement, you get provisional status which means immediately, the 11, whatever, million, now, i'm concerned about that... we'll say 11 million, for the sake of the argument, immediately have legal status in this country? >> look, i think you are poised now for a better chance at success on this issue. than any time we have had previously. one of the things that happened is, you do have a sea change among many republicans who
10:51 am
believe there is an important political ramification here and, put that aside we will not win hispanic voters with one immigration bill. what is different about it this time around when we have had the debate internally as a party in the past, folks like marco rubio accept the reservation of people like senator vitter and people have strong, substantive concerns about how we go about enforcement and he's not willing to demonize those critics or attack them and instead is looking for them for input and to be part of the solution. that is what happens with -- i don't mean it critically against john mccain, i mean it clinically, every time someone disagreed with senator mccain he'd attack them and say come up with your own bill and this time there is a greater degree by folks like marco rubio who want to engage critics as he has done with conservative talk show hosts and engaged people who have been critical and that is a key element to whether or not there is -- this is successful or -- >> to answer my question, do you
10:52 am
think, particularly the house republican majority, should go along with something like this? >> there are principles in there folks in the house majority agree with and they realize it is part of a larger economic argument and only a step in dealing with the political problems we have. >> chris: nina, this is a win-win for the president? if he gets comprehensive immigration reform, it is' huge legislative accomplishment and adds to his legacy and if he doesn't, republicans are just digging themselves into a deeper hole with hispanics? >> like everything seems to be a win-win with this president, these days, particularly on spending issues. i think it is -- we can't lose sight of the fact it is potentially a win for republicans. you know, this legislation, outline of the legislation is remarkably similar to 2007. when, by the way, that sank john mccain's first attempt at the primary. but, the difference now is a
10:53 am
lost election, the fact that republicans got 27% of the hispanic vote when they should be getting 40%. and you have a very attractive, popular conservative leading the charge and i think there will be conservatives who are not on the boat but having marco rubio out there and out front on this is key and will be good for the republican party. >> it is risky for rubio. we have to be clear on that. while he's extremely popular, and again, we all like him, there is a divide here and the -- in the republican party. we have 23 million americans either unemployed or under employed and the idea that this will be' boon to the economy, tell that to the middle class worker in ohio who sees his pag wages stagnated and people unemployed for long term periods of time. it is a tough deal for them. >> the difficulty for the republican party, chris, you have a disconnect between primary politics and general election politics and marco r b
10:54 am
rubio understands is it does not do any good if you made yourself up electable in the fail. >> chris: do you think they'll go along with something along these lines? >> i don't. unless there is real enforcement and verifiable, not the appointment of another commission, which i think is a joke, unless it is real enforcement, i think it's not going to work and i don't think it will go through, is my view. >> chris: thank you, panel, see you next week. don't forget to check out panel plus where our group picks up with the discussion on our web site, foxnewssunday.com and we'll be sure to post the video before noon the following day, and be sure to follow us on twitter. up next our power player of the week.
10:55 am
10:56 am
>> chris: it is common practice in washington tor people to use words to score a point, to sting. but we found a woman who uses words to reach out, and to heal. and she is our power player of the week.
10:57 am
>> to comfort us when we have losses. to celebrate with us our joys and triumphs. but also to help us see things differently than we do in our every day lives. >> chris: she is talking about poetry. and the role she says it continues to play. not as accessible as prose. >> to keep a record, sometimes our every day speech has a way of saying, this is me and that is you and we are different, and i think poetry has a way of saying, this is my experience, and you can share in it with me. >> truth be told, i do not want to forget anything of my former life... >> chris: she's the nation's 19th poet laureate. working out of the library of congress, her job this year is to spread her love of poetry. >> actually, i get inspired, it helps me to write poems to be
10:58 am
here. >> chris: and describes her role as a cheerleader. >> in a former life, was a cheerleader and seemed a natural way to think about being excited about something, being passionate about something that means a lot to me. that i would like to convey to other people. >> chris: her father is white, the mother, black. they had to leave mississippi in the '60s, to get married. >> chris: how do you think it affected you, the idea that your parents' marriage was a crime? >> well, i think that it created in me a sense of psychological exile. >> chris: and when she was 19 her mother was murdered by her former stepfather. >> that is the moment where i really tried in the language of poetry to make sense of that loss. here, the dead stand up in stone, white marble on confederate avenue. i stand on ground once hallowed by a web... >> chris: one of the themes of her work is memory, what is left
10:59 am
out of the nation's public record. she won a pulitzer prize in '07 for native guard, about a forgotten black union regiment that fought in the civil war. >> we know it is our duty now to take white men as prisoners, rebel soldiers, would-be masters... >> chris: she wrote the poem in the library's reading room in seat 170. sometimes to rest her eyes she'd look up at a pillar marked "poetry". >> and now when i do it i cannot see the word, "poetry" so clearly but i have faith that it is there. >> chris: so she'll continue to cheer-lead. for an art form that forces you to slow down and contemplate. in a world that doesn't always value that. >> trying to find a way to say what seems so necessary to be said, but so difficult also, to someone that i can speak very intimately to. across time and space. on the page. that is
TV News
Search inside
Search only quotes
Search only political ads
Date - Most Recent
Date - Oldest
FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace
FOX February 3, 2013 10:00am-11:00am PST
News/Business. (2013) NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre; retired Capt. Mark Kelly; panel discussion with Kevin Madden, Nina Easton, Laura Ingraham and Evan Bayh. New. (CC) (Stereo)
Marco Rubio
Wayne Lapierre
Jared Loughner
Chuck Hagel
Mr. Lapierre
Scanned in
San Francisco, CA, USA
Comcast Cable
Channel 13 (213 MHz)
Video Codec
Audio Cocec
Pixel width
Pixel height
Internet Archive
sound, color
Borrow a DVD of this show
Stream Only
In Collection
In Collection
Television Archive
In Collection
Television Archive News Search Service
Uploaded by
TV Archive
on 2/3/2013


text:
Oakwood at 6th Avenue
No prices found through our partners. Please contact the business directly or check some of our recommended alternatives.
- Suites
- Non-smoking rooms
- Refrigerator in room
- Microwave in room
- Laundry facilities (self serve)
- High-speed internet in room
Photos of Oakwood at 6th Avenue
TripAdvisor Reviews Oakwood at 6th Avenue New York City
Travel Blogs from New York City
Our last day - SOHO/Little Italy and soooo hot
... brother of influential builder Ezra Weeks)accused of her murder after he reportedly impregnated and promised to marry her. Weeks retained the city's top attorneys (including Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton) and was acquitted, despite growing public outrage. In 1817, the Manhattan Well was filled in and built over, but it was rediscovered in 1980 and has since become a notorious ...
Beating the heat
... a documentary. It looked a lot like a non-cartoon version of A Bug's Life—I have no idea how it was actually done. At one point a hawk suddenly made a surprise attack on the mouse, and I pretended to be startled and jumped and made some kind of noise, fooling Shannon and Johnny completely. They're insisting I wasn't pretending, and Shannon says it was her favorite part of the day. They're just silly. Johnny's favorite parts were going out ...
Day 3
We woke up early on Thursday morning and got breakfast to eat in Central Park. After we had finished watch the many New Yorkers walking their dogs and jogging through the park we hired a couple of bikes for two hours to ride around the park. The size of the park is deceiving. I managed to ride the whole ring road in the park and see some of the sites in the centre. There were many places that looked familiar from the many TV ...
Tartan Week Parade
... We end up in an Applebee's out of ease, and then, happily fed and watered, we're headed down towards 6th to find a good spot for the Tartan Day Parade.
We choose a quiet-ish spot on the side of the road near to the starting point. It's only quiet as we're there almost an hour before the parade begins. There are still NYPD buses in the road -for the band- and three fire trucks blocking the road ...
Starting with Columbia and finishing with Alice
... Diner - the exterior was used for the diner in Seinfeld) and we had a bit of a wander around the Columbia Campus. The architecture is straight out of a Greek historical tour. Next was the Manhattan Children's Museum. This is a hands-on museum so Hannah was very happy. She crawled through intestines, made music by dancing through lasers and learnt about Japanese culture from Manga through to temple etiquette. I even got into making character ...
Other places to stay in New York City
The Lexington New York City - An Autograph Collection HotelMidtown East, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $218
- Great value and great hotel!
- Good Location, Average Hotel
- Fabulous hotel!
The Roosevelt HotelMidtown, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $220
- Great Value, Nice Room
- Loved it!
- Nice hotel, but ...
Wyndham New Yorker HotelGarment District, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $213
- Hated it!!!
- Native NY'er says "These rooms are perfect for the price!"
- Good choice
Hudson New York HotelMidtown, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $211
- Great Ambiance
- Hudson Horrors
- Won't Be Back
Sheraton New York Times Square HotelTheater District - Times Square, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $274
- Review of ny sheraton
- Typical sheraton...nice place
- Very Nice Establishment!
W New York - Times SquareTheater District - Times Square, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $294
- You call this a modern hotel?
- Always stay at the W Times Square!
- The most happening place in the city- Great Location
W New YorkMidtown, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $237
- Small room
- Cool Hotel
- Not up to the usual W standards
The Pierre, A Taj Hotel, New YorkUpper East Side, New York City | 5 star hotelfrom $418
- Looooove the Pierre
- If your looking for an 'escort', this seemed the place to be..
- Not up to Four Seasons Standards
New York Marriott East SideMidtown, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $256
- Loved the New York Marriott East Side
- Good stay at the Marriott
- Had and enjoyable stay
Paramount Hotel Times Square New YorkMidtown, New York City | 2 star hotelfrom $209
- Nonsense-- Have Stayed Here 4 Time, Just Fine
- Revolting!!
- Know what you're getting
Hilton Times SquareMidtown, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $289
- Great Value, Great Location
- Great Location, great hotel
- Great Location
Days Inn Hotel New York City - BroadwayUpper West Side, New York City | 2 star hotelfrom $159
- Not so nice.
- Great F*kin holiday!
- Quality Hotel on Broadway Needs to Reflect Name
InterContinental New York BarclayMidtown, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $270
- Great stay!!!
- Wonderful!
- First class hotel in the heart of Manhattan
The Westin New York at Times SquareMidtown, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $256
- Loved Shula's!
- Great for convention, subpar for Westin
- Excellent in every way!
Waldorf Astoria New YorkMidtown Center, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $336
- The only way to see New York
- Revisiting a New York treasure
- Fit for a king... but you had to be one!
Hilton Manhattan EastTudor City, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $211
- Comfortable, small, quiet
- Good, but no cigar
- A tranquil oasis in the city that new sleeps !
The Manhattan At Times Square HotelMidtown, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $198
- Excellent Room and hotel
- Loved the Sheraton Manhattan
- I loved NY
Best Western PLUS President Hotel at Times SquareTheater District - Times Square, New York City | 2 star hotelfrom $199
- Worth the money
- Pleasantly suprised
- Great Stay
Radisson Martinique on BroadwayKoreatown, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $278
- Wonderful experience at the Holiday Inn Martinique
- Nothing wrong with this hotel
- Loved new york, but not The Martinique
Grand Hyatt New YorkMidtown, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $265
- This Hotel Is A 4Star Disappointment!
- I expect more for my money
- Would not reccomend it to anyone
Empire HotelUpper West Side, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $231
- Great hotel for lower Central Park West
- Fab-tastic!
- Nice Look but lacking atmosphere
Holiday Inn Midtown / 57th StClinton, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $219
- Really good!
- Good location but...
- Clean, comfortable, good location
Doubletree Hotel Metropolitan - New York CityMidtown, New York City | 3 star hotelfrom $194
- Very good value!
- Just tolerable
- Why so negative?
The Westin New York Grand CentralMidtown, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $261
- Absolutely Fabulous
- Just okay
- One of my favorites!
The London NYCMidtown, New York City | 5 star hotelfrom $340
- Good upgrade from the Rhiga
- Only OK
- Above and beyond
New York Hilton MidtownClinton, New York City | 4 star hotelfrom $293
- Great stay
- Problems with Cleanliness of Rooms
- Nasty, not worth the $$$

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Haga clic aquí para obtener información sobre Cáncer de Cérvix en español.
Gynecologic oncologists discuss some of the most important research presented at the 2016 SGO Annual Meeting in San Diego. Ovarian cancer survivor and patient advocate Jocelyn Alfandre (pictured) was a featured speaker at the Annual Meeting.
FREE Gynecologic Cancer Survivors Courses throughout the country. For more information, click here.


text:
Genoa-based classification society RINA has taken a lead in the developing market for floating LNG terminals. It has been chosen to class the first offshore Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU), and is providing studies and support for a number of further offshore LNG projects, including the newbuilding which is likely to be the world's second offshore LNG FSRU.
Addressing the Mare Forum Houston conference, Massimo Volta, RINA's General Manager America, said, "Italy leads the world in implementing offshore LNG terminals. We have recently brought the Adriatic LNG terminal on stream, and we have five more live projects for floating and gravity-based offshore LNG terminals around our coasts. RINA is involved with all these in a number of ways, and our expertise is now being sought by other countries developing offshore LNG projects. We are very proud to have been chosen as the first classification society in the world to class a true offshore floating LNG FSRU, for the OLT Offshore LNG Toscana project."
The OLT development will see the 138,000 cu m Moss-type Golar Frost converted into a 3.75 billion cubic metres (bcm) per year FSRU, moored in 120 m of water off Italy's west coast port of Livorno. It will act as a receiving terminal for importing LNG, regasifying the LNG and pumping it into Italy's gas grid.
The OLT FSRU is currently under conversion in Dubai Drydocks and will be towed to Livorno at the end of 2010, with the aim of coming on stream in 2011. An external turret is being fitted, along with over 2,400 tones of regasification equipment. The main contractor is Saipem, working for the terminal owners - a joint venture between E ON Ruhrgas, Iride, Golar LNG and OLT Energy. RINA will class the vessel and provide statutory certification on behalf of the government. Through its dedicated oil and gas team it is also providing authority and owner engineering, ship handling simulation and assistance with local and international regulatory compliance.
Following the OLT FSRU, RINA is engaged in providing a range of services to assist the Triton FSRU project. That will be a 5 bcm newbuilding FSRU, to be developed by GdF-Suez and Hoegh.
RINA was also closely involved in the development of the eight bcm Adriatic LNG terminal, providing a wide range of analytical and supervision services, plus assistance with regulatory compliance. This gravity-based concrete terminal was built in Spain, towed to its site in the Adriatic and settled on the seabed in 27 m of water, where it came on stream in the second half of 2009. The world's first offshore LNG terminal, it is jointly owned by Exxon Mobil, Qatar Petroleum and Edison.
RINA has also recently completed a feasibility study for a regasification terminal to be built off the Atlantic coast of Morocco. A decision on investment in the terminal will be made later this year.
Maritime Today
The Maritime Industry's original and most viewed E-News Service
Hoover Container Solutions' chairman and CEO, Donald Young, has been nominated and elected to the Petroleum Equipment & Services Association (PESA) Advisory Board for a three-year term.
The U.S. Navy conducted a series of cooperative air defense test exercises with the Spanish navy that culminated in live missile firing events using the latest Aegis Weapon System baseline July 20-21.
After 25 years as CEO of Antwerp Port Authority, Eddy Bruyninckx has been raised to the nobility by H.M. the king of Belgium with the rank of baron. In Belgium
Japanese shipping company Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, has, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Lakler S.A., agreed to conclude a charter contract with Gas Sayago, for
The bodies of 21 women and one man were brought ashore to Sicily on Friday as fellow migrants described scenes of panic and violence when water poured into their dinghy.
Keppel Offshore & Marine Ltd (Keppel O&M)'s wholly owned subsidiary Keppel Singmarine Pte Ltd (Keppel Singmarine) has secured contracts from Jan De Nul Group to


text:
- Swimmer Ryan Lochte reveals one of his worst dates - US Weekly
- Get the latest on Dr. Dre's arrest - TMZ
- Despite rumors, Eddie Murphy's daughter is not pregnant - Gossip Cop
- The Vampire Diaries star Michael Trevino steps out for a good cause - Just Jared Jr
- Are Blac Chyna and Kylie Jenner on good terms? - Radar
- Blue Ivy is just as stylish as her mom Beyonce! - Lainey Gossip
- This Narcos star confirms he's not coming back for another season of the show - The Hollywood Reporter
22 October 2013 at 11:18 PM
AnnaSophia Robb Counts Down Days 'Til 'Carrie Diaries'!
About this photo set: AnnaSophia Robb and Austin Butler film a scene where they make some appalled faces on the set of The Carrie Diaries in New York City on Monday afternoon (October… Read More Here
Photo #: 2976961
Posted to AnnaSophia Robb, Austin Butler
powered by ZergNet


text:
Click here to visit site
|Short review: If young crotch is always the freshest, what about a young, tender chocolate hole? First Anal Quest finds fillies who have never had rectal sex and convinces them to give up their cherries on cam. The gals on the preview pages are mostly unknown European young ladies, so these are some of the freshest, never-before-seen neophyte young women you can find. The young ladies look verdant but definitely dont action it. Inside the website, youll find original rectal films shot in HD that cant be seen anywhere else except on this website.


text:
Bob Holt is a reporter for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. A graduate of the University of Missouri, he is a member of the Football Writers Association of America, and voter for the Heisman Trophy, Biletnikoff Award and AP Top 25 basketball poll. Holt was awarded Arkansas Sportswriter of the Year in 2000 and 2015.
Losing its grip
Defense caves in amid offense's implosion
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/RICK MCFARLAND --11/17/12-- Arkansas's Will Hines (9) and Ross Rasner (35) hang onto Mississippi State's Chris Smith (8) after he caught a pass in their game at Davis Wade Stadium in Starkville, Miss.
STARKVILLE, Miss. An encouraging second quarter gave way to a disastrous second half for the Arkansas defense Saturday when Mississippi State pounded the Razorbacks 45-14 at Scott Field.
"That wasn't how we should have finished," Arkansas defensive coordinator Paul Haynes said. "Win or lose, we should have finished that game better."
The defense finished the first half well, holding the Bulldogs to a field goal after Kaelon Kelleybrew's fumbled punt return set up Mississippi State at the Arkansas 22 and cornerbacks Will Hines and Tevin Mitchel combining on a forced fumble and recovery at the Razorbacks' 7 to end a scoring threat that kept them within 17-14 at halftime.
But the defense collapsed in the second half, allowing 289 yards and 4 touchdowns - including touchdowns on 3 consecutive Mississippi State possessions after Arkansas turnovers.
Those three touchdowns covered a combined 142 yards in seven plays, capped by Nick Griffin's 60-yard touchdown run on the first snap after Darius Slay intercepted a Tyler Wilson pass.
"We use the terminology we've got to hold the rope," said Arkansas defensive end Chris Smith, when asked about the defense's mind-set when taking the field after a turnover. "When the defense makes mistakes, the offense has got to have our back, and we've got to do the same when the offense makes mistakes.
"We should have had their back, and we didn't."
Mississippi State redshirt junior quarterback Tyler Russell completed 19 of 32 passes for 274 yards and 4 touchdowns without an interception. He has 21 touchdown passes and four interceptions this season.
"He's a great quarterback, and that's something Mississippi State hasn't had in a long time," Smith said. "I kept on getting to him, but he kept on releasing it.
"He just hung in there and played very well. He was always just getting the ball away."
Haynes said the Razorbacks used more man-to-man coverage to free up rushers to put pressure on Russell, but they sacked him just twice.
"He did a good job controlling their offense, like we knew he would." Haynes said. "But there were a lot of times we hit him. He just got rid of it, and we weren't in tight enough coverage."
Two of Russell's touchdown passes went to running back LaDarius Perkins on wheel routes.
"We got him into man coverage twice and had him lined up on their 'backer or safety," Mississippi State Coach Dan Mullen said.
"It's something we saw on film, that you have an opportunity to get them in some man coverage.
"Perk made two spectacular catches, and Tyler made two great throws. It was executed about as well as you could.
"It's hard to get that look in practice sometimes. In practice we're a little more open than that. It was covered, and they just both made great plays."
Haynes said Mississippi State also hurt the Razorbacks with some option runs in the second half.
"We just had a couple guys out of position and didn't make the play," Haynes said. "I hate to make excuses, but it's about getting lined up right and doing the right things over and over again."
Arkansas is starting three true freshmen in Hines and linebackers Otha Peters and A.J. Turner.
"It's been tough," Haynes said. "We ended up with the injuries, and we've got a bunch of young dudes playing.
"It is very, very challenging for them. They will be good for this program, and they will continue to get better, but they had a little bit of a rough day today.
"They played hard, they try to play right, but this time last year they were in high school and they're going to struggle.
"They'll be great for this program. We've just got to go through the battles with them right now, but we will get better and this program will be back."
Sports, Pages 36 on 11/18/2012


text:
CEDA is an independent not-for-profit association that undertakes research on the economic and social issues affecting Australia. Donations to CEDA's research fund are placed in a trust to undertake research to inject new ideas into the policy debate. With our donors' support, CEDA has been providing the Australian community with high quality policy analysis and research since 1960. Electronic copies of our research reports are available to the general public on our website.CEDA is a deductible gift recipient (DGR), which means your donation is tax deductible and does not include GST. Donations over $2.00 are tax deductable in Australia.If you would like to make a donation by cheque or by electronic funds transfer, please use the below details:
Account Name: Committee for Economic Development of Australia Bank: NAB, 330 Collins Street, Melbourne 3000 BSB: 083-004 Account Number: 515113346 Please quote invoice number when paying by EFT
CEDAGPO Box 2117Melbourne, VIC 3001 Learn more about CEDA membership
If you would like to leave a bequest in your will for CEDA research please contact CEDA.
CEDA would have to be, in my opinion, the most objective, neutral business group in Australia. It was never born as a lobby group. It was born as a committee for the economic development of Australia. This neutrality has held CEDA in high esteem. It's not a threat to any government, although that doesn't always mean they like what it says.
Phil Ruthven, Founder and Chairman, IBISWorld
Telephone +61 3 9662 3544
Email firstname.lastname@example.com
Home |
Sitemap |
Privacy |
Contact |
Terms of use |
Subscribe |


text:
Motherhood Matters: How to get twice as much done by cutting your to-do list in half
April Perry
I remember one particular day in high school — a couple of weeks before homecoming — when I felt completely stressed out by all of my responsibilities.
I had no idea how I would do it all, so I made a list — a very long list that took up every single line on my piece of paper.
Yes, getting that string of tasks out of my head felt somewhat helpful, but here's what happened when I looked at the list:
I felt paralyzed.
I didn't know where to start, and I knew there weren't enough hours in the day to get everything done, so I simply ran around like a crazy person, checking off whatever I could and probably snapping at my family members and friends throughout the day.
Sadly, this crazy list-making habit followed me to college and into motherhood. Even now, I have an overambitious tendency to pack my lists tight. And if I don't do something to counteract my need to achieve everything in one day, it destroys me.
My husband knows me well. He can take one look at my planner and see my nuttiness coming from a mile away. So he reminds me over and over again: "Write out your list and then cut it in half."
That's good advice, right?
But how do you cut your list in half? I can't just ignore my commitments or throw away my dreams. Every item on my list is there for a reason, and I'm not going to magically feel less stressed if I attack it with a pair of scissors.
Well, fortunately, there are some powerful "ninja tricks" from David Allen's best-seller, "Getting Things Done," that showed me the specifics of how to cut my to-do list in half and get twice as much done in the process. I'm here to show you how.
1. Scrub your list
These preliminary steps are taught in just about every time management book:
- Delete whatever you can
- Delegate whatever can be delegated quickly
- Do whatever can be done in less than two minutes
Once your list is "scrubbed," it will contain the following:
- Things that you really want or need to do
- Things that can only be done by you
- Things that require your focused time and attention
2. Make a someday list
When you look at your edited list, you'll realize that not everything needs to or can be done right now. But you don't want to throw those ideas into oblivion, right?
So create a "someday list" that will hold all of your not-necessary-right-this-minute ideas until you're ready for them. I use a magazine holder for paper lists and physical items, and I use an Evernote list on my phone to capture everything else.
Then I review these about once a month (or less often, if I've got a lot on my plate). Easy.
3. Create calendar triggers
Next, you'll take any tasks that could be assigned to particular days and write them on your calendar.
Let's say you just bought a new microwave that needs to be installed. You need to call your repairman and talk with him about a few other things as well, so you set a calendar trigger for next Friday, when (a) you know your schedule is open, (b) you'll have all the information you'll need to discuss with him and (c) your children will be playing happily with their friends.
- Erin Stewart: Should you teach your kids to...
- After 8 years with no 'true increase' in...
- First-timers and veterans among thousands to...
- Twila Van Leer: Wow! I'm part of history, too
- Wright Words: What I learned from Machu...
- Motherhood Matters: 3 keys to a great family...
- Is this TV show a 'game changer for people...
- 4 tips for planning a successful family hike
- Erin Stewart: Should you teach your... 21
- Amy Iverson: Showing kids how to make... 6
- Wright Words: What I learned from Machu... 4
- After 8 years with no 'true increase'... 3
- First-timers and veterans among... 2
- The Clean Cut: 91-year-old widow... 2
- Tiffany Gee Lewis: Lessons from sending... 2
- Twila Van Leer: Wow! I'm part of... 1


text:
Big Bear, CA, October 22, 2015 - Seniors are being specifically targeted in a 'Postage Due' scam to obtain bank account and credit card information. Scam artists are delivering official looking notices to mailboxes stating that a package is being held pending payment of the postage due. The fraudulent notice provides a telephone number … [Read more...]
E-Mail Scam Alert
San Bernardino, CA, September 27, 2012, 6am - Scam Artists are masquerading as Social Security Representatives and they're attempting to get your personal information through e-mails that appear to be from the Social Security Administration. The e-mails often appear as invitations for you to receive on-going federal benefits. These e-mails include … [Read more...]


text:
Sign Up
Log In
Size:  (micro)
Additional Hints
(No hints available.)
What are Attributes?
Advertising with Us
There are no Trackables in this cache.
View past Trackables
What are Trackable Items?
View all bookmark lists...
63 1 1
View Logbook | View the Image Gallery of 2 images
**Warning! Spoilers may be included in the descriptions or links.
Current Time: 07/23/2016 10:07:52 Pacific Daylight Time (17:07 GMT)Last Updated: 2014-08-09T16:57:08Z on 08/09/2014 09:57:08 Pacific Daylight Time (16:57 GMT) Rendered From:UnknownCoordinates are in the WGS84 datum


text:
$theTitle=wp_title(" - ", false); if($theTitle != "") { ?>
Clearly, Taylor Swift and Apple Music are on better terms these days. If you recall, the "Out of the Woods" singer penned an open letter criticizing the music streaming service for not paying artists enough. Given her clout, Apple amended their policy within hours. Fast forward months later and the 26-year-old singer is now the company's newest spokesperson.
Taylor, clad in fitness gear (is it Beyonce's Ivy Park by any chance?), hops on the treadmill to work on her fitness. After sifting through all the options, she selects Drake and Future's "Jumpman" to run to. Unfortunately, after a few verses things don't end very well. Girlfriend falls, and falls hard.
Check out the cute advert below which was, as she tweeted, "Based on true events. #TAYLORvsTREADMILL."
Style, attitude and confidence is what Victoria's Secret looks for when determining their annual round-up of all things sexy. At least, that's what they say according to their website.
Earning this year's Sexiest Actress honor is Kerry Washington. The Scandal actress takes the torch from last year's winner Rachel McAdams. Meanwhile, Jennifer Lopez snags the Forever Sexy crown from Rihanna who earned the title last year.
Before we get to the alleged shade, here's the backstory.
Last week, Kesha was delivered a devastating blow when the New York Supreme Court denied her motion to be released from her Sony recording contract with producer Dr. Luke, whom she alleges sexually and verbally abused her over the years.
When news broke out, the "Tik Tok" singer received tons of love from her fans and fellow female musicians. Celebs like Lady Gaga, Sara Bareilles, Ariana Grande, Kelly Clarkson and Lorde to name a few spoke out supporting Kesha. #FreeKesha became a trending topic on Twitter.
Over the weekend, Demi Lovato got in on the action. The 23-year-old not only expressed her love for Kesha but threw shade at "so-called feminists." When Kesha's mom revealed Taylor Swift donated $250,000 to Kesha's legal case, Lovato sent a tweet that many felt was directed at Swift. After being accused there was a rivalry with Tay, once again Demi took to social media to clarify her comments. Read all the posts below.
#FreeKesha ? this is only gonna make you stronger, you brave and beautiful girl. Prayers are with you ?? @KeshaRose
— Demi Lovato (@ddlovato) February 20, 2016
As with every year, the Grammys can be a long-drawn out affair. Luckily, there are usually a handful of performances that make the marathon telecast bearable. The 58th annual Grammys were no different.
Arguably, the highlight and the one most people were looking forward to was Lady Gaga's tribute to David Bowie. Mother Monster certainly didn't disappoint. From head to toe and from the red carpet to the stage, she embodied the late great singer. She performed several of Bowie's hits including "Fame," "Rebel Rebel," "Under Pressure" and "Suffragette City" to name a few. Though she did them all fantastically, Adam Lambert's cover of "Let's Dance," IMHO, is better. Sorry Monsters
Adele was surprisingly a bit off her game with her performance. In her defense, it was primarily due to technical glitches that made her sound pitchy and out of tune at times. "The piano mics fell on to the piano strings, that's what the guitar sound was. It made it sound out of tune. Shit happens. X,:" she tweeted after her performance.
If I had to pick the worst, I hate to say it was Pitbull's show-closing performance. It pains me to say that because he's my guilty pleasure, but Sofia Vergara's special appearance had me cringing. I honestly couldn't watch and was kinda embarrassed for her.
Watch all the performances below and find out my five favorites. Be sure to weigh in on who you think stole the show and who stank.
Heading into the 58th annual Grammy Awards, Kendrick Lamar led the pack with a whopping 11 nominations. Taylor Swift and The Weeknd were close behind with 7 nods apiece. Each of them walked away with some hardware with Lamar taking the lead again with five statues.
With regards to the big categories, the Grammys spread the love. Mark Ronson and Bruno Mars' ubiquitous hit, "Uptown Funk" won Record of the Year while Album of the Year and Song of the Year went to Swift and Ed Sheeran respectively. It's worth nothing, Taylor is the first woman to win Album of the Year twice.
The Best New Artist statue went to Meghan Trainor. Didn't she already win a Grammy last year? How is she still a 'new artist?' It's also worth mentioning, Justin Bieber walked away with his first Grammy statue for his "Where Are U Now?" collaboration with Diplo and Skrillex.
For the most part, the acceptance speeches weren't anything too memorable with exception to Taylor. Even though her rep previously issued a statement regarding Kanye West's controversial lyrics, Swift has kept mum… until now.
"As the first woman to win album of the year twice, I want to say to all the young women out there, there are going to be people along the way who will try to undermine your success or who will try to take credit for your accomplishments or your fame." – Swift
Though she doesn't specifically mention West's name or "Famous," it's pretty clear her speech was a less-than-veiled response to the rapper. Watch her speech in full below, along with the complete winners list for the 2016 Grammys.
check out all the winners after the jump and Taylor Swift's speech
This release is a bit random. Why now? It's been over a month since Taylor Swift first released her "Out Of The Woods" music video on New Year's Eve. I suppose timing doesn't really matter to hardcore Swifties. They'll eat up anything she's serving. It's already amassed massive views.
Swift and director Joseph Kahn reveal tidbits about their most recent collaboration. Though shot on location in New Zealand, there's plenty of CGI used to create some of the stunning visuals. With that being said, some old fashioned movie-making tricks were used as well. For instance, the blue dress she's wearing was dipped in wax to make it appear frozen. Learn more secrets in the behind-the-scenes clip below.
Just like her other recent clips, Taylor Swift chose a huge event to debut her latest visual. The 26-year-old singer unveiled "Out Of The Woods" during Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' with Ryan Seacrest on December 31. Happy belated New Year's Eve BTW. I think I've finally recovered 😉
"Out of the Woods" is the sixth single off Swift's 1989 album. If this cracks the Top 10 like the others, I fully expect Taylor to release a seventh one. Girl is going to milk the LP until it's bone dry.
Once again, she teams up with Joseph Kahn for another big budget video with even more special effects. Love the clip, but it's pretty much "Wildest Dreams" but set in a forest and icy environment. Speaking of which, T-Swizzle channels a little Elsa in her Frozen blue gown in several segments of the clip. Check it out below.
For the fourth straight year, Taylor Swift has topped the Celebs Gone Good list. DoSomething.org compiles an annual list highlighting celebrities who use their fame and wealth for positive change.
Among some of the charitable acts the 26-year-old singer has done this past year include a $50,000 donation to a young girl who had to miss one of her shows to undergo treatment for leukemia. The "Bad Blood" entertainer also donated $50,000 to the Seattle Symphony, $50,000 to help fund arts education in NYC and another $50,000 to her backup dancers baby nephew fighting cancer.
Coming in the runner-up slot was Miley Cyrus. She made the cut for founding the Happy Hippy Foundation– an organization with a mission to rally young people to fight injustice facing homeless youth, LGBTQ youth and other vulnerable populations. Check out the Top 20 most charitable celebrities below.


text:
Camden Town Plumbing and Heating
020 7043 3056
Plumber Camden Town
Looking for a Heating Engineer in Camden Town? click here for more information.
Looking for a Boiler Repair Engineer in Camden Town? click here for more information.
Contact Us
Please complete the form below & we will be in touch
Customer Reviews
Reviewed by Frederic
Arrived quickly, really happy with the finished work, great service!
"Great service from Gemma... and Edgar engineer. Would definitely recommend."
Rating:4 / 5
Camden Town Plumbers serve the London postcode NW1
And the nearby locations in NW1: Regents Park
Our plumbers in Camden Town also serve the following local post codes : N1,N7,NW3,NW5,W1,W2,W8,WC1,W8,


text:
Table of Contents
- What is an abscessed tooth?
- What causes an abscessed tooth?
- What are the signs and symptoms of an abscessed tooth?
- How is an abscessed tooth diagnosed?
- What is the treatment for an abscessed tooth?
- What is the prognosis for an abscessed tooth?
- Are home remedies effective for an abscessed tooth?
- Can an abscessed tooth be prevented?
What are the signs and symptoms of an abscessed tooth?
- The tooth turns dark in color compared to surrounding teeth. The byproducts of the necrotic pulp that leach into the porous tooth layer cause this discoloration. In many cases, there may be no pain present.
- There is pain with eating or with pressing on the tooth. The abscess that has spread out the root tip causes the supporting structures (gum and bone) to be affected. Sometimes the throbbing or pulsating pain is so severe it can't be relieved with pain medications. This is usually related to the infection spreading and causing more pressure on the surrounding structures of gum and bone.
- There is swelling and/or a pimple on the gum that is filled with pus. This pimple is called a "draining fistula" and oftentimes can rupture to release pus. This is an obvious sign of infection. Other signs of a tooth abscess are a bad taste or bad odor in the mouth.
- A swollen face or jaw often signals a growing infection. Jaw pain from the swelling can be present as well.
It is also important to note that an abscessed tooth may not have any symptoms at all. Because the tooth has lost vitality (or the ability to feel stimuli), there may be no pain associated with it. However, the abscess is still present and could be further spreading the infection. On occasion, an abscessed tooth is detected during a routine radiographic (X-ray) exam where the patient has not experienced any telltale symptoms of an abscessed tooth.
How is an abscessed tooth diagnosed?
Diagnosis of a tooth abscess is collectively determined by (1) signs and symptoms reported by the patient, (2) exam and tests that are performed by the dentist, and (3) what is visualized with dental radiographs (X-rays). Continue Reading
Burns, Richard C. and Stephen Cohen (Eds.). Pathways of the Pulp, 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1980.
1. MedicineNet
2. Medscape
3. iStock
4. Getty Images
5. iStock
6. Getty Images
Subscribe to MedicineNet's Newsletters
Get the latest health and medical information delivered direct to your inbox!
By clicking Submit, I agree to the MedicineNet's Terms & Conditions & Privacy Policy and understand that I may opt out of MedicineNet's subscriptions at any time.
Abscessed Tooth - Symptoms
What symptoms did you experience when you had an abscessed tooth?Post View 7 Comments
Abscessed Tooth - Home Remedies
Did you try a home remedy for your abscessed tooth?Post View 2 Comments
Abscessed Tooth - Treatment
What treatment did you have for your abscessed tooth?Post View 1 Comment
Abscessed Tooth - Complications
Did you suffer any complications from your abscessed tooth?Post View 5 Comments


text:
|Reviews for Pranksters
| Kigura chapter 11 . 7/11/2013
This was one of the best narugaanaru story's I have read yet it was set up and executed perfectly
| Dead account no longer here chapter 11 . 1/16/2013
Soooooooooooo, whos top? I'm guessing it went both ways. This was cooh.
| Livy.Uzumaki.Obsessed chapter 11 . 12/24/2012
Ahhhhh oh my god, I loved this! I could feel the jealousy, the anticipation, the shock when Sasuke made the announcement :3 It was beautiful, I felt everything and absolutely loved it, very nice work here.
| xytera chapter 11 . 12/5/2012
Awesome story. I love how you developed Naruto's and Gaara's relationship. Gaara's definitely going to have his hands full with his mischievous prankster! I'm glad Sasuke wasn't made into a complete douchebag, and I came out liking him a lot more in the end.
| Fujoshi-dono chapter 11 . 7/14/2012
THIS. WAS. AWESOME. I love how you made Sasuke the one who plays the villain, and ugh if only you went into detail about Sasuke's and Naruto's relationship back then. Mannnnnn. But stil, this was really great. Got me squealing and shit. Haha.
| sapphireblue12 chapter 11 . 6/10/2011
amazing! i read this in less than a day because i was so into it :) I am happy they got together in the end 3
| raineynight chapter 11 . 6/10/2011
Awww, how cute! Loved it! :D
| heavensentskysky chapter 11 . 5/18/2011
what a beautiful story! iloved it!
| Drifty Sock chapter 11 . 4/21/2011
Wow, amazing story. I particularly loved the ending, poor 'ol Gaara. .
This is one of the best Gaa/Nar stories I've ever read, I'm amazed at how well this is written compared to the other Gaa/Nar stories, which most of the time contained PWP. I'm not a fan of pure smut stories with no plot.
I am currently in love with this story, it has all the features of a well written text. Sure, I've seen a few minor errors, nothing too noticeable though. Don't stop writing!
| nekochick93 chapter 11 . 1/4/2011
omg that was a awesome story one of my favs right now! i like the ending with the whole stay the way you are i love it _
| Jubpawz chapter 11 . 6/8/2010
SO yeah...I loved this story~~
I haven't read a GaaNaru in a long time...it's always overshadowed by SasuNaru, but when I really get the urge, GaaNaru's never disappoint.
The plot was well thought out. I liked that a lot. The story FLOWED instead of hopped, you know?
The way you portrayed the characters was perfect. Sasuke as the "I'll help you, but in a discreet complex way" guy. Naruto being the "Damn I love you! Don't you get it from my pranks?" type and Gaara, the stoic "Will I regret this?" type.
Anyways~ Great story. I absolutely loved it.
Keep Writing.
| JessMess chapter 11 . 4/21/2010
Brilliant story.
The characterization was strong and consistent, the tone and overall feel was beautiful. Grammer and Spelling was awesome! A truly refreshing thing to see :P
I enjoyed the plot emmensly. The character interactions and responses to situations was realistic and effective to convey the tone of each scene, which inturn added depth to the plot. I enjoyed the plot twists and how they progressed.
Overall Brilliant story, one that is getting added to my fav story list, and one that I would enjoy reading again :P
Well done.
| i chapter 11 . 3/12/2010
Right. No more starting your fics before work, cause they are hard as hell to put down.
Loved this as much as Sweltering - you easily write some of the best naruto/gaara fic I've read. Thanks for posting :)
| thassoCardigin chapter 3 . 3/2/2010
okay, only one question: WHY IS SASUKE HELPING NARUTO OUT! SHOULDN'T HE BE JEALOUS? Argh! It maketh nu sense su! [] X[]X Z[]Z V[]V T[]T O[]O Q[]Q [] [] meh, watever... su.
| thassoCardigin chapter 1 . 3/2/2010
D I love the game Cat and Mouse~ (wow, that was random) lol, "Oh Goody." I could have never before imagined Gaara saying that but this fanfiction makes it possible. XD Its Great, thanks su!


text:
Jonah 12 Arise, go to In spite of the fact that Nineveh is called a ``great city" three times in the Old Testament (Gen. 10:11, 12; Jonah 1:2; 3:3) and once in the Apocrypha (Judith 1:1), skeptical Bible critics long believed the statement to be greatly exaggerated. When the walled city was first excavated, it was found to be less than nine miles in circumference. That sparked cynical claims that the author, Jonah, did not know what he was talking about. But the real author, the Holy Spirit, was being overlooked. Later excavations have revealed that Nineveh had many suburbs, three of which are mentioned along with Nineveh in Gen. 10:11, 12. One first-century writer (Diodorus of Sicily) justifiably says that Nineveh was a quadrangle measuring about sixty miles in circuit--a ``great city" indeed.Nineveh, that great city, and proclaim against it, for their wickedness has come up before Me. 3 But Jonah rose up to flee to Tarshish from being in the presence of the Lord and went down to Joppa and found a ship going to Tarshish . So he paid the appointed fare and went down into the ship to go with them to Tarshish from being in the presence of the Lord . 4 But the Lord sent out a great wind upon the sea, and there was a violent tempest on the sea so that the ship was about to be broken. 5 Then the mariners were afraid, and each man cried to his god; and they cast the goods that were in the ship into the sea to lighten it for them. But Jonah had gone down into the inner part of the ship and had lain down and was fast asleep. 6 So the captain came and said to him, What do you mean, you sleeper? Arise, call upon your God! Perhaps your God will give a thought to us so that we shall not perish. 7 And they each said to one another, Come, let us cast lots, that we may know on whose account this evil has come upon us. So they cast lots and the lot fell on Jonah. 8 Then they said to him, Tell us, we pray you, on whose account has this evil come upon us? What is your occupation? Where did you come from? And what is your country and nationality? 9 And he said to them, I am a Hebrew, and I fear and worship the Lord, the God of heaven, Who made the sea and the dry land. 10 Then the men were exceedingly afraid and said to him, What is this that you have done? For the men knew that he fled from being in the presence of the Lord , because he had told them. 11 Then they said to him, What shall we do to you, that the sea may subside and be calm for us? For the sea became more and more tempestuous. 12 And said to them, Take me up and cast me into the sea; so shall the sea become calm for you, for I know that it is because of me that this great tempest has come upon you. 13 Nevertheless the men rowed hard to bring the ship to the land, but they could not, for the sea became more and more violent against them. 14 Therefore they cried to the Lord, We beseech You, O Lord, we beseech You, let us not perish for this man's life, and lay not upon us innocent blood; for You, O Lord, have done as it pleased You. 15 So they took up Jonah and cast him into the sea, and the sea ceased from its raging. 16 Then the men feared the Lord exceedingly, and they offered a sacrifice to the Lord and made vows. 17 Now the Lord had prepared and appointed a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.
Top 10 sermons on Jonah 1
- Throw It Overboard
- The World's Worst Missionary
- You Can Run But You Can't Hide
- Great God's - Great Fish
- Three Characteristics of Jonah
Copyright � 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation. All rights reserved.


text:
|Message view
|« Date » · « Thread »
|« Date » · « Thread »
|"Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
|[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config
|Wed, 18 May 2011 20:42:47 GMT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035654#comment-13035654 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------------ java_home is not a stable interface. It cannot be trusted to last, especially given the question marks that hang over Java on OS X. I'm -1 for a variety of reasons: a) we're getting into platform specific code without a good reason b) this could have significant performance ramifications as we add more and more paths to support more and more OSes c) there is a config option to specifically eliminate the need to do this > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|View raw message