text:
- News
- Calendar
- Blogs
- Sports
- Entertainment
- Business
- Lifestyles
- Community
- Opinion
- About Us
- Classifieds
- Coupons
- Local Savings
- Green Editions
- Legal Notices
- Weekly Ads
- Connect2Classes
Connect with Us
MLS SOCCER: Weekend homecoming awaits Federal Way's Kelyn Rowe
Kelyn Rowe is living his dream. The Federal Way High School graduate is in the midst of his second season with the New England Revolution of Major League Soccer (MLS).
"Every day is a great day," Rowe said. "It's a dream come true. It's what I've wanted to do since I was 10 years old. I'm just happy to play the game that I love."
Rowe will receive the biggest honor Federal Way High School can bestow on a former student-athlete Friday night when his No. 2 jersey is retired at halftime of a game between the current Eagles and Spanaway Lake at Federal Way Memorial Stadium.
"(Head coach) Jason (Baumgardt) really did it all," Rowe said. "He talked to me about doing it and I was obviously honored. It's kind of surreal right now. I never thought anything like this was going to happen."
Despite playing just two seasons during his time at Federal Way, Rowe had a humongous impact on the Eagle program.
All you have to do is look at Rowe's senior season. In 2010, Rowe scored 32 of the Eagles' 49 goals and had an eye-popping 25 goals in Federal Way's last 10 games. Rowe also scored nine of the Eagles' 11 goals during their four-game postseason winning streak that ended in the state semifinals.
Rowe also led Federal Way into the state championship game as a freshman in 2007. It was the program's first, and only, appearance in the title game. Rowe finished the season with 14 goals, including a pair in Federal Way's loss to Pasco in the state championship, and 13 assists as a ninth-grader.
Rowe didn't play for the Eagles during his sophomore and junior seasons because of his commitment to his club team, Crossfire Premier out of Redmond.
Rowe will be in the Pacific Northwest in preparation for the Revolution's MLS game Saturday against the Seattle Sounders FC. The game is slated for 1 p.m. at CenturyLink Field.
"This is actually going to be my first time at CenturyLink," Rowe said. "It's going to be awesome playing in that atmosphere. Growing up in the area and being able to play in front of my family and friends for the first time is going to be a good homecoming."
But Rowe, who trained with the Sounders (0-3-1) during his time in high school and college, isn't going to let all the off-the-field distractions take away from his job with New England (1-2-1).
"This is definitely a business trip," he said. "I will see my parents throughout the day and hope to make it to the game on Friday, but this is a business trip. I'm here to get three points."
Rowe was selected third by the Revolution during the 2012 MLS SuperDraft after two seasons at UCLA.
During his sophomore season for the Bruins, Rowe became the fourth UCLA player to be named Pac-12 Player of the Year after leading the conference in assists with 10. Rowe also tallied six goals and led UCLA to the semifinals of the NCAA College Cup. He finished his college career with 13 goals, 20 assists and 46 points in 46 games played and was named the Pac-12 Freshman of the Year in 2010.
During his rookie season with New England, Rowe played in 30 games, starting 21. He tallied three goals, which was third on the team, and dished out a team-leading five assists. This season, Rowe has the only assist for the Revolution, who have scored just once in four games.
Rowe is also a veteran of the U.S. youth national team program, appearing with the under-18, under-20 and under-23 teams.
"It's going to be fun," Rowe said.
Latest news, top stories, and community events,
delivered to your inbox.
Trending Stories Oct 14 - Oct 21
Read the Oct 21
Green Edition
Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.
Browse the archives.


text:
Down memory lane
News Articles from Terry Tribune Archives
44 Years ago - April 30, 1964
New Scenic View Road considered
Representatives of the Terry Chamber of Commerce, the Terry Jaycees, Prairie County Sportsman's Association, Prairie County Commissioners and the Bureau of Land Management, toured the cliffs and badlands area last Wednesday and looked over a new route to Scenic View.
The proposed route would turn west at the top of the cliffs across the Yellowstone River and follow a somewhat natural plateau to Scenic View. A fairly good trail would be bladed, and cattle guards put in two or three places.
It was generally agreed there was a definite need for further development of the area, and a study will be made and plans developed.
Those attending were Jack A. Brubaker, John H. Trask, Elmer Spidel, Gordon Knuths, F. J. Pomeroy, Sheldon H. Tusler, William H. Allen and Bureau of Land Management representatives from the Miles City district office.
43 Years ago - June 3, 1965
New Scenic View Road is built
With the help of county road equipment, donated labor by the county road crew, and other volunteer help, a new road has been built to Scenic View in the Badlands across the river from Terry.
The road turns off the blacktop, on Terry hill, skirts the dump area, then follows the rim west, connecting with the old Scenic View road in the hills.
The distance, made by the new road, is reduced about half of the old road, and is a better road.
The BLM furnished cattle guards where needed.
Sponsor of the new road was a joint undertaking by the Terry jaycees, the county, BLM and Chamber.
43 Years ago - June 17, 1965
Scenic Drive signs will be made soon
The Prairie County Sportsman's Association were inadvertently omitted two weeks ago from the list of organizations involved in promoting the new road to Scenic View. As a matter of fact, the Sportsmen were the prime promoters of a new road in the first place.
New direction signs will be posted from town to the new route during the next few days.
The Sportsmen have two sites spotted for a new rifle range along the new Scenic View route. They found a couple places with a ravine between two buttes which would make as good a range as the former one across the bridge on the bank of the yellowstone.
The actual distance to Scenic View from the turn-off on US 10, is 8.3 miles.
Published April 30, 2008
Article Type:
Scenic View Road
- Login to post comments

subset: commoncrawl


text:
The Dow Jones industrial average rose 46 points to 12,950, its highest close for the year so far. That followed a 123-point surge the day before.
Read More
The Standard & Poor's 500 also popped, rising 3 points to 1,361, also securing its highest close for the year. The Nasdaq composite fell 8 points to 2,952.
Among the biggest movers were Campbell Soup and ketchup maker H.J. Heinz, both of which beat analysts' expectations for quarterly results.
The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose to 2.01 percent from 1.99 percent, a sign that investors are becoming more comfortable with riskier stock investments.
Market trackers» Dow Jones industrial average
--The Associated Press


text:
Dordt College News
Three Ranked Teams On Schedule For Weekend
October 11, 2012
WHERE AND WHEN…The Dordt College volleyball team faces three teams ranked in the most recent coaches' poll. The Defenders face #3 Columbia on Friday night at 7:00 and will meet Viterbo and Taylor on Saturday at 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM respectively. Viterbo is #19 and Taylor #24 in this week's poll. All of the matches are part of a classic hosted by Bellevue University in Bellevue, Nebraska. Results and stats will be posted to www.dordt.edu/athletics and https://twitter.com/dcathletics and also at https://www.facebook.com/dordtdefenders .
THE RIVALS… Columbia (Missouri) is 20-1 this season and stand 10-0 in their league with the loss coming to top ranked Texas-Brownsville on September 8. The Cougars have won 14 matches in a row since that loss and have lost just seven sets this season. Columbia is averaging 16.13 kills per set and have a .341 team kill efficiency. The Cougars averaged 2.23 ace serves per contest and get to 16.41 digs per outing. Columbia is averaging 1.76 points per set off of blocks.
Kahoriz Feliz is the top hitter with a 3.88 average while Brooke Simpson is at 3.23 kills and Carol Berger knocks down 2.71 per outing. Paula Ferreira puts up 12.44 assists per set and she gets to 2.63 digs per contest. Elena Berroteran is the leader in digs with a 5.13 average and she also has 28 ace serves. Sarah Schwentker is the leader in aces with 32 and Ferreira has 31.
Viterbo (Wisconsin) is 20-4 this season with a 3-0 league mark. The V Hawks have won six in a row since a loss to then #6 Embry Riddle. The other losses for Viterbo are to Doane, Hastings and Biola—teams that are all rated in the top-25. Viterbo is averaging 13.51 kills per set with a team kill efficiency of .238. They also score 1.31 points per set on ace serves and have an average of 17.23 digs per contest with 2.31 blocks.
Alicia Olson leads the team with 4.49 kills and a .301 kill efficiency. Katie Flock is putting down 3.74 kills and gets to 2.51 digs. Stacie Hoffman puts up 9.35 assists and Brianna Brinkman is putting up 5.61 assists. Erica Willadsen is the leader in ace serves with 19 and blocks with a 1.23 average. Jordan Blaken tops the team with 5.01 digs per set.
Taylor enters the weekend with a 16-7 overall record and a 10-3 conference record. The Trojans had a five match winning streak snapped on Wednesday night with a loss to Goshen in conference play. Before that loss Taylor's last setback came to Cornerstone on September 29. Taylor's other losses are to Indianapolis, Mount Vernon, Indiana Wesleyan, Evangel and Grand View.
The Trojans are putting down 11.94 kills per contest with a .199 kill efficiency. Taylor has an average of 1.45 ace serves and 2.24 blocks and they dig up 15.03 kill attempts by opponents. Ashlyn De Hoogh is the team kill leader with 3.16 kills per contest and Ali Swart is averaging 2.74. Olivia Griffith assists on 8.39 kills per contest and she has 25 ace serves. Courtney Herschberger is averaging 4.84 digs and Casey Allen is the team leader in blocks with 1.15 per contest.
THE DEFENDERS… are 18-4 this season, 8-1 overall and were receiving votes in the most recent NAIA poll. Dordt has won three in a row since a loss to Doane on September 29. Dordt's other losses are to Grace (Indiana), Grand View and Bellevue (Nebraska). Dordt has an average of 12.3 kills per contest with a .221 kill efficiency. Dordt's defense at the net gets it 2.76 points per set on blocks and they get 1.53 ace serves per outing. The Defenders also get 14.14 digs per contest.
Danae Geels is the team leader with 2.63 kills and a .272 kill efficiency while Katelyn Schuller is averaging 2.62 kills and a .244 kill efficiency. Lindsey Floen is good for 2.35 kills and 1.30 blocks. Loy Sahr has worked her kill average to 2.10 and is averaging just under one block per set. Kayla Gesink handles the setting duties and averages 9.3 per contest and she has 28 ace serves, just under a kill per contest and 2.64 digs. Jana Van Zanten leads the team in aces with 29 and she averages 1.97 digs. Kayla Broekhuis is the team leader in digs with 4.03 per set.
LAST ACTION… Columbia handled Missouri Baptist 25-22, 25-19, 25-21 on Wednesday behind 12 kills by Berger and eight by Simpson. Ferreira had 34 assists and Berroteran 11 digs.
Viterbo dropped Clark 25-17, 25-21, 25-17 on Tuesday with Flock getting 16 kills and 13 Alicia Olson added 13. Hoffman had 39 assists and Jen Krentz 11 digs.
Taylor was upset by Goshen Wednesday night 25-11, 21-25, 18-25, 25-19, 10-15. Elizabeth Luke had 17 kills and De Hoogh put away 15. Herschberg had 31 digs and Olivia Griffith put up 34 assists.
Dordt beat Briar Cliff 21-25, 25-22, 25-22, 25-23 on Tuesday night with Danae Geels leading them with 12 kills and Lindsey Floen had 11 and was in on nine blocks. Meghan Krausman and Katelyn Schuller each had 10 kills and Gesink put up 44 assists. Broekhuis accounted for 26 digs and Van Zanten had four ace serves.
HISTORY… Dordt and Columbia have played eight times with the Defenders trailing the series 7-1. Dordt's win came on September 27, 2011 at the Bellevue Classic which the Defenders won 25-23, 25-13, 18-25, 28-26. Kendra Potgeter had 19 kills in the win and Cassie Huizenga put up 24 assists and Dorinda Hibma had 34 digs. Flavia Lino had 20 kills and Luana Branco 35 assists. The teams played again that season and Dordt lost in the national tournament 23-25, 26-28, 26-24, 25-27. Flavia had 27 kills while Kristin De Ronde had 15 kills and Kelsey Van Dyke 14. Hibma had 39 digs for the Defenders.
Dordt and Viterbo have played once and that meeting was won by the V Hawks on September 3, 2011 in Bellevue. Dordt lost 25-17, 25-14, 25-18. Schuller had ten kills in the loss while Flock had 14 for the winners.
We had to dig deep for the last meeting with Taylor. That was a 2001 national tournament pool play match won by the Defenders 30-24, 30-13, 30-26. Darci Wassenaar led Dordt with 15 kills and Rachel Pontier 13. Wassenaar also had 14 digs along with AJ Lefever . Dordt leads the series 2-0.
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE…Columbia is scheduled to face Hannibal-Lagrange in conference play on Tuesday, October 16.
Viterbo will play AIB on Tuesday in conference action.
Taylor plays Bethel (Indiana) in conference play on October 17.
Standings (Thursday, October 11)
Hastings 8-0/18-3
Dordt 8-1/18-4
Doane 6-3/19-7
Midland 6-3/14-8
Northwestern 5-3/16-6
Nebraska Wesleyan 3-4/9-10
Concordia 4-6/8-12
Morningside 3-6/12-10
Briar Cliff 3-7/11-12
Mount Marty 1-8/4-16
Dakota Wesleyan 0-6/4-19
Wednesday, September 5
Dordt def Briar Cliff 3-2
Midland def Concordia 3-0
Hastings def Doane 3-2
Tuesday, September 11
Briar Cliff University def. Mount Marty College 3-0
Hastings College def. Nebraska Wesleyan University 3-0
Doane College def. Concordia University 3-0
Wednesday, September 12
Dordt def. Dakota Wesleyan 3-0
Northwestern def. Morningside 3-2
Friday, September 14
Northwestern def. Concordia 3-0
Saturday, September 15
Doane def. Mount Marty 3-0
Midland def. Morningside 3-2
Tuesday, September 18
Northwestern def. Briar Cliff 3-0
Concordia def. Nebraska Wesleyan 3-1
Wednesday, September 19
Doane def. Midland 3-2
Morningside def. Dakota Wesleyan 3-1
Dordt def. Mount Marty 3-0
Friday, September 21
Nebraska Wesleyan def. Briar Cliff 3-0
Saturday, September 22
Midland University def. Mount Marty College 3-0
Hastings College def. Northwestern College 3-0
Dordt College def. Nebraska Wesleyan University 3-2
Concordia University def. Dakota Wesleyan University 3-2
Doane College def. Morningside College 3-2
Tuesday, September 25
Mount Marty def. Dakota Wesleyan 3-0
Wednesday, September 26
Briar Cliff def. Morningside 3-0
Midland def. Nebraska Wesleyan 3-0
Hastings def. Concordia 3-0
Dordt def. Northwestern 3-2
Saturday, September 29
Nebraska Wesleyan University 3, Mount Marty College 0
Hastings College 3, Briar Cliff University 1
Midland University 3, Northwestern College 1
Morningside College 3, Concordia University 1
Doane College 3, Dordt College 1
Tuesday, October 2
Briar Cliff University 3, Dakota Wesleyan University 0
Nebraska Wesleyan University 3, Doane College 1
Wednesday, October 3
Hastings College 3, Midland University 2
Dordt College 3, Morningside College 2
Northwestern College 3, Mount Marty College 0
Friday, October 5
Concordia 3, Briar Cliff 2
Saturday, October 6
Dordt College 3, Midland University 2
Concordia University 3, Mount Marty College 0
Hastings College 3, Morningside College 0
Doane College 3, Briar Cliff University 2
Tuesday, October 9
Dordt College 3, Briar Cliff University 1
Hastings College 3, Doane College 1
Morningside College 3, Mount Marty College 1
Wednesday, October 10
Midland University 3, Concordia University 0
Northwestern College 3, Dakota Wesleyan University 0
Friday, October 12
Doane @ Morningside
Saturday, October 13
Midland @ Briar Cliff
Concordia @ Dakota Wesleyan
Hastings @ Mount Marty
Northwestern @ Nebraska Wesleyan
Sunday, October 14
Hastings @ Dakota Wesleyan
Tuesday, October 16
Nebraska Wesleyan @ Concordia
Dordt @ Mount Marty
Wednesday, October 17
Briar Cliff @ Northwestern
Doane @ Midland
Morningside @ Dakota Wesleyan
Friday, October 19
Dakota Wesleyan @ Nebraska Wesleyan
Saturday, October 20
Dordt @ Hastings
Dakota Wesleyan @ Midland
Northwestern @ Doane
Morningside @ Nebraska Wesleyan
Tuesday, October 23
Mount Marty @ Briar Cliff
Dakota Wesleyan @ Dordt College
Wednesday, October 24
Hastings @ Nebraska Wesleyan
Concordia @ Doane
Northwestern @ Morningside
Saturday, October 27
Nebraska Wesleyan @ Briar Cliff
Midland @ Mount Marty
Hastings @ Northwestern
Concordia @ Dordt College
Doane @ Dakota Wesleyan
Tuesday, October 30
Briar Cliff @ Dakota Wesleyan
Midland @ Hastings
Nebraska Wesleyan @ Doane
Dordt @ Morningside
Mount Marty @ Northwestern
Thursday, November 1
Morningside @ Briar Cliff
Midland @ Nebraska Wesleyan
Dakota Wesleyan @ Mount Marty
Hastings @ Concordia
Northwestern @ Dordt College
Saturday, November 3
Mount Marty @ Doane
Morningside @ Midland
Dakota Wesleyan @ Hastings
Dordt @ Nebraska Wesleyan
Northwestern @ Concordia
Media Access: Download Word Version | High Resolution Image: 1


text:
Powered by our sister site, Family Vacation Critic
Monte Triana Hotel
Clara de Jesus Montero 24
Seville Spain 41010
Seville Spain 41010
Monte Triana Hotel is in a less hectic neighborhood across the river from the city center of Seville, but only a 20-minute walk across the bridge. The 116-room property is more easily accessible by car than if it were downtown, plus it has an unloading zone at the street entrance, and for-fee parking garage under the building. Complimentary amenities include use of cribs, fitness center and Wi-Fi. The hotel has a restaurant, cafe and bar/lounge. There's a surcharge for the buffet breakfast, which features hot and cold options.


text:
I was blown away to receive this story. As I said earlier about my first half-marathon experience, there are so many wonderful stories out there.
This one is an amazing, incredible and inspirational story. It actually brought a tear to my eye. Please take a second to read it.
My First Marathon (half) Story
By Debbra
Let's fast forward to spring of 2007 I finally was walking a 20-minute mile and could walk for an hour. I had shed off somewhere around 40 pounds and I decided I needed a challenge, because I hated to walk. But the Fifth Third Riverbank Run does not allow walkers, so I set out to find a race that would allow walking and found The Grand Rapids Marathon and signed up before I realized what I was doing and changed my mind.
I continued with my 3-mile walks and started implementing a longer walk once a week. I actually started to look forward to my longer walks because it was a challenge to see how far I can go. My ultimate goal was to complete the 13.1 miles in less than four hours.
Somewhere around first of July I had lost a total of 90 pounds and had to start intervals of running with my walking because I could not get my heart rate up to the fat burning stage. I still did not like running at first, but somewhere along the way I started to get addicted to running. I had done a couple of pretend half marathons and was not sure I could finish under four hours but thought it was possible.
Now fast forward to Oct. 28, 2007. I set out to walk the half with a few runs here and there. Well that changed as well, I now tell people I ran a half marathon with a few walking breaks. There's something about having people who don't even know you but are taking their precious time to serve you and encourage you and even to have other runners come along and encourage you and tell you that you look great.
I also had decided toward the beginning of the race that no matter what happened I was not going to walk across that finish line, that I was going to run no matter how I did it. I would not be seen walking.
Somewhere around mile marker 9 my runs started to slow down to 1 minute and then I would walk for two. So at mile marker 24, which was a tenth of a mile before my 11-mile marker, I decided to see if I could run a tenth of a mile. I could not do it, so I was not sure how I was going to run that last tenth of a mile, but I was determined to run it.
I turned the corner onto the road where the finish line was and there where just tons of people cheering everyone on, including me. They would say my name or my number so I knew they were cheering for me even though they did not know me.
When I reached the 13-mile marker I started to run again and was not sure I could make it. I cannot explain where that last burst of energy came from other than it helped to have people cheering for you, and then when I looked at the clock and saw the number 3:21 and realized I was not only going to beat my four-hour time frame but I would do it under 3.5 hours, I'm still in shock.
I was so excited when the paper was hung and had my name on it with the time of 3:18:17. It took me 3:30 minutes to get across the starting line since I was so far back.
I could not say enough thank yous to all the people who put this together and the fact that (race director) Don (Kern) stood there greeting everyone who crosses that finish line.
I'll be back next year, but plan to run the half without taking any walking breaks and I will also be more fit and at my goal weight, which will make it a lot easier to run. Then in 2009 I'm planning on running my first full marathon.
I know some people would say what I did was no big deal, and I know there are a lot of stories out there of people accomplishing the half or the full through many different trials, but for me the fact that at 40 years old and 220 pounds I ran 13.1 miles and I went from walking a 20 minute mile to running a 15 minute mile and for me that is a big deal ...
Thanks for listening to my story, I hope it might inspire someone to do something they think might be impossible, because with the stories I have heard and with my story I believe nothing is impossible and everyone should experience at least a half marathon race once in their life."
Thanks Debbra.
If you have a story to share, please send it along.
E-mail John Gonzalez: firstname.lastname@example.com


text:
January/February 2005 Table of Contents
Green Pastures
Can a church, a land trust, and the memory of a famous racehorse save Seabiscuit's ranch?
By James Conaway
The Art of Survival
An incalculably precious national resource, Nine Mile Canyon, is threatened in Utah.
By Reed Karaim
A Marvelous Harvest
Book by book, the Buildings of the United States series is painting the nation's architectural portrait.
By Arnold Berke
Development threatens graffiti in Los Angeles · Hemingway's Cuban house is falling apart · Turning a St. Louis cement plant into an artsy theme park · Yikes! · Transitions · Who's News
A house on Maryland's Eastern Shore reveals its many secrets, once the clutter of two centuries is stripped away.
By Adam Goodheart
The Short Answer
Documentary filmmaker Ken Burns ponders disunities, regional traits, and history.
Two adventurous Frenchmen arrived on the Great Plains in the 1880s, with dreams of ruling the cattle industry.
By David Laskin
Exploring the quarters where America's literary greats took shelter to write
By Robert Wilson
House Rules
Newlyweds revive a disused Chicago church by making it home.
By Luba Vangelova
Back Page
Good building today is a sound investment for tomorrow.
By Dwight Young
Your Trust
Information for members and friends of the National Trust
Trust announces new insurance entity · Hart Family Fund for Small Towns established · President's Note · Teaching the teachers at Trust sites · D.C. school restored · Arnold Berke's NTHP


text:
From The Miami Herald:
In what is being billed as the biggest police corruption investigation in the history of the FBI, more than 130 people were arrested Wednesday in Puerto Rico -- including 89 law enforcement officers -- accused of drug trafficking.
Sixty one Puerto Rico police officers were charged, as were 16 officers from municipal departments, six former state police officers, 12 corrections officers and three members of Puerto Rico's National Guard. Two U.S. Army soldiers and 30 civilians were also charged.
» Read the story: Feds: Sting nets corrupt cops in Puerto Rico [The Miami Herald]
» 133 charged in FBI anti-graft sweep in Puerto Rico [AFP]
» Holder Reveals Puerto Rico Police Corruption Probe, Largest in FBI History [Main Justice]
Pakistan update:
» NATO concedes its helicopters fired on Pakistani post [Los Angeles Times]
» U.S. Apologizes as Attacks in Pakistan Continue [The New York Times]
» 'Better coordination' could have averted Pakistani deaths, panel says [CNN]
» NATO Helicopters Killed Pakistan Troops Who Gave 'Warning' [Wired magazine]
In other news:
» City of Oneida, Oneida Nation to discuss cigarette facility [WSYR-TV Channel 9]
» State threatens to shut down Seneca's three western New York casinos [The Buffalo News]
» Off-campus violations for Le Moyne, OCC students increase as more move to Euclid, SU area [The Daily Orange]
» DeWitt's dilemma: Factory closings hit tax base [CNYcentral.com]
» Report: N.Y.'s net job loss to other states is worst in nation [Rochester Democrat and Chronicle]
» Gender-neutral housing pilot at SU sees drop number of participating students [The Daily Orange]
» Unshackle Upstate announces campaign endorsements [Central New York Business Journal]
» Study to look at Great Lakes water levels [Watertown Daily TImes]
» Fleming voters approve joining library district [The Auburn Citizen]
» Fight for Congress could last past Election Day [The Associated Press]
» Skaneateles community center gets new management [centralny.ynn.com]


text:
Thanks for stopping by.
Our Website is currently being re-designed.
In the meantime, please contact us at email@example.com.
What is Ekcetera?
We get asked that a lot. Creative Design is the basis behind everything we do. Specializing primarily in graphic and web design, marketing & social media, we're always interested in a project that pushes trends, challenges us, and helps a client learn something new. Design should be an artful, but organized process. That's why we're focused not only on making your design the best it can be, but also in making the process as painless and seamless for you as possible. We want to break the stereo-type of working with creatives that are difficult and living in their own artsy world. We also like to have fun.
We pride ourselves in tackling many areas of creativity. We're brave when it comes to trying something new! We offer hands-on solutions for those wanting to be involved in the creative process as well as full-service options to make your life easier.
Ekcetera is different from most creative companies because of our unique philosophies about business and the way design happens. Our scope of offerings spans several markets, but focuses around finding the best creative solution for your unique set of needs. Every client at Ekcetera receives personal attention; we go out of our way to create the best project we can. You'll always find us using the industry standard in software and technology, and we're always searching for and developing new and unique ideas.
Our Mission
To provide quality design and business practices founded on Christian values in a knowledgable, fun, and friendly environment.
As a family-owned business, we value relationships and the importance of family balance in the workplace.
The Owner/Founder
Kelly Garrett, MBA
Kelly founded Ekcetera Productions in 2003. She's discovered in herself an unusual combination of the tolerance of ambiguity that creativity provides while thoroughly enjoying the rigid details of running a business.
After growing up in Fargo, ND, Kelly attended the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks where she earned her Bachelor of Business Administration degree in 2003. Her major was information systems and she had a minor in music.
Shortly after graduating from UND, Kelly jumped into graduate school and received her Master of Business Administration degree from the University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis, MN in 2006. During her graduate study, she aggressively worked on establishing Ekcetera's foundation. She currently serves on the Board of Directors at the River Heights Chamber of Commerce.
Kelly is very active in her church community, enjoys music, photography, ballroom dancing, interior design, travel, and especially time with her family. She lives with her husband and two children in Inver Grove Heights, MN.


text:
Eva Norvind
|Eva Norvind
|Eva Johanne Chegodayeva Sakonsky
May 7, 1944
Trondheim, Norway
|May 14, 2006
(aged 62)
Zipolite, Oaxaca, Mexico
|Cause of death
|Mexico City, Mexico
|Writer, documentary producer, director, sex therapist, dominatrix, actress
|Years active
|1961-1968 (actress)
1961-2006 (writer, producer, director)
|Nailea Norvind (b. 1970)
|Prince Paulovic Chegodayef Sakonsky
Johanna Kajanus
|Georg Kajanus (brother)
Naian González Norvind (granddaughter)
Tessa Ia González Norvind (granddaughter)
Eva Norvind (born Eva Johanne Chegodayeva Sakonsky on May 7, 1944 in Trondheim, Norway - Died May 14, 2006, in Zipolite, Mexico) was a Norwegian-born Mexican writer, documentary producer, director, sex therapist/ dominatrix, and former actress of the cinema of Mexico. She was the mother of telenovela actress Nailea Norvind and the sister of composer and singer/songwriter Georg Kajanus.
Eva Norvind was the daughter of Russian prince Paul Vernstad née Chegodayef Sakonsky and Finnish sculptor Johanna Kajanus, who won the bronze medal for sculpture at the Exposition Internationale des Arts et Techniques dans la Vie Moderne (1937). Eva, her mother and her brother moved to France when Eva was 15 years old. The following year she won the second prize in the beauty contest at the Cannes Film Festival which enabled her to win a minor role in the film Saint Tropez Blues. She then joined the cast of the Folies Bergère and changed her stage name to Eva Norvind. She also appeared in A School for Scandal at the Comédie-Française.
In 1962, Eva moved to Canada and then to New York City where at the age of 18 she worked as a Playboy Bunny and a Can-Can dancer. She finished high school in 1964 and then moved to Mexico City to study Spanish when she was recruited as an actress. She made seven films in Mexico, her last one being Báñame mi amor in 1968.
Norvind was the object of controversy in Mexico, when on the highly censored national television she spoke in defense of birth control. The government of Mexico then asked her to leave the country within 24 hours but with the help of the National Association of Actors she was able to stay in the country, although she was forbidden from appearing on television for one year. She performed in two plays, En el closet, no and Machiavelli's La mandragola (The Mandrake).
In 1968, she became a photographer covering fashion and celebrity news - traveling to Paris and New York City. She also wrote film articles and worked on distribution of Mexican films to Scandinavia and vice versa.
In 1970, Eva gave birth to her daughter Nailea Norvind in Mexico City and returned to New York City in 1980 to study film at New York University (NYU), graduating in 1982 with a Bachelor in Fine Arts degree. In 1985, she became interested in erotic power exchange and two years later founded Taurel Associates, an umbrella company for counselling, erotic role play and video production for health related services. She gave lectures at national conferences worldwide, to both health professionals and lay audiences. In 1996, she obtained her master's degree in Human Sexuality from NYU. The following year, a movie about her life entitled Didn't Do It For Love was made by German filmmaker Monika Treut. She appeared in that film as well as in the 1999 film Tops & Bottoms. In 1999, John McTiernan hired Norvind to coach Rene Russo for her assertive sexual image in The Thomas Crown Affair for which she got screen credit. Norvind also pursued graduate studies in Forensic Psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. In 2003, she provided sexual consultation for the film 'Distress'.
Norvind died on 14 May 2006, drowned in the waters off the beaches of Zipolite, in Oaxaca, Mexico. At the time of her death, she was writing, directing and producing a documentary about severely handicapped Mexican actor and musician Jose Flores, entitled Born Without ("Nacido sin").
Eva Norvind: "My goal is to inspire people to live to their full potential, by exploring the life of Jose Flores. Born without arms and other limbs, Jose supports his large family by playing the harmonica throughout Mexico. In the face of adversity, he shows great courage and spiritual strength.
This is a film with multiple layers. It is about sharing, daring and being grateful for what we have. It is also an exploration of social values, some of them controversial. Many of Jose's choices have been strongly criticized by his family and people around him. As a result, this is also a film about self discovery: a way to explore what we judge ... and what we choose to accept and forgive."
In March 2007, Born Without won Best International Documentary at the Festival Internacional de Cine Contemporaneo de la Ciudad De Mexico (FICCO), Best Documentary Feature at the Vancouver International Film Festival 2008 and the Audience Award for Best International Feature at the 2009 LA Film Festival.
- "La Mandragola (The Mandrake)
- En el Closet, no
- Báñame mi amor (1968) as Priestess
- Un yucateco honoris causa (1967)
- Don Juan 67 (1967) as Helga
- Santo el enmascarado de plata vs la invasión de los marcianos (1967) as Selene
- Nuestros buenos vecinos de Yucatán (1967)
- Juan Pistolas (1966)
- Esta noche no (1966) as a blond in Acapulco
- Pacto de sangre (1966) as Helen
- Saint Tropez Blues (1961) as a German Tourist
- Whipped (1998) as herself[1]
- The City (2007) as herself
- ^ "Obituary: Eva Norvind". The Daily Telegraph. 20 May 2006. Retrieved 2010-03-21.
External links[edit]
- Los Angeles Film Festival website
- Review of 'Born Without' in Variety
- Eva Norvind at the Internet Movie Database
- The outrageous life of Eva Norvind
- Festival Internacional de Cine Contemporaneo de la Ciudad De Mexico
- Eva's bio from the 2007 film, The City
|This article about a Mexican actor or actress is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
|This article about a Norwegian actor or actress is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
- 1944 births
- 2006 deaths
- Deaths by drowning
- Accidental deaths in Mexico
- Mexican film actresses
- Mexican stage actresses
- Mexican women writers
- 20th-century Mexican actresses
- 21st-century Mexican actresses
- Norwegian emigrants to France
- Norwegian emigrants to Canada
- Norwegian emigrants to the United States
- Norwegian emigrants to Mexico
- Norwegian people of Russian descent
- Norwegian people of Finnish descent
- Mexican dominatrices
- Mexican women journalists
- People from Trondheim
- Mexican actor stubs
- Norwegian actor stubs


text:
Bergen Regional Medical Center offers a variety of behavioral health services and benefits for children from the ages of 5 to 17, including:
One of eleven Children's Crisis Intervention Services (CCIS) inpatient units in New Jersey providing:
Child/Adolescent Psychiatric Outpatient Evaluation and Treatment Services provided by board certified child psychiatrists and licensed social workers. These professionals treat children between the ages of 5 and 17 for a variety of mental health issues including:
Teen Track, one of our newer services, is an adolescent group therapy program for teens from the ages of 13 to 17:
Bergen Regional Emergency Department is the only one in the area providing 24/7 access to psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals dedicated to treating children or adolescents experiencing a behavioral health crisis.
Bergen Regional Medical Center, including its Behavioral Health Division, is fully accredited by The Joint Commission.
Call the Access Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. Operators are available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Access Center assessments are free and confidential.
Download the Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Services Brochure
Alzheimer's Association Greater NJ Chapter
Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance
Mental Health Association in New Jersey
NJ Division of Mental Health Services
Northern NJ Maternal/Child Health Consortium


text:
All eyes are on Angelina Jolie's left hand and the oversized custom-made engagement ring she's been spotted wearing, most recently on a family outing to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.Read more ››
anne marie
Results 121-130 of 180
Aisle Say
Angelina Jolie's Engagement Ring (PHOTO!)
Aisle Say
Browse 200+ Brand New Wedding Dresses from Bridal Fashion Week
Browse the latest wedding gown collections from Spring 2013 Bridal Fashion Week in our Runway gallery.Read more ››
Aisle Say
First Look: Spring 2013 Rivini
A photograph of a ballerina prancing alongside an indoor pool was the inspiration behind Rivini's Spring 2013 collection.Read more ››
Aisle Say
First Look:
Spring 2013 Monique Lhuillier
Bridal gown guru Monique Lhuillier always gives us something to lust over when she debuts her latest collection, and this season was no different.Read more ››
Aisle Say
First Look:
Spring 2013 Douglas Hannant
When we received this sneak peek sketch from Douglas Hannant, we knew his runway presentation would be one like none other.Read more ››
Aisle Say
First Look:
Spring 2013 Carolina Herrera
Carolina Herrera sent her Spring 2013 Bridal collection down the runway just moments ago, and I think it's safe to say that jaws hit the floor. Our editors were front row center for all the action, and naturally we're passing it along to you.Read more ››
Aisle Say
We're Calling It: Angelina Jolie's Wedding Gown Will Have a High Slit
Just as we thought things this weekend couldn't get any more exciting, what with Bridal Fashion Week happening and all, news broke that Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt got engaged.Read more ››
Aisle Say
First Look: Spring 2013
White by Vera Wang
The collection is comprised of seven new gowns, each featuring signature Vera Wang details such as laser-cut flowers and organza roses.Read more ››
Aisle Say
Style How-To:
High Slit Wedding Gowns
All eyes will be on you as you walk down the aisle in a leg-baring gown—complete the sultry look with the right accessories.Read more ››
Aisle Say
The New Look of Brides.com
Earlier this morning, Brides.com went live with a new look and feel! You like?Read more ››
- Tags
- Behind the Scenes


text:
Pantone named Radiant Orchid the color of the year for 2014.
I couldn't be more pleased about that! I love the rich lavender shade — it makes me excited for spring!
Sometimes, though, that can be a difficult color to pull off when it comes to makeup. Give me an orchid-colored sweater and I'll be fine, but tell me I have to work an orchid shade into my cosmetics? I may need a minute to think about it.
For eye makeup, the shade pairs beautifully with browns and grays. And as a lip color? You can't go wrong! Just make sure you don't go overboard with wearing it as a makeup shade; too much orchid could end up dating your look a bit … if over-applied it can be reminiscent of the 1980s!
It won't be hard to find orchid-inspired makeup now that Pantone made it official, but in case you need a starting point, check out the products below. Can't get enough radiant orchid? You can also rock this shade in your hair… if you are brave enough.
1 of 7
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eye Colour 2 of 7
Mix this beautiful lavender shade with a bronze or mocha brown and you'll have a stunning eye makeup look.
Formula X Nail Polish 3 of 7
This cheery orchid shade is just the right mixture of purple and pink.
Benefit Lollitint 4 of 7
Swipe this fluid along your cheekbones and lips for an orchid-inspired look.
Too Faced La Creme 5 of 7
A little bit darker, this violet hue is a beautiful berry color that's perfect for wintertime.
Marc Jacobs Plush Shadow 6 of 7
The hues in this palette known as "The Punk" are perfect for a rockstar makeup look.
Smashbox Primer 7 of 7
The orchid tone of this primer will balance out otherwise dull skin. Don't worry, it won't look as purple as it does in the bottle!


text:
I started a long position today as I feel the company/stock is primed to move higher. The secondary should close on Thursday and we should see a nice move higher on the news. GL.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
good luck to you!
I agree. I went long on this today as well. Are you planning on holding this long term?
At the least I'm holding for a double, but would hold longer based on momentum and future catalysts. I'm confident we can see a double digit stock price this year, probably this summer.
...depends, how long can you hold your breath underwater for?


text:
ALLENDALE -- Former Michigan Wolverine linebacker and fullback Quintin Patilla has told Scout.com he is transferring to Grand Valley State to finish his football career.
Grand Valley officials declined comment Wednesday because Patilla, a linebacker who switched to fullback at Michigan, is not enrolled.
Nobody is saying Patilla, a former Flint Carman-Ainsworth standout and former teammate of Grand Valley star defensive tackle Dan Skuta and kicker Todd Carter, is not coming. He would have at least two years of eligibility remaining.
Patilla, 6-foot-2 and 193 pounds, reportedly has battled asthma, which limited him last fall with the Wolverines, and, in the Scout.com report, he has critical words about the new Wolverines coaching staff and the changes within the program.
Patilla also told Scout.com he would play defensive end at GVSU. The Lakers lost key starters and back-ups on the defensive line after going 12-1 last year and falling in the national Division II semifinals.
Attempts to reach Patilla on Wednesday were unsuccessful.
If his health problems are behind him, he certainly is an athlete who could fit in at Grand Valley. He was ranked in the top 10 in the state by most scouting services coming out of high school, and Scout.com ranked him the 26th best linebacker in the nation when he was a senior in Flint.
E-mail Greg Johnson: firstname.lastname@example.com..


text:
Allegan General Hospital welcomes families to "get their dance on" at the National Day of Dance for Your Health event on Saturday, February 23, 2013 at Allegan High School's Performing Arts Center (1560 M-40 North, Allegan) from 2:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m.
"We are so excited and proud to bring this fun, nationwide initiative to the area," said Jennifer Dentler, Spirit of Women Coordinator at Allegan General Hospital. "Join families in our community as we take a stand against heart disease by dancing and moving to a variety of music for all ages."
Day of Dance is a program of the Spirit of Women Hospital Network held in 75 communities across the country and attended by more than 100,000 people. Day of Dance has been helping to create healthier communities nationwide for over nine years, and this is the sixth year that Allegan General will participate.
This event combines the fun of dances such as salsa, belly dancing, hip-hop, and Bollywood with health screenings, exercise/movement classes, and education on heart disease. There will also be special activities for children including a Teddy Bear Clinic.
"We encourage kids to bring their favorite stuffed animal with them for the Teddy Bear Clinic," said Dentler. "They can bring their teddy bear to various stations to have teddy's heart checked or get blood drawn. Our goal is to show kids that going to the doctor or the hospital isn't something to be scared of."
Day of Dance brings together healthcare professionals and businesses to teach families about healthy choices that they can easily incorporate into their daily lives.
"We want to help the community understand their personal risk factors for heart disease and stroke, all while having fun and learning new moves," said Dentler.
Day of Dance educates consumers on a variety of cardiovascular conditions such as atrial fibrillation, stroke, and more. Coronary heart disease, which causes heart attacks, is the leading cause of death for Americans. When done on a regular basis as a form of exercise, dancing can burn as many calories as swimming, walking, or riding a bike.
"There are many health benefits from dancing on a regular basis , including weight maintenance or weight loss, blood pressure and cholesterol management, increased energy, decreased sadness and depression, increased coordination and muscle strength, and an overall sense of well-being," said Dentler.
The 2013 National Day of Dance is presented by Allegan General Hospital, the Spirit of Women Hospital Network, Good Housekeeping magazine and The Heart Truth ® campaign.
To register for Day of Dance, visit aghspirit.org or call AGH's Community Events Line at (269) 686-4231. Day of Dance is free and open to the entire family.


text:
BPPE Annual Reports
View or download the BPPE Annual Report 2014
View or download the BPPE Annual Report 2013
View or download the BPPE Annual Report 2012
View or download the BPPE Annual Report 2011
Performance Fact Sheet
View or download the Performance Fact Sheet
Schedule of Classes Brochure 2014
View or download the 2014 Schedule of Classes Brochure
Test Hazard Analyses
View the Test Hazard Analyses Page or download all THA's
Using GPS to Determine Pitot-Static Errors
A paper describing how to use GPS to determine pitot-static errors is available for download. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and a paper by Doug Gray on the same subject are also available:
GPS PEC Method (MS Word document)
GPS PEC Spreadsheets (MS Excel workbook)
Doug Gray's paper (Adobe pdf file)
PreTPS Document
The following document is a refresher for those students attending the PreTPS course
Right click on the hyperlink to save to your computer.
PreTPS Tutorial (Adobe pdf file)
PreTPS Tutorial Solutions (Adobe pdf file)
NTPS Welcome Package
This document is provided for long course students and families who are relocating to the area. The welcome package is intended to answer the most common questions that you may have when you arrive.
NTPS Welcome Package (Adobe pdf file)
7 Part Paragraph
Download the 7 Part Paragraph Example
Volume I - Math and Physics for Flight Testers
This download contatins the textbook files for Volume I - Math and Physics for Flight Testers.
Volume I - Math & Physics (Compresseed zip file)
Homebuilder Flight Test Data Reduction Spreadsheets
These Excel workbooks are provided for flight testing for builders of kit airplanes.
Climb (MS Excel workbook)
Cruise (MS Excel workbook)
GPS PEC (MS Excel workbook)
GPS SpeedTrack (MS Excel workbook)


text:
You are going to Watch Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi Episode 34 English dubbed online free episodes with HQ / high quality. Stream Anime Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi Episode 34 Online English dub Episode Description : Tooth Decay: When Yumi accidentally injures the tooth fairy, she and Ami become tooth fairies for one night. But soon they meet a little boy who would do anything to keep his tooth.
4 / 20
- 1 ratings.
Watch on Playlist
! Broken - Missing Video Report !
Having trouble watching videos?
What kind of do you see ?
Video not found: http://lb.watchanimesub.net/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/xxxxxx/ series-folder/episode-name.flv


text:
Move over Zoe Cruz. The former co-president of Morgan Stanley, who is or perhaps was the bestknown woman investment banker, will need to make way for Manisha Girotra, 38, managing director and chairperson of UBS (Union Bank of Switzerland) India. The Chandigarh-born Girotra received a master's degree from the Delhi School of Economics, joined UBS in 1998 and infiltrated
Also touted as the most talked about woman in investment banking circles, industry analysts identify Manisha Girotra's name as synonymous with M&A deals in
At UBS, Girotra is pursuing two objectives: raising the profile of UBS in
In 2007, with growing corporate activity and a booming market, UBS leapfrogged rivals such as Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, CitiGroup and Merrill Lynch to join the top ranks in M&A market share in
Describing her initial years at UBS as tough, Girotra says she had her hands full winding up some long-pending deals. Her toughest, she says, was the disinvestments of the state-owned petrochemicals firm IPCL, which earned the down-to-earth CEO the reputation as "an unrelenting tough deal maker" from her opponents in
"The IPCL transaction was languishing for more than two years, and by then many bidders like Dow Chemical had gone away," Girotra recounts. "A lot of ministries were involved, a lot of changes happened in government and a lot of justification had to be provided on the valuation, bidders, processes and methodology. Though it took five years, eventually we emerged victorious and never did we lose our cool."
Today she brushes aside talk of being a woman in the old boys' club of banking. "You are only as good as what you produce," she observes. "Twelve years ago, nobody would shake my hand; they would just wish me a hello, much in line with etiquettes of the Indian tradition, where men would greet a woman with words rather than offering their hand." She laughs and adds: "Most took me as someone's secretary who is there to take notes. When they asked me when they would get to see my boss, I would tell them there was no boss." She says that most of her colleagues now are women; be it the HSBC Bank, JP Morgan or Morgan Stanley.
Girotra thinks UBS has been lucky in identifying cross-border M&A trends at an early stage in
Nevertheless, she says, India Inc. is poised for more of the crossborder deals now than before. For Indian companies there is a manifold increase in their desire to become the next major multinational out of the country. "The thinking among the Indian CEOs is, ��why should all the MNCs be from some-where else? If a small country like
So how does she plan to meet these challenges? UBS is treating its Indian employees as global workers. "If an Indian employee desires to work abroad, it shall be perfectly OK, given a vacancy exists there," she says. The company is also striving to project itself as a family-oriented work place on par with the entire service sector in the country. "Opportunities for global exposure, alongside a homey atmosphere, are our USP [unique selling proposition]. Besides, compensation and wage bills have also gone up in
Girotra sees robust M&A activity in the coming years and calls upon CEOs across the globe to be a part of this growth. The credit crunch affecting the
"Companies have a higher risk appetite for emerging markets, so there will be a redirection of funds to India and China, as was the case earlier with Korea and Taiwan," she says, adding, "If a company wants to be a dominant player in the next 10 or 20 years, India is the market, and just as we've seen huge growth in the equity sector, the same will be seen in the debt markets as well."


text:
(a) This part contains EPA procedures for issuing, modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating all RCRA, UIC, PSD and NPDES "permits" (including "sludge-only" permits issued pursuant to § 122.1(b)(2) of this chapter. The latter kinds of permits are governed by part 270. RCRA interim status and UIC authorization by rule are not "permits" and are covered by specific provisions in parts 144, subpart C, and 270. This part also does not apply to permits issued, modified, revoked and reissued or terminated by the Corps of Engineers. Those procedures are specified in 33 CFR parts 320-327. The procedures of this part also apply to denial of a permit for the active life of a RCRA hazardous waste management facility or unit under § 270.29.
(b) Part 124 is organized into five subparts. Subpart A contains general procedural requirements applicable to all permit programs covered by these provisions. Subparts B through D and Subpart G supplement these general provisions with requirements that apply to
(c) Part 124 offers an opportunity for public hearings (see § 124.12).
(d) This part is designed to allow permits for a given facility under two or more of the listed programs to be processed separately or together at the choice of the Regional Administrator. This allows EPA to combine the processing of permits only when appropriate, and not necessarily in all cases. The Regional Administrator may consolidate permit processing when the permit applications are submitted, when draft permits are prepared, or when final permit decisions are issued. This part also allows consolidated permits to be subject to a single public hearing under § 124.12. Permit applicants may recommend whether or not their applications should be consolidated in any given case.
(e) Certain procedural requirements set forth in part 124 must be adopted by States in order to gain EPA approval to operate RCRA, UIC, NPDES, and 404 permit programs. These requirements are listed in §§ 123.25 (NPDES), 145.11 (UIC), 233,26 (404), and 271.14 (RCRA) and signaled by the following words at the end of the appropriate part 124 section or paragraph heading: (
(f) To coordinate decisionmaking when different permits will be issued by EPA and approved State programs, this part allows applications to be jointly processed, joint comment periods and hearings to be held, and final permits to be issued on a cooperative basis whenever EPA and a State agree to take such steps in general or in individual cases. These joint processing agreements may be provided in the Memorandum of Agreement developed under §§ 123.24 (NPDES), 145.24 (UIC), 233.24 (404), and 271.8 (RCRA).
(a) In addition to the definitions given in §§ 122.2 and 123.2 (NPDES), 501.2 (sludge management), 144.3 and 145.2 (UIC), 233.3 (404), and 270.2 and 271.2 (RCRA), the definitions below apply to this part, except for PSD permits which are governed by the definitions in § 124.41. Terms not defined in this section have the meaning given by the appropriate Act.
(b) For the purposes of part 124, the term
(2) The Director shall not begin the processing of a permit until the applicant has fully complied with the application requirements for that permit. See §§ 270.10, 270.13 (RCRA), 144.31 (UIC), 40 CFR 52.21 (PSD), and 122.21 (NPDES).
(3) Permit applications (except for PSD permits) must comply with the signature and certification requirements of §§ 122.22 (NPDES), 144.32 (UIC), 233.6 (404), and 270.11 (RCRA).
(b) [Reserved]
(c) The Regional Administrator shall review for completeness every application for an EPA-issued permit. Each application for an EPA-issued permit submitted by a new HWM facility, a new UIC injection well, a major PSD stationary source or major PSD modification, or an NPDES new source or NPDES new discharger should be reviewed for completeness by the Regional Administrator within 30 days of its receipt. Each application for an EPA-issued permit submitted by an existing HWM facility (both Parts A and B of the application), existing injection well or existing NPDES source or sludge-only facility should be reviewed for completeness within 60 days of receipt. Upon completing the review, the Regional Administrator shall notify the applicant in writing whether the application is complete. If the application is incomplete, the Regional Administrator shall list the information necessary to make the application complete. When the application is for an existing HWM facility, an existing UIC injection well or an existing NPDES source or "sludge-only facility" the Regional Administrator shall specify in the notice of deficiency a date for submitting the necessary information. The Regional Administrator shall notify the applicant that the application is complete upon receiving this information. After the application is completed, the Regional Administrator may request additional information from an applicant but only when necessary to clarify, modify, or supplement previously submitted material. Requests for such additional information will not render an application incomplete.
(d) If an applicant fails or refuses to correct deficiencies in the application, the permit may be denied and appropriate enforcement actions may be taken under the applicable statutory provision including RCRA section 3008, SDWA sections 1423 and 1424, CAA section 167, and CWA sections 308, 309, 402(h), and 402(k).
(e) If the Regional Administrator decides that a site visit is necessary for any reason in conjunction with the processing of an application, he or she shall notify the applicant and a date shall be scheduled.
(f) The effective date of an application is the date on which the Regional
(g) For each application from a major new HWM facility, major new UIC injection well, major NPDES new source, major NPDES new discharger, or a permit to be issued under provisions of § 122.28(c), the Regional Administrator shall, no later than the effective date of the application, prepare and mail to the applicant a project decision schedule. (This paragraph does not apply to PSD permits.) The schedule shall specify target dates by which the Regional Administrator intends to:
(1) Prepare a draft permit;
(2) Give public notice;
(3) Complete the public comment period, including any public hearing; and
(4) Issue a final permit.
(a)(1) Whenever a facility or activity requires a permit under more than one statute covered by these regulations, processing of two or more applications for those permits may be consolidated. The first step in consolidation is to prepare each draft permit at the same time.
(2) Whenever draft permits are prepared at the same time, the statements of basis (required under § 124.7 for EPA-issued permits only) or fact sheets (§ 124.8), administrative records (required under § 124.9 for EPA-issued permits only), public comment periods (§ 124.10), and any public hearings (§ 124.12) on those permits should also be consolidated. The final permits may be issued together. They need not be issued together if in the judgment of the Regional Administrator or State Director(s), joint processing would result in unreasonable delay in the issuance of one or more permits.
(b) Whenever an existing facility or activity requires additional permits under one or more of the statutes covered by these regulations, the permitting authority may coordinate the expiration date(s) of the new permit(s) with the expiration date(s) of the existing permit(s) so that all permits expire simultaneously. Processing of the subsequent applications for renewal permits may then be consolidated.
(c) Processing of permit applications under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may be consolidated as follows:
(1) The Director may consolidate permit processing at his or her discretion whenever a facility or activity requires all permits either from EPA or from an approved State.
(2) The Regional Administrator and the State Director(s) may agree to consolidate draft permits whenever a facility or activity requires permits from both EPA and an approved State.
(3) Permit applicants may recommend whether or not the processing of their applications should be consolidated.
(d) [Reserved]
(e) Except with the written consent of the permit applicant, the Regional Administrator shall not consolidate processing a PSD permit with any other permit under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section when to do so would delay issuance of the PSD permit more than one year from the effective date of the application under § 124.3(f).
(a) (
(b) If the Director decides the request is not justified, he or she shall send the
(c) (
(2) In a permit modification under this section, only those conditions to be modified shall be reopened when a new draft permit is prepared. All other aspects of the existing permit shall remain in effect for the duration of the unmodified permit. When a permit is revoked and reissued under this section, the entire permit is reopened just as if the permit had expired and was being reissued. During any revocation and reissuance proceeding the permittee shall comply with all conditions of the existing permit until a new final permit is reissued.
(3) "Minor modifications" as defined in §§ 122.63 (NPDES), 144.41 (UIC), and 233.16 (404), and "Classes 1 and 2 modifications" as defined in § 270.42 (a) and (b) (RCRA) are not subject to the requirements of this section.
(d) (
(2) For EPA-issued NPDES or RCRA permits, if the Director tentatively decides to terminate a permit under § 122.64(a) (NPDES) of this chapter, other than at the request of the permittee, or decides to conduct a hearing under section 3008 of RCRA in connection with the termination of a RCRA permit, he or she shall prepare a complaint under 40 CFR 22.13 and 22.44 of this chapter. Such termination of NPDES and RCRA permits shall be subject to the procedures of part 22 of this chapter.
(3) In the case of EPA-issued permits, a notice of intent to terminate or a complaint shall not be issued if the Regional Administrator and the permittee agree to termination in the course of transferring permit responsibility to an approved State under §§ 123.24(b)(1) (NPDES) of this chapter, 145.25(b)(1) (UIC) of this chapter, 271.8(b)(6) (RCRA) of this chapter, or 501.14(b)(1) (sludge) of this chapter. In addition, termination of an NPDES permit for cause pursuant to § 122.64 of this chapter may be accomplished by providing written notice to the permittee, unless the permittee objects.
(e) When EPA is the permitting authority, all draft permits (including notices of intent to terminate) prepared under this section shall be based on the administrative record as defined in § 124.9.
(f) (
(g)(1) (Reserved for PSD Modification Provisions).
(2) PSD permits may be terminated only by rescission under § 52.21(w) or by automatic expiration under § 52.21(r). Applications for rescission shall be precessed under § 52.21(w) and are not subject to this part.
(a) (
(b) If the Director tentatively decides to deny the permit application, he or she shall issue a notice of intent to deny. A notice of intent to deny the permit application is a type of draft permit which follows the same procedures as any draft permit prepared under this section. See § 124.6(e). If the Director's final decision (§ 124.15) is that the tentative decision to deny the permit application was incorrect, he or she shall withdraw the notice of intent to deny and proceed to prepare a draft permit under paragraph (d) of this section.
(c) (
(d) (
(1) All conditions under §§ 122.41 and 122.43 (NPDES), 144.51 and 144.42 (UIC, 233.7 and 233.8 (404, or 270.30 and 270.32 (RCRA) (except for PSD permits)));
(2) All compliance schedules under §§ 122.47 (NPDES), 144.53 (UIC), 233.10 (404), or 270.33 (RCRA) (except for PSD permits);
(3) All monitoring requirements under §§ 122.48 (NPDES), 144.54 (UIC), 233.11 (404), or 270.31 (RCRA) (except for PSD permits); and
(4) For:
(i) RCRA permits, standards for treatment, storage, and/or disposal and other permit conditions under § 270.30;
(ii) UIC permits, permit conditions under § 144.52;
(iii) PSD permits, permit conditions under 40 CFR § 52.21;
(iv) 404 permits, permit conditions under §§ 233.7 and 233.8;
(v) NPDES permits, effluent limitations, standards, prohibitions, standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, and conditions under §§ 122.41, 122.42, and 122.44, including when applicable any conditions certified by a State agency under § 124.55, and all variances that are to be included under § 124.63.
(e) (
EPA shall prepare a statement of basis for every draft permit for which a fact sheet under § 124.8 is not prepared. The statement of basis shall briefly describe the derivation of the conditions of the draft permit and the reasons for them or, in the case of notices of intent to deny or terminate, reasons supporting the tentative decision. The statement of basis shall be sent to the applicant and, on request, to any other person.
(a) A fact sheet shall be prepared for every draft permit for a major HWM, UIC, 404, or NPDES facility or activity, for every Class I sludge management facility, for every 404 and NPDES general permit (§§ 237.37 and 122.28), for every NPDES draft permit that incorporates a variance or requires an explanation under § 124.56(b), for every draft permit that includes a sewage sludge land application plan under 40 CFR 501.15(a)(2)(ix), and for every draft permit which the Director finds is the subject of wide-spread public interest or raises major issues. The fact sheet shall briefly set forth the principal facts and the significant factual, legal, methodological and policy questions considered in preparing the draft permit. The Director shall send this fact sheet to the applicant and, on request, to any other person.
(b) The fact sheet shall include, when applicable:
(1) A brief description of the type of facility or activity which is the subject of the draft permit;
(2) The type and quantity of wastes, fluids, or pollutants which are proposed to be or are being treated, stored, disposed of, injected, emitted, or discharged.
(3) For a PSD permit, the degree of increment consumption expected to result from operation of the facility or activity.
(4) A brief summary of the basis for the draft permit conditions including references to applicable statutory or regulatory provisions and appropriate supporting references to the administrative record required by § 124.9 (for EPA-issued permits);
(5) Reasons why any requested variances or alternatives to required standards do or do not appear justified;
(6) A description of the procedures for reaching a final decision on the draft permit including:
(i) The beginning and ending dates of the comment period under § 124.10 and the address where comments will be received;
(ii) Procedures for requesting a hearing and the nature of that hearing; and
(iii) Any other procedures by which the public may participate in the final decision.
(7) Name and telephone number of a person to contact for additional information.
(8) For NPDES permits, provisions satisfying the requirements of § 124.56.
(9) Justification for waiver of any application requirements under § 122.21(j) or (q) of this chapter.
(a) The provisions of a draft permit prepared by EPA under § 124.6 shall be based on the administrative record defined in this section.
(b) For preparing a draft permit under § 124.6, the record shall consist of:
(1) The application, if required, and any supporting data furnished by the applicant;
(2) The draft permit or notice of intent to deny the application or to terminate the permit;
(3) The statement of basis (§ 124.7) or fact sheet (§ 124.8);
(4) All documents cited in the statement of basis or fact sheet; and
(5) Other documents contained in the supporting file for the draft permit.
(6) For NPDES new source draft permits only, any environmental assessment, environmental impact statement (EIS), finding of no significant impact, or environmental information document and any supplement to an EIS that may have been prepared. NPDES permits other than permits to new
(c) Material readily available at the issuing Regional Office or published material that is generally available, and that is included in the administrative record under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, need not be physically included with the rest of the record as long as it is specifically referred to in the statement of basis or the fact sheet.
(d) This section applies to all draft permits when public notice was given after the effective date of these regulations.
(i) A permit application has been tentatively denied under § 124.6(b);
(ii) (
(iii) (
(iv) An appeal has been granted under § 124.19(c);
(v) (
(vi) An NPDES new source determination has been made under § 122.29.
(2) No public notice is required when a request for permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination is denied under § 124.5(b). Written notice of that denial shall be given to the requester and to the permittee.
(3) Public notices may describe more than one permit or permit actions.
(2) Public notice of a public hearing shall be given at least 30 days before the hearing. (Public notice of the hearing may be given at the same time as public notice of the draft permit and the two notices may be combined.)
(c) Methods (applicable to State programs, see 40 CFR 123.25 (NPDES), 145.11 (UIC), 233.23 (404), and 271.14 (RCRA)). Public notice of activities described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be given by the following methods:
(1) By mailing a copy of a notice to the following persons (any person otherwise entitled to receive notice under this paragraph may waive his or her rights to receive notice for any classes and categories of permits);
(i) The applicant (except for NPDES and 404 general permits when there is no applicant);
(ii) Any other agency which the Director knows has issued or is required to issue a RCRA, UIC, PSD (or other permit under the Clean Air Act), NPDES, 404, sludge management permit, or ocean dumping permit under the Marine Research Protection and Sanctuaries Act for the same facility or activity (including EPA when the draft permit is prepared by the State);
(iii) Federal and State agencies with jurisdiction over fish, shellfish, and wildlife resources and over coastal zone management plans, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, State Historic Preservation Officers, including any affected States (Indian Tribes). (For purposes of this paragraph, and in the context of the Underground Injection Control Program only, the term State includes Indian Tribes treated as States.)
(iv) For NPDES and 404 permits only, any State agency responsible for plan development under CWA section
(v) For NPDES permits only, any user identified in the permit application of a privately owned treatment works;
(vi) For 404 permits only, any reasonably ascertainable owner of property adjacent to the regulated facility or activity and the Regional Director of the Federal Aviation Administration if the discharge involves the construction of structures which may affect aircraft operations or for purposes associated with seaplane operations;
(vii) For PSD permits only, affected State and local air pollution control agencies, the chief executives of the city and county where the major stationary source or major modification would be located, any comprehensive regional land use planning agency and any State, Federal Land Manager, or Indian Governing Body whose lands may be affected by emissions from the regulated activity;
(viii) For Class I injection well UIC permits only, state and local oil and gas regulatory agencies and state agencies regulating mineral exploration and recovery;
(ix) Persons on a mailing list developed by:
(A) Including those who request in writing to be on the list;
(B) Soliciting persons for "area lists" from participants in past permit proceedings in that area; and
(C) Notifying the public of the opportunity to be put on the mailing list through periodic publication in the public press and in such publications as Regional and State funded newsletters, environmental bulletins, or State law journals. (The Director may update the mailing list from time to time by requesting written indication of continued interest from those listed. The Director may delete from the list the name of any person who fails to respond to such a request.)
(x)(A) To any unit of local government having jurisdiction over the area where the facility is proposed to be located; and (B) to each State agency having any authority under State law with respect to the construction or operation of such facility.
(xi) For Class VI injection well UIC permits, mailing or e-mailing a notice to State and local oil and gas regulatory agencies and State agencies regulating mineral exploration and recovery, the Director of the Public Water Supply Supervision program in the State, and all agencies that oversee injection wells in the State.
(2)(i) For major permits, NPDES and 404 general permits, and permits that include sewage sludge land application plans under 40 CFR 501.15(a)(2)(ix), publication of a notice in a daily or weekly newspaper within the area affected by the facility or activity; and for EPA-issued NPDES general permits, in the
The Director is encouraged to provide as much notice as possible of the NPDES or Section 404 draft general permit to the facilities or activities to be covered by the general permit.
(ii) For all RCRA permits, publication of a notice in a daily or weekly major local newspaper of general circulation and broadcast over local radio stations.
(3) When the program is being administered by an approved State, in a manner constituting legal notice to the public under State law;
(4) Any other method reasonably calculated to give actual notice of the action in question to the persons potentially affected by it, including press releases or any other forum or medium to elicit public participation.
(i) Name and address of the office processing the permit action for which notice is being given;
(ii) Name and address of the permittee or permit applicant and, if different, of the facility or activity regulated by the permit, except in the case of NPDES and 404 draft general permits under §§ 122.28 and 233.37;
(iii) A brief description of the business conducted at the facility or activity described in the permit application or the draft permit, for NPDES or 404
(iv) Name, address and telephone number of a person from whom interested persons may obtain further information, including copies of the draft permit or draft general permit, as the case may be, statement of basis or fact sheet, and the application; and
(v) A brief description of the comment procedures required by §§ 124.11 and 124.12 and the time and place of any hearing that will be held, including a statement of procedures to request a hearing (unless a hearing has already been scheduled) and other procedures by which the public may participate in the final permit decision.
(vi) For EPA-issued permits, the location of the administrative record required by § 124.9, the times at which the record will be open for public inspection, and a statement that all data submitted by the applicant is available as part of the administrative record.
(vii) For NPDES permits only (including those for "sludge-only facilities"), a general description of the location of each existing or proposed discharge point and the name of the receiving water and the sludge use and disposal practice(s) and the location of each sludge treatment works treating domestic sewage and use or disposal sites known at the time of permit application. For EPA-issued NPDES permits only, if the discharge is from a new source, a statement as to whether an environmental impact statement will be or has been prepared.
(viii) For 404 permits only,
(A) The purpose of the proposed activity (including, in the case of fill material, activities intended to be conducted on the fill), a description of the type, composition, and quantity of materials to be discharged and means of conveyance; and any proposed conditions and limitations on the discharge;
(B) The name and water quality standards classification, if applicable, of the receiving waters into which the discharge is proposed, and a general description of the site of each proposed discharge and the portions of the site and the discharges which are within State regulated waters;
(C) A description of the anticipated environmental effects of activities conducted under the permit;
(D) References to applicable statutory or regulatory authority; and
(E) Any other available information which may assist the public in evaluating the likely impact of the proposed activity upon the integrity of the receiving water.
(ix) Requirements applicable to cooling water intake structures under section 316(b) of the CWA, in accordance with part 125, subparts I , J, and N of this chapter.
(x) Any additional information considered necessary or proper.
(i) Reference to the date of previous public notices relating to the permit;
(ii) Date, time, and place of the hearing;
(iii) A brief description of the nature and purpose of the hearing, including the applicable rules and procedures; and
(iv) For 404 permits only, a summary of major issues raised to date during the public comment period.
(e) (
(a) (
(2) The Director may also hold a public hearing at his or her discretion, whenever, for instance, such a hearing might clarify one or more issues involved in the permit decision;
(3) For RCRA permits only, (i) the Director shall hold a public hearing whenever he or she receives written notice of opposition to a draft permit and a request for a hearing within 45 days of public notice under § 124.10(b)(1); (ii) whenever possible the Director shall schedule a hearing under this section at a location convenient to the nearest population center to the proposed facility;
(4) Public notice of the hearing shall be given as specified in § 124.10.
(b) Whenever a public hearing will be held and EPA is the permitting authority, the Regional Administrator shall designate a Presiding Officer for the hearing who shall be responsible for its scheduling and orderly conduct.
(c) Any person may submit oral or written statements and data concerning the draft permit. Reasonable limits may be set upon the time allowed for oral statements, and the submission of statements in writing may be required. The public comment period under § 124.10 shall automatically be extended to the close of any public hearing under this section. The hearing officer may also extend the comment period by so stating at the hearing.
(d) A tape recording or written transcript of the hearing shall be made available to the public.
All persons, including applicants, who believe any condition of a draft permit is inappropriate or that the Director's tentative decision to deny an application, terminate a permit, or prepare a draft permit is inappropriate, must raise all reasonably ascertainable issues and submit all reasonably available arguments supporting their position by the close of the public comment period (including any public hearing) under § 124.10. Any supporting materials which are submitted shall be included in full and may not be incorporated by reference, unless they are already part of the administrative record in the same proceeding, or consist of State or Federal statutes and regulations, EPA documents of general applicability, or other generally available reference materials. Commenters shall make supporting materials not already included in the administrative record available to EPA as directed by the Regional Administrator. (A comment period longer than 30 days may be necessary to give commenters a reasonable opportunity to comply with the requirements of this section. Additional time shall be granted under § 124.10 to the extent that a commenter who requests additional time demonstrates the need for such time.)
(a)(1) The Regional Administrator may order the public comment period reopened if the procedures of this paragraph could expedite the decisionmaking process. When the public comment period is reopened under this paragraph, all persons, including applicants, who believe any condition of a draft permit is inappropriate or that the Regional Administrator's tentative
(2) Public notice of any comment period under this paragraph shall identify the issues to which the requirements of § 124.14(a) shall apply.
(3) On his own motion or on the request of any person, the Regional Administrator may direct that the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall apply during the initial comment period where it reasonably appears that issuance of the permit will be contested and that applying the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section will substantially expedite the decisionmaking process. The notice of the draft permit shall state whenever this has been done.
(4) A comment period of longer than 60 days will often be necessary in complicated proceedings to give commenters a reasonable opportunity to comply with the requirements of this section. Commenters may request longer comment periods and they shall be granted under § 124.10 to the extent they appear necessary.
(b) If any data information or arguments submitted during the public comment period, including information or arguments required under § 124.13, appear to raise substantial new questions concerning a permit, the Regional Administrator may take one or more of the following actions:
(1) Prepare a new draft permit, appropriately modified, under § 124.6;
(2) Prepare a revised statement of basis under § 124.7, a fact sheet or revised fact sheet under § 124.8 and reopen the comment period under § 124.14; or
(3) Reopen or extend the comment period under § 124.10 to give interested persons an opportunity to comment on the information or arguments submitted.
(c) Comments filed during the reopened comment period shall be limited to the substantial new questions that caused its reopening. The public notice under § 124.10 shall define the scope of the reopening.
(d) [Reserved]
(e) Public notice of any of the above actions shall be issued under § 124.10.
(a) After the close of the public comment period under § 124.10 on a draft permit, the Regional Administrator shall issue a final permit decision (or a decision to deny a permit for the active life of a RCRA hazardous waste management facility or unit under § 270.29). The Regional Administrator shall notify the applicant and each person who has submitted written comments or requested notice of the final permit decision. This notice shall include reference to the procedures for appealing a decision on a RCRA, UIC, PSD, or NPDES permit under § 124.19 of this part. For the purposes of this section, a final permit decision means a final decision to issue, deny, modify, revoke and reissue, or terminate a permit.
(b) A final permit decision (or a decision to deny a permit for the active life of a RCRA hazardous waste management facility or unit under § 270.29) shall become effective 30 days after the service of notice of the decision unless:
(1) A later effective date is specified in the decision; or
(2) Review is requested on the permit under § 124.19.
(3) No comments requested a change in the draft permit, in which case the permit shall become effective immediately upon issuance.
(2)(i) Uncontested conditions which are not severable from those contested shall be stayed together with the contested conditions. The Regional Administrator shall identify the stayed provisions of permits for existing facilities, injection wells, and sources. All other provisions of the permit for the existing facility, injection well, or source become fully effective and enforceable 30 days after the date of the notification required in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
(ii) The Regional Administrator shall, as soon as possible after receiving notification from the EAB of the filing of a petition for review, notify the EAB, the applicant, and all other interested parties of the uncontested (and severable) conditions of the final permit that will become fully effective enforceable obligations of the permit as of the date specified in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section . For NPDES permits only, the notice shall comply with the requirements of § 124.60(b).
(2) No stay of an EPA-issued RCRA, UIC, or NPDES permit shall be granted based on the staying of any State-issued permit except at the discretion of the Regional Administrator and only upon written request from the State Director.
(c) Any facility or activity holding an existing permit must:
(1) Comply with the conditions of that permit during any modification or revocation and reissuance proceeding under § 124.5; and
(2) To the extent conditions of any new permit are stayed under this section, comply with the conditions of the existing permit which correspond to the stayed conditions, unless compliance with the existing conditions would be technologically incompatible with compliance with other conditions of the new permit which have not been stayed.
(a) (
(1) Specify which provisions, if any, of the draft permit have been changed in the final permit decision, and the reasons for the change; and
(2) Briefly describe and respond to all significant comments on the draft permit or the permit application (for section 404 permits only) raised during the public comment period, or during any hearing.
(b) For EPA-issued permits, any documents cited in the response to comments shall be included in the administrative record for the final permit decision as defined in § 124.18. If new points are raised or new material supplied during the public comment period, EPA may document its response to those matters by adding new materials to the administrative record.
(c) (
(a) The Regional Administrator shall base final permit decisions under
(b) The administrative record for any final permit shall consist of the administrative record for the draft permit and:
(1) All comments received during the public comment period provided under § 124.10 (including any extension or reopening under § 124.14);
(2) The tape or transcript of any hearing(s) held under § 124.12;
(3) Any written materials submitted at such a hearing;
(4) The response to comments required by § 124.17 and any new material placed in the record under that section;
(5) For NPDES new source permits only, final environmental impact statement and any supplement to the final EIS;
(6) Other documents contained in the supporting file for the permit; and
(7) The final permit.
(c) The additional documents required under paragraph (b) of this section should be added to the record as soon as possible after their receipt or publication by the Agency. The record shall be complete on the date the final permit is issued.
(d) This section applies to all final RCRA, UIC, PSD, and NPDES permits when the draft permit was subject to the administrative record requirements of § 124.9 and to all NPDES permits when the draft permit was included in a public notice after October 12, 1979.
(e) Material readily available at the issuing Regional Office, or published materials which are generally available and which are included in the administrative record under the standards of this section or of § 124.17 ("Response to comments"), need not be physically included in the same file as the rest of the record as long as it is specifically referred to in the statement of basis or fact sheet or in the response to comments.
(a) Within 30 days after a RCRA, UIC, NPDES, or PSD final permit decision (or a decision under 270.29 of this chapter to deny a permit for the active life of a RCRA hazardous waste management facility or unit) has been issued under § 124.15 of this part, any person who filed comments on that draft permit or participated in the public hearing may petition the Environmental Appeals Board to review any condition of the permit decision. Persons affected by an NPDES general permit may not file a petition under this section or otherwise challenge the conditions of the general permit in further Agency proceedings. They may, instead, either challenge the general permit in court, or apply for an individual NPDES permit under § 122.21 as authorized in § 122.28 and then petition the Board for review as provided by this section. As provided in § 122.28(b)(3), any interested person may also petition the Director to require an individual NPDES permit for any discharger eligible for authorization to discharge under an NPDES general permit. Any person who failed to file comments or failed to participate in the public hearing on the draft permit may petition for administrative review only to the extent of the changes from the draft to the final permit decision. The 30-day period within which a person may request review under this section begins with the service of notice of the Regional Administrator's action unless a later date is specified in that notice. The petition shall include a statement of the reasons supporting that review, including a demonstration that any issues being raised were raised during the public comment period (including any public hearing) to the extent required by these regulations and when appropriate, a showing that the condition in question is based on:
(1) A finding of fact or conclusion of law which is clearly erroneous, or
(2) An exercise of discretion or an important policy consideration which the Environmental Appeals Board should, in its discretion, review.
(b) The Environmental Appeals Board may also decide on its own initiative to review any condition of any RCRA, UIC, NPDES, or PSD permit decision issued under this part for which review is available under paragraph (a) of this section. The Environmental Appeals Board must act under this paragraph
(c) Within a reasonable time following the filing of the petition for review, the Environmental Appeals Board shall issue an order granting or denying the petition for review. To the extent review is denied, the conditions of the final permit decision become final agency action. Public notice of any grant of review by the Environmental Appeals Board under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall be given as provided in § 124.10. Public notice shall set forth a briefing schedule for the appeal and shall state that any interested person may file an amicus brief. Notice of denial of review shall be sent only to the person(s) requesting review.
(d) The Regional Administrator, at any time prior to the rendering of a decision under paragraph (c) of this section to grant or deny review of a permit decision, may, upon notification to the Board and any interested parties, withdraw the permit and prepare a new draft permit under § 124.6 addressing the portions so withdrawn. The new draft permit shall proceed through the same process of public comment and opportunity for a public hearing as would apply to any other draft permit subject to this part. Any portions of the permit which are not withdrawn and which are not stayed under § 124.16(a) continue to apply.
(e) A petition to the Environmental Appeals Board under paragraph (a) of this section is, under 5 U.S.C. 704, a prerequisite to the seeking of judicial review of the final agency action.
(f)(1) For purposes of judicial review under the appropriate Act, final agency action occurs when a final RCRA, UIC, NPDES, or PSD permit decision is issued by EPA and agency review procedures under this section are exhausted. A final permit decision shall be issued by the Regional Administrator:
(i) When the Environmental Appeals Board issues notice to the parties that review has been denied;
(ii) When the Environmental Appeals Board issues a decision on the merits of the appeal and the decision does not include a remand of the proceedings; or
(iii) Upon the completion of remand proceedings if the proceedings are remanded, unless the Environmental Appeals Board's remand order specifically provides that appeal of the remand decision will be required to exhaust administrative remedies.
(2) Notice of any final agency action regarding a PSD permit shall promptly be published in the
(g) Motions to reconsider a final order shall be filed within ten (10) days after service of the final order. Every such motion must set forth the matters claimed to have been erroneously decided and the nature of the alleged errors. Motions for reconsideration under this provision shall be directed to, and decided by, the Environmental Appeals Board. Motions for reconsideration directed to the administrator, rather than to the Environmental Appeals Board, will not be considered, except in cases that the Environmental Appeals Board has referred to the Administrator pursuant to § 124.2 and in which the Administrator has issued the final order. A motion for reconsideration shall not stay the effective date of the final order unless specifically so ordered by the Environmental Appeals Board.
(a) Any time period scheduled to begin on the occurrence of an act or event shall begin on the day after the act or event.
(b) Any time period scheduled to begin before the occurrence of an act or event shall be computed so that the period ends on the day before the act or event.
(c) If the final day of any time period falls on a weekend or legal holiday, the time period shall be extended to the next working day.
(d) Whenever a party or interested person has the right or is required to act within a prescribed period after the service of notice or other paper upon him or her by mail, 3 days shall be added to the prescribed time.
(a) Part 124 of this chapter became effective for all permits except for RCRA permits on July 18, 1980. Part 124 of this chapter became effective for RCRA permits on November 19, 1980.
(b) EPA eliminated the previous requirement for NPDES permits to undergo an evidentiary hearing after permit issuance, and modified the procedures for termination of NPDES and RCRA permits, on June 14, 2000.
(c)(1) For any NPDES permit decision for which a request for evidentiary hearing was granted on or prior to June 13, 2000, the hearing and any subsequent proceedings (including any appeal to the Environmental Appeals Board) shall proceed pursuant to the procedures of this part as in effect on June 13, 2000.
(2) For any NPDES permit decision for which a request for evidentiary hearing was denied on or prior to June 13, 2000, but for which the Board has not yet completed proceedings under § 124.91, the appeal, and any hearing or other proceedings on remand if the Board so orders, shall proceed pursuant to the procedures of this part as in effect on June 13, 2000.
(3) For any NPDES permit decision for which a request for evidentiary hearing was filed on or prior to June 13, 2000 but was neither granted nor denied prior to that date, the Regional Administrator shall, no later than July 14, 2000, notify the requester that the request for evidentiary hearing is being returned without prejudice. Notwithstanding the time limit in § 124.19(a), the requester may file an appeal with the Board, in accordance with the other requirements of § 124.19(a), no later than August 13, 2000.
(4) A party to a proceeding otherwise subject to paragraph (c) (1) or (2) of this section may, no later than June 14, 2000, request that the evidentiary hearing process be suspended. The Regional Administrator shall inquire of all other parties whether they desire the evidentiary hearing to continue. If no party desires the hearing to continue, the Regional Administrator shall return the request for evidentiary hearing in the manner specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
(d) For any proceeding to terminate an NPDES or RCRA permit commenced on or prior to June 13, 2000, the Regional Administrator shall follow the procedures of § 124.5(d) as in effect on June 13, 2000, and any formal hearing shall follow the procedures of subpart E of this part as in effect on the same date.


text:
Questions, Concerns, Comments? Tell me belowEdit
Catnipkatniss 19:50, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Can I be an awesome pie admin?
Err...I don't know either :P
Ask justafox or Rue District11 they will know :P
Catnipkatniss 19:55, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to be an admin,if possible.
Where's Finnick? Odair he is! <3 FinnickisBOSS! 20:03, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for making me an admin! This is an awesome wiki!
Jsm13athome 21:01, June 13, 2012 (UTC)That was me, I forgot to put the tildes. Thank's!
Special feautures Edit
Do you want to enable any other features, like the top ten list, badges, chat,ect.
I got rid of the blank poll options on the front page for you! Only problem is, all the votes have been removed. That was unintentional. Sorry. Oh well, the blanks are gone anyway.
Billy's Mine From Mrs.Billy Unger a.k.a BillyUngerLover 21:20, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
Hey Ms.Finnick :) i was just wanting to ask you a Question. Do you think the pages on this wiki to be looked at and improved more cause i do. I think they should be looked at to see what info/pics need to be added.
Prezziesnow9704:)! 23:47, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
I think most pages should be overauled apart from: the district 4 female and the district 4 male. User:Prezziesnow9704:)! Talk </div></div>


text:
The hottest darlings of the fashion world pulled out all the stops for this year's Coachella festival in California.
The music festival, which seems to attract a particularly stylish crowd, is great for spotting the trends that will dominate the summer.
Actress Diane Kruger attended with boyfriend Joshua Jackson, and the pair were perfectly dressed for the Californian sun.
Kruger chose a pair of monochrome cut-off shorts and a slouchy print t-shirt, which she paired with knee-high boots. Jackson was a picture of laidback cool in a patterned shirt and knee-length jeans.
Katy Perry cut a dashing figure in a daring Dolce & Gabbana two-piece, which consisted of a bandeau top and a mini-skirt emblazoned with a quirky print. She finished off the look with a pair of oversized sunnies and a vintage Lulu Guinness bag.
Alexa Chung was typically preppy in a Lacoste Peter Pan collar dress which she wore with round pink sunglasses and strap sandals.
Model Allesandra Ambrosio posed poolside in pink cut-off shorts, a white crop top and ubiquitous layered necklaces and bracelets. Not so sure about those orange reflective sunnies though.
Singer Rita Ora was a burst of sunshine in an orange slogan tee, pastel midi-skirt and black sneakers.


text:
You don't want your ministry to grow anyway! There isn't the budget for it, there aren't enough volunteers, and frankly – yours is a traditional church that likes things the way they are. So be sure and do the following things this fall as your youth ministry starts up again. This way, your first-time visitors won't come back for sloppy seconds:
1) Be sure to make your youth room hard to find. Don't mark what door to come in and heaven forbid – don't have signage!
2) Forget (or never learn) their name. Dude and bro will work for a long time, even on the girls.
3) Change an event's time or location without telling them. Showing up to an empty room says, "We don't care about you."
4) Pick on them in front of the rest of the group. Oh, and make them stand up to introduce themselves.
5) Miss the signals when they're not fitting in with the other kids.
6) Don't have them sign in and don't get follow up contact info.
7) Create your own "inner circle" and leave them standing on the outside looking in.
8) Assume they know the "inside jokes" or stories.
9) Don't add them to your event mailing list, ESPECIALLY the fun stuff.
10) Continue planning boring youth meetings using out-of-date technology and stale teaching methods.
That should do the trick.
PS: OR if you're a rebel and want to have a positive "visitor flow process," check out this chart:http://ymarchitects.com/137/samples