text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|Aug 3, 1999
|Filing date
|Apr 30, 1997
|Priority date
|May 6, 1996
|Fee status
|Also published as
|Publication number
|James L. Eden, Yong-Cheng Shi, Russell J. Nesiewicz, Joseph Wieczorek, Jr.
|Original Assignee
|National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (33), Referenced by (34), Classifications (22), Legal Events (7)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/643,643 filed May 6, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,688,845 and pending application Ser. No. 08/643,719 filed May 6, 1996.
This invention relates to the use of unique high solids maltodextrin syrups in adhesives, particularly remoistenable adhesives such as envelope adhesives and non-remoistenable adhesives such as bookbinding adhesives.
Starches and dextrins have long been used as an adhesive material in various applications such as the fabrication of corrugated board, paper bags, paper boxes, laminated paperboard, spiral-wound tubes, gummed labels, gummed tapes and other gumming applications. See the discussion in Starch Chemistry and Technology, 2nd Edition, by R. Whistler et al., 1984, pp. 593-610 and Chapter 22 "Starch and Its Modifications" by M. W. Rutenberg, pp. 22-63 and 22-64 in "Handbook of Water-Soluble Gums and Resins" edited by Robert L. Davidson and published by McGraw-Hill Book Co. (1980).
Typical adhesive categories include liquid adhesives, pastes, cold-water-soluble adhesives, water-resistant adhesives, and numerous other applications. In most applications, the starch is cooked and solubilized and used as either the only component in addition to the water in the adhesive or as an added component in more complex formulations to provide the required tack, overall adhesion, solution viscosity, stability, and/or desired rheological characteristics.
Adhesives for specific applications include corrugating adhesives, multiwall bag adhesives, laminating adhesives, tube-winding adhesives, labelling adhesives, side bag seam adhesives, tissue and towel adhesives, cigarette adhesives, wallpaper adhesives, adhesives for disposables, remoistenable adhesives, bookbinding adhesives, cup and plate adhesives, case and carton seal adhesives, carton forming adhesives, glued lap adhesives, and the like.
Remoistenable adhesives are commonly utilized in the production of envelopes, stamps, wallpaper, tapes, labels and similar products where it is desired to provide a dry, but remoistenable, adhesive film. In the manufacture of remoistenable adhesives, typically an aqueous solution or dispersion or an organic solvent solution of the dry adhesive material is applied as a wet film to a substrate. After the water or organic solvent is removed by drying and evaporation, the resulting dry adhesive film will, on being moistened, produce the desired tacky adhesive surface.
The ability to provide an adhesive which is remoistenable is not in itself difficult and, in fact, there are a number of known and commercially available products that are used in various applications requiring remoistenable adhesives. Conventional remoistenable adhesives have generally been prepared from either of two adhesive systems. The first class includes adhesives prepared by the addition of dextrin, plasticizer, and other additives to dextrin-emulsified vinyl acetate homopolymers. The second class includes polyvinyl acetate homopolymers and copolymers which are emulsified with polyvinyl alcohol or dextrin to which additional polyvinyl alcohol or dextrin and plasticizer may be post-added.
The usefulness of a particular composition as a remoistenable adhesive in a specific application will depend on its ability to meet the many physical and chemical property requirements and to best satisfy the processing conditions to which it is subjected. Accordingly, a remoistenable adhesive composition in addition to providing good adhesion and remoistenability, typically is expected to provide a lay flat or non-curl product, be processable on different manufacturing equipment, provide adequate drying speed, resist hygroscopic and thermal blocking, and satisfy various other requirements depending on the application involved.
Remoistenable adhesives based on dextrins and/or modified starches now require a tradeoff in desirable properties such as adequate adhesion and tack, high solids content (60-70%), and stable useable final viscosity (2500-25,000 cps). Typically, a high molecular weight starch or dextrin is required for adhesion but a lower molecular weight starch or dextrin is required for viscosity and stability.
An adhesive is stable if it remains at a near constant viscosity after manufacture. Most adhesives are utilized within a year of manufacture. If the adhesive increases or decreases in viscosity over time, the machining characteristics will be adversely affected as well as the storage handling and/or shelf life. If the viscosity increases over time, pasting or non-flow will occur, the adhesives will no longer function properly and poor coating will result. Flow problems can also occur when the adhesive is removed from the storage containers which can range in size from 5 to 7000 gallons or more.
One method of "stabilizing" a starch- or dextrin-based adhesive is by heating the cooked dextrin or starch in the presence of formaldehyde or glyoxal to effect a light crosslinking which minimizes retrogradation of the starch or dextrin (i.e., loose hydrogen bonding), which is commonly referred to as "pasting".
An inherent problem exists because higher molecular weight dextrins provide excellent adhesion, but the adhesives are extremely high in viscosity and have poor viscosity stability, whereas lower viscosity adhesives contain excessive water (added to achieve acceptable machine viscosities) but, as a result, the overall adhesive solids are lowered. The use of low solid adhesives also results in slow machine speeds since the coated adhesive must be dried before packaging. In contrast, low molecular weight dextrins provide low viscosity, high solids adhesives which give poor adhesion and poor tack on remoistening.
Humidity resistance is very important when formulating a remoistenable adhesive. The adhesive should not be prematurely reactive when exposed to normal atmospheric conditions.
"Blocking" is the undesirable adhesion that can occur between touching layers of a material under certain conditions. Hygroscopic blocking resistance is the ability of the adhesive to resist reactivating due to humidity. In a situation where substrates, such as envelopes or sheets of stamps, are coated with an adhesive which is non-resistant to hygroscopic blocking and are stored and exposed to varying degrees of humidity, there is a tendency for adjacent surfaces of the stacked substrates to adhere and stick to one another. Thermoplastic blocking is the adhesion that can occur when adhesive coated substrates are exposed to varying temperatures and pressures during processing, storage and other handling operations. Pressure conditions causing blocking can exist, for example, during storage or stacking of products while processing, during the printing of products such as the laser jet printing of papers and envelopes, and during the perforating of sheets of stamps and other products. Depending on the particular conditions used, the amount of pressure that is created can cause blocking in non-resistant adhesive formulations.
Hygroscopic blocking has been more particularly defined by a standard test method, ASTM D 114653. Hygroscopic blocking is measured on a test specimen at 50 percent relative humidity at 38� C. for 24 hours. If there is no blocking (free), it is then measured at increments of successively higher humidities until blocking occurs (critical humidity) or until a suitably high humidity is reached. Thermoplastic blocking is measured under the same. ASTM D procedure at 38� C. for 24 hours. If there is no blocking (free), it is measured at successively higher temperatures (increments of 5� C.) until blocking occurs (critical temperature) or until a suitably high temperature is reached. Especially suitable high humidity and high temperature conditions for determining hygroscopic and thermoplastic blocking are 95 percent relative humidity and 90� C.
Since remoistenable adhesives are mainly used on paper substrates, the use of excessive water can also result in poor lay-flat or "curling" of the coated surface. The paper absorbs water and swells, distorting the original configuration of the paper fibers. As the adhesive dries, wrinkling or "curling" occurs due to the unequal rates of expansion and contraction of the paper backing and adhesive film.
Excessive curl can cause equipment jam-ups or other handling difficulties. While some adhesive materials have good lay flat or non-curl properties, others require various techniques such as the addition of humectants to overcome or minimize this curling tendency. While these techniques often alleviate the curling problem, other properties such as hygroscopic blocking resistance can be unfavorably affected.
To solve this problem, one can reduce the overall amount of water in the final adhesive formulation or add humectants which act as diluents and do not distort the paper fibers. The use of humectants, however, increases the time required to dry the adhesive. The use of humectants also reduces the adhesive's humidity resistance since the humectants are hygroscopic.
Pyrodextrins are used in the preparation of many liquid and dry adhesives including remoistenable adhesives. There are four major steps in the manufacture of pyrodextrins: acidification, predrying, dextrinization, and cooling. In the early stages, hydrolysis is the major reaction and the viscosity of the starch is substantially reduced to near the level of the finished dextrin. Repolymerization becomes a major factor as the temperature rises. As the reaction progresses, an equilibrium viscosity is approached, and at increasing temperatures, a transglucosidation reaction predominates. There are two major characteristic changes--one is the molecular size of the dextrin molecule, the other is a change in the degree of linearity. Each has a specific effect on the physical and chemical characteristics of the dextrin. Variation in average molecular weight influences the dextrin's viscosity, while changes in linearity greatly influence the solution stability.
The use of pyrodextrins in remoistenable adhesives requires compromises in adhesive formulating between the desired solids, viscosity, tack/strength and stability. In addition, the adhesives suffer from color problems.
Bookbinding adhesives require superior adhesion and various classes of adhesives are utilized in the bookbinding industry. For example, synthetic emulsion adhesives, such as polyvinyl alcohol or ethylene vinyl acetate emulsion polymers, are used on endpapers, for tipping, for gluing-off operations, for lining, casing-in, spine gluing and side gluing, and on special stencil applicator case makers. Hot melt adhesives, which consist of polymers, tackifier resins and waxes, are used mainly as one-shot adhesives for pocket-books and magazines, in multi-shot applications in the production of catalogues, and in burst binding. Starches derived from maize, potato, and tapioca are used for producing pastes, generally for the hand-binding section of the trade and sometimes for operations such as endpapering and tipping or for hand case making in leather.
Case making is one of the more demanding bookbinding techniques. Because of the adhesive properties required, animal glues are mainly used for case making and lining and only occasionally in unsewn binding lines. Animal glues consist of one or more kinds of gelatine in a solution of water. They give aggressive tack with a medium-set speed. Since they are derived from natural materials, they are very susceptible to seasonal factors and tend to vary with their source of supply. Operators using these glues have to be skilled in achieving the correct degree of dilution and tack. Most animal glues age and become brittle under dry, warm conditions as evidenced by the condition of the spine of a book kept for some time in a centrally heated home.
Most cigarette making adhesives are based on synthetic polymer systems. There is, however, a growing trend to the use of natural products in this area. Modified starches, such as chemically modified starches and dextrins, are being used for such constructions. Adhesives containing these starches and dextrins have a Brookfield viscosity of approximately 500-5000 cps., and they are used in all applications including side seams and tipping. A side seam is the bond produced to facilitate the formation of the tobacco filled cigarette rod. Tipping is the process by which the separate filter section is combined with the tobacco filled section by means of an overlapping bond.
Corrugating adhesives are prepared using starch, water, alkali, and other optional ingredients, e.g., a waterproofing agent. Starches used as the carrier portion may contain portions or mixtures of high amylose starch.
There is a need for improved maltodextrin-based adhesives having a high adhesive solids content, which maintain a useable viscosity during storage, and which provide good adhesion and which also provide good lay flat properties, block resistance, and tack when the adhesive is a remoistenable adhesive and resistance to humidity changes when the adhesive is a bookbinding adhesive.
The present invention is directed to adhesives containing unique maltodextrin syrups which are prepared by a novel high solids, enzyme conversion process. The adhesives include high solids, maltodextrin-based remoistenable adhesives, resin-based remoistenable adhesives, and non-remoistenable adhesives. As used herein, "remoistenable adhesives" include liquid or paste adhesives which are coated onto substrate(s), dried, later reactivated, by heat and/or moisture and then bonded to another uncoated or coated substrate. As used herein, "non-remoistenable adhesives" include liquid or paste adhesives which are coated on one or more substrates which are wet combined and then dried to form the bond.
The high solids, remoistenable adhesives consist essentially of:
a) at least about 50% by weight of a maltodextrin syrup having a solids content between about 60 to 80% by weight and a water content of about 40 to about 20% by weight, which is prepared from a converted or a non-converted, chemically derivatized starch having an amylose content of 40% or less; which maltodextrin has (i) substituents in an amount sufficient to provide a degree of substitution of greater than about 0.01 and less than about 0.50; (ii) a reducing sugar content of between about 5 and about 19 dextrose equivalent; and (iii) a polymodal molecular weight distribution having one peak between about 630 to about 1600 daltons and at least one other peak between about 1600 and about 2,500,000 daltons;
b) 0 to about 50% by weight of water; and
c) an effective amount, based on the weight of the maltodextrin syrup in the remoistenable adhesive, of a preservative, a humectant, a defoamer, a plasticizer, and/or a peptizing salt. The high solids, remoistenable adhesive described above preferably will have a maltodextrin syrup content of from about 70% to less than 100% by weight and more preferably about 70 to about 90%. The reducing sugar content of the maltodextrin preferably will be between about 10 and about 17 dextrose equivalents. The substituents in the maltodextrin will preferably be in an amount or degree of substitution of between about 0.05 and less than about 0.17.
The resin-based remoistenable adhesives consist essentially of:
a) about 15 to about 90% by weight of a resin selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl acetate, ethylene vinyl acetate, and mixtures thereof;
b) about 10 to about 85% by weight of a maltodextrin syrup having a solids content between about 60 to about 80% by weight and a water content about 40 to about 20% by weight, which is prepared from a converted or a non-converted, chemically derivatized starch having an amylose content of 40% or less; which maltodextrin has (i) substituents in an amount sufficient to provide a degree of substitution of greater than about 0.01 and less than about 0.50, (ii) a reducing sugar content of between about 5 and about 19 dextrose equivalent, and a polymodal molecular weight distribution having one peak between about 630 to about 1600 daltons and at least one other peak between about 1600 and about 2,500,000 daltons; and
c) 0 to about 75% by weight of water.
When the remoistenable adhesive is the resin-based adhesive, the polyvinyl acetate and/or ethylene vinyl acetate may be emulsified during polymerization of the monomers with part of the maltodextrin syrup which acts as a protective colloid. The amount of maltodextrin syrup used as the protective colloid is about 25% of the wet emulsion. Partially hydrolyzed, moderate molecular weight polyvinyl alcohol may be added to the adhesive in addition to, or as a partial replacement for, the polyvinyl acetate or polyethylene vinyl acetate resins in an amount of up to 10%, more preferably 2-5%, of the wet formula. A suitable polyvinyl alcohol is Airvol 203 from Air Products, Allentown, Pa.
The remoistenable adhesives are characterized by their combination of dry strength, wet tack, remoistenability, long term viscosity stability, and light color in comparison to remoistenable adhesives formulated with pyrodextrins. In addition, clay or other lay-flat additives may not be required.
The non-remoistenable adhesives consist essentially of:
a) at least about 50% by weight of a maltodextrin syrup having a solids content between about 60 to 80% by weight and a water content of about 40% to about 20% by weight and which is prepared from a converted or a non-converted starch and which has a reducing sugar content of between about 5 and about 19 dextrose equivalent;
b) 0 to about 50% by weight of water; and
c) an effective amount, based on the weight of the maltodextrin syrup in the non-remoistenable adhesive, of a preservative, a humectant, a defoamer, a plasticizer, and/or a peptizing salt. Preferably, the maltodextrin syrup content in the non-remoistenable adhesives described above will be about 70% by weight. The reducing sugar content of the maltodextrine preferably will be between about 10 and about 17 dextrose equivalents. The maltodextrin syrup in the non-remoistenable adhesive may also be a chemically derivatized starch as described above for the remoistenable adhesive containing different substituents such as non-ionic, anionic or cationic ether and/or ester substituents. Preferably the substituent groups will be in an amount or degree of substitution between about 0.05 and about 0.17.
The non-remoistenable adhesives are characterized by their combination of dry strength, long term viscosity stability, and light color in comparison to non-remoistenable adhesives formulated with pyrodextrins.
The adhesives may be prepared from a powdered maltodextrin recovered by drying the maltodextrin syrup and then adding water or the aqueous based resin. The non-remoistenable adhesives may also be prepared from the powdered maltodextrin by adding water or a suitable solvent.
Preferably, the maltodextrins are prepared by a single phase, high solids enzyme conversion which provides maltodextrins with a unique polymodal molecular weight profile, when the starch is a derivatized starch. This "polymodal" profile is advantageous for the claimed adhesives because the higher molecular weight portions of the maltodextrin syrup provide the required adhesion, while the lower molecular weight portions of the maltodextrin syrup provide lower final viscosities. Previously, these characteristics could only be achieved by blending different starches and/or dextrins. The chemically derivatized maltodextrins produced in the single phase process are inherently stable and no glyoxal or formaldehyde stabilization is required.
In the single phase process for preparing the chemically derivatized maltodextrins, a portion of the starch can be unaffected by the enzyme conversion. The ungelatinized or partially gelatinized granules (generally less than 1%) alter film continuity and contraction and thus contribute to the remoistenable adhesive's lay-flat properties and humidity resistance. The resultant improvement in the remoistenable adhesive's non-curl or lay-flat properties results in a reduction in the use of humectants, which in turn results in faster application speeds and faster drying times.
The single phase, high solids enzyme conversion process involves the steps of:
(a) adding, to a converted or unconverted, chemically derivatized or a non-derivatized granular starch, water and a starch-hydrolyzing enzyme, the water being used in an amount sufficient to produce a single phase powdered mixture without a visible free water phase;
(b) activating the enzyme by heating the powdered mixture to about the optimum temperature for the enzyme while maintaining a substantially constant moisture content (i.e., within �5% from the starting moisture content) in the mixture;
(c) allowing the enzyme to hydrolyze and liquefy the starch; and
(d) optionally inactivating the enzyme by reducing the pH, increasing the temperature, and/or adding an inhibiting salt.
As used herein, "starch" is intended to include non-pregelatinized granular starches, pregelatinized granular starches, and starches which are pregelatinized but not cold-water-soluble and the chemically derivatized starches contain ether and/or ester non-ionic, anionic, or cationic substituent groups. Preferred ether groups are hydroxypropyl, 3-(trimethyl ammonium)-2-hydroxypropyl, or N,N-diethylaminoethyl groups. Preferred ester substituent groups include succinate, octenylsuccinate, acetate or phosphate groups.
As used herein, "single phase" means a mixture which has no visible free water, whereas a "slurry" consists of two phases, i.e., a water phase and a starch phase. The preferred total water content of the conversion process is about 15 to 40% by weight of the total mixture, except when a converted granular starch is being prepared with only alpha amylase where the total water content is about 15-35%.
The powdered or preferably liquid enzyme and sufficient water to give the desired total moisture content are dispersed onto a granular starch powder. The typical moisture content of granular starches is about 10-14%. Thus, sufficient water is added in step (a) to bring the total amount of water to the desired amount. As used herein, the term "total amount of water" refers to the total of the equilibrium moisture typically present in a granular starch and the added water.
If the moist single phase powdered mixture is subjected to a mixing process which kneads and compacts, such as that typical of dough mixing equipment or viscous polymer compounding equipment, it may, depending upon the water content and amount of solubles present, become a very high viscosity compact doughy mass before the onset of gelatinization and conversion. Continued mechanical shearing will raise the temperature and cause gelatinization and conversion.
When the powdered mixture starch contains a granular starch, as the powdered mixture is heated, the heat and moisture initiate the swelling of the starch granules and the starch is completely or partially gelatinized and simultaneously converted. When the powdered mixture contains a pregelatinized, non-cold-water-dispersible starch, the heat and moisture disperse the starch and the starch is fully gelatinized and simultaneously converted. As the starch is converted, usually the powder liquefies. The peak viscosity of the native starch is never reached.
The maltodextrin may be in the form of a syrup, a converted granular starch, or a mixture of the syrup and the converted granular starch. As used herein, "syrup" covers liquids and viscous pastes. The resulting starch syrup is obtained at a high solids content (e.g., at least 60%, typically 65-75% by weight). The syrup may be spray dried, belt-dried, or freeze dried. The enzyme-converted starch may be recovered from the starch syrup as a water-soluble powder. If desired, the sugar by-products may be removed from the granular converted starch by washing.
The enzyme may be activated by direct or indirect heating and/or pH adjustment to the optimum temperature and pH for the particular enzyme used. Optionally, an enzyme activator such as certain inorganic salts and/or a pH adjuster such as an acid, a base, or a buffer may be used. The enzyme may be inactivated by adjusting the pH, adding an inhibiting salt, or increasing the temperature.
The water content during the conversion is affected by the product solids, the condensation of injected steam used for direct heating, and evaporation during the conversion. The product solids are increased by the hydrolysis. During conversion to a D.E. of 100, the dry weight of the starch is increased by 11.11% due to water covalently bound to the hydrolysis reaction products. This dry weight increase is proportional to the degree of conversion. The solids are decreased due to the condensed steam and increased by evaporation.
The powdered mixture of the starch, water, and enzyme does not require stirring during the enzyme conversion step. In contrast to prior art enzyme conversion processes, the process is carried out at such a high solids content that the mixture is a single phase.
Suitable starches depend on whether or not the adhesive is a remoistenable adhesive. Suitable starches for the remoistenable adhesives include any starches having an amylose content of less than 40%. Any starch is suitable for the non-remoistenable adhesives, including high amylose starches, (i.e., starches having an amylose content of 40% or above). The starch can be derived from any source. Typical sources for the starches are cereals, tubers, roots, legumes, fruit starches, and hybrid starches. Suitable native sources include corn, pea, potato, sweet potato, wheat, rice, sorghum, waxy starches such as waxy maize, waxy tapioca, waxy rice, waxy barley, waxy wheat, waxy potato, waxy sorghum, and the like. A "native" starch is an unmodified starch. It may be possible to convert flours provided effective enzyme levels are used to obtain sufficient conversion.
The use of humectants in remoistenable adhesives may cause, or can contribute to, hygroscopic blocking. In non-remoistenable adhesives salts are often used at relatively high levels, with the amount used being adjusted to lower levels when the adhesive is used in a humid environment.
Chemically derivatizing the starch can lower the gelatinization temperature and make it easier to carry out the conversion. The chemical modifications useful herein include heat- and/or acid-conversion, oxidation, phosphorylation, etherification, esterification, crosslinking, and conventional enzyme modification. These modifications are preferably performed before the starch is enzyme converted. Procedures for chemically modifying starches are described in the chapter "Starch and Its Modification" by M. W. Rutenberg, pages 22-26 to 22-47, Handbook of Water Soluble Gums and Resins, R. L. Davidson, Editor (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y. 1980). Since high amylose starches are harder to gelatinize, it will also be necessary to use a higher level of chemical substitution to lower the starch's gelatinization temperature. The increased substitution, however, inhibits the enzyme conversion.
The degree of substitution (D.S.) is an indication of the amount of chemical substitution of the hydroxyl groups of a glucose unit. Each glucose unit has three reaction sites and a D.S. of 1 indicates that one site has reacted. The chemical substituents interfere with and stop the enzyme conversion so that fully converted products are not obtained. The more highly substituted the starting starch material, the higher the molecular weight of the maltodextrin as there is less enzyme conversion.
Granular starches which have not been pregelatinized are preferred. Granular pregelatinized starches are also useful herein. The pregelatinized granular starches are prepared by processes known in the art. The pregelatinization is carried out in such a way that a majority of the starch granules are swollen, but remain intact. Exemplary processes for preparing pregelatinized granular starches are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4.280.851, U.S. Pat. No. 4.465.702, U.S. Pat. No. 5.037.929, and U.S. Pat. No. 5.149.799, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Predispersed (i.e., pregelatinized starches) can also be used in the high solids, single phase enzyme conversion process provided they are not cold-water-soluble. They can be prepared by jet-cooking and spray-drying.
Physically modified starches, such as the thermally-inhibited starches described in WO 95/04082 (published Feb. 9, 1995), are also suitable for use herein provided they have also been chemically modified.
Suitable enzymes for use herein include bacterial, fungal, plant, and animal enzymes such as endo-alpha-amylases which cleave the 1→4 glucosidic linkages of starch, beta amylases which remove maltose units in a stepwise fashion from the non-reducing ends of the alpha-1,4-linkages, glucoamylases which remove glucose units in a stepwise manner from the non-reducing end of the starch molecules and cleave both the 1→4 and the 1→6 linkages, and debranching enzymes such as isoamylase and pullulanase which cleave the 1→6 glucosidic linkages of amylopectin-containing starches. Alpha amylases or mixtures thereof with other enzymes are preferred and are used for preparing the enzyme-converted starches having unique bimodal or polymodal molecular weight profiles.
Enzymes can be purified by selective absorption or precipitation, but many commercial products contain significant amounts of impurities in the form of other enzymes, as well as in the form of inert proteins. For example, commercial bacterial "amylases" will sometimes also contain "proteinases" (enzymes which break down protein). After extraction and partial purification, commercial enzymes are sold either as powders or as liquid concentrates.
Process conditions for the use of a particular enzyme will vary and will usually be suggested by the supplier. The variables include temperature, pH, substrate solids concentration, enzyme dose, reaction time, and the presence of activators. Very often there are no absolute optimum reaction conditions. The "optimum" pH may depend on temperature; the "optimum" temperature may depend on reaction time; the "optimum" reaction time may depend on cost, and so on. The reaction time can vary from 10 minutes to 24 hours or more, typically 1 to 4 hours for alpha amylase. The recommended conditions therefore are usually compromises.
The stability of an enzyme to adverse conditions is usually improved by the presence of its substrate. Some enzymes are also stabilized by certain salts (bacterial amylase is stabilized by calcium salts). It is necessary to rigorously exclude heavy metals and other enzyme poisons, such as oxidizing agents, from an enzyme reaction since these materials usually result in permanent inactivation (i.e., denaturization) of the enzyme. There are many instances however where enzyme activity is reduced reversibly, frequently by the products of a reaction (product inhibition) or by a substance which is structurally related to the usual substrate (competitive inhibition). Reversible inhibitors complex temporarily with the enzyme and therefore reduce the amount of enzyme available for the normal reaction. Typical enzyme reaction conditions are discussed in "Technology of Corn Wet Milling" by P. H. Blanchard, Industrial Chemistry Library, Vol. 4 (Elsevier, New York, N.Y. 1992).
The optional humectants used herein may be any of those conventionally used in formulating adhesives. Typical humectants include sugars, sorbitol, glycerin and related derivatives, propylene glycol and similar related glycols, and glycol ethers. These humectants are used in the remoistenable adhesive formulations at levels of about 0.5 to 10% by weight of the total adhesive formulation.
A minor amount of polyvinyl alcohol (about 0.05 to about 4% by weight) may be added to the remoistenable adhesives as a protective colloid. The polyvinyl alcohol can be a partially or a fully hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohol. A suitable polyvinyl alcohol is Airvol 203 (available from Air Products, Allentown, Pa.).
In preparing the preferred remoistenable adhesive compositions, the maltodextrin syrup may be prepared and added to the ethylene vinyl acetate latex and/or polyvinyl acetate latex or a dry maltodextrin (recovered from the maltodextrin syrup by spray-drying or like drying methods) may be added directly to the latex. The maltodextrin may also be added during the monomer polymerization to act as a protective colloid.
In preparing the non-remoistenable adhesive composition, the maltodextrin syrup may be used directly or diluted to the desired solids or a dry maltodextrin syrup (recovered as discussed above) may be dispersed in water, in solvents such as alcohols, (e.g., propanol), esters (e.g. ethylacetate), or cycloalkenes (e.g., kylene), or in a water-based resin.
The adhesive composition is then heated and maintained at a temperature of about 71-82� C. (160-180� F.) with agitation for a period sufficient to ensure compete dissolution if the dry maltodextrin is used. Any other additives which are to be employed should be added at this point. The resulting mixture is then diluted with additional water, if necessary, to the desired viscosity, generally in the range of about 2,000 to 30,000 cps, preferably 2,000 to 20,000, most preferably about 6,000 cps for remoistenable adhesives. Depending the particular end use for the non-remoistenable adhesives the viscosity can vary from 500 to 200,000 cps. In the embodiment wherein maltodextrin syrup or powder is not post-added to the preferred resin-based remoistenable adhesives, it may be necessary to add a thickener (e.g., polyacrylamide, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, etc.) in order to obtain a: viscosity within these limits. In the final preferred remoistenable adhesive compositions, the maltodextrin syrup will be present in an amount of from about 10 to 85%, preferably from 50%, by weight of the formulation, with the ethylene vinyl acetate and/or polyvinyl acetate resin (optionally emulsified with the maltodextrin) comprising about 15% to about 40%, and with the remainder being water.
Various optional additives, such as humectants, defoamers, plasticizers, preservatives, thickeners, bleaching agents, peptizing salts such as magnesium chloride and sodium nitrate may also be present in the adhesive compositions in order to modify certain characteristics thereof, as long as they do not detrimentally affect the adhesion or the hygroscopic and thermoplastic blocking properties when the adhesive is a remoistenable adhesive. Such ingredients will generally be used in effective amounts of 5% by weight or less, typically in minor amounts of less than about 3% by weight for remoistenable adhesives. Such ingredients will generally be used in effective amounts of 30% by weight or less. A suitable defoamer is Foamaster III (available from Henkel Chemical Co.) in an amount of about 0.01-1%. A suitable preservative is Kathon in an amount of about 0.01-0.5%. A suitable plasticizer is a dibenzoate in an amount of about 0.5-5% %.
Although the optional additional maltodextrin has been referred to as being "post-added", it should be recognized that the post-addition is merely the most convenient and generally accepted method of formulating remoistenable adhesives, such as envelope adhesives, and that it is possible to add the additional maltodextrin directly to the monomer charge prior to the actual polymerization.
Remoistenable adhesives in which the high solids maltodextrins are useful include envelope adhesives and stamp gumming adhesives. Non-remoistenable adhesives in which the high solids maltodextrins are useful include book casing adhesives, laminating adhesives, tube core winding adhesives, case and carton adhesives, seam adhesives for grocery bags, envelopes and the like, corrugating adhesives, cigarette making adhesives, etc.
The dextrose equivalent (D.E.) is an indication of the degree of conversion as shown by the reducing sugar content of the maltodextrin.
A Fehling Volumetric Method, as adapted from the Eynon-Lane Volumetric Method #423 of the Cane Sugar Handbook by Spencer and Mead (John Wiley and Son Inc.), is used to determine the D.E.
A starch solution (w/v) of known concentration on an anhydrous starch basis is prepared. The usual concentration is 10 g/200 ml. The starch solution is transferred to a 50 ml. burette. To 50 ml of distilled water in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask are added by pipette 5 ml each of Fehling Solutions A and B. Fehling Solution A contains 34.6 g of copper sulfate (CuSO4.5H2 O) dissolved in and brought to volume in a 500 ml volumetric flask. Fehling Solution B contains 173 g of Rochelle salt (NaKC4 H4 O6.4H2 O) and 50 g of sodium hydroxide dissolved in and brought to volume in a 500 ml volumetric flask. The Fehling Solutions are standardized against Standardized Dextrose obtained from the Bureau of Standards.
To determine the Fehling Factor, the test procedure is followed except that 0.5000 anhydrous grams of dextrose per 200 ml of distilled water is used as the test solution. Using the following formula the factor is then computed: ##EQU1## The factor applies to both Fehling solutions A and B and is computed to 4 decimal places. The contents of the flask are brought to a boil over a hot plate. The starch solution, while at a boil, is titrated to the distinctive reddish-brown colored end point (precipitated cuprous oxide complex). The ml. of starch solution required recorded.
The Dextrose Equivalent (D.E.) is calculated using the following formula: ##EQU2## where "starch solution" equals the ml of starch solution used in the titration to reach the end point and "starch concentration" equals the concentration of the starch solution on an anhydrous basis expressed in g/ml.
Molecular weight (MW) distribution is determined using a Water Associates GPC-150C Model with a refractive index (RI) detector. Two PL gel columns (105 and 103 obtained from Polymer Laboratories of Amherst, Mass.) made of highly crosslinked spherical polystyrene/divinylbenzene, are connected in sequence. Dextrans from American Polymer Standards Corp. (Mentor, Ohio) are used as the standards. The experimental conditions are a column temperature of 80� C. and a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The mobile phase is dimethyl sulfoxide (DMS) with 5 mM of sodium nitrate (NaNO3). The sample concentration is 0.1%. The injection volume is 150 μl.
Test samples are measured using a Model RVT Brookfield Viscometer and the appropriate spindle which is selected based on the anticipated viscosity of the material. The test sample is placed in position and the spindle is lowered into the sample to the appropriate height. The viscometer is turned on and the spindle is rotated at a constant speed (e.g., 10 or 20 rpm) for at least 3 revolutions before a reading is taken. Using the appropriate conversion factors, the viscosity (in centipoises) of the sample is recorded.
The solids content of the adhesive is determined by oven drying the adhesive at 100-110� C. to a constant weight. Using the following formula the % solids are calculated: ##EQU3##
Setting speed is the time it takes an adhesive to form a fiber-tearing bond which is achieved as a result of wet tack development. A faster setting adhesive allows a user to run the lines faster, accommodates short and low pressure compression zones, and produces a fiber tearing bond off-line insuring product performance. Set speed is very dependent on coat weight, compression, temperature and humidity. Therefore, comparisons should be made using the same application method and substrate under the same temperature and humidity conditions.
To test the set speed, two 15 inch long by 6 inch wide sheets of 50# brown Kraft paper are cut. Then cuts one inch wide and five inches long are made in one of the 15 inch pieces of the Kraft paper creating a "hula skirt". A glass plate, longer and wider than paper stock, is placed onto a clipboard and oriented horizontally with the clip to the left. The cut "hula skirt" Kraft paper is placed on the top of the other piece of Kraft paper and both are clipped to the clipboard-glass set up. The "hula skirt" is then folded up and back to expose the second sheet of Kraft paper. A piece of scrap paper is placed underneath and to the far right of the Kraft paper to catch excess adhesive when the drawdown is made. A bird applicator is centered to the far left on top of the bottom piece of Kraft paper. Four to six grams of adhesive are placed in the opening of the applicator. The adhesive is drawn down across the paper using even pressure. Excess adhesive is caught by the scrap paper. The "hula skirt" is over the top of adhesive film and is unfolded. A timer is immediately started as well as immediately hand rolling the adhesive to compress bond. Slowly the one inch sections are pulled up and the time when each section is pulled up is noted. The amount of fiber tear at each time interval is examined. The time at which consistent 50% or more fiber tear is acquired is noted. The set speed of the adhesive is the first time 50% or more fiber tear is achieved.
Open time is the amount of time an adhesive film on one substrate may remain open (i.e., uncovered) and still form a durable bond when combined with a second substrate. An adhesive with a longer open time will tend to machine better. In other words, it will remain "wet" in the glue pot, on rollers and on stencil pads, and therefore be less likely to build up and form skins. Open time is very dependent on coat weight, temperature and humidity. Hence, when comparing adhesives, the same application method and substrates should be used at the same temperature and humidity.
The test is carried out using the above procedure for testing the set except that one of the two pieces of Kraft paper is cut into one inch strips and the strips are bonded to the Kraft paper coated with the adhesive film over consistent time intervals using the same pressure to compress the straps. The time that each strip is bonded is noted. A minimum of one hour is allowed for drying. Then, starting at the left side of the Kraft paper, the one inch strips are carefully peeled off and the strength and degree of fiber tear are noted. The open time is the first point where 50% or less fiber tear is noted. It may be necessary to repeat the test if the last strip has more than 50% fiber tear and begin bonding at a later time.
The adhesive composition is heated to 65� C. A glass plate is placed under the clip of a clipboard. A sheet of board stock is placed between the clip and the glass plate. Strips of cover stock are cut to dimensions of 3.5 inches long, 1.5 inches wide in the machine direction. A strip of cover stock is placed between the clip and the board stock such that the clip is positioned about 0.25 inches from the top of the cover stock strip. The remainder of the cover stock is folded back to expose the board stock positioned under the cover stock. A 1.5 mil bird applicator with a one inch gate (available from MCD Industries, Medfield, Mass.) is placed between the cover stock and the board stock. A bead of the heated adhesive is applied under the bird applicator and drawn down the board stock. The cover stock is contacted with the board stock immediately and rolled once with a roller to adhere the cover stock to the board stock. The adhesion of the cover stock to the board stock is evaluated the day after the draw downs by pulling the stock from the board and evaluating the condition of the bond. The percentage of bond surface showing fiber tear is recorded.
In the examples which follow, non-pregelatinized granular starches were used unless it is otherwise stated and the various enzymes described hereafter were used.
The alpha amylases were Ban 120 L and Termamyl. They were obtained from Novo Nordisk. Ban is a conventional alpha amylase with an optimum temperature of approximately 70� C., optimum pH of 6.0-6.5, an activity of 120 KNU/g, and recommended usage (based on the weight of the starch) of 0.005-1.0, preferably 0.01-0.5. Termamyl is a heat-stable alpha amylase with an optimum temperature greater than 90� C., an activity of 120 KNU/g, and recommended usage (based on the weight of the starch) of 0.005-1.0, preferably 0.01-0.5. One Kilo Novo unit (1 KNU) is the amount of enzyme which breaks down 5.26 g of starch (Merck, Amylum Solubile, Erg. B6, Batch 994 7275) per hour in Novo Nordisk's standard. Method for determining alpha amylase using soluble starch as the substrate, 0.0043 M calcium content in solvent, 7-20 minutes at 37� C. and pH 5.6.
The mixture of alpha amylase and glucoamylase used was Aspk 27 obtained Daikin Kogyo, Kabushigi, Kaisha, Osaka, Shi Kibanoku, Ichome 12-39 Japan. The optimum conditions are not disclosed.
The barley beta amylase used was Spezyme BBA 1500 which was obtained from Finnsugar Group. The optimum conditions for this enzyme are pH 5.0-7.0 and a temperature of 55-65� C. It has an activity of 1500 Dp�/ml and its recommended usage (based on the weight of the starch) is 0.1-2.0%, preferably 0.2-0.8%. One Degree of Diastatic Power (Dp�) is the amount of enzyme contained in 0.1 ml of a 5% solution of the sample enzyme preparation that produces sufficient reducing sugars to reduce 5 ml of Fehling Solution when the sample is incubated with 100 ml of substrate for 1 hour at 20� C.
Amyloglucosidase (AMG 300L) is an exo-1,4-alpha-D-glucosidase. Optimum conditions are pH 4.5 and 60� C. It has an activity of 300 AGU/ml recommended usage (based on the weight of the starch) of 0.005-1.0%, preferably 0.01-0.5%. One Novo Anhydroglucosidase Unit (AGU) is defined as the amount of enzyme which hydrolyzes 1 micro-mol of maltose per minute using maltose as the substrate at 25� C., pH 4.3 for 30 minutes.
The debranching enzyme used is Promozyme 600L (pullulanase) which was also obtained from Novo Nordisk. It is a heat-stable debranching enzyme with an optimum temperature of 60� C. and optimum pH of 5.2. It has an activity of 200 PUN/g and the recommended usage (based on the weight of the starch) is 1-15%, preferably 2-10% PUN/g. One Pullulanase Unit Novo (PUN) is defined as the amount of enzyme which under standard conditions hydrolyzes pullulan, liberating reducing carbohydrate with reducing power equivalent to 1 micro-mol glucose per minute. It is a concentrated form of Promozyme with an activity of 600 PUN/ml concentrate.
This example describes a series of enzyme conversions run in a ten gallon gate mixer reactor using Ban (B) and Termamyl (T), and mixtures thereof. The resulting maltodextrins were used in remoistenable adhesives.
The internal dimensions of the tank were 16 inches tall by 16 inches diameter. The gate agitator, made from 1/2 inch wide by 2 inch deep stainless steel bar stock, had four vertical rakes 101/2 inches tall. The outside rakes cleared the inside tank wall by 1/2 inch; the inside rakes were 31/4 inches from the outside set. Attached to the tank top were four breaker bars, of the same bar stock, located 13/4 and 51/4 inches in from the tank wall. A electric drive, variable from 0 to 60 rpm, powered the agitator. A vent in the tank top provided variable draft forced exhaust. The tank sides and bottom were jacketed for steam heating or water cooling. A 1/2 inch diameter steam injection port was provided in the side wall 1 inch above the tank bottom. A thermocouple probe was attached to the bottom of one outside breaker bar. In the tank bottom a 2 inch port with a ball valve was provided for product draw off. For these conversions a removable metal plug was inserted into the draw port, flush with the tank bottom, to eliminate the possibility of a portion of the initial dry charge receiving non-uniform moisture, enzyme, or heat.
For each conversion 33 pounds of a commercially dry granular starch was added to the tank. The enzyme charge was diluted with sufficient water to bring the charge to 25 percent moisture on an anhydrous basis. This water/enzyme mix was added to the starch with mixing. The mixture, after addition of the enzyme/water mix, was a blend of dry starch and moist starch aggregates less the one half inch in diameter.
At this point, the agitator is turned off for about 30 minutes to allow the enzyme solution to diffuse through out the starch. The starch, after this rest, was a moist flowable powder.
The mixture was heated, generally by injection of live steam (at 32 psi except where indicated otherwise) into the mixture and/or optionally by heating the tank jacket. Typically, the mass was mixed during heating, but this was not required. Mixing only improved heat transfer.
As the granular starch gelatinized (or the cold-water-insoluble predispersed starch was solubilized), it was converted and the reaction mixture changed from a moist powder to a wet doughy mass and then to a dispersed syrup. These changes occurred as the temperature was increased from 50� C. to 90� C. The temperature at which the onset of liquefaction occurred varied depending on the water content, enzyme activation temperature, and starch type.
In this vented tank, there was some loss of moisture during the full heating cycle. When the injection steam was shut off, the temperature was maintained at the indicated temperature with jacket heating for 30 minutes. The batch was then cooled to less than 50� C. and drawn off. Optionally, the pH was reduced to 3.5 with phosphoric acid and the mixture was held for 30 minutes to deactivate any residual enzyme. The pH was readjusted if required.
To 43.52 parts of the indicated starch were added a mixture of 6.95 parts water and the indicated amount of Ban and/or Termamyl 120 L. A gate mixer was at 30 rpm while the premix was slowly added in steady stream. Mixing was continued until the starch was uniformly damp. The agitator was shut down and the mixture was heated with live steam and jacketed steam to 82-93� C. (180-200� F.) for 30 minutes. Then 6.94 parts of water were added.
The mixer was restarted and agitation was continued at 30 rpm while the mixture was being heated at 93-99� C. (200-210� F.). When the adhesive product clarified and was smooth, the viscosity and solids were tested. After the test results were recorded, the pH was adjusted to 3.5 with 85% phosphoric acid, and additional acid added, if needed, to end the enzyme activity.
The starch base used, enzyme and amount used, and properties of the an resulting suitable and comparative maltodextrins (solids, D.E., and D.S.) are summarized in Table 1. The three month viscosity stability of the same maltodextrins is reported in Table 2.
TABLE 1______________________________________ DextrinNo. Starch Enzyme Solids D.E. D.S.______________________________________1* 35 WF, 0.045 B 62.2 13.7 0.16Hydroxypropylated 0.045 TWaxy Maize2 35 WF, 0.09 T 70.9 11.0 0.16HydroxypropylatedWaxy Maize3 35 WF, 0.18 T 62.8 10.6 0.16HydroxypropylatedWaxy Maize4 Hydroxypropylated 0.09 T 68.9 13.2 0.09Waxy Maize5 Octenylsuccinate 0.09 T 60.2 15.2 0.02Waxy Maize6** 35 WF, 0.045 T 60.0 7.4 0.16Hydroxypropylated 0.045 TWaxy Maize7 35 WF, 0.09 T 69.0 13.6 0.16HydroxypropylatedWaxy MaizeComparative Enzyme-Converted Maltodextrins8 Predispersed 0.09 T 68.5 4.1 0.09HydroxypropylatedWaxy Maize9 Waxy Maize 0.045 T Paste 13.6 -- 0.045 T10 Waxy Maize 0.09 T 65.0 18.7 --11 Cationic Waxy Maize 0.09 T 71.0 22.2 0.0412 Tapioca 0.09 T 56.9 6.9 --13 Commercial Waxy Maize -- 67.0 10 --Maltodextrin14 Hydroxypropylated -- 70 8.0 0.09Commercial Waxy MaizeMaltodextrin______________________________________ *For Sample No. 1, the steam pressure was 8 psi. **For Sample No. 6, the enzyme addition was carried out in two steps.
TABLE 2______________________________________ 3 Month Maltodextrins ViscosityNo. Starch Solids D.E. D.S. (cps)______________________________________Viscosity Aging Characteristics ofSuitable Enzyme-Converted Maltodextrins 1 35 WF, 62.2 13.7 0.16 clear,Hydroxypropylated flowableWaxy Maize >50, 000 2 35 WF, 70.9 11.0 0.16 clear,Hydroxypropylated flowableWaxy Maize >50,000 3 35 WF, 62.8 10.6 0.16 clear,Hydroxypropylated flowableWaxy Maize >50,000 4 Hydroxypropylated 68.9 13.2 0.09 clear,Waxy Maize flowable >50,000 5 Octenylsuccinate 60.2 15.2 0.02 opaque,Waxy Maize flowable paste 6 35 WF, 60.0 7.4 0.16 clear,Hydroxypropylated flowableWaxy Maize >50,000 7 35 WF, 69.0 13.6 0.16 clear,Hydroxypropylated flowableWaxy Maize >50,000Viscosity Aging Characteristics ofComparative-Enzyme Converted Maltodextrins 8 Predispersed 68.5 4.1 0.09 clear pasteWF HydroxypropylatedWaxy Maize 9 Waxy Maize Paste 13.6 -- opaque gel10 Waxy Maize 65.0 18.7 -- clear 275011 Cationic Waxy 71.0 22.2 0.04 clear,Maize* flowable >50,00012 Tapioca 56.9 6.9 -- opaque gel13 Commercial Waxy Maize 67.0 10 -- --Maltodextrin14 Hydroxypropylated 70.0 8.0 0.09 ClearCommercial Waxy Maize flowableMaltodextrin >50,000______________________________________
This example shows the preparation of remoistenable adhesives using the high solids maltodextrins of Example 1.
To the hot maltodextrin syrups from Part A were added 18.29 parts each of ethylene vinyl acetate and polyvinyl acetate together with 0.3 parts of a defoamer. Mixing was continued during cooling. When the temperature was below 60� C. (140� F.), the following ingredients were added: 2.96 of Carbowax 600, 1.98 parts of propylene glycol, 0.20 parts of additional defoamer, and 0.15 parts of a preservative.
The Brookfield viscosity aging and curling of the various maltodextrin syrups used in the above formulation were tested.
A control sample was also prepared using a standard canary waxy maize pyrodextrin which is 100% soluble.
Comparative maltodextrins, prepared by the high solids, single phase process, were also prepared and included in the above adhesive formulation. The comparative maltodextrins were either not chemically derivatized, had too high or too low a degree of substitution, or had too high or too low a dextrose equivalent.
A comparative enzyme-converted maltodextrin, without chemical modification, prepared by a conventional enzyme slurry process, which had a polymodal molecular weight distribution was also used in the adhesive formulation.
The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Viscosity Aging Characteristics of Adhesives Suitable Enzyme-ConvertedMaltodextrins Adhesive Viscosity Dextrin (cps)No. Starch D.E. D.S. Solids Initial 7 Days 160 Days__________________________________________________________________________Control Pyrodextrin 4-5 -- -- 16,500 16,000 17,0002 35 WF 11.0 0.16 70.9 10,420 9580 4150 Hydroxy- propylated Waxy Maize3 35 WF 10.6 0.16 62.8 3720 3760 13,000 Hydroxy- propylated Waxy Maize4 Hydroxy- 13.2 0.09 68.9 5900 5290 5000 propylated Waxy Maize5 Octenyl- 15.2 0.02 60.2 5000 6120 6850 succinate Waxy Maize6 35 WF 7.4 0.16 61.0 7500 7300 54,400 Hydroxy- propylated Waxy Maize7 35 WF 13.6 0.16 69.0 2340 3700 -- Hydroxy- propylated Waxy MaizeComparative - Enzyme Converted Maltodextrins8 Predispersed 4.1 0.09 59.4 16,500 16,680 >200,000 WF Hydroxy- propylated Waxy Maize9 Waxy Maize 13.6 -- 65.0 12,600 Paste Paste10 Waxy Maize 18.7 -- 65.0 2170 2090 290011 Cationic 22.2 0.04 66.0 5320 5020 7350 Waxy Maize*12 Tapioca 6.9 -- ˜60 Paste Paste Paste13 Commercial 10 -- 67.0 10,400 Paste Paste Waxy Maize Maltodextrin14 Hydroxy- 8.0 0.09 67.2 35,600 45,200 >50,000 propylated @ 90 days Commercial Waxy Maize Maltodextrin__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 4______________________________________Curl Testing of Adhesives Suitable Enzyme-Converted Maltodextrins 50% 12% Relative Relative Adhesive Humidity HumidityNo. Starch DE DS Solids (dupl.) (dupl.)______________________________________Control Pyro- 4-5 -- 68.4 70� 60� 127� 109� dextrin2 35 WF 11.0 0.16 60.0 43� 43� 91� 92� Hydroxy- propylated Waxy Maize3 35 WF 10.6 0.16 64.2 39� 39� 73� 73� Hydroxy- propylated Waxy Maize4 Hydroxy- 13.2 0.09 60.0 45� 46� 94� 102� propylated Waxy Maize5 Octenyl- 15.2 0.02 59.1 37� 53� 73� 94� succinate Waxy Maize6 35 WF 7.4 0.16 61.0 34� 34� 63� 66� Hydroxy- propylated Waxy Maize7 35 WF 13.6 0.16 31� 26� 66� 58� Hydroxy- propylated Waxy MaizeComparative - Enzyme Converted Maltodextrins8 Predis- 4.1 0.09 59.4 65� 61� 129� 125� persed WF Hydroxy- propylated Waxy Maize9 Waxy 13.6 -- 65.0 Paste - not Maize run10 Waxy 18.7 -- 65.0 37� 24� 58� 39� Maize11 Cationic 22.2 0.04 66.0 21� 32� 44� 56� Waxy Maize*12 Tapioca 6.9 -- ˜60 Paste - not run13 Commer- 10 -- 67.0 Paste - not cial Waxy run Maize Malto- dextrin14 Hydroxy- 8.0 0.09 67.2 33� 14� 102� 59� propylated Commer- cial Waxy Maize Malto- dextrin______________________________________
The control is a conventional envelope adhesive based on a waxy maize pyrodextrin. It shows an acceptable viscosity and good viscosity stability over time. It shows an undesirably high curl angle at both 50% and 12% relative humidity.
Samples 1, 2, 3, and 4 show good initial adhesive viscosity and good viscosity stability over time. Sample 2 shows a minor increase in viscosity due to the higher solids maltodextrin syrup. The use of mixed alpha amylases in Sample 1 shows no significant difference in the resulting adhesive. The use of a higher level of enzyme in Sample 3 causes no significant difference in the resulting adhesive. Sample 4 shows that use of a non-converted starch and a starch having a lower degree of substitution has no significant effect in the resulting adhesive.
Sample 5 illustrates the use of another chemically derivatized starch having a lower degree of substitution. The resulting adhesive is acceptable except for long term viscosity stability, probably due to the low degree of substitution. This shows the use of a non-viscosity stable maltodextrin syrup in these adhesives.
Sample 6 was made with a split addition of the enzyme, 1/2 into the powder 1/2 after the mixture's temperature reached 90� C. The resulting syrup is less converted but still shows acceptable adhesive properties.
Sample 7 has higher solids compared to Samples 1 and 3, but the resulting adhesives show no significant differences.
Samples 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 are examples of the preferred maltodextrins. They show acceptable viscosity and good viscosity stability, as well as reduced curl compared to the control.
Sample 8 shows the use of a maltodextrin syrup of insufficient conversion, i.e., D.E. less than 5. The resulting adhesive is unacceptable in long term viscosity stability and has unacceptable curl.
Samples 9 and 10 show the use of non-chemically modified maltodextrins with dextrose equivalents in the claimed range. Sample 10, with higher D.E., yields a viscosity stable adhesive with shallow fiber tear. Sample 9, with lower D.E., gives an adhesive which gels in less than seven days.
A highly converted, D.E. 22, modified maltodextrin, Sample 11 gives a viscosity stable, low viscosity adhesive with shallow fiber tear.
Sample 12, an unmodified tapioca, gives an adhesive formula which gels in less than 24 hours.
The adhesive formulated with the commercial waxy maize maltodextrin (Sample 13) which had a D.E. of 10 and a polymodal molecular weight distribution showed an unacceptable viscosity stability. The commercial waxy maize maltodextrin having an original D.E. of 10 was reacted with propylene oxide to a D.S. 0.09, after which it had a D.E. of 8.0. It was then formulated into an adhesive (Sample 14); it showed an unacceptable viscosity stability.
Adhesion testing of the formulated adhesives which did not gel was carried out by determining the percentage of fiber tear on 24 substance weight white wove paper. All adhesives gave 100% fiber tear. The comparative maltodextrins, like the pyrodextrin control, however, gave shallow fiber tear, whereas the adhesives containing suitable maltodextrins (i.e., D.E. between 5 and 19, D.S. >0.01 and <0.50, and polymodal molecular weight distribution) gave deep fiber tears.
This example shows the use of a fully converted, hydroxypropylated (PO) waxy maize and a partially converted, unmodified waxy maize, prepared by the high solids, single phase enzyme conversion process in a corrugating adhesive with and without added caustic. These fully solubilized adhesives were compared to a Stein-Hall type control (caustic dispersed carrier starch with suspended raw starches).
At room temperature, the 61% solids converted P.O. waxy maize and the 71% solids converted waxy maize had viscosities of 3000 cps. and >20,000 cps., respectively. When held in a boiling water bath, the materials thinned considerably. At 200� F., the 61% solids converted P.O. waxy maize had a 45 second viscosity as measured in the Stein-Hall cup. To maintain a high solids level and move the adhesive viscosity towards standard levels, the materials were heated prior to being poured in the glue pan.
The 61% solids P.O. waxy maize was evaluated on the corrugator using a standard gap setting of 0.012 in. The adhesive was unable to deliver bonded single face web at speeds above 50 ft./min. When the board was analyzed immediately off the corrugator, there was no evidence of fiber tear. It appeared that the adhesive had not penetrated the paper. Caustic was added to the adhesive to increase alkalinity and improve the adhesives bite into the paper. At 0.5% on the mass of the adhesive, the caustic made a significant difference and the adhesive was run at 175 ft./min.
The 71% partially dispersed converted waxy maize was held at 88� C. (190� F.). Even at that temperature, the viscosity was approximately 2000 cps. To thin the adhesive and add bite, 0.5% caustic was added based on the total mass. At a gap of 0.012 in., the adhesive was able to produce single face web at speeds of 250 ft./min. Board was also produced at a top speed of 450 ft./min.
To compare this adhesive to Stein-Hall adhesives, 250 ft./min. runs were completed at gap settings of 0.008, 0.014, and 0.020 in. The bond strength vs. adhesive pick up were determined using the ICD procedure for pin strength analysis and the ICD enzyme test for pick up. All the experimental adhesives were held between 66 and 93� C. (150� F. and 200� F.). The specifications for the runs are shown below.
______________________________________No. 1 Material: 63% solids fully dispersed P.O. waxySpeed: 50 ft./min.Caustic: noneGap: 0.012Pick up: 1.6 lb/MSFBond: 3.1 lb/lineal ft.No. 2 Material: 63% solids fully dispersed P.O. waxySpeed: 175 ft./min.Caustic: 0.5% on total adhesiveGap: 0.012Pickup: 1.6 lb/MSFBond: 4.3 lb/lineal ft.No. 3 Material: 71% solids partially dispersed unmodified waxySpeed: 250 ft./min.Caustic: 0.5% on total adhesiveGap: 0.008Pick up: 1.4 lb/MSFBond: 10.3 lb/lineal ft.No. 4 Material: 71% solids partially dispersed unmodified waxySpeed: 250 ft./min.Caustic: 0.5% on total adhesiveGap: 0.014Pickup: 5.0 lb/MSFBond: 28.0 lb/lineal ft.No. 5 Material: 71% solids partially dispersed unmodified waxySpeed: 250 ft./min.Caustic: 0.5% on total adhesiveGap: 0.020Pick up: 9.9 lb/MSFBond: 32.5 lb/lineal ft.______________________________________
One major weakness of both adhesives was the final bond strength given the adhesive pick up. An acceptable bond strength is considered to be 50 lb/lineal ft. Even with 9.9 lb/MSF, the better performing 71% solids converted waxy maize was unable to surpass the minimum standard. On the same paper, a Stein-Hall adhesive is capable of achieving a bond strength of 50 lb/lineal ft. using 1.5 lb/MSF. The board produced by the 63% solids converted P.O. waxy maize had virtually no fiber tear. There was a maximum of 25% fiber tear even for the highest pick up of the 71% solids waxy. The partially converted material probably had some higher molecular weight polymer chains which could be the reason for the improved bond strengths.
This example describes the preparation of a layflat laminating adhesive.
To a clean, dry tank are added 100 parts of an octenylsuccinate waxy maize (0.02 D.S.) followed by a premix of 31 parts of water and 0.2 parts of Termamyl. Mixing at 20 rpm is carried out while the premix is added in a slow, steady steam. Mixing is continued until the mixture is uniformly damp and then the agitator is shut down. The mixture is heated with live steam and jacketed steam to 93.3� C. (200� F.) for 60 minutes or until liquid forms uniformly around the tank and at the steam lines. The temperature is held at 93.3� C. (200� F.) while mixing at 30 RPM. When the product clarifies and is smooth, the viscosity and solids are tested. After the test results are recorded, then the pH is adjusted to 3.5 with additional acid to end the enzyme activity. The heat is turned off and 10 parts of sodium nitrate are added. The mixture is cooled to below 48.9� C. (120� F.) and 0.30 parts of defoamer, 11 parts of magnesium chloride hexahydrate, 13 parts of calcium chloride, and 0.15 parts of a preservative are added. The resulting high solids maltodextrin should have a DE of about 10 and a total solids content of about 70%.
The Brookfield viscosity is adjusted to 2000-5000 cps by adding water. The adhesive is expected to demonstrate excellent layflat, high solids, good adhesion, and superior stability.
This example describes the preparation of a case and carton sealing adhesive.
Using the procedure described in Example 4, a cationic waxy maize starch containing diethylamino groups (0.04 D.S.) is converted using 0.2% Termamyl. The resulting high solids maltodextrin should have a DE of about 18 and a solids content of about 70%. The Brookfield viscosity is adjusted to 500-5000 cps by dilution with water. This adhesive is designed for fast drying, high tack, and excellent adhesion.
This example describes the preparation of a grocery bag adhesive.
Using the procedure described in Example 4 a hydroxypropylated waxy maize (D.S. 0.09) was converted using Termamyl. The resulting maltodextrin should have a DE of about 10 and a solids content of about 67%. The maltodextrin is diluted to a 1500-5000 cps Brookfield viscosity. The adhesive should produce faster set, higher solids, stronger adhesion as well as minimal wrinkling compared to a standard bag adhesive.
This example describes the preparation of a tubewinding adhesive.
Using the procedure described in Example 4 a hydroxypropylated fluidity waxy maize (35 WF, 0.16 D.S.) was converted using 0.2% Termamyl. The resulting maltodextrin should have a D.E. of about 15 and a solids content of about 68%. The Brookfield viscosity is adjusted to 2000-10,000 cps by dilution with water. This adhesive is designed for superior tack and very fast set speed with minimal puckering and excellent adhesion.
This example describes the preparation of an envelope seam adhesive.
Using the procedure described in Example 4, corn starch is converted using 0.2% Termamyl. The resulting maltodextrin should have a D.E. of about 15 and a solids content of about 70%. Fifteen parts of sodium nitrate, 12 parts magnesium chloride hexahydrate, and 8 parts urea, are added and the Brookfield viscosity is adjusted to 200-8000 cps by dilution with water. This adhesive should demonstrate high tabbing resistance due to the elevated solids, excellent rheology for clean machining, good adhesion, and light color which will eliminate discoloration of paper seams.
This example describes the preparation of a label wrap adhesive.
Using the procedure described in Example 4, waxy maize starch is enzyme converted using 0.2% Termamyl. The resulting maltodextrin should have a D.E. of about 18 and a solids content of about 70%. Ten parts of sodium nitrate, 15 parts urea, 10 parts magnesium chloride hexahydrate, are added and the Brookfield viscosity is adjusted to 10,000-100,000 cps (which depend on the machinery to be used) using water as the diluent. This adhesive is expected to produce less paper wrinkling, have high tack, good adhesion, and light color.
This example describes the use of a fully converted, hydroxypropylated waxy maize starch as cigarette making adhesives in the three bonding applications, i.e., cigarette paper to itself for the side seam, tipping paper to itself, and tipping paper to cigarette paper to mimic the tipping bonds.
A hydroxypropylated waxy maize (0.16 D.S) is converted with 0.2% Termamyl using the procedure of Example 4. The resulting maltodextrin should have a DE of about 15 and a solids content of about 62% (see Table I, Sample 1).
The maltodextrin is diluted with sufficient water to yield an adhesive having a Brookfield viscosity of approximately 3000 cps. The viscosity stability at room temperature and adhesion characteristics are expected to be as good as the adhesives of Example 1.
This example shows the use of a maltodextrin-based adhesive as a book casing adhesive where it successfully replaces the animal glue typically used.
A fluidity waxy maize (35 WF) was reacted with sufficient propylene oxide to give a D.S. of about 0.16. It was then further converted in the previously described ten gallon gate mixer reactor using 0.2% Termamyl.
For the conversion 33 pounds of the above commercially dry, converted, hydroxy propylated granular starch was added to the tank. The enzyme charge was diluted with sufficient water to bring the charge to 25% moisture on an anhydrous basis. This water/enzyme mix was added to the starch with mixing. The mixture, after addition of the enzyme/water mix, was a blend of dry starch and moist starch aggregates less the one half inch in diameter. At this point, the agitator was turned off for about 30 minutes to allow the water to diffuse throughout the starch. The starch, after this rest, was a moist flowable powder. The mixture was heated by injection of live steam at 32 psi into the mixture. The mass was mixed during heating, but this mixing was not required as mixing only improved heat transfer. As the granular starch gelatinized, it was converted and the reaction mixture changed from a moist powder to a wet doughy mass and then to a dispersed syrup. This change occurred as the temperature was increased from 50� C. to 90� C. (123-195� F.). In this vented tank, there was some loss of moisture during the full heating cycle. When the injection steam was shut off, the temperature was maintained at 90-95� C. (195-204� F.) with jacket heating for 30 minutes. The batch was then cooled to less than 65.6� C. (150� F.) and drawn off. The solids content was about 71% and the DE (which was not recorded) should be about 11.0. The Brookfield viscosity of the 71% solids maltodextrin adhesive was 318,000 cps at room temperature and 12,500 cps at 65.6� C. (150� F.).
The adhesive was coated onto one surface of the substrates as a 1.5 mil film at 65.6� C. (150� F.). The Kraft speed and spin time at 65.6� C. (150� F.) were 20 and 50 seconds, respectively. The animal glue control (67.8% solids) had a Brookfield viscosity at 65.6� C. (150� F.) of 1650 cps and a Kraft speed and open time at 65.6� C. (150� F.) of 25 and 120 seconds, respectively. The adhesion was 25% fiber tear for the maltodextrin adhesive vs. 100% fiber tear for the animal glue when the substrates were canvas/composition board and 100% fiber tear (shallow) when the substrates were glossy overstock/composition board. The fiber tear of the maltodextrin laminated glossy overstock/composition board was somewhat shallow due to the high viscosity of the adhesive.
The above maltodextrin syrup was diluted to improve the open time. Adhesive A was diluted with water. Adhesive B was diluted with a combination of water and glycerol. The adhesive was coated at 1.5 mil onto the canvas or gloss overstock. The above substrates composition and the properties of the resulting adhesives are shown below.
______________________________________ ADHESIVE A ADHESIVE B______________________________________Maltodex syrup 200 g 200 gWater 20 g 10 gGlycerol -- 20 gSolids 68 % 68 %Brookfield Viscosity at 32,800 28,200Room Temperature (cps)Kraft Speed (sec.) 20 40Open Time (sec.) 40 130Adhesion 100 % 100 %Canvas/Composition 100 % 100 %BoardGlossy Cover Stock/ 100 % 100 %Composition Board______________________________________
The results show that the adhesive containing the water and glycerol had an open time as good as the animal glue control (130 sec. vs. 120 sec. for the control) but that the Kraft speed increased (40 sec. vs. 25 sec for the control). The adhesion was as good as the animal glue control for both substrates. Adhesive A had a 40 sec. open time due to its high solids content and high viscosity; however, the open time can be increased by diluting the adhesive with water which will not have a detrimental effect on the other properties.
Now that the preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, various modifications and improvements thereon will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the present invention are to be limited only by the appended claims and not by the following specification.
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|May 21, 1948
|Sep 2, 1952
|Corn Prod Refining Co
|Cold water dispersible starch product and method of preparing the same
|Aug 9, 1955
|Oct 1, 1957
|Paisley Products Inc
|Resin-dextrin compositions and method of preparation
|Apr 8, 1955
|Sep 2, 1958
|Du Pont
|Remoistenable adhesive comprising polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol and a plasticizer and method of preparation
|Mar 14, 1962
|Aug 10, 1965
|Nat Starch Chem Corp
|Remoistenable adhesive compositions and method for making the same
|Mar 24, 1967
|Feb 2, 1971
|Cpc International Inc
|Low d. e. starch conversion products
|May 26, 1969
|Feb 22, 1972
|Standard Brands Inc
|Method of making a starch conversion syrup
|Feb 23, 1968
|May 16, 1972
|Grain Processing Corp
|Hydrolysis of starch
|Feb 14, 1972
|May 22, 1973
|Union Oil Co
|Ethylene-vinyl acetate emulsion adhesive
|Sep 17, 1971
|Nov 19, 1974
|Cpc International Inc
|Low d.e. starch conversion products
|Jan 18, 1971
|Dec 10, 1974
|Cpc International Inc
|Process for producing non-waxy starch hydrolysates
|Oct 8, 1974
|Nov 25, 1975
|Cpc International Inc
|Enzymatic hydrolysis of granular starch
|Jan 28, 1974
|Nov 25, 1975
|Cpc International Inc
|Process for converting granular starch to dextrose
|Jan 28, 1974
|Nov 25, 1975
|Cpc International Inc
|Enzymatic hydrolysis of granular starch
|Oct 2, 1974
|May 4, 1976
|Wacker Chemie Gmbh
|Stable polyvinyl ester dispersions and methods of producing the same
|Jan 10, 1973
|Mar 29, 1977
|Penick & Ford, Limited
|Method for continuous preparation of cooked thinned starch pastes
|Apr 30, 1979
|Dec 23, 1980
|Grain Processing Corporation
|Starch liquefaction process
|Feb 6, 1980
|Feb 23, 1982
|Novo Industri A/S
|Fermentation process
|Nov 5, 1984
|Mar 11, 1986
|National Starch And Chemical Corporation
|Remoistenable adhesive compositions
|Jul 24, 1984
|Feb 17, 1987
|Colorcon, Inc.
|Maltodextrin coating
|Feb 13, 1986
|Jul 7, 1987
|National Starch And Chemical Corporation
|Remoistenable adhesive compositions
|Oct 1, 1986
|Feb 16, 1988
|Colorcon, Inc.
|Maltodextrin coating
|Nov 5, 1987
|May 9, 1989
|Colorcon, Inc.
|Maltodextrin coating
|Mar 20, 1987
|May 1, 1990
|North American Adhesive Company
|Method for producing high solids dextrin adhesives
|May 3, 1990
|Mar 22, 1994
|National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation
|Remoistenable adhesive composition
|Dec 2, 1994
|Aug 29, 1995
|Director Of National Food Research Institute Ministry Of Agriculture, Forestry And Fisheries
|Method of using α-amylase to prepare slightly decomposed starch granules having low viscosity
|Aug 12, 1994
|Jul 2, 1996
|National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation
|Water-borne, water redispersible, laminating adhesives for nonwoven applications
|Aug 8, 1994
|Jul 16, 1996
|Penford Products Company
|Cationic starch/vinyl acetate containing board coating binders
|Jun 2, 1995
|Oct 15, 1996
|Penford Products Company
|Reinforced films made from water soluble polymers
|May 6, 1996
|Nov 18, 1997
|National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation
|High solids, maltodextrin-based adhesives
|Sep 17, 1987
|Apr 6, 1989
|Gfv Pfeil Hoch 2 Pfeil Hoch Ge
|Process and apparatus for digestion and degradation of starch and other carbohydrates in high concentration
|Dec 2, 1986
|Aug 12, 1987
|Herwood N.V.
|Process for the enzymatic degradation of whole flour of carbohydrates to produce a foodstuff, the foodstuff and its use
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Jun 1, 2000
|Apr 23, 2002
|A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.
|Modified starch as a replacement for gelatin in soft gel films and capsules
|Jun 1, 2000
|Mar 4, 2003
|A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.
|Highly flexible starch-based films
|Sep 23, 2003
|Apr 19, 2005
|Corn Products International, Inc.
|Fiber-based product
|Jan 18, 2002
|Sep 27, 2005
|Banner Pharmacaps, Inc.
|Non-gelatin capsule shell formulation
|Jun 11, 2003
|Oct 17, 2006
|Zinsser Co., Inc.
|Wall papering adhesive
|Apr 14, 2004
|Oct 5, 2010
|Fmc Corporation
|Homogeneous, thermoreversible gel film containing kappa-2 carrageenan and soft capsules made therefrom
|Apr 14, 2004
|Oct 19, 2010
|Fmc Corporation
|Homogeneous, thermoreversible gel containing reduced viscosity carrageenan and products made therefrom
|Jun 30, 2003
|Feb 15, 2011
|Banner Pharmacaps, Inc.
|Non-gelatin film and method and apparatus for producing same
|Aug 22, 2006
|Aug 28, 2012
|Jorge Cueto-Garcia
|Biodegradable, non-toxic biological adhesive for use in abdominal surgery
|Apr 23, 2012
|May 14, 2013
|Jorge Cueto-Garcia
|Biodegradable, non-toxic biological adhesive and methods for use in abdominal surgery
|May 3, 2011
|Aug 12, 2014
|Grain Processing Corporation
|Jun 28, 2011
|Oct 7, 2014
|Mondi Ag
|Bag with a bag wall designed to dissolve in a moist environment and use of the bag as a cement bag
|Jul 19, 2010
|Nov 4, 2014
|Cargill, Incorporated
|Sizing-adhesive composition
|Jun 17, 2002
|Dec 18, 2003
|Muren John W.
|Remoistenable pre-applied foamed adhesive
|Jun 11, 2003
|Jan 22, 2004
|Calienni James J.
|Wall papering adhesive
|Apr 14, 2004
|Jan 13, 2005
|Fmc Corporation
|Delivery system of homogeneous, thermoreversible gel film containing kappa-2 carrageenan
|Apr 14, 2004
|Jan 20, 2005
|Fmc Corporation
|Delivery systems of homogeneous, thermoreversible alginate films
|Apr 14, 2004
|Jan 20, 2005
|Fmc Corporation
|Homogeneous, thermoreversible gel containing reduced viscosity carrageenan and products made therefrom
|Apr 14, 2004
|Jan 27, 2005
|Fmc Corporation
|Homogeneous, thermoreversible alginate films and soft capsules made therefrom
|Apr 14, 2004
|Jan 27, 2005
|Fmc Corporation
|Homogeneous, thermoreversible low viscosity polymannan gum films and soft capsules made therefrom
|Apr 14, 2004
|Jan 27, 2005
|Fmc Corporation
|Homogeneous, thermoreversible gel film containing kappa-2 carragenan and soft capsules made therefrom
|Apr 14, 2004
|Mar 3, 2005
|Fmc Corporation
|Delivery systems of homogeneous, thermoreversible low viscosity polymannan gum films
|Apr 14, 2004
|Apr 21, 2005
|Fmc Corporation
|Process for making gel films
|Aug 2, 2005
|Feb 9, 2006
|Fonkwe Linus G
|Non-gelatin capsule shell formulation
|Sep 14, 2004
|Mar 16, 2006
|Thierry Pasquier
|Labeling adhesive and use thereof
|Aug 22, 2006
|Aug 30, 2007
|Jorge Cueto-Garcia
|Biodegradable, non-toxic biological adhesive for use in abdominal surgery
|Dec 12, 2007
|Apr 17, 2008
|Fmc Corporation
|Process for making gel films
|Jul 19, 2010
|Mar 17, 2011
|Cargill, Incorporated
|Sizing-adhesive composition
|Jun 28, 2011
|Aug 9, 2012
|Mondi Ag
|Bag with a Bag Wall Designed to Dissolve in a Moist Environment and Use of the Bag as a Cement Bag
|Dec 14, 2012
|Jun 20, 2013
|Johns Manville
|Binder-consolidated textile fabric, method for producing it, and use thereof
|Dec 7, 2012
|Aug 20, 2015
|B.K. Giulini Gmbh
|Borax-free starch adhesive compositions
|Dec 15, 2015
|Apr 7, 2016
|Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V.
|Superhydrophilic amphiphilic copolymers and processes for making the same
|Jul 19, 2010
|May 23, 2012
|Sizing-adhesive composition
|Sep 30, 1999
|Jun 24, 2015
|S�dzucker Aktiengesellschaft Mannheim/Ochsenfurt
|Adhesive and adhesive preproduct
|U.S. Classification
|524/48, 435/96, 536/123, 435/95, 156/336, 536/123.1
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|Jan 28, 2003
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jan 25, 2007
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jan 5, 2011
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
|Sep 25, 2014
Owner name: NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL INVESTMENT HOLDING CO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:EDEN, JAMES L.;SHI, YONG-CHENG;NESIEWICZ, RUSSELL J.;ANDOTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 19960430 TO 19960502;REEL/FRAME:033814/0126
|Sep 26, 2014
Owner name: HENKEL CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL INVESTMENT HOLDING CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:033825/0960
Effective date: 20090105
|Nov 7, 2014
Owner name: HENKEL US IP LLC, CONNECTICUT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HENKEL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034186/0588
Effective date: 20141106
|Feb 26, 2015
Owner name: HENKEL IP & HOLDING GMBH, GERMANY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HENKEL US IP LLC;REEL/FRAME:035101/0856
Effective date: 20150225


text:
As you may know, Acquia has been growing quite fast. Since I joined the company in the fall of 2008, we have gone from about 25 employees to around 200 today. It has been a fantastic ride for everyone, and we see no signs of slowing. The tough part of growth for us has been keeping up with the demand for talented Drupalists. From what I understand, Acquia isn't unique in this requirement.
Read More
This discussion has been inactive for over a year.
You may get a better answer to your question by starting a new discussion.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Kat Hausler's wonderful debut novel, Retrograde, is available for a limited time for download at NetGalley. Booksellers, librarians, reviewers and media: be sure to get a copy before 9/26 and let us know what you think!
Retrograde at NetGalley
On a warm summer day in Berlin, Helena is hit by a truck while crossing the street. She awakens to the loving face of her husband Joachim. In addition to a few broken bones, she realizes she can't remember anything about the accident, or even the last few years leading up to it. Retrograde amnesia the doctors call it and assure her that with time, she should regain her memory. At loose ends after another botched relationship, Joachim doesn't intend to lie to his estranged wife, Helena. But when he realizes that she doesn't remember their separation, he can't bring himself to tell her. So he does what any rational man would do: he takes her home and pretends they were never apart. As the lies accumulate, Helena senses something isn't quite right—that her husband is hiding something. When the outside world encroaches, Helena must face an unsettling truth and decide what the past will mean for their future. Is the past binding, or can she go back and change what went wrong in their relationship? And if given the chance, would she even want to? More info →


text:
Neuro Complex is a unique, high potency combination of sage, rosemary, saffron, alpha lipoic acid, carnitine, phosphatidylserine, with zinc and vitamin B5 to support nerve health and cognition.
We have a full range of antioxidants and immune products for all the family; from powdered vitamin C and elderberry liquid, through to unique combinations.
A range of high potency liquid nutrients that are pure, highly absorbable, flexible and easy to take.
Recently added item(s)
You have no items in your basket.
Please enter your email address below. You will receive a link to reset your password.
* Required Fields
« Back to Login


text:
KENWOOD KRFV5570 D/DS Service Manual
Product Reviews
There are currently no product reviews.
Reviews of our other manuals
Heinz Preiss - 2008-02-05
You provide an excellent service. The PDF copies are very clear and easy to read. I will remain a customer.
peter aziz - 2008-02-07
is the best site i seen on the internet i visit a lot of sites it more poor and feast but this site is very good and more reliadle and kind and hope
Daniel Landen - 2008-04-01
Complete service manual and easy to read. Lots of good info in this one! Made something vintage even more valuable since it's working great! Thanks!
christos MPLIMES - 2008-04-30
Thank you for excellent sevice. This my project had stopped without you.
Huub Peters - 2008-05-07
Recieved the manual within 6 hours after order comfirmation and payment.complete and very clear manual.Great job!
Customers who bought this product also purchased...
We provide manuals to wide range of devices, including:
Gas (builtin Hobs, With Controls), Mikrowellengerat, Tvr, Marine Pack, Hardwired Personal Perfomance Pack, Power Amplifier, Kitchen, Transcriber, Vietn, Tweeter, Laptop, User Information, Cookers - Ground Or Catalytic Enamel - Multifunction Oven, Compressor Refrigerators - Standard And Low Energy - Freestanding Refrigerators > 90 Cm Height, Sd Recorder, Monitor Av, Riders, Household Dishwashers - Freestanding, Facsmile, Micro System, Hung On Wall Unit, Fm Receiver, Telephone, 47" Projection Tv, Snow Blowers, Microwave - 1.2cuft - English/ Spanish, Console Game, Media Receiver, Coclor Copier, Plasma Extra Large > 43"
In our catalog We have following types of manuals:
Addendum, Limitations On I/o Cards, Editing Guide, Ti, About The Internal Hard Disk Drive, Online User Guide, Accompanument Chord Progressions, Electronic Program Guide, New Functions, Appendices, Handbook, Image Coution Sheet, Unknown, Owner's Manualaddendum, Feature Demo, Retrofit Manual, Tools, Guide Book, Anleitung, V1.2 Owner's Manual, Admin Guide, Adjustments, Function Reference, Owner's Manual, C.diagram, Technical Manual, About The Included Memory Cards And Cd-rom, Assembly Instructions, Patchbay, Lan Guide


text:
Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.
Have one to sell?
Hot Design Premium TbhRdNM1608yLBRL Tpu Case Cover Iphone 6 Protection Case(buffalo Sabres (75) )
Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
- Slim iphone case
- Fits iphone 6
- Best gift for all your friends.
- Hard shell case for the iphone 6
- Original designed iphone cover with logos
Product description
Premium brand silicone derma to accommodate added aegis adjoin drop, bang and shock. Form-fitting case advised to altogether fit your accessory Simple admission to all buttons, sensors, and ports Abounding admission to user interface, camera lens, headphone jack, speakerphone and microphone Allows charging afterwards removing the case.
Customer reviews
There are no customer reviews yet.
|5 star
|4 star
|3 star
|2 star
|1 star


text: The healthcare sector in Dubai is one of the most rapidly growing in terms of perspectives in investing. And I am not making this statement up, according to the Global Health Care Sector Outlook, as for 2015, the Middle East, including Dubai, expected high growth and had huge potential in healthcare. From the investor's point […]Read More


text:
In September/October 2013, I had the amazing opportunity to visit the beautiful country Cambodia.
The trip was organised by our Charity Partners 'Samaritan's Purse' and was for the following purposes
1) To better understand the challenges of education access for children.
2) To see first hand the projects and schools we would be funding and the systematic processes of our charity partners.
It was a remarkable experience, from listening to heartbreaking stories of the local families, the hardship and difficulties they face to walking through knee high water to a remote school, to providing bicycles for children so they can have access to attend school. I can say I am more than convinced and re assured in my heart that not only is education one of the vital ways to eliminate poverty but also that I am committed to making a difference in this sector in Cambodia.
I truly see greatness and some of the next generation of leaders emerging from this beautiful country. I see children being raised up with knowledge and opportunities their parents never had and breaking the cycle of poverty. I see children growing up to fulfil their dreams of becoming doctors, lawyers, educators, government officials, entrepreneurs and making a difference in the world! 'When You Finish, They Start' is an initiative I believe will engage year 12 students to think globally and also understand that they too can make a difference!If your an educator, student, or anyone at all that would be interested in helping us reach more schools to present our idea and samples in schools then I would love to hear from you. Together let's help children in Cambodia have access to a better brighter future!
Thank You
Eric, PVBS


text: MARIO. I have nothing against Luigi, but I still prefer Mario. 17:00, June 25, 2013 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://mario.answers.wikia.com/wiki/Who_is_better_mario_or_luigi?oldid=5696" Ad blocker interference detected! Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected. Categories: Answered questions Add category Cancel Save


text:
4.65 /
At times it can be a bit of to and fro-ing to f...
Total: 365
If the Audio link cable is too short then this extension cable should help. With a 3.5mm stereo socket on one end and a 3.5mm stereo jack plug on the other, this 4m long cable will help to extend the connection between your audio device and your powerbox.
Supplied with a 3 month guarantee.
Product 7/8


text:
The doctrine of eternal security, or preservation, or perseverance of the saints, is the Spirit-revealed, objective fact that salvation is forever, while assurance is believers' Spirit-given, subjective confidence that they truly possess that eternal salvation. Though the Old and New Testaments speak much about assurance (e.g., Job 19:25; Isa 32:17; Col 2:2; 1 Thess 1:4-5, NKJV; Heb 6:11; 10:22), many who profess Jesus Christ struggle to experience it. That raises the obvious question of why some Christians lack assurance. There appears to be a complex of several reasons that believers doubt their salvation.
First, some lack assurance because they sit under demanding, confrontive, convicting preaching of the law that upholds a high standard of righteousness, forces people to acknowledge their sinfulness, and causes them to feel the weight of sin and God's displeasure. Such preaching may greatly disturb some listeners and cause them to waver concerning their spiritual condition.
Second, some people feel they are too sinful to be saved, and thus they have difficulty accepting forgiveness. There may be two basic causes for this. First, the human conscience can be relentless in some sensitive souls, and it naturally offers little forgiveness, grace, and mercy to relieve conviction and guilt (cf. Ps 58:3; Prov 20:9). Second, holiness, the law of God, and divine justice do speak strongly against sin (cf. Isa 35:8; 52:11; Rom 6:13,19); the law itself contains nothing of forgiveness (Deut 27:26; Gal 3:21; Heb 10:28; James 2:10; cf. Jer 9:13-16; Acts 13:39).
A third reason for lacking assurance is that some do not accurately comprehend the gospel. They have an erroneous notion (Arminian) that maintaining one's salvation requires their effort as well as God's. Salvation, they think, is secure as long as the believer keeps believing and avoids sinful patterns. But assurance of eternal salvation can be very elusive for the person who believes it depends partly on his own "free will" cooperation with God. Such people need a true understanding of the gospel, namely that salvation is an utterly sovereign, divine operation in which sinners' redemption (from justification to glorification) depends solely on God (John 6:37,44-45,64-65; 15:16; Rom 8:31-39; Phil 1:6; 1 Thess 1:4-5; 2 Thess 2:13-14; 2 Tim 1:9; Jude 24-25).
Scripture teaches that God sent His Son into the world to completely pay the price of all sins—past, present, and future—for all who believe (Isa 43:25; 44:22; 53:5,8,11; 61:10; John 1:29; Rom 3:25; 5:8-11; Eph 1:7; 1 John 1:7; 2:2; 4:10; cf. Isa 1:18). Furthermore, Christ's resurrection affirmed God's acceptance of that total payment (Rom 4:25; 8:34; 1 Cor 15:17). An accurate understanding of the completeness of forgiveness is foundational to believers' assurance.
Fourth, some people lack assurance because they cannot remember the exact moment of their salvation. Evangelicalism and fundamentalism have wrongly placed too much emphasis on a dramatic event—the so-called decision for Christ. They have so emphasized praying a prayer, raising a hand, walking an aisle, or signing a card, that when people cannot remember such an event they may wonder if their salvation is genuine. The only legitimate basis for assurance has nothing to do with a past event when one "made a decision," but is based on the reality of present trust in Christ's atoning work, as evidenced by one's present pattern of faith, obedience, righteousness, and love for the Lord (cf. 1 John 1:6-7; 2:6).
Fifth, some believers still feel the strong influence of their flesh or unredeemed humanness and wonder if they truly are a new creation in Christ (2 Cor 5:17). One day all saints will experience complete deliverance from the flesh when they enter the heavenly realm (Rom 8:23; 1 John 3:2; cf. 1 Cor 15:52-57). But as long as they feel the power of the flesh warring against them (Rom 7:14-25; Gal 5:17), they may doubt if they are really Christ's.
But one must read Rom 7:14-25in a balanced way. The passage does explain the reality and power of the flesh, but it also speaks of the believer's desire to do what is right (vv. 15,19,21), his hatred of sin (vv. 23-24), and delight in the Law of God (v. 22). The battle Paul refers to is indicative of the regenerated spirit contending against the flesh (cf. Rom 8:5-6), and therefore is reason for saints to be confident they have new life in Christ. Unbelievers have no such struggle (Rom 3:10-20) and no confidence in Christ.
Sixth, other Christians may lack assurance because they fail to see God's hand in all their trials. They thereby miss the strongest proof of assurance, which is a tested faith. Paul instructed the Romans…
Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into this grace in which we stand; and we exult in hope of the glory of God. And not only this, but we also exult in our tribulations, knowing that tribulation brings about perseverance; and perseverance, proven character; and proven character, hope; and hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured out within our hearts through the Holy Spirit who was given to us. (Rom 5:1-5; cf. Heb 6:10-12; James 1:2-4)
Peter earlier wrote,
In this you greatly rejoice, even though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been distressed by various trials, so that the proof of your faith, being more precious than gold which is perishable, even though tested by fire, may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ. (1 Peter 1:6-7)
Trials test believers' faith, not for God's sake but theirs. He knows if their faith is truly saving faith because He gave it to them (Eph 2:8-9); however, they learn their faith is real because it triumphs in their trials. In God's sovereign providence, He ordained that believers' trials and difficulties constitute the crucible from which assurance derives (cf. Job 23:10; Rom 8:35-39).
Seventh, others lack assurance because they do not know and obey the Word and, thus, fail to walk in the Spirit, whose ministry it is to assure obedient Christians (Rom 8:14-17). He does so first by illuminating Scripture for them (1 Cor 2:9-10). The very process of illumination means the Holy Spirit is confirming to believers that they are children of God. Second, the Spirit testifies through salvation itself, as He reveals to saints that Jesus Christ is indeed their Savior (1 John 4:13-14). The Spirit's work in the hearts of the elect causes them to love Christ and dwell in the love of God (Gal 4:6). Third, the Spirit's testimony draws believers into communion with God, as the expression "Abba! Father!" in Rom 8:15and Gal 4:6 indicates. That term of intimacy connotes a Spirit-generated petition of praise and worship offered to the Father.
Finally, and perhaps mingled through all the previous issues, some believers lack assurance because they are willfully sinful. Clearly, one who walks in the flesh and fulfills its desires (Gal 5:16-21) will not know the blessing of spiritual fruit or the joy of assurance (vv. 22-23). Purity and assurance go hand in hand, as Heb 10:22points out: "Let us draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water." When believers fall into sin, they may fall into doubt, as happened on various occasions even to the psalmist (e.g., Ps 31:22; 32:3-4; 77:1-4,7). Whatever the causes for lack or loss of assurance, the reliable cure is to walk in the Spirit and thereby obey God's commands (Ezek 36:27; John 14:26; 16:13; 1 Cor 2:12-13).


text:
The "view and kill processes" is an excellent step forward but how 'bout the ability to restart processes? I've found that restarting a service is preferable to just killing a process in most cases.
This topic was created during version 4.6.
The latest version is 7.5.00101.
2 Replies
· · ·
Mar 18, 2010 at 2:48 UTC
Keep IT Simple Technology Group is an IT service provider.
Sounds like a feature request to me!
· · ·
Oct 8, 2012 at 7:39 UTC
I'd love to see this feature added as well.
This discussion has been inactive for over a year.
You may get a better answer to your question by starting a new discussion.