text:
Publication number | US7594498 B2 |
Publication type | Grant |
Application number | US 11/291,362 |
Publication date | Sep 29, 2009 |
Filing date | Nov 30, 2005 |
Priority date | Nov 30, 2005 |
Fee status | Paid |
Also published as | US7765982, US7849842, US20070119421, US20090320790, US20100294235 |
Publication number | 11291362, 291362, US 7594498 B2, US 7594498B2, US-B2-7594498, US7594498 B2, US7594498B2 |
Inventors | Donald J. Lewis, John D. Russell |
Original Assignee | Ford Global Technologies, Llc |
Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |
Patent Citations (99), Non-Patent Citations (30), Referenced by (35), Classifications (28), Legal Events (3) | |
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |
Engines may use various forms of fuel delivery to provide a desired amount of fuel for combustion in each cylinder. One type of fuel delivery uses a port injector for each cylinder to deliver fuel to respective cylinders. Still another type of fuel delivery uses a direct injector for each cylinder.
Further, engines have also been described using more than one injector to provide fuel to a single cylinder in an attempt to improve engine performance. Specifically, in U.S. 2005/0155578 an engine is described using a port fuel injector and a direct injector in each cylinder of the engine.
Another approach utilizing multiple injection locations for different fuel types is described in the papers titled "Calculations of Knock Suppression in Highly Turbocharged Gasoline/Ethanol Engines Using Direct Ethanol Injection" and "Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engine: Biofuel Leveraging for Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO2 Emissions" by Heywood et al. Specifically, the Heywood et al. papers describes directly injecting ethanol to improve charge cooling effects, while relying on port injected gasoline for providing the majority of combusted fuel over a drive cycle.
However, the inventors herein have recognized a problem with such approaches. For example, a minimum valve opening amount, or minimum pulsewidth, may be encountered when varying injection of one or both injectors in response to conditions such as knock sensor feedback during engine operation, thus generating air-fuel errors.
Thus, in one approach, a method is provided for an engine configured to deliver an actively varying relative ratio of a first and second fuel via a delivery system having a first and second injector for a cylinder of the engine, where the first fuel has a lesser relative amount of alcohol. The method comprises varying an amount of injection from the first and second injector with operating conditions; and when said variation causes said first injector to approach a first minimum opening condition, increasing injection of said second injector and disabling said first injector, and when said variation causes said second injector to approach a second minimum opening condition, avoiding further reduction of said second injector and decreasing injection of said first injector.
In this way, it is possible to err on the side of providing extra fuel having a greater alcohol content (and thus a greater knock avoidance effect. For example, when the first injector approaches as minimum opening, it is disabled so that extra fuel from the second injector can be used to provide a desired total fuel injection amount. Likewise, when the second injector approach as minimum opening, further reduction is avoided so that at least the desired minimum amount of the second fuel is provided, and the first injector may be reduced if necessary to provide a desired total fuel injection amount.
Referring to
In an alternative embodiment, a manual transmission operated by a driver with a clutch may be used. Further, various types of automatic transmissions may be used.
As will be described in more detail below, various advantageous results may be obtained by various of the above systems. For example, when using both gasoline and a fuel having alcohol (e.g., ethanol), it may be possible to adjust the relative amounts of the fuels to take advantage of the increased charge cooling of alcohol fuels (e.g., via direct injection) to reduce the tendency of knock. This phenomenon, combined with increased compression ratio, and/or boosting and/or engine downsizing, can then be used to obtain large fuel economy benefits (by reducing the knock limitations on the engine).
Also, as described herein, there are various configurations of the cylinders, fuel injectors, and exhaust system, as well as various configuration for the fuel vapor purging system and exhaust gas oxygen sensor locations.
Continuing with
In one particular example, piston 36 may include a recess or bowl (not shown) to help in forming stratified charges of air and fuel, if desired. However, in an alternative embodiment, a flat piston may be used.
Combustion chamber, or cylinder, 30 is shown communicating with intake manifold 44 and exhaust manifold 48 via respective intake valves 52 a and 52 b (not shown), and exhaust valves 54 a and 54 b (not shown). Thus, while four valves per cylinder may be used, in another example, a single intake and single exhaust valve per cylinder may also be used. In still another example, two intake valves and one exhaust valve per cylinder may be used.
Combustion chamber 30 can have a compression ratio, which is the ratio of volumes when piston 36 is at bottom center to top center. In one example, the compression ratio may be approximately 9:1. However, in some examples where different fuels are used, the compression ratio may be increased. For example, it may be between 10:1 and 11:1 or 11:1 and 12:1, or greater.
Fuel injector 66A is shown directly coupled to combustion chamber 30 for delivering injected fuel directly therein in proportion to the pulse width of signal dfpw received from controller 12 via electronic driver 68. While
Fuel may be delivered to fuel injector 66A by a high pressure fuel system (not shown) including a fuel tank, fuel pumps, and a fuel rail. Alternatively, fuel may be delivered by a single stage fuel pump at lower pressure, in which case the timing of the direct fuel injection may be more limited during the compression stroke than if a high pressure fuel system is used. Further, while not shown, the fuel tank (or tanks) may (each) have a pressure transducer providing a signal to controller 12.
Fuel injector 66B is shown coupled to intake manifold 44, rather than directly to cylinder 30. Fuel injector 66B delivers injected fuel in proportion to the pulse width of signal pfpw received from controller 12 via electronic driver 68. Note that a single driver 68 may be used for both fuel injection systems, or multiple drivers may be used. Fuel system 164 is also shown in schematic form delivering vapors to intake manifold 44. Various fuel systems and fuel vapor purge systems may be used, such as those described below herein with regard to
Intake manifold 44 is shown communicating with throttle body 58 via throttle plate 62. In this particular example, throttle plate 62 is coupled to electric motor 94 so that the position of elliptical throttle plate 62 is controlled by controller 12 via electric motor 94. This configuration may be referred to as electronic throttle control (ETC), which can also be utilized during idle speed control. In an alternative embodiment (not shown), a bypass air passageway is arranged in parallel with throttle plate 62 to control inducted airflow during idle speed control via an idle control by-pass valve positioned within the air passageway.
Exhaust gas sensor 76 is shown coupled to exhaust manifold 48 upstream of catalytic converter 70 (where sensor 76 can correspond to various different sensors). For example, sensor 76 may be any of many known sensors for providing an indication of exhaust gas air/fuel ratio such as a linear oxygen sensor, a UEGO, a two-state oxygen sensor, an EGO, a HEGO, or an HC or CO sensor. In this particular example, sensor 76 is a two-state oxygen sensor that provides signal EGO to controller 12 which converts signal EGO into two-state signal EGOS. A high voltage state of signal EGOS indicates exhaust gases are rich of stoichiometry and a low voltage state of signal EGOS indicates exhaust gases are lean of stoichiometry. Signal EGOS may be used to advantage during feedback air/fuel control to maintain average air/fuel at stoichiometry during a stoichiometric homogeneous mode of operation. Further details of air-fuel ratio control are included herein.
Distributorless ignition system 88 provides ignition spark to combustion chamber 30 via spark plug 92 in response to spark advance signal SA from controller 12.
Controller 12 may cause combustion chamber 30 to operate in a variety of combustion modes, including a homogeneous air/fuel mode and a stratified air/fuel mode by controlling injection timing, injection amounts, spray patterns, etc. Further, combined stratified and homogenous mixtures may be formed in the chamber. In one example, stratified layers may be formed by operating injector 66A during a compression stroke. In another example, a homogenous mixture may be formed by operating one or both of injectors 66A and 66B during an intake stroke (which may be open valve injection). In yet another example, a homogenous mixture may be formed by operating one or both of injectors 66A and 66B before an intake stroke (which may be closed valve injection). In still other examples, multiple injections from one or both of injectors 66A and 66B may be used during one or more strokes (e.g., intake, compression, exhaust, etc.). Even further examples may be where different injection timings and mixture formations are used under different conditions, as described below.
Controller 12 can control the amount of fuel delivered by fuel injectors 66A and 66B so that the homogeneous, stratified, or combined homogenous/stratified air/fuel mixture in chamber 30 can be selected to be at stoichiometry, a value rich of stoichiometry, or a value lean of stoichiometry.
Emission control device 72 is shown positioned downstream of catalytic converter 70. Emission control device 72 may be a three-way catalyst or a NOx trap, or combinations thereof.
Controller 12 is shown as a microcomputer, including microprocessor unit 102, input/output ports 104, an electronic storage medium for executable programs and calibration values shown as read only memory chip 106 in this particular example, random access memory 108, keep alive memory 110, and a conventional data bus. Controller 12 is shown receiving various signals from sensors coupled to engine 10, in addition to those signals previously discussed, including measurement of inducted mass air flow (MAF) from mass air flow sensor 100 coupled to throttle body 58; engine coolant temperature (ECT) from temperature sensor 112 coupled to cooling sleeve 114; a profile ignition pickup signal (PIP) from Hall effect sensor 118 coupled to crankshaft 40; and throttle position TP from throttle position sensor 120; absolute Manifold Pressure Signal MAP from sensor 122; an indication of knock from knock sensor 182; and an indication of absolute or relative ambient humidity from sensor 180. Engine speed signal RPM is generated by controller 12 from signal PIP in a conventional manner and manifold pressure signal MAP from a manifold pressure sensor provides an indication of vacuum, or pressure, in the intake manifold. During stoichiometric operation, this sensor can give an indication of engine load. Further, this sensor, along with engine speed, can provide an estimate of charge (including air) inducted into the cylinder. In a one example, sensor 118, which is also used as an engine speed sensor, produces a predetermined number of equally spaced pulses every revolution of the crankshaft.
In this particular example, temperature Tcat1 of catalytic converter 70 is provided by temperature sensor 124 and temperature Tcat2 of emission control device 72 is provided by temperature sensor 126. In an alternate embodiment, temperature Tcat1 and temperature Tcat2 may be inferred from engine operation.
Continuing with
While this example shows a system in which the intake and exhaust valve timing are controlled concurrently, variable intake cam timing, variable exhaust cam timing, dual independent variable cam timing, or fixed cam timing may be used. Further, variable valve lift may also be used. Further, camshaft profile switching may be used to provide different cam profiles under different operating conditions. Further still, the valvetrain may be roller finger follower, direct acting mechanical bucket, electromechanical, electrohydraulic, or other alternatives to rocker arms.
Continuing with the variable cam timing system, teeth 138, being coupled to housing 136 and camshaft 130, allow for measurement of relative cam position via cam timing sensor 150 providing signal VCT to controller 12. Teeth 1, 2, 3, and 4 are preferably used for measurement of cam timing and are equally spaced (for example, in a V-8 dual bank engine, spaced 90 degrees apart from one another) while tooth 5 is preferably used for cylinder identification, as described later herein. In addition, controller 12 sends control signals (LACT, RACT) to conventional solenoid valves (not shown) to control the flow of hydraulic fluid either into advance chamber 142, retard chamber 144, or neither.
Relative cam timing can be measured in a variety of ways. In general terms, the time, or rotation angle, between the rising edge of the PIP signal and receiving a signal from one of the plurality of teeth 138 on housing 136 gives a measure of the relative cam timing. For the particular example of a V-8 engine, with two cylinder banks and a five-toothed wheel, a measure of cam timing for a particular bank is received four times per revolution, with the extra signal used for cylinder identification.
Sensor 160 may also provide an indication of oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas via signal 162, which provides controller 12 a voltage indicative of the O2 concentration. For example, sensor 160 can be a HEGO, UEGO, EGO, or other type of exhaust gas sensor. Also note that, as described above with regard to sensor 76, sensor 160 can correspond to various different sensors.
As described above,
Also, in the example embodiments described herein, the engine may be coupled to a starter motor (not shown) for starting the engine. The starter motor may be powered when the driver turns a key in the ignition switch on the steering column, for example. The starter is disengaged after engine starting, for example, by engine 10 reaching a predetermined speed after a predetermined time. Further, in the disclosed embodiments, an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system may be used to route a desired portion of exhaust gas from exhaust manifold 48 to intake manifold 44 via an EGR valve (not shown). Alternatively, a portion of combustion gases may be retained in the combustion chambers by controlling exhaust valve timing.
As noted above, engine 10 may operate in various modes, including lean operation, rich operation, and "near stoichiometric" operation. "Near stoichiometric" operation can refer to oscillatory operation around the stoichiometric air fuel ratio. Typically, this oscillatory operation is governed by feedback from exhaust gas oxygen sensors. In this near stoichiometric operating mode, the engine may be operated within approximately one air-fuel ratio of the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. This oscillatory operation is typically on the order of 1 Hz, but can vary faster and slower than 1 Hz. Further, the amplitude of the oscillations are typically within 1 a/f ratio of stoichiometry, but can be greater than 1 a/f ratio under various operating conditions. Note that this oscillation does not have to be symmetrical in amplitude or time. Further note that an air-fuel bias can be included, where the bias is adjusted slightly lean, or rich, of stoichiometry (e.g., within 1 a/f ratio of stoichiometry). Also note that this bias and the lean and rich oscillations can be governed by an estimate of the amount of oxygen stored in upstream and/or downstream three way catalysts.
As described below, feedback air-fuel ratio control is used for providing the near stoichiometric operation. Further, feedback from exhaust gas oxygen sensors can be used for controlling air-fuel ratio during lean and during rich operation. In particular, a switching type, heated exhaust gas oxygen sensor (HEGO) can be used for stoichiometric air-fuel ratio control by controlling fuel injected (or additional air via throttle or VCT) based on feedback from the HEGO sensor and the desired air-fuel ratio. Further, a UEGO sensor (which provides a substantially linear output versus exhaust air-fuel ratio) can be used for controlling air-fuel ratio during lean, rich, and stoichiometric operation. In this case, fuel injection (or additional air via throttle or VCT) can be adjusted based on a desired air-fuel ratio and the air-fuel ratio from the sensor. Further still, individual cylinder air-fuel ratio control could be used, if desired. As described in more detail below, adjustments may be made with injector 66A, 66B, or combinations therefore depending on various factors.
Also note that various methods can be used to maintain the desired torque such as, for example, adjusting ignition timing, throttle position, variable cam timing position, exhaust gas recirculation amount, and number of cylinders carrying out combustion. Further, these variables can be individually adjusted for each cylinder to maintain cylinder balance among all the cylinders.
Referring now to
Also, a twin turbocharger arrangement, and/or a sequential turbocharger arrangement, may be used if desired. In the case of multiple adjustable turbocharger and/or stages, it may be desirable to vary a relative amount of expansion though the turbocharger, depending on operating conditions (e.g. manifold pressure, airflow, engine speed, etc.). Further, a supercharger may be used, if desired.
Referring now to
As one example, since two injectors are used, they may each be designed with smaller valve flows/openings so that under low load conditions it may be possible to provide more accurate quantity control (e.g., by using only one of the injectors).
As another example, when using different fuels for two the injectors (e.g., one injecting gasoline and one injecting a fuel having an alcohol component, such as ethanol or E85) many of the above system constraints can be satisfied. For example, by using separate port injectors for fuels with alcohol (e.g., ethanol) and gasoline, and using the alcohol injector at higher loads when the engine is warmed up, some of the constraints at low fuel flow and cold start are avoided for the alcohol injector. Further, if the alcohol injector is operated with OVI timing, or at least partial OVI timing, then transient fuel problems may also be reduced for the ethanol injector.
Additionally, using OVI timing (at least under some conditions) allows the alcohol injector spray pattern and targeting to be optimized for OVI. The spray could be much narrower angle than for the gasoline port injector, to increase the probability that most of the fuel enters the cylinder as a liquid, instead of evaporating from intake port and intake valve metal surfaces. This would increase the evaporative cooling benefit in a manner similar to direct injection. Also, the injector targeting may be selected to reduce bore wash issues, in which liquid fuel washes oil off cylinder walls, potentially causing excessive wear.
In this way, in some cases, it may be possible to achieve advantageous results without requiring direct injection. For example, by using two port fuel injectors per cylinder it may be possible to reduce system cost, reduce required fuel rail pressure (high fuel rail pressure can reduce fuel economy due to parasitic losses of the fuel pump), and reduce packaging issues (direct injection may require compromised valve sizes and/or angles, intake or exhaust port shapes, etc.).
In one embodiment, injector 466A injects a fuel having alcohol, such as ethanol, methanol, or a mixture of gasoline with an alcohol (e.g., E85, M85, or other such blends and ratios), while injector 466B injects gasoline. The gasoline injection may be performed at least partially during conditions when valve 452 b is open. Alternatively, gasoline injection from injector 466B may be performed at least partially during conditions when valve 452 b is closed. In still another example, gasoline injection from injector 466B may be performed at least partially during conditions when valve 452 b is closed and at least partially during conditions when valve 452 b is open. In yet another example, under some conditions open valve injection may be used while in other conditions closed valve injection may be used. Thus, the two injectors may be of a different type due to physical location, type of substance being injected, operating strategy, etc.
In one example, the valve 424 may be adjusted to reduce airflow (i.e., made more closed) under lower engine load conditions where fuel is primarily provided by injector 466B. While a single valve is shown, multiple valves may be used if desired. Also, each cylinder may have such a valve, and each of such valves may be controlled by a single actuation. In this way, it is possible to position a valve to obtain the desired flow for the injectors that are active under different conditions.
Referring now to
By adjusting valve 424 (or 524), it is possible to take advantage of the fact that at high loads, both ethanol injection and open (or partially open) valve operation provide improved performance. At lower loads, the valve(s) may be closed (or partially closed), and the gasoline injector can spray fuel into the active intake port, and the ethanol injector may be deactivated. At higher loads, the valve would be open or partially open, and ethanol could be injected into one port while gasoline is injected into the other port.
Further, by using different operation of the two port injectors (e.g., different timing, different fuels, different injectors for a cylinder, etc.) it is possible to reduce a compromise between package-space and air/fuel mixing. Further, it allows one injector to be placed in each intake port, and ensures that fuel can always be supplied to a port that is flowing air. By reducing airflow in a port when the injector is not injecting fuel, it is possible to maintain acceptable air-fuel mixing in the other port that is flowing air with injected fuel. Further, such an approach may provide improved packaging compared with twin-spray injectors that may require a more central injector location between the ports, making it more difficult to package two injectors per cylinder.
Referring now to
In one example, both injectors are sized to meet peak torque requirements (for example a maximum airflow or aircharge). However, in an example where one injector provides gasoline and the other injector provides an alcohol blend (e.g., ethanol, E85, methanol, etc.), the power densities of the fuels may be different. In such a case, the injector for the alcohol based fuel may be sized to provide a different maximum fuel flow (e.g., approximately 37% higher to account for pure ethanol).
Referring now specifically to
In this way, the respective injectors may be designed to provide different functionality and/or injection type (e.g., fuel type) compatibility so that improved engine operation and control may be achieved. As noted herein, an injection type may refer to different injection locations, different substances being injected (e.g., water vs. fuel), different fuel types being injected, different fuel blends being injected, different alcohol contents being injected (e.g., 0% vs. 85%), etc. Further note that different injection types may also refer to different substances being injected via a common injector, where a type 1 injection may be a gasoline amount in the injection and type 2 injection may be an alcohol amount in the injection.
Referring now to
Referring now specifically to
One or both the fuel systems may be returnless-type fuel systems, return-type fuel systems, or combinations thereof. Further, the fuel systems may have different characteristics, such as different size tanks, different size pump, different pump capacity, different pump pressure, different pump maximum flows, different on/off cycles (e.g., pump 712 may run more intermittently than pump 722), etc. Note that in some examples, only one pump may operate under some conditions. For example, if fuel from tank 710 is not needed, or not enabled (e.g., during cold start conditions), pump 712 may be deactivated (or not activated) while pump 722 operates. In this way, less battery power may be used, and less vapors may be generated.
In one example, the first tank contains an alcohol blend, such as ethanol or an ethanol-gasoline mixture, while the second tank contains gasoline. However, other fuel types may also be used.
Referring now specifically to
One example embodiment is shown in
However, one fuel may be more volatile than another fuel (for example, 10% vaporization occurs at approximately 100 degF for gasoline vs 160 degF for 85% ethanol). Thus, in this example, when tank 812 fuel level is low, the total vapor volume (ullage space) of the system may be relatively high, which can make vapor control more difficult. Also, fuel from one tank may mix with a different fuel in the other tank (e.g., contaminating the ethanol tank with excessive amounts of gasoline due to evaporation from the gasoline tank and condensation in the ethanol tank). Some of the above issues may be reduced by making the sizes of conduits 820 and 822 relatively differently sized, for example.
Another approach that may be used is shown in
In this way, it is possible to enable vapor from both tanks (or tank sections) to the engine in controllable differential amounts while reducing contamination from one tank to another tank.
In one example, a one-way check valve may be placed in line 1028 to reduce vapor flow from tank 1010 to tank 1012. Further, such a valve may also be placed in line 1022. However, the presence of canister 1014 may be sufficient to reduce flow of vapors from tank 1010 to tank 1012, and vice versa.
In this way, a single valve may be used (although more may be added if desired), yet the system provides at least some separation between the tanks via a canister (in this example, canister 1014). Canister 1014 may be sized large enough to reduce the amount of a first fuel vapor (e.g., gasoline) that enters the tank 1012 to an acceptable level, and since it is in series with canister 1016, this can enable canister 1014 to have a reduced size or capacity.
In any of the examples herein with more than one canister, the canisters may be packaged in a single housing if desired.
As will be described in more detail below, control of fuel vapors, adaptive learning, vapor concentration learning, vapor blend learning, along with air-fuel ratio, may be affected by the fuel system type and configuration. For example, in some examples vapors from one or more fuel source may be concurrently delivered to the engine, in varying amounts, and thus the controller may estimate the blend of the vapors (e.g., the percentage of alcohol in a gas/alcohol blend, for example) to determine stoichiometry of the vapors, etc., that can then be used to adjust fuel injection, etc.
For example, under some conditions, purging of a first fuel type may be advantageous, and under other conditions, purging of a second fuel type may be advantageous. Further still, under still other conditions, both types may be concurrently purged. Factors that may influence which of these are selected may include, for example, the amount of fuel vapors of each being inducted. Thus, if the vapors contain mostly a fuel corresponding to a first injector, purging from that source may be given preference and continued for a longer period, or performed with a greater purge flow rate, for example. Alternatively, an estimated blend in the reservoirs(s) may influence which reservoir is purged (and how much volume from that source is purged). For example, some reservoirs may generate more vapors than other reservoirs, and thus need longer or more frequent, or higher volume, purging.
Further, note that the desired/delivered amounts of type 1 and type 2 injection, or for example, the relative amount of type 1 to type 2 injection, may vary depending on the source of fuel vapors being inducted into the engine. Thus, the injection amounts may be varied based on the source of vapors, or based on whether any vapors are being inducted into the engine, or based on the concentration of vapors being inducted into the engine, and/or based on the blend of vapors being inducted into the engine.
Referring now to
Specifically, in 1110, the routine determines whether injection or delivery of fuel type 2 is enabled. As described in more detail herein, various factors may be used to determine whether to enable delivery or injection of fuel type 2, such as engine temperature, exhaust temperature, an amount of type 2 injection (e.g., fuel type) on-board (e.g., in a fuel tank), etc. If the answer to 1110 is yes, the routine continues to 1112 to determine if injection or delivery of fuel type 1 is enabled. Again, as described in more detail herein, various factors may be used to determine whether to enable delivery or injection of fuel type 1, such as engine temperature, exhaust temperature, an amount of type 1 injection (e.g., fuel type) on-board (e.g., in a fuel tank), etc. If the answer to 1112 is yes, the routine continues to 1114, otherwise the routine continues to 1116.
When the answer to 1110 is no, the routine continues to 1118 where again the routine determines if injection or delivery of fuel type 1 is enabled. If not, the routine ends. Otherwise, the routine continues to 1120.
In 1114, the routine selects a fuel type for adjustment as described below in more detail with regard to
In 1116, the routine adjusts fuel type 2 based on air-fuel ratio sensor feedback (see also
In 1120, the routine adjusts fuel type 1 based on air-fuel ratio sensor feedback (see also
In 1122, the routine adjusts both fuel type 1 and 2 based on air-fuel ratio sensor feedback (see also
In this way, different fuel types (e.g., injection locations, fuel qualities, fuel densities, fuel heat capacities, etc.) may be used under different conditions and in different amounts to facilitate air-fuel feedback corrections depending on operating conditions.
Referring now to
In 1210, the routine reads exhaust air-fuel ratio sensor information from one or more exhaust gas sensors. Then in 1212, the routine calculates an amount and direction of correction or corrections. For example, a PI controller may be used, or multiple PI control loops may be used, such as based on upstream and downstream sensors. Then, in 1214, the routine determines whether a high frequency adjustment is required in the amount of fuel delivered. For example, if a rapid (and possibly large) change in exhaust air-fuel ratio is encountered, it may be possible to more rapidly correct this error using type 2 injection (e.g., fuel type, such as when type 2 fuel is injected directly, or injected more closely to the cylinder, or if an injector for type 2 fuel has a higher bandwidth than an injector for type 1 fuel). If the answer to 1214 is yes, the routine continues to 1216 to select type 2 fuel adjustment and then ends.
Otherwise, the routine continues to 1218 to determine if a corresponding pulse width (PW) of the injector for the type 1 injection is near a minimum PW value for the injector or a maximum PW for the injector. If so, the routine again proceeds to 1216. If the answer to 1218 is no, the routine continues to 1220 to determine if a corresponding pulse width (PW) of the injector for the type 2 injection is near a minimum PW value for the injector or a maximum PW for the injector. If so, the routine proceeds to 1222 to select type 1 fuel for adjustment. If the answer to 1220 is no, the routine continues to 1224.
In 1224, the routine determines whether conditions are present to adjust both fuel types based on feedback information. For example, it may be determined that higher frequency adjustments be made with type 2 injection (e.g., fuel type) adjustments and lower frequency adjustments be made with type 1 fuel adjustments. In this way, in the example where type 2 injection is direct fuel injection and type 1 injection is port fuel injection, wall wetting dynamic delays can be reduced. Alternatively, both fuels may be selected for adjustment, where a portion of the adjustment is made by each fuel type. This portion, which may be a percentage or other ratio, may be adjusted with engine operating conditions, fuel conditions, etc.
If the answer to 1224 is yes, the routine continues to adjust both fuels in 1226. Otherwise, the routine continues to 1228 to adjust fuel type 1.
In this way, different fuel types can be used to provide air-fuel feedback control for different conditions so that overall operation is improved. For example, where port injection is used to control lower frequency feedback adjustments than direct injection, faster feedback control can be achieved while reducing wall wetting dynamics, and still utilizing feedback adjustment of both fuel types. Further, issues with minimum or maximum injector fueling can be addressed, while still maintaining accurate overall air-fuel ratio control.
Referring now to
While the above example relies on engine coolant temperature, various other parameters may be used, such as ambient air temperature, ambient pressure, oil temperature, etc. Likewise, various exhaust temperatures may be used, such as exhaust gas temperature, catalyst temperature, or estimates thereof. In this way, it is possible to provide an appropriate fuel for engine starting and/or warm-up. Further, the starting approaches herein may be used for re-starting, such as a hot-restart, a re-start after an unsuccessful start, starting after deceleration fuel shut-off, or starting an engine during rotation or from rest, such as with a hybrid vehicle (e.g., hybrid-electric vehicle).
Referring now to
As will be described in more detail below, once the engine is warmed up, a desired ethanol fraction (EF), or other such parameter, can be determined as a function of speed and load as described, with additional logic for unusual ambient conditions, low fuel level of ethanol or gasoline, etc. The warmed-up desired ethanol fraction can then be modified with one ore more multipliers (e.g., an overall multiplier EF_MUL) to account for cold start and warm-up.
The value of EF_MUL can be in the range between zero and one during warm-up (values higher than one may be desired for higher-than-normal temperatures). The value of EF_MUL can be determined from a variety of inputs, including engine coolant temperature, engine oil temperature, ambient air temperature, engine intake air temperature, time since engine start, speed, load, available fuel pressure, ambient humidity, and other parameters. Each of these inputs could be measured or inferred. The value of EF_MUL can be continuously re-calculated during engine operation.
Referring now specifically to
From either 1412 or when the answer to 1410 is no, the routine continues to 1414, 1416, and 1418 to calculate individual multipliers for the type 2 injection using the calibration graphs of
In one embodiment of step 1420, the routine determines a current value of the overall multiplier on a desired fuel type 2 fraction by multiplying the values of the separate multipliers for each input. In this method, the effects of the input variables can all be accounted for simultaneously, for example:
EF_MUL=Overall multiplier on desired ethanol fraction, EF_MUL_ECT=Multiplier as a function of engine coolant temperature, EF_MUL_EOT=Multiplier as a function of engine oil temperature, EF_MUL_AAT=Multiplier as a function of ambient air temperature, EF_MUL_ACT=Multiplier as a function of engine intake air temperature, EF_MUL_ATMR1=Multiplier as a function of time since engine start or number of combustion events since engine start.
Example calibrations for these multipliers are illustrated in the top, middle, and bottom graphs of
Note that the above multipliers may also be a function of additional parameters, such as a number of combustion events from an engine start.
An alternative embodiment of step 1420 is described for limiting a fuel type during engine warm-up. Specifically, in this embodiment, each input factor is considered as a separate possible constraint on a fuel type use (e.g., ethanol use). The current value of the overall multiplier (for the desired ethanol fraction) can be determined by the input factor which is currently the most constraining. This may involve examining the same input multipliers as above, although the calibration values of these multipliers may be chosen differently. Also, the value of EF_MUL may be continuously re-calculated during engine operation. For example, the following calculation may be used:
With this method, when the engine is first started, EF_MUL_ATMR1 may be the limiting constraint, followed by EF_MUL_ECT until the coolant warms up, followed by EF_MUL_EOT until the oil warms up, and then the remaining constraint may by EF_MUL_AAT in very cold weather.
Referring now to
In 1610 the routine reads various engine operating parameters, such as engine speed, engine load, engine coolant temperature, exhaust temperature, gear ratios, etc. Then, in 1612, the routine selects an initial type 1 and type 2 relative amounts, such as a desired fraction based on the operating parameters. Note that various alternative determinations may be made, such as determining a desired percentage of fuel types, or absolute amounts of fuel types. Further, an adaptive parameter may also be included to account for learned adjustments to the fuel types based on feedback from various sensors, such as a knock sensor. The adaptive terms may be stored as a function of speed, load, temperature, or combinations thereof, for example. In this way, if knock consistently occurs in repeatable locations, an automatic increase in the amount of type 2 injection, for example, may be adaptively learned so that such adjustment can be made without waiting for feedback from a knock sensor.
In one example where type 2 injection is ethanol (or an ethanol blend), the determination in 1612 may be referred to as a desired ethanol fraction (EF). Note, however, that it may be a weight percent, mass percent, volume percent, or ratio. Further, absolute values may also be used, if desired, as noted herein. Further, the selection of the amounts of type 1 and type 2 injections may be based on other factors, such as factors that can affect a tendency for knock. For example, ambient humidity may be used to adjust an amount of type 2 injection for given operating conditions, as increased humidity can decrease knock tendency (and thus less type 2 injection may be needed), and vice versa. Note that a desired spark timing may also be varied as the relative amounts of type 1 and type 2 injection are varied, or as the individual amounts of the type 1 and type 2 injections are varied.
In one example, the amount of type 2 fuel may be determined based on compression ratio, boosting, and temperature so that engine knock may be reduced thus reducing a limit of spark advance. However, as noted herein, additional factors may be used in determining whether to use type 2 fuel, and the amount of type 2 fuel, such as, for example, the amount of type 1 fuel remaining in the tank, the need to learn the content (e.g., blend) of type 2 fuel on-board, minimum pulsewidth issues, and a need to periodically operate with type 2 fuel if it has not been used frequently enough (e.g., to reduce deposit formation and or clogging of fuel lines and/or injectors).
In another example, which may be used in addition to the examples and embodiments noted herein, transient conditions may be detected and used to initiate an open-loop adjustment in the amount of type 2 (and type 1) injection. The adjustment may be include a temporary increase in a relative amount of type 2 injection in response to the transient condition detection. In one embodiment, a driver tip-in, such as a rapid tip-in from idle conditions, may be detected. In response to such conditions, a type 2 injection (e.g. direct or port injection of an alcohol-containing mixture, e.g., ethanol or an ethanol blend) may be temporarily increased with a predetermined or actively varying profile. In this way, the heat capacity/heat of vaporization of substances, such as fuel, injected into the engine may be increased, thereby reducing a tendency for tip-in knock. As one example, EF may be temporarily increased by 5-10 percent for one to 10 combustion cycles in response to a driver tip-in.
Continuing with
The routine then continues to 1710 in
In 1718, the routine determines feedforward amounts of type 1 and type 2 injections based on the relative amount, desired torque, desired air-fuel ratio, and/or other operating conditions. For example, the routine can determine a total amount of fuel energy that needs to be provided to provide the desired engine torque, and then proportion the fuel energy among the fuel types based on the desired ratio (or relative amount) of the fuel types taking into account different power density, fuel density, etc. of the fuel types, if present. Further, the routine can then determine an initial fuel amount for each fuel type, that when supplied to the engine at the current conditions, produces the desired torque, assuming sufficient air is present. The fuel amounts may be in various units, including a corresponding fuel pulse width (PW) given the injector characteristics for the fuel type, thus taking into account an injector slope and offset, for example.
Next, in 1720, the routine adds feedback air-fuel ratio adjustments to one or both of the fuel amounts. As described herein, the feedback adjustments may be based on air-fuel ratio sensors in the exhaust, and adjustments may change between different fuel types under different conditions. Again, the adjustments may be in various units, including pulse width (PW).
Continuing with
Alternatively, if the answer to 1722 is no, the routine continues to 1726 to determine whether the type 1 pulse width is less than a minimum value (min_pw—1) for the type 1 injector. If so, the routine continues to 1728 to decrease the type 1 fuel amount (e.g., PW) to zero and increase the type 2 fuel amount by a corresponding amount. Again, in this way, in the example where type 2 fuel is used to decrease a tendency of knock, the system errs on providing additional type 2 fuel so that knock is reduced and operating at low pulse width values is also reduced or avoided.
From either 1728 or when the answer to 1726 is no, the routine continues to 1730 to determine an air amount based on the desired air-fuel ratio and the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio of the actual mixture provided via type 1 and type 2 injectors. The airflow can then be provided via an electronically controlled throttle, valve timing, or other such actuator.
In this way, it is possible to account for varying relative amounts of fuel types and varying total fuel amounts, while compensating for minimum fuel limits and providing a desired engine torque at a desired air-fuel ratio.
Referring now to
One approach to open-loop knock avoidance when EF_MUL is less than one can be provided with a combination of additional spark retard, additional enrichment, transmission downshifting (to increase engine speed, because knock may be less likely at higher speeds), load limiting with electronic throttle, and/or boost limiting via wastegate or variable geometry turbocharger adjustments. Depending on operating conditions (e.g. compression ratio and/or boost pressure), various control strategies could be used.
In a first embodiment, sensitivity of knock-limited spark advance may be mapped to a number of variables, such as RPM, torque, air/fuel ratio, engine intake air temperature, and also the amount of ethanol reduction (e.g., EF_MUL) or ethanol fraction as an additional variable.
In a second embodiment, where spark retard alone to avoid knock may be insufficient (e.g., excessive spark retard can cause surge and/or high exhaust temperature), additional modifications may be made. For example, the routine can first retard spark as much as feasible, then enrich the combustion air-fuel ratio to avoid or reduce knock. If the maximum feasible enrichment is encountered, then a transmission downshift may be commanded.
In a third embodiment, the routine can first retard spark as much as feasible, then command a transmission downshift. If there is still a potential for knock, the routine can then enrich enough to avoid or reduce knock.
In a fourth embodiment, the routine can limit maximum load with electronic throttle control. Such an approach may be used alone, or in combination with one of the first, second, and/or third embodiment above if those approaches provide insufficient knock control (because limiting maximum load may cause degraded driver satisfaction). The maximum allowed load can be mapped as a function of EF_MUL or ethanol fraction, engine speed, engine coolant temperature, relative air/fuel ratio, and other variables. For example, the following function may be used:
MAX_LOAD=f(EF — MUL or EF,RPM,ECT,a/f, etc.)
In a fifth embodiment, the routine can limit maximum boost with the wastegate and/or compressor bypass valve. Again, such action may be used alone, or in addition to one of the four embodiments above, if those strategies provide insufficient knock control (again because limiting maximum boost may cause driver dissatisfaction). The maximum allowed boost can be mapped as a function of EF_MUL or ethanol fraction, engine speed, engine coolant temperature, relative air/fuel ratio, and other variables, as:
MAX_BOOST=f(EF — MUL or EF,RPM,ECT,a/f, etc.)
Numerous variations on these embodiments are possible, for example the second and third embodiments could omit either downshifting or enrichment.
Referring now specifically to
In this way, even when the desired amount of type 2 injection to reduce knock is not available, knock may still be reduced in an efficient manner.
Referring now to
Returning to
If the probability of a successful start is below a threshold (i.e., answer to 1914 is no), then the engine can be cranked without any fuel injection (or operating only injectors for fuel type 1. If the probability of a successful start exceeds the threshold, then a start can be attempted With type 2 fuel in 1918. If a start is attempted but the probability of acceptable exhaust emissions is low, then an indicator light may be activated alerting the driver and an error code can be set.
In this way, it may be possible to provide an engine start even if a fuel type is depleted, while avoiding attempting starts under condition in which the remaining fuel type may cause degraded or unacceptable performance.
In one embodiment, when the answer to 1914 is yes, the routine may continue to 1920 to determine whether starting on both type 1 and type 2 fuel types may be performed. Such operation may desirable under selected conditions, such as based on ECT, EOT, ACT, barometric pressure, or combinations thereof. If so, the routine may proceed to 1922 to crank with both fuel types. And if not, the routine proceeds to 1918 as indicated above.
Referring now to
First, in 2010 the routine determines respective reservoir levels of at least a first and second reservoir. As noted herein, the reservoirs may separately hold different fuel blends, where one reservoir is larger than another reservoir, which may be referred to as primary and secondary reservoirs, respectively. Next, in 2012, the routine determines whether the primary reservoir is empty. For example, the routine may determine the reservoir is empty if the fluid level is below an empty threshold, or if an estimate of the amount of fluid used reaches a preselected value, without a refilling event. If not, the routine continues to 2014 to determine whether the secondary reservoir is empty. Again, this may be determined in various ways. If so, the routine continues to 2024, otherwise the routine continues to 2016. In one example, the values that would be considered "low" for each reservoir level could be calibratable so that unmodified injection and engine function could be maintained for a majority of operation, or could be set so that it is maintained as long as possible.
In 2016, the routine determines whether the primary reservoir is low. For example, the routine may determine the reservoir is empty if the fluid level is below a low threshold, or if an estimate of the amount of fluid used reaches a second preselected value, without a refilling event. If so, the routine continues to 2028. If not, the routine continues to 2018 to determine whether the secondary reservoir is low. Again, this may be determined in various ways. If so, the routine continues to 2020, otherwise the routine continues to 2022.
In 2020, the routine determines whether the manifold absolute pressure level, and/or boosting level, can be maintained without enrichment if the secondary injection is not used. In other words, the routine determines whether the secondary injection is needed to avoid knock without adjusting using enrichment and/or spark retard, for example. If the answer to 2020 is yes, the routine continues to 2022. In 2022, the routine continues to use the injection amounts determined herein without modification. Otherwise, the routine continues to 2024 to disable the secondary injectors to one or more cylinders and adjust the primary injection amount in 2026. Specifically, the primary injection is adjusted to compensate for the reduction in secondary injection in terms of air-fuel ratio, torque production, etc. Further, additional adjustments may also be used, such as spark adjustments, throttle angle, boost pressure, or combinations thereof.
Continuing with
In general terms, the routine of
Further, once it has been determined that the secondary supply is running low, the goal of the control system could be to maintain stoichiometric operation as long as possible to maintain emissions performance. The operating conditions could be evaluated to determine if the desired torque (or close to the desired torque) could be achieved with spark retard and without (or with reduced) fuel enrichment. If the desired torque could be obtained by increasing boost and retarding spark, then the secondary injection (e.g., ethanol or an ethanol blend) could be disabled. However, if enrichment is needed, then the secondary injection could be used. In such a circumstance, acceptable operating conditions in which the secondary injection is disabled could be mapped to determine acceptable spark, fuel, throttle, and boost settings without the secondary injection (e.g., without ethanol or with reduced ethanol). Then, once the secondary reservoir was depleted, the engine could still operate, but with potentially reduced maximum engine performance and/or reduced fuel economy (because of the potential need for additional fuel enrichment and spark retard to counteract knock).
In this way, it is possible to take advantage of multiple reservoirs with different fuel blends to extend engine operation and performance and/or efficiency gains over a greater range.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Note that in the examples described in
Referring now to
Next, in 2314, the routine calculates an overall stoichiometric air/fuel ratio for the EF of 2310 as:
AF_stoich_total=(1−EF)*(AF_stoich_gas)+(EF)*(AF_stoich— eth)
where AF_stoich_total is the overall stoichiometric air/fuel ratio, AF_stoich_gas is the stoichiometric air/fuel ratio for a first fuel type (e.g., for gasoline approx. 14.6), AF_stoich_eth=stoichiometric air/fuel ratio for a second fuel type (e.g., 9.0 for pure ethanol, approx. 9.8 for E85), and EF=desired ethanol fraction from 2310 (or in general, desired fraction of the second fuel type). Note that the stoichiometric values for gasoline and ethanol could be modified based on adaptive learning with feedback from exhaust oxygen sensors.
Next, in 2316 the routine calculates a desired fuel mass flow for the gasoline injector (which may be a port injector) and for the ethanol injector (which may be a direct injector) as:
lambda is a desired relative air-fuel ratio from 2312, AF_stoich_total is an overall stoichiometric air/fuel ratio from step 2314, and air_mass is an air mass entering the cylinder to be fueled, which may be measured or inferred.
Continuing with
Referring now to
As discussed herein, a possible benefit of multiple fuel types, such as using gasoline and ethanol, is that knock may be suppressed under conditions where it may otherwise occur due to a combination of higher fuel octane and increased charge cooling (e.g., due to the ethanol's higher heat of vaporization). The charge cooling effect may also be enhanced by providing the charge cooling effect mostly by the air, with little or no evaporation from metal surfaces like the intake manifold, via direct injection or targeted port injection with open valve injection.
However, ethanol (or other alcohol based fuels) may be expensive or unavailable at some times and/or locations. Thus, if relying on such fuels, if they are unavailable, engine torque and/or performance may be limited. To reduce or eliminate such torque and/or power limitations, one approach could include added hardware and/or control logic to allow use of water (or water/ethanol, or water with an alcohol containing mixture, or other mixtures) in the second (e.g., ethanol) fuel system.
For example, water, or a water mixture, could attain part or all of the knock benefit of ethanol at high loads. Although water has no specific octane value, it does have a higher heat of vaporization (approximately 2256 kJ/kg, compared to approximately 840 for ethanol and approximately 350 for gasoline). Therefore, by enabling injection (direct or port) of water (or a water alcohol mixture), similar knock improvements may be achieved. Further, an additional benefit of water/ethanol flexibility may be the ability to use very late injection of water (when the tank is filled with mostly water). Late injection could be used for exhaust temperature control and/or increased boost at low RPM and/or reduced turbo lag.
In one approach, when enabling a second injection source to have a varying ratio of water and an alcohol blend (e.g., water and ethanol, or water and an ethanol/gasoline blend), it may be beneficial to be able to measure or infer the Water Fraction (WF) in the ethanol/water fuel tank, or conversely, the ethanol fraction. WF may vary from zero (pure ethanol) to one (pure water), in this example. This information can then be used for various features, including determining the desired amount of gasoline and the water/ethanol blend to provide a desired torque while reducing knock, and also to maintain accurate control of combustion overall air/fuel ratio.
In one embodiment, a sensor could measure one or more properties that differ between water and ethanol, for example any of the following, or combinations thereof, may be used: specific gravity (about 1 for water, and about 0.789 for ethanol), viscosity (about 21 lb-s/ft2 for water and about 25 for ethanol), capacitance, resistance, or others. Sensor readings may use compensation for temperature and other changes that affect the properties of water and/or ethanol, if desired.
In another embodiment, an inferred estimate of the water fraction (WF), or equivalent parameter may be used. One process of inferring WF may include performing the estimate at specific times, for example after each engine start and/or after a refueling event is detected via fuel level sensor. The WF inference process can occur when the engine is running on gasoline in closed-loop air/fuel control (e.g., stoichiometric feedback control), with vapor purge disabled.
The WF inference process may include gradually increasing pulse width on the water/ethanol injector(s) while maintaining an overall stoichiometric air/fuel ratio based on closed-loop control using exhaust oxygen sensors via corresponding reduction of the gasoline injection pulse width. The pulse width values and/or changes of the gasoline and water/ethanol injectors can then be used to calculate WF. For example, if the pulse width of the water/ethanol injectors can be greatly increased and/or decreased with no or minimum decrease and/or increase in gasoline injector pulse width, then WF is one (pure water).
Alternatively, or in addition, a combination of feedback information and other information can be used to estimate WF. For example, one can use the airflow (e.g., from the MAF sensor) and air/fuel ratio (e.g. from an exhaust sensor) to determine a total amount of fuel provided by the injectors, and then use the injector slopes and offsets to determine an amount and ratio of water in the water/ethanol mixture.
In one embodiment, various factors may be considered, including injector transfer functions (fuel mass flow vs. pulse width) may include compensation for changes in specific gravity and viscosity, which can be themselves a function of the water fraction. Thus, the water fraction (WF) may be referred to as the fraction of water in an ethanol/water mixture, although other fractions may be used, such as the fraction of water in the overall ethanol/water/gasoline mass. In the example where the water fraction is the fraction of water in an ethanol/water mixture, the following procedure may be used for calculating/estimating the water fraction (WF) during engine operation:
WF=water fraction, of total ethanol+water (not gasoline in this example)
PW=pulsewidth of the ethanol/water injectors
OFFSET1=ethanol/water injector offset (initial delay) as a function of voltage
ALOSL=slope of ethanol/water injectors (mass per time) at low PW
If the injector characteristics (slopes) are a function of the water fraction, the equation is:
ALOSL_eth=slope of ethanol/water injectors at low PW with ethanol
ALOSL_water=slope of ethanol/water injectors at low PW with water
sqrt[ ]=square root of expression in brackets
While the above equations show one approach for performing the calculations and determinations, they may be modified to include alternative fuel types, alternative injector characteristic equations (for example mass flow vs pulsewidth may be curved), etc. Further, various modifications may be made to the equations to improve accuracy, or improve simplicity of calculation, if desired.
To illustrate the source of the above equations and thus provide details for modification of the equations, the relationship between the mass of gasoline, the measured or inferred air mass, the known stoichiometric air/fuel ratios of the fuels being combusted (e.g., gasoline and ethanol), and the ethanol fraction (EF) can be derived by first noting that: fuel_mass_gas=(1−EF)*fuel_mass_total, and then manipulating this equation to substitute for the fuel mass in terms of the air mass and overall air-fuel ratio as: fuel_mass_gas=(1−EF)*air-mass/AF_stoich_total. Then, the individual air-fuel ratios of the fuel types can be inserted as: fuel_mass_gas=(1−EF)*air_mass/[(1−EF)*AF_stoich_gas+EF*AF_stoich_eth]. From this, the equation can be rearranged to give: fuel_mass_gas*AF_stoich_gas−EF*fuel_mass_gas*AF_stoich_gas+EF*fuel_mass_gas*AF_stoich_eth=air_mass−EF*air_mass, which leads to the equation listed above in (5).
Likewise, the mass of ethanol may be derived by noting that fuel_mass_ethanol=EF*fuel_mass_total. Then, by manipulating this equation, the equation listed in (6) can be obtained.
Further, the water fraction (WF) can be derived (in the case where any interaction between WF and slope/offset changes is ignored) by starting with the following equation 1:
PW=OFFSET1+LBM — INJ — TOT/ALOSL [equation 1]
Note that the water fraction determination process occurs with the ethanol/water injectors at low pulsewidths, so these equations are based on the steep part of curve with slope ALOSL (it will be apparent that similar equations could easily be derived for higher pulsewidths if desired).
Then, using a definition of WF and rearranging to solve for LBM_INJ_TOT gives:
WF=fuel_mass_water/LBM — INJ — TOT=(LBM_INJ— TOT−fuel_mass_ethanol)/LBM — INJ — TOT
Note that WF is the fraction of water in the ethanol/water mixture in this example, not the overall ethanol/water/gasoline mass, although such a parameter may be determined and used for engine control. The equation above can be rearranged to give equation 2:
LBM — INJ — TOT=fuel_mass_ethanol/(1−WF) [equation 2]
Rearranging equation 1 and substituting LBM_INJ_TOT from equation 2 gives: (PW−OFFSET1)*ALOSL=fuel_mass_ethanol/(1−WF), which can be rearranged to give:
In an alternative embodiment, the equations may be derived for the case where the injector slope (and/or offset) is a function of the water fraction. In this example, the characteristics of
In this example, it is assumed that the offset (OFFSET1) is not a function of water fraction, because the offset is the time required to overcome inertia of the injector pintle and electrical inertia of the driver circuit, although it may be a function of other parameters, such as battery voltage and temperature. Assuming that the injector slope changes linearly in proportion to the water fraction, the slope would be measured with pure water and with pure ethanol (or E85) and expressed as:
ALOSL_total=WF*ALOSL_water+(1−WF)*ALOSL — eth
Substituting ALOSL_total into equation 1 yields:
PW=OFFSET1+LBM — INJ — TOT/[WF*ALOSL_water+(1−WF)*ALOSL — eth] [equation 3]
Substituting LBM_INJ_TOT from equation 2 gives:
PW=OFFSET1+[fuel_mass_ethanol/(1−WF)]/[WF*ALOSL_water+(1−WF)*ALOSL — eth], which can be rearranged to give:
WF*WF*(ALOSL — eth−ALOSL_water)+WF*(ALOSL_water−2*ALOSL — eth)+ALOSL — eth−fuel_mass_ethanol/(PW−OFFSET1)=0
Expressing the injector's water slope as a constant multiplied by its ethanol slope gives ALOSL_water=k*ALOSL_eth, which can then be substituted into the previous equation as:
WF*WF*(ALOSL — eth−k*ALOSL — eth)+WF*(k*ALOSL — eth−2*ALOSL — eth)+ALOSL — eth−fuel_mass_ethanol/(PW−OFFSET1)=0
Solving the quadratic function yields two possible results, with the physically meaningful solution having WF greater than or equal to zero. Further, in this example, k should be greater than one because water has a higher density and lower viscosity than ethanol. Approximating injector flow with the equation for orifice flow, it becomes clear that k may also be less than two in this example. From this, the appropriate selection of the equation for WF can be obtained, which is set forth above herein in (7).
Referring now specifically to
If not, the routine increases the amount and/or frequency of type 2 injection in 2416 to increase sensitivity and/or accuracy of the measurement. Further, in 2416, the routine may also purge a water/ethanol mixture through the fuel lines after a refueling event, to ensure that the inferred WF reading has sufficient accuracy and correlation to the mixture in the tank. The purging could involve bypassing the water/ethanol fuel rail on a return fuel system. In the example of a return-less fuel system, the WF inference process described above may continue for a sufficient time or number of injections to ensure that the water/ethanol mixture in the fuel lines has been used and the new mixture ratio is provided to the engine thus providing accurate estimates. This time can be calculated from the known volume of the fuel line and summation of the water/ethanol used during the WF inference process, if desired. Finally, the routine continues to 2418 to update the estimate of WF based on the sensed information using a rolling average filter, or other such filter.
While the above approaches have been described for estimating a water fraction, various modifications and/or changes and/or additions may be used. For example, the estimation may occur at periodic intervals, or throughout engine operation, rather than only in response to an engine start or refueling event. Further, type 2 injection may be provided specifically for estimation, even when not needed to reduce knock, so that an estimate can be updated, or the estimate could be updated only when type 2 injection is needed to reduce knock.
By providing an accurate estimate of the water fraction, it is possible to provide more accurate delivery via the type 2 injection and thus provide improved knock resistance and efficient use of the type 2 resources. An example of a routine to take advantageous use of such information is provided below with regard to
Referring now specifically to
In this example, various parameters are adjusted as the water fraction in a water/ethanol blend varies. For example, the measured or inferred water fraction may be used to control the amount of gasoline injection and the amount of water/ethanol injection for a given set of operating conditions. Further it may be used to adjust a desired air-fuel ratio and/or desired ethanol fraction due to changes in cooling and octane effects. It may be used to adjust injection pulse width of the water/ethanol injector in order to attain the desired mass flow of water and/or ethanol. It may also be used to limit maximum torque and/or power and/or boost to reduce engine degradation, at least under some conditions.
The measured or inferred water fraction may also be used to vary injection timing. In particular, if the WF is close to one, then very late injection (during the expansion and/or exhaust stroke) can be used to control exhaust temperature. Such an approach may be used when there is little or no ethanol in the mixture, thus avoiding to potential emissions (e.g. HC, aldehydes, CO, etc.) that may be produced from the late injection of ethanol. In this way, late water injection for exhaust temperature control may be used under some conditions.
Also, on a turbocharged engine, late injection may also be used to increase mass flow to the turbine, which may increase boost at low RPM and/or reduce turbo lag. While there may be a penalty from lowering temperature/energy to the turbine (which may offset the benefit of added mass flow), it may be possible to avoid or reduce this penalty by injecting at a time when the water spray is likely to impinge on the piston and/or cylinder walls. Such operation may avoid excessive cooling of the exhaust gas.
In 2510, the routine reads engine operating parameters, such as engine speed, engine load, etc. Then, in 2512, the routine reads an estimated water fraction (WF) in an ethanol/water mixture, such as described above with regard to
Then, in 2516, the routine determines a desired quantity of type 2 injection based on the knock reduction needed and the water fraction. For example, as shown by
Various advantages may be achieved by such operation. In one example, it is possible to use knowledge of the water fraction to provide a correct amount of charge cooling to reduce knock, even when the water fraction is changing. Further, it is possible to maintain accurate engine air-fuel ratio control and torque output by compensating for variability in water fraction by appropriate adjustment of the type 1 fuel injector based on the water fraction.
In this way, it is possible to use water injection, or a blend of water injection, to increase compression ratio and/or boost pressure due to decreased knock at high loads, while also compensating for variability in the water fraction and alcohol (e.g., ethanol) fraction of the mixture. Further, a vehicle customer is able to achieve improved engine operation using one or both of water and an alcohol based fuel as a secondary injection in the engine. Further still, late injection for exhaust temperature control and/or increased boost at low RPM and/or reduced turbo lag can be provided with water injection, for example directly injected water or water blend.
As noted above,
Referring now to
If knock is indicated in 2812, the routine continues to 2814 to determine whether type 2 injection is enabled and whether additional type 2 injection/fueling is feasible. In other words, the routine determines whether conditions are acceptable to use any type 2 injection, such as, for example, coolant temperature, whether type 2 fuel is depleted, and various others as noted herein, and whether type 2 pulsewidth is less than maximum. If not, the routine proceeds to 2816 to retard spark timing to reduce knock, and then takes additional actions in 2818, optionally, if necessary, such as reducing airflow, etc.
If the answer to 2814 is yes, the routine proceeds to 2820 to increase type 2 injection (e.g., ethanol injection) and correspondingly decrease type 1 injection to reduce a tendency for knock, assuming that it is possible to increase type 2 injection and/or decrease type 1 fuel injection. Alternatively, the desired ethanol fraction (EF) may be increased to increase a relative amount of ethanol to gasoline, assuming it is possible to further increase the fraction. In other words, resort to spark retard and other operations as noted herein to reduce knock may be used if type 2 injection is near a maximum available amount. Thus, spark may optionally be retarded relative to its current timing before or concurrently with the type 2 injection increase in 2822, and then returned once the fuel adjustments have been effective. Note that the combination of spark timing and fuel adjustment may be beneficial in that the spark timing change may have a faster response on knock than the fuel change under some conditions. However, once the fuel adjustment has been effected, the spark timing may be returned to avoid fuel economy losses. In this way, fast response and low losses can be achieved. Under other conditions, only spark adjustments, or fuel adjustments without spark adjustments may be used so that even temporary retard of spark timing is reduced.
Various examples of such alternative operation are shown in the graphs of
In this example, at time t1 an indication of knock rises above a threshold value and the spark timing is retarded while the type 1 and type 2 injection amounts are also adjusted. In this case, the fuel adjustments are offsetting in direction and of different amounts to account for the different power density and stoichiometric air-fuel ratio between the fuel types. The spark timing is than returned to avoid further fuel economy losses.
Then, at t2, the engine output torque is gradually increased by increasing airflow and respective fuel amounts until at t3, an indication of knock is again generated. At t3, the routine adjusts type 1 and type 2 injection amounts without additional spark retard to reduce knock, while still increasing the total fuel injection energy. Then, fuel injections and airflow increases, and then decreases until at time t4 knock again reaches a threshold value. At this point, spark timing is retarded until t5, at which point the fuel injection amounts are adjusted, while still continuing to reduce the total amount of fuel energy. At t5, the effect of the relative fuel adjustment between the fuel types takes effect and the spark timing may be gradually returned to its desired position to avoid further fuel economy losses from retarded ignition timing.
In this way, it is possible to provide varying levels of total fuel injection amounts, while varying the relative amounts of fuel types and ignition timing to reduce knock.
Referring now to
In step 3010, engine operating conditions are read. Measured or inferred operating conditions such as engine coolant temperature, catalyst temperature, time since engine last operated (soak time), and other parameters may be used. These parameters may be used to compensate the engine fuel request in 3024, described below. These parameters can influence engine operation in different ways depending on their state. For example, low engine coolant temperatures may lead to air-fuel enrichment, but normal engine coolant temperatures may lead to stoichiometric air-fuel.
In 3012, the routine decides to proceed based on whether the engine is rotating. If the engine is not rotating, the routine waits until a crank position sensor detects engine rotation. If the engine is rotating, the routine proceeds to 3014. In 3014, the controller determines if a cylinder event has occurred, if so, the routine proceeds to step 3016. If no new cylinder events have occurred, the routine waits until a cylinder event is observed. In step 3016, the routine determines if synchronization between controller 12 and engine 10 has occurred. Synchronization can occur when engine timing is aligned with engine controller operation. If synchronization has occurred, the routine proceeds to step 3018, if not, the routine proceeds to step 3020.
In 3018, the number of fueled cylinder events is incremented since a cylinder event has been detected and the engine and controller 12 are in synchronization, thus indicating that fuel delivery may occur. The number of fueled cylinder events may then be used to determine an amount of fuel to be delivered to the cylinder or cylinders currently being fueled. Further, as noted below, is may also be used to select where fuel is delivered and/or a type of fuel delivered and/or when during a cycle fuel is delivered. For example, injection timing may be varied based on a number of fueled cylinder events. Likewise, a selection of type 1 and/or type 2 fuel may be based on a number of fueled cylinder events as noted in 3023 below. Further, a selection of a desired air/fuel ratio (or relative air-fuel ratio) may be based on a number of fueled cylinder events.
Note that alternatively to, or in addition to a number of fueled cylinder events, a number of combustion cylinder events and/or other factors may be used.
Continuing with
In 3023, the routine selects a fuel type based on the number of fueled cylinder events. For example, where different fuels are injected (e.g., port gasoline and direct injection ethanol), a port injector may be used to inject gasoline into each cylinder on an event basis (i.e., each cylinder has a unique amount of fuel injected based on the combustion event number). After a predetermined number of events, inferred cylinder temperature, time, and/or other factors, the engine could be transitioned over to direct injection. For example, both injection types may be enabled after a selected number of events, or only direct injection may be used after a selected number of events.
In 3024, a desired air-fuel ratio for the up coming fueled cylinder event is determined based on a number of fueled cylinder events and other factors, such as coolant temperature, etc.
In 3026, individual cylinder fuel mass is calculated based on the desired air-fuel ratio calculated in 3024, predicted engine air amount retrieved from 3022, and the fuel type selected in 3023. If two fuel types are selected, the calculation for each fuel type is performed by further using a desired ratio or fraction of fuel types, which may be a function of engine speed, load, and/or other operating parameters. Further, other modifications may be used based on fuel puddle dynamics for any fuel injected via a port injector.
In 3028, the fuel pulse width(s) is(are) determined from the calculated fuel mass(es) and a function that represents the time to deliver a given fuel mass, and the respective injector slopes/offsets. The routine then continues on to 3030 where injectors are activated to deliver the desired fuel masses. The routine then advances to 3032. In 3032, the routine passes the fueled cylinder event number to a spark delivery routine that can adjust spark based on the fueled cylinder event number and cylinder burn rate. Typically, desired spark is advanced if the burn rate is slower and retarded if the burn rate is faster. The burn rate may be determined by the cylinder design and type of fuel, e.g., gasoline, ethanol, methanol, or blend. Base spark timing is retrieved from predetermined values stored in a table. The base spark table has x indices of engine coolant temperature and y indices of fueled cylinder events. If the burn rate of the fuel being used changes, a function FNBUR_SPK, alters the spark demand by adding an offset to the base spark. FNBUR_SPK is empirically determined and outputs spark offset as a function of burn rate. As the burn rate changes, depending on the fuel type, spark is advanced or retarded appropriately. In other words, the base spark angle that is based on the number of fueled cylinder events is modified based on cylinder burn rate. By linking spark angle to cylinder burn rate and fueled cylinder events, engine emissions can be reduced on a variety of fuel types. The routine then continues to 3034.
In 3034, engine operating conditions are evaluated to determine if closed loop fuel control is desired. Common signals used to determine desired closed loop engine operation include; time since start, exhaust gas sensor temperature, engine coolant temperature, and engine load. If closed loop fuel control is desired the routine proceeds to 3036 where fuel control transitions from open loop control to closed loop control by ramping fuel toward the desired air-fuel ratio, which may be stoichiometry. If closed loop fuel control is not desired the routine exits until it is called again to determine fuel for the next cylinder. Closed loop control may be executed as described above herein.
Alternatively, another embodiment delivers fuel based on the number of fueled cylinder events then transitions to time based fuel delivery. This method benefits from the advantages of fueling based on the number of fueled cylinder events during starting then reduces computations by using time based fueling. In another alternative, simultaneous use of fueled cylinder event based and time based fueling is provided. Event based fueling offers the before-mentioned advantages. Time based fueling permits simplified calibration of fuel compensation for slower changing conditions, such as fuel vaporization. By using both methods, fuel amount can be compensated for both engine conditions that change slowly and engine conditions that change rapidly.
In still another embodiment, non-sequential fueling may also be used on an event basis.
The above routine can achieve various advantages since the routine can provide selective fuel delivery on an individual cylinder basis. By determining individual cylinder fuel amounts and types, individual cylinder mixtures and combustion may be better controlled.
Referring now to
In 3114, the routine adjusts fuel injection from one or more injectors per cylinder based on feedback from exhaust gas oxygen sensors to maintain a desired air-fuel ratio. In addition, compensation based on a feedforward estimate of vapors in the purge flow may be used, if desired. The adjustment of fuel injection may utilize various types of air-fuel ratio control, such as, for example, the approach described herein with respect to
Continuing with
In this way, it is possible to provide robust compensation for fuel vapor purging even when the content of the vapor varies, while still maintaining a desired overall amount of fuel types during combustion. For example, where the vapor may contain varying amounts of gasoline and ethanol, the routine can appropriately use compensation of gasoline and ethanol injection to maintain desired total amount of combustion gasoline and ethanol under varying operating conditions. Further, it is possible to provide compensation even when one fuel type is depleted or not enabled during the current operating conditions, thus providing improved opportunity to purge fuel vapors.
Referring now to
If single operation is selected, the routine continues to 3216 to select which valve should be active. For example, purging from different valves may alternatively be activated so that both systems are able to purge fuel vapors. The relative amounts and durations of activation can be varied with operating conditions and/or with desired ethanol fraction. For example, purging from the ethanol system may be preferred when higher ethanol fraction is desired. Also, systems having higher volatility fuels may need additional amounts of purging (such as greater flows, longer durations, etc.). Next, in 3218, the routine adjusts the selected purge valve to provide a desired flow amount.
Alternatively, if dual purge valve operation is selected, the routine continues to 3220 to adjust a first purge valve to provide a first desired flow amount, and then to 3222 to adjust a second purge valve to provide a second desired flow amount. Then, from either 3222 or 3218, the routine continues to 3224 to adjust fuel injection of one or more fuel injectors per cylinder to compensate for the fuel vapors based on exhaust gas oxygen sensor feedback and optionally feedforward estimates. As noted above, such operation may include selection and variation of which injector provides adjustment based on operating conditions, as well as selection criteria described with regard to
Continuing with
In this way, it is possible to provide robust compensation for fuel vapor purging even when the content of the vapor varies, while still maintaining a desired overall amount of fuel types during combustion. For example, where the vapor may contain varying amounts of gasoline and ethanol, the routine can appropriately use compensation of gasoline and ethanol injection to maintain desired total amount of combustion gasoline and ethanol under varying operating conditions. Further, it is possible to provide compensation even when one fuel type is depleted or not enabled during the current operating conditions, thus providing improved opportunity to purge fuel vapors. Finally, it is possible to provide desired purging of more than one fuel type.
Referring now to
Alternatively, when the answer to 3314 is no, the routine continues to 3318 to adjusts type 2 injection to compensate for type 1 fuel in the fuel vapors based on feedback from exhaust gas oxygen sensors and possibly using feedforward estimates of vapor contents. While this may vary the amount of fuel types in the cylinder, it is still possible to maintain a desired air-fuel ratio, and thus improve emission control even when type 1 fuel injection may be disabled, such as due to degradation.
The routine then continues from either 3316 or 3318 or a NO in 3312 to 3320. In 3320, the routine determines whether compensation for type 2 fuel contained in the purge flow is requested. In one embodiment, the routine determines whether type 2 fuel is contained in the vapors being purged into the engine. If so, the routine continues to 3322 to determine whether type 2 injection is enabled at the current conditions. If so, the routine adjusts type 2 injection to compensate for type 2 fuel in the fuel vapors based on feedback from exhaust gas oxygen sensors and possibly using feedforward estimates of vapor contents in 3324. In this way, an increase in type 2 fuel attributed to fuel vapor purge can be compensated by a corresponding decrease in type 2 fuel injected into the cylinder, thus providing accurate air-fuel control and maintenance of a desired amount of type 2 fuel at the given operating conditions.
Alternatively, when the answer to 3322 is no, the routine continues to 3326 to adjust type 1 injection to compensate for type 2 fuel in the fuel vapors based on feedback from exhaust gas oxygen sensors and possibly using feedforward estimates of vapor contents. While this may vary the amount of fuel types in the cylinder, it is still possible to maintain a desired air-fuel ratio, and thus improve emission control even when type 2 injection may be disabled, such as due to degradation.
Note that in an alternative embodiment, the routine may vary different fuel injector amounts for a cylinder based on the type of vapors being purged and/or based on a quantity of types of vapors being purged.
Referring now to
In one particular embodiment where one injection type is a fuel such as gasoline (which may be port or directly injected) and a second injection type includes an alcohol containing fuel (such as ethanol, or an ethanol blend, which may be port or directly injected), a method is provided that takes advantage of regression techniques to independently determine the characteristics of the elements of the air and fuel metering system. In one example, a routine may be used that schedules the injection of type 2 injection as a function of an engine parameter, such as air mass or load, and then learns an air and fuel correction as a function of that engine parameter. Thus, if the injection of alcohol via the in-cylinder injectors is scheduled strictly as a function of air mass, an adaptive system that determines an air fuel correction as a function of air mass may be used to correct for an air fuel error from a system with air meter errors (slope) and primary and secondary injector errors (slope and offset).
However, if the amount of type 2 injection varies with other parameters, such as in response to temperature and/or knock sensor feedback or exhaust gas oxygen sensor feedback, an alternative approach may be used. Specifically, in this example, the approach described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,138,655 (which is incorporated herein by reference) may be adapted and modified. The method may include air mass squared and purge volume squared terms based on vehicle experience. Further, different algorithms may be used, such as the Potters Square Root algorithm or the Recursive Least Squares algorithm depending on numerical stability issues.
In particular, by determining the coefficients of the following equation, improved adaptive learning of air and fuel errors may be achieved:
FuelCorrection=α0+α1*AirMass+α2*AirMass2+α3 *RPM+α 4*Purge Volume+α5*Purge Volume2+α6*SecondaryInjector Pulsewidth
Where "SecondaryInjector Pulsewidth" refers to pulsewidth of a type 2 injector, for example. The coefficient in this term would be updated only when the secondary injection is active using a series of liner regressions that can be separately enabled. Alternatively, rather than using pulsewidth, secondary injector flow may also be used. Also it may be advantageous to add terms such as secondary injector flow or pulsewidth squared and/or secondary injections per minute to account for non-linearities such as errors in the injector offset. Further, in still another alternative, the air mass and air mass squared terms may be replaced with type 1 fuel flow and type 1 fuel flow squared. Thus, in an alternative approach, the following may be used:
FuelCorrection=A 1 +A 2*PrimaryFuelFlow+A3*PrimaryFuelFlow2 +A 4 *RPM+A 5*SecondaryFuelFlow+A 6*Purge Volume
Referring now to
First, in 3440, the routine determines whether the vehicle is operating under near steady state conditions, such as based on a rate of change of engine speed, vehicle speed, pedal position, fuel flow, injector pulsewidth(s), throttle position, or combinations thereof. For example, if the variation in input parameters is below an acceptable level (e.g., engine speed, fuel flow), updates to the coefficients related to speed and fuel flow may have increased error. Therefore, in steady state, the routine proceeds to 3432. If enough activity is present (driven by transient operating conditions), the routine proceeds to 3412. In 3412, the routine determines whether sufficient time has passed to perform an update. In this way, it is possible to provide the opportunity to slow down or speed up the adaptive routine by only providing a pre-determined delay between coefficient updates. If it is not yet time to perform updates to the parameters, the routine jumps to step 3432. Otherwise, continue to 3414.
In 3414, the routine updates adaptive coefficients b1, b2, b3, and b4 using a regression in the equation:
where: FuelErr is the difference between the commanded fuel flow and "measured" fuel flow (equal to measured air flow divided by the air fuel ratio measured in the exhaust); PriFul is the commanded fuel to be injected by the primary injectors—for example, gasoline injected into the intake ports; PriFul^2 equals PriFul squared; and RPM is the measured engine speed.
One method that could be used to perform the regression is the commonly known "recursive least squares" method. Alternatively, "Potters square root" algorithm may also be used. Having completed the update of the coefficients, the routine continues to 3416 to determine if the secondary injection (e.g. in cylinder injection of alcohol or an ethanol blend, for example) is active or has been active recently. In this example, a regression of secondary injection data is not enabled until the secondary injection has been enabled, or was recently enabled. Once secondary injection is disabled, the routine may continue the regression for a short, predetermined, time to collect data at zero or low secondary fuel flow. Thus, if the secondary injection is not active, the routine continues to 3430. Otherwise, the routine continues to 3418.
The following acts performed by the routine are directed to determining the coefficients of the fuel correction equation described herein. However, since portions of this regression may only be performed at certain times, or under selected conditions, (e.g., when sufficient modulation of the independent variables (primary and secondary fuel flow, engine speed, purge flow, or others) is available), the regression may be performed via a series of regressions of the various terms. Also, regarding determination of the terms related to the secondary injection, in one approach it may be advantages to independently control the secondary injection from the above parameters, e.g., by selecting values that were statistically independent of the engine speed and primary fuel flow or others. However, the secondary flow may be based on one or more of these parameters to provide the desired engine response. As a result, there is the potential for some degree of correlation between the secondary injection and these terms. Therefore, in one approach, it may be beneficial to determine how the secondary injection correlates with the terms, and subtract the correlated, and already compensated for, effects of secondary injection. To do this a similar approach as used above in 3414 may be used to update the coefficients of the equation:
where: SecInj is the commanded secondary fuel flow; and c1, c2, c3, and c4 are the coefficients being updated. Further, since some of the sane independent variables are being used again, some of the intermediate matrices calculated for recursive least squares or Potters square root algorithm may be used from above and may not need to be re-calculated.
Having determined the coefficients for the correlated secondary fuel flow in 3418, in 3420 the routine determines how much of the current secondary fuel flow, at the current operating conditions, has already been accounted by applying those coefficients. Subtracting the correlated secondary fuel flow from the actual secondary fuel flow in step 3422 gives the secondary fuel flow residuals that may be used in 3428.
In 3424, the routine determines how much of the fuel error has already been accounted for by the regression in 3414 by using the updated values of the coefficients b1 through b4 and the current operating conditions. In 3426, the routine determines the unaccounted for fuel error (fuel error residuals) that are available for the regression in 3428. In 3428, the routine updates the coefficient for the equation:
where: FulResid is the residual fuel error calculated in 3426; SecFlResid is the residual secondary fuel from step 3422; and d is the coefficient to be determined. A similar approach as in 3414 may be used, with a different independent variable, and thus previous intermediate matrices are not re-used.
It may be advantageous to expand the regression performed in 3428 to include additional terms such as secondary fuel flow squared to account for nonlinearities in the secondary fuel flow error. In this case the equation and coefficients to be updated could be of the form:
Where: SecFlResid^2 is the secondary fuel residuals squared.
Having determined the correlation between fuel errors, primary and secondary fuel flow, and engine speed, the routine now combines the terms from the previous regressions in step 3430 as follows:
to get the coefficients for the equation that describes the expected fuel error without considering the effects of carbon canister purge:
This equation is used in step 3434, and the coefficients are again used in 3456.
Again, the routine updates coefficients for an equation if the independent variables are significantly changing. For carbon canister purge, however, it once it has been enabled and stabilized from the initial opening, the flow may be modulated to improve regression results, if desired. For example, it may be modulated independently from variable such as injector flow, speed, etc.
Continuing with
In 3434, the routine determines how much of the fuel error has already been accounted for above. Then, in 3436, the routine determines the residual fuel errors that may be caused by the canister purge flow. Next, in 3438, 3440, and 3442, the routine determines how the canister purge correlates to the primary fuel flow and engine speed and calculates the residual (unaccounted for) canister purge. These steps are similar to some above and thus may re-use some intermediate calculations, if desired.
If secondary injection has been active, the routine also determines how the canister purge correlates to the secondary fuel flow, where the decision to make this determination is made in step 3444. Next, in 3446, the routine performs correlation between the purge residuals and the secondary fuel flow residuals to update coefficient g. If, in 3428, a regression with an additional term such as secondary fuel flow squared was used, this term would also be included here. Again, since the inputs to the regression are similar to those in 3428, some intermediate values used in the regression can be reused. If secondary injection is not active, the routine proceeds to 3446, and in either case, to 3448.
In 3448, the routine combines the coefficients related to the canister purge flow using the technique to arrive at the equation used in 3450:
This equation gives the purge volume that correlates to, and has already been accounted for, in the regressions from steps 3414 through 3430.
Continuing with
Having determined the effects of the various independent parameters in the above series of regressions, at 3456, the routine combines the coefficients to determine the final fuel correction equation used in step 3458. The coefficients are combined as follows:
to provide the final fuel correction equation:
This compensation may then be used to modify the injected fuel flow, for example, as described herein.
Note that in the above algorithm using a Potters Square Root Algorithm, it may be executed where values for the algorithm coefficients may be stored in memory. The values stored can be predetermined initial values that are used when the computer keep-alive memory has been reset, or will be the values updated in the last iteration of this algorithm.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In this example, fuel tanks 3810 and 3812 (each storing a respective fuel type such as gasoline and an ethanol or alcohol mixture) are each coupled to a first and second fuel pump 3830 and 3832 via a set of three controllable/mixing valves 3820, 3822, and 3824. Specifically, valve 3820 is coupled directly to tank 3810 and valve 3824 is coupled directly to tank 3812. Each of these valves may lead through an optional one way check valve (3826 and 3828, respectively) to respective pumps 3830 and 3832. A line between the two pumps may be controlled via valve 3822, which may be used instead of or in addition to valves 3820 and 3824. Each of the pumps leads to a respective fuel rail 3834 or 3836, having one or more fuel injectors 3840 and 3842, respectively. In one example, tank 3810 holds type 1 fuel and injector 3840 is a port injector, and tank 3812 holds a type 2 fuel, and injector 3842 is a direct cylinder injector for the same cylinder as injector 3840.
This example configuration can enable either fuel type to be fed to ether injector, or combinations of fuel types to either injector. Also, the control valves can be located upstream of the pumps so that one can deliver either fuel at either pressure, in the case where the pumps generate different fuel pressures. Note, however, that the valves may be located downstream of the pumps if the fuel pumps generated similar pressures/flows, which could be either a high pressure fuel system or a low pressure fuel system.
In one example, valve 3820 may be closed, and valves 3822 and 3824 open to allow flow from tank 3812 to both pumps/injectors. Alternatively, all valves could be open, where the relative amounts of each valve are adjusted to vary an amount of different fuel types to different injectors, where the valves may be adjusted based on operating conditions, whether fuels are enabled, etc. In this way, improved operation may be achieved by tailoring the fuel types and relative amounts to different injectors for different operating conditions. In another embodiment, valves 3820 and 3824 may be omitted, and both tanks may be coupled to the inlet of valve 3822, thus allowing control of relative amounts of fuel types to both injection systems (although only one injection system may be operating at any given time).
However, with the operation of the example systems of
Referring now to
Note that the above adjustments are described for two injectors in a single cylinder, however for a multi-cylinder engine, each cylinder may be transitioned in a similar way in sequence. Also, in another example, only one or a subset of the cylinders may be transitioned to operate with both fuel types. Further, the transition may be serial, or all cylinders may be transitioned at substantially the same time.
Further note that the above approach assumes that the relative power density in the fuels compensates for the change in total fuel mass being provided. In other words, when increasing the type 2 injector by Δ2 and decreasing the type 1 fuel by a smaller Δ1 so that an appropriate amount of fuel is provided to burn with the already present air, the overall torque of the combustion may change due to power density differences in the fuels. As the ratio of the stoichiometric air-fuel ratios between ethanol and gasoline is similar to the ratio of power densities, only a negligible torque disturbance may be present. However, in some cases, such a torque disturbance may be perceptible. Thus, in 3918, the routine determines whether additional compensation may be used. If so, the routine proceeds to 3920 to use spark and/or throttle and/or boost adjustments to compensate for such torque variation. In one example, if the overall torque after the transition may increase, spark retard may be used commensurate with the change in fuel amounts, and then gradually ramped out as the throttle and/or boost level is ramped to decrease airflow. In another example, if the overall torque after the transition may decrease, spark retard along with increasing airflow before the transition may be used and then the spark retard may be removed commensurate with the change in fuel amounts.
If the answer to 3918 is no, the routine continues to 3922 to compensate for the effect of changing the relative amounts of fuel types on optimal ignition timing. In other words, by adding type 2 fuel, it may be possible to advance ignition timing without incurring engine knock, thus providing more efficient operation. As such, the routine gradually ramps to the new desired ignition timing while gradually reducing airflow to account for the increased efficiency. In this way, it is possible to commence an alternative fuel type during engine operation without violating minimum pulse width requirements and thereby achieve improved efficiency and maintaining engine output torque.
In this example, fueling adjustments are shown for a fixed engine speed and load, and without delays from puddle dynamics, although compensation for these may be added, if desired. Further, additional adjustments may be present due to other transient conditions, such as feedback from exhaust gas oxygen sensors, etc.
Referring now to
Specifically, in 4110 the routine reads operating conditions such as speed, load, coolant temperature, valve and/or cam timing, air temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, fuel temperature, etc. Then, in 4112, the routine reads a desired type 1 and type 2 desired fuel delivery amounts, and then selects the timings for type 1 and type 2 fuel injection based on the conditions of 4110 and the amounts of 4112. Thus, as the conditions of 4110 change and/or the amount of fuel types vary, injection timing of one or both fuel types may vary. As shown herein with regard to
In one example, during idle conditions, open valve port injection may be used with a smaller amount of direct injection at least partially during a compression stroke to improve combustion stability, such as during a cold start.
Note that in one embodiment, two port fuel injectors may be used. In such a case, a routine similar to that of
One example approach for operating multiple port injectors is described with regard to
Referring now to
In 4416, the routine determines whether a type 2 fluid reserve is below a threshold value (for example, near empty, or the system is unable to provide the amount desired in 4414). If so, the routine continues to 4418 to reduce the boost amount to reduce a tendency of knock caused by lack of a desired amount of type 2 fluid, for example.
From 4418, or a no in 4416, the routine determines whether a knock indication is present in 4420, such as based on a knock sensor or other approach as noted herein. If so, the routine continues to 4422 to determine if a first condition is present. For example, the conditions may be a high boost presence, a temperature is above a threshold, or other. If so, the routine continues to 4424 to further reduce a boost amount. Otherwise, the routine continues to 4426 to identify if a second condition is present. If so, the routine continues to 4428 to increase a type 2 fluid delivered and adjust a type 1 fluid if necessary to control air-fuel ratio and/or engine torque. Otherwise, the routine continues to 4430 to retard spark timing.
In this way, boost can be adjusted and engine improved engine operation can be achieved under varying conditions.
It will be appreciated that the configurations, systems, and routines disclosed herein are exemplary in nature, and that these specific embodiments are not to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerous variations are possible. For example, the above approaches can be applied to V-6, I-3, I-4, I-5, I-6, V-8, V-10, V-12, opposed 4, and other engine types.
As another example, engine 10 may be a variable displacement engine in which some cylinders (e.g., half) are deactivated by deactivating intake and exhaust valves for those cylinders. In this way, improved fuel economy may be achieved. However, as noted herein, in one example injection using multiple types of fuel delivery (e.g., fuel composition or delivery location) can be used to reduce a tendency of knock at higher loads. Thus, by operating with direct injection of a fuel containing alcohol (such as ethanol or an ethanol blend) during cylinder deactivation operation, it may be possible to extend a range of cylinder deactivation, thereby further improving fuel economy.
As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the specific routines described herein in the flowcharts and the specification may represent one or more of any number of processing strategies such as event-driven, interrupt-driven, multi-tasking, multi-threading, and the like. As such, various steps or functions illustrated may be performed in the sequence illustrated, in parallel, or in some cases omitted. Likewise, the order of processing is not necessarily required to achieve the features and advantages of the example embodiments of the invention described herein, but is provided for ease of illustration and description. Although not explicitly illustrated, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that one or more of the illustrated steps or functions may be repeatedly performed depending on the particular strategy being used. Further, these figures graphically represent code to be programmed into the computer readable storage medium in controller 12. Further still, while the various routines may show a "start" and "end" block, the routines may be repeatedly performed in an iterative manner, for example.
The subject matter of the present disclosure includes all novel and nonobvious combinations and subcombinations of the various systems and configurations, and other features, functions, and/or properties disclosed herein.
The following claims particularly point out certain combinations and subcombinations regarded as novel and nonobvious. These claims may refer to "an" element or "a first" element or the equivalent thereof. Such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. Other combinations and subcombinations of the disclosed features, functions, elements, and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or through presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such claims, whether broader, narrower, equal, or different in scope to the original claims, also are regarded as included within the subject matter of the present disclosure.
Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
US2221405 | Jan 10, 1938 | Nov 12, 1940 | Daimler Benz Ag | Internal combustion engine |
US3589348 | Feb 5, 1969 | Jun 29, 1971 | Burnham Corp | Spark plug and heated adaptor therefor |
US3794000 | Sep 17, 1971 | Feb 26, 1974 | Ethyl Corp | Fuel system for separating volatile fuel from gasoline |
US4031864 | Mar 9, 1976 | Jun 28, 1977 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Energy Research And Development Administration | Multiple fuel supply system for an internal combustion engine |
US4136652 | Oct 19, 1976 | Jan 30, 1979 | Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft | Fuel delivery system |
US4205650 | Jun 6, 1978 | Jun 3, 1980 | Szymon Szwarcbier | Start aid for combustion engine |
US4256075 | Jul 11, 1979 | Mar 17, 1981 | Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Fuel feed device for engine |
US4311118 | Jul 10, 1979 | Jan 19, 1982 | Slagle Bernie L | Water injection system for diesel engine |
US4325329 | May 5, 1980 | Apr 20, 1982 | Taylor Thomas G | Method and apparatus for producing alcohol and an alcohol-petroleum fuel mix |
US4402296 | May 4, 1981 | Sep 6, 1983 | Schwarz Walter J | Dual fuel supply system and method for an internal combustion engine |
US4411243 | Feb 25, 1981 | Oct 25, 1983 | Daimler-Benz Ag | Externally operated internal combustion engine |
US4480616 | Jan 25, 1983 | Nov 6, 1984 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Knock control method and apparatus for an internal-combustion engine |
US4489596 | Mar 24, 1983 | Dec 25, 1984 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Spark plug with measuring means |
US4502453 | Apr 3, 1984 | Mar 5, 1985 | General Motors Corporation | Dual fuel supply system |
US4590904 | Jul 27, 1984 | May 27, 1986 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Fuel injection apparatus |
US4648367 | Dec 18, 1985 | Mar 10, 1987 | Saab-Scania Aktiebolog | Method and apparatus for detecting ion current in an internal combustion engine ignition system |
US4706630 | Feb 7, 1986 | Nov 17, 1987 | Ford Motor Company | Control system for engine operation using two fuels of different volatility |
US4810929 | Jul 15, 1988 | Mar 7, 1989 | Strumbos William P | Spark plug temperature control |
US4817576 | Nov 20, 1987 | Apr 4, 1989 | Nippondenso Co., Ltd. | Vaporized fuel control apparatus for internal combustion engines |
US4930537 | Jun 2, 1989 | Jun 5, 1990 | Paccar Inc. | Vehicle multiple-tank fuel system |
US4945881 | Dec 21, 1989 | Aug 7, 1990 | General Motors Corporation | Multi-fuel engine control with initial delay |
US4962789 | Nov 13, 1989 | Oct 16, 1990 | Kenneth Benscoter | Emergency water reservoir |
US4993386 | Dec 29, 1989 | Feb 19, 1991 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Chuo Kenkyusho | Operation control system for internal combustion engine |
US4998518 | May 17, 1990 | Mar 12, 1991 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Swirl control system for lean-burn engines |
US5017826 | Aug 21, 1989 | May 21, 1991 | Ngk Spark Plug Co., Ltd. | Rapid heat-dissipating type spark plug for internal combustion engines |
US5018483 | Oct 16, 1990 | May 28, 1991 | Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Fuel injection quantity control device for alcohol engine |
US5044331 | Dec 19, 1990 | Sep 3, 1991 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Air-fuel ratio control method for an internal combustion engine having spark plugs with heaters |
US5044344 | Oct 16, 1989 | Sep 3, 1991 | Walbro Corporation | Pressure-responsive fuel delivery system |
US5056490 | Jul 16, 1990 | Oct 15, 1991 | Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Fuel injection control apparatus for alcohol engine |
US5056494 | Apr 23, 1990 | Oct 15, 1991 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | System for treating vaporized fuel in an internal combustion engine |
US5111795 | Aug 9, 1991 | May 12, 1992 | Ford Motor Company | Fluidic controller for automotive fuel tank vapor collection system |
US5131228 | Jul 27, 1990 | Jul 21, 1992 | Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control apparatus for a turbocharged alcohol engine |
US5188087 | Feb 13, 1992 | Feb 23, 1993 | Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Method for controlling an exhaust gas recirculation system of a flexible fuel vehicle engine |
US5204630 | Jun 26, 1991 | Apr 20, 1993 | Allied Signal Inc. | Preignition warning device |
US5230309 | Nov 10, 1992 | Jul 27, 1993 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Spark plug heater control system for internal combustion engine |
US5233944 | May 19, 1992 | Aug 10, 1993 | Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control apparatus for alcohol engine |
US5335637 | May 4, 1993 | Aug 9, 1994 | Chrysler Corporation | Energy adjust for a flexible fuel compensation system |
US5336396 | Mar 29, 1993 | Aug 9, 1994 | Shetley Michael C | Waste oil management system |
US5357908 | Apr 16, 1993 | Oct 25, 1994 | Engelhard Corporation | Fuel modification method and apparatus for reduction of pollutants emitted from internal combustion engines |
US5360034 | Feb 28, 1994 | Nov 1, 1994 | General Motors Corporation | Dual fuel tank system |
US5408979 | Jan 15, 1993 | Apr 25, 1995 | Ab Volvo | Method and a device for regulation of a turbo-charging device |
US5417239 | Jun 2, 1994 | May 23, 1995 | Ford; James D. | Fuel transfer control apparatus |
US5469830 | Feb 24, 1995 | Nov 28, 1995 | The Cessna Aircraft Company | Fuel blending system method and apparatus |
US5477836 | Jan 30, 1995 | Dec 26, 1995 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Fuel vapor emission control system for an engine |
US5508582 | Apr 25, 1994 | Apr 16, 1996 | Ngk Spark Plug Co., Ltd. | Spark plug insulator for use in internal combustion engine |
US5565157 | May 31, 1995 | Oct 15, 1996 | Ngk Spark Plug Co., Ltd. | Method of making a spark plug insulator |
US5694908 | May 8, 1996 | Dec 9, 1997 | Hsu; Chih-Cheng | Auxiliary water-supply sytem for an internal combustion engine |
US5740784 | May 25, 1995 | Apr 21, 1998 | Pleasurecraft Marine Engine Co. | Fuel control system |
US5782092 | Jun 7, 1996 | Jul 21, 1998 | Volkswagen Ag | Arrangement controlling the output pressure of a turbocharger for an internal combustion engine |
US5806500 | Feb 3, 1997 | Sep 15, 1998 | Ford Motor Company | Fuel vapor recovery system |
US5875743 | Jul 28, 1997 | Mar 2, 1999 | Southwest Research Institute | Apparatus and method for reducing emissions in a dual combustion mode diesel engine |
US5921222 | Aug 5, 1998 | Jul 13, 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Vapor recovery control system for an internal combustion engine |
US6112705 | Jan 21, 1999 | Sep 5, 2000 | Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Water injection amount control system for fuel and water injection engine |
US6112725 | Nov 5, 1997 | Sep 5, 2000 | Pleasurecraft Marine Engine Co. | Fuel control system |
US6119637 | Jul 6, 1999 | Sep 19, 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | On-board gasoline distillation for reduced hydrocarbon emissions at start-up |
US6189516 | Jul 31, 1998 | Feb 20, 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Fuel vapor extraction system |
US6229253 | Jun 10, 1999 | May 8, 2001 | Ngk Spark Plug Co., Ltd. | Spark plug with specific gap between insulator and electrodes |
US6318083 | Sep 20, 2000 | Nov 20, 2001 | Unisia Jecs Corporation | Intake air control device of an engine with a charger and method thereof |
US6382225 | Sep 13, 2000 | May 7, 2002 | Federal-Mogul World Wide, Inc. | Fuel transfer pump and control |
US6494192 | Jun 12, 2001 | Dec 17, 2002 | Southwest Research Institute | On-board fuel vapor collection, condensation, storage and distribution system for a vehicle |
US6505579 | Sep 25, 2001 | Jan 14, 2003 | Te-Fa Lee | System and process for water injection control of internal combustion engine |
US6553974 | Oct 24, 2001 | Apr 29, 2003 | Brunswick Corporation | Engine fuel system with a fuel vapor separator and a fuel vapor vent canister |
US6617769 | Jun 28, 2001 | Sep 9, 2003 | Ngk Spark Plug Co., Ltd. | Spark plug and mounting structure of the same |
US6622664 | Dec 13, 2001 | Sep 23, 2003 | Daimler Chrysler Ag | Fuel supply system |
US6622690 | Jun 8, 2001 | Sep 23, 2003 | Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Direct injection type internal combustion engine and controlling method therefor |
US6698387 | Sep 11, 2002 | Mar 2, 2004 | Mcfarland Steve | Method of hydrating the intake air of an internal combustion engine |
US6711893 | Sep 7, 2001 | Mar 30, 2004 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Fuel supply apparatus for an internal combustion engine |
US6792966 | Oct 18, 2002 | Sep 21, 2004 | Federal-Mogul World Wide, Inc. | Fuel transfer pump and control |
US6845616 | Nov 30, 2001 | Jan 25, 2005 | General Motors Corporation | Internal combustion engine which can be operated with a choice of different fuels, especially for a motor vehicle drive system |
US6928983 | Nov 18, 2004 | Aug 16, 2005 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Fuel injection controller for internal combustion engine |
US6951202 | Oct 29, 2004 | Oct 4, 2005 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Knocking control system and method for internal combustion engine using multiple fuels |
US6959693 | Nov 17, 2004 | Nov 1, 2005 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Fuel injection system and method |
US6972093 | Jan 30, 2003 | Dec 6, 2005 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Onboard fuel separation apparatus for an automobile |
US6978762 | Feb 3, 2005 | Dec 27, 2005 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for internal combustion engine |
US6988485 | Jan 3, 2005 | Jan 24, 2006 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Fuel injection control device for internal combustion engine |
US6990956 | Jul 22, 2004 | Jan 31, 2006 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Internal combustion engine |
US7055500 | Jul 21, 2005 | Jun 6, 2006 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Ignition timing control apparatus for internal combustion engine |
US7082926 | Apr 20, 2005 | Aug 1, 2006 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus and method for controlling fuel injection in internal combustion engine |
US7159568 | Nov 30, 2005 | Jan 9, 2007 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for engine starting |
US7178503 | Aug 31, 2005 | Feb 20, 2007 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | System and method to pre-ignition in an internal combustion engine |
US7225787 | Apr 6, 2005 | Jun 5, 2007 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Optimized fuel management system for direct injection ethanol enhancement of gasoline engines |
US7255080 | Mar 17, 2006 | Aug 14, 2007 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Spark plug heating for a spark ignited engine |
US7261064 | Oct 1, 2004 | Aug 28, 2007 | General Electric Company | System and method for reducing emission from a combustion engine |
US7278396 | Nov 30, 2005 | Oct 9, 2007 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method for controlling injection timing of an internal combustion engine |
US7287492 | Nov 30, 2005 | Oct 30, 2007 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for engine fuel blend control |
US7287509 | Aug 11, 2006 | Oct 30, 2007 | Ford Global Technologies Llc | Direct injection alcohol engine with variable injection timing |
US7293552 | Nov 30, 2005 | Nov 13, 2007 | Ford Global Technologies Llc | Purge system for ethanol direct injection plus gas port fuel injection |
US20010035215 | Jun 28, 2001 | Nov 1, 2001 | Tipton Larry J. | Fuel transfer pump and control |
US20030089337 | Nov 14, 2001 | May 15, 2003 | Cohn Daniel R. | High compression ratio, hydrogen enhanced gasoline engine system |
US20030127072 | Dec 2, 2002 | Jul 10, 2003 | Henry Gmelin | Internal Combustion engine and method for operating an internal combustion engine |
US20030221660 | Sep 19, 2002 | Dec 4, 2003 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Overall scheduling of a lean burn engine system |
US20040035395 | Jun 12, 2003 | Feb 26, 2004 | Heywood John B. | Hydrogen and carbon monoxide enhanced knock resistance in spark ignition gasoline engines |
US20040065274 | Oct 2, 2003 | Apr 8, 2004 | Cohn Daniel R. | High compression ratio, hydrogen enhanced engine system |
US20040083717 | Jun 11, 2003 | May 6, 2004 | Zhu Guoming G. | Closed loop cold start retard spark control using ionization feedback |
US20040261763 | Jun 25, 2004 | Dec 30, 2004 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Method for controlling compression ignition internal combustion engine |
US20050051135 | Sep 2, 2004 | Mar 10, 2005 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | System and method for controlling spark-ignition internal combustion engine |
US20050066939 | Aug 6, 2004 | Mar 31, 2005 | Kosaku Shimada | Fuel supply system and fuel supply method for in-cylinder direct fuel injection engine |
US20050097888 | Nov 1, 2004 | May 12, 2005 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Internal combustion engine and control method thereof |
US20050103285 | Oct 20, 2004 | May 19, 2005 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Onboard fuel separation apparatus for an automobile |
Reference | ||
1 | D.R. Cohn et al., "Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engines: Biofuel Leveraging For Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO2 Emissions", Mar. 15, 2005, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. | |
2 | Hunter, M. Park, "1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire," originally appeared in Special Interest Autos, Apr. 1996, http://www.tctc.com/~park/mph/pageCLIP/page62JET/62jet.htm, Nov. 7, 2006. | |
3 | L. Bromberg et al., "Calculations of Knock Suppression in Highly Turbocharged Gasoline/Ethanol Engines Using Direct Ethanol Injection", Jul. 7, 2005, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. | |
4 | S. Brusca et al., "Water Injection in IC-SI Engines to Control Detonation and to Reduce Pollutant Emissions", SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-1912, May 19-22, 2003. | |
5 | Stephen Russ, "A Review of the Effect of Engine Operating Conditions on Borderline Knock", SAE Technical Paper Series 960497, Feb. 26-29, 1996. | |
6 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/464,172, filed Aug. 11, 2006, Stein. | |
7 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,131, filed Dec. 1, 2006, Blumberg et al. | |
8 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/682,372, filed Mar. 6, 2007, Bromberg et al. | |
9 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/683,564, filed Mar. 8, 2007, Bromberg et al. | |
10 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/684,1000, filed Mar. 9, 2007, Cohn et al. | |
11 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/766,120, filed Jul. 11, 2007, Stein et al. | |
12 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/776,120, filed Jul. 11, 2007, Stein et al. | |
13 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,050, filed Jul. 24, 2007, Bromberg et al. | |
14 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/846,373, filed Aug. 28, 2007, Leone et al. | |
15 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/851,116, filed Sep. 6, 2007, Kerns. | |
16 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,496, filed Oct. 12, 2007, Zubeck et al. | |
17 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/923,418, filed Oct. 24, 2007, Leone et al. | |
18 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/924,395, filed Oct. 25, 2007, Brehob. | |
19 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,246, filed Dec. 12, 2007, Pursifull et al. | |
20 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/962,683, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Pursifull et al. | |
21 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/746,507, filed May 5, 2006, Cohn et al. | |
22 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/747,865, filed May 22, 2006, Heywood et al. | |
23 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/780,319, filed Mar. 8, 2006, Bromberg et al. | |
24 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/780,981, filed Mar. 10, 2006, Cohn et al. | |
25 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/781,598, filed Mar. 10, 2006, Blumberg et al. | |
26 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/790,715, filed Apr. 10, 2006, Bromberg et al. | |
27 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/832,836, filed Jun. 24, 2006, Bromberg et al. | |
28 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/948,753, filed Jun. 10, 2007, Bromberg et al. | |
29 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/973,499, filed Sep. 19, 2007, Bromberg. | |
30 | Vance, Bill, "Turbocharger Boosted Engine's Efficiency: Developed to maintain high-altitude performance," for the Calgary Herald Edmonton, http://www.ucalgary.ca/~csimpson/Articles/JetFire.html, Nov. 7, 2006. |
Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
US7765982 * | Sep 2, 2009 | Aug 3, 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for compensation of fuel injector limits |
US7789063 | Jan 5, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for engine air-fuel ratio control |
US7853396 * | Jun 12, 2007 | Dec 14, 2010 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Multifuel internal combustion engine and combustion controlling method thereof |
US7877189 | Nov 30, 2005 | Jan 25, 2011 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Fuel mass control for ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port fuel injection |
US7913668 | Dec 2, 2009 | Mar 29, 2011 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Engine output control system and method |
US7942128 | May 13, 2010 | May 17, 2011 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Warm up strategy for ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port fuel injection |
US7971575 | Apr 8, 2010 | Jul 5, 2011 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for tip-in knock compensation |
US8037874 * | Jun 11, 2008 | Oct 18, 2011 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Fuel based cylinder knock control |
US8100107 | Jul 21, 2010 | Jan 24, 2012 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method and system for engine control |
US8245690 | Oct 4, 2011 | Aug 21, 2012 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Direct injection alcohol engine with boost and spark control |
US8297255 | Jan 19, 2012 | Oct 30, 2012 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method and system for engine control |
US8312867 | Feb 16, 2012 | Nov 20, 2012 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | On-board fuel vapor separation for multi-fuel vehicle |
US8375899 | Nov 22, 2011 | Feb 19, 2013 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | On-board water addition for fuel separation system |
US8393312 | Mar 8, 2012 | Mar 12, 2013 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Event based engine control system and method |
US8434431 | Mar 17, 2006 | May 7, 2013 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Control for alcohol/water/gasoline injection |
US8459238 | Sep 14, 2012 | Jun 11, 2013 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | On-board fuel vapor separation for multi-fuel vehicle |
US8495983 | Aug 7, 2012 | Jul 30, 2013 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Directly injected internal combustion engine system |
US8550058 | Dec 21, 2007 | Oct 8, 2013 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Fuel rail assembly including fuel separation membrane |
US8567370 | Sep 14, 2012 | Oct 29, 2013 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method and system for engine control |
US8656869 | Feb 19, 2013 | Feb 25, 2014 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | On-board water addition for fuel separation system |
US8733321 * | Aug 1, 2013 | May 27, 2014 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Fuel management system for variable ethanol octane enhancement of gasoline engines |
US9038613 | Oct 8, 2013 | May 26, 2015 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Fuel rail assembly including fuel separation membrane |
US9103294 | Oct 16, 2012 | Aug 11, 2015 | Cummins Inc. | Fuel drift estimation and compensation for operation of an internal combustion engine |
US9132388 | Nov 27, 2012 | Sep 15, 2015 | Corning Incorporated | Partition fluid separation |
US9435287 * | Feb 25, 2014 | Sep 6, 2016 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method for fuel injection control |
US20090159057 * | Dec 21, 2007 | Jun 25, 2009 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Fuel Rail Assembly Including Fuel Separation Membrane |
US20090308367 * | Jun 11, 2008 | Dec 17, 2009 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Fuel based cylinder knock control |
US20090320790 * | Sep 2, 2009 | Dec 31, 2009 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and Method for Compensation of Fuel Injector Limits |
US20100010725 * | Jun 12, 2007 | Jan 14, 2010 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Multifuel internal combustion engine and combustion controlling method thereof |
US20100101529 * | Dec 2, 2009 | Apr 29, 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Engine output control system and method |
US20100116244 * | Jan 5, 2010 | May 13, 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for engine air-fuel ratio control |
US20100192905 * | Apr 8, 2010 | Aug 5, 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for tip-in knock compensation |
US20100224167 * | May 13, 2010 | Sep 9, 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Warm Up Strategy for Ethanol Direct Injection Plus Gasoline Port Fuel Injection |
US20110162620 * | Jul 21, 2010 | Jul 7, 2011 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method and system for engine control |
US20150240737 * | Feb 25, 2014 | Aug 27, 2015 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method for fuel injection control |
U.S. Classification | 123/431 |
International Classification | F02B7/02, F02B7/00 |
Cooperative Classification | Y02T10/18, F02M69/046, F02D41/0007, Y02T10/47, F01N11/007, F02D13/0226, F02M69/044, F02M69/045, F01N11/002, F02D35/027, F02M43/00, Y02T10/144, F02D41/0025, F02B37/00, F02D41/1454 |
European Classification | F02D35/02K, F02D41/00F, F01N11/00B, F02M43/00, F02D13/02C2, F02B37/00, F02M69/04C4, F01N11/00C, F02M69/04C2, F02M69/04C3 |
Date | Code | Event | Description |
Feb 10, 2006 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEWIS, DONALD J.;RUSSELL, JOHN D.;REEL/FRAME:017255/0768 Effective date: 20051128 |
Apr 7, 2006 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FORD MOTOR COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:017757/0050 Effective date: 20060208 |
Sep 29, 2012 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 4 |