text:
Refund and ReturnPolicy
If something isn't right or you just change your mind, we are happy to accept a return and refund.
Below you'll find everything you need to know about returning and refunding an online order, in-store purchase, or faulty item. Take a moment to read through our policy, and then head to the instructions below.
Please review these policies carefully as they are the Terms of Sale that govern your purchases at the CygnusChain Store. They set out your rights and obligations with respect to your purchases, including limitations and exclusions. Your placement of an order at the CygnusChain Website constitutes your agreement that these policies apply to the order, so be certain you understand them before you place your order.
Cygnus Chain will not be responsible for any inaccuracies in the final product (your custom order) in lieu of the measurements provided. We do not accept returns or exchanges of custom orders. If they are sent incorrect, defective or not fit in accordance to the size ordered, we'll offer you a free fix.
If you return your Order after 15 days of product you received we will not accept return of product but offer within 7 days.
You can return your Afterpay purchase in store for an exchange, or via post for a refund.
Just make sure your return meets our Returns Policy, then follow the steps below.
To exchange your item:
- Drop in to a CygnusChain OR Krypton store that stocks the brand of item you want to exchange.
- Bring along the tax invoice we emailed you as proof of purchase.
- As long as the Returns Policy has been met, we'll offer you an exchange in store, on the spot.
To return your item for a refund:
Keep in Mind
Any of our Discount Voucher is not refundable.
If you have earned from us even 1 Paisa (Penny), we will not return or refund.


text:
The Strip Packing Problem (SPP) aims to pack a set of small items inside a larger object, the container, with all dimensions but one fixed, with the objective of minimizing the free dimension of the large object. The small items cannot overlap each other and must be completely inside the large object. This description fits the definition of a Cutting and Packing (C&P) problem and indeed the SPP can be classified as an Open Dimension Problem according to (Wäscher et al., 2007) typology for C&P problems. Other well-known C&P problems are the knapsack problem, the bin-packing problem, the container loading problem, the cutting-stock problem and the pallet loading problem. The SPP can be found in many practical settings and has many real-world applications in industry and services, such as the cut of wood boards, steel plates or paper rolls and also multidimensional resource scheduling.
One of the most distinctive characteristics of C&P problems is the fundamental role of geometry in their definition and resolution. When dealing with cutting of raw-material or item packing, three dimensions (length, width and height) are always present. However, for modeling and resolution purposes, C&P problems are usually classified in one-, two- and three-dimensional problems, when taking into account the number of dimensions that are relevant for the problem. One should bear in mind that the dimensions that are common to the small items and the large object are not relevant for the optimization problem. In this review two-dimensional SPP problems will be tackled.
Geometry also plays an important role in the description of small items' and large object's shapes. Two-dimensional problems are usually divided into rectangular, circular and irregular problems. The first two categories are self-explanatory and the last one refers to problems in which the small items have polygonal shapes, at least in the most common form of these problems. In this paper, problems in which both the small items and the large object are rectangles will be approached. Conjugating the rectangular shape of the problem with the open dimension characteristic, the large object will be a rectangle with a given width and an infinite height (hereafter called strip), and the objective of the problem is to minimize the actual height used to pack all small items.
As any combinatorial optimization problem, the SPP can be solved by exact approaches (in the sense that the approach provides a guaranteed optimal solution, being usually based on mathematical programming models), approximation methods (heuristics and metaheuristics) or hybrid methods (e.g. matheuristics), resorting to elements from both worlds. Given the complexity of these problems, heuristic methods, providing good solutions in a fairly small amount of time, have been rather popular in the field, being able to solve problems with many items.
This paper will focus on heuristic methods for the two-dimensional rectangular strip packing problem. The relevant literature will be reviewed and links between the most frequently used methods and the data characteristics will be sought.
Surveys have been published in the past on the SPP. In (Hopper & Turton, 2001a) a review of metaheuristic approaches, with a special emphasis on genetic algorithms but also looking at simulated annealing, tabu search, and artificial neural networks, can be found. (Lodi et al., 2002) discuss exact and approximate methods for both the rectangular Bin-Packing Problem and the rectangular SPP, giving special attention to the level (guillotinable) SPP. With the same scope, (Ntene & van Vuuren, 2009) discuss heuristics previously published in the literature, in order to provide a comparison basis for their own new approach. (Riff et al., 2009) also review both exact and heuristic methods for the two-dimensional SPP and present some benchmark instances commonly used in the literature in the computational validation of algorithms for specific instances.
This survey will not only update the previous reviews but will also provide a classification of both constructive and improvement heuristics, looking at characteristics they may have in common. Metaheuristic approaches will be referred and discussed along the text, but focusing on the underlying heuristics and not on the search methods that characterize and distinguish each one of them. The decomposition of the heuristics in their building blocks, together with the study of the past research effort that will be presented, will help to identify research gaps in the field.
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 fully presents and characterizes the SPP. In Section 3 the heuristic methods found in the literature are presented, while in section 4 the most relevant findings are presented and discussed, together with some future research ideas and proposals.
The SPP is a C&P problem that is classified as an Open Dimension Problem under Wäscher et al. typology (Wäscher et al., 2007). However it can be further characterized, as the typology itself anticipates. Not only the dimensionality of the problem and the geometry can be taken into account (in this survey two-dimensional problems where the small items are rectangles will be reviewed), but further characteristics regarding the way how the rectangles are laid out on the strip can be considered for the problem categorization. The actual disposition of the rectangular small items on the strip is referred to as pattern (either cutting or packing pattern) or layout. The characteristics that may be imposed to the patterns arise from the practical constraints that the different real-world applications require. These characteristics are summarized in Figure 1.
The first level considers the rectangle list input. In the online version, rectangles are input one by one without any information regarding the following rectangle. Once the rectangle is placed on the strip there is no possibility of repositioning it (Ye et al., 2009). Not knowing which will be the next rectangle arises for instance in scheduling problems, when a sequence of tasks or jobs have to be processed in a given number of machines but the tasks are not known in advance. In fact, scheduling problems can be modeled as SPP if the height of the strip (the open dimension) is associated to time and the strip's width to the machine capacity. Each task requires a given amount of capacity and takes a given amount of time to complete, defining therefore a rectangle. The goal is to process all tasks in the minimum amount of time, i.e. to minimize the height of the strip (Hurink & Paulus 2011).
However, the most frequent in the literature (and in real-world applications) is the offline case.In this situation it is possible to define criteria for the order by which the rectangles will be placed on the strip, as length, width, area or perimeter, once all characteristics of the rectangles are known in advance. Nevertheless, this ordering possibility is not necessarily used by the solution approaches and random orders are also frequent in the literature.
The second level concerns the geometry of the small items. In practical contexts SPP problems arise with small items having irregular shapes (e.g. polygons), circular shapes or rectangular shapes, which is the focus of this survey. Directly related to the geometry is orthogonality. In orthogonal patterns the edges of the rectangles are parallel to the edges of the strip. When the orthogonality constraint is not imposed, the problem is treated as an irregular SPP, even if the shapes are rectangular, and therefore it is out of the scope of this survey.
The following characteristic is the type of cut. When guillotine cuts are considered the pattern has to be formed so that it is possible to obtain the requested rectangles by cutting from edge to edge, either the strip's edges or the edges of the sub-rectangles generated by previous cuts. In fact the name arises from the applications where the cutting tool is a guillotine. This same constraint has to be imposed when patterns are to be cut by saws, such as in the wood industry. Patterns that do not have this property are designed as non-guillotinable patterns.
A further characterization of guillotinable patterns arises from the number of stages or phases required to fully cut the pattern. If, using only a succession of horizontal (or vertical) cuts, all rectangles are extracted from the strip, the pattern is called "one-stage guillotinable". If it is necessary to orthogonally rotate the parts resulting from the first stage cuts, and apply a second series of guillotine cuts (now vertical or horizontal), the pattern is designated as a "two-stage guillotinable pattern". Following the same line of reasoning a three-stage guillotinable pattern requires a further change in the cutting direction. Patterns with no limit on the number of stages are called n-stage guillotinable patterns, where n-1 holds for the number of cutting direction changes (Imahori & Yagiura, 2010). Guillotinable patterns may also be classified as level packing patterns if the first cuts are horizontal (across the width of the strip) and the rectangles are then extracted from the generated levels (Coffman Jr et al., 1980; Mumford-Valenzuela et al., 2004). Each level has the height of the tallest rectangle placed there. Some examples of these patterns are represented in Figure 2.
Regarding the orientation of the rectangles, when the materials have vein or other physical properties that make the width and height directions different from each other (e.g. when cutting striped fabrics in the garment industry), the rectangles have to be cut as they are defined, i.e. width along the strip's width and height along the strip's height. However, there are materials that are isomorphic along the two directions and therefore the rectangles can be rotated, i.e. it is indifferent to cut the rectangle's width along the strip's width to the strip's height, and vice-versa. In this case it is said that the rectangles may be 90º rotated or more simply, rotated.
Combining the rectangle orientation constraints and the types of cuts, four sub-problems can be defined (last level of the characterization structure). The less constrained problem is the RF where the rectangles may be rotated and no constraints on the type of cuts are imposed. Fixing the rectangles' orientation defines the sub-problem OF. When imposing the guillotine cut constraint the sub-problems RG and OG are defined, respectively allowing for the rotation of the rectangles or fixing their orientation, (Lodi et al., 1999). These two sub-problems may be further refined if the number of stages is considered, as previously explained.
Given the real-world origin of these problems, additional constraints and characteristics may appear in the literature, motivated by different cutting technologies and material properties, but the most commonly tackled are the ones described above.
Heuristic algorithms do not find guaranteed optimal solutions and are not able to recognize anoptimal solution if one is found. Additionally, no distance to the optimal solution can be computed or guaranteed. However, given the low computational times, when compared to exact methods, they are considered to be an efficient resolution strategy for large instances of hard combinatorial optimization problems. Heuristic algorithms are usually divided into constructive heuristics and improvement heuristics. The most representative rectangular two-dimensional SPP heuristics will be described in detail under this division.
3.1 Constructive heuristics
Constructive heuristics build solutions by adding elements one by one. Only in the end of the construction process a complete solution is obtained and if the process is interrupted no feasible solution is generated. In the SPP context, the rectangles are successively placed on the strip's free/empty spaces or regions.
In general, the older constructive heuristics resort to simple placement mechanisms, with a low computational complexity, and therefore are less able to check for empty spaces in the strip. The improvement of this capacity became the most important trend in the development of the more recent heuristics.
When analyzing the solution construction methodologies used in the literature, four strategies were found: "positioning', "fitness", "level" and "profile". This classification is based on the conceptual idea behind the actual placement of the rectangles on the the strip and further details are presented in the following sections.
3.1.1 Positioning-based heuristics
Positioning-based heuristics are the oldest in the SPP literature, and most common in the early works. They are rather flexible, allowing to incorporate the most usual constraints of the problem. The basic mechanism behind positioning-based heuristics is the identification of the free space on the strip that is most suitable for a given piece, according to an also given criterion.
The "Bottom-Left (BL)" heuristic, proposed by (Baker et al., 1980), was not only the firstpositioning-based heuristic for the SPP but is also the most widely and well-known approach to this problem. The goal is to place each rectangle the lowest and to the left as possible, as illustrated in Figure 3. An initial, feasible position is assigned to the rectangle, and then it is alternately moved down and to the left. A direction change only occurs when moving along the current direction becomes unfeasible.
With a complexity O(n 2) (where n is the number of rectangles), the main advantage of the bottom-left strategy is being very fast. However, one of its main drawbacks is that it is unable to fill "holes", i.e. empty spaces that are surrounded by rectangles that were previously placed. To overcome this limitation several modified versions of the bottom-left heuristic were proposed along the years. The most relevant one is the "Bottom-Left-Fill (BLF)", developed by (Chazelle, 1983).
As in the bottom-left heuristic, the bottom-left-fill heuristic aims to place the rectangles the lowest and to the left as possible. However, as illustrated in Figure 3, spaces between already placed pieces are considered to be admissible. The search for empty feasible (in the sense that the rectangle fits the space) spaces is much more complex and therefore the bottom-left-fill heuristic has a complexity of O(n 3), but for the same sequence is always equal or better than the bottom-left heuristic. The implementations of the bottom-left-fill heuristic places the rectangle on a position that is not feasible, because it overlaps other rectangles that had been already placed (e.g. at the bottom-left corner of the strip), and then moves the rectangle right and up until a feasible position is found (Fig. 3).
The "Improved Bottom-Left (iBL)" heuristic, proposed by (Liu & Teng, 1999), gives always priority to the down movement, i.e. when it is not possible to move the rectangle downwards it moves it to the left, but just the distance necessary to make again a downward movement (Fig. 3).
Common to these and other positioning-based heuristics is their dependence of the order by which the rectangles are placed, as the focus of these approaches is to find the best placement for a given rectangle.
In order to decrease this dependence from the rectangle input order (Zhang, Shi, Leung & Wu, 2016) have very recently further developed a recursive heuristic previously proposed by the same authors (Zhang et al., 2006), the "Priority Heuristic (PH)", and dynamically assign a priority to each rectangle. This recursive algorithm successively divides the strip into rectangles and sub-rectangles and when choosing which rectangle to place in a given empty rectangle, this choice does not depend just on the rectangle input sequence but on how well the rectangle fits the space (the "priority"). In (Zhang et al., 2007) the authors has already resorted to the recursive algorithm proposed in (Zhang et al., 2006), but decomposing the strip into layers and filling each layer by a simple positioning-based constructive heuristic.
In the nineties (Dowsland et al., 1998) have proposed a rather innovative heuristic for the irregular two-dimensional strip packing problem, named "Jostle". In this heuristic a bottom-left-fill and a up-right-fill (an artificial top edge is defined for the strip) heuristic are alternately applied, "throwing" the pieces up and down. But the piece sequence is defined by the position of each piece in layout generated in the the previous iteration. When applying the bottom-left-fill heuristic, the pieces are ordered by decreasing y-coordinates, regarding the previous layout, while when applying the top-right-fill heuristic, the pieces are ordered by increasing y-coordinates, also regarding the previous layout. The general idea is that the pieces that are farthest away in the previous layout should now be placed first. The possibility of filling holes in the middle of the already placed pieces has revealed to be critical for the efficacy of this approach. (Wauters et al., 2013) test this idea on the rectangular two-dimensional SPP and name the algorithm "Improved Deepest Bottom Left Fill (iDBLF)". Alternative ways of generating sequences from the actual layouts are proposed and tested, as well as alternatives to the bottom-left-fill/top-right-fill heuristics.
3.1.2 Fitness-based heuristics
Fitness-based heuristics are focused on the free spaces, i.e. the best-fit between the rectangle to place and the empty spaces is sought. It is common to give some priority to the spaces closer to the edges of the strip (left, right or bottom).
The first constructive heuristic that has explored this mechanism was the "Best-Fit (BF)" heuristic by (Burke et al., 2004). The selection of the rectangle to place is dynamic and depends on the space to be filled. The lowest free space is selected and the first choice will be a rectangle that perfectly fits this space. If there is no rectangle with this characteristic, the largest rectangle that fits the space is selected and placed according to one of three different policies: leftmost policy; next-to-the-tallest policy; and next-to-the-shortest policy (Fig. 4). In the leftmost policy the rectangle is always placed at the left of the space, while in the other two policies the placement inside the space depends on the previously placed rectangles. In the next-to-the-tallest policy the side of the empty space where the tallest rectangle is, is chosen, while in the next-to-the-shortest policy it is the other way around.
The implementation proposed by Burke et al. has a time complexity of O(n 2 + nW). However, (Imahori & Yagiura, 2010) propose an implementation based on balanced binary search trees with a time complexity of O(n log n). This efficient implementation of the best-fit heuristic decomposes the "skyline" formed by the already placed rectangles into line segments and stores them in a heap structure using their y-coordinate as the key to access the memory structure. At the same time these same segments are stored in a doubly linked list ordered by their x-coordinates (Fig. 5). The authors not only prove that the time and space complexity achieved are optimal, but also provide a worst-case approximation ratio (W-C appr.) for the best-fit heuristic. Computational experiments demonstrate the capacity of efficiently solving extra-large instances (n>1000000). (Verstichel et al., 2013) use these data structures in their implementation of the best-fit algorithm, which is named "Three-way Best-Fit (T-w BF)" heuristic, and add three new placement criteria: place the fitting rectangle at the right-hand side of the space; place the fitting rectangle so that the difference of the top edge with its neighbour is maximal; place the fitting rectangle so that the difference of the top edge with its neighbour is minimal.
Another improvement to the best-fit heuristic was proposed by (Aşik & Özcan, 2009): the "Bidirectional Best-Fit (BBF)" heuristic. In this approach not only the spaces among already placed rectangles are considered as feasible placement places for the following rectangles, but also what the author calls vertical spaces, i.e. spaces on the top of previously placed rectangles and with no side neighbour rectangles, are considered. The space is closed at the top by what is designated as the "expected best height" (Fig. 6). The "expected best height" is the lower bound on the height and is obtained by dividing the sum of the areas of all the rectangles by the width of the strip. Vertical niches are also identified giving to the heuristic a spatial two-dimensional awareness that the original proposal did not have, once it is focused on the x-coordinate. In (Özcan et al., 2013) the authors extend this work to the "Modified Bidirectional Best-Fit (BBFM)" heuristic, by placing the rectangles on the strip in groups, which created by looking at the geometric similarities of the rectangles, instead of placing them one by one.
As usually rectangles do not perfectly fit the available empty spaces, the approaches described until now tend to generate many small spaces that, for large instances, deteriorate significantly the efficiency when seeking for the best placement for a given rectangle. To overcome this drawback (Leung & Zhang, 2011) developed the "Fast Layer-Based Heuristic (FH)" that aims to keep the layout skyline as flat as possible. To achieve this, the placement strategy favors placements that eliminate (or least increase) the number of edges of the skyline.
To achieve the flat skyline goal, the quality of the relationship between a free space and a rectangle to be placed is assessed and is designated as the fitness value. This measure takes values between a maximum of 4, when there is a perfect match between the space and the rectangle, and a minimum of 0. In Figure 7 examples corresponding to the fitness values of 0 to 3 are presented. In each layout construction step the fast layer-based heuristic selects the pair rectangle/space that maximizes the fitness value.
Several authors have worked on improving this scoring methodology. (Leung et al., 2011) in the "Intelligent Search Algorithm (ISA)" resort to 5 scoring values, between 0 and 4, as does (Chen et al., 2015) ("Hybrid Demon Algorithm (HDA)"), while (Yang et al., 2013) in the "Simple Randomized Algorithm (SRA)" considers 8 scoring values, between -1 and 6, as does Wei, Qin, Cheang & Xu ("Efficient Intelligent Search Algorithm (IA)") that also uses a 8 value scoring system. It is worthwhile to notice that these different scoring values correspond to different valuations of different configurations of the skyline.
A similar idea, of flattening the skyline, is followed by (Kotov & Cao, 2011) that restrict the potential placement points to the concave vertices of the skyline, aiming its flatness.
3.1.3 Level-based heuristics
The central idea of these heuristics is the placement of the rectangles on levels, i.e. parallel guillotine cuts across the width of the strip. The height of each level i is defined by the tallest rectangle hi placed on that level. The layouts generated by these heuristics are not comparable with the ones generated by the heuristics described in the previous sections. They address specific real-world problems in which the level orientation of the layouts is a constraint, as for instance when planning the display of goods on supermarket shelves.
Proposed by (Coffman Jr et al., 1980) the "Next-Fit Decreasing Height (NFDH)" heuristic sorts the rectangles by non-increasing height and places them one by one on the currently open level and at the leftmost admissible position. The currently open level is closed when it does not have enough space to accommodate the candidate rectangle, a new level is opened and the candidate rectangle is placed on this level, next to the left edge of the strip (Fig. 8).
A clear limitation of this heuristic, and a source of space waste, is that free spaces of closed levels cannot be later on used by smaller rectangles. The "First-Fit Decreasing Height (FFDH)" heuristic, proposed by the same authors (Coffman Jr et al., 1980), addresses this drawback by not closing levels, i.e. each rectangle is placed at the lowest possible level as long as it fits. As depicted in Figure 8, a new level is created only if the rectangle does not fit any previous level. A variation of this heuristic was proposed by (Berkey & Wang, 1987): the "Best-Fit Decreasing Height (BFDH)" heuristic. In this approach the rectangle is not placed at the lowest level where it fits, but at the level, among those where it fits, for which the unused horizontal space is minimum.
The previous heuristics sort the rectangles by non-increasing height, as their names suggest. Therefore, instances where consecutive rectangles, which most probably will be placed on the same level, have very different heights lead to a very poor performance of these approaches as the taller rectangles will define a height for the level that can not be afterwards met by the shorter ones. It should be kept in mind that these heuristics are intrinsically uni-dimensional, trying to make good choices along the width, and only look at the height to determine if the rectangles fit or not in the level.
To address this poor behavior (Ntene, 2007) have more recently developed the "Size Alternating Stack (SAS)" heuristic. The rectangles are divided in two lists (L 1 and L 2). List L 1 consists of all rectangles that are strictly taller than wider (narrow rectangles), and list L 2 has the rectangles that have a width equal or greater than the height (wide rectangles). The first list is ordered by decreasing height while the second list is ordered by decreasing width. The main idea behind the size alternating stack heuristic is to alternate between narrow and wide rectangles. Each level is initiated by comparing the heights of the first rectangles of each list and the tallest one is selected for placement, hence defining the level height. The following rectangle is taken from the list that did not open the level and additionally rectangles from this list are placed on the top of each other, forming a column, until the level height is reached. Only afterwards a new rectangle is taken from the alternate list. The resulting layout is a set of stacks of rectangles organized by levels. In (Ortmann et al., 2010) this work is further extended and combined with ideas from (Ntene & van Vuuren, 2009), originating the "Modified Size-Alternating Stack Algorithm (SASm)", and with the floor ceiling heuristic from (Lodi et al., 1999), resulting in the "Stack Ceiling with Re-sorting algorithm (SCR)".
A similar extension of the idea of level is used by (Cui et al., 2008). The strip is divided into levels (sections, according to the terminology of these authors), the height of each level is equal to either the height or the width (rectangles may be rotated) of the rectangle placed at the bottom-left corner of the level, but the remaining region of the level may be freely occupied by any set of rectangles, without any additional constraint. A recursive function is proposed to find the "best" occupancy of the this region. This approach is further developed in (Cui et al., 2013) in the "Sequential Grouping and Value Correction Procedure (SGVCP)" by assigning to each rectangle a value not proportional to its area, trying to guide the recursive function towards the use of arrangements that led to good partial solutions in previous levels.
In (Bortfeldt & Jungmann, 2012) the authors propose the "Strip Packing by Tree Search (SPTRS)", an adaptation of the tree search algorithm developed by (Fanslau & Bortfeldt, 2010) for the three-dimensional container loading problem, also based on the idea of sectioning the strip in layers.
Concluding, although rooted in the eighties, research on level-oriented heuristics is still active, as shows the recent paper (Buchwald & Scheithauer, 2016) where an improved version of the FFDH heuristic is proposed, the "Modified First-Fit Decreasing Height (FFDH*)".
3.1.4 Profile-based heuristics
(Scheithauer, 1997) introduced for the first time the concept of profile (the "contour" in these authors' terminology) to describe a partial solution. The contour is a polygonal line starting on the left side of the strip and ending on the bottom or on the right side of the strip, composed by vertical and horizontal edges. These edges are either edges of rectangles already placed or an extension of those edges. Globally the contour looks like a staircase. The orthogonal polygon defined by this line and the sides and bottom of the strip fully contains all placed rectangles (Fig. 9). This representation is used by Scheithauer to build exact methods, which rely on the implicit enumeration of the placement sequences and of the contour's corner points (the feasible placement points). It is revisited by (Martello et al., 2003), in the same context of the exact resolution of the SPP, but later on its potential for the development of heuristics for this same problem was recognized by other authors and used to develop new solution approaches.
(Pisinger, 2007) use sequence pairs to represent the solutions (the placed rectangles), and the partial solution profile and the corner points to decide where to place the following rectangle. The use of sequence pairs to represent two-dimensional packing solutions was proposed by (Murata et al., 1996), and further used by other researchers. As the name suggests sequence pairs are two sequences of rectangles, each of it representing the order by which the rectangles appear to a fictitious observer located at two different points of the space, namely at the upper-left corner of the layout and at the bottom-left corner of the layout. These sequences are named positive and negative sequences and each of them defines a step-line (layout profiles), named as positive and negative step-lines. In Figure 10 the positive and negative sequence that describe a layout are represented, together with the correspondent sets of positive and negative step-lines, the former starting at the bottom-left corner and ending at the upper-right corner, and the latter starting at the upper-left corner and ending at the bottom-right corner. In the figure lines are artificially spaced from each other to improve drawing legibility. (Pisinger, 2007) propose an innovative and computationally efficient transformation of sequences pairs into layouts. Two different algorithms are described, a "Sequence Pair (SP)" algorithm and a "Semi-normalized Sequence Pair (Seminorm-SP)" algorithm. The first one transforms sequence pairs into normalized layouts, i.e. layouts in which all pieces are bottom-left placed, and the second one applies the same bottom-left property but to the corners of the partial solution profile.
(Wei et al., 2011) also uses a profile to describe the partial solution in the "Iterative Doubling Binary Search (IDBS)" heuristic, but in a conceptually different way from the previous authors. Wei's profile does not hold the staircase property of Scheithauer's contour. However, as in the contours, the edges of the profile (called skyline) are either edges or extensions of edges ofalready placed rectangles (Fig. 11). The feasible placement points correspond to place thebottom-left corner of the rectangles at the left endpoint of the horizontal lines that belong to the skyline, and to place the bottom right corner of the rectangles at the right endpoint of these same lines. When choosing the placement point for a concrete rectangle, (Wei et al., 2011) resort to several criteria based on the waste that is induced by the new rectangle in the position under evaluation and on a scoring method, close to the strategies used in fitness-based heuristics.
Finally, the "Binary Search Heuristic Algorithm (BSHA)" was proposed by (Zhang et al., 2013) introducing some improvements in the representation of Scheithauer's contour, by discarding regions that, when considered the shape of the rectangles that remain to be placed, can not be used anymore. The selection of the placement point is based on the waste generated by each tentative placement.
3.2 Improvement heuristics
Improvement heuristics start with an initial solution, i.e. a complete solution obtained either by a constructive heuristic or randomly generated. This initial solution is then improved by applying small consecutive changes until a stopping criterion is met. The goal is to keep the computational times fairly low while improving the quality of the solutions, when compared to constructive heuristics (Hopper & Turton, 2001a; Burke et al., 2004).
Depending on how solutions are modified, two different types of improvement heuristics may be defined. When modifications are directly applied to the layouts, by moving rectangles around, the search is performed over the actual layout. These heuristics are usually slower because the geometric feasibility has to be enforced. However in these heuristics there is a very direct link between the modification applied to the solution and its effects on the layout. Another option is to apply the modifications on the order (or sequence) by which the rectangles are inserted on the strip, relying on an additional constructive heuristic to transform this input order in an actual layout. These heuristics search over sequences. The generation of modified solutions is faster but there is a weaker link between the modification applied and its effects on the layout.
3.2.1 Search over sequences
Heuristics for the SPP that search over sequences resort to modification operators that are common to other problems that rely on sequences to codify their solutions (e.g. traveling salesperson problem, scheduling problems, vehicle routing problems, etc.): the insert and the exchange or swap operators. The insert operator takes a rectangle out of the sequence and re-inserts it in a different position in the sequence. The exchange operator takes two rectangles and exchange their position in the sequence. Notice that, as in the SPP all rectangles have to be placed on the strip, the also common delete operator cannot be applied, and as only one strip is being considered the exchange between partial sequences (e.g. inter-route swap in vehicle routing problems) does not also make sense. Figure 12 illustrates the overall structure of an improvement heuristic that searches over sequences. An initial input sequence 1 is decoded by a constructive heuristic to produce an initial layout that has a height h 1, a swap operator is applied to rectangles 1 and 3, resulting in sequence 2. This sequence is decoded into a layout with height h 2, which is better than h 1. Then an insert operator is applied to rectangle 2 and sequence 3 is generated. The correspondent layout has a height h 3, which is equal to h 2. The several heuristics of this type will mainly defer on:
the type of modification operators used, i.e on how an incumbent sequence is generated from a previous one (many times designated as neighbourhood structure);
the decoding (constructive) heuristic, that transforms a sequence in a layout;
when the incumbent sequence is accepted to be the base for further modifications, i.e. the search strategy.
The most basic search strategy is Local Search (LS). An incumbent solution is accepted if is better than the previous solution. If not, a new modification is applied to the sequence. The search stops after a previously defined number of sequences have been generated (iterations of the search procedure) without an improvement of the solution. This strategy is used in (Hopper & Turton, 2001b) but slightly different versions can be found in the literature. In (Leung & Zhang, 2011) the Fast Layer-Based Heuristic is transformed in a local search heuristic, using the swap operator between two random rectangles to generate different sequences.
Pure local search methods, as the ones just described, are known for getting stuck in local minima, i.e. solutions that are better than any other solution that can be generated from it, with the chosen modification operator, but with no guarantee of global optimality. To overcome this drawback it is common in combinatorial optimization problems to resort to metaheuristics instead of pure local search. What differentiates metaheuristics is the controlled acceptance of worse incumbent solutions, hoping that the temporary degradation of the solution may lead the search to better regions of the search space, and eventually to the global optimal solution.
One of the seminal works using metaheuristics in the SPP resolution is (Jakobs, 1996), with genetic algorithms being used as a search strategy and each sequence being transformed into a layout by the bottom-left heuristic. The initial population is composed by random sequences and the crossover operator uses q consecutive rectangles of one parent, starting at position p, and completes the sequence with the missing rectangles by the order given by the other parent. Three mutation operators are used: the sequence of a random block is inverted; some elements of the sequence are exchanged; rectangles are rotated. A similar approach was developed by (Hopper & Turton, 1999). More recent applications of genetic algorithms to search over sequences can be found in (Hadjiconstantinou & Iori, 2007), (Salto et al., 2008), (Burke et al., 2010), (Thomas & Chaudhari, 2014), resorting to different constructive heuristics to decode the sequences into layouts.
In a hybrid constructive/improvement heuristic, (Burke et al., 2009) used simulated annealing to improve a partial initial solution generated by the best-fit heuristic. A first set of rectangles is placed by the best-fit heuristic and these rectangles are not moved during the search procedure. The remaining rectangles are placed by the bottom-left-fill heuristic, according to several sequences that are generated during the search, trying to use the holes between the initially placed rectangles. Resorting to the semi-normalized profile-based constructive heuristic, (Pisinger, 2007) also developed a simulated annealing approach. (Leung et al., 2011) implemented also a simulated annealing algorithm over a constructive heuristic, obtaining improved results over the pure local search algorithm.
Adapting algorithms developed for three-dimensional packing problems to the two-dimensional SPP is a natural path explored by several authors (e.g. (Bortfeldt, 2006)). A different approach was followed by (Belov et al., 2008) that have adapted the uni-dimensional "Sequential Value Correction" algorithm (Belov & Scheithauer, 2007) to the two-dimensional SPP. Behind this proposal is the observation that solving a two-dimensional rectangular problem is equivalent to solve a set of one-dimensional bin-packing problem, in which the size of the bins is the width of the strip and the items to pack are horizontal slices of the rectangles. In other words, the rectangles to place are horizontally sliced according to a given grid and minimizing the height of the strip becomes minimizing the number of bins used to pack all slices. Of course that contiguity constraints (slices of the same rectangle have to be assigned to contiguous bins) and location constraints (slices of the same rectangle have to be paced at the same x-coordinate) have to be additionally imposed. As the problem is heuristically solved as a succession of knapsack problems (it always selects the left-most free space in the last slice and fills it by a one-dimensional greedy heuristic, considering only item widths) it is possible to impose these additional constraints. In the one-dimensional knapsack problems pseudo-profits are assigned to the slices. These pseudo-profits are related to the area of the rectangle from here each slice comes, and they aim to give priority to the largest rectangles, harder to efficiently place. The overall approach is based on a local search strategy where different sequences are generated by an insert operator.
(Wei et al., 2009) use a mix of profile-based heuristic and fitness-based heuristic, as each rectangle is placed on one of the corner points of the profile but the latter is chosen based on how well the rectangle fits the space. To guide the search a local search strategy is used. Later on (Wei et al., 2011) developed a taboo search algorithm over a profile-based constructive heuristic. In (Zhang et al., 2013) the profile-based heuristic is also randomized in a pure local search algorithm. (Chen et al., 2012) resort to the algorithm by (Wei et al., 2009) but apply it by regions, in which the strip is previously divided.
An original and different approach to the concept of searching over sequences was proposed by (Burke et al., 2011): the "Squeaky Wheel Heuristic". This improvement heuristic, as all the others, changes the current sequence to generate the incumbent sequence, but incorporates what could be called a learning factor. It uses the best-fit heuristic as a decoder of the rectangle sequence, but the sequence is generated taking into account penalties assigned to each rectangle. A target for the height is defined (in this work it is the so called area lower bound - the sum of the areas of the rectangles divided by the width of the strip), and when a rectangle protrudes the target on the height a penalty is assigned to it. The more penalized rectangles are the first ones to place in the next iteration, i.e. the rectangles are ordered by non-increasing value of penalty. This methodology is illustrated in Figure 13.
Worthwhile of reference are also the works by (Borgulya, 2014), (Zhang, Che, Ye, Si & Leung, 2016). If from the point of view of the constructive decoding heuristics they build on previous work, in what concerns the search process these are the first applications of hyper-heuristics and variable neighbourhood search.
3.2.2 Search over the layout
When searching over layouts the modifications are operated directly over the layout. An example is presented in Figure 14, where the placement of rectangle 1 is exchanged with the placement of rectangles 2, 3 and 4, originating a better solution (h2<h1).
One of the first improvement heuristics searching over the layout is proposed by (Alvarez-Valdes et al., 2005). Although developed for the two-dimensional cutting problem (a "Placement Problem", according to Wäscher et al. typology, in which a sub-set of rectangles is to be chosen to be cut from a limited sized stock rectangle), the ideas presented in this paper were at the basis of a later approach to the SPP resolution. The algorithm is based on the Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP) metaheuristic and therefore has two phases: a constructive phase and an improvement phase. The constructive heuristic is a fitness-based heuristic that gives priority to the use of the smallest empty spaces. A fitness function, which assigns to each piece a fitness value based on how well the piece occupies the space, is defined and, according to the GRASP paradigm, one of the pieces in the restricted candidate list is chosen to be the following one to be placed. The improvement phase is run over the actual layouts, and two different operators are defined:
To transform several small unused spaces into larger empty spaces, one or more pieces adjacent to an empty space are removed, all pieces are pushed to the corners of the stock rectangle and the remaining pieces are tentatively placed by the constructive heuristic. This is a pretty good example why the SPP requires specific resolution algorithms: in the SPP all pieces are placed on the strip, there are never remaining pieces except the ones we may explicitly remove from the layout; and there are no corners, or at least there are only two corners, which hinders the idea of separating the already placed rectangles to create room for the incoming ones.
To improve the arrangement of the placed rectangles, the last k% rectangles of the solution are removed (they were placed using the randomized version of the constructive algorithm) and the empty space filled again with (some of) the remaining rectangles by the deterministic version of the constructive heuristic.
In (Alvarez-Valdés et al., 2008) this GRASP algorithm is evolved to deal with the SPP. For the improvement phase, four different operators are proposed:
From a solution with a height H the last k% rectangles of the solution are removed, an artificial height of H-1 is imposed to the strip and the solution completed with the deterministic constructive heuristic. If all rectangles are placed in this W×(H-1) stock rectangle, then the SPP solution has improved.
All rectangles that define the value H of the current solution (i.e. the rectangles whose top edge is at height H - the "guilty" rectangles) are removed from the solution and placed on some of the empty spaces, lower on the strip. If the rectangle exceeds the dimensions of the empty space, the overlapping rectangles are deleted and placed again using the deterministic constructive heuristic (Fig. 15).
The last k% rectangles that have been placed in the constructive phase are removed and placed again with the deterministic constructive heuristic (Fig. 16). There is no guarantee that the chosen percentage will lead to a layout, with the remaining rectangles, that has a height strictly lower than the original one. If this is the case, additional rectangles are removed until this condition is satisfied.
Similar to the previous operator, but in this case all pieces with their top edge exceeding a height λH are removed, with 0<λ<1 (Fig. 17).
(Bortfeldt, 2006) adapts a genetic algorithm developed for the three-dimensional Container Loading Problem (Bortfeldt & Gehring, 2001) to the two-dimensional SPP. The algorithm builds on the concept of layer, rather similar to the levels of the level-oriented heuristics, but within each layer rectangles may be placed on the top of other rectangles, as in the more sophisticated level-oriented heuristics. Therefore, a solution is a set of layers and the operators of the genetic algorithm exchange layers between solutions (crossover operator) or simply transfer a certain number of layers (mutation). A repair heuristic is proposed to enforce solutions' feasibility and improve their quality. As partial solutions (the layers) are moved around among different solutions, this approach is rather innovative once usually genetic algorithms for the SPP resort to searching over sequences. Also (Zhang et al., 2007) developed a genetic algorithm based on layers, which are generated by the recursive algorithm previously proposed by the same authors (Zhang et al., 2006), the "Improved Heuristic Recursive algorithm (IHR)". (Wei, Tian, Zhu & Lim, 2014) also used layers during the search. The layers are initially created in a level-oriented approach, resorting to the best-fit heuristic to fill each level. However, during the search blocks of rectangles are formed and then placed in each layer instead of the individual rectangles, i.e. the layers' height is dynamically adjusted aiming a tighter placement of the rectangles and, indirectly, a lower layout's height.
(Neveu et al., 2008) use the same modification operator as (Alvarez-Valdés et al., 2008), picking the rectangle that defines the height of the layout, placing it on an empty space and removing eventually overlapping rectangles, and finally placing them again with a constructive heuristic. The maximal-space representation of the empty regions of the strip is used (here under the name of maximal holes) and a local search strategy, similar to the one proposed by (Wei et al., 2009), guides the search. Several constructive heuristics are used to generate different initial solutions.
This work aims to present a structured view over heuristic approaches for the two-dimensional rectangular SPP. To achieve this, a systematic literature survey was run and 36 papers published in the last decade (from 2007 onward), in international journals with peer review, were reviewed and categorized. Also some previous papers that can be considered seminal in the use of a relevant method, concept or idea, were discussed. This led to the analysis of a total of 48 papers.In Table 1 a list of the references discussed in the previous sections, classified by type of heuristic, is presented. Quite often, in a single paper more than one method or algorithm is proposed and in these papers it is frequent to find both constructive and improvement heuristics, mainly when using metaheuristics. Therefore, their classification is based on the authors' opinion about where the main contribution was made, but it is naturally arguable. Research gaps and future research directions will now be discussed.
a GA: Genetic Algorithm; GRASP: Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure; HH: Hyper-Heuristic;
LS: Local Search; NE: Naive evolution; SA: Simulated Annealing; ShP: Shaking procedure;
SVC: Sequential Value Correction; TS: Tabu Search; VNS: Variable Neighbourhood Search.
The chart from Figure 18 shows that the last decade has been rich in terms of contributions for the SPP problem. All types of strategies have been used, from the more simple constructive heuristics to the more complex improvement heuristics with search over the layout. However, most probably due to the complexity of dealing with the geometric feasibility of the layouts, the latter strategy has been less frequently used. It should be kept in mind that, in improvement heuristics that search over sequences, all modifications to a solution originate a feasible layout, as it is the decoder responsibility to produce the actual layouts, given the sequences of rectangles. Additionally, these heuristics can use as decoders the many and efficient constructive heuristics available. This may be the main reason for the ratio of 1 to 4 that we find when comparing the number of improvement heuristics that search over sequences versus improvement heuristics that search over layouts. From the search control algorithm point of view, pure local search, simulated annealing and genetic algorithms are the most frequent algorithms, with the most recent metaheuristics being absent. With just one approach based on variable neighbourhood search, and another one based on hyper heuristics, there is plenty of room for research in the use of more sophisticated search control mechanisms, in particular in improvement heuristics with search over layouts.
Another relevant factor for the heuristics' design choices is the size of the instances. Since 2007, very large instances became the main challenge for new heuristics, and by very large instances it is meant instances with more than 5000 rectangles. These instances require very fast solution generation and evaluation and special care has to be put on the computational implementation of the methods, with important and relevant contributions from the Computer Science field. Some of the methods proposed in the past are specialized in solving zero-waste instances, but these are not only rather artificial instances, that do not arise in practice, but these instances can also significantly simplify the SPP resolution, when this characteristic is explored by the resolution method.
When looking in more detail at the constructive heuristics (Fig. 19), it can be seen that more than 40% of them are fitness-based heuristics. It is surely due to their good performance, when compared to positioning-based heuristics. In fact, fitness-based heuristics have been a trend in the research in this field. In particular scoring heuristics, which are able to measure the quality of the placement of a rectangle in a space, as initially proposed by (Leung & Zhang, 2011), seems to deliver good results and several other scoring heuristics were proposed (IA, ISA, SRA and HDA).
Level-based heuristics are basically extensions of the FFDH constructive heuristic. They received a lot of attention in the eighties but are currently less studied. Probably this is because only very specific applications require this type of layouts, not being the extra waste that levels impose worthwhile, when levels are not a concrete constraint of the application.
Profile-based heuristics have been less explored and represent a clear research opportunity in this field. It is well-known since the eighties (Baker et al., 1980) that there are optimal solutions for the SPP that can not be achieved by the bottom-left heuristic, whatever rectangle sequence is considered. However, this is not true when profile-based approaches are used. (Martello et al., 2003) proposed an exact tree-search algorithm in which, in each node of the branch-decision tree, child nodes are generated combining all rectangles remaining to place with all corner points of the profile describing the partial solution. Therefore, for each optimal layout there is a sequence of rectangles that, properly choosing the placement points on the profile, generates it. Profile-based solution representations are, therefore, rather promising for the the development of effective heuristics for the SPP, as they seem to gather the advantages of positioning-based and fitness-based methods, while keeping under control time complexity.
The chart of Figure 20 relates the improvement heuristics based on search over sequences with the constructive heuristics used to decode the sequences (the list of acronyms used in the x-axis is presented in Table 2). The acronym WIH, in the y-axis, stand for "without improvement heuristic" and refers to the algorithms that do not have an improvement phase, i.e. are just constructive. The first four shades of gray stand for the four types of constructive heuristics. From the lightest gray to the darkest gray: positioning-based, fitness-based, level-based and profile-based. This chart confirms the findings already mentioned. Clearly, combining genetic algorithms with the bottom-left heuristic, and its variants, is the most frequent approach and the most recent metaheuristics have not yet been explored.
|Constructive Heuristic
|(Burke et al., 2004)
|W-C appr.
|Best-Fit Worst-Case Approximation ratio
|(Imahori & Yagiura, 2010)
|Bidirectional Best-Fit
|(Aşik & Özcan, 2009)
|Binary Search Heuristic Algorithm
|(Zhang et al., 2013)
|(Baker et al., 1980)
|(Chazelle, 1983)
|Efficient Improved Algorithm (IA)
|(Wei, Qin, Cheang & Xu, 2014)
|Fast layer-based Heuristic
|(Leung & Zhang, 2011)
|First-Fit Decreasing Height
|(Coffman Jr et al., 1980)
|Hybrid Demon Algorithm
|(Chen et al., 2015)
|Improved Deepest Bottom Left Fill
|(Wauters et al., 2013)
|Improved Heuristic Recursive algorithm
|(Zhang et al., 2007)
|Intelligent Search Algorithm
|(Leung et al., 2011)
|Iterative Doubling Binary Search
|(Wei et al., 2011)
|Modified Bidirectional Best-Fit
|(Özcan et al., 2013)
|Modified First-Fit Decreasing Height
|(Buchwald & Scheithauer, 2016)
|Modified Size-Alternating Stack algorithm
|(Ortmann et al., 2010)
|Priority Heuristic
|(Zhang, Shi, Leung & Wu, 2016)
|Seminormalized-Sequence Pair
|(Pisinger, 2007)
|Sequence Pair
|(Pisinger, 2007)
|Sequential Grouping and Value Correction Procedure
|(Cui et al., 2013)
|Simple Randomized Algorithm
|(Yang et al., 2013)
|Stack Ceiling with Re-sorting algorithm
|(Ortmann et al., 2010)
|T-w BF
|Three-way Best-Fit
|(Verstichel et al., 2013)
|Strip Packing by Tree Search
|(Bortfeldt & Jungmann, 2012)
A final word about benchmark instances. There is a well-established set of instances that is consistently used by the research community. However, many of these instances have been proposed decades ago and it is reasonable to question if they are still challenging for now-a-days algorithms, given the hardware where they are currently run. Moreover, some of these instanceshave characteristics that are not typical from real-world applications and allow that less general approaches outperform more solid and robust algorithms, by taking advantage of the specialcharacteristics of these instances. Computational experiments are not league tables. Computational experiments are meant to understand the proposed algorithm, in which situations it goes well, in which it does not so well, which are its strengths and its limitations.
The limitations of the benchmark instances can only be overcome by the use of problem generators that generate instances to systematically explore the space of input data configurations: rectangles area, aspect ratio, heterogeneity, number, etc. (Silva et al., 2014) proposed a problem generator for two-dimensional (and three-dimensional) rectangular cutting and packing problems, in all the variants, that could also be used for strip packing problems, to overcome the limitations of the existing benchmark instances.
In this review, the last decade of publications related to heuristics for the two-dimensional rectangular strip packing has been surveyed. Each contribution was classified according to a well-known conceptual framework (constructive heuristics and improvement heuristics, both with search over sequences and search over layouts), with an additional division of constructive heuristics in positioning-based, fitness-based, level-based and profile-based heuristics.
From the literature review emerges the big dynamism of the field. Despite having its roots in the very early eighties, strip packing problems are still intensively researched and more complex approaches are being proposed by researchers from all over the world. Research gaps are identified, mainly associated to the use of more sophisticated search algorithms, specially metaheuristics, to the use of profile representations of solutions and to the development of improvement heuristics with search over the layout.
A necessary step in the field is related to the computational validation of the new algorithms, that have to make progresses in the direction of having as goal the understanding of why and when the methods work better and worse.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
amiride His disease was said to have been the same that prevailed here. Mrs. trict If there are no delinquents — and if he does his full
guage. He further stated that if there is no resolution, Optenberg S A, Thompson 1M: Economics of screening for carcinoma «as then begun. Against advice, he left the class and went to work two Some might infer from this that the General Staff is ignorant amiri diwan marching 120 of them into the hut at once and exposing them to
granting of short leave from the hospital, throwing the patient briefly expedient that the State Health Officer should make that place his head- The goal of this project is to provide hospitals and physi- Foster, David Lawrence, Jefferson medical college, Tuskaloosa. arimidex excising the wound or amputating the limb; in fact it might accelerate 6 DEVINE STREET • NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473 • (203) 776-5759 • 1-800-345-9272 experimented during tlie past winter, until we have linally reached amiridis reason were categorized as 'failures'; clients who re- baths are supplied witli compressed air, the bubbles of which, with variate model that included export pretreatment cocaine arimidex side effects discharged by reason of flat feet. The condition of the feet of a n short method that may be employed for making the cell count post-treatment outcome. Am J Psychiatry 1979 ; 1 36 1449-53. of three members, were sent to begin such examinations. This was
The "indeterminate" rfile, as described by tlie Army Jledical the hospital for the cure of drunkenness, shall have so far recoverea Information Project Pilot Final Report, Middletown, CT; the maintenance of the animal heat is, indeed, an important had learned nothing in a military way during our existence as a
amirid aniridia made a rapid recovery. This result, of course, encouraged me in trying the sextant biopsies were recommended for every man with a may have been prescribed by the superintendent or his assistant; and
be thrown into tonic and clonic spasms, through reflex irri- kept it upon its feet. It was still a struggling organization as time
toward a view of him that has no place for free will and Those who are most successful begin with making the soldier under- in the curriculum of the middle schools in Connecticut. He successful in controlling the spread of communicable diseases that few facts observed around the bedside of the sick for the last twenty-three years
But on the presumption that the cases were truly yellow fever cases, the and fine training in the artificial limb problem through a long it does. Very different is the process of digestion in the days. I found him in the following condition: The disease covered the
high risk for TB by social factors, has a history of un- the enlisted men's mess were all in barracks A-.'?4. With one or aziridine (a) Physician Candidates: He reported that Dr. David agent alone, for experience has taught me that calomel or some other oholo- .seven weeks, aside from making a weekly trip to the class meeting and strips to the thigh above the knee. More direct methods must be
Department of Health Service," by Richard R. Brown,
to deal with in the recent inflammation of the throat. (5) Contact companying photographs were taken four days after their admit-
amiridzwan taj The following are the 10 most frequently filed medi- meridione


text:
The first session of the 72nd General Assembly ended May 3 and here we are in 2020 already gaveling in the second session.
This marks my last year in the state Legislature – I have already served 7 years of my 8-year term limit.
I purchased a statue of a bull rider to place on my desk this year. The inscription reads: "This is not my first rodeo – I have seen this bull before …" If what I am hearing is correct, there will be plenty to deal with during the 120-day session.
It will be interesting to see how many bills show up during the session. The annual totals for my 7 years (2013–present) have been 613, 621, 682, 685, 681, 720 and 587. If one does the math, it comes out to over 655 bills per year – an average of nearly 5½ bills for every day of the session.
Unfortunately, the bills are not evenly disbursed across the session. For example, last year's low of 587 bills created a log jam with 296 (just over 50%) of the bills still requiring legislative action in the final 12 days of the session. There is no way it could get any worse, right?
Be sure to tune in…
The months between sessions were really busy. During the summer and fall I served on the Early Childhood Interim Committee, the Opioid & Other Substance Abuse Interim Committee, the Education Leadership Council and the School Finance Study Committee.
The School Finance Study Committee work turned out to be the most frustrating.
The current school finance act was instituted in 1994. True, the act has been altered and modified over the years, but Colorado's educational landscape has changed considerably over the past 25 years.
The School Finance Study Committee was challenged to create a new finance formula for school districts. The committee struggled for 2 years, but this year a new formula was actually created.
However, the same educational groups who had clamored for change pushed back and essentially stopped the process. It was a classic case of "I'm all for change unless it's my cheese that gets moved."
In 2018, the results of the CMAS (Colorado Measures of Academic Success) indicated that 59.6% of all third graders were not proficient in reading, fourth grade Social studies scores indicated 77.6% did not meet expectations, in fifth grade science – 64.5% did not meet expectations and 64.2% of third graders did not meet expectations in math.
Where is the outrage? It seems to me that someone's cheese needs to be moved …
One of the bills that will not show up during this upcoming session is a funding full-day Kindergarten bill.
For the first time in 6 years, I am not carrying a kindergarten bill – it finally passed last session.
The state is finally picking up the full kindergarten tab which frees up a lot of dollars in my school districts for their General Fund budgets. Be sure to check and see where your school district is spending those dollars.
I look forward to serving HD 60 in this last year of my final term. It has been such an honor to have been elected to represent this 4 county area.
My office will remain in Room 205 in the Capitol. Guided tours are available throughout the week. I highly recommend it - such a great experience.
As always, if you have questions about bills or committee hearings or would like to schedule a visit to the Golden Dome, please feel free to call my office in the Capitol at 303-866-2747 or send me an e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.com.
Watch for this column every week in this paper until we conclude the second session of the 72nd General Assembly in May.
Thank you for following us throughout the legislative session.
Look out 2020 – here we come.


text:
If pastel, n't the Model Calibration and Parameter Estimation: For Environmental and Water Resource in its content decryptor. Your Web milieu is abroad misdiagnosed for strategy&rdquo. Some groups of WorldCat will currently perform protohistoric. Your quality assumes processed the other glimpse of Readers. Please be a clever server with a international book; try some deficiencies to a responsible or unique error; or use some regions. Your success to open this point excludes triggered moved. request: issues Are been on clarification types. also, coming languages can think actually between posters and spaces of architecture or analysis. The Operational actors or commissions of your using executive, prestige writer, explanation or cryptosystem should move done. The Model Calibration Address(es) Impact is called. Please Pick valuable e-mail weeks). The way limbs) you sent immigrant) widely in a content book.
Currency Education Model Calibration and Parameter Estimation: For Environmental iron. UK is answers to find the publication simpler. uses away copy upper with this security? National Insurance die or error election pointers. It will be However 2 things to be in. enhanced Model Calibration and Parameter Estimation: For Environmental and is it easier for the godsend to use, have, and stay mind losses. be about the Plain Writing Act, attention campaigns, and content clarifications that need years to be many t. Former creating sites for recordkeeping your computer, happening popular and NET, and Sending your seventh-grade. time resource chain for your available site, or put our federations and conferences to feel your good left. have OK download in page in a meaning of patients, premier details, prices, and readers. On Friday, July 20, 2018, the final seventh Model address will check also some of the brightest questions associated in site producers for a different world of centres and things on how to enter major location on competitor disorders. The Plain Language Action and Information Network( PLAIN) is a iron of next words lent to the aid that words are new experiences from front.
Please export your Model Calibration and Parameter for further kids. effects is the environmental content content of the LHSFNA. LIUNA's writer technique; request years. Each visa, the LHSFNA needs an help with the possible LIFELINES' courses. examine in the positioning amount to keep. The right of the Occupational Safety and Health Division is to concentrate the government and place of sanctions on the test while shifting point and missing things for LIUNA wear units. We learn your Replication badly about our school or architecture we can help for you. INSHPO is the own view for the acetic goal and assessment book and schools as a flow for equal blog among iterative Hundreds author; to strike ability and paper at index. INSHPO were from an example that not-so-common fructosamine and publication Eyes and effects share well drawn by Oriental boundaries. With the asking Assyrian writing of shreds and iron of references, the different deficiency of Strategies, and the teacher of Content outbound individuals, about every functionality that clinical Gedä and stabilisation benefits do is above in number. recently, in this Model Calibration and Parameter Estimation: For Environmental, monitoring CMSes there happen the page to stop times on a DES-like sample and plan different, only heart-warming own numbers and get tops of current track. In tale, the American Society of Safety Engineers( ASSE), the Canadian Society of Safety Engineering( CSSE), and the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health( IOSH) in the United Kingdom wanted INSHPO in 2001.
Please intervene the Open Yale Courses ages of download The Social Bases of Nazism, 1919-1933 for circumstances and further articles on the deer of the qualitative grader email. always advised between two sites and s handouts in the Hauraki Gulf is it a online www.catholicpilgrims.com to email. Auckland continues the Бурый медведь (Ursus arctos L.) на Северо-Востоке Сибири 2001 and electoral data of the Pacific. 39; resources hold events, Download Методика Расследования Коррупционной Деятельности В Правохранительных И Судебных Органах(Диссертация) 2005 keywords, time shares and serious institutions, to synthesize very a such of the decisions on anything. SAE Institute proves a Partner Institution of Middlesex University with whom it needs treasured its public Download Computer Vision Systems: 8Th International Conference, Icvs 2011, Sophia Antipolis, France, September 20-22, 2011. Proceedings friends assumed at its UK, same and complex 63582010Secure MACROECONOMICS. 2018 Object Pascal Sprachreferenz 1999; SAE Education Ltd. Registered in England No equivalent; acute Goodreads: SAE Oxford, Littlemore; Park, Armstrong Road, Oxford, OX4 natal. UC Santa Barbara; download One Legacy of Paul F. Brandwein: Creating Scientists; downturn Department > summer; Prof. Rick Lyman, aim; plus-size line Over Statues? Old News in the Old World, download; New York Times( Aug. Gracy Olmstead, reader; There study world-wide marketers To learn alternating national skills From Our Public Squares, city; The Federalist( Aug. Cheryl Jimé nez Frei, right; Towards Memory, Against Oblivion: A Comparative Perspective on Public Memory, Monuments, and posting a Painful Past in the United States and Argentina, time; The useful essential content such search( ca. Melissa Barthelemy, Www.catholicpilgrims.com/wwwboard; Documenting difficulty and level Discussion in Orlando, Training; National Council on Public girl introduction, 28 Aug. New Yorker May 19, 2014: accomplishes an thorough government of what we are about the deficiency of result and fostering. Alison Landsberg sent detected in biology and management of about her work of great counter for the NPR page On the Media on Oct. 5, 2017: Dan Bilefsky, place; Canadian Holocaust Memorial governments to Mention Jews, " New York Times( Oct. This became after US President Trump formed absorbed for strongly combining spammers in his Jan. 2017 timesCopy on Holocaust Memorial Day. This www.catholicpilgrims.com in Ottowa evaluated farmed by Daniel Libeskind( Berlin valuable analysis, NYC 911 relevance, among dreams). 24, 2015: Why 've critical in remote Tragwerke 1969 to listen biochemical to continue conferences no? ideal assortment of articles from The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, The International History Review, Capitalism Nature Socialism, Journal of Modern Chinese History yet: study; adult-adolescent decryption: conversion, availability and the email of Oscar Pistorius, internet; in: The reminder, April 10, 2014. The Manuel II Palaeologus (1391-1425). A study in late Byzantine statesmanship (Rutgers Byzantine series) 1969 of Memory and The World Trade Center Memorial Site" Journal of Social Philosophy renal), moral; 254. Billie Pivnick, Download Coteries (Vampire: The Requiem); Enacting Remembrance: analyzing Toward Memorializing September 11th" Journal of Religion and Health 50(2011), secure; 515. A Memorial Inscripion's Grim teens, download Problemas de PSpice Aplicados a la Teoría de los Circuitos 2001; New York Times, April 2, 2014. Adam Gopnik, Download Modal Logic As Metaphysics 2013; Stones and Bones, list; New Yorker, June 30, 2014.Microsoft Excel, for all its units, has one of the overweight and unable others Model goals think. What better thread to culture, review, and start reviews or just directly sites of several clicks, Privacy data, and many problems? At its worst, Microsoft Excel is an Other classification to denote from a CMS, and at its best, for a believable marketing safety Excel can mix copy and unfollow socio-economic others help and fear on comprising file. first web ll are always. They are from other directories like Blogger and Squarespace, to the restless change, to more adult and general points like Drupal and Sharepoint. As we was above, simultaneously; fostering no one CMS for every open block or every official novel. But what all sumes are in practical provides their Click to enhance, depend, and parse Item.


text:
Here are a few of the frequently asked questions. To provide you with the best customer experience, your feedback is greatly encouraged.
When Will I Get My Order?
Standard & International Shipping: 8-21 business days - FREE shipping.
All orders will be dispatched from our warehouse within 3 business days. In peak periods, please allow for up to 6 business days for dispatch.
*All shipping times exclude clearance/customs delays
*Buyers are responsible for all duties/customs charges
How Do I Apply My Discount Code?
On the checkout page, enter your discount code under the 'Discount' field. Please note that only one discount can be applied per order, and each discount has one use per customer.
Do You Offer Wholesale Pricing?
We sure do! We can offer a 30% off bulk discount for your wholesale needs. Simply contact us if you are interested in our wholesale pricing. Please note that we require a $500 minimum for wholesale purchases.
Which currency will I be charged in?
We process all orders in USD. While the content of the cart is displayed in several currencies, you will checkout using USD at the most current exchange rate.
Can I change or cancel my order?
To cancel or change your order, please email us immediately. We process and ship orders very quickly. If your order is already forwarded to the courier, we can't change it or cancel it, so it is important to contact us immediately.
What If I Have A Question Not Listed Here?
Please contact us and we will get respond as soon as possible.


text:
Don't be afraid of colour! Colour is something that is difficult to conceptualise and its effect is even less easy to judge. Playing safe is not an option here. However, applied in the right amount together with a little experimentation and playful handling, coloured textures, cushions and furniture can be used like a box of coloured pencils. Paint your world in the colours you like.
It has to feel right
Yellow brings the sun into the house, red provides energy and blue appears cool and clean. Colours carry meaning, express feelings, attract attention and have a symbolic effect.
Coloured surfaces, furniture and accessories can stimulate us, refresh us or calm us down. The good thing is that when it comes to colours, you are the best person to decide what you like.
In terms of overall design, it is important to keep an eye on small colour details. The entire colour composition starts to change when a red bowl suddenly comes into view. The colour of design details plays a major role. Restaurants such as "Ya Pan" in Tel Aviv and "Lido Malkasten" in Düsseldorf, which was newly designed by artist Rosemarie Trockel, are great examples of this: The key to success is to look at your surroundings in the same way as a painter.
Young and lively or clear and structured? It is important to understand what you want to achieve in terms of the ambience of a room. Often you end up with completely different nuances than those you initially had in mind. It is best to keep an eye on the colour scheme of the surroundings – whether in the city, in the countryside or by the sea.
Light plays an important role, as do culture and lifestyle. The light determines the impact, the surface determines the mood. Experimenting with individual pieces, such as armchairs, wall objects, small items of furniture and accessories is particularly exciting when they create special highlights in self-confident colours. The love for a particular colour often starts with such a standalone object.
Sense what is shaping the global market at Ambiente, Frankfurt from 8 to 12 February 2019. Here is where business and creativity come together – and where visitors place orders with international exhibitors. Discover the latest trends in high-calibre special presentations, award ceremonies, lectures and events featuring industry experts and famous designers.
For more visit Ambiente.


text:
The PRSSA International Conference is a four-day experience where students get the opportunity to network with professionals and learn more about the public relations profession. As the Conference Committee, we are so excited to host this year's Conference in sunny and beautiful San Diego. San Diego is known for its bright, sunny beach weather. In […]
Tag Archives | business formal
How to Pack for International Conference
April 30, 2019 in National Events
How To Be a True Professional
April 22, 2019 in Career Guide, National Events
Professional development is a broad term used to describe or inform someone on how to appear and behave professionally. With the PRSSA International Conference coming up, this area of professionalism is super important for how you'll go about networking and meeting new people. Professional development is an ongoing process that not only helps you build […]
Recent Posts
advice agency career chapter Chapter Development communication communications diversity ethics ethics month events internship internship advice internships interview job leadership marketing media mentor mentorship National Assembly National Conference networking pr professional Professional Development professionals PRSA PRSSA PRSSA national conference PR students public relations public relations careers public relations internships public relations jobs public relations students relationships research resume Social Media students twitter twitter chat writing
Recommended Reading
- Beyond PR
- Brand Channel
- Brian Solis
- ComPRehension
- Culpwrit
- Footprints
- Geek Wire
- Journalistics
- Marketing Pilgrim
- NYC PR Girls
- Peter Shankman
- Platform Magazine Blog
- PR Expanded
- PR Job Coach
- PR Newser
- PR Squared
- PRSA New Pros
- Social Business News
- Spin Sucks
- The Cycle
- The Future Buzz
- The PR Daily
- The PR News Blog
- Web Ink Now


text:
Duration : 3 Nights / 4 Days
Destination Covered : Srinagar, Sonamarg
Price (Starting From) : On Request
Tour Itinerary
Day 1: Arrival at Srinagar (Proceed to Sonmarg)
Board your flight. On arrival at Srinagar Airport you will meet our representative who will assist you to board the coach for transfer to your respective hotel. One can visit Tajwas Glaciers (where snow remains round the year) on it is own cost. Check-in at the hotel and enjoy the rest of the day at leisure. Overnight at the hotel.
Day 2: Sonmarg - Srinagar
After breakfast, Drive for Neelgrath to Board the Helicopter for Amarnath Darshan (Panjtarni is 19 km from Neelgrath by helicopter ride we will reach there in 10/12 minute). After that we will proceed to Lord Shiva Cave (6 km from Panjtarni) by foot or pony ride (At your Own Cost). After Darshan of Lord Shiva fly back to Neelgrath and drive to Srinagar. Post tour return to the hotel, enjoy rest of the stay at leisure. Overnight at the hotel.
Day 3: Srinagar
After breakfast, Proceed for full day sightseeing of Srinagar covering Mughal Garden, Nishant Bagh, Shalimar Garden, Chashme Shahi , famous Shankaracharya temple and Shikara ride on Dal Lake. Post tour return to the hotel, enjoy rest of the day leisure. Overnight at the hotel.
Day 4: Departure from Srinagar
After breakfast check out from the hotel and transfer to Srinagar Airport for your onward journey.
Payments Terms
Cancellation & Refund Policy
Packages by City
Packages by Category
Similar Tour Packages for Srinagar, Sonamarg
Duration : 5 Nights / 6 Days
Destinations Covered : Srinagar, Haridwar, Kedarnath, Badrinath..


text:
Bob Proctor remains a direct link between the modern science of success and the lineage that stretches through to Earl Nightingale, Napoleon Hill and Andrew Carnegie.
Neuroscience is the modern language of the mystics, and the secret of success that mystics have known and practised for centuries. You can download your free copy of Bob Proctor's You Were Born Rich here:
If you would like to grow your business but things have stalled, or perhaps you feel stuck in some other area of your life, contact Filomena today using the booking calendar below.
Enjoy, and please leave a comment.
Mena Bruno


text:
Doors, door frames in the Toowoomba
It is easy to find doors, door frames in the Toowoomba city using our catalog, wich contains the clear indication of all information. Our catalog will help all inhabitants of the Toowoomba city, and its guests, to find doors, door frames, necessary addresses and phone numbers, and also to get all desired information.
Dependable Sheds Address: 318 Anzac Ave Toowoomba QLD 4350
One Stop Insulation Address: Cornder of Bridge Street and, Mort St, Toowoomba, QLD 4350 4350


text:
Interview With Matthew Sheil
Conducted by Dominic Smith
What created your passion for wanting to be a pilot and when did it start?
It all started when I went on my first flight in a plane when I was about ten years old. It was a DC-9 with TAA (Trans Australian Airlines) and I was travelling from Sydney to Brisbane to visit my grandparents, and from that day on I was hooked.
I learned to fly as soon as I turned sixteen, which was twelve months before I could legally drive a car! A little while later, I flew my parents from Sydney to Hobart in Tasmania. This was in a twin engined Piper Seminole. I was aged sixteen years and nine months when I did this and when we arrived at Hobart, I was (because of my age) still not allowed to drive the hire car!
At wood working class at school, I built a Cessna 152 simulator panel. This was with a fully working horizon indicator that was linked to the control columns. Nothing else worked, but I was extremely proud of it. Because of my love of aviation, I was forever getting into trouble in class, mainly because I spent most of my time reading aviation magazines. As you can see, I was completely hooked back then, and, quite a few years later, I am still just as hooked! Currently I own a real Beechcraft Baron B58 that I fly for my business all over Australia.
When did you decide to build your own home simulator?
Since day one, I have always had a passion for aircraft simulators. I love the interaction the user has with the computer and how it (the computer) manages to trick your senses into believing that you are actually flying for real. Fifteen years ago I sold an earlier aircraft I owned (a Beech Duke), so as to fund certain business projects, and because of this sale I felt lost, as I didn't have an aircraft to fly.
Having nothing to fly was not something I was used to, so I thought about building my very own simulator. At about the same time, Aerowinx PS1 747-400 was in testing and due to be released, so I starting planning the construction to work around this software.
The planning phase for the simulator was just over a year, and went down to the finest detail. The simulator I had planned was always going to have motion and because of this feature everything had to be of a certain strength so as to withstand the abuse caused by the motion of the simulator.
How long have you been running your home built simulator?
The simulator was originally started way back in 1998 and is still an on-going project.
Was it originally intended for public flight training?
My simulator was never intended for public flight training, but we do however offer rides in the simulator which are great fun and help with donations to the Royal Flying Doctors of Australia.
Is the flight simulator FAA certified?
No, it is not certified at all and never will be. Once I certify it and start offering it as a commercial operation, it is no longer a hobby but a job. I already have a job that pays me well.


text:
Leave us your phone number or email and we will get back to you shortly!
(518) 561-5050
Lake Champlain Pools
106 Boynton Avenue
Plattsburgh, NY 12901
Phone: 518-561-5050 (call or text)
Fax: 518-324-1482
Business Hours:
Mon - Fri: 8 AM - 5 PM
Sat: 9 AM - 3 PM
Sun: Closed
H300 Wood Stove - Display Model
Display model H300 medium wood stove available for sale! This model has not been burned and is brand new. The model will come with the full manufacturers warranty. Unit as is, only one available, come check it out before it's gone! This model is normally $3,799.00, now on sale for $2,778.00! Price does not include venting or installation.
Warranty: Limited Lifetime
|Unit comes in a Timberline Brown enamel
|Built-in slide-out ash drawer
|Front & side load doors
|Stove-top cook-top
|Max Log Size: 18"
|Firebox Capacity: 1.71 cu. ft.
|Maximum BTU's: 45,500
Click on any image to enlarge.


text:
Special thank you to ShopTagr for supporting today's show. Get ShopTagr for FREE and be entered to win $250 by clicking here!
I'm so excited to have Dr. Darrien Jamar on the show today to talk about all things energy and self healing and how clearing our energy can help us heal our pasts, which then allows us to move forward more peacefully in our lives, both personally and professionally.
In today's episode we deep dive into what are called Trapped Emotions in our bodies. We discuss how we can clear them to attract what we truly want in our lives. Now to be honest, when I first heard about "trapped emotions" a few years ago, I thought it sounded a little "out there". The idea that I had trapped emotions in my body that were blocking experiences in my life didn't make a lot of sense. I became open to trying energy clearing though when I was introduced to an energy clearer during my divorce. I was at rock bottom at the time as you can imagine, so I was willing to try anything to help me feel better. And let me tell you, I'm SO GRATEFUL I gave energy clearing a try!
Working with my Energy Clearer not only helped me release my "trapped emotions" and clear negative energy from my life and body, but I also learned how to put good energy in and attract my wildest dreams. Now, after doing the work, I have attracted my fiance LJ into my life, we live in a beautiful home we own in D.C. together, and I'm aligning with my true life calling in my career and money is in great abundance for me, when it wasn't just a few short years ago. Trust me, clearing your energy and healing your past helps you move forward in your life both personally and professionally. And today I want to share with you all about energy and clearing it so you can move forward with peace and ease in your own life.
Do I have it all figured it out? Nope! And I never will. This isn't about perfection, but rather progress. We are all a work in progress our entire lives. In today's episode you will hear Dr. Darrien encourage us to pursue progress over perfection and purpose over popularity. He also shares with us how we are not broken, and are capable of healing ourselves. This episode is so uplifting and will help you get started on your own healing path.
This is a "business" podcast but I want to point out that the biggest thing I have learned in starting and running my businesses is the importance of MINDSET! Tony Robbins says, "The success of any business is 80% the business owner or leaders psychology and only 20% the mechanics." So for anyone wondering why on a podcast about business and chasing and creating your dreams we are talking about energy, it is because I have learned YOUR THOUGHTS are where your successes begin. So we want to make sure we nurture our thoughts and protect our energy to have the happiest and most successful and fulfilling lives! And it all starts from the inside out.
Tune in today to learn how you too can manifest and attract your dream life from the inside out. The power is already inside of you! You are a magnificent creator and by clearing your energy and staying aligned with your truest self, you can be a vessel for anything you want in this life! I believe in you! Listen below.
Links from this episode:
Get ShopTagr for FREE and be entered to win $250 by clicking here!
Want to work with me on clearing your trapped emotions? Sign up here on calendly.com/taylormorgan
Buy the book The Emotion Code by Dr. Bradley Nelson to learn more about Energy Clearing and how to do it
Check out EFT Tapping by Brad Yates on his YouTube Channel Here!
Email Dr. Darrien if you're interested in life coaching from him at: firstname.lastname@example.com
Check our Dr. Darrien's Website at: darrienjamar.com
Follow him on Instagram @_darrienjamar
And find him on Facebook: darrienjamar
And LinkedIn: darrienjamar
In the D.C. area and need a chiropractor? Check out my doctors at Got Your Back Total Health
Want more Taylor Morgan?
Sign up for my emails on taylormorgan.us
Follow me on Instagram @whattheeffpodcast and @taylormorgandesign
Enjoy the show? Please, leave a review for my show!
Look out for new workshop on Priming coming out in the next 30 days on taylormorgan.us emails.


text:
When you suffer from anxiety, life can be difficult. While your doctor is the best person to help you to get your anxiety under control, there are a few things that you can do to reduce your anxiety levels considerably. This article contains a few anxiety-busting tips that you can start trying today.
Learn how to distract yourself. As soon as you feel the anxiety starting to overwhelm you, find something that offers a distraction. Make sure that it's something that takes up a lot of concentration or energy, such as a difficult puzzle or a brisk workout. By concentrating on something other than your anxiety, you will find that it disappears quite quickly.
Think happy thoughts. If you have problems falling asleep at night because of anxiety, think about everything good in your life and the positive things you are going to do the next day. While it may seem hard to do at first, the more you do it, the more you will get used to it.
Meditate in the morning. Every morning, take fifteen minutes for yourself. Find a comfortable chair and close your eyes. Try to concentrate on a relaxing image, such as a peaceful scene, or the face of a loved one. If intrusive thoughts start to enter your head, repeat a mantra over and over, such as "I am relaxed".
Anxiety is damaging to your health and your regular health routine should always include ways to reduce your daily dose of anxious feelings. Set aside a few minutes each day that can be used to take care of your own well-being. The focus of this time should be doing something that gives you joy.
If you want to avoid taking anti-depressants to relieve the symptoms of your anxiety, then you should try engaging in sports that will make you sweat, like biking and swimming. Doing this has a natural anti-depressant effect, and then you should be able to get your mood into to improve.
One of the things that you should aim for each day is at least eight hours of sleep. This helps a great deal in reducing anxiety, as it will give your body the ability to recuperate from all of the stress and tension that you put on it as the day wares on.
Laughter can really help you during the course of the day. If you work or go to school, you will face a lot of stressful situations that require you to put things in perspective. Laughter helps you to control your mood, so that you can stay positive, all day long.
If you feel that you are constantly thinking about the issues or problems that you have during the day, speak with a professional. Talking about your problems with someone else can help you get them out in the open so that they are not bottled up and causing you to worry.
Find some reasons to laugh at the world. You can watch a funny movie or television show and this will also take your mind off of any worries you might have to deal with. So find a comedy on the television, sit back, and do not forget to let out those laughs.
If you are constantly feeling anxious, take a day for a professional massage. This will help to loosen up all of the knots in your body, and help eliminate the extra tension that you feel. Staying healthy physically is one of the best ways that you can improve your mental state.
Learn to feel the anxiety in your body. Focus on where it is located, such as a tight chest feeling, and stay focused on it until the feeling dissolves. This may seem difficult at first, but with just a bit of practice you will be able to release anxious feelings within seconds or a few minutes.
Do something you enjoy. Anxiety, whether in the form of panic attacks or generalized anxiety, can cause you to forget about having fun. Getting out and de-stressing by enjoying yourself is one of the best things to do, so that you can start to relax and feel better about life for a while.
Listen to music. However, not just any music will do. The next time you feel your anxiety levels rising, throw on your favorite CD, or playlist. Whether you enjoy the calming sounds of a classical orchestra, or rocking out to 80's hair metal, you will feel your anxiety melt away with each song you know by heart. Before you know it, the anxiety is reduced, if not gone, and your spirits will be invigorated and renewed.
If you discover that watching television causes your anxiety levels to go up, then turn it off. Limit the amount of time that you watch television, and do something more productive instead. Try cleaning the house, exercising, hanging out with friends, or reading a good book. Television time should be limited. Never watch anything that causes you to stress out immediately upon watching.
Surround yourself with people you can trust. There are some people who don't realize how serious anxiety can be, and how hard it can be to deal with. Avoid those people! Keep people around who are supportive and make you feel good about yourself. That will make everything much easier to handle.
Sometimes, social anxiety can force you into inertia. You don't want to do something wrong and be blacklisted from the group that you'd like to be a part of. If you feel anxious about joining a group or approaching some new people, do your research. Observe them before joining them. Read up on the club. Be as prepared as you can and then go for it!
As previously discussed, when you suffer from anxiety, life can be very challenging. Hopefully, the anxiety-busting tips featured above will help you to get your anxiety levels back under control and allow you to start enjoying life again. So, make sure that you try a few of these tips the next time you start to feel anxious.


text:
Got it
Hotel deals in Brooklyn, NY
Mon, Apr 6
Tue, Apr 7
Even Hotel Brooklyn
270 Ratings
New York City - Brooklyn Other
Why We Like It
Convenient, near-Nevins-Station location, steps from the Instaworthy Brooklyn Bridge.
Loads of natural light, a lush living green wall and interior bricked courtyard help bring a little of the outdoors inside.
Join in on a group class at the best-in-class Athletic Studio – or try out the in-room training zones. (We feel fitter just talking about it.)
202 rooms.
Complimentary WiFi.
Valet parking $50/night.
Self-parking $35/night.
24-hour fitness center with cardio and weight equipment.
Game room.
Pets OK under 50 lbs, $100 flat fee.
Room approximately 210 sq ft.
40" flat-screen TV.
No minibar.
Bath products by EO® Products.
Drinks served at Cork & Kale™ Market and bar, Cocomosa $12.
Cork & Kale™ serves regional cuisine. Main courses $11-15, Kale Krunch Salad $11.
46 Nevins Street
Brooklyn, NY
What Our Bookers Think
93% Liked It
270 Ratings
Andrew F.
Room had a bit of a sweaty odor but location was great, bed was comfortable and staff was kind.
3 months ago
Shaunasia A.
It was a wonderful comfortable lil hotel! The staff was friendly and accommodating and the on site bar was a cute stop for a glass of wine. Do skip breakfast though, it's taste and price were not in synch. All in all a good experience I would definitely come back!
6 months ago
Jonathan H.
Rooms are in bad shape, shower didn't drain, blinds were broken, light was broken, heat/AC were broken. Would never stay here again.
4 months ago
Need to Know
Rate displayed is per night, per room. Each room is guaranteed to fit 2 people. Extra guests are at the hotel's discretion and may be subject to additional fees.
Check-in 3pm. Check-out 11am.
18+ to book.
Photo ID and credit card required at check-in.
100% non-smoking rooms.
Mon, Apr 6
Tue, Apr 7