text:
Sometimes when you read the Bible, a verse will jump out off the page and slap you across the face. When you read the Bible with an open mind and heart, the bluntness of it can be jarring. One verse in particular that comes to mind is 1 John 2:19. It says, "They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us."
As much as we do not like to think about it, this is something all of us have seen and experienced. And in reading this verse, it should not be taken as just fact, rather it should be a sobering warning for us today Sometimes people we walk with and minister with suddenly "fall away."
For many, Christianity is about following rules or saying a prayer. I think we need to remember that Christianity is neither, rather it is a life of devotion to Christ. It is daily taking up our cross and following Him and the fruit of which is a lifestyle of daily worship of Him and active service in His kingdom.
As Christians, it is important that we always evaluate the motivation of our hearts to be sure that the faith we live by is the true Christianity of the Bible, not a focus on outward things or counterfeit teaching that omits Jesus. Things such as going to church, doing the devotions and putting something in the offering bag are good things, but they are not the true markers of a follower of Christ.
What then are some of the characteristics of a false, Christ-less Christianity? Although there are many, I want us to focus on three.
Firstly, it mistakes commitment to Christianity for commitment to Christ. As I mentioned earlier, going to church is a good thing. The traditions of Christianity are engaging and exciting, and they should be. Christmas pageants, early morning Easter services, and potluck socials are great ways to know one another and build relationships, but the danger is that they can function as a replacement for a relationship with Jesus. A cruel trick of the enemy is to make us feel most alive when we are participating in the culture of Christianity, rather than communing with Christ.
The writer of Hebrews noticed this and commented in 6:4-6, "It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age and who have fallen away, to be brought back to repentance."
There is the old adage, "going to church makes you a Christian as much as going to McDonald's makes you a hamburger." Sadly, many have been deceived into believing this is true.
Secondly, people mistake biblical knowledge for biblical wisdom. It is quite possible to grow in biblical literacy without growing in wisdom and holiness. Many people shudder when they hear the word, "theology," thinking it is something reserved for pastors and theologians. The truth is, if you claim to be a Christian, theology should be a natural part of your life. It is literally the "study of God." But this study is not purely an academic vocation, rather it is one of the ways we get to know God, His character and His story.
Sadly, many people look at it as purely academic or they only scratch the surface, taking in information rather than allowing it to transform our lives. Going to school and being in ministry for over two decades, I love studying the theology of the Word of God, but I have also seen far too many people remain as immature followers of Jesus.
Lastly, it mistakes participation in ministry for a Christ-like lifestyle. Ministry is a part of the life of a church and believers. In fact, I would say it is necessary for Christian growth. But doing that does not define what or who a Christian is. Disciples of Jesus are called to offer every aspect of their life to the Kingdom of God, not just those on the church calendar.
In my first church, there were many people involved in ministry. Some did missions while others were active with Sunday school and youth programs. There were others who participated in our church's worship ministry as musicians and vocalists. But the problem was many of them would only come to church when they were on. For the Sundays they were not scheduled to lead, they avoided church.
It's unbiblical for us to think of ministry as separate from life as if we step out of one and into the other. Living for Jesus is not something we do part-time or on our own terms. Compartmentalizing our lives to "accommodate" our faith is unbiblical. Instead, we ought to live with a constant mentality that asks the question: "How can I, right here right now, be part of what God is doing on earth?"
If our Christianity is something less than a surrender of the thoughts and motives of our heart to the Lordship of Jesus Christ, and a daily hunger for and the pursuit of his transforming grace, then our faith will tend to get reduced to a system of tradition, philosophy, and activity.
Until the day we die, we are called to resist this kind of "false" faith and Christ-less Christianity. We have been given the grace to do so, and the grace to desire something so much better – a soul-satisfying relationship with Jesus himself!
Maybe it is time for each of us to take some time and reevaluate where we are in our walk with God. Are we going through the motions or are we pursuing God with all we are in this journey called life? In the end, maybe, perhaps, you need to make the courageous decision to stop living for everybody else's expectations and start being true to who God uniquely made you to be.


text:
A poem about Sir Geoffrey Hill
A poem for the planet.
Originally written as haikus: an almanac about the seasons in Headington, Oxford, where I used to live.
Appetizing new versions of famous poems
Little ironies: Six poems in imitation of Thomas Hardy.
On the limits of empathy
A familiar bird on our back lawn...
A poem protesting against the dominance of neuroscience
With apologies to Elizabeth Bishop
First published in "Diary of a Bipolar Explorer" (Signal 2018)
During a bout of flu, the poet is imprisoned in her sick-bed but finds herself in the company of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who as usual has quite a lot to say.
Four days before Christmas, a bitter vengeful woman tries to compose a Christmas card to send to her ex, whom she believes to be on his deathbed...
A poem about internet trolls
The Armstice centenary has prompted terrible dreams...
A poem about the menace of internet trolls
A poem from my collection 'Earth's Almanac'
An anthology of contemporary poems and critical reflections on Edward Thomas
An environmental tale in verse
A cautionary tale in verse
A mock-epic satire in 3 cantos about technocracy in higher education
A selection of my political verse
An anthology inspired by Bob Dylan's winning of the Nobel Prize for Literature
An experiment in integrating creative writing into the Oxford acaedmic syllabus
An anthology celebrating the return of the Cornish Chough to Cornwall
A long historical ballad set in Cornwall just before the First World War. Written by Lucy Newlyn, set to music and performed by Stuart Estell.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
The biggest ship that MSC has launched
MSC Meraviglia
MSC Cruises is a European cruise line with passengers from all over the world. They offer comfortable, informal cruises at a reasonable price. Due to good offers, there are many families on board. Especially on the Mediterranean cruises in the summer (July till August) many Italian families enjoy their holidays on board and spread a lively, typically Italian atmosphere on board. During off-season and during cruises to Northern Europe the atmosphere is calmer and also many elderly guests enjoy their cruise.
MSC Meraviglia is by far the biggest ship the line has launched — and the fourth biggest in the world. The 171,598-ton, 5,714-passenger ship marks the start of a massive (nine billion euros) ship-building program that will see a megaship launched each year until 2022 (in fact, there are two alone in 2017 — MSC Seaside, a new class of ship, launches in December 2017).
MSC Meraviglia, or wonder in English, is the lead ship of MSC's new Vista generation vessels that is the first of two identical ships on order from STX France. This mega ship spends its first summer sailing the Western Mediterranean with three homeports: Genoa, Marseille and Barcelona. The new flagship of MSC cruises is 1033 feet long and has more than 355,209 sq. ft. of public spaces
MSC Meraviglia is the flagship of MSC Cruises' modern fleet of family-friendly cruise ships. Meraviglia, which translates to "Wonder", is the perfect name for a ship that's sure to amaze with her contemporary design and feature-filled decks plans. MSC Meraviglia's enhanced MSC Yacht Club will feature exclusive restaurants, a private lounge, private whirlpool baths and several spacious suites. Outside of these premium suites you'll find a variety of cabins such as duplex suites, balcony/ocean view/interior cabins and MSC Cruises' new family cabins.
All 2250 cabins on the MSC Meraviglia are furnished very modern, equipped with a bathroom (shower and WC), mini bar, safe and Air conditioning. Standard cabins measure about 15 up to 18 square meters (inside and ocean view), 19 square meters (balcony cabin) and 28-38 square meters (suite with balcony). The MSC Meraviglia features cluster cabins for families travelling together. This new concept allows up to 3 passenger staterooms to be linked together and opened up. Guests can also experience a new level of luxury with the enhanced MSC Yacht Club, entirely self-contained with restaurants, a solarium with its own pool, a private lounge and fascinating suites with private whirlpool baths.
Food and Beverages
The main restaurants L'Olivio d'oro, L'Olive dorée and the Waves restaurant serve a mouthwatering blend of freshly prepared Mediterranean cuisine and international specialties in elegant surroundings. The Marketplace Buffet restaurant is an alternative to the main restaurants and is opened 20 hours per day. Furthermore the guests can enjoy Asian specialties in the Kaito Teppanyaki Grill as well as in the Kaito Sushi Bar. American delicacies are waiting for the guests in the Butcher's Cut.
Entertainment, Sports and Relaxation
The cutting-edge MSC Meraviglia is packed with extraordinary features that make them ideal for cruising in summer and winter, including wide dining options and entertainment choices, stunning panoramic spaces, a large theatre and a spectacular amusement park linked to an outdoor aqua park, as well as a three-deck interior promenade. The picturesque Promenade Deck includes the ship's shopping arcade (with duty-free priced boutiques and shops), various bars, specialty restaurants, live street entertainment, ample seating. The whole area is covered by a huge LED-screened dome ceiling, serving as digital sky. Besides the real sky webcam views, the Promenade LED screen above shows various images, vistas, special-effects and visual shows. Another highlight is the cooperation with Cirque du Soleil. The guests are entranced by an unique and extraordinary show.
Atmosphere Onboard
Aboard the MSC Meraviglia it is like in a well-kept vacation hotel ashore: Good food, a numerous sports facilities, comfortable cabins and a variegated entertainment program creating a variety of powerful atmospheres at all times.
MSC Meraviglia Dress Code
During the daytime it's casual, with people wandering around in just swim suits and flip-flops. In the evening it's dressier, but more smart casual than formal, except for the two "elegant" (not formal) nights per cruise. A jacket for the men and a dress for the ladies would not go amiss, but it's not strictly enforced. A suit or tux or ball gown are not necessary, though on the meet-the-captain night people go all-out.
MSC Meraviglia Gratuity
Adults, which are classified as aged 12 and over, pay 10 euros per night; children, classified as aged 2 and over, pay five euros per night, and there's no charge for kids aged 2 and under. This is automatically added to your account. A 15 percent service charge is added to bar bills and spa treatments, with the exception of the prepaid all-inclusive beverage package. The onboard currency is the euro.
MSC Yacht Club
Experience MSC Cruises' most luxurious touches in the MSC Yacht Club, which has been enhanced specifically for the MSC Meraviglia. Within the exclusive retreat, the Meraviglia's Yacht Club guests will have private access to specialty restaurants, a solarium, pool and lounge space. Plus, personal suite accommodations feature whirlpool baths!
Shop to your heart's content along the MSC Meraviglia's extensive Promenade. The full ceiling of the Promenade is an LED display that will display beautiful images and skies throughout your voyage. If you can pull your eyes away from the ceiling, be sure to check out the popular shops and restaurants along the Promenade.
Amusement & Aqua Parks
Have the time of your life in MSC Meraviglia's two-story indoor amusement park, which features a basketball court and plenty of space for fun activities. After a good workout indoors at the Amusement Park, head right outside to cool off at the Aqua Park or one of the refreshing onboard pools.
The ship will be Mediterranean-based until 2019, it also (unlike many lines) embarks and debarks in most ports. The average age is around the early 40s for adults, though with the strong emphasis on family expect literally hundreds of kids during school vacations, all of which are extremely well catered for. There are no bedtimes for kids, nor adult-only areas: Children are up until all hours, roam the ship unchecked and will be in the disco until closing time, which can seem odd.
All announcements are in five languages: English first, then Italian, Spanish, French and German.
When you aren't relaxing in your state-of-the-art accommodations, you could be enjoying any number of activities aboard the MSC Meraviglia's expansive decks. From the two-story amusement park and outdoor water park to the indoor promenade lined with restaurants and shops, there's something for everyone aboard the MSC Meraviglia.
To learn more about this marvelous ship, contact Joyful Holidays experienced consultants today through:
Tel: 02 634 2301 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com Website: www.tourjoyful.com


text:
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. — Robert A. Heinlein
Or a person endlessly going to school, never producing, living on other people's golden eggs - the eternal student syndrome. — Stephen R. Covey
BY DEVOTING THE TIME AND EFFORT IT TAKES TO DEVELOP WHAT GOD HAS PLACED YOU, YOU WILL EXPERIENCE THE JOY OF FULFILLMENT. — Joyce Meyer
Most fathers and ... Mothers. Only your grandmother and Ghengis Khan know how to do it. — Bill Cosby
In my experience I've learned women are better streakers. — Steve Spurrier
Let's go get the slug gun and shoot some cats — Louis Nowra


text:
Actualiseer je flash player voor een optimale gebruikerservaring. Klik hier om de laatste versie van Adobe Flash te downloaden.
U heeft het maximaal aantal karakters voor dit bericht bereikt(140 karakters).
Positive and kind, thoughtful and got to the point quickly, the kind of reading i really needed, thank you Jonathan.
Hello everyone. How you all are having a great day. Blessings xxx Jonathan Love
just wondering when youre on I missed you bu a hair the other day
Always quick to connect and very accurate, and consistent. His readings always give me hope. Thank you!
We got cut off due to my credits running out but Jon was able to connect quickly and tell me what I needed to hear. It was meaningful, and I enjoyed his comfortable, calm demeanor and accuracy of connecting the way he did. Thank you for your help Jon.
What I like most about Jon is his passion for his work. Clear messages and straight forward communications he provides. Thanks Jon.
Fabulous. Really great!
Great. Really enjoy his reading style. He really connected well. I like his energy. Highly recommend! TY Jon
Great at connecting. doesn't need too much info. I can tell he really cares and his advice was spot on!
Fast, specific, spot on with background.Thank you!
U heeft het maximale aantal karakters voor dit bericht bereikt (140 characters).
De site wordt beheerd en geëxploiteerd door Duodecad IT Services Luxembourg S.à r.l.
© 2019 numerology.oranum.com - Alle rechten voorbehouden!


text:
Beau Card Stock Thickness
Photos – From the thousand images on the internet with regards to card stock thickness
, we all picks the top selections having ideal image resolution simply for you all, and this photographs is one of pictures series within our ideal photos gallery about Beau Card Stock Thickness
Photos. I hope you may think it's great.
This specific picture (Card Stock Thickness Unique Super Thick Business Cards) earlier mentioned will be labelled having: card stock,card stock dollar general,card stock examples,card stock ivory,card stock keys,card stock nsn,card stock office depot,card stock paper sizes,card stock thickness,cardstock canada,cardstock dividers,cardstock knife,cardstock laser printer,cardstock letters,cardstock name tags,cardstock nz,cardstock walmart,joanns cardstock,officeworks cardstock,ream of cardstock,
posted simply by admin with 2018-04-27 17:49:30. To find out just about all photos in Beau Card Stock Thickness
Photos pictures gallery make sure you abide by this particular url.
The Elegant and Interesting card stock thickness
intended for Motivate Your own home Provide Property|Inviting FantasyProperty
Card Stock Thickness Unique Super Thick Business Cards Uploaded by admin on Friday, April 27th, 2018 in category Invitations.
See also Card Stock Thickness Unique 1 Bag Hang Pennants Happy Birthday Paper Flag Party Favor Bunting from Invitations Topic.
Here we have another image Card Stock Thickness Génial Paper Thickness Chart 14 Inspirational Paper Thickness Gsm Chart featured under Card Stock Thickness Unique Super Thick Business Cards. We hope you enjoyed it and if you want to download the pictures in high quality, simply right click the image and choose "Save As". Thanks for reading Card Stock Thickness Unique Super Thick Business Cards.


text:
Subject: Coroplast
Our museum purchased cabinets to store Civil War flags in March 2003. All three museum technicians working in the vicinity of the cabinets are experiencing health problems, ie. allergies, burning eyes and other problems. There is a strong acidic-like smell from the interiors especially when kept closed up. The cabinet materials include large sheets of coroplast for the shelves, silicone gaskets, powder-coated steel walls and plastic end pieces on sides of each shelf. The manufacturer claims that he has not experienced this problem and wonders if it may be a bad batch of coroplast. Has anyone experienced this problem? I have never heard of this problem with coroplast. *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:21 Distributed: Monday, August 18, 2003 Message Id: cdl-17-21-011 ***Received on Monday, 18 August, 2003
URL: http://cool.conservation-us.org/byform/mailing-lists/cdl/2003/1116.html
Timestamp: Thursday, 26-Jan-2012 15:56:53 PST
Retrieved: Tuesday, 15-Oct-2019 11:05:15 GMT


text:
HP LEET Answer Key 2019 HP Lateral Entry Entrance Test Answer Key 2019 HP Polytechnic LEET Answer Key 2019 Download HP Polytechnic Lateral Entry Entrance Test Answer Key 2019 Check Himachal Pradesh LEET Answer Sheet 2019 HP LEET Entrance Exam Answer Sheet 2019 HP LEET Objection Form 2019
HP LEET Answer Key 2019
Latest Updated 27.05.2019 : HPTSB Has release the HP Lateral Entry Exam (LEET) Answer Key On Its Official Website. Candidates can download their respective Answer Key through the Link Given Below…..
About HP Polytechnic Lateral Entry Entrance Test (LEET):
Himachal Pradesh Takniki Shiksha Board (HPTSB) Invited the Applicants for Admission to Diploma courses in Govt. & Pvt. Polytechnics in Himachal Pradesh under Lateral Entry Scheme for the academic session 2019-20. All the Eligible & Interested Candidates Applied for Entrance Test By Submitting a Online Application Form. The Process of Application Submission is Commenced From the Date 04/04/2019 to 09/05/2019. More Details About the Recruitment is Provided Below.
About Exam:The HSSB was decided to conduct the exam on 26 May 2019. Many Candidates gave the exam on the prescribed exam centers. The exam was written objective type with total 100 marks of 03 hours duration.
Answer Key :
Those Candidates who gave the exam of HP LEET are now searching for the Answer Key. Answer Key is available on on the official website of HPTSB. Answer Key is very important for forecasting the result and also examine own answers. Candidates keep in touch with the official website of HP LEET. Also we will upload the Answer Key below in the link.
Download the HP Lateral entry (LEET) Answer Key 2019: Available Soon
Objection Form :
All the Candidates gave their exam on the decided exam date. Now when the answer key is provided to the candidates they can check that answer keys. Many Candidates will have objection with the provided answer key So those candidates can filled a objection form against the answer key. The Details of Objection form is available on the official website. Candidates can filled that form on the decided dates by the HPTSB. Candidates must visit to the website to know the objection form Details.
Candidates can send their Objection to the E-mail : [email protected] till 5:00 PM of 27.05.2019 (Expected).
Final Words :
Candidates can bookmark our website (www.jobriya.com) for get the regular updation regarding this post and other related details.
Important Link Area
|Download Answer Key
|Available Now
|Download Himachal Pradesh Polytechnic LEET Result
|Detailed Notification
|HP Polytechnic Lateral Entry Entrance Test (LEET) Notification
|Official Website
If Candidates have any query about this post then they are invited to comment on the post. We will solve them soon.


text:
What role will Evangelicals play in the 2016 presidential election? How to explain the unexpected rise of Republican candidate Donald Trump? These were among the questions panelists grappled with during a lunchtime discussion hosted by the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD).
The event took place at the University Club in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, April 5. Panelists included Washington Examiner Politics Editor Jim Antle, pro-life author and activist Charmaine Yoest, Ethics and Public Policy Center Vice President Michael Cromartie, and Weekly Standard Executive Editor Fred Barnes. The panel was introduced by IRD President Mark Tooley. It was attended by members of the IRD staff and board, in addition to members of the public.
Below is a transcript of this panel, lightly edited for continuity. Also included is a gallery containing photos from the event.
Tooley: The experts include one of our IRD board members, more famously television commentator and founding editor of The Weekly Standard, Fred Barnes.
And then my friend Jim Antle, who is at the Washington Examiner, great columnist and journalist, and he and I are the only two conservative Methodists in Washington, D.C. Glad Jim is here.
And of course Mike Cromertie, vice president of Ethics and Public Policy Center, who knows everything there is to know about Evangelicals in America. He will bring that expertise to us today, so thank you Mike.
And finally Charmaine Yoest, herself a well-known commentator and writer, an exponent for the pro-life cause, and she's most distinguished for her mother Janice Crouse who is chair of the IRD board. So Charmaine, great to have you here.
In terms of who speaks first, that should be based on whoever has finished their lunch first. Jim, you're not eating, so maybe you can go first. If you could kick us off.
Antle: As long as I don't get indigestion while talking about the 2016 campaign I'll be fine. And so, just to give you a little bit of a rundown, on the Republican side, obviously everything has been very dominated by Donald Trump. I'm the politics editor at Washington Examiner, but since Trump has been in the race I've felt much more like the entertainment editor.
Essentially the Republican race is about a number. It's about the number 1,237. Either Trump will get that number – that is the number of delegates that is required to [obtain the] absolute majority of delegates at the Republican National Convention. That's the number any one will need to get in order to win the nomination, the minimum threshold, and it's probably the number Donald Trump probably needs to win on the first ballot if he is going to be the nominee.
The thinking is that if he is not winning the majority on the first ballot, on subsequent ballots when the delegates are no longer required to vote as their states and congressional districts have voted that he will begin to bleed support, and that even some of those people who are attending the Republican National Convention as Trump delegates will not actually be Trump supporters. So once they are no longer required to vote for Donald Trump, the thinking is that they will no longer do so. Most states only confine their delegates for the first ballot. Some do for the first two. There are a couple of cases where I think it's the first three. But after that it's a free for all.
So the real question is whether Trump can hit that number, and it's not clear that he can, but he is the only person who can mathematically at this point through the primary process. No one else right now can win the Republican presidential nomination through the primaries and caucuses that remain. Anybody else who becomes the nominee has to become the nominee through a contested convention process. So Ted Cruz and John Kasich are remaining in the race with the hopes that they would be able to prevail at the convention. Ted Cruz, I think, however, does need to get as close as he can in order to make a more compelling argument.
The sort of advantage that Trump has, and the disadvantage that Cruz has, is that Cruz's popularity with a lot of Republican insiders is not much better than Trump's and in fact there was a lot of reluctance early on by Republican donors to fund anti-Trump activities when it looked like Cruz would be the primary beneficiary of anti-Trump activities. The hope was always among a lot of these Republicans was that Marco Rubio would at some point emerge and be in a position to benefit from anything that harmed Trump. And there were some brief periods where that looked like it might come to pass, but that's not ultimately not what happened. Rubio is now out of the race.
Rubio, however, is still a factor in the race because he has suspended his campaign. He has not released his delegates. He is urging them to stick with him as long as their state party rules require them to do so. That would make him a factor in denying Trump the absolute majority that he needs. Unfortunately, Rubio failed in his biggest opportunity to deprive Trump of a majority when he did not win his home state primary, which is a winner-take-all state, and Donald Trump instead won it in very, very convincing fashion and got all of those delegates.
But still, Rubio did well enough to get a significant cache of delegates. And John Kasich, by virtue of winning his home state of Ohio and managing to collect some stragglers here and there, also has what is going to be a significant group. He's got about 143 or so delegates.
So we've never really in the modern primary process had to concern ourselves this much with who individual delegates are and, you know, what they're going to do once they get to Cleveland. Because in the modern process, everything's really been decided by the primaries and the caucuses, and the convention is kind of a formality. And people show up and they listen to speeches and, you know, they sightsee during the day, and they, you know, go watch speeches at night. And it may not be like that this time.
Trump, even if he gets a majority, will be very close. So then the fact that some states like Pennsylvania have large numbers of unbound delegates will be very important. The fact that a lot of state conventions influence, or actually determine, what the identity of delegates, regardless of who they are allocated to by the primary process, becomes very important. And just, you know, I think you may end up seeing challenges to different delegates. You might see Donald Trump threatening to sue lots of people. So it's become a very interesting and kind of insidery process.
Another thing to watch is this possibility that the convention may bring somebody from the outside to become the Republican nominee. Once it is thrown open — an "open convention" is actually the term that the RNC prefers — once it becomes open that is a real possibility. The people involved in the rules process are very divided on whether that would be a good thing to do. Some people say "yes" because none of the current candidates — or a lot of the current candidates, people don't have a lot of confidence in their general election ability. Other people say "no" because you had people spend millions of dollars, and in some cases get millions of votes, and you're simply going to tell them, "Well too bad. We're going to give Paul Ryan this job, too." Or, you know, whomever.
There is a limit though, I think, on the number of jobs we can't find anybody else to do for the Republican Party. Be that as it may. So that is also a possibility.
So you could see then a strange alliance forming between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz at the convention because they will control the overwhelming majority of delegates. They may, at some point, their increasing personal acrimony aside, need each other, because they will then be in the best position to prevent some kind of— by working together, prevent some kind of white knight from coming in.
And then a huge thing that doesn't really have a whole lot to do with the primaries at all, but may end up deciding the entire outcome of the nomination process, is the rules committee. The big thing about the rules of the Republican National Convention is that there really aren't any rules that are binding on the rules committee. They can really rewrite pretty much anything they want to do. It hasn't really mattered in the past, because the convention has primarily — with the exception of 1976 when there was a contested convention between Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan, which Ford won on the first ballot — the conventions have really been a pep rallies for the nominee.
So the most significant recent rules change was in 2012 when they decided they wanted to require that anybody who name was placed in nomination had to have won a majority of delegates in eight rather five states, because Ron Paul had won a majority of delegates in five states, and he otherwise would have been able to have his name placed his name in nomination. Now Ron Paul supporters and some others were unhappy with that rule change, but it did not alter the outcome of the nomination process. Even if they had placed his name in nomination, Mitt Romney still would have beat him. So the rules change really served primarily to preserve the Republican National Convention as a pep rally for the eventual nominee, and it was going to be Mitt Romney.
In this case, rules changes about how many states and whose name can be placed in nomination and under what circumstances and conditions, those can very much affect the outcome of the race. They could affect the outcome of who is the nominee. So they become very, very important, and even a lot of people who are very plugged into the process don't necessarily know how everything is going to shape out. So, you know, that's the Republicans.
Now the Democrats have a race that is simultaneously much more boring, but also much more interesting in a weird way, too. Hillary Clinton, barring something that places her in severe legal jeopardy with the email situation, is going to be the Democratic nominee. She has an insurmountable delegate lead, past by the large number of super delegates who are party leaders in the Democratic Party, who get to be delegates to the convention and who can vote for whoever they want, regardless of who won primaries and caucuses in their state or congressional districts.
But even among pledged delegates, Hillary Clinton has a lead that Bernie Sanders is unable to likely overtake. Democrats don't have any winner-take-all states, so there's no real easy way for him to make up the deficit, even if he piles up some wins in big states New York or California.
But Bernie Sanders is on a bit of a winning streak. So there is no real incentive for him to get out of the race, even though Hillary Clinton would like him to, at the very least, stop criticizing her, because she would like to give her attention to the general election. But Sanders has no incentive to do that, both because he's winning in a lot of these predominantly white states and in a lot of the caucus states where he can out organize Hillary Clinton, and he is also still raising money. The big thing that gets candidates to drop out of their races is their donors. You know, the candidate often has a hard time deciding for themselves when it's over, but your donors have a little bit more financial incentive to tell you when it's over, so they do. And [in] Bernie Sanders's case, his donors are not giving that much money per donor. They're mostly small contributions, and they're idealists so they don't have much of a reason to tell him to drop out. And a lot of them still think he can win because he's winning all these states. He might win Wisconsin tonight.
So there are all these sort of dynamics in play where Clinton wants to focus on the general, which she inevitably will get to barring, you know, something terrible happening legally, and Bernie Sanders won't let her. So there's less suspense, but that also could potentially have some general election impact because you have some of your younger and more enthusiastic Democrats who are unlikely to vote for another candidate. But do you retain that kind of enthusiasm?
The big question for the Democrats is: How do you maintain the level of enthusiasm some traditionally low-turnout voting blocs had for Barack Obama? And I think the answer for Hillary Clinton is hope that Donald Trump is the nominee and substitute enthusiasm for Barack Obama by way of fear of Donald Trump. And even if Trump is not the nominee, I think Hillary Clinton will attempt to continue to run against Donald Trump.
Secondarily, she is obviously going to run on the fact that she would be the first woman president, and hope that that generates a lot enthusiasm among female voters, which it probably would to some extent do and might do to a greater extant if she's running against Donald Trump.
So with one party's nomination process really still very much in flux, and the other party's nomination process over but complicated and messy, we're still looking at, I think, a very uncertain picture heading into November.
So, you know, Wisconsin tonight is very important on the Republican side. It gives Ted Cruz his best opportunity to really create a narrative that momentum is shifting away from Donald Trump. Given that we're heading into New York where Trump has a very, very big lead, that may or may not be true, but narratives and expectations matter a lot in politics. This is really Cruz's best shot to get into in an actual primary. He's mostly beat Trump in caucuses or in states where you feel like he had everything going for him. This is a little bit more of a mixed state, even though he's got a lot going for him here. So we'll have to see what happens tonight.
Tooley: Thank you, Jim. Charmaine, could you go next?
Yoest: I would love to. Thanks so much for having me, Mark. This is really an interesting opportunity, particularly because it is Wisconsin primary day. … Tomorrow we know, one way or the other, the roads are going to diverge. Some of the polls coming out this morning do show Trump having an opportunity to still have a good showing in Wisconsin, so I think that's fascinating because the last two weeks obviously have been a disaster for him.
So the thing that I find the most fascinating about his breakdown over the last ten days is that it very neatly coincides with the birth of his grandson and the corollary relative disappearance of Ivanka, not just from the campaign trail, but having had children myself, I can tell you she might have been just a little bit distracted over the last ten days.
And to me that really speaks volumes about both the way his campaign is being run, how he is being influenced, and also it speaks to the fact that this election is going to be largely driven by the female vote. And why do I say that? It's because we've been paying a fair amount of attention to the most recent polling data which shows Donald Trump having 70 percent unfavorables among the entire electorate. But that drops down to, I want to say, roughly around 49 percent when you're looking at just Republicans, which for right now, during this period, is what's the really relevant time period.
If you shift your gaze and look over at Hillary, she's also doing dramatically badly among women – really dramatically badly. And so Jim, I'd love to hear more of your thoughts about this as we get into a conversation, but you know I don't see how she sells the first woman president as a reason to vote for her later as we move into the general election better than she already has, and she hasn't sold that. It's really, really striking to me that she hasn't been able to close that deal and to make that sale to American women. And frankly, I find it very gratifying because if there is one animating passion that I have about this election it is to deny her that particular accolade of being the first female president, because I dearly want to see it be someone who shares our values, and I believe ultimately it should be.
So that's also why I come down in being a "hashtag never Hillary" person. I do believe that seeing her take up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania would be absolutely devastating. I've called it publically Barack Obama's third term. And some people have come back and said, "Well she's her own person. She has her own agenda." And I would say, "Yes, she does, and in fact it's worse than his."
She is even more ideological than he is, and particularly on issues that are near and dear to me, specifically the pro-life issue. She gets up every morning and thinks about how she can further entrench both a radical feminism and a very radical pro-abortion agenda ideology in the fabric of not just our laws but also in our culture.
So I do see this as being a very, very significant fight for the hearts and the minds of the American woman as we go into this summer. And so then the question does become: Which one of these candidates makes that argument better?
I do think it's also interesting that after seeing an entire primary campaign up to this date where absolutely nothing could touch Donald Trump – nothing could touch Donald Trump – the two things that have really finally permeated his brand of Teflon is: one, the tweet where he attacked Heidi Cruz's looks; and this brouhaha over Michelle Fields, both having to do with women. Kind of gratifying actually that the Heidi Cruz tweet was a challenge for him. I think it should have been, and so, you know, that speaks well of our reaction as a culture that that was reaching too far. Also, interestingly enough, the one thing that he felt like he had to finally come out and apologize for. He did it in a low key, soft, soft way. [He] didn't make a big production out it. But he did come out and say he thought it was a mistake, which was pretty dramatic. If you look at—
Let's set aside for the minute whether or not Cruz or Trump ends up getting the nomination. And I think even if we end up in an open convention that it ends up— I think Jim is right, I think Trump would have a tough time hanging on to it if he doesn't win that first ballot. But I think it will be difficult to take it away from Cruz at that point, given that the fact that he'll come in with a strong slate of delegates.
But if you look at making the pro-woman argument, we do actually have better spokespeople on our side than they do, given the fact that Hillary hasn't sealed the deal in being a pro-woman mouthpiece, which, you know, when you think of Ivanka Trump, when you think of Heidi Cruz, when you think of Carly Fiorina, we actually do have some really good voices to start talking about what a conservative pro-woman agenda actually does look like.
I'd mentioned too, and I won't talk about this a whole lot because I'm pretty certain that Mike is going to want to pick up this theme, but I think one of the more interesting questions, and I know this is something you wanted to get into Mark, is how Evangelicals are engaging with this election. Certainly we've seen some really interesting endorsements that have come out that have affected where people are kind of putting the Evangelical label. But I think an underreported story that is really dramatically significant when you talk about Evangelicals is the fact that there are different brands of Evangelicals and they're lining up in very different ways in this election. You know, it's kind of funny given that most of us in the room are Evangelicals that people do tend to – Actually I guess shouldn't make that sweeping generalization, should I?
Cromartie: There's a diverse group here, my friend.
Tooley: There are a few Catholics in the room, too.
Yoest: The minute I said that I looked over at my friend Bill Saunders and I thought, "You know, what am I saying?"
Cromartie: There's more than Bill.
Yoest: More than Bill. Okay. I apologize to my Catholic and other brethren.
Cromartie: Classical Christian.
Yoest: Nice. I like it. I'll take it, I'll take it.
Cromartie: Mere Christian.
Yoest: Well, okay. But so that does make my point, doesn't it? It's that there are a lot of different brands of believers in our country. And the data that I've seen on how Evangelicals are breaking down in terms of their alignment, I'm going to bet, also carries over into Catholicism and other alignments. I'm just going to hazard a guess. I haven't seen data on it. And the division on the Evangelical side goes, not surprisingly, along the lines of whether or not you go to church. And so, church-going Evangelicals are tending to line up with Cruz, and non-church-going Evangelicals are tending to line up with Trump, you know, our friend from Liberty notwithstanding. So that to me is a really interesting development and certainly will play out further along the way.
I'll stop. I won't talk more about that because I'm really guessing you are going to—
Cromartie: Yeah, and the first thing I want to say is that the definition of Evangelical is someone who is church-going. So if you're a non-church-going Evangelical, you are not an Evangelical.
Now that was not my lead in, but there it was.
Yoest: I'm just here to set him up, and he can just—
Cromartie: I want to say thank you to Mark for inviting me. He sent me an email that says, "I'd like you to come to share some thoughts with the IRD board." I go on the website and I familiarize myself with the IRD board, all eight or ten or twelve of you, and then I walk in the room and all of conservative Christendom is in the room. I thought I was going to be sitting around a little round table sharing my thoughts on what I'd like to label it, my talk, "The Evangelical Crackup," or what I could also call "The Rise and Fall of the Christian Right".
So thank you Mark for inviting me to your board and all your – I just assume everyone else here is not on the board but some of his million dollar donors. Delighted to meet you.
Look, every four years I say to my Evangelical friends who do not know about what the phrase "Christian realism" means that Christian realism comes from Reinhold Niebuhr but he got it from Augustine, and that is, that the world is fallen and that we have to be realistic about our goals. And I say to them every four years, "I know the guy that we got on our side is not your favorite, but compared to the other—"
Niebuhr always said politics is the art of making choices between relative goods and lesser evils. And they go, "Oh I hadn't thought of that. Okay, now I can vote Romney or McCain or, you know, Bush Sr. over Dukakis." I mean, I've used it.
I am now here to announce to you this doesn't work anymore. If the candidates are Trump and Hillary, Niebuhr's quote goes out the window. I see no good option between either one of them. Now, I know one or two of my friends on the panel will make an argument otherwise, but I don't see how it holds up at all. And so I can't use my Niebuhr quote anymore to convince some of you all who are ideological purists and ideologues who will not bend to, you know, the lesser of two evils. We got some really bad choices if this happens. And so my hope is the contested convention where he finally falls – caves and falls through the roof.
Did you all remember that about over twenties years ago a sociologist and a friend of our names James Davidson Hunter at the University of Virginia wrote a book called Culture Wars, where he described that there was a new culture war in American society between those who were orthodox in the Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish community, conservatively orthodox religiously and morally and culturally, over against what he called a progressive coalition, which were people who were liberal Protestants, liberal Jews, and liberal Catholics, and that these two parts of American society were involved in a "culture war," and they had two totally different worldviews, two different ways of looking at society and politics?
And the book was well known and popular and got a lot a discussion because it also helped claim the rise of what then was called the rise of the new Christian Right, that it was a response to what Nathan Glazer at Harvard called a defensive offensive, what was a prior imposition by liberal elites of values onto conservative religious communities, and the culture war was a response to liberal imposition. And after I read Hunter's book and thought about it, I then went to a luncheon at AEI, the American Enterprise Institute, where I heard the renowned and wonderful public intellectual, the late Irving Kristol. And I went up to him after he gave this luncheon address, the keynote, and I said, "Irving, of course, you know there is this book called Culture Wars and there's this thesis that we're in a 'culture war'."
And he said, "Michael, there's no culture war."
"Really? What do you mean?"
He said, "There was one. But it's over, and the other side won."
Now that was over 20 years ago, and I was cold in my tracks. Because what we're seeing now in our culture, Evangelicals and conservative Catholics and conservative Jews, we are losing in the culture. Witness Indiana. Witness the recent Georgia governor's bill about a simple religious liberty piece of legislation. Business has now been won over to the other side of the culture war.
And now we have this situation where, even more tellingly, so-called Evangelicals who don't go to church are going to vote for Donald Trump. And it's utterly bizarre to me that when you look at the values and the commitments and the history of Donald Trump that anybody with any sense of – who had been to church twice a year, would consider voting for this man. It's appalling to me.
And yet as other friends of mine have suggested that we saw these trends in our culture when the president of the United States was caught red handed having an affair in the Oval Office with an intern and the American culture and the American people said, "Okay, but enough is enough. Leave him alone. Don't dare impeach him."
So the slide began some time ago and now we're seeing the fruits of it. Now the rise of the Christian Right also brought with it, as many of us know, Ronald Reagan and the Bushes and a huge voting bloc. But it also brought with it a kind of a bad reputation that many of us have felt was part of the leadership of the Christian Right was harsh. It was legalistic, it was pharisaical, it was self-righteous. It did not present itself well in the public arena.
And in the last six or seven or eight years, we've now had new leaders replace those old leaders so that there's a new branding of Evangelicals in our society. Jim Daily has replaced Jim Dobson. There's a new face to Focus on the Family. You could say that Tim Keller has replaced T. James Kennedy, and there's a new face to conservative Protestantism. You could say that Rick Warren has replaced Jerry Falwell Sr. and there is a new look to Evangelicalism and a new branding.
Now that's all out the window, ladies and gentlemen. When Jerry Falwell Jr. has the audacity to come out and endorse Donald Trump? When Robert Jefferies goes on and sells his soul every week on Fox News encouraging the candidacy of Donald Trump? If this is not a crackup, I don't know what it is.
When somebody as smart and who has a seminary degree and has been a politician all his life like Mike Huckabee doesn't endorse Donald Trump but does everything but endorse him, then we're moving around in an insane world.
This is inexcusable, and I agree with the blogger Matt Walsh who wrote a couple weeks ago. Here are the names, ladies and gentlemen. We're going to remember you Laura Ingraham. We're going to remember you Ann Coulter. We're going to remember you Sean Hannity. All of you people that elevated this man, shame on you. And shame on you Chris Christie, and shame you Newt Gingrich, and shame on you Mike Huckabee.
Now that's not what Mark asked me to come talk about, but I've been wanting to say it for weeks now. This is my chance to preach to the floor of the IRD.
[Editor's Note: Off the record section excluded from the transcript.]
Anyway, so in summary, my comments are these: We're in a bad situation and I'll conclude with this. However, I do believe in the reformed doctrine of Providence and the sovereignty of God, and that we all in this room know who the Lord of history is. And I say that all the time and I had to tell my wife recently, "I now have to own it!" Because this has been such a dizzying and depressing thing to see somebody like Trump who's made at least 15 gaffs where we thought he was going to fall. And he hasn't. And it's caused many of us to be stunned. So we thank God that He's in control of history. Amen.
Okay Fred. After all that preaching.
Barnes: Yeah, you did. I'm probably going to appall you.
Cromartie: Oh you already— Yeah, I know what you're going to do.
Barnes: I'll get to that in a minute. But we can see this tremendous impact that Donald Trump has had, not only on the agenda, the political agenda, on the Republican Party, on the Republican race, but on people like Mike as well who have become—
Cromartie: And a lot of people in this room.
Barnes: I know. I agree. Most of my friends are very passionately anti-Trump. I voted in the Virginia primary. I didn't vote for him. I don't agree with him on much of anything. I don't agree with him on immigration. I don't agree with him on trade. I don't agree with him on foreign policy. I don't agree with him on entitlements. I don't agree with him on eminent domain. He does have a pretty good tax bill, but that's about it. The question though is if Trump is the nominee and you don't vote for him, what do you get? You get Hillary Clinton which would have a devastating impact on America.
And Trump, there's at least a chance with him. But just look at the impact that Trump has had, I think, on the agenda for America, one I don't agree with. But certainly it's going to be very difficult to have any immigration reform without a wall or something close to it being built now. You look on trade treaties. They've been demonized so much by Trump, free trade treaties, that it's going to be hard to do much on trade in the short run. And tinkering with trade can be devastating to the economy. You know, you can— We're not all old enough to remember Smoot-Hawley, but when you start fiddling in protectionist ways it can be extremely harmful to the country.
When I was thinking on these earlier subjects as we were talking, you know, if it weren't for Trump, we would be having a panel on religious liberty. And Charmaine and Mike, you would be here. James and I probably wouldn't be here. There would be other people here. But with Trump, we're talking about the Republican race. I think in the Republican race, the thing the think about now is when we get to after the first Tuesday in June, that's when the primaries end. California ends and so on. But there's what? Five weeks, six weeks or something like that before the convention begins and a lot can happen in that period. James mentioned that the delegates that other candidates have who are not particularly—
Marco Rubio has delegates committed to him, and he has not released them. Now Trump thinks of himself as a great negotiator. Well this will be a test. We know he can negotiate real estate deals. Beyond that it's all guess work. But let's see if he can negotiate with unpledged delegates, with candidates who are not in the race anymore but do have delegates pledged to them, and see what we wind up with. I think there's a substantial chance that at the end of the primaries Trump will not have a majority of the delegates, but by the time the convention begins he could have. And, you know, politics is not science.
I don't know what's going to happen. I don't know what Trump would do as president. I don't know much of what he would do as a nominee, what he'd say, because he's frequently not really in control of what he knows is better to do as a candidate.
At least he tells people about things. You know, he was telling — Who has he told? His riff now is that he can be presidential anytime he wants to. He just doesn't want to be presidential yet. He thinks it's not time for him to act presidential yet. Anyway.
So that's what— I mean, there's going to be that period where a lot is going to be going on after the primaries and before the convention. And it's not hard for me to envision winding up with something like a ticket of Trump and Rubio with Rubio's delegates going to Trump. People say, "Well they hate each other." Of course they hate each other, but this is politics. It doesn't make any difference how they feel about each other personally. I mean, Jack Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson hated each other and that worked out pretty well for them.
You know, I don't know whether any of you all saw this or not. The best discussion of religion of any of the Republican candidates in the race was a video that somebody sent me, I don't know who it was, about a five minute video of Marco Rubio. Did you see that one Mike?
Cromartie: I sent it to you.
Barnes: Well you sent it to me. That's right, you did send it to me. Well I sent it to all kinds of people.
Cromartie: Where the atheist challenged him? The atheist challenged him. In Iowa. The video.
Barnes: Yeah, yeah. And it was the best explanation of someone's faith and understanding of it that I heard from any candidate I've ever heard, from a candidate for president or any other office for that matter. It was absolutely fantastic. I sent it to—I was stunned by it. I had no idea that Marco Rubio had such a strong faith and could explain it so well. Now maybe others can but—
Cromartie: History of Christian Doctrine 101. He just went through the whole—
Barnes: Yeah, yeah. It was fabulous. And I sent it to many people who were all very impressed with it. I guess, who was he speaking to? He was speaking to some Iowa preachers, right?
Cromartie: Yeah, there was a couple. One was Iowa preachers, and then in another one an atheist challenged him in the audience in Iowa and said, "Sir, would my rights be violated if you're elected because we know you're motivated by your faith?"
And he said, "Yes and let me tell you what my faith does. My faith allows me to say to you, you have the freedom and the right to not believe what I believe. And you need to hold me accountable if I don't do that for you." It was wonderful.
Barnes: Yeah, if you haven't seen it, get Mike to send it to you. It really was good. What was I going to wind up with here?
You know, there are a lot of people who don't like Trump at all, who don't necessarily think that it's outside of a possibility that they could — They don't feel they have to morally reject Donald Trump considering his opponent. And there are people who believe that, and Mike is one of those and heaven knows I know a lot of them, that believe that Trump is just not acceptable. "We can't vote for him." They would rather not vote. Some say they would vote for Hillary Clinton. And others are in favor of a third candidate running, a conservative candidate running in the race, someone who probably can't win, but would be a place where you could make an honest vote that you would feel better about anyway.
And I'm not necessarily against that.
But my view is basically: What makes a vote for Trump entertainable is the fact of Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton would have such a devastating effect on America, on the Supreme Court, on the morality of America, on — You talk about the culture war. Well there's still some being fought, and that would be crushed. On everything that Obama has done, everything would be locked in place forever. ObamaCare we'd never get rid of. Every one of the presidential orders and memoranda and so on that he signed, she would ratify. And on some of them, she would go further; at least she said that about immigration. And on and on and on. It would be incredibly devastating.
My overall view of the race though is this. Everybody in my family except for one, and I have grown daughters and husbands and so on, and we all voted in the Virginia primary. I think we all voted for Marco Rubio: one, because of that video; and two, which is so important, and that is that he had the best chance of any Republican to win in the general election. He could attract Hispanic votes. He had a broad base. Look, I know, you've got to win the nomination. But anyway, that seemed to be something that— It's traditionally not something that voters base their vote on. They don't vote strategically. Now maybe they should. And I thought they should, but they usually don't. But I thought Marco Rubio had the best chance.
Now, I hate to admit it, but I think John Kasich has the best chance of beating Hillary Clinton. He can be very off-putting, even when he talks about his faith. The polls sometime lie, but they've been pretty consistent on Kasich. He does have a broader base. He's done a pretty good job as a governor in Ohio. He just can't win the Republican nomination. So I think Republicans are stuck in this situation where Republicans are probably going to wind up with candidate who can't win. Again.
Tooley: Any questions?
Cromartie: Richard Hyde.
Audience Question: Mike, I thought your presentation was fabulous. Now just for those of us who might need the remediation here, could you give us "Why Donald Trump Is So Unacceptable 101" for anyone who doesn't—? Because you haven't actually explained that much. And I agree with you, so would you just go over it again for us?
Cromartie: Oh I see. Okay, the first one. The very first one before I go into all his extensive character flaws. I'll begin with this: He's entirely unelectable. Fred is right. Sometimes polls lie, but most of the time they don't, and he's going to get annihilated. So I think it's a wasted vote to vote the other way and I think it's a wasted vote to vote for him. He cannot win the country.
Number two, I just don't think that a sexist, racist, demagogic, misogynist, woman hater, anti-immigrant person who shows none of the fruits of the Spirit and calls himself a Christian but puts his money in the communion plate when it comes around and then says he's never had to ask God for forgiveness. I don't vote on candidates based on their rigorous theology, but I'd like for them to know at least one thing. And it's so clear that his own personal profession of faith is totally calculated. Totally.
Now look, I believe as much as anybody in this room in the grace of God transforming anybody anytime, and I'll be glad for God to transform Donald Trump after the election personally. But right now, I just think that somebody who makes fun of reporters who are disabled in front of them, who has this attitude toward other races, other ethnicities, other genders, that's so obviously off-putting, I cannot understand how that kind of person—
And then here's the next one. And then when he's interviewed by anybody and is asked any question more than an inch deep, a question on foreign policy, and knows nothing, and when is pressed by Anderson Cooper on any question filibusters by wandering off on other topics. I mean, the man doesn't know anything. And the other problem with that is we all know candidates who know only a little, but we like them. We also know they know what they don't know and they'll surround themselves with really good people. I don't get the impression this man wants to listen to anyone either. So, on all those counts Richard, if you know more I've got a list, but that's my beginning.
Audience Member: I'd like to compare lists.
Cromartie: Yeah. Yes, gentlemen. I'll be — Do you want me to be moderator? I've done it before.
Tooley: You be the moderator.
Cromartie: Yes, Andrew. Run it away, buddy.
Audience Member: What do you all think of Cruz? I mean, he's the one that hasn't really been talked about in general election. I guess that's one prospect. I mean, Fred has talked about that possibility.
Cromartie: I don't think he could win, either.
Antle: I don't, either. I think the fact that he's not consistently done well with the groups that he was supposed to do well [with] in Republican primaries undercuts his entire strategy for winning the general election, or at least his stated strategy. Maybe he secretly has another one. We should hope that he does.
Cruz has essentially said that he is going to run the Bush 2004 reelection on steroids, and he is going to drive out the conservative base and that that will outnumber the liberal base and he will win, albeit probably narrowly. The problem with that is that has not worked in Republican primaries. He is losing Republican primaries to a candidate who is, by all conventional measures, to his left and he is not doing well enough among the core groups of conservative voters.
I mean, basically he's in the race because he sometimes wins the states that he's supposed to win and he sometimes wins the voters he's supposed to win. If he is going to win the general election, he has to win all of those states and all of those voters. It's very hard to see how he does that.
Maybe, Trump will make Cruz look like a moderate, and the country will sigh this huge sigh of relief if he comes out of the convention that maybe they wouldn't have sighed if he'd beaten Marco Rubio or John Kasich. I don't know. That seems like a lot to bet on though.
Cromartie: Fred, what's your experience?
Barnes: With Cruz?
Cromartie: Yeah.
Barnes: You know, I've talked to him a few times. I don't know him very well. It is very telling though that a guy who is supposed to be gathering all the leaders on the right behind his campaign is now amassed a grand total of two of his fellow senators who have endorsed him. Two. And that's not very many. I think that's very telling. I've talked to you about this before Mike, I think, but I know people who he has tried to court—
Cromartie: You don't have to mention names, but do tell the anecdote, please.
Barnes: He has tried to court people in journalism at higher levels than the rest of us who have spent a lot of time with Cruz at Cruz's request and wound up disliking him heartily. So there's something strange about him that, you know, I pretty much agree with him on everything, and yet—well not on immigration, but on other things—and yet he's so off-putting. I'm not rooting against him, but he's hard to warm up to, I'll tell you.
Audience Member: Follow up on that. So all of that given, he would be running against Hillary, who seems particularly weak. So do you still think he can't win when in fact if Hillary is running such a weak campaign now and seems to be destined to run a weak campaign in the general?
Barnes: She has a united party though, which the Republicans are certainly not united. If Trump were the nominee, they would certainly be disunited, but to a much lesser extent if Cruz [was the nominee], I think. With Cruz, I don't know. Can you imagine him moving to the center or at least trying to dominate the center in politics? You need to do that to win, particularly now, I think anyway. And so I just don't think he can win. James described very well his weaknesses in the primaries, where actually Cruz would be the first to admit that it hasn't gone the way he had planned it all because of Trump, but—
Cromartie: Well let me make a case that I've never made before but I'll now make here for Cruz on this point.
Barnes: You'll have to say more than he's not Trump.
Cromartie: And I mean that. And what I mean to say is that one reason why he might not have done well in those states where the cultural conservative vote he thought was totally his is that he had to share it with Rubio, and he had to share it Kasich, and he had to share it with Carley, and he had to share it with so many others. And so in one sense while I totally agree with everything that you've said that you got to win more than just that one constituency, you've got to win these other parts. My colleague Henry Olsen says there are four strands of the Republican Party that you've got to pull together, and only one of them is Evangelical/cultural conservative strand. And what you're arguing is that he didn't even win that strand. But one part of the reason he didn't win that strand was because he had to share it with other people.
Barnes: Yeah, but he also shared it with Trump.
Cromartie: Yeah, that's pretty depressing.
Yoest: He did also show up in North Dakota with a slate of candidates, too, and had a much better operation than anybody else did, which surprised me a little bit.
Cromartie: Yeah, North Dakota, one of those pivotal states.
Yoest: Maybe not particularly pivotal, but coming at a particularly important and crucial juncture and, you know, showing that this far down the stretch he was able to pay attention to basics and blocking and tackling in a way the others were not.
Antle: He has the best organization by far of any of the candidates running. That's why he's still around.
Cromartie: There was a hand in the back. Mark, yeah there in the back.
Audience Member: I'm in back. So the Good Book says, "For the hope that was set before him Christ endured the cross," right? So looking at worst case scenarios, Hillary is president. What's the hope after that? What do we do? What's the cost of a Hillary president? What do we do afterwards? What's the cost of a Trump presidency? What do we do afterwards to recover? And then if I could sneak another question in: With Cruz's inelectability, what if Carly is VP or what if someone down ticket from him is more electable? So what's the hope?
Yoest: Well, I mean, everyone woke up in despair after Barack Obama was elected and we particularly in the pro-life movement because he has been the most pro-abortion president that we ever had in our history. So, you know, I'm not going to deny that he has— I said I think it would be a disaster for us to see a third term and to entrench the gains he achieved.
But at the same time, we have seen a lot of gains on our side as well. We have seen a tidal wave of pro-life legislation across the country and a real invigoration of a conservative response to the liberal agenda. So there's to me— I'm always going to be the one that comes back and says that the empire is going to fight back and there is hope on our side. Having said that, I do think that we do have to be really realistic about what a second administration would look like.
Tooley: Maybe time for two more questions.
Barnes: You know with Hillary, all her worst left-wing instincts would be ratified and pushed by Democrats in Congress. It's a very left-wing party. Very different from the one when her husband was president. Very different. On the other hand if Trump were president, the Republicans in Congress would have a majority—[they] would be pushing against at least some of the things he has talked about in this campaign. How many of them he would carry with him into office I don't know, and I guess I haven't thought about it much because I don't think that he'll ever get there. But anyway.
Yoest: Can I just throw this in?
Cromartie: Yeah, yeah. Please. And then we'll get you next.
Yoest: Because you and I do disagree on this. I mean, to me, you have this vision of we've lived through eight years of we can't pass anything. You have that presidential veto that is an absolute block and with Hillary you just go straight, you continue on, and it's an entrenchment. It's an entrenchment. At least with Trump, you have someone who would sign our legislation.
Antle: I would also say even though there are all the negatives that you mentioned associated with social conservative support for Trump, one silver lining is the only part of the conservative coalition that Trump has felt the need to consistently pay lip service to is Evangelicals and social conservatives. I mean, he signed a tax plan that's pretty conservative. There's no evidence he's ever read it. He knows Larry Kudlow likes it and hailed it. That's the only thing I've ever heard him actually say about it. He has pretty consistently— I mean, he's waffled on abortion, but he has, other than that, pretty consistently tried to appeal to Evangelicals. Ham-fistedly. Ineptly. Insincerely. But he's done it, whereas lots of other parts of the conservative coalition, he has been very happy to tell them, "No, I'm not going to do what you say. Sorry."
Cromartie: Okay, right here.
Audience Member: So where do you guys see the battle especially for religious liberty, what we would be talking about if it weren't for Trump, going into the future under a Hillary presidency; or, God forbid a Trump presidency; or, you know, if it is at all possible, a Cruz presidency?
Antle: I think Trump has benefited from the fact that even a lot of social conservatives believe that the culture war is lost, and they are now looking for a tough guy who might protect them. So they are no longer looking for a Christian. They're looking for a friendly Roman, and they see in Trump that Roman. A talking point I hear Trump use a lot—
Cromartie: A friendly Roman. I love that.
Antle: Trump will say, "Yes, I'm a strong Christian," and this and that and the other thing. But for the most part, he doesn't pretend that too hard. The talking point I hear him make the most is, "I will protect the Evangelicals." So calling them "the Evangelicals" implies he doesn't really view himself as one. But he also understands that "the Evangelicals" see themselves as under siege and he is not going to be part of who is besieging them. Or at least he says he's not.
And he also makes an argument for Christian cultural preeminence, which even a lot of now non-practicing Christians are concerned about. They've lost a sort of cultural preeminence that we once had. You know, if you're old enough to remember the "All in the Family" sitcom, Archie Bunker was always making these religious pronouncements and was very upset about, you know, minority religions getting more recognition in society. But he sent his wife to church every Sunday. He didn't go. He reminds me a little bit of the Donald Trump.
Cromartie: That's a good answer right there. And I think on that Mark—
Fred would like to add anything?
Barnes: No, no. That was good.
Tooley: All right, great talk. Thanks so much.


text:
Finnish Tatars
|Regions with significant populations
|Tatar (Mishar Tatar), Finnish, Swedish
|Sunni Islam
|Related ethnic groups
|Mishar Tatars and other Volga Tatars
The Tatars of Finland (Mishar: Финляндия татарлары; Finnish: Suomen tataarit Swedish: Finländska tatarer) are an ethnic Volga Tatar diaspora in Finland, who espouse the Muslim faith. They number approximately 1,000 and form a well-established and homogeneous religious, cultural and linguistic minority. The Tatars are the oldest Muslim minority in Finland and in the Nordic countries,[1] and operate the Finnish Islamic Congregation (Tatar: Finlandiya Islam Cemaati),[2] the oldest state-recognised Muslim congregation in the Western world.[vague][3] Finnish Tatars (mainly Mishar Tatars) have their historical origins in Eastern Europe and their language belongs to the Turkic language family.
During the early years of Finland's status as an autonomous Grand Duchy under the Russian Tsars, Tatars were already being employed by the Russians at the construction of the Bomarsund fortress in Åland and at the Suomenlinna sea fortress off the coast of Helsinki. Most of those returned to Russia. For the ones who did not, an Islamic cemetery in Bomarsund bears witness to their presence in Finland.
The ancestors of the present-day Tatars came to Finland from the 1870s to the mid-1920s from a group of some 20 villages in the Sergachsky District on the Volga River, to the southeast of Nizhny Novgorod. Most of them had been farmers but they settled in Finland as merchants trading in furs and textiles and chose initially to reside in Helsinki and its surrounding area. Tatars living in the city of Vyborg on the Karelian Isthmus resettled in Tampere and Helsinki when the area was ceded to the Soviet Union in the Moscow Peace Treaty of 1940. Most Finnish Tatars continue to live in Helsinki and its surroundings.[4]
Finnish Islamic Congregation[edit]
In 1925, the Finnish Islamic Congregation (Tatar: Finlandiya Islam Cemaati; Finnish: Suomen Islam-seurakunta) was founded. Finland was thus the first Western European country to officially recognise an Islamic congregation.[citation needed] The Finnish Freedom of Religion Act had been adopted in 1922. Today, the congregation has mosques in Helsinki and Järvenpää. A second congregation of Tatars was established in Tampere in 1943. Non-Tatar Muslims may worship at, but cannot become members of, the Finnish Islamic Congregation.[5] There are Tatar Islamic cemeteries in Helsinki, Turku and Tampere.
Modern day[edit]
The Tatars are fully integrated into Finnish society and they are actively engaged in Finnish economic and cultural life in a wide array of professions. At the same time, they have succeeded in maintaining a distinct identity and in keeping the Tatar language alive by using it in family and private circles and also in their cultural organisations. Since 1935, the Tatar Cultural Society (Tatar: Finlandiya Türkleri Birligi) has organised principally Tatar-language cultural events in the form of plays, folk music, folk dancing and poetry recitals.
The pride of the sports club, Yolduz, established in 1945, is its football team. Both the cultural society and the sports club operate with the support of the Islamic Congregation, which thus contributes to the maintenance of the Tatar culture and language. One notable Finnish Tatar is the former soccer player Atik Ismail.
From 1948 to 1969 there was a Tatar primary school (Tatar: Türk Halk Mektebi) in Helsinki, which was partly subsidised by the Islamic Congregation and partly by the City of Helsinki.[6] About half of the teaching was in Finnish and half in Tatar. Reform of the Finnish school system in the 1970s made the school unviable due to the small number of pupils and the conditions governing state subsidies. Instead, during the autumn and spring terms after school hours, the Islamic Congregation provides regular teaching of Tatar language, culture, religion and history, with Tatar as the language of instruction. A Tatar kindergarten has existed since the 1950s. Summer courses in Tatar are now held at the Tatar Training Centre in Kirkkonummi, near Helsinki.
It is remarkable that the small group of Finnish Tatars has managed to preserve proficiency in the Tatar language for as long as five generations. The publishing activity of the Tatars was once extensive but has now ceased. Past publications include religious texts, poetry, plays, novels as well as periodicals, the earliest from 1925.[4]
Notable Finnish people of Tatar descent[edit]
See also[edit]
- ^ Kookas.fi: Keitä ovat tataarit?
- ^ "Suomen Islam-seurakunta" (in Finnish). uskonnot.fi. Retrieved 26 October 2010.
- ^ Kervinen, Elina (3 September 2004). "Tavismuslimit". Ylioppilaslehti (in Finnish). Student Union of the University of Helsinki. Retrieved 26 October 2010.
- ^ a b Tatar Cultural Association
- ^ "Suomen Islam-seurakunta". Uskonnot Suomessa. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
- ^ Hakulinen, Rauno. "Kansankirkon varjossa" (PDF) (in Finnish). University of Helsinki. Retrieved 2 April 2013.


text:
Free Shipping Over $75
Fun, Flirty and Lightweight. This is the first thing we pack for a sunny vacation. Perfect for a day on the town or wear as a swim suit cover up. Embroidered neckline with tassel detailing, pompom details on sleeves.
Care: We recommend Dry CleaningMaterial:
Fit: True to Size


text:
Bureau of Chinese civil aviation promulgates " the announcement that carries sale agent poundage to run way about changing domestic aviation " clear, airline ticket sale agent cancels since October 1 the airline ticket of 3% secures commission policy, change to negotiate the commission scale that airline ticket acts as agent with the agent directly by airline. The wide attention of enterprise of representative of on Shenzhen 1000 airline ticket is caused after new regulation is carried out, the commission that afraid airline gives airline ticket sale agent the person can decrease. Although at present of short duration of enterprise of aviation sale agent was not affected by new rule, but mostly enterprise of aviation sale agent begins to worry about prospective vivosphere, enterprise of ticket of partial carry out called loot client, may pay out of own pocket carry out ticket.
□ market prospect
Aggravate of competition of airline ticket sale agent
Although aviation acts as agent,many people inside the enterprise think, agent of ticket of large scale computer is OK have the aid of is new on October 1 policy undertakes conformity to whole industry, can adopt chain or join in means will be numerous in small representative closes put in under one's name 's charge to expand oneself, enhance the weight used on a balance with airline argy-bargy further. But reporter discovery, no matter size aviation acts as agent,the enterprise is opposite in succession incessantly of new policy complain of suffering.
Analytic personage points out, in current airline ticket cent sells channel in, the acting fee that airline pays every year to agent is as high as billions of to get on one billion four hundred and ten million and sixty-five thousand four hundred and eight yuan even. Each are big airline already began nibble of do all one can annual the airline ticket middleman's fee with huge amount, the passenger source between airline and acting enterprise contends for battle already start shooting. Be like last year when the Spring Festival, from the airline ticket that Zhengzhou goes to Guangzhou, through airline ticket acting company lowest can be hit 5 fold, and him airline the price of work off is lowest can be hit 3 fold.
Partial agent thinks, big to dimensions sale agent company, perhaps be an opportunity, act as agent after all the sale still is current airline ticket acts as agent advocate channel, and airline wants him to assume an airline ticket marketing entirely far from actual, after accordingly the market is unlocked, the company with big dimensions passes a negotiation, the standard that still perhaps can expend the representative mentions 3% above, but the sale agent company with small dimensions, perhaps be about to face a market crisis that brings by policy, because its scope is little, airline overwhelms the standard of acting poundage very likely 3% the following.
Previous12 Next


text:
Nearly half a million babies in the U.S. are born premature every year (that's roughly 1 in every 8 children). Many of them require medical assistance during the first weeks of life, especially due to their under-developed lungs. Babies that are born premature are often put on breathing machines as their lungs finish maturing, but there can be negative side effects of these measures: many children (as many as 10,000) develop a condition called bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or BPD.
But research headed by Bernard Thébaud, a neonatologist and senior scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and CHEO Research Institute, demonstrates that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can help repair damaged lungs in animal studies involving newborn rats, which have lungs that are roughly similar to a human fetus at 24 weeks of development.
The Research
Thébaud and his team found that injecting stem cells into the lungs of baby rats was beneficial both when done while the rats were in the process of first receiving oxygen, as well as 2 weeks and even 6 months after oxygen was provided. If these time spans are applied to the human life span, this is similar to the maturity of a middle-aged adult.
This research suggests that science may one day be able to reverse lung damage in those who were born premature, both in infants and even into adulthood.
Stem cells are revolutionizing the field of medicine. To learn how to bank your own valuable stem cells and insure your family's future health, visit www.stemsave.com or call 877-783-6728 (877-StemSave) today.
To view the article click here.
The future of Regenerative Medicine is now™


text:
Sensory Play Instruments
We provide outdoor musical instruments for schools. Outdoor Musical Instruments in the playground provide a non-threatening and fun outlet for creative and emotional expression and through the medium of music many essential life skills can be learned.
Music can have a profound effect on anyone, but the benefits of exposing a child with special needs to music can be life-changing. We can supply a number of instruments including Tubular Bells, Drums, xylophones, chimes, floor piano's and much more. Contact us for further information and to discuss any requirements in further detail.


text:
The hotel chain focused on the following five key strategies: Employees should then be trained on how to achieve these goals and on any problem solving skills. Contemporary Concepts and Cases 4th Edition. Employees performance can be monitored and employee performance revues should be conducted.
The system can also measure customer and employee satisfaction. Radisson is required to purchase the resources which are not available with it or discover the alternative of it so that they can effectively satisfy the customers wants Clayton, This would work through their global network of hotels and provide not only corporate staff the data but also deliver that data directly to hotel management.
This system was designed to analyze and measure aspects of the company internally such as sales patterns and productivity. However, the value that's created and captured by a company is profit margin. This is because satisfied staff will work better towards the goal.
Each of the involved staff should be assigned the job that he or she should accomplish so that at the end of the day the objectives are met.
Thus, the development of these resources assist in enhancing the corporate governance mechanisms so that it helps in controlling the internal and external factors in hotel and attain desired results. Focus on the customer 2. Radisson implemented a complaint card that was used to collect guest feedback at the end of their stay.
Due to competition, the organization should keep updating their strategies so as to remain on top. External mechanisms are often imposed on organizations by external stakeholders in the forms of regulatory guidelines.
Radisson can define its service guarantee by laying down a written statement showing promises to the customers which they must fulfill. Also, responsible water management helps in improving the water footprint which impacts the emphasis on production, usage and consumption in all the areas of management and operations.
This program encompasses the organizations service philosophy and allows the front line employees to meet the needs and wants of the individual customer.
Further, Redisson owns prestige brand and uses differentiation strategy by offering outstanding facilities and superior services within the culture of hotel.
For instance, Radisson Blu provides effective services to clients in order to attract them and thus attain high profits. It should also include what would result upon dissatisfaction.
Successful quality management of next-generation services requires end-to-end service management across complex, multitechnology, multivendor infrastructures. Driving commitment to service quality is key to a healthy hospitality industry.
Appropriate training should definitely be delivered to each of the hotels from not only the employees but also the leaders, owners, and executive staff. Franchisees should be held to the same high standards that the core organization must adhere to.
The procurement or purchasing activities helps the business to receive the resources which the hotel requires to operate the business. Also, the firm can use effective resources in order to implement the similar strategies and thus organization to attain superior performance French, There are about 20 different room designs.
It is one of the leading full service global hotel organizations operating over four hundred hotels and resorts in sixty six countries Radisson Hotels Jump to The company's headquarters, as well as the headquarters of the parent organization, Radisson Hospitality, Inc.
In an organization of this which provided instant access to availability at any of the Radisson We will write a custom essay sample on Radisson Hotels. The Radisson Hotels organization is one of the few hotels using technology advertising.
The customerKARE system is just one of them and is a fully integrated guest information system. Unique to Radisson hotels is the reservation service known as Curtis-C which is accessible through many airline reservation systems worldwide.
Radisson hotels and resorts worldwide online reservations. The best online rate is at agronumericus.com, guaranteed.
Hotel deals, vacation packages and more from Radisson. Marketing Strategy Radisson Hotel Tourism Essay. brand equity for the organization. Airlines,hotels,travel industry all are Radisson hotels are named.
Customer-Driven Learning at Radisson Hotels Essay. B. Customer-Driven Learning at Radisson Hotels of service the organization intends to.Download


text:
Control over Stories of Illness and Life
, see Stage, 2015 ). However, the encounter with editorial media and professions is not considered, and they remain important in questions of participants' access to legitimate public voice. As for the media organizations' interests in recruiting participants, they routinely need human interest cases for their stories about illness and health, which is a popular topic of journalism and other factual genres (Briggs & Hallin, 2016). Research has demonstrated the importance of individual cases to journalistic media coverage generally (e.g., Birks, 2017 ; Figenschou
The Difference Culture Makes
shifting paradigm and a 'journalistification' of the profession. Journalism 18(6): 664-679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915625629 10.1177/1464884915625629 Sarrimo C. 2017 The press crisis and its impact on Swedish arts journalism: Autonomy loss, a shifting paradigm and a 'journalistification' of the profession Journalism 18 6 664 679 https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915625629 Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism 2(2): 149-170. 10.1177/146488490100200201 Schudson M. 2001 The objectivity norm in
The Other Stance: Conflicting Professional Self-Images and Perceptions of the Other Profession Among Finnish PR Professionals and Journalists
://profcom.univie.ac.at/en/ (read 12.1.2011) Robson, J. (1998) `A Profession in Crisis: Status, Culture and Identity in the Further Education College', Journal of Vocational Education and Training 5(4): 585-607. Rogers, T.B., Kuiper, N.A., and Kirker, W.S. (1977) `Self-Reference and the Encoding of Personal Information', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 677-688. Ryan, M. and Martinson, D. L. (1988) 'Journalists and Public Relations Practitioners: Why the Antagonism?', Journalism Quarterly 65(1): 131-140. Salter, L. (2005) 'The communicative structures of journalism
Disrupting journalism from scratch
article attempts to identify what has persisted and what has changed, asking what kind of standards may have settled for pure players today. How is the journalistic work organized, how is revenue made and – consequently – what does this mean for the journalistic profession more generally? Furthermore, we ask whether the precarious conditions in the early years of a pure player's existence provide a context in which the journalistic profession is "disrupted" and begins to be shaped by more entrepreneurial ideals and values. Methodology and field of research This
Disrupting video game distribution
shifting to Steam's transformation into an OSN, it is useful to consider the aforementioned Steam Summer Sale in more detail, as it illustrates the second characteristic game aspect of Steam, that is, the framing of game purchasing as a playful ritual. Early conceptualizations of play and games have already emphasized the playful qualities of rituals and the ritualistic quality of play. For instance, Johan Huizinga posited that, just as a child plays "in sacred earnest" ( Huizinga, 1949 : 18), actors in other professions, like sportspersons, actors or practitioners of
Unboxing news automation
for "exciting times" when newswork and news automation can interact, as long as the "the human touch" of journalism remains at the core. Discussion In this exploratory study, we have attempted to highlight the imagined affordances of news automation and the underlying factors framing the way in which participants envision the technology. News automation is an emerging technology, deriving from digitalization through datafication, and is currently appearing in newsrooms. Newswork is a profession in which several fields of interest intertwine: affordances are
From Public Relations to Strategic Communication in Sweden: The Emergence of a Transboundary Field of Knowledge
Profession: The Development and Current Structure of Public Relations in Germany, in Sriramesh, K. and Verčič, D. (eds.), The Global Public Relations Handbook: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 199–221). London: Routledge. Bivins, T.H. (1993) 'Public Relations, Professionalism, and the Public Interest'. Journal of Business Ethics , 12 (2), 117–126. Bowen, S.A. (2009) 'What Communication Professionals Tell Us Regarding Dominant Coalition Access and Gaining Membership'. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37 (4), 418–443. Broms, H., and Gahmberg, H
Rethinking Photojournalism: The Changing Work Practices and Professionalism of Photojournalists in the Digital Age
) Imaginary dark room. Digital photo editing as a strategic ritual. Journalism Practice 4(4): 454-475. Nygren, G. & Degtereva, E. & Pavlikova, M. (2010) Tomorrow's Journalists. Trends in the development of the journalistic profession as seen by Swedish and Russian students. Nordicom Review 31(2): 113-133. Ottosen, R. & Krumsvik, A.H. (2012) Digital challenges on the Norwegian media scene. Nordicom Review 33(2): 43-55. Pantti, M. & Andén-Papadopoulos, K. (2011) Transparency and trustworthiness: Strategies for incorporating amateur photography into news discourse
The Changing Landscape of Local Information Space in the Czech Republic: Consequences for Local Political Communication
future? Journalism , 2009, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 396–397. Witschge Tamara, Nygren Gunnar. Journalism: profession under pressure? Journal of Media Business Studies , 2009, no. 1, pp. 37–59.


text:
Kumon initially started off as a good supplement to the school learning. But as the levels got harder the instructor seem displeased at using more time to help my son, so instead of helping they decided to send him home with homework that he had done six months earlier. I found out when he finished homework in five minutes instead of the usual 30-45 minutes.
Bottom Line: No, I would not recommend this to a friend
33 people found it helpfulLink to this Review


text: Home Uncategorized Hello world! Uncategorized Hello world! By admin - 30/09/2018 137 0 Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest WhatsApp Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing! RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Uncategorized Thử đăng bài đính kèm văn bản LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply Please enter your comment! Please enter your name here You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Stay connected43,563FollowersFollow13,800SubscribersSubscribe Recent posts Could Shanghai Disneyland Be Cooler Than Walt Disney admin - 17/02/2019 0 Choose Your Own Adventure: Machu Picchu admin - 17/02/2019 0 7 Reasons Cruising Is a Great Way to See the World admin - 17/02/2019 0 Random article Could Shanghai Disneyland Be Cooler Than Walt Disney Choose Your Own Adventure: Machu Picchu 7 Reasons Cruising Is a Great Way to See the World Are You Already Wearing the Hottest Brands in Your City?