text:
Thanks to Our Supporters
Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc. is deeply grateful to the many contributors whose generous gifts provide vital resources for its cultural, educational, and outreach programs and services.
Katherine Farley and Jerry I. Speyer
Frank A. Bennack, Jr./Steven R. Swartz/Hearst
Oak Foundation
David M. Rubenstein
American Express
James Dinan and Elizabeth Miller
Jim Herbert/First Republic Bank
Mr. and Mrs. John B. Hess
Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe
Robert Wood Johnson 1962 Charitable Trust
Lincoln Center Corporate Fund
Laura and Scott Malkin
Frederick P. and Sandra P. Rose Foundation
Kara and Stephen M. Ross
Steinway & Sons
Sandra and Tony Tamer
Laurie M. Tisch Illumination Fund
Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence D. Ackman
Adrienne Arsht
Joseph Bae and Janice Lee
Christina and Robert C. Baker
Bank of America/ U.S. Trust
BNY Mellon
Renée and Robert Belfer
Steffi and Robert Berne
Susan and Richard Braddock
Ellen and Daniel Crown
The Walt Disney Company
Dr. Ronald and Beth Dozoretz
Cheryl and Blair Effron
Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz
William E. Ford
Jeff Gates and Mike Moran
Meg and Bennett Goodman
Mimi and Peter Haas Fund
Hakluyt & Company
Ronald G. & Nancy A. Harrington
Ralph Schlosstein and Jane Hartley
Rita E. and Gustave M. Hauser
HNA Group
Chip and Sheryl Kaye
Julia and David H. Koch
Bruce and Suzie Kovner
Thomas H. Lee and Ann Tenenbaum
Betty and John Levin
Mr. Bryan Lourd
The Manton Foundation
MetLife Foundation
Cheryl and Philip Milstein
Movado Group Foundation
Stavros Niarchos Foundation
Anna Nikolayevsky
Omnicom Group Inc.
The Pasculano Foundation
PepsiCo Foundation
Julian Robertson
Robert and Gillian Steel
Chandrika and Ranjan Tandon
John A. Thain
Ann and Thomas Unterberg
Amanda and John Waldron
Joe Tsai and Clara Wu
Ann Ziff
21st Century Fox
Allen & Company
The Estate of Jean D. Appleton
Barbara and James Block
Guoqing Chen and Ming Liu
Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Dalio Foundation
The Dinan Family Foundation
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
Ford Foundation
Dr. Marjorie & Roy Furman
Lise Strickler and Mark Gallogly
Howard Gilman Foundation
Glenwood Management
Gray Foundation
Jim and Cecilia Herbert
Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis
Mr. and Mrs. Peter L. Malkin
The Pierre and Tana Matisse Foundation
The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
LuEsther T. Mertz Charitable Trust
The New York Community Trust
Amelia & Bayo Ogunlesi
Donald A. Pels Charitable Trust
Ronald O. Perelman and Anna Chapman
Proskauer Rose LLP
The Shubert Foundation
Sidley Austin LLP
The Taft Foundation
The Three Little Pigs Foundation (William E. Ford)
Alice and Tom Tisch
Janice Savin Williams and Christopher J. Williams
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Judith and Stanley Zabar
The Trust Under the Will of Roberta L. Zuhlke
Katie McGrath and J.J. Abrams Family Foundation
Robert J. Alexander/CBRE
Jody and John Arnhold
Mr. and Mrs. Gregory Bedrosian
Cathie Black
The Blavatnik Family Foundation
Aryeh B. Bourkoff
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Russell L. Carson
Kathryn and Kenneth Chenault
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Joan Ganz Cooney and Peter G. Peterson
Judith-Ann Corrente and Willem Kooyker
Covington & Burling LLP
Chris and Bruce Crawford
Ravenel Curry
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas J. DeRosa
Neerja Sethi and Bharat Desai
Jennie L. and Richard K. DeScherer
Gina Diez Barroso de Franklin
The Diller - von Furstenberg Family Foundation
Judy and Jamie Dimon
Evelyn H. Lauder Charitable Trust
The FAR Fund
Focus Financial Partners
Bart Friedman and Wendy A. Stein
Catherine A. Gellert
General Atlantic
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Kenneth Goldman Donor Fund
Goldman Sachs
Abraham and Mildred Goldstein Charitable Trust
Roberta and Harvey Golub
The Audrey and Martin Gruss Foundation
Agnes Gund
William B. Harrison & Anne Harrison
Marlene Hess and James D. Zirin
Stephen R. Howe, Jr.
Karen and Charles Phillips / Infor
Brad S. Karp, Chairman, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
The Katzenberger Foundation, Inc.
Gautam Kumra
Yang Lan
Shelly and George Lazarus
Mrs. Jane Lombard
Audrey Love Charitable Foundation
Mr. Anand Mahindra
José Roberto Marinho
Howard and Nancy Marks
Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw
McKinsey & Company
Tom and Tai Mendoza
Mercantil Bank
Stacey and Eric Mindich
Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.
The Ambrose Monell Foundation
Renata Nascimento
Jenny and John Paulson
Charles Phillips
The Pinkerton Foundation
Evercore Friends
Hon. Stephen C. Robinson
Carlos and Gabriela Rodriguez-Pastor
María Catalina Saieh Guzmán
The Fan Fox and Leslie R. Samuels Foundation, Inc.
Sonia Sarmiento
Nancy & Alan Schwartz
The Harold & Mimi Steinberg Charitable Trust
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Tina and Steven Swartz
Time Warner Inc.
Esme Usdan and James Snyder
Barbara and John Vogelstein
The Walton Family Foundation
Brad and Patty Wechsler
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Wildes & Weinberg, P.C.
Sid Yog
Zabar's and Zabars.com
Roger Altman and Jurate Kazickas
Amazon Prime Video
AMC Networks
Sarah Arison & Thomas Wilhelm
Jenner & Block LLP
Keith and Debbie Banks
Mrs. Anne H. Bass
Mrs. Mercedes T. Bass, Mercedes T. Bass Charitable Corporation
Mr. and Mrs. Frederick C. Benenson
Mary Lake and Frank Bennack
Dr. Georgette Bennett and Dr. Leonard S. Polonsky
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Neil G. Bluhm
BNY Mellon Wealth Management
Tina and Jeffrey Bolton
Boston Consulting Group
Shirley Brodsky
Clarissa & Edgar Bronfman Jr. Foundation
Jeff and Susan Campbell
CBS Corporation
Ms. Angela A. Chao
Simona and Jerome A. Chazen
Choi & Burns
The Coca-Cola Company
Continental Grain Company
Susan and David Coulter
Creative Artists Agency
Credit Suisse
Nancy and Steve Crown
Constans Culver Foundation
Mark & Susan Dalton
Aashish and Dinny Devitre
Diamond Schmitt Architects
Mrs. Junia Doan
Jonathan and Susan Dolgen
Jane & Robert Draizen
Eva and Glenn Dubin
Marilyn and Lawrence Friedland
David Geffen Foundation
Michael and Mary Gellert
General Catalyst
Ann and Gordon Getty Foundation
Arlene and Robert M. Goldberg and The Fay J. Lindner Foundation
Jon & Mindy Gray Family Foundation
Myrna & Steve Greenberg
Judd B. Grossman, Grossman LLP
Nancy and Stanley Grossman
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
The William Randolph Hearst Foundations
Roberta A. Herbison
The DuBose and Dorothy Heyward Memorial Fund
Shelley and Allan Holt
Alice and David Hunt
Rita J. and Stanley H. Kaplan Family Foundation, Inc.
The Marilyn and Jeffrey Katzenberg Foundation
Mrs. Robert Kaufman (Florence)
Tom and Kitty Kempner
Christine M. Kim and Jung Hoon Chang
Robert K. Kraft
Orin S. Kramer
LionTree LLC
The Litwin Foundation
George Lucas Family Foundation
Vincent and Anne Mai
Phyllis Mailman
Nancy Abeles Marks
Leni and Peter May
The John P. and Anne Welsh McNulty Foundation
Julie and Edward J. Minskoff
Mitsubishi Corporation (Americas)
Morgan Stanley
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
NEXT for AUTISM
Nixon Peabody LLP
John H. and Ethel G. Noble Charitable Trust
The Olayan Group
James and Melissa O'Shaughnessy
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP
Cecilia Picon & Pedro J. Torres
Carole and Ira Pittelman
Cynthia Hazen Polsky and Leon Polsky
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
RBC Capital Markets
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas A. Renyi
Frank Richardson and The Honorable Kimba M. Wood
Timothy and Andrea Collins
Mrs. Frederick P. Rose
The Edward John and Patricia Rosenwald Foundation
Susan Rudin
May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation, Inc.
Richard Salomon and Laura Landro
Thomas Schumacher
The Scully Peretsman Foundation
The SJS Charitable Trust
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Michelle Smith
The Sun Family Foundation
Frank & Cherry Tang
Bonnie and Daniel R. Tisch
Barbara and Donald Tober
Alyce Williams Toonk
Turner Construction Company
Mr. and Mrs. Nick Valenti
Mr. and Mrs. Stanford S. Warshawsky
Amy & John Weinberg
Suzy and Jack Welch
Jody Wolfe
Zakaria Family Foundation
Roy J. Zuckerberg & Tara E. Kelleher
Anonymous (3)
Nora Abousteit and Joshua Cooper Ramo
Keith & Peggy Anderson
Joan and Robert Arnow Fund
Rose M. Badgeley Residuary Charitable Trust
The Barker Welfare Foundation
Theodore H. Barth Foundation
Diana and Dick Beattie
Ginette and Joshua Becker
Judy and Howard Berkowitz
Brook and Roger Berlind
Parnassus Foundation/Jane and Raphael Bernstein
Max and Monique Burger, Hong Kong
J.E. & Z.B. Butler Foundation
Brook and Shawn Byers
The Ralph M. Cestone Foundation
Melinda Cheng
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Joseph M. Cohen
Robyn and Tony Coles
Comcast NBCUniversal
The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation
Antoinette Delruelle and Joshua L. Steiner
Deutsche Bank
Nancy Donohue and Diane Elam
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Jane and Michael Eisner and The Eisner Foundation
The Elkes Foundation
Robert and Anne Essner
Joseph S. Fichera
Barbara J. Fife
First Data
The G & A Foundation, Inc.
Mali Sananikone Gaw and Akarin Gaw
Cynthia Crossen and James Gleick
David Goldhill and Natasha Ozhiganova
Mr. and Mrs. Barry W. Gray
Anuj Gupta
The Harkness Foundation for Dance
Joyce Hergenhan
Bonnie B. Himmelman
HLMH, Inc.
Carl Jacobs Foundation
Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry of New York, Inc.
The Joelson Foundation
Mr. and Mrs. Charles B. Johnson
Kauff McGuire & Margolis LLP
Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation
William R. Kenan, Jr. Charitable Trust
C.L.C. Kramer Foundation, Inc.
Eric and Sandra Krasnoff
Henna H. Ong and Peter D. Lawrence
Karen and Paul Levy
Leon Levy Foundation
Arthur L. Loeb
The Honorable and Mrs. Earle I. Mack
Richard and Ronay Menschel
Bethany and Robert Millard
Linda Mirels
William C. and Susan F. Morris
Dinny and Lester Morse
Henry and Lucy Moses Fund, Inc
Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP
Donald R. Mullen
Thomas S. Murphy
Linda and Stuart Nelson
Neuberger Berman Foundation
Nicholson & Galloway, Inc.
David and Melanie Niemiec
Lida Orzeck, Ph.D.
Dina and George Perry
Diana and Joel C. Peterson
Tracey and Robert Pruzan
Susan and Arthur Rebell
Melissa and R. Bruce Rich
Richenthal Foundation
Estate of Catherine F. Roach
Sarah I. Schieffelin Charitable Trust
Lisa and David T. Schiff
Dr. and Mrs. Thomas P. Sculco
The Sequoia Foundation for Achievement in the Arts and Educations Inc.
Shiv Sethi
William Sherman, trustee for the Murray G. and Beatrice H. Sherman Charitable Trust
Walter V. Shipley
Greg S. Feldman and Melanie Shorin
Klara & Larry Silverstein
Esther Simon Charitable Trust
The John Ben Snow Memorial Trust
Jay and Deanie Stein
Judy and Michael Steinhardt
Jane and James Stern
Gabrielle and Arthur Sulzberger
Sumitomo Corporation of Americas
Pamela & Allen B. Swerdlick
Nicki and Harold Tanner
Ann and Andrew Tisch
Bruce and Robbi Toll
Alair A. Townsend
Uneeda Enterprises
Andrea and Paul Vizcarrondo
The Isak and Rose Weinman Foundation, Inc.
Working Title Films
Barbara and David Zalaznick
Randi Zuckerberg & Brent Tworetzky
Anonymous (11)
Patricia and Alan B. Abramson
Rodney & Michelle Adkins
Paul G. Allen
Linda and Earle Altman
Eleanor S. Applewhaite
Ardian Foundation
Mr. and Mrs. George Asch
Norma K. Asnes
Brett Beldock and John Simoni
Beth and Alan Berkeley
Rhoda Bressler
Deenie and Frank Brosens
Daniel Bross and Robert Cundall
Elizabeth A.R. and Ralph S. Brown, Jr.
Mr. and Mrs. Robert L. Burch, III
Ann L. and Lawrence B. Buttenwieser
Mr. and Mrs. John Calicchio
Tracia Luh and Paul Carpenter
The Kate W. Cassidy Foundation
Shirley Chen
City Protection - Uri Zilkha
Andy Cohen, Bravo
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Consulate General of the Netherlands in New York
Core BTS
The Frederick R. Coudert Foundation
Lucy and Mike Danziger
Peggy and Dick Danziger
Davis Polk & Wardwell
DBID, Inc.
Jane and Bill Donaldson
The Max and Victoria Dreyfus Foundation, Inc.
Evolv Technology
Peter and Joan Faber
Patricia and Eric Fast
Fiona Morgan Fein
Bill Fischer, Fischer Travel
Fisher Dachs Associates
Margaret and Howard Fluhr
Judith A. Garson and Steven N. Rappaport
Barbara and Peter Georgescu
The Giants Foundation
Russell Granet and David Beach
Dr. and Mrs. Victor Grann
The Grodzins Fund
Allen and Deborah Grubman
Michael Halperin
Gail and Walter Harris
Nicholas P. Haslett
Michele Hirshman and Russell Pearce
HSBC Bank, N. A.
Jill and Ken Iscol
Linda Janklow
Dave & Suzi Johnson
Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC
Kelco Construction
Stuart and Isabel Kessler
Mr. Peter Kim and Ms. Juliette Cho
Dr. Barbara Kravitz
Bonnie Englebardt Lautenberg
Larry Leeds
Jonathan E. Lehman
Ellen and Dr. Richard U. Levine
Crystal McCrary and Raymond J. McGuire
Joyce F. Menschel
Robert B. Menschel and Janet Wallach
Carolyn and Gene Mercy
Virginia E. Moens
Paul Montrone and Perspecta Trust
The Naggars
Nandansons Charitable Foundation
Needham Foundation Trust
Stanley Newman and Dr. Brian Rosenthal
Charles John O'Byrne
Martin and Suzi Oppenheimer
Palladium Window Solutions
Liza Parker and Frank Migliorelli
Michael Park and Sarah Seo
The Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater
Abraham Perlman Foundation
Tamar C. Podell
Judy and Jim Pohlman
Lynn Povich and Stephen Shepard
Robert A. Press, M.D.
Rajika and Anupam Puri
Paula and Ira M. Resnick
Denise Rich
Jane and Paul Rittmaster
Liz Robbins
James Robinson III
Jonathan F. P. and Diana Rose
Emilia Saint-Amand
Joan & Jack Saltz
Paul H. Scarbrough, Akustiks, LLC
Pam and Scott Schafler
Jordan B. Seaman
Anna Marie and Robert F. Shapiro
Jaar-mel and Peter Sloane
Grant and Jacqui Smith
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas W. Smith
Susan and Peter Solomon
Barbaralee Diamonstein Spielvogel and Ambassador Carl Spielvogel
Astrid Spina
Stairway Fund
Nancy and Burton Staniar
Joan and Michael Steinberg
Dianne and David Stern
The Leila and Mickey Straus Family Charitable Trust
Scott & Lisa Stuart
Maryann Sudo Baxter
Lita Tandon
Tiger Baron Foundation
Lizzie and Jonathan Tisch
Michelle Toll and William O'Flanagan
Ms. Jacqueline Truong
Amy and Jeff Verschleiser
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Ilene Gotts / Wachtell Lipton
Mary J. Wallach
Walsh Pizzi O'Reilly Falanga LLP
Barbara Washkowitz
Lynne and David B. Weinberg
The Weininger Foundation, Inc.
Mr. and Mrs. James O. Welch, Jr.
Anita and Byron Wien
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Mr. and Mrs. James D. Wolfensohn
Anonymous (5)
Gloria and Bert Abrams
Joseph and Jacqueline Aguanno
Mr. and Mrs. Ira Akselrad
Stephanie Ansin & Spencer Stewart
Loreen Arbus
Karen and Gregory Arenson
Ariel Investments
Page Ashley
Barclay Damon, LLP
Martin and Rhoda Barr
William Barry - Sompo International Insurance
Kathy & Gene Bernstein
Lisa & Mark Bezos
Susan and Matthew Blank
Madeline and Alan Blinder
Robert Brenner
Rita and Charles Bronfman
Maggie and Don Buchwald
Marian Burke
Jamie and David Caro
Marcy Carsey
Lisa and Dick Cashin
Una Chae & Jonathan Zucker
Ms. Huiping Chen
Betsy Cohn
The Simon and Eve Colin Foundation
Joyce B. Cowin
Jeffrey and Caren Cox
Gordon J. Davis and Peggy Cooper Davis
Scott M. Delman
Jenny Brorsen and Rich DeMartini
Robert C. Dinerstein
Domitilia M. dos Santos
Brendan Dougher
Les Duffy
Lisa and Sandy Ehrenkranz
Ciara Burnham/Evercore Partners
Seymour Falik and Loraine Liebmann
Patricia Falkenberg
Kenneth and Diane Feinberg
Mr. Harry Feng
Caryl and Kenneth Field
Linda and Gregory Fischbach
Nancy Fisher and Marc Kirschner
Jeanne Donovan Fisher
Laura Gurwin Flug
Andrew Frackman and Emily Braun
Barbara A. Gallay
Bruce Gelb
Ms. Lynn Gilbert
Golden K-9 Protective Svc.
Tracie Golding Gerson
Stephanie Pottruck Goldman
Terina Golfinos and Robert Lisi
Barbara Freid Gottesman
Lenore and Edward Grabowski
Gramercy Park Foundation
Paula S. Greenman
Marilee K. Greenwald
Joan and Charles Gross
Dr. and Mrs. Sanford Grossman
Jennifer & Bud Gruenberg
Mrs. John (Susan) Gutfreund
Peter and Helen Haje
Jill and Martin Handelsman
Lynne and Harold Handler
J. Ira and Nicki Harris Family Foundation
Francena T. Harrison Foundation Trust
Charles Goren and Hazan Family Foundation, Lisa and Tom Hazen, Trustees
Hermione Foundation, Laura J. Sloate Trustee
Janet and Arthur Hershaft
Ian and Lea Highet
Paul and Josefin Hilal
Hitz Foundation
Joan Holmes
In memory of Alfred R. Horan
Ruth W. Houghton
Chris Stern Hyman
Dr. Betty S. Iu
Japan Foundation
Alexandra Krofta Jones
Marnee and Eric Kaltman
John Kander
Robert and Debra Kasirer
Gene Kaufman and Terry Eder-Kaufman
Kathy Keneally
Mr. and Mrs. Harold Kingsberg
Dr. and Mrs. Samuel Klagsbrun
Judi and Douglas Krupp
Jill and Barry Lafer
Nicole & Fernand Lamesch
Leonard & Judy Lauder
Alain and Helene LeBleu
Sara Lee and Axel Schupf
Carol Leibenson
Sahra Lese
Robert M. and Diane v.S. Levy
Amy and Frank Linde
Arthur and Susan B. Lindenauer
Ms. Jie Ling
Dorothy Litwin Brief and Donald Brief
Robert Losada
Yang Lu & Grace Gui
Duncan & Nancy MacMillan
John Madden
Barbara and J. Robert Mann, Jr.
Bernice Manocherian
Jody G. Mansbach
Judith and Michael Margulies
Judith and David Marrus
John E. McAuliffe
Shelley Mendell
Josie Merck and Jim Stevenson
Susan Merinoff
Ellen and Lee Metzendorf
Edward & Sandra Meyer Foundation
Marti Meyerson & Jamie Hooper
Mid Atlantic Arts Foundation
William R. Miller
Marianne & Steven Mills
Evangeline Morphos & Alan Brinkley
Prue Mortimer
Charlotte Moss & Barry Friedberg
MSA Security
Kathryn Myers
Ms. Jackie Napalan
National Basketball Association
Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal U.S.A., Inc
Beth and Michael Nochomovitz
Barbara & Barry Novick
Charles and Jean Osgood
Betsy and Justin Painter
Jean and Kent Papsun
Dr. Herb Pardes
Robin and Bob Paulson
The Peckham Family Foundation
Liz and Jeff Peek
Barbara A. Pelson
Ann and Hollis Petersen
In Loving Memory of Nancy Pfifferling
Mr. Mark Pick
Catherine A. Rein
The Related Companies LP
Rems Family
The Karl F. Reuling Fund
Philip W. Riskin Charitable Foundation, Inc.
Gail and Michael Rogers
Daniel and Joanna S. Rose
Alexandra Munroe & Robert Rosenkranz, The Rosenkranz Foundation
Jamie Rosenthal Wolf, David Wolf, Rick Rosenthal, Nancy Stephens and The Rosenthal Family Foundation
Nina Rosenwald
Janet C. Ross
Anne and Noah Roy
Deborah and Chuck Royce
Reed Rubin and Jane Gregory Rubin
Mr. and Mrs. Anthony W. Ruggiero
Lynda and Robert Safron
The Sagner Family Foundation
Lauren and Deeb Salem
Judy and Dirk Salz
Ms. Gail Robin Sarner
The Irwin S. Scherzer Foundation Inc.
Robert Schoenthal & Diane Silberstein
Jonathan M. Schorr
Edmund and Elaine Schroeder
Stephen A. Schwarzman
Emily Segal and Andrew Ellis
The Helena Segy Foundation
Nadine Shaoul and Mark Schonberger
Susan Stein Shiva Foundation
Mr. Ilya Shor
Mrs. Constantine Sidamon-Eristoff
Laine Siklos
Adrianne and William Silver
Herbert and Arline Slepoy Charitable Foundation
Joan and Joel Smilow
Andrew Malik & Elizabeth Smith-Malik
Carla Solomon and Antonio Magliocco, Jr.
Annaliese Soros
John Sparling, Esq.
Dr. Eric J. Spicer and Christiane Vanderlinden
Janet and Gil Spitzer
Stephen Stamas
Lauren and Scott Stelzer
Aaron and Betty Lee Stern Foundation
Christopher Stewart
Bonnie and Tom Strauss
In memory of Mrs. Lee Strong
Caryn and Richard Swanson
Gloria and Philip Talkow
Jay H. Tanenbaum
Ellen and Bill Taubman
Thornton Tomasetti
Lee L. Traub
In loving memory of Ernest E. Tyrrasch
Enzo Viscusi
Mary Ellen and Karl von der Heyden
Heather & Bill Vrattos
David Wackman
Candace and Jonathan Wainwright
Lana and Justin Walder
Elaine and Alan Weiler
Sue Ann Weinberg
Judy and Josh Weston
Mrs.Carolyn Wiener
Sherry and Robert Wiener
Susan and Benjamin Winter
Richard and Lisa Witten
Lee Wolf and Jordan Cohen
Ira Wolfson
Ellen and Joseph Wright
Elaine G. Yaffe
George M. Yeager
Ms. Ming Zhou Lin
W. Kevin Zhu
Anonymous (16)
3.1 Phillip Lim
Hussain Abbas
Mr. Omar Abboud
Mr. Hector Abdelnour
Jen Ablon
George and Pamela Ackert
Mr. Conrad Adolf
Mr. and Mrs. Alan Alda
In Memory of E. Nelson & Betty L. Asiel
Aspro Plumbing Inc.
Mr. Michael Audet
Charles Ayres
Mr. Vishnu Bachani
Abigail and Joseph Baratta
Kara Medoff Barnett and Dov Barnett
Brent T. Barnhart - UBS Private Wealth Management
Mr. Phillip Basil
Dale and Max Berger
Mr. and Mrs. T.G. Berk
In Memory of Arthur M. Bernhardt
Ms. Anna Bitton
Maury and Joseph Bohan
Leon Baer Borstein, Esq.
Lotte and Ludwig Bravmann
Josephine Brown
Mr. Kenneth P. Browne
Mr. Arri Burrows
Mr. Yanni Burton and Mr. Jordan Palmer
Ms. Golda Calonge
Kristen Campolattaro
Ms. Jessica Cardenas
Graydon and Anna Carter
Ms. Laura Cawley
Hilary Cecil-Jordan
Joyce Chelberg
Lola L. Chlupsa
Mary Cirillo-Goldberg
Betsy Cohen and Marc Devorsetz
Ms. Mercy Cohen
Suzanne and Jeff Cohen
Amy Fine Collins
Donald Comras
Lori Conkling
Ms. Michelle Copelman
Arika and Jon Couchman
Mr. and Mrs. Stephane Cremieux
Dr. and Mrs. Charles H. Debrovner
Steve and Connie Delehanty
Vicky and Thomas DiDonato
Melanie Dodson and David Granger
Mr. & Mrs. Harold Domnitch
Mr. Alexander Donnelly
Miriam and David Donoho
Christopher and Robyn Donovan
Mr. Andrew Duchi
Mr. and Mrs. Oded Edan
Ms. Launa Eddy
Ms. Patricia S. Eigen
Nora Ephron & Nicholas Pileggi Foundation
Mr. and Mrs. Yehuda Even-Zohar
Mr. and Mrs. Leroy Fadem
Dr. Egidio Farone
Mr. William Finnegan
Mr. Anton Finucane
Joanne and Ellen Flanagan
James and Kerianne Flynn
Emily Abigail Friedman
Matthew J. Friedman
Ms. Amanda Gallagher
Gerstner Family Foundation
Carol Gertz
Peter Gethers
Anne Gilbert and Gordon Goldstein
Joseph D. Gioe
Elizabeth F. Goodstein
Michael D. Granoff
Mr. Lawrence Grant and Mrs. Michele Grant
Ms. Katherine Grehl
Susan Griffith and David Neill
Terry and Michael Groll
Peter Gruenberger and Carin Lamm
Louise Grunwald
GSI Systems, Inc.
Jan M. Guifarro
Ms. Kelly Hallinan
Beverly L. Hamilton
Trish Hamlin
Ms. Florence Haseler
Ms. Laura Hellman
Buck Henry Charitable Fund Administered by the California Community Foundation
Horacio and Julia Herzberg
Dr. and Mrs. Charles Hesdorffer
Hightech Solutions NYC, LLC
Ryan and Sara Hinkle
Josephine Lawrence Hopkins Foundation
Riva Horwitz & Josh Easterly
Hotta Liesenberg Satio LLP
Mr. Roger Huang
Jake Huff
Tracey and Craig Huff
Richard and Sharon Hurowitz
Jean and Maurice Jacobs
Raphael G. Jacobs
Mr. Spencer Jaffe
Surjit K. Jairath
Ms. Brooke James
David Jaquet
Monica Jasty
Dan and Elizabeth Jolivette
Barbara and Donald Jonas
Hilda and Christopher Jones
Jones Day
Jonah Katz
Michael Katz
Ms. Yukako Kawata
Judge Amalya L. Kearse
Mrs. Ralph W. Kern
Ms. Lisa Khan
Mr. Boris Khentov
Mr. Hank Klehm
Jamie Klein
Steven Klinsky
June H. Koizumi
Mr. and Mrs. George Krupp
Amy B. Kuhn and Stuart Rosow
Dr. Edward Kwak & Ji Park Kwak
Carole and Frank Lalli
Mr. and Mrs. P.L. Lamb
Douglas Lancet and Adam Sikora
Madeleine Lebwohl
Mr. Brian Lee
Yan & Daipan Lee
Almudena and Pablo Legorreta
Cindy & Richard Leibovitch
Frank & Patricia Lenti
Ms. Kara Lentz
Ms. Elissa Li
Suzanne Lim MD
Timothy Cooper Lin
Ms. Ava Lubell
Dr. Andrew T. Lupo, Jr. & Mrs. Andrea S. Lupo
Sondra and David S. Mack
Mr. Varun Madiath
Tony Magro
Tina Livanos and Alexandros Makrygeorgos
Stephen C. Malamud, MD
Elissa and Hal Mandel
Ms. Erica Manoff
Kristine G. Manoukian
The Mansi Family
Margaret P. Mautner
Ms. Rebecca McAfee
Gilda & John P. McGarry, Jr.
Gerard M. Meistrell
Marie and Joe Melone
Dr. Naomi Mendelsohn
The Janis and Alan Menken Foundation
Marissa and Ryan Miller
Barbara A. Miller and Stuart Nordheimer
Mr. and Mrs. Peter Milligan
Cheryl and Michael Minikes
Moelis & Company
Barbara Moore
Harold and Mary Ann Moore
Mr. Paul Mourino
Ms. Tyler Murphy
Margo Nederlander
Debby & Joel Neiterman
Angie Nguyen and Sanford Weisburst
Colleen Noall
Ken and Carolyn Ottenbreit
Dennis Palmeri
The Par Group
Mary Carr Patton
Laura Pels
Peter L. Philipps
Evan Picoult
Sal Piscopo
Ms. Emma Podlesnik
Mia Poppe, Esq.
J.R. Randall
Lisa Maris Raylesberg
Mr. and Mrs. Ariel Recanati
Dr. and Mrs. James S. Reibel
Judith & Kenneth Reiss
Ms. Charlotte Renfield-Miller
Julie and Matt Richardson
Mr. David Robbins
Heidi Roberts
Ms. Alicia Robinson
Nancy Rose
Lesley & Ted Rosenthal
Susan and Jon Rotenstreich
Judith O. and Robert E. Rubin
Ms. Christina Russell
Michael and Donna Sasso
Agata and Sumeer Sathi
Kate Schlesinger
Sanford J. Schlesinger and Lianne Lazetera
Rudy and Elaine Schott
Ms. Cagla Gamze Seten
Teena and George Shaw
Ted and Mary Jo Shen
Jenny Shotwell
Dr. Robert Silver
Jack and Shirley Silver
Ms. Kelly Sinn
The Alan B. Slifka Foundation
Amir and Manisha Sobhraj
Michael and Claudia Spies
Mr. Michael Spinelli
Mr. Alexander Stamatiadis
Melissa and Neil St. Clair
Lynn G. Straus
Allison and Stephen Sullens
Mr. Salvatore Takoushian
Eduardo Tamraz
Ray and Karen Testa
Edward T. Tokar
Phyllis Trible
Hatsuko Ueno
Nisha Venkataraman
Vorhoff Family
Elle S. Wang
Judy and Lee Wasserman
Antonia Watson of Watson International Equities
Mr. Eric Weil
Ellen and Peter Weintraub
Ms. Kim Amanda Weiss and Mr. Stephen D. Oestreich
George and Sal Wen-Capolarello
Mitch Wergiles, Premier Supplies
Naida S. Wharton Foundation
The Wise Family Fund
Elliot & Nancy Wolk
Ms. Nekeshia Woods
Robert and Alicia Wyckoff
Xpress Termite & Pest Control Corp.
Ms. Lynn Yen
Henry Bernstein and Jerry Zachary
Zelnick/Belzberg Charitable Trust
Anonymous (17)
Founding Patrons of Lincoln Center
Lincoln Center gratefully acknowledges the support of those individuals, foundations and corporations whose gifts to the capital drive helped build Lincoln Center and maintain its operations during its formative years.
John D. Rockefeller Jr.
Mr. and Mrs. David M. Keiser
Mrs. Felix M. Warburg
Arthur A. Houghton Jr.
Mr. and Mrs. John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Mr. and Mrs. Pierre David-Weill
Mrs. V. Beaumont Allen
Mrs. John T. Pratt
Mrs. Richard Charlton
Frasier W. McCann
Mrs. Joseph V. McMullan
Mrs. Arthur Lehman
Mrs. Alta Rockefeller Prentice
Mrs. Robert Walton Goelet
Francis Goelet
Mr. and Mrs. John Goelet
Robert G. Goelet
Mr. and Mrs. Hayward F. Manice
Alfred P. Sloan Jr.
Mr. and Mrs. Frank Altschul
Mr. and Mrs. Robert E. Blum
Mr. and Mrs. David Rockefeller
Mr. and Mrs. Walter H. Annenberg
Mr. and Mrs. Louis J. Horowitz
John S. Newberry
Barbara Hutton
Lauder Greenway
Mr. and Mrs. Francis Kernan
Mrs. Thomas J. Watson
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas M. Evans
Family of Cornelius N. Bliss
The Family of Julius Rosenwald
Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Appleton Ives
James Donahue
Robert Lehman
Audrey Love
Mr. and Mrs. O. Roy Chalk
Nancy Susan Reynolds
Huntington Hartford
The Family of Edward H. and Mary W. Harriman
Mr. and Mrs. John N. Irwin II
The Family of Carl M. Loeb
Mr. and Mrs. Albert A. List
Mrs. Charles V. Hickox
Mr. and Mrs. Henry Ittleson Jr.
Mr. and Mrs. John Hay Whitney
Mrs. John D. Rockefeller Jr.
Mr. and Mrs. Owen Robertson Cheatham
Mr. and Mrs. Leon Hess
Mrs. Charles W. Englehard
Mr. and Mrs. Irwin Hamilton Kramer
Mr. and Mrs. Lansdell K. Christie
Mr. and Mrs. Cornelius Vanderbilt Whitney
Mr. and Mrs. Percy Uris
Mr. and Mrs. Harold D. Uris
Mrs. Ambrose Monell
Mrs. Hazel Hopkins Ford
The Family of Clarence and Anne Dillon
Alice Bigelow Tully
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Kimberly
Mr. and Mrs. Charles Shipman Payson
Mr. and Mrs. Willis H. Booth
Mrs. Vincent Astor
Harold Stirling Vanderbilt
Mrs. Josephine Lawrence Graeber
Allan P. Kirby
Mr. and Mrs. Walker G. Buckner
Mr. and Mrs. Amyas Ames
Mr. and Mrs. Gustave L. Levy
Mr. and Mrs. Henry J. Heinz II
Margaret Mellon Hitchcock
Mr. and Mrs. Seymour H. Knox
Mr. and Mrs. Frank Stanton
Mr. and Mrs. David Hunter McAlpin
Mr. and Mrs. Douglas Dillon
Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence A. Wien
The Family of Carl H. Pforzheimer
Mr and Mrs. W. Van Alan Clark
Mr. and Mrs. Harry B. Helmsley
Mr. and Mrs. Eugene Ferkauf
Mr. and Mrs. Nathan Cummings
Mr. and Mrs. Andre Meyer
David and Irene Schwartz
Mr. and Mrs. Edwin S. Marks
Mr. and Mrs. Richard Rodgers
Mr. and Mrs. Gardner Cowles
Mr. and Mrs. Roger L. Stevens
Mr. and Mrs. Louis Calder
C. Michael Paul
Mr. and Mrs. Samuel Lemberg
Mr. and Mrs. Samuel H. Golding
Mr. and Mrs. Shelby Cullom Davis
The Family of Joseph P. Kennedy
The Mazer Family
Mr. and Mrs. James P. Warburg
The Family of Solomon and Rose S. Lasdon
Mrs. Edsel Ford
The Fribourg Family
Irving Geist
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph A. Neff
Enid Annenberg Haupt
Mr. and Mrs. Lester-Francis Avnet
Mrs. Lytle Hull
Mr. and Mrs. Leonard Block
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph L. Mailman
Mr. and Mrs. Harold L. Fierman
Mr. and Mrs. Richard Salomon
Mr. and Mrs. Frank E. Taplin Jr.
Mr. and Mrs. Herbert M. Singer
Stavros S. Niarchos
Bernice Chrysler Garbisch
The Family of Erwin S. Wolfson
Carl A. Morse
Mr. and Mrs. Jack Linsky
The Durst Family
Mr. and Mrs. Saul Jeffee
Mr. and Mrs. Sol Kittay
Mr. and Mrs. Charles H. Dyson
Lila Acheson Wallace
Mr. and Mrs. Bruce L. Zenkel
Richard J. Schwartz
Mr. and Mrs. Milton Petrie
Evlynne and Max M. Low
The Family of Ethel S. Mehlman
Aye Simon
Mrs. Jean Mauze
Mr. Louis Marx
Charles H. Revson
Mr. and Mrs. Howard Lipman
Harry Lebensfeld
Minna and Benjamin M. Reeves
Mr. and Mrs. Irving Mitchell Felt
Mr. and Mrs. Edouard L. Cournand
Miss Julie A. Spies
Frank and Selma Kalisch
Mr. and Mrs. Avery Fisher
Anne C. Burns
Mr. and Mrs. Christopher T. Chenery
Louis R. Simon
Carrie S. Beinecke
Dr. and Mrs. Jerome S. Coles
Blanche and A.L. Levine
Emily Fisher Landau
Three Anonymous
The Rockefeller Foundation
The Ford Foundation
Exxon Corporation
Avalon Foundation
First National City Educational and Charitable Foundation
The Chase Manhattan Bank Foundation
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company
Corning Glass Works Foundation
Chemical Bank
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York
James Foundation of New York, Inc.
Bankers Trust company
The Commonwealth Fund
The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Lazard & Frères & Co.
IBM Corporation
Texaco, Inc.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
New York Life Insurance Company
Juilliard Musical Foundation
Bell System Companies in New York City
Union Carbide Corporation
United States Steel Foundation
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Carnegie Corporation of New York
New York Foundation
Columbia Broadcasting System
Shell Companies Foundations, Incorporated
RCA Corporation
Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
Old Dominion Foundation
The John A. Hartford Foundation, Inc.
The Bodman Foundation
Mobil Oil Corporation
The Heckscher Foundation for Children
Schenley Industries, Inc.
Revlon Foundation
Charles and Rosanna Batchelor Memorial, Inc.
Standard Oil Company of California
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Consolidated Natural Gas Company
Samuel H. Kress Foundation
Bethlehem Steel Corporation
Vivian B. Allen Foundation, Inc.
Irving Trust Company
The Spiros G. Ponty Foundation
Charles Ulrick and Josephine Bay Foundation, Inc.
Josephine Bay Paul and C. Michael Paul Foundation Inc.
Wertheim & Co.
Firestone Foundation
William S. Paley Foundation, Inc.
The Howard Johnson Foundation
Lehman Brothers
W.H. Charities
The George F. Baker Trust
D.S. and R.H. Gottesman Foundation
Glen Alden Corporation
The Philip and Janice Levin Foundation
Carl Marks & Company, Inc.
Beinecke Foundation
Bear, Stearns & Co.
J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. Foundation
The First Boston Foundation Trust
Korvettes-Division of Arlen Realty & Development Corporation
The New York Times
The Samuel & David Rose Fund
Sterling National Bank of New York
Van Munching & Co., Inc.
Heineken Holland Beer
United Brands Foundation
Rapid-America Corporation
The Seigfried & Josephine Bieber Foundation
Sherman Fairchild Foundation, Inc.
Herman Goldman Foundation
As of June 14, 2012
The Foundation Patrons of Lincoln Center built the Center and maintained it through the first 12 years as a worldwide recognition was won. Patrons of the Lincoln Center Fund continue this tradition of generosity, ensuring the Lincoln Center will enrich the lives of future generations. Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts is indebted to these individuals, foundations and corporations.
Estate of John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Amerada Hess Corporation
American Brands, Inc.
American Can Company Foundation
The American Express Company
Mr. and Mrs. Amyas Ames
The Jack and Mimi Leviton Amsterdam Foundation
Nathan S. Ancell
J. Aron Charitable Foundation, Inc.
Ted Ashley
The Vincent Astor Foundation
Bankers Trust Company Foundation
Diane and Arthur Belfer
Bell System
Mr. and Mrs. George F. Berlinger
Steffi and Robert Berne
Mr. and Mrs. Leonard Block
Mr. and Mrs. Robert S. Boas
The Bodman Foundation
Booth Ferris Foundation
Evelyn Brand
CBS, Inc.
Celanese Corporation
Mr. and Mrs. O. Roy Chalk
Irwin S. Chanin
The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Trust under the will of Eleanor S. Cole
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman
Charles E. Culpeper Foundation, Inc.
Marjorie and Richard W. Dammann
The Eleanor Naylor Dana Charitable Trust
Mr. and Mrs. Richard M. Danziger
Evelyn Y. Davis
Evelyn Y. Davis Foundation
Mr. and Mrs. Aaron Diamond
The Dillon Fund
William H. Donner Foundation, Inc.
Mr. and Mrs. Charles H. Dyson
Mr. and Mrs. Lester Eisner Jr.
Mrs. Charles W. Engelhard
Exxon Corporation
Sherman Fairchild Foundation
Emily Fisher Landau
The Fribourg Family
GTE Foundation
General Electric Company
General Foods Corporation
Diane and Robert Goldberg
Fay J. Lindner Foundation
Herman Goldman Foundation
Nathan and Jacqueline Goldman
The Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation
D. & R. Gottesman
Grace Foundation, Inc.
Jerome L. Greene
The Family of Louis A. Green
The George Gund Foundation
Mr. and Mrs. John H. Gutfreund
John A. Hartford Foundation
Eva and Jean Pierre Hartman, M.D.
Rita E. and Gustave M. Hauser
William Randolph Hearst Foundation
Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley
Mr. and Mrs. Leon Hess
Mr. and Mrs. George H. Heyman Jr.
IBM Corporation
Ittleson Foundation, Inc.
Joyce and J. Seward Johnson Jr.
Maria Olivia and Jim Judelson
Rita and Stanley H. Kaplan
Mr. and Mrs. William W. Karatz
Henry Kaufmann Foundation
Anne and Sidney Kriser
Mr. and Mrs. Jay B. Langner
Kenneth D. Laub
Samuel J. and Ethel LeFrak Foundation
Lucille and Samuel Lemberg
Mr. and Mrs. William M. Lese
Richard R. Levien
Janice H. Levin
Mortimer and Mimi Levitt
Kenneth and Evelyn Lipper Foundation
Albert and Vera List
Mr. and Mrs. John L. Loeb
Mrs. V. Theodore Low
The Joe and Emily Lowe Foundation, Inc.
MacAndrews & Forbes Group, Inc.
R.H. Macy and Co., Inc.
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph L. Mailman
Mr. and Mrs. Peter L. Malkin
Nancy and Edwin Marks
Family of Cecile Lehman Mayer
Helen and William Mazer
Merrill Lynch & Co. Foundation
LuEsther T. Mertz
Kathryn and Gilbert Miller Fund, Inc.
The Milstein and Lindner Families
Mobil Foundation
The Ambrose Monell Foundation
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company
Mr. and Mrs. Lester S. Morse Jr.
Stephen I. Morse
Lucy G. Moses
Nabisco Brands, Inc.
National Endowment for the Arts
Samuel I. Newhouse Foundation, Inc.
Mr. and Mrs. Jerome A. Newman
Edward John Noble Foundation
Richard and Evelyn Paige
Margot Papamarkou
Abraham Perlman Foundation
Carroll and Milton Petrie
The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation, Inc.
Philip Morris Incorporated
Mr. and Mrs. Maurice Pollak
Rita and Alfred Rand
Kurt P. and Auguste Reimann
Pearl and Jack Resnick
Charles H. Revson Foundation
Irving and Murray Riese
Meshulam Riklis
The Gerald and May Ellen Ritter Memorial Fund
Josie and Julian Robertson, Jr.
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Mr. and Mrs. Frederick P. Rose
Jill and Marshall Rose
Helena Rubinstein Foundation
Samuel and May Rudin Foundation
Richard and Edna Salomon
The Fan Fox and Leslie R. Samuels Foundation, Inc.
Alma and Morris A. Schapiro
S.H. and Helen R. Scheuer Family Foundation
Helen and Irving Schneider
David and Irene Schwartz
Mr. and Mrs. Richard J. Schwartz
Mr. and Mrs. Martin E. Segal
Peter Jay Sharp
Mr. and Mrs. Herbert M. Singer
Nate B. & Frances Spingold Foundation, Inc.
Standard Brands
Ronald P. Stanton
Ruth and Frank Stanton
Miriam and Harold Steinberg Foundation
Mr. and Mrs. Frank E. Taplin Jr.
Mr. and Mrs. Emanuel M. Terner
Tisch Foundation, Inc.
Alan and Margaret Tishman
Mr. and Mrs. Roy Titus
Uris Brothers Foundation, Inc.
The Nathaniel and Suzanne Usdan Family
Miriam and Ira D. Wallach Foundation
Warner Communications, Inc.
Florence and Max Wechsler
Weiler-Arnow Family
Mildred and George Weissman
Shelby White and Leon Levy
Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence A. Wien
The Norman and Rosita Winston Foundation, Inc.
The Family of Erwin S. Wolfson
Bruce and Lois Zenkel
Mortimer B. Zuckerman
Two Anonymous
As of June 14, 2012


text:
No results were found.
The Westchester County Association (WCA) announced today its Community Partnership with the Westchester Biotech Project (WBP), a consortium dedicated to stimulating knowledge-sharing and collaboration among researchers, engineers, and data scientists from companies and institutions across the region. Ongoing programs will launch this spring, leading to the Innovation in Research Symposium on October 26 at New York Medical College.
A new Steering Committee for the Westchester County Association's Smart Growth for Gigabit initiative was announced today by William M. Mooney, Jr., President and CEO of the Westchester County Association.
The Committee will oversee bringing gigabit-speed broadband to Westchester, beginning with its four largest cities, by giving guidance to the effort, as well as raising seed funding to pave the way for this needed infrastructure.
The committee is comprised of "some of the most informed, respected, and enterprising individuals in our midst," Mr. Mooney said in his announcement. Mr. Mooney said that the Committee held its first meeting and anticipates that in May, an RFP for a national consultant to assess the county's current infrastructure, market realities, and help determine the best course of action to bring gigabit broadband into the county will be issued.
On the heels of our groundbreaking conference, "Westchester: County of Tomorrow," the Westchester County Association is spearheading Smart Growth to bring to Westchester County high speed broadband, innovation districts, and housing that's affordable for the region's workforce. To assist us, the WCA has hired Joan M. McDonald, former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Transportation, and a nationally recognized expert in economic competitiveness, sustainable development and transportation solutions, to be a strategic advisor for The Blueprint for Smart Growth.
The future of Smart Growth in Westchester County began on April 29 in earnest as leaders from various business, government, nonprofit, and financial sectors convened at the Westchester County Association's (WCA) sold-out conference, "Westchester: County of Tomorrow." Provocative speakers from New York City, Austin, Chattanooga, and Raleigh explained...
Jerry Sanders is on to something. His company believes in Smart Transportation for Smart Cities, which led to the invention of a low-cost, elevated Personal Rapid Transportation system (PRT) to replace light rail. It might be just the thing to revolutionize rapid transit within Westchester's cities or as a connector between one side of the county to the other.
No results were found.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Tuesday 24th Apr
The Beaverwood Club , Beaverwood Road, Chislehurst, London BR7 6HF
On Apr 24, 2018
Featuring Mike Zito, Vanja Sky and Bernard Allison
Other Dates Throughout the Month
Blackfen School for Girls , Blackfen Road DA15 9NU
From Friday 15th Aug 2014 - Until Tuesday 30th Jun 2020
Maths and English classes for children of all ages and abilities.
10 Heath Court , Stanley Close, London, SE9 2BB
From Wednesday 24th May 2017 - Until Sunday 30th Apr 2023
Cleaning Express is a professional cleaning company which offers a wide range of cleaning services across London for domestic and commercial needs. Our cleaners are fully vetted, insured, trained and customer focused. We provide the following services: Regular cleaning and one offs...


text:
LAS VEGAS (AP) — A Nevada jury has found drug companies liable for $104 million in damages in a third product liability lawsuit stemming from a hepatitis C outbreak four years ago at Las Vegas outpatient colonoscopy clinics.
A Clark County District Court civil jury on Wednesday awarded $90 million to 71-year-old Michael Washington and his wife, Josephine Washington, in their lawsuit against Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. and Baxter Healthcare Corp. The same jury on Monday awarded $14 million in compensatory damages to the couple.
Officials with Israel-based Teva and Deerfield, Ill.-based Baxter didn't immediately respond to messages seeking comment.
Teva and Baxter are appealing a $500 million jury awarded last year to plaintiffs in a similar case.
Teva has also promised to appeal a $182.6 million verdict awarded just days ago.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press.


text:
Until we get the notifications straightened out for the new blog, I will let you know here when I put a new post up.
Happy Easter!
Neat stuff-- I'm a baker myself, love the designs you've got here.
Hello my loved one! We wish to say until this article will be amazing, great written as well as include almost many significant infos. I would like to see extra threads similar to this.
I am so much excited after reading your blog@}->--
Nice blog!
شات صوتي
شات الغلا
شات صوتي
شات الغلا
سعودي كام
عرب ذوق
نايس كام
شات كول
شات صوتي
عذاب كول
شات صوتي
عرب كول
عرب كول
انحراف كام
شات صوتي مغربي
شات انحراف
شات صوتي
شات الغلا
This post is very useful. Thnks for sharing it.
Icing Sheets
Edible Ink Printer
Set of Edible Cartridges
This blog contains some interesting posts and everything is about cakes and also shares some interesting recipes. Admission essay writing service
Students are required to submit a research paper which is more of a comprehensive essay at the end of their academic semester. Many students tend to neglect research paper writing assignments. To them, it seems to be a tedious task which has no benefit at all. However, students fail to prepare quality research papers due to lack of subject knowledge, misconception of topics, lack of fresh ideas and poor writing skills. Under these circumstances, they seek professional assistance from research paper writing services. A research paper helps in assessing a student's ability to do research work, assemble information, arrange and compile it, analyze it and construe a topic. A student's total learning is amalgamated through research papers. Through professional assistance, they learn how to prepare an ideal research paper with well cited resources.
Thanks for this article. It contains the information i was searching for and you have also explained it well. We are also a service provider that deal in the assignment writing help sector. So, the students struggling to write their college assignments can opt for our online assignment help and can get a quality assignment written from us.
Assignment Help online
I am big fan of such lovely little things that smell so good. I have numerous aromatic candles at home! It helps me to relax after my working days Assignment help | Need Assignment help
I am very happy to read this. This is the kind of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that's at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this best posting. Assignment help | Need Assignment help | Marketing Assignment help | Law Assignment help
Many thanks for sharing this very informative post. Have a super nice day!!
Very Informative.
The Student Room has the best writer for you in Australia to provide my assignment help.Contact us today for instant writing services & get delivery before the submission date.
Globalassignmenthelp.com Scam? TopAssignmentReviews.com is the largest academic news and reviews website and rapidly growing in the US, Aus, UK and Singapore. We'll work hard to provide you original reviews & news.
good post thanks Wedding photographer in jaipur
To avail swift loans for bad credit with no guarantor hassle, contact us by filling an online form on our website. We extend free broking advice to each client. We share assured loan help to borrowers despite their credit issues.
I am an antique article collector and this article is one of the best I have ever read. I hope to see the same amazing work from you in future. Thanks Assignment help | Need Assignment help | Marketing Assignment help | Law Assignment help
If you are looking for best interior designers in Delhi then visit TheInteria online.
If you are looking to study in UK then International Foundation Group is the best option for you they provide best Foundation courses in UK.
Get the best assignment help from MakeMyAssignments.com at affordable prices. Assignment help | HR Assignment help
A research paper helps in assessing a student's ability to do research work, assemble information, arrange and compile it, analyze it and construe a topic. A student's total learning is amalgamated through research papers. Through professional assistance, they learn how to prepare an ideal research paper with well cited resources. https://topacademictutors.com/write-my-essay/
Nice blog and absolutely outstanding. You can do something much better but i still say this perfect.Keep trying for the best. Write my thesis ireland
Thanks for sharing your wealthy information. This is one of the excellent posts which I have seen. I go through your all of your blog, but this blog is the best one. It is really what I wanted to see hope in future you will continue for sharing such an excellent post. We also provide blog CDR Engineers Australia.
If you want to facilitate your life but do not know what to do, we suggest you purchase high-quality online academic writing help and enjoy your free time.
Well written article! I really love your designs


text:
NetX POP3 Client Module Guide Resources
Information on the module guide itself and the associated resources and known issues are available here.
The Post Office Protocol Version 3 (POP3) is a protocol designed to provide a mail transport system for small workstations to access Client maildrops on POP3 Servers for retrieving Client mail. POP3 utilizes Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) services to perform mail transfer. Because of this, POP3 is a highly reliable content transfer protocol. However, POP3 is does not provide extensive operations on mail handling. Typically, mail is downloaded by the Client and then deleted from the Server's maildrop.
The module supports the following features:
- NetX Client POP3 is compliant with RFC 1939.
- High-level APIs for
- Creating a client instance
- Deleting a client instance
- Managing mail items
Module Guide
The module guide is targeted for SSP 1.2.0 and above and the SK-S7G2 Kit.
The currently is no module guide for this module.
Module Guide Resources
The Express Logic User Manual for the NetX and NetX Duo POP3 Client is available from the X-Ware Component Documents for Renesas Synergy zip file located at the bottom of the web page here.
Many NetX and NetX Duo related application projects are available from the Renesas web site. A few examples are listed below.
- NetX™ Duo DHCP Client Module Guide- Application Project here.
- NetX™ Duo FTP Server Module Guide- Application Project here.
- NetX™ Duo NAT Module Guide- Application Project here.
- NetX™ and NetX™ Duo Auto IP Module Guide- Application Project here.
To find ALL available NetX related module guides, simply search for "NetX Module Guide Synergy" on the Renesas web site search bar, and specify Application Notes in the document type Search Results filter, like this.
You can similarly search for Net Duo related module guides, like this.
Known issues
- Refer to the SSP release notes for known issues, available here.


text:
By Bill O'Reilly
Yesterday we learned that the Department of Defense headed by former Senator Chuck Hagel has stopped payments to the families of military people killed in Afghanistan. That is an absolute disgrace. There is no excuse for it.
The two men responsible are the Commander-in-Chief President Obama and Secretary Hagel. The President has the power by executive order to pay for anything he wants, despite the government shutdown. Hagel allowed it to happen. He should resign immediately.
The situation is so outrageous that Ken Fisher who heads up the Fisher House Charity that helps military families says that his organization will pay the families' expenses until the government wises up.
Military benefits of the families of those killed in action are about $100,000. And we know of 26 service families that have so far been denied. We have the names of six military people who are being dishonored by their own government: Lt. Jennifer Moreno, Sergeant Patrick Hawkins, Sergeant Joseph Peters, Private First Class Cody Patterson, Lance Corporal Jeremiah Collins, and Private Angel Lopez. These brave Americans sacrificed their lives for this country. And they get this? They get this?
The whole debacle once again points out that President Obama's leadership capacity is in steep decline. We saw it in the Syrian situation. We are seeing it again in the government shutdown.
A new Associated Press poll says that the President's job approval rating has now slipped to 37 percent, the lowest point in his tenure. And while the majority polled continue to blame the Republicans for the government shutdown the gap is closing.
And by the way the AP is one of the most liberal news agencies in the country. It has backed President Obama all the way. It must have pained them to release this poll. And the headline they put out buried the lead. The headline says "Poll: GOP Gets the Blame in Shutdown." So you can see how fair the AP really is.
The entire ObamaCare government shutdown thing is a catastrophe. There is no question ObamaCare is not ready to be rolled out. All the evidence says that. If the president would simply admit it and delay the individual mandate for a year the impasse would be solved. But Mr. Obama is too stubborn to do that and Americans are starting to catch on.
In the meantime, major damage is being done to the country and to the families of our service people killed in action. There is no excuse as I said. There is no excuse. Hagel must go. He has lost all credibility among the military. And the president should order those payments immediately.
And that's "The Memo."


text:
'American Idol': Shannon Magrane Sympathizes With Fellow Booted Finalist Jermaine Jones
"I know how it feels to go home," said the Tampa teen, who was sent packing on Thursday's results show.
Capping off an emotional week on American Idol, voters eliminated 16-year-old Florida finalist Shannon Magrane on Thursday night's results show.
Magrane's send-off came following the disqualification of co-finalist Jermaine Jones from the competition due to outstanding arrest warrants and apparent failure to come clean with show producers about his criminal record.
In a conference call with reporters Friday, Magrane said she and her fellow Idol contestants were just as surprised as America while learning about Jones' departure in their dressing rooms.
"All our jaws dropped to the floor," she said.
The teen said she feels sympathy for Jones, as both singers found themselves at the end of their Idol journey the same week.
"I know how it feels to go home," she said, adding: "I know exactly what he's going through. … I feel really bad for him."
STORY: Shannon Magrane Gets The Boot, 10 Remain
Magrane expressed disappointment that her time was cut short, just one spot shy of joining the season-11 summer tour.
"I really wanted to go on tour. This is what I've wanted to do since I was a little girl," she said. "I was so close to it."
Speaking of girls, how did Magrane feel in the bottom three amongst Elise Testone and Erika Van Pelt? Will this be a repeat of season 10, where America picked off the girls one by one?
"There have been lots of guys that have been winning the last couple of years," she said. "All the girls, I know, are fighting for that spot, to be the next American Idol. I certainly was."
She name-checked Phillip Phillips and Heejun Han as examples of guys that are getting oodles of female fan love either for cuteness and sense of humor.
STORY: 'Idol' Contestants React To Jones' Departure
"We understand that, but we are thinking 'girls got to vote for the girls.' We have to stick with them. We got to have that girl power, and stick together," she said, noting that the guys have a "competitive edge."
Magrane said she doesn't blame the judges for declining to use their save, adding that they should use the privilege later in the season for someone else who's in trouble.
"I don't think they should have used it this early in the competition because you never know. Somebody could be so good and can be kicked off because they already used it," she observed.
VIDEO: David Hernandez, Katie Stevens Guest Star on THR's 'Idol Hangover' Show
"Last year they used the save for Casey (Abrams) and I think they should have used it, because Casey was so talented," she said. "If they used it for me, America wouldn't have too much to look forward to with the save."
After the show, Magrane said she felt better unloading her post-elimination feelings to her parents -- and journalists on the scene.
"It was kind of like therapy, I just let it all out," she told. "It's like my dad and mom said, 'Pick yourself up, get on your feet and hold yourself tall because this is not the end for you.' And this is not the end for me."
Magrane, said she's not ready to return to school in Tampa.
"I'm really looking forward to doing my own music," she said of her future plans.


text:
You are here
Why Horticultural Sciences?
Teaching – Our highly respected Undergraduate & Graduate programs offer a diverse choice of specializations, ranging from organic or conventional crop production to plant molecular and cellular biology.
Research – We investigate all stages of plant growth and development using classical and cutting-edge techniques; we develop new varieties through breeding and biotechnology; we seek solutions to current problems and develop new approaches to increase production and yield of fruits and vegetables.
Extension – We develop and provide research-based recommendations for technology transfer to the commercial fruit and vegetable industry and the home gardener through electronic resources, interactive workshops, and collaboration with county extension faculty.


text:
Posted by BE on August 7th, 2011
In today's Herald on Sunday, in a piece headlined 'Lynch Mob', the paper's 'gossip queen' Rachel Glucina reveals that Close Up reporter Kate Lynch has been 'unceremoniously demoted' by TVNZ from her senior reporting role on the prime-time programme and transferred to the channel's off-peak, late-night news show Tonight.
The remarkably well-briefed Glucina goes on to reveal that Lynch 'insisted that producers at Close Up knew what she was doing and approved of it.'
'However, Spy understands the findings of the [TVNZ] investigation suggest Lynch was found to have acted alone.'
Glucina goes on:
'Sources say Lynch will be expected to work on Tonight for a period of three to six months before her role is reviewed. It is likely she will make her way back to primetime news, though she will not be offered another position at Close Up.'
And, in case we missed the seriousness of Lynch's demotion:
'"It's like being dumped from Cabinet to the electorate office as secretary," said one inside mole. "It's effectively the most junior role you can get. All new reporters cut their teeth on the late-night news shows. It's a start-in position."'
This story raises some disturbing questions about TVNZ's handling of this affair and whether Lynch has been fairly treated.
First, it is clear from the detailed description of the arrangements between Lynch and TVNZ, so precisely laid out in the story, that formal terms for her continued employment were negotiated with her employer. Such terms will certainly have included a non-disclosure clause binding both parties. Thanks to Glucina's 'one inside mole' – there were apparently several – TVNZ must now be in breach of that agreement. Lynch has now not merely been demoted by TVNZ but humiliated by the release of the terms of that demotion, either by someone in TVNZ's senior management or, more probably, by one of her former colleagues in Close Up. She has, in a nutshell, been hung out to dry.
Which brings me to the question: has she been made the scapegoat for a failure of oversight by TVNZ itself?
Let's deal first with the TVNZ investigation allegedly having concluded that Lynch had 'acted alone'. Anyone who knows anything about how a magazine programme like Close Up is put together will tell you the idea that a story could be filmed, let alone put to air, without its content and treatment having first been discussed with the programme's producer, is utterly preposterous. Equally preposterous is the idea that a producer would put to air an item they had not already seen and approved. If Lynch did indeed 'act alone', then her producer should have been demoted with her or possibly fired.
That Lynch had not 'acted alone' was in any event made patently clear by TVNZ's initial response to Ana Samways' revelation that the Close Up item was a virtual clone of an ABC America original:
Close Up has been running a series of investigative stories called Made in NZ after seeing what a huge success our affiliate network, ABC America, has had with Made in the USA.
We have done four stories so far. The editorial concept for the first three originated in Close Up. The idea for the one we ran last night came from ABC America World News. It was a clever concept that illustrated the point visually therefore perfect for television.
However, it would not have worked to run the American story here. It would have been completely irrelevant to a New Zealand audience, which is why we reversioned it. We found a Kiwi family and conducted the same experiment here, as we are perfectly entitled to do under our affiliation agreement.
Like ABC America, Close Up has had an incredible response from viewers on our Made In series and have several other stories planned. [My italics and emphasis]
No suggestion there of Lynch having 'acted alone'. And no suggestion either of the network (or her) having done anything improper or wrong. TVNZ tells us, '… we reversioned it. We found a Kiwi family and conducted the same experiment here, as we are perfectly entitled to do under our affiliation agreement.'
'Reversioning' is a well-known term not only at TVNZ but in most television networks. It happens all the time in news and current affairs programmes, most commonly by substituting a local voice-over for the original in an overseas report.
But the key words in TVNZ's statement were 'as we are perfectly entitled to do under our affiliation agreement.' That was the network's position at the time the Close Up item was broadcast. It follows that no-one at TVNZ – neither management, nor her departmental head, nor her producer – could have advised Lynch that her understanding of what 'reversioning' meant was unacceptable. They cannot have done so, since at the time they clearly did not think it was. Unless, that is, they want us to believe that literally none of Lynch's superiors in the organisation had seen the item before it went to air. If that were the case, other heads should be rolling.
I don't believe it for a moment. I would be astonished if the programme's producer and director were not shown the rough-cut of Lynch's story, were not sent a detailed rundown of the final cut, and had not received a copy of the to-camera and voice-over script. And not a peep from anyone!
What's clear from all of this is that Close Up and TVNZ both thought the idea of 'reversioning' the ABC America concept was great. And both Close Up and TVNZ were delighted with their audience's 'incredible response' to the series. But after Samways' exposure the picture changed. There was flak from the public. The 'P-word' was mentioned. As we've seen, TVNZ at first decided it had done nothing wrong and issued a media release saying so. But later it changed its mind. That in itself raises some interesting possibilities – that ABC America had expressed some displeasure about one of its items being 'cloned', that the Corporation's dozy lawyers had started biting their nails or that widespread public and media disapproval of what had been done – much of it ill-informed and unfounded – was raising the temperature in Hobson Street to unbearable levels.
What to do? Why, follow Rule One of New Zealand broadcasting PR – 'When in the poo, find a scapegoat.'
In this matter, it's extremely hard to see Kate Lynch in any other role. What this entire debacle reveals is an appalling lack of oversight at all levels in the organisation. Lynch may have made an error of judgement, but against a background where her employer and her immediate superiors considered what she had done was something she and they were 'perfectly entitled to do'. And no one, either in management or in the Close Up office, expressed any reservation to her, either before or immediately after the item went to air. TVNZ's handling of this affair, from go to wo, has been an absolute scandal. And only Lynch has paid the price.
I should reveal that Judy and I know Kate Lynch well. She is one of a number of reporters who received training from us when she was at TV3. On this matter her editorial judgement failed her. But she can hold her head considerably higher than her faceless lowlife former colleague/s who seized an opportunity to hurt her further by talking to the tabloid press.
That Glucina story was a disgrace. As you note, her anonymously-sourced tittle-tattle doesn't even acknowledge TVNZ's own statements about editorial responsibility for the programme, and it's completely at odds with the story as presented by the Herald's media columnist, John Drinnan.
This doesn't meet basic news standards and, like most of what Glucina turns out, it's not even good gossip.
The Herald on Sunday's editor, Bryce Johns, needs to take some responsibility for this rubbish, which may yet damage the career of a young journalist.
I agree with you , Brian…Kate Lynch is being hung out to dry and if I was her I would be launching a massive grievance claim against TVNZ for humiliation, embarrasment ,loss of earnings and future career damage.
Over the last fortnight the general impression, via media drip, has been that Closeup stuffed up on a low interest story and it was not of major interest to viewers either way.
Now , with the publics thirst for titillation whetted we have a personal focus in the shape of Kate Lynch being singled out as the person responsible for the whole thing.
In the dark of the night and unbeknownst to everyone in Fortress TVNZ she compiled, edited and readied an entire segment and then single-handedly put it to air on Closeup…shock,horror !..and unlikely!
To quote from your blog above:
" Anyone who knows anything about how a magazine programme like Close Up is put together will tell you the idea that a story could be filmed, let alone put to air, without its content and treatment having first been discussed with the programme's producer, is utterly preposterous. Equally preposterous is the idea that a producer would put to air an item they had not already seen and approved. If Lynch did indeed 'act alone', then her producer should have been demoted with her or possibly fired."
Kate Lynch..talk to your lawyer…!
It's quite conceivable that one associate producer commissioned the story based on a story he/she saw on ABC, and two other senior producers viewed the finished product, not knowing that the finished product mirrored the original so closely.
BE: Well, anything's possible, I suppose. But this scenario would not explain TVNZ's claim that it was entitled to do precisely what Kate had done.
"But this scenario would not explain TVNZ's claim that it was entitled to do precisely what Kate had done."
Flannery talked about this on Mediawatch, and implied that the initial response was not well thought through, but a reflexive push back at another swipe from the Herald.
I think it was the overwhelming and unanimous reaction of the rank-and-file on the newsroom that might have also helped change some minds.
BE: Any literate and informed viewer would have serious doubts about the stone-throwing qualifications of the journos in the TV1 newsroom. There are very few sins against journalistic standards that they do not commit in a single bulletin.
Brian I take your point about TVNZ's intial denial, and you are right that there is a broader responsibility here that has not been dealt with appropriately.
However, Ms Lynch is not a delicate flower of an individual. She promotes herself as a 'ballsy' stroppy butt-kicker of a journo who is hunting for the next big scoop. She is not a person to placidly accept direction without challenging something she would percieve as wrong/inappropriate.
Giving her the benefit of the doubt that it was not her idea, there has still been no suggestion that, having been told to 'copy' the item word-for-word, shot-for-shot, Ms Lynch said "No I am not comfortable with doing that".
Instead she appears to have gone along with it happily enough until the point at which she drew criticism, when she effectively said "They made me do it".
Yes she has been a 'fall guy' to some extent, and she should not have been the only person singled out.
Yes the senior producer is at fault and should take his share of the punishment, but Kate Lynch drove that story and she knew exactly what she was doing.
BE: Several of the assertions you refer to in this comment were not made in my post nor by Kate Lynch who, as far as I know, has kept her counsel on the whole affair. It's TVNZ and members of its staff who have done all the talking, both on and, it now appears, off the record.
I've removed one sentence which I considered actionable.
I would have thought there should be some collective responsibility for the story as it wasn't just one reporter rocking up to Jo Average's house and noting all items that were not Kiwi made. It involved a furniture van, furniture removers, the family being temporarily relocated and a household of goods being removed. What surprised me was not so much that it was an exact copy of the ABC story that I viewed on TVNZ7, but the size of the budget that had to found to make the story work. I'm sure the reporter must have had someone's say so to sign off the budget …. and therefore someone else's knowledge as to how the piece to air was to be played.
What a putrid, shabby outfit. They do have form.
This episode has the same odour about it as did the hanging out to dry of Paul Henry who was encouraged to be controversial because his antics upped the ratings.
A hint of trouble and the big brave executives ran for their lives.
Why on earth do we expect high standards from TVNZ, their news is I'll informed rubbish generally and close up is truly appalling.
sell the blasted thing to Murdoch and be done with it.
BE: Well, since they're generally regarded as the national broadcaster, we should expect high standards from them. As for Murdoch, you should perhaps be careful what you wish for.
It remains worth noting that on the basis of Glucina's story, this can't be attributed to TVNZ as such. It actually seems more likely to be sourced from a colleague.
Close Up has always been a showcase for a shameless bunch of rating chasing whores.
Tomorrow's "shock, horror, probe" will have obliterated any memory of Lynch's alleged reprehensible behaviour, that no one else, in televisionland, knew anything about.
Yeah Right!
Something smells.
Normally Close Up would ignore the issue, after "apologizing".
Why sacrifice a reporter for a suspect telecast on a dodgy programme?
If Close Up had ignored it, no on would have remembered it.
It looks like some very senior TV types have it in for Lynch, for undisclosed reasons.
Lynch should be talking to good employment relations practitioners.
Surely Brian, you just need to make a few calls to some of your friends and acquaintances at TVNZ and you could find out the answer to a few questions rather than just speculating.
Have you ever seen anything like this before? Is plagiarism the right description?
Is there any evidence that there was a non-disclosure clause? Especially when there would be obvious evidence in a newsroom that someone had moved from one programme to another. Wouldn't a company explain the shift to all that it would impact on, which in this case would probably be more than 20 colleagues from the two respective shows. A company could also be expected to outline to all news staff the results of their investigation and expectations of journalism ethics, given the obvious changes that had seen one person involved be moved from one programme to another.
"Well, since they're generally regarded as the national broadcaster, we should expect high standards from them." And they've cut the person loose who they say is responsible for what is a huge error. If you have any evidence to the contrary, perhaps you should produce it.
BE: Well Tim, what do you think the chances are of my ringing Rick Ellis or Anthony Flannery and being told just what conditions were attached to Lynch remaining with TVNZ? So trust me, Glucina's mole may be a total scumbag, but his story was accurate and it represents only part of the humiliation which Lynch was subjected to in order to keep her job. There are, you see, some decent moles inside TVNZ who aren't rejoicing about how a fellow journalist was treated and who really would like the full story to be out there.
"You've made your bed now lie in it", comes to mind.
Call it "cloning", imitating, borrowing, copying etc, and read the Close-Up's transcript which smacks of "Cut'n'Paste", flogged straight off the American show. Which makes it not only the height of journalistic laziness but also dishonest. Kate Lynch was in a senior role in current affairs, so she shouldn't need to be moddle-coddled by the producer's supervision, to ensure the bona fides of her report.
The demotion is unfortunate, but to be expected. Kate's been relegated to the graveyard shift, as deserved punishment. If she doesn't want her TV career to get truly buried, best, she not hand out shovels by running to the lawyers.
BE: I personally don't think you go far enough. The punishment for 'reversioning' a minor, light-hearted item from an affiliate with the tacit or perhaps even explicit approval of your employer really should be public stoning. I'm sure you'd have no trouble tracking down other judgemental ignoramuses to assist.
Dubious, the point Brian is making is that its rubbish to suggest that Kate bears all responsibility for the story. And that, aside from the mechanics of journalism in NZ making that virtually impossible, TVNZ have effectively admitted she didn't. Its not relevant whether she came up with the idea, or failed to fight against it if it was someone else's. No one is painting her as a saint. That is not the point.
Kate Lynch managed to make and air a TV segment on Close Up without anyone else knowing?
Yeah right!
Close Up is a brothel full of whores chasing ratings.
The presenters will do, and say anything to get ratings.
The presenters are not accountable to the brothel rating owners or brothel rating management?
Yeah right!
Kate needs to talk to experienced employment relation practitioners.
Close Up "apologized".
The next night everyone would have forgotten about it.
Remember the old talk about yesterday's news being today's fish and chip paper?
Rather than continue on as if nothing had happened the ratings brothel owners and management continue feeding an inconsequential "story" by publicly humiliating one of its employees.
Very kinky, and disturbing.
@David: would you like phone hacking and police bribery with that?
Seriously though, TVNZ needs a BBC man in charge.
PhilC above has a good point.
How could anyone working for a company "act alone" and not be noticed?
Furthermore, if, as TVNZ insists, Ms Lynch "acted alone" – what does this say about that company;
1. Managerial over-sight? Who was in charge? Who was paid the big bucks to take responsibilty for staff actions?
2. TVNZ's culture that would permit/encourage it's staff to "act alone".
3. Are there no such things as "staff meetings" at TVNZ?
4. Do people at TVNZ not talk to each other? (If so, it must be an errily silent place to work in… )
Whenever I hear the phrase, "acted alone", my first inclination is to look toward the grassy knoll and see who else was involved… I'm sure there must've been a manager or two mixed up with this crazy situation.
Furthermore, if, as TVNZ insists, Ms Lynch "acted alone" – what does this say about that company;
Again, that rather oddly-phrased claim appears in Glucina's story, but that doesn't necessarily mean that's what the report actually says.
BE: You're correct, Russell, it is based on an anonymous report and therefore unreliable. However, I have very reliable information that the nub of the matter was whether Lynch had made the item in the way that she did with the full knowledge and approval of her producer. Her position that this was indeed the case was not accepted by management. Hence her demotion and other demeaning requirements of her including, according to my source, the requirement to apologise to the Close Up team and to accept a warning which, I assume, would appear on her work record.
I'm sure you'd have no trouble tracking down other judgemental ignoramuses to assist.
Unkind and unwarranted. And — it appears you've done an about-face on your own critical posting, which you described as an "exact facsimile". And does this ring a bell?
But does 'conducting the same experiment' include making an almost exact copy of the original – same idea, same storyline, same direction, same graphics, same commentary? And all of that without attribution? I would have thought not. Exactly!
"Reversioning" is perfectly acceptable, provided it's referenced. But Kate Lynch lifted much of ABC's transcript, almost verbatim — and that's just plain laziness. The aftermath has produced much incredulous mirth amongst us viewers. Even more galling for TVNZ bosses, was the loud guffawing they heard coming from the direction of Flower Street, rankling them no end.
Factor in: that much viewer scorn has been heaped upon Close Up, and then you'd have to agree that the sanction imposed upon Kate is eminently fair and commensurate with her violation of trust.
It will be a blunt lesson to her: that you can't build your journalistic credentials and, seemingly, tout your 'innovativeness' on the backs of others, without first tipping your hat in the direction of those who gave you the inspiration for 'your' story. It's like entering a talent contest, where you not only lip-sync your way through the song but also use the soundtrack of the original artist's vocals. A big no-no in the integrity stakes, drumming up that dreaded 5-letter c-word amongst not only your rivals but also your colleagues.
BE: I'll agree with only one part of what you've written, that my response to your earlier comment was indeed unkind and unwarranted. I have a tendency to take the verbal cane to people who take the verbal cane to others. So Sorry.
However, I've given a lot of thought to what I said in my earlier post which you quite rightly point out seems rather at odds with what I'm saying now.
I don't think this qualifies as 'plagiarism' in the commonly held sense. Generally speaking plagiarism involves stealing someone else's work and either explicitly or implicitly claiming it as your own. The context is usually reasonably serious: an author publishes part of another author's work without acknowledgement or attribution and portrays it as his/her own; an academic presents someone else's research as his/her own. There are other examples in the field of entertainment, film-making, television etc. With television programmes it's generally formats which are protected by copyright. Ideas can be a different matter, especially if the idea is so wide that it could have been thought of by anyone. Even then, a wide idea might be subject to copyright if someone intended to make a series based on that idea which had never been made before. I suppose that what all this boils down to is that there must be something unique about the programme or idea for someone to say, "Hey, that's my original idea and copying it constitutes plagiarism." I don't see that as being the case here. We're not talking about a programme format or even a programme; we're talking about one item in a regular magazine programme series, one of possibly hundreds of such items in that programme over a year. And the idea is really a one-off idea. "Hey, our affiliate had this great idea for demonstrating how few locally made products are in people's homes. We could do that here as well." I don't know whose suggestion that was – the Close Up producer's, someone else's in the Close Up team or Kate herself. TVNZ's statement that it was "entitled" to "reversion" the item because Air America was an affiliate, at any rate suggests that the reversioning was given the OK. They were, after all, not depriving their affiliate of anything since they are not in competition in the same market. In essence what I'm saying is that, given the relatively trivial and one-off nature of the item and TVNZ's position that it had an arrangement with Air America to do this sort of thing, it's extremely doubtful whether what happened here could be described as or ever have attracted a legal action for plagiarism. As to whether Kate did all of this off her own bat and without any of her superiors knowing, I stick by my opinion that that suggestion is preposterous and that TVNZ's subsequent treatment of Kate Lynch has been an outrage. Finally, I agree that using virtually the same to camera and voice-over script wasn't a good look. But plagiarism? No
While Lynch does seem to have been treated harshly, we don't know how she reacted after this matter was brought to her attention. The following comes from a Herald report.
"I've never seen so many people upset. They're pissed off. It's a unilateral response across the newsroom. It's not our practice to copy other people's work. We don't approve of it."
What was Lynch's response to this and to the accusation of plagiarism? This is much as anything else may have contributed to her plagiarism.
Well, the Herald did report that staff at TVNZ were "pissed off" with Lynch for not taking any responsibility. If true, it might help to explain her demotion. We don't know how she reacted to a "please explain". She may have been unprofessional and unreasonable. Certainly that's what I took from the Herald (not Glucina) article.
should read: "This as much as anything else may have contributed to her demotion."
Shock horror! A TV journalist is caught cheating, and the bosses cover it up. Stop the presses. What some years back might have been a serious slight on television journalism, is now just another issue to be managed, with the pseudo-sorry and a scapegoat. Meanwhile, business as usual.
Not sure I'd put training Kate Lynch on my CV, Brian. She's never really bothered the scorers when it comes to journalism awards or exclusives and seems more interested in being in Rachel Glucina's column or flogging her wedding to the woman's mags. I'm also not sure if you get the difference between taking an idea and adding your own spin to it and copying something word for word, shot for shot. One happens all the time the other should never. But you make a very good point about her being hung out to dry. Someone must've viewed it before it went to air and someone must've talked to Rachel Glucina. So here's a "guess who don't sue" for you, which senior TVNZ news executives and producers wined and dined with Paul Henry and Ms Glucina last Friday?
The whole thing is very odd.
Hey Bri. Perhaps the problem with Kate is that she was trained by you, as you point out, and therefore her hubris and ego got in the way. Sounds familiar. Kindest Regards from Beautiful Phuket. Alastair
BE: Perhaps the problem with you, Alastair, is that you've forgotten your manners.
I simply can't imagine that TVNZ would have embarked on this series of stories without having viewed the original ABC series first. Especially the big feature piece in question.
It is similarly unimaginable then that the Producers of the show were not aware of the striking similarities between the script of the US version and that of Lynch's story.
Presumably it was her idea to simply reshoot the same script, as surely she'd have stood up for herself if she'd been instructed to do just that. However it seems certain that the script was available to producers through the department's iNews system and that the same producers would have viewed the finished story.
Given that it wasn't a breaking news story it is also hard to imagine that it wasn't finished early enough to allow for changes had the producers decided to call Lynch on her scripting decision. Instead they decided it was good enough and aired it anyway, assuming no one would notice it was practically a shot-for-shot remake (as is so common in NZ advertising)
Janet Wilson reckons that Lynch was lucky to keep her job.
"The whole thing is very odd."
John, as a Herald media commentator, the only thing that is "very odd" is why you'd bother making an absolutely meaningless one-sentence post.
Hedging your bets by having a bob-each-way, are we?
BE: That seems rather unfair. I think John's comment sums it up very neatly. It is distinctly odd.
Did anyone expect anything other than Ms Lynch to cop the blame when this "story" was broken (by Sideswipe, no less)?
When has poo ever rolled uphill?
Odd, that knowing the inevitable repercussions of being exposed, Kate Lynch would pull a stunt like that?
Odd, that in the age Internet streaming, someone wouldn't notice and bring it to the public's attention?
Odd, that you feel she's been "hung out to dry", when she's the author of her own fall from grace. (Solely, I might add).
Odd, that you believe she's been treated, harshly?
Odd, that some of you think the producer would've green-lighted the story, knowing what Kate Lynch knew?
Odd, that you say, "…after the similarities were made public that the Close Up story was a frame-for frame, word-for-word duplicate and "at best, it's lazy journalism" and you describe it as "an exact facsimile"? But it's not plagiarism?
Don't you think, Drinnan, could be a little more precise? Or, is he as befuddled as Tully?
Very odd, indeed.
Close Up has been disfunctional for years. Their EP used to be a reporter on Holmes. Was considered lazy then, and from what I know is still classed as lazy now.
[Lynch is] the author of her own fall from grace. (Solely, I might add).
You might add it, but it's a specious addition.
Odd, that some of you think the producer would've green-lighted the story, knowing what Kate Lynch knew?
The producer (and possibly others) either knew, and gave it the greenlight anyway (and is therefore equally culpable), or somehow didn't know, and therefore manifestly failed in her job.
Or Steve, the producer knew the essence of the story, which was fine, but didn't know it was a replica of another item, which wasn't fine. Either way, the producer may have copped it on the chin and admitted fault, but Kate may have acted like she was blameless. Similar to the Tanya Katterns case. Katterns, a journalist, was sacked by Fairfax last year for plagiarism. She ripped off a Debra Coddington article, though not word for word.
BE: There is actually a difference between a literary work and an idea for a clever way of presenting an item on a TV magazine show. And we still have no denial of TVNZ's assertion that they were entitled to reversion the ABC America story. Where I think we all agree is that it was kinda lazy to effectively copy the original. Except that the effort involved in shotlisting the original and writing up the script was probably far more time-consuming and onerous than just going out and more or less doing the same thing as they'd done.
I am always astounded by young journalists comments when I see them on t.v – because I always think – "What amazing ethical standards they have – it seems journalism school is the last bastion of real professionalism, and I'm glad that these people are leading us into the future".
It all seems so head-smackingly obvious what you shouldn't do, but as a non-media person of course it's only obvious to me once I've heard it.
THe current fracas with Close-up beggars belief…
Even I know (without a slightest shadow of doubt)that I must never write or say or print or use in anyway in any form,anything I haven't thought of completely by myself without acknowledging this to be the case.
How on earth can this even happen? This is not about a Journalists's integrity, or a producer's or editors, or a whole team….this can only happen where the organisation's culture allows it to happen vis a vis Newscorp.
Murdock type Heads must be delivered to us on silver platters, because there is something very rotten in the State of Denmark.
Close Up has been dysfunctional, for years. Lillybird, you win the cigar for Clutching at Straws.
BE: Potentially actionable sentence deleted by me.
Huh? What you deleted was Lillybing's post. Maybe, if I had put speech-marks….
will not be watching close up or tv1


text:
UP 10th Time Table, UP High school Exam Date Sheet, UP Board 10th Schedule Online 2018, UP Board tenth Scheme, UP board 10th Date sheet, UP Board high school Time Table 2017, UP Board 10th Exam Scheme 2018, UP Board high School Exam Routine
UP Board 10th Time Table 2018
Students need to look for UP 10th Board Time Table by latest in the month of February 2018. Exact dates will be out soon. Students need to check official website for instant Time Table or else, students can check our page for Date Sheet. UP Board Class 10th Exam Schedule 2018 will be soon available. Students need to get UP Board 10th Exam Time Table soon on the official website.
UP Board High School Time Table 2018
Every year in the month of February, Uttar Pradesh Board conducts 10th Board Exams. This year also, UP Board Exams will be likely to be conducted in the month of February and last until the month of March. Uttar Pradesh Board will be declaring UP Board 10th Date sheet 2018 soon on their web portal. Students need to download Exam Time Table so that they can prepare better. Students need to prepare accordingly to the give Date Sheet. Every students need to check Date Sheet after official website will finally declare the releasing of UP 10th Exam Schedule.
CBSE Board 10th Date sheet 2018 Available to download
Students who will be appearing this year for UP Board 10th Exam 2018 can go through UP class 10th Board Date Sheet on the UP Board official web portal. The whole paper will be of 70 marks which will be theoretical and rest 30 marks will be of internal assessment which will be taken by the respective schools affiliated under UP Board.
<< Rajasthan Board 10th Exam Time Table 2018>>
UP Board 10th Date Sheet 2018
It is important to have a particular Time Table/ Schedule so that students who are appearing for this year UP Board Intermediate Exam 2018 can get a clear pathway to plan their Intermediate Exams in a way to crack it effortlessly. Below is a tabulated Form of UP Board Matric Date sheet 2018, students can go through it and channelize their strategies to crack up Board 10th Exam 2018.
Telangana SSC Time Table 2018 Download for first time
|UP Board 10th Exam Paper
|Hindi Language
|16th February 2018
|Music- Written Paper
|20th February 2018
|Commercial Education
|21th February 2018
|23rd February 2018
|Vocal Music Paper
|24th February 2018
|Computer Science
|25th February 2018
|Maths, Home Science, Primary Maths Paper (Girls only)
|26th February 2018
|Sculpting Paper
|27th February 2018
|Other Languages Paper (Urdu, Bengali, Punjabi, Oriya, Nepali, Sindhi, Tamil)
|28th February 2018
|Social Science
|2nd March 2018
|Human Science Paper
|3rd March 2018
|English Language
|4th March 2018
|Other Languages Paper Sanskriti, Persian, Arbi & Pali
|9th March 2018
|Home Science Paper (Boys Only)
|10th March 2018
|Drawing & Painting Paper
|11th March 2018
All students who are appearing for this year UP Board class 10th Exam can go through the above tabulated form of UP Matric Schedule . Though, UP Board has still not released its UP Board class 10th Routine 2018, so the above table is of tentative dates. This is not an official data. This is just for a rough idea for students so that it will be a little easy for them to startegise their UP Board class 10th Exam Paper 2018.
Bihar Board 10th date sheet 2018 Matric time Table
UP Board High School exam Schedule 2018
For the academic session of UP Board 10th class 2016-17, Students who will appear in this session, are suggested to start preparing from the very first day of their 10th class academic session 2018. The early a planing is plotted regarding the cracking of UP Board class 10th Exam 2018 the better results it will give. UP Board High School Time Table 2018 will be soon available on www.upmsp.nic.in
Odisha HSC Date sheet 2018 Available to download


text:
The alleged head of the Neapolitan Mafia, one of Italy's most-wanted criminals, has been captured after police made a bugged recording of him talking about his low-fat diet.
Edoardo "Angelface" Contini, 52, was having dinner with members of his family when armed officers burst into his hideaway and arrested him as he tried to leap out onto his balcony.
"You are very brave," he told them.
Contini had been on the run for seven years, and had relinquished almost all forms of communication.
Barbara Sargenti, the public prosecutor, said Contini was terrified of being bugged.
He did not have a phone, and he would give written instructions to his henchmen even when they were in the same room.
Police are analysing the dozens of "pizzini", or little notes, that were found in his apartment in Naples.
In order not to leave any traces, he would also never wear the same socks or underwear twice, preferring to buy new pairs.
He had not seen his wife, Maria Aiata, since last Christmas. In February, she tried to see him, but he decided against it in order not to give himself away.
He had also not seen his two-month old grandson, Ms Sargenti said.
When it came to food, he would give a list of instructions once a week to a widow who lived in the flat downstairs.
However, police managed to capture him on tape discussing with her how various dishes should be prepared.
Contini was obsessed with keeping trim, and was determined to eat healthily while in hiding.
On his dining table, his weekly menu included Chicken with potatoes, steak and salad and ricotta cheese with rocket. Desserts were banned.
In the corner of his room was a running machine, and a 32-inch television with a Sky subscription.
Police also seized tens of pairs of designer jeans and shoes, from the unusually elegant boss.
Contini was last arrested during the New Year's celebrations at the chic ski resort of Cortina D'Ampezzo in 1994.
However, he was released in 2000 because his arrest warrant expired before his trial could be concluded. He immediately went underground.
The police said Contini had revolutionised the Camorra, or Neapolitan Mafia, turning it into a major player in the drugs trade.


text:
Status: Open
Know more about this business than we do? Cool! Please submit any corrections or missing details you may have.Help us make it right
Be the first OregonLive.com user to add photos or videos of Christensen Scott E Pt Ocs
TMJ Dysfunction, Sports-Care, Specializing In Orthopedics, Pce/Work Conditioning, Neurological/Balance Recovery, Medicare Assignment Accepted, Insurance-Billed, Board Certified Orthopedic Clinical Specialist, Auto/Work Injury, Ankle/Foot Care


text:
The Web site Craigslist says it will crack down on ads for prostitution as part of an agreement with attorneys general in 40 states, including Illinois.
The deal will require people who post "erotic services" ads on Craigslist to provide a working phone number and pay a fee with a valid credit card. The Web site will provide that information to law enforcement if subpoenaed to do so.
Illinois Atty. General Lisa Madigan calls the agreement "the first step to make sure that Craigslist begins to address the prostitution and exploitation of women that occurs online."


text:
- Posted August 28, 2011 by
- NigelBarker
New York, New York
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Irene's aftermath
Hurricane Irene hits the Meat Packing District NYC (2)
- katie, CNN iReport producer
Photos taken from 8-9 am this morning on the West Side Highway as Soledad O'Brian was reporting live outside my apartment. The water rose fast and we were very quickly flooded. However by 11.30 AM the rains ended and the sun came out. NYC was running as if nothing had happened by lunch.....


text:
Mamma sits by the fire
Her little ones round her knees.
"How cosy we are, Mamma," they cry,
"Tell us something, if you please."
"Tell us about King Winter,
And about Jack Frost, his man;
We'll not be noisy or naughty at all,
But as good as ever we can."
"Well then;" says mamma, "you, Jenny,
May knit and listen, my dear;
And Johnny may split up wood, to make
The fire burn bright and clear."
King Winter dwells in the North;
Far away in the Frozen Zone,


text:
Girls only. Japan's Asahi Shimbun has an article about how Japanese arcades are banning men from sticker picture machines. Why'd they do that?
According to the piece, "A growing number of arcade operators are banning men from areas around these machines—popularly known as purikura—to protect customers, such as high school students, from men trying to sneak camera shots, steal their belongings or even pick them up."
Male-female couples are okay, but not groups of guys or single dudes. Truth is, this has been going on for a while. A long while. A long, long, long while.
However! When I interviewed the folks who manage Shibuya landmark Purikura Mecca, Japan's most famous sticker picture arcade, for Arcade Mania, I was told that male customers would not be kicked out as long as they were "well-behaved." Because, hey, they have money, too. Ironic as Purikura Mecca was the first arcade not to allow male-only purikura customers.


text:
Two people were stabbed -- and one of them severely injured -- after an argument early this morning on a
Both victims were being treated at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago police said, citing preliminary reports. One of them was reported in critical condition and the other in stable condition.
The stabbing occurred about 12:30 a.m. in the 2500 block of North Lincoln Avenue. Police said several people were involved, but don't know what led to the initial altercation.


text:
We have got our application running in the cloud and wanted to implement SSL ( https ) for the requests. We had previously thought it as an expensive affair as the certificate authority like verisign charges decent amount per year. That's when we came across letsencrypt.org which is a opensource and free certificate authority sponsored by tech giants like cisco.
They provide easy and intuitive methods to generate free certificates for any number for websites and sub domains. In this post, I am going to explain implementing https for a site running tomcat 8.


text:
- Home
- About CSM South
- VoIP Solutions
- Other Solutions
- Hotel Phone Systems
- Contact Us
Why CSM?
CSM is the most experienced VoIP and digital communications business in the southeast USA. CSM was founded in 1984 and has constantly been at the forefront of technology, providing our partners with the best in service, sales, and a system that works for them and their business.
Solutions For Anyone
Mitel ShoreTel UC
Small Business UC
Legacy Nortel Service
Why CSM
A World Class Partner
About CSM
Service Areas
Contact Us
UC Solutions
A World Class Selection
Mitel ShoreTel
Cloud VoIP
Hospitality Communications
Phonesuite Voiceware
SIP Trunking
CSM is headquartered in Tampa and specializes in VoIP Phone and UC solutions from Mitel ShoreTel, NEC, and Avaya, and hotel phone systems from PhoneSuite as well as legacy solutions such as Nortel, Norstar and Meridian. We help small, medium, and large businesses design and deploy VoIP and traditional digital communication solutions that save money, time and streamline business processes. CSM is devoted to delivering the best solution at a competitive price while empowering our customers to deploy the best VoIP or converged solution for their business.


text:
Artist Statement:
Helaine Soller "National Parks" series of paintings seek to create awareness of our fragile ecosystems, and to support its preservation. Nature's beauty, power, and cycles of destruction and regeneration throughout time are evident as one encounters the great vistas of our National Parks. The often under-reported effects of global warming due to increasing rates of greenhouse gasses realized in current patterns of climate change have created environmental chaos, danger, and destruction at a alarming rates. Helaine Soller exhibits her paintings nationally and internationally in museums and galleries. Her work is included in numerous corporate and private collections.