text:
Newt Boom Ahead?; Senate Dems Fall in Line for Obama
Defiant Gingrich Shines at GOP Debate
"Everybody in the media who wants to go after the business community ought to start by going after the politicians who have been at the heart of the sickness which is weakening this country and ought to start with Bernanke."
-- Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich at a Bloomberg News/Washington Post debate answering a question about the need to arrest bankers.
If Tuesday night's Republican debate is a sign of things to come, the next campaign boom might be coming from Newt Gingrich.
The former speaker turned in his best debate performance so far in a New Hampshire forum hosted by Bloomberg News and the Washington Post, and Gingrich might already be experiencing the kind of surge that lifted Herman Cain to the top of the polls in the weeks since the Sept. 22 FOX News/Google debate if more Republicans could have seen the show.
It makes sense, because it was the ideal environment for him: a policy-driven discussion on fiscal and economic matters with questioners who were coming from the heart of the establishment press.
Gingrich went hard after the premise of the very first question to him, which was a restatement of the core grievances of the Occupy Wall Street movement: "Do you think it's right that no Wall Street executives have gone to jail for the damage they did to the economy?"
Frontrunner Mitt Romney and others did not want to kick the same tripwire that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor did when he referred to "mobs." Romney explained that "the reason that you're seeing protests, as you indicated, on Wall Street and across the country is, middle income Americans are having a hard time making ends meet."
Gingrich stipulated that there were some legitimate protesters but then hammered "left-wing agitators who would be happy to show up next week on any other topic" and leave trash and disruption in their wake. Gingrich then explained that, "in both the Bush and the Obama administrations, the fix has been in. And I think it's perfectly reasonable for people to be angry. But let's be clear who put the fix in: The fix was put in by the federal government."
Gingrich launched a withering attack on Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and told questioner Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post: "If you want to put people in jail -- I want to second what Michele said -- you ought to start with Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and let's look at the politicians who created the environment, the politicians who profited from the environment, and the politicians who put this country in trouble."
And he had big bang-boom answers all night: defending Sarah Palin on "death panels" when asked (again by Tumulty) about the need to reduce spending on end-of-life care; using his candidate-to-candidate question with Romney to ask why he chose $200,000 as the break point in his tax reduction proposal, alluding to President Obama's "class-warfare approach"; and using his closing argument to go around the table and praise his one favorite thing about his opponents' economic agendas.
Cain, meanwhile, lost some of his rocket boost. Not only did he have to face lots of questions about his 9-9-9 plan for a flat income, corporate and national sales tax, but he even faced open mockery from Michele Bachmann who said that the plan would be 6-6-6 (the biblical mark of the Antichrist) after Congress turned it upside down, as well as from former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman.
Huntsman may well have ended his woebegone campaign with his attack on Cain, snarking that Cain's proposal was "a catchy phrase. I thought it was the price of a pizza when I first heard it." When the somewhat brittle, well-born son of a chemical magnate snickers at the idea put forward by the sympathetic self-made black businessman you know that you are seeing someone who is not ready for Prime Time. Like school on Saturday…
The debate was probably Huntsman's last chance to be viable in New Hampshire, where the debate was aired widely, and it seemed he pretty well disqualified himself.
And in that way, Romney got a big win. With Huntsman – or anyone else on the stage – still unable to lay a glove on him, Romney looked coolly presidential and sounded very much like the moderate Republican voters of the state as he stressed the need to work with Democrats and defended the TARP program.
Add to that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's endorsement earlier in the day, including a vigorous defense by Christie of Romney's Massachusetts health law, and it was a very good day for the frontrunner. The moderate wing of the party has started to coalesce and the conservative press in Washington and New York is starting to wheel around in his favor. An aura of inevitability has always been Romney's greatest asset, and unlike the inevitability candidate of 2008, Democrat Hillary Clinton, there has been no emergence of a giant killer.
Conservatives had hoped that Texas Gov. Rick Perry would be the one, but that so far hasn't been the case as Perry has been as bad in debates as he has been good on the stump. In this cycle, debates are even more crucial than usual with a wide open field and early primaries. Perry, now in third place, was an ancillary figure in the debate Tuesday, which seemed to be a relief to the candidate who spent his first three debates taking brickbats to the head and then adding his own self-inflicted wounds for good measure.
The good news in this debate for Perry: He didn't blow it and gave plausible answers. The bad news: There will be a nationally televised debate next week and laying back won't feed the bulldog. One can go too far in trying to get into the conversation (Rick Santorum shouldn't complain so much) but Romney and Gingrich always look interested and up for the fight – ready to be heard and to take command. Perry surmounted the very low bar he set for himself in the third debate, but will have to be substantially better to convince skeptical voters on the Republican right to unite behind him as the most conservative candidate who is electable.
With Gingrich hitting his stride on the debate stage, that may get harder for Perry to do.
But Cain should be happiest that this debate was mostly a local affair in a state that he has next to no chance of winning anyway. His expression of admiration for Alan Greenspan will be enough to put a lot of conservatives off of him anyway. Rep. Ron Paul nearly popped his top when Cain, a former chairman of the Kansas City Federal Reserve already in Paul's crosshairs for being dismissive about the need to audit the central bank, endorsed Greenspan's economic vision.
Many conservatives now blame Greenspan for paving the way for the current weakened dollar and stimulative practices of the Bernanke Fed, so he is an unhappy association for any candidate. Everyone around the table last night either attacked the Fed directly or declined to associate themselves with the leadership of the bank since the Reagan era.
Senate Dems Fall In Line on Stimulus Package
"The president's plan contains many ideas that Republicans have supported consistently over the years. I guess Republicans think if the economy improves it will help President Obama, so they oppose anything the president proposes."
-- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid discussing the failure of the president's $450 billion stimulus package.
The bar was low for President Obama's stimulus package in the Senate – he only needed to get the vast majority of his party on board in order to be able to fulfill campaign strategy of assailing Republicans for blocking any effort to revive the failing economy.
This is not legislation designed to become law but to use for a PR push against Republicans. The president has built his fall campaign push around the doomed legislation and has been out on the trail, mostly in swing states, touting the plan for most of the past six weeks.
The idea is that though economists agree that little can be done to change the lousy economy much before the 2012 election, Obama can spread the blame around by highlighting Republican opposition. The talking point, now well worn on the Blue Team, is that Republicans are unpatriotic because they are intentionally keeping people out of work in an effort to politically harm Obama.
There were signs of Democratic dissatisfaction with the plan, but once the Obama proposal for broader tax increases was replaced with a massive surtax on those who earn $1 million or more, many more in the majority obviously felt comfortable in aiding Obama.
Obama lost only two Democrats – perhaps the two most vulnerable members of the Senate majority Sen. Jon Tester of Montana and Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska – while other centrists like Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana climbed on board. Even vulnerable Democrats like Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri and Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio took the leap for Obama.
It may have helped that the administration's effort to re-brand "stimulus" as "jobs bill" was widely absorbed in the establishment press and certainly it was better for Obama that there are very few folks to complain about voting to raise taxes dramatically on $1 million incomes. While 4 percent of tax filers would have fallen under Obama's $200,000 tax hike, only .08 percent (350,000 filers out of 140 million) would be hit with the millionaire tax. Plus, nobody knows how to beat taxes like rich folks.
It also fits in with the party's effort to show solidarity with the anti-corporate protesters in the streets.
But despite getting Manchin et.al. on board, the victory was only symbolic, with the vote falling far short of the 60 votes required for Senate passage. The question now: Will Obama build pressure on individual Republican Senators, especially New England moderates like Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts or Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine and keep hammering away on his Stimulus III idea or will Obama agree to break up the legislation and try to force votes on individual components in the House to maximize the media pressure on Speaker John Boehner?
The danger there is that Republicans would have the chance to counter with their own proposals, something Obama has worked hard to avoid, shutting the GOP out of the stimulus planning process and refusing to negotiate on any elements of his package. These defeats are vital to Obama's underdog, declinist re-election strategy.
Whatever Democrats decide to do with their next gambit, they need to act fast. In a month's time the debt-ceiling supercommittee must report its recommendation for finishing the leftover work from the August debt impasse and that will certainly preoccupy Congress right up to Christmas, if not beyond.
And Now, A Word From Charles
"I think this demonstrates the degree of brazenness on the part of the Iranian leadership. They have contempt for the United States and the leadership and they would do anything.
And what did we hear in moments of the announcement? As we heard earlier in the show, a statement this was not issue for Pentagon response. This was not going to be a tripwire for military action, but we'll hear the usual rubbish about the sanctions and isolation, which means nothing.
Even if we are not going to do an attack, say an attack on an al Quds camp, why do we announce it within hours? Why do we take it off the table? Why do the Iranians always have to know on this, on nuclear issues, on attacks on Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq, they can always act with impunity?"
-- Charles Krauthammer on "Special Report with Bret Baier"
Chris Stirewalt joined Fox News Channel (FNC) in July of 2010 and serves as politics editor based in Washington, D.C. Additionally, he authors the daily Fox News Halftime Report political news note and co-hosts the hit podcast, Perino & Stirewalt: I'll Tell You What. He also is the host of Power Play, a feature video series on FoxNews.com. Stirewalt makes frequent appearances on network programs, including America's Newsroom, Special Report with Bret Baier and Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace. He also provides expert political analysis for FNC's coverage of state, congressional and presidential elections.


text:
John Mayer has heaped praise on his girlfriend Katy Perry's new single, insisting he knew Roar would be a hit the moment he heard it.
The I Kissed A Girl hitmaker premiered her new song on Monday (12Aug13) after it was leaked online over the weekend (10-11Aug13).
Critics have already predicted the track is destined for chart glory, and Mayer, who has been dating the singer on and off since last year (12), insists he was blown away when Perry first played it for him.
He tells Billboard, "I remember hearing it, going like, 'Wow what an interesting experience' to hear something that you identify as massive before it's massive. I thought it was a really sweet, unforgettable sort of experience to hear someone's work while they still have a very nascent relationship with it.
"In a way you get swallowed up by it, it's so big. Because it's such an incredibly big song that it doesn't need you to tell anybody, while you're eating lunch, (that) millions of people are going to be dancing on tables to that."
Mayer has also teamed up with Perry in the recording studio - they have collaborated on Who You Love, a country-style track which will feature on the rocker's upcoming album Paradise Valley.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Street Way Holidays
Best For Travelling
Romantic Honeymoon
Street Way Holidays is a gateway of information & services for travelers who want to get to know India a little bit closer.
As some say, travel in India (or anywhere else for that matter) is indescribable. Reading, or seeing is not good enough to make a strong believer, you have to experience in order to know what holiday or travel really feels like. To make such experience, our focus has been to help people travel better & memorably, especially in India. To achieve this we get into the minutest details of each holiday as per travelers interest. Be it any form of tourism – Yoga, Spa, Ayurvedic, adventure, romantic, historic, cultural, beach or religious etc., we will have one designed for you. Read More>>>
This was a wonderful trip (Pune). The driver was very professional and excellent. All the arrangements were perfect. Thank you so much for all your help with my trip.
Thanks again for such a great organized and superb tour. It was perfect tour for us. And trust me this is first time not last time.
Hi Street Team,
Thank you very Much for all your hard work and your services.
Best regards
Thank you for the great service. We go to Goa about once in a year and will be pleased to arrange all service by phone. We again through your Street Way Holidays.


text:
Hemlock Standard Series
Start reaping the benefits of an at-home sauna today – look better, feel better, live better!
HeatWave Saunas are the safe, effective and affordable way to relieve stress and improve health, right in the comfort of your own home. Our exclusive InfraWave FAR heat technology heaters emit ultra low levels of EMF, making them safe and beneficial to your health. All HeatWave saunas are designed for quick easy assembly and will fit in virtually any room in your home. Constructed from solid premium grade Hemlock wood tongue and groove joinery to create a superior strength edge to edge surface, these saunas are built to last, providing you with years of health benefits and stress relief. HeatWave Saunas™ come with either Ceramic or Carbon InfraWave FAR heaters, feature interior reading lights and built in sound systems to further enhance your sauna experience. The 2, 3, and 4-Person models come equipped with ergonomic back rests, towel hooks, magazine holder, 7 color CHROMOTHERAPY light, and oxygen ionizers. HeatWave Saunas™ operate on a safe UL approved 120v / 15-amp or 20-amp power and are proudly backed by CE, CETL, RoHS and ISO 9001 certifications, internationally-recognized seals of quality, safety, and professional manufacturing.


text:
SOURCE: OrganizedWisdom
February 04, 2011 08:00 ET
Partnership Offers Solution to Medical Information Overload by Connecting Doctors, Health Experts and Consumers Online
NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwire - February 4, 2011) - OrganizedWisdom, an expert-driven platform for health and wellness, and Reader's Digest, the world's largest global editorial brand whose name is synonymous with "getting to the heart of the matter," today announced a partnership aimed at improving consumers' search for health information. Under the agreement, OrganizedWisdom will power a new search-driven, consumer-facing health program that will aggregate, organize and promote high-quality Web resources, medical journal articles, and other vetted health content shared online to give millions of people the right information at the right time.
"Our goal is to do everything we can to close the 'Online Health Gap' -- the scary space that exists between a doctor visit and the Internet, where people are left alone with an empty search box and millions of computer-generated results," explains Steven Krein, CEO of OrganizedWisdom. "By partnering with trusted content curators like Reader's Digest, we can help elevate the standard of care as we guide millions of people to discover valuable health information contributed by experts."
In addition to search, consumers will also be able to access the program's content at OrganizedWisdom.com and at the newly relaunched RD.com, now known as the Reader's Digest Version. The program will also consist of additional online and offline initiatives, including inserts in print editions of Reader's Digest and pamphlets distributed to up to 300,000 doctor waiting rooms. Multiplatform sponsorship opportunities enable health marketers to interact meaningfully with consumers at the most critical moment -- during their search for information.
"This is a year of tremendous growth and innovation for the Reader's Digest brand with a return to our roots as expert content curator and the launch of a range of new, digitally-driven products, ensuring that consumers can experience Reader's Digest however they choose," said Dan Lagani, President of Reader's Digest Media. "The partnership with OrganizedWisdom extends our ability to deliver trusted, time-saving insights beyond the Reader's Digest Version website and mobile platforms."
About RDA
The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. (RDA) is a global multi-brand media and marketing company that educates, entertains and connects audiences around the world. The company builds multi-platform communities based on branded content. With offices in 44 countries, it reaches a customer base of 130 million in 78 countries. It publishes 92 magazines, including 50 editions of Reader's Digest, the world's largest-circulation magazine, operates 78 branded websites and sells 40 million books, music and video products across the world each year. Further information about the company can be found at www.rda.com.
About OrganizedWisdom
OrganizedWisdom is on a mission to close the "Online Health Gap" and elevate the standard of care by inspiring all doctors and health experts to embrace the power of digital media and share their wisdom. The company aggregates, organizes, and promotes online wisdom shared across the Web by more than 5,000 vetted health and wellness experts. The company's investors include leading health, technology, and business minds: Esther Dyson, Roger Ehrenberg, Jason Finger, Linda Holliday, Jerry Levin, Jeff Stewart and SeventySix Capital. Learn more at organizedwisdom.com.
Media Contacts Aly Gibson LaunchSquad for OrganizedWisdom (212) 564-3665 ow(at)launchsquad(dot)com Karen Reynolds Reader's Digest Media (646) 293-6153 karen_reynolds(at)rd(dot)com
Media Contacts Aly Gibson LaunchSquad for OrganizedWisdom (212) 564-3665 ow(at)launchsquad(dot)com Karen Reynolds Reader's Digest Media (646) 293-6153 karen_reynolds(at)rd(dot)com
See all RSS Newsfeeds


text:
This is a rush transcript from "The Five," June 5, 2014. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.
ANDREA TANTAROS, CO-HOST: This is a Fox News alert. Fox News chief Washington correspondent James Rosen has learned that Army Sergeant Bow Bergdahl converted to Islam during his captivity with the Taliban and even considered himself a, quote, warrior to Islam according to secret documents. Rosen will have much more on special report in the next hour but let's discuss these shocking new developments right here on "The Five."
Eric, these documents showed that he converted to Islam, he considered himself a Mujh Jadeed. He also said that he was kept in a cage while he was part of this camp run by the Haqqani network. Does this significantly change the game because it confirms what his fellow soldiers have been saying that the White House has been trying to dispute for days?
ERIC BOLLING, CO-HOST: So, here's what came out today since the last time we were here. New York Times reported that Bergdahl on two separate occasions walked off from the base that he was at, one time in California, one time in Afghanistan. Prior to the time that he allegedly walked off and was captured or whatever happened with the Taliban.
As you point out, he converted to Islam. He declared himself a warrior for Islam while he was in captivity. Add that to the e-mail to the parents, add that to the journal he left behind and what you end up with, the same facts with one extra fact that the Obama administration despite of all their victory dance in the end zone, way too soon. I understand they still want to get him back, he's an American, you want to get him back. But before you go ahead and parade the parents out and ,you know, do your rose garden thing, you better make sure who the guy you're saving really is.
TANTAROS: Dana, according to this report that James Rosen has filed, Bergdahl was the subject of a, quote, major classified file prepared by the U.S. intelligence community and that they had been monitoring him for years. So, it is again impossible to think that somehow the White House didn't know if our intelligence community was preparing this massive file that showed that he in fact had ties to this Haqqani group.
DANA PERINO, CO-HOST: Right. So again, not illegitimate questions. I think the reasonable questions that Americans are asking trying to get answers from the administration.
But the question about James Rosen's report although is that James he maybe he knows more about this, that what if he was made to convert by his cap -- by the Haqqani network by the Taliban? Maybe he was willing to be converted but perhaps he was under duress, if it's true that he was kept for five days upon his recapture. After he escapes for a little while and gets captured, they put him in a metal cage for five days. That might explain the White House in State Department the seemingly -- they had some confidence that there was something yet to come out that would make Americans feel more sympathetic towards him.
I think this also raises yet another question. I've been praising the army for the care and feeding of the family of Bergdahl and for his rescue and handoff. But I think that if this is true, was the Intel community not communicating directly with the Defense Department in telling them that they had a problem within their ranks? We know that the platoon members were telling their higher ups that they thought there was a problem there. So, why is he - why is Bergdahl not removed from the theater earlier and either given an honorable or dishonorable discharge? I think that too is a reasonable question to ask.
TANTAROS: And this also doesn't make a lot of sense, Greg. The state department's spokeswoman came out and said, we're still trying to figure out the fact. And then yesterday she vary with certitude said, all these aren't the facts, when the reporter asked about what his fellow soldiers were saying. Doesn't it seem more and more that the White House had the facts and that they were trying to suppress the story. I mean, there are reports that they were trying to suppress the associated press and Time Magazine or New York Times, I should say, from mentioning Bergdahl. Is it harder and harder to believe that they didn't know that this was a problem?
GREG GUTFELD, CO-HOST: This is the consequence of political urgency. They wanted to get this thing done. I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't read half of this stuff. By the way, I don't see how converting to Islam is a bad thing. Not to do so would've been Islamophobic.
Let's face it, you know, you have to be polite while you're there. The thing is -- it could very easily be Stockholm syndrome where you become enamoured by your captors. In Stockholm its called Cleveland syndrome, it seems to be called Stockholm syndrome by proxy cause it seems like his dad has become sympathetic as well. This is a mess. You can't condemn this poor guy for what he's gone through, and you can't be sure if he was vulnerable or if he sought this out.
But it reveals like what Eric says, how poorly rolled out this exchange was, it's like we gave five Mercedes for a slinky. He could've -- President Obama could have acknowledged all of this stuff, all of this complexity and said, despite the fact this guy could be a criminal, he could be bad, we need him because he has a wealth of information and he could be dangerous. He may be a risk. And he's not a hero. But we need him. That's all he had to say. By the way, this guy is still a sergeant.
TANTAROS: Here's what I don't understand, Juan. If they knew that there were issues with Bergdahl, wouldn't it make more sense for the White House to say, as part of this prisoner swap, we need to get him back because we do believe he could be collaborating with them, giving him intelligence? He could be working -- we've got to get him back on our side and then court- martial him? Wouldn't that make a little bit more sense, then the White House wouldn't have to go against the military. They could say, look, this was a national security threat. That's why we got him back. And not give us these just lame excuses about his health and all this other stuff. Mixed facts that we've been hearing.
JUAN WILLIAMS, CO-HOST: Well, first of all, I think everybody knew the background on Bergdahl. Rolling Stone had written about this several years ago. I think it had been out there, I think there's any secret about Bergdahl not being fully committed and in fact there was information about the fact that the troop with the platoon he was in had tremendous discordant issues. People not getting along, poor quality leadership. There was a very unfortunate tweet out of the White House today saying that some of those guys were going after Bergdahl. I thought that was really wrong.
Listen, they can say what they want to say, but the fact is people knew the issue. But I think, Andrea, the key answer to your point is it's separate from whether or not you go back as commander in chief and get someone of your own country, your military soldier and get him back from the enemy.
TANTAROS: But if that were, Juan, if that were true, President Obama would not leave Sergeant Tahmooressi in a prison in Mexico and wouldn't have.
TANTAROS: They're not consistent when it comes to leaving them behind.
WILLIAMS: We're fighting a war. We're not fighting a war in Mexico.
TANTAROS: But the president says we're not it fighting a war against.
WILLIAMS: I don't know, you may know as more than I do, Greg. But let me just say one more thing.
TANTAROS: You can't cherry pick when you're gonna leave men behind and when you're not.
WILLIAMS: It's a war, we're in a war. That man was sent there to fight an enemy, to risk his life and die. But let me just say one more thing. I think when the president said this so well today, he showed compassion to a family that sent their child overseas to fight a war for the United States. And he has not had the opportunity, you know, when kids come back in wooden boxes, he writes a letter but he doesn't have the opportunity to say to them, listen, we understand the sacrifice your family made. He did for this man.
BOLLING: Juan, allow me so if you're right and the administration, President Obama read the 2012 Rolling Stone article and realized that this guy may have been a bad guy, was it advisable for Susan Rice to go out on Sunday and say he served honorably and with distinction?
WILLIAMS: I don't know about with distinction but it's clearly that's a judgment made by the military. Even the military as I understand promoted him to sergeant.
PERINO: But there's a reason for that.
WILLIAMS: Go ahead. So, in 2009 and in 2010, the Pentagon issued two separate reports saying that questioning whether or not he was honorable. And then he was, absent -- they didn't describe him as AWOL or a deserter because they hadn't talked to him so they didn't know. The reason he's promoted to sergeant is not because he had any particular distinction. It's was just time served. It's like a clock ticks over.
WILLIAMS: My point to you, Dana, is if there was in fact a sense this man had behaved dishonorably, et cetera, et cetera, you don't have to do anything. You could say you know what we honor the fact that he is being held as prisoner.
PERINO: I just don't want to give the impression that he got a promotion from the Defense Department based on merits. It was based on time served.
WILLIAMS: Well, look. But look if they're putting me in a cage and they've got me for five years.
PERINO: But that's not why he was, because they didn't know that.
WILLIAMS: I know that. But I'm just saying this is a horrible situation.
TANTAROS: And I don't think it the cage fact really matters. Because if it's true, according to the time that Obama had been negotiating to get him out, for years, this prisoner release, he wanted to get rid of these prisoners, well of course the Taliban's gonna keep their golden ticket to getting their five guys back of course they're gonna keep him in a cage, whether he's part of their warrior of Islam or not.
WILLIAMS: What I saw in this morning's papers was that one of the fears the administration has was they were gonna kill him. Because they felt that his value was decreasing to the Taliban.
BOLLING: Hey, hey, Juan, why did that come out today five days later?
WILLIAMS: Because what they had was they have to go back to the hill and have the secret briefing that.
BOLLING: Don't you really think that we're kind of making they're kind of making this up as they go along, hey you know what let's just say Taliban threatened to kill him if we leaked any of this information. They had five days to do that. This have -- if this came down on Saturday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday , Tuesday, Wednesday. Thursday now, almost six days to say, we had to do this now because there was a threat that he was gonna be killed.
TANTAROS: And, we have to go to this someone. Hang on one second. The president doubling down today, he's not second-guessing his decision on Bergdahl. Again, doubling down at a press conference today. Take a listen.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: We had a prisoner of war whose health had deteriorated, and we were deeply concerned about it and we saw an opportunity and we seized it. And I'm making no apologies for it that.
PERINO: Greg, no apologies for this it decision.
GUTFELD: Well he's not going to apologize to us. He only apologizes to our enemies. We'll be right back.
GUTFELD: So, they say it was a -- they say it was a health issue, and the fact is we can't tell internally if he has issues. If he was mentally ill, physically he looked better than me.
WILLIAMS: That ain't saying much.
GUTFELD: I know he could write a book The Taliban's guide to six pack abs. But no we don't know he could be in serious, serious health problems but remember John McCain was in serious -- I mean he was in bad shape. And he stayed there when he could have gone out. But, I mean, I don't know -- I don't know what you could say, is he in bad health? I don't know. I think, what is President Obama going to say, that's what he is going to say.
WILLIAMS: What did McCain say today? McCain said today that the poor man was in isolation. And John McCain who was with other people says I won't even talk about the kind of psychological.
PERINO: What else did John McCain say? He said in the interview if I have it with me the exact words, but he said that, yes, he would want Bergdahl to get back. He wanted him to be rescued, he would have been willing to do some sort of a swap but then he didn't know any of the details, so the details matter to members of congressman, including Senator John McCain.
WILLIAMS: Everybody.
PERINO: Then he said today, is that if he would have known that it was these five Taliban that were going to be released, that he would agreed with Clapper, Panetta and all the other intelligence community that said, we absolutely do it not have confidence that they would not return to the battlefield and kill more Americans. For the full picture, I mean, it's more complex.
GUTFELD: Yes, I don't think you can make a judgment on the guy's health from like looking at that because you don't know what's going on in his head and what's happened internally. He could have God knows what.
BOLLING: You know what you can do, though. You can change the dialogue, you could change the debate. It was health issues for five days, we had to hurry up his health was failing. We compared it to a video that we saw, whatever two years ago, it looks like his health was failing. That was the debate. That was the reason they said they had to go now. Couldn't get Congress to.
GUTFELD: Yes, it was politically expedient.
BOLLING: But then we see the video, and we see a guy who walks on his own, he gets to helicopter, he climbs in the helicopter and the debate -- among tables, on TV, he says, well, he wasn't in such bad shape. Couldn't they have waited a few more days and all of a sudden it becomes, oh, I forgot to tell you, Taliban said if they don't release him they're going to kill him.
PERINO: Which is a different issue which.
GUTFELD: Which is a health problem. You do die. When somebody is going to kill you it's a health problem.
WILLIAMS: Yes.
TANTAROS: But President Obama has wanted to release these five Gitmo detainees for years.
PERINO: They're some of the hardest ones to get rid of.
TANTAROS: He's been trying to release them and close Gitmo the day even before he was captured. Dana, can I play this for you? Juan, I heard you mentioned this kid, using the term this kid, Bowe Bergdahl as a kid. You may have gotten the memo from the White House, because Dana the President used very similar wordings today at the press conference when he referred to Bergdahl as just a kid.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: I am responsible for those kids. And I get letters from parents who say, if you are in fact sending my child to war, make sure that child is being taken care of. And I write too many letters to folks who unfortunately don't see their children again after fighting a war. This is somebody's child. And that we don't condition whether or not we make the effort to try to get them back.
PERINO: OK. I don't like to use the word "kids" either. I gave Bob Beckel a hard time about it the other day because at the age of 18 at some point we have to get over this it delayed adolescence in America. At 18, if you decided to fight for your country or smoke weed in Colorado or whatever you get to do now, vote, those are actions that he was a man of conscious. He made decisions. I do think in some ways that President Obama's team might say, well, we used to say bring our boys home. OK. What's the difference between boys and kids. I think we understand the distinction. But I also think that when I hear President Obama talking about Bergdahl as a kid and all of this compassion for the Bergdahl family, OK, I can understand that. But what I do not understand and even though I'm sure he feels it, but they are not expressing it, it's the compassion for the families of the soldiers who served alongside Bergdahl who then had to go on patrols and they lose possibly up to 6 maybe even 14 members of that platoon in reconnaissance missions looking for Bergdahl. And there's some compassion that needs to be shown to those families as well.
WILLIAMS: I think there's compassion, Dana. I don't think.
PERINO: He doesn't talked -- has President Obama addressed them at all?
WILLIAMS: Of course -- most of them -- listen he -- if you lost a child, and I'm going to say a child because you know what, one of my boys.
PERINO: I know, I already have a child.
WILLIAMS: No, I have children who are in their 20s and 30s, Dana and if you.
PERINO: Well, isn't that what I just said, Juan?
WILLIAMS: Well, I don't -- I still consider them my children.
PERINO: I'm not talking about your children. I'm saying that everybody is going to say that. And I didn't criticize Obama for using the word "kid." I do think, though, that when there are other children -- people's children who fought alongside Bergdahl and then tried to save him and lost their lives or were wounded in that action, that deserve some compassion as well.
WILLIAMS: I don't doubt they would get compassion. If the case of death I know that they get compassion and they get a letter from the President of the United States.
TANTAROS: I just had to throw this out really quick, it looks like today, Greg, the White House is considering releasing another terrorist from Gitmo, Ted Cruz is trying to prevent this from happening.
GUTFELD: Yes, closing Gitmo is part of Obama's legacy. Damn the outcomes. And he even admits there's a risk involved. So, the question is where do you put those fellas? And Harry Reid has been, you know, strongly supportive of closing Gitmo. So I say, do it in his district. It could be like a Mustang Ranch, you get beheaded instead of bedded.
TANTAROS: Very interesting idea.
GUTFELD: My ideas are always interesting, thank you America.
WILLIAMS: I thought you are going to do the nuclear dump but you went to the whore house.
TANTAROS: We got to go, be sure to catch James (inaudible) on Central Report directly following the Five with more on the new Bergdahl development. Directly ahead, a White House official issues a stunning remarks about Bergdahl's platoon members who have been critical of the circumstances about the night that he vanished. We have breaking details on that and later, President Ronald Reagan remembered 10 years after his death. We will honor our nation's 40th president, that's coming up on The Five.
GUTFIELD: As the White House backpedals faster than a dyslexic union cyclist, others poured gas on the fire to protect the president from his own blindness. They even went after soldiers who did served with honor and distinction.
Obama employee and decorated war veteran Brandon Friedman tweeted this about Bergdahl's fellow troops. He writes, "Here's the thing about Bergdahl… What if his platoon was long on psychopaths and short on leadership?"
See, Bowe left because his comrades were murderous fiends. It's not him. It's them.
Now, I can't say I blame Brandon entirely for this in any war movie made after Vietnam, Bowe would be the hero. But Brandon quickly apologized, realizing it offended service members -- the very people he work with and admire.
But should he have? He just said what many in the administration thinks. After all, its staffed with Ivy League lacks weaned on snarling academics brimming with American self-hatred in war movies that always embracing that recurring cliché: the gung-ho military head case.
I feel for Brandon as a loyal guy who's only trying to help a clueless Obama recover from that boneheaded move in the Rose Garden and save some shred of Bowe's legacy.
That was the real mistake: Obama's grandstanding in the garden. You can't paint a turd purple and tell America it's eggplant.
The lesson here as always, Dana, Twitter. Why do you go on Twitter? You work for the government. Nothing good comes from it.
PERINO: Right. And also, it's very difficult to separate maybe what you said in private or at a bar or a cocktail table to your friend than what you would say as an official. He works at the Department of Homeland, I'm sorry, Department of Housing and Urban Development.
GUTFIELD: Right.
PERINO: That they suppose to deal with housing. I can understand that he's a political appointee that wants to support the president but if you are wanting to make sure that you don't add to the White House's problems, the best thing you can do is probably keep your tweets to yourself.
GUTFIELD: Yeah, and he said that this guy is a deck ratted war veteran which was surprising -- I think surprised a lot of people that he would tweet this. Maybe he has experience in dealing with some unusual people in the battle field. But should he have done this?
TANTAROS: Well, it shows that they don't have their messaging pretty tight. I mean, I don't know many people have been in the Bush administration that.
PERINO: They didn't have Twitter.
TANTAROS: Make blanket statements about things they shouldn't weigh in on, but they bungled this from the beginning. And I'm going to say this again. I gets their calculus is, it's OK for us to go out there and fight against the fellow comrades and question their patriotism and question anyone's patriotism on this decision when from get-go, they should have not have the Rose Garden press ceremony, not done a Sunday show. And if asked to that, it should have been a very brief statement, that said, the reason we got him back was because of National Security interest. We thought he maybe collaborating with the Taliban, because that was Intel (ph) that they had could be possible and put a rest to it. Even if, Greg, the real motive, which it is, is to close Gitmo and end the war in Afghanistan, at least make it look like you're not going against his fellow soldiers. This White House doesn't care if they're going against military members. They have no respect for anyone in the military except for a very confirmed deserter -- multiple deserter.
WILLIAMS: You know, it's just -- you know, I think you'd have a better case if you said to me, Juan, the president has made a big show of loving the military at every turn, done everything.
TANTAROS: How so?
WILLIAMS: Oh my gosh.
TANTAROS: I would never say something like that because it's not true.
WILLIAMS: Well, it is true. The president has made -- and I think people on this show have questioned whether it's sincere, did they -- has he gone overboard in this show.
TANTAROS: He's cut benefits at the department of defense. He's drawn down the military. There's a sergeant in the marines -- you said we're at war? That jailed marines served two tours in Afghanistan.
WILLIAMS: I said, here's -- even Mexico. OK. Let me move on.
TANTAROS: Does it matter which country he's in?
WILLIAMS: Yes, that died -- we're not in war with Mexico.
GUTFIELD: Are we, Juan?
WILLIAMS: No, we're not. But let me just say, I couldn't agree more. I think it's out of line for that man to have tweeted that message and I think it's out of line for the White House to be saying that somehow these soldiers are swift boating Bergdahl. I think that authentic, leave it alone. Those soldiers were on the ground. They were there. They have a story to tell. I also think it's offensive when I see people making -- and the president said that they have a political football out of this issue.
PERINO: But he asked for it.
WILLIAMS: No, he didn't.
PERINO: Yes, he did. You don't have a Rose Garden Ceremony and not expect press.
WILLIAMS: You see some of this right winging bloggers, they were calling for Obama to get Bergdahl, at anyway, take any risk to get our man back. What are they saying today? Talking about, other soldier, Obama didn't know he was this. Obama didn't know. They had every other reason to go after Obama. It looks like you're playing a political football game.
GUTFELD: What do you think, Eric? Is he making a point?
BOLLING: Here's, what, no, Juan? No.
(LAUGHTER) BOLLING: No. He talks a lot.
PERINO: Agree.
BOLLING: Just let me make this one quick point. Someday we're gonna move on from the Bergdahl story, but one thing needs to be said before we go. A Taliban commander told Time Magazine that they were excited to kidnap more Americans because then they can trade for more Gitmo detainees. That's something that we said on this show on Monday afternoon, that this was gonna be one of the fallouts for this horrible trade. And guess what they're saying it.
PERINO: So, the Taliban watches The Five
WILLIAMS: I hope now.
BOLLING: Maybe they get it at Gitmo. Maybe the other Gitmo detainees send it back to the Taliban. And said, hey, hear what The Five just said? Kidnaps some more Americans cause may we can get out of here.
GUTFELD: Yeah, straight from the goats mouth. You know what? Obama could salvage the whole thing by doing -- coming back for a press conference and saying, I'd like to thank the Taliban five who were released for all of that great information that we got to fight terror. Those guys' heads would be on a stick by tomorrow.
PERINO: I love that. That's a good idea.
GUTFELD: It wasn't my idea.
PERINO: I just told of a good idea today.
GUTFELD: I stole that one. From a viewer, thank you. Up next on The Five, what do Justin Bieber, President Obama, pumping iron, and soccer have in common? They're all at Eric's fastest seven coming up after the break. Don't miss it.
BOLLING: Welcome back to the fastest seven minutes in cable. Three blazing stories, seven blistering minutes, one blithe host.
First up, a few days after a video emerged of a 15-year-old Justin Bieber using a racial slur that starts with the letter "N," a new video was leaked to TMZ. This one features the Biebs a year younger, dropping "N" bombs all over the place.
JUSTIN BIEBER, POP SINGER (singing): One less lonely (EXPLETIVE DELETED). One less lonely (EXPLETIVE DELETED). One less lonely (EXPLETIVE DELETED). One less (EXPLETIVE DELETED). I kill you, I'll be part of the gang. One less lonely (EXPLETIVE DELETED). There's going to be one less lonely (EXPLETIVE DELETED).
BOLLING: All right, Greg, you want to -- by the way, Bieber said he was sorry.
GUTFELD: Yes. Big misunderstanding. He was saying "neighbor."
How fitting, though, that he is being blackmailed for denigrating black males. So he -- I think he deserves it.
He's really stupid. You know what happens when you demonize a word? Justifiably, this word is demonized. Its risk creates allure, especially among adolescents. It's like because we say cigarettes are bad, a 13-year- old will smoke cigarettes.
By saying this word is bad, he knew it was bad. That's why he kept saying it over and over again. But he said that on the camera, and you know there's more stuff out there. You just know it. I mean, it's all going to come out.
BOLLING: This is the second one. This is when he was 14 years old. There was one from when he was 15 years old. Greg's probably right, who knows -- there's a lot of time. He's 20 now.
TANTAROS: And he's not it getting a pass from the press. The press is beating up on him pretty significantly, especially the entertainment press. But you know why he will survive this? Because his fan base is a bunch of naive little girls that they don't care what he does. It doesn't matter. They're still going to support him.
GUTFELD: I am not a naive little girl.
TANTAROS: I say something critical of him one time, and I got the nastiest tweets, and I thought they were coming from Greg Gutfeld under a secret account, calling me the "B" word and all this other stuff.
GUTFELD: That was me.
TANTAROS: But he'll survive.
GUTFELD: I'm Bieber forever.
BOLLING: So I really don't know how -- what the rest of -- there's different connotations or different ways of saying that word, am I correct? In hip-hop at times.
GUTFELD: You go to Juan. Juan.
BOLLING: Here's my question. Is there any slack to cut Bieber?
WILLIAMS: Zero. I mean, it's offensive. I mean, and it's hurtful. But you know what? I mean, the odd part about this is his mentor is Usher, I believe. Right? He brought him on -- I mean, so...
GUTFELD: That's because his career is dead.
WILLIAMS: But do you know what I think? Because They must cut him slack. And I'm thinking to myself, it is such a corrupt culture, that whole hip-hop thing.
BOLLING: But black artists do the same thing.
WILLIAMS: That's what I'm tell you. I just get upset personally that the black kids have the same issue that Greg was talking about. There's some kind of allure to this word and that they're going to be defiant and they're going to reclaim it by using it. That is nonsense; that is illegitimate. And the word is out there now, and it's become very much au courant, current or hip with the white crowd, because that's what they're in the car, thumping the dashboard.
PERINO: You should hear me walking up and down the street.
GUTFELD: You are disgusting. You're like a mini Donald Sterling.
BOLLING: Any more thoughts on this one?
PERINO: I was going to say that if were his demo tape, I'm surprised he ever got a record deal.
BOLLING: All right. We're going to go. Moving on to this one. Being president of the United States requires some heavy lifting at times. The other day in Poland wasn't one of those times.
BOLLING: All right. Five pounds, ten pounds max, Ands.
TANTAROS: Which is what I use. We have a similar workout routine. He also -- he has great form. I think he has better form than I do.
I'm wondering what he's really listening to. He's very focused. Maybe a little "Eye of the Tiger." I think they may have leaked this themselves. I think this makes him look pretty -- I don't know.
BOLLING: What? Fit?
TANTAROS: I think they think it makes him look fit.
BOLLING: Come on. Dana, you think it makes him look...?
PERINO: Low weights, high reps. And he's a picture of health.
TANTAROS: He is.
PERINO: I just don't know -- who put the music to that video?
TANTAROS: Greg Gutfeld?
GUTFELD: Look, this -- I think this is beautiful. I'm more worried when he's not in the gym. I want him to work out constantly, train for ultra-marathons, get into power lifting. I'll treat him. At six weeks he'll have abs like an abacus. I don't want him doing anything but working out, because that means there's less problems for us.
BOLLING: Juan, if this is your workout tape, would you leak it?
WILLIAMS: Leak it? No, I wouldn't leak it. But I'm amused by it. But I saw that The Washington Post asked a professional trainer who said, "Oh, the only problem is his form," to pick up on your point. His form.
PERINO: It's not bad. Trainers always said that. That's their job.
BOLLING: Those are like five pounds. Like they taped a quarter to a pen and started curling that. That was like why...
WILLIAMS: You're a real athlete. You're a real athlete.
BOLLING: Shall we move on to this one? Baseball is America's pastime. Football is America's sport. Soccer, a bunch of dudes chasing a ball around. No strategy, no hitting. Hell, almost no scoring. McDonald's had to go aboard to find a star for their new ad.
BOLLING: Greg has a very strong moral point to make. We're going to hold out for that.
GUTFELD: Soccer is a metaphor for the world. See, the world is soccer. America is football. We do everything bigger, better, scarier, and we create sophisticated padding and equipment to preserve its brutality. It's why we win. Soccer, as you said, it's settled with penalty shots. It's kickball without strategy.
BOLLING: Exactly. Dana.
PERINO: Is that why we -- is America so much better because that's why we have a White House that now is focused on concussions in football? Because that's what we do now?
GUTFELD: Look, I didn't think that much into this.
PERINO: OK, that's true. I love soccer, and I think we have to understand that in America it's -- this is the biggest thing going around the world. I love the world...
GUTFELD: So is E. Coli.
BOLLING: Do you know, Dana, that the survey that we based this whole thing on, that only 2 percent of Americans would call soccer their favorite sport. Two percent.
PERINO: Well...
BOLLING: I think it only beats bowling and...
TANTAROS: I have a confession. I have to admit. It's fun to watch with the volume off. So sometimes secretly on a Saturday I'll put on a game, because the men are so gorgeous. I'll just watch them run up and down the field.
However, there's a reason they get so drunk and trample each other. Because it is very boring.
WILLIAMS: You know what it reminds me of is the basketball ad, that - - was it a McDonald's ad with Jordan and Bird? And I find it entertaining. I mean, when the volume was off, Greg said it's not soccer. Even better.
TANTAROS: They always cry, though, Juan. And they fall down when they -- wimpy babies like Greg said.
WILLIAMS: No, Dana's point, don't ignore it. The passion for soccer in the world is beyond anything. GUTFELD: You know what my favorite sport is?
WILLIAMS: Don't tell me.
PERINO: Cricket.
GUTFELD: Bowling. Eric Bolling.
BOLLING: There you go.
Straight ahead, the American dream. Is it attainable, or is it not? New details on why the deck may be stacked against our nation's youth and how colleges might play a role. Coming up.
PERINO: I'm not sure what that song was. Joshua, you are in trouble for that, too.
OK. Is the American dream out of reach? According to a new poll, the answer is yes.
As they struggle to find jobs, young adults are the most likely to feel hopeless, as a staggering 63 percent say a shot at success is unattainable. Part of the reason, according to historian Victor Davis Hanson, is that we are not teaching kids how to succeed while they're trying -- while they're in college.
In the National Review he writes, quote, "Colleges that were once our most enlightened and tolerant institutions became America's dinosaurs."
Juan, I wanted to talk to you about this, because you're an education expert.
WILLIAMS: Oh, yes.
PERINO: There's lots of issues colliding. Right? There's changing economy, changing demographics. And do you -- from your observations, do you think our colleges and universities are underserving America's family but overcharging them at the same time?
WILLIAMS: Definitely overcharging. I don't think there's any question about it. And I'm particularly worried about what's going on with low-income kids. A lot of these colleges that -- community colleges and the like, you know, and they take a kid that's unprepared, and they have to put him in remedial training. And then the kid thinks, "Oh, I can become a mechanic, a nurse." Turns out they're not even prepared to take that training. Then they drop out. Then they've got the debt.
And some of these kids have tremendous debt. And don't get the end result that you want. So yes, it worries me. That was too serious an answer. I apologize.
PERINO: We can do serious here. We can.
BOLLING: At 43 after the hour.
GUTFELD: No, we're not.
PERINO: Eric, why do you think people say -- 63 percent of people say that they -- you can't even reach the American dream anymore? I don't think that's true. I think I'm in the minority.
BOLLING: Well, remember, these are kids who are coming out of college, as Juan points out, with this massive debt. And they see their unemployment rate, I think, among young people is approaching 10 percent. If you're African-American it's approaching 17 percent. It's grim prospects out there.
They are -- didn't we just report another number? If you're 18 to 35 years old, something like 1 in 4 of you...
PERINO: And 33 percent of them are living at home.
BOLLING: One-third are still living at home? In their own home.
I mean, it's -- for all the numbers that they put out saying the economy is getting better, if you ask -- if you ask people looking for jobs, especially at the lower end, the entry level, it's tough pickings right now.
PERINO: Andrea, what could the universities do? What do you think is going to happen? Do you think there will be some sort of creative disruption that changes the education model?
TANTAROS: No, not at all. I think Republicans would be smart to hold hearings on the cost of college tuition and haul some of these university presidents up to ask why they're charging so much for a bunch of classes that aren't even beneficial.
But you asked in the beginning, Dana, are colleges teaching kids how to succeed? No. And they're also not being taught how to fail. So kids aren't being taught that it's OK to fail, and you learn more from the failures, because they're so guarded and protected.
They're also teaching them that success comes without working very hard, this entitlement society. "I deserve health care. I deserve a car. I deserve a house, irrespective of whether or not I can afford it. I deserve a college education." It's that Elizabeth Warren anger that you deserve everything. That entitlement society. And if you can't get it yourself, the government's going to give it to you.
WILLIAMS: But what about the recession? Don't you think they got a bad deal?
PERINO: I think it's complex, and there's a lot of things...
TANTAROS: I don't think that helped. But...
PERINO: Have you ever thought of opening your own college and university?
GUTFELD: I actually did in my basement, but the police shut it down. Had a heating issue.
CNN is doing a special on the 1960s this week, bringing the total number of specials on the 1960s to 14 million. If you linked all the specials on the 1960s together, it would actually be longer than the 1960s.
So when you obsess over a time that denigrated traditional success, don't be surprised if you create generations that fail. Men fought wars; they built bridges so today's men could masturbate to porn, vegetate in front of video games and ban speech on campus. We didn't deserve their service.
PERINO: Coming up, does race have anything to do with income inequality?
BOLLING: That was -- Dana's face was absolutely...
PERINO: Oscar-winning actor Morgan Freeman weighs in, and his answer may surprise you, next on "The Five."
GUTFELD: What did I say?
WILLIAMS: We go to a break.
WILLIAMS: Actor Morgan Freeman made some surprising remarks about income equality, saying it has nothing to do with race. The Oscar winner cites himself as living proof. Watch this.
DON LEMON, CNN ANCHOR: Do you think that race plays a part in wealth distribution? Or either a mindset that you can't...
MORGAN FREEMAN, ACTOR: Today?
LEMON: Yes.
FREEMAN: No.
LEMON: You don't?
FREEMAN: No, I don't. No. You and I, we're proof. Why would race have anything to do with it? Stick your -- put your mind to what you want to do and go for that. It's kind of like religion to me. It's a good excuse for not getting there.
WILLIAMS: Andrea. Disagree? Agree?
TANTAROS: Oh, I agree. I think he's making a very honest, true statement. It doesn't matter, especially in this country. That's the -- that is the greatest thing about this country. You can be from any other country. You don't have to speak the language. You can overcome these barriers, and you can achieve great success.
I'm happy that he's being so honest about it. I mean, I -- I don't really buy into that whole income inequality argument. I don't know why it's a problem. I don't understand why it's a problem.
WILLIAMS: I happen to agree -- I agree with you. I mean, I think that's why immigrants continue to flock here, and I think the idea that you would say to your children, "You can't make it in America," I think that's condemning your own child. And I think Morgan Freeman is to being honored and celebrated for saying that.
On the other hand, and you look at income inequality, you say you don't agree with it; you don't believe it exists. It does exist. And there's a huge gap between white and black.
TANTAROS: I don't think it's -- I don't think it's -- I don't think it's a huge problem.
WILLIAMS: Well, it is a problem if you see whites having so much more wealth than blacks, and that has worsened since the recession.
TANTAROS: If you have a guy making a certain amount on one side of the street...
TANTAROS: ... and another man on the other side of the street, why is that a problem? Why do we have to go in and fix it so everyone is the same like Cuba? I don't understand.
WILLIAMS: Not the same. But there's a huge...
TANTAROS: So that everybody is equally miserable?
WILLIAMS: Go ahead. I'm sure that Dr. Wall Street has a thought. BOLLING: No, I just -- not Dr. Wall Street, Dr. Logic.
WILLIAMS: Dr. Logic.
BOLLING: OK, so income inequality, it's not -- it's not racial. It's income levels. Income inequality in a free market is a great thing. It means the higher end of the income spectrum is pulling up the bottom end.
WILLIAMS: But it ain't pulling.
BOLLING: In a communist society or -- But it is, Juan.
WILLIAMS: But Dana, it's not pulling. It's like this. And it's getting wider.
BOLLING: No, no. It's getting wider on the way up.
PERINO: I think in theory it's true, but in reality, I think we have to look at the hard numbers. Three of them are graduation rates, which are so much lower; marriage rates, which are, like, 25 percent only; and then you look at the unemployment number, which is almost double (ph).
WILLIAMS: Yes. Gregory.
GUTFELD: What Morgan Freeman said, I consider these what you call these moral vitamins. You need to hear one of these at least once a day or at least a jaded populous needs to be reminded that it's not whining but it's work that gets you where you are.
Remember, he wasn't -- he just didn't become Morgan Freeman, the voice of God.
PERINO: Right.
GUTFELD: He played a pimp in "Street Smart."
WILLIAMS: All right.
GUTFELD: He was in an -- "Electric Company." He worked up that ladder.
PERINO: I liked "Electric Company." And I liked...
WILLIAMS: All right. And I liked -- here's to Morgan Freeman. You got it.
"One More Thing" coming right at you. Stay with us.
TANTAROS: Time now for "One More Thing." Eric Bolling.
BOLLING: So every time there's a scandal, the Demo libs come up with a line. And look at the line they use for Benghazi. Watch.
HILLARY CLINTON, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE: The fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?
BOLLING: OK. So now we have a bigger scandal in Bergdahl, possibly. Take a look what Harry Reid had to say.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: How come it seems that you were the only one who got a heads-up the day before?
SEN. HARRY REID, D-NEV., MAJORITY LEADER: I'm not sure I'm the only one. I mean, it's made a big deal over nothing. The whole deal is, is it Friday or Saturday? What difference does it make? What difference does it make?
BOLLING: Bad choice of words, I think.
PERINO: Banned phrase.
BOLLING: ... stick for a while.
No, let's not ban that one.
GUTFELD: No, no. It works for us.
TANTAROS: Juan.
WILLIAMS: All right. So the theme of our show tonight, soccer. And guess what? We have a great video for you, because Peru and England squared off in a match last Friday, but they weren't the key attraction. It was a paper airplane. Watch this.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes! Look at that!
GUTFELD: Most exciting thing ever in soccer.
WILLIAMS: It's unbelievable, because watch. The paper airplane makes it all the way to the field, and it hits one of the opposing players in the head. Is that great?
GUTFELD: And he fell down and cried.
WILLIAMS: No. He fell down and died, and they were defeated. Greg, they were defeated.
TANTAROS: Dana.
PERINO: Today is the tenth anniversary of former president Ronald Reagan's death. He was the 40th president. He also gave that wonderful remembrance at D-Day. People gathered today in California, and there was a rare appearance by former first lady Nancy Reagan at the event, as well. Our friend Peggy Noonan was there. Howard Baker spoke. And it was quite an amazing day. And we celebrate his life, as well.
TANTAROS: Very nice -- Greg.
GUTFELD: I just want to show this picture that aired earlier on the show. That's my mother. That wasn't what the picture was. But OK, let's talk about my mother.
I want to thank everybody who sent me cards regarding my mother's passing. I read every single card. So believe that, that I read every one, every message. And they meant a lot to me, so thank you.
TANTAROS: And very quickly, congratulations to our makeup artist, one of our very talented makeup artists here at the Fox News Channel. Ashana Morgan, she got married in France...
PERINO: Oh, how nice.
TANTAROS: ... earlier today. She looks beautiful. Ashana, we miss you, but Seven (ph) and the girls are doing a great job. Congratulations.
We'll see you back here. Don't forget to set your DVR so you never miss an episode of "The Five." Bye.
Content and Programming Copyright 2014 Fox News Network, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2014 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.


text:
January 21, 2013 12:34 ET
CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwire - Jan. 21, 2013) - MGold Resources Inc. (TSX VENTURE:MNI) ("MGold" or the "Corporation") announced today that is settled outstanding indebtedness of $40,000 through the issuance of 800,000 common shares of the Corporation at a deemed price of $0.05 per share. The common shares issued in connection with the debt settlement are subject to a four month hold period that expires on May 15, 2013.
MGold Resources Inc. is a Lethbridge, Alberta based corporation engaged in the exploration for minerals. The Corporation's common shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange under the trading symbol "MNI".
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as the term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
MGold Resources Inc.John SquarekPresident and Chief Executive email@example.com
See all RSS Newsfeeds


text:
What Are Your All-Time Favorite xoVain Articles?
It's gonna get sappy up in here.
After being bombarded with every possible type of BB cream you could dream up, BB creams for the body have arrived. I knew they would show up eventually. I'm basically a beauty psychic. When I grow up, I want to be an oracle.
Anyway, after I wrote about that Dr. Jart BB gel, some questions about body BBs popped up in the comment section, so I decided to try one. I'm happy to be your guinea pig. Honestly, I'm happy to do whatever you tell me to.
Jergens sent me their new BB Body Skin Perfecting Cream, which is one of the first BBs for the body that I've seen. Admittedly, I was skeptical about the concept of a BB for the body, thinking it was just another way for beauty companies to cash in on the trend. On the other hand, I am the first person to fall for all of that. So, sign me up!
At $11.99, Jergens BB Body Skin Perfecting Cream is easy to find at the drugstore and inexpensive, which are two of my favorite things, especially when it comes to new products. This body BB is available in two shades, for light skin tones, and for medium-deep skin tones. It promises to hydrate, even, firm, illuminate, and correct, all in just five days.
The cream itself is a light tan, but doesn't go on thick and streaky like a self-tanner or a tinted moisturizer. It doesn't rub off on your clothes, either! It's light and the color is very sheer, so when you rub it in, you don't even notice the coverage. You're not standing there trying to make sure the color is even, because there's really not an immediate color payoff.
The texture is lightweight --it feels like a whipped body cream. I thought that because it was so light, I was going to have to use a ton of it to get the coverage I wanted, but what I found was exactly the opposite. I squeezed about a quarter-sized amount into my hand thinking it would be enough for just my chest, but I found myself spreading it over my shoulders and down my arms. Is this sensual enough for you yet? I'll go on.
But does it work? Five days is a lot for me to do anything, you guys, because I get bored easily. Five days is like, a big commitment. But for you, I will. For five days, I swaped my normal lotion for the body BB and applied it right after I got out of the shower, and before bed. I didn't see the immediate results that I see when I use a regular BB on my face and for the first few days, I thought I wasn't seeing any results at all.
BUT THEN. Towards the fifth day, I noticed some subtle changes with my skin, so I kept my little test going for a few more days, just to see.
Does it:
Hydrate: Yes! I mean, it's made by Jergens so of course it's very moisturizing. I did notice that it took a touch longer to dry than what I prefer. I normally hate smearing body cream all over myself because it makes me feel clammy and slimy. But, you know what, by the time I threw some clothes on, the cream was dried down and I had forgotten it was even there, so I guess I should stop being so sensitive.
Illuminate: Yes! Now, I love an illuminator, especially a body illuminator. I just want to SHINE! I could walk around looking like the Silver Surfer and it still wouldn't be enough. The BB body cream subtly illuminates without any talc or glitter, so you're not going to look like you're on your way to a rave when you're really on your way to the office. It's just a slight touch of sheen that helps add a healthy glow.
Even the skin: Yes. This is what I noticed the most, actually. The cream is supposed to help with redness, but being olive skinned, I really don't experience a whole lot of redness on the regular. But what I noticed after a couple of days was that my skin was a little brighter, a little more vibrant, and had better color all around, almost like I had just (forgive me) had an orgasm, or thrown myself into a giant vat of NARS Orgasm blush (bucket listing that one, btw.)
Firm: In the interest of fairness, let's level here. I'm 26 with the body of like, a cartoon ballerina. I don't have any skin that needs to be firmed, yet. I think this might be meant to sound like it will help with cellulite, but I don't have any of that either, so I can't really speak for that result. My skin is still tight, but my morals are loose.
Correct: This is essentially meant to work like a perfector for your body, to blur and hide imperfections. Did it hide imperfections? Not quite. It doesn't work like a concealer and you wouldn't want it to anyway. But it does blur imperfections making them less noticeable. If you have discoloration, marks from healing blemishes, or little scars from who knows what, then this will help make them less noticeable.
I was really happy with the mileage I got out of the cream, so I wasn't afraid to load up on it, feeling like I was using it up too quickly. I definitely wouldn't hesitate to buy another one either, especially since I'm planning on wearing basically no clothes this entire summer. Couldn't hurt!
Are you skeptical, or would you give body BB creams a try? I mean, you already have beautiful skin, but if you're going to moisturize, you might as well do it with something that's going to go the extra mile. Have you tried it? Am I crazy? Tell me in the comments!
Tynan is trying every new beauty trend on Twitter @TynanBuck.


text:
Sharp's president Takashi Okuda has revealed that the screens Apple will be using for its iPhone 5 will ship this month, keeping the production of the new handset on course for the much-rumoured September release date.
Speaking during the Japanese manufacturer's press briefing to announce its quarterly earnings, Okuda said: "Shipments will start in August."
Sharp is one of three display makers supplying Retina displays for the latest in Apple's handset range. The others are LG and Japan Display Inc. The president didn't say any more on exact shipping dates or the size of the screens supplied (many believe them to be widescreen and come in at 4-inches), but even revealing that they are ready to be supplied is a surefire confirmation that production is starting.
The iPhone 5 is widely expected to be announced on 12 September, with a 21 September on-street release date. It makes complete sense considering rival Microsoft is using October to launch Windows 8 and its Microsoft Surface tablet.
Pocket-lint, of course, will keep you updated with all the gossip and news.
What do you think? A September release? Let us know in the comments below...


text:
A man who abused two young children for more than five years has been jailed.
Simon Stocken, 40, from Dallison Road, Hibaldstow, South Humberside, was sentenced to five years and nine months in prison when he appeared at Nottingham Crown Court last Friday.
Stocken's reign of abuse started in 1989 when he assaulted a six-year-old girl. He also assaulted a boy who was aged just two. Stocken then continued to abuse the boy for five years.
The offences took place at addresses and woodland in Nottinghamshire.
Stocken was found guilty of one count of indecent sexual assault, seven counts of indecent sexual assault on a male, three counts of indecency with a child and one count of attempted burglary at the same court in November 2015.
DC Asif Majid, the officer dealing with the case, said: "I am pleased that the hard work of all the officers involved in this case has been rewarded with a good sentence.
"It is clear that Simon Stocken is a callous and dangerous individual and he will have a considerable amount of time to think about his actions.
"For the victims, I hope that seeing Stocken sentenced will start a long healing process."


text:
This section contains 769 words
(approx. 2 pages at 400 words per page)
Part Two, The Sixth Estate, Chapters 50-58 Summary
Parker investigates the hotel where the Midnight Club is located in order to find any vulnerabilities, assuming it is a member of this club he and his partners are to hit. Parker is unsure this hit is one he will be able to pull off and becomes nervous when he sees Detective Stefanovitch. Stef had been taking a break, but is now back at the surveillance. Stef is bothered by something he cannot put his finger on, but he is filled with the same foreboding that he felt the night he was shot. Sarah arrives to observe the operation for her book. Sarah sits with Stef most of the evening before sneaking off for some sleep. Sarah wakes in the middle of the night and finds that Stef has not stopped...
(read more from the Part Two, The Sixth Estate, Chapters 50-58 Summary)
This section contains 769 words
(approx. 2 pages at 400 words per page)


text:
Does each department admit an incoming class every year?
No. The economics, finance, international business, international finance, management, management science (P/OM) and marketing departments will be accepting applications during the 2017-18 academic year (to start Fall 2018). The accounting department anticipates admitting students during 2018-19 (to start Fall 2019).
When is the application deadline?
To have full consideration for university-wide fellowships, all application materials must be received by Dec.15 (Dec. 5 for Finance); additional applications will be accepted until Jan. 15. Applicants are encouraged to submit their materials prior to the deadline because some departments may start making offers earlier if they see attractive candidates. Some departments will accept applications after this deadline. Interested individuals should check with the director of the doctoral programs, Marcelo Frias (firstname.lastname@example.com), for more details.
Is a master's degree required for admission to the Ph.D. program?
No. However, students who have master's degrees are more competitive for admission. To earn a Ph.D., a student must take at least 60 credit hours beyond a bachelor's degree (including 12 hours of dissertation preparation). Some credit from a master's degree may be transferred toward the doctoral degree, depending on departmental approval.
Are foreign national applicants considered for financial aid awards?
Yes. All financial aid awards decisions are made on a merit basis.
What is the amount of doctoral assistantship awards?
Our stipends are nationally competitive and vary by academic area. For more information, contact the faculty coordinator in your area of interest. Stipends are guaranteed for four years as long as a student shows satisfactory academic progress.
Is a tuition waiver included with the assistantship?
Yes. With satisfactory academic progress, students can expect to receive a 100 percent tuition waiver for five years.
Is student insurance covered?
Yes; 100 percent of individual student insurance premiums will be covered for students using university insurance.
Can a foreign national student meet all necessary expenses based on the assistantship?
Yes. Students receiving graduate assistantships are issued an I-20 form without any additional financial certification needed.
Can the doctoral degree be pursued on a part-time basis?
No. The program is structured to be completed on a full-time basis and typically takes five years to complete.
What are the admission criteria for the Ph.D. in Business Administration program?
Students are considered for admission based on previous academic performance, GMAT/GRE scores, statement of career objectives, letters of reference and work experience. The weight given to these individual criteria varies according to the area of concentration (i.e., accounting, marketing, finance, etc.). Average test scores and grade point ratios also vary from year to year, depending on the applicant pool. Please see a profile of our current students. Some departments prefer one test over the other, so you are encouraged to check with the individual departments about their requirements.
What is the Educational Testing Service institutional code to use for submission of GMAT/GRE/TOEFL scores?
The GMAT institutional code is JV2-TP-78. The GRE & TOEFL code is 5818. It is not necessary to include a departmental code.
Can the TOEFL examination be waived for international applicants?
Any international student who completes a degree from a U.S. school will automatically have the TOEFL requirement waived (no paperwork required). We will consider waiving the TOEFL for international applicants from programs and countries where the medium of instruction is English. An official waiver request must be sent to the director of doctoral programs with justification for the waiver request. If the GMAT/GRE score, or other indicators of English, are sub-standard, we reserve the right to require the TOEFL.


text:
Pompton Plains, NJ (PRWEB) January 13, 2014
Brain games developer Acuity Games is pleased to announce the release of Word Crunch, a new Universal iOS app that joins Acuity Games' growing line-up of brain health assessment-based brain games.
Word Crunch is a fun and challenging word game where players trace letters in a straight line to form words of three letters or more. Letters can be traced up, down, left, right or diagonally, but if a player takes too long to find a word the letter tiles get crunched and a new set of letters appear.
Game options:
- Time Limit: From 5 seconds to unlimited.
- Grid Size: 17 grid sizes with 30 to 100 letters.
- Crunch Interval: The number of seconds between finding words before the letters change.
- Word Target: The minimum number of words needed to win the game.
- Continue After Win: Stop or continue games after the word target is reached.
Word Crunch, like all Acuity Games apps, provides revolutionary brain health assessment that can help improve the brain health results of lifestyle choices, helping to prevent dementia. Acuity Games: Word Crunch is available on Apple's iTunes App Store as a free download with minor feature limitations that can be removed via a $0.99 in-app purchase.
"Our first brain game was released 2 years ago this week. It's been an amazing 2 years of innovation leading up to Word Crunch," said Dan Hansen, founder of Acuity Games. "And we are continuing our drive to reinvent brain games, with our 11th game scheduled for release next month."
"The greatest benefit of playing Acuity Games is the brain health assessment that can help people improve the brain health results of their lifestyle choices. Upcoming releases will provide new and improved brain health assessment features that build upon our current design," he concluded.
Learn more: http://acuity-games.com
About Acuity Games
People who weigh themselves are more successful at maintaining a healthy weight. Acuity Games' brain games apply the same principle as a bathroom scale to help maintain a healthy brain. Monthly and yearly brain health assessment makes it incredibly easy to see changes to brain health. With up to 100 years of assessment, Acuity Games' Universal apps for iPhone and iPad motivate people to make the healthy lifestyle choices that maintain brain health. Acuity Games apps are a scale for your brain.
The current lineup of brain games includes:
- Concentration: Match sets of hidden letters, numbers or shapes.
- Edge Match: Match scrambled square puzzle tiles using colors and patterns.
- Flash 2: The classic game of Simon Says using flashes and sounds.
- Grid Guru: Tap tiles to repeat increasingly complex patterns.
- Matchematics: Match sets of unsolved math expressions.
- Shape Shift: Match shapes before they shift positions.
- Sudoku: Match every row, column, and 3x3 sub-grid with the numbers 1 to 9.
- Word Crunch: Find words before the letter tiles get crunched.
- Word Hunt: Trace adjacent letters to form words of three letters or more.
- Word Warrior: Form words from previously highlighted lettered tiles.


text:
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Introducing Evan Hsu and grenade launcher
22 comments:
- playn (ta beta)November 19, 2009 at 6:29 AM
i love playing as evan! hes cool as and hes goggle hat looks pretty funny :pReplyDelete
Do I see a giant furry split in two? =DReplyDelete
Is Evan Hsu going to be in 3rd or 4th episode of MiniGore?ReplyDelete
- AnonymousNovember 19, 2009 at 8:28 AM
Oh he's gonna be in the third, no doubt about that. Now THATS what I call a post K&T! I'm not a Beta and even I can tell this episode is gonna be EPIC to the C! A giant furry split in two is f***ing awesome! Like everyone has said before, GET THIS UPDATE SUBMITTED SOON B4 XMAS!!! It's gonna be hell if ya'll don't. Can't wait to see what Evan does when he OD's on clovers, lol! But here's my beef with the whole deal: When does the storyline come out? That's all. Keep up the good work K&T! Same thing goes for you Betas out there!ReplyDelete
Ozzy: Evan is in 3rd episode.ReplyDelete
Anonymous: It could be ready for Saturday or Sunday submission, only some small things missing :)
- AnonymousNovember 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Oh yeah, even if they do submit it on sunday, imagine how long the wait will be.ReplyDelete
DAMN YOU APPLE! WE WONT GORE AND WE WANT MINI VERSIONS OF IT. Petition? Tis time for it.
It takes two weeks to be approved? (Best outcome?) Are we having snow this update.
Damnit timo, you are like an ice lolly. I dont know how but you are. Or maybe an artichoke, either way its a sort of furniture.
Got any ideas of how long ep 4 will take? Please answer in terms of pi (if you have no idea) (Or even pie, which ever suits you best.)
Lastly, OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGPLEASESUBMITLIKESUNDAY.
That is all.
Yea the timing submission is great news, this coming sat and sun (tomorrow) or is it going to be the next? 28th nov. Lets all hope apple doesnt do anything screwy this time.ReplyDelete
Elliohow, patience for episode 4, this just came out, when its ready, we will hear about it.
@ Timo or any beta tester
Does grenade launcher have a minimum range?
Does grenade launcher have a splash AOE attack?
These are just common grenade launcher properties
Does the grenade launcher fire at the same spot, for example always hits 5 furry spaces away, with AOE 3 spaces, so u cant hit anything close to you. Otherwise i think its safe to assume auto-target, but by hitting the first furry, AOE (if its still in) will be half gone, since the circle analogy, hit area is only a semicircle, other semicircle has no targets.
Thanks for this great update, keep up the good work, hope that you guys dont run into any roadblocks
If i could just add a point to previous post, although it may be too late to change now, that the grenade launcher targets a furry 3 units away, fires a shot 4 units away, meaning the hit wont be on the furry but rather behind it, to maximise area damageReplyDelete
- NarcoslothNovember 19, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Looks Awesome but I was wondering up to what level can each weapon get to and what kind of improvements does leveling up weapons addReplyDelete
Hey timoReplyDelete
when you start to develope multiplayer, you should read my post near the 43 post it has wicked multiplayer ideas kk!
It's on the santa clover zombie pageReplyDelete
- AnonymousNovember 19, 2009 at 4:40 PM
what is that THING on the first picture with Evan Hsu?ReplyDelete
- Pugway (Beta)November 19, 2009 at 5:14 PM
The gernade dose splash damage. As it gets leveled it shoots more gernades at a faster rate and has more ammo.ReplyDelete
- narcoslothNovember 19, 2009 at 6:01 PM
kool thanksReplyDelete
- Cbizzle2590November 19, 2009 at 7:25 PM
Ep.3 is looking great and that's good and all, but I still have one burning question left. After the "Christmas" episode has been sent out and becomes available, are you guys (Kimmo & Timo) gonna take a hiatus from all this for the holidays? I mean, I could see why you guys have packed SO MUCH into this update. It just seems like something that'll hold all of us over til after the holidays, and there's nothing wrong with that, given Ep.3's gonna be awesome. In other words, since the Christmas update is gonna be out soon, are you guys gonna chillax til AFTER the holidays to start with Ep.4? I mean, it would seem kinda pointless to come up with Ep.4 immediately after the Christmas episode, mainly because the approval process would take FOREVER (assuming the update becomes available next week or two, due to Ep.3 being submitted this Saturday or Sunday, maybe). Sorry this post is so long guys, I'm just curious... Post back when ya'll can K&T.ReplyDelete
- Pugway (Beta)November 20, 2009 at 5:31 PM
Well it takes a while to get beta's through ect. ect. You obviously can't expect ep 4 in december early Jan but even if they do take a break it probably wont be to long.ReplyDelete
- AnonymousNovember 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM
Sooooper Badass love the ripping in half animations, good job as usual guys, I remember that at one point you were going to like double flick the attack button to launch a grenade and then it would have a cooldown, buy it appears that it's a pickup now? So is there like a differant styled crate that you pick up now? Just wondering also what happened with lizzy, considering johns allready in sway, was it scrapped? will it be in a later episode, is it going to be dlc? Also is co-op going to be the only thing in Ep 4? Not that Im complaining because that's really all that it needs, wondering if we could have an update on that and Ep 4 and the future of minigore after ep 4 zombies? Maps? Lizzy? Just wondering what's going on, Thanks guys good work! You guys deserve a break so if you take one, I think well all be cool with it, I just think if you guys are going to maybe you guys could let us know and update the blog a bit more often thanks :)ReplyDelete
What's everyones high score Episode 1/2?
- Cbizzle2590November 20, 2009 at 6:35 PM
Yea Pugway I agree with ya there. I know that it takes a lot of work and time to get through updates like these. Episode 4 is the update everyone's been really wanting, and we all know why; I don't even need to say it. But we can already assume that multiplayer isn't the only big thing for Ep.4, we all know K&T will add something else huge to go with it. Hopefully a storyline to explain everything. Since you're a beta, I gotta ask, Survival Mode isn't the only game mode available for MiniGore right? There's gotta be a campaign in the works for all this. Remember that MiniGore collage on Flickr? It looks totally epic. Btw Pugway, what's your HS? Mine's 12506. Just curious...ReplyDelete
My highscore is *looks at iPod* 12900 beat ya by a bit ;). In the current beta there is only survival mode but it was said earlyer that the entire minigore story was already written out and would be included in some form in a later episode although I don't know any details on that. Also zombies will possiby add a new game mode. I can tell you that this is by far the best update ever. Preapare for awsomenessReplyDelete
- Cbizzle2590November 21, 2009 at 7:52 AM
Thanks Pugway for deets! Btw, just played last night, just bumped my HS to 13780! Hellsyea! Check OpenFeint if ya want, my name's there in the rankings. It's so gay though how you build up such a good score for yourself and you think you're the s***, and then when you check your rank on OF, you're like #219! lol I hate that s***!ReplyDelete
I love dicksReplyDelete
- THE REAL CHEESZNovember 23, 2009 at 8:41 AM
LOL omg my friend is a asshole for saying thatReplyDelete


text:
Morristown, NJ Area Scholarships
Morristown is a town in Morris County, New Jersey, United States. As of the 2010 United States Census, the town's population was 18,411, reflecting a decline of 133 (-0.7%) from the 18,544 counted in the 2000 Census, which had in turn increased by 2,355 (+14.5%) from the 16,189 counted in the 1990 Census. It is the county seat of Morris County. Morristown has been called "the military capital of the American Revolution" because of its strategic role in the war for independence from Great Britain. Today this history is visible in a variety of locations throughout the town that collectively make up Morristown National Historical Park.
The area was inhabited by the Lenni Lenape Native Americans for up to 6,000 years prior to exploration by Europeans. The first European settlements in this portion of New Jersey were established by the Swedes and Dutch in the early 17th century, when a significant trade in furs existed between the natives and the Europeans at temporary posts. It became part of the Dutch colony of New Netherland, but the English seized control of the region in 1664, which was granted to Sir George Carteret and John Berkeley, 1st Baron Berkeley of Stratton, as the Province of New Jersey. In British colonial records, the first permanent European settlement at Morristown occurred in 1715, when a village was founded as New Hanover by migrants from New York and Connecticut. Morris County was created on March 15, 1739, from portions of Hunterdon County. The county was named for the popular Governor of the Province, Lewis Morris, who championed benefits for the colonists.
Following the American Revolution the former colony became the state of New Jersey and almost 100 years after the American Revolution began, Morristown was incorporated as a town by an Act of the New Jersey Legislature on April 6, 1865, within Morris Township, and it was formally set off from the township in 1895.
Morristown, NJ Scholarships
|Caroline Thorn Kissel Summer Environmental Studies Scholarship
|February 05, 2019
|NACA Mid Atlantic Undergraduate Scholarship for Student Leaders
|September 30, 2018
Schools in and around Morristown, NJ
Rabbinical College of America
Four or more years; Private not for profit; $10,200 average out-state tuition; $10,200 average in-state tuition
College of Saint Elizabeth
Four or more years; Private not for profit; $26,440 average out-state tuition; $26,440 average in-state tuition
Fairleigh Dickinson University-College at Florham
Four or more years; Private not for profit; $34,082 average out-state tuition; $34,082 average in-state tuition
Drew University
Four or more years; Private not for profit; $40,122 average out-state tuition; $40,122 average in-state tuition
Artistic Academy of Hair Design
Less than 2 years (below associate); Private for profit
Morris County Vocational School District
Less than 2 years (below associate); Public
County College of Morris
At least 2 but less than 4 years; Public; $9,720 average out-state tuition; $6,840 average in-state tuition
Popular Majors in Morristown
- Business Administration and Management
- Education Leadership and Administration
- Nursing - Registered Nurse Training (RN, ASN, BSN, MSN)
- Speech Communication and Rhetoric
- Teacher Education, Multiple Levels
- Psychology
- Biology
- Nursing Science (MS, PhD)
- Counseling Psychology
- Talmudic Studies
- Sociology
- Dietetics/Dietitians
- American/United States Studies/Civilization
- Theology/Theological Studies
- History
- Mathematics
- Health Care Administration and Management
- International/Global Studies
- Art/Art Studies
- English Language and Literature