text:
BBC's £10m whitewash of Savile scandal: Report 'clears' TV chiefs who were warned about years of sick abuse
- Leaked £10m inquiry reveals Jimmy Savile abused 45 victims at the BBC
- Children as young as nine attacked in 'every BBC building' he worked in
- Stars knew rumours of interest in children – widespread within the BBC
- 107 heard he was a paedophile – others heard he had sex with the dead
- 'Deferential' bosses ignored his abuse to protect then UK's biggest star
- Inquiry chief Dame Janet Smith says another paedophile could be lurking
- BBC bosses may have to face MPs to prove the corporation has changed
Jimmy Savile's victims accused the BBC of a £10million whitewash last night after a leaked official investigation cleared executives of any wrongdoing despite revealing they were warned of his abuse.
Although 107 people suspected Savile of molesting young girls, managers did nothing to stop him because they had no 'hard evidence', a draft of the broadcaster's review into the scandal found.
Celebrities who reported hearing stories about the star's predilections included Esther Rantzen and Terry Wogan, Dame Janet Smith's review says.
The review was commissioned by the BBC to consider the culture and practices at the corporation during the years that Savile worked there.
Free reign: Sir Jimmy Savile abused 45 victims as young as nine, including four rapes, in plain view but a leaked report has refused to blame the BBC for not stopping him
Evidence: Esther Rantzen was one of six stars who had heard stories that Savile had an interest in children while Louis Theroux was warned Savile abused dead bodies – two years before making a film about him
It says there is 'some' evidence Savile was involved in a paedophile ring at the BBC and, chillingly, warns that another Savile 'could be lurking undiscovered in the BBC even today'. But a culture of secrecy means whistleblowers are even more afraid now than 40 years ago.
The report reveals that Savile – who died in 2011 aged 84 – behaved inappropriately on at least 61 different occasions, including 45 counts of physical sexual abuse.
Four of the victims were raped, including two girls under 16. Three of his victims were as young as nine. One of those little girls was taken to the BBC on several occasions, and 'taken round to various men who would abuse her', the report said.
Yesterday some of the victims said they were furious that they had to relive their ordeals to an inquiry which turned out to be an expensive 'sham' designed to get the BBC off the hook.
Katrina Rose, 54, who was abused by Savile at his Belgravia flat as a 14-year-old, said she was 'devastated' by the findings. 'I didn't really expect to be upset because part of me was expecting it to be a whitewash but I feel really let down by this,' she said.
Miss Rose decided to waive her anonymity and tell her story to the Daily Mail before recounting it to the BBC inquiry. 'Asking us to give evidence and then finding that no one at the BBC was at fault nullifies what we all went through,' she said.
'Saying that the BBC bosses can't be blamed in any way is absolutely awful. They [told us]: "We're listening to you, we're taking notes", but for what purpose?
'To say that that was the climate at the time is no excuse.' Victims' lawyer Liz Dux denounced the report as 'not credible'.
The review, which was leaked to the website Exaro, was pieced together from interviews with 260 witnesses, including senior TV executives such as Lord Grade and Alan Yentob. It found that senior bosses were warned about Savile's behaviour, but when they looked into it, it seems that their primary concern was that a public scandal that could damage the BBC's reputation.
TV producers who worked closely with Savile saw him behaving inappropriately with young teenagers but insist they did not know he was having sex with them.
The review blames the broadcaster for a deferential culture where 'untouchable' stars were treated with kid gloves.
Tales of Savile's predilection for young girls reached some of the BBC's most senior managers long before he was asked to present Jim'll Fix It, yet his career continued to flourish.
A few made inquiries into his behaviour – but largely this was only to check whether his behaviour posed a risk to the BBC's reputation. Other senior figures, including two who ran BBC1 while he was a presenter, said they did not hear anything about his behaviour until 2012, when the scandal erupted.
Douglas Muggeridge, then controller of Radio 1 and 2, was warned about Savile around 1973 and spoke to BBC press officer Rodney Collins.
He explained that he had heard allegations about Savile having sex with underage girls in his caravan and wanted to check whether the newspapers were planning to print any stories about the 'inappropriate liaisons'. Mr Collins told Mr Muggeridge that the press were unwilling to print the tales, even if true, because Savile did so much for charity and was 'perceived as a very popular man'.
Mr Muggeridge died in 1985. Roger Ordish, producer of Jim'll Fix It for two decades, once saw two teenage girls coming out of the star's dressing room, and talked to a colleague about whether Savile had had sex with them. He was warned by another colleague that 'Savile should not be left alone with children'.
But in a 2012 interview he insisted that news of the star's campaign of abuse had come as a 'terrible shock'.
Dame Janet said Mr Ordish was a 'creature of his time', adding: 'Nobody at the BBC would want the Jim'll Fix It ship to capsize. And the Jim'll Fix It ship depended on Savile.' Mr Ordish could not be reached for comment.
Nick Vaughan-Barratt worked with Savile throughout the 1970s. On one occasion, Savile even asked him to pick up a teenage girl from his flat in Leeds.
When Savile fell ill in 2010, Mr Vaughan-Barratt told the BBC he would feel 'queasy' about preparing an obituary as he had seen 'the real truth'. But he told the review he had not known anything about Savile's sexual impropriety.
Dame Janet says he 'must have seen something that had caused him some concern… he is plainly not going to tell me.' Mr Vaughan-Barratt, who left the BBC in 2012, declined to comment. Derek Chinnery, then head of programmes for Radio 1, also heard rumours about Savile and challenged him. However, Savile replied that they were 'nonsense and that there was no truth in them' and he let the matter drop. Mr Chinnery died last year.
Alan Yentob, controller of BBC1 from 1993 to 1996, worked at the corporation for almost all of Savile's career, but says he did not hear any rumours about the DJ's behaviour until 2012.
He admitted that 'the top end' of the BBC had not 'paid sufficient attention' to what was going on. He suggested that managers were probably more forgiving in those days because Savile was 'so loved and liked'. Mr Yentob could not be reached for comment yesterday.
Watch Video Here
Michael Grade, controller of BBC1 from 1984 to 1986, admitted there was a 'groupie culture' around certain BBC stars, and that Savile's boasts about his sex life would not have been taken very seriously. Even if they had been, bosses would have reacted only if they thought Savile's actions were going to harm the BBC by causing a scandal, Lord Grade said. He declined to comment last night.
Yesterday, Savile's nephew Guy Marsden said the star regarded his bosses as 'insignificant nothings' and claimed that the BBC 'quaked in front of him'. 'It was impossible for the high-ups not to know what was going [on],' he said. 'They all knew at the BBC what was going on. They were just hoping it would not come out.'
However, Dame Janet said: 'I do not think that the BBC can be criticised for failing to uncover Savile's sexual deviancy. Nobody in a senior position at the BBC was ever aware of information that could have led to or assisted in the prosecution of Savile.'
Last night, Meirion Jones, the former BBC journalist whose Newsnight investigation into Savile was suppressed in 2012, said: 'There is very useful information here about just how high it went, but the conclusion is a whitewash.' A spokesman for Dame Janet stressed that the leaked document was an 'early' draft, and that people should not rely on it.
Support: Abuse lawyer Liz Dux, who represent 168 Savile victims,
Director general Tony Hall described Savile as a 'dark chapter in the history of the BBC' but declined to comment fully until the final report is published.
Lawyer Liz Duz said today the 168 Savile victims she represents would not accept the retired judge's 'incredible' decision to clear all bosses for failing to intervene.
Mrs Dux said it 'beggars belief' and is 'not credible' because the inquiry also found Savile struck in studios, dressing rooms, corridors, staircases and even on camera in virtually every BBC building.
She said: 'I find it incredible that 107 people gave evidence to having heard rumours of his depravity and inappropriate sexual behaviour yet no-one in a position of authority seemed to be aware'.
Bosses including Director General Tony Hall may be hauled before MPs to prove the BBC has changed after the report said there could still be a paedophile 'lurking undiscovered'.
BBC stars suspected that Jimmy Savile was a 'groper and a paedophile' who interfered with corpses but nobody at the corporation tried to stop him, Dame Janet's £10million inquiry has found.
Dame Esther Rantzen, Sir Terry Wogan, Louis Theroux, Nicky Campbell, and Andy Kershaw were among 107 people who admitted hearing rumours and stories about the child abuser's 'darker side'.
Figures from the report reveal that half of those witnesses believed he was interested in young girls from stories they were told or what they saw.
A leaked report has revealed Savile was 'untouchable' and abused 45 victims as young a nine in virtually every BBC building and even on live TV, all under the noses of his 'deferential' bosses.
Dame Janet said Savile 'never had any fear that any of the girls would report him' and those who did were either thrown off BBC property or told it was just 'Jimmy messing around', her draft report said.
Broadcaster Mark Lawson told Dame Janet Smith's inquiry a common joke at the BBC was: 'What do Margaret Thatcher and Jimmy Savile have in common? They both screwed the miners/minors'.
But Dame Janet's report has caused fury by refusing to blame the BBC for failing to uncover Savile's´sexual deviancy', a claim which the lawyer represent 168 of his victims branded 'incredible
The Dame Janet Smith review was set up shortly after Savile´s crimes were finally exposed, and has interviewed 375 witnesses, 107 of which said they heard the DJ was a paedophile.
A draft report due to be published in six weeks was leaked to Exaro today, and revealed Savile attacked victims 'in the corridors, the canteens, the staircases and dressing rooms of every BBC premises'.
The inquiry found:
- Jimmy Savile attacked 45 victims – three as young as nine – and raped four victims
- Boozy and 'deferential' management allowed star to do what he liked at the BBC
- Management including Alan Yentob and Michael Grade claim they had no idea
- Staff were too afraid to report Savile to managers – and one described him like a violent 'gangland boss'
- Stars say rumours about Savile being a paedophile were well known at the BBC and beyond
- BBC closed ranks after the suicide of 'abused' 15-year-old Top of the Pops dancer
- BBC personalities like Jimmy Savile were 'untouchable stars' and perceived as 'above the law' – Savile was 'more valuable than the values' of the Corporation.
- There was a culture of keeping the 'talent' happy. Dame Janet says: 'The producers of the programmes on which Savile worked did not ask him to stop his habit of wet kissing or licking the hands and arms of staff members to whom he was introduced.'
- £10million inquiry warns that 'a predatory child abuser could be lurking undiscovered in the BBC today.'
Six major stars were among the witnesses who told the inquiry stories about Savile being a paedophile were rife.
Dame Esther Rantzen was one of many who described how 'repulsive' Savile was, and said once when they met the DJ kissed her hand then licked her the length of her arm.
The That's Life presenter and ChildLine founder told the inquiry she first heard rumours in the 1970s and 'was told by the sound editor of Savile's Travels that Savile had recorded himself having sex with nurses at Stoke Mandeville Hospital.
'Her personal experience of him was that he was repulsive in the way he kissed, or, rather, licked, her hand and up her arm when they met', Dame Janet says in her report.
Film maker Louis Theroux, 45, said in 1998 he was told Savile had a fetish for dead bodies and abusing the disabled, two years before he made a chilling documentary about the DJ's strange life.
Mr Theroux was one of five or six people who told Dame Janet Savile was a necrophiliac and his 2000 intimate film with the DJ hinted clearly that he was a sex offender, the inquiry said.
BBC DJs Sir Terry Wogan, Nicky Campbell and Andy Kershaw also said that they had heard he was a pervert with a thing for young girls.
Mr Kershaw said he 'heard stories relating to Savile's interest in underage girls' and 'had sex with young teenage girls in his campervan'
The report said: 'Mr Kershaw added these rumours were rife throughout the entertainment industry and were not limited to the BBC'.
But yet Savile's abuse of 45 at the BBC, and hundreds more across the country over many decades, only emerged after his death – when it was too late to prosecute him.
According to today's leaked report, published by Exaro, Dame Janet wrote: 'There were a number of specific rumours. Perhaps most surprising is that several people (about five or six) heard that Savile was a necrophiliac.
'Some heard that he was a paedophile. Some heard that he took girls to his caravan for sex'.
None of the stars were blamed by the inquiry for not speaking out, and the report said that employees were scared to tell seniors as they 'appeared to have the ability to influence careers'.
The report said: 'It would be a brave person indeed who would make a complaint against such a person'.
Dame Janet Smith spoke to 107 people who believed or heard rumours that Jimmy Savile was a paedophile.
As part of her inquiry Dame Janet spoke to BBC stars, interviews which were produced in her draft report, published by Exaro today.
Dame Esther Rantzen
Esther Rantzen heard that Savile was sexually interested in young girls. She first heard about him in the 1970s from a researcher who had come from the BBC from a job in Fleet Street.
She heard that the people making a programme about Savile in the ITV series This is Your life had wished to include the parents of a young girl with heart problems for whom Savile had provided financial help.
The parents refused to allow that and she said the implication was there was another side to it, which was a darker side. But, she said, this rumour was one of many which 'swirled around' at the time in respect of all sorts of famous people.
Ms Rantzen said that she was told by the sound editor of Savile's Travels that Savile had recorded himself having sex with nurses; there was no suggestion the nurses were unwilling. Her personal experience of him was that he was repulsive in the way he kissed or, rather, licked her hand and up her arm when they met.
Sir Terry Wogan
Sir Terry Wogan is reported to have descroibed a conversation about Savile with well-known columnist Jean Rook, in which she asked: When are you goung to expose him?' And he replied: 'That's your job'.
Sir Terry is reported to have commented to the press 'And nobody ever did (expose him), even though everybody had heard these rumours. The review wished to speak to Sir Terry but unfortunately he said he was too busy working on Children in Need.
The Review then asked him if he could confirm the accuracy of the press report, to which he replied confirming Ms Rook had make the reported remark but his recollection was that he had not replied directly but had only thought to himself 'Surely that's your job'. He added that he knew nothing about Savile apart from a vague rumour, which, he said tended to be about Savile's sharp commercial practices and his shameless use of charity work for his own greater glory, rather than his sexual behaviour.
Andy Kershaw who became a Radio 1 DJ, first heard rumours and stories about Savile in the early 1980s. He heard from many sources that, in the 1950s and 1960s, Savile had a reputation as a gangland enforcer and would personally use physical violence against anyone who upset those who ran nightclubs and dance halls in Leeds.
When Mr Kershaw joined the BBC he was advised by John Walters, who had in the past produced programmes with Savile, to steer clear of Savile because he was a 'bad lot' and 'nasty piece of work'. Mr Kershaw found that was so.
He heard stories relating to Savile's interest in underage girls; for example it was said he had sex with young teenage girls in his campervan. Mr Kershaw added these rumours were rife throughout the entertainment industry and were not limited to the BBC.
Nicky Campbell, Radio DJ and presenter, heard rumours that Savile was a necrophiliac but thought it was utterly incredible and regarded it as an urban myth. His personal impression was that he was sexless.
Mark Lawson, the journalist, broadcaster and author, heard rumours about Savile before he joined the BBC and afterwards. Whilst at the BBC, he heard that Savile was a groper and a paedophile. He told the review of a 'joke' that dated from two decades ago: 'What do Margaret Thatcher and Jimmy Savile have in common? They both screwed the miners/ minors.'
A leaked report, conducted by Dame Janet Smith, into BBC culture during the years disgraced Jimmy Savile (pictured) worked there warns there could be another paedophile lurking undiscovered at the Corporation
107 witnesses, including household names, told the retired judge they believed Savile was a paedophile – BBC bosses including Alan Yentob and Michael Grade told the inquiry they had no idea.
Dame Janet Smith Report – Key BBC Failings
- BBC personalities like Jimmy Savile were 'untouchable stars' and perceived as 'above the law'. A former BBC worked described him as being regarded as 'more valuable than the values' of the Corporation.
- A 'very deferential' and hierarchical structure meant the junior employees would be scared to blow the whistle on their seniors as they 'appeared to have the ability to influence careers'. The report comments: 'It would be a brave person indeed who would make a complaint against such a person'.
- There was a culture of keeping the 'talent' happy. Dame Janet says: 'The producers of the programmes on which Savile worked did not ask him to stop his habit of wet kissing or licking the hands and arms of staff members to whom he was introduced.'
- She also blames the louche and alcohol-fuelled culture among BBC management staff, writing: 'Until the late 1980s, managers had drinks cabinets in their rooms…Even early morning coffee might be laced with a spirit.
- Dame Janet also describes how different BBC radio and television failed to share concerns about Savile due to 'a sense of superiority among one group over the other' and loyalty to particularly programmes like Top Of The Pops.
Dame Janet admitted paedophile could still be lurking undiscovered at the BBC – as it was claimed whistleblowing is now worse than ever at the Corporation.
Director general Tony Hall has described Jimmy Savile's abuse as a 'dark chapter in the history of the BBC', adding that Dame Janet Smith's report 'will be invaluable in helping us understand what happened and to help ensure that we do everything possible to avoid it happening again'.
In the report, which runs into more than 500 pages, Smith reportedly criticises the Corporation for its 'untouchable stars', 'above the law managers' and for its 'very deferential culture'.
She also warns that another predatory child abuser could still be lurking undiscovered at the BBC.
In the conclusion of the lengthy report, the retired judge states: 'Finally, I wish to consider whether it is possible that a predatory child abuser could be lurking undiscovered in the BBC even today.
'The answer is that I think it is possible'.
The leaked report, which was due to be published officially within the next six weeks, comes more than four years after Savile was outed as a paedophile who sexually abused more than 500 people.
Many BBC employees told Smith's 'review' they had heard about Savile's predatory sexual conduct during his time working for the taxpayer-funded Corporation, but feared reporting their concerns.
But Smith accepts a series of denials by senior figures that they were aware of Savile's sexual misconduct.
In the 37,500-word report, Smith outlines how Savile carried out multiple rapes and indecent assaults on both boys at girls, as well as incidents of 'inappropriate sexual conduct' with teenagers who were 'in some way associated with the BBC'.
She says most of Savile's abuse crimes took place in his flat or caravans, but admitted that she had heard of incidents occurring in 'virtually every one of the BBC premises at which he worked'.
This includes the BBC Television Theatre, where Jim'll Fix It was filmed, the BBC Television Centre, where he worked on Top of the Pops, Broadcasting House, where he worked as a Radio 1 DJ, and various provincial studios including in Leeds, Manchester and Glasgow.
'He would indulge in sexual touching while working on the set (of Top of the Pops or Jim'll Fix It) and on at least one occasion, he was actually on camera,' the report claimed.
'Savile would seize the opportunity for sexual contact even in public places such as corridors, staircases and canteens.'
The BBC was slammed in today's leaked report after a 15-year-old claimed she was abused by a Top of the Pops DJ – and later killed herself.
Claire McAlpine, was just 15 years old and had been a regular dancer in the audience and told her mother that she was seduced on February 17, 1971, at a time when Savile was abusing at the BBC.
Miss McAlpine's mother Vera called the BBC ten days later and complained a 'DJ had invited her back to his flat and seduced her'.
Claire McAlpine, 15, pictured dancing in the Top Of The Pops audience in 1971
Smith's report said that BBC management had pre-judged the case believing it was 'out of character' for the star – and proposed not taking 'any further action'.
On the morning of March 29, 1971, Claire, a former convent school pupil, was found lying on the floor of her bedroom at home in Watford, Hertfordshire, by her distraught mother. She had taken a fatal overdose.
Near her body was a bottle of tablets and her red diary. 'Don't laugh at me for being dramatic, but I just can't take it any more,' Claire wrote.
Today's leaked draft report said the BBC's response to an abuse complaint was 'wholly inadequate' and lacked 'any sense of concern' for Claire or the safety of other girls.
Claire's diary named a string of radio disc jockeys — and other showbusiness personalities, all household names — who, she claimed, had 'used' her.
One of the DJs, she said, had taken her to his house for the night and given her a pill which made her feel like she was 'floating on a cloud'. Another had also invited her back to his 'sumptuously furnished' residence.
Savile, then in his 40s, who presented Top Of The Pops, was asked during an interview that year with the News of the World if he knew or remembered Claire from the show.
'I studied a photograph of Claire very closely,' he replied. 'I cannot recollect ever seeing the girl in my life. They say she came from Watford. I don't know anyone who lives in Watford.'
The inquest into Claire's death was held shortly after the article appeared. The coroner ruled that Claire committed suicide after deciding her 'day-dreams' of becoming a pop star would never come true.
Jenni Bale knew Claire. She was 22 and also a dancer on Top Of The Pops and said previously one of the DJs who abused Claire was Jimmy Savile, who 'bluffed his way out of it'.
'Claire's diary entries were later described as fantasy by the police, a terrible slur against someone who couldn't defend herself,' said Jenni.
'I believe Claire lost her life all those years ago because of what was done to her. She would probably be a mother herself now.'
- Top of the Pops photographer in the 1960s and 1970s Harry Goodwin probably took pornographic photos of audience members and showed 'blue films' backstage, the inquiry found – but no action was taken
However, while some members of staff at the BBC were supposedly aware of Savile's behaviour, they reportedly were too afraid to report the issues for fear of losing their jobs or not being taken seriously.
According to Smith, some aspects of BBC culture during the 1970s and 1980s made it 'difficult for such young women to complain about anything, and about sexual misconduct or harassment in particular'.
She highlighted cases where complainants had reported concerns about the disgraced DJ's behaviour, only to be told that making an official complaint 'would not be making the right decision'.
Concluding, Smith said: 'During the Savile years, the culture in the BBC and the BBC's management style did not encourage the reporting of complaints or concerns.
'Given the hierarchical structure, the impracticability of complaining to anyone other than a line manager and the weakness of the personnel department, the only option for a victim of inappropriate behaviour during the Savile years was to put up with it or leave'.
Smith also outlined claims of the BBC's management culture being 'very deferential'
'My general impression is that most staff (other than those who had been in the higher echelons) felt that the management culture was too deferential and that some executives were 'above the law',' she writes in the draft report.
'I have the clear impression that most people in the BBC held the talent in some awe and treated them deferentially; they appeared to have the ability to influence careers and were themselves untouchable. It would be a brave person indeed who would make a complaint against such a person.'
Other disturbing disclosures from the inquiry report include that the honours committee advised Lady Thatcher, as prime minister, against recommending a knighthood for Savile because of public warning signs about the presenter.
Smith began conducting a review into how Savile was able to carry out sexual abuse of children and adults while at BBC since it was revealed – following his death in October 2011 – that he was a paedophile.
Sources have previously said that the long-delayed independent report 'tears the BBC apart' and is 'much worse than expected'.
In particular, it is said to show that abuse on the Corporation's premises was far more widespread than previously feared during the period Savile worked there.
BBC chiefs are braced for severe criticism over its failure to act on rumours of Savile's behaviour towards children and young people.
Publication of the report has been postponed several times, most recently at the request of the Metropolitan Police, owing to 'on-going' sexual abuse investigations.
The £5million inquiry, led by Smith, was set up in 2012 and completed in May last year. It reportedly has so far only been circulated among BBC bosses, until it was leaked to investigative website Exaro this week.
The review team was set up by the BBC to carry out 'an impartial, thorough and independent review of the culture and practices of the BBC during the years that Jimmy Savile worked there'.
After paedophile Stuart Hall pleaded guilty in 2013 to 14 charges of indecent assault, the BBC announced another inquiry, led by Dame Linda Dobbs, the former High Court judge.
The scandal of child sex abuse by both Savile and Hall has rocked the broadcaster in recent years.
The BBC declined to comment on the leaked report when contacted by MailOnline, adding: 'The BBC hasn't seen Dame Janet's report or any draft copy.'
The BBC's management culture during the Jimmy Savile days was 'alcohol-fuelled' with bosses drinking heavily and treating celebrities with 'kid gloves', an explosive leaked report revealed today.
The draft report, by Dame Janet Smith, has claimed former BBC chiefs adopted a louche management style and made booze-fuelled decisions at the licence-fee payers' expense.
The culture made it difficult for more junior employees to report issues or offences such as sexual abuse, even when they were victims themselves.
In the report, seen by investigative website Exaro, Smith writes: 'The first reason why this would be so was because of the deference or even adulation which was, and still is, accorded to celebrity in our society.
'The second reason was because of the attitude within the BBC towards the 'talent'. The general perception of the witnesses I heard was that the talent was treated with kid gloves and never challenged.'
She highlighted one comment by Peter Scott-Morgan, who worked as a consultant for the BBC in 2003 and was tasked with determining what the unwritten rules of behaviour were at the Corporation.
Smith said: 'Dr Scott-Morgan used an expression that I think encapsulated the general attitude towards the talent. He said that they were 'more valuable than the values'.
The report documents the allleged booze-fuelled culture of BBC management during Savile's days
The report documents the allleged booze-fuelled culture of BBC management during Savile's days
By this, he meant that a member of the talent could be so influential in the BBC or so important to the success of a programme that he or she could get away with conduct that flew in the face of the values of the BBC.
'Managers would not challenge them.'
She added: 'It was important to keep the star of the show happy.
'The producers of the programmes on which Savile worked did not ask him to stop his habit of wet kissing or licking the hands and arms of staff members to whom he was introduced.
'I am sure they would not have wished to upset the star of the show.'
Touching on the alcohol-fuelled culture of the management staff which once was prevelant at the BBC, she said: 'Until the late 1980s, managers had drinks cabinets in their rooms. The cabinets were replenished at public expense.
'Many informal meetings would be conducted with the aid of alcohol. Even early morning coffee might be laced with a spirit.
'I heard accounts of executives and managers being the worse for wear in the afternoons.'
The report also highlighted a witness account from a researcher on Jim'll Fix It between 1987 and 1989.
In an interview for the Smith report, the researcher told how he went for a meeting about a possible promotion with a head of department and a senior producer and found them 'both lying on sofas with their shoes and socks off, watching the television'.
'He painted a picture of two powerful individuals who felt that they could behave as they liked and did not show any respect to those more junior', Smith wrote in the report.
Read more:
Jimmy Savile: Janet Smith's damning review leaked to Exaro | ExaroNews
ExaroNews: Investigative journalism and analysis | ExaroNews


text:
Company Info
Fabric Quilt Shop is an online fabric shop dedicated to great service and customer satisfaction. Our fabric is 100% high quality cotton which makes it great not only for quilts but for crafts and clothing as well. We offer quality quilt fabric, quilt kits, quilt books and patterns. We have precut goods such as jelly rolls, layer cakes, charm packs, fat quarters and fat eighths. We also have the best of Moda Marbles and Moda Bella Solids.
Our fabrics are by companies such as, but not limited to Moda Fabric and Fabri-Quilt. These companies have popular designers like Mimick & Simpson, Me & My Sister, 3 Sisters, Sweetwater, Deb Strain, Kate Spain, The Berenstains, Sentimental Studio, Ro Gregg and many others. We have a variety of quilt patterns and quilt books that include vendors and designers like Abbey Lane Quilts, Kansas City Stars, Kraus, Mimick & Simpson, Planted Seed, Me & My Sister, Atkinson Design, Miss Rosies Quilt Company, Primitive Gathering and others. We also have layer cake patterns, charm pack patterns, fat quarter patterns and fat eighth patterns. There will be links to several places for your quilting needs as well as some of our favorite sites.
We greatly appreciate your business and look forward to meeting all of your fabric needs.
16353 Ranchette Road
Terrell,Texas 75161

subset: commoncrawl


text: "Tracey Breaks the News" Series 1 Update! Written by expat on Tuesday, September 26, 2017 in bbc, Tracey Breaks the News, updates with No comments Filming commenced on series 1 of Tracey Breaks the News yesterday! Three new episodes will air soon on BBC One! Share: Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook


text:
Breach of Contract?
Los Angeles Business Litigation Lawyer Robert G. Klein Can Assist
A breach of contract is a problem for any company or corporation. Contracts exist to express the specific items pursuant to an agreement. They clearly convey how two or more parties expect one another to behave and outline certain actions that one or more parties may find unacceptable. The parties involved in a contract have sound reasons for limiting particular kinds of behavior, not the least of which is protecting a company's interests from injury and damage. Any deviation from this contract can cause serious harm to a company's long-term goals and economic standing. Los Angeles business litigation attorney Robert G. Klein can help when someone breaches your contract.
Business attorney Robert G. Klein has over 25 years of contract law and business litigation experience that he can use to help salvage your business after a legal catastrophe, including breach of contract violations, copyright infringement and trade secret disputes.
What Can I Do About a Breach of Contract?
A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to live up to the terms of a contract or violates a clause contained in the contract. These actions may have interrupted the daily course of business, or may have caused harm to other parties involved with the contract. Their actions may have caused direct or indirect economic loss and put the injured party in a very difficult situation.
When a breach of contract occurs, the injured party may seek a remedy as outlined by the terms of the contract. Some contracts allow for filing suit in a court of law, some require all parties to attend binding arbitration. In either case, it is imperative that the injured party retain the services of skilled Los Angeles contract disputes lawyers to represent their case, particularly if there is a possibility of a breach of contract lawsuit.
Contact Our Los Angeles Breach of Contract Attorney Today
With over 25 years of litigation experience, business lawyer Robert G. Klein is able to assess the damage your company has suffered due to a breach of contract and properly represent your company's interests in a contract law dispute in either a court trial or in a binding arbitration hearing.
If your company is the victim of a breach of contract or involved in a contract dispute, fraudulent misrepresentation, interference with prospective business advantage or business disparagement, work with an experienced contract disputes lawyer. Contact our law office today to evaluate the merits of your case.
Call For A Case Evaluation
(323) 405-1002


text:
Quick Links
Additional Information
This toy features exotic Manzanita wood and other wood pieces woven into a fun jumble of knotted cotton ropes. The toy is built to withstand a tough beak and will encourage preening, beak maintenance, and exercise.
Small Knotrageous - Jungle Talk dimensions: 12" length x 4" width (Recommended for small to medium sized birds Cockatiels, parakeets, and conures)


text:
Governance of the foundation is organized according to French law. A nine-member Board of Directors (Conseil d'Administration), led by the President of the foundation, is responsible for overall administration and oversight. A representative of the French Interior Ministry participates in the Board's activities.
The strategic development of the foundation is guided by a fourteen-member Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC), composed of internationally recognized experts in cardiology, cardiac surgery, and neurovascular medicine from Europe and North America. The SAC is responsible for evaluating the scientific merit of all funding requests made to the foundation, and for monitoring the progress of those research programs ultimately selected for funding. According to the SAC charter, there shall be fourteen members on the SAC, seven of whom should be North-American, and seven European. The Presidency of the SAC is to rotate every three years between North American and European members.
Board of Directors (Conseil d'Administration)
- Martin Landaluce, President
- Dr. David Tancredi, Executive Director & Treasurer
- Jean-Guy de Chalvron, Interior Ministry Representative
- Dr. Annabel Chen-Tournoux
- Maître Maylis Chevallier
- Laurent Deltour
- Neil Jones
- Patrick Laurens-Frings
- Claude Lauzanne, Secretary
- Xavier Péneau
Scientific Advisory Committee
North American members:
- Dr. Mark Anderson (Vice President), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Dr. Daniel Drucker, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Dr. Helen Hobbs, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Dr. Michael Moskowitz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Dr. Daniel Rader, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Dr. Dan Roden, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
- Dr. Joseph Woo, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
European members:
- Dr. Friedhelm Beyersdorf, Heart Center Freiburg University, Germany
- Dr. Elisabetta Dejana, University of Milan, Italy
- Dr. Ulrich Dirnagl, Charité-University of Medicine of Berlin, Germany
- Dr. Christian Hamm, Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- Dr. Göran Hansson (President), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Dr. Christine Mummery, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
- Dr. Alain Tedgui, Paris-Cardiovascular Research Center, France


text:
Hi-Visibility Keel Pullover. Hi-Visibility Keel Pullovers offer the perfect combination of cut protection and increased visibility for manufacturing team members working in a fast paced environment. This garment is the perfect solution for differentiating new hires from experienced team members. Tuff-N-Lite® PPE products are treated with Micro-Texpur® anti-microbial to dramatically reduce harmful microbe growth resulting in reduced odors, mold and mildew. Easily laundered in cold water and dried in low heat!
COOLMAX® is a registered trademark of INVISTA
Color: Hi Vis Orange or Hi Yellow


text:
BJP MP injured in clash between encroachers, policeOctober 3rd, 2008 - 9:16 pm ICT by IANS
Bhopal, Oct 3 (IANS) The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party's parliamentarian Virendra Khatik was injured in a baton-charge in Madhya Pradesh's Sagar district when he tried to intervene between encroachers on a railway land and the police, an official said.The personnel of the Government Railway Police (GRP) and the Railway Protection Force (RPF) were removing encroachment from railway land in Bina town's Chhotta Bajaria locality.
While the encroachment drive was on, the affected people started pelting stones at the policemen as soon as MP Virendra Khatik reached there.
The policemen used force to disperse the crowd, injuring Khatik. He received serious head injury.
"The MP is being shifted to Bhopal for treatment," S.S. Badgujar, GRP in-charge at Bina, told IANS.
Tags: encroachment, head injury, janata party, madhya pradesh, parliamentarian, railway land, railway police, rpf, sagar, virendra


text:
See the night sky, and know. . .that you are made of the same stuff as those stars in your eyes,
and that your time on this earth is for shining.
So what is coaching? I explain and share client experiences here and here. Ready to try it? Let's talk.
May 3, 2018
Lessons From My Father's Life, and Death
As I mourn my Dad's passing, I'm noting things I learned from his life, and death Read More...
March 6, 2018
Whose Permission Are You Waiting For?
It's scary, but worth it, to take the reins of our own life. Read More...
November 16, 2017
Going Back in Time to Move Forward
Revisiting the past to reclaim energy can help us live into a better future. Read More...
Facing – or craving – change in your life or career? Feeling too stuck or overwhelmed to go for a dream? I'd love to help you define your desires, take inspired action and live a more personally fulfilling life.
Reclaim your creativity, manifest dreams, navigate midlife with more ease, and cultivate greater happiness through my classes on The Artist's Way, Positive Psychology, It's Never Too Late to Begin Again, and more!
I specialize in Positive Psychology, the science of optimal living. Want to learn more and try some practices? Click here. And try this "Miracle Question," below, on a sticky problem…


text:
|Message view
|« Date » · « Thread »
|« Date » · « Thread »
|Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>
|Re: What's next for 2.2 and 2.3/trunk?
|Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:35:26 GMT
On 04 Jun 2010, at 2:51 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > +1 for the continued, and perhaps more widespread, voluntary > soliciting of approval in advance for changes which add new modules > or other significant new function, or make other widespread changes, > or change prerequisites in a meaningful way, or have been discussed > in the past without resolution (or with outright rejection), etc., > etc. (We don't need an explicit laundry list, or any additional > policy, to codify the practical matter that multiple developers need > to be ready and willing to cope with such changes when they reach > the user base). > > This has been done countless times by numerous people in this > successful decade, in spite of, and even for the continued viability > of, the C-T-R policy. This creates an artificial "two tier" hierarchy of committers, those who regularly "approve" changes, and those who don't. A new person arriving here is certainly not going to feel confident enough to step in and "approve" a change. What they'll see is a small group of people "approving" changes made by a larger group of people, and they'll naturally fall into the second "tier". The ASF is a meritocracy, and someone attains committership by proving their merit to the point where they are invited to become committers: http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#meritocracy Where this has started to become a problem is when committers in the "first tier" feel their "seniority" is enough basis for an objection to a code contribution. All committers are equal, and no matter how long a committer has been around, they have to provide a justification for their objection to a piece of code just as thoroughly thought out as the original committer is expected to be thorough with their original contribution. Regards, Graham --
|View raw message


text:
Thai police officers who break rules will be forced to wear hot pink Hello Kitty armbands as a mark of shame. Be scared of the Hello Kitty. I'm sure criminals will be.
The striking armband features Hello Kitty sitting atop two hearts. nice.
source: NY Times
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Thai Hello Kitty Police Force
Posted by JRK at 10:43 PM
Labels: hello kitty, police, thai
No comments:
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)


text:
5 Things You Should Know When Using Sunscreen
The warm weather and balmy sunshine can certainly be enticing during this time of year. Here are five specific ways to help you select the right type of sunscreen to guard your skin from sun damage. Read the sunscreen label thoroughly: There are varying qualities of sunscreen that can help or hinder your effort to […]
- Posted on: Jun 15 2017
- Leave a response


text:
Name: Ruslan Svobodin.
Age: 30
Grew up in the far east of Russia. In 2000 moved to St. Petersburg, where graduated
from the St Petersburg Academy of Arts and Crafts with M.A. degree. Since 2000
worked as a concept artist. In 2005 started a digital artist career. Worked, and continues
to collaborate with leading Russian game development companies such as:
Creat studio, Nival-Online, Timezero, Card game (Russian analogue MG) Berserk, and others.
Currently - a freelancer.


text:
This is a rush transcript from "Hannity," May 6, 2016. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.
DONALD TRUMP, R-PRESUMPTIVE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE: We're going to have a strong border. Yes, we're going to have the wall. And who's going to pay for the wall?
AUDIENCE: Mexico!
TRUMP: We want people to come into our country, but they have to come in legally, folks. Otherwise, we don't have a country. We don't have a country. Get your money ready because you're going to pay for the wall.
We're going to bring jobs back from China, from Japan, from all these countries.
Politicians don't know how to stop it. I will stop it quickly and easily.
Syrian refugees are now being resettled in Rhode Island.
TRUMP: We don't know where they're from. They have no documentation. We all have hearts and we can build safe zones in Syria and we'll get the Gulf states to put up the money. We're not putting up the money.
We're going build our military bigger, better, stronger than ever before. Ever before.
TRUMP: ISIS will be gone if I'm elected president. I would bomb the (EXPLETIVE DELETED) out of them! I'd blow up the pipes. I'd blow up the -- I'd blow up every single inch. There would be nothing left!
We have to rebuild America! We have to rebuild the United States! Our infrastructure is going to hell!
Our vets have been forgotten. They have been forgotten.
Our vets have been treated like third-class citizens. Our vets will be treated properly with Donald Trump.
We have a disaster called the big lie, ObamaCare.
Your premiums are going up 25 percent, 35 percent, 45, 55 percent. We're going to repeal it. We're replace it with something great.
People say Trump has a very tough tone. He has a very tough temperament. We need a tough temperament now, folks.
SEAN HANNITY, HOST: And welcome to this special edition of "Hannity." So with senator Ted Cruz and Governor John Kasich dropping out of the race, Donald Trump is now the presumptive Republican nominee.
Tonight, for the hour, we will be examining Trump's positions on numerous issues, including his stance on immigration, ISIS, health care, the economy, and much more. So how effective can a Trump presidency be? And who will Trump lean on for advice?
Now, we got a lot to cover tonight, so let's get started. We welcome the author of The New York times best-seller "Duplicity," former Speaker of the House, Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich.
You know, I saw something on Twitter. I love social media. I know you do. You've been well ahead of the curve on social media. And it just has-- it kind of -- it's been circulating. It goes, for example, he's going to build the wall, have legal immigration, end sanctuary cities, immediately deport criminal illegal aliens, create safe zones in Syria, take care of vets, support police, end Common Core, fix failing schools, negotiate better trade deals, bring back good American jobs, energy independence, balance the budget, fix a broken political system, rebuild infrastructure, restore America's military, reduce taxes on lower and middle class Americans, protect the 2nd Amendment, repeal and replace ObamaCare. Women's health issues, he's pro-life.
That kind of sums up the guy I interviewed all these times over these many months. Last night, we were talking about this. And I agree with your analysis. He's not a traditional conservative. Is there any one of those positions that's not conservative, though?
NEWT GINGRICH, R-FORMER HOUSE SPEAKER: Well, again, I think you can argue about, for example, building the wall, whether that's conservative or not. It's certainly popular.
But I would make a deeper point that the news media totally misses. You just gave a list of the most substantive candidate I can remember who has taken item after item after item -- I mean, when people say he doesn't stand for any issues, I wonder, you know, what planet they're on.
This is a guy who's gone out and has told us about a tremendous range of issues, the direction he would go in. And I think that in that sense, he's been a very substance-oriented candidate. Some of the substance terrifies Washington. But frankly, that's good. Washington needs to be terrified a little bit.
HANNITY: Why is it -- why is Washington so terrified? Can you psychoanalyze that?
GINGRICH: Well, sure. He represents the end of their world. Look, Washington today is this bureaucratic lobbyist system that is trying to impose left-wing values on the country. Look what EPA is trying to do to the Navajo nation, for example, in terms of their large electro-generating capabilities. Look what Obama has done to the entire coal industry. Look at what you see happening again and again with court decisions that favor radical values.
So you have this huge industry in Washington of people who try to dictate to the rest of us how we should think, how we should act, what we should do. And they're faced with a candidate who represents the will of the American people, who's prepared to have, you know -- you can think of "take back Washington" as the subset of "make America great again." And I think that if you're Washington, that kind of scares you.
HANNITY: So there really -- what's happened is -- and it's really true because Republicans have allowed the entire Obama agenda to pass. They -- they never had the courage that you had as speaker to let the government shut down. If I recall, you did it twice. And they wanted it because they wanted to maintain power. They were afraid that they were going to get blamed, so they were timid. And pretty much everything Obama wanted, Obama got with very little opposition.
So there really isn't too much of a difference, is there, between the Republicans in D.C. and Democrats in D.C. And isn't that what the voters have been saying?
GINGRICH: Now, look, there's a huge difference between individual Republicans. I mean, if you looked at the House Republicans and the Senate Republicans, they're dramatically more conservative, but they have not been effective in taking on Obama and taking on the elite news media.
What makes Trump so fascinating is he's reached right past the elite media and he's communicated with the American people, and he's beginning to create a Trump movement and a sort of Trumpism as a philosophy. And if this thing begins to cohere this summer, and by the time we get to Cleveland, you can begin to really sense, here's how we're going to deal with the country for the next eight years, this could become a historic turning point because it would mean, as you pointed out in several of your interviews, he's prepared basically to dismantle the Washington education bureaucracy and send it back to the states.
HANNITY: Yes.
GINGRICH: My guess is he would dismantle the Washington Medicaid bureaucracy and send it back to the states. This is a guy who I think will be very directly engaged in reshaping the federal government in ways that will make Washington very uncomfortable.
HANNITY: You know, last question. And I asked you this before. Because the distrust level is so high right now, I always thought -- and I watched up close and personal when you ran on a contract, you put your word, your promises, on a solemn vow, what you're going to do -- I like that idea again.
I think to build up trust, to be held accountable, for promises, it could help run a national party. You'd have senators and congressmen run on the same platform. I think many of the issues everyone would agree on. These are 80/20 issues, many of them. Good idea, bad idea?
GINGRICH: I think they ought to have a fairly broad platform in the summer, and then I think they should pick maybe 10 big things, and those 10 big things -- and that's got to be negotiated. It can't be dictated by Trump. He's got to actually have the Senate and the House candidates with him talking it through.
But they could pick 10 of them and really create a vivid example and then say, Look, you elect us, and by Easter of 2017, this is what we're going to get done.
HANNITY: Well, all right. Mr. Speaker, thanks so much for being with us. Appreciate it.
GINGRICH: Good to be with you.
HANNITY: Joining us now with more is the editor of Lifezette, Fox News contributor, nationally syndicated radio host Laura Ingraham. How are you?
LAURA INGRAHAM, FOX CONTRIBUTOR: Hey, Sean.
HANNITY: Whenever I hear Newt Gingrich speak, it's kind of -- you always get this sense of hope and optimism. And then I just realized how the institution in Washington, the bureaucracy in Washington, especially among Republicans, is so deeply flawed and how weak they have truly been and how visionless they really are. It's kind of a great comparison.
INGRAHAM: Right.
HANNITY: Am I wrong or...
INGRAHAM: No, you're totally right, Sean. And look, last year, friends of mine and I were sitting around and watching the cranes in Washington, the growth of Washington, the building in Washington. It just keeps expanding out the city.
I actually came to Washington to work for President Reagan in 1987, and right out of college, and you know, Washington then was -- there was traffic and it was a busy city, but it's grown into this just mega, you know, city of lobbyists and lawyers and everybody who feeds off the -- excuse the phraseology, but the teat of Washington, D.C., and the growth of government.
So Newt is absolutely right. The threat of someone who would come in and change that and really upend it, if that's what Trump does, which he says he'll do, that shakes their world order. And people like, you know, Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell -- they're used to things being a certain way.
And Trump's got to be very careful that he doesn't allow the establishment now in Washington -- after he clear-cut that entire field and grew his support among the electorate, he can't bow down and give away all the momentum and the credibility he has on the key issues that he ran on, the immigration issue and the trade issue.
And that's what I'm concerned about when I hear these statements from Ryan and McConnell that Trump's got to unify the party. I say Trump has unified the party. He's up over 50 percent. He clear-cut the whole field. Bushism is over. There's no appetite for it.
So I think right now, they're on the wrong side of some key issues and they've got to come closer to him on a few key issues.
HANNITY: But as we talked about last night, this is like openly sabotaging the guy, which I don't think they would do to anybody else. And so he now has some problems inasmuch as -- I actually can see in my mind's eye some of these people actually actively helping Hillary. That's how much -- that's how angry they are at the voters that they didn't pick an establishment candidate.
INGRAHAM: Well, I think so, Sean. And remember, they have no problem working with Obama on issues like trade promotion authority. They've had no problem passing Obama's budget funding Planned Parenthood.
And I think if they feel in the end that they can cut better deals on globalization and trade, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, immigration amnesty, with Hillary than they can with Trump, then they might as well cut deals with Hillary.
I mean, it's like the last year hasn't even happened for them, like none of this is settling in, that populism and a conservatism imbued with more of an economic nationalism -- that is the only future for the Republican Party. They can be spoilers, I guess, or they can be irrelevant like John Anderson in 1980. But I think they ought to be really thoughtful about what they to because I think -- I think the people are going to have a very long memory if the sabotage game is really what's going on here.
HANNITY: I think so. But you know, I also don't think it's a time for half measures. I think the problems are so deep.
INGRAHAM: Right.
HANNITY: It's really in the foundation of everything there, and Trump represents to them, I guess, the equivalent of a political earthquake and that will rock their world and change it, hopefully, forever.
INGRAHAM: Maybe the country would be changed for the better, though. I mean, when policies don't work, you don't keep doing the same policies. You actually do something different.
HANNITY: It's called the definition...
INGRAHAM: And if that doesn't work out, you change that. I mean, it's crazy!
HANNITY: Definition of insanity...
INGRAHAM: Yes.
HANNITY: ... doing the same thing over, thinking you can get a different result. Laura, thank you again for being with us.
HANNITY: Appreciate it.
And coming up next tonight right here on this special edition of "Hannity"...
TRUMP: We're going to have a strong border. Yes, we're going to have the wall. And who's going to pay for the wall?
AUDIENCE: Mexico!
TRUMP: 100 percent, by the way. 100 percent.
HANNITY: Donald Trump vowing he will build a border wall if elected and get rid of sanctuary cities. How will he do it? We'll check in with former Arizona governor Jan Brewer and Sheriff Joe Arpaio are here. They'll weigh in on that and much more as this special edition of "Hannity: Road to the White House, Trump on the Issues" continues.
HANNITY: And welcome back to this special edition of "Hannity: Road to the White House, Trump on the Issues." Now, the day he announced he was running for president, Donald Trump brought up the issue of immigration and said it would be a top priority. Now, listen to what Trump said he would do if elected.
TRUMP: Believe me, folks, we're building the wall. Believe me.
TRUMP: Believe me. We're building the wall. We're building the wall. No, we're building the wall. We have no choice! Do we have a choice? We have to.
We're going to create a path where we can get them into this country legally, OK? But it has to be done legally.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Are you willing to...
TRUMP: Otherwise, we don't have a country. They're going to be -- and they're going to come back and they're going to come back legally.
We're going to end sanctuary cities really fast, I can tell you that, sanctuary cities.
TRUMP: You ever see anything -- it's almost like a free zone. You kill people and you're fine because you're in a sanctuary -- it is so insane, what's happening to our country.
HANNITY: Joining us with reaction, former Arizona governor Jan Brewer and Maricopa County sheriff, Mr. Pink Underwear himself, Joe Arpaio, our favorite sheriff. Welcome, both of you.
You know, if you look at all the exit polls from all the different primary states, including Arizona, it's jobs, the economy and security. All of them are tied to immigration.
And Governor, I'll start with you. What is the impact on jobs for Americans, the health care costs, the educational costs, the criminal justice costs of the illegal immigrants? How big is it?
JAN BREWER, R-ARIZ., FORMER GOVERNOR: Well, it's extraordinary. It costs us probably, you know, a billion dollars or more a year to educate these people that are coming across with their children. Certainly, they're taking jobs out of the economy, and then their health care under our Medicaid program -- we call it access here -- and the incarceration. It's extraordinary. And we certainly can't afford it and it's not our job. And the point of the matter, truly, Sean, is that our borders need to be secured, and we believe in the rule of law.
HANNITY: Yes. And Sheriff, you have an up close and personal view of this. How many -- or what percentage of the people over the years has your jail been holding that are illegal immigrants?
JOE ARPAIO, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF: Well, you know, just recently, we did a survey. I think I talked about it before. Thanks for asking the question. We've had 5,500 in our jail system we turned over to ICE. And guess what, 3,000 have come back. That's a big story that nobody will talk about.
HANNITY: When you say 3,000 come back, meaning they didn't -- they got out of jail, you told ICE that they had committed crimes in the U.S., they were here illegally, and they just let them back in the United States. They didn't send them back.
ARPAIO: No, came back to the same jails that I run.
HANNITY: Yes. That's what I'm saying.
ARPAIO: ... 24 at a time.
HANNITY: Yes, they keep coming back but they were let out, and ICE never picked them up and sent them back. Isn't that the law?
ARPAIO: No, they were turned over to ICE to be deported. Yes, and they keep coming back.
HANNITY: That's my point.
ARPAIO: I don't think they're crossing the border. They're let out the back door to roam the streets.
HANNITY: Yes.
ARPAIO: So when you talk about deportation -- these are people that should be deported for serious crimes. So that's one problem domestically. But you have to crack down at the border of Mexico.
You know, I was a director in Mexico City for many years, and you have to do it over there, get to the source, get that wall up and I -- you know, I was with Donald right from the beginning when he mentioned the wall and immigration. Nobody wanted to talk about it, Sean. You know that. Now everybody's talking about it. It's a no-brainer to put that wall up.
HANNITY: Yes. And by the way, Republicans, if they wanted the wall up, they would have put it up.
Let me ask a political question, Governor, and that is John McCain was whining earlier this week that, oh, his reelection campaigns are going to be reduced because Donald Trump's the nominee.
I don't think that's the case. Isn't it because the people of Arizona feel that he's been part of the problem over these years? Which scenario is more realistic?
BREWER: Well, you know, John McCain has served us well, I believe, for the many years that he's been in office. But there's a lot of concern out there. I think he will win reelection. He still has a lot of support. The people that oppose him are very vocal.
But you know, Sean, I will tell you there's nobody better that you would want in your foxhole if you have a problem. I think that John is truly an American hero. And you know, security is so, so important that we have to be very concerned that if John doesn't return to the Senate -- he's got seniority, so I think people should think a little bit cautiously about moving in a different direction.
HANNITY: Let me go back to the border, Sheriff, and ask you this question. Tell people what you have seen. In other words, drugs -- I've been to a drug warehouse, you know, floor to ceiling drugs, the biggest room I've ever been in. The stench was horrible. Drugs, human trafficking -- explain all of this to me.
BREWER: Well, I'm glad you brought that up because every politician that goes to the border, all they talk about is illegal immigration for their photo op when they're running for office.
Nobody talks about the drugs coming into our country. They're destroying our country -- Heroin. I have to once again commend Donald. He brought this out. We need the wall to stop the drugs from coming into our country, destroying our young people, and not just the illegal immigration problem. And we have to talk about the terrorism threat, too. So it's very important to do something at that Mexican-U.S. border.
HANNITY: I agree. It think it impacts jobs. It impacts the economy. It impacts our security. And the trillions of dollars over the years we spend on the health care system, criminal justice system, educational system, has been enormous and a burden on American taxpayers.
Thank you both for speaking out. We appreciate it.
And coming up next tonight on this special edition of "Hannity"...
TRUMP: They're going to be gone. ISIS will be gone if I'm elected president. And they'll be gone quickly. They will be gone very, very quickly.
HANNITY: Donald Trump taking a strong approach when it comes to dealing with ISIS. Now, we're going to speak with Dr. Walid Phares. He's one of Trump's foreign policy advisers. That and more as this special edition of "Hannity: Road to the White House, Trump on the Issues" continues.
TRUMP: We're going to build up our military bigger, better, stronger than ever before. It's the cheapest thing we can do. And we're going to have to take out ISIS and we're going to have to take them out fast.
I would bomb the (EXPLETIVE DELETED) out of them!
TRUMP: I'd blow up the pipes. I'd blow up the -- I'd blow up every single inch. There would be nothing left! And you know what? You'll get Exxon to come in there, and in two months -- you ever see these guys, how good they are, the great oil companies? They'll rebuild that sucker brand-new. It'll be beautiful.
And I'd ring (ph) it and I'd take the oil. And I said I'll take the oil.
We must, as a nation, be more unpredictable. We are totally predictable. We tell everything. We're sending troops, we tell them. We're sending something else, we have a news conference. We have to be unpredictable, and we have to be unpredictable starting now.
But they're going to be gone. ISIS will be gone if I'm elected president. And they'll be gone quickly. They will be gone very, very quickly.
HANNITY: And welcome back to this special edition of "Hannity." That was Donald Trump explaining how he will deal with ISIS if, in fact, he's elected to be the next commander-in-chief.
Here with reaction, one of Donald Trump's foreign policy advisers. Fox News Middle East analyst Dr. Walid Phares is with us. The author of, by the way, great new book, "In the Arena," Fox News contributor Peter Hegseth is here, and Fox News national security analyst K.T. McFarland. Good to see you.
Congrats on the book, by the way.
PETE HEGSETH, FOX CONTRIBUTOR: Thank you very much (INAUDIBLE)
HANNITY: Walid, you talked about Donald Trump. You advised Donald Trump. I like "bomb the living" out of them. I think that's pretty good. I think that's a start. I think we've been timid with ISIS. How do you -- he said he wouldn't telegraph everything. Bring us some insight into his thinking.
WALID PHARES, FOX MIDDLE EAST AND TERRORISM ANALYST: Well, absolutely. What we've heard so far is the narrative of the primaries, which has ended, and then you're going to hear more details and more expansion during the debates this summer. But more important, Sean, is basically, what we actually -- he is going to be doing when he is going to be elected president -- elected president.
So number one, as he mentioned, there is no containment with regard to ISIS. This is a dismemberment of ISIS. Actually, the eradication of ISIS. But that means that we're going to have to have a force on the ground. I mean, there will be continuous, relentless shelling of ISIS positions...
HANNITY: You think he'll send American troops into Iraq and Syria?
PHARES: There are all tools, Sean. Now, he will choose. If he can through a coalition of local allies inside Iraq and Syria -- more importantly in the region -- and he has mentioned this even in his foreign policy speech last week, he will reach out...
HANNITY: He said he wouldn't do that. He said he would let other countries do that. He said they should be shedding their blood. They should be contributing their money.
PHARES: That's exactly what I'm trying to say. He will talk to these Arab countries who have armies that are modern that we have trained that have been very frustrated with the Obama/Clinton administration's policies -- he will talk to them...
HANNITY: All right, let me bring in K.T. K.T., I heard a guy that said, You know what? We can't change countries that don't want to be democracies, and we've done more harm than good in some instances, and we always end up politicizing the war, anyway, and giving up our gains. How many more times are we going to do that?
K.T. MCFARLAND, FOX NATIONAL SECURITY ANALYST: Yes, I mean, I think he's been pretty clear that he doesn't want to have a Bush kind of war in the Middle East, and he also doesn't want to have Obama's leading from behind.
What I think is intriguing is that he's -- similar to Reagan in the sense that he's rethinking what should our strategy be. And in fact, Trump has said to defeat ISIS, we need a comprehensive strategy, like we had to defeat the Nazis during World War II and Reagan used to defeat the communists during the cold war.
It has an economic component, an ideological component, a covert action component. Yes, it has a military component, but it's one of a number of issues and a number of ways we fight this enemy.
HANNITY: And one similarity, Pete, is building up our military strength that everybody knows we are a force to reckon with.
HEGSETH: No, that's right. I mean, no one's going to doubt Trump's gut. We know he wants to defeat, crush ISIS. That's there, and that matters for troops on the ground who look at their commander-in-chief right now and they wonder where his compass really is.
But there is an inconsistency in the actual application. Is it going to be troops? Is it not going to be troops? How do you seize the oil fields without troops? I mean, there are -- the devil is oftentimes still in the details in the application.
HANNITY: So...
HEGSETH: You can't lead without American boots on the ground...
HANNITY: Here's my theory.
HEGSETH: ... part of the equation.
HANNITY: And we have got to advance warfare to the point where it's not like Baghdad, where we're sending kids in without even up-armored Humvees, knocking door to door to try and win a war. I think we have got to accept that if we're going to wage war against a modern-day evil, there's going to be far more collateral damage than people are willing to accept.
That means the media, CNN, they'll go in there with their pictures, Oh, they killed women and children. Well, that's going to happen in war, and we don't seem to have the appetite to do that.
MCFARLAND: Yes. One of the things I think is interesting about what Trump has said...
HANNITY: By the wary, I'm not hoping for that.
HANNITY: ... as a natural course, yes.
MCFARLAND: You know, if they're going to kill each other and you have two enemies killing each other, you kind of wonder why should you step in and try to stop them? Let them exhaust themselves.
But when Trump says we're going to build the strongest, toughest military and it's cheaper, that is a really sophisticated concept. Why? Because he says have the strongest, toughest military, nobody picks a fight with you.
HANNITY: That's right.
MCFARLAND: As long as you don't start the fight...
MCFARLAND: That's was Reagan's peace through strength.
HEGSETH: They're going to keep picking a fight with us, no matter what. They've got a caliphate with a black flag flying over it.
MCFARLAND: Not if they're bankrupt!
HEGSETH: They've got Raqqa. They've got Mosul. And they're staying there. And will we be willing to bomb their capital and bomb it the way it needs to happen? We know where their headquarters are. We just won't do it.
HANNITY: Obama wouldn't do it because he didn't want any environmental damage.
HEGSETH: I think Trump would be willing to.
HANNITY: Of course he would.
HEGSETH: And the American people would rally to defeating the caliphate.
HANNITY: Walid, I think that's a good point. Obama wouldn't do it. He did little pinpricks. There was no overwhelming use of force, and then there was concern about, well, there might be environmental damage if we bomb the oil wells and take their money away.
PHARES: That was another concern, Sean. The reality is the Obama administration could have destroyed ISIS if it wanted. We have the best military in the world. It's Iran that didn't want this to happen because they wanted to seize those areas. This is where a Trump administration is going to have a different strategy. We and our allies will destroy ISIS. Details will come later, but we're going to make sure the Iranians and other jihadi group is not going to come after us. It's always the day after we need to think about.
HANNITY: All right, guys, thank you all for being with us. Good to see you, Pete. Congrats on the book.
And coming up next tonight here on "Hannity" --
TRUMP: You have millions of people out there that can't get jobs. We're going to bring our jobs back to our country, and we're not going to let people leave so easily anymore.
HANNITY: Donald Trump is a very successful businessman and he promises if elected that he'll bring back jobs from Mexico, he'll fix the economy. Coming up next, Charles Gasparino, Nicole Petallides, Gerri Willis will weigh in on Trump's plans as this special edition of "Hannity" continues.
PATRICIA STARK, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Live from America's news headquarters, I'm Patricia Stark.
A federal security officer suspected in three deadly shootings in the Washington, D.C., area was charged today. The 62-year-old is facing first- degree murder after he allegedly shot and killed his estranged wife yesterday. Police believe he may also be connected to two other deadly shootings that happened today, one at a mall and another about a half hour later at a grocery store.
And while speaking at the White House, President Obama used the deteriorating state of the D.C. rail system as one example of the, quote, "underinvestment in the nation's infrastructure." The president is pinning the blame on the Republican-led Congress. He says there are bridges, roads, and pipes across the country that are being neglected, and that Republican lawmakers haven't been serious about fixing them.
I'm Patricia Stark. And now back to "Hannity." For all your headlines, logon to FoxNews.com.
HANNITY: Welcome back to the special edition of "Hannity, Road to the White House, Donald Trump on the Issues." Now, if Trump does become president, he's going to have to do a lot of work to fix America's broken economy of course caused by years of Obama's failed policies. Here's where Trump stands on this very important issue. Let's take a look.
TRUMP: We're going to bring back our jobs and we're going to keep our jobs. We're not going to let companies leave. Now, if they want to go to a different state, good luck. Compete. But when they start going to different countries that in many cases are countries that devalue their currency and make it impossible for our companies to compete, that's not going to happen.
You have millions of people out there that can't get jobs. We're going to bring our jobs back to our country. And we're not going to let people leave so easily anymore.
We're bringing our jobs back to this country, and companies that want to leave, they're going to have to pay the consequences. I mean, if they want to leave for Mexico and going to make product and sell it, they're going to have to pay the consequences, which in this case is going to be taxes. They're going to have to pay a tax if they want to come back into the country.
With me, they're paying a 35 percent tax as soon as they leave, folks. And they're never going to leave.
HANNITY: Joining us from the Fox Business Network, Charles Gasparino, Nicole Petallides and Gerri Willis. By the way, I got a chance to read and endorse a brand new book "Rich is not a Four-Letter Word" out now in bookstores and Amazon.com. It really isn't.
I look at this economic plan. I like the idea we become energy independent, we create millions of jobs, it's good for our national security. You let all of these multinational corporations that have trillions or billions of dollars, I think trillions, about $2 trillion or $3 trillion, overseas, bring it back at a low tax rate, build manufacturing centers and factories. Good idea?
GERRI WILLIS, "RICH IS NOT A FOUR-LETTER WORD" AUTHOR: He wants a 15 percent corporate tax rate.
HANNITY: Right, lower tax rate.
WILLIS: In order to bring it way, way down, he wants to bring down individual tax rates. The top tax rate would be 25 percent. This would turn a lot of money over to the private sector, a lot of money over to individuals. This would cause the economy to grow and grow dramatically, one percent a year. Over ten years -- you say Gerri, that's not much, but over ten years that's 10 percent growth.
HANNITY: And Nicole, Obama is the last quarter, 0.5 percent. He's the only president in eight years that will never reach three percent growth in a year.
NICOLE PETALLIDES, FOX BUSINESS NETWORK: I can tell that I talk to all the Wall Street traders all the time. As a matter of fact today I talked to several of them just about this segment alone asking about Trump's policies and what do they think. And you know what, they embrace it. They want a political maverick. They want someone to make some changes.
They're willing to take obviously some challenges and some obviously risk with this, but they mike what they're seeing. They like what Gerri just noted, 15 percent from 40 percent. They like getting rid of the inversions, bringing back $2.5 trillion back to the States.
HANNITY: That's a lot of money.
PETALLIDES: We don't want to be Japan.
HANNITY: There's a critic in the corner, Gasparino.
CHARLES GASPARINO, FOX BUSINESS NETWORK: I'm the voice of reason. Let's be clear, there's a difference between the few traders that are left on the floor of the stock exchange and most major investors.
PETALLIDES: He likes to note that.
GASPARINO: No, no.
PETALLIDES: Go ahead.
GASPARINO: Most major investors are scared to death of Donald Trump. They're scared to death --
PETALLIDES: OK, about John -- go ahead.
GASPARINO: How about Paul Singer. How much money could John --
PETALLIDES: All right, here's the point. Monetary policy versus --
GASPARINO: No, no. Listen, a trade war. One of the basics that has allowed our economy to grow in good times, forget the Obama administration. You're comparing him to the largest midget in the room when it's President Obama's economy, has been free trade. Donald Trump wants to start a trade war with China.
HANNITY: That's not what he said at all.
GASPARINO: I'm sure he does. He wants 45 percent -- 45 percent tariffs.
HANNITY: I'm listening to you and you guys are talking about rich Wall Street guys. Here's the problem.
GASPARINO: Right.
HANNITY: And 20 percent of American families don't have a single person employed.
GASPARINO: How many jobs --
HANNITY: I'm not done. And 95 million Americans out of the labor force, 50 million in poverty.
GASPARINO: Use your head, Sean. Use your head.
WILLIS: Americans are still suffering. This continues. Median incomes are down.
GASPARINO: Who doesn't know that?
WILLIS: -- any policies to change this? I don't think so. Donald Trump does.
GASPARINO: Are you telling me repealing --
WILLIS: I'm not going to answer your questions. This is an important fact.
GASPARINO: Are you saying repealing NAFTA is going to bring factories back to upstate New York?
HANNITY: Fracking would bring jobs to upstate New York.
GASPARINO: I agree with that.
HANNITY: That's part of his policy to allow it.
GASPARINO: By repealing NAFTA, we'd be getting into a trade war --
HANNITY: That's not what he said. If you listen closely --
GASPARINO: Listen closely, 45 tariff?
HANNITY: Can I finish?
GASPARINO: Sure.
HANNITY: If you listen closely -- what he's saying, he's never given a percent that I heard.
GASPARINO: Yes, he has.
HANNITY: But what he has said is that he is going to negotiate better trade deals. There's a huge trade imbalance -- wait a minute. You try and sell an American car in China, good luck to you.
GASPARINO: We are selling cars in China.
HANNITY: No, we're not. We're getting rammed --
GASPARINO: Dealer sells 95 percent of their products overseas, not here. Engage in an overseas trade war.
HANNITY: They're engaged in one with us. We're just not fighting back.
PETALLIDES: I agree with Charlie. I've talked to a lot of people, they are nervous about that. But when you talk at home, when you're talking about Americans and concerns about lower income Americans, a single person who makes less than $25,000, a married couple who makes --
HANNITY: How about the people out of work that make nothing?
PETALLIDES: They're not going to have to pay anything. He simplifies the tax brackets from --
HANNITY: Wait a minute.
PETALLIDES: He's making it simpler.
HANNITY: The unbalance in the trade has resulted in less manufacturing, less factories in America, Americans out of work.
PETALLIDES: Right.
HANNITY: And then the Americans that are out of work now have to compete with illegal immigrants that drive down wages and take opportunities.
WILLIS: That's why Trump has been so popular and why he's gotten so much currency and why people are listening to him.
HANNITY: That's why he's won.
GASPARINO: Sean, here's your economic theory. Build a wall, only sell to ourselves. It ain't happening.
HANNITY: Why do you make this stuff up? You're out of your mind. That is not what I said. That's not what he says.
GASPARINO: Its' 45 percent tariffs.
HANNITY: Oh, my gosh.
WILLIS: I think he's going to end up working with other countries.
GASPARINO: He didn't say that.
PETALLIDES: What he's saying is --
HANNITY: He said he would negotiate better trade deals.
GASPARINO: Right.
HANNITY: Because there's such an imbalance. That imbalance has resulted in Americans losing jobs.
GASPARINO: If they manipulate the currency, like we manipulate, because we manipulate the currency --
HANNITY: They do it more than us.
GASPARINO: It's called quantitative easing.
HANNITY: That's really horrible. I can't stand quantitative easing.
WILLIS: He's done little thing, incentives to keep these companies here, at home. How about impoverished cities in Baltimore, have more incentives to stay there. He could be the greatest jobs person God ever created.
HANNITY: Go vote for Hillary. Go vote for Hillary.
GASPARINO: By the way, Donald Trump didn't invent the tax cut. You do realize that?
HANNITY: John Kennedy did it. Let's see, Ronald Reagan did it.
GASPARINO: And Mitt Romney wanted to do it, and every Republican candidate. The difference between them and Donald Trump is he wants to engage in a trade war.
HANNITY: That's not what he said.
WILLIS: We don't want more regulation, either. We left out another point. How about more regulation?
HANNITY: Talked about remedying regulations.
GASPARINO: Who doesn't like regulation?
HANNITY: The only one not frustrating me here is Gerri. Gerri Willis' book right there "Rich is not a Four-Letter Word."
WILLIS: "Jobs" is a four-letter word.
HANNITY: Up next on this special edition of "Hannity" --
TRUMP: There are so many things you could have privately to take care of health care. ObamaCare is out of control, premiums are going up 25, 35, 45, 55 percent. We're going to repeal it and replace it with something great.
HANNITY: Donald Trump has promised to repeal and replace ObamaCare. We're going to show you more of how he plans to do it and get reaction from Eboni Williams and Monica Crowley as this special edition of "Hannity, Road to the White House: Trump on the Issues" continues.
TRUMP: There are so many things you could have privately to take care of health care. ObamaCare is out of control. Your premiums are going up 25, 35, 45, 55 percent. We're going to repeal it. We're going to replace it with something great.
We don't win with health care. ObamaCare is a disaster.
With health care, we have to repeal and replace ObamaCare.
GASPARINO: What would you replace it with?
TRUMP: Health care savings accounts, which are great. We have to get rid of the lines. We have to create competition. When you do that, you will have the best health care you've ever, ever had, and it will be at a reasonable cost.
We have to get rid of the lines around the states so that there's serious, serious competition. And you're going to see -- excuse me, then you're going to see preexisting conditions and everything else be part of it, but the price will be down. And the insurance companies can pay. Right now they're making a fortune.
HANNITY: And welcome back to this special edition of "Hannity." That was Trump explaining his plans to improve America's health care system. Another key issue in this election is the Supreme Court as the next president may have nominate a new justice or many. Here's Trump in his own words on that issue. Take a look.
TRUMP: I'm going to name 10 or 12 judges that I would recommend to put on the Supreme Court, and I'm going to name them up front, and I'm only going to take the judges out of that pool of judges, because I want people to understand that I want the values, in terms of the Republican party and the conservatives, I want judges that are going to be happy with that. I'm going to actually name 10 or 12 judges up front, and that would be a pool of which I will take and only take from that.
HANNITY: Here with reaction, Fox News contributors Monica Crowley and Eboni Williams. I love the idea, especially conservatives, that they be skeptical of Donald Trump, says he is going to layout 10, 12 names of people for the Supreme Court that people will know ahead of time, and it's only from that pool that he will choose from. It's a good idea.
MONICA CROWLEY, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: What is so fascinating is that the two front runners on both sides have yet to lock down their bases, right? Hillary Clinton has yet to lock down the far left which is still with Bernie Sanders. And on the right Donald Trump has some work to do with the conservative base. One of the most important things he can do to reassure a lot of people who have concerns --
HANNITY: Right there, that's a huge issue.
CROWLEY: Because he is an unknown quantity, and he's talked about this so many times before, is release the list of conservative judges who are strict constitutionalists.
HANNITY: He's going to do it. Can you imagine, what if Mike Lee and Ted Cruz's name popped up on that list?
EBONI WILLIAMS, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: I think that would be music to Ted Cruz's ears, right? Remember, right before he dropped out Ted Cruz hit hard on this issue. You know, a very powerful ad talking about the skepticism around what a Trump nominee to the Supreme Court would look like. So I think that will go a long way.
HANNITY: Do you remember one debate Donald Trump was talking about the lines, the lines became an issue. Because I interviewed him just before that debate, and he went into detail about health care savings accounts, and said it over and over again. But on the campaign trail every one of his opponents kept saying he kept referring to the Canadian system, which, by the way, he did. But that is not on his website and that's not what he kept telling me again and again, he would go for health care savings accounts.
CROWLEY: Look, Since ObamaCare was signed into law in 2010, every time Republican candidates have run on repealing and replacing Obamacare, they won in droves, in 2010, in 2014. In 2012, Mitt Romney because he was the grandfather of RomneyCare in Massachusetts couldn't legitimately make it an argument.
If Donald Trump continues to make this argument, repeal, replace ObamaCare, replace it with patient-based and market-based solutions like the private accounts and so on, allowing insurance to be bought over state lines.
HANNITY: Portability, sure.
CROWLEY: He will win on that issue and might even win the presidency just on that alone.
HANNITY: Especially because prices this year on average --
CROWLEY: They're going up one week before the presidential election.
WILLIAMS: It's a good opportunity for Donald Trump to be the compassionate conservative, right? Because we have seen him on debate stages talk about people shouldn't be dying in the streets. In their resumes now, some of the far right were booing it.
WILLIAMS: It wasn't you. It was someone else.
HANNITY: Someone was OK with that?
WILLIAMS: I think they felt it sounded a little too close to government- supported health care, but Trump has now rectified it. To Monica's point, he's clarified. He's been more specific.
HANNITY: You're voting for Trump, aren't you?
WILLIAMS: Not only is he going to repeal but replace. That replace part is important.
HANNITY: Are you voting for Trump?
WILLIAMS: I actually haven't decided. My mother is voting for Trump.
HANNITY: Coming up, we have more of this special edition of "Hannity, Road to the White House, Donald Trump on the Issues," as we continue.
HANNITY: Welcome back to this special edition of "Hannity." Unfortunately that is all the time we have this evening. As always, thank you for being with us. We hope you'll set your DVR so you never miss an episode. We take attendance and it hurts our feelings if you're not here. Thanks for being with us. Have a great weekend and we'll see you back here Monday.
Content and Programming Copyright 2016 Fox News Network, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2016 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.


text:
If you ever go to the supermarket and see the rack full of instant noodle, Indomie must be there. Comes out in delightful packaging and attracting picture of home cooked noodle, this product has served all around the globe. Even some of my friends who live in the UK already taste this before I introduced this to them. Known as the proud brand of Indonesia, astonish foodies will never ever skip this since dull moment has never existed whenever you taste this. Let's see how to create a good moment with this product.
There is no specific occasion for having this product. In Indonesia, people can have this 2 or 3 times a day. That's mean, they love to make any creation using this product. Since the wide variety of flavor is exist for this product, there is no excuse to say bored or even lack of idea for cooking Indomie. Even there are several famous Indomie cafe in Indonesia that we all love.
A gloomy day can be solved with this menu. They called this as Indomie Kari Ayam. Featuring a perfect combination between ultra-springy noodle and rich chicken stock results in heartwarming meal all the time. To add more saturation into the bowl, just add a rough cut of tomatoes and hard boiled egg. To some extent, both toppings will soak up the richness of that soup and become tastier than ever. Enjoy your meal then.
Nothing can beat the Indomie Goreng so far. The perfectly cooked noodle bathed in sweet soy sauce and secret spices in undeniably delicious. Even when you cooked this, all the aroma will pamper your sense of smell and delight you as always. The idea could be served together with sunny side up, chicken sausage or even chicken nugget. How do you think?
Another good option might be Indomie Soto. If you realized, this flavor is inspired by mandatory local food in Indonesia called Soto Ayam that comprises the ultra-juicy chicken bathed in special homemade soup. But in this case, they do replace the protein element with noodle and surprisingly it works well in your mouth. Just smell that beautiful aroma and have it your way.
Lazy to go out but still looking for a heartwarming meal? Indomie is your perfect idea. Comes in a wide variety of flavor, you can mix and match anything based on your preferences. Just drop your comment below, which one is your favourite?
'The Best Indonesian Instant Noodle'
Check out trending guide for Indonesia: KERATON HOTEL JAKARTA, BEST STREET FOOD IN JAKARTA, 24-HOURS EATING IN JAKARTA.
Collaboration: firstname.lastname@example.com
Snapchat: AaronHandajani
Collaboration: firstname.lastname@example.com
Snapchat: AaronHandajani


text:
Soft Surroundings Coupons & Promo Codes
We have found 1 items matching your search query.
They're invited at SoftSurroundings.com, a universe of easy style, quality and solace. With awesome designs in delicate, liquid fabrics, legacy quality home furniture, luxury bedding and the most up to date choices in excellence care, Soft Surroundings is the a la mode answer throughout today's occupied lady.