text:
Legal Status
Document Details
Published Document
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act") [1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] notice is hereby given that on June 23, 2005, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. ("BSE" or "Exchange") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the BSE. On July 7, 2005, the BSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.[3] The BSE filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,[4] and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,[5] which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.[6] The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The BSE proposes to amend its rules regarding Account Identification Codes.[7] The text of the proposed rule change is available on the BSE's Internet Web site (http://www.bostonstock.com), at the BSE's Office of the Secretary, and Start Printed Page 40758at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the BSE included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The BSE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is seeking to add several Account Identification Codes to its existing rules regarding recordkeeping requirements. In Chapter II, "Dealings on the Exchange", Section 15, "Record of Orders from Offices to Floor", the BSE requires that each order be marked with one of several Account Identification Codes. The codes that are currently available are as follows:
|Program trade index arbitrage
|Program trade non-index arbitrage
|All other orders
|Member/member organization:
|—As agent for other member
|—Individual (80A)
|—Other agency
Accompanying the existing Account Identification Codes are definitions, as follows:
Member/member organization, proprietary: A member/member organization trading for its own account.
Member/member organization, as agent for other member: A member/member organization trading as agent for the account of another member/member organization.
Program Trade, Index Arbitrage: The purchase or sale of "baskets" or groups of stocks in conjunction with the intended purchase or sale of one or more cash-settled options or futures contracts in an attempt to profit by the price difference, as defined in NYSE Rule 80A.
Program Trade, Non-Index Arbitrage: A trading strategy involving the related purchase or sale of a group of 15 or more stocks having a total market value of $1 million or more, as defined in NYSE Rule 80A.
Individual (80A): An account for an individual as defined by NYSE Rule 80A.
Other Agency: Any other non-member or non-member organization.
The BSE proposes to add new Account Identification Codes and definitions to its rules in order to provide its members and customers with the ability to more accurately reflect their specific type of trading in the records of their orders. Similar identification codes and accompanying definitions are presently utilized by other exchanges, such as the NYSE, as required by NYSE Rule 123 "Record of Orders," and the AMEX, as set forth in AMEX Rule 719, "Comparison of Exchange Transactions." The account types and definitions that the BSE seeks to add to its existing rules are similar to those set forth by the NYSE and AMEX. The BSE proposes to add the following information to its account indicator requirements:
|Competing market maker
|Short exempt
|Competing market, maker, short exempt
|Member/member organization:
|—As agent for other member
|—Individual (80A)
|—Other agency
Additional definitions would also be added to reflect the new codes:
Competing Market Maker: Any person acting as a market maker, as defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in an exchange-listed security. A person acting solely in the capacity of a block positioner would not be considered a competing market maker.
Proprietary, Competing Market Maker: A member or member organization trading for its own competing market maker account.
As Agent for Other Member, Competing Market Maker: A member or member organization trading as agent for another member's competing market maker account.
Other Agency, Competing Market Maker: A member or member organization trading as agent for the proprietary account for a non-member competing market maker.
Short Exempt: Short sale transactions that are exempt from the provisions of SEC Rule 10a-1.
In proposing the above changes, the BSE seeks to be consistent with the similar requirements of other exchanges regarding account identification codes. Moreover, the addition of the various codes will provide Exchange members the ability to more appropriately identify the types of trading activity in which they engage, and therefore, to Start Printed Page 40759maintain more accurate and detailed records of their trading activity.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,[8] in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,[9] in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, brokers, or dealers, or to regulate by virtue of any authority matters not related to the administration of the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The BSE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The BSE has neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to provide the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The BSE has asked the Commission to waive the five-day pre-filing notice requirement and the 30-day operative delay to allow the Exchange to immediately apply the new Account Identification Codes. The Commission waives the five-day pre-filing notice requirement. In addition, the Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because the proposed rule change will provide the Exchange's members and customers with the ability to more appropriately identify the types of trading activity in which they engage and more accurately reflect their specific type of trading in the records of their orders.[10]
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.[11]
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
- Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an e-mail to email@example.com. Please include File No. SR-BSE-2005-23 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-BSE-2005-23. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the BSE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions.
You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-BSE-2005-23 and should be submitted on or before August 4, 2005.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[12]
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
1. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).Back to Citation
2. 17 CFR 240.19b-4.Back to Citation
3. In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange made non-substantive changes to re-format certain account identification code headings and clarify references made to rules of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. ("NYSE") and the American Stock Exchange LLC ("AMEX"). The effective date of the original proposed rule change is June 23, 2005, and the effective date of Amendment No. 1 is July 7, 2005. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers such period to commence on July 7, 2005, the date on which the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).Back to Citation
4. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).Back to Citation
5. 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).Back to Citation
6. The BSE has asked the Commission to waive the five-day pre-filing notice requirement and the 30-day operative delay. See Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). See also discussion infra Section III.Back to Citation
7. See infra Section II.A.1 for a complete description of the terms and purpose of the proposed rule change.Back to Citation
8. 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).Back to Citation
9. 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).Back to Citation
10. For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
11. See supra note 3.Back to Citation
12. 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. E5-3729 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am]


text:
- New Products
- Pigments
- Dyes & Vegetable Color Paints
- Fillers & Building Materials
- Mediums, Binders & Glues
- Solvents, Chemicals & Additives
- Ready-made Colors
- Gold & Gilding Materials
- Linen, Paper & Foils
- Brushes
- Tools, Packaging & Supplies
- Books & Color Charts
- Special Offers
Order number: 94110
green crystals, intensive red solution, synthetic dye
Shipping and Ordering
|Hazardous Item Disclaimer
Please send us a copy of your identity card and fill this form
? Read the Material Safety Data sheet carefully and consult our safe handling procedures. Not for home use! To buy this product you have to be over 21 years old. Please send us a copy of your identity card. These products require a Hazardous Item Disclaimer. Please fill this form and submit with your order.
|Sold only to professional users. Please read the material safety data sheet (MSDS).
Download Material Safety Data Sheet
? Professional users read and understand the Material Safety Data Sheets and hazard designations before use.
Handling and WarningsDissolves slowly in water and alcohol.
Safety Information
GHS08-2: Health Hazard
|Signal word: Danger
Hazard designation
- H350: May cause cancer.
Safety Information
- P201: Obtain special instructions before use.
- P281: Use personal protective equipment as required.
- P308+P313: If exposed or concerned: Get medical advice/attention.
green crystals, intensive red solution, synthetic dye
- Chemical description Dye, woodstain.C20H20ClN3; CAS No. 632-99-5; EINECS 211-189-6.
- ColorIndex 42510
- Opacity transparent
- Color Green, Red
- Form solid
- Solubility in water 4 g/l (25°C)
- Chemical Formula C20H20ClN3
green crystals, intensive red solution, synthetic dye
WARNING: Exercise care when using dry pigments. Do not eat, drink or smoke. Avoid breathing dust. Use a NIOSH-certified dust respirator. Wash hands immediately after use. If creation of dust is likely, wear protective clothing.
Keep out of reach of children.
No ACMI Certification Seals available.
green crystals, intensive red solution, synthetic dye
Available downloads:Download Material Safety Data Sheet Hazardous Item Disclaimer
Please send us a copy of your identity card and fill this form
Customer evaluation for "Fuchsin"
Reviews will be activated after verification.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Maybe it's the horrible economy that seems to never end. Maybe it's the unemployment figures that continue to climb. Maybe it's just the bleak mid-winter skies that bring on the "will-summer-never-come?" blues. Whatever it is, I am not moved to dance for joy at the latest IT budget revelations, even though they appear to bring good news.
Despite budget cutting and layoffs across most IT organizations over the last two years, Computer Economics is reporting that "the picture is brightening for IT workers." The researcher's "Computer Economics 2010 IT Salary Report" has found that the IT organizations are budgeting to give the typical IT worker a 1.8% boost in pay.
Obviously, the increase is almost infinitesimal, but CE points to this as a sign that, despite the economy being so weak, "IT executives are responding to the need to retain their best workers and boost damaged morale." Another recent report from CE shows that IT organizations plan to increase operational budgets by a median 2% in 2010 and that more than one-third are planning increase staff, restoring some of the positions shed over the past two years.
Sounds great, right? But some questions beg to be asked. First, how many current H1B workers are among those who will receive wage increases? Let's remember that this is a group of imported workers who have been brought here and paid less than the going rate for people in their positions—while also displacing American workers who might have assumed those positions. Assuming they are among those who get these "shoots of hope" pay increases, would the 1.8% bring them up to snuff? Somehow, I doubt it. Yet it might, as CE suggests, help boost their damaged morale, or that of non-H1B workers.
Then we must ask: How much of the planned increase in IT staffing will be due to new workers coming in under H1B? We already know that U.S. companies are seeking to bring such workers here in at least the same volume as last year, and we know that some of our insurance and financial technology services and consulting leaders are among those clamoring for this cheap labor. One would have to believe that H1B workers would make up some if not all of the projected staff increases.
"We see this as another sign that IT jobs and budgets are recovering this year," said John Longwell, VP of research for Computer Economics, Irvine, Calif. Obviously that is true, but the tragic aftershock of this revelation is that the U.S.-born IT worker will likely see no light at the end of this tunnel. CE provides another twist, noting, "That most IT workers will receive raises does not mean median total compensation will rise at the same rate, or at all. With the persistent unemployment, organizations will be able to hire new workers at rates lower than those who were laid off during the recession. This should place downward pressure on U.S. national median IT salary levels over the coming months."
Thus, what purports to be good news is in fact a statistical proof of an ongoing problem in the U.S.—our failure to look out for the welfare of our own citizens due to a pathological obsession with the bottom line. Of course the bottom line is important, but how many of our own people will have to suffer before we say that enough is enough?
This blog can also be found at InsuranceNetworking.com.
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Information Management content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access


text:
Simple Invoice Format Html
Invoice 2 : http://stamplia/html-email-template/transactional at invoice examples
Simple Invoice Format Html For developing the best impression on their clients firms need to have professionally-designed account. The invoice could be your revenue deal's last part that will get registered in the head of the client. Isn't it great to close the specials utilizing an outstanding, successfully- bill that is created?
A skillfully created bill is critical in building the standing of the business, pressing the consumer to ask for your solutions again and also to stay your dues quickly, therefore supporting your business grow. When doubting the invoice's authority, the customer could take longer to stay your fee and your profit can be significantly affected by that. While you can very quickly access a theme which will suit your form of enterprise or market that you don't want to get overwhelmed by this work of invoicing. Choosing the proper design helps protecting lots of time and money.
To start with, you ought to be ready to acknowledge the requirements of a great design. Particular capabilities are normal to most accounts. For example, it's to truly have the brand of the business and its particular address, as well as the contact information of the customer. It fundamentally explains the sort of companies supplied and also the price agreed for delivering them. Frequently, companies contain their logo within the bill and, with regards to business' dynamics, they could note the payment conditions and the break down of items or services offered.
Having produced of that which you demand a notion, it becomes much easier to reduce your alternatives. These can be relatively expensive, specifically for small enterprises, although typically, themes are provided by software applications. You may also buy individual layouts online. For completing your company, the Net offers a significant amount of beneficial resources. You can even get invoice themes totally free.
It is possible to build an invoice by making use of the bill layouts supplied without charge on the Internet containing all-the crucial functions. You can get various types of invoices. You may have an account for providing products or any specific assistance or simply work. Additionally you can find templates for pro forma invoices. You will uncover free templates in a sizable selection of types, and some of these might currently be there in your computer, for example Microsoft Word, HTML, Microsoft Excel and PDF etc. Many free templates have timesaving features, including typical logos, and also other options you may like including in your specific brand – automated installation of day of invoicing, built in calculation program and drop down menus – enabling you to choose numerous items to transform quickly the theme to your requirements.
Having finally designed the invoice format, you will have to print it. Here, again, you have some alternatives. For-one, you submit them to your customer and print the invoice inside your workplace, and could only modify your bill design. You may even electronically transmit your account, utilising the mail. At times, you may need to provide your offering team with debts that are bare, permitting them to hand them up to consumers for collecting funds also to prepare bills at that moment. It's also possible to consider having a combination of each one of these.


text:
Last week, Big Think uploaded an interview with P.W. Singer, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who has worked in the Pentagon and as a military adviser to Barack Obama's presidential campaign and recently, has authored the book Wired For War, about the impact the age of robotics will have on warfare in the near future. Video games coming to life, that sort of thing.
Now, according to today's GlobalPost, a new report supports Singer's thesis on the frightening next stage in military technology: "the imminent arrival of weapons designed to fight on their own.
"The 108-page report, prepared for the U.S. Navy's Office of Naval Research, does not predict when independent killing machines might go to war, nor take a firm stand for or against their deployment," according to GlobalPost. "Instead it suggests that advances in artificial intelligence, coupled with the growing use of semi-autonomous robots in battle, make it a question of when, not if, robots will become capable of making life and death decisions."
Obviously, this raises some important Terminator-esque ethical dilemmas for humanity. Robots can prevent human casualties, sure. But they also might turn on us. Fortunately, "The technological and moral considerations involved in putting that killing decision on autopilot make up the body of the report," according to GlobalPost's Tom Abate.
Ultimately the report is a double-edged robotic sword: "The report entertains the possibility that properly designed robots might be less prone to commit atrocities." However, "in a scholarly way the report reminds us that technology is posed to bring science fiction to life."