text:
Option Quotes
RealTick v.9.3.118
RealTick is the most powerful direct access platform and online trading in the market, as it provides stock traders and brokers a cutting edge advantage to stay ahead in the market.
Motivational Quotes v.184.108.40.206
Excellent collection of Motivational Quotes for all. Liked the Quotes then option to Share it via Email, SMS or Share on social networks. Option to randomly generate the
Stock Intraday Quotes Download Lite v.1.02
Stock Intraday Quotes Download is software that can asynchronously download intraday quotes of stocks, indices and mutual funds publicly traded in US and Canadian markets.
Prime Option
Prime Option is used to measure what is important and to select the best option. It can be used to choose products, software, development options, shares, funds, staff, features and design points. It can also be used to measure judgments,
Option Pricing Calculator
This free option pricing calculator can be used to calculate: Call Price, Put Price, Gamma, Delta, Theta, Vega, Implied Volatility. Calculator can use three option pricing models to caculate prices: Black-Scholes Option price, Binomial American option
Option Profit Calculator
Easily compare stock or option transactions for various time periods and various investments. Input transaction information such as purchase and sale (or execution) dates, prices, etc.. Gives actual profit from the transaction and the potential loss. Also
Stock Quotes for Pocket PC
Stock Quotes for Pocket PC is an easy-to-use application for modern mobile platform. It allows you to monitor stock quotes information from Yahoo in real time. Besides, you can view news relevant to the selected stock, set customizable alerts, search for
Internet Quotes Assistant
Internet Quotes Assistant allows personal investors to automatically keep track of investment portfolios, getting the most recent financial quotes from any server in the Internet for free (preconfigured servers: Frankfurt, London, Paris, New York, Madrid,
Option Trading Workbook
Option pricing spreadsheet that calculates the theoretical price and all of the Option Greeks for European Call and Put options. The spreadsheet also allows the user to enter up to 10 option legs for option strategy combination pricing. The calculations
Quotes Manager
Quotes Manager offers you advanced charting features for Symbol's data. It gives you the flexibility of more than 125 indicators, each fully customizable and configurable.It quick-links you to deeper analysis pages of Yahoo! Finance or Reuters. Its RSS
Love Quotes v.1.25
Love Quotes simple and easy jigsaw puzzle. Join the puzzles to make a complete puzzle


text:
Executive Coaching for Leadership development
Would you care to place a value to your Managers impact to your
World class companies identify their high-potentials and senior managers, for supporting their leadership development. Executive Coaching is now part of standard leadership training to help their star players grapple with new responsibilities and advance within the company.
Put our expertise to work for you
Leaders for Growth DWC LLC meets the needs of your Leadership development through Leadership Coaching & business consulting.
What do clients say about their benefits?
In repeat surveys, CEO's of leading companies have reported that Executive Coaching is the best people investment they have ever made.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
WMC 2014 Schedule Event
Panel Information:
|Date: March 27
|Time: 2:30 PM
|Room: A-107
|Ready Room: A-101
What is it About Detroit?
Put your hands up for Detroit! Cars are not the only hot export from this city! What is it about this city that makes it the Birthplace of techno and hotspot for house? Find out about the origins of this esteemed panel made up of Detroits techno and house creators from the past, present and future. From the Strings of life to Big Fun to "Burnin," and all the other innovators assembled here, it is Clear that Detroit has a special influence over the broad spectrum of electronic dance music, techno, house and everything in between. Check out what these present and future icons have to say with this amazing question and answer session.


text:
1 work Add another?
Kunststoff- Kompendium1 edition - first published in 2000
Are you sure you want to remove Adolf Franck from your list?
Links (outside Open Library)
No links yet. Add one?
History Created April 30, 2008 · 1 revision Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
|April 30, 2008
|Created by an anonymous user
|initial import


text:
Call Us: (248) 478-2555
Home | Features | Sharepoint Integration
« Back Next »
EIOBoard can be integrated into the SharePoint environment, allowing SharePoint users to use all the features that EIOBoard has to offer. Easily change status within SharePoint.
SharePoint Integration Instructions
Copyright © 2018 Savance, LLC | All Rights Reserved
Login   Logout


text:
The Instigator
Pro (for)
1 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
9 Points
Animal captivity is okay in terms of ethnics.
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
|Voting Style:
|Point System:
|7 Point
|6 years ago
|Post Voting Period
|4,356 times
|Debate No:
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (3)
I believe that animal captivity, in terms of ethnics, is acceptable and may even be beneficial to the animals.
Con will argue the opposite. He or she believes that animal captivity is not a good practice and is inhumane in terms of ethnics.
"Ethical issues involve right and wrong or what is considered good, and what is considered evil in a society." -- Yahoo Answers! (1)
Try to base your arguments on empirical knowledge or opinion rather than religion. Religion, though it may be relevant, is not the focus of this debate.
1. No offensive language.
2. The first round is for introduction and agreement only.
3. When using sources, be sure to cite URLs or book titles and authors.
Each side has 48 hours to submit an argument that is, at most, 7,000 characters long. There are three rounds, and there is a two-week voting period.
Good luck to my opponent.
(1) http://answers.yahoo.com...
In this debate I will demonstrate that "cash-crop" farms contain unhealthy animals that we ingest on a daily basis. These animals are poorly taken care of, which I will show my sources and detailed argument.
I will also debate how animal preserves are much better to observe wild animals than in a zoo. True animal conditions in a zoo are much better than it was fifty years ago and zoos use these animals as research. But animals in captivity have lost their "wildness" (Ex: Killer whales in places like Sea World). While in preserves, the wild still hold their own spaces and way of life little to undisturbed by humans.
Another thing maybe no one takes seriously but feeder fish kids win at carnivals are also treated poorly, they are in dirty toxic water (made toxic by their own dirtiness) and they end up dying shortly after and the kid who wins it is deeply upset. This is just an example.
Hello, ldellova. Thanks for accepting the challenge. Sorry about the typo in the title. When I said "ethnics," I meant "ethics": I had misheard the word in science class.
Anyway, on to the arguments.
Author Stephen Budiansky points out that captivity is a natural process and can be beneficial to both the animals and human beings. He mentions how some endangered species escaped extinction through domestication.
The most obvious benefit for animal captivity is animal safety. In the outside world where death, disease, predators, natural disasters, struggles for the social hierarchy, thirst, and starvation amongst other dangers are around, keeping endangered species in zoos and farms can rebuild a species's population and increase the health of the animals. After all, food and drink are given on a daily basis in zoos, while animals must spend days or sometimes weeks hunting for it in the wild.
Cats, dogs, horses, and goldfish are all animals that have been domesticated by humans. Most of these species are housebroken, and it has been proved that keeping a pet has its benefits.
First off, service animals are animals that help people with disabilities. You can often see blind people being led by guide dogs. Also, owning pets has been proved to lower cholesterol and blood pressure, sometimes in a better fashion than medication. Spending time with animals can prevent allergies as well.
The playful nature of animals make pet owners less likely to become depressed, anxious, or stressed. This fact is prominent especially amongst children: studies show that young pet owners tend to make higher grades than those who do not own a dog or cat.
Congratulations to Con, who has made some pretty interesting points that I have not thought about before.
Con's main points are "cash-crop" farming, animals losing their "wilderness," and the issue with poorly-kept fish at carnivals.
Sure, I agree that livestock can be found in some food products. However, who says that animal domestication is completely responsible? If animal captivity somehow became illegal, other animals such as flies, mosquitoes, birds, etc. can still be picked from corn fields, even though those animals are still non-domesticated wild animal. Banning animal captivity will not solve this issue at all, and therefore is a very small drawback. Soon, the voters will understand that animal captivity has more advantages than disadvantages.
The "original setting" is "what Mother Nature intended". In other words, it is the state that animals would be in if humans never occupied the planet. Con argues that the "original setting" is preferable and should be maintained. He claims captivity ruins this notion.
In Yann Martel's novel Life of Pi, Pi Patel, the main character who loves zoos, explains that he has heard "... much nonsense about zoos." I find some of his explanations intriguing, so I shall include them in my own words here.
Sure, when animals are domesticated, they have lost their original settings, but does this harm the animals? Not really. In most cases, it benefits them.
Animals tend to be conservative. They stick to traditions and patterns and don't enjoy changes. They tend to stay in the same environments, whether its the grassy fields or a zoo cage, as penguins and deer do.
Many people believe animals are "happy" because they are "free" in the wild. They imagine large tigers running freely through the sun-lit fields. They also imagine a mean-spirited human capturing one in a cage and bringing it to the zoo, where it lives the rest of its life in captivity.
However, putting an animal in a cage is simply a change in environment. Soon, the monkey, as we'll call it, will adapt to its environment and will most likely stay in it. As mentioned before, animals are territorial. They keep to where they think they belong. Even if the cage accidentally opens, the monkey will probably stay.
The definition of "territory" for monkeys is a place for resting, eating, drinking, bathing, grooming, hunting, looking around, etc, and that's exactly what the cage is. In a few weeks, a monkey will take possession of its cage in the same way it takes possession of a new territory in the wild. The monkey is neither happy nor sad about its new environment. After all, the cage fulfills all the basic needs.
What would you think if someone ran into your house, destroyed the door, and said, "You're free, friends! Free! You can run around outside as much as you want!" Would you like it? Of course not, and neither do the animals. Again, animals keep to their territory, regardless if that environment is natural or artificial.
You may think that animals should prefer the natural environment, as it is where they came from. However, many animals are emotionless. They are incapable of having such preferences or opinions. They act in similar ways in the wild as in captivity. Animals, within their natural limits, make do with what they have.
I believe Con may mention that the space in cages in zoos is very small and that, in contrast, the wilderness is a large place to live. After all, what could be better than a whale swimming in the vastness of the ocean? However, space in the wild is present because it is necessary: many animals are living together in one place. Cages simply divide this space up into manageable parts, each part containing one or two animals. Look at what humanity has done with houses. They are simply divisions of a large tract of land that was originally made for multiple beings to thrive in at the same time.
I'm not sure if this rebuttal helps, but any job done poorly should not have been done at all. Carnivals, as far as I see, are the only drawback to captivity. The poor conditions of the environment for the fish is the fault of the carnival-keeper. Still, I think carnivals are a pretty special case. The majority of cages in farms and zoos are good for the species.
The readers should now see how animal captivity has more advantages than drawbacks. I look forward to Con's rebuttal and conclude my section of this round.
(1) http://www.petcareclub.com...
(2) Life of Pi by Yann Martel
When it comes to space, pro said:
"However, space in the wild is present because it is necessary: many animals are living together in one place. Cages simply divide this space up into manageable parts, each part containing one or two animals. Look at what humanity has done with houses. They are simply divisions of a large tract of land that was originally made for multiple beings to thrive in at the same time."
Firstly, "humanity with houses" I have to disagree. All people crave for is real estate is space, property and territory. This drive is how civilization has grown into countries, empires, etc. We love extra elbowroom for us to wiggle about. If a billionaire had to choose between a one-room apartment, or a 120-room mansion, I put my money on the mansion.
Also small captive spaces prove to drive wild animals to rebellion and starvation.
"While conditions have improved from the years of bars and cages, detractors take issue with other items. Although the natural-looking habitats are certainly more attractive, people like David Hancocks, a zoo consultant and former zoo director, describe them as mere illusions, arguing that they're not much of an improvement in terms of space"
"Zebras at the National Zoo in Washington D.C. starved to death because of insufficient or incorrect food, and the same zoo's red pandas died after ingesting rat poison"
"In this same article, it says that some animals, like the aardvark, survive on a limited diet that zoos have a hard time fulfilling; others thrive only in certain temperatures and environments that aren't easy to recreate."
When it comes to zoo conservation's attempt for reintroduction programs, out of "145 reintroduction programs" that are "carried out…in the last century, only 16 truly succeeded in restoring populations to the wild."
[Source: http://animals.howstuffworks.com...]
Another article
Also in the article "Marine Animal Exhibits: Chlorinated Prisons." It says that "In the wild, orcas and dolphins swim up to 100 miles per day. (5,6) But captured dolphins are confined to tanks that may be only 24 feet long, 24 feet wide, and 6 feet deep.(7) They navigate by echolocation—bouncing sonar waves off other objects to determine their shape, density, distance, and location—but in tanks, the reverberations from their own sonar bounce off the walls, driving some dolphins insane. Jacques Cousteau said that life for a captive dolphin "leads to a confusion of the entire sensory apparatus, which in turn causes in such a sensitive creature a derangement of mental balance and behaviour." It says that high chlorine levels in their tanks can have side affects that are highly dangerous for their animals. "Dolphins at the Clearwater Marine Aquarium were unable to open their eyes, and their skin began to peel off." Another incedent is when a tank in "North Carolina Zoological Park didn't provide enough shade, causing a sea lion's eyes to develop blisters and rupture. Oklahoma City Zoo closed its dolphin exhibit after four dolphins died within two years from bacterial infections.(10) Sea lions at Hershey Park won't come out of their pen because they fear the noise made by the nearby rollercoasters.(11)"
"Captivity's Tragic Consequences"
"If life for captive orcas and dolphins were as tranquil as marine parks would have us believe, the animals would live longer than their wild counterparts. However, while captive marine mammals are not subject to predators or ocean pollution, their captivity is nevertheless a death sentence."
"It has been documented that, in the wild, dolphins can live into their 40s and 50s.(14) But more than 80 percent of captive dolphins whose ages could be determined died before the age of 20.(15) Wild orcas can also live for decades—some have been documented to be more than 90 years old—but those at Sea World and other marine parks rarely survive for more than 10 years.(16)"
This is a deep concern for all the animals that stay in captive envirnments.
Example of Incident: Thirty-year-old Sharky died of head injuries when she collided in mid-air with another dolphin while forced to perform tricks as part of Florida's Discovery Cove, where tourists participate in the "Swim With Dolphins" program.(23)
More details PLEASE LOOK!
In conclusion, there are more damaging cons than positive pros. Zoos may help with research but at the price of shortened lives of these animals. Nature preserves are better because it is land that no human can live on so the animals can do what they do best, being wild. It also benefits research because we can look at them and learn about them in their natural environment.
Hello again. Sorry for taking so long with the response. I had some errands to run.
Con points out the following:
1. Animals and humans both enjoy more space.
2. The poor living conditions in zoos results in some animal deaths.
3. Emulating the exact natural conditions of an animal can be challenging and is sometimes done incorrectly.
4. Humanity has caused the deaths of many animals in different ways.
Poor living conditions and low space composes about 70% of Con's arguments. Therefore, it will be my first priority to counter these. Con also points out some specific incidences where captivity has caused animal troubles.
The Issue with Space
Although it is obvious that most humans prefer increased living space, most of us don't have a choice. Con states "If a billionaire had to choose between a one-room apartment, or a 120-room mansion, I put my money on the mansion." Notice how he says "if a billionaire...". It is a widely known fact that the majority of earth's population is not comprised of billionaires. Therefore, most of us live in smaller houses because it's the best we can find. This fact is true in the animal kingdom as well. If a species overextends its territory, it will invade the space of potential predators. Some animals "mark their territory" by urinating on the ground. They must choose a limited space because they have to. Sheep usually have a territory space of 1 to 3 square miles, which is about the same as a good domestication farm.
Poorly Living Conditions from Zoos
Sure, there are poorly-kept zoos around the world, but that doesn't mean every single one is poorly-kept. "It is true that there have been zoos treating animals in a cruel manner. However, there is continuous improvement in their manner of working. It won't be fair to shut down all the zoos for mistakes committed by few in the past. With reforms being brought about in this sector, animals are provided with proper diet and enough space." (Source: Buzzle.com)
I'm not sure if it helps, but there was a movie released just recently called "Dolphin Tale". I haven't watched it, but the commercials claim it is about a boy who finds a dolphin without a tale. He rescues the poor creature and keeps it in human care until it rehabilitates. The commercials claim the movie to be "based on a true story."
Emulation of Natural Environments
Zookeepers do their best to get the most natural-looking environments for their animals. The technology for it isn't perfect yet, but the great thing about technology is that it evolves. Scientists are close to finding ways to add wind and water currents and weather conditions to swimming pools. Just wait a few years, and you'll be surprised.
Humanity Sins
Almost anyone would agree that humanity is responsible for an imbalance in the animal kingdom, but most of that comes from pollution and consumption. Humans consume massive amounts of fossil fuels daily for transportation and manufacturing. Pollution, such as smoke, all stop the balance of life. If we were to release all animals from captivity, what good will it do? We'd be letting them out of their safe cages to the oil-spilled oceans and landfilled fields. Not to have a negative tone here, but I just want to get across that captivity is a very small portion of life imbalance.
These are just a few points I thought of after round 2.
With a rise in demand of animal-made products such as skins, ivory, and supposed medicinal purpose, zoos keep animals in a safe haven away from hunters and gatherers. A buffalo in a zoo stops it from being hunted down for its leather skin.
"Today's zoos put more emphasis on educational and conservation purpose than mere recreation. Many schools visit zoos to know more about endangered species and the ways to conserve them. Zoos are in fact, trying to make people aware of their ecology."
Although it is true that our technology and living conditions in our zoos is imperfect, things keep changing. Improvement by improvement, someday, all will agree that animals belong in captivity. Until then, our current system is good enough, and it should be clear to the voters that the Pros of animal captivity outweigh the cons.
Good luck to the contender in the last round. It was a thrill debating with you.
1. one of the reasons that there are zoos is to study animal behavior in a controlled environment. But over the years, there are accidents like mistakes in controlled environments (food, medicine, space, etc.) that can hurt the animals. Pro argues that zoos and captivity are ment to perserve endangered animals from going into extinction. But when a wild animal stays in a controlled environment, it will lose its "wildness" and hopes for rehibiliatation are slim to none.
2. The simple solution is to give the animals their environment back. Preserving land instead of building a mall will save the ecosystem. Man and Animal want the same thing...SPACE and land. If we hold on to nature perserves and national parks, we are not only helping science understand animal behavior, but they are protected from extinction. Laws against hunting and poaching in national parks are strict but unfortunately there are loop holes and the law over looks these innocent, and helpless creatures.
It is inhumane for animals to be kept under captivity like zoos and waterparks, just for the sake of our amusement. They have the right to roam free.
Pro also mentioned that some species in the animal kingdom do not go further than 3 miles from their birthplace. I disagree. Species like salmon, birds, gorillas, buffalo, deer, wolves, bears, sharks, and whales (just to name a few) migrate all over the world to find homes, food and water. If we limit their resources, all our efforts to preserve them from going instinct will be in vain and futile. We are not too late, preserve the land that was made for all of us.
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by 000ike 6 years ago
Posted by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 6 years ago
Posted by shooterboss 6 years ago
Posted by wjmelements 6 years ago
Posted by innomen 6 years ago
Posted by sadolite 6 years ago
Food animals don't count in my book, they were put here for us to eat. Virtually all the rest are predators and scavengers and not worth eating. They exsist to kill of the weak and deformed and clean up the mess after we are done eating.
Predators by their very definition do not belong in captivity.
Then we have all those other grazers we don't eat monkeys,giraffes, elephants, etc. Seed spreaders.
Every animal has a purpose in nature. Looking at them in confined spaces or cages isn't one of them. Rescuing an injured animal is messing with the food chain and mother nature. If an animal goes extinct, it was meant to. Funny how I am told everything must change. Except when it comes to the environment. That must remain static and preserved in it's present form at all costs even if it means the mass extermination and starvation of humanity.
Posted by Cerebral_Narcissist 6 years ago
Ethnics =/= Ethics.
Posted by OMGJustinBieber 6 years ago
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by dappleshade 6 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:
|0 points
|Agreed with after the debate:
|0 points
|Who had better conduct:
|1 point
|Had better spelling and grammar:
|1 point
|Made more convincing arguments:
|3 points
|Used the most reliable sources:
|2 points
|Total points awarded:
Reasons for voting decision: Con pointed out that all animals prefer space, which was never really dealth with by Pro. Pro neglected the saving of endangered species and the use of zoos in publicity for funding.
Vote Placed by 000ike 6 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:
|0 points
|Agreed with after the debate:
|0 points
|Who had better conduct:
|1 point
|Had better spelling and grammar:
|1 point
|Made more convincing arguments:
|3 points
|Used the most reliable sources:
|2 points
|Total points awarded:
Reasons for voting decision: I was disappointed that CON did not ever mention that human beings are intelligent life forms that act upon that intelligence, and PRO's comparisons are therefore fallacious. This would have been a fast route to destroying the affirmative case. Nevertheless, CON did sufficiently negate the resolution, and I found myself seeing too many holes in PRO's argument. Great debate :)
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 6 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:
|0 points
|Agreed with after the debate:
|0 points
|Who had better conduct:
|1 point
|Had better spelling and grammar:
|1 point
|Made more convincing arguments:
|3 points
|Used the most reliable sources:
|2 points
|Total points awarded:
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's arguments about territory and analogies with human houses aren't relevant because humans have the freedom to leave anytime they choose. A real comparison would be between zoos and prisons. Con presented enough unrefuted evidence of shortened life spans and other and other problems faced by animals in zoos to win this debate. Personally I was intrigued by Pro's argument that captivity saved animals from extinction but he didn't elaborate on it or give any specific examples.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.


text:
2018 Phoenix Cup February 22nd – 25th
[trx_title type="1″ style="regular" align="center" font_size="3″ top="inherit" bottom="inherit" left="inherit" right="inherit"]2018 Phoenix Cup Rules[/trx_title]
[trx_line style="solid" width="100%" top="inherit" bottom="inherit" left="inherit" right="inherit"]
A minimum of 6 LEDs on a minimum of 3 sides (back, and 2 sides) are MANDATORY
There will be a frame check in apon arrival, to verify that all LED's are functioning.
This is a night race, anyone that does not have LEDs will be disqualified immediately.
Props: No bigger than 5″ props
Battery: No bigger than 4s (high voltage accepted)
Frame: Nothing bigger than 280mm
VTX: Limit 200mw (must have pit mode)
If no pilot completes a heat, all quadcopters must stay in crashed locations until judges determine positions. Positions will be based on progress – whomever makes it closest to the finish wins.
(One Flip Rule) – If all pilots crash before completion of the first lap, you will get one free flip over.
**Each pilot will use provided ground station (you will not be allowed to use your own)**
There will be assigned VTX frequencies given to you before the start of the race, you will be required to use given frequencies throughout the entire event
*we have a zero tolerance policy for drama, if you come to the race with intentions other than racing, having fun, and supporting the hobby you will be asked to leave*
[trx_line style="solid" width="100%" top="inherit" bottom="inherit" left="inherit" right="inherit"]


text:
The second most photographed bridge in NSW (after Sydney Harbour Bridge) has to be Seacliff Bridge near Wollongong. Opened in 2005 it was named after an 11 year old school girl in a naming competition. The 665m bridge has seen thousands of people walk across it to admire it's beauty and can be seen from the Stanwell Tops lookout point. But, how does one get to the secret lookout spot to really capture the bridge in all its glory?The famous secret lookout point at Seacliff bridge by William Patino
Last weekend, I was near the area so I decided to stop off to find this secret path. Good news is, there's a train station nearby called Coalcliff so you don't necessarily need a car to get there. It's just 15 minute to the bridge from the station. If you're driving from Sydney, it's just over an hour's drive to Stanwell Tops. The view from Stanwell Tops overlooking the bridge in the distance
Keep driving down the road from Stanwell Tops and once you drive over the Seacliff bridge, you'll see a small car park on your right at the end of it, big enough for two cars. This is where the entrance to the path is, but because you'll be on the other side of the road, just park up round the corner on the side of the road.The car park (for 2 cars) and entrance to the secret path!Other perspective of the secret entrance and other parking at the end of the bridge
Look for this small gap in the bushes to enter the path
Once you walk into the bushes, you'll see a massive tree with a billion branches. This obviously doesn't look like the right way, but it actually is. There will look like various paths along the way which is confusing but as long as you stay to the right and work your way up through the hill, you'll come to the top to view the bridge.
This is what you'll see once you walk into the bushes – keep right and make your way up the hill
When you make your way up to the lookout, you'll see the path continues on. Just walk up another minute or so and the view gets even better! This entire walk took 10 minutes to get to the top so it's not too difficult. Things to know before you go to Sea Cliff Bridge
I would strongly recommend wearing hiking boots as it's not the safest climb in the world. I also definitely wouldn't recommend taking children up there as it's quite steep in sections and there's not a lot to hold onto. Because I went up there in the afternoon, the light wasn't great so I'd recommend going early in the morning to catch the sunrise.
I have heard there's another way up to the hill by the art college and playground, and along the railway. This track is actually illegal so I wouldn't be trying that one as an Instagrammer pointed out to me that the police caught him and his friends going along this path and they were all fined $400 each!!!
Here's a video of how we got there!
Thanks for taking the time to read this post!
If you liked this post you might like these:


text:
Theresa Hightower Returns to Stone Mountain
By Doc Lawrence
STONE MOUNTAIN, GA-When she takes the stage, Stone Mountain shakes and rattles. Add some virtuoso piano styling and the nearby mighty granite monolith might turn into Jell-O. It's Blues, Jazz and Broadway this Saturday night at Art Station's Trolley Stop Cabaret.
Theresa Hightower is Georgia's unofficial diva of song. Long thejazz club's main attraction in Atlanta's Ritz-Carlton Buckhead, thousands enjoyed her interpretations of standards by Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald, Rosemary Clooney, Peggy Lee, Aretha Franklin and other legends. Having the truly great pianist S. Renee Clark on stage makes the two-hour performance one of the most memorable evenings anywhere in the South.
On par with greats like Errol Garner, Gene Harris and Nina Simone, S. Renee Clark thrilled audiences with her gospel accompaniment and acting performance with Bernardine Mitchell in the acclaimed musical Mahalia! the story of Mahaila Jackson and her music that transformed much of America.
An evening at the Cabaret is about as near to the clubs and show bars in the French Quarter or downtown Savannah. as possible without being there.
The Cabaret is intimate, the stage elevated, the food and beverages delicious and the music is world class.
The fun starts Saturday around sunset. Parking is free and the audience primed with goodwill and joy. It's the best entertainment bargain during the Dog Days of August.
Details: http://artstation.org


text:
Hello! It is finally time for me to review a product I have been banging on for months and months, and even spamming other blogs' comment boxes singing its praises… yes ladies and gents, it's time for my review of The Body Shop Camomile Cleansing Oil.
The Body Shop Camomile Cleansing Oil
They say:
This silky-soft cleanser will effortlessly remove make-up from the whole face quickly and effectively, leaving skin feeling clean, refreshed and clear of impurities. It's the ultimate time-saver.
- Removes make-up
- Suitable for sensitive skin and contact lens wearers
- Removes waterproof make-up
- Leaves skin feeling clean and refreshed
Ingredients Analysis:
Glycine Soja Oil/Glycine Soja (Soybean) Oil (Emollient/Skin Conditioner), Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis Oil/Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) Oil (Skin-Conditioning Agent), Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil/Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil (Emollient), C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate (Emollient), Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride (Emollient), Ethylhexyl Palmitate (Skin Conditioning Agent), Isohexadecane (Emollient/Solvent), Polysorbate 85 (Surfactant-Emulsifying), Sorbitan Trioleate (Surfactant-Emulsifying), Sesamum Indicum Seed Oil/Sesamum Indicum (Sesame) Seed Oil (Skin-Conditioning Agent), Octyldodecanol (Emollient), Parfum/Fragrance (Fragrance), Linalool (Fragrance Ingredient), Tocopherol (Antioxidant), Limonene (Fragrance Ingredient), Anthemis Nobilis Flower Oil (Fragrance/Essential Oil), Citric Acid (pH Adjuster) – Source
I say:
I originally won a bottle of this in a Body Shop giveaway – you had to tweet your top skincare tip. Me, being the little competitive bean that I am, went all out and my tip was "oily skins should use oils as it balances the skin out" (something to that effect anyway…). I actually won a whole range of the camomile cleansing range but you all know what I'm like now; it takes me about 5 years to review skincare. This is my second bottle of this and I am going to say, right now, that I will be buying more bottles of this.
As a make up remover, I cannot fault it. Dispense 2-3 pumps of oil into your hands and massage on to your dry face. The oil breaks down the make up and dissolves it, loosens it, promises it a life of adventure away from a humdrum existence *skin sighs dreamily*. When it comes to make up removal, this oil makes it easy and fast. You can even use it on eye make up but do take out your contact lenses and try not to pour it INTO your eye. Sometimes my eyes can hurt a little afterwards but a quick rinse with cold water usually sorts them out. I would recommend rinsing away the oil with warm water thoroughly, and then using a flannel/muslin cloth to wipe away any residue. When rinsing away with water, you will see the oil magically change from yellow to white. This is normal, do not be alarmed.
After cleansing, my skin feels comfortable. Not tight or dried out, nor still feeling heavy from make up.
I tried using this on a morning as a morning cleanse but I have to say I'm not a fan. It just didn't feel the same and I didn't feel it was as effective using it on my morning face as opposed to using it to remove make up.
My personal opinion is that this is a great make up remover; it is quick, fast and it doesn't dry out the skin; nor does it require a packet of cotton wool pads! As skin care (emphasis on the care part), I'm not so sure. I don't feel that this could deliver long term benefits apart from obviously making sure you're not clogging your skin up by sleeping in your make up *hisses in disgust*. Like I said above, when I used it on a morning on a clean, slightly sweaty morning face it just didn't feel it was doing as good a job as it does removing make up.
Would I recommend this? Yes! Would I repurchase? Yes!
Have you tried The Body Shop Camomile Cleansing Oil? What did you think? If you haven't, would you give it a try?
Danniella x
★ Follow me on Bloglovin ★


text:
Something Blue
Lord & Lady Hetheridge #3, Lord & Lady Hetheridge
Emma Jameson
This book can be downloaded and read in iBooks on your Mac or iOS device.
The New York Times Bestselling Series
Anthony Hetheridge, ninth baron of Wellegrave and chief superintendent for New Scotland Yard, will marry Kate Wakefield in three weeks. It's inevitable–the invitations are out, the flowers are ordered, the cake is chosen. But murder waits for no man, and no wedding.
In London's prestigious West End, a disgraced CEO has been murdered at Hotel Nonpareil, an exclusive destination. No one, it seems, liked Michael Martin Hughes. Not his estranged wife, Thora, or his defiant son, Griffin. Not Hotel Nonpareil's manager, its head of security, or perhaps even the other two women in Hughes's life: his future bride, Arianna, or his secret girlfriend, Riley. Still more ominously, before Hughes died, he incurred the wrath of a potentially more unforgiving foe: Sir Duncan Godington, longtime nemesis of both CS Hetheridge and DS Deepal "Paul" Bhar.
For the first time, CS Hetheridge, Kate and Bhar find themselves under tremendous pressure to uncover the killer in the shortest time frame ever. Has Scotland Yard, not to mention Downing Street, lost confidence in Hetheridge? Will the murder conviction rest on hard forensic evidence, a mountain of circumstantial details, or an impulsive theft? Find out by returning to the world of ICE BLUE and BLUE MURDER in SOMETHING BLUE, the third mystery featuring Lord Hetheridge, Kate Wakefield and Paul Bhar.
What's New in Version 2017.0
Typos corrected, formatting updated, buy links updated to include new releases.
Customer Reviews
Tensions Rise as the Wedding Day Approaches
All your favorites are back and have a wedding to plan in addition to solving a murder. I really enjoy this series because of the characters. The relationship between Tony, Kate and Paul continues to strengthen and they have a real understanding now of one another. They are a team and they protect one another. Their interactions are usually pretty funny. The usual villain, Sir Duncan Godington, is back as well.
The author takes some time to give us Tony's, Kate's and Paul's point of view at different points in the story. This one is more focused on Tony. His life is in for a major change. Going from a bachelor to a husband with a small child in the house as well as her disabled brother is quite a challenge. There is even some discussion of them adding to the mix with their own child. Tony also takes an interest in his daughter and seems to now want to pursue a relationship with her. Kate's mother and sister are coming out of the woodwork and the press and Scotland Yard are putting a lot of pressure on the couple to solve the murder fast.
Kate is stressed by all the attention. She really worries about her mother and sister harassing the couple. We also learn about Paul's life with his mom and his dating habits. He is in for a major change as well. We are introduced to some new characters who are suspects in the murder. They are a diverse group and quite a challenge for the team to manage and get accurate information from in order to solve the crimes. As with the other stories in the series, it is the relationships that get the focus of the attention.
It is a great series and I encourage you to check them all out. I received a copy in return for a honest review.
Fun Mystery
This series is a fun read with serious happenings and funny ones too.
Something Blue
Like the regular characters. Not difficult to put down. Romantic part better than the side stories and plot.
Other Books in This Series
- Black & Blue
- 2015
- Ice Blue
- 2015
- Blue Murder
- 2013
- $5.99
- Category: Mysteries & Thrillers
- Published: May 22, 2013
- Publisher: Lyonnesse Books
- Seller: Stephanie Abbott
- Print Length: 230 Pages
- Language: English
- Series: Lord & Lady Hetheridge #3, Lord & Lady Hetheridge
- Version: 2017.0


text:
Finally! with Natalie Stoberman
About This Show
We are Finally! laying it all out there and talking about everything: NBA and WNBA, NHL, NWHL and CWHL, MLB and NPF, PGA and LPGA. Get the idea? Finally! there's a podcast that talks about men's AND women's sports - equally. We will cover the big games, sprinkle in some trash talk and challenge the gender inequality that exists in sport. Hearing is believing, and Finally! offers listeners a podcast that plays every position and where women don't just sit in the stands or twirl for reporters. Host Natalie Stoberman calls up leading thinkers and actors in sports to discuss the news of the day, and how to even out the playing field between male and female athletes.Read more »


text:
Main → Afghanistan → Farah → Showalga-ye Wasati
Map of Showalga-ye Wasati Farah, Afghanistan
Other Names: Shah Walga Wasafi,Shaval'gakh-Vasati,Shaval'gakh-Vasati,Showalga-ye Wasati,Showālgā-ye Wasaţī,Shāh Wālgā Wasāfi,Sowalga Wasati,Šowālgā Wasāţī,شوالگا وسطی, Showālgā-ye Wasaţī
Showalga-ye Wasati
Welcome to the Showalga-ye Wasati google satellite map! This populated place is situated in Farah, Afghanistan. Original name (with diacritics) of the place is Showālgā-ye Wasaţī. See Showalga-ye Wasati photos and images from satellite below, explore the aerial photographs of Showālgā-ye Wasaţī area. This placemark was added 2010-10-09.
Map of Showalga-ye Wasati
- Country: Afghanistan
- Province: Farah
- Category: populated place
- Altitude: 0 m
- Population: 0
Asia/Kabul +4.5
- Local Time: 04:36
- Sunrise: 05:46
- Sunset: 19:02
Wiki articles near Showalga-ye Wasati
Places near Showalga-ye Wasati
Online Dating
Showalga-ye Wasati Singles. Date and find singles is the best online singles dating directory of local dating sites and personals for meeting and dating singles in your area.
Showalga-ye Wasati, Afghanistan, From cheap hotel rooms to luxury hotel deals, discount 5 star hotels. Read reviews & descriptions, see maps & quality photos. Make a booking today. Find hotels in Showalga-ye Wasati, Afghanistan


text:
Its finally finished. Piece one of four. I may tweak it a bit, but this is it for now.
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Monday, October 7, 2013
Is the room stretching?
Posted by Tyler Richlen AKA OZ! at 2:53 PM
No comments:
Labels: Daredevil, elektra, haunted mansion, OZ, oz!, stretching painting, stretching paintings, Tyler Richlen
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


text:
Published at Tuesday, February 06th, 2018 - 03:21:49 AM. Living Room. By Florentin Marjolaine.
Hit to Read More
In any room that's tight on space, it's tempting to push all big furniture up against the walls to create a kind of pool of open flooring in the middle. But while useful for doing cartwheels—and there is some real liberation in being able to do just that—the space would be put to better use serving a function.
Once the furniture is in place it's important to think about where to place the accessories. No doubt you will have some window treatments and artwork, and maybe a television and some sconces. Give just as much thought to placing living room accessories as you do the furniture.
Recent Post
Monthly Archives
Static Pages
About ⋅ Contact ⋅ Privacy Policy ⋅ Terms of Service ⋅ Copyright/IP Policy
Any content, trademark's, or other material that might be found on the Schunkit website that is not Schunkit's property remains the copyright of its respective owner/s. In no way does Schunkit claim ownership or responsibility for such items, and you should seek legal consent for any use of such materials from its owner.
© Copyright 2018 Schunkit. All Rights Reserved.


text: Rigol = £300, didn't realise new DSO's were that cheap Mark. So yes, an old Tek DSO doesn't make sense. I'm happy with my old analogue Tek's and as I don't work on anything over 20khz at the moment I won't be rushing out to buy a new DSO. It is easy to be smitten with the pretty colours and other function's a DSO has, like displaying the frequency, cursor's to make measuring easier etc. Still I'm slowly dipping a toe into digital circuits and higher frequency stuff so i'll look at getting one, one day. By then they'll probably be going for £50. : ).


text:
Some Random pics and familiar face :)
And as usual, some blackjack and poker session in my house later. No Mahjong since i dun feel like disturbing both my left right neighbour since they are indian LOL..guess they suffer alot on CNY period XP
Thanks for those who coming! Cayenne, Samantha, Jeffro, Zhao, Ken, Alex, Jacq, Marilyn, Mike, Shannon, Xiang, Victoria & Samuel. Hope can have this kind of things again next year. oh might shift it to my 1.5st floor LOL


text:
Tag: pro tools
Equaliser Tips and Tricks – Know Your FrequenciesOn
Equaliser Tips and Tricks – Know Your Frequencies 50Hz Increase to add more fullness to lowest frequency instruments like foot, toms, and the bass. Reduce to decrease the "boom" of the bass and will increase overtones and the recognition of bass line…
Parallel Compression ExplainedOn
Parallel Compression Explained
Multiband Compression – Waves Linear Multiband Tutorial Pt 2On
Multiband Compression – Waves Linear Multiband Tutorial Pt 2
Recording Guitars – Interview with Diamond Duggal from SwamiOn
Part 3 of 3 video interviews with Diamond Duggal from the band Swami. Diamond talks about recording guitars for the new album 'Upgrade'.
Soundflower – Free Inter-application Audio Routing Utility for Mac OS XOn
Free Inter-application Audio Routing Utility for Mac OS X Soundflower is a Mac OS X (10.2 and later) system extension that allows applications to pass audio to other applications. Soundflower is easy to use, it simply presents itself as an audio device,…
TCE Time Stretching in Pro Tools 8On
TCE Time Stretching in Pro Tools 8
Vocal Plugin Chain Set Up – Example 1On
Vocal Plugin Chain Set Up Example 1 Quite often people ask what plugins I use on vocals and in what order. To help answer this question I will periodically post pictures of the different vocal chain set ups I use. In this…
Zero Latency Monitoring for Digidesign 002 and 003On
Zero Latency Monitoring for Digidesign 002 and 003 RME's Fireface Offers A Unique Solution Robert Holsman of Jigsaw24.com Reading through the various Pro Tools forums, there are two commonly recurring themes. Firstly, Pro Tools users love Pro Tools software for its reliability,…
Musicians – Use Skype To Collaborate RemotelyOn
Musicians – Use Skype To Collaborate Remotely If you're a Pro Tools user you may have heard of a plugin called Source Connect. Whilst this article is not directly about Source Connect, it is useful to understand what it is and what…


text:
Herbs just love hypertufa pots and you will too if you're looking for a late-summer project to involve the kids or grandkids. You'll need rubber gloves, a dust mask and a sheet of plastic to protect your work area. Choose a mold of some kind to shape the hypertufa around, invert it onto the work area and drape the mold with plastic. The mold could be any pot or trough shape — a large mixing bowl, a small Styrofoam cooler, even a sturdy box — but it's easiest to start small with your first one.
Kathleen Halloran, former editor of The Herb Companion, grows potted herbs in Las Vegas, where she is a freelance writer and editor.
Fibermesh is available at many ready-mix cement companies. For the name of a dealer near you, contact SI Concrete Systems, 4019 Industry Dr., Chattanooga, TN 37416; (800) 635-2308; www.fibermesh.com.
Click here for the original article, The Pot Spot: Container Herb Gardening.
Sit in on dozens of practical workshops from the leading authorities on natural health, organic gardening, real food and more!LEARN MORE


text:
This is a rush transcript from "The Kelly File," May 20, 2016. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.
TRISH REGAN, FOX NEWS HOST: Breaking tonight, search crews are ramping up the efforts to locate the black boxes from EgyptAir flight 804 in hopes of determining once and for all what brought that plane down.
Welcome, everyone to "The Kelly File," I'm Trish Regan in tonight for Megyn Kelly. Right now a navy ship is on its way to the crash scene. It will search the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea for the flight data recorders. So far, no terror group has claimed responsibility for the plane's destruction. But there is a new clue tonight. Reports now suggest smoke was detected in a lavatory near the cockpit. Still it's unclear what and it's unclear who might have caused the crash.
Back here at home the fear of a potential terror attack on a U.S. passenger plane is bringing the issue of national security and foreign policy right to the forefront of this presidential race. And it's leading to an ugly back and forth between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Mrs. Clinton striking first.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Trump this morning was out hot and early on Twitter when this happened saying, looks like another act of terror. More proof that we're weak.
HILLARY CLINTON, D-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: He says a lot of things that are provocative that actually make the important task of building this coalition, bringing everybody to the table and defeating terrorism, more difficult.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Let me ask you, do you think that Donald Trump is qualified to be president?
CLINTON: No, I do not.
REGAN: Hours later, Mr. Trump responding saying, Hillary Clinton is the one who is unfit to be president. Take a look.
TRUMP: So today we had a terrible tragedy, and she came up and she said that Donald Trump talked about radical Islamic terrorism. He essentially shouldn't be running for office. He doesn't have the right to run for office. And I'm saying to myself, what just happened about 12 hours ago? A plane got blown out of the sky. And if anything -- if anybody thinks it wasn't blown out of the sky, you are 100 percent wrong, folks, okay?
REGAN: All right. Trace Gallagher reporting for us from our West Coast Newsroom tonight. Trace.
TRACE GALLAGHER, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Trish, if there was ever a question about the polar opposite political instincts of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, the crash of EgyptAir Flight 804 certainly settled it before any major details were known about the crash, Donald Trump, in a move many called impulsive, took to Twitter and declared that it was a deliberate act quoting here, looks like yet another terrorist attack.
Airplane departed from Paris. When will we get tough? Smart, and vigilant. Great hate and sickness. Hillary Clinton's response was much more cautious saying we should wait for more information. But Clinton was very quick to go after Trump, calling his comments irresponsible, dangerous, and reckless. Watch.
CLINTON: I know how hard this job is. And I know that we need steadiness as well as strength and smarts in it. And I have concluded he is not qualified to be president of the United States.
GALLAGHER: Trump, who calls himself a counter-puncher hit back again and again saying, quote, "By the way, ask Hillary who blew up the plane last night. Another terrible but preventable tragedy." Trump went on to say, she's the one who is unfit to serve. Watch.
DONALD TRUMP, R-PRESUMPTIVE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE: So we're going to have to get very tough and very smart. And Hillary Clinton can never get you there. It's four more years of Obama, and this country can't take it.
GALLAGHER: Political experts believe this back and forth will be a key part of the campaign's narrative going forward with the Clinton camp citing her experience and temperament while accusing the Trump camp of being -- or Trump of being intemperate. The Trump camp will then respond by hammering away at the Republican belief that Democrats are loathe to call any attack terrorism to avoid offending Muslims. And according to a new Quinnipiac poll, this clash of temperaments has benefits for both sides. Voters in the swing states of Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania say when it comes to handling terrorism, they prefer Trump over Clinton, albeit by a small margin. But when it comes to handling international crises, they prefer Hillary by a lot. Just one more facet of what's already shaping up as a
pretty personal campaign -- Trish.
REGAN: Indeed. Right. Thank you so much, Trace. You know just days before the Egyptian airline crashed, voters told Fox News they trust Donald Trump to do a better job on terrorism than Hillary Clinton by a margin of 52 to 40 percent.
Joining us now, Boris Epshteyn, a Trump supporter and former communications aid at the McCain campaign. Richard Fowler a nationally syndicated radio host and senior fellow with the New Leaders Council. And Charles Hurt, a political columnist for The Washington Times.
Gentlemen, all good to see you. I'll start with you Boris. And Donald Trump is a man with no classical training in foreign affairs. A man who has never held office. And yet Boris he is resonating with American voters on this very issue of terror. Why?
BORIS EPSHTEYN, TRUMP SUPPORTER: Because he is able to get to the point. He doesn't pars his words. And he speaks what he believes. He doesn't wait. If you look at the clock when Hillary Clinton was making those comments, it was 12:52 Central. About 2:00 Eastern. Donald Trump was out six hours before then talking about what actually happen. Same thing happened in Brussels. As soon as the Brussels terror attack happened, Donald Trump was on the phone to the radio shows, to the morning shows, giving his view, speaking to the American people. What did Hillary Clinton do? She had a conference call with about 30 of her advisors and then gave a speech at Stanford. That difference is exactly why Donald Trump is leading in the polls as a whole and on terrorism specifically.
REGAN: You know, Charles, a lot of people say it just feels like he has some common sense. I mean, when people heard about that crash of course everyone's mind went straight to where Donald Trump went, with the assumption that this very likely could be a terrorism event. But we still do not know that for sure. But he came out as Boris says, hours before anyone else. Is that not a risky thing to do?
CHARLES HURT, WASHINGTON TIMES POLITICAL COLUMNIST: Yes. But he's willing to take risks. And I think that they have paid off very well for him. You know? And it may turn out that his, you know, his declaration that this is terrorism winds up being premature. But I think what we're seeing in polling, especially on the issue of terrorism is that people would far rather have somebody who is a bit premature about something like this than to have someone who for seven and a half years refused to even utter the name of our enemy. And I think that for as long as Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump clash on an issue like this, she can win all the polls she wants to on international -- handling international crises. Nobody cares about them. All they care about in terms of this is terrorism.
REGAN: Richard Fowler, does she need to be a little more forthcoming when she's up against the likes of Donald Trump? Does she need to be able to say, this is radical Islamic terror? Does she need to at least identify the enemy if she wants to be seen as tough on terror?
RICHARD FOWLER, NATIONALLY SYNDICATED RADIO HOST: Well, Hillary is tough on terror. She has been, and she has been in the State Department four years. She led this country's foreign policy and quite effectively at that. Here's the real question we should be asking ourselves, Trish, do we want someone like Donald Trump who is completely unhinged who has no self- control running our foreign policy? And the answer to that question is no. You want somebody who is tempered, you want somebody who is strong, you want somebody who is going to hear all the voices, to get all the information before --
REGAN: I think you're bring out an interesting point.
BORIS: I happened to disagree though.
REGAN: Hang on, Boris. He is bringing up a very interesting point. Donald Trump is willing to spout off, but -- but let's face it. He's not president yet. Is this part of his political tactic, Boris, because it resonates with voters? They want someone who seems tough. If he were president, would it be -- would it be different?
EPSHTEYN: It's both a tactic and it is who he really is. This is an authentic candidate. Just like Ronald Reagan was an authentic candidate.
Let's talk about what Richard just said. Hillary Clinton was a terrible secretary of state. Just because she was one doesn't give her any credit whatsoever. Benghazi, China, Libya, Egypt, Russia, all fronts where this country is worse off. Now, after she had been secretary of state. And our country here under Obama and Hillary, we had San Bernardino happen here. And who knows what else could have happened.
REGAN: Richard, I mean, they may not have been her policies. They may not have been her policies. However, Richard, she was there, she was secretary of state, and we have seen an incredible rise in ISIS terrorism in the last eight years. Will she be tarnished by this?
FOWLER: Not at all. And here's the thing where Boris is wrong. Right?
REGAN: Whoa, whoa, I back up, Richard. How can she not -- no, no, no, no! How can she not be tarnished by that? She was part of that administration.
FOWLER: And here's the thing. What we've seen under President Obama is a roll back on the war in Iraq, a roll back in the war in Afghanistan. Both irresponsible wars taken to task by people who were irresponsible just like Donald Trump. Right? Vietnam another example of irresponsible war because we didn't have all the facts. So, if we are going to go into war again in a country that's war weary, we don't want the likes of Donald Trump being at the nuclear --
REGAN: She voted for the war in Iraq. And she also was part of an administration that got out of there. They hightailed it out as fast as they possibly could which many believe has led to this rise in ISIS terrorism.
HURT: And of course earlier this week we just passed the -- Barack Obama broke the record for being at war longer than any president in history, including George W. Bush. But one thing that you can't blame Barack Obama for. You can only accept that maybe he picked Hillary for Secretary of State completely in her wheel house is, the day after the Benghazi attacks, a coordinated terrorist attack, she had information, and knew that, or should have known that. And instead she lied about and it said that it was-- cited some internet movie which of course then brought that to the forefront and sparked rise around the world.
REGAN: I mean, so at the end of the day, you're coming back to this polls, I cited in the beginning of this segment where Americans see Donald Trump, a man who has no political experience, as the guy who can keep them safe.
HURT: He sounds like he knows what he is talking about.
EPSHTEYN: And the reason is, Trish, because Hillary Clinton --
REGAN: All right. Okay. We're going to have to save this for another day. Gentlemen, wonderful to see you all. Richard, we'll talk again soon. I promise. All right. Thank you so much.
Coming up, everyone. The latest details on the search that's underway right now for that debris in the Mediterranean. As some sources still think this was terror. So, which 2016 contender would handle terror, handle ISIS best with a fair and balanced debate, we're going to have Sebastian Gorka and Larry Korb next.
Plus, as investigators recover debris, we are getting new details about the final minutes of that fateful flight, details that may help solve the question of what or who might have actually brought that plane down. Don't go anywhere.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I would say that it's probably an explosive that was brought onto the plane not by a passenger, but by an insider, by somebody who worked either at that airport --
REGAN: Breaking tonight, harrowing new details beginning to shed light on what may have transpired during those final minutes of EgyptAir Flight 804. Debris from that flight was found near the location where it sent out its final signal as the frantic search for the plane's black boxes begin. Slowly but surely investigators are beginning to piece together what happened.
Greg Palkot joins us right now from Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris where this doomed flight took off.
GREG PALKOT, FOX NEWS SENIOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT: Trish, we just have gotten important new information about the harrowing last minutes on board the doomed EgyptAir Flight 804. According to a respected aviation website backed up by our own aviation expert, smoke alarms went off in the forward bathroom. And the avionics compartment just before the crash. That information relayed via satellite monitoring system.
Our source says that this affected computers and controls on the plane and could have led to its deadly dive. A possible sign of a critical malfunction or a plane's system recoiling from a terror attack. This as the air and sea search for debris from the plane continues in the Mediterranean where it went down. Plane parts, personal belongings and human remains were found some 200 miles off of the Egyptian coast. As more information emerges about who was on the plane, the pilot identified as 36- year-old Mohammed Saeed Shakir. The co-pilot a young man, 24-year-old, Mohamed Mamdouh Assem. Both from Cairo, Egypt. Both said to have past periodic security test ran by the airline.
Here at Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris from where the doomed plane left, with the terror options still out there, and officials say today, security has been tightened. Islamist leaning staffers already have been identified. Finally in Cairo, where many families of the victims are or have traveled to, prayers were said on this Muslim holy day. For those lost, for those just beginning to be recovered. For whatever reason -- Trish.
REGAN: Thank you, Greg. Also tonight, questions swirling around this flight and whether a terror group could have possibly brought this plane down. When a Russian passenger jet was taken down by a bomb over Egypt last fall, it took an ISIS affiliate weeks to claim responsibility. With terror, the second most important issue to American voters, they are looking to presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton for some answers. Both think they are the ones best equipped to do it. Listen to this.
TRUMP: We are going to beat ISIS very quickly, very quickly, folks, very, very quickly, going to be fast. Going be fast. We're going to be fast. I have a great plan. It's going to be great. What is it? I'd rather not say. I want to be unpredictable. Why would you announce that? Why do you announce that? Why do you tell the enemy that you are sending people over there, and they now have a target on their back?
CLINTON: His idea that he quote has a secret plan to get rid of ISIS that he is not going to tell anybody, I found it disturbing because I -- you know, as senator from New York for eight years, as secretary of state for four years, I know that the stakes are high, that we face some real challenges and dangers in the world.
REGAN: Joining me right now, we have Dr. Sebastian Gorka, he is the Chair of the Military Theory at Marine Corps University, and author of "Defeating Jihad." And Larry Korb, he is a senior fellow at the center for American progress and a former assistant defense secretary. Welcome to you both.
Dr. Gorka, starting with you, what do you think Donald Trump's plan is to get rid of ISIS?
DR. SEBASTIAN GORKA, CHAIR OF MILITARY THEORY, MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY: Well, I'm not on his campaign staff. I did advise Mr. Trump last year on some national security issues. He's being a little bit cagey. He gave his first very big foreign speech just a couple of weeks ago, and there's this one big difference about Mr. Trump. He actually believes we are at war and he wants to win and destroy the enemy. And that would be very, very refreshing Trish after the last seven disastrous years.
REGAN: Yes. But at the same time Larry, he'd strikes at times a very isolationist type of tone. In other words saying, we shouldn't be involved in this battle overseas and the Middle East. Certainly not battles that we're not going to see through. How do you reconcile that with he's saying he's going to destroy ISIS?
LARRY KORB, FELLOW, CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: Well, I think that's the problem, he'll say one thing and then do something else, he's very impulsive. He came out right after the plane went down and said, we know it's terrorist, you just had a report on that. He said it could have been a critical malfunction. He said he wants to defeat ISIS but he doesn't want to get involved in places overseas. I mean, one of the reasons where you have ISIS is because the Syrian civil war. He said, he wants to get involved in it. So, I think he's got -- now he's the presumptive nominee, he can't keep playing this games where he says, well, I'm not going to tell you. No, he needs to tell the American people and the world, because around the world listens to him, he's now the nominee of one of our major political parties.
REGAN: Well, Dr. Gorka, he's promised that he would get rid of ISIS. That he would bomb ISIS, is that -- is that enough in an environment such as we're living in right now politically speaking where people are hungry for details and they do want answers, and this is something Hillary Clinton is going to continue to harp on as we see this race play out.
GORKA: Well, he did give some answers, and they are very important ones. He said in his foreign policy speech that the Muslim Brotherhood is inimical to democracy and is a threat to the United States. And he is prepared to put it on the foreign terrorist organization list just as Egypt, where it was created, has already done, and the Muslim Brotherhood is the grandfather of all Jihadi groups, al Qaeda, ISIS, Al-Nusra, you name it. So, he has made some statements that are very reassuring. And things that simply after the last seven years are a breath of fresh air. It's disastrous, whether it's Benghazi, whether it's betraying the Iranian people in the green revolution, whether it's the events of Libya. You couldn't -- you couldn't imagine a worse foreign policy than the last seven years.
REGAN: Well --
GORKA: So whatever he does, I think it would be an improvement.
REGAN: Larry, I mean that's the big challenge right now for Hillary Clinton. She has to live down being secretary of state at a time when ISIS came to power. You look at the last eight years, and I don't think anyone could say, we are in a good state as far as our foreign affairs go. How does she campaign when American voters know there is a good chance they could get another four years of exactly what they have had for the last eight?
KORB: Well, I think it's important to keep in mind, ISIS came into being because when Bush's mind, he was senseless invasion of Iraq, which he was not honest about. And basically then, that's why ISIS came into being. And everybody is blaming Obama for getting out of Iraq in 2011. Bush signed an agreement with them in 2008 that said, we had to get out. I remember asking Maliki this. And he said, you sign an agreement. And basically, that's what created this situation. Had we not done that, we wouldn't be having these problems today.
REGAN: You know, the challenges, you get into something, you have got to see it through. You can't just run out and leave chaos behind. Because otherwise you are going the see exactly what we are seeing right now.
KORB: Well, I agree. Bush shouldn't have signed that agreement. If he hadn't done it, we wouldn't have this situation. But remember when he signed it, Maliki said, we have repelled the invaders when Bush signed the agreement.
REGAN: I'll give you the last word. Go ahead. Dr. Gorka, go ahead.
GORKA: I think we have to stop blaming Bush. I mean, that is just hackneyed. Let's talk about the future. Let's talk about San Bernardino, Brussels, and Paris. Let's talk about the fact ISIS is the most powerful Jihadi organization the world has ever seen and it was facilitated by our withdrawal in 2011 when Secretary Clinton was the secretary of state.
There would be no ISIS and no caliphate if we still had American troops in Iraq and President Obama hadn't pulled them out and Secretary Clinton hadn't supported that decision. That's the truth. Let's stop blaming Bush.
REGAN: Gentlemen, goo to see you. Thank you so much. I appreciate you being here.
KORB: But Bush signed the agreement. You still haven't --
REGAN: Larry Korb, thank you. I've got to go. I'm coming up against a hard break.
New details coming into us tonight about the final moments aboard that EgyptAir Flight that may help explain what caused the deadly crash. Up next we'll going to hear what the experts are saying may have brought that plane down. Ambassador James Woolsey is here.
Plus, we'll speak with Colonel Tony Schaeffer and aviation expert Robby Mark. Passengers aren't the only ones frustrated meanwhile with the TSA. The agency is now feeling the wrath of politicians. Florida Congressman John Mica is fed up. And he's telling us why.
REP. JOHN MICA, R-FLORIDA: Last night, I had the night from hell. I had three people who I invited to Washington who came to Washington, spent most of the day with me -- all of them missed their flight standing in a TSA line.
REGAN: Tonight, we're learning more about the final minutes of the EgyptAir Flight. It left Paris for Cairo but suddenly, and without warning fell from the sky, killing all 66 people aboard. News this evening that there was smoke in the bathroom and in the communication system minutes before the crash.
Catherine Herridge has more. Catherine.
CATHERINE HERRIDGE, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT: An official confirmed to Fox News tonight that smoke was detected on Flight 804 before it disappeared. The plane's reporting network called ACARS sends information to ground stations about the -- of the jet systems and status of on board sensors. One aviation expert says smoke is consistent with a number of events including a small bomb as well as mechanical and electrical failure which could explain Flight 804's erratic flight path, that sudden 90 degree turn to the left and then the 360 spin to the right before it dropped off radar.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: In other words, it was out of control. Something had happened that caused the plane to do then -- something other than the pilot actually telling it do those things.
HERRIDGE: As a second U.S. Navy plane joins the search for submerged wreckage, a counter-terrorism source who tracks al Qaeda and ISIS, social media accounts for the U.S. government said there has been no credible or even semi-credible claim of responsibility. In fact, the Islamic State terror group put out new propaganda that made no mention of Egypt, France or the flight. Fox News is told that U.S. investigators are doing a deep dive on the two Egyptian pilots identified today and a review of their social media profiles who determine their state of minds before the flight and extremist ties -- Trish.
REGAN: Thank you so much, Catherine.
HERRIDGE: You're welcome.
REGAN: All right. Joining me now with his assessment of what have or who took down the jetliner, former CIA Director Ambassador James Woolsey. Ambassador, welcome.
AMBASSADOR JAMES WOOLSEY, FORMER CIA DIRECTOR: Good to be with you.
REGAN: Do you believe this was terrorism?
WOOLSEY: I think it's more likely than not, although this new information about the smoke in the cockpit could suggest some kind of malfunction or it could suggest a small bomb that went off. But let me say that I don't think that's the main point. Because whether or not this particular event was terrorism or not, there is a lot of terrorism in that part of the world, and people are focusing on aircraft.
They have since the beginning of this crazy business and 9/11. And we need to figure out how to make our airports and facilities that aircraft use safer for people to use.
REGAN: Are you concerned about us here in the U.S.? In other words, what kind of vulnerabilities do we have here right now?
WOOLSEY: Well, those large international corporations, some $80 billion company that operates all over the world, some 70-plus countries with maintenance facilities and facilities for essentially caring for all of the logistics dealing with aircraft.
And those companies -- that big company has been moving away from America -- in the United States from American-based companies with largely American workers and moving toward companies -- subcontracting to companies that hire a great many foreign workers some of them from the Mideast.
REGAN: Foreign workers here in the United States?
WOOLSEY: Yes, some from Mideast.
REGAN: Foreign workers here in the United States many of whom you say are from the Middle East are actually the ones responsible for some of the airlines that we have here in the U.S. whether that be cargo.
WOOLSEY: We don't know, what we do know is that we have to vet them very, very carefully. And vetting people from that part of the word is really hard because passports going for $100 that are really extremely good copies-- all of that is the way things are in Lebanon and...
REGAN: Ambassador, I just want to articulate this, basically what you're saying is you're concerned about companies that are active in airports here in the United States hiring Islamic sympathist -- Islamic extremist sympathist that are coming in contact with airlines here, thus making all of us vulnerable?
WOOLSEY: In a sense, yes. The French had to fire a large number and review a might even larger number of foreign workers, and we need to pay attention to it. It's not that we want to tell everybody from Syria that gets into the United States that they can't work here. No. But what we do need to do is...
REGAN: But maybe not at the airport?
WOOLSEY: What we need to do is vet them very thoroughly and maybe not at the airport if they are marginal on the vetting.
REGAN: I mean, it's the reality of the world we live in. However, Ambassador Woolsey, a lot of people would say that's racial profiling. I mean you can't just say, okay, anybody from the Middle East is, you know, not able to get a job at the airport because we're suspect of them.
WOOLSEY: If we don't profile, we lose a really important tool. In New York City, there was a period of time in which there were -- in organized crime, you wanted to check first in Jewish neighborhoods and then later it was Sicilian neighborhoods. People who commit crimes, including terror often come from similar backgrounds, they work together, they know one another, and sometimes they are even family members. And we need to understand that and get on top of it and not force...
REGAN: How do we understand that when our president won't even acknowledge the threat that we face?
WOOLSEY: Get a new president.
REGAN: All right. Ambassador James Woolsey. Thank you very much.
WOOLSEY: Thank you.
REGAN: No terrorist group has yet to take responsibility for the crash. Is that an indication of anything? Joining me now with their thoughts, Lieutenant Colonel Tony Shaffer. He was a CIA trained intel-ops. He's now with the London Center for Policy Research and Robert Mark, a commercial pilot and publisher of Jetwhine.com. Good to see both of you. Colonel Shaffer, do you find it at all significant that this plane went down immediately after crossing into Egyptian air space?
TONY SHAFFER, CIA TRAINED INTEL OPERATIVE: It could mean something. It could not. It's one of those unknowns at this point. One of the points I think is important to recognize, is that our airbus is a completely automated system. A Boeing has a different way of flying their aircraft -- basically designed aircraft. This was a catastrophic loss of control. That means something happened to destroy the ability of the pilots the take command of the flight.
Now, when that automated system crashes in the Airbus it just goes down. Boeing has a way of actually giving control back to the pilots. So, there's a precedence for this and I think we're may be looking not broadly enough at the usual suspects. Ramszi Yousef actually did a bombing like this -- Ramzi is actually in a federal prison right now by the way -- Al Qaeda did a bombing of a Philippine airliner in December of `94 where they actually had a device go off with the intended design of taking the aircraft down by hitting the fuel tank. Missed it, but it took out the flight controls.
So, we've seen this before and we have to recognize that Al Qaeda in the Arabic peninsula has been pretty silent but has been desirous of using some sort of a bomb on an airplane for a while. So, I think based on -- if you look at the patterns of the past, it may be repeating to the future.
REGAN: Do you then think that Al Qaeda is a group that we should be honing in on? You've also got Isis, you've got Boko Haram. There are many different terrorist groups out there right now when you think of potentially who could have done this? Al Qaeda is at the top of your list?
SHAFFER: Well, Al Qaeda because they have both had the attempt. They've been seeking targets. The shoe bomber, Reed was trained in Yemen. Yemen has been the place where Al Qaeda has been rapidly able to expand again.
And frankly, you know, this is more of a pattern I would recognize coming out of Al Qaeda who by the way, is probably wanting to compete with Isis, you know, and no one is taking credit yet. So, I'm just saying it is. I'm just saying it's a possibility.
REGAN: That's one perplexing thing, right. Nobody has come forward and taken credit. That said, it did take weeks for Isis to come forward to claim responsibility for the Russian passenger jet that went down in Egypt recently.
Robert, turning to you, when you heard tonight's news that there was smoke in the bathroom, did that make you question at all the terrorism theories that are out there right now?
WOOLSEY: Oh, it did to me, certainly. It almost seemed like a game changer to me because the first thing I wanted to know after I heard about the smoke in the cockpit, which of course is an awful thing because it would cause the crew to lose control of the airplane because you can't even see the instruments. But what I wanted to know is what caused the heat sensors to go off in the bay below the cockpit.
What was the cargo this aircraft was carrying? I mean, you know, this could also be a catastrophic failure in the sense that if it was carrying lithium ion batteries and one of them started to short circuit -- it's had this kind a reaction. So to me, I'm not completely, you know, focused on this terrorism. I'm not saying it's not. It could be. But I think we have other options.
REGAN: There are a lot of different options are there. They need to find this black box. They have a definite period of time that they need to find it in. What is the likelihood that they will find it given the depth of the sea?
WOOLSEY: Well, I think they'll find it. I mean -- although it took a while, two years as a matter of fact for them to find the ones from the Air France airplane, we're going to probably find the pingers, the little radio transmitters on these boxes are still emitting a signal that when they get into the right area, they're going to hear them. And they may not be able to grab them right away, but they're going to know pretty darn close where they are on the bottom of the Mediterranean.
REGAN: Thank you so much gentlemen. Good to have you here tonight.
WOOLSEY: You're welcome.
SHAFFER: Thank you.
REGAN: Security ramping up at airports across the country right now likely bringing no end in sight to those long lines TSA passengers -- TSA is dealing with their passengers. One Republican congressman credited with forming the agency says the TSA is destined the fail. He joins us next.
Plus, a looming deadline brings an onslaught of new regulations leading some to wonder if the president is making sure his legacy just doesn't get overturned.
REGAN: With major airports like Los Angeles International boosting counter- terrorism efforts in the wake of the downed EgyptAir flight, passengers around the U.S. can expect increasingly frustrating TSA experiences. Passengers subjected to long lines and missed flights are beginning to question whether the safety procedures are really worth it. And tonight, you will hear from this Republican congressman, credited with forming the TSA agency. Here he is.
MICA: And you can't get a hold of a damn person in TSA even as a member of Congress nor would they take your calls. I'll tell you what, it's just unbelievable. If you can fail, and you will fail, and your attempts on the training and recruiting and all will be a failure. I can tell you that and I told you that on my cell phone when you came in because you cannot recruit, you cannot train, you cannot retain, and you cannot administrate it. It's just a huge failing government program, and it will fail.
REGAN: Florida congressman John Mica joins me right now. Congressman Mica, welcome.
MICA: Oh, good to be with you, but under some tough circumstances.
REGAN: You sound pretty upset sir.
MICA: Well, I am. A lot depends on our getting it right and keeping the American public safe.
REGAN: You helped create this agency, the TSA, why is it such a disaster now?
MICA: Well, it spun out of control. We started out with 16,500 screeners. When government failed to put in regulations even to direct screeners or to limit things that could be taken aboard, we grew to 22,000, to 35,000, 45,000 screeners. That's just the tip of the iceberg.
Then we have 13,000 screeners -- non-screeners on top of that. We have the biggest bureaucracy created and government agencies -- it's bigger than seven cabinet offices and they can't get it right. They spend money on equipment that doesn't work. They can't train and retain personnel.
And now, because of their failure, which was disclosed by the media last fall, 95 percent failure rate with 45,000 screeners -- in 2008, the media uncovered 75 percent failure rate with 35,000 screeners so, they got more screeners and a higher failure rate. It's not good.
REGAN: I'll admit it I've gotten a few large bottles of shampoo through those lines myself without a TSA agent even blinking.
MICA: And that bottle of shampoo doesn't pose a risk. What does matter is they've let 17 known terrorists go through airports 24 times and failed on that account. These are the reports that I get.
REGAN: It is very scary and this is a reality that we need to be confronting right now. How do we change this? Do we need the private markets here? Do we need a company running the TSA as opposed to the government?
MICA: I'm trying to get them out of the personnel business because they can't manage the screeners. And screeners are not law enforcement or intelligence people. The most important role of government is the intelligence part, connecting the dots. That's what's failed every time. That's what's failed in Paris and Europe and some of these events. But we've got to get those terrorists before they get to the gate or if they get to the gate, we stop them before they board. They're not capable of doing it.
REGAN: Congressman, I think about Israel...
MICA: They're very good.
REGAN: ... and the security they have for example of El Al, very different than anything you see in the U.S. Nonetheless, Israel is a small country. The United States is not. Can we -- can we do something similar to what they're doing given that we are as large a country as we are?
MICA: Well we've got -- we've go to do it smart. You don't spend all your resources like they're doing now, shaking down 99 percent of the population that doesn't pose a risk. All these people that are waiting in line, they don't pose a risk. We're looking for specific people.
REGAN: Should we racial profile.
MICA: I would profile not on the basis of race or religion, ethnic background, but we can do some profiling, yes. But what we need to do is be targeting. We know in many cases who these individuals are that pose a risk. However, sometimes we don't even know who's working at the airports. We have thousands of people who are undocumented working behind secure areas in our airports.
REGAN: Exactly what Ambassador Woolsey was saying just earlier in the show, that we need to be cautious...
MICA: Well, he's right.
REGAN: ...about who is working in our airports.
MICA: They are vetting TSA employees or secure workers, and if these are inside jobs like we had in the Sinai Peninsula, we are in a lot of trouble.
REGAN: Congressman, thank you so much for joining us tonight.
MICA: Good to be with you, thank you.
REGAN: All right here we are, just eight months until his last day in office. A new report reveals how President Obama is laying the ground work to protect his legacy. Well, what do you know, loads and loads of business regulations. How an abuse of executive power could lead to more problems for our already bad economy. Guy Benson is here, he's going to explain.
REGAN: Well, a new report is shedding light on a mountain of new rules. Loads of regulations being pushed through at an alarming rate by the Obama administration. This sudden regulatory blitz is likely due to a fast- approaching deadline that would prevent the next administration from being able to strike down the rules and that has a whole lot of people wondering if the president is getting worried about a Trump presidency.
KEVIN CORKE, FOX WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT : Would you acknowledge that there is a bit of a race against the clock to try to beat the 23rd so that Donald Trump doesn't have a chance were he to be elected, sort of undo some of these regulations the president's sort of trying to push through?
JOHN EARNEST, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: Well, again, this is a rule that's been --
CORKE: I understand.
EARNEST: No, it's a revision, but it's also a rule that's been in the works for more than two years. Obviously the next president will also have executive authority that they can wield and presumably they can make changes to this threshold as well. We obviously hope that they won't, but this is an executive action and it is consistent with what the president believes is a smart strategy...
REGAN: All right. Joining me now, Guy Benson, a political editor of townhall.com and Fox News contributor. Guy, good to see you.
GUY BENSON, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: Hey, Trish.
REGAN: You get all kinds of stuff going through these days, overtime rules, all kinds of regulations, new environmental regulations. I'll tell you, economists are saying this is not good for our economy. It's going to cost business a whole lot of money. Nonetheless, the president is a busy man these days. Why such the rush?
BENSON: Well, $70 billion worth of regulation, almost that amount since January 1st alone and the reason that he's doing this, and to be fair, president Bush executed a similar maneuver back in 2000 based on a law that was passed in the mid '90s that was intended to reign in the regulatory state by taking it out of the control of presidents late in their terms.
And so what did President Bush do? Well first, he canceled what Clinton had attempted to do, then he remembered that eight years later and beat the deadline before he left office. Obama's doing the same thing. And I think the question that we just heard put to Josh Earnest is interesting. Is this in some way an acknowledgement from the Obama administration that they're concerned that Donald Trump could win this election?
And what does that say about the president's agenda? Hillary Clinton's vulnerability in the election? I think it's an interesting political story behind that big, big price tag that I know you would focus on the "Fox Business."
REGAN: I know, a big economic one. Look, he's seen the polls and Hillary Clinton has seen the polls and this is not going to be a lay-up for her. It's not going to be as easy as she may have originally hoped in terms of beating Donald Trump. But you know, all this economic regulation, I'm always struck by the fact that, look, the president's trying to do the right thing.
He wants to help people. He wants people to earn more money. Everybody wants that. But sometimes, Guy, there's what you call the law of unintended consequences and if you regulate the heck out of everything, the reality is those people that you're trying to help, they're not going to have a job.
BENSON: That's right because there's such high cost for compliance. And I think another big story intrinsic in this particular report, Trish, is President Obama is -- in his entire eight-year term -- he has spent a lot of time especially when the Republicans took over Congress really governing by fiat with executive orders, challenging people saying, "I need to do what I want to do, you can sue me if you want, good luck."
And a lot of progressives or so-called progressives have cheered him on at every step because he's advancing their agenda -- his agenda. But if there's a President Trump or the next Republican president or conservative president, there's now the precedent set by Barack Obama that they can look back to and say, "Oh, no, I'm sorry, there's a new rule set in town that President Obama implemented during his time, we're going to do the same thing."
REGAN: All right, look, Guy, the reality is we're not a monarchy. News flash.
BENSON: We shouldn't be.
REGAN: We're going it be right back. I'll see you here.
REGAN: I just want to thank Megyn for letting me sit in for her tonight and I want to thank all of you for watching. Megyn is going to be back with you on Monday and I'll be on the Fox Business Network hosting "The Intelligence Report" every day at 2:00 p.m. eastern. I hope to see you there. "Hannity"
is next.
Content and Programming Copyright 2016 Fox News Network, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2016 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.


text:
Today, Plexchat announced its new Path2Pro league for Supercell's Clash Royale, which has been established in partnership with three top-tier mobile esports organizations: Team Queso, Tribe Gaming, and Nova eSports alongside two other logistical partners, Royale Premier League (RPL) and Statsroyale. With tens of thousands Plexchat community members regularly using features catered specifically to the Clash Royale player-base, one thing has become crystal clear: Clash Royale fans are keenly aware of a blossoming professional scene in 2017's breakout mobile esport and they want to forge their own path into the action.
"Mobile esports has exploded in popularity over the past year, and in our communities on Plexchat we are seeing players worldwide ask how they can turn pro," said Shawn Foust, CEO of Plexchat. "As the home for mobile gamers, we are uniquely positioned at the center of the mobile gaming and mobile esports ecosystems and have built the tools and relationships to give this new path to players."
Plexchat created Path2Pro to give talented players a platform to show off their elite skills. In addition to providing amazing Clash Royale entertainment, it is providing a showcase for amateur players to be seen by mobile gaming talent scouts worldwide. The most battle-hardened Clash Royale warriors in Path2Pro will have the opportunity to complete an official tryout for Team Queso, Tribe Gaming and Nova eSports.
"2018 is going to be a ground-breaking year for mobile esports – specifically for Clash Royale. We're excited to be part of Path2Pro, and hopeful that we'll discover hungry, dedicated, and talented players to recruit to Tribe." said Tribe Gaming CEO Patrick "Chief Pat" Carney.
Nova eSports Director of Content Tim "CWA Mobile Gaming" Evans added "I believe we could be in the early stages of creating the standard by which all Clash Royale pro teams recruit undiscovered talent. Players that are able to list accomplishments such as 'Path2Pro Champion' on their competitive resumes will be very attractive to Nova."
Team Queso CEO, and popular Spanish YouTube personality Alvaro "Alvaro845" Gonzalez de Buitrago said "The Clash Royale events we competed at in 2017 were huge! We hope to find the next rising Team Queso star to join us on an amazing journey this year!"
Joining the most well-respected professional teams, Plexchat teamed up with two other logistical partners. The Royale Premier League (RPL) will manage and administrate the championship rounds of the Path2Pro league, while top Clash Royale fan site Stats Royale will provide statistics and standings for Path2Pro.
"RPL is excited to be part of this project to enable us to continue unearthing talented players. Our league has a rich history of discovering young talent before they went on to achieve great things in Clash Royale including some of the biggest names in the game such as ColtonW83, MusicMaster and so many more. Path2Pro league will be the new, perfect platform as we work closely with some of the best people in the community such as Shawn (Plexchat), CWA, Steve (Statsroyale) and the management staffs of the three top-tier teams." said Royale Premier League CEO Chee "Chisin" Kok Ban.
Registration opens January 24-28 at the official website or use this link https://share.plexchat.com/#p=GOPRO&r=a35b85e0cf8&t=pwgveg. Path2Pro league concludes on February 25 and winners will be announced in the coming months, with future Path2Pro participant updates to come from the professional organizations themselves through their official media channels.
To learn more about the Path2Pro league, please visit the official website at www.plexchat.com/path2pro.
About Royale Premier League:
Royale Premier League is a tournament and league organizer with a heavy focus on mobile games such as Clash Royale and Arena of Valor, since early 2016. RPL was one of the co-organizers for the Southeast Asia region of a global Clash Royale tournament with over $1,000,000 prize pool.
About Plexchat
Plexchat is building the new home for mobile gamers, with communities and tools focused on the great games being produced for our phones. The Plexchat app offers rich, live conversations and tools within large, open communities of mobile gamers, where fans connect and communicate about the games they love. Clash Royale is just one of many dedicated, thriving communities growing on the Plexchat app. Gamers can get the free app today on the App Store or Google Play.


text:
Carl Monday's recent investigation into city workers sleeping on the job hit a nerve with our viewers.
Tips about Cleveland Public Power employees taking power naps behind Steelyard Commons sent Cleveland 19's investigative unit out with cameras in-hand. Our team documented men and women hardly at work -- and getting paid for it -- some of them making upwards of $25 an hour.
For thousands of honest, hard-working Clevelanders stuck in the unemployment line, this footage is a slap in the face.
Equally surprising was some of the reaction on our Facebook page. One viewer wrote: "Quit hating because we can't do that on our jobs. If we could, most of us would."
Another wrote: "When you're working this kind of physically taxing job, it's OK to take a nap."
But the majority of people we've heard from are just as frustrated as we are with CPP's oversight, service, and even the admission by commissioner Ivan Henderson that customers were illegally billed millions in hidden fees for more than a decade. Some of those fees, no doubt, were part of the hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on a vehicle tracking system that's designed to help supervisors keep an eye on what their employees were doing.
So why didn't they use that technology to catch their workers sleeping? Unfortunately, from what our report showed, being asleep at the wheel is a company-wide problem.
It needs to be fixed. Let's hope putting Cleveland Public Power in the spotlight will spark a much-needed wake up call.
Download the Cleveland 19 News app and First Alert Weather app.
Copyright 2017 WOIO. All rights reserved.
1717 E. 12th Street
Cleveland, OH 44114
(216) 771-1943
(216) 367-7535EEO Report Closed Captioning
All content © Copyright 2000 - 2018 Raycom Media. All Rights Reserved. For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service, and Ad Choices.