text:
Matchmaker.com is your source to meeting attractive Bluffton Women. Single and available Bluffton girls are just a few clicks away. Matchmaker has hottest Bluffton women on the Internet from young Bluffton girls available looking for dates to maybe visit the Bluffton nightlife or one of the top Bluffton restaurants. Find Bluffton single women and meet Bluffton single girls, sexy single women, Bluffton women who are looking for a date through our trusted Bluffton matchmaking site. We have thousands of Bluffton babes to female models to classy mature ladies also know as sexy Bluffton cougars looking for toy boys. If you are looking for a wife for a happy marriage, serious girlfriend, or friend, create a free dating profile today.
BlufftonJoin Now Free!
Bluffton | Bluffton Men | Bluffton Gay | Bluffton Lesbians
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
More Bluffton Links:
Senior Dating | Catholic Dating | Christian Dating | Muslim Dating
Black Singles | Asian Singles | Latin Dating
Whether you are looking for a few fun nights out to a Bluffton night clubs with hot Bluffton girls on the town or a long term relationship, keep things fun and light for now. If you seem too serious in an introductory email, it can scare her off. The thrilling part of matchmaking online dating is that it takes the impersonal and gives it real potential. Meeting Bluffton women for online can be easy. Two strangers who sending each other letters through their computers might actually meet in person, start dating and end up in a real relationship!


text:
Friday, September 30, 2016
Halloween Pop-Up Flip Card Tutorial
Posted by Judy G. at 12:57 PM
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
The writer speaks of the common occurences in the life of anyone who scrapbooks regularly and finds that she (or he) has spent more on scrapbooking tools than on food for the family. There are musings about a hobby that creates a mess wherever you work at it, and as long as there are unscrapped photographs anywhere in the house, it never ends. And there are always new and wonderful products coming out that one HAS to have!

subset: commoncrawl


text:
VMware's vCloud Hybrid Service, slated for launch in June, is designed as a way for customers to move private cloud workloads to the public cloud in a way that's palatable to enterprises. The service brings VMware's management, orchestration, networking and security model to the wilds of the public cloud, and the vendor hopes customers will gravitate to it as a "safer" alternative to Amazon.
While not an Amazon killer per se, vCloud Hybrid Service is VMware's bid to carve out space in a marketplace it has addressed exclusively through its partners. VMware has good reason to tread carefully, as it has spent the past several years building a partner ecosystem to deliver public cloud services, and would presumably want to keep that intact.
Last week's revelation looks like a major change in strategy, but VMware executives tiptoed around the most poignant questions. Following are five unanswered questions that are most pressing for the vendor's partners at the moment.


text:
About University Housing
Approximately 10,000 undergraduate students live on the University of Michigan campus in University housing. In a typical year, residents come from nearly all 50 states and over 65 foreign countries. There is no requirement to live on campus, but because residential communities are the best places to meet others and enter into campus life, 97 percent of first-year students prefer to live in University Housing.
Our residence halls and apartments are far more than places for resting or studying. They function as smaller, more accessible communities within the University of Michigan, helping new students make a successful transition from high school to college. They provide a sense of belonging. Many residents return to campus housing because of the amenities, conveniences and friendships.
Facilities include 18 residence halls and 1,480 apartments on North Campus that accommodate undergraduates, students with families and graduate students.
Over 600 regular staff and as many as 2,000 part-time student employees sustain the wide range of facilities, services, and programs that support the needs of these residential communities.
Our Mission
One of many student-centered programs in Student Life, University Housing serves students through its mission: To create and sustain diverse learning-centered residential communities that further the goals of the University. Through partnership with others, we provide quality programs, services, and facilities for those we serve.
Living at Michigan Credo
The University of Michigan is a special place. It is an educational community designed to foster freedom of thought and unconventional, even uncomfortable, opinions. It attempts to provide an environment conducive to inquiry, in which innovation and creativity are nurtured. Part of this openness to ideas is an acceptance and appreciation of diverse cultures from around the country and around the world— an allowance not only for people to be different, but a recognition that such diversity is the vital core of University life. University Housing is committed to an inclusive, sensitive, socially just and humane community in our residence halls and apartments.
Many students use their college years to explore and develop their personal identity and values. We believe this exploration can best take place in an environment that is open to and respectful of individuals across the spectrum of human differences and distinctions. It is the responsibility of every member of the Housing community, staff and students alike, to work to create and maintain such an environment. We pledge to work collectively to examine our values and conduct, and to question those values when they reflect an origin of fear, anger, or ignorance. Acts of bigotry are acts of hatred against us all, and they will not be condoned or tolerated. We must all share in the responsibility of confronting unacceptable behavior, and in providing an example of involved citizenship. We continue to strive towards fulfilling our ideals. Join us in this affirmation of our common humanity.
Living in a Community
Members of a University Housing residential community participate in a range of activities, from concerts and movie screenings to sporting events, socials and special theme events. Each term also brings a full schedule of seminars and workshops on topics such as diet and nutrition, stress management, health education, sexuality, diversity, academics and study techniques.
Residence life staff work in partnership with other campus units to continually provide safe and inclusive, multicultural residential communities. Peer advisors provide educational support functions, programming, and consultation for students related to intergroup relations and cultural awareness.
A variety of student leadership opportunities are available through the Residence Hall Association, hall and multicultural councils, community service and other organizations. In addition, several residential Michigan Learning Communities provide academic, experiential and leadership opportunities for over 1,400 students.
Academic Support
Student peer advisors offer consultation on course and concentration selection, study skills and computer assistance. Additionally, academic and technology programs and events are presented throughout the academic year in the halls.
Community Learning Centers in residence halls offer a comfortable, technology-rich environment conducive to learning, with space provided for individual and group work.
Technology support for high-speed internet access in student rooms and wireless service in the residence halls is provided by the ITS Service Center.
Residential Dining
Dining halls are critical to the residential experience. Residential Dining Services offers board plans and a variety of meal options in several full-service dining halls. In addition, a number of retail cafés provide early morning to late night grab 'n go options, deli offerings and alternative meal selections. Combined, these services add up to as many as 18 hours of dining service per day.
Menu creations that serve diverse appetites and food preferences include locally grown produce and regional dairy products. Residential Dining staff provide nutrition information and guidance such as the MSmart Healthy Dining Program, free individual nutrition consultation, support for managing food allergies and special diets, nutrition publications in each dining room and healthy eating seminars.
Safety & Security
The University of Michigan is the only Big Ten school with a dedicated, professional security staff for its residence halls and apartments. Housing Security officers maintain a daily (and nightly) presence to offer assistance to residents, investigate incidents, and to monitor systems for electronic access and fire protection. They also meet with individual residents and groups about campus safety.
Graduate & Family Housing
With over 1,000 graduate and student families as residents, the Northwood Community Apartments is a vibrant campus community. Residents represent more than 80 countries, affording both adults and children the opportunity to discover lifestyles and customs from around the world. Throughout the year, Northwood resident staff and Student Life professional staff work with residents on a wide range of cultural and social events that engage students and families.
Northwood has its own Community Center, which serves as a focal point for social events and programs.
Residential Life Initiatives
University Housing is an auxiliary enterprise and is financially self supporting for annual operations through its room and board revenue. It seeks to balance room and board rates—with the responsibility of providing students with a satisfactory experience that supports their academic progress—and reinvesting in facilities so they meet the needs of current and future generations of students.
University Housing's building portfolio and inventory totals approximately 4.7 million square feet of floor space, approximately one-sixth of the campus total. The replacement value of the fixed assets is estimated at over $1 billion.
The Residential Life Initiatives provides a planned approach for the renewal, revitalization and expansion of campus residential facilities, including both student housing and dining. Many efforts are underway to revitalize facilities, programs, and the dining experience to strengthen the connection between living and learning for present and future students.
- RLI Briefing Update (pdf)
RLI in the News
- Regents approve East Quad renovation design and improvements to Baits II
- Couzens Hall welcomes new generations of students
- North Quad residents, programs making the most of their new space
- Regents approve Alice Lloyd Hall renovation
- Stockwell reopens with new amenities, traditional character
- Hill Dining Center and renewed Mosher-Jordan open new doors to campus living
- Regents polish 'Blue Apple' project
Housing Availability and Assignments
University Housing is committed to providing an exceptional residential experience for students who live within our residence halls and campus apartments. The living and dining facilities, programs and services we offer are structured "to create and sustain diverse, learning-centered residential communities" and are the preferred student housing choices for nearly all incoming freshmen and many returning students.
While we make every effort to accommodate new and returning students, University Housing is limited in the number of spaces we can offer upperclass students. During our current round of renovations and improvements to our facilities, University Housing assigns spaces on the basis of priority for those students who typically benefit the most from the personal and community support of living on campus.
Research in student development, and our own experiences, show that first-year students need the campus residential experience to help them transition from home life to more independent living and study at a university. Second-year students often need the continued stability of campus residential life to support their academic and social development, typically more than juniors and seniors.Following these principles, University Housing utilizes the following priorities when housing students on-campus for any given fall semester:
- Incoming freshmen are not required to reside on campus. However, those who choose to live in University Housing are guaranteed a space if they complete their housing application within our stated deadlines. Spaces for freshmen are allocated before any other populations are given access to housing.
- Current students residing in University Housing are eligible to participate in a selection process prioritized by the number of terms they have lived in University Housing.
- First selection – 2 or fewer terms lived in University Housing
- Second selection – 3 or 4 terms
- Third selection – 5 or 6 terms
- Fourth selection – 7 or more terms
- Returning Study Abroad/Co-op Students who lived in University Housing immediately prior to study abroad are eligible to participate in Housing Sign-Up at the same selection priority as if they had lived on campus.
- Transfer students and enrolled students living off-campus
Similar priorities exist to guide the housing of students during winter, spring, and summer semesters. Different dates, applications, and deadlines exist for these periods.
Housing Outlook 2012-2016
The total number of residence hall and apartment spaces throughout the University Housing system varies somewhat from year to year depending on capital projects that require closing a facility for renovation or major improvements. For practical and financial reasons, University Housing has been scheduling one facility each year for planned capital improvements.
The following plan for facility improvements is offered to help incoming and returning students anticipate their housing options over the next few years – based on the stated assignment and selection priorities.
- South Quadrangle closed for major upgrades
- East Quadrangle reopens
- West Quadrangle closed for renovation
- South Quadrangle reopens
- West Quadrangle reopens


text:
Choose your location from the list below to view the correct local market pricing, delivery times and shipping costs for your destination
My Order
RtA, as known as Road To Awe, believes clothing should be a form of expression. The brand's aesthetic is minimalist and cool - its line of off-duty basics is rendered in muted tones. Expect classic denim and leather pieces with an urban feel.


text:
Exploring Europe by bus is an affordable, yet comfortable way of getting to know the continent. We have a long experience in getting you to the most beautiful places of Europe. Travelling with DeinBus.de makes your bus trip from Berlin to Frankfurt am Main even more fun!
On this page we have collected information on departure times and the location of the stations from which we are operating for the departure in Berlin and the arrival in Frankfurt am Main. The exact station that your bus is operating from is indicated when you select your journey as well as on your booking confirmation that you receive via e-Mail.
The station is located at the central bus terminal (ZOB) on the street "Messedamm 2-4". It is easily accessible via the subway station "Kaiserdamm" (U2) or the S-Bahn station "Messe Nord/ICC" using the Ringbahn (S41, S42) as well as S46. Alternatively, you can also take the city buses M49, 139 or 218 to the station "Messedamm/ZOB. There are also parking spots available close by. Please always pay close attention to the TVs and announcements for information on the platform of departure.
Use Google Maps for navigation to the station.
The station is located at the central station of the city. If you leave the station through the main entrance and walk roughly 50m to the right, you will find several platforms (Area A). DeinBus.de leaves from platform A2, where our logo is displayed on the station pole. Eurolines busses depart from platforms A1, A2, A3 or A4.
Use Google Maps for navigation to the station.


text:
Not surprisingly, the acquisition of AMR Research by Gartner is inspiring other analyst firms to launch campaigns to capture AMR clients, sales team members, and even analysts.
Two firms that have already announced client switch campaigns include Ovum (see here) and Ventana Research (click here). For research consumers who are looking for market and product/services insights and advice, rather than access to a firm for influencing purposes, this could be an opportunity to purchase access to analysts at a very competitive rate. At a minimum, enterprises and vendors with AMR contracts coming up for renewal should talk to Ovum and Ventana, if these firms have research relevant to you.
Ovum is also interested in talking with AMR analysts and sales representatives. For more information, please contact Rosemary Masterson (email).
Any analyst firm with special deals for AMR or Gartner clients, sales representatives, or analysts should notify SageCircle at "info [at] sagecircle [dot] com." Please indicate whether you want your special deal highlighted on the SageCircle blog or if you would prefer that we privately pass the information to interested parties.
SageCircle Technique:
- AMR clients should take a zero-based approach to contract renewals, exploring offerings from other firms and not just signing up with Gartner (avoid the automatic contract renewal trap)
- Analysts and sales representatives at AMR – and the affect portions of Gartner – should explore career opportunities at other firms
Bottom Line: M&A events offer research consumers opportunities for that could provide enhanced access to smart analysts at very competitive prices. At the same time, M&A offers analysts and sales representatives with opportunities to switch employers. For AR professionals, the switching of clients and employees between firms could lead to changes in analyst list rankings, outreach priorities, plans, and spending. Analyst firms and AR should focus on leveraging M&A events as situations for changing the status quo.
Question: What do you think will be the departure rate of AMR clients, sales professionals, and analysts once Gartner has assumed control?
Filed under: Analyst industry | Tagged: AMR Research, analyst relations, AR, Gartner, Ovum, Ventana Research |


text:
new vintage guitar day, and my hunt for an old Ibanez Artist is finally over!
She sounds awesome, with those ceramic Super 80 pickups. A rather agressive sound, but very nicely balanced and defined.
The only thing I don't really like is that she's neck-heavy, so I'll have to get used to that. And the pickups could use wax potting.
But what a guitar! Sustain!


text:
By WGBH News
May 23, 2012
BOSTON — Despite the Supreme Court's decision not to hear his appeal, a former Boston University student facing a $675,000 fine for downloading and sharing 31 songs via the online file-sharing network Kazaa has vowed to continue his fight against the group of record companies suing him.
While free downloads mean lost revenue for musicians, Joel Tenenbaum said that many recording artists had no problem with online file sharing. "Music fans love the artists," he said, adding that the lyricist for the Grateful Dead testified at his trial that "familiarity, not scarcity, creates value."
"The music business will never cease to exist in some form because it does what humans fundamentally need to do, which is share art," Tenenbaum added.
The case is currently before U.S. District Court Judge Rya Zobel, who will decide whether to impose the penalty, ask the Recording Industry Association of America whether it will accept less money from Tenenbaum or order a new trial.
The playlist
Tenenbaum faces the $675,000 penalty for illegally downloading 31 songs. You've probably heard some of them yourself. Perhaps you even own them ... one way or another. Here they are, legally and for free on Grooveshark.
Aerosmith — Pink; Water Song/Janie's Got a Gun
Beastie Boys — (You Gotta) Fight for Your Right (to Party)
Beck — Loser
Blink-182 — Adam's Song
Deftones — Be Quiet and Drive
Eminem — Cleaning out My Closet; Drug Ballad; My Name Is
The Fugees — Killing Me Softly
Goo Goo Dolls — Iris
Green Day — Minority; Nice Guys Finish Last; When I Come Around
Incubus — New Skin; Pardon Me
Limp Bizkit — Rearranged; Leech
Linkin Park — Crawling
Monster Magnet — Look to Your Orb for the Warning
Nine Inch Nails — The Perfect Drug
Nirvana — Come As You Are; Heart-Shaped Box
OutKast — Rosa Parks; Wheelz of Steel
Rage Against the Machine — Guerrilla Radio
The Ramones — The KKK Took My Baby Away
Red Hot Chili Peppers — By the Way; Californication; My Friends
Smashing Pumpkins — Bullet with Butterfly Wings
List source: Wikipedia.
Sign-up for WGBH News updates, WGBH promotions, and previews of what's coming up on WGBH TV.


text:
Enter a magazine title or keyword
America's well-regarded newsmagazine is savvy, incisive, and scintillating. With its comprehensive coverage of national and international affairs, newsmakers, politics, business, economics, science, technology, health, arts, entertainment and society, Newsweek is your one-stop information source. Thought-provoking essays and compelling columns like Periscope, Cyberscope, Perspectives and Newsmakers analyze events and put them into an interesting perspective.
I am terribly disappointed by your decision to discontinue the paper version of Newsweek. I've enjoyed reading it for many years.
Thank you thank you!
Thank god someone in the media is pointing out what a nut case this woman really is. She is insane and nothing more. She does have charisma, but so did Hitler.
Her understanding of the facts, her perspective of history, and her right wing, "God is on Our Side" is nothing more than scary, and more of same garbage that the uninformed "Baggers" want to believe. Regardless of the actual truth or reality.
This country is in a lot of trouble when a "Nut Job" like her can actually run for president. Because there might be enough uninformed "Nut Jobs" out there voting for her, she could actually win the presidency.
God save us all.
Over my last 25 mature years, I have been or have become "religious" in my reading of the NY Times, the Economist and other mainstream/informative news sources; including several stints/prescriptions to Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report and Time - to name a few. I currently subscribe to the NYT, Economist, Scientific American & Newsweek; the last being over the last year.
I just want to congratulate Newsweek Magazine for being the most consistently informative and thought provoking weekly -- and having significantly changed (improved to me) over the last few years -- I study and enjoy the articles throughout -- not all, but most provide me valuable insights on current events here and abroad.
My husband, daughter, son-in-law and I have been loyal subscribers for many years. But we am now ready to cancel my subscription, due to the new format. Your graphic designers really missed the mark. The smaller type font, and the fact that it is justified right and left, makes it very difficult to read. Running type over a ghosted background and the reverse type you've used show that your designers truly don't understand readablility. We don't enjoy the humor in the writing. We hated the cover about Iran (trite and sensationalistic). We also miss Anna Quindlan. We'll be cancelling our subscription.
Yes, indeed it is always a pleasure to read this magazine.
I'm actually not sure who I will vote for yet. Recently, I read several articles about the multi million business deals the Clinton's made with Dubai and other strong ties they have with Arab nations.
I do wonder if we should be concerned about national security should she be elected.
Join Us:
Accepted Cards:


text:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stunned the UN General Assembly yesterday with a placard depicting a bomb, then using a red marker to draw a line near the top.
The crude cartoon, reminiscent of a Wile E Coyote "Acme" bomb, went viral — a huge hit among Bibi's admirers and detractors far beyond the UN halls.
The image, and the argument behind it, will surely figure in the Oct. 22 Obama-Romney foreign-policy debate.
Netanyahu's recent demand for a "red line" after which the West will no longer try to negotiate Iran's bomb away — and President Obama's rejection of the idea — renewed old hostilities between the two men.
Even some of Netanyahu's most ardent US supporters started to question the wisdom of raising a contentious issue in the heat of a presidential campaign. But yesterday Netanyahu didn't budge: "The hour is getting late, very late," he said. "The Iran nuclear calendar doesn't take time out for anyone or for anything."
Like it or not, that calendar has inserted Israel's problem (which is America's and the world's as well) into the campaign.
Paul Ryan told Fox News yesterday that Republicans tried three years ago to push the sanctions that Obama is applying only now, adding, "We don't think the president speaks with credibility when he says all options are on the table."
Obama refrained from addressing the red-line issue in his Tuesday UN speech, but vowed America will "do what we must" to prevent Iran from obtaining a bomb and said that containment is not an option.
Bibi sought to defuse the political fracas yesterday, expressing his "appreciation" for Obama's containment line and saying that stopping Iran from getting a bomb "unites the people of Israel. It unites Americans, Democrats and Republicans alike."
He also said that Iran is getting close to the point where "by next spring, at most next summer," it could move to the final stages of building a nuke — which some took to mean there'll be no Israeli "October surprise" before the US election.
But Netanyahu's whole point was that 1) Iran must be stopped before that point, and 2) "Red lines don't lead to war. Red lines prevent war."
The line he drew yesterday was at the "90" mark of his cartoonish bomb — when Iran gets 90 percent of the weapons-grade enriched uranium it needs for a nuclear weapon.
Iran finishing a detonator to ignite that bomb is no place to draw a line, he explained, because that device can be made at " a small workshop" anywhere in the country, and thus is unlikely to be detected by intelligence agencies.
In short, "The relevant question is not when Iran will get the bomb, but at what stage we can no longer stop" it.
Critics seized on the cartoon as proof that the Israeli leader's approach to Iran is unserious and simplistic. Yet everything he said yesterday about Iran's nuclear dash is based on recent open-source data from the International Atomic Energy Agency.
"But," as a Bibi aide sighed, "who reads IAEA reports?" Which is why Netanyahu simplified it all so that a six-grader (or even a UN official) can get it.
He's hoping yesterday's widely-watched performance will move the debate away from America's campaign trail to where he said he's long wanted it to be: on the menace that a genocidal weapon in the hands of a genocidal regime presents for Israel and the rest of the world.
He may yet get his wish — but first we'll see our presidential nominees debate it.


text:
Free CNAM And Detailed Subscriber Information for any U.S. or Canadian Telephone Number
Estimated Caller Location for 330-259-0357
Subscriber Data for 3302590357
Location Data for 3302590357
City: Youngstown
State: OH
Zip: 44503
Telco Data for 3302590357
Company: CHOICE ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. - OH
Switch: YNTWOHID5MD
User Provided Phone Number Information for (330) 259-0357 (0)
No comments yet!
Add your information about this number below.
Post your information about this number
Your name:
Don't enter anything here. This field is used to trap spam robots.
©identified.us - From
Ziptel Networks


text:
Department of Health and Human Services
Participating Organizations
National Institutes of Health (NIH), (http://www.nih.gov)
Components of Participating Organizations
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), (http://www2.niddk.nih.gov)
Title: Limited Competition for the Continuation of the Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Study Group (U01)
Announcement Type
Request For Applications (RFA) Number: RFA-DK-09-505
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number(s)
Key Dates
Release Date: January 7, 2010
Letters of Intent Receipt Date: February 15, 2010
Application Receipt Date: March 15, 2010
Peer Review Date: June/July 2010
Council Review Date: October 2010
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: September 30, 2010
Additional Information To Be Available Date (Url Activation Date): Not applicable.
Expiration Date: March 16, 2010
Due Dates
for E.O. 12372
Not Applicable
Overview Content
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
I Overview Information
Part II Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Research Objectives
Section II. Award Information
1. Mechanism(s) of Support
2. Funds Available
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
A. Eligible Institutions
B. Eligible Individuals
2.Cost Sharing or Matching
3. Other - Special Eligibility Criteria
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Information
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
3. Submission Dates and Times
A. Receipt, Review and Anticipated Start Dates
1. Letter of Intent
B. Sending an Application to the NIH
C. Application Processing
D. Application Assignment
4. Intergovernmental Review
5. Funding Restrictions
6. Other Submission Requirements
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
2. Review and Selection Process
A. Additional Review Criteria
B. Additional Review Considerations
C. Resource Sharing Plan(s)
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
A. Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award
1. Principal Investigator Rights and Responsibilities
2. NIH Responsibilities
3. Collaborative Responsibilities
4. Arbitration Process
3. Reporting
Section VII. Agency Contact(s)
1. Scientific/Research Contact(s)
2. Peer Review Contact(s)
3. Financial/ Grants Management Contact(s)
Section VIII. Other Information - Required Federal Citations
Part II - Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Research Objectives
The purpose of this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is to continue the support for the Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Study Group (PALF) to allow for further enrollment of patients with acute liver failure (ALF) into a clinical database, to increase the numbers of well characterized biospecimens stored in a central repository, to continue innovative clinical investigation into the causes and means of treatment of ALF and to complete enrollment and follow-up in the randomized, placebo-controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine for non-acetaminophen related-ALF.
The Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Study Group was an original component of the Adult Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG) and was established through partial funding support by the Food and Drug Administration with subsequent full support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases since 1997. In 2005, PALF as an organization was segregated from the ALFSG as an independent clinical network. Current and recent activities of the PALF include the ongoing, large clinical trial on the use of N-acetylcysteine for non-acetaminophen related ALF and a prospective database with more than 850 cases of which one third are less than 2 years of age and half are of indeterminate cause. The clinical trial on the use of N-acetylcysteine is nearing completion of enrollment with over 160 patients already enrolled. Several ancillary studies are ongoing to address unknown causes of pediatric ALF such as those focused on fatty acid oxidation, innate immunity, and the presence of acetaminophen adducts.
Acute Liver Failure is a rare and clinically devastating condition characterized by the acute loss of hepatic function. An estimated 2000 cases of ALF occur annually in the United States, often affecting young individuals without previous medical problems and often leading to death or need for emergency liver transplantation. ALF is not a single, specific disease, but rather a clinical syndrome that represents the most extreme consequences of several forms of sudden and severe liver injury. The causes of ALF encompass a wide range of etiologies including viral hepatitis, drug- or toxin-induced liver injury, autoimmune conditions, metabolic disorders, vascular compromise, and other rare causes. Importantly, despite modern diagnostic tools, approximately half of the cases of pediatric ALF remain "indeterminant" or of unknown cause. Without knowing the cause of these cases of ALF, it is difficult or impossible to develop means of prevention and treatment of this condition. In children, slightly less than half of the patients with ALF will either undergo liver transplantation or die from liver failure. The most common immediate causes of death from ALF are cerebral edema and sepsis. Other organ system involvement is common, and ALF can present early with acute renal or respiratory failure.
Therapy for ALF is largely supportive in nature. Specific therapies are available for some forms of ALF such as N-acetylcysteine for acetaminophen overdose; intravenous glucose for children with fatty acid oxidation defects; 2-(2-nitro-4,3 trifluoro-methylbenzolyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione for children with hereditary tyrosinemia type 1; or removal of galactose from the diet in children with galactosemia.. However, indeterminant where no identifiable cause is found occurs in approximately one-half of children with ALF. For the children with indeterminant causes and other forms of acute liver failure, there are no specific treatments. Liver transplantation is effective as a treatment of last resort for ALF but is problematic because of the acute, unanticipated nature of ALF, the need for immediate transplantation (within hours or days) and the national shortage of liver donor organs. Paramount to the management of children with ALF is the timing of the decision for liver transplantation, determining whether the patient will recover spontaneously or will continue to deteriorate requiring transplantation. The traditional metrics of gauging the severity of ALF in adults such as the degree of hepatic encephaolpathy does not translate as a reliable indicator in infants and children. Timing is critical because waiting too late to go to transplantation may result in irreversible renal, lung or brain damage such that the child will not recover even if a successful liver transplantation is performed. Going to transplantation too early is also problematic because some children will recover spontaneously and thus will undergo the procedure unnecessarily and be left with a life-time need for immunosuppression to protect the liver graft from rejection. These challenges make development of prognostic algorithms critical for proper management of pediatric ALF.
Rapid identification of the cause, improved prognostication of the disease course, and institution of appropriate supportive and therapeutic measures are essential for optimal clinical management of pediatric ALF patients. Understanding the pathophysiological basis of these clinical manifestations of pediatric ALF remain daunting and formed the basis for several research recommendations in ALF that were identified at the Acute Liver Failure research workshop held in Bethesda, Maryland in December 2006 (Hepatology, vol 47, No 4, 2008). These challenges underscore the need to continue support of the PALF Study Group.
The overall goal of the PALF Study Group is to gain a better understanding of the causes, pathophysiologic mechanisms, complications, natural history, and therapy of pediatric ALF. Future goals for the PALF Study Group may include but are not limited to:
See Section
VIII, Other Information - Required Federal Citations, for policies
related to this announcement.
Section II. Award Information
1. Mechanism of Support
This funding opportunity will use the NIH Cooperative Agreement (U01) award mechanism.
The Project Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) will be solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project.
This FOA uses "Just-in-Time" information concepts. It also uses non-modular budget formats described in the PHS 398 application instructions (see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html).
This funding opportunity will use a cooperative agreement award mechanism. In the cooperative agreement mechanism, the Project Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) retains the primary responsibility and dominant role for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project, with NIH staff being substantially involved as a partner with the Principal Investigator, as described under the Section VI. 2. Administrative Requirements, "Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award".
2. Funds Available
Because the nature
and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application,
it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary.
Although the financial plans of the IC(s) provide support for this program,
awards pursuant to this funding opportunity are contingent upon the
availability of funds and the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious
Facilities and administrative costs requested by consortium participants are not included in the direct cost limitation, see NOT-OD-05-004.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
1.A. Eligible Institutions
The following organizations/institutions are eligible to apply:
1.B. Eligible Individuals
Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the PD/PI is invited to work with his/her institution to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support.
More than one PD/PI, or multiple PDs/PIs, may be designated on the application for projects that require a "team science" approach and therefore clearly do not fit the single-PD/PI model. Additional information on the implementation plans, policies and procedures to formally allow more than one PD/PI on individual research projects is available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/multi_pi. All PDs/PIs must be registered in the NIH eRA Commons prior to the submission of the application (see http://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/preparing.htm for instructions).
The decision of whether to apply for a grant with a single PD/PI or multiple PDs/PIs is the responsibility of the investigators and applicant organizations, and should be determined by the scientific goals of the project. Applications for grants with multiple PDs/PIs will require additional information, as outlined in the instructions below. When considering multiple PDs/PIs, please be aware that the structure and governance of the PD/PI leadership team as well as the knowledge, skills and experience of the individual PDs/PIs will be factored into the assessment of the overall scientific merit of the application. Multiple PDs/PIs on a project share the authority and responsibility for leading and directing the project, intellectually and logistically. Each PD/PI is responsible and accountable to the grantee organization, or, as appropriate, to a collaborating organization, for the proper conduct of the project or program, including the submission of required reports. For further information on multiple PDs/PIs, please see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/multi_pi.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
program does not require cost sharing as defined in the current NIH Grants Policy
3. Other-Special Eligibility Criteria
Number of Applications. Applicants may submit only one application in response to this limited competition FOA as a PI.
Resubmissions. Resubmission applications are not permitted in response to this FOA.
Renewals. Renewal applications are permitted in response to this FOA.
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to
Request Application Information
The current PHS 398 application instructions are available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in an interactive format. Applicants must use the currently approved version of the PHS 398. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone (301) 710-0267, Email: email@example.com.
Telecommunications for the hearing impaired: TTY 301-451-5936.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Prepare all applications using the PHS 398 application forms and in accordance with the PHS 398 Application Guide (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html).
Applications must be
prepared using the current PHS 398 research grant application instructions and
forms. Applications must have a D&B Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number as the universal identifier when applying for Federal grants or
cooperative agreements. The D&B number can be obtained by calling (866)
705-5711 or through the web site at http://www.dnb.com/us/. The D&B number should
be entered on line 11 of the face page of the PHS 398 form.
The title and number of this funding opportunity must be typed in item (box) 2 only of the face page of the application form and the YES box must be checked.
Applications with Multiple PDs/PIs
When multiple PD/PIs are proposed, use the Face Page-Continued page to provide items 3a – 3h for all PD/PIs. NIH requires one PD/PI be designated as the "contact PD/PI" for all communications between the PD/PIs and the agency. The contact PD/PI must meet all eligibility requirements for PD/PI status in the same way as other PD/PIs, but has no special roles or responsibilities within the project team beyond those mentioned above. The contact PD/PI may be changed during the project period. The contact PD/PI should be listed in block 3 of Form Page 1 (the Face Page), with all additional PD/PIs listed on Form Page 1-Continued. When inserting the name of the PD/PI in the header of each application page, use the name of the "Contact PD/PI, et. al." The contact PD/PI must be from the applicant organization if PD/PIs are from more than one institution.
All individuals designated as PD/PI must be registered in the eRA Commons and must be assigned the PD/PI role in that system (other roles such as SO or IAR will not give the PD/PI the appropriate access to the application records). Each PD/PI must include their respective eRA Commons ID in the eRA Commons User Name field.
All projects proposing Multiple PDs/PIs will be required to include a new section describing the leadership plan approach for the proposed project.
Multiple PD/PI Leadership Plan: For applications designating multiple PDs/PIs, the Research Plan section and the Multiple PD/PI Leadership Plan must be included. A rationale for choosing a multiple PD/PI approach should be described. The governance and organizational structure of the leadership team and the research project should be described, and should include communication plans, process for making decisions on scientific direction, and procedures for resolving conflicts. The roles and administrative, technical, and scientific responsibilities for the project or program should be delineated for the PDs/PIs and other collaborators.
If budget allocation is planned, the distribution of resources to specific components of the project or the individual PDs/PIs should be delineated in the Leadership Plan. In the event of an award, the requested allocations may be reflected in a footnote on the Notice of Award.
Additional information is available in the PHS 398 grant application instructions.
Submission Dates and Times
Applications must be received on or before the receipt date described below (Section IV.3.A). Submission times N/A.
3.A. Receipt, Review and Anticipated Start Dates
Letters of Intent Receipt Date: February 15, 2010
Application Receipt Date: March 15, 2010
Peer Review Date: June/July 2010
Council Review Date: October 2010
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: September 30, 2010
Letter of Intent
Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
Although a letter of
intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a
subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to
estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
The letter of intent is to be sent by the date listed in Section IV.3.A.
The letter of intent
should be sent to:
Francisco O. Calvo, Ph.D.
Chief, Review Branch
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 752
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452
(for express/courier service: Bethesda, MD 20817)
Telephone: (301) 594-8897
Email: email@example.com
3.B. Sending an Application to the NIH
Applications must be prepared using the forms found in the PHS 398 instructions for preparing a research grant application. Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the checklist, and three signed photocopies in one package to:
Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD 20892-7710 (U.S. Postal Service Express or regular mail)
Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service; non-USPS service)
Personal deliveries
of applications are no longer permitted (see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-040.html).
At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application and all copies of the appendix material must be sent to:
Francisco O. Calvo, Ph.D.
Chief, Review Branch
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 752
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452
(for express/courier service: Bethesda, MD 20817)
Telephone: (301) 594-8897
Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
3.C. Application
Applications must be received on or before the application receipt date) described above (Section IV.3.A.). If an application is received after that date, the application may be delayed in the review process or not reviewed. Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the CSR and for responsiveness by the reviewing Institute. Incomplete and/or non-responsive applications will not be reviewed.
The NIH will not accept any application in response to this funding opportunity that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. However, when a previously unfunded application, originally submitted as an investigator-initiated application, is to be submitted in response to a funding opportunity, it is to be prepared as a NEW application. That is, the application for the funding opportunity must not include an Introduction describing the changes and improvements made, and the text must not be marked to indicate the changes from the previous unfunded version of the application.
Information on the status of an application should be checked by the Principal Investigator in the eRA Commons at: https://commons.era.nih.gov/commons/.
4. Intergovernmental Review
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
5. Funding Restrictions
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The Grants Policy Statement can be found at NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable. A grantee may, at its own risk and without NIH prior approval, incur obligations and expenditures to cover costs up to 90 days before the beginning date of the initial budget period of a new or renewal award if such costs: 1) are necessary to conduct the project, and 2) would be allowable under the grant, if awarded, without NIH prior approval. If specific expenditures would otherwise require prior approval, the grantee must obtain NIH approval before incurring the cost. NIH prior approval is required for any costs to be incurred more than 90 days before the beginning date of the initial budget period of a new or renewal award.
The incurrence of pre-award costs in anticipation of a competing or non-competing award imposes no obligation on NIH either to make the award or to increase the amount of the approved budget if an award is made for less than the amount anticipated and is inadequate to cover the pre-award costs incurred. NIH expects the grantee to be fully aware that pre-award costs result in borrowing against future support and that such borrowing must not impair the grantee's ability to accomplish the project objectives in the approved time frame or in any way adversely affect the conduct of the project (see NIH Grants Policy Statement https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part6.htm.)
6. Other Submission Requirements
In order to fully assess the prior accomplishments and future potential of the PALF Study Group to address the significant research challenges that confront PALF investigators, additional submission requirements and information are requested to be included in the application.
The application should demonstrate prior accomplishments during the previous funding cycle including but not limited to original publications and abstracts, ancillary studies, requests for biosamples and data requests, status of current ongoing clinical studies and any completed clinical studies or trials.
The application should describe the current and future organizational structure of the PALF Study Group in terms of the executive and steering committees and functional roles of these committees. A listing of other supportive subcommittees should be included with a concise description of the supportive roles to the PALF Study Group.
The components and roles of the PALF Study Group such as the clinical sites and Data Coordination Center should be described. An estimate of the anticipated number of clinical sites should be included along with a description of selection factors used to determine participation in the PALF Study Group such as but not limited to prior performance, intellectual contributions, initiation of ancillary studies, institutional support for the conduct of clinical studies, and participation on committees.
The Data Coordination Center selection factors should also be reviewed with respect to the following issues in support of the PALF Study Group:
A description of prior and potential future partnerships from industry in support of the research mission of the PALF Study Group should be described. Any future partnerships should be discussed in terms of the investigative value added to the PALF Study Group research efforts and goals.
Other Special Performance Requirements
The PALF Study Group will continue to be a collaborative effort that will require frequent interactions of the awardee with the Steering Committee members and the Data Coordination Center and the NIDDK. The applicant must explicitly indicate their willingness to:
1. Participate in Executive and Steering Committee meetings as teleconferences and face to face meetings and other regular telephone conference calls;
2. Cooperate with Steering Committee and the Data Coordinating Center in the development and design or modification of research protocols and in carrying out approved research protocols;
3. Abide by common definitions; common methods for patient selection and enrollment; and common protocols, procedures, tests, and reporting forms as chosen by majority vote of the Steering Committee;
4. Cooperative oversight with the NIDDK of the clinical sites and the Data Coordinating Center performance in support of the PALF Study Group investigative activities.
5. Actively seek to implement each consortium-wide protocol approved by the DSMB and the NIDDK;
6. Comply with all study policies and quality assurance measures approved by the Steering Committee;
7. Agree to oversight of the study by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB);
8. Accept awards for the support of research based on per-patient (capitated) rates and the actual numbers of subjects enrolled, followed, and completing the study (Clinical Centers only);
9. Transmit study data to the Data and Coordinating Center in a timely and accurate manner (Clinical Centers only);
10. Report all adverse events in accordance with procedures established by the Steering Committee and NIDDK policies;
11. Cooperate with clinical sites and the Data Coordinating Center in the publication of study results and the eventual release to the scientific community of study procedures and other resources;
12. Serve as chair of the Executive and Steering committees;
The awardee must agree to the "Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award" in Section VI.2.A "Award Administration Information".
PHS398 Research Plan Component Sections
All application instructions outlined in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide are to be followed, with the following additional requirements:
Budget Component
This FOA uses non-modular budget formats described in the PHS 398 application instructions (see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html).
Appendix Materials
All paper PHS 398 applications submitted must provide appendix material on CDs only. Include five identical CDs in the same package with the application. See https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-031.html.
Do not use the Appendix to circumvent the page limitations. An application that does not observe the required page limitations may be delayed in the review process.Resource Sharing Plan(s)
NIH considers the sharing of unique research resources developed through NIH-sponsored research an important means to enhance the value of, and advance research. When resources have been developed with NIH funds and the associated research findings published or provided to NIH, it is important that they be made readily available for research purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community. If the final data/resources are not amenable to sharing, this must be explained in Resource Sharing section of the application. See https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_faqs.htm.
(a) Data Sharing Plan: Investigators seeking $500,000 or more in direct costs in any year are expected to include a brief 1-paragraph description of how final research data will be shared, or explain why data-sharing is not possible. Applicants are encouraged to discuss data-sharing plans with their NIH program contact. See Data-Sharing Policy or https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html.
(b) Sharing Model Organisms: Regardless of the amount requested, all applications where the development of model organisms is anticipated are expected to include a description of a specific plan for sharing and distributing unique model organisms and related resources, or state appropriate reasons why such sharing is restricted or not possible. See Sharing Model Organisms Policy, and NIH Guide NOT-OD-04-042.
(c) Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS): Regardless of the amount requested, applicants seeking funding for a genome-wide association study are expected to provide a plan for submission of GWAS data to the NIH-designated GWAS data repository, or provide an appropriate explanation why submission to the repository is not possible. A genome-wide association study is defined as any study of genetic variation across the entire genome that is designed to identify genetic associations with observable traits (such as blood pressure or weight) or the presence or absence of a disease or condition. For further information see Policy for Sharing of Data Obtained in NIH Supported or Conducted Genome-Wide Association Studies, NIH Guide NOT-OD-07-088, and https://grants.nih.gov/grants/gwas/.
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process.
2. Review and Selection Process
Review Process
Applications that are complete and responsive to the FOA will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and in accordance with NIH peer review procedures (http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/peer/), using the review criteria stated below.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will:
The mission of the NIH is to support science in pursuit of knowledge about the biology and behavior of living systems and to apply that knowledge to extend healthy life and reduce the burdens of illness and disability. As part of this mission, applications submitted to the NIH for grants or cooperative agreements to support biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
Overall Impact. Reviewers will provide an overall impact/priority score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following five scored review criteria, and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Scored Review Criteria. Reviewers will consider each of the five review criteria below in the determination of scientific and technical merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Significance. Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Investigator(s). Are the PD/PIs, collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?
Innovation. Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?
Approach. Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned
and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Are
potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success
presented? If the project is in the early stages of development,
will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be
If the project involves clinical research, are the plans for 1) protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
Environment. Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?
Additional Review Criteria
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider the following additional items in the determination of scientific and technical merit, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Protections for Human Subjects. For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials.
Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children. When the proposed project involves clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion of minorities and members of both genders, as well as the inclusion of children.
Vertebrate Animals. The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following five points: 1) proposed use of the animals, and species, strains, ages, sex, and numbers to be used; 2) justifications for the use of animals and for the appropriateness of the species and numbers proposed; 3) adequacy of veterinary care; 4) procedures for limiting discomfort, distress, pain and injury to that which is unavoidable in the conduct of scientifically sound research including the use of analgesic, anesthetic, and tranquilizing drugs and/or comfortable restraining devices; and 5) methods of euthanasia and reason for selection if not consistent with the AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia. For additional information, see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/VASchecklist.pdf.
Biohazards. Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
Renewal Applications. When reviewing a Renewal application (formerly called a competing continuation application), the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.
Additional Review Considerations
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will address each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items and should not consider them in providing an overall impact/priority score.
Select Agents Research. Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Resource Sharing Plans. Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: 1) Data Sharing Plan (http://grants.nih/gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm); 2) Sharing Model Organisms (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-04-042.html); and 3) Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-088.html).
Budget and Period Support. Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Selection Process
The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award
Not Applicable
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons.
If the application is under consideration for funding,
NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant. For
details, applicants may refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement
Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General.
formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be
provided to the applicant organization. The NoA signed by the grants management
officer is the authorizing document. Once all administrative and programmatic
issues have been resolved, the NoA will be generated via email notification
from the awarding component to the grantee business official.
Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs. See Also Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part4.htm) and Part II Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_part9.htm).
The following Terms and Conditions will be incorporated into the award statement and will be provided to the Principal Investigator as well as to the appropriate institutional official, at the time of award.
2.A. Cooperative Agreement
Terms and Conditions of Award
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS grant administration regulations at 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92 (Part 92 is applicable when State and local Governments are eligible to apply), and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the awardees is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the awardees for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the awardees and the NIH as defined below.
2. A.1. Principal Investigator Rights and Responsibilities
The Principal Investigator will have the primary responsibility for all aspects of the protocols, including any modification of study design; conduct of the study including participant recruitment, safety and follow-up; assuring quality of patient care and protocol adherence; data collection; quality control; data and safety monitoring, data analysis and interpretation; preparation of publications; and collaboration with other investigators, unless otherwise provided for in these terms or by action of the Steering Committee. Awardee agrees to the governance of the study through a Steering Committee. Awardee will be required to accept and implement the common protocol(s) and procedures approved by the Steering Committee, the NIDDK and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board.
All applicants will be required to participate in a cooperative and interactive manner with one another and with the DCC in all aspects of the PALF Study Group.
Awardees will retain custody of and have primary rights to the data and software developed under these awards, subject to Government rights of access consistent with current HHS, PHS, and NIH policies. The collaborative protocol and governance policies will call for the continued submission of data centrally to the DCC for a collaborative database; procedures for data analysis, reporting and publication; and procedures to protect and ensure the privacy of medical and genetic data and records of individuals. The NIDDK Project Scientist, on behalf of the NIDDK, will have the same access, privileges and responsibilities regarding the collaborative data as the other members of the Steering Committee.
Awardee will be responsible for implementing the clinical trials and studies according to the protocols and methodologies decided upon by the Steering Committee. For a study involving multiple institutions, it is the responsibility of the awardee and Clinical Site to ensure that data will be submitted in a timely manner to the central Data Coordinating Center. Additionally, individual investigators/sites must demonstrate the ability to implement the strategy specifically designed for their individual study population.
Awardee is responsible for ensuring accurate and timely assessment of the progress of each study, including development of procedures to ensure that data collection and management are: (1) adequate for quality control and analysis; (2) for clinical trials, as simple as appropriate in order to encourage maximum participation of physicians and patients and to avoid unnecessary expense; and (3) sufficiently staffed across the participating institutions. For research involving multiple awards, strategies for the analyses of pooled data will be developed by the Steering Committee. No site may publish or share data collected at their own individual site while following an PALF Study Group protocol in accordance with policies, including the data sharing plan, approved by Steering Committee.
Awardee is responsible for submitting interim progress reports, when requested, to the NIDDK Project Scientist including as a minimum, summary data on protocol performance. For coordinated multiple awards or a multi-site single award, the NIDDK may require additional information from individual awardees/sites. Such reports are in addition to the annual awardee noncompeting continuation progress report.
Awardee is responsible for establishing procedures, where applicable, for all participating institutions in coordinated awards to comply with FDA regulations for studies involving investigational agents or devices and to comply with the requirements of 45 CFR Part 46 for the protection of human subjects, and the NIH policy requirements for the inclusion of women, minorities and children.
The Data Coordinating Center will be involved in collaborations with the NIDDK and the Clinical Centers during all phases of the study. Thus, the DCC is expected to work cooperatively with Clinical Centers and sponsoring organizations in multicenter studies and oversee the implementation of and adherence to a common protocol, as well as assure quality control of the data collected and storage of collected specimens. In addition to organizing and attending regular meetings, the Data Coordinating Center will be expected to maintain close communications with the NIDDK Project Scientist and the Principal Investigators of the Clinical Centers.
Awardee is encouraged to publish and to publicly release and disseminate results, data and other products of the study, concordant with the study protocol and governance and the approved plan for making data and materials available to the scientific community and the NIDDK. In additional they will adhere to the steering committee approved publication/presentation policy.
Support or other involvement of industry or any other third party in any study performed by the Network -- e.g., participation by the third party; involvement of project resources or citing the name of the project or the NIDDK support; or special access to project results, data, findings or resources -- may be advantageous and appropriate. However, except for licensing of patents or copyrights, support or involvement of any third party will occur only following notification to, and concurrence by the NIDDK.
Upon completion of the project, the DCC is expected to transfer all study intervention materials and procedure manuals into the NIDDK Central Repository, which in accordance with current NIDDK and NIH policies, will make them available to the scientific community for the conduct of research at no charge other than the costs of reproduction and distribution.
Awardee will retain custody of and have primary rights to
the data and software developed under these awards, subject to Government
rights of access consistent with current HHS, PHS, and NIH policies.
2. A.2. NIH Responsibilities
An NIH Project Scientist will have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below.
1. Retaining overall programmatic responsibility for the award, and will clearly specify to the awardee the name(s) and role (s) of any additional individuals with substantial involvement in the project and the lines of reporting authority.
2. Interacting with the principal investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progress. Monitoring may include: regular communications with the principal investigator and staff, periodic site visits for discussions with awardee research teams, observation of field data collection and management techniques, quality control, fiscal review, and other relevant matters; as well as attendance at Steering Committee, data safety and monitoring board, and related meetings. The NIDDK retains the option of periodic external review of progress.
3. Reviewing and approving protocols to insure they are within the scope of peer review and for safety considerations, as required by Federal regulations. The NIDDK Project Scientist will monitor protocol progress, and may request that enrollment in a protocol study be terminated for reasons including: (a) accrual rate insufficient to complete study in a timely fashion; (b) accrual goals met early; (c) poor protocol performance; (d) patient safety and regulatory concerns; (e) study results that are already conclusive; and (f) emergence of new information that diminishes the scientific importance of the study question. The NIDDK will not permit further expenditures of NIDDK funds for a study after requesting closure (except for patients already on-study).
4. Making recommendations for continued funding based on: a) overall study progress, including sufficient patient and/or data accrual; b) cooperation in carrying out the research (e.g., attendance at Steering Committee meetings, implementation of group decisions, compliance with the terms of award and reporting requirements); and/or c) maintenance of a high quality of research, which will allow pooling of data and comparisons for common data elements.
The NIDDK reserves the right to terminate or curtail the study (or an individual award or Clinical Site) in the event of (a) failure to develop or implement a mutually agreeable collaborative protocol, (b) substantial shortfall in participant recruitment, follow-up, data reporting, quality control, or other major breach of the protocol, (c) substantive changes in the agreed-upon protocol with which NIDDK cannot concur, (d) reaching a major study endpoint substantially before schedule with persuasive statistical significance, or (e) human subject ethical issues that may dictate a premature termination.
The NIDDK will name additional scientific advisors as necessary from within the National Institutes of Health whose function will be to assist the NIDDK Project Scientist and the Steering Committee in carrying out the goals and aims of the approved studies. NIDDK will have one vote for all key study group subcommittees, regardless of the number of NIDDK personnel involved.
The Project Scientist will have substantial scientific programmatic involvement in quality control, interim data analysis, safety monitoring, and final data analysis and interpretation, preparation of publications, and coordination and performance monitoring. The dominant role and prime responsibility for these activities resides with the awardee for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities in carrying out the studies will be shared among the awardee and Clinical Sites and the NIDDK Project Scientist.
Other NIDDK Project Scientist responsibilities and levels of involvement in the project, as described below.
1. For multi-institutional protocols, participation in the Steering Committee that oversees study conduct. The NIDDK Project Scientist or designee will be a full participant and voting member of the Steering Committee and, if applicable, subcommittees.
2. Serves as a resource with respect to other ongoing NIDDK activities that may be relevant to the protocol to facilitate compatibility and avoid unnecessary duplication of effort.
3. Has substantial involvement in assisting in the design and coordination of research activities for awardees as elaborated below:
Assisting by providing advice in the management and technical performance of the investigations and in coordinating clearances for investigational agents held by NIDDK. The NIDDK may reserve the right to cross file or independently file an Investigational New Drug Application form with the FDA.
For multi-institutional protocols, through participation in the Steering Committee and with the agreement of the Principal Investigator(s) of any coordinating center and data management centers, the NIDDK Project Scientist or designee may coordinate activities among awardees by assisting in the design, development, and coordination of a common research or clinical protocol and statistical evaluations of data; in the preparation of questionnaires and other data recording forms; and in the publication of results.
Reviewing and approving advice regarding the establishment of mechanisms for quality control and study monitoring.
Additionally, an agency program official or IC program director will be responsible for the normal scientific and programmatic stewardship of the award and will be named in the award notice.
2.A.3. Collaborative Responsibilities
The Steering Committee, composed of the awardee as the Chair, Principal Investigators from each of the Clinical Sites, the Principal Investigator of the DCC, and the NIDDK Project Scientist will be the main governing board of the studies. Only the awardee, the principal investigators of the Clinical Sites and the DCC, and the NIDDK Project Scientist or designee will be voting members of the Steering Committee and all major scientific decisions will be determined by a majority vote. This committee will have the primary responsibility for approval of the common protocols, facilitating the conduct of participant follow-up, monitoring completeness of data collection and timely transmission of data to the DCC, and reporting the study results. It will also be responsible for establishing PALF Study Group policies in such areas as access to patient data, ancillary studies, publications and presentations, and performance standards.
The Chairperson of the Steering Committee will be the awardee. In collaboration with the PI of the DCC and the NIDDK Project Scientist, the Chairperson(s) is responsible for coordinating the Committee activities, for preparing meeting agendas, and for scheduling and chairing meetings.
Subcommittees will be established on topics such as ancillary studies, publications and presentations, quality control, recruitment, protocol adherence, among others. Both PIs and Co-PIs may serve as chairs of the subcommittees.
An Executive Committee comprised of the awardee, the Principal Investigator of the DCC, and the NIDDK Project Scientist will be convened to effect management decisions required between Steering Committee meetings, as needed for efficient progress of the trial.
Each Clinical Site PI and the DCC PI agree to the governance of the study through the Steering Committee. Meetings of the Steering Committee will ordinarily be held by telephone conference calls or face to face meeting.
The NIDDK Project Scientist (and the other cited NIDDK scientists) may work with awardee on issues coming before the Steering Committee and, as appropriate, other committees, e.g., issues of recruitment, intervention, follow-up, quality control, standards and methods, adherence to protocol, assessment of problems affecting the study and potential changes in the protocol, interim data and safety monitoring, final data analysis and interpretation, preparation of publications, and development of solutions to major problems such as insufficient participant enrollment. Regardless of the number of NIH staff participating in technical advisory roles, the NIDDK will be limited to one vote on the Steering Committee.
An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be established by the NIDDK to review protocols and monitor patient safety and performance of each study. As a part of its responsibilities, the DSMB will submit recommendations to the NIDDK regarding the continuation of each study. The DSMB will be responsible for final approval of the Data and Safety Monitoring Plan developed by the DCC. Because the DSMB serves as an independent group advisory to the NIDDK, study investigators will not communicate with the Board members regarding study issues, except as authorized by the Board's Executive Secretary or the NIDDK Project Scientist.
full member of the Steering Committee will have one vote. Members of the
Steering Committee will be required to accept and implement policies approved
by the Steering Committee.
2.A.4. Dispute Resolution Process
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between award recipients and the NIH may be brought to arbitration. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened. It will have three members: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual awardee. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the awardee's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulations 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulations 45 CFR Part 16.
3. Reporting
Awardees will be required to submit the Non-Competing Continuation Grant Progress Report (PHS 2590) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
A final progress report, invention statement, and Financial Status Report are required when an award is relinquished when a recipient changes institutions or when an award is terminated.
encourage your inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the
opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall
into three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants
management issues:
1. Scientific/Research Contacts:
Patricia R. Robuck, Ph.D, M.P.H.
Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 659
Bethesda, MD 20892-5450
Telephone: 301-594-8879
Email: email@example.com
Edward Doo, M.D.
Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 651
Bethesda, MD 20892-5450
Telephone: (301) 451-4524
Fax: (301) 480-8300
Email: email@example.com
2. Peer Review Contacts:
Francisco O. Calvo, Ph.D.
Chief, Review Branch
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 752
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452
(for express/courier service: Bethesda, MD 20817)
Telephone: (301) 594-8897
Email: email@example.com
3. Financial or Grants Management
Ms. Sharon Bourque
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 719
Bethesda, MD 20892-5456
Telephone: (301) 594-8846
Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
Section VIII. Other Information
Required Federal Citations
Use of Animals in Research:
Recipients of PHS support for activities involving live, vertebrate animals must comply with PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/PHSPolicyLabAnimals.pdf) as mandated by the Health Research Extension Act of 1985 (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/hrea1985.htm), and the USDA Animal Welfare Regulations (http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htm) as applicable.
Human Subjects Protection:
Federal regulations (45CFR46) require that applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained (http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm).
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan:
Data and safety monitoring is required for all types of clinical trials, including physiologic toxicity and dose-finding studies (phase I); efficacy studies (Phase II); efficacy, effectiveness and comparative trials (Phase III). Monitoring should be commensurate with risk. The establishment of data and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) is required for multi-site clinical trials involving interventions that entail potential risks to the participants (NIH Policy for Data and Safety Monitoring, NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html).
Sharing Research Data:
Investigators submitting an NIH application seeking $500,000 or more in direct costs in any single year are expected to include a plan for data sharing or state why this is not possible (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing).
Investigators should seek guidance from their institutions, on issues related to institutional policies and local IRB rules, as well as local, State and Federal laws and regulations, including the Privacy Rule.
for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS):
NIH is interested in advancing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify common genetic factors that influence health and disease through a centralized GWAS data repository. For the purposes of this policy, a genome-wide association study is defined as any study of genetic variation across the entire human genome that is designed to identify genetic associations with observable traits (such as blood pressure or weight), or the presence or absence of a disease or condition. All applications, regardless of the amount requested, proposing a genome-wide association study are expected to provide a plan for submission of GWAS data to the NIH-designated GWAS data repository, or provide an appropriate explanation why submission to the repository is not possible. Data repository management (submission and access) is governed by the Policy for Sharing of Data Obtained in NIH Supported or Conducted Genome-Wide Association Studies, NIH Guide NOT-OD-07-088. For additional information, see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/gwas/.
to Research Data through the Freedom of Information Act:
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to provide access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm. Applicants may wish to place data collected under this funding opportunity in a public archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include information about this in the budget justification section of the application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under this award.
Sharing of Model Organisms:
NIH is committed to support efforts that encourage sharing of important research resources including the sharing of model organisms for biomedical research (see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/model_organism/index.htm). At the same time the NIH recognizes the rights of grantees and contractors to elect and retain title to subject inventions developed with Federal funding pursuant to the Bayh Dole Act (see the NIH Grants Policy Statement https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm). All investigators submitting an NIH application or contract proposal, beginning with the October 1, 2004 receipt date, are expected to include in the application/proposal a description of a specific plan for sharing and distributing unique model organism research resources generated using NIH funding or state why such sharing is restricted or not possible. This will permit other researchers to benefit from the resources developed with public funding. The inclusion of a model organism sharing plan is not subject to a cost threshold in any year and is expected to be included in all applications where the development of model organisms is anticipated.
Inclusion of Women And Minorities in Clinical Research:
It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing clinical research should read the "NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a complete copy of the updated Guidelines is available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm. The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences.
Inclusion of Children as Participants in Clinical Research:
The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all clinical research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as participants in research involving human subjects (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm).
Required Education on the Protection of Human Subject Participants:
NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for all investigators submitting NIH applications for research involving human subjects and individuals designated as key personnel. The policy is available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESC):
Criteria for federal funding of research on hESCs can be found at http://stemcells.nih.gov/index.asp and at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-09-116.html. Only research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (http://escr.nih.gov). It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide in the project description and elsewhere in the application as appropriate, the official NIH identifier(s) for the hESC line(s) to be used in the proposed research.
NIH Public Access Policy Requirement:
In accordance with the NIH Public Access Policy (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-033.html) investigators must submit or have submitted for them their final, peer-reviewed manuscripts that arise from NIH funds and are accepted for publication as of April 7, 2008 to PubMed Central (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/), to be made publicly available no later than 12 months after publication. As of May 27, 2008, investigators must include the PubMed Central reference number when citing an article in NIH applications, proposals, and progress reports that fall under the policy, and was authored or co-authored by the investigator or arose from the investigator's NIH award. For more information, see the Public Access webpage at http://publicaccess.nih.gov/.
for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information:
The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to the "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information", the "Privacy Rule", on August 14, 2002. The Privacy Rule is a federal regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable health information, and is administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR).
Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website (http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/) provides information on the Privacy Rule, including a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on "Am I a covered entity?" Information on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review, funding, and progress monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html.
URLs in NIH Grant Applications or Appendices:
All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations. For publications listed in the appendix and/or Progress report, internet addresses (URLs) must be used for publicly accessible on-line journal articles. Unless otherwise specified in this solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide any other information necessary for the review because reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites. Furthermore, we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when they directly access an Internet site.
People 2010:
The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This FOA is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
Authority and Regulations:
This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance at http://www.cfda.gov/ and is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372. Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The NIH Grants Policy Statement can be found at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm.
The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Loan Repayment Programs:
NIH encourages applications for educational loan repayment from qualified health professionals who have made a commitment to pursue a research career involving clinical, pediatric, contraception, infertility, and health disparities related areas. The LRP is an important component of NIH's efforts to recruit and retain the next generation of researchers by providing the means for developing a research career unfettered by the burden of student loan debt. Note that an NIH grant is not required for eligibility and concurrent career award and LRP applications are encouraged. The periods of career award and LRP award may overlap providing the LRP recipient with the required commitment of time and effort, as LRP awardees must commit at least 50% of their time (at least 20 hours per week based on a 40 hour week) for two years to the research. For further information, please see: http://www.lrp.nih.gov.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS)
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health®
Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.