text:
The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
7 Points
4th DDO Census Debate: Trump v Clinton
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
|Voting Style:
|Point System:
|Select Winner
|2 years ago
|Post Voting Period
|2,340 times
|Debate No:
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (31)
Votes (4)
The Resolution:
The US Should Elect Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton.
The the US Presidential Elections closing near, the nomimations are becoming clear. Donald Trump against Hillary Clinton... Both members equally as loved by their parties as they are hated by their parties. It's easy to see why this would be the biggest debate of 2016.
- No wars (source wars or definition wars, etc...)
- No kritiking.
- No Conduct or S&G votes.
- Proper formatting must be used (and consistent.)
The winner shall receive a choice between a $25 gift card to Amazon or Walmart.
Pro side is represented by TN05, and advised by Thett3. Con side is represented by Lannan, and advised by bsh1.
- US: United States
- Elect: Choose (someone) to become President by voting.
I accept.
I'd like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate. Best of luck to us both, and I look forward to seeing my opponent's arguments.
The 2016 election has become one of the most interesting in recent memory. While the Republicans have nominated a charismatic outsider, the Democrats have nominated a corrupt career politican. The choice seems obvious and I will attempt to prove it.
Donald Trump is running on a campaign of economic realism and pragmatism centered around bringing American jobs back, in contrast to the far-left dogma of Hillary Clinton to expand globalism and allow other countries to steal out jobs. Trump's tax plan simplifies the tax code, establishing four new brackets of 0%, 10%, 20%, and 25%, eliminates the net investment income surtax, lowers the highest corporate tax rate to 15%, and abolishes the death tax.[1] According to the Tax Foundation, this plan would result in 11 percent higher GDP growth, 6.5% higher wages, and 5.3 million more full-time equivalent jobs.[2] On trade, Trump has proposed re-negotiating trade deals, in particular NAFTA, a disastorous trade agreement signed by Bill Clinton that resulted in the loss of over 850,000 jobs.[3] Trump opposes the TPP, which has already resulted in over 100,000 jobs lost in Ohio alone.[4] Trump has also proposed changes to our visa policies, such as increasing the prevailing wage for H1B visas and requiring companies to hire American workers first.[5] Trump is the only candidate with a plan to fix inner-city poverty (replacing a visa for foreign workers with a job bank for inner-city youth) as well as to provide safe homes for parentless children.[5]
Trump is not dogmatic economically; he is willing to negotiate. Trump is open to plans that might help American workers, such as a minimum wage increase,[6] as well as slight tax increases on the wealthy as part of an overall tax deal.[6] This is a key strength of the Trump campaign: a willingness to work with others and compromise for the greater good. This is something that Hillary Clinton cannot do - she was among the most liberal senators during her term, more liberal than even our current president, and she ranks on OnTheIssues as liberal as fake Indian Elizabeth Warren and only slightly less liberal than communist Bernie Sanders.[7] Trump is the only candidate willing to work with both sides on the economy to protect American workers.
Foreign policy
Possibly the strongest difference between Trump and Clinton is on foreign policy. Trump's foreign policy plan is simple: we aren't the world's policeman. It's time we focus on our interests and stop trying to run the world. Hillary Clinton, as Obama's Secretary of State, will continue his failed policies and head us well into our 13th year of unstopped war. Trump opposed the Iraq War, while Clinton voted for it. Trump opposed the Iran deal; Clinton supported it. Clinton's failures on foreign policy are so massive she has no grounds to attack any Trump policy.[8] Trump didn't, for instance, leave four Americans to die in Benghazi. He didn't use a private email server, in violation of federal law and leaving emails open to hacking from our enemies. Regardless of what you think of Donald Trump, he never gloated over the rape-murder of a foreign leader.[8] Trump stands for an end to endless war. Clinton stands for more of the same. Her reckless policies will continue the mistakes of Iraq and lead to hundreds of thousands, if not millions of deaths.
It's become very apparent through the public lives of the Clintons that they have achieved an impressive list of scandals. WMD.com lists 22 scandals:[9]
1) Bill Clinton's abuse of the IRS to target political enemies.
2) Bill Clinton's hiring PIs to intimidate potential informants
3) Clinton's looting the White House upon leaving, including reportedly selling off taxpayer-funded goods.
4) Filegate, when the Clinton's illegally used to FBI to dig dirt up on their enemies.
5) Huma Abedin's link to the Muslim Brotherhood
6) Vince Foster's murder
7) Emailgate
8) Chinagate, when tech companies donated millions to the Clintons to get permission to sell secrets to China.
9) Travelgate, where the Clintons fired White House staff to install cronies
10) Whitewater
11) Sniper fire in bosnia lie
12) Hillary's missing billing records from Watergate
13) Pardongate, where Bill Clinton pardoned a number of people, including a convicted tax evader who was - surprise - a donor.
14) Hillary Clinton's amazing cattle futures business (read: fraud)
15) Clinton body count
16) Clinton's mentor, communist Saul Alinsky
17) Hillary's defense of a child rapist
18) Hillary's fundraising in Iran
19) Clinton foundation
20) Benghazi
21) Paul Franklin Peter
22) Watergate, where she was fired for being a liar
This is a massive list, and it's not even all of them. The Clintons have more scandals than Bill has affairs. What scandals could Trump possibly have that compare? Nothing. There is no way Hillary Clinton or her husband Bill should get anywhere near the White House, ever. She should be in jail, and will be once Trump installs a fair AG who will do the job our current one is refusing to do.
Trump has proposed a list of esteemed conservative justices, who will fight to protect the rights established under the Constitution, including the right to keep and bear arms. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, will nominate justices to promote her far-left agenda. Given there is already one vacancy, and there may be two or three more, do you honestly want Crooked Hillary Clinton to be appointing justices? I don't think so.
As I've explained and proven, Trump is a far better candidate than Hillary Clinton. His economic proposals are going to lead to millions of new jobs and massive GDP growth, and he's open to working with all sides, whereas Hillary is a partisan hack with no real plans and no willingness to negotiate; his foreign policy plans will avoid the hundreds of thousands of deaths Hillary Clinton will lead to; and his judges will work to protect your rights rather than the political views of the Democratic Party establishment. Even if you still can't bring yourself to support that, what must bring you to do it is the list of scandals the Clintons have had - frankly, they should both be in jail. Donald Trump is going to Make America Great Again. Are you going to join him?
1. http://taxfoundation.org...
2. http://taxfoundation.org...
3. https://ideas.repec.org...
4. http://www.cleveland.com...
5. https://www.donaldjtrump.com...
6. https://www.washingtonpost.com...
7. http://fivethirtyeight.com...
8. http://www.thenation.com...
9. http://mobile.wnd.com...
I thank my opponent for this debate and wish him good luck. Due to the traditional structure, this round shall be for my Opening Arguments only.
Contention 1: Deportation
We all currently know that Donald J Trump's greatest and most famous piece of his platform is the wall and deportation of all illegal immigrants in the US. The issue with that is that it's not as easy as he makes it seem, not to mention that it will hurt the US so bad that it pushes us into an economic Depression, not just a recession.
The key thing we have to look at here is the illegal immigrants jobs as well how they affect the everyday American. Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve showed that illegal immigrants, mainly from Latin America, had accounted for a sixth of the US economic growth from 2000-2007. [1] While in the US, illegal immigrants have been supporting their families back home while in the past year, illegal immgirants had sent home $63 billion. [2] This shows that they are not as "heartless" or "lazzy" as my opponent claims they are as it is impoosible to send that much home if you're living on welfare. The CBO reports that if we are to allow illegal immigrants work in the US, they will raise wages in the long hall, but deportation will lead to a decrease of our wages by 0.6%, which despite not sounding like much, is still a significant loss. [3] We have to also look and see that Trump himself has also flip flopped on this issue from going hard line to saying that this is a possiblity within days [13]. What kind of President do we expect to have when they are teeter tottering on an issue that can destroy our nation?
With this being my final point I will review the final costs of deportation. If we were to deport ALL illegal immigrants in the US our nation's GDP would drop by $1.6 TRILLION! [4] This is a huge effect on the economy that would sink the US into another Great Depression not to mention all fo the other impacts that I have brought up this round. There is no logical reason why the US should deport all illegal immigrants, but should instead grant amnesty to those here which Clinton not only supports, but will expand on increasing the US economy while Trump will plunge the world into a second Great Depression.
Contention 2: Clinton the Unifier.
Many times Trump has called Mexicans rapists and criminals. He has attacked all non-white, evangelical Americans. Trump's own rhetoric has caused riots in the US. Many times his own words has sparked riots like in Chicago and many places in California where people don't appriate this Fascist Rhetoric where he constantly gives hate speeches against others and then goes to blame the problems he has been causing on Bernie supporters where he fails to understand the implacations of his own actions [5]. Studies have shown that Trump's own hate speech has created a level of harm where people are more violitile against others.
"In a 2005 experiment, […] passers-by were more likely to help an apparently injured person if that person was wearing a football jersey which supported the same team as them than an opposing team. However, when their shared identity as football fans was made salient instead, supporters of both teams were likely to be helped, significantly more so than a person wearing a plain shirt.[6]"
Here we can see the effects, though on a simplistic scale, that such an action can effect people and it shows how people are less able to help out minorities when subjected to this kind of speech while under the normal case where they would easily help anyone. Trump is tearing this country appart and something needs to be done before it's too late.
On top of this, Trump has tried to introduce a program where we survey Muslim neighborhoods and mosques. This is an extremely flawed plan. John Horgan, the Director of the Center for Terrorism and Security Studies at UMass pointed out a great deal of the flaws in this plan. He showed that there is a great deal of vagueness that is involved in this plan like "How do we define concerning behavior?" "How do others and how should they recognize it?[7]" These are some key issues with the plan that are very vague making it impossible to actually enforce or even to do so without people being wrongly accused and improsioned. This breads distrust and zero co-operation which was a key flaw in Trump's Plan. Hilary will not do such an autrocity where our own Constitutional Rights are being intruded on just to follow through with some sort of xenophobic plan.
Contention 3: Domestic
This is a very broad topic here, so I'll only be able to lightly touch some of the topics here. For Starters, when we actually compare the two campaigns, we can see that Hilary is more open with her campaign than Trump. If you look at both campaign websites, you'll only see that Trump lists and defends 7 political issues, while Hilary supports over 35 political issues [8][9].
Hilary has openly stated that she supports a minimum wage increase to $12 per hour, but Trump, on the other hand, has purposed things that will destroy the economy as well as the well being of every American. Several times this election he has changed his stance from opposing the raising of the minimum wage, to wanting it raised, to his newest stance where Trump wants to abolish the minimum wage [10]. This would completely harm many of the average Americans as many of the costal states would have high minimum wages, many of the Midwestern states would have a mimium wage that is decreased which would harm the well being of every single American as many would be unable to afford many of the rising prices that would occur with this as their incomes shrank.
The next key issue is abortion. Hilary Clinton has been a great supporter of women's rights, but Trump on the other hand, has said some terrible things on the matter. Trump had stated that women who recieve abortions should be punished. This was an outrage that someone who is running or even going to be President, would even consider. This is a clear violation of female rights as the SCOTUS has ruled Abortion to be Constitutionally legal. Within 3 hours of his statement, Trump changed his stance on it, not once, not twice, but three times [11]. This is something that shouldn't be over looked as he simply did this as damage control to hide his own motives and this isn't someone we should have as President.
Hilary Clinton has supported clear common sense gun control, but Trump on the other hand, has flip flopped many times on this issue. Trump had stated that he had supported the second amendment, but he has also stated that he supported Assault Rifle Ban, magazine bans, and longer back ground checks. He has also stated the exact opposite [12]. Can we really support a President who flip flops so many times on these issues that are extremely important to our nation? Especially when these flip flops are within months of each other, others over time.
1. Alan Greenspan, PhD, former Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, stated in his Apr. 30, 2009 testimony before the US Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees, and Border Security
2. (http://tinyurl.com...)
3. (http://tinyurl.com...)
4. (http://tinyurl.com...)
5. (http://tinyurl.com...)
6. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 443–453.
7. (http://tinyurl.com...)
8. (http://tinyurl.com...)
9. (http://tinyurl.com...)
10. (http://tinyurl.com...)
11. (http://tinyurl.com...)
12. (http://tinyurl.com...)
13. (http://tinyurl.com...)
I'd like to thank my opponent for his timely opening round.
Before I begin going into specific responses to my opponent's claims, I'd like to note a glaring theme - or lack of one - throughout his opening statement; namely, his case is build virtually entirely around a negative one of Trump. That is, with the exception of a few relatively minor social issues, he does not argue affirmatively that Hillary Clinton would be a good president. Instead, he instead argues that Trump will be a bad one. Now, I completely understand why he might be reluctant to lay out an affirmative case for Hillary Clinton: it just isn't possible. Hillary Clinton is a corrupt career politican who has been on virtually every side of every issue. I do not envy his task, but my opponent's strategy is incredibly flawed for one reason; even if we accept Donald Trump as most likely being bad president, he must still prove Hillary Clinton would be better, and in absence of that, he really doesn't have a case.
Argument 1 - Immigration and deportation
Without a doubt, Donald Trump's stance on immigration is a key factor in his sudden rise. I'm not going to question the fact that Trump's stated positions on this issue are well outside of what one might expect from an ordinary politican. He cares deeply for the American worker, which is why he is understandably upset that people are losing their jobs to illegal immigrants, and that people like Kate Steinly are being killed by violent illegal immigrants the government has refused to deport.
My opponent notes several benefits of illegal immigration: he argues it heavily accounts for economic growth, a sixth of our economic growth from 2000-07. Unfortunately, this is a misrepresentation of his source; Greenspan only argued illegal immigration accounted for a sixth of our increase in the civilian labor force over that period.[1] This is not a good thing; a sixth of our jobs created over that period went to people who aren't legally here and don't pay taxes, rather than Americans or those with legal status who pay taxes. Our unemployment rate peaked at 5.8% during that period - imagine how low our unemployment rate could be if we let Americans do these jobs![2]
He also notes that illegal immigrants have sent $63 billion dollars back home just in the past year. While he presents the latter as a positive fact, demonstrating the humanity of illegal immigrants, I would argue to the contrary: it demonstrates the damage illegal immigration does to our economy. Putting aside the issues with non-payment of taxation as well as the fact these immigrants are taking jobs away from Americans who would do them, this is a net loss of $63 billion from our economy. According to my opponent's own source, 20% of Mexican households are supported by these sorts of remitances.[3] In effect, we are subsidizing Mexico and getting nothing in return. This is the sort of unfairness Trump has correctly brought to attention during his campaign.
My opponent also notes that deporting illegal immigrats might result in a slight reduction in wages; however, Tump's tax plan alone would raise wages by 6.5%,[4] far more than the minor losses my opponent notes might occur under deportation. In the case of flip-flopping my opponent attempts to make, Trump did not actually alter his stance on illegal immigration; all he did was argue in favor of high-skilled visas. This is consistent with his platform, which argues for retaining them but raising the prevailing wage.[5] Rather than teetering, Trump has presented a consistent message: we must protect our borders.
On a final note, my opponent argues that there is an immense cost to deporting all illegal immigrants. I don't deny that it would not be cheap; two things are worth noting here, however. The first is that Trump has, in actuality, expressed an openness to compromise on this issue. The wall and deportations are a starting point, but everything is negotiable; Trump noted that Rubio's views on immigration are "OK" and that, while he is tougher on it, it is only a difference of 'degree'.[6] Trump is a master negotiator and will no doubt get a great deal.
Clinton unifier
In regards to Mexican rapists, Trump never said all Mexicans were rapists. Rather, what he noted was that the people coming over the border illegally aren't necessarily the best Mexico has to offer - many are criminals, such as the muderer of Kate Steinly, who liberal Democrats in San Francisco refused to deport.[7] Clinton supports such 'sanctuary city' policies.[8]
Trump has also not caused any riots; Trump supporters have never rioted. These riots are led by leftists, and many of these riots are being caused by paid agitators who oppose him.[9] You may disagree with what Donald Trump says, but the fact is the rioters are people who oppose him. And yes - many riots are being caused by Bernie Sanders supporters. At the recent San Jose riots, Bernie Sanders supporters were documented assualting fellow Sanders supporters after mistaking them for Trump suppoters.[10] My opponent cites a study that has nothing to do with this scenario - it pre-assumes Trump supporters are rioting and harming others. I defy my opponent to provide just one instance of a Trump supporter refusing to help a minority.
My opponent also argues that Trump's proposal to surveil certain Muslims neighborhoods and mosques is bad because it is impossible to work and unconstitutional; I disagree. A 2011 survey from Pew noted that nearly half of all American Muslims believe their leaders have not done enough to speak out against terrorism, 20% believe support for terrorism has grown, and 60% are concerned about the rise of Islamic extremism in the US.[11] This helps my opponent, right? Wrong. American Muslims recognize the problem and are willing to help. Trump's proposal to surveil mosques and neighborhoods is not a draconian measure - in fact, it requires the help of American Muslims to work. Surveillance could be as simple as finding patriotic Muslims willing to investigate dangerous neighborhoods and mosques so that their communities can live securely. Is that such a bad idea? By rejecting any surveillance outright, my opponent rejects that very reasonable idea.
Domestic policy
Now, we finally get to my opponent's affirmative case for Clinton. My opponent notes Hillary Clinton has released more policy papers than Trump. This is true. But does it really matter? I would argue not. Policy papers alone do nothing that verbal statements don't accomplish. Trump is in fact far more open than Hillary in regards to media access - at one point, she hadn't had a press conference in over 180 days, while Trump is grilled almost daily by the media on every issue.[12]
In regards to minimum wage, I will note that Trump is open to a minimum wage increase if it helps American workers. Clinton only recently supported raising one after receiving pressure from unions. Abolishing the wage would indeed harm Midwestern states, but so would raising it; after all, the cost of living in San Francisco is more than Witchita. According to the CBO, increasing the minimum wage to just $10 nationwide would result in 500,000 lost jobs.[13] In a way, this would continute the Clinton cartel's disastorous record of destroying jobs - remember that NAFTA killed 700,000 jobs.
On abortion, my opponent argues vaguely that Clinton's stance is great and Trump's is awful. I disagree. Clinton's stance on abortion is that it should be legal up until very late in the third term.[14] Contrary to what my opponent says, this is not required by Roe v. Wade. Roe v. Wade allows for restriction of late-term abortion.[15] The stances of neither candidate are popular; only 20% support a total ban, and only 30% support total legality.[16] While Trump's position on abortion has changed, so has Clinton's; in 2000, she supported late-term abortion bans.
Finally, on guns, my opponent makes a baffling argument: Trump has flip flopped on guns. It is true he used to support gun restrictions. But Hillary used to oppose them![17] In 2008, she ran to the right of Obama on guns. Additionally, given my opponent views SCOTUS rulings as valid, how can he support a candidate who rejects the court's ruling that there is a right to guns? Like Hillary, he must twist himself into a pretzel to attack Trump.
1. http://immigration.procon.org...
2. http://www.multpl.com...
3. http://www.thedialogue.org...
4. http://taxfoundation.org...
5. https://www.donaldjtrump.com...
6. https://www.washingtonpost.com...
7. http://www.realclearpolitics.com...
8. http://www.breitbart.com...
9. http://dailycaller.com...
10. https://pjmedia.com...
11. http://www.people-press.org...
12. http://townhall.com...
13. http://www.themainewire.com...
14. https://www.americarisingpac.org...
15. http://www.theatlantic.com...
16. http://www.gallup.com...
17. http://www.ontheissues.org...
I thank my opponent for his patience. In this round I shall be posting the last of my remaining Case as I was unable to fully post it last round and any attempt to add on to it this round would count as a rebuttal. For this round I shall post the last of my case and then move on to rebutting my opponent's case.
Contention 4: Leadership Trumps.
Bad puns aside, the race for the Presidency must be focused around leadership which is obviously Clinton by a mile. Don't believe me? Let's hear what Trump has to say.
"Hillary is smart, tough and a very nice person, so is her husband. Bill Clinton was a great president. They are fine people. Hillary was roughed up by the media, and it was a tough campaign for her, but she's a great trooper. Her history is far from being over," and "I know Hillary and I think she'd make a great president or vice-president." [1]
As a senator from New York, she was the first ever New Yorker to serve part of the Senate Armed Services Committee and helped for the Family and Medical leave Act, she also worked to expand health care for the National Guard. Where does Trump stand on this, he makes fun of POWs and attacks our nation's vets. What kind of Commander in Chief would do such a thing? Vetern groups have actually condemned Trump because of this [2]. Our nation's troops wouldn't even respect him.
On immigration, she took charge by help passing the DREAM act. She introduced two key bills to help our new immigrants by introducing S. 764 (110th) by extending medical care to low income LEGAL immigrants and pregnant women. She also helped introduce S. 1543 (108th) which helped give new immigrants job training and help them learn English. What does Trump want to do? Deport all illegal immigrants claiming they are all rapists and criminals. Is this the message we should be sending to legal immigrants coming to America of what we think of them?
Hilary has helped broker a key Cease fire between Israel and Hamas [3]. If the allowed to continue, Israel would have launched a ground invasion of the Gaza strip possibly leading to massive war in the middle east and oil prices to skyrocket.
Rebuttal 1: Economy
Donald Trump is going to make America poor again. A group of expert economists did a study on Trump's purposed 35% tarrif on Mexico and 45 tarrifs on China and the results are disasterous. It will cost the Average American $11,500 in increased prices over the next 5 years, and these numbers are expected to continue to climb [4]. It will cost poor Americans 53% of their income and prices will rise 30%. US exports to these nations will decline by 78%! If you want to make America great again, then Trump is not the right answer. Sure Trump may oppose the TPP, but so does Hilary [6].
My opponent claims that Trump is willing to work with Americans, but we can see that he's in love with Hillary and the Democrats, "I've been around a long time. And it just seems the economy does better under the Democrats than under Republicans. [5]"
Rebuttal 2: Foreign Policy
I have previously brought up Hilary's peace deal with Israel and Hamas stoping a war. What has Trump done to even come close to this? Trump actually supported the Iraq War, Trump had stated on the Howard Stern show that he supported the Iraq war when asked. In a seperate interview, he said he'd supported it since the markets would skyrocket [7]. Sounds like strong support to me. As much as Trump likes to bash the Iran deal, we can call this a huge success for Hilary, she created the sanction that finally brougth Iran to it's knees while all the other sanctions just encouraged Iran to continue nuclear developement [8]. Trump stated that he would hammar them with sanctions, but if that was true, Iran would have a nuke under Trump. Speaking of the Iran deal, Trump had originally supported the deal [9]. This is just another foreign policy flip flop by Trump. Bengahzi is a dead issue, Hillary Clinton was interviewed by the Bengahzi investigation pannel headed by Trey Goudy and easily won out. There's nothing else here to prove. We are talking about Donald Trump here who wants to bring back torture and kill family members of terrorists. Which is why so many people actually oppose the US in the first place.
Rebuttal 3: Corruption
Some of these don't actually apply to Hillary as they are more Bill than her. Hillary was a Public defense attourney and had no choice in the child rapist case. Coming out of law school, there's really nothing much else to do in that field outside of being the Public Defense attourney where you get impossible cases like this. She actually won the case though. We may look at it bad, but it shows she did her job right. Sadly, that's just how the American justice system works. Saul Alinsky is irrelevent as many could say the same thing about Obama, but the Historical Presidential ranking for Obama is 17th out of the 44 US Presidents [10]. Trump has done some terrible things like how about his bankruptcies or what about his creation of $1 billion in junk bonds? What about how he went so far into debt that the Saudi prince had to bail him out [11] and we expect him to run our nation's budget? Trump had forcefully taken a women's property just to use it as part of his corrupt business. This list is simple ludicrious as even with this, Hillary is a better candidate than the corrupt Donald Trump. #NeverTrump.
Rebuttal 4: Judges
My opponent is talking about how Trump is better than Clinton because of his judges. This is simply rediculious as the GOP Congress is refusing to do it's Constitutional duties where they must nominate a judge and this is harming our political process as the SCOTUS has to make rulings with 8 judges, which only benefit the left, making this a loss for the Right. Trump is making matters worse here by failing to uphold our nation's laws and encouraging his party to disobey the Constiutition.
1. (http://tinyurl.com...)
2. (http://tinyurl.com...)
3. ( http://tinyurl.com...)
4. (http://tinyurl.com...)
5. ( http://tinyurl.com...)
6. (http://tinyurl.com...)
7. (http://tinyurl.com...)
8. (http://tinyurl.com...)
9. (http://tinyurl.com...)
10. (http://tinyurl.com...)
11. ( http://tinyurl.com...)
I'd like to thank my opponent for his response. I'll respond first to his new arguments.
Leadership Trumps
My opponent notes Trump had previously praised the Clintons. This is a bit of a silly claim - the entirety of Trump's praise for them came when Hillary was a Senator from New York, Trump's home state. Trump, being a businessman, needed to play both sides. Why alienate a Senator who is the wife of a former President? Unfortunately, this is the sort of dirty politics the Clintons run. This is the sort of politics Trump seeks to end.
My opponent also notes several achievements Clinton had as Senator. These seem like good ideas, I'm not going to dispute that. But to argue Trump fails in supporting the military is silly. Rather than wasting time debating a bunch of empty suits, Trump held a fundraiser to raise $5.6 million for veterans.[1] It is no surprise military voters prefer Trump to Clinton by a margin of 15 points and he holds a favorable approval rating among military members and households.[2]
I'm a bit confused by the claim Hillary helped pass the DREAM Act. The DREAM Act was never implemented. It did not pass. He also criticizes Trump's immigration plan as being a bad signal to legal immigrants. How so? How is fair for illegal immigrants to instantly become citizens, but for legal immigrants such as Trump's mother and wife to wait years or decades to become citizens? Trump notices this unfairness and wants to fix it - Hillary does not. My opponent also notes Hillary helped broker a cease-fire between Hamas and Israel. This is a very, very low bar to clear. Israel and Hamas have continued sporadic attacks for years since then. Trump seeks a lasting peace in the region, and who better to negotiate it than the best negotiator on the planet?
To begin my rebuttals, I'd like to note my opponent's rebuttals only very rarely respond to my points. Because of this, a traditional response is difficult. I hope my opponent will use his next roun to get into policy specifics, such as the benefits of Trump's tax plan or the harm caused by free trade deals.
My opponent argues tariffs on China and Mexico would harm American consumers, especially poor ones. This is true, but it would also hurt China and Mexico worse. The proposed tariffs are not policies - they are negotiating positions. Unless Mexico and China act fairly, they will be treated as economic enemies. Mexico and China, who rely on US purchases of their exports, will not risk losing the US market and will comply with demands. Contrast this pretty solid position with Hillary, who praised the TPP as the "gold standard" of trade deals before deciding to oppose it for political reasons.[3] Trump saying Democrats tend to run the economy better isn't a problem either - unlike Hillary, he's willing to cross party lines and work with the other side, and recognize when they do accomplish things.
Foreign policy
My opponent argues Trump supported the Iraq war. This is misleading at best. Trump gave a few comments along the lines of "sure, I guess", but noted the job should have been finished during the Gulf War. During the early stages of invasion - which were undoubtably the best periods of the war - Trump was more optimistic. But he quickly realized the war would be bad well before many others.[4] Contrast this with Hillary, who voted for invasion and then attempted to duck the blame when it backfired. My opponent also attempts to defend the failed Iran Deal. While she claims it helped keep them from a nuke, that's silly. It awarded Iran over $55 billion to fund it's terrorist regime and nuclear program.[5] If that's a success, I don't know what failure is.
It is also an outright lie to claim Trump supported the Iran Deal. He did not.[6] In 2011 - well before the 2015 Iran Deal - he supported negotiating with Iran's then-President. His negotiation plan? Threaten war if Iran didn't stop developing nukes. That's far, far different from the 2011 deal. To say Trump supported the Iran Deal negotiated in 2015 by John Kerry is a lie. Point blank.
My opponent also argues Benghazi isn't a problem anymore. Like Hillary, he thinks at this point it doesn't matter. That's wrong. The Benghazi scandal revealed her illegal use of a private email. It also revealed her early acceptance of the attacks as terrorism, despite her later claims it was just a reaction to a youtube video.[7]
My opponent dismisses many of these scandals by claiming they only apply to Bill. Considering Hillary has said Bill will have a big role in her administration on the economic front, it is entirely fair to bring them up. He tries to defend Hillary's defense of a child rapist by claiming she did her job. That's true. But it's one thing to do your job, another to laugh at the victim and accuse her of lying. This woman - who we know was raped by this man - had her life ruined by Hillary Clinton.[8] He tries to defend Hillary's link to communist Saul Alinsky by arguing Obama was linked to him too. This is maybe the worst excuse I've ever heard. He then tries to pivot to Trump's business bankrupcies, but it's not very effective. While it is true Trump has failed in some businesses, that is what happens when you are a businessman - you win some and lose some. And, being worth over $10 billion, he's certainly won far more than he's lost.
Finally, on judges my opponent argues bizzarrely that because Congress won't confirm Obama's SCOTUS pick, Trump can't be trusted to appoint judges. That's silly. Congress is not run by Trump. Trump does not run Congress, but even if he did stalling a nomination is a perfectly legitimate strategy. The Democrats stalled many judges under Bush. My opponent never contests that Hillary's justices would strip our constitutional right to keep and bear arms or push a far-left agenda. What does that say about his case here?
1. http://www.politifact.com...
2. http://thehill.com...
3. http://www.cnn.com...
4. http://www.factcheck.org...
5. https://www.washingtonpost.com...
6. http://dailycaller.com...
7. http://www.theatlantic.com...
8. http://www.frontpagemag.com...
This round I shall be defending my case, as my opponent did in his previous round, this will include C4 since it is part of my Opening Arguments.
Unlike my opponent's claims, I have easily provided cases for Hillary, he just fails to see it as I add it in constantly with the bombardments on Trump, though it may not be as obvious. As much as I dislike both politicians and really don't think either of them should be president as a personal opinion, Hillary is obviously the better choice.
Contention 1: Immigration and Deportation
My opponent claims that they are doing bad things like taking our jobs, but the thing is, they are taking jobs that no one actually wants to do, from farmhands to maids/buttlers. We also have to remember, unlike Trump's claim, they are sending some really good people as 34% of software engineers, 44% Medical scientists, and 25% chemists [1]. We want to deport these people? Do you know what this would do to a vast majority of America? Getting rid of almost half of our Medical scientists is something that will significantly harm our nation. If anything, we should ennact Hillary's plan and grant them anmesty as not only are they working, but their work is benefitting all Americans, no matter who you are.
My opponent claims that illegal immigrants don't pay taxes, but that's absurb. The National Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy has reported that in this past year, illegal immigrants have paid over $11 billion [2]. I don't know about you, but that's a huge amount of taxes that we would be getting rid of. If you actually go to this source, you'll see it has an interactive map on how much taxation was paid by them. They have also reported that Obama's executive action has lead to an increase in local taxes profit by $805 million. My opponent states that this is not a lot, but we do still have to realize that they accounted for that much of our growth is still a huge aspect. If you get rid of that our growth would have lost $698,809,333,333 [3]. That is a huge loss for the US that would have occured. My opponent can downplay these numbers all he wants, but you can't defy simple statistics. My opponent harps on American jobs with the unemployment, but we still have to see that the US would have lost $700 billion if this would have occured. That is appalling.
My opponent is simply doing incorrect math here. Illegal immigrants are sending $63 billion home, but they are adding $700 billion to our GDP and they are paying $11 billion in taxes. These numbers completely trump my opponents arguments. Even if that's the case. We can see that the US is one of Mexicos top trading partners and they can easily be purchasing American made products leading to more American jobs based on the increased demand on the foreign market for American products. If you take this away, outside of all the other bad effects I've already mentioned, but we would see a loss of American jobs as these Latinos would be unable to purchase as much American products as they would have less money to purchase them with.
My opponent wants to talk about how Trump's taxes will increase wages by that much, but let's look at some other effects of it, like the decrease of national income by $12 trillion. With the ballooning of interest on debt as well as our Social Program, the US deficet will skyrocket [4]. This isn't fixing the issue, it's making it worse. Hillary may lower wages by 0.9%, but we are able to actually come close to paying all of our bills compared to Trump where we are destroying our economy, paying for more projects than ever, and loosing income to pay for it all [5]. That's not fixing the problem, that's making it worse, while Hillary solves for taxes. Either way, my opponent has dropped this argument, so please extend it across.
Though Trump may has talked about compramise, we can't ignore that his plan will cost our GDP over a trillion dollars and will plunge our economy into a Depression. This argument has a huge Impact in this debate and it has been dropped. This is a huge economic depression that could wreck our economy and Trump would lead the charge off the Fiscal cliff and make America poor again. Hillary, will help us by granting amnesty.
Contention 2: Clinton the Unifier
My opponent claims that this statement is false, but even if that's even remotely true, which it's not. We can see that Trump is stereotyping all Mexicans, legal and not, that they are all villianous people. Hell, there are people who are getting brainwashed by this propaganda that he is throwing out there.
As much or whatever my opponent wants to spin this, Trump is causing these riots happening through his hateful speeches. Even if they are Bernie supporters, things like this wouldn't be happening if Trump wasn't such a demagogue. My opponent has discarded my study saying it's untopical, but it's a legittamate study contrary to whatever my opponent believes as it help shows, without the political aspect, that this does occur. You have to accept my scientific study in this debate as it's political neutral in this case. Trump has caused these issues and there is no doubt that this is true. Does this happen at Clinton rallies? The answer is no. Why? It's because she's not a hateful bigot just saying terrible things just to get people on board, though he has no idea what he's talking about. I mean what do you call Trump thanking the Orlando Shooter and patting himself on the back after the shooting? Do we really want someone who ignores the people killed just for his own agenda?
My opponent is miscontrewing the data that I provided. My opponent talks about Muslim American support increasing things about Islamic Extremism in the US, but no where in the study or what my opponent is talking about saying anything about surveillance in Muslim American Neighborhoods and Mosques. My study has shown that not only does it not work, but it's unconstitutional. My opponent has dropped this argument, please extend it across in this debate.
Contention 3: Domestic Policy
My opponent talks about how Trump is grilled by the media and this somehow makes him more open. This is absolutely false. Trump has only stated in stone that he talks about just a few issues, 7 on his website. This shows he has some sort of a hidden agenda. Donald Trump has banned the Washington Post for their coverage of him [6]. I would like to remind you that Richard Nixon was the only US President to ban them. It goes to show you just how corrupt Trump is.
Indeed it would harm jobs, but we do have to remember that abolishing the minimum wage and leaving it to red states would harm all Americans. This point was agreed to by my opponent, he also dropped how Trump has flipped flopped on this issue and certainly he is even arguing it here in this debate.
Even if Clinton changed her's in the 2000, Trump changed his 3 times in three hours. Do we want a Presidnet who can't actually make up his mind on the issue. My opponent has also dropped the Trump comment on Punishing women for getting an abortion. Not just late term, but any abortion at all.
I have absolutely no idea what my opponent is talking about here. In the Court Case DC V Heller, Late SCOTUS Justice Scalia on page 53-54 of his ruling claimed that there can be limitations in the Right to bare arms. Meaning that Congress can Constituionally create Gun Control [7]. This is from the most Conservative Judge that was on the SCOTUS. My opponent's case is simply a farse. Please extend my arguments.
Contention 4: Leadership Trumps
My opponent is incorrect, these comments were made when she was running against Obama. This can still hold true through today as my opponent's claim is incorrect here.
Trump has made some outragous comments on the military and many military groups had selected Clinton over him. Overall, Veterans support Trump, but only by a slim, very slim lead, while in many other elections, the Veterans had a significant lead of the GOP over the Democrats. This just shows how bad Trump is. I've already refuted much on immigration, so please extend that from C1. My opponent claims that Trump is the best negotiated, but I guess that's what we get from a man who has faced several bankruptcies, Trump University being a failure, and Eminet Domain, it seems like failure and force to me.
1. (http://tinyurl.com...)
2. (http://tinyurl.com...)
3. (http://tinyurl.com...)
4. (http://tinyurl.com...)
5. (http://tinyurl.com...)
6. (http://tinyurl.com...)
7. (http://tinyurl.com...)
I'd like to thank my opponent for a solid debate.
Throughout this debate, there has been a pretty clear pattern: while I give solid, affirmative points in favor of Trump, my opponent mostly ignores whatever positive qualities of his candidate in favor of attacking Trump. He didn't begin truly giving affirmative reasons for Hillary until I pointed this problem out. As much as he wants to say, his focus in this debate was not constructive, and in abscence of a compelling case for Hillary, it's impossible to call her better than Trump. As I said - Trump can be a bad person with bad policies. But that means absolutely nothing if you don't prove Hillary isn't better.
I would also like to note the massive numbers of arguments my opponent never even touched this debate. These include:
*The massive benefits of Trump's tax plan (notice he never gave a Hillary tax plan).
*The destructive harm of trade deals like NAFTA and TPP that the Clintons either negotiated directly or supported.
*Hillary being more liberal than Obama, as liberal as Elizabeth Warren and only marginally less liberal than avowed socialist Bernie Sanders.
*Hillary would continue the disastrous war policies of the last 13 years, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths.
*Most of her scandals
*The massive economic harms of her $12 dollar minimum wage policy.
*Clinton's support of sanctuary cities, which resulted in the murder of Kate Steinly.
*No Hillary press conferences in 180 days.
My oppponent also outright dropped his abortion argument (where I noted Hillary's defense of late-term abortion was outside the scope of Roe v. Wade and public opinion), one of only three constructive arguments he made in the first round. In other words, a third of his case for Hillary was thoroughly refuted to the point he never mentioned it again.
The themes here are obvious: Hillary just isn't defensible. She's a corrupt politician who has had more scandals than you can count on your fingers and toes, and is also a partisan hack who would institute a radical agenda. Because of this, it is necessary to attack any opponent first and then say "Well, we know she's bad but maybe he's worse", which is a terrible way to argue. In contrast, as I established early, Trump is a unifier. He will work with both sides to bring the best outcome for the American worker. He'll bring jobs back from countries that have stolen them. He'll protect the American worker and legal immigrants from people who violate the law. He'll protect your right to keep and bear arms. He'll appoint judges like Antonin Scalia. He'll avoid our current situation of endless war brough on by both parties. But above all, he'll Make America Great Again.
I like to thank my opponent for this debate. Before I go into my conclusion and the key voting issues on this debate, I will show a political cartoon to lighten the mood a bit.
Throughout this debate, one thing has remained constant. The failures of Donald Trump and how he's toxic in for this country. My opponent has brought we have to realize how much of a failure and how much damage he is going to cause to our nation. He doesn't even know what issues he believes in on many issues.
In this debate the key issue that you should be voting on is the one with the greatest impact and that it Trump's dangerous immigration policy. We can see that it will cost America $1 trillion of our GDP, that will wreck our economy. This is a huge issue that occurs and my opponent has dropped it. We can also see that illegal immigrants pay their fair share in taxes and unlike what Trump says, Mexico is sending some great people as they have a great deal of important high skilled people. We can see that if we do this we'd lose $2 trillion just by ennacting this and nearly $700 billion each year. This entire argument was dropped, and since it has the most important and worst negative impact, this should be reason enough to vote for me off of this argument alone.
We can see that unlike Trump, Hillary is quite quallified with introducing a multitude of bills and has helped out in a ton of places. Trump has been shown to have a multitude of bankrupticies and his Trump University issue that he's being sued for that scam. My opponent targets Hillary on a multitude of things, but we have to realize that a lot of these things she's proven otherwise or these things are applicable to Bill. We also have to remember that Trump has flip flopped on several issues throughout the debate. Trump has only written 7 issues in stone to Hillary's 35. Hillary has been open and transparent vs. Trump and his hidden agenda. Trump doesn't really support our country as he thanked the Orlando shooter and patted himself on the back on this issue just hours after it happened. How can we trust a guy like this.
We've looked at Trump's tariff plan and seen the issues involved hear on how much it will cost Americans. This is another huge impact that my opponent has dropped. We will lose 78% of our exports to our greatest trade partners. You want to talk jobs, Trump kills more than he will create. We also can see that prices will rise by 30% while the average American will lose 53% of their income. Here is another impact that this debate that my opponent drops. It will significantly harm our country and destroys way more than Trump claims to save.
With that I thank you and urge you to vote Con!
31 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by lannan13 2 years ago
Posted by TN05 2 years ago
---(1 of 3)---
Please use less assertions, and more arguments supported by evidence. A politician says something, it's pretty easy to find and link a quote. Also copy/pasted arguments complaining about arguments the other side did not make, please don't do that again.
Pro's case (Trump)...
Economy: Trump is promising Jobs, Clinton is promising to outsource them.
A simplified tax code, with 11% faster GDP growth.
Replace work visas for foreigners, with jobs for inner city youth.
Some off topic insults "[Clinton] ranks on OnTheIssues as liberal as fake Indian Elizabeth Warren and only slightly less liberal than communist Bernie Sanders.[7]"
Con counters with a study that suggests Trump's plan will actually cost us each "$11,500 in increased prices over the next 5 years." Plus Trump is secretly in love with Clinton (really not sure what suggested that, certainly nothing in the source beside it).
Foreign policy: Simplified to "It's time we focus on our interests and stop trying to run the world." Plus a reminder of Clinton sucking in this area, worst of all killing 4 Americans.
Con countered with Clinton getting a cease-fire in Israel, and Trump's support of the Iraq war. The rest of it was mostly unsourced, including ironically calling the deaths a "dead issue."
Corruption: A Gish Gallop against Clinton.
Judges: Not much to judge here. No evidence that either would do better in this area, so it's like asking which one we want making presidential decisions (not counting it for either side just saying it fell utterly flat).
Con's case (Clinton...
Deportation: "...This shows that they are not as 'heartless' or 'lazzy' as my opponent claims." The only person who typed either quoted word in this debate is con, but it's not a good tiding when an argument is dependent on refuting one's own imagination (I did a little research, it turns out he keeps copy/pasting the same argument on different debates... I do not consider copying yourself to be plagiarism, plus pro insisted conduct doesn't count on this debate at all, so zero harm done to his case). He recovered this area a little catching Trump changing his mind on the issue.
Pro counters the Greenspan source with a different interpretation of it. Countering the money sent home one by casting it in a bad light a net loss of $63 billion from our economy" was a good touch, quoting Trump's own website to say he never flip flopped was not.
Clinton the Unifier: In which Clinton is not mentioned once... Contentions within included such things as Trump evoked riots and insulted people, then blamed Sanders (source 5 was inaccessible, so I really can't weight it). Trump's plan to "survey Muslim neighborhoods and mosques" was a bit better, but would have carried more weight had the source mentioned Trump (thus been fully on topic, rather than suggest his type of behavior).
Pro in trying to counter this, beings up sanctuary cities and Clinton speaking out against their misuse (so long as pro doesn't catch that, you've gained ground, but please don't contradict your own sources). The riots bit was a lot better, particularly a source that outright blames said riots on Clinton. The Sander's friendly fire incident was hilarious, but borderline off topic (the previous link had already made the connection to Clinton, so why weaken it with pointing to someone else?). Countering the surveillance with a good way to work it, would have been better if sourced to Trump (still made the need for it seem reasonable).
Domestic: Clinton has a stance on 27 more political issues than Trump. Also Clinton offers a $12 minimum wage, Trump competes with that offer by offering to "destroy the economy as well as the well being of every American." Much better was catching him flip flopping on his minimum wage stance. Women's rights Clinton=Good, Trump=Bad (with a very good CNN source). On Gun's we have an unclear yay Clinton, and evidence against Trump, as a voter to view Clinton as better than Trump, it would be nice to know what exactly Common Sense Gun Control means.
Pro's counters started with the political issues bit, questioning the meaning, and pointing out Clinton's half year of quiet. "Clinton only recently supported raising one after receiving pressure from unions" was a nice counter on the minimum wage issue, showing her also changing her mind, but would have gone better with a source, like when Clinton changed her mind on guns.
YouTube: Hilarious, but not integrated.
Leadership Trumps: Trump's prior endorsement of Clinton was a great opening, it likely should have been the opening for the whole debate rather than buried so late. Trump's anti POW stance was a good thing to bring up. The cease-fire in Israel was a great point, concise, and well sourced.
R3 Pro's case (Trump)... Shown above with the connected points to con's case.
R3 Con's case (Clinton)... Disconnected.
When I worked on this before, this is as far as I got. Getting back to it, I do not have enough time to re-read everything, finish the analysis, and cast a fair vote. However, I suspect the debaters will enjoy the extra feedback on their perspective cases.
Posted by Wylted 2 years ago
Posted by lannan13 2 years ago
(from RFD part 1)
Pro argues that Donald Trump's proposals are superior on the economy. Trump wants to lower taxes and retain jobs in the U.S. He's allegedly willing to negotiate and concede to some liberal ideals (such as the minimum wage). Pro also says that Trump's foreign policy is superior, as Clinton wants to continue policing the world while Trump wants less military involvement overseas. He accuses Clinton of "more of the same" and suggests she has not and can not keep Americans safe. He also lists a slew of corruption allegations against Clinton and claims she will nominate a bunch of super liberal Supreme Court justices.
Con begins by citing Trump's less than favorable plans (like the deportation of immigrants) and claims that Clinton is a unifier. Whereas Clinton wants to impose Unconstitutional surveillance and create dissidence with certain communities, Con says that Clinton brings people together. Con also claims that Hillary is more open about her political plans whereas Trump is secretive and intentionally vague or ambiguous. And while Clinton's policies might be pretty liberal (i.e. pro choice and anti-gun) Con argues that this might be best for the U.S.
In R3, Pro posits that Con's case is centered around bashing Trump and not promoting Hillary (though the 2 are not mutually exclusive as it pertains to the resolution). He says that Trump does talk a lot about deportation; however, suggests Trump's plan to curb illegal immigration will have greater benefits than the immigrants themselves. He also claims that Clinton isn't a great unifier and that Trump's proposals, while maybe Unconstitutional, are actually supported favorably by the Muslim communities that Con says are being cast aside. Pro then points out how both Clinton and Trump can be "moderate" through exemplifications of their flip flops and other compromises.
Con starts advocating more heavily for Hillary in R3 by rattling off her accomplishments and credentials. He lists some of the projects she's spearheaded while in the public eye. Con also says Trump would make America poor. I don't think quoting Trump's appreciation for Hillary and the Democrats is really relevant however. On foreign policy, Con points out that Trump has seemingly flip flopped his support and bases it around his perception of what's best for certain people in the market (not America as a whole). Con also explains more of Hillary's successes vs. Trump's lack of experience. Finally Con defends Hillary by saying a lot of the corruption allegations against her were unavoidable or more related to Bill than Hillary Clinton.
Pro contests how useful or significant Hillary's alleged achievements were and attacks them in R4. Pro admits that Trump's economic policy would hurt Americans, but believes this is okay because it will "hurt other people worse." He also says the corruption is relevant, especially given Bill's presumed role in a Hillary administration (even if it were unofficial).
Con argues that immigrants are good for the U.S. and therefore Trump's plan to deport them is bad vs. Hillary's lack of commitment to do so. Con also claims that Trump's willingness to compromise is not admirable if it does not bring success. He notes that Trump is divisive and creates hostility. On domestic policy, Con claims that it's preferable to have a leader flip flop less often and a leader who is open about their goals, whereas Trump is not entirely clear.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by SeventhProfessor 2 years ago
|Who won the debate:
Reasons for voting decision: Since I did not award any points, I do not have to explain my decision.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
|Who won the debate:
Reasons for voting decision: Half vote in the comment section... But as unfinished, it cannot be anything more than a tie.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
|Who won the debate:
Reasons for voting decision: Test
Vote Placed by Danielle 2 years ago
|Who won the debate:
Reasons for voting decision: RFD in comments
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.


text:
Flask w/ Star
Flask w/ Star
Stainless Steel 3 oz Collide Symbol Flask.
This is a really cool item, the finish is brushed silver and the star is cast in pewter and has a very sturdy black enamel inlay.
Perfect for holding tequila, lemonade, or water...if it's liquid, this will hold it.
Add To Cart

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Autumn Leaves of White Rock Lake
1010 Emerald Isle Dr
Dallas, TX 75218
$ Request Pricing Write a Review
Categories: Assisted Living, Nursing Home, Independent Living, Memory Care, Hospice, Respite
Autumn Leaves of White Rock Lake is located within Dallas, Texas. They provide senior living in a clean facility for eldery individuals. The neighborhood encompassing this community is heavily populated, including roughly 21,665 people in the 75218 zip code. It is a mostly middle class area, with an average family income of $59,336. They are conveniently located, with shopping, churches, and health care services all within close proximity. They're located just 0.6 miles from Doctors Hospital, there are 15 pharmacies within 1 mile of the community, and there are 85 churches within four miles, which include Lakeside Baptist Church, St Bernard's Church, White Rock United Methodist, and Lakeview Christian Church.
Autumn Leaves of White Rock Lake offers assisted living, memory care, independent living, and nursing home care. They can care for individuals who need assistance with day-to-day tasks but who also want to preserve some level of independence. They can also accommodate individuals at any level of dementia or memory loss who require support with day-to-day tasks and monitoring to prevent wandering. Additionally they can house older people who are independent and autonomous but also want a worry-free life with services like on-site maintenance, housekeeping, and community activities. Lastly, they can support individuals who are mostly unable to move freely and who need to be under the care of medical professionals frequently.
This provider offers multiple personal services that include laundry services and a staff available 24/7. Additionally, they have several recreational activities like off site outings, education programs, general social interactions, and wellness and health programs. They also have lots of living options including efficiency suites, single bedroom suites, and two bedroom suites.
Community Features
- Pool
- Game / Activities Room
- Library
- Dining Room
- Store
- Fitness Center
- Salon / Barbershop
- Private Bathrooms
- Safety / Handicap Features
- Kitchens / Kitchenettes
- Emergency Call System
- Housekeeping
- Two Bedrooms
- One Bedroom
- Studio / Efficiency
Property Amenities
Room Amenities
Room Options
- Education Programs
- Off-site Outings
- Social Activities
- Health and Wellness Programs
- Occupational Therapy
- Physical Therapy
- Medication Support
- Nurses
- Stroke Care
- Speech Therapy
- Meals Included
- Family Outreach / Education
Medical Services
Guest / Family Services
- VA Benefits
- Insurance
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Laundry / Dry Cleaning
- 24-Hour Staff


text:
Court slams Lands C'ssion with cost… for failing to file defence to suit
An Accra Fast Track High Court (Lands Division Four), has awarded a cost of GH¢2,000 against the Lands Commission for failing to file a defence in a legal suit against it.
Despite prior notice served it by the court, the Commission waived the opportunity to defend claims of allowing illegal sale of lands belonging to members of the Kete Community in the Krachi West District of the Volta Region.
Two weeks ago, the court presided over by Justice Hafisatu Ameleobe, deferred ruling in respect of an application brought against the Commission for not filing its defence.
The adjournment was to allow the defendant to enter defence but they failed to do so.
There was no legal representation for the Commission when the matter was called at 9: 45 a.m. on Friday, June 19, 2015.
Angered by this development, counsel for the plaintiffs prayed the court to impose a heavy fine on the defendants.
"My Lord, in the prevailing circumstance, we pray for a cost of GH¢ 5,000 against the defendants. My Lord, the conduct of the commission is a testimony that state lawyers don't respect the courts," he said.
The court did not disclose the date for hearing of the substantive case which had the Volta River Authority and Nana Mprah Besemuna Mprah III, the Paramount Chief of the Krachi Traditional Area, who are joined to the suit for the same claim.
The plaintiffs, Alhaji Abu Safianu Baba, Abdulai T. Baako and Alhaji Salifu Sualley, dragged the Commission to court for allowing the illegal sale of land acquired and paid for by the state for the resettlement of the Kete community.
An affidavit in support of the interlocutory judgement in default of defence, prayed for a number of reliefs: a declaration that all the piece of land containing approximately 1829.81 acres situated at Kantankufri in the then Buem Krachi District (now Krachie West District) of the Volta Region is land that was acquired by the State as a resettlement and farmlands for the plaintiffs and other members of the plaintiff's community who were displaced from their original settlement as a result of the construction of the Volta Lake.
The affidavit also prayed for an order directed at the Volta River Authority and Lands Commission to make allocations of farmlands among the plaintiffs and other members of the plaintiff's community who were entitled to same.
It also includes declaration that neither Nana Mprah Besemuna III, nor any of its agents, assigns, servants, workmen or any other person acting in concert with Nana Mprah has the capacity to make any valid alienation of any portion of land which is the subject of dispute in the suit.
There is also an order declaring void, any alienations of any portions of land which is the subject matter of the dispute to any person whether by Nana Mprah alone or acting in concert with any other person.
In addition, there is an order of perpetual injunction to restrain Nana Mprah and his agents, assigns, servants, privies, associates, workmen or any other person from purporting to make any grants or alienation of the land which is the subject matter of the suit to any person.
By Malik Sullemana


text:
Friday, July 18, 2008
New Website
Finally our new website has been completed and is now live. Our new website shows our most recent work and focus of our company. This has been a long time in coming. Thanks to Hoopjumper for the new site. We still have more work to do on the site but the majority of it is online and is working.
Created by Michael & Terri Lee at 1:21 PM No comments:
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
Make A Wish Luncheon with Matt Leinart
On June 25 I went out on my first assignment with Terri and Julia which was a charity event for the Make a Wish Foundation. Terri donated her time and talent for this worthy cause and I was glad I got to be a part of it. It was at the Marconi Automotive Museum in Tustin and if you have never been there it's pretty cool, especially if you are into cars. Their special guest was Matt Leinart who is a former quaterback of USC and is currently playing for the Arizona Cardinals. We set up the equipment in the VIP room and photographed Matt Leinart with all the genourous people who donated to the Make a Wish Foundation.
Julia is a huge USC Football fan, so when she got to take her picture with Matt she was very excited.
Created by Michael & Terri Lee at 12:38 PM No comments:
Labels: Arizona Cardinals, Charity, Make A Wish Foundation, Marconi Automotive Museum, Matt Leinart, USC
Hi, my name is Crissy Alaimo and I am a new employee here at Starlight Photography. I am very excited to work with Mike and Terri, and am so eager to learn as much as I can from them. I have always had a passion for photography and the way it tells your life story. Photographs capture moments of time that we will never see again and it amazes me how a simple photograph can be transformed into a work of art. Looking at some of Mike and Terri's work I must say has left me in awe. They both have such an incredible talent and have photographed so many local families, businesses and organizations in our community. Although I have worked here only a short time, I can tell by the phone calls and clients coming by the studio that Mike and Terri have formed a lot of personal relationships with their clients. They truly care about not only the work they do, but the people they photograph, and that is what makes Starlight Photography so unique. I look forward to not only bringing in new clients but also getting to know all the ones they already have.
Created by Michael & Terri Lee at 11:00 AM No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


text:
The Patagonian parrot is also known as the Burrowing Parrot. It looks different then other conures but has the behavior of a typical conure. This species of conure has its own genus that is comprised of three species, the Lesser Patagonian Conure, the Andean Patagonian Conure, and the Greater Patagonian Conure. They all look very similiar with size being the variation.
They love to cuddle and can be social demanding. They love attention and will fill your make your heart melt. Patagonians have a dull olive brown color with yellow and red patches near the bottom breast.
Patagonian Parrots originate from Argentina.
Patagonians need a variety of foods to maintain a clean bill of health, no pun intended. This species can become obese, so offering fresh fruits and vegetables with a high quality parrot pellet and seed mix will give them the balance of nutrition they need. Check out the fresh foods you should be feeding your parrot on our fresh food list.
This species breeds best when other patagonians are near by. They seem to settle for the day after dusk. They reach maturity at two years of age.
Patagonian Conures are a larger parrot, up to 18 inches, and require a larger cage that is spacious to move around and play in. The cage should be large enough to spread the entire wing span as well.
Emotional Well-Being:
Patagonian Parrots are very social and active. They love to play and chew on a variety of toys with different textures. The Patagonian is a beloved pet with proper care.
They can be somewhat noisy and can learn to talk but when given time to play outside of the cage, it is not a problem for most owners.


text:
San Antonio Huista,
Phone: +5027804109
Library details: Biblioteca Banco de Guatemala -- San Antonio Huista is a Public library.
This library is affiliated with the library system that serves San Antonio Huista, Guatemala.
Permalink: https://librarytechnology.org/library/48290
(Use this link to refer back to this listing.)
|Technology Profile
|Product Name
|Year Contracted
|libraries.org ID
Record History: This listing was created on Sep 24, 2009 and was last modified on Nov 22, 2016.
Updates: Corrections or Updates? Registered members of Library Technology Guides can submit updates to library listings in libraries.org. Registration is free and easy. Already registered? login. Or, you can report corrections just by sending a message to Marshall Breeding.


text:
Triathlon Australia and it's eight affiliated State and Territory triathlon associations offer annual membership. When joining, you simultaneously become a member of both Triathlon Australia and your nominated STTA.
Annual membership is available from 1 July each year, and all memberships expire on 30 June each year.
Adult - which includes Lincoln Tri Club Membership and Triathlon Australia - $145
Junior 12-19 years - which includes Lincoln Tri Club Membership and Triathlon Australia - $70
As a member of your state and national association you receive the following MEMBER BENEFITS:
- priority entry period to Events including all 70.3 and Ironman, Noosa & Moloolaba (NEW)
- access to the members log-in section of our website, containing details of our new Membership Benefits Package including special offers and discounts.
- a lower cost to enter races because you are exempted from the one day membership fees which non annual members are required to pay for each race;
- eligibility to accumulate points in the Australian National Triathlon Championship Series and to become the National Series Champion in your age group;
- eligibility to compete for State and National Championships in sprint, olympic, long course distance triathlons as well as duathlon and aquathlon;
- eligibility to represent Australia at ITU Age Group and Elite World Championship events;
- regular communication from the National and State associations;
- reduced prices on magazine subscriptions and other products offered from time to time by your state association;
- public liability and personal accident insurance cover while you are racing in sanctioned events and training for sanctioned events;
- the assurance that your annual membership fee is contributing to the growth and development of the sport of triathlon in Australia;
To become an annual member of Triathlon Australia, you initially join the State Association via the ON-LINE MEMBERSHIP registration form. Soon after, you will receive your plastic membership card and a package of information from Triathlon Australia. You can log back into your profile at any point to update your details.


text:
Rapport is a really weird word to say, according to Blake Lyles.
Lyles, 12, belongs to the Boys & Girls Club that visited the Hagerstown Suns' ballpark Wednesday afternoon as part of the educational "Ballfields and Boardrooms" program initiated by the New York Mets organization.
Local professionals and businessmen teamed up with Suns players to give presentations to about 45 children. Rapport, teamwork, communication and ethics were covered in four separate sessions.
Blake's comment about rapport sounding "weird" came after Suns pitcher Jon Niese and Herald-Mail sportswriter Bob Parasiliti explained that it means treating people the way you would want to be treated.


text:
Neal D. Futran, M.D., D.M.D.
Neal D. Futran, MD, DMD joined the University of Washington faculty in 1995. He is currently the Allison T. Wanamaker Professor and Chair of the Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. He is also the Director of Head and Neck Surgery as well as an adjunct professor in the departments of Plastic Surgery and Neurological Surgery. Dr. Futran earned his dentistry degree at the University of Pennsylvania and completed training in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as an MD degree at the Health Science Center at Brooklyn, New York. He then trained in Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery at the University of Rochester followed by a Head and Neck Oncology and Microvascular Surgery fellowship at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York with Dr. Mark Urken. Dr. Futran became an assistant professor in the Department of Otolaryngology at the University of South Florida in 1993 specializing in head and neck oncologic and reconstructive surgery and subsequently relocated to Seattle.
Dr. Futran is board certified in Otolaryngology and has outstanding expertise and an active practice in head and neck oncology and microvascular reconstruction and rehabilitation of complex, oncology and trauma cases. He also specializes in skull base surgery utilizing both endoscopic and open approaches. His major research activities center on microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck and he also participates in grants studying molecular profiles and gene analysis in oral carcinogenesis.
He enjoys teaching on the topics of head and neck reconstruction, craniofacial trauma, skull base surgery, and head and neck oncology worldwide. He is on the board of directors for the AO Foundation, a trustee of the UW Physicians, and the Virginia Bloedel Hearing Research Institute. Dr. Futran is on the editorial boards of several scientific journals and holds the position of associate editor of both Head and Neck, and Oral Oncology. He is listed in the Best Doctor's in America.
Undergraduate Education: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 1978
Medical School: SUNY-Downstate Medical School, Brooklyn, NY 1987 University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 1982
Internship: Temple University Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 1988
Residency: University of Rochester Dept. of Otolaryngology-HNS, Rochester NY 1992
Fellowship: Mount Sinal School of Medicine, Head and Neck Oncology and Microvascular Reconstruction, New York, NY 1993
Other Training: Residency in Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, King County Hospital/SUNY-Downstate Medical School, Brooklyn, NY 1985
Board Certification: Otolaryngology-HNS 1993
Awards and honors
2014: Keynote Speaker and visiting professor Peking No.1 School of Stomatology
2013: Keynote Speaker, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Annual Scientific Congress
2013: American Head and Neck Surgery Presidential Citation
2006-2014: Best Doctors Seattle and USA
1998, 2011: Driftwood Award, Faculty Teaching Award, Oto-Head & Neck Surgery
Academic interests
Dr.Futran's clinical interests include head and neck oncology and microvascular reconstruction and rehabilitation of complex, oncology and trauma cases. He also specializes in skull base surgery utilizing both endoscopic and open approaches.
Dr. Futran's major research activities center on outcomes of microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck and he also participates in projects studying molecular profiles and gene analysis in oral carcinogenesis. He also leads head and neck process improvement projects throughout UW Medicine.
Recent Publications
Multiple-Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects., JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018 Aug; 144(8):753-754
Eadie T, Faust L, Bolt S, Kapsner-Smith M, Pompon RH, Baylor C, Futran N, Méndez E. Role of Psychosocial Factors on Communicative Participation among Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer., Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018 Aug; 159(2):266-273
Shen JY, Futran ND, Sardesai MG. Craniofacial osteomyelitis evolving from sinusitis., Radiol Case Rep 2018 Feb; 13(1):104-107
Méndez E, Rodriguez CP, Kao MC, Raju S, Diab A, Harbison RA, Konnick EQ, Mugundu GM, Santana-Davila R, Martins R, Futran ND, Chow LQM. A Phase I Clinical Trial of AZD1775 in Combination with Neoadjuvant Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin before Definitive Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma., Clin. Cancer Res. 2018 Jun; 24(12):2740-2748
Latest news
Named again in 2017 as one of Puget Sound area's Top Doctors in Otolaryngology by Seattle Magazine.
UW Health Sciences Newsbeat article: "Surgical team rebuilds man's jaw, palate in rare procedure."


text:
If you have raised an invoice and you want to change some aspect of the invoice without deleting it and starting again you can do the following:
- Open the invoice
- Click on the "Edit Header" button at the bottom of the screen
- This will allow you to edit various aspects of the invoice, including the reference, who it is payable by and the address details.
Related Article
How do I edit an invoice that has been marked as paid?
Need More Help?
We understand that not everything is black and white, so if you need some help, click "Submit A Request" ticket and one of our team will help you out as soon as possible.


text:
Photographers Ignite
Ignite events feature a series of five-minute presentations in which speakers have exactly 20 slides (and exactly 15 seconds per slide) to engage the audience and make their points. These events are usually very lively, informative, and entertaining, and they take place all around the world. Many conferences, including PePcon, have added Ignites to their schedules as well.
One such conference, the Wedding & Portrait Photography Conference and Expo (WPPI), has included a Photographers Ignite for each of the last five years, and now you can check out the videos of those presentations at PhotographersIgnite.com.
In all, over 70 videos have been posted of presentations by established and up-and-coming photographers.


text:
Chris Cavener is a graduate of Dawson College's Professional Theatre Program (2006-2009), and has since had a successful career as a local Montreal actor. Throughout the years he's been performing Improv, Sketch and Stand-Up Comedy at venues such as The Rialto Theatre, The Comedyworks, and Montreal's Comic- Con, all the while auditioning for film/television roles. A few of his credits include a recurring principal role on CBC's 21 Thunder, Bon Cop Bad Cop 2, X-Men: Apocalypse, and Robert Zemecki's The Walk. Besides film and television he's been doing performance motion capture for Ubisoft, appeared in more than a handful of national commercials, plus creating his own work online through his youtube channel: Brain Child Comedy. Keeping busy, he continues to write and come up with television series in hopes to break into the mainstream through his original ideas and story telling.
Represented by: Amanda Tilson
resume on breakdownexpresshttp://resumes.breakdownexpress.com/...


text:
'Simran' trailer: Kangana Ranaut steals, gambles and flirts
The trailer of 'Simran' starring Kangana Ranaut in the female lead in out and audience will get to see a different side of Kangana. She is full of life in the film and lives life on her own terms. Kangana plays the role of Praful, a Gujarati divorced who sets to start afresh. She lives as there is no tomorrow. She is full of madness and does bizarre things.
Kangana's character in her upcoming film, 'Simran' is too interesting to see. She is addicted to stealing and gambling, she even flirts and drink. According to her, 'Ladka Patana is a talent, not a flaw'.
Directed by Hansal Mehta, 'Simran' is set in America.
Going by the looks of the trailer, we can conclude 'Simran' is going to be a delightful watch. The film hardly has any dull moments. With every scene, new characteristic of 'Simran' unfolds.
It also has few actions and chasing scene. The film also also stars Soham Shah. Earlier, in the day Hansal Mehta captioned an image as, "The indefatigable spirit of #KanganaRanaut as Praful Patel in #Simran. 'Simran' is set to release on September 15.


text:
Getty Images
Now that Reputation has been out for a couple of hours, and fans have had time to digest all the lyrics and who they could possibly be about – Taylor Swift is also doing more than just letting her music do all the talking. Aside from releasing music, the "Look What You Made Me Do" singer dropped a magazine to accompany the album that's titled Reputation Vol. 1.
So what's inside the glossy mag? There's tons of personal work from the superstar, including some very personal poetry. Though the one thing that has caught just about everyone's eye is the poem titled, "Why She Disappeared." Fans are taking it as an explanation from Tay as to why she decided to flee from the spotlight for more than a year.
Within each of the lines, the "Gorgeous" singer goes off to list various reasons as to why she had enough with all the attention directed towards her and they include "fair-weather friends" who vanished when things got tough. The media mistaking her acts of kindness as anything other than genuine, and "a love that was really something. Not just the idea of something."
'Why She Disappeared' by Taylor Swift. A poem in the Target Exclusive Vol. 1 magazine! pic.twitter.com/PpZhGDkSLL— Taylor Swift Podcast (@Swiftcast13) November 10, 2017
Yikes! At the time nothing was right – not even in the romance department. Could that be about Calvin Harris? Tom Hiddleston? At this point, it doesn't really matter. Those relationships are all in the past, and Tay is beyond smitten with her new guy, Joe Alwyn – who's gotten the seal of approval from her besties Selena Gomez and Ed Sheeran.
As the poem continues on, fans can see that despite all the negativity surrounding the "Bad Blood" singer during that time, she was able to come out of it and find happiness again. The final two lines in the poem "and in the death of her reputation, she truly felt alive" kind of says it all – doesn't it?
Taylor Swift Has a British Twin Who's Just as Obsessed With Cats as She Is
A List of All the Easter Eggs in Taylor Swift's "...Ready For It?" Music Video
Taylor Swift Gave Fans the Ultimate Surprise By Inviting Them to a Secret Session for 'Reputation'


text: Skydiving in Franz Josef over the southern Alps in Winter offers spectacular scenery. With a top up of snow on the mountains and clear crisp days there really is no better way to check out the sites here than from above! Check out our photo gallery page for more images and you can easily book online or drop into our office and have a chat to our staff to learn more about what exciting products we offer!


text:
Earth Day - The Rocky Mountain Flatbread Company
In honour of Earth Day, I'd like to share with you a company that provides a "community and organising dining experience" - the Rocky Mountain Flatbread Company.
This lovely restaurant located between Cypress and Burrard on 1st in Vancouver (and one in Canmore, AB) aims to revolutionize pizza. Their pizzas are handcrafted on site, with locally sourced organic ingredients. They extend their commitment to the environment and their community on many fronts, included local school involvement, neighbourhood nights, use of reclaimed materials in their decor. Read all about their achievements in sustainability here.
A lovely thing they do is have family nights on Sunday and Monday evenings.
Your kids get to go into the back kitchen and make their own pizzas!
The exceptionally patient and kind Jade helped our group out.
You start with a thorough hand washing, and then get instruction on rolling out their delicious pizza dough.
After a thorough saucing, you get to choose your own organic pizza toppings. Favorites from our visit were the mangoes, prosciutto, green peppers, tomatoes and olives. Not all on the same pizza.
They are then brought to the clay oven for firing. You can feel the heat from it, it was a pretty dramatic way to cook!
The yummy finished product! I can tell you that it tastes amazing - crispy, chewy crust with perfect toppings.
They have a fun little play kitchen (from the cool store Natural Pod - check out the cardboard rocket ship!)where kids can don aprons and chef's hats and pretend to make pizzas. No plastic toys here!
Part of their commitment to sustainability is their use of biodegradable pizza boxes, cutlery and straws. The kids were incredulous that the pizza boxes and take-away cutlery was made of potatoes and the straws were made from corn. No pizza boxes were harmed in the making of this photo.
We highly recommend it for both dining and entertainment. We're excited to try out their curry night soon . . .
And if you are inspired to increase your own commitment to the sustainability of our planet, check out their list of simple things to change the world.
Happy Earth Day!
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Labels: Adventures
No comments:
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)


text:
SecurityWire in History
Welcome to SecurityWire, your curated cybersecurity resource since 1999. SecurityWire's goal is to be a quality resource in inventorying the best and up to date content on the internet relating to cybersecurity. Topics ranges from risk management, secure development practices, vulnerability management, penetration testing, fuzzing and exploit development. The site is mostly meant for personal consumption but is accessible to the masses in the spirit of knowledge sharing.
1999 - 2001
2002 - 2009
2013 - Today


text:
Holodeck Christmas Card
Christmas card designed by artist Sarah Taylor Silverwood, eco-friendly Risograph printed on FSC certified 300gsm Munken paper. Packed with a white recycled envelope, 50p from each sale will go towards helping the homeless this winter. Buy here from The Holodeck.
Grand Union Tote Bag
Brand new Grand Union Tote Bag designed by studio artist Sarah Taylor Silverwood.
Limited edition of 50, white print on good quality, burgundy cotton tote bag.


text:
The Book Formerly Known as Tales of the Weird Wild West
We've freshened up and retitled Tales of the Weird Wild West in preparation for releasing it in print. The gorgeous new cover is by our intern Shannon, and we think she did a fabulous job with it! The new title, Muddy Creek Tales, brings it in line with our plan for the future. There's no new material in this one, […]Continue reading »


text:
Do you live in the Fredericksburg, Virginia area? Are you interested in becoming a martial arts instructor at Seong's Martial Arts Academy? Then make sure to check back soon for career information and opportunities. If you have any other questions feel free to contact us, visit our location, or call us at 540-898-8111. We look forward to hearing from you!
1/19/2016 - Seong's Martial Arts Academy is seeking qualified applicants for immediate openings in our Before and After School Program
The ideal applicant will have experience working with children in a school or professional childcare setting. Only applicants with a clean driving record will be considered. All applicants must be able to pass a background check.
If you or anyone you know is looking for a fun part-time job with flexible hours, please email your resume to us at firstname.lastname@example.com or fax it to us at (540) 898-7084.
Please call the number listed above with any questions.


text:
Awesome, However Affordable, Cell Residence Kitchen Reworking Concepts
Remodeling your kitchen is at all times very interesting but since there can be so many options and choices on easy methods to make your kitchen better; it could actually at occasions be frustrating. Any transforming concept for a small kitchen should deal with the following issues: counter area, storage, constructed-ins, and pantry. Wood floors are generally avoided in the kitchen space as a result of they'll turn out to be simply broken from the moisture that splashes and spills leave behind.
Stunning neutrals and Calacatta marble countertops give this galley kitchen an undeniably glamorous edge. The kitchen is my favorite room in the home, and you have some nice ideas of what to do with house. The cabinets also needs to be capable of retailer all of your essential kitchen objects in an organized manner.
Good lighting is one area of your kitchen transform that it is advisable to pay attention to. Light can make a room seem larger than it's. Planning out your lighting is something that many individuals don't put a variety of thought into. We have been actually shocked at how inexpensively we had been in a position to fully transform our kitchen.
Should you guarantee your cabinets have these features then the identify on them would not actually matter. If the kitchen is the coronary heart of the house, then the counter tops is likely to be known as the heart of the kitchen. The data enter into the software such because the room dimensions as well as the measurements of present massive appliances will help develop some kitchen reworking concepts based on actual sizes.
Small Kitchens with Fashionable Options have like some stainless-steel items positioned in steadiness, pendant lights, a wine cooler, contemporary tiles and custom white cupboards. As an example, wood for kitchen cabinets must be FSC authorized Additionally, keep away from poisonous substances, like high-VOC adhesives, paint, and stain.


text:
High Fog is a work-in-progress camp horror visual novel about the mysterious town of Clearwater Cove – and the ghastly happenings which occur on the same notorious day of the year, in which a thick fog blankets the town. Likely it originates from the swamp, with its own cruel and bloody past. Whose ghost is it haunting the town, really? …Perhaps more importantly, is it a ghost?
Cypress Rodilla and his wacky and mismatched group of friends are roped into the legend against their will. Will they survive high fog, or will their three-day-weekend become… a forever-day weekend?
Progress on the game can be tracked on its official tumblr blog!


text:
This site is designed to offer comprehensive information on the Georgetown residential real estate market by providing readers with data on current property listings, open houses, price trends, and recent home sales. The goal of this platform is to present real-time information in a way that can be most helpful to a prospective buyer or seller of Georgetown real estate. As an expert Georgetown realtor, my goal is to help you buy or sell your home quickly and at the best price possible.
Listed below are some of the advanced features and tools you can find throughout the pages of this site. These tools give you powerful insight into the Georgetown real estate market, and goes far beyond what you'll find with standard MLS listing sites.
On the Property Listings Page you can view all of the available properties exclusively on the Georgetown market. If you would like to refine your search, we have done all of the work for you. Simply visit our pre-sorted search results to narrow your search. The Houses Page filters the listings results to include only single family houses on the market. However, many people prefer the condo lifestyle. So we've also created a page dedicated solely to Condos as well. Finally, parking is in constant demand in Georgetown and finding homes that have parking can be a big challenge. So we have created a Properties with Parking Page to help you narrow your search even further.
We regularly provide viewing access to many properties on the Georgetown market through our open houses program. Open house information is updated on a weekly basis every thursday and a current list can be found on our Open Houses Page.
The monthly Market Report Page provides important information on the current state of the housing market in Georgetown. You can find data on the current housing inventory, selling prices, and where prices are trending. We've also provide a list of Recently Sold Homes in Georgetown to help you develop a pricing strategy.
Whichever kind of property or alert you are interested in, you can sign up to have them delivered to your e-mail inbox through our Alerts Page. Whether it be new listings on the market, upcoming open houses, or regular market data trends we can customize e-mail alerts to your needs.
Find helpful articles on real estate topics and what happening in Georgetown today on our Real Estate Blog. Topics include simple tips for buying real estate, how taxes are calculated, what the best gyms in town are and many others.
Learn about Melanie and why she's considered to be the expert Georgetown realtor on the About Melanie Page. You can call to speak with her or schedule an appointment on our Contact Page. She is always happy to answer any questions you have and looks forward to helping you.


text:
Healthy Life is Australia's house of 'really feel good'. With a high school diploma or a Regular Equivalency Diploma (GED), chances are you'll apply to any of MATCH's affiliate degree applications. It's Thursday, August thirty first, 2017 and welcome to Episode 204 of TechTalk4Teachers, I'm Tom Grissom. Welcome to TechTalk4Teachers the show about educating and learning with expertise. Corporations like people, Google like service and Cash, publishers have the purchasers and on the same time as well as they need to earn some money from their onerous work. So, Google is act like a third celebration between Writer and Advertisers. arms-on, know-how-based studying can launch your profession as a properly being skilled.
We create holidays and skilled-led and wildlife group tours to over a hundred areas worldwide. We make it straightforward for you to take advantage of out of every go to. Browse prime actually helpful inns on-line with TripAdvisor opinions by Card Members like you, or speak to a Travel insider for personalised recommendations, itineraries and one-of-a form experiences that may mean you can travel like an area. No-as peculiar, these write-ups are for casual vacationers, usually vacationers. Enterprise people often require matches, robe footwear, and many others. Nevertheless since we travel much more often than the vacationers, now we have realized all our personal tips of the travel commerce-speaking as someone who flies a whole lot of a thousand's of miles a yr, and stays in inns often a hundred nights a yr. I could write a guide for our kind of vacationers, and it would not look much like this article.
Camping is a good exercise to do together with your friends and family. Everybody ought to go on a tenting journey. Tenting takes a whole lot of preparation and this text to collect some useful advice for camping. It is very important do not forget that getting dirty during a camping trip. Take pleasure in your time within the wilderness and don't fret too much about getting messy. You may get cleaned up while you get dwelling. I can get newspaper articles to back up many of those claims. They were posted primarily within the Eighties and Nineteen Nineties in the Toledo Blade and the BG newspaper. They're principally written in his old title, Meghan Lawniczak.
We're not used to seeing exact sunshine knowledge, further often simplifying the weather to gosh it's sunny" or oh it is uninteresting". This year we have now cherished twenty days with over twelve hours of sunshine, all of them in the midst of the yr as a result of the photo voltaic's not above the horizon lengthy enough at different occasions. Within the meantime 100 and forty days saw only one hour of sunshine or less, with over sixty days having no sunshine in any respect. December has been the month with the best variety of totally overcast days, whereas February was probably the most uncharacteristically boring month. January seems to have been the month which most exceeded seasonal expectations, actually all these blue skies help clarify the way it managed to get so chilly.
TUT's new promotional video titled Evaluation is the important thing to the long run" takes you on a breath-taking visible journey into the world of science, retracing the commercial historical past of Tampere and reaching for the celebs to supply a glimpse into the way ahead for scientific exploration. On the end of every week every pupil should locate, read and write a couple of information article that pertains to a expertise. The news article can come from the next: newspapers, magazines, or from the Internet. The final idea is to hunt out an article that is about a machine, instrument or machine that each has a optimistic or unfavorable impact on people. The scholar ought to doc the place the article got right here from (title of newspaper, journal or website), checklist the title of the article after which write a short description of the article that is not lower than four sentences (one paragraph).


text: Fri. 11/15 10a: The University of New Mexico Symphony Orchestra celebrates the 103rd anniversary of the Mexican Revolution with a performance of "La Coronela," by 20th Century Mexican composer, Silvestre Revueltas. The multimedia concerts, on November 19 and 20 at Popejoy Hall in Albuquerque, include projected images by Mexican visual artist José Guadalupe Posada. Spencer Beckwith is joined by the conductor of the concerts, Director of Orchestral Activities at UNM, Dr. Jorge Pérez-Gómez.