text:
Mattress Steam Cleaning Mitchelton. We clean mattresses thoroughly with our effective mattress cleaning services in Mitchelton. Call 0482077306
Efficient Mattress Cleaning Services in Mitchelton
Searching for a good mattress cleaning service in Mitchelton? Mark's Mattress Cleaning provides professional mattress steam cleaning service in Mitchelton. Clean mattress forms an important part of a deep and safe sleep. Further, mattresses are likely to house bugs, stains, dust mite, bacteria etc. At Mark's Mattress Cleaning, we make mattresses rid of every sort of intruders. With the help of our mattress cleaners, we tend to make things right, easy, healthy and safe for you.
Mattress Steam Cleaning Mitchelton
Local Mattress Cleaners in Mitchelton
On an average, we spend one-third of our days in bed. As a result, mattresses fall prey to allergens, germs, soil, and dust mite. This is perhaps why we recommend that mattresses should be steam cleaned every 6 months to remove all the excess oils, dead skin and other substances.
Your mattress has to go through a lot you don't actually realize. Our mattresses handle the unwanted spills, urines of our pets and kids, food crumbs and others. You won't believe but we perspire 400 ml every night and much more. This becomes a source of food for dust mites, bugs, and viruses. This, in turn, produces allergens and you start experiencing sudden sneezing, itching, coughing and other allergies. If your children have asthma and respiratory problems, it is necessary to steam clean the mattresses every 6 months.
This pretty much explains why mattress cleaning in Canberra is of utmost importance.
Our Mattress Cleaning Process
To be honest, not all mattresses are fit for steam cleaning. Some require dry cleaning and other methods. But you need not worry about that. Mark's Mattress Cleaning takes due care and understands the cleaning processes thoroughly according to the type of mattresses. Here is an in-depth guide on how we clean your mattresses thoroughly:
High power vacuuming
We start with vacuuming the entire mattress surface with a high-powered vacuum cleaner. It involves cleaning thoroughly through the seams and corners and the spaces between the contours. Furthermore, our special mattress cleaner removes dust mite, dead skin easily removing 3 grams of waste as compared to 1 gram of waste that normal vacuum remover sucks.
Mattress cleaning and stain removal
Once we vacuum the mattress,we remove the stains with the help of stain removal formulas safe for the fabric of the mattress. Mattress stain removal is an important step for the mattress sanitization.
Mattress steam cleaning
Once the stains are removed, we steam clean the mattress to kill the germs. The mattress should not be soaked in water completely, therefore, it is best to steam clean them with short bursts of steam. This removes all the dust, stains and the mattress is sanitized to make it odor free. Additionally, we do Mattress anti-allergen cleaning in the same process. Further, all the bacteria and allergens that intrude into your mattresses die when we pass hot steam over them.
Mattress dry cleaning
After steam cleaning a mattress, we do a final vacuuming to remove excess water. Mattress dry cleaning is an important step as not properly drying it can result in mildew, which can make situations worse.
Mattress Stain Removal Mitchelton
Mark's Mattress Cleaning Mitchelton offers a wide range of services for mattress cleaning and restoration at the most affordable prices. Whether there are the old stubborn stains or fresh spill on your mattress, we can handle and treat them. The cleaning team of our professional mattress cleaners have ample knowledge of stain treatment and also possess the appropriate cleaning solutions. With our advanced skills and experience, we can completely clean and restore your mattress to new. Be it is mattress blood stain removal, mattress urine stain removal, mattress wine stain removal or mattress food stain removal, our results are classic and unbeatable.
Mattress Mould Removal Mitchelton
Another one of the most special, effective and widely used services is mattress mould removal. Mould on the mattress is responsible for many health issues in the home. It is responsible for breathing and skin problems, and usually, kids with low immunity get stuck with severe disease. Getting rid of mould on your own is an option but we suggest you go for it, as treating it yourself can lead to severe health problems. So, what are you waiting for? Call us today and get the best services for mattress mould removal.
Guaranteed Mattress Steam Cleaning Mitchelton
We at Mark's Mattress Cleaning provide guaranteed mattress cleaning services to our customers. You do not need to pay for if you are not happy with our services. This implies that if you are not happy with our service, we provide you the services again with no additional cost. Though healthier bedding is our main aim, we don't give our customers a chance to disappoint them and they don't usually have to ask us for re-do.
Taking our services is beneficial because:
- We are locals of Mitchelton
- Additionally, we provide healthier bedding
- We adopt high-end sanitization processes
- Furthermore, we provide mattresses stain removal
- We extend your mattresses life
Mattress Steam Cleaning Mitchelton
Why Mark's Mattress Cleaning Service?
We are not just a regular mattress cleaning services provider in Mitchelton. Additionally, we deal in a multitude of other services like mattress base cleaning, latex mattress cleaning, and pillow top mattress cleaning. Here are the reasons why you should choose us:
- We are a team of certified and trained mattress dry cleaners
- Additionally, we use high powered, heavy duty mattress cleaning equipment
- We also provide mattress anti-allergen cleaning
- Furthermore, we make your bedding healthier and free from bacteria, mold, fungus and other germs.
- We are experts in mattress sanitization
- Also, we use safe and eco-friendly chemicals to make mattress free from odor.
- We increase the durability of mattresses
- Additionally, we provide mattresses dry cleaning
Wait no more! Avail our services and get your mattresses steam cleaned by us today.
Location: Mitchelton, Queensland, Australia


text:
Mark your time of sobriety with this special medallion, which will serve as an amulet, warding off the evils of alcohol, a tangible reminder of the milestones reached on the road to recovery. It's a symbol of your personal change and accomplishment, that through accepting your limitations, embracing and working the Twelve Steps, and attending meetings regularly, you are learning the behaviors that will help you maintain your hard fought abstinence.
Look back on your achievements with satisfaction, and look ahead to today because today is the only day you must commit to being sober. Every Alcoholic can look back on this accomplishment with satisfaction, but also look ahead to today and continue the success of sobriety. The strength of this token will help make that pledge as real and as solid as the metal itself.
Minted in antiqued bronze, and displaying the years of sobriety on the obverse, the AA Wisdom, Courage, Serenity coin is the perfect way to commemorate your first 24 hours of sobriety in physical, easy-to-carry way. The obverse features the words "To Thine Own Self Be True," from Shakespeare's Hamlet (Act 1, scene 3, 78–82), a motto that those striving for sobriety know well. The reverse features two lions, representing strength to fight against perilous addiction, and the words, "WISDOM, COURAGE, SERENITY," and area perfect for engraving a name or special message.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
- 131
- Fonds
- February 1987
The fonds consists of photographs documenting the welcome ceremony that occurred in February 1987 for the canoe project by Nisga'a carver Norman Tait. The Museum of Anthropology appears in the background of multiple pictures in which spectators can be seen gathered for the 1st cut ceremony of the canoe log. Norman The event included speeches as well as ceremonies and performances by Norman Tait and his close relatives. Joe David, Reva Robinson, and Bill Reid are among the other notable individuals that appear in these images.


text:
Why BrandSTIK : BrandSTIK, subsidiary of WorldOne Sourcing HK Ltd incorporated during third quarter of 2011 by a team of professionals who sought to bring a fresh approach to the promotional products and retail industry . With a vision to become the most preferred promotional products company in India, it offers the latest and most innovative promotional products as they are launched globally for its Indian clients backed by its own sourcing offices in China and HK along with highly responsive service and turnaround time . Within a short duration of 40 months since its launch, it has partnered with 300+ blue-chip clients and executed over 100 projects. OUR BUSINESS : Consumer Promotions in retail are established techniques of increasing brand sales in quick time. Such offers increase the perceived value of the purchase and helps differentiate the brand in a cluttered marketplace. However its success depends on the kind of product it is clubbed with. Corporate Gifting : BrandSTIK provides over 1000+ unique promotional gifting products across all budgets. With high quality products, warranty on all electronics merchandise and quick turnaround time is the hallmark of this division.A well thought-out gift can lead to tremendous increase in awareness, engagement and even sales. BrandSTIK with its largest collection of promotional gift products in the world and a team of merchandisers who pick and choose relevant offerings based on the brand briefs ensure that Corporate Gifting is not just an afterthought.Within a short span of 3 years its worked with over 300 brand across industries to offer specific corporate gifting products which are unique , innovative and budget bound.
Phone nos: 91673 73749 | 95940 70940
Mail us: email@example.com
For Assured Replies Please WhatsApp Your Inquiries to 91673 73749 or 95940 70940


text:
Early 18th century. England is at war with the French. Nevertheless, duck racing and pineapple eating are thriving. A frail Queen Anne (Olivia Colman) occupies the throne and her close friend Lady Sarah (Rachel Weisz) governs the country in her stead while tending to Anne's ill health and mercurial temper. When a new servant Abigail (Emma Stone) arrives, her charm endears her to Sarah. Sarah takes Abigail under her wing and Abigail sees a chance at a return to her aristocratic roots. As the politics of war become quite time consuming for Sarah, Abigail steps into the breach to fill in as the Queen's companion. Their burgeoning friendship gives her a chance to fulfil her ambitions and she will not let woman, man, politics or rabbit stand in her way.
The Favourite
More Trailers and Videos for The Favourite
Cast & Crew
Emma StoneActor
Nicholas HoultActor
Olivia ColmanActor
Mark GatissActor
Rachel WeiszActor
Joe AlwynActor
Yorgos LanthimosDirector
Yorgos LanthimosProducer
Ed GuineyProducer
Ceci DempseyProducer


text:
Squeeze Bottles
Dispensing condiments should be quick, clean, and easy, and with squeeze bottles, it can be just so. Unlike glass bottles, the squeeze bottles available at Mission Restaurant Supply are made of plastic so that you can easily and cleanly dispense ketchup and other condiments while managing portion control. Just point and squeeze! Choose from red, white or yellow squeeze bottles for your traditional condiments or purchase our cases packs of 6 and take advantage of our wholesale pricing at Mission Restaurant Supply!


text:
sarcasm and irony
As I'm sure you're aware, the British are very fond of saying that 'Americans don't get irony' and expressing over-inflated national pride in our astounding power of sarcasm. It of course isn't the case that Americans don't get irony [see this past post--ed.], and while BrE applications of sarcasm can be very subtle, we're not the unequivocal masters of the form. For example, I always thought the typically AmE expression 'I could care less' to be a particularly stupid grammatical error on their part, until this week when I saw it pointed out here, that the expression is in fact intended sarcastically (see also this past post, which is not so kind to Americans--ed.). Perhaps we misinterpret this because in our arrogance we Brits don't expect sarcasm from Americans without all the attendant cues, bells and whistles. Or maybe because I've mainly seen it written down in novels and forums, rather than heard it said aloud.
Over the course of my research into the differences between American and British (especially English) sarcasm however, it became clear to me that the difference isn't so much in the way we use it, as in the way we define it. While the AmE definition emphasi{s/z}es negativity and saying the opposite of what is meant, Brits seem to have a far broader definition, which includes humorous exchange, clever wordplay and affectionate insults or criticisms of others (even those we don't know, which I think may be the most fundamental cultural difference).
To put it another way, there are things we British will do in conversation which we would call sarcastic, but which Americans would not. For example, in the irreverent media, Sir Bob Geldof, of Live Aid fame, is frequently referred to as 'Saint Bob'. Now this is obviously not entirely sincere, but it isn't fully contemptuous either; we are mocking his interminable altruism and campaigning, but we also respect all his charity work and dedicated parenting. So although we don't completely mean that he is a saint, we also don't mean that he isn't and I think most Brits would refer to that as sarcasm, but I'm also fairly sure our American counterparts would not. Feel free to correct this flagrant generali{s/z}ation ☺
In AmE 'sarcasm' seems to be very much a subordinate term for a specific type of pragmatic use. (Many theorists will argue it's a subcategory of verbal irony, but I won't go into that here.) But in my (humble) opinion it has a much broader application BrE. Thoughts would be much appreciated.
I shall furnish this largely speculative theori{s/z}ing with some spurious exemplification:
If a friend of mine were to be self-deprecating above and beyond the call of Britishness, I might say something obvious like "Yeah, cos (=AmE 'cause--ed.) you're the worst national award-winning photographer St. Martin's [a top art college—ed.] has ever had," in a heavily sarcastic tone. Equally I might agree in a very sincere sounding way with "Yeah, you are quite sh*t." Or I might say "Don't say that, you're actually really good," or "You're not that bad"--both in a way that made it sound like I didn't think they were good at all. Then again I might feign ignorance and comment "You were lucky to get in really," or ask "How did you manage to pass the course?" in an ingenuous fashion.
All of these I would quite happily and definitively class as sarcastic utterances, but my research suggests that under the AmE theoretical rubric, they would fall into other categories. I think our predilection for teasing each other and continually (BrE) 'taking the piss' has come to be associated with sarcasm as an everyday conversational form in a way that it has not in AmE, where there seems to be more of a time and place for it.
Regional and gender differences in production of sarcasm have been quite conclusively demonstrated in the literature. Megan Dress and others (2008) carried out some research comparing attitudes to sarcasm and likelihood of use between Northern USans, from upstate New York, and Southern USans from Memphis. They found that the Northerners were far more likely to find sarcasm amusing and assume friendly intentions than their Southern equivalents and therefore much more likely to use it spontaneously. The difference was even more marked between the two sets of men. The Northern perspective seems to be much closer to the British attitude, though the sources Dress et al(.) provide suggest that the examples of use may still not be as broad as the unofficial BrE definition seems to allow. A majority of respondents in this study mentioned the negativity of sarcasm, though not an overwhelming majority. This might suggest that the insistence on sarcasm as a negative form is generated by linguists and literary types more than speakers.
83 comments
- Anonymous30 May, 2009 21:14
Well! A lot of interesting information, but a bit too diffuse. Gimme some strong conclusions (generalisations)!
Brits like dry understatement. Americans make bigger, bolder, less nuanced statements, which can come across as shouting to British ears. Maybe this, rather than preferences for sarcasm, satire, irony or slapstick, account for national humour differences?
Neither country's sense of humour is better or worse. Some of the best comedy on British TV comes from programmes like Frasier or the Daily Show. American humour can be unexpectedly cruel, but often comes across as PC. The public world of US television performers is sometimes smooth and bland, whereas the private opinions of US bloggers are sometimes quite shocking and strident to more tolerant British ears. I think generalizing AM sense of humor misses how much variation there is across the country, and in different socioeconomic groups. I come from Detroit, where sarcasm (saying one thing while obviously meaning the opposite) is a near art form. But even there, some folks just didn't get it.
I thought people in Utah just didn't have sarcasm, but have found it does exist here, in small pockets, and with a very different flavor. Stealth sarcasm, so as to avoid the notice of the dominant religion, easily explained away as an innocuous statement.
It seems to be a matter of "Well, we get it, of course, but the next tribe over is too dumb to understand, they don't have sarcasm."I heard my favourite piece of sarcasm from a teacher in Scotland when I was in primary 7 (age 11-12). If somebody was trying to show how clever they were without beig able to show evidence of their knowledge, they'd say "a little knowledge can be dangerous". It wasn't until many years later that I learnt the riposte to this - "then you must be Britain's most wanted!"
ReplyDeleteI'd disagree about the St. Bob example. In my experience is IS meant with contempt. Most people I know who use it really do hate him.
ReplyDelete- Anonymous31 May, 2009 11:58
I often find that the Brits who read my American-in-the-UK blog take everything literally and tend to get offended by tongue-in-cheek remarks or comments clearly intended to be sarcastic (which apparently they miss or choose to ignore). I've been perplexed by this, not understanding where the famous British sense of irony and humor is. I can't seem to figure out how I would have to write things differently for them to "get the joke" compared with the Americans who seem to see when something is meant as non-literal.
ReplyDelete I wouldn't think that spoken communications involving the more sarcastic put-down can every really be transferable to an anonymous written post, especially seeing as there is so much flaming (or near flaming) to confuse the issue. I have found that it is hard for me to write things that I would say without fear of being misunderstood (unless it's self deprecating), without them sounding harsher than I intended.
As it happens, last night I ran across a terrific example of the type of British irony I like best, and (because I'm American, perhaps) can never seem to master:
"On the morning of 17th August a Cabinet meeting at Downing Street agreed that a Royal Commission should discuss the railwaymen's grievances. Now Royal Commissions are notoriously slow; their deliberations have been known to last for two or three years, and their findings, though just in the main, usually appear long after the need for them has passed. The Cabinet, therefore, could scarcely have hit upon the likeliest means of appeasing a group of men who happened to be in a hurry. None the less the Prime Minister... hurried off... to inform the Unions' officials of this luminous solution."
As an aside, I think that the fine word "facetious" should be here employed to describe irony which is perceived by another, but thought inappropriate, or otherwise unnecessary.- Rick S31 May, 2009 16:20
As a youngster in upstate NY some 40-odd years ago, I learned the term irony as a generic for saying the opposite of what you mean, with sarcasm as a subset of that when the intent is to demean. However, the latter could be used humorously with a friend, one of those "normal social customs don't apply to us" interactions. You say that upstate NYers are more likely to find sarcasm amusing. I don't know whether that's because the meaning of the word has changed over time, or whether it's less often used in the intentionally demeaning way in recent times. But then, those two possibilities are linked, so perhaps it's impossible to say.
In any event, I think there are not only regional and gender(? Never noticed that) differences but differences based on microculture, such as age group and ethnic identity. That's probably what can make sarcasm so risky for any public use in the US, such as blogs. Perhaps British attitudes are more homogeneous. @notfrom: It's possible that the problem is just that you're American. I have this experience too--even in spoken interaction. My hypothesis is that the British person thinks 'American. Must be very literal-minded.' and so they are temporarily blinded to non-literal intentions.
ReplyDelete@NFAH: Honestly I think what you have is a couple or at the very least one cyber stalker determined to take EVERYTHING you say the wrong way and troll your blog. That you didn't ban their IP address/es months ago just proves you're a much better person than me. Perhaps they view their trolling as ironic British performance art, but it's still trolling. Unless you want to meet him in person and open up a can of Minnesota nice on his ass, banning seems the only solution.
@ actual topic:
affectionate insults or criticisms of others (even those we don't know, which I think may be the most fundamental cultural difference).This rings true to me as an American. My friend calling me a bar slut is funny. My friend calling my roommate's date a bar slut when they've never met, well, it's still funny, but mostly just mean to a person who probably doesn't deserve it.
I tend to think this phenomenon goes a long way towards explaining the bells and whistles sarcasm and irony Americans are accused of. People aren't always great judges of whether they need to hang a lampshade (or how big a lampshade?) on their irony, so they ere on the side of causing the least offense.- biochemist31 May, 2009 22:14
Isn't sarcasm usually a quick verbal remark, while irony takes a bit longer and is usually a more considered comment?
Thus, long ago in the UK, schoolteachers were well-known for being 'sarcastic': Well, Smithers, we won't ask you for your opinion, since you have been gazing out of the window all afternoon.
By the end of the term, they might be saying: It's ironic that Smithers, who appeared to take no interest in class, has scored top marks in the exam.
The sarcasm gained a cheap laugh, while the irony acknowledges a reversal of expectation. - robert6101 June, 2009 06:41
One difference between Englanders and their near colonial minions and Americans is that Englanders et al think neologisms like "USans" are clever and useful.
ReplyDelete I suggested the USans, not the English author of this, as I was concerned that her 'Northern Americans' might seem to include Canadians. So, you've laid the blame in the wrong place, I'm afraid.
ReplyDelete- Anonymous01 June, 2009 11:08
Another difference is that Americans tend to use ridiculous terms such as "Englander", and endlessly overplay the former-colonial aspect when referring to themselves.
ReplyDelete "we are mocking his interminable altruism and campaigning, but we also respect all his charity work and dedicated parenting!"
Speak for yourself. It's all mockery as far as I'm concerned.@latest Anonymous: I'm not really sure what you're talking about, but could we keep the discussion to the topic at hand? If you'd like to see another topic discussed, please email me the suggestion.
ReplyDelete- coal porter01 June, 2009 13:53
From a British perspective, I think of irony as more subtle than sarcasm. Basil Fawlty is sarcastic but not ironic. A comedian such as Paul Merton uses irony.
No-one has mentioned adding "not" at the end of a statement. Eg I am the world's best lover. Not. One issue that I think has some real truth to it is along the lines of the section talking about defining irony. Especially the "American's don't get Irony" idea.
American's of course get irony. We just don't find it particularly funny. Pithy, maybe. Amusing, probably, but not funny.
(Sarcasam is funny...irony is amusing. And while they are surely related, I believe they are seen as very different things.)
Irony, for Americans usually falls more along the line of "Hunter killed by deer." Or "Jumbo Shrimp." That sort of thing. Whereas sarcasam is just as it has been outlined by the OP and responders.
My understanding is that "Hot Fuzz" was a lot funnier to Brits because while the idea of a huge shoot out and conspiracy in a tiny English town has a lot of irony and comedy in it, it is a comedy that we understand, but don't really laugh at. It is like "OK that is a funny premise, but is what happens in the movie funny?" Whereas I am assuming that the a funny premise carries a lot further for audiences across the pond. (for the record I loved "Hot Fuzz.")
I don't know how cohesive what I just wrote was, but I hope the point got across.- Martin01 June, 2009 18:06
I'm 23 and have spent my life in and around US East Coast cities, except for three years I spent living in the English Midlands.
In my experience, AmE and BrE irony differs most in how aggressive or "destabilizing" uses of irony are to the conversation. British conversations are saturated in humor, and BrE irony is almost always an invitation to respond in kind. BrE speakers will carry on long exchanges in which everyone participates in the mutual game of constructing some alternate world that all know to be false.
AmE irony, by contrast, seems to be more about aggression or disruption. American conversations contain more sincere, non-ironic statements per minute than British conversations, which creates possibilities for disruption that don't exist in BrE. A pattern of sincerity builds up over time, and then a speaker can destroy it by injecting some ostensibly disturbing non-sequitur like "my father died that way." The conversation never continues uninterrupted after something like this, in the way that British conversations continue after someone makes a joke. Instead, people laugh, and then the sincere statements resume, building tension for another disruption.
American speakers, in my experience, also ironically "inhabit characters" more than British speakers. Americans will borrow from the idioms of speakers whose perspective is not theirs. Whereas BrE constructs fantasy worlds, AmE constructs fantasy perspectives or speakers. So an AmE speaker might reject a friend's proposal for Friday night as "the same tired rhetoric and the same failed policies."
A final sweeping, tenously related claim: Form in humor is more important in BrE than in AmE. Unpredictability and novelty is crucial to American humor, in my experience. (Is this a recent development?) American speakers will sometimes create an obvious setup for a joke and then omit the punchline. The joke is that there is no joke. I can't recall ever hearing a British speaker do this. Rather, BrE emphasizes traditional forms in humor (hence the love of puns and wordplay) rather than disruption.
I suppose all this is likely false ... I wish I had data to support it. But does it strike a chord with anyone else, particularly younger readers? Was not that last anonymous being sarcastic/ironic?
My understanding was that there's a difference between irony as discussed here and the dramatic irony of 'hunter shot by own gun'.
I too had noticed the 'USan' usage - I just thought it was a bit of academic jargon (another language altogether...)Do we at least all agree that Alanis Morrissette (raised Canadian, currently dual Canadian-American) got it wrong? That a black fly in one's chardonnay is a lot of things but not ironic?
ReplyDeleteThis bit of sarcasm on Slate the other day had me laughing out loud (and it's apropos to this blog's theme):
"No doubt the new political appointees can handle the job. ... Obama's appointee to Great Britain, Louis Susman, speaks fluent English."- Cameron02 June, 2009 09:01
Sorry for the cut and paste, but this is from this morning's Herald:
"So," said the chap in the pub the other night, "that poor doctor in America who carried out abortions was shot dead by some American pro-lifer."
He added: "Who says Americans don't do irony?"
http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/diary/display.var.2511774.0.kirk_rent.php - Cameron02 June, 2009 09:03
A friend of mine renamed alanis's song "Isn't it a Bummer", which is fair enough, but I must say I think the concept of meeting the man of your dreams (in her case) and then meeting his beautiful wife is beautifully ironic. She has spent her life looking for her soulmate, finds him, and then in an ironic twist of fate, finds that someone else got there first.
ReplyDelete - Anonymous02 June, 2009 09:51
Some of these references are passing me by, but never mind. I'm not bitter.
Earlier comments about homogeneity and regional US differences resonated with me. In the UK I think there is more of a common cultural frame of reference than in the US. It may come in different colourways in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, but the basic pattern is similar. The US is more diverse. This may account for some differences in national humo(u)r. The 'setting up a joke' comment reminded me of what I consider to be a very ironic (and very American) film, Napoleon Dynamite. I believe the film has generally been less popular in the UK, although perhaps this is mostly due to cultural references. I wonder what a comparison of the irony in N.D. and maybe Hot Fuzz or Monty Python would show. Also, the New Zealand film Eagle vs Shark seemed to me to have a lot in common with N.D. in terms of ironic tone, which got me wondering where other English-speaking countries fall on the irony spectrum. Actually, The Gods Must Be Crazy from South Africa & Botswana has a prety ironic premise, too... Sorry for the disconnectedness.
ReplyDeleteAnother time when I noticed a difference between the US and UK "definitions" of irony happened in Bridget Jones' Diary...
Forgive the paraphrasing, but the dialogue was something like...
"I said I loved you but I was being ironic."
I don't think a US English person would have said it in this way, they would probably have said, "I was just being funny." or "I was only messing with you"- Maggie03 June, 2009 03:48
Martin, I think your observations and theory that American humor depends more on surprise or "disruption" is possibly quite astute. I think all that sincerity creates tension that is then dispelled with a disruption. This definitely seems to be a style of humor. I'm American - and it is a style of humor that I appreciate and practice. There's a bit of a rebellious feel to it whereas my sense of British humor is that it is more traditional, somehow- clever and wordy, punny and nerdy. Why do I have this impression? It fits with your observations though, I think.
I'm wondering about the NOT! reversal that often comes after a statement that sounds sincere. Or at least should, for the NOT to have more of an effect. What are the origins of this? (Did Madonna start that, somehow? Anyone remember?) The "NOT" phenomenon as it were, was made famous by Mike Myers and Wayne's World. madonna used it in the one sketch with Wayne that parodied her Justify My Love Video.
However, as a bit of dorky trivia, Steve Martin used the same thing in the 70's on Saturday Night Live.- Maggie03 June, 2009 04:32
Thanks, Bill. On leaving this site I immediately looked NOT! up. Wikipedia says some interesting things to say about it. That it's not new, for one - only the pause before it, maybe.
Speaking of pauses. The "USans" gave me pause. It took me a few beats before I figured out what it was - I saw Sans and thought it was the French "without." Being American, I still assume even when I should know better. When I was doing volunteer work overseas, I was assigned to work with two guys. They asked me where I was from. I told them I was American. They said, Oh, they were American too. I said, Oh, where from? They said, Uruguay. Oh. Would a Canadian ever mistake him/herself for an American? It's a US of American, not a North American that it's referring to, no? - coal porter03 June, 2009 08:35
Very interesting, the comments about sincerity. British people don't do sincerity in the same way, so perhaps there isn't the same build-up of pressure that needs to be relieved.
Perhaps that is why we don't think Americans do irony, and why we don't expect the disruptive or cruel comment - we assume that Americans are hard-wired with a kind of gregarious sincerity.
I agree that British people do like wordplay, and other intellectual games. The Times newspaper is full of crosswords, sudoku, mental arithmetic tests, and the like. @Maggie et al.: Quoting from myself in a comment on the 'I love this guy' post: "There's the famous example of people assuming that post-sentential "NOT!" comes from the film/movie Wayne's World when in fact it goes back to at least 1860. (New Scientist did a little piece on this phenomenon a couple of weeks ago, referring to Arnold Zwicky's Language Log posts that dub this the Recency Effect.)"
On the general discussion of Americans and sarcasm--Better Half has a very hard time with my 'teasing' which is typical in my family. I.e. putting one another down jocularly. One could say it's sarcastic but opposite-wise, in that we're saying something mean with friendly intent. My impression is that this kind of thing requires more intimacy in BrE than in AmE, but that it just doesn't sit right with some BrE folks (probably less so with southern and midwestern USans too).- Cameron03 June, 2009 18:25
How are South Americans who call themselves American "mistaking" themselves for Americans? They are from SOUTH America. And their countries are certainly members of the Organi(s/z)ation of American States, which has nothing to do with Texas, Rhode Island, or any other states of the US.
Do citizens of anywhere other than the US mistake their country for an entire continent? - Anonymous03 June, 2009 18:27
I think you might have something there. It would certainly make sense of why my humor attempts at irony fall flat so often. I'm American, but rather than the single-statement disruption-style sarcasm, I sometimes add onto whatever they're saying--I guess building a world, as you described it. This almost always earns me an "I was being sarcastic." To which I usually have to say, "Yeah, I know. I was too."
To whoever posted this: "No doubt the new political appointees can handle the job. ... Obama's appointee to Great Britain, Louis Susman, speaks fluent English."
I find the humor in it, but--I suppose fitting with one of the elements of American humor that the OP theorized--I wouldn't call it sarcasm per se. I would still consider it dry wit, of course, but... hmm... it just doesn't quite suit my mental definition of sarcasm? - Maggie04 June, 2009 00:40
Cameron, I think they were just teasing me. When I say I'm American, I'm meaning, not that I'm from North America, but that I am from the United States of America - which is a mouthful. People from Canada say they are Canadian, people from Uruguay are Uruguayan (I think). People from Mexico say they are Mexican. USers makes more sense to me than USans - along the line of Englanders which was made fun of earlier. Or maybe I'd be happier with USAans. Uruguay is a country that is a member of the Organization of American States the way England is a country that is a member of the European Union...
...What are you taking such strong objection to, again?
If I were referring to the continent, not the country, I would say I was North American. i agree with Anonymous
"Brits like dry understatement. Americans make bigger, bolder, less nuanced statements, which can come across as shouting to British ears. Maybe this, rather than preferences for sarcasm, satire, irony or slapstick, account for national humor differences?"
its just a case of where you
were brought up and the TV
shows you watched in your youth..
which in turn affect the humor of
people around you and so on- Cameron04 June, 2009 10:41
England is no more a member of the European Union than Texas is a member of the Organisation of American States: Britain is, though.
ReplyDelete "American speakers, in my experience, also ironically "inhabit characters" more than British speakers. Americans will borrow from the idioms of speakers whose perspective is not theirs. Whereas BrE constructs fantasy worlds, AmE constructs fantasy perspectives or speakers. So an AmE speaker might reject a friend's proposal for Friday night as "the same tired rhetoric and the same failed policies.""
This is a fascinating claim. I'd love to know if there's any research on it.@Cameron: someone's going to say it anyway so it might as well be me. Britain's not a member of the European Union either; the UK is. :)
ReplyDelete- Maggie05 June, 2009 06:34
Thanks, Kelv, for clearing that up.
Is it something about me (and if so, what) that draws such irate exactitude? --Now that is a unique trait that I have only experienced first-hand in some Englanders, never from anyone else hailing from anywhere else... Sorry to say. - Don't mean to change the topic or know whether this is even topic-worthy. Just a phenomenon I'm suddenly recognizing... - Cameron05 June, 2009 11:21
Kelv, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the full offical title of the country, which is more briefly known as Britain (or indeed as The United Kingdom). Just as The Federal Republic of Germany is generally known simply as Germany (or, dare I say it, as the United States of America are almost universally known simply as America, although that is complicated by it also being the name of two whole continents!).
Maggie, the reason people are getting mad at you is because you are calling our country by a name it does not have, which is in fact the name of just one of its constituent nations: it's as though I were to say Texas or California when I meant the entire US. You would pretty soon get annoyed if I did that. I am British. I am NOT English; I am Scottish. I come from Britain; I do NOT come from England. In calling the whole country England what you are in effect doing is wiping Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland out of existence, a sort of linguistic genocide! Totally ignoring the existence of three entire nations. Not polite and of course not appreciated.
PS "Great Britain" is technically just the largest island in the group, the mainland of Britain, but it's never used as such any more and most people are completely unaware of it.
PPS I would just as surely correct you if you said Scotland when you meant all of Britain. (Great) Britain = England + Scotland + Wales
United Kingdom = England + Scotland + Wales + Northern Ireland
To use "Britain" when meaning the UK would be just as incorrect as saying "England" when meaning Britain.- coal porter05 June, 2009 17:36
Kelv, technically I agree. However, Britain is sometimes used loosely to mean the UK, as in GB (an abbreviation that appears in many international designations, eg for patents), Grande Bretagne (although admittedly sometimes Royaume Uni), etc. The British Isles includes both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, as well as islands such as the Isle of Man which is not technically part of the UK.
We should be sensitive to Scots who dislike the name England being used for the UK, even there is a long historical tradition of doing this. Other dislikes include referring to the Scots as Scotch (which must only be used for whisky, broth (soup), eggs, etc).
People who are ignorant of these preferences can be politely corrected, but ignorance is not a crime. - Cameron05 June, 2009 22:50
Coal, thank you for being sensitive to people who insist on the right name being used for their country rather than one which is wholly wrong.
There is a long tradition of people getting all sorts of things wrong, but it doesn't make them right. This country is not called England, and everything I said about doing so is correct, as is everything I said about the name of the country, whether you and Kelv "agree" or not. I could agree with someone who said 2+2=5, but it would not make it right. I suggest you both look these things up: you will discover that I am right about them and you are both wrong.
If you choose to disbelieve me, you can google them. I say that because I imagine you would probably sniff and tell me Wikipedia is unreliable if I just gave you this link:
although perhaps you might find this one more convincing:
or maybe this one:
And for completeness' sake, here is "Great Britain: UK tourist information":
and also one last Wikipedia page, about the ninth largest island in the world, to make sure non-British visitors to this blog have enough accurate information to counter inaccurate information they may have received:
Apologies for all the copying and pasting some of you may have to do to visit those; I do not know how to include hyperlinks in here, but I feel accuracy is worth it. And remember, if you don't trust the sites I have given you here, it's easy to google terms like Britain, United Kingdom, Great Britain or even, should you feel out of typing practice, Great Britain and Northern Ireland. - Cameron05 June, 2009 22:51
PS One thing you ARE right about is that ignorance is not a crime.
ReplyDelete - Cameron05 June, 2009 22:55
PPS Grand Bretagne is French for Great Britain. Royaume Uni is French for United Kingdom. Both, as far as I know, simple literal translations. I'm sure any French speakers here can let me know whether I'm right about that, as I don't speak French. And PPPS Lynn, sorry about all this digression, but as I said, I think sometimes accuracy is important.
ReplyDelete - Maggie06 June, 2009 06:52
I apologize for this digression as well.
The first time I used England in error - I apologize. The second time, I meant England as when I have experienced that exactitude it was from people from England. (That Cameron is Scottish means that this is not solely an English phenomenon.) When meeting people they would often identify themselves right off as being Scottish, Welsh, English, or from Northern Ireland and skip or bypass British or UKish (wink). Do people of the UK identify themselves more closely to being British or being English/Scottish/Welsh/Northern Irish? Or maybe I was traveling among mostly British people and so they were making distinctions among themselves. That may very well have been the case.
I appreciate being corrected. However, I do notice the way in which I'm corrected. The mention of England was a minor, tangential, unfinished aspect of the point that I was trying to make and focusing on it while ignoring my main concerns just seems... well, missing the forest for the tree. - Cameron06 June, 2009 08:51
Maggie, I appreciate that it's a minor point to you, but to a Scottish, Welsh or Northern Irish person, it is wiping out the existence of their nation, which is not minor at all. I dare say we would soon hear you complain if we started referring to all of North America as Canada.
As far as self-identification goes, I am first European, second Scottish and a distant third British. Well, really I'm first Human, but that's another issue. I think you are being overly kind about the American use of 'I could care less'. The expression works when it is used sarcastically, but in by far the majority of cases I've heard it used, there is no evidence of any intended sarcasm. Indeed, when I've challenged Americans on their use of the phrase, they have expressed surprise and then said they've never thought about what it actually means.
ReplyDelete- Anonymous06 June, 2009 23:31
"Do people of the UK identify themselves more closely to being British or being English/Scottish/Welsh/Northern Irish?"
As a loose, and tounge in cheek, rule of thumb, the Scots, Welsh and Irish identify more closely with their 'constituent country' rather than Britain and the English, at least until recently, don't distinguish between English and British. (The big exception being in cases involving a sport with an English rather than British team.) Maggie: As an American (that is to say, a resident of the United States), I assure you I can be as down on terminological inexactitude as any Englander (hey, if Little Englanders are a subset, then Englanders are the superset, surely?), or any Britisher for that matter. Per(s)nicketiness is not a national characteristic.
Coal Porter: Despite Wikipedia, the nation-state is called Ireland (in English), though it may be described as the Republic of Ireland, since it is a republic and it is named 'Ireland'.- Picky07 June, 2009 09:43
There is considerable confusion even among residents of the British Isles about the names of the various bits and combinations, and if we ourselves stumble we can't expect others to be word perfect.
As to England and Britain, in the 21st century it would be insufferably rude of me as an Englishman to use the lesser for the greater, since I am fully aware of the offensiveness of this practice to many of my fellow-Britons.
But we should be, perhaps, more forgiving of others who have no reason to be particularly attuned to the sensitivities.
I have been known to call the Netherlands "Holland", I'm afraid. - Cameron07 June, 2009 10:43
Picky, I always try to avoid using terms I know would be offensive to anyone in these issues, as I'm aware of the sensitivity of England/Britain. "The Netherlands" is awkward because of the "the" and the s at the end but I do try never to call it Holland. I usually (I think) refer to U.S.Americans. And so on.
ReplyDelete @Cameron
"I suggest you both look these things up: you will discover that I am right about them and you are both wrong."
Except, of course, the reverse is true, and the defintions I provided are the correct ones:
(Great) Britain = England + Scotland + Wales
United Kingdom = England + Scotland + Wales + Northern Ireland
That you've found a handful of websites which also get it wrong proves nothing. I can find plenty of websites (and people) which confuse England with Britain; still doesn't make them correct.
My final word on the matter: I'm Welsh, so it infuriates me just as much as you when certain nationalities repeatedly lump us all together as "England".
However, I always think you get further by remaining polite when pointing out someone's error. I also think it important to be damn sure exactly which countries belong to what (including the difference between Britain and the UK) before trying to correct someone else.- Cameron07 June, 2009 15:10
Kelv, "Britain" and "Great Britain" are not the same, there's an additional word in Grweat Britain, which I do not believe you haven't noticed, which is presumably why this time you have changed what you said. You said BRITAIN=England, Scotland and Wales, NOT Great Britain. You were and are wrong. Try and find a remotely reliable website that says otherwise. You won't be able to, because it isn't truth or reality.
You were and are wrong. Get used to it.
A final word: there is NO difference between Britain and the UK. They are both, as I originally said, short forms of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. As the British government knows even if you don't. If you can't play nice, I'm going to have to start deleting people. I've tolerated the off-topicness for quite a number of posts now, but have to wonder if it was an error to do so.
Can we turn our attention back to sarcasm, please?- Cameron07 June, 2009 16:43
Sorry, Lynne. (And sorry for misspelling your name earlier). A final (peacemaking) word:
I have found a page on Wikipedia which does in fact state that "Britain" can be used for the island of Great Britain AS WELL AS for the country of the UK as a whole. I have never come across that before, but am more than happy to acknowledge that Kelv and I were both right in our usage of the name Britain, and each wrong to accuse the other of being wrong.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Britain I'll start by saying my post wasn't actually about irony at all, I only mentioned it to say that I wasn't going to talk about it. It's a whole different kettle of fish. Nonetheless I would have said that "None the less the Prime Minister... hurried off... to inform the Unions' officials of this luminous solution." was sarcastic rather than ironic. In my experience "facetious" is used by adults to chastise a child for being a (BrE) smartarse/ (AmE) smart aleck (?) but yes, it could equally identify misplaced irony.
Anyway, back to the case in hand.
Jo and Ginger Yellow: Point taken, maybe Saint Bob was a bad example, but you get the point right? I just meant we can be 'a bit sarcastic'- it isn't an absolute in BrE.
NFAH: I'd agree with Lynne, it's that British attitude that leads to missing your use of ironicism. The leading academic thought suggests that if you expect non-literal language from people you will identify and process it far more easily. If you don't expect it you are much more likely to mistakenly take it literally, regardless of personal aptitude or likelihood of use.
Posters seem to be affirming my main generalisation, albeit in indirect and tangential fashion, that the AmE definition of sarcasm is very much negative and related to (BrE?) *getting at* others. @ Rick S- I hadn't personally noticed a gender difference in sarcasm use, but all the US-based research suggests that men will use it more.
Biochemist: I'd disagree almost entirely. I think it's possible to be ironic without saying anything, or when saying very little, and sarcasm doesn't have to be quick, or cheap (though it does have to be verbal yes.)
Bill: I think the 'comedy' in Hot Fuzz (I, for the record, thought two hours was a long time to string out a sketch show joke) derives from the juxtaposition of big guns American action conventions and a genteel British village. But most people I know thought it was hilarious, so presumably the premise is much funnier for us.
Martin: A lot of that rings true to me, although I'm not sure about how much Brits rely on form. Omitting the punchline is fairly common practice I'd say, trailing off at the end with something like "…and he's an Everton [British football/soccer team] supporter so…" Is that what you meant? But I don't think we see sarcastic interjections as disruptive in the same way, so your intuition still holds true. Food for thought, I'll keep an ear out for it in future.
"Obama's appointee to Great Britain, Louis Susman, speaks fluent English." I'd say this was dry wit if he does indeed speak fluent (Br)English and sarcasm if he employs a Bush-esque mangling of the mother tongue. So it depends on the writer's personal opinion of Susman really.
Joel: To my knowledge 'Napoleon Dynamite' was hugely popular in the UK and 'Eagle and Shark' has made a reasonable showing on DVD. Would probably describe them as 'offbeat' more than ironic, but that's probably just me.
Coal Porter: That is partly what I was trying to say. Sincerity as a national trait.
Lynne: That surprises me, I would have thought teasing (and taking the piss) was more British than 'USan.' My friends and I certainly do it to each other and at work (in all my many walks of employment) I know we always do it to new people.
As an end note, I would have to take exception to the Wikipedia {spits on ground} definition of *Taking the Piss* which misses entirely the jocularity often intended and other applications of the phrase. It's probably the subject of an entirely new post but… if a BrE speaker were to make a joke about another person, who then took umbrage at the comment, the Brit might defend themselves by saying "Alright, I was only taking the piss." Conversely, if you're being messed about, say by a plumber who keeps turning up late, increasing his quotes etc, you might tell a friend "He's just taking the piss now." Not entirely relevant but I felt the need to mention it.Rather than being an entirely BrE/AmE issue, I think the (UK) family I married into just has more sensitive souls than the (US) one I was born into.
In other words, we make lots of generali{s/z}ations on this blog, and if they're good generali{s/z}ations, they work in general, but not always in specific!- Martin09 June, 2009 05:41
Solo: That wasn't quite what I had in mind. I'm thinking of cases in which the setup for the joke is so clear that the humor comes from the absence of the expected punchline, possibly replaced by something "straight."
I actually just watched an old Simpsons* episode where this style of humor was used nicely. Near the beginning of the episode, cut to Bart on the phone with Principal Skinner. Skinner: "Well, as a matter of fact, my refrigerator *wasn't* running. You've spared me quite a bit of spoilage. Thank you, anonymous young man."
The humor comes not from the traditional form but from the subversion of it. I never saw British people enjoy this kind of joke, which is why I started to think that they appreciate the traditional forms more. But maybe I'm not thinking about this the right way.
* It's a separate theory of mine, equally unsubstantiated, that The Simpsons changed the American sense of humor. Comedy before the Simpsons feels in a way foreign to me, and I have to fight against my natural responses to find it funny. The ironic humour in the premise of Hot Fuzz is pretty obvious, but the film isn't just the premise. It has jokes in it too. And lots of pop culture references. And funny characters. And so on. Obviously not to everybody's taste, but that's humour for you.
I liked it, but not as much as Shaun of the Dead, because I'm a big zombie movie fan, whereas I can take or leave buddy cop movies.
And I'd also concur that Napoleon Dynamite was very successful over here, at least among the same sort of crowd that liked it in the US. It's one of my favourite movies of recent years.- Anonymous07 July, 2009 23:49
As far as "I could care less" goes, I think I've heard it used in a sarcastic tone, but most people do not and are generally unaware that it isn't grammatically correct. I always say "I couldn't care less," and I hear it said that way quite a bit (perhaps this is because I live in the Northeast. If it means anything, we use the "Great Lakes" dialect here in central New York State).
Interestingly, my father tends to say "I could care!" (not with sarcasm, but usually anger/frustration) as a short form of the phrase when someone is whining to him about something. It's pretty effective. I didn't read all of the other comments because I couldn't differentiate between those being intentionally sarcastic and those being unintentionally dull.
I think saying "in America, there is a time and place for sarcasm" is spot on. I'm sarcastic, but I dated a girl who was always sarcastic and it drove me mad. Introductions to my family and coworkers were always awkward because they had just met her and saw her humor as disrespectful and out of line.
Also, sarcasm can be quite insensitive or inflammatory when used at inappropriate times. One of my exes and I had just got a dog and for some reason this dog's ears were extremely sensitive to contact. My ex's roommate had invited over a male guest whom I had never met before and as he was playing with the dog, I heard her (the dog) scream in agony. I told him to be careful around her (the dog's) ears. He responded (sarcastically) "I'll make sure to pull them real hard then".
I didn't laugh. I thought he was an asshole. Had he been a close friend of mine, perhaps I would have appreciated his joke, but in this context he was simply obnoxious. Maybe I'm too sensitive, but I don't sarcastically rib relative strangers.- Robbie11 September, 2009 13:29
Re: setting up a gag and omitting or subverting the punchline. I thought Monty Python were the first to do this as a regular type of humour. The Flying Circus programmes are full of unfinished jokes and sketches, the most famous being the dead parrot sketch.
I seem to recall this drew negative reactions from the more traditional crowd, so presumably it wasn't recognised at the time (1960s) as being a "proper" form of comedy. - Anonymous07 December, 2011 00:23
piThe English are a very moody, passive aggressive bunch based on my experiences with the same. My friend bores easily and thinks nothing of making offhand remarks full of ridicule, contempt and meanness. To and fro's with him become a competition and honestly I think the vast swaths of water from the Atlantic separate us in many ways. Americans are taught that if we shoot our mouths off too much we'll get our clocks cleaned...the English don't seem to care if they're offensive because it's second nature to them. Find the Scots and Irish to be much more direct and but the English have an insidious, spiteful side to them that belies their inflated sense of themselves.
ReplyDelete My experience, on the contrary, is that the English are very reluctant to critici{s/z}e anyone directly. But there's plenty of individual variation on both sides of the Atlantic. As well as lots of stereotyping!
ReplyDeleteBeing late to the game and off topic, I probably should be refraining from commenting, especially as my comments won't pertain to the subject of this post (BrE v AmE), but I found the discussion in the comments about USans and Americans and English and Scottish and British quite (AmE) interesting.
Having traveled in Latin America I know that Spanish does have a PC term for citizens of the United States that flows rather more easily off the tongue than USan, namely "estadounidense," and perhaps that term exists because the Spanish-speaking Latin Americans feel themselves to be as American as the estadounidense.
But having lived in Germany I know that when Germans say Amerikaner they generally mean a citizen of the United States. Yes, German too does have a PC term for US citizens, US-Amerikaner, but really Germans don't use it as much as they do just Amerikaner.
And a Scotsman surely knows it's a lost cause to try to get the US Americans to stop claiming the general term American for the US when he can't even convince his fellow Scots (or Britons or UKers) to stop using the term American to apply only to the United States.
Lastly I've noticed that our host here, perhaps because she herself is American, uses the tag AmE, and not USE. That could be because she's not worried about offending non-US Americans, or it could instead be because of the general awkwardness in English of referring to US American people and things without appropriating the term American. USE doesn't work at all as well as AmE because it's all capitals and US-AmE is not as easy to type as BrE, and really no one thinks she's talking about English as spoken in all of North and South America when she says AmE, right?
Sorry for being a naughty (US-)American and fanning the flames.David Lauri
Posting arguments in a thread headed 'sarcasm and irony' doesn't exactly invite us to take you seriously. But if you are serious, there's a very practical answer. There's a great body of observed date under the headings AmE and BrE. It's easier to check perceptions against impressions than, say, comparisons between Canadian and US English or the English of England and Wales. OK, such comparisons are not impossible, but they are not the focus of interest of Lynne's blog. Not are they excluded, of course,
Nobody in Britain uses American to refer to the two continents of North and South America unless it's totally clear from the context. I presume the same is true for people in the US. If we want a noun, we say 'the Americas'.
We do quite often use American to refer to the English language culture of North America — the US and Canada. I see no harm. If ever the US-Canada differences are relevant, it's perfectly easy and natural to speak of them in natural everyday English terms.
A great many of us in Britain are intrigued by the variety of English we hear in North American media. Enough are us are interested enough to follow Lynne's blog. It's perhaps surprising that a large number of people who describe themselves as 'American' are similarly interested in British English.
Only rarely is some unique feature of Canadian English of particular interest. The English of South America is not even a concept.
You may not have read the blog much. Read a bit more and you'll see that within the groups of self-proclaimed 'British' and self-proclaimed 'American' there's interest in relating individual experience to the two alleged norms. BrE and AmE are constantly being redefined.
I think it's about identity. We want to belong and yet have individual differences. We want to belong to the world of English-speakers and retain individuality for the two main branches (and, of course for Australian English etc.) But we also value the differences which mark out groups by region and/or by generation within each branch. They mean we belong to something small as well as something big. We are not alone.
Those with an objective interest in BrE/AmE differences can go to the reference works. Here on Lynne's blog the questions are Where do I belong? Who are my sisters and brothers?'David Crosbie:
I wouldn't invite you to take me too seriously. I try not to take myself too seriously. Life's not much fun if it's too serious.
But seriously, it's not as if I chose a post here at random to comment on denonyms. Rather I commented on this post only having read all the comments on this post about what people living in the United States and in Scotland and England and Britain and the UK should be called, triggered in part by the post's author's use of the term "USan" (a term that our host suggested her guest writer use in this post to avoid the inclusion of other Americans, specifically Canadians, that using the more generally used term American might have implied), so my commenting here, albeit late, wasn't completely off target.
Incidentally someone who did take denonyms overly seriously might argue that AmE could cover English in Guyana, where it is an official language, but I wasn't seriously suggesting that our host should not use AmE to mean English in the United States. I was poking a wee bit of fun at the seriousness of the comments about whether American could be used to mean US-American. Sorry for having taken a piss at anyone's expense (if that's the proper way to use that BrE phrase).I would think it is more about tone. When Americans are being sarcastic, we tend to overtone it so that the other person will understand (hopefully) that we are being sarcastic, not mean/rude. We do not want to offend people or hurt their feelings. We want them to know it is a joke, not how we truly think or feel
ReplyDeleteOh my goodness! Why so much hostility to US Americans calling ourselves Americans?
What are we supposed to call ourselves(in your opinion)?
In the USA, we are taught in School that we are Americans, People in Canada are Canadians, People in Mexico are Mexicans.
We do not have a separate term for it because The Name of our Country is not the United States, but The United States of America.ok you made all this sound like if you British people where superior than americans in any way.Oud sarcasm may be different but it doesnt mean you are better or less im so fucking tired of you british people saying you are better at everything get over you trauma of inferiority and stopd trying to make everyone think you are better when in your insides you feel inferior
ReplyDelete- Anonymous08 November, 2013 09:44
I'm afraid as soon as I see phrases like: 'over-inflated national pride'
or 'because in our arrogance we Brits don't expect sarcasm'
then I can't really take the rest of the article seriously without feeling there is an agenda going on somewhere. Some good points made but without neutrality one could believe that points will be made to back up the authors view rather than be a true study. Massachusetts-
from anonymous
This almost always earns me an "I was being sarcastic." To which I usually have to say, "Yeah, I know. I was too."
I too tend to riff on someone's sarcasm, but if they stop to explain their sarcasm I'd be heavily tempted to respond "Were you? I hadn't noticed."
While I do define sarcasm in the more narrow dare I say true to source AmE sense, That form of sarcasm is more often insulting than funny.
I much prefer the dry understated wit that, while found on both sides of the Atlantic seems more treasured on the right.
I especially like making a game out of using just the right tone, emphasis and phrasing that what I say is both true and understandable if taken either literally or metaphorically, but is only fully true and understood if taken on both levels.
Americans will sometimes overstate their sarcasm in a vain attempt at making it idiot proof, but other times they might take part in some plausible deniability. My favorite form of sarcasm is when not even the speaker themself is sure whether or to what degree they are serious. That presents the ideal form of ambiguity that even the best puns fail to achieve.
I also get a jolt of amusement from subject object reversal playing on stock phrases and cliches.
Some of the least funny comedians from my perspective are those who think shock humor is nothing more than calling someone an !$#$^^&% ##^%#@.
P.S. While further comments revealed that Maggie was in fact conflating England and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (et al),
It was also possible in the context of her post that she incorrectly thought that England Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland each had direct membership in the EU.
P.P.S. one source of confusion for Americans regarding the country of the United kingdom and the countries of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland is that all 5 entities are considered countries. The USA is one country of many states. The concept of a country being part of another country is challenging.
I wonder how denizens of " Papua New Guinea, East Timor* and portions of Indonesia"(Wikipedia)
feel about being Australians?(i.o.w. Do they consider themselves to be Australian as Brazilians et al consider themselves (South) American?)You know, it's hardly as though ''cause' is exclusive to AmE, and in any case some people pronounce it rhyming with 'claws'.
ReplyDeleteIt is absolutely NOT the case that Americans don't understand irony, we just tend to use that word differently. What Brits commonly refer to as irony, to most Americans is simply flat-out sarcasm. And in that, there are many instances an American would not find it socially acceptable to use sarcasm (as in a business meeting perhaps) so when it is used, the hearer might be caught off guard and look for genuine meaning, causing the Brits to employ their usual assumption that Americans are just too dumb to get it.
Americans more often reserve use of the term irony in reference to historical, dramatic, or situational irony. Passing, casual, verbal sarcasm (which many Americans, depending on class, region, etc would use at length) would almost never be referred to as irony.
BTW, American living in London here....having giving quite a lot of thought and analysis to this question. As one with a fairly sarcastic sense of humor, I have even been caught of guard by the use of sarcasm in situations I would never expect, and accused of 'not getting it.'As an American in the Midwest, I find that in my area sarcasm tends to be more caustic and immediate. Irony tends to be more deliberated and thoughtful.
That is to say that while sarcasm is blunt and in-your-face irony tends to be noticed more on reflection.
We yanks definitely understand and appreciate both. (at least those of us with a multi-digit i.q. What so many of my countrymen miss is satire, but that is another topic altogether.


text:
How do I register a Sony product?
Please click on the links below to register your product in your locale.
- Australia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- Malaysia
- Indonesia
- Thailand (ไทย)
- Vietnam (Việt Nam)
- India
- Taiwan (台灣)
- South Korea (한국)
- Hong Kong
- Online product registration is not available for all countries in Asia.
- You will need to create an account before you can register your product.
The model name and serial number is required for registration. Learn more on how to identify this information. - For all other countries, please check with your friendly Sony local support team.


text:
Gatsby Summer Afternoon (a.k.a. heaven)
I don't think I need to tell you that The Gatsby Summer Afternoon was fabulous. But just in case:
It was fabulous.
The morning of, Julie and I prepared a picnic lunch, then headed over to the estate with her friend Dave. When we got to the parking lot and dressed up picnic goers were getting out of the car I got giddy, but it was just a little taste of what the afternoon would hold. Groups of people had set up anything from picnic blankets and baskets, to tents with tables and oriental rugs. There were art deco automobiles parked on the edges of the lawn, and a dance floor and live band in the middle of it all.
Seeing so much 20s and 30s attire in one place was amazing, with every turn Julie and I couldn't help but stare at the detail and drape of many a ladies frock.
One of the greatest things about it was that most of the attendants were people just like me, who dress in vintage every day. I met some amazing people, and even a couple gals who read Vixen Vintage!
I am counting down the days until next years picnic, we've already started planning something crazy elaborate! I think every weekend should be a Gatsby weekend.
You can see ALL the photos I took in a special Flickr account I created for this picnic and ones in the future! Click here
Dress-Gift from Twila Jean
Hat-Estate Sale
Purse-Urban Eccentric Vintage
56 comments:
- Miss Tami Lee said...
Aaah that looks so much fun! I *love* the dude in the Stanford get-up
- September 14, 2010 at 11:33 PM
- disco said...
- September 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM
- Vivi.Deluxxxe said...
looks like a whole lot of fun!
hey... were you at the Forbidden Island tiki lounge later that evening?? I swore I saw you there... - September 14, 2010 at 11:44 PM
- B-b-b-etty said...
Oh! it sure does looks like heaven! I whish someone could arrange something similar here in Stockholm
- September 14, 2010 at 11:50 PM
- Unknown said...
Vivi, we all were! It had just all sort of died down by then, you should have come said hello!
- September 14, 2010 at 11:52 PM
- Candace Lynn Grubbs said...
you look so cute! i wish i lived in CA so i could go to that! i love meeting people that share my love for vintage!
- September 15, 2010 at 12:02 AM
You look absolutely exquisite, and the event looks unbelievable! I've been looking forward to this post for a while, and boy did it meet my expectations!
- September 15, 2010 at 12:09 AM
- Bite The Beat said...
I think I felt my heart skip a beat! The wonderfulness of it all!
You simply look divine-- everyone does, really!
♥♥ - September 15, 2010 at 12:09 AM
- Svenja said...
This really looks fabulous and you outfit is very lovely!
- September 15, 2010 at 12:14 AM
- Brittney said...
Your photos are beautiful and it looks like you had a wonderful day! :)
- September 15, 2010 at 12:19 AM
- Lexie said...
I am so extremely jealous. That looks amazing and like a ton of fun. Im glad you enjoyed yourself!
- September 15, 2010 at 12:25 AM
- B Sees said...
Fabulous is right. Gosh, thanks a million for sharing your day and pictures. The ones on Flicker are beautiful. Just what I needed to help shake off this Australian winter. Glorious.
- September 15, 2010 at 12:58 AM
- the exhausted etiquette (kirstine) said...
too cute. I really wish I could go to something like this. it really is a dream com true!!
kirstine - September 15, 2010 at 12:59 AM
- Chhan said...
I whish someone would arrange something like that here in Denmark!!
Looks absolutely wonderful!!
I love vintage :D - September 15, 2010 at 1:49 AM
- Tatieva said...
Wouah, mais c'est incroyable !
Tout est luxe, calme et volupté... Un moment hors du temps et vous étes tous trés beaux ! Ca donne envie de mettre son petit bibi et d'organiser un grand pique-nique !
Merci pour ces belles images...
Tatieva, artiste vintage - September 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM
- Ally said...
O hhhh myyyyy... it looks amazing, the whole day!!!! would have loved to have been there...
- September 15, 2010 at 4:46 AM
- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa said...
This looks amazing! There was recently a vintage festival in England and I was so sad to miss it :(
xoxo. - September 15, 2010 at 5:02 AM
- Erica! said...
oh wow!! this looks amazing!! i'm a wee bit jealous!! thanks for the pictures.
- September 15, 2010 at 5:37 AM
- Casey said...
Oh wow!!! It looks like you had an amazing afternoon--what a treat to be able to attend something like this! I especially adore your dress--it's so sweet. :)
Weird question, but one I've been meaning to ask you: where do you purchase your ankle socks? I've been wanting to find some thin ones to wear with some of my pumps and such. So I was wondering if you had any tips on sources?
♥ Casey
blog | elegantmusings.com - September 15, 2010 at 6:02 AM
- Aimee Marieee said...
So many great photos! Really was a perfect day!!
- September 15, 2010 at 6:24 AM
- BaronessVonVintage said...
really glad you had a lovely time! Also glad to see that the codes of dress were not as strict as made out to be on their website (i.e. silly rules that ladies must wear stockings, etc).
- September 15, 2010 at 6:42 AM
- Dakota said...
Wow, I'm jealous!! Going to a Gatsby picnic is like, my dream! It looks like you had so much fun; your dress is incredibly lovely, of course.
Thanks for sharing so I can live vicariously through you : ) The whole event looks so authentic and beautiful! - September 15, 2010 at 7:05 AM
- Q's Daydream said...
Oh my goodness! There are no words.
- September 15, 2010 at 7:10 AM
- Victoria / Justice Pirate said...
I loev the floral design
- September 15, 2010 at 7:34 AM
wow! I sure am glad you got to use your camera!
- September 15, 2010 at 7:43 AM
- Rebecca Jean said...
Gah! I'm in heaven just looking at your photos. Beautiful!
♥ Rebecca Jean
Midnight Maniac - September 15, 2010 at 7:56 AM
- Belle de Ville said...
Your event looks like so much fun. I love the fact that everyone went all out to get into Gatsby style.
- September 15, 2010 at 7:56 AM
- archives vintage said...
wow - so, so jealous! looks like a dream come true!!!
- September 15, 2010 at 8:19 AM
- Zohar said...
Oh my goodness that looks amazing! Heaven indeed, I am so jealous :) Looks like you girls are having the best time.
- September 15, 2010 at 8:21 AM
- MrJeffery said...
wow o wow, everyone looks so great! looks like fun.
- September 15, 2010 at 8:56 AM
- cb said...
this looks amazing! you look amazing!
cb - September 15, 2010 at 9:33 AM
- Cassandra said...
Heaven is right! I just about died of excitement and joy looking at your pictures. Oh, how I wish I was there! Next year I will go for sure! Your post has already convinced me of that. :)
I'm glad you had fun! I'm sure it was definitely an event to remember! You looked fabulous, as always. - September 15, 2010 at 9:35 AM
so fun and incredible!!! ^.^
- September 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM
So happy you had fun-and you came to SF when it was beautiful outside!! I didn't go this year, would have loved to have met you.
- September 15, 2010 at 10:17 AM
- mary van note said...
wow looks like a beautiful time. I'm glad to see these photos because I thought that it was strictly 20s attire only. I like seeing people rocking the 30s there. Makes me feel like I could manage to go next year.
- September 15, 2010 at 10:44 AM
- Emma said...
This looks amazing Solanah, you look like you're in your element! I wish there was more things like this!
- September 15, 2010 at 11:11 AM
- Hannah Becca said...
What a magical day! Solanah, the dress you wore is darling!
- September 15, 2010 at 12:21 PM
- JGO said...
Oh...I wish I could go there. You look so beautiful...as always.
Jacqueline - September 15, 2010 at 1:02 PM
- Stevie said...
Gosh I wish I could've been there! looks lovely! Beautiful costumes, Adore your gloves!
- September 15, 2010 at 2:04 PM
- Antonia Glavic said...
Wow. Everybody looks immaculate! I love the menswear, it's not often that you see such well dressed men! There needs to be more events like this, I don't think we have any in Australia.
http://www.antoniaglavic.blogspot.com/ - September 15, 2010 at 3:34 PM
- Kitty said...
I was on pins and needles waiting to see how it went. Then I noticed that a young man that I used to babysit was in one of the photo's. It made my whole day.
You look beautiful and I'm so happy you had an amazing time.
Fritzi Marie - September 15, 2010 at 8:02 PM
- Brooksie said...
- September 15, 2010 at 8:38 PM
- Linoleum Rose said...
Ooh, this looks like so much fun! And you look lovely as usual.
- September 16, 2010 at 2:21 AM
- Charlotte said...
*Sigh* too gorgeous! It must have been just amazing.
xx Charlotte
Tuppence Ha'penny Vintage - September 16, 2010 at 2:34 AM
- Natalie said...
Oh my! Everything looks amazing, and you look like a dream.
So very jealous! - September 16, 2010 at 5:17 AM
- Olivia said...
Looks like so much fun!! I hope I can go someday...And I love your gloves, where can I get some?!
- September 16, 2010 at 4:26 PM
- Unknown said...
In the group picture, I love the women in the green hat- she has style, really takes me back- almost like looking at a picture from back then!
- September 16, 2010 at 9:57 PM
- Watkins35 said...
wow, you look fabulous (as ever), wish we had Gatsby over here too, looks soooo much fun. x
- September 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM
- Rosa and Carlotta: Illustrated-Moodboard said...
love the pictures!!
check out my fashion illustrations at http://www.illustrated-moodboard.com/ :) - September 18, 2010 at 5:46 AM
- Maria Confer said...
Wow! Everyone looked incredible and you looked stunning.
I wish everyone dressed like this always.
Lulu Letty - September 21, 2010 at 5:40 PM
- WeAreWere said...
Whoa. Is that the house from Phantasm? Where you right by a cemetery?
- September 21, 2010 at 5:55 PM
- EvaDress said...
I've not been to the Gatsby in six years. I very much look forawrd to returning next year and I hope to bump into you!
- September 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM
- marmaladie said...
I was pleasantly surprised to see pictures of Chinese paper lanterns hanging around! Must be to celebrate the Chinese Lantern Festival as well, and I can't think of a better way to do it. ;) I love every one of your pictures; there's always something wonderful to see! ^^
- October 2, 2010 at 12:22 AM
- Mrs. Leyhew said...
I feel like you and I would be best friends if we knew each other....you are like my fashion/lifestyle twin!
- January 9, 2011 at 6:44 PM
- ladyseyta said...
WTF! How did I miss you there? Duchess was there, representin' too!
Seyta - October 16, 2011 at 11:33 PM
- Solanah said...
This was last year, I didn't get to go this year :( Would have loved to hang out with you too!
- October 16, 2011 at 11:37 PM


text:
A maximum of characters (including spaces) may be used. The system will not allow you to use more than this.
Your custom lettering will be placed centrally so please bare that in mind.
Optimus Princeps is an uppercase font, both it's lowercase and uppercase characters are uppercase the only difference being it's uppercase characters are larger.
When choosing your text colour, please consider how well your lettering will display against the colour of the item. For example a gold or silver on black will contrast well and show up clearly but a gold on gold will not display well at all.
If you have any further questions or special requests, please don't hesitate to get in touch.
Click here to go back...
Please check and confirm that you are happy with your finished text...


text:
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) _ Police are scratching their heads trying to work out who donated a human skull to a thrift store in Austin, Texas.
Homicide Detective Derek Israel said Wednesday that foul play is not suspected and that he just wants to know how the adult skull came to be left at the Goodwill store.
Goodwill store staff discovered the skull while sifting through donations on July 16. A spokeswoman says it could have been gifted up to a week prior to its discovery.
No other details about it have been released.
This is at least the fourth skull to be donated to the international nonprofit this summer. Three were donated in July to a Goodwill store in Bellevue, Washington.


text:
Make some noise and promote your brand with our custom printed noise makers and cheering items! One of the most popular giveaway items we offer is our custom promotional noise makers. Personalized noise makers and cheering products are fantastic for a variety of special occasions, from sporting events to holiday parties. People who love football games will really enjoy rooting for their team in a noisy and amusing way. Everyone in the stands won't miss seeing your corporate logo and name on your customized promotional noise makers and cheering items, which means tons of exposure for your organization. For a party, your logo imprinted noise makers will get the party popping, and everyone will be dancing in no time!
Here at IASpromotes.com, our amazing selection of custom promotional noise makers and cheering items can be imprinted with your business name and logo. You can choose a promotional noise maker to hand out at trade shows, or personalize them to make great party favors for both kids and adults!


text:
The Rogue brand is synonymous with quality, over-built power racks, rigs, and squat stands. Whether you're equipping a garage gym, collegiate weight room, or professional strength and conditioning center, Rogue can deliver virtually anything a training facility requires—no matter the size or budget. As the leading manufacturer of functional fitness equipment and official provider for the Reebok CrossFit Games, we've developed our own unique lines of rigs, racks, and squat stands, giving the customer a broad range of features to choose from. Rogue's S-Series Squat Stands, R-Series Power Racks, and heavy-duty Monster Lite lines have earned the trust of competitive strongmen and accomplished athletes across the globe, and we're happy to make this same equipment available to everyone at a reasonable price.
Beyond racks and rigs, Rogue offers many other products essential to a complete strength training program, including utility benches, speed sleds, GHDs, storage accessories, and everything in between. Browse out strength equipment catalog above or contact us directly to get started.