text:
SECTION VII. Critique of all Theology based upon Speculative
Principles of Reason
If by the term theology I understand the cognition of a primal being
That cognition is based either upon reason alone (theologia rationalis)
Or upon revelation (theologia revelata). The former cogitates its
Object either by means of pure transcendental conceptions, as an ens
Originarium, realissimum, ens entium, and is termed transcendental
Theology; or, by means of a conception derived from the nature of our
Own mind, as a supreme intelligence, and must then be entitled natural
Theology. The person who believes in a transcendental theology alone
Is termed a deist; he who acknowledges the possibility of a natural
Theology also, a theist. The former admits that we can cognize by pure
Reason alone the existence of a Supreme Being, but at the same time
Maintains that our conception of this being is purely transcendental
And that all we can say of it is that it possesses all reality, without
Being able to define it more closely. The second asserts that reason
Is capable of presenting us, from the analogy with nature, with a more
Definite conception of this being, and that its operations, as the cause
Of all things, are the results of intelligence and free will. The former
Regards the Supreme Being as the cause of the world--whether by the
Necessity of his nature, or as a free agent, is left undetermined; the
Latter considers this being as the author of the world
Transcendental theology aims either at inferring the existence of a
Supreme Being from a general experience, without any closer reference
To the world to which this experience belongs, and in this case it is
Called cosmotheology; or it endeavours to cognize the existence of such
A being, through mere conceptions, without the aid of experience, and is
Then termed ontotheology
Natural theology infers the attributes and the existence of an author of
The world, from the constitution of, the order and unity observable
In, the world, in which two modes of causality must be admitted to
Exist--those of nature and freedom. Thus it rises from this world to a
Supreme intelligence, either as the principle of all natural, or of
All moral order and perfection. In the former case it is termed
Physico-theology, in the latter, ethical or moral-theology
As we are won't to understand by the term God not merely an eternal
Nature, the operations of which are insensate and blind, but a Supreme
Being, who is the free and intelligent author of all things, and as it
Is this latter view alone that can be of interest to humanity, we might
In strict rigour, deny to the deist any belief in God at all, and
Regard him merely as a maintainer of the existence of a primal being or
Thing--the supreme cause of all other things. But, as no one ought to be
Blamed, merely because he does not feel himself justified in maintaining
A certain opinion, as if he altogether denied its truth and asserted
The opposite, it is more correct--as it is less harsh--to say, the deist
Believes in a God, the theist in a living God (summa intelligentia). We
Shall now proceed to investigate the sources of all these attempts of
Reason to establish the existence of a Supreme Being
It may be sufficient in this place to define theoretical knowledge or
Cognition as knowledge of that which is, and practical knowledge as
Knowledge of that which ought to be. In this view, the theoretical
Employment of reason is that by which I cognize a priori (as necessary)
That something is, while the practical is that by which I cognize a
Priori what ought to happen. Now, if it is an indubitably certain
Though at the same time an entirely conditioned truth, that something
Is, or ought to happen, either a certain determinate condition of this
Truth is absolutely necessary, or such a condition may be arbitrarily
Presupposed. In the former case the condition is postulated (per
Thesin), in the latter supposed (per hypothesin). There are certain
Practical laws--those of morality--which are absolutely necessary. Now
If these laws necessarily presuppose the existence of some being, as the
Condition of the possibility of their obligatory power, this being must
Be postulated, because the conditioned, from which we reason to this
Determinate condition, is itself cognized a priori as absolutely
Necessary. We shall at some future time show that the moral laws
Not merely presuppose the existence of a Supreme Being, but also, as
Themselves absolutely necessary in a different relation, demand
Or postulate it--although only from a practical point of view. The
Discussion of this argument we postpone for the present
When the question relates merely to that which is, not to that which
Ought to be, the conditioned which is presented in experience is
Always cogitated as contingent. For this reason its condition cannot be
Regarded as absolutely necessary, but merely as relatively necessary
Or rather as needful; the condition is in itself and a priori a mere
Arbitrary presupposition in aid of the cognition, by reason, of the
Conditioned. If, then, we are to possess a theoretical cognition of
The absolute necessity of a thing, we cannot attain to this cognition
Otherwise than a priori by means of conceptions; while it is impossible
In this way to cognize the existence of a cause which bears any relation
To an existence given in experience
Theoretical cognition is speculative when it relates to an object
Or certain conceptions of an object which is not given and cannot be
Discovered by means of experience. It is opposed to the cognition of
Nature, which concerns only those objects or predicates which can be
Presented in a possible experience
The principle that everything which happens (the empirically contingent)
Must have a cause, is a principle of the cognition of nature, but not of
Speculative cognition. For, if we change it into an abstract principle
And deprive it of its reference to experience and the empirical, we
Shall find that it cannot with justice be regarded any longer as a
Synthetical proposition, and that it is impossible to discover any
Mode of transition from that which exists to something entirely
Different--termed cause. Nay, more, the conception of a cause likewise
That of the contingent--loses, in this speculative mode of employing
It, all significance, for its objective reality and meaning are
Comprehensible from experience alone
When from the existence of the universe and the things in it the
Existence of a cause of the universe is inferred, reason is proceeding
Not in the natural, but in the speculative method. For the principle of
The former enounces, not that things themselves or substances, but only
That which happens or their states--as empirically contingent, have
A cause: the assertion that the existence of substance itself is
Contingent is not justified by experience, it is the assertion of a
Reason employing its principles in a speculative manner. If, again, I
Infer from the form of the universe, from the way in which all things
Are connected and act and react upon each other, the existence of
A cause entirely distinct from the universe--this would again be a
Judgement of purely speculative reason; because the object in this
Case--the cause--can never be an object of possible experience. In both
These cases the principle of causality, which is valid only in the field
Of experience--useless and even meaningless beyond this region, would be
Diverted from its proper destination
Now I maintain that all attempts of reason to establish a theology
By the aid of speculation alone are fruitless, that the principles of
Reason as applied to nature do not conduct us to any theological truths
And, consequently, that a rational theology can have no existence
Unless it is founded upon the laws of morality. For all synthetical
Principles of the understanding are valid only as immanent in
Experience; while the cognition of a Supreme Being necessitates their
Being employed transcendentally, and of this the understanding is quite
Incapable. If the empirical law of causality is to conduct us to
A Supreme Being, this being must belong to the chain of empirical
Objects--in which case it would be, like all phenomena, itself
Conditioned. If the possibility of passing the limits of experience be
Admitted, by means of the dynamical law of the relation of an effect to
Its cause, what kind of conception shall we obtain by this procedure?
Certainly not the conception of a Supreme Being, because experience
Never presents us with the greatest of all possible effects, and it is
Only an effect of this character that could witness to the existence
Of a corresponding cause. If, for the purpose of fully satisfying the
Requirements of Reason, we recognize her right to assert the existence
Of a perfect and absolutely necessary being, this can be admitted
Only from favour, and cannot be regarded as the result or irresistible
Demonstration. The physico-theological proof may add weight to
Others--if other proofs there are--by connecting speculation with
Experience; but in itself it rather prepares the mind for theological
Cognition, and gives it a right and natural direction, than establishes
A sure foundation for theology
It is now perfectly evident that transcendental questions admit only
Of transcendental answers--those presented a priori by pure conceptions
Without the least empirical admixture. But the question in the present
Case is evidently synthetical--it aims at the extension of our cognition
Beyond the bounds of experience--it requires an assurance respecting the
Existence of a being corresponding with the idea in our minds, to which
No experience can ever be adequate. Now it has been abundantly proved
That all a priori synthetical cognition is possible only as the
Expression of the formal conditions of a possible experience; and that
The validity of all principles depends upon their immanence in the field
Of experience, that is, their relation to objects of empirical cognition
Or phenomena. Thus all transcendental procedure in reference to
Speculative theology is without result
If any one prefers doubting the conclusiveness of the proofs of our
Analytic to losing the persuasion of the validity of these old and
Time honoured arguments, he at least cannot decline answering the
Question--how he can pass the limits of all possible experience by the
Help of mere ideas. If he talks of new arguments, or of improvements
Upon old arguments, I request him to spare me. There is certainly no
Great choice in this sphere of discussion, as all speculative arguments
Must at last look for support to the ontological, and I have, therefore
Very little to fear from the argumentative fecundity of the dogmatical
Defenders of a non-sensuous reason. Without looking upon myself as a
Remarkably combative person, I shall not decline the challenge to detect
The fallacy and destroy the pretensions of every attempt of speculative
Theology. And yet the hope of better fortune never deserts those who
Are accustomed to the dogmatical mode of procedure. I shall, therefore
Restrict myself to the simple and equitable demand that such reasoners
Will demonstrate, from the nature of the human mind as well as from that
Of the other sources of knowledge, how we are to proceed to extend
Our cognition completely a priori, and to carry it to that point where
Experience abandons us, and no means exist of guaranteeing the objective
Reality of our conceptions. In whatever way the understanding may have
Attained to a conception, the existence of the object of the conception
Cannot be discovered in it by analysis, because the cognition of the
Existence of the object depends upon the object's being posited and
Given in itself apart from the conception. But it is utterly impossible
To go beyond our conception, without the aid of experience--which
Presents to the mind nothing but phenomena, or to attain by the help
Of mere conceptions to a conviction of the existence of new kinds of
Objects or supernatural beings
But although pure speculative reason is far from sufficient to
Demonstrate the existence of a Supreme Being, it is of the highest
Utility in correcting our conception of this being--on the supposition
That we can attain to the cognition of it by some other means--in making
It consistent with itself and with all other conceptions of intelligible
Objects, clearing it from all that is incompatible with the conception
Of an ens summun, and eliminating from it all limitations or admixtures
Of empirical elements
Transcendental theology is still therefore, notwithstanding its
Objective insufficiency, of importance in a negative respect; it is
Useful as a test of the procedure of reason when engaged with pure
Ideas, no other than a transcendental standard being in this case
Admissible. For if, from a practical point of view, the hypothesis of
A Supreme and All-sufficient Being is to maintain its validity without
Opposition, it must be of the highest importance to define this
Conception in a correct and rigorous manner--as the transcendental
Conception of a necessary being, to eliminate all phenomenal elements
(anthropomorphism in its most extended signification), and at the
Same time to overflow all contradictory assertions--be they atheistic
Deistic, or anthropomorphic. This is of course very easy; as the same
Arguments which demonstrated the inability of human reason to affirm
The existence of a Supreme Being must be alike sufficient to prove the
Invalidity of its denial. For it is impossible to gain from the pure
Speculation of reason demonstration that there exists no Supreme Being
As the ground of all that exists, or that this being possesses none
Of those properties which we regard as analogical with the dynamical
Qualities of a thinking being, or that, as the anthropomorphists would
Have us believe, it is subject to all the limitations which sensibility
Imposes upon those intelligences which exist in the world of experience
A Supreme Being is, therefore, for the speculative reason, a mere ideal
Though a faultless one--a conception which perfects and crowns the
System of human cognition, but the objective reality of which can
Neither be proved nor disproved by pure reason. If this defect is ever
Supplied by a moral theology, the problematic transcendental theology
Which has preceded, will have been at least serviceable as demonstrating
The mental necessity existing for the conception, by the complete
Determination of it which it has furnished, and the ceaseless testing of
The conclusions of a reason often deceived by sense, and not always in
Harmony with its own ideas. The attributes of necessity, infinitude
Unity, existence apart from the world (and not as a world soul)
Eternity (free from conditions of time), omnipresence (free from
Conditions of space), omnipotence, and others, are pure transcendental
Predicates; and thus the accurate conception of a Supreme Being, which
Every theology requires, is furnished by transcendental theology alone
Of the Regulative Employment of the Ideas of Pure Reason
The result of all the dialectical attempts of pure reason not only
Confirms the truth of what we have already proved in our Transcendental
Analytic, namely, that all inferences which would lead us beyond the
Limits of experience are fallacious and groundless, but it at the same
Time teaches us this important lesson, that human reason has a natural
Inclination to overstep these limits, and that transcendental ideas
Are as much the natural property of the reason as categories are of the
Understanding. There exists this difference, however, that while the
Categories never mislead us, outward objects being always in perfect
Harmony therewith, ideas are the parents of irresistible illusions, the
Severest and most subtle criticism being required to save us from the
Fallacies which they induce
Whatever is grounded in the nature of our powers will be found to be in
Harmony with the final purpose and proper employment of these powers
When once we have discovered their true direction and aim. We are
Entitled to suppose, therefore, that there exists a mode of employing
Transcendental ideas which is proper and immanent; although, when we
Mistake their meaning, and regard them as conceptions of actual things
Their mode of application is transcendent and delusive. For it is not
The idea itself, but only the employment of the idea in relation to
Possible experience, that is transcendent or immanent. An idea is
Employed transcendently, when it is applied to an object falsely
Believed to be adequate with and to correspond to it; imminently, when
It is applied solely to the employment of the understanding in the
Sphere of experience. Thus all errors of subreptio--of misapplication
Are to be ascribed to defects of judgement, and not to understanding or
Reason never has an immediate relation to an object; it relates
Immediately to the understanding alone. It is only through the
Understanding that it can be employed in the field of experience. It
Does not form conceptions of objects, it merely arranges them and gives
To them that unity which they are capable of possessing when the sphere
Of their application has been extended as widely as possible. Reason
Avails itself of the conception of the understanding for the sole
Purpose of producing totality in the different series. This totality the
Understanding does not concern itself with; its only occupation is the
Connection of experiences, by which series of conditions in accordance
With conceptions are established. The object of reason is, therefore
The understanding and its proper destination. As the latter brings unity
Into the diversity of objects by means of its conceptions, so the former
Brings unity into the diversity of conceptions by means of ideas; as
It sets the final aim of a collective unity to the operations of the
Understanding, which without this occupies itself with a distributive
Unity alone
I accordingly maintain that transcendental ideas can never be employed
As constitutive ideas, that they cannot be conceptions of objects, and
That, when thus considered, they assume a fallacious and dialectical
Character. But, on the other hand, they are capable of an admirable and
Indispensably necessary application to objects--as regulative ideas
Directing the understanding to a certain aim, the guiding lines towards
Which all its laws follow, and in which they all meet in one point. This
Point--though a mere idea (focus imaginarius), that is, not a point from
Which the conceptions of the understanding do really proceed, for it
Lies beyond the sphere of possible experience--serves, notwithstanding
To give to these conceptions the greatest possible unity combined with
The greatest possible extension. Hence arises the natural illusion which
Induces us to believe that these lines proceed from an object which lies
Out of the sphere of empirical cognition, just as objects reflected in
A mirror appear to be behind it. But this illusion--which we may hinder
From imposing upon us--is necessary and unavoidable, if we desire to
See, not only those objects which lie before us, but those which are at
A great distance behind us; that is to say, when, in the present case
We direct the aims of the understanding, beyond every given experience
Towards an extension as great as can possibly be attained
If we review our cognitions in their entire extent, we shall find that
The peculiar business of reason is to arrange them into a system, that
Is to say, to give them connection according to a principle. This unity
Presupposes an idea--the idea of the form of a whole (of cognition)
Preceding the determinate cognition of the parts, and containing the
Conditions which determine a priori to every part its place and relation
To the other parts of the whole system. This idea, accordingly, demands
Complete unity in the cognition of the understanding--not the unity of
A contingent aggregate, but that of a system connected according to
Necessary laws. It cannot be affirmed with propriety that this idea is a
Conception of an object; it is merely a conception of the complete unity
Of the conceptions of objects, in so far as this unity is available to
The understanding as a rule. Such conceptions of reason are not derived
From nature; on the contrary, we employ them for the interrogation and
Investigation of nature, and regard our cognition as defective so long
As it is not adequate to them. We admit that such a thing as pure earth
Pure water, or pure air, is not to be discovered. And yet we require
These conceptions (which have their origin in the reason, so far as
Regards their absolute purity and completeness) for the purpose of
Determining the share which each of these natural causes has in every
Phenomenon. Thus the different kinds of matter are all referred to
Earths, as mere weight; to salts and inflammable bodies, as pure force;
And finally, to water and air, as the vehicula of the former, or the
Machines employed by them in their operations--for the purpose of
Explaining the chemical action and reaction of bodies in accordance with
The idea of a mechanism. For, although not actually so expressed, the
Influence of such ideas of reason is very observable in the procedure of
Natural philosophers
If reason is the faculty of deducing the particular from the general
And if the general be certain in se and given, it is only necessary
That the judgement should subsume the particular under the general
The particular being thus necessarily determined. I shall term this
The demonstrative or apodeictic employment of reason. If, however
The general is admitted as problematical only, and is a mere idea
The particular case is certain, but the universality of the rule which
Applies to this particular case remains a problem. Several particular
Cases, the certainty of which is beyond doubt, are then taken and
Examined, for the purpose of discovering whether the rule is applicable
To them; and if it appears that all the particular cases which can be
Collected follow from the rule, its universality is inferred, and at the
Same time, all the causes which have not, or cannot be presented to our
Observation, are concluded to be of the same character with those which
We have observed. This I shall term the hypothetical employment of the
The hypothetical exercise of reason by the aid of ideas employed as
Problematical conceptions is properly not constitutive. That is to say
If we consider the subject strictly, the truth of the rule, which has
Been employed as an hypothesis, does not follow from the use that is
Made of it by reason. For how can we know all the possible cases
That may arise? some of which may, however, prove exceptions to
The universality of the rule. This employment of reason is merely
Regulative, and its sole aim is the introduction of unity into the
Aggregate of our particular cognitions, and thereby the approximating of
The rule to universality
The object of the hypothetical employment of reason is therefore the
Systematic unity of cognitions; and this unity is the criterion of the
Truth of a rule. On the other hand, this systematic unity--as a mere
Idea--is in fact merely a unity projected, not to be regarded as given
But only in the light of a problem--a problem which serves, however, as
A principle for the various and particular exercise of the understanding
In experience, directs it with regard to those cases which are not
Presented to our observation, and introduces harmony and consistency
Into all its operations
All that we can be certain of from the above considerations is that
This systematic unity is a logical principle, whose aim is to assist the
Understanding, where it cannot of itself attain to rules, by means of
Ideas, to bring all these various rules under one principle, and thus
To ensure the most complete consistency and connection that can be
Attained. But the assertion that objects and the understanding by which
They are cognized are so constituted as to be determined to systematic
Unity, that this may be postulated a priori, without any reference
To the interest of reason, and that we are justified in declaring all
Possible cognitions--empirical and others--to possess systematic unity
And to be subject to general principles from which, notwithstanding
Their various character, they are all derivable such an assertion can
Be founded only upon a transcendental principle of reason, which would
Render this systematic unity not subjectively and logically--in its
Character of a method, but objectively necessary
We shall illustrate this by an example. The conceptions of the
Understanding make us acquainted, among many other kinds of unity
With that of the causality of a substance, which is termed power. The
Different phenomenal manifestations of the same substance appear at
First view to be so very dissimilar that we are inclined to assume
The existence of just as many different powers as there are different
Effects--as, in the case of the human mind, we have feeling
Consciousness, imagination, memory, wit, analysis, pleasure, desire
And so on. Now we are required by a logical maxim to reduce these
Differences to as small a number as possible, by comparing them and
Discovering the hidden identity which exists. We must inquire, for
Example, whether or not imagination (connected with consciousness)
Memory, wit, and analysis are not merely different forms of
Understanding and reason. The idea of a fundamental power, the existence
Of which no effort of logic can assure us of, is the problem to be
Solved, for the systematic representation of the existing variety of
Powers. The logical principle of reason requires us to produce as great
A unity as is possible in the system of our cognitions; and the more
The phenomena of this and the other power are found to be identical
The more probable does it become, that they are nothing but different
Manifestations of one and the same power, which may be called
Relatively speaking, a fundamental power. And so with other cases
These relatively fundamental powers must again be compared with
Each other, to discover, if possible, the one radical and absolutely
Fundamental power of which they are but the manifestations. But this
Unity is purely hypothetical. It is not maintained, that this unity does
Really exist, but that we must, in the interest of reason, that is
For the establishment of principles for the various rules presented by
Experience, try to discover and introduce it, so far as is practicable
Into the sphere of our cognitions
But the transcendental employment of the understanding would lead us to
Believe that this idea of a fundamental power is not problematical, but
That it possesses objective reality, and thus the systematic unity
Of the various powers or forces in a substance is demanded by the
Understanding and erected into an apodeictic or necessary principle
For, without having attempted to discover the unity of the various
Powers existing in nature, nay, even after all our attempts have failed
We notwithstanding presuppose that it does exist, and may be, sooner or
Later, discovered. And this reason does, not only, as in the case
Above adduced, with regard to the unity of substance, but where
Many substances, although all to a certain extent homogeneous, are
Discoverable, as in the case of matter in general. Here also does
Reason presuppose the existence of the systematic unity of various
Powers--inasmuch as particular laws of nature are subordinate to general
Laws; and parsimony in principles is not merely an economical principle
Of reason, but an essential law of nature
We cannot understand, in fact, how a logical principle of unity can of
Right exist, unless we presuppose a transcendental principle, by which
Such a systematic unit--as a property of objects themselves--is regarded
As necessary a priori. For with what right can reason, in its logical
Exercise, require us to regard the variety of forces which nature
Displays, as in effect a disguised unity, and to deduce them from one
Fundamental force or power, when she is free to admit that it is just
As possible that all forces should be different in kind, and that a
Systematic unity is not conformable to the design of nature? In this
View of the case, reason would be proceeding in direct opposition to her
Own destination, by setting as an aim an idea which entirely conflicts
With the procedure and arrangement of nature. Neither can we assert that
Reason has previously inferred this unity from the contingent nature
Of phenomena. For the law of reason which requires us to seek for this
Unity is a necessary law, inasmuch as without it we should not possess
A faculty of reason, nor without reason a consistent and self-accordant
Mode of employing the understanding, nor, in the absence of this, any
Proper and sufficient criterion of empirical truth. In relation to this
Criterion, therefore, we must suppose the idea of the systematic unity
Of nature to possess objective validity and necessity
We find this transcendental presupposition lurking in different forms in
The principles of philosophers, although they have neither recognized
It nor confessed to themselves its presence. That the diversities of
Individual things do not exclude identity of species, that the various
Species must be considered as merely different determinations of a
Few genera, and these again as divisions of still higher races, and
So on--that, accordingly, a certain systematic unity of all possible
Empirical conceptions, in so far as they can be deduced from higher and
More general conceptions, must be sought for, is a scholastic maxim or
Logical principle, without which reason could not be employed by us. For
We can infer the particular from the general, only in so far as general
Properties of things constitute the foundation upon which the particular
That the same unity exists in nature is presupposed by philosophers
In the well-known scholastic maxim, which forbids us unnecessarily to
Augment the number of entities or principles (entia praeter necessitatem
Non esse multiplicanda). This maxim asserts that nature herself assists
In the establishment of this unity of reason, and that the seemingly
Infinite diversity of phenomena should not deter us from the expectation
Of discovering beneath this diversity a unity of fundamental properties
Of which the aforesaid variety is but a more or less determined form
This unity, although a mere idea, thinkers have found it necessary
Rather to moderate the desire than to encourage it. It was considered
A great step when chemists were able to reduce all salts to two main
Genera--acids and alkalis; and they regard this difference as itself a
Mere variety, or different manifestation of one and the same fundamental
Material. The different kinds of earths (stones and even metals)
Chemists have endeavoured to reduce to three, and afterwards to two; but
Still, not content with this advance, they cannot but think that behind
These diversities there lurks but one genus--nay, that even salts and
Earths have a common principle. It might be conjectured that this is
Merely an economical plan of reason, for the purpose of sparing itself
Trouble, and an attempt of a purely hypothetical character, which
When successful, gives an appearance of probability to the principle of
Explanation employed by the reason. But a selfish purpose of this kind
Is easily to be distinguished from the idea, according to which every
One presupposes that this unity is in accordance with the laws of
Nature, and that reason does not in this case request, but requires
Although we are quite unable to determine the proper limits of this
If the diversity existing in phenomena--a diversity not of form (for
In this they may be similar) but of content--were so great that the
Subtlest human reason could never by comparison discover in them the
Least similarity (which is not impossible), in this case the logical law
Of genera would be without foundation, the conception of a genus, nay
All general conceptions would be impossible, and the faculty of the
Understanding, the exercise of which is restricted to the world
Of conceptions, could not exist. The logical principle of genera
Accordingly, if it is to be applied to nature (by which I mean objects
Presented to our senses), presupposes a transcendental principle. In
Accordance with this principle, homogeneity is necessarily presupposed
In the variety of phenomena (although we are unable to determine a
Priori the degree of this homogeneity), because without it no empirical
Conceptions, and consequently no experience, would be possible
The logical principle of genera, which demands identity in phenomena, is
Balanced by another principle--that of species, which requires variety
And diversity in things, notwithstanding their accordance in the same
Genus, and directs the understanding to attend to the one no less than
To the other. This principle (of the faculty of distinction) acts as a
Check upon the reason and reason exhibits in this respect a double and
Conflicting interest--on the one hand, the interest in the extent (the
Interest of generality) in relation to genera; on the other, that of the
Content (the interest of individuality) in relation to the variety of
Species. In the former case, the understanding cogitates more under its
Conceptions, in the latter it cogitates more in them. This distinction
Manifests itself likewise in the habits of thought peculiar to natural
Philosophers, some of whom--the remarkably speculative heads--may be
Said to be hostile to heterogeneity in phenomena, and have their
Eyes always fixed on the unity of genera, while others--with a strong
Empirical tendency--aim unceasingly at the analysis of phenomena
And almost destroy in us the hope of ever being able to estimate the
Character of these according to general principles
The latter mode of thought is evidently based upon a logical principle
The aim of which is the systematic completeness of all cognitions
This principle authorizes me, beginning at the genus, to descend to the
Various and diverse contained under it; and in this way extension, as
In the former case unity, is assured to the system. For if we merely
Examine the sphere of the conception which indicates a genus, we cannot
Discover how far it is possible to proceed in the division of that
Sphere; just as it is impossible, from the consideration of the space
Occupied by matter, to determine how far we can proceed in the division
Of it. Hence every genus must contain different species, and these again
Different subspecies; and as each of the latter must itself contain a
Sphere (must be of a certain extent, as a conceptus communis), reason
Demands that no species or sub-species is to be considered as the lowest
Possible. For a species or sub-species, being always a conception, which
Contains only what is common to a number of different things, does not
Completely determine any individual thing, or relate immediately to
It, and must consequently contain other conceptions, that is, other
Sub-species under it. This law of specification may be thus expressed:
Entium varietates non temere sunt minuendae
But it is easy to see that this logical law would likewise be without
Sense or application, were it not based upon a transcendental law of
Specification, which certainly does not require that the differences
Existing phenomena should be infinite in number, for the logical
Principle, which merely maintains the indeterminateness of the logical
Sphere of a conception, in relation to its possible division, does not
Authorize this statement; while it does impose upon the understanding
The duty of searching for subspecies to every species, and minor
Differences in every difference. For, were there no lower conceptions
Neither could there be any higher. Now the understanding cognizes only
By means of conceptions; consequently, how far soever it may proceed
In division, never by mere intuition, but always by lower and lower
Conceptions. The cognition of phenomena in their complete determination
(which is possible only by means of the understanding) requires an
Unceasingly continued specification of conceptions, and a progression
To ever smaller differences, of which abstraction bad been made in the
Conception of the species, and still more in that of the genus
This law of specification cannot be deduced from experience; it can
Never present us with a principle of so universal an application
Empirical specification very soon stops in its distinction of
Diversities, and requires the guidance of the transcendental law, as
A principle of the reason--a law which imposes on us the necessity of
Never ceasing in our search for differences, even although these may not
Present themselves to the senses. That absorbent earths are of different
Kinds could only be discovered by obeying the anticipatory law of
Reason, which imposes upon the understanding the task of discovering the
Differences existing between these earths, and supposes that nature is
Richer in substances than our senses would indicate. The faculty of the
Understanding belongs to us just as much under the presupposition of
Differences in the objects of nature, as under the condition that these
Objects are homogeneous, because we could not possess conceptions, nor
Make any use of our understanding, were not the phenomena included under
These conceptions in some respects dissimilar, as well as similar, in
Their character
Reason thus prepares the sphere of the understanding for the operations
Of this faculty: 1. By the principle of the homogeneity of the diverse
In higher genera; 2. By the principle of the variety of the homogeneous
In lower species; and, to complete the systematic unity, it adds, 3
A law of the affinity of all conceptions which prescribes a continuous
Transition from one species to every other by the gradual increase of
Diversity. We may term these the principles of the homogeneity, the
Specification, and the continuity of forms. The latter results from the
Union of the two former, inasmuch as we regard the systematic connection
As complete in thought, in the ascent to higher genera, as well as in
The descent to lower species. For all diversities must be related
To each other, as they all spring from one highest genus, descending
Through the different gradations of a more and more extended
We may illustrate the systematic unity produced by the three logical
Principles in the following manner. Every conception may be regarded as
A point, which, as the standpoint of a spectator, has a certain horizon
Which may be said to enclose a number of things that may be viewed
So to speak, from that centre. Within this horizon there must be an
Infinite number of other points, each of which has its own horizon
Smaller and more circumscribed; in other words, every species contains
Sub-species, according to the principle of specification, and the
Logical horizon consists of smaller horizons (subspecies), but not of
Points (individuals), which possess no extent. But different horizons
Or genera, which include under them so many conceptions, may have one
Common horizon, from which, as from a mid-point, they may be surveyed;
And we may proceed thus, till we arrive at the highest genus, or
Universal and true horizon, which is determined by the highest
Conception, and which contains under itself all differences and
Varieties, as genera, species, and subspecies
To this highest standpoint I am conducted by the law of homogeneity
As to all lower and more variously-determined conceptions by the law
Of specification. Now as in this way there exists no void in the whole
Extent of all possible conceptions, and as out of the sphere of these
The mind can discover nothing, there arises from the presupposition of
The universal horizon above mentioned, and its complete division, the
Principle: Non datur vacuum formarum. This principle asserts that there
Are not different primitive and highest genera, which stand isolated, so
To speak, from each other, but all the various genera are mere divisions
And limitations of one highest and universal genus; and hence follows
Immediately the principle: Datur continuum formarum. This principle
Indicates that all differences of species limit each other, and do not
Admit of transition from one to another by a saltus, but only through
Smaller degrees of the difference between the one species and the other
In one word, there are no species or sub-species which (in the view of
Reason) are the nearest possible to each other; intermediate species or
Sub-species being always possible, the difference of which from each of
The former is always smaller than the difference existing between these
The first law, therefore, directs us to avoid the notion that there
Exist different primal genera, and enounces the fact of perfect
Homogeneity; the second imposes a check upon this tendency to unity and
Prescribes the distinction of sub-species, before proceeding to apply
Our general conceptions to individuals. The third unites both the
Former, by enouncing the fact of homogeneity as existing even in the
Most various diversity, by means of the gradual transition from one
Species to another. Thus it indicates a relationship between the
Different branches or species, in so far as they all spring from the
Same stem
But this logical law of the continuum specierum (formarum logicarum)
Presupposes a transcendental principle (lex continui in natura), without
Which the understanding might be led into error, by following the
Guidance of the former, and thus perhaps pursuing a path contrary to
That prescribed by nature. This law must, consequently, be based upon
Pure transcendental, and not upon empirical, considerations. For, in the
Latter case, it would come later than the system; whereas it is really
Itself the parent of all that is systematic in our cognition of nature
These principles are not mere hypotheses employed for the purpose
Of experimenting upon nature; although when any such connection is
Discovered, it forms a solid ground for regarding the hypothetical unity
As valid in the sphere of nature--and thus they are in this respect not
Without their use. But we go farther, and maintain that it is manifest
That these principles of parsimony in fundamental causes, variety in
Effects, and affinity in phenomena, are in accordance both with reason
And nature, and that they are not mere methods or plans devised for the
Purpose of assisting us in our observation of the external world
But it is plain that this continuity of forms is a mere idea, to which
No adequate object can be discovered in experience. And this for two
Reasons. First, because the species in nature are really divided, and
Hence form quanta discreta; and, if the gradual progression through
Their affinity were continuous, the intermediate members lying between
Two given species must be infinite in number, which is impossible
Secondly, because we cannot make any determinate empirical use of this
Law, inasmuch as it does not present us with any criterion of affinity
Which could aid us in determining how far we ought to pursue the
Graduation of differences: it merely contains a general indication that
It is our duty to seek for and, if possible, to discover them
When we arrange these principles of systematic unity in the order
Conformable to their employment in experience, they will stand thus:
Variety, Affinity, Unity, each of them, as ideas, being taken in the
Highest degree of their completeness. Reason presupposes the existence
Of cognitions of the understanding, which have a direct relation to
Experience, and aims at the ideal unity of these cognitions--a unity
Which far transcends all experience or empirical notions. The affinity
Of the diverse, notwithstanding the differences existing between its
Parts, has a relation to things, but a still closer one to the mere
Properties and powers of things. For example, imperfect experience
May represent the orbits of the planets as circular. But we discover
Variations from this course, and we proceed to suppose that the planets
Revolve in a path which, if not a circle, is of a character very similar
To it. That is to say, the movements of those planets which do not form
A circle will approximate more or less to the properties of a circle
And probably form an ellipse. The paths of comets exhibit still greater
Variations, for, so far as our observation extends, they do not return
Upon their own course in a circle or ellipse. But we proceed to the
Conjecture that comets describe a parabola, a figure which is closely
Allied to the ellipse. In fact, a parabola is merely an ellipse, with
Its longer axis produced to an indefinite extent. Thus these principles
Conduct us to a unity in the genera of the forms of these orbits, and
Proceeding farther, to a unity as regards the cause of the motions of
The heavenly bodies--that is, gravitation. But we go on extending our
Conquests over nature, and endeavour to explain all seeming deviations
From these rules, and even make additions to our system which no
Experience can ever substantiate--for example, the theory, in affinity
With that of ellipses, of hyperbolic paths of comets, pursuing which
These bodies leave our solar system and, passing from sun to sun, unite
The most distant parts of the infinite universe, which is held together
By the same moving power
The most remarkable circumstance connected with these principles is that
They seem to be transcendental, and, although only containing ideas
For the guidance of the empirical exercise of reason, and although this
Empirical employment stands to these ideas in an asymptotic relation
Alone (to use a mathematical term), that is, continually
Approximate, without ever being able to attain to them, they possess
Notwithstanding, as a priori synthetical propositions, objective
Though undetermined validity, and are available as rules for possible
Experience. In the elaboration of our experience, they may also be
Employed with great advantage, as heuristic [Footnote: From the Greek
Eurhioko.] principles. A transcendental deduction of them cannot be
Made; such a deduction being always impossible in the case of ideas, as
Has been already shown
We distinguished, in the Transcendental Analytic, the dynamical
Principles of the understanding, which are regulative principles of
Intuition, from the mathematical, which are constitutive principles of
Intuition. These dynamical laws are, however, constitutive in relation
To experience, inasmuch as they render the conceptions without which
Experience could not exist possible a priori. But the principles of pure
Reason cannot be constitutive even in regard to empirical conceptions
Because no sensuous schema corresponding to them can be discovered, and
They cannot therefore have an object in concreto. Now, if I grant that
They cannot be employed in the sphere of experience, as constitutive
Principles, how shall I secure for them employment and objective
Validity as regulative principles, and in what way can they be so
The understanding is the object of reason, as sensibility is the object
Of the understanding. The production of systematic unity in all the
Empirical operations of the understanding is the proper occupation of
Reason; just as it is the business of the understanding to connect the
Various content of phenomena by means of conceptions, and subject them
To empirical laws. But the operations of the understanding are, without
The schemata of sensibility, undetermined; and, in the same manner
The unity of reason is perfectly undetermined as regards the conditions
Under which, and the extent to which, the understanding ought to carry
The systematic connection of its conceptions. But, although it is
Impossible to discover in intuition a schema for the complete systematic
Unity of all the conceptions of the understanding, there must be some
Analogon of this schema. This analogon is the idea of the maximum of the
Division and the connection of our cognition in one principle. For we
May have a determinate notion of a maximum and an absolutely perfect
All the restrictive conditions which are connected with an indeterminate
And various content having been abstracted. Thus the idea of reason
Is analogous with a sensuous schema, with this difference, that the
Application of the categories to the schema of reason does not present
A cognition of any object (as is the case with the application of the
Categories to sensuous schemata), but merely provides us with a rule or
Principle for the systematic unity of the exercise of the understanding
Now, as every principle which imposes upon the exercise of the
Understanding a priori compliance with the rule of systematic unity
Also relates, although only in an indirect manner, to an object of
Experience, the principles of pure reason will also possess objective
Reality and validity in relation to experience. But they will not aim at
Determining our knowledge in regard to any empirical object; they
Will merely indicate the procedure, following which the empirical and
Determinate exercise of the understanding may be in complete harmony and
Connection with itself--a result which is produced by its being brought
Into harmony with the principle of systematic unity, so far as that is
Possible, and deduced from it
I term all subjective principles, which are not derived from observation
Of the constitution of an object, but from the interest which Reason
Has in producing a certain completeness in her cognition of that object
Maxims of reason. Thus there are maxims of speculative reason, which are
Based solely upon its speculative interest, although they appear to be
Objective principles
When principles which are really regulative are regarded as
Constitutive, and employed as objective principles, contradictions must
Arise; but if they are considered as mere maxims, there is no room for
Contradictions of any kind, as they then merely indicate the different
Interests of reason, which occasion differences in the mode of thought
In effect, Reason has only one single interest, and the seeming
Contradiction existing between her maxims merely indicates a difference
In, and a reciprocal limitation of, the methods by which this interest
Is satisfied
This reasoner has at heart the interest of diversity--in accordance
With the principle of specification; another, the interest of unity--in
Accordance with the principle of aggregation. Each believes that
His judgement rests upon a thorough insight into the subject he is
Examining, and yet it has been influenced solely by a greater or less
Degree of adherence to some one of the two principles, neither of which
Are objective, but originate solely from the interest of reason, and on
This account to be termed maxims rather than principles. When I observe
Intelligent men disputing about the distinctive characteristics of men
Animals, or plants, and even of minerals, those on the one side assuming
The existence of certain national characteristics, certain well-defined
And hereditary distinctions of family, race, and so on, while the other
Side maintain that nature has endowed all races of men with the same
Faculties and dispositions, and that all differences are but the result
Of external and accidental circumstances--I have only to consider for
A moment the real nature of the subject of discussion, to arrive at the
Conclusion that it is a subject far too deep for us to judge of, and
That there is little probability of either party being able to speak
From a perfect insight into and understanding of the nature of the
Subject itself. Both have, in reality, been struggling for the twofold
Interest of reason; the one maintaining the one interest, the other the
Other. But this difference between the maxims of diversity and unity
May easily be reconciled and adjusted; although, so long as they
Are regarded as objective principles, they must occasion not only
Contradictions and polemic, but place hinderances in the way of the
Advancement of truth, until some means is discovered of reconciling
These conflicting interests, and bringing reason into union and harmony
With itself
The same is the case with the so-called law discovered by Leibnitz, and
Supported with remarkable ability by Bonnet--the law of the continuous
Gradation of created beings, which is nothing more than an inference
From the principle of affinity; for observation and study of the order
Of nature could never present it to the mind as an objective truth. The
Steps of this ladder, as they appear in experience, are too far apart
From each other, and the so-called petty differences between different
Kinds of animals are in nature commonly so wide separations that no
Confidence can be placed in such views (particularly when we reflect
On the great variety of things, and the ease with which we can discover
Resemblances), and no faith in the laws which are said to express
The aims and purposes of nature. On the other hand, the method of
Investigating the order of nature in the light of this principle
And the maxim which requires us to regard this order--it being still
Undetermined how far it extends--as really existing in nature, is beyond
Doubt a legitimate and excellent principle of reason--a principle which
Extends farther than any experience or observation of ours and which
Without giving us any positive knowledge of anything in the region of
Experience, guides us to the goal of systematic unity


text:
AssociaTitle names Mark Sadlek director of business development
AssociaTitle announced it appointed Mark J. Sadlek director of business development at its corporate headquarters in the heart of Uptown Dallas at Crescent Court.
"We are thrilled to be adding Mark Sadlek to the AssociaTitle team," said AssociaTitle President Paul Reyes. "He is a seasoned real estate professional in the Dallas area with a track record of proven success and will serve both our clients and our company well."
Sadlek joins AssociaTitle from Republic Title of Texas, where he served as vice president of business development and director of coaching services. He worked to build and promote the company externally with Realtors, developers and lenders. His focus also included business coaching and training.
He has also served as vice president of business development for American Title and as home mortgage consultant for Shelter Mortgage & Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. Previous to his work in the North Dallas real estate industry, Sadlek worked in marketing and sales for almost 20 years and was intimately involved in the start-up of two companies, VerCeram and Velux-America.
For the past nine years, Sadlek has worked in the North Dallas real estate industry, building positive relationships with local Realtors and lenders. He was awarded the 2010 Affiliate of the Year Award from MetroTex Association of Realtors, served on the MetroTex Board as an affiliate appointee board member, and chaired the Affiliate Forum Committee of MetroTex.
He was a co-founder and co-chair of Leadership Lambda Inc., an LGBT leadership development organization. He was also a board member of Design Industries Foundation Fighting AIDS (DIFFA) and has chaired the Heart Strings Fundraiser at the Majestic Theatre. Additionally, Sadlek served on the Board of Governors for the Human Rights Campaign, as well as a co-chair of the Dallas-Fort Worth Federal Club.
Ernst & Young Announces Gross Up for Jan. 1
On Jan. 1, Ernst & Young joined more than 30 major U.S. employers that are equalizing the pay for gay and lesbian employees by covering the cost of state and federal taxes for domestic partners.
Employees enrolled in domestic partner benefits incur additional taxes as the value of those benefits is treated as taxable income under federal law, while the value of opposite-sex spousal benefits is not.
Federal law treats domestic partner benefits differently from federally-recognized spousal benefits.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Promoting the world's best creativity and services
Find photographers, photo reps, photo production service, post production, retouchers, locations, stylists, studios equipment and more
Find directors, production houses, film production services, VFX, film studios, equipment rent and more
View all feature images
Subscribe and get our online magazines direct to your inbox
We've detected you are using an ad-blocker which means some of our content might not been dispayed on your browser.
Since our page has a lot of content about the advertising industry, we recommend that you white-list or disable the ad blocker for productionparadise.com for the optimum experience.
For more information, view this guide on how to to disable your ad blocker.


text:
In a congressional hearing on Tuesday, three out of the five
FCC commissioners told lawmakers that they are supportive of the open-access standards
as proposed by FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin, according to Reuters. "A network more open to devices and applications can help
ensure that the fruits of innovation on the edges of the network swiftly pass
into the hands of consumers," said Martin, speaking to the House Energy and
Commerce subcommittee.Democratic commissioner John Adelstein specifically noted that an
open-access approach "could open these key airwaves to badly needed competition
in the broadband space."
Republican commissioners Deborah Tate and Robert McDowell
had not decided whether to support or oppose the standards, however McDowell
expressed that he is leaning towards opposition.
Martin spoke to the subcommittee of a "third pipe,"
expressing the necessity of an alternative to cable and DSL service for
high-speed internet access into the home, particularly those who cannot be
served with existing services like those living in the rural parts of America.
"Depending on how the Commission structures the upcoming auction, we will
either enable the emergence of a third broadband pipe -- one that would be
available to rural as well as urban American -- or we will miss our biggest
The open-access proposal by Martin has garnered support by
No. 1 wireless provider AT&T, which made a sudden reversal
from the rest of the wireless industry, and was threatening litigation again
open-access provisions in a time period as short as a few weeks ago. However,
the plan is still opposed by No. 2 provider Verizon Wireless, and the rest of
the wireless industry.
Less clear, however, is the commission's support for
Google's vision of "open-access", as outlined by a July 20 letter
sent to FCC Chairman Martin by Google CEO Eric Schmidt, asking for "unwavering
obligations to provide (1) open applications, (2) open devices, (3) open
wholesale services, and (4) open network access."
Martin expressed
reservations about Google's proposal, which has been met with fierce criticism
from the wireless industry. It's a "giant scheme to have the 700MHz auction
rigged with special conditions in its favor," says CTIA president Steve Largent. U.S. Representative Fred Upton (R-Mich) stated, "the free market works best.
And successful auctions work best without encumbrances."
Martin's plan needs the support of a majority of the
commissioners to get approval, and can be dropped off the agenda if it does not
gain the necessary support. The FCC announced on Tuesday its intention to hold
a commission meeting on July 31 to discuss service rules and determine the
plan's fate.


text:
Illinois BioNanotechnology and Nanomedicine: Applications in Cancer and Mechanobiology Lecture 9: Characteristics of a normal cell
Licensed according to this deed.
Published on
Parsing error resulted in empty content. Displaying raw markup below.

NCN@Illinois Laura Miller
Sponsored by
Cellular and Molecular Mechanics and BioNanotechnology (IGERT) Midwest Cancer Nanotechnology Training Center Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology NCN@Illinois
Cite this work
Researchers should cite this work as follows:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign


text:
You're not just getting an Audi. You're getting peace of mind.
Enjoy the many benefits of Audi ownership: A comprehensive 300+ point dealer inspection, CARFAX® Vehicle History Report, special financing and competitive interest rates, 24/7 roadside assistance including towing and trip interruption reimbursement, transferability of the Certified pre-owned Limited Warranty to a subsequent private owner, and more. At Audi, we're there for you every step of the way so you can focus on what you love to do most: driving.


text:
1. Please quote promo code 5120 at time of booking to utilise the offer. Bookings must be made through http://www.intrepidtravel.com/PSAVictoria or by calling 1300 797 010 only.
2. The 10% off discount is available for bookings made during the period 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2015.
3. Travel is valid from 1 January 2015 until 31 December 2016.
4. Offer available to Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (VIC Branch) members and one travelling companion. Proof of entitlement is required at time of booking and must be provided to Intrepid Travel for validation (these docements will be kept on file).
5. A deposit of $250 is required at time of booking.
6. Full payment is required no later than 60 days prior to departure. If full payment is not received it could affect the status of your booking.
7. The discount can be applied to new bookings only. This discount will not be applied to existing bookings.
8. There will be no extensions to the travel or booking periods listed above.
9. The discount is valid on all Intrepid operated trips with exclusions of Intrepid Family Adventures, Antarctica, Short Break Adventures and Urban Adventures and any third party operated trips. For a full list of exclusions please contact our sales team.
10. The discount can only be applied to land bookings; it cannot be applied to airfares, trip kitties, travel insurance, extra accommodation, single supplements or visas etc.
11. Intrepid Travel's Booking Conditions will also apply to the trip booked, and it is imperative that you examine those conditions before booking with Intrepid Travel. The most up to date Booking Conditions are accessible at https://www.intrepidtravel.com/ourtrips/howtobook/bookingconditions.php
12. As outlined in the Intrepid Travel Booking Conditions, travel insurance is compulsory for all Intrepid Travel travellers and should be taken out prior to or at the time of booking.
13. The trip is subject to availability and confirmation by Intrepid Travel at time of booking.
14. This offer cannot be used in conjunction with any other discounts or special offers and must be taken up in full at the time of booking.
15. Trip prices and itineraries are subject to change at any time, including after booking. If there is a significant price change to a trip that is outside the control of Intrepid Travel (for example a significant increase in third party service provider costs), travellers may need to be re-invoiced at the new price. Promotions & discounts will still apply to the new price.


text:
Not sure if any of you guys are Big Fans of J.R.R.Tolkien (and as an extension, Peter Jackson), but I am ridiculously Pumped for these movies.
The Hobbit was likely the First book that Showed me 'the power of reading'.
J.R.R.Tolkien literally taught Millions of kids (Adults even) how to imagine whole other Worlds.
With the Entire Rings series becoming a Double Trilogy ala Star Wars, I see these movies going down in History as some of the finest Films ever created.
Haven't watched all of these "Production Blogs" yet, but I certainly will be making a point of it.
Apparently the Movie is being shot in 48FPS (as opposed to 24FPS which is Industry Norm) becoming the first Film to do so (this is a lie. Apparently Avatar was the first); not entirely sure what the implications of such a move will be. I can't really tell the difference.


text:
Greek authorities ask INTERPOL to help identify unknown girl using DNA comparison
LYON, France – Greek authorities have asked INTERPOL to assist their efforts to identify a young blond girl found living in a Roma settlement by sharing her DNA profile with its global membership.
INTERPOL will make its DNA Gateway available to any member country whose law enforcement agency has been provided with the profile of someone claiming to be a blood relative of the unknown child.
Until now, a comparison of the girl's profile against INTERPOL's global DNA database has not produced a match. All of the Organization's 190 member countries are now being encouraged to check her DNA profile against their own national databases, as Greek authorities investigate whether the young girl known as 'Maria' may have been abducted or fallen prey to child traffickers.
Countries which do not have national DNA databases are being encouraged to add all their DNA records of missing children to INTERPOL's database.
INTERPOL has issued a Yellow Notice at the request of INTERPOL's National Central Bureau in Athens which includes the photo and DNA profile of the child, believed to be aged around four years, who was found on 16 October near Farsala in central Greece.
Yellow Notices are circulated by INTERPOL to help locate missing persons, especially minors or, as in this case, to help identify persons who are not able to identify themselves.
At the request of the Greek authorities, INTERPOL has also issued Blue Notices for Christos Salis and Eleftheria Dimopoulou, the couple in whose home the girl was found and who have now been charged with abduction. Blue Notices are issued to collect additional information about a person's identity, location or activities.
Anyone with information about the girl or the adults should contact their national police or the Greek authorities.
All enquiries in relation to the investigation should be directed to the Greek authorities.
Yellow Notice (Public version)


text:
General Motors has been in a downward spiral all year with lagging sales and losses in the billions. GM and its cross town rival, Chrysler, asked Congress for monetary assistance to stave off bankruptcy by the end of the year. In the end, the Senate failed to hand over even $14 billion USD to the two struggling Detroit giants.
Now as the White House mulls what plan it will present to help GM and Chrysler stay in business during 2009, GM is stating that it will bring the Chevrolet Volt to market no matter what. This confidence in the Volt program comes despite that fact that GM announced yesterday that it would halt the production on a new engine assembly plant which will produce the 1.4-liter gasoline engine/generator for the vehicle.
Despite the setback with the engine assembly plant, billions of dollars in losses, and a production schedule that leaves little room for error, GM is still committed to bring the Volt -- and the Chevrolet Cruze -- to market by the end of 2010 as it has always stated.
If the engine assembly plant is unable to be completed in time to get the production Chevrolet Volt and Cruze out the door in 2010, GM will be forced to rely on one of its overseas facilities to produce the engine according to the Wall Street Journal. Interestingly enough, the Chevrolet Cruze is already available in overseas markets like South Korea albeit with a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine -- two years ahead of the car's North American launch.
"Everything that involves heavy cash outlays obviously is under review," said GM spokeswoman Sharon Basel on Wednesday. "Our intent is to still go forward with a new facility bringing that engine to Flint, Michigan."
"Although we are temporarily absolutely stopping all work on everything, the Volt will be out as originally scheduled," added one GM executive.
GM is banking on the Volt to bring it some of the same positive press that has been bestowed upon the Toyota Prius. However, the Prius and its rival, the Honda Insight, have base prices below the $24,000 mark. The Volt, however, will be priced near or will surpass the $40,000 mark before a $7,500 tax credit.


text:
Next time you feel your phone buzz or chirp with an incoming text message, it could be the law. Don't worry - they're not after you. They're trying to help.
On March 1, the Montezuma County Sheriff's Office launched a new alert system to communicate quickly with citizens via their electronic devices.
Called "Nixle", the service functions like 911 in reverse, said deputy emergency manager Paul Hollar. It can be used to inform people of potential threats - like wildfire evacuations, road closures, gas leaks, weather advisories and missing child alerts - as well as safety tips and benign community updates. Notices are delivered by email and/or with a cellphone text message.
The alerts are one-way traffic; replying to them only results in an error message.
Hollar said the MCSO did in-house tests among its deputies and the system worked like a charm.
Only subscribed individuals will receive messages, which are free of charge. While he knew some people would be reluctant to give their personal contact information to an unfamiliar company, Hollar is hoping for widespread participation from the public. The sheriff's office cannot view the list of subscribers, he said, and Nixle keeps the information on a secured server and never sells it to third parties. The service can be cancelled at any time.
"Really, there are no drawbacks," Hollar said.
Sheriff Dennis Spruell is throwing his support behind the idea.
"The Montezuma County Sheriff's Office is dedicated to the protection of all we serve. By adding a system of notification in an emergency situation we hope to keep our community informed and protected," he said in a prepared statement.
To register for the alerts, visit www.montezumasheriff.org or nixle.com.
Those with questions or concerns can contact Spruell at 565-8452.


text:
In its just-released Guide to Greener Electronics (PDF), the activist organization rated electronics companies based on their record of eliminating hazardous substances from their products and manufacturing processes, and on their commitment to actively recycling obsolete products.
Lenovo scored eight of a possible 10 points in the report, earning praise for phasing out dangerous chemicals and for being the first to provide "global takeback and recycling services wherever its products are sold." Lenovo also got high marks for its adherence to existing environmental regulations and other relevant policies designed to protect human health and the global environment.
Of the 14 companies reviewed by Greenpeace, Apple fell to the bottom of the barrel with a dismal score of only 2.7 points. The PC and peripheral maker ran afoul of Greenpeace for inadequate recycling policies and for waffling on its timelines to phase out hazardous materials such as brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC).
"For a company that claims to lead on product design, it is perhaps surprising to find Apple languishing at the bottom of the scorecard," the report states. "While other laggards have moved upwards in the Guide (to Greener Electronics), Apple has made no changes to its policies or practices since the launch of the Guide in August 2006. The company scores badly on almost all criteria."
Sony, Panasonic and LG electronics were also singled out as polluters in the report. LG and Sony were even assigned "penalty points" for corporate double-speak on environmental issues. Specifically, the Greenpeace report claims that the two companies publicly espouse support for producer responsibility, which designates "that the producer -- not consumer -- should be responsible for financing the waste management of its own brand products when they are discarded."
However, Greenpeace charges that both manufacturers are also "part of a coalition that has been opposing producer responsibility and lobbying for U.S. consumers to pay an Advanced Recycling Fee (ARF)."


text:
Why hunt and search? Let us deliver our best Great Deals to your inbox. Sign up for email now or manage your email subscription here.
Go >
More >
Short on time? Join Blue Chip for the fastest way to reserve, pick up and return your car!
Learn more >
Members sign in >
Get this Deal >
You'll find a great rate on a great car rental at more than 300 conveniently located Thrifty car rental sites throughout the United States, including many at or near major airports.
For more information on Thrifty and its locations, follow us on Google+
Enter the city or airport code to find a Thrifty rental car location nearest your destination. With more than 300 locations across the United States it's easy to find a great rate on a great rental car wherever you're going!
Find a better Thrifty car rental rate anywhere other than Thrifty.com and we'll not only match it, we'll give you an extra 10% off your rental car! Now that's booking smart.
North. South. East. West. No matter where you're headed in the U.S., Thrifty's got a great rate on a great rental car. Even the Midwest, Northeast, South…well, you get the point. Great rates on great rental cars in great places. That's Thrifty.
Thrifty Car Rental has teamed up with some premier airline and hotel partners to offer our car rental customers some great rewards - from frequent flyer miles & hotel points to a free car rental when you sign up for Blue Chip rewards.
When it comes to rental car selection, Thrifty's got everything from sub compacts to SUVs. Find a rental car for every occasion - minivans for vacations, ragtops for weekend getaways and economy models for saving a little extra spending money.


text:
There are a number of recommendations that may help you to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs):
Preventative Medication
If you tend to have frequent UTIs, your doctor may suggest that you take a small daily dose of an antibiotic or cranberry products. Or, if you tend to have UTIs after sexual intercourse, you might be advised to take a dose of antibiotic just before or just after you engage in intercourse.
Several antibiotics, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and nitrofurantoin, can be used in small doses to prevent UTIs. Cranberry extract may also offer benefits in some people. Other ways to reduce your risk of a UTI include:
Drink a Lot of Water
Drinking plenty of water (about eight 8-ounce glasses each day) may help flush out your urinary system and wash out bacteria. Consider drinking cranberry juice, as well. Some studies have shown that 1-3 cups a day makes the urine more acidic, which may help to prevent bacteria from growing. Cranberry tablets may also be effective for some people.
Take a Shower
It is possible that sitting in bath water (especially soapy bath water) may irritate your tissues, making you more susceptible to infection. Furthermore, using perfumed products, bubble bath, douches, or feminine hygiene sprays may also increase your risk of developing a UTI.
Always Wipe From Front to Back
Women should carefully wipe themselves after urinating or having a bowel movement. It is important to always start wiping by the labia and finish at the anus. This way, you will not contaminate your urethral or vaginal area with bacteria from your anus.
Urinate Frequently and Completely
Try not to hold your urine. When you feel the need to urinate, do so. Take your time to be sure that you empty your bladder completely.
Take Special Care After Sex
Urinate after intercourse. Also, drink an 8-ounce glass of water. This can help flush out bacteria that may have been forced up the urethra during intercourse.
Wear Cotton Underwear
Cotton underwear is more absorbent than artificial fibers. It also wicks moisture away from your skin. Artificial fibers, such as nylon and polyester, trap moisture, making a good growing environment for bacteria (as well as yeast). This can promote infections.
Revision Information
- Reviewer: Adrienne Carmack, MD
- Review Date: 09/2016 -
- Update Date: 09/17/2014 -


text:
Ski Packages - Skis With Bindings - MensProboardshop.com is the leading skiing company on the web for Men's Ski Packages - Skis With Bindings. All skiing brands in stock for next day shipment with up to 50% savings. 29 years of great prices, selection, and service.
Please refine here
- Color: Grey
- Price: 200.00 - 249.99


text:
What is the education discount policy?
For more than 15 years, Bio-Rad has made science education a major priority. To support this effort, the company has implemented a discount policy that allows high school and college teaching laboratories to purchase kits, instruments, reagents, and other equipment at preferred prices.
How do I apply for the education discount?
If you are an educator at the high school or college level, visit our Education Discount Policy page to establish an education account number.
Low-pressure adaptor fittings kit, includes luer to M6 fittings to connect 1 cartridge to an FPLC system
Sorry, an error has occurred. Please try again. If the problem persists, please call {0} for assistance.
This product contains electrical or electronic material. Learn more about Bio-Rad's EU Recycle Program


text:
Teller Supervisor Gets Three Years for $200,000 Theft
A former credit union teller supervisor was sentenced to three years in prison this week for stealing $200,000 from the $1.1 billion Greylock Federal Credit Union in Pittsfield, Mass, said Berkshire District Attorney David F. Capless.
Janine Shepard, 48, of Pittsfield pleaded guilty to one count of larceny and one count of making false entries into corporate records. She was sentenced Wednesday by Berkshire Superior Court Judge John Agostini.
Massachusetts state police detectives said Shepard stole the money and attempted to cover it up between Jan. 1, 2010 and Feb. 18, 2012.
The Berkshire Eagle newspaper reported that Shepard had been employed at Greylock FCU for 13 years, but she and another co-worker were fired shortly after the credit union discovered the criminal activity and reported it to police. The incident prompted the credit union to change its security procedures, according to the newspaper.


text:
I'd be willing to bet fans could be all about him again (and I think the majority were early in his career and gave him the benifit of the doubt even with a sub par rookie year and an abysmal 2nd year), IF he ever could put together consistency and effort. Even from what I've read about him in this Euroleague tournament he hasn't shown that effort or consistency... and when he was actually challenged he faltered.
I'd bet Tim (or almost any other 'hater' for that matter... not to single out Tim sorry) would compliment/talk about Bargnani's accolades if Bargs ever actually 'got it together'. But I also think the expectations that that will ever happen flew out the window this past season.
By the way, when is this thread getting merged?
I think the main difference with my belief on Bargnani with others posters, is that i dont think Bargnani is born defense or rebounding incapable. I think he just never received the proper training for a big man. Be it be his own accord or by the trainers, i dont think it was enough for him to get over to the next level. Do i blame him? a little bit, but i put this on management and staff. Sure its easy to say that if he really wanted to improve then he should have put in the work. That is true, but mind you, these guys are controlled by the coaching staff and trainers. Do you honestly think that these coaches and trainers push him enough everyday on defense and rebounding and he tell them he doesnt want to do it because he's lazy? i dont think so. I dont think he has that much cred as a Raptor. My feeling is, and again, this is pure assumption, is that they drafted him knowing he was a pure scorer with the thought of pairing him with a rebounder like Bosh and now theyre saying he's an enigma coz he doesnt know how or when to rebound and defend. Ive always thought that if the Raptors got a veteran big man to help Bargnani work on his game (like how Howard worked/works with Ewing) then he will definitely show some improvement on defense and rebounding.
He is partially to be blamed for his inadequacies, but not entirely.
Last edited by TheGloveinRapsUniform; Tue Sep 6th, 2011 at 05:04 PM.
Why should the Raptors be spoon feeding him, when he can go out and do it himself? That's the problem I have with Bargnani. He doesn't seem to be a self-motivator. If I was struggling with a subject in school, instead of failing, I'd go find a tutor. I wouldn't have my parent or my teacher try and find one for me because it would be my responsibility to grow and become better.
The problem with Bargnani is that he's not motivated all the time, and I don't think you can teach motivation.
From this point onward, I wouldn't mind seeing Bargnani + fillers get traded for a legit young PG + role players.
I promose this trade Andrea Bargnani + Jerryd Bayless + James Johnson to Pacers
Pacers give us Roy Hibbert + George Hill + James Posey (waived) + 2012 1st round pick (top 15) where we can get another SF in Terrence Jones by drafting either H.Barnes or Q.Miller
Our Lineups will be
Hill/Calderon/D-League PG
DeRozan/Leandro Barbosa/S.Weems
Blaming the team is a cop out... especially when there are other players who have showed the willingness to put in 100% night in and night out, to try and improve their game, to do the things that others won't. If it was on the organization, then why does Derozan seem to be the polar opposite of Bargnani? Or Jose?
Smitch, Jay and PJ never hid their dislike for Bargnani's lack of D and rebounding and Bargnani himself has said he's 'lazy'. So yes I do believe it.these guys are controlled by the coaching staff and trainers. Do you honestly think that these coaches and trainers push him enough everyday on defense and rebounding and he tell them he doesnt want to do it because he's lazy
Maybe not with the organization as a while, but I think he had that much 'cred' with BC. Whether thats because BC saw/expected more out of him than he got, or because BC was to arrogant to accept his #1 pick has been in 'bust'-like territory I'm not sure. But Bargs had enough 'cred' to get a coach fired and have a yes man coach to replace him (that would give minutes without accountability), get a big pay day without earning it and getting franchise player-like treatment. Is it that hard to believe that his lack of effort has simply been accepted by BC and therefore entitled to him?I dont think he has that much cred as a Raptor
There is no reason why he couldn't or shouldn't try and improve even without the organizations help IF he actually wanted to improve in area's we all know he needs to. I can agree that this organization seems to have been much to easy on him for the last 3 years... but he still has the responsibility himself, and that responsibility to himself is much greater than the teams responsibility to him.
If your boss at work ever said 'you aren't working hard enough', what do you think he would say if you responded with 'well its not my fault you aren't motivating me well enough'? I'm sure he'd motivated you with a severence package 5 minutes later.
And while George Hill was good on the Spurs, he was in the perfect situation, there. He didn't need to pass the ball because of the system, as well as being on the court with Ginobili and Duncan, both of whom are great passers. Just look at Hill's Per 36 assist stats. He's never averaged even 4 apg. And the Raptors desperately need a PG who will make those around him better since, they don't have a great passer on the roster outside of Calderon.
And having two rookie SFs fighting for playing time is also not a good idea.
Other than that, I'm all for the trade!
Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
On a side note, I hope you weren't lumping Calderon in with Bargnani. Calderon has his faults, but lack of effort has never been one of them. Even on defense, he does try. He's just not very good at it (although better than many Raptor fans seem to give him credit for).
Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
fighting for playing time can be a very good thing. It creates competition which CAN bring out the best in players and be the best thing for the team. This is especially true with young players who have to earn their future contracts. It can also help create depth which is a huge boon when the inenvitable injuries happen. However, some players don't deal well with not getting what they expect and might sour them. Although I'd say thats an excellent way to weed out those players anyways.
I like the trade in general but I don't think there is a chance Indiana would pull the trigger on this trade though
Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
1. Pulled down 9+ rebounds per game.
2. Made over half his shots.
3. Played solid help defense (e.g., gave out 2 hard fouls each game on people penetrating to the basket - but 3+ blocks per game would also count).
There is no need to interpret or excuse. He does those things consistently (on average) I am a fan. If he doesn't, I'm not.
Take his 36 point performance against Latvia. That came on 11/25 shooting. He missed 14 shots! I am tired of Bargnani missing baskets and wasting offensive opportunities. And that's not even talking defense.
When the stats say Bargnani defended on the most possessions, even though that's without a minute count, one can be pretty sure that's not barely or almost exclusively. Agreed?Tim W. wrote:
Poor poor Bargnani if he gets called out for a performance like this.
Bargnani is never going to pull down 9+ rebounds a game, but neither are the majority of big men in the league. There are plenty of good big men that didn't pull down 9+ rebounds per 36 minutes, last season, including Bosh, Millsap, Amare, Aldridge, Marc Gasol and Dirk. Instead of demanding something unattainable, and really not necessary, I simply demand that he puts in an effort on the boards and works harder to prevent opposing players from grabbing boards.
And while Bargnani doesn't make half his shots, that's because he's a perimeter player. That's not going to change and it shouldn't because that's where his strength lies. Dirk has only shot more than 50% from the field twice in 13 years. Bosh has only done it twice in 8 years. Bargnani has a unique talent and skill, and in order to shoot more than 50% from the field he'd have to shoot more close to the basket, which pretty much negates the offensive advantage he has. I don't see the point in that.
I do agree that Bargnani has to play solid help defense, but again, you're bringing up numbers that are pretty arbitrary. 2 hard fouls are great, but you don't need to give hard fouls to play solid help defense. And Bargnani doesn't have the personality to start punishing people physically. He's not an enforcer or intimidator and asking him to be one is a little ridiculous. His role will never be as a stopper and lots of good big men in the league play good, solid help defense without laying people out. And the 3 bpg would put him among the league leaders. So you'd only be happy if he was among the league leaders in blocks? And blocks don't necessarily equal good defense. JaVale McGee is a poor defender, but a great shotblocker. On the other hand, neither Nene or Al Horford are great shotblockers, but are excellent defenders.
I'm as hard on Bargnani as anyone, but I'm not asking him to become a different player, which is what you seem to want. What I'd want from him is simply to improve on his weaknesses so he's not a liability half the time he's on the floor. I don't think even that's going to happen, since we have seen so little improvement in those areas in five years, but it sounds like you're saying that Bargnani would have to become an elite player in the league in order for you to like him. And I don't think that's fair. I'm simply asking him to have a positive impact on the court.
Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


text:
What is the education discount policy?
For more than 15 years, Bio-Rad has made science education a major priority. To support this effort, the company has implemented a discount policy that allows high school and college teaching laboratories to purchase kits, instruments, reagents, and other equipment at preferred prices.
How do I apply for the education discount?
If you are an educator at the high school or college level, visit our Education Discount Policy page to establish an education account number.
1 ml, 1.25 x 107 beads/ml, carboxylated magnetic beads internally labeled with two fluorescent dyes, for developing multiplex assays
Bio-Plex Pro™ magnetic COOH beads are 6.5 µm magnetic, carboxylated beads that enable users to build their own multiplex assays for use with either magnetic- or vacuum-based wash stations. These beads are identical to the MagPlex microspheres, developed by Luminex Corporation, and are internally labeled with two fluorescent dyes for bead identification. The beads come in a 1 ml volume with 1.25 x 107 beads/ml.
The Bio-Plex® amine coupling kit (#171406001) provides a complete set of reagents for coupling proteins to the beads. For nucleic acid coupling refer to the instruction manual. The instruction manual for these products, bulletin 4110012, is only available online.
Key Features
Instrument Compatibility
More Information
Additional bead regions are available with longer delivery times. Contact Bio-Rad Technical Support for more information.
Sorry, an error has occurred. Please try again. If the problem persists, please call {0} for assistance.
This product contains electrical or electronic material. Learn more about Bio-Rad's EU Recycle Program


text:
Advanced - Powered by Google
Cookies must be enabled past this point.
Login Name:
Stay in SSL mode after login
[Lost your password?]
[New Account]
Copyright © 1999-2008, OW2 Consortium | contact | You have a difficulty, a problem ? Please report an issue using your OW2 forge account credentials


text:
I don't know, looking at that specific clip, Len looks a bit slow and clumsy to me. Not overly so, but still, I can see it being a concern.
I don't know, looking at that specific clip, Len looks a bit slow and clumsy to me. Not overly so, but still, I can see it being a concern.
Interesting read on Jonas' summer "vacation" plans:
Twitter - @thekid_it
I'm, as I was before the season started, of the opinion that he will never be an elite defensive player because of his 'problems' with lateral movement.
General rule no.1 - never say never. Especially if it's Valanciunas and basketball. He's a kid in terms of his competition, just give him a chance.
And yes, I haven't see any of the last 10 or so games when they weren't on an afternoon. The time difference combined with the fact that the season is already over didn't give me the incentive to stay up or view the next day. I'll hope to see enough of Valanciunas in the summer and that would be my only reason to watch. Even though the Raptors are winning, I don't suppose everything is suddenly different?
I wouldn't call Chandler an all-around defensive force. I frankly think it's ridiculous he won DPOY last year. He's a good defender and capable of causing problems in the paint. He's good at rebounding and shotblocking, but nothing special in either one. He should never ever be mentioned in the same sentence as actual defensive forces like Howard, Ben Wallace, Dikembe, David Robinson, Tim Duncan, etc....The fact that he won DPOY last year is all politics, because he helped a team win a ring and then got a big contract in NY (where their defensive improvement was not astonishing, by any means, and definitely helped by Woodson's presence, a fantastic defensive coach).
Man, Chandler is such a ridiculously overrated player. Casey/Dallas made his career by teaching him defensive discipline. He was always an over aggressive defender before that, who would pick up too many fouls and overcommit frequently. There's a reason Charlotte's GM was willing to trade Jose for Chandler, and it wasn't because of how amazing Jose was.
***phew, end of rant. If you think Chandler's a great player, that's fine, but to me he's never been that impressive.
Last edited by white men can't jump; Thu Apr 18th, 2013 at 11:38 AM.
I'm glad it's fine that I think he is a great player, because I do...
Im glad the team loves one another didnt make the playoffs but you can tell they get along well and have fun together. The entire team except Bargs and Klieza went to watch evil Dead and 42 before the Boston game too.
Raptors 'Quickly Rebuffed' James Harden For Jonas Valanciunas Trade Inquiry From Thunder.
Last edited by rocwell; Thu Apr 18th, 2013 at 05:57 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


text:
Lockheed Martin's new single-engine F-35 Joint Strike
Fighter is the latest Swiss Army Knife of fighter aircraft for the US military.
The plane, which is destined to replace
the F-16, AV8-B, A-10 and F/A-18, will be available in three variants:
Lockheed is now proposing a fourth variant that it has been
working on for the past two years. The design proposal is for an unmanned
version of the F-35 that could operate as a hybrid -- that is, it could be
configured to either fly by remote or if need be with a human pilot in the
cockpit. Many have stated that the F-35 would be the last manned fighter jet
for the Air Force as the military has been pouring more and more dollars into unmanned
combat systems. Lockheed's proposed unmanned J-35 would bridge the gap between
the past and the future of aerial combat. From the Washington
The Pentagon, looking
to save money, has accelerated spending on unmanned systems since the Sept. 11,
2001, terrorist attacks. This year, it allocated $2 billion for unmanned
aircraft and millions more in the supplemental budget, compared with $363
million in 2001. The figure is projected to reach more than $3 billion by the end
of the decade. What has resulted is a hodgepodge of unmanned vehicles, such as
small, bomb-seeking robots that can be carried in a backpack, and airplanes
that provide surveillance for days at a time. The systems have become bigger
and more expensive in recent years, such as the Predator, built by General
Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc., and the Global Hawk, which has a 134-foot
wingspan, comparable to the Boeing 737.
Lockheed has been playing second fiddle to other names in
the industry, namely Boeing,
when it comes to unmanned aircraft. The price tag of
the F-35 program has also ballooned from $201 billion to $276 billion. The price increase along
with the government's increasing fascination with unmanned drones is probably
why the initial order for 2,000 planes could likely drop significantly in the
near future.


text:
JohnC wrote:Right, right; no worries, most do!ー( ´ ▽ ` )ノ It's offtopic anyway. If you'd like to know more about the Childfree lifestyle, feel free to PM me!Sorry, my mistake, I've misunderstood that
Ontopic though, I'm personally really frustrated (」゜ロ゜)」when people recommend simplistic casual games for young kids (and you see it more for young girls, for whatever reason.) Very young children are capable of learning and understanding much more complex systems than I believe most people give them credit for. I was playing my elder brother's copies of Wizardry, Might and Magic, and Final Fantasy not long after I could read, and I started reading very early!
Perhaps my own personal, anecdotal experience is the exception, rather than the rule; perhaps other children are dumb. (;¬_¬) I prefer to believe that people underestimate their kids, though, and that's why we have so many lazy, ignorant adults these days -- a kind of intellectual "learned helplessness".
Hmm, I'm getting sort of political again. Maybe I should stop posting in this thread! (≧σ≦)