text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|Jan 12, 2010
|Filing date
|Jun 26, 2006
|Priority date
|May 23, 1996
|Fee status
|Also published as
|Publication number
|Kenton F. Brett
|Original Assignee
|Ticketmaster L.L.C.
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (286), Non-Patent Citations (64), Referenced by (19), Classifications (19), Legal Events (7)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/059,990, filed Feb. 17, 2005, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/778,606, filed Feb. 7, 2001 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,907,405), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/586,927 filed Jun. 5, 2000 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,704,713), which is a continuation of PCT application Ser. No. PCT/US00/03136 filed Feb. 7, 2000, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/862,547, filed May 23, 1997 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,023,685), which claims the benefit of provisional patent application No. 60/018,211, filed May 23, 1996. The entire disclosure of each one of these priority applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
1. Field
The present invention relates to the field of auctions and, in particular, networked systems for conducting specialty auctions using computers.
2. Background
An important goal of anyone attempting to sell the right to attend an event, to own a product, or to perform an activity is to receive in return for that right the true market value of the right. For some rights, the market values of similar rights are all equal. For example, under normal conditions, the fair market value of two identical radios, both of the same brand and model, is the same. Thus, if a consumer were given the opportunity to purchase the right to obtain one of the radios instead of the other, there would typically be no incentive for the consumer to pay for that right. Therefore, the market value of the rights to obtain the radios are equal. However, the relative market values of some rights to similar products, services, or events are not the same, but are dependent upon a difference in some characteristic of the rights. For example, when purchasing tickets to a concert, although each of two tickets may allow the holder to see the same performer, on the same night, in the same venue, the market values of those tickets differ depending upon the location of the ticket within the venue. Therefore, the market value of the right to sit in a particular seat at a concert depends at least in part upon the characteristic of the proximity of the seat to center stage.
The right to perform an activity, or obtain a product, or attend an event wherein the difference between the market value of the right and the market value of another similar right is dependent upon the difference in some characteristic of the rights shall be referred to herein as a "priority right". A ticket is one example of a priority right used throughout the specification. However, it is to be understood that tickets are not the only priority rights applicable to the present invention.
Too often, the established methods of selling priority rights do not result in prices for these rights that are equal to their true market value. Therefore, these established methods are incapable of maximizing the revenue of those selling priority rights.
For some priority rights, the manner in which differences in the pertinent characteristic affect the market value of the right are apparent. For instance, for most sports or concert performances, the market value of the ticket rights, i.e., the right to sit in a particular seat at a particular event, is greater if the seat is closer to the stage. Thus, it may be relatively easy for a seller to rank the ticket rights prior to any sale of the rights. However, for other priority rights, although the characteristic that affects the market value of the right may itself be obvious, the manner in which variance in the characteristic affects the market value is not apparent. For example, when an individual wishes to purchase the right to play a round of golf at a particular course, the time that the round begins will likely affect the amount that the individual is willing to pay. The golfer may wish to be the first to tee off and would be willing to pay more for such a time than for any other. On the other hand, the golfer may have another commitment in the morning and be interested only in tee times in the afternoon. Therefore, the amount the individual would be willing to pay for a time in the afternoon varies greatly from the amount for a time in the morning. Due to this variability in consumer preference, any ranking of the rights to play a round of golf at particular times on a particular day by the owner of the golf course may not result in sales prices for these rights that are equal to their true market values. Therefore, a system is needed whereby the true market values of all priority rights can be achieved, including both those rights with relative values that can be easily pre-ranked and those rights with relative market values dependent upon consumer preferences that are difficult to discern prior to the commencement of sales.
Types of Priority Rights
As discussed above, the right to sit in a particular seat for a particular event is a priority right wherein the market value of similar rights can be ranked prior to the sale of the rights, by ordering the seats in large part according to their proximity to center stage. The current manner of selling the right to sit in a particular seat for a particular event involves selling tickets to the event. However, the established method of selling tickets to sporting and entertainment events involves pre-setting inflexible prices and then releasing the tickets for sale at a box office or by phone. This method has a number of shortcomings. Typically, each sale involves employees taking time-consuming individual orders and trying to describe the prices and seat locations to customers. Another shortcoming with this method is that it can be highly inconvenient and sometimes impossible for the purchaser to access the sale due to demand. This is especially true for premium or "high demand" events. Moreover, for practical reasons, prices are assigned to tickets in large blocks, while, in reality, purchasers often consider tickets within a block to have a wide ranging continuum of values; and these market values can be very hard to estimate before the tickets are sold. Largely because of these shortcomings, many premium tickets are sold for substantially less than their market value. Generally, these shortcomings exist even with new automated methods involving phone or Internet sales since the number of tickets is limited and the selling system is still fundamentally the same; with "first-come-first-served" orders taken for pre-priced tickets.
Another priority right with a relative market value that can be fairly easily determined prior to sale is the right to obtain a product for which the market demand far exceeds the supply. Occasionally, a manufacturer underestimates the demand for its product and thus creates too few units for the product's initial market release. Examples of this occurrence in the recent past include the Cabbage Patch Kids™ doll, the Tickle-Me Elmo™ doll, and the Sony PlayStation 2™ video game system. When such a situation exists, the manufacturer generally maintains a fixed selling price and offers the products on a "first-come-first-served" basis. The manufacturer not only loses revenue from the sales it could have made if it had produced more units, but it also loses revenue by selling the units it did produce at a price below their true market value. This difference between the original sales price and the market value is typically realized by an entity other than the manufacturer, e.g. one who buys the product and then resells it at a higher price. The pertinent characteristic that determines the market value of such highly desired products is the time of availability of the product to the consumer. In other words, a consumer would pay more to have the first product off the assembly line than to have the five-hundredth. Therefore, a system is needed so that when a manufacturer realizes that it has produced too few of a highly desired product, the manufacturer may maximize its revenue on those products by selling them at their true market value.
Other priority rights with market values that can be ranked prior to their sale are rights to obtain services wherein the value of those rights are dependent upon the order in which the services are received. For example, many consumers hire companies or individuals to remove snow from their property after an accumulation of snow. However, the value of this service is dependent upon the time at which the service is performed and, therefore, is dependent upon the order in which the properties are serviced. For instance, a consumer would likely be willing to pay more to be the first serviced after the accumulation of snow has stopped than to be the twentieth to receive the same service. Therefore, a system is needed wherein this discrepancy in market value may be realized by the provider of the service.
Another example of a service with a market value dependent upon the order of its performance is admittance through a toll booth. Currently, the administrator of a toll booth receives a set price for each vehicle that passes through the toll booth. That price is often dependent upon the type of vehicle, but the price does not reflect the true market value of the right to pass through the booth. The true market value depends upon how quickly the consumer is able to pass through the booth, i.e., the consumer's order in the line at the toll booth. Therefore, a system is required whereby the price of the right to pass through a toll booth is dependent upon the order in which the consumer is allowed to pass through the toll area.
Another right for which the current sales system does not return the true market value of the right is the right to obtain a certain numbered product of a limited edition series of products. For example, a popular artist may sell only 100 prints of one of her paintings. The current established method for such sales is offering all of the prints for sale at a set, inflexible price on a "first-come-first-served" basis. However, this sales approach may not achieve the full market value for all of the prints. Many consumers may be willing to pay more for the first numbered print than for the fiftieth. Therefore, because only one price is set for all of the prints, many of the prints are likely being sold at a price below their true market value. Also, by basing the availability of the prints upon "first-come-first-served," the additional profit that could be gained by selling a print to one who comes later but is willing to pay more is lost. Because the lower the number on the limited edition item, the higher its value, the relative market values of the rights to obtain items with different numbers can be determined prior to any sales activity. A system is needed whereby the true market value of limited edition items may be realized by the seller of the items.
Other markets in which the priority rights that are sold are often purchased for less than their market value are those markets containing products whose true market value depends on the product's location. For example, the rights to stay in cabins on cruise ships or hotel rooms or bungalows in vacation resorts are often assigned a sales price based on the amenities available in the room. However, among rooms containing the same amenities, the true market value of the right to stay in each room may differ depending upon the distance from the room to some desired location, such as a pool, beach, or lounge. The established method for determining the price of the right to stay in such rooms is to simply set a fixed price and make the rooms available on a "first-come-first-served" basis. A system is needed whereby the market values of these priority rights, which can be ranked according to the distance from some desired attraction or attractions, can be fully realized.
Another characteristic which determines the value of some priority rights is the time of entry into some venue. The established methods for selling these priority rights are not capable of garnering the full market value of the rights. For example, theme parks, such as Disneyland™ and Busch Gardens™, sell tickets at an inflexible price for a day's admission to the park. However, the actual time of admission to the park on any particular day is generally determined by how early the patron is willing to arrive at the park to stand in line. An earlier time of admission is desired by many patrons because the most popular attractions at theme parks often fill up quickly and maintain long lines for the entire day. The desirability of early admission is evidenced by the current practice of some theme parks, such as Walt Disney World™ in Orlando, Fla., which allow customers who stay at resorts affiliated with the theme park to enter the park earlier than customers who do not. However, this practice consists of allowing all patrons of the affiliated resort to enter the park at a set time, such as one hour prior to the admittance of the general public. This practice does not maximize the profit that may be obtained by the selling of these rights. Some of those customers who stay at the affiliated resorts may be willing to pay more to enter the park before other affiliated resort patrons. Further, this system does not account for the profit that could be gained by allowing members of the general public to purchase the right to enter the park at a time prior to other members of the general public. The relative value of these rights can be easily ranked, with earlier times of admittance having higher market values.
Another priority right with a market value dependent upon location, but for which pre-ranking of the relative market values may not gamer the true market value of the rights, is the right to sit at a particular table in a restaurant. A patron is likely to pay more to obtain a table closer to a window, for example, and is likely to pay less for a table close to the kitchen. However, individual patrons may prefer one window view to another or may desire to sit at a table in a corner for more privacy. Therefore, a complete, objective ranking of such rights to sit at a particular table may not be entirely accurate. There is a need for a system which would enable the seller of these rights to obtain their full market value.
As discussed above, the right to begin a round of golf at a particular time is a priority right for which the relative market values of related rights are difficult to determine prior to the sale of the rights. The tee time itself is the pertinent characteristic that determines the relative values of the rights to begin rounds of golf throughout a particular day. However, it is unclear prior to the sale of the rights which times are most desired by individuals wishing to play golf that day. The established method for determining tee times at a golf course is to set an inflexible price for playing a certain number of holes and then offering tee times on a "first come first served" basis. At premier golf courses, the system may be slightly different, requiring consumers to stay at a particular resort or be a member of an association in order to purchase a round of golf. However, even within these premier systems, the tee times are generally offered on a "first-come-first-serve-d" basis. These systems fail to garner the most profit for the golf course owners because individuals who attempt to reserve tee times after all the times have been reserved may be willing to pay more than the owner has currently received for a particular time. Also, some individuals may prefer to tee off at certain times of the day and, therefore, would be willing to pay more for the right to tee off at those times. For example, a golfer may wish to be the first person to tee off on a particular day, or a golfer may wish to tee off later in the afternoon to avoid the heat of the day and to view the sunset on the golf course. Therefore, the current system for selling golf tee times is sub-optimal because it does not account for individuals who would pay more to play at a particular time or for individuals who attempt to make reservations after all tee times have been reserved.
Another priority right with a relative value dependent upon individual consumer preference and, therefore, difficult to rank prior to a sale is the right to sit in a particular seat to view a movie in a theater. When viewing a movie, many individuals prefer to sit in the exact middle of the theater. However, others, such as those with small children, may wish to sit on an aisle, and others may prefer seats in the back of the theater. Therefore, the market value of the right to sit in a particular seat is not determined by some easy calculation, such as the distance from the center of the screen, but is dependent upon each potential movie-goer's personal preferences. The current system of selling tickets to the movie and then allowing admission on a "first-come-first-served" basis does not garner the full market value of the right to view the movie in a particular seat. Therefore, a system is needed whereby the full market value of the right to sit in a particular seat to see a particular movie at a particular time can be recognized by the theater owner.
Some priority rights are unique in that it may be relatively easy in one situation to determine the relative market value of related rights prior to their sale while in another situation it is very difficult. One example of such a priority right is the right to view an art exhibit. For highly anticipated art exhibits, many individuals would be willing to pay a premium for the right to be one of the first to view the exhibit. Therefore, the true market value of the right to enter the art exhibit is not being achieved by the current system of either issuing select invitations to a premiere night or simply allowing admission to ticket holders on a "first-come-first-served" basis. In this situation, the priority rights could easily be pre-ranked with the earliest time of admittance being the most valuable. Thus, a system is needed whereby the exhibit organizer may realize the full market value of the right to view such an exhibit.
However, on any day after the opening day of an art exhibit, the relative values of different times of admittance may vary more widely due to the schedules of potential viewers. For example, one individual may be willing to view the exhibit late in the afternoon because work precludes any other time of attendance. Therefore, to that individual, the right to view the exhibit in the late afternoon is more valuable than the right to view it in the morning. The current system of selling tickets for an art exhibit does not account for this variance in market value due to individual viewers' preferences. Therefore, there is a need for a system that does yield the full market value of the rights sold.
Priority Right Auctioning System Options
In selling priority rights where the relative market values of the priority rights can be easily pre-ranked, there also exists a need for a system that can allow the purchaser to override the pre-ranking to denote the purchaser's own personal preference. For example, although seats in the front row at a concert are widely regarded as the best seats and would be pre-ranked as the seats with the highest relative market value, an individual may wish to sit on the side of the stage to be near a particular member of the performing group. If that individual was willing to pay handsomely for the right to sit in a seat on the side, but not one in front of the stage, then the full market value of the right to sit in a seat on the side of the stage would only be captured by a system which allowed the individual to denote his own ranking of desired seats. Also, a bidder may be willing to pay a premium for the right to sit in the first few rows but not for the right to sit in all the seats in a section specified by the seller of the rights. Therefore, a system is needed whereby a bidder may personally designate one or more priority rights and then offer to pay up to a certain amount for those rights.
Additionally, when purchasing priority rights consumers often wish to designate alternative bids. For example, an individual who wished to purchase the right to sit in a seat at an event may only be interested in sitting in the first few rows if it would cost below a particular price. If that person's bid was unsuccessful for that section of priority rights, however, he may be willing to sit in one of a group of seats in another location for some lesser amount of money. The current method of selling priority rights does not accommodate this desire by the consuming public to designate individually-tailored alternative priority right bids. Therefore, there is a need for a system that satisfies this desire.
Shortcomings of Current Auctioning Systems
Logistically, auctioning of priority rights has not always been feasible due to the large quantity of unique rights and even larger quantity of buyers wishing to purchase them. A few auction systems have been developed that operate using the Internet as the communications mode. These systems have been used to auction items such as computer equipment, artwork, and special items for charity. However, these systems are not suitable for use in connection with a real-time mass auction of priority rights. With the currently operating systems, generally the items being sold are of a small quantity or individually unique. In most of the currently operating systems, the items for sale are individually listed and individually bid upon using e-mail over a period of days or weeks. While, the currently operating systems are useful for such limited purposes, they have several shortcomings.
One such shortcoming arises from the use of e-mail to place bids and to update participants of their bid status. While in theory e-mail is instantaneous, there are occasional routing delays of which the sender is often not immediately aware. In an auction of a slow, deliberate nature such as those presently operating, this is not a great concern. However, in a fast pace auction with numerous participants some bids could be lost as delayed e-mail, unbeknownst to the participant.
An additional problem with the e-mail approach is that time may elapse before the bid information is read and applied. Therefore, the participant may not get instantaneous feedback on other bids which may be taking place simultaneously. The participant often must wait for some period of time to learn if the bid is successful. If the participant has a strategy for bidding on a very desirable item, the participant must return to the auction numerous times to follow its progression.
Most currently operating systems provide some general bid status data, usually a minimal amount of information such as "current" high bid. This "current" high bid is updated by periodically reviewing the bids received, and entering the highest bid to date. Therefore, these "current" bids are not current up to the second. Moreover, if there are many of a particular item, such as event tickets or golf tee times having a continuum of values, participants need to know considerably more than the high bid information in order to make an informed bidding decision.
Currently operating systems do not provide bid status information updates independent of solicitation of the information from participants. Once the Internet auction site is accessed, the information conveyed may become outdated as it is being viewed. Again this would be quite unfavorable for fast-paced auctions. Therefore, even with auction sites which were actually being updated real-time, a participant would need to continually re-access the site in order to keep information truly updated.
One Internet auction system, "onsale" at http://www.onsale.com/ attempts to overcome the e-mail auction problems by automatically updating its Internet site. However, like the other Internet auction sites, "onsale" conducts relatively slow, deliberate sales, and still relies on e-mail to transmit some of the bid information. In addition, although the "onsale" auction site is automatically updated, it does not automatically present this information to participants. As explained above, participants need to continually re-access the site in order to keep information truly updated.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,689,928 details an auction system for used cars that is capable of interactive, essentially real-time auctioning. Instead of being Internet based, this used car auctioning system is constructed with a 4-level hierarchy of computers networked to a plurality of auto dealers terminals. At each level, the bids received by the computer are processed and only select bids are transmitted to the next level. The bids are raised in increments of 3000 yen and the participants may bid via a single signal indicating a "yes" in response to the bid being raised. This system is based on the traditional auction format, and is used to sell one item or lot at a time. When a car has been auctioned, a disc is loaded by each dealer into his terminal which shows the photograph of the next car to be auctioned. Bidding is limited to a predetermined group of auto dealers. Because the structure of this system is hierarchical, i.e. not on the Internet, it is not practical for use in wide-spread auctions available to consumers. Because of the methodical nature of this system, selling a progression of single items with incremented bids, it is geared for low volume sales of items with relatively high values.
Recently tickets have been made available for purchase on the Internet, for example at http://www.ticketmaster.com and http://www.tickets.com. However, at these Internet sites, sales are of the traditional pre-set pricing, "first-come-first-served" format. Some Internet sites do offer tickets in an auction format, but only a few tickets to select events sold by individuals who have purchased the tickets and are attempting to resell them. Examples of such sites are http://www.ebay.com, http://auctions.yahoo.com, http://www.allsoldout.com, and http://www.busyrhino.com.
Considering the selling of a large number of priority rights, there are unique circumstances which present challenges not manifested in selling other types of rights. Since the values of priority rights vary widely depending upon the difference in a pertinent characteristic, it is not practical to mass the priority rights into simple generic blocks to be auctioned. Nor is it practical to list and auction each priority right individually, since this could present auction participants with a prohibitively large number of individual auctions, and no practical way to obtain contiguous priority rights. In other words, if a bidder wished to purchase the right to sit in four adjacent seats at a show or movie, and the right to sit in each seat was sold in a separate auction, it would be virtually impossible for the bidder to monitor every combination of four adjacent seats and make appropriate bids. Accordingly, there exists a need for a system which can, within a single, clear format, auction a large number of rights with a continuum of values, each at its market price. Furthermore, this system needs to apply logic in sorting bids based not only on price, but on clustering requirements to ensure that within a multiple priority right bid, the priority rights are contiguous. This would require a database configuration unlike that employed by the prior art.
Moreover, given the furious pace of sales for many premium priority rights, there exists the unique and as yet, unmet challenge of providing instant, automatic, comprehensive feedback for the status of a relatively complex arrangement of standing bids. Frequently the more popular sporting and entertainment events sell all available tickets in a matter of a few minutes. The number of tickets to these events may reach into the hundreds of thousands. A practicable auction of priority rights for such an event would require a system uniquely designed to process this large volume while presenting an updated, clear and informative view of the proceedings to all participants. It would be logical to presume that efficient conveyance of bid information for a large, complex pattern of bids would require a graphical representation of the bid standings. Although some Internet auctions employ graphical representation of objects for sale, none employ graphical representation of bid status.
Another need for on-line auction systems is a method of convincing bidders to place their bids early instead of waiting to bid at the last minute before the auction closes. As mentioned previously, on-line auctions are typically conducted over a set period of time. With these systems, bidders often wait until the last possible second before auction closing to place their bids in an attempt to block subsequent bidders from making higher bids. Such actions by bidders not only keeps the price of the auctioned item undesirably low, but sometimes results in a large quantity of bids just before auction closing which the on-line system is not capable of handling. Thus, it would be advantageous for an on-line auction system that provides incentives for bidders to place their bids early in the auction rather than waiting until the last minute.
In addition, ticket auction participants occasionally need to have two or more mutually exclusive ticket purchase options available to them. Ticket purchase decisions are often made based on price and availability of seats having acceptable locations. Even the number of tickets a consumer wishes to order may be dependent on price. For example, a consumer may desire two front row tickets if they are within his budget, otherwise he desires four tickets in a different location within budget, otherwise he desires ten tickets anywhere available within budget. But with auctions of pre-ranked seats, some such information cannot be known until the auction has ended, unless the auction close is phased-out from the best to the worst seats. There exists a need to make solutions available in the form of mutually exclusive, prioritized bids simultaneously entered by a consumer in a ticket auction.
In addition, not all ticket auction customers will agree with the exact seat pre-ranking assigned for an auction. For example, a race fan may prefer seats behind his favorite driver's pit stop. An older fan at an arena concert may wish to be as close as possible without being on the floor, where he assumes fans will stand during much of the show. Again, there exists a need for mutually exclusive, simultaneous prioritized bidding in order to provide this flexibility to fans.
Another shortcoming of currently established methods for selling tickets and other priority rights is their inability to reap for the priority right seller the dramatic increases in market value of priority rights immediately prior to their usage. For example, in the days immediately preceding a popular concert or movie premiere, the market value of tickets to those events typically increase dramatically as publicity increases and the public focuses on the event. However, because a large percentage of the public must plan their schedules far in advance, it is not feasible to only sell tickets to these events in the few days before the event occurs. Therefore, tickets are sold months in advance and popular events sell out before the true market value of the rights to attend the event can be determined. A system is needed that permits individuals to reserve priority rights a sufficient amount of time in advance but that also garners for the priority right seller the full market value of those rights.
A potential negative effect of a system that places primary emphasis upon the maximum amount of money an individual is willing to pay for a particular right is that less affluent members of the consuming public will be unable to procure desired priority rights. Under current established methods for selling priority rights which offer rights on a "first-come-first-served" basis, individuals of limited means may still purchase rights if they are willing to stand in line for an extended period of time. Also, a system that only seeks the highest profit margin in priority rights sales would not permit special treatment of certain bidders, such as alumni group members, company employees, or frequent purchasers. Such special treatment may be important to the public image of a priority right seller, and, thus, its long-term economic success. Therefore, there is a need for a priority right sales system that may be modified to favor members of a selected group, such as those of limited means or company employees.
Additionally, to achieve the full market value of a group of priority rights, the administrator of a priority right sales system must be equipped with certain statistical information regarding the progress of the sale. Therefore, a system for selling priority rights should be capable of real-time statistical analysis to aid the system administrator in regulating the system to achieve optimal results.
In spite of their shortcomings, the above mentioned prior art systems are useful for their respective intended purposes. However, given their limitations, and the above noted unique circumstances for mass priority right sales, it is simply not practical or feasible to apply any of the prior art to the particular task of auctioning a large volume of priority rights.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a computer controlled auctioning system, in which an large number of participants may have simultaneous access to bid on to the desired priority rights. The above stated needs as well as others are fulfilled by the present invention through a system constructed to sell a large number of priority rights in a very short time, each said priority right being sold for a value set by existing market forces. The system provides participants with simple, yet informative graphical standing bid information on the entire stock of priority rights available, and allows them real-time bidding interaction. This system can achieve such sales even for priority rights garnering extremely high public interest, without excluding any potential purchasers.
The present invention achieves said objectives by employing a computer controlled priority right auctioning system which receives and evaluates bid information records received from a plurality of remote terminals, said bid information records corresponding to bids for one or more priority rights.
The automated priority right auctioning system is comprised of a memory storing a plurality of previously accepted bid information records, said records each including identification information, section information, quantity information, and bid price information. The automated priority right auctioning system is further comprised of a central controlling computer operably connected to the memory and operable to receive a message including a received bid information record from one of a plurality of remote terminals through a communication system, determine a lowest minimum acceptable bid value corresponding to the received section information using the previously accepted bid information records stored in the memory, and store the received bid information record if a value represented by the received bid price information exceeds the lowest minimum acceptable bid value.
The central controlling computer is further operable to, in a like manner, receive, evaluate and store, if acceptable, subsequent bids received and to stop receiving subsequent messages after a predetermined time period.
Within the automated priority right auctioning system, each previously accepted bid information record includes rank information based on the section information and the bid price information, and the central controlling computer is further operable to assign a rank to each received bid information record based on its section information, its bid price information, and the previously accepted bid information records.
After stopping receiving subsequent messages, the central controlling computer is further operable to associate one or more particular priority rights with a previously accepted bid information record based on the rank information and the section information of each of a plurality of previously accepted bid information records.
The automated priority right auctioning system further includes a programmed graphical representation method designed to efficiently convey to auction participants useful standing bid information across a spectrum of priority rights to be auctioned, allowing current priority right bid prices to be quantified in an effective manner.
The system further includes programmed methods for ensuring contiguous grouping of priority rights within each multiple priority right bid, and for ensuring that the standing bid information is automatically updated on a real-time basis and presented as such to all auction participants; said programmed method employing HTML programming features such as the recently available META refresh (a client pull type browser directive) or the multipart/mixed MIME format (a server push type browser directive).
Participants may access this system from remote sites using terminals, such as personal computers, via telephone lines or other means of communication. The status of bids and their corresponding priority rights are conveyed on graphic displays which are updated on a real-time basis for all participants to view. Participants may place bids of any amount, subject to predetermined limits, and cancel, raise, or lower bids at will. In addition, participants may view their personal bid standings and the updated overall bid standings without having to continually re-access the auction site. Through the participants' remote terminals, the personal bid requests are sent to the host computer which immediately processes, and sorts the bids according to section and price. The central computer immediately updates and displays the new bid standing order. When the auction is closed, the bids become fixed and the physical transaction can occur.
The system further includes the ability for participants to limit their bids to particular types of priority rights. Additionally, the system will allow participants to lock-in their priority rights before auction closing upon the payment of a premium. Also, the system provides for proxy bidding which allows participants to automatically increase bid amounts to match subsequent higher bids. The system further includes the ability for participants to define their own personal bidding sections and to make alternative bids. Also, the system provides incentives for compelling bidders to place bids well in advance of auction closing.
In addition, it would be advantageous for the system to further include the ability for each participant to place two or more prioritized simultaneous but mutually exclusive bids in a single ticket auction.
A computer controlled priority right auctioning system is now described with reference to
Accordingly, consumers wishing to become participants (also referred to herein as "bidders") in an upcoming auction may access the central computer 12 of
Registration Procedure of Auctioning System
Referring again to
Referring again to
Step 24 in
The central computer 12 of
At step 22 of
Auction Procedure of Auctioning System
Referring again to
If the query finds the participant is registered, then in step 44 of
Referring again to
As shown in step 51 and step 52, if the standing bid price of a pre-selected key ticket in the graphical representation has changed as a result of the latest bid, this change is reflected immediately by automatically updating the display of the current bid standings. These prices are displayed within the graphical view of the priority right and sale information, just as the initial minimum bids were displayed in
Referring again to
Referring again to
The databases shown in
Accordingly, a ticket seller could promote numerous ticket sales simultaneously at one network site, with the added step for the registrant/participant of choosing the desired sale from those presented.
In one embodiment, a template may be loaded into participants' terminals prior to their accessing the auction site, said template providing text or graphic information that does not change during an auction or between auctions, such as background art, forms or instructions. Said template may be downloaded from the Internet, or installed from a disc or by some other means. Use of a template allows the bid status updates to be made with transmission of only the numerical data, which in combination with the template, presents the comprehensive auction status update to participants. In another embodiment, the bid status changes are automatically presented to the participants by means of the multipart/mixed MIME format, a recently available server-push type programming feature which takes advantage of a connection that is held open over multiple responses, allowing the server to send more data at will. This method can be more efficient, since new HTTP connections do not have to be reopened.
Participant Preference Options of Auctioning System
Various other alternative embodiments of the invention are also possible. For example, as shown in
Another participant preference option presented to the bidder under the ticket options block 202 is the option for a premium subsection ticket, such as the right to sit in a front row seat at an event. Certain bidders may be exclusively interested in a premium subsection ticket. Under this option, the participant may instruct the system to cancel the bid if the bid is bumped from the premium subsection. Thus, if a participant makes a bid and specifies that he must be in the premium subsection, the system will cancel the bid if the bid is bumped from the premium subsection. Alternatively, the participant may state that he simply prefers the premium subsection, but will take other tickets. Thus, under this option, the system will leave the participant with a premium subsection ticket so long as his bid is consistent with the other premium subsection bids. If the participant is bumped from the premium subsection, the participant's bid will not be canceled, but he will simply be moved back. This will generally be the system default. Finally, the participant may state that he absolutely does not want a premium subsection ticket, and he should be moved back if his bid lands him in the premium subsection. Thus, under this option, the system will place the participant in another subsection even if his bid qualifies him for the premium subsection.
Another example of a premium subsection ticket is the right to sit in an aisle seat at an event. The ticket options block 202 would allow the participant to specify aisle seat preference as a participant preference option. The system may present the participant with a number of choices concerning the aisle, including the following options: (i) must have an aisle seat and will move back to get on the aisle, (ii) will not accept an aisle seat, (iii) prefer the aisle, but will accept other seats, (iv) do not prefer the aisle, and (v) don't care. The "don't care" option is generally the system default. Based upon the participant's input, the system will attempt to place the participant in the desired location either on an aisle or away from an aisle.
A number of other participant preference options other than those described above may also be specified in the ticket options block 202. For example, if the priority right is the right to sit in a particular seat at an event, the system may give participants options for being placed near concession stands, restrooms, exits, or the rear of a section. Other preference options are also possible and may be easily incorporated by those of ordinary skill in the art.
The participant's preference screen 200 also includes an option 204 that allows the system to receive lock-in ticket information. This option 204 allows the participant to secure a ticket, upon payment of a premium, regardless of any subsequent bids for the ticket during the auction. This premium may be expressed in any number of ways such as a flat dollar amount (e.g., $25) or a percent of the bid value (e.g., 50%). The premium is expressed on the preferences screen 200 by lock-in premium line 208. Thus, if the participant makes a bid of $80 per ticket for five seats, and this bid currently places the bidder in a particular subsection of seats, the participant may lock-in these five tickets upon payment of the premium. If the premium is 50% of the bid value, the participant would be required to pay $120 per ticket, or $600 total dollars to secure these five seats until the close of the auction. If the participant does choose to lock-in his bid by paying the premium, the participant will retain all five tickets throughout the auction even if a subsequent bidder offers $120 or more for the same tickets.
The participant's preference screen 200 may also include an option that allows the system to receive proxy bid information. The proxy bid options are shown under proxy block 206. According to the proxy bid options, the participant may enter a maximum proxy bid amount in addition to the current bid amount. The maximum proxy bid amount is the amount that the bidder authorizes the system to bid in his absence in order to keep the bidder in the preferred seat or location. Under this block 206, the bidder has the following three options: (i) keep the bidder in the bidding for the same tickets for up to the maximum bid amount, (ii) keep the bidder in the same section of seats for up to the maximum bid amount, and (iii) keep the bidder in the bidding for any ticket in the auction for up to the maximum bid amount. Thus, if the participant bids $80 for a ticket in a certain section, but authorizes proxy bidding up to $130, the participant may leave the auction, knowing that proxy bids will be made for him up to $130 should a subsequent bid exceed his bid. If the participant chooses the option to stay in the bidding for the same ticket for up to the maximum bid, the system will keep the participant in the bidding for that ticket until subsequent bids for that ticket are received exceeding $130. At that time, the participant's bid will be bumped. If the participant chooses the option to stay in bidding for the same section of seats for up to the maximum bid, the participant will be bumped to the rear of the section as subsequent bids are received for greater than $80. Once bids for the rear of the section reach $80, the participant's bid will automatically increase to keep him in the section up to a value of $130. Once all bids in the section exceed $130, the participant's bid will be bumped. Finally, if the bidder chooses to simply stay in the overall bidding for up to $130, the participant's $80 bid will be continually bumped to less preferential tickets, as bid values exceed $80. Once the least preferential ticket reaches $80, the participant's bid will automatically increase to keep him in the bidding for up to a bid of $130. If bids for the least preferential ticket exceed $120, the participant will be completely removed from the bidding.
The participant's preference screen 200 may also include an option that allows the auction participant to individually designate those seats upon which the participant wishes to bid. Instead of selecting to bid within the sections or subsections defined by the auction organizer, each participant may define his own personal bidding section. One embodiment of this invention is to allow the auction participant to define the bounds of his personal bidding section by using a mouse to "click and drag" a cursor over a portion of the graphical representation of the available seats. Another embodiment involves permitting the auction participant to define his personal bidding section by entering the first and last seat identification numbers in the desired personal bidding section.
The participant's preference screen 200 may also include an option that allows the auction participant to place alternative bids. For example, in an auction for the right to sit in a particular seat at an event, an auction participant could designate that she wished to stay in the bidding for the right to sit in a seat in Section A for up to $50, but if that bid was bumped then she wished to stay in the bidding for the right to sit in a seat in Section D for up to $25.
This option to place alternative bids may be used with the seat sections designated by the auction organizer, as in the previous example, or with the participant's personal bidding sections. Therefore, the auction participant could designate that she wished to stay in the bidding for a right in her first personal bidding section for up to $45, and if that bid was bumped then she wished to stay in the bidding for a right within her second personal bidding section for up to $25. Additionally, more than two alternative bids may be placed.
Referring to
Then, in step 414 the central computer 12 determines whether the activated bid exceeds the standing minimum acceptable bid for the tickets identified in the activated bid. This is accomplished by conducting a query on the main auction database 16 of
Referring again to
Alternative Embodiments of Auctioning System
In another alternative embodiment of the invention, a bidding activity meter 302 is used as shown in
Because the auction may be conducted over an adjustable time period using the bidding activity meter, the bidding activity meter encourages bidders to place their bids early and not wait until the very last minute before auction closing to place their bids. When a large number of bidders wait to bid at the very last minute before auction closing, the system may be unable to handle the large number of bids and all bidders may not be allowed to place their bids. If all bids are not placed, the market price per ticket is not realized. However, the bidding activity meter prevents this problem by encouraging bidders to place their bids early. With the bidding activity meter 302, bidders will monitor the bidding activity meter and place their bids immediately when they realize that bidding is reaching the low threshold level. Because bidders will likely have a continuum of different interpretations as to when the bidding activity meter is reaching the low threshold level, bids will be more evenly distributed over time and the intensity of the final bidding will be decreased.
In a further embodiment of the invention, bidding may be split into a first session and a second session. In this first session, bids are taken to determine which bidders will receive the tickets. In this session, a market price is determined for the least preferential ticket in the auction. Alternatively, bidders may bid on the least preferential ticket in each section. Bidders making bids in excess of the market price are guaranteed a ticket and allowed to bid in the second session. In the second session of bidding, bidders place bids on particular tickets in the auction. The most preferential tickets in the auction are awarded to the highest bidders, consistent with the method of conducting an auction described herein. The bid activity meter 302 may be used in both the first and second session of bidding to define the time limits that bidders have to place bids during the first or second sessions.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, priority bidding may be offered. In the ticket auction context, priority bidding allows the bid participant to place a prioritized bid that acts as a packet of bids and includes a first bid as well as at least one back up bid in the event that the first bid or other higher priority bid in the prioritized bid is rejected during the auction. By way of example,
After submission of the first priority bit, a terminal screen such as screen 406 in
After submission of the second priority bid, the participant may choose to enter a third priority bid or any number of priority bids. Entering third or additional priority bids is performed in generally the same manner as described above for the first and second priority bids. Right clicking with the mouse selects an entire section for the area of a bid, as shown in
When the first priority bid of a prioritized bid has been entered by the bid participant, it becomes active immediately, and is either accepted or rejected by the system. When the lower priority bids are entered, they remain inactive unless other bidders bump the first priority bid out such that the bid is no longer acceptable within its defined area. If the first priority bid is bumped or otherwise rejected during the auction, the second priority bid is then activated. If the second priority bid is bumped, the third is activated and so on. If all priority bids are bumped, the participant must raise one or more bids or enter a new bid in order to purchase tickets.
As mentioned above, the auction procedure illustrated by the flowchart in
In an auction for priority rights that are not easily pre-ranked, the sorting algorithm of step 50 in
Referring again to
First, the central computer 12, in step 428, determined that priority right bid 442 for $300 was the highest of all the bids received. Therefore, that bid was assigned the priority right to tee off at 8:00 a.m., and the bid record corresponding to bid 442 in the main auction database of
The central computer 12 then determined that there were more available priority rights, step 430, and that there remained bids that had not yet been processed, step 436. Therefore, the central computer 12 queried the main auction database of
Returning to step 430 in
The central computer 12 continued processing this algorithm until all priority rights were assigned to received bids. The final result of all priority right assignments can be seen in frame 444. During the process of assigning priority rights, if a desired priority right was already assigned the central computer 12 then selected the closest available priority right to the desired priority right. Other embodiments of this invention may vary this selection, opting to only choose priority rights in one direction, e.g. later tee times. Additionally, the priority rights auctioning system could be modified to permit, as discussed above, alternative priority right bids, personal priority right bidding sections, and participant preference options, such as the option to designate which direction the bid is bumped. The priority rights auctioning system of the present invention, utilizing a sorting algorithm such as that illustrated in
Statistical Analysis of Auctioning System
The automated priority right auctioning system of the present invention may be used in connection with other computer programs to create graphs and tables to enable real-time statistical analysis of the auction.
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments of the invention are merely illustrative. Other implementations may readily be devised by those of ordinary skill in the art which will embody the principles of the invention and fall within the spirit and scope thereof. For example, the exemplary contiguous ticket algorithm of
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Title not available
|Mar 28, 1968
|May 25, 1971
|Frederick Nymeyer
|Auction market computation system
|Mar 21, 1969
|Nov 23, 1971
|Burroughs Corp
|Automatic ticket/credit card check-in system
|Sep 15, 1982
|Oct 25, 1983
|Braddock Iii Walter D
|Automated stock exchange
|Sep 24, 1984
|Jul 29, 1986
|Npd Research, Inc.
|Rapid market survey collection and dissemination method
|Aug 27, 1985
|Nov 29, 1988
|Trippe Kenneth A B
|Cruise information and booking data processing system
|Jan 30, 1987
|Dec 6, 1988
|Flex Japan Inc.
|Auction information transmission processing
|Oct 1, 1986
|Jan 17, 1989
|Strategic Processing Corporation
|Interactive market management system
|Apr 10, 1987
|Mar 28, 1989
|Control Data Corporation
|Television and market research data collection system and method
|May 16, 1988
|Jul 4, 1989
|Fdr Interactive Technologies
|Telephonic-interface statistical analysis system
|Nov 18, 1988
|Aug 29, 1989
|Systemone Holdings, Inc.
|Computer reservation system with means to rank travel itineraries chosen in terms of schedule/fare data
|Feb 24, 1989
|Dec 26, 1989
|Gas Research Institute
|Temperature and humidity auctioneering control
|Mar 19, 1984
|Dec 25, 1990
|World Energy Exchange Corporation
|Voice actuated automated futures trading exchange
|May 25, 1989
|Dec 31, 1991
|Reuters Limited
|Distributed matching system
|May 31, 1989
|Mar 31, 1992
|Lattice Investments, Inc.
|Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets
|Jan 5, 1990
|May 12, 1992
|John R. Koza
|Broadcast lottery
|May 26, 1989
|Aug 4, 1992
|Reuters Limited
|Anonymous matching system
|Feb 15, 1991
|Jan 26, 1993
|Bantec, Inc.
|Ribbon saving control mechanism
|Nov 12, 1991
|Aug 17, 1993
|Garback Brent J
|Computer travel planning system
|Feb 12, 1991
|Aug 24, 1993
|Ais Infonetics Inc.
|Automatic ticket dispensing system
|Dec 12, 1990
|Oct 12, 1993
|Eduardo Leiseca
|Computerized reservations and scheduling system
|Mar 19, 1992
|Nov 30, 1993
|Moore Business Forms, Inc.
|Secure event tickets
|Sep 19, 1991
|Feb 1, 1994
|Kohorn H Von
|System and method of communication with authenticated wagering participation
|Nov 28, 1990
|May 10, 1994
|Japan Airlines, Co., Ltd.
|Reservation system terminal
|Jun 3, 1993
|Jul 12, 1994
|At&T Bell Laboratories
|Mediation of transactions by a communications system
|Aug 9, 1991
|Jul 26, 1994
|C/A Architects, Inc.
|System for displaying selected assembly-facility seating views
|Dec 17, 1993
|Sep 13, 1994
|Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.
|Animated electronic meeting place
|Jul 5, 1994
|Apr 18, 1995
|Wilder; Wilford B.
|Automated ticket sales and dispensing system
|Aug 25, 1993
|Jun 6, 1995
|Touch Screen Media, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for providing travel destination information and making travel reservations
|Oct 29, 1993
|Jun 20, 1995
|Abecassis; Max
|Transaction protection system
|Sep 13, 1994
|Jun 27, 1995
|Office Express Pty. Ltd.
|Selective dissemination of information
|Feb 2, 1994
|Dec 12, 1995
|Bush; Thomas A.
|Transactional processing system
|Apr 27, 1995
|Feb 6, 1996
|Double Win, Ltd.
|Ticket systems for wagering on sports events
|Jul 7, 1994
|May 21, 1996
|Johnston; William H.
|Lottery racing sweepstake
|Aug 4, 1995
|Sep 3, 1996
|Micali; Silvia
|Simultaneous electronic transactions with visible trusted parties
|Apr 28, 1994
|Sep 17, 1996
|Citibank, N.A.
|Trusted agents for open electronic commerce
|Jan 31, 1995
|Sep 24, 1996
|Delorme Publishing Company
|Computer aided routing system
|Mar 11, 1994
|Jan 7, 1997
|Eagleview, Inc.
|Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers
|Nov 22, 1994
|Jan 28, 1997
|Pitney Bowes Inc.
|Apparatus and method for issuing and validating tickets
|Jun 7, 1995
|Sep 2, 1997
|Fraser; Richard
|Interactive computer system to match buyers and sellers of real estate, businesses and other property using the internet
|Nov 21, 1994
|Mar 3, 1998
|Anthony V. Pugliese
|Electronic ticketing and reservation system and method
|May 10, 1994
|Apr 7, 1998
|Eon Corp
|Low power output subscriber unit
|Dec 29, 1995
|Apr 21, 1998
|At&T Corp.
|Universal message delivery system for handles identifying network presences
|Nov 16, 1995
|May 19, 1998
|Hitachi, Ltd
|Electronic ticket vending system and method thereof
|Nov 1, 1995
|May 26, 1998
|First Virtual Holdings Incorporated
|Computerized payment system for purchasing goods and services on the internet
|Mar 29, 1996
|Jun 30, 1998
|Adt Automotive, Inc.
|Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system
|Sep 4, 1996
|Aug 11, 1998
|Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership
|Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers
|Dec 11, 1995
|Aug 11, 1998
|Cybergold, Inc.
|Attention brokerage
|Feb 20, 1996
|Aug 11, 1998
|Health Hero Network, Inc.
|Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling
|Feb 16, 1996
|Aug 18, 1998
|Helbling; Edward
|Automatic theater ticket concierge
|Feb 28, 1996
|Sep 22, 1998
|Micali; Silvio
|Traceable anonymous transactions
|Mar 27, 1995
|Oct 6, 1998
|Aucnet Inc.
|Auction information transmission processing system
|Sep 16, 1994
|Oct 20, 1998
|First Virtual Holdings Incorporated
|Computerized system for making payments and authenticating transactions over the internet
|Mar 29, 1996
|Nov 10, 1998
|Onsale, Inc.
|Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
|Nov 7, 1995
|Dec 1, 1998
|Mercexchange, L.L.C.
|Consignment nodes
|Dec 12, 1995
|Dec 1, 1998
|Optimark Technologies, Inc.
|Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features
|Mar 26, 1996
|Dec 15, 1998
|Entegrity Solutions Corporation
|Secure world wide electronic commerce over an open network
|Aug 26, 1996
|Mar 30, 1999
|Bid.Com International Inc.
|Computer auction system
|Jan 11, 1996
|Jun 29, 1999
|Talus Solutions, Inc.
|Method and system for determining marginal values for use in a revenue management system
|May 23, 1997
|Feb 8, 2000
|Brett; Kenton F.
|Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
|Jun 5, 1998
|Feb 8, 2000
|Health Hero Network
|Method for conducting an on-line bidding session with bid pooling
|Jan 4, 1996
|Feb 15, 2000
|Ausubel; Lawrence M.
|System and method for an efficient dynamic auction for multiple objects
|Sep 2, 1997
|Mar 28, 2000
|Hitachi, Ltd.
|Automatic auction method
|Oct 8, 1996
|Apr 4, 2000
|Onsale, Inc.
|Method for supplying automatic status updates using electronic mail
|May 7, 1996
|Apr 11, 2000
|Barcelou; David M.
|Automated league and tournament device
|Jul 14, 1998
|May 23, 2000
|American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc.
|Ticket redistribution system
|Mar 3, 1998
|May 30, 2000
|Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
|Ticket issuing system, ticket checking system, check system, retrieving system and automatic examination machine
|Dec 24, 1997
|Jul 4, 2000
|Bone, Jr.; Wilburn I.
|Liquid crystal dynamic barcode display
|Mar 4, 1997
|Jul 4, 2000
|Sabre Inc.
|Apparatus and method of allocating flight inventory resources based on the current market value
|Jul 8, 1997
|Jul 4, 2000
|Priceline.Com Incorporated
|Conditional purchase offer management system
|May 22, 1998
|Jul 11, 2000
|Sehr; Richard P.
|Travel system and methods utilizing multi-application passenger cards
|Oct 10, 1997
|Jul 25, 2000
|The Pugliese Company
|Electronic ticketing and reservation system and method
|Aug 22, 1997
|Aug 22, 2000
|Walker Digital, Llc
|System and method for controlling access to a venue using alterable tickets
|Apr 1, 1998
|Sep 12, 2000
|Eyeticket Corporation
|System and method for aircraft passenger check-in and boarding using iris recognition
|Aug 8, 1997
|Sep 19, 2000
|Koninklijke Kpn N.V.
|Method and system for storing tickets on smart cards
|Mar 13, 2000
|Jan 16, 2001
|Esign, Inc.
|Electronic transaction systems and methods therefor
|Sep 28, 1998
|Feb 20, 2001
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Smart card mechanism and method for obtaining electronic tickets for goods services over an open communications link
|Jun 29, 1998
|Apr 10, 2001
|Sun Microsystems, Inc.
|Multi-venue ticketing using smart cards
|Nov 26, 1997
|Apr 24, 2001
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Cryptographic encoded ticket issuing and collection system for remote purchasers
|Feb 19, 1999
|May 8, 2001
|Freemarkets, Inc.
|Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots
|Sep 4, 1997
|May 29, 2001
|Priceline.Com Incorporated
|Conditional purchase offer management system for event tickets
|Mar 29, 1996
|Jun 5, 2001
|Onsale, Inc.
|Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
|May 7, 1998
|Jun 12, 2001
|Messagemedia, Inc.
|Computerized system for facilitating transactions between parties on the internet using e-mail
|Dec 11, 1998
|Oct 23, 2001
|At&T Corporation
|Method and apparatus for ticket turn-back capability
|Dec 10, 1999
|Jan 22, 2002
|The Brodia Group
|Smart electronic receipt system
|Oct 3, 1997
|Jul 9, 2002
|Priceline.Com Incorporated
|System and method for aggregating multiple buyers utilizing conditional purchase offers (CPOS)
|Sep 6, 2000
|Aug 13, 2002
|Eric Inselberg
|Method and apparatus for interactive audience participation at a live spectator event
|Jan 10, 2000
|Sep 3, 2002
|Lucinda Stone
|Method for using computers to facilitate and control the creating of a plurality of functions
|Jun 7, 1995
|Sep 10, 2002
|Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.
|Telephone-television interface statistical analysis system
|Mar 9, 2000
|Oct 15, 2002
|Ebay Inc.
|Method and apparatus for verifying the identity of a participant within an on-line auction environment
|Feb 25, 1999
|Oct 22, 2002
|International Computers Limited
|Cancellation method for an automatic ticket system
|Dec 20, 1999
|Nov 5, 2002
|Robert O. Mankes
|Active reservation system
|Sep 4, 1997
|Nov 19, 2002
|Priceline.Com Incorporated
|System and method for managing third-party input to a conditional purchase offer (CPO)
|Jun 9, 2000
|Dec 17, 2002
|Brett Nakfoor
|Electronic ticketing system and method
|Sep 22, 2000
|Feb 18, 2003
|Ebay Inc,
|Method and system for communicating selected search results between first and second entities over a network
|May 19, 2000
|Aug 5, 2003
|Pitney Bowes Inc.
|System and method for issuing electronic tickets
|Apr 24, 2000
|Aug 5, 2003
|Ebay Inc.
|Generic attribute database system for storing items of different categories having shared attributes
|Mar 2, 1999
|Dec 2, 2003
|Walker Digital, Llc
|System and method for reselling a previously sold product
|Oct 1, 2001
|Jan 20, 2004
|Secubay Corporation
|Integrated customer management system and method using wireless barcode
|Sep 25, 2001
|Feb 3, 2004
|Ecrio, Inc.
|System, method and apparatus for communicating information between a mobile communications device and a bar code reader
|Jul 10, 1998
|Feb 10, 2004
|Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
|Electronic ticket system
|Jun 5, 2000
|Mar 9, 2004
|Ita Investments, Llc
|Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
|Nov 19, 2001
|May 18, 2004
|Ecrio Inc.
|Method and apparatus for acquiring, maintaining, and using information to be communicated in bar code form with a mobile communications device
|Aug 4, 2000
|Nov 16, 2004
|Sri International
|System and method using information-based indicia for securing and authenticating transactions
|Aug 12, 1999
|Jan 11, 2005
|Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation
|Recording medium with electronic ticket definitions recorded thereon and electronic ticket processing methods and apparatuses
|Jul 1, 2002
|Feb 15, 2005
|Wildseed Ltd.
|Non-persistently displayed bar code based data input method and apparatus
|Aug 16, 2001
|Apr 12, 2005
|Richard M. Webb
|Scannable barcode display and methods for using the same
|Mar 21, 2002
|Apr 12, 2005
|Ecrio, Inc.
|System, method, and apparatus for communicating information encoded in a light-based signal using a fob device
|Aug 30, 2001
|May 31, 2005
|Eric Morgan Dowling
|Negotiated wireless peripheral security systems
|Feb 7, 2001
|Jun 14, 2005
|Ita Investments, Llc
|Computer controlled priority right auctioning system
|Jan 11, 2001
|Jun 21, 2005
|Robert C. Dorr
|Countdown on-line auction clock
|Sep 20, 2000
|Jun 28, 2005
|Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|Smart card systems and electronic ticketing methods
|Nov 19, 2001
|Jul 19, 2005
|The Friday Group Llc
|Method of selling and distributing articles associated with live events
|Sep 13, 2000
|Sep 13, 2005
|Ebay Inc.
|Monitoring and automatic notification of irregular activity in a network-based transaction facility
|Mar 3, 2000
|Nov 8, 2005
|Manugistics, Inc.
|Target pricing system
|Aug 22, 2001
|Nov 15, 2005
|Eric Morgan Dowling
|Negotiated wireless peripheral systems
|Apr 26, 1998
|Feb 14, 2006
|Sehr Richard P
|Electronic ticketing system and methods utilizing multi-service visitor cards
|May 5, 2000
|Feb 21, 2006
|Dale Young
|Ticket auction
|Mar 23, 2004
|Feb 28, 2006
|Nec Corporation
|Electronic ticket issuing system and electronic ticket issuing method
|Mar 26, 2004
|Mar 7, 2006
|University Of Washington
|Performing predictive pricing based on historical data
|Jul 24, 2001
|Apr 18, 2006
|Donner Irah H
|System and method for reallocating and/or upgrading and/or rewarding tickets, other event admittance means, goods and/or services
|Oct 10, 2001
|May 16, 2006
|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
|Electronic ticketing system and method
|Aug 18, 2000
|Jun 6, 2006
|Luckysurf.Com, Inc.
|Enhanced auction mechanism for online transactions
|Apr 25, 2003
|Jun 27, 2006
|Dinwoodie David L
|Interactive remote auction bidding system
|Dec 3, 2001
|Jul 11, 2006
|Dinwoodie David L
|Interactive remote auction bidding system
|Feb 27, 2002
|Jul 11, 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|User-centric consent management system and method
|Oct 29, 2001
|Jul 18, 2006
|Manugistics, Inc.
|Supply chain demand forecasting and planning
|Feb 27, 2002
|Jul 18, 2006
|Digonex Technologies, Inc.
|Digital online exchange
|Mar 28, 2001
|Jul 18, 2006
|Ebay, Inc.
|Graphical user interface for filtering a population of items
|Dec 14, 2004
|Jul 25, 2006
|Douglas Stitt
|Seat lock
|Oct 8, 2002
|Aug 1, 2006
|First Data Corporation
|Electronic card and ticket and methods for their use
|Sep 27, 2001
|Aug 1, 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method, system, and program for providing information on proximate events based on current location and user availability
|Mar 1, 2000
|Aug 15, 2006
|Site59, Inc.
|System and method for grouping and selling products or services
|Jan 24, 2000
|Aug 15, 2006
|The Regents Of The University Of California
|System and method for delivering and examining digital tickets
|Aug 4, 2000
|Aug 29, 2006
|Sports Securities, Inc.
|Methods and systems for trading permanent seat licenses
|Jun 8, 2001
|Sep 19, 2006
|Manugistics, Inc.
|Event revenue management system
|Apr 7, 1999
|Sep 26, 2006
|Swisscom Mobile Ag
|Method and system for ordering, loading and using access tickets
|May 11, 2000
|Oct 24, 2006
|Ebay, Incorporated
|Method and apparatus for a dual online registration contact information system
|Jun 13, 2003
|Oct 24, 2006
|Rosen Michael J
|Method of creating season ticket package
|May 18, 2001
|Nov 7, 2006
|Manugistics Inc.
|Dynamic pricing system
|Jun 28, 2002
|Nov 21, 2006
|Ebay, Inc.
|Method and system for monitoring user interaction with a computer
|Nov 8, 2000
|Dec 12, 2006
|Ortiz Luis M
|Providing multiple perspectives for a venue activity through an electronic hand held device
|Apr 11, 2001
|Dec 19, 2006
|Ariba, Inc.
|Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions
|Aug 27, 2003
|Jan 9, 2007
|Donner Irah H
|System and method for reallocating and/or upgrading and/or selling tickets, other even admittance means, goods and/or services
|Jun 10, 2004
|Mar 13, 2007
|Adpay, Inc.
|Facilitating the sale of ad items via the internet
|Dec 1, 2000
|Oct 25, 2001
|Bushonville Arthur Roland
|Service contracts and commodities market for trading service contracts
|May 30, 2001
|Dec 6, 2001
|Koichi Nakajima
|Auction system
|Jul 6, 2001
|Jan 10, 2002
|Nec Corporation
|Ticket sales system and ticket sales method using an IC card, and computer program product
|Nov 29, 1999
|Feb 28, 2002
|Leonard Frank
|Electronic delivery of admission tickets direct to a purchaser
|Sep 25, 2001
|Apr 4, 2002
|Yamaha Corporation
|Method of validating entrance to event site
|Sep 4, 2001
|Apr 4, 2002
|Kwan Khai Hee
|Computer system and method for on-line generating a password protected and barcode prepaid instrument of entitlement and activating said instrument on presentation over a computer network
|Oct 9, 2001
|Apr 11, 2002
|Shunsuke Yajima
|Specific electronic information related information providing system and specific electronic information related information providing method
|Oct 25, 2001
|May 2, 2002
|Arthur Roland Bushonville
|Method and apparatus for providing rights for event tickets
|Aug 30, 2001
|May 2, 2002
|Dowling Eric Morgan
|Negotiated wireless peripheral security systems
|Jun 15, 2001
|May 30, 2002
|Jeff Taylor
|Method and system to implement seller authorized buying privileges within a network-based shopping facility
|Mar 15, 2001
|May 30, 2002
|Chung-Seob Na
|Method and system for providing and using ticket
|Feb 16, 2001
|Jun 13, 2002
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for providing integrated inventory control of time-sensitive inventory
|Dec 27, 2000
|Jun 27, 2002
|Brent Miller
|Method and system for seat selection and ticket purchasing in a networked computer system
|Dec 21, 2000
|Jun 27, 2002
|O'keeffe Gerard M.
|Event ticket pricing and distribution system
|Mar 27, 2001
|Jul 4, 2002
|Daniel Abeshouse
|Method, apparatus, and system for synchronizing timing of an auction throug a computer network
|Dec 21, 2001
|Jul 11, 2002
|Leppink David Morgan
|Fraud-proof internet ticketing system and method
|Dec 12, 2001
|Jul 18, 2002
|Yoichiro Iino
|Information recording medium, information processing apparatus and method, program recording medium, and information processing system
|Oct 12, 2001
|Jul 18, 2002
|World Theatre, Inc., A North Carolina Corporation
|System and method permitting customers to order selected products from a vast array of products offered by multiple participating merchants and related security applications
|Jan 26, 2001
|Aug 1, 2002
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and system for determining ticket availability
|Mar 28, 2001
|Aug 8, 2002
|Reed Maltzman
|Method and system to enable a fixed price purchase within an online auction environment
|Dec 21, 2001
|Aug 22, 2002
|Masakazu Nakamura
|Apparatus, system and method for electronic ticket management and electronic ticket distribution authentication
|Oct 15, 2001
|Sep 12, 2002
|Joao Raymond Anthony
|Apparatus and method for selling a ticket to an event and/or to a portion of an event or venue
|Mar 6, 2002
|Sep 26, 2002
|Fujitsu Limited
|Event invitation method and system
|Mar 26, 2001
|Sep 26, 2002
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for binding and unbinding ticket items with user-negotiated security features
|Mar 26, 2001
|Sep 26, 2002
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for processing ticked items with customer security features
|Apr 19, 2001
|Oct 24, 2002
|Cameron Wall
|Apparatus and method for auctioning and reissuing a ticket online
|May 10, 2001
|Nov 14, 2002
|Call Nicholas J.
|Online creation of tickets for ticketed events
|Jul 11, 2002
|Nov 28, 2002
|Dean Michael A.
|Method for using computers to facilitate and control the creating of a plurality of functions
|Dec 14, 2001
|Dec 12, 2002
|Steve Grove
|Method and system automatically to support multiple transaction types, and to display seller-specific transactions of various transaction types in an integrated, commingled listing
|Aug 22, 2001
|Feb 27, 2003
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for selecting arena seat locations for display
|Sep 27, 2001
|Mar 27, 2003
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method, system, and program for providing information on proximate events
|Oct 4, 2001
|Apr 10, 2003
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|System for displaying personal messages at a public facility and method of doing business
|Oct 4, 2001
|Apr 10, 2003
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|System and method for selling image-display time to customers of a public facility
|Oct 4, 2001
|Apr 10, 2003
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|Business method and system for communicating public-facility status information through a virtual ticket device
|Oct 4, 2001
|Apr 10, 2003
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|Selling best available seats at a public facility
|Oct 4, 2001
|Apr 10, 2003
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|System and business method for offering seat upgrades to patrons at a public facility
|Oct 4, 2001
|Apr 10, 2003
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|System and method for selling goods to customers of a public facility
|Oct 4, 2001
|Apr 10, 2003
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|Ticket exchange system and method of operation
|Oct 4, 2001
|Apr 10, 2003
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|Public-venue auction system and method of operation
|Mar 17, 2000
|Jun 5, 2003
|Woodson Lewis
|Electronic ticketing and validation system and method
|Jan 15, 2002
|Aug 14, 2003
|Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
|Inventory and revenue maximization method and system
|Mar 13, 2001
|Aug 14, 2003
|Hiroshi Yanai
|Electronic ticket system
|Jan 22, 2003
|Aug 28, 2003
|Vlady Cornateanu
|Device for receiving advertising data and method of application
|Apr 18, 2001
|Sep 4, 2003
|Boyd Leslie Fergus
|Method of operating a ticketing system
|Apr 9, 2003
|Sep 11, 2003
|Skinner James Jay
|Electronic ticket issuing system
|Dec 24, 2002
|Sep 18, 2003
|Francis Mitchell J.
|Ticket distribution system
|Apr 1, 2002
|Oct 2, 2003
|Booth John R.
|System and method for booking a performance venue
|Apr 30, 2003
|Dec 11, 2003
|Russell William Christopher
|System and method for electronic ticket purchasing and redemption
|Jun 25, 2002
|Dec 25, 2003
|Richard Harmon
|Electronic system and method for trading seat licenses, event tickets and contingent event ticket certificates
|Mar 22, 2001
|Jan 8, 2004
|Nestor Tod A.
|Entertainment event ticket purchase and exchange system
|Jul 26, 2002
|Jan 29, 2004
|Intel Corporation
|Mobile communication device with electronic token repository and method
|Oct 4, 2001
|Feb 26, 2004
|Linde Alexander N.
|Ticketing apparatus and method
|Mar 12, 2003
|Feb 26, 2004
|Richard Harmon
|System and method for executing a payment transaction over a computer network
|Sep 10, 2002
|Mar 11, 2004
|Johnson Jeffrey P.
|Electronic commodities and automated ticket manager
|Mar 26, 2003
|Apr 15, 2004
|Ideaflood, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for issuing a non-transferable ticket
|Oct 31, 2002
|Apr 29, 2004
|Arne Schulze
|Creating and conducting a reverse auction
|Nov 1, 2002
|May 6, 2004
|Werberig David K.
|Integrated machine readable media and ticket
|Jun 19, 2001
|May 13, 2004
|Tan William Henry
|Forecasting group demand
|Dec 24, 2002
|Jun 10, 2004
|Francis Mitchell J.
|Ticket distribution system
|Mar 28, 2001
|Jul 1, 2004
|Okamoto Steve Atsushi
|Method and apparatus for administering one or more value bearing instruments
|Mar 28, 2001
|Jul 1, 2004
|Okamoto Steve Atsushi
|Method and apparatus for verifying bearing instruments
|Dec 22, 2003
|Jul 15, 2004
|Ebay Inc.
|Method and apparatus for facilitating sales of goods by independent parties
|Nov 24, 2003
|Sep 2, 2004
|Hitachi, Ltd.
|Admission control method and system thereof, and facility reservation confirmation method and system thereof
|Apr 11, 2003
|Oct 14, 2004
|Lee Stacy A.
|Method and system to incentivize a user to perform an activity relating to a network-based marketplace in a timely manner
|Apr 11, 2003
|Oct 14, 2004
|Jay Monahan
|Method and system to incentivize a seller to perform an activity relating to a network-based marketplace
|Dec 30, 2003
|Oct 28, 2004
|Grove Brian Alan
|Method and system to publish a seller fixed price offer
|Aug 21, 2003
|Nov 4, 2004
|Ericsson Arthur Dale
|Bidding method for time-sensitive offerings
|Dec 16, 2003
|Jan 6, 2005
|Innovation Connection Corporation
|System, method and apparatus for electronic ticketing
|Jun 25, 2003
|Jan 20, 2005
|Ticket Technology Holding Company, L.L.C.
|Distributed network transaction system and method
|Dec 30, 2003
|Jan 20, 2005
|Grove Brian Alan
|Method and system to adjust a seller fixed price offer
|Aug 13, 2004
|Jan 27, 2005
|Nakfoor Brett A.
|Method and system for access verification within a venue
|Aug 13, 2004
|Jan 27, 2005
|Nakfoor Brett A.
|Multi-input access device and method of using the same
|Nov 25, 2003
|Feb 3, 2005
|Andreas Wiesmuller
|System and method for providing commercial services over a wireless communication network
|Dec 30, 2003
|Feb 3, 2005
|Grove Brian Alan
|Introducing a fixed-price transaction mechanism in conjunction with an auction transaction mechanism
|Sep 14, 2004
|Feb 24, 2005
|Walker Jay S.
|Method for allowing a customer to obtain a discounted price for a transaction and terminal for performing the method
|Dec 30, 2003
|Mar 24, 2005
|Grove Brian Alan
|Method and system to publish a proxy bid and a reserve price
|Jan 8, 2004
|Mar 31, 2005
|Norins Arthur L.
|System and method for transacting for a perishable object having an uncertain availability
|Dec 11, 2003
|Jun 16, 2005
|Watt William R.Ii
|Auction with interest rate bidding
|Feb 25, 2005
|Jun 30, 2005
|Digonex Technologies, Inc.
|Dynamic pricing system with graphical user interface
|Feb 25, 2005
|Jun 30, 2005
|Digonex Technologies, Inc.
|Dynamic pricing system
|Jun 7, 2004
|Jun 30, 2005
|Billingsley Eric N.
|Method and system to generate an image for monitoring user interaction with a computer
|Feb 17, 2005
|Jun 30, 2005
|Ita Investments, Llc
|Computer Controlled auction system
|Feb 25, 2005
|Jul 7, 2005
|Digonex Technologies, Inc.
|Dynamic pricing system with graphical user interface
|Aug 9, 2004
|Jul 21, 2005
|Asher Joseph M.
|System and method for trading a financial instrument indexed to entertainment revenue
|Dec 8, 2004
|Jul 28, 2005
|Kasten Christopher J.
|Custom caching
|May 20, 2005
|Sep 22, 2005
|Texas Instruments Incorporated
|System and method for offering a futures contract indexed to entertainment revenue
|Apr 12, 2004
|Oct 13, 2005
|Kevin Embree
|Method and system to detect outlying behavior in a network-based marketplace
|Apr 18, 2005
|Oct 27, 2005
|Scott Lyons
|Home ticketing system
|Sep 20, 2004
|Dec 8, 2005
|Perry Chen
|Method and system fro making a conditional event binding on purchasers and vendors
|Jul 22, 2004
|Jan 26, 2006
|Nguyen Martin K
|Tracking by radio frequency identification
|Oct 15, 2004
|Apr 20, 2006
|Evans Scott A
|Ticket entry systems and methods
|Dec 20, 2005
|May 4, 2006
|Nakfoor Brett A
|System and method for fan lifecycle management
|Nov 8, 2005
|May 11, 2006
|Gerald Mark
|System and method of assigning seats and/or tables, as well as issuing and tracking personalized tickets for patrons attending events
|Nov 16, 2004
|May 18, 2006
|Giraldin Timothy W
|Guest amenity system and methods for using same
|Nov 22, 2005
|May 25, 2006
|Rice Rodney S
|System for buying and selling tickets to sporting events in the aftermarket through gifting
|Sep 17, 2003
|May 25, 2006
|Mobiqa Limited
|Optimised messages containing barcode information for mobile receiving device
|Nov 29, 2004
|Jun 1, 2006
|Bowman Robert A
|System and method for allocating seats for a ticketed event
|Aug 31, 2005
|Jun 15, 2006
|Kurt Wallerstorfer
|Access control system
|Feb 1, 2006
|Jun 29, 2006
|Light Elliott D
|System and method for obtaining a status of an authorization device over a network for administration of theatrical performances
|Dec 2, 2005
|Jun 29, 2006
|Kohout Chris M
|Providing purchasing opportunities for performances
|Dec 23, 2004
|Jun 29, 2006
|Ebay Inc.
|Method and system of listing an item in a fixed-price section
|Dec 28, 2005
|Jun 29, 2006
|Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|System, server and device for providing ticket
|Dec 31, 2004
|Jul 6, 2006
|Masayuki Kuriyama
|System and method for utilizing a highly secure two-dimensional matrix code on a mobile communications display
|Dec 30, 2004
|Jul 6, 2006
|Lakshminarasimha Arkalgud N
|Method and apparatus of an extended Cell-A-Lot sales lead enhancement and customer loyalty system
|Nov 23, 2004
|Jul 13, 2006
|Dicesare Vincent
|Method and system for promoting fan identification with a sports team
|Aug 6, 2003
|Jul 20, 2006
|David Diamond
|Delivery of targeted offers for move theaters and other retail stores
|Jan 21, 2005
|Jul 27, 2006
|Ebay Inc.
|Network-based commerce facility offer management methods and systems
|Jun 16, 2004
|Aug 10, 2006
|Seong-Su Kim
|One-way sending time expiring coupon operating method for sale of unsold perishable resources
|Jan 31, 2006
|Aug 24, 2006
|Molloy Mark E
|Normalized synthetic continuous double auctions
|Jan 31, 2006
|Aug 24, 2006
|Molloy Mark E
|Synthetic continuous double auctions
|Jan 31, 2006
|Aug 24, 2006
|Molloy Mark E
|Compound buy-buy auctions
|Jan 31, 2006
|Aug 24, 2006
|Molloy Mark E
|Compound buy-sell auctions
|Feb 25, 2005
|Aug 31, 2006
|Mark Nerenhausen
|Entertainment venue data analysis system and method
|Apr 1, 2005
|Oct 19, 2006
|Ariel Ovadia
|Reserved seat control apparatus and system for arenas, stadiums and theaters
|Apr 28, 2005
|Nov 2, 2006
|Madsen Josh D
|Secured entertainment seating
|Jun 29, 2005
|Nov 9, 2006
|Chen Gigi
|Electronic transaction system capable of improving transaction security and electronic transaction method thereof
|Apr 25, 2006
|Nov 30, 2006
|The Ticket Reserve, Inc.
|Methods and Apparatus for Marketing contingent Event Certificates
|Apr 25, 2006
|Dec 7, 2006
|The Ticket Reserve, Inc.
|Methods and apparatus to predict demand for a product or service
|Jun 23, 2005
|Dec 28, 2006
|Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
|Electronic-ticket service system based on color-scale-code image recognition
|Jun 28, 2005
|Dec 28, 2006
|Ebay Inc.
|Method and system to enable a fixed price purchase within a multi-unit online auction environment
|Mar 9, 2004
|Jan 18, 2007
|Dominique Trinquet
|Device for representing a multiple-use comsumption ticket by means of a bar code
|Jul 25, 2005
|Jan 25, 2007
|Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
|Mobile ticketing via information hiding
|Mar 22, 2006
|Mar 8, 2007
|Adam Sussman
|Apparatus and methods for providing queue messaging over a network
|Sep 1, 1997
|Mar 11, 1998
|Hitachi, Ltd.
|Automatic auction method
|Jul 14, 2000
|Jan 17, 2001
|Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
|Electronic ticket, electronic wallet, and information terminal
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|May 30, 2000
|Dec 7, 2000
|The Regents Of The University Of California
|System and method for delivering and examining digital tickets
|Jun 5, 2000
|Dec 14, 2000
|Cella Charles H
|Contingency-based options and futures for contingent travel accommodations
|Jul 24, 2000
|Feb 1, 2001
|Robert Scott Nieboer
|Automated system for conditional order transactions in securities or other items in commerce
|Dec 1, 2000
|Jun 7, 2001
|Ultimate Markets, Inc.
|Service contracts and commodities market for trading service contracts
|Dec 1, 2000
|Jun 7, 2001
|Ultimate Markets, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for processing quotes in a commodity exchange system
|Dec 1, 2000
|Jun 21, 2001
|Ultimate Markets, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for establishing commodity markets
|Nov 21, 2000
|Jul 19, 2001
|Justarrive, Inc.
|A system and method for electronic ticketing
|Feb 7, 2000
|Aug 16, 2001
|Brett Kenton F
|Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
|Feb 7, 2001
|Aug 16, 2001
|Vanberg & Dewulf
|Data processing system for conducting a modified on-line auction
|Mar 22, 2001
|Sep 27, 2001
|Global Eticket Exchange Ltd.
|Entertainment event ticket purchase and exchange system
|Oct 26, 2001
|May 2, 2002
|Ultimate Markets, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for providing rights for event tickets
|Sep 26, 2002
|Apr 3, 2003
|Liquidseats Inc.
|System and method for providing logistics for a sale of goods
|"Acteva and Enspot.com Sign Agreement to Provide On-Line Ticketing, Broader Distribution", Business Wire (Dec. 3, 1999).
|"AuctionNet Still One-Of-A-Kind", Automotive News, S12 (Sep. 20, 1993).
|"Cathay Pacific Airways Auctions a Boeing 747-400 Worth of Seats in Third Cybertraveler Auction", Business Wire (Apr. 29, 1996).
|"Cathay Pacific Airways-USA Receives More than 1,300 Bids During First Five Days of CyberAuction", Business Wire (Oct. 18, 1995).
|"Cathay Pacific Airways-USA to Hold First-Ever Internet CyberAuction", Business Wire (Sep. 28, 1995).
|"E-TicketBoard Launches PSL Xchange for Eight NFL Teams", PR Newswire (Jul. 18, 2000).
|"E-TicketBoard Launches Revolutionary New Site-SeatsandSuites", PR Newswire (Oct. 17, 2000).
|"E-TicketBoard Launches Revolutionary New Site—SeatsandSuites", PR Newswire (Oct. 17, 2000).
|"Keyware Unveils Multi-Application Smart Card Suite", Card News, vol. 16, No. 10 (May 30, 2001).
|"Online Movie Ticket Site Launched in China", China Online (Dec. 23, 1999).
|"OnSale Brings Thrill of the Auction to the Web", Link-up p. 34 (Jul./Aug. 1995).
|"Season Ticket Solutions Announces Availability of Ticket Exchange for Sporting Teams and Entertainment Venues", Business Wire (Jul. 30, 2001).
|"WBGH to Hold Online Computer Auction", Link-Up, p. 10 (Sep./Oct . 1988).
|Ban�tre, "Distributed Auction Bidding System". International Computing Symposium, vol. 4, No. 4 (Aug. 1981).
|Banks, "PSL Put Owners on the Hot Seat", St. Petersburg Times, p. 10C (Oct. 31, 1993).
|Beam et al, "Electronic Negotiation through Internet-Based Auctions", CITM Working Paper 96-WP-1019, http://haas.berkeley.edu/citm/publications/papers/wp-1019.pdf (Dec. 1996).
|Blau, "Dormitories See Departure from Previous Years' Trends", The Tech, vol. 116, No. 38 (Aug. 30, 1996).
|Boyes et al, "Auctions as an Allocation Mechanism in Academia: The Case of Faculty Offices", Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 37-40 (Summer 1989).
|Collier, "Columbia, S.C.-Based Internet Firm Helps Buy, Sell Sports Tickets", The State, (Oct. 23, 2000).
|Dickey, "Raider PSL Without Permanent Place", San Francisco Chronicle, p. B2 (Jun. 26, 1997).
|Dickey, "Raiders' PSLs May Be for Life", San Francisco Chronicle, p. D5 (Mar. 26, 1997).
|European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2008; European Application No. 07 01 8280.
|Garza, "Space Cruise", Reason (May 2000).
|Happel, "Creating a Futures Market for Major Event Tickets: Problems and Prospects", Cato Journal, vol. 21, No. 3 (Winter 2002).
|Harlan, "At Least it isn't the Team's Ball that's in Somebody Else's Court", Wall Street Journal (Jun. 4, 1991).
|Hayashi, Nobuyuki, "Great-bargain Malls Come to Your Home: Attractive, Easy-to-get-hooked Internet Auction" MAC POWER, ASCII Corporation, Dec. 1, 1999, 10th volume, 12th issue, pp. 252 to 257 (with Partial english translation).
|Holbrook, "Oakland, Calif., Professional Football Team Sees Gain in Seat License Sales", Contra Costa Times (Feb. 26, 2001).
|Hylton, "Dorm Lottery Starts Strong", the Tech, vol. 114, No. 34 (Aug. 29, 1994).
|International Search Report for PCT Application-PCT /US06/10295, mailing date Sep. 14, 2007.
|International Search Report for PCT Application—PCT /US06/10295, mailing date Sep. 14, 2007.
|Isokawa, Akiko, the 25th "Using Convenient Internet Sites", Nikkei PC21, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Jan. 1, 2000, 5th Volume, 1st issue, pp. 248 to 251 (with Partial english translation).
|Isokawa, Akiko, the 25th "Using Convenient Internet Sites", Nikkei PC21, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Jan. 1, 2000, 5th Volume, 1st issue, pp. 248 to 251 (with Partial english translation).
|Jackson, "Media Futures: This Bazaar Could Put Retailers Under the Hammer", Financial Times (May 25, 1995).
|Jenkins, "Giants Draw Fans into Web Team Helps Season-Ticket Holders Get Mileage Out of Plans", USA Today, p. 3C (Jun. 27, 2000).
|Kasper, "Purchase Griz Playoff Tickets Now", Missoulian Online (May 3, 2001).
|Koenig, "Texas Firm Links Sports Teams, Fans", Amarillo Globe-News, Feb. 20, 2000).
|Kravets, "Going, Going, Gone! Real Estate Auctions in the 90s", Probate & Property, p. 38 (May/Jun. 1993).
|Kroll et al, "The Commodity Futures Market Guide", Harper and Row, pp. 9-10 (1973).
|Kumar, "With Stars in their Eyes, Travelers Look to Space", St. Petersburg Times, p. 1A (Jun. 11, 2000).
|Labuszewski et al, "Inside the Commodity Option Markets", John Wiley & Sons, pp. 19-21 (1985).
|Liao, "Sloan's Class Priority System Set to Go", The Tech, vol. 116, No. 25 (May 10, 1996).
|Martin, "LiquidSeats Helps Fill the House, Sans Scalping" cnn.com, (Dec. 14, 2000).
|Matsumoto et al, "Feasibility of Space Tourism 'Cost Study for Space Tours'", Proceedings of 40th IAF Congress, Paper IAF-89-700 (1989).
|Matsumoto et al, "Feasibility of Space Tourism 'Cost Study for Space Tours'", Proceedings of 40th IAF Congress, Paper IAF-89-700 (1989).
|Menezes et al, "Simultaneous Pooled Auctions", The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol. 17(3), pp. 219-232 (Nov. 19, 1996).
|Moldovanu et al, "The Optimal Allocation of Prizes in Contests", http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/publications/dp99-75.pdf (Jul. 14, 1999).
|Nestor et al, "Transforming Tickets from a Commodity into a Valuable Strategic Asset", Global eTicket Exchange whitepaper, Oct. 13, 2000.
|Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2009 (Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-558899, Our Reference No.: TICKMA.040QJP) (English Translation).
|Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/453,286, mailed Nov. 5, 2007.
|Office Action mailed on Aug. 2, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/453,286.
|O'Neil, "Q and A", St. Louis Post-Dispatch, p. 4D (Jan. 19, 1995).
|Pelline, "Cathay Pacific to Auction Off Airline Tickets on the Internet", San Francisco Chronicle, p. C4 (Apr. 30, 1996).
|Riley et al, "Optimal Auctions", The American Economic Review, vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 381-392 (Jun. 1981).
|Rosen et al, "Ticket Pricing", University of Chicago Center for the Study of the Economy and the State (Sep. 1995).
|Rubel , "ETM to Ticketmaster. Let's Rock", Marketing News (Jun. 19, 1995).
|Stevenson, "Frosh Get at Least Fifth Choice Dorm: Women Find Shortage of Single-Sex Rooms", The Tech, vol. 115, No. 37 (Aug. 31, 1995).
|Thomas, "Deadline Looms for Playoff Tickets; PSL Owners Have Until Dec. 8 to Make Purchase", St. Louis Post-Dispatch, p. D8 (Dec. 3, 1999).
|U.S. Appl. No. 11/453,286, filed Nov. 2007, Kenton, Brett.
|Vanderporten, "Strategic Behavior in Pooled Condominium Auctions", Journal of Urban Economics 31, pp. 123-137 (1992).
|Waddell, "Adventix, Tickets.com Hope Merger Brings Best of Both Ticketing Worlds", Amusement Business (Feb. 8, 1999).
|Wagner, "How Retailers are Using Web Auctions to Let Customers Help Them Set Prices", http://www.internetretailer.com/printArticle.asp?id=3164 (Mar. 2001).
|www.TicketOptions.com Web Pages, as retreived from archive.org (2001).
|wwwSeasonTicket.com Web Pages, as retreived from archive.org (2001).
|Zoltak, "Advantix Acquisitions Continue with Protix Deal", Amusement Business (Nov. 2, 1998).
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Nov 9, 2009
|Jun 28, 2011
|Aloft Media, Llc
|System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
|Jul 27, 2010
|Aug 23, 2011
|Aloft Media, Llc
|System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
|Jul 27, 2010
|Apr 17, 2012
|Aloft Media, Llc
|System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
|Oct 30, 2009
|Sep 11, 2012
|Sri Raghavan
|Methods and systems for supporting asset exchange
|May 4, 2012
|Mar 19, 2013
|Transengine Technologies, LLC
|Method for a ticket exchange across different systems of record
|Mar 3, 2010
|Aug 13, 2013
|Ticketmaster Llc
|Networked barcode verification system
|Apr 12, 2010
|Sep 17, 2013
|Ticketmaster, L.L.C.
|Computer-based right distribution system
|Dec 21, 2012
|Nov 12, 2013
|Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
|Push channel authentication for mobile computing devices
|Aug 14, 2012
|Jan 28, 2014
|Tixtrack, Inc.
|Sports and concert event ticket pricing and visualization system
|Nov 4, 2011
|Mar 18, 2014
|Ticketmaster Llc
|Methods and systems for computer aided event and venue setup and modeling and interactive maps
|Aug 10, 2006
|May 20, 2014
|Ticketmaster, L.L.C.
|Computer-based right distribution system with temporal variation
|Jan 22, 2013
|Dec 1, 2015
|Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
|Methods and systems for computer aided event and venue setup and modeling and interactive maps
|Aug 16, 2016
|Oct 3, 2017
|Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
|Establishing communication links using routing protocols
|Aug 10, 2006
|Feb 1, 2007
|Brett Kenton F
|Computer-based right distribution system with temporal variation
|Oct 30, 2009
|May 27, 2010
|Sri Raghavan
|Methods and systems for supporting asset exchange
|Apr 12, 2010
|Aug 26, 2010
|Ticketmaster Llc
|Computer-based right distribution system
|Mar 3, 2010
|Sep 9, 2010
|Marti Benjamin J
|Networked barcode verification system
|Aug 14, 2012
|Dec 20, 2012
|Tixtrack, Inc.
|Sports and concert event ticket pricing and visualization system
|Feb 24, 2014
|Aug 28, 2014
|Rakuten, Inc.
|Ticket processing system, control method for ticket processing system, and program
|U.S. Classification
|705/37, 705/38
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|Aug 9, 2007
Owner name: TICKETMASTER, L.L.C., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ITA INVESTMENTS, L.L.C.;REEL/FRAME:019682/0859
Effective date: 20060203
Owner name: ITA INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., INDIANA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BRETT, KENTON F.;REEL/FRAME:019682/0865
Effective date: 20070208
Owner name: TICKETMASTER, L.L.C.,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ITA INVESTMENTS, L.L.C.;REEL/FRAME:019682/0859
Effective date: 20060203
Owner name: ITA INVESTMENTS, L.L.C.,INDIANA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BRETT, KENTON F.;REEL/FRAME:019682/0865
Effective date: 20070208
|Aug 27, 2008
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:TICKETMASTER;PACIOLAN, INC.;FLMG HOLDINGS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:021439/0542
Effective date: 20080819
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:TICKETMASTER;PACIOLAN, INC.;FLMG HOLDINGS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:021439/0542
Effective date: 20080819
|May 11, 2010
Owner name: TICKETMASTER,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024358/0733
Effective date: 20100506
Owner name: PACIOLAN, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024358/0733
Effective date: 20100506
Owner name: FLMG HOLDINGS CORP., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,CALIFO
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024358/0733
Effective date: 20100506
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT,TEX
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:TICKETMASTER L.L.C., A VIRGINIA LLC;REEL/FRAME:024358/0801
Effective date: 20100506
Owner name: TICKETMASTER, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024358/0733
Effective date: 20100506
Owner name: PACIOLAN, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024358/0733
Effective date: 20100506
Owner name: FLMG HOLDINGS CORP., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, CALIF
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024358/0733
Effective date: 20100506
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TE
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:TICKETMASTER L.L.C., A VIRGINIA LLC;REEL/FRAME:024358/0801
Effective date: 20100506
|Dec 28, 2010
|Certificate of correction
|Feb 25, 2013
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 24, 2015
Owner name: LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INCORPORATED, CALIFORNI
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TICKETMASTER, LLC;REEL/FRAME:035489/0081
Effective date: 20150422
|Aug 28, 2017
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.)