text:
|Numéro de publication
|Type de publication
|Numéro de demande
|Date de publication
|12 juin 2012
|Date de dépôt
|8 nov. 2006
|Date de priorité
|8 nov. 2006
|État de paiement des frais
|Autre référence de publication
|Numéro de publication
|Hans Littooy, Vincent Pugliese, Michael Emmerson
|Cessionnaire d'origine
|Mitchell International, Inc.
|Exporter la citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Citations de brevets (44), Citations hors brevets (7), Classifications (6), Événements juridiques (6)
|Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet
The present invention relates generally to auditing and information management systems, and more particularly, some embodiments relate to a systems and methods for implementing the same.
With the advent of high-power, cost effective computing systems came the increased automation of numerous facets of our contemporary society. In the insurance and other casualty and loss industries, for example, computerized claims processing, tracking and payment systems have long been in use to streamline the process and to expedite claims handling and closure.
Insurance and other reimbursement or payment industries often utilize rules that govern the circumstances in which and the amount to which they will reimburse or otherwise fund or pay their respective payees. For example, in the insurance industry, reimbursement amounts, categories of approved replacement parts and the types and quantities of remediation services are often dependent on the type of harm suffered, the particular loss incurred and the type of coverage provided. In many instances, care givers, repair facilities, and other providers are informed of the rules so that the remedial action can be conducted in accordance with the rules. In some instances, a caregiver may call the carrier to determine what activities are covered, or not, based on the carrier requirements. In other instances, an estimate or other proscribed remediation plan may be submitted to the carrier, electronically or manually, and this plan reviewed by the carrier for approval. In some instances, such as in automotive repair, for example, a carrier representative may visit the estimator at the repair facility to review the damage and approve the estimate.
However, because a given remediation location (for example, an auto body shop in the case of automobile insurance, a doctor or hospital in the case of medical insurance, and so on) may work with many different coverage providers and handle numerous different situations, the quantity of and variation among the rules can be daunting. As such, appraisers, care givers, office managers and others in the remediation chain have difficulty knowing and understanding, and hence, complying with, provider rules.
In the automotive repair industry, web-based auditing of estimate data was initiated to address this issue and to provide a more effective tool for screening and approving estimates. In such conventional systems, an estimate was prepared by a repair facility, and transmitted to the carrier or other organization to review the estimate. The estimate was then reviewed and either approved or denied based on the carrier's rules as applied to the given loss. If an estimate was approved the remediation facility was informed and work could proceed. If, on the other hand, the estimate was not approved, reasons for non-approval were communicated back to the shop and the estimate reworked until it was in compliance. This back-and-forth process could be time consuming and logistically difficult. Also, this environment did not lend itself well to accommodating numerous different rules scenarios and accompanying rules sets, nor did it lend itself to the ability to update existing rules or to implement new rules.
According to various embodiments of the invention an estimate and invoicing compliance tool to specify compliance criteria is presented. In one embodiment, the tool can be provided using hardware, software or a combination thereof, and can be configured to include functionality to facilitate creation of rules to outline criteria for estimate creation or invoicing. In one embodiment, a rules creation module is provided to allow a user to generate rules. The rules creation module can include a user interface to provide the opportunity to enter vehicle and parts identification to which a rule will apply to a rule being created. The user can also be prompted to enter a rule requirement or suggestion such as, for example, the type of parts required.
In one embodiment, the system can include a first module configured to accept user input specifying vehicle criteria; a second module configured to accept user input specifying parts criteria; and a third module configured to create an estimate compliance rule based on the entered vehicle selection criteria and parts criteria. The system can further include a storage medium configured to store a plurality of created estimate compliance rules and a profile module configured to create a rules profile comprised of a set of one or more estimate compliance rules. Additionally, a compatibility module configured to check a plurality of created rules for conflicting rule criteria can also be provided.
The system can further include a communication module configured to provide the created estimate compliance rule to an estimator for use in checking his or her estimates or invoices for compliance therewith. The system can be configured to accept various vehicle criteria, including for example, a vehicle year or range of years, vehicle mileage or range of mileage, and other vehicle criteria such as, for example, a vehicle class, vehicle type, vehicle make/model, or vehicle duty. Similarly, the system can be configured to accept various parts criteria identifying parts, components, assemblies, subassemblies or categories of parts for which the rule can apply, and parts types (e.g., original equipment, LKQ, used, etc.) required. Modules to accept Boolean operators can also be included.
Features and aspects of the invention can be provided in hardware, software and combinations thereof. Other features and aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the features in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The summary is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined solely by the claims attached hereto.
The present invention, in accordance with one or more various embodiments, is described in detail with reference to the following figures. The drawings are provided for purposes of illustration only and merely depict typical or example embodiments of the invention. These drawings are provided to facilitate the reader's understanding of the invention and shall not be considered limiting of the breadth, scope, or applicability of the invention. It should be noted that for clarity and ease of illustration these drawings are not necessarily made to scale.
The figures are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. It should be understood that the invention can be practiced with modification and alteration, and that the invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
The present invention is directed toward a system and method for providing a system, appliance, application or other tool for remedial activity management. In one embodiment, the invention can be implemented to provide such features as rules creation, rules implementation and management, remediation plan review and approval, activity tracking, and reporting and analysis. As used herein, the phrase remedial activity is broadly defined to encompass any of a number of various activities including, for example, reparative, replacement, alleviation, antidotal, corrective, curative, health-giving, invigorating, medicating, treatment, recuperative, restitutive, restorative, and other activities. The phrase can apply to mandatory or compulsory activities, processes and procedures as well as optional, elective or voluntary activities, processes and procedures.
Before describing the invention in detail, it is useful to describe an example environment with which the invention can be implemented. One such example is that of automotive repairs that are covered, at least in part, by a third-party provider or other payor such as, for example, an insurance carrier.
In an example scenario in this environment, the insured's vehicle is damaged in an accident as illustrated by icon 24. The insured (icon 27) informs his or her insurance carrier (icon 30) of the accident and requests coverage for the remediation activities, which in this case is repair of the damaged vehicle. As illustrated by icon 32, a towing facility is dispatched to take the vehicle to a repair facility 35.
In the example environment, before repairs are undertaken, the insurance carrier may require that an estimate be provided and that all repairs and parts be made in accordance with carrier rules, and that they be approved in advance. The carrier may also require appraiser review from a carrier representative. For example, carrier rules may specify they types of parts that can be used (for example, Original Equipment (OE), Like Kind and Quality (LKQ), Used, Remanufactured, and so on). The part types may vary based on vehicle make and model, model year, mileage, vehicle class, part number, part use, policy limits and so on. The rules may also specify other parameters such as, for example, labor rates, labor maximums, part-type ratios, interim inspections, allowable substitutions, and so on. Once the estimate is prepared, it can be submitted to the carrier and audited. The audit may lead to approval of the specified remedial activities or may result in disapproval of the estimate or one or more line items thereof. When repairs on the vehicle are completed, the final bill can be submitted to the carrier and again audited for conformance.
From time to time, the present invention is described herein in terms of this example environment. Description in terms of this example environment is provided to allow the various features and embodiments of the invention to be portrayed in the context of an exemplary application. After reading this description, it will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art how the invention can be implemented in different and alternative environments, and how the invention can be implemented for various remedial and other activities.
In one embodiment, this estimating process can be performed utilizing any of a variety of computing devices such as, for example, computers, laptops, PDAs, smartphones, and other stationary or portable computing devices. These devices can include various user interfaces to allow data entry, viewing of entered data, and printing of reports and other information. In addition to data entry by user interfaces, the computing devices can support additional forms of data entry including, for example, bar code readers, RFID readers, near-field communication readers, data ports and other data interfaces. As would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading this description, any of a variety of peripheral devices, user interfaces, features, software applications or modules, or other options and enhancements, whether now or later developed, can be included with the computing device used for the estimating.
Also occurring in Step 56 is the step of compliance checking. In this step, the entered estimate is compared against a set of one or more rules to determine whether the estimate is in compliance with those rules. As discussed above in terms of the example environment, the rules can include, for example, rules delineating part types, labor thresholds, levels of inspection, suppliers and so on. The rules in one embodiment can vary from customer to customer, shop to shop, and carrier to carrier, and can vary based on the incident type, the subject of the remedial activity and so on.
In one embodiment, a rules profile, or set of one or more rules, can be defined for various entities. For example, certain shops may receive certain profiles, different regions may have different labor rates, and so on. Therefore, in one embodiment a rules library or grouping of various rules can be maintained, and rules selected from the library to create various rules profiles to be distributed as deemed appropriate. The rules library can be used to select rules for profiles, copy and edit existing rules to create new rules and so on. Rules stored in the rules library can be categorized using various parameters or criteria such that they can be sorted, searched, and browsed to facilitate identification of desired rules for inclusion in a given profile. Profiles can be saved and stored and can also be updated from time to time. Profiles can be identified for applicability to various estimators, shops or other entities.
In one embodiment, a profile of one or more rules can be distributed to the estimator so that the estimator can maintain the rule at a computing device to allow local compliance checking of an estimate before it is sent off to a carrier or other third party for compliance review. If desired, an updated profile can be created and distributed to the estimator as well.
In one embodiment, with a profile, rule or set of rules installed at an estimator location, real time or near real time compliance checking can be implemented to allow the estimator to review and correct his or her estimate in accordance with a pre-determined rule set or profile of one or more rules before the estimate is provided to a carrier. This can provide a benefit of saving time and communication bandwidth in the compliance review process. This can also allow for a smoother working interface between the estimator and the carrier or other third party provider.
In another embodiment, compliance checking can be performed by the carrier or other third party or by another third party service remote from the estimator location. In this embodiment, the completed or partially-completed estimate can be uploaded to the utility at the carrier location to perform the compliance check and to report back to the estimator items that are out of compliance, if any. A hybrid approach can also be implemented wherein local rules checking or compliance checking is performed by the estimator locally and the estimate is further checked at the carrier as a redundancy check or to compliance check the estimate against the latest version of the rules that may be in place at the carrier.
In Block 58, the completed estimate is uploaded to the carrier. In embodiments where the estimate is checked for compliance locally by the estimator, the information communicated to the carrier can also include information regarding the results of the compliance check. For example, where the compliance check was completed and the estimate successfully validated, information indicating the same can be provided to the carrier such that an auditor or other carrier personnel will know that the estimate was checked and that it is in compliance with the rules in place.
In one embodiment, additional information can be included such as the version of the rule set in place that the estimator had used to perform the compliance check as well as summary information such as the rule set used, incident type and other like information that would be useful to provide an auditor with at-a-glance information as to the estimate and compliance checking process. The information uploaded can also include, where available, information such as a claim number, a claimant number, carrier identification, body shop identification, estimator identification, claimant and body shop contact information, and other information that may be useful, provided or available during the estimation and repair process.
In one embodiment, a flag can be set or other data provided to indicate the compliance check was successful such that an automated process at the carrier detects this flag or other data to confirm compliance before providing the estimate to an auditor for review and inspection. Appropriate software or other control logic can be resident on the carrier's server system to respond to the estimator when an estimate is received that is out of compliance. In one embodiment, the carrier system can identify the areas of noncompliance and provide specific information back to the estimator regarding why the estimate is not in compliance and in some instances how to correct the noncompliance.
In another embodiment, the system can simply reject or disallow the estimate leaving it to the estimator or the local rules engine at the estimator's location to determine the reason for the noncompliance. In one embodiment, it is preferred that the local rules at the estimator's location perform a complete compliance check and ensure full compliance with the local rules set prior to transmitting the estimate to the carrier location. In one embodiment, the system can be configured to inhibit transmission of an estimate until the compliance check is completed locally to avoid unnecessary communications and iterations.
As described more fully below, the local rules can be configured to provide explanation or analysis as to areas of noncompliance to enable the estimator to rework the estimate to be in compliance with the rules. Additionally, help lines, interactive chat sessions and other techniques can be implemented and provided to lend real time or near real time assistance to an estimator to bring the estimate into compliance. In another embodiment, where an exception to a compliance rule is provided, the application can allow the estimator to enter a notation that a line item or various items are out of compliance, and to enter a reason for the non-compliance. In one embodiment, the system can be configured to allow exceptions for certain rules (or any or all of the rules), and can also be configured to track levels of non-compliance.
In block 60, the estimate can be provided to an auditor or other like personnel to review and audit the estimate. In this step, the auditor can manually review the estimate as a double check to confirm that it is, in fact, in compliance. Where exceptions are sought, the indicated reasons for such exceptions can also be reviewed to allow the auditor to allow or disallow the estimate with the exceptions.
Although not discussed above, the final invoice for parts and services rendered can also be submitted to the carrier in the same manner as estimates. The invoice can also be checked locally or at the carrier for compliance with the applicable rules and any exceptions granted during the estimation process. As such, in block 60 the auditor can also perform the function of reviewing final invoices for compliance and authorizing payment to the repair facility where appropriate. Additionally, an auditor or appraiser can conduct an independent inspection of the vehicle before any work is performed as a further step in checking for compliance with the rules and ensuring appropriateness of the estimate. Such a physical inspection or re-inspection can also occur prior to final payment to verify that the work was done in accordance with the estimate and proper business standards.
Information throughout the process can be gathered and maintained for various purposes including recordkeeping and reporting purposes, statistical analysis, auditing, and other purposes. For example, the system can be configured to provide reports on compliance and noncompliance for one or more vendors, vendor estimating accuracy, and so on. Additionally, the data can be reviewed and analyzed to identify areas for improvement in rule sets used for various scenarios and developing new rule sets as the industries evolve. Thus, in Block 64, profiles and rules can be modified and created and new rule sets provided to estimators for use in estimating operations.
Guidelines, rules, and other information provided to estimators can be communicated or distributed in a variety of ways using various communication technologies. For example, web-based applications can be used to distribute rules and other information to estimators as well as to transmit estimates from the estimators to the carrier and to perform other communication throughout the process. Of course, as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading this description, the communications are not limited to web-based communications and any variety of communication, whether via direct link, WAN, LAN, MAN or other communication medium, can be implemented as may be appropriate considering cost, speed, bandwidth, security, or other considerations.
As discussed above with reference to
In the embodiment illustrated in
Also illustrated in
Estimate management system 70 also includes a user interface 78 that allows for data entry by a user and also allows display of data and providing other information to the user. User interfaces 78 can include, for example, keyboards, keypads, mice and other pointing devices, touch screen displays, voice-actuated systems, and the like. Outputs to provide information feedback and other data to the user can include devices such as display screens, monitors, speakers, tactile devices and other user interfaces.
Additionally, the estimate management systems 70 can be configured to accept a variety of different peripheral devices 80 to facilitate additional functionality. For example, printers, scanners, faxes, plotters, and other like devices can be used to provide further data output and also provide a vehicle for data input. Likewise, bar code readers, RFID readers and other data entry mechanisms can be used to facilitate electronic data gathering. Although not illustrated, data storage can be provided to facilitate record keeping event tracking, statistical analysis, reporting, and other functions. Also not illustrated are other applications and other modules that also can be running on the estimate management systems 70. As one example, where the estimate management system 70 is implemented utilizing a desktop computer, that computer may have other office applications running such as the MICROSOFT OFFICE® and others.
Also provided in the example illustrated in
In another embodiment, an estimate compliance report can be generated automatically by compliance manager module 73 to provide information not only to the estimator but also to the carrier or other reviewer regarding the status of compliance or noncompliance regarding the estimate. In one embodiment, the estimate compliance report can be automatically attached with the estimate that is transmitted back to the carrier for review and approval.
As discussed above, various embodiments can be implemented to provide estimate management and compliance verification in accordance with the present invention.
Referring now to
Shop-specific hourly rates, specific product codes, and other information used by the shop in preparing estimates can be used to prepare the estimate. In a Step 88, the completed estimate is audited to check for compliance. In one embodiment, one or more rule sets are provided by the carrier or other third party to the local estimator against which the estimate can be audited. In this context, the estimate can be verified against the specific rules to see if one or more items in the estimate are out of compliance. As indicated by decision Step 90, if the estimate does not comply with the rule set, the estimate is reworked and rechecked against the rule set to ensure compliance. Alternatively, reasons for non-compliance can be entered by the estimator to allow the estimate to be transmitted for approval with exceptions noted.
In one embodiment, the compliance check can be completed line by line as parts, labor rates, hourly requirements, or other data is entered into the estimate application. In this manner, errors, noncompliance or other issues can be flagged as the estimator is entering the data. In another embodiment, the completed estimate can be checked for compliance by passing the estimate through the compliance manager after it has been prepared, and areas of noncompliance can be flagged to the estimator to go back and correct. A final pass-through compliance check such as this can be useful to spot overall compliance issues that might not be flagged on a line by line basis.
For example, consider an example rule set wherein one of the rules requires that a certain percentage of like-kind-and-quality parts be used as opposed to original equipment replacement parts. With such a rule, it is useful to perform this check at the completion of the estimate such that the total quantity of original equipment parts and the total quantity of like kind and quality parts be compared against one another to ensure compliance with the threshold ratios. This example illustrates one scenario in which a line-by-line check may not reveal whether or not an estimate is in compliance. In one embodiment, however, various entries can be accumulated as entered to check total-estimate compliance as the estimate is being prepared. This can indicate to the estimator general compliance trends and may allow the estimator to adjust parts selection (or other decisions) to improve his or her chances of meeting the compliance goals. Textual, graphic and other indicators can be provided to the estimator to keep track of these values along the way.
To better illustrate this scenario, consider again the example where there is a requirement of a threshold ratio of like-kind-and-quality parts to original equipment parts. In this scenario, the compliance management system can track the ratio on an ongoing basis as the estimate is being entered, and provide the estimator with information as to his or her compliance up to that point. This can, for example, allow the estimator to adjust his or her decision making process in preparing the estimate to aim for compliance with the completed estimate.
As discussed above with respect to Blocks 56, 58 and 60, once the estimate has been checked for compliance it can be sent to the carrier for approval, whereupon subsequent compliance checks can be performed and a manual review and audit can also be performed. As illustrated by Step 92, when the estimate is deemed to be in order, the carrier can provide its approval to the estimator so that in Step 94 the repairs can be conducted.
Once the repairs are completed, in a Step 96 a final invoice can be prepared to be sent to the carrier for reimbursement. As with the estimate, the final invoice can be checked by the compliance management module to ensure that the job was invoiced in accordance with the applicable rule set. Thus, in one embodiment, the estimator module or other like module can be used to prepare the final invoice to facilitate a more automated compliance checking process. The local repair facility can also review the invoice for accuracy and completeness before forwarding to the carrier for reimbursement. In a Step 98, the carrier can review and audit the final invoice electronically or manually prior to issuing payment on the invoice in Step 100. As discussed above with reference to
As discussed above, various rules sets comprising one or more rules can be created and distributed to various estimators and billers to provide rules under which remedial activities are to be performed.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, rule sets can be created and distributed to the remediation facility for compliance management purposes. In one embodiment, an administrator can create rules with characteristics distinct to a particular region, locality or other geographic vicinity. Additionally, shop or facility-specific rules can be created that are specific to a given repair or other remediation facility. The created rule sets can be distributed electronically to the estimators 107, 108, and 109 via communication mediums such as, for example, the internet or other communication network or channel. In one embodiment, rule sets can be distributed using tools such as Web Services tools.
Version management can be implemented to manage various versions of the rule sets and updates can be distributed individually or within defined regions or other subsets. Additionally, profile statuses can be tracked among the various estimators and shops such that a compliance manager can easily determine which rule sets and which versions of the rules, etc., have been downloaded to a given facility. This information such as downloaded version numbers, etc., can also be used when an estimate is received from a shop for verification to determine whether an estimate that has been marked as compliant is, in fact, compliant with the latest version of the rule set. In one embodiment, the various estimators and shops can be configured to receive only read-only versions of the rules such that end users cannot change, delete or otherwise modify the rules or profiles.
The above embodiment contemplates a scenario wherein one or more rules are generated on a server system and distributed to one or more clients. For example, an insurance carrier may create one or more rules and distribute them (whether in rule sets or not) to estimators, repair shops and other locations for use. In another embodiment, the invention can be implemented to allow rules can be created locally at a client site. In such an embodiment, a client device can be used to create one or more rules. In one embodiment, locally created rules may be submitted for approval prior to use or directly implemented, depending on the compliance goals.
The rules that relate to compliance can relate to any of a number of different factors or parameters associated with the remedial activity. Although the options for rule parameters and rule types are virtually unlimited, a specific example in terms of the example environment is now provided to illustrate just a sample of the types of rules can be included. For example, with automobile repair and restoration, rules can cover things such as labor rates, tax rates, parts markups and discounts and so on. Additionally, labor times can be specified such as times for activities like color coating, sanding and buffing, blending and tinting, frame set up, and other max allowable times. Additionally, labor times can be specified as fixed numbers, caps for ranges for repair lines and so forth. Also, labor times for partial or spot re-finish alerts can also be provided.
As a further example, rules based on material usage can also be specified. For example, rules can specify material amounts, types, brands, costs, and so on. Material usage rules can also specify items such as paint materials allowable, shop materials, hazardous waste allowances, allowable towing rates and ranges, rental reimbursement and so on. Parts and betterment management rules can specify, for example, alternative parts guidelines, and betterment component management. As still a further example, the rules can specify what administrative data, if any, is required as a part of the estimate. For example, the rule may specify whether a VIN, claim number, point of impact information, vehicle mileage, deductible information, inspection dates and others, are required to be entered by the estimator or otherwise obtained for the compliance management process. As described in more detail below, in one embodiment, the system is configurable to allow custom rules to be created to virtually any component, operation, or labor category and for various vehicle types, years, conditions, mileage and so forth. Also, rules can be implemented to perform p-page checking to check, for example, for missing p-page items or not-allowed items.
Once the estimate is created, it can be saved in step 132 and a compliance check initiated in Step 134. To perform the compliance check, the compliance manager module 73 or other like module is launched to review the estimate and provide feedback to the appraiser about the estimate status. In one embodiment, the compliance manager module 73 can be automatically launched. The compliance manager module 73 checks the estimate in step 135 and provides feedback to the appraiser regarding the status of the estimate in terms of compliance in step 137. In one embodiment, the feedback can take the form of a message, pop-up window, audio stream, or other communication to the user, one example of which is discussed below with reference to
Column 152 is a line item column illustrating the line number of the estimate in which the exception is found. This can be used to facilitate location of the out of spec item by the appraiser. The description column 153 provides a description of the items that is out of specification. For example, the first line of the description column indicates that the item that the exception item is that the hazardous waste exceeds the authorized carrier level. The actual column, column 154, illustrates the actual cost bid in the estimate for the item. The guideline column, column 155, shows the guideline amount for that item based on the rule set. Thus, for the hazardous waste line-item column, the actual amount in the estimate in this example is $40.50 while the guideline is limited to $5.00. Therefore, this item is out of specification.
As another example, this window illustrates in the fourth line down that the guideline in the rule sets specifies that 10% alternate parts are to be used. The exception report illustrates that currently there are no alternate parts selected. Therefore, in reviewing this report, the appraiser can understand why the estimate is out of specification. A Print button, 157, can be provided to allow the report to be printed by the user. A Back button, 159, can be provided to allow the user to step back to a previous screen. Additionally, an Add Estimate Notes button, 160, can also be provided to allow the appraiser to explain the reason for an exception and request a variance or override of that exception.
An additional feature that can be included with the present invention is the ability to prepare and provide compliance results reports. Such reports can be prepared on an estimate by estimate basis to show compliance results for a given estimate or job. Additionally, in another embodiment, compliance results reports can be run over a series of estimates or period of time to show compliance history for that series or period. For example, compliance results reports may be consolidated and run for a given repair facility, a given appraiser, a given region, or any other subset of reports as may be identified by a user of the system.
A status line 214 provides a status of the current estimate, which in this example indicates that the estimate is out of compliance. Noncompliance items 216 provides a listing of items in the estimate that are not in compliance with the identified rule and version number. For example, illustrated in
The illustrated example also shows an area for estimator comments 218. In this example, the estimator provided notes as to why certain items may be out of compliance. Thus, an auditor can review the notes in conjunction with the noncompliance items to determine whether to approve the estimate despite the noncompliance items.
Also, the example of
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a rule creation module can be provided to allow a carrier or other entity to create one or more rule sets for distribution to the various appraisers. In one embodiment, a custom user interface or GUI can be provided to simplify the process and to allow intuitive interaction with the system for creation of custom rules for a variety of circumstances and situations. Created rules can be used by the carrier, and can also be distributed to the various appraisers as discussed above. An example of a rules creation module in accordance with one embodiment of the invention is now described.
Although not illustrated, a drop down window, ellipses button or other selection mechanism can be utilized to allow the user to select a rule name from a set of rule names. The Rule Description field 234 can also be provided to allow the user to enter a description of the rule. As with Rule Name field 232, Rule Description field 234 can also utilize a free text entry format as well as a drop down button, ellipses button, or other mechanisms to select predefined descriptors.
The example illustrated in
The Vehicle Mileage field 244 allows the user to enter the vehicle mileage for which the rule applies and a Mileage Condition field 245 can be included to allow the user to identify whether it is for vehicles with only that mileage, vehicles with that mileage or higher or vehicles with that mileage or lower. Boolean Operator field 243 allows the user to enter a condition such as a an AND or an OR condition for application for the year and mileage conditions.
As a further alternative, instead of mileage and year conditions such as or newer, or older, or more, or less, ranges can be provided to allow the user to specify a specific year or mileage range for which the rule would apply. As further examples of additional vehicle criteria that can be utilized in preparing the rules, vehicle criteria such as vehicle type (for example, sedan, sport, compact, SUV, convertible, and so on), vehicle class (for example, car, truck, etc.), vehicle duty (for example, commercial use, personal use, etc.) can also be provided. Although not illustrated, selections such as these can be provided with fields and the illustrated in another window.
Returning again to
In the illustrated example, clicking the Select Parts button 252 brings up a window from which the user can select the part or parts to which this rule will apply.
In this example, the parts are arranged hierarchy based on category and one or more of the categories can be drilled into to select individual parts within that category. For example, if the user wishes to apply the rule to the broad category of any air conditioning part, the user can simply check the Air Conditioning box thereby selecting that category. If, on the other hand, the user only wishes the rule to apply to a high pressure line for the air conditioning system, for example, the user can expand the air conditioning folder to reveal the list of items underneath the air conditioning heading and then select the high pressure line. Additional layers of hierarchy can be included depending on the structure and makeup of the part category selected. The user could then browse through the various selections to find the high pressure line (or other part) for which the user wishes the rule to apply. In one embodiment, subsequent 'folders' may be provided to handle the additional layers of hierarchy.
Having selected the category or categories and part or parts, the user can return to the rule creation menu to finish creating the rule for those selected categories or parts. Although not illustrated, a text entry field can also be provided allowing the user to manually enter the name of the part or parts (or categories) for which the rule is to be applied. For the selected part or category, the user can select the part type 253 that will apply. For example, the user may select that the specified part or parts be original equipment parts, like kind and quality parts, used parts, and so on. In one embodiment, this part type selection can be made for all parts in the selection or a percentage of the parts, or other metrics can be applied. In one embodiment, the user can be provided with the option of not specifying any parts, thus making the rule applicable to all parts for the identified vehicle(s).
Although not illustrated in
Additionally, as illustrated in
The example illustrated in
In one embodiment, the fields for vehicle criteria and parts criteria (as well as other fields, as appropriate) can be tied to the same or similar fields in the estimating software such that there is a correspondence between the created rules and the line items in the prepared estimate. For example, even if they are separate software packages, in one embodiment the compliance module and the estimator module can be implemented to use common designators for vehicles, years, mileage, part numbers and so on. In another embodiment, a translation interface can be provided to allow identifiers from one package to be read by the other. This can help to ensure that a match between items is made.
In one embodiment, a module is provided to create the rule based on the vehicle criteria and parts criteria entered. For example, in one embodiment a rule generation module can accept the input provided by the user and format the information into the proper syntax to thereby generate the rule. Thus, a properly formatted rule can be created based on the supplied user input. For example, consider the example data input as illustrated in
In a Step 354, the user can select the parts criteria for applicability of the rule. An example of a user interface that can be provided for this was discussed above with reference to
In a Step 358, the user provides a noncompliance message that will be displayed to the appraiser or other party upon encountering an exception to the rule. Preferably, the noncompliance message is sufficiently descriptive to explain the estimator why the estimate, or part thereof, is in violation of the rule. Additionally, the noncompliance message can provide guidance on how to come into compliance. Further, a noncompliance message can indicate situations in which an exception to the rule will be granted.
In a Step 360, completed rules can be compared to one another to determine whether there are any conflicts among the rules. For example, consider a situation where a user creates a rule that says all vehicles model year 1998 and older or having greater than 60,000 miles require used parts for body panels. Consider a second rule that says all vehicles of a particular make and model require new original equipment body panels. In this circumstance, for vehicles of that particular make and model that happen to be older than model year 1998 or have greater than 60,000 miles, there is a conflict in these two rules. The rules compatibility check can be used to identify situations in which such conflicts may arise. A conflicts module can be implemented such that rules conflicts checks can be run among various rules at any time. In one embodiment, a conflicts module can be implemented to check for conflicts among rules identified by a user, or among rules identified as being associated with a profile. In this manner, profiles can be created and conflicts checks limited to a given profile so that conformance among all the rules within a profile is ensured. This embodiment can allow multiple rules to exist in a library of rules, even where conflicts exist.
In one embodiment the system can be implemented such that the more specific rule will prevail over the more general rule. In another embodiment, the system can be configured to require manual intervention to resolve rule conflicts. Rule conflicts can be resolved for example by deleting a rule, changing the rules such that they are no longer in conflict or by specifying to the system which rule will prevail in the event that a situation arises where there is a conflict between the two rules (for example the situation where a particular make and model is older than 1998). In yet another embodiment, the system can be configured to allow the user to assign a weighting to the rules such that rule conflicts can be resolved based on rule waiting. This can allow a form of prioritization to be made as the rule is being created to potentially avoid unresolvable conflicts.
Having thus described an overall process for automated rule creation, examples of a specific process for vehicle criteria and parts criteria selection are now described. Various factors can be included in the rule specification, such as vehicle class, make and model information, vehicle year, mileage, duty, and other criteria. Depending on the implementation, any or all of these criteria can be set forth as required information to create a rule. These criteria can be used as 'inclusive of' or 'exclusive of' to specify a subset of vehicles to which the rule will apply. For example, in one embodiment, the rules creation interface can be configured to ask the user to specify a vehicle year range and a vehicle mileage range to which the rule will apply, and to further allows the user to enter any make or model vehicles that the user wishes to be excluded from the specified subset.
In a Step 412 the user decides whether the rule will be make and model specific. If so, in a Step 414 the user can specify the make and model and in Step 416 determine whether the rule is applied only to that make and model or applied to every vehicle other than that make and model. Likewise, in a Step 418 the user can determine whether the rule will be year specific. If so, in a Step 420 the user can select the year or year range and in Step 422 whether it is inclusive or exclusive. As discussed above, the user can select a particular year, a range of years, or make a selection based on newer-than and older-than criteria.
Similarly, in Step 424 the user can determine whether the rule will be based on mileage specifications as illustrated by Step 424. If so, in a Step 426 the user can enter the mileage or mileage range and in 428 identify whether the rule is inclusive or exclusive of the identified mileage. As also discussed above, mileage can be entered as a particular mileage, a mileage range of specific mileages, or a greater-than or less-than mileage condition. Although not illustrated in
In a Step 444, the user is prompted to specify the part type for the rule. In other words, the user can specify whether original equipment parts are to be used, whether like kind and quality parts are to be used, whether refurbished or remanufactured parts are to be used and so on.
In a Step 466, the user can specify the requirement for the parts. In this step the user can specify the applicability of the part type requirement to the parts. For example, the user can specify that all parts be of the specified part type that a percentage of the parts of the specified part type that at least one or at least two of the parts be of the specified part type and so on. In one embodiment, the user can also specify whether this is a required rule or a guideline rule. In some embodiments, where it is a required rule, exceptions to the rule will not be granted but will only be granted under exceptional circumstances. Where there is a desired rule or a guideline, exceptions may be granted or granted only with explanation. Additionally, compliance with the rule can be tracked on an appraiser, shop basis, case-by-case basis or other basis to analyze compliance statistics and trends.
In another embodiment, rather than specifying separate rules for particular makes and models or for other classes or categories, make and model exceptions or other desired exceptions can be identified in the rules generation process to avoid issues of rule conflict. For example, in the context of the example conflict discussed above, a single rule can be created in accordance with the process illustrated in
Although not illustrated, rule creation is not limited to creating a rule for a single make and model or a single class or a single year range or single mileage range. For example, in one embodiment the user can be given the opportunity to specify multiple classes, makes and models, year ranges, mileage ranges and so on in the creation of a rule, or to leave a particular criteria field vacant (or be given an 'All' selection) to allow the rule to apply to all vehicles regardless of their status in that particular criteria. Additionally, although not illustrated in
As these examples illustrate, the rule creation module can be implemented with varying degrees of feature richness. As the example illustrated in
Although not illustrated in
As would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading the above description, a number of different interfaces can be created and implemented to provide users with the ability to create compliance rules in accordance with the features and functionality described herein.
Likewise, in this example, the mileage criteria also includes a mileage range 536 and a mileage field 538. Thus, for example, the user can specify a mileage range greater than, less than or equal to a certain number of miles. Additionally, a Boolean operator 532 can be included to make the age and mileage criteria Boolean functions such as, for example, AND or OR functions.
The example interface illustrated in
Although not illustrated in
As discussed above, in one embodiment various criteria can be selected as either inclusive criteria or criteria to identify a category to be excluded. In the example illustrated in
For example, a rule creator may decide that the particular rule being created would not apply to a particular make and model of vehicle or a particular class, type, duty, or other criteria of vehicle as the rules creator may deem appropriate. In a preferred embodiment, the exclusion criteria allows the rule creator to identify a make or make and model of vehicle to be excluded from the rule. Selection button 549 can be clicked to open criteria selections for identifying the exclusion criteria. Selection button 549 might open a selection box allowing the category to be selected before advancing to the list of vehicles in that category. Alternatively, selection button 549 might be implemented go directly to a list of vehicles for a predetermined category. For example, in the case of make/model exclusions, clicking button 549 would open a window to allow the user to select the make and model of vehicle to exclude from the rule.
As discussed above with the example provided in
As discussed above, selection button 545 allows a user to identify the part or parts to which the rule will apply. In one embodiment, clicking selection 545 opens a new window in which the part or parts can be identified.
Particularly, in the example illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, a model-by-model listing is provided for the selected make. In alternative embodiments, model categories may also be provided to facilitate multiple-model selection without identifying each individual item. For example, model selection criteria might be provided that allowed the user to select all coupes, sedans, all-wheel drives, or SUVs for example, or all models having the V6, V8 or V12 engine as an other example. As yet a further example, the interface can be implemented to provide the user the ability to select model series such as, in the illustrated example of a BMW, to select the 5 series, the 7 series, M model series, and so on.
Thus, in this example, in an estimate is created for a vehicle that is either more than two years old or has more than 12,000 miles and bumper cover parts are used in the estimate, if those parts are not either remanufactured, like kind, or after market, a non-compliance flag will be raised and the non-compliance message specified will be provided to the estimate preparer.
Yet another example of a user interface that can be used for rule creation is provided in
As these additional examples illustrate there are a number of different configurations for the user interface that can be provided to enable a user-friendly approach to rules creation. After reading this description, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand how alternative interfaces can be provided to enable creation of rules and provide the features and functionality discussed herein.
As used herein, the term "module" is used to describe a given unit of functionality that can be performed in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention. As used herein, a module can be implemented utilizing any form of hardware, software, or a combination thereof. In implementation, the various modules described herein can be implemented as discrete modules or the functions and features described can be shared in part or in total among one or more modules. In other words, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading this description, the various features and functionality described herein may be implemented in any given application can be implemented in one or more separate or shared modules in various combinations and permutations. The term tool can be used to refer to any apparatus configured to perform a recited function. Tools can include a collection of one or more modules and can also be comprised of hardware, software or a combination thereof. Thus, for example, a tool can be a collection of software modules, hardware modules, software/hardware modules or any combination or permutation thereof. As another example, a tool can be a computing device or other appliance on which software runs or in which hardware is implemented.
Where components or modules of the invention are implemented in whole or in part using software, in one embodiment, these elements can be implemented using a computing system capable of carrying out the functionality described with respect thereto. One such example computing system is shown in
Referring now to
Computing system 600 can also include a main memory 608, preferably random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic memory, for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 604. Main memory 608 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 604. Computing system 600 can likewise includes a read only memory ("ROM") or other static storage device coupled to bus 602 for storing static information and instructions for processor 604.
The computing system 600 can also include information storage mechanism 610, which can include, for example, a media drive 612 and a removable storage interface 620. The media drive 612 can include a drive or other mechanism to support fixed or removable storage media. For example, a hard disk drive a floppy disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, a CD or DVD drive (R or RW), or other removable or fixed media drive. Storage media 618, can include, for example, a hard disk, a floppy disk, magnetic tape, optical disk, a CD or DVD, or other fixed or removable medium that is read by and written to by media drive 614. As these examples illustrate, the storage media 618 can include a computer usable storage medium having stored therein particular computer software or data.
In alternative embodiments, information storage mechanism 610 may include other similar instrumentalities for allowing computer programs or other instructions or data to be loaded into computing system 600. Such instrumentalities can include, for example, a removable storage unit 622 and an interface 620. Examples of such can include a program cartridge and cartridge interface, a removable memory (for example, a flash memory or other removable memory module) and memory slot, and other removable storage units 622 and interfaces 620 that allow software and data to be transferred from the removable storage unit 618 to computing system 600.
Computing system 600 can also include a communications interface 624. Communications interface 624 can be used to allow software and data to be transferred between computing system 600 and external devices. Examples of communications interface 624 can include a modem, a network interface (such as an Ethernet or other NIC card), a communications port (such as for example, a USB port), a PCMCIA slot and card, etc. Software and data transferred via communications interface 624 are in the form of signals which can be electronic, electromagnetic, optical or other signals capable of being received by communications interface 624. These signals are provided to communications interface 624 via a channel 628. This channel 628 can carry signals and can be implemented using a wireless medium, wire or cable, fiber optics, or other communications medium. Some examples of a channel can include a phone line, a cellular phone link, an RF link, a network interface, a local or wide area network, and other communications channels.
In this document, the terms "computer program medium" and "computer usable medium" are used to generally refer to media such as, for example, memory 608, storage device 618, a hard disk installed in hard disk drive 612, and signals on channel 628. These and other various forms of computer usable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 604 for execution. Such instructions, generally referred to as "computer program code" (which may be grouped in the form of computer programs or other groupings), when executed, enable the computing system 600 to perform features or functions of the present invention as discussed herein.
In an embodiment where the elements are implemented using software, the software may be stored in a computer program medium and loaded into computing system 600 using removable storage drive 614, hard drive 612 or communications interface 624. The computer program logic (in this example, software instructions or computer program code), when executed by the processor 604, causes the processor 604 to perform the functions of the invention as described herein.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not of limitation. Likewise, the various diagrams may depict an example architectural or other configuration for the invention, which is done to aid in understanding the features and functionality that can be included in the invention. The invention is not restricted to the illustrated example architectures or configurations, but the desired features can be implemented using a variety of alternative architectures and configurations. Indeed, it will be apparent to one of skill in the art how alternative functional, logical or physical partitioning and configurations can be implemented to implement the desired features of the present invention. Also, a multitude of different constituent module names other than those depicted herein can be applied to the various partitions. Additionally, with regard to flow diagrams, operational descriptions and method claims, the order in which the steps are presented herein shall not mandate that various embodiments be implemented to perform the recited functionality in the same order unless the context dictates otherwise.
Although the invention is described above in terms of various exemplary embodiments and implementations, it should be understood that the various features, aspects and functionality described in one or more of the individual embodiments are not limited in their applicability to the particular embodiment with which they are described, but instead can be applied, alone or in various combinations, to one or more of the other embodiments of the invention, whether or not such embodiments are described and whether or not such features are presented as being a part of a described embodiment. Thus the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
Terms and phrases used in this document, and variations thereof, unless otherwise expressly stated, should be construed as open ended as opposed to limiting. As examples of the foregoing: the term "including" should be read as mean "including, without limitation" or the like; the term "example" is used to provide exemplary instances of the item in discussion, not an exhaustive or limiting list thereof; and adjectives such as "conventional," "traditional," "normal," "standard," "known" and terms of similar meaning should not be construed as limiting the item described to a given time period or to an item available as of a given time, but instead should be read to encompass conventional, traditional, normal, or standard technologies that may be available or known now or at any time in the future. Likewise, where this document refers to technologies that would be apparent or known to one of ordinary skill in the art, such technologies encompass those apparent or known to the skilled artisan now or at any time in the future.
A group of items linked with the conjunction "and" should not be read as requiring that each and every one of those items be present in the grouping, but rather should be read as "and/or" unless expressly stated otherwise. Similarly, a group of items linked with the conjunction "or" should not be read as requiring mutual exclusivity among that group, but rather should also be read as "and/or" unless expressly stated otherwise. Furthermore, although items, elements or components of the invention may be described or claimed in the singular, the plural is contemplated to be within the scope thereof unless limitation to the singular is explicitly stated.
The presence of broadening words and phrases such as "one or more," "at least," "but not limited to" or other like phrases in some instances shall not be read to mean that the narrower case is intended or required in instances where such broadening phrases may be absent. The use of the term "module" does not imply that the components or functionality described or claimed as part of the module are all configured in a common package. Indeed, any or all of the various components of a module, whether control logic or other components, can be combined in a single package or separately maintained and can further be distributed across multiple locations.
Additionally, the various embodiments set forth herein are described in terms of exemplary block diagrams, flow charts and other illustrations. As will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading this document, the illustrated embodiments and their various alternatives can be implemented without confinement to the illustrated examples. For example, block diagrams and their accompanying description should not be construed as mandating a particular architecture or configuration.
|Brevet cité
|Date de dépôt
|Date de publication
|1 juin 1973
|13 aoűt 1974
|Philips Corp
|Interrogation apparatus and method including a record carrier for storing images with addresses
|22 aoűt 1974
|10 aoűt 1976
|Vladimir Nikolaevich Balashov
|Storage and display apparatus
|2 aoűt 1976
|6 déc. 1977
|Conway Malcolm J
|Mental image enhancement apparatus utilizing computer systems
|2 déc. 1980
|13 sept. 1983
|Chevron Research Company
|Automotive diagnostic system
|20 avr. 1981
|1 nov. 1983
|Forney Engineering Company
|Industrial process control system
|12 mars 1982
|13 déc. 1983
|Edward Dolejsi
|Combination text and picture display system
|16 mars 1981
|6 mars 1984
|Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
|Portable type automobile repair estimate issuing device
|30 oct. 1981
|28 aoűt 1984
|Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
|Document size conversion circuit for a document filing system
|18 janv. 1983
|28 mai 1985
|Tokyo Shibaura Kenki Kabushiki Kaisha
|Picture information display device
|28 déc. 1982
|27 aoűt 1985
|Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
|Image editing apparatus
|11 mai 1983
|10 déc. 1985
|Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
|Picture data processing device
|27 juin 1985
|19 mai 1987
|Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
|Document image editing device
|29 juil. 1983
|1 sept. 1987
|Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd.
|Method and apparatus of storing image data into a memory in a layout scanner system
|25 avr. 1986
|16 févr. 1988
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and apparatus for enlarging or reducing an image on the basis of precalculated reference pel contribution rate data and two-dimensional reference window shifting amount data stored in a table memory
|29 janv. 1987
|21 juin 1988
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Visualizable and descriptive data handling system
|24 juil. 1987
|27 sept. 1988
|Eastman Kodak Company
|Method for adaptively masking off a video window in an overscanned image
|22 janv. 1988
|6 juin 1989
|Hewlett-Packard Company
|A scanning system in which a portion of a preview scan image of a picture displaced on a screen is selected and a corresponding portion of the picture is scanned in a final scan
|24 janv. 1989
|2 janv. 1990
|Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|Image expansion apparatus
|27 janv. 1988
|9 janv. 1990
|Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
|Data processing apparatus having enlargement/reduction functions capable of setting different magnification in different directions
|2 mars 1988
|6 févr. 1990
|Image Storage/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
|System for storing and retrieving text and associated graphics
|24 avr. 1990
|20 nov. 1990
|Iron City Sash & Door Company
|Order entry and inventory control method
|13 mars 1989
|12 févr. 1991
|H-Renee, Incorporated
|System and method for automated selection of equipment for purchase through input of user desired specifications
|26 nov. 1990
|7 juil. 1992
|Carbone Albert R
|Electronic accident estimating system
|19 sept. 1986
|8 sept. 1992
|Westinghouse Electric Corporation
|Electronic maintenance support work station
|13 oct. 1992
|1 févr. 1994
|Clear With Computers, Inc.
|Computer-assisted parts sales system
|29 sept. 1987
|8 mars 1994
|Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
|Estimate generating system for automotive panel repairing
|27 mars 1992
|31 mai 1994
|Isao Inoue
|Apparatus for calculating a repair cost of a damaged car
|27 févr. 1989
|27 déc. 1994
|Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
|Method and apparatus for compiling data relating to damage extent, panel and chassis member rectification work, painting work and costs
|9 nov. 1993
|11 juil. 1995
|Ccc Information Services Inc.
|Auto repair estimate, text and graphic system
|19 mai 1993
|2 avr. 1996
|Ccc Information Services, Inc.
|Insurance claims estimate, text, and graphics network and method
|28 déc. 1994
|17 nov. 1998
|Automatic Data Processing
|Method and apparatus for displaying and selecting vehicle parts
|9 nov. 1995
|7 sept. 1999
|Ccc Information Services, Inc.
|System and method for managing insurance claim processing
|14 oct. 1997
|11 avr. 2000
|Reclaim Technology And Services Limited
|Automated method for identification of reinsurance claims
|17 nov. 1998
|6 févr. 2001
|Automatic Data Processing
|Insurance estimating system
|7 mai 1999
|14 sept. 2004
|Hfn, Inc.
|Automated claim repricing system
|6 avr. 2000
|26 oct. 2004
|Xactware, Inc.
|Automated task management and evaluation
|20 avr. 2001
|26 oct. 2004
|General Electric Company
|Method and system for servicing a selected piece of equipment having unique system configurations and servicing requirements
|18 juil. 2000
|27 sept. 2005
|Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for coordinating services
|2 aoűt 2005
|3 févr. 2009
|Verifacts Automotive, Llc
|Data management systems for collision repair coaching
|30 nov. 2000
|30 mai 2002
|Tsubasa System Co., Ltd.
|System for processing insurance benefit agreements and computer readable medium storing a program therefor
|30 mai 2003
|2 déc. 2004
|Decision Support Services
|Automotive collision estimate audit system
|22 aoűt 2003
|24 févr. 2005
|Dale Kwasniewski
|System for processing applications for manufacture of vehicle parts
|28 juin 2004
|16 juin 2005
|Automated Vehicle Analysis, Inc.
|Integrated automated analysis and repair
|6 oct. 2006
|19 avr. 2007
|Ganzcorp Investments Inc.
|Method and apparatus for validating OBD repairs
|"I/M Costs, Benefits, and Impacts", U.S. E.P.A., Nov. 1992.
|ADP, ClaimsFlo Passport, Streamline Estimate Review Automatically. (2001) Automatic Data Processing www.adpclaims.com.
|Audatex, a Solera Company, "Audatex Estimate Check(TM)" (2006) Audatex North America http://www.audatex.com.
|Audatex, a Solera Company, "Audatex Estimate Check™" (2006) Audatex North America http://www.audatex.com.
|CCC information Services, Inc., "Estimate Quality Review" (2001) http://www.ccis.com.
|CCC Pathways, Estimating Solutions, "Integrated Self Audit" (created Sep. 22, 2006).
|NuGen LT., "Response to CCIF Parts and Material Committee", Enterprise Workflow, NuGen I.T., The internet Integration Company (created Sep. 22, 2006).
|Classification aux États-Unis
|707/802, 707/758
|Classification internationale
|Classification coopérative
|Classification européenne
|13 févr. 2007
Owner name: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LITTOOY, HANS;PUGLIESE, VINCENT;EMMERSON, MICHAEL;REEL/FRAME:018887/0452;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070212 TO 20070213
Owner name: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LITTOOY, HANS;PUGLIESE, VINCENT;EMMERSON, MICHAEL;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070212 TO 20070213;REEL/FRAME:018887/0452
|26 avr. 2007
Owner name: SUMITOMO MITSUI BANKING CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL
Free format text: GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNOR:MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019215/0023
Effective date: 20070328
Owner name: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P., AS COLLATERAL
Free format text: GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST (FIRST LIEN);ASSIGNOR:MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019204/0991
Effective date: 20070328
|11 oct. 2013
Owner name: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:SUMITOMO MITSUI BANKING CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:031397/0696
Effective date: 20131011
Owner name: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS-FIRST LIEN;ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.;REEL/FRAME:031397/0739
Effective date: 20131011
|25 oct. 2013
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH
Free format text: FIRST LIEN SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:031495/0520
Effective date: 20131025
Owner name: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW J
Free format text: SECOND LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:031495/0548
Effective date: 20131025
|8 nov. 2013
Owner name: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE (REEL 019204/FRAME 0991);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:031607/0011
Effective date: 20131107
Owner name: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE (REEL 019215/FRAME 0023);ASSIGNOR:SUMITOMO MITSUI BANKING CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:031607/0079
Effective date: 20131107
|25 nov. 2015
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4


text:
Eddie Gaven was unsure how many minutes he could give the Crew on Sunday vs. DC. United. A bruised right leg had kept him out since Aug. 5.
"I wasn't sure if I was going to go 45, 60, 90 [minutes]," the veteran midfielder said. "It was all about whatever the team needed me to do and tonight it was to go the whole game."
As it turned out, an hour would have been enough.
Gaven scored his fifth goal of the season on a diving header in the 60th minute to rally the Crew to a 2-1 victory that ended a six-game winless streak and revived their hopes of winning the Eastern Conference.
WATCH: Full Match Highlights
The Crew (12-12-8, 44 points) are a point behind first-place Sporting Kansas with two games left.
"We've been waiting a long time to win," coach Robert Warzycha said. "That tastes sweeter than usual."
The Crew missed Gaven's tireless efforts on the right flank during a 0-5-1 skid and were knotted with D.C. at 1-1 after Daniel Woolard scored for the visitors in the 37th minute then put in an own goal 11 minutes later.
"You always want to have Eddie Gaven on the field," defender Danny O'Rourke said. "He brings so much to the game that goes unnoticed. He makes good runs. You wouldn't know he's been out a month doing a little bit of fitness here and there. He's running all over the place. He's a smart player. He rarely makes a bad decision."
Gaven only resumed training two weeks ago but has always been one of the fittest players on the team.
"Even though I couldn't play, I could run to stay fit," he said. "I knew I was able to come back soon. I didn't know when. I kept trying to work hard to make sure I was fit when I came back. Tonight was my chance."
Gaven took advantage of some lax defending to cut toward the penalty spot as Sebastian Miranda delivered the service from the right side for the winner "He served me a perfect ball," he said. "I was going to hit it with my foot but for some reason – I really don't know why – I dived for it, closed my eyes and hoped for the best.
"Usually I just hit that with my foot," he added. "I don't know why I decided to hit it with my head but I did and fortunately it went in."

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Yoshida in Madison: Don't declare BlackBerry DOA
10 comments post a comment
As the Android market turns into a giant playground for me-too products could it be such a bad development for BlackBerry to emerge?
MADISON, Wis. -- Here we go again.
As soon as Research In Motion--which renamed itself BlackBerry--unveiled Wednesday (Jan. 30) its two new devices--Z10 and Q10--running on the companys new BB10 operating system, the whole world is now talking about how the new devices failed to impress Wall Street analysts.
BlackBerrys Z10 phone looks similar to Apple's iPhone 5, or any other new smartphone model. It features an 8- megapixel camera and high-definition video. BlackBerrys Q10's touch screen is significantly smaller, so that it allows space for a physical QWERTY keyboard. It looks similar to recent BlackBerry Bold models.
The announcement, indeed, did not move the needle for the Canadian company. The companys Nasdaq-listed shares closed down 12 percent Wednesday at $13.78.
Reuters reports that at least three financial analysts have downgraded the companys stock.
In an era when a companys (and/or a technologys) worth is often measured by like tags from the financial community, I shouldnt be surprised that the general public already seems to agree that BB10--and by extension the whole BlackBerry brand--is DOA.
Maybe so. But, just for the heck of it, lets consider exactly what in the new Blackberry devices disappointed the financial community. Specifically, the two biggies were pricing and product delay.
Here are the facts we know as of Thursday morning:
Verizon Wireless said it would sell the Z10 for $199 with a two-year contract, or $149 with a three-year contract in the United States. Verizon will offer both Q10 and Z10 on its 4G LTE network. But the company did not announce pricing for Q10.
Sprint is only planning to carry the keyboard-equipped Q10 at this time, with no immediate plans to carry the touch-screen Z10 device. T-Mobile for now is said to be just planning to carry the touch-screen Z10. AT&T said that it will offer the Z10 and the Q10.
The point here is that no one has any information as to how much the keyboard-equipped Q10 is going to cost; nor how U.S. carriers other than Verizon are going to price either Z10 or Q10, let alone how much they will eventually cost in the emerging markets.
But apparently it's already been determined that $199 for Z10 is too expensive. And the financial analysts, according to Reuters, noted that average sales prices might be too high for many emerging market users." They also raised questions about how quickly businesses would adopt the new devices.


text:
With a suite of analog modeled and digital Dynamics/EQ processors, T RackS 3 Standard raises the bar again in high-end DAW mastering and mixing. Plus an audio quality that is unmatched in software and scores of new and unique features. Its rich, warm sound combines new tube-modeled and state-of-the-art digital processors on top of its classic top-notch analog classics. A new modular chain gives you full control and easy navigation/compare features. A new complete metering section keeps all the most important variables of your sound under control. A truly superior mastering and mixing system that will put a polish on your tracks you may have never thought possible. All this, while adding the beautiful warmth and space of the tube devices it emulates. T RackS 3 has all the tools you need to create superb, tube-toned or digital-tuned, mixes and masters.
T Racks 3 Standard is a modular high-end mastering/mixing suite of dynamics and EQ processors, including:
- 4 classic, award-winning T-RackS processors


text:
Opal Range > Grizzly Peak > Climber's Log
Grizzly Peak Climber's Log
[ Sign the Climber's Log ]
|Grizzly Peak
Date Climbed: Jul 19, 2014
|A good workout well worth the view of the lovely field just below the summit
|Posted Aug 21, 2015 2:03 pm
|William Marler
|Great outing
Date Climbed: Jul 19, 2014
|Good outing with all types of weather mostly good. Patrick, Karin and myself to the summit. Lots of sheep
|Posted Jul 20, 2014 1:14 am
|Old School WB
|Fun hike with great views
Date Climbed: Oct 22, 2010
|I hiked a steady, but not quick pace, stopped many times to take photos and consult the map, figured out routes on other Opals, had a big snack at the col, laid around the summit, checked the map, took a bunch of photos, marveled how cool The Wedge looked from this angle, had some lunch, slowly packed up.
Well even trying to be slow I was 2 hours and 30 minutes car to car. I probably spent over 45 minutes checking route descriptions, maps and taking photos. I was really surprised how short this scramble is.
|Posted Jan 16, 2012 1:38 pm
|Popular Route
Date Climbed: Jun 28, 2009
|On this sunny summer Sunday, this route was popular. We met 6 groups going up or down, and a small dog.
Saw a bear on the highway below the mountain, and marmots on the grassy meadow below the summit, but no sheep or deer.
The summit register is full.
|Posted Jun 28, 2009 11:08 pm
|The Scrambler
|Scrambling Route
Date Climbed: Sep 9, 2007
|This is an easy climb, though the Kane's book doesn't lie about taking the wrong way. The first time we did it we took the way discribed in the book as the wrong way to go. Though I did get alot of practise scrambling we didn't make it. The second time we took the right was a did it after work. Not as fun as the hard way, but it got us too the top. Some neat views from the top. Lots of goats too!!
|Posted Oct 19, 2007 2:20 pm
|William Marler
|Scramble Route
Date Climbed: Aug 13, 2006
|Excellent short day out.. fine views all along the route. Will be back. Definately the easiest route in Kanes book. A hike really. But the scenery is worth it.
|Posted Aug 14, 2006 1:01 pm
|Scramble route
Date Climbed: Jun 4, 2006
|Didn't have my guidebook with me so I just followed a trail (with cairns up to a point) which curves around the base of the rocky walls, I was never more than 30 m away from the imposing vertical rock walls. This route didn't have any scrambling but it didn't seem easy to me due to the relentless steep hills cover with loose scree near the top. Took me 2:15 to get up and I was dead tired when I reached the summit. I guess doing Black Rock mtn yesterday didn't help. At least it was a warm day and I spent 40 mins at the summit and even took a little nap. Had the mtn all by myself...well not completly alone since I saw a young bighorn sheep. Coming down wasn't any easier either, the scree over rock was not ideal for running down and I slipped so many times. Luckily that only last a short while before gaining the trail again. Not a lot of traffic on this mtn, only ~10 pages of the summit registry filled up after the new centennial register was placed back on August 2005.
|Posted Jun 5, 2006 12:52 am
|Dow Williams
|Route Climbed: Scramble Date Climbed: October, 2003
|This is the easiest scramble in Kananaskis in Kanes book. Good one for the pet and/or kids. I took BJ (dog) up this day for some exercise. We enjoyed several sheep on the way up as this is a very grassy area. We also walked right past one of the neatest A-frame natural shallow caves I have ever seen, serving as a perfect shelter for sheep. Once on top, we enjoyed some neat clouds over the Haig Glacier Mountains and close up shots of Packenham and Evan Thomas mountains. Do move back west when spotting routes versus descending all the way down to the creek. Cheers.
|Posted Jul 19, 2005 12:15 am
|Route Climbed: Scramble route Date Climbed: July 17, 2005
|Climbed this with my brother Greg on a Sunday afternoon. We saw two other groups heading down while we were heading up, otherwise we had the mountain to ourselves. It was such a beautiful day we took our time, taking a lot of pictures, exploring the ridge, and enjoying the phenominal views. We had very little wind, which made the day extra enjoyable! This trip can easily be done in 4-5 hours.
|Posted Jul 19, 2005 12:00 am


text:
Discussion in 'Junior League & Tournament Talk' started by yonexman001, Apr 12, 2008.
Has anyone found out anything about Pacific yet?
Yea I would really like to find a contact number for Pacific
i think u just contact their email on there web and they send u application form... still any info on bosworth or avery...?
I cant find the Pacific Website
that is the worst website it doesnt even work
does anyone just have a contact e-mail address for Pacific
dang i used to but i lost it... ill see if i can find it but i dont think so...=(
if you could find it that would be great
im pretty sure it was found at like garrison sports and the guy was gary if that helps any...stiil looking though btw
I got it I found the actual Pacific website
Spill it man, we're dying from anticipation!
grat!! hope they take u or atleast give u a deal!
so anyone get pacific?
also when is that new babolat package coming out???? i was told feb but i dont think it has come out yet...
i was having trouble cuz i was just typing pacific.com but u have to type www.pacific.com
oooooooooooo lol so u get the pacific sponsor?
Im sponsored by PRINCE, equipment and shoes and clothes
I got the new EXO3's, Rebel 95's
I'm ranked in the top 800 (795) nationally and I'm ranked 72 in Norcal. Will any companies sponsor me?
I've emailed some of the bigger companies but I don't qualify for their requirements by a longshot.
I hope I can find a sponsor, my parents can't afford to pay for my tennis.
adidas adiplayer will sponsor you... but also if you break 250 i think u get full tecnifibre
lazyenviet, are you sure your parents cant pay or dont want to pay, no offense? Because id hate to know that someone is denied the right to play.
Get a job or something if your really that hungry either that or pray.
My mom was unwilling because of me tossing rackets and a bad grade in spanish, i fixed it and Im ranked to 5. I dont know whats the storry with you
I specifically phrased it as "can't afford". Times are hard buddy.
Being a 1st gen Vietnamese fob doesn't help either when I'm in love with tennis.
On another note, does anyone know if Tennis Warehouse sponsors juniors?
What is the requirement for adidas? What rank do you have to be?
i dont know about uk but for the usa u must be around 25 in your section but they can give it to you if your higher... but this is for the adiplayer partial...
i dont know...however when i was talking to iso speed i think it was they told me to talk to tw so i did but i dont think i used the right email and they never responded
what grade in HS are you? I may have an idea
anyone know if unique sponsors players?
i recently talked to a pro and she said she was sponsored by nike n babolat but not unique yet she still used there grips...anyway im kinda surprised she wouldnt just use babolat grips that she got for free and im also surprised she was not sponsored by unique
full sponsorship with tecni for top 250??? is this for the US?
sorry i have never contacted them but maybe...yes us
so are you saying that if i get or have been in the top 250 i can get full tecnifibre
i think... it might be partial ive never asked... also i think u must be 250 currently but im sure they let ppl slide
Whats the Email for Head sponsorship??
idk but i hear u can just cal them 2
seach head team elite in google and apply there
so anyone have any new info on anything like pacific or msv
Sure .
Eligibility varies
Full sponsor
circa 75% off Prince goods.
50% off Prince goods.
25% off Prince goods.
Hope this helps!
do you have to attach a photo to that?
Not sure if anyone posted this yet. but the new adiplayer package is out from Adidas for spring/summer 2009.
i like the new barricades and also the novak shoes are offered!..... anyone might get extra items or packages?
does anyone know if there are new requirements for the gamma sponsorship? what it is for partial and full?
Does anybody know about Canada?
someone here said it was ez to get one in canada and said they had a full with yonex...
Pro Supex isn't too difficult. I turned down Pro Supex's offer and Adidas offer as I was not going to play tennis anymore. Sorta regret it now and I was only like one more decent tournament away from a half sponsorship from Head, that's what their sponsor said. Sucks but oh well.
i think he means adiplayer which is the partial sponsorship if you are top 25 in your section
what section??????
ooo well they or pretty good but not like a flordia or so cal...
Woah, woah, woah caaaalmm down Daycrawler!
Okay. I'm not brown so whatever ha. I don't really care. It's real cool to make fun of friends of mine online man. That's real classy. Why don't you reveal your identity?
Separate names with a comma.


text:
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) – When the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse was moved 15 years ago, the massive stones that held up the famous beacon were left behind at the erosion-prone spot on the Atlantic.
A nonprofit group paid to have the stones engraved with the names of the 83 light keepers. The stones were then placed in a circle that became a popular spot for weddings and other events.
But erosion continues to threaten the area, and sand from storms such as Isabel and Sandy covers the stones. Hatteras Island residents want the stones moved to the lighthouse so that they are publicly visible year-round and better protected from erosion.
But the decision rests with the National Park Service, and so far there is no indication that the stones will be moved.


text:
North Cascades > Mountain Loop Highway > Cadet Peak > Climber's Log
Cadet Peak Climber's Log
[ Sign the Climber's Log ]
|Glacier Basin
Date Climbed: Aug 21, 2016
|With Gimpilator and Heather
|Posted Aug 21, 2016 7:11 pm
|Standard West Slope
Date Climbed: Sep 13, 2014
|Easy goings. Traversed left at 6500, and found no difficulties, or snow. Found a couple friendly ptarmigans.
|Posted Sep 14, 2014 1:22 pm
|East Ridge
Date Climbed: Jun 11, 2014
|Via traverse from Monte Cristo Peak. South Ridge involved a circuitous route, with some interesting class 4 scrambling and loose rock. Descended the standard route.
|Posted Jun 13, 2014 12:06 pm
|Took 2 attempts
Date Climbed: Oct 25, 2013
|It was slight gamble to try Cadet this late in the year. We made it to 6400 feet before bad snow conditions turned us around near the crux.
UPDATE 8/20/16: Returned with Heather and Chandler for the summit and traversed solo to the north peak as well. Trip Report
|Posted Oct 25, 2013 10:30 pm
|Can't go wrong in glacier basin.
|Posted Sep 20, 2012 7:59 pm
|Via Glacier Basin
Date Climbed: Aug 12, 2012
|Don't forget the bike, as it will save you a couple hours in your day. Great peak, had the summit to myself, enjoyed a nice read and a cup of joe. Didn't see anyone all day except right near the start of Glacier Basin trail.
|Posted Aug 28, 2012 1:29 am
|Cadet Peak
Date Climbed: Sep 3, 2011
|Great climb with beautiful weather. Did not see anyone until Glacier Falls on the way back out, which seemed really strange on the Friday before Labor Day. To answer leftfield's question, yes, it is possible to scramble Cadet with no thrashing. Just follow the route as described in Jeff Smoot's book, which follows two gullys just to the right of the route described here. Once you get to the top of the gullys, you will find the flagged climber's path.
|Posted Sep 10, 2011 12:30 pm
|Glacier Basin Route
Date Climbed: Mar 20, 2010
|Plan for a long day! We made it to around 6,000' before we had to turn around due to time, snow conditions and signs of avalanche danger. Glacier Basin is beautiful and the views from were we got on Cadet were great. Postholed for hours in thigh high snow, first couple gullies are extremely steep, too steep for snowshoes. Very annoying snow conditions around mystery hill. Signs of ice caves forming with the melting snow off of rocks. Be careful, lots of hollow sections and snow bridges over the creek. We will be back this summer to finish what we started.
|Posted Mar 21, 2010 8:29 pm
|Route Climbed: South Slope Date Climbed: 04 September, 2003
|A straight forward climb with two short sections of class three. Great views from the summit.
|Posted Dec 22, 2005 9:39 pm


text:
A spectacular photo of a great white shark in airborne attack mode, with the rising sun as a backdrop, was posted to Reddit on Wednesday and picked up by other websites. But the mystery photo contained no details--beyond what was offered in the 400-plus comments--and no photo credit.
"This great white shark jump photo is majestic, awesome, scary," reads the headline above a post on MSN.com.
So, we did some checking and discovered that the "Great White Shark jumping into the sunset" photo was actually captured at sunrise, as part of a sequence, by Chris Fallows.
Fallows and his wife, Monique, run Apex Shark Expeditions in South Africa. And many of the people commenting on Reddit were correct: The photo was captured at Seal Island in False Bay, South Africa.
Fallows did not authorize use of the photo that went viral, but provided us with permission to run the jaw-dropping three-image sequence, which he captured in 2010 as part of an Apex sunrise shark-viewing tour. (Fallows uses a seal decoy made of carpet, so as not to injure attacking sharks.)
"It was taken in July and the magic of the sun rising behind the breaching shark was no coincidence, as we had tried to position ourselves in such a way to best capture the beauty of the morning's sunrise," Fallows explained.
The white sharks at Seal Island are famous for their airborne attacks. Chris and Monique Fallows have worked with numerous documentary teams, including the Discovery Channel for its "Air Jaws" series.
The Fallows' images have been featured on this website, too, most recently last February when we profiled an expedition during which first-of-their-kind images showed a cape fur seal devouring large sharks.
--Find Apex Shark Expeditions on Facebook


text:
Prices, promotions, styles, and availability may vary. Our local stores do not honor online pricing. Prices and availability of products and services are subject to change without notice. Errors will be corrected where discovered, and Lowe's reserves the right to revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions including after an order has been submitted.
Formica Brand Laminate 30-in x 144-in Tuscan Marble-Crystal Postform Laminate Kitchen Countertop Sheet
Item # 239113 Model # 7736-46-30X144-000
Image is a representation of the color; view actual sample of the product prior to making your final selection
Product Information
- Art, craft and technology converge to create Premiumfx™ finishes: high-gloss crystal, shimmering 3-D Radiance®, as well as our textured Honed™ and Etching™ finishes, designed to enhance the beauty of Formica® brand laminate
- Maximum style yet minimum fuss - Premiumfx™ finishes are excellent choices for kitchen and bath surfaces
- Formica® brand laminate with Premiumfx™ finishes are GREENGUARD Indoor Air Quality Certified® for low-emitting products including the requirements for children and schools
- Manufactured in North America and contains a range of 6% to 14% pre- and post-consumer recycled wood fiber as determined in accordance with ISO standard 14021; percent of recycled content depends on product grade
- Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) chain of custody certification (SCS-CoC-003270) is available upon request for most Formica® brand laminates with Premiumfx™ finishes
|Color/Finish Family
|Manufacturer Color/Finish
|Tuscan Marble-Crystal Postform
|Length (Inches)
|Width (Inches)
|Stain Resistant
|Heat Resistant
|Impact Resistant
|1-year limited


text:
On June 1, 1999, blink-182 released Enema of the State, an album that would go on to sell more than 15 million copies and change the band's lives forever.
The album boasted three major singles, each unique: the humor-driven "What's My Age Again?," midtempo love song (well, much as blink can do love songs) "All The Small Things" and suicide tale "Adam's Song."
As the '90s came to a close, the album transcended the pop-punk world and reached the mainstream. And with it, the album's cover became indelible, particularly in the minds of blink's many teenaged male fans; the cover art famously features adult film star Janine Lindemulder adorning a nurse uniform and rubber glove. According to bassist/singer Mark Hoppus, it took three tries to get the artwork correct.
During a reddit session from his London home Sunday, (June 2), Hoppus thanked loyal fans by revealing a few secrets about the pop-punk masterpiece. He wrote:
Wow. 14 years. Thanks for the birthday wishes. Here's some trivia about the artwork. There are three different versions. Initial release version has the red cross on the nurse's hat and a capital B Blink-182. We'd always preferred the lower case b, so the artwork was changed to the second version: red cross on the nurse's hat, lower case b blink-182 (my favorite). We were then contacted by the Red Cross that, as we are in no way a medical organization (which I would debate. one time I changed a band-aid), we should not have a red cross on our artwork. If we continued using the red cross logo, we would be in violation of the Geneva Convention. (for real). Thus, the third iteration of the artwork: no red cross, lower case b blink-182.
This record changed our lives. Thanks to everyone who has supported it through these years. It still makes me happy to be onstage and hear Tom start the opening riff of What's My Age Again. Looking forward to new music in the future.
And by the way, it's "wore cologne," not "walk alone."
According to Tom Delonge the band is working on a follow-up to its 2011 comeback album, Neighborhoods. On May 22, Delonge tweeted: "This is my office… Inside my studio… As I Record… A new #Blink song."
Read More Music News On Fresh1027.com:


text:
Featured News
Evangel prof encourages students to take part in "hands on" history
September 26, 2012 | Chase Replogle
What better way to understand history than to don elaborate period pieces and reenact battle-scenes?
That is exactly what Dr. Larry Toll, associate professor of history, encouraged some of his students to think about when he introduced the Moonlight Tour to them — a unique opportunity to reenact Civil War events at Wilson's Creek National Battlefield.
On the second Saturday evening in September, Toll and nine others from Evangel dressed up and became part of the history they are so passionate about.
Toll is an active volunteer at Wilson's Creek and has been involved with the tour for the past few years. Small groups of visitors are led through the battlefield and are able to eavesdrop on history, viewing scenarios that would have actually taken place 150 years ago.
This year's participants had four scenes to select from, ranging from a heroic cavalry of Union soldiers to the unfortunate death and burials following the battles. Each scene portrayed has been historically documented, and the goal was to accurately depict both the truth and spirit of these Civil War events.
Toll believes reenactments are one of the best ways for students to relate to history. "Programs such as the Moonlight Tour are unique learning experiences," Toll says. "It is a way for students to learn history from a 'hands-on' approach instead of from a textbook."
Brandon Cadwell, senior history major, agrees with Toll. Cadwell now has a new perception on events he regularly studies.
"The most interesting part of the evening was seeing history come alive. You read about it, memorize names and dates, but you never get to see it. Live it. And that is where a real connection to an event like this can happen," Cadwell says.
Cadwell encourages other history enthusiasts to study in a hands-on environment.
"Being a history major at Evangel, I have always had a passion for the subject, but this really gave me an opportunity to delve into it deeper and deeper," Cadwell says.
— Ana Pierce graduated from Evangel in May 2012 with a B.A. in English.


text:
Both of the major-party presidential candidates are ramping up their campaigns as they try to lock down enough states to add up to the 270 electoral votes they need to win the race.
According to NBC News' battleground state map, Hillary Clinton appears to have a lock on 182 electoral votes with an additional 92 leaning in her favor. That makes a total of 274.
As for Donald Trump, NBC News estimates that 71 electoral votes are a lock, with an additional 109 leaning Republican, meaning a total of 180.
There are several ways in which the race could play out in either candidate's favor.


text:
Below are the available Super Capacitor Iceberg solar pavers that we provide online. Each paver has a unit price, as well as a specified minimum quantity for purchase.
Our premium line excels in its longevity. Whereas our NiMH line is limited in lifetime by the NiMH battery technology to 5 years, our premium line doubles or even triples the lifetime of a single paver.


text:
Santa Clara, CA (SportsNetwork.com) - The San Francisco 49ers have signed running back Alfonso Smith to a one-year contract.
Smith will help a depleted running back corps that has already lost Kendall Hunter and LaMichael James in training camp.
Hunter suffered a torn ACL last week and will likely be out for the season. James left practice this past weekend with an arm injury, reported to be a dislocated left elbow that could keep him out for the entire preseason.
Smith spent four seasons with Arizona after signing as an undrafted free agent in 2010. He has 156 yards and two touchdowns on 48 carries over 43 games, and added 13 special teams tackles.
In 16 games with the Cardinals last year, Smith carried the ball 18 times for 54 yards with a score and chipped in six tackles on special teams.
The 49ers opened a roster spot by waiving guard Fouimalo Fonoti.