text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|8 May 2007
|Filing date
|15 May 2002
|Priority date
|15 May 2002
|Fee status
|Also published as
|Publication number
|Richard P. Sinn
|Original Assignee
|Oracle International Corporation
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (106), Non-Patent Citations (63), Referenced by (64), Classifications (15), Legal Events (6)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material, which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure as it appears in the United States Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
This Application is related to the following Applications:
"Determining Group Membership," by Shawn P. Delany, Sajeed Abmed, and Vivian M. Ganitsky, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/998,926, filed Nov. 30, 2001;
"Determining A User's Groups", by Shawn P. Delany and Sajeed Ahmed, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/999,177, filed Nov. 30, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,085,834;
"Policies for Modifying Group Membership", by Shawn P. Delany, Sajeed Abmed and Vivian M. Ganitsky, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/998,898, filed Nov. 30, 2001;
"Runtime Modification of Entries In An Identity System", by Shawn P. Delany and Sajeed Abmed, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/997,409, filed Nov. 30, 2001; and
"Employing Job Code Attributes In Provisioning", by Richard Sinn, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/145,684, filed the same day as the present application, May 15, 2002.
Each of these related Applications are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to technology for provisioning tasks.
2. Description of the Related Art
Identity Systems have become more popular with the growth of the Internet, network use, and other information technologies. In general, an Identity System provides for the creation, removal, editing and other managing of identity information stored in various types of data stores. The identity information pertains to entities, such as users, groups, organizations and/or things. The data store maintains a set of attributes for each entity. For example, the attributes stored for a user may include a name, address, employee number, telephone number, email address, user ID and password. The Identity System can also manage access privileges that govern what an entity can view, create, modify or use in the Identity System. Often, this management of access privileges is based on one or more attributes.
Entities managed by the Identity System may require access to a variety of resources that are external to the Identity System. For example, a user may need a telephone connection and accounts on various computer systems. A person working as an Identity System administrator can manually submit a request for the necessary external resources to one or more external provisioning systems.
A provisioning system services resource requests by establishing external resource access for an entity, such as an Identity System user. Most provisioning systems include one or more agents with each agent corresponding to an external resource. For each requested resource, the provisioning system assigns an agent to make the resource available to a specified entity. In one example, the provisioning system receives a request to establish a computer system account and telephone connection for a user. The provisioning system assigns one agent to create the computer account and another agent to create the telephone connection. Provisioning systems are also capable of terminating an entity's resource access.
An Identity System administrator is often required to manually interface with multiple provisioning systems, because no one provisioning system supports all of the external resources required by the administrator. Each provisioning system can have a different user interface and manner of operation—placing an undesirable burden on the Identity System administrator. The separate provisioning systems may not be able to communicate with each other to support possible interdependencies in resource assignments—creating logistical difficulties for the Identity System administrator.
The present invention, roughly described, pertains to technology for enabling automated interaction with provisioning systems.
In one implementation, one or more job code attributes are associated with an entity managed by an Identity System. A job code attribute corresponds to a set of external resources the entity needs. For example, a user may be added to an engineering group in the Identity System. The Identity System assigns the user a job code attribute indicating that the user needs an account on the engineering computer system and a telephone connection.
In one embodiment, the Identity System is in communication with one or more provisioning systems. The Identity System determines whether an entity's job code attribute is supported by the provisioning systems. The Identity System also provisions resource related tasks based on the job code attribute to appropriate provisioning systems—providing or eliminating resource access for an Identity System entity. For the example above, the Identity System ensures that the provisioning systems support the tasks of creating an engineering computer account and setting up a telephone connection. The Identity System then provisions these tasks among the provisioning systems.
One implementation of the Identity System includes a Provisioning Bridge Server to manage communications with the provisioning systems—enabling the Identity System to automate the use of multiple provisioning systems. The Provisioning Bridge Server maintains a set of control information that lists characteristics for each job code attribute—enabling job code attributes to be continually updated based on Identity System and provisioning system changes. In one instance, the listed characteristics for a job code attribute include a job code, targeted resources for the job code, whether approval is required to gain access to the resources, and the provisioning system supporting each of the listed resources. The Provisioning Bridge Server uses this information to perform the operations of ensuring that job code attributes are supported and provisioning tasks in response to job code attributes.
In further embodiments of the present invention, automated job code based provisioning is employed in processing environments other than an Identity System. Providing automated job code based provisioning can have broad applicability to enhance the performance of many different server based systems.
The present invention can be accomplished using hardware, software, or a combination of both hardware and software. The software used for the present invention is stored on one or more processor readable storage media including hard disk drives, CD-ROMs, DVDs, optical disks, floppy disks, tape drives, RAM, ROM or other suitable storage devices. In alternative embodiments, some or all of the software can be replaced by dedicated hardware including custom integrated circuits, gate arrays, FPGAs, PLDs, and special purpose computers.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will appear more clearly from the following description in which the preferred embodiment of the invention has been set forth in conjunction with the drawings.
Web Server 18 is a standard Web Server known in the art and provides an end user with access to various resources via network 16. One embodiment includes two firewalls. A first firewall (see dotted lines) is connected between network 16 and Web Server 18. A second firewall (see dotted lines) is connected between Web Servers 16 and 18 and Access Server 34/Identity Server 40.
URL Encoding
HTML Page
CGI Script with no query
CGI Script with query
A URL includes two main components: a protocol identifier and a resource name separated from the protocol identifier by a colon and two forward slashes. The protocol identifier indicates the protocol used to fetch the named resource. Examples of protocols include HTTP, FTP, Gopher, File and News. The resource name is the complete address to the resource. The format of the resource name depends on the protocol. For HTTP, the resource name includes a host name, a file name, a port number (optional) and a reference (optional). The host name is the name of the machine on which the resource resides. The file name is the path name to the file on the machine. The port number is the number of the port to which to connect. A reference is a named anchor within a resource that usually identifies a specific location within a file. Consider the following URL:
A complete path, or a cropped portion thereof, is called a URL prefix. In the URL above, the string "/oblix/sales/index.html" is a URL prefix and the string "/oblix" is also a URL prefix. The portion of the URL to the right of the host name and to the left of a query string (e.g. to the left of a question mark, if there is a query string) is called the absolute path. In the URL above, "/oblix/sales/index.html" is the absolute path. A URL can also include query data, which is typically information following a question mark. For example, in the URL:
The Access System includes Access Server 34, Web Gate 28, and Directory Server 36. Access Server 34 provides authentication, authorization, auditing logging services. It further provides for identity profiles to be used across multiple domains and Web Servers from a single web-based authentication (sign-on). Web Gate 28 acts as an interface between Web Server 18 and Access Server 34. Web Gate 28 intercepts requests from users for resources 22 and 24, and authorizes them via Access Server 34. Access Server 34 is able to provide centralized authentication, authorization, and auditing services for resources hosted on or available to Web Server 18 and other Web Servers.
The Identity System includes Web Pass 38, Identity Server 40, Directory Server 36, and Provisioning Bridge Server 49. Identity Server 40 manages identity profiles. An identity profile is a set of information associated with a particular entity (e.g. user, group, organization, etc.). The data elements of the identity profile are called attributes, which are discussed in more detail below. An attribute may include a name, value and access criteria. The Identity Server includes three main applications, which effectively handle the identity profiles and privileges of the user population: User Manager 42, Group Manager 44, and Organization Manager 46. User Manager 42 manages the identity profiles for individual users. Group Manager 44 manages identity profiles for groups. Organization Manager 46 manages identity profiles for organizations. Identity Server 40 also includes Publisher 48, an application that enables entities to quickly locate and graphically view information stored by Directory Server 36. In one embodiment, Web Pass 38 is a Web Server plug-in that sends information back and forth between Identity Server 40 and the Web Server 20, creating a three-tier architecture. The Identity System also provides a Certificate Processing Server (not shown in
User Manager 42 handles the functions related to user identities and access privileges, including creation and deletion of user identity profiles, modification of user identity profile data, determination of access privileges, and credentials management of both passwords and digital certificates. With User Manager 42, the create, delete, and modify functions of user identity management can be set as flexible, multi-step workflows. Each business can customize its own approval, setup, and management processes and have multiple processes for different kinds of users.
Multi-level delegation features also simplify individual user management. Companies can assign the responsibility for maintaining user identity data to the people closest to it. For example, individual users can be allowed to: (1) add themselves to the user directory by filling out customized forms, (2) modify personal or professional information about themselves (such as addresses, personal preferences, or name changes), (3) change a piece of information in their identity profiles that can determine their access rights, or (4) allow someone else to log in as their temporary substitute while they are out of the office or on vacation. Likewise, any number of delegated administrators (both inside and outside the company) can be given the authority to: (1) create and delete users in the user directory, (2) approve a change that a user has requested, and (3) change the information about users to grant or revoke services. An administrator can be delegated any allowed degree of responsibility. For example, a company might decide that only IT staff can assign application access, whereas department managers can add new users.
External legacy systems—such as human resource management systems—can be allowed to trigger automated workflows. With this feature, a new user could be created, a departing employee could be deleted, or certain services could be granted or revoked following an event change in an external system.
The Identity System also provides for self-registration. User Manager 42 enables an individual to self-register in situations when it's appropriate. User Manager 42 then authorizes delegated administrators to verify the individual's information and approve or deny the registration requests. In one embodiment, self-registration is defined by a customizable, multi-step workflow.
Group Manager 44 allows entities to create, delete and manage groups of users who need identical access privileges to a specific resource or set of resources. Managing and controlling privileges for a group of related people—rather than handling their needs individually—yields valuable economies of scale. Group Manager 44 meets a wide range of e-business needs: easy creation, maintenance, and deletion of permanent and ad hoc groups of users who may be allowed or denied access to particular resources; modification and adaptation of groups and their access privileges with minimal disruption to the directory server's underlying schema; efficient addition and deletion of users from established groups; and delegation of administrative responsibility for group membership and subscription requests and approvals.
With Group Manager 44, companies (or other entities) can allow individual users to do the following: (1) self-subscribe to and unsubscribe from groups, (2) view the groups that they are eligible to join or have joined, and (3) request subscription to groups that have access to the applications they need. Multi-step workflows can then define which users must obtain approval before being added to a group and which can be added instantly. Group Manager 44 also lets companies form dynamic groups specified by an LDAP filter. The ability to create and use dynamic groups is extremely valuable because it eliminates the administrative headache of continually keeping individual, static membership up-to-date. With dynamic group management features, users can be automatically added or removed if they meet the criteria specified by the LDAP filter. Dynamic groups also greatly enhance security since changes in user identities that disqualify someone from membership in a group are automatically reflected in the dynamic group membership.
The third application in the Identity System, Organization Manager 46, streamlines the management of large numbers of organizations within an e-business network, including partners, suppliers, or even major internal organizations such as sales offices and business units. Certain infrastructure security and management operations are best handled—or can only be handled—at the highest organizational unit level rather than at the individual or group level. Like User Manager and Group Manager, this application relies on multi-step workflow and delegation capabilities. Organization Manager handles the following administrative tasks: (1) organization lifecycle management, whereby companies can create, register, and delete organizations in their systems using customizable workflows; (2) maintenance of organization profiles on an attribute-by-attribute basis through self-service, delegated administration and system-initiated activities; (3) organization self-registration, whereby organizations such as business partners, customers and suppliers can self-generate a request to be added to the e-business network; and (4) creation of reusable rules and processes through multi-step workflows.
Provisioning Bridge Server 49 provisions tasks among provisioning systems (not shown) external to the Identity System. In one embodiment, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 supports multiple provisioning systems. Provisioning Bridge System 49 is in communication with Identity Server 40 and Directory Server 36—receiving task requests from Identity Server 40 and maintaining control information in Directory Server 36. The tasks provisioned by Provisioning Bridge Server 49 provide or remove external resource access for entities managed by the Identity System, such as users. Examples of external resources include computer and telephone systems. Greater details about Provisioning Bridge Server 49 are provided below.
The system of
With the system of
Web Gate 28 in turn makes an authentication request to Access Server 34, which determines whether the user's supplied log-on information is authentic or not. Access Server 34 performs the authentication by accessing attributes of the user's identity profile and the resource's authentication criteria stored on Directory Server 36. If the user's supplied log-on information satisfies the authentication criteria, the process flows as described below; otherwise, the end user is notified that access to the requested resource is denied and the process halts. After authenticating the user, Web Gate 28 queries Access Server 34 about whether the user is authorized to access the resource requested. Access Server 34 in turn queries Directory Server 36 for the appropriate authorization criteria for the requested resource. Access Server 34 retrieves the authorization criteria for the resource and answers Web Gate 28's authorization query, based on the resource's authorization criteria and the user's identity profile. If the user is authorized, the user is granted access to the resource; otherwise, the user's request is denied. Various alternatives to the above described flow are also within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Authentication and Authorization decisions are based on policy domains and policies. A policy domain is a logical grouping of Web Server host ID's, host names, URL prefixes, and rules. Host names and URL prefixes specify the course-grain portion of the web name space a given policy domain protects. Rules specify the conditions in which access to requested resources is allowed or denied, and to which end users these conditions apply. Policy domains contain two levels of rules: first level default rules and second level rules contained in policies. First level default rules apply to any resource in a policy domain not associated with a policy.
A policy is a grouping of a URL pattern, resource type, operation type (such as a request method), and policy rules. These policy rules are the second level rules described above. There are two levels of rules available (first and second levels) for authentication, authorization, and auditing. Policies are always attached to a policy domain and specify the fine-grain portion of a web name space that a policy protects. In practice, the host names and URL prefixes from the policy's policy domain are logically concatenated with the policy's URL pattern. The resulting overall pattern is compared to the incoming URL. If there is a match, then the policy's various rules are evaluated to determine whether the request should be allowed or denied; if there is not a match, then default policy domain rules are used.
The system of
The system of
Portable storage medium drive 62 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, to input and output data and code to and from the computer system of
User input device(s) 60 provide a portion of a user interface. User input device(s) 60 may include an alpha-numeric keypad for inputting alpha-numeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. In order to display textual and graphical information, the computer system of
The components contained in the computer system of
The basic unit of information store in a directory is called an entry, which is a collection of information about an object. The information in an entry often describes a real-world object such as a person, but this is not required. A typical directory includes many entries that correspond to people, departments, servers, printers, and other real-world objects in the organization served by the directory.
An entry is composed of a set of attributes, each of which describes one particular trait of the object. Each attribute has a type, one or more values, and associated access criteria. The type describes the kind of information contained in the attribute, and the value contains the actual data.
An entry in the directory has a set of attributes that are required and a set of attributes that are allowed. For example, an entry describing a person is required to have a cn (common name) attribute and an sn (surname) attribute. One example of an allowed attribute may be a nickname. Any attribute not explicitly required or allowed is prohibited. The collections of all information about required and allowed attributes are called the directory schemas.
Examples of attributes stored in a user identity profile include: first name, middle name, last name, title, email address, telephone number, fax number, mobile telephone number, pager number, pager email address, identification of work facility, building number, floor number, mailing address, room number, mail stop, manager, direct reports, administrator, organization that the user works for, department number, department URL, skills, projects currently working on, past projects, home telephone, home address, birthday, previous employers, job code, and anything else desired to be stored by an administrator. Examples of attributes stored in a group identity profile include: owner, name, description, static members, dynamic member rule, subscription policies, etc. Examples of attributes stored in a user organization identity profile include: owner, name, description, business category, address, country, etc. In other embodiments, less or more than the above-listed information is stored.
Each entity has a distinguished name (DN), which uniquely identifies the node. In one embodiment, each entry also has a relative name, which is different from all other relevant names on the same level of the hierarchy. In one implementation, the distinguished name (DN) comprises a union of the relative names up the tree through to the entity. For example, the distinguished name of employee 1 (node 250) is
DN=CN=Empl, OU=OrgA, O=CompanyA, DC=entity,
There are many ways for an entity to access and use the Identity System. In one embodiment, the entity can access the Identity Systems services using a browser. In other embodiments, XML documents and API's can be used to access the services of the Identity System. For example, an entity can use a browser by pointing the browser to Identity Server 40. The user will then be provided with a login page to enter the user's ID, password, type of user and application requested (optional). Upon filling out that information, the user will be authenticated and authorized (by the Access System) to use the Identity System. Alternatively, the Access System can be bypassed (or there may be no Access System) and the Identity System authenticates the user.
If, in step 304, it is determined that a valid UidCookie exists, then, in step 306, the user is given access to the Identity System application requested. The Uid from the cookie is used as the user identification upon entering the Identity System. If the valid UidCookie does not exist (step 304), then it is determined whether a user identification was received in a header variable. In one embodiment using an integrated Access and Identity System, a user's request to access the Identity System will be authenticated and authorized by the Access System. After authentication and/or authorization, the HTTP request will be redirected to the Identity System. This redirected HTTP request will include a header variable labeled as "userAuth." The data associated with this header variable will indicate the user identification for the user. If the user identification was in a header variable then a UidCookie is created in step 310 and that user identification is added to the UidCookie. Subsequent to step 310, the user is provided access to the Identity System in step 306.
If the user identification was not in a header variable, then the system attempts to authenticate the user in step 312. That is, the user's user name and password provided by the login page are used to access Directory Server 36 in order to authenticate the user. More information about authentication is described below. If the user is properly authenticated, then a UidCookie is created in step 316. During an authentication process, the user's ID and password were used to access the user's identity profile in Directory Server 36. That identity profile will include a user identification, which is added to the UidCookie in step 316. In one embodiment, the user identification is the user's distinguished name. In step 318, the user is provided access to the Identity System. If the user was not properly authenticated, then the user is denied access to the Identity System in step 320.
As discussed above, when requesting access to the Identity System, the user selects which of the Identity System applications (User Manager 42, Group Manager 44, Organization Manager 46 or Publisher 48) the user wishes to access. In one embodiment, the login page for the Identity System will request an ID, a password, an indication of the application requested and an indication of a role (discussed below). After appropriate authentication and authorization, the user is provided with a home page for User Manager 42, a home page for Group Manager 44, a home page for Organization Manager 46 or a home page for Publisher 48, depending upon which application was selected by the user. From the home page, the user can access the various services of the application.
By selecting My Identity tab 406, a user is provided with the information stored in that user's identity profile. Create User Identity tab 408 allows a user with the appropriate privileges to create a new user identity profile (e.g. with a workflow). Deactivate User Identity tab 410 allows a user with proper privileges to remove an identity profile from the directory. Substitute Rights tab 412 allows the user to indicate who can proxy that user and allows the user to be a proxy for someone else. Request tab 414 allows a user to monitor workflows that are in progress or recently completed. Depending on the user's privileges, by selecting request tab 414, the user can see all workflows that involve that user, that are started by that user, that affect that user or that the user has privileges to view. Request tab 414 will indicate workflows for which there is an outstanding action to be done by the current user. The user can select that workflow and perform the task.
Configure tab 416 allows a user to configure various options for User Manger 42. The user must have sufficient privileges to access Configure tab 416. The user can perform attribute access control, delegate administration, define workflows and set the search base. Attribute access control includes controlling who has view and modify permissions for each attribute. Attributes can be set at any and all levels in an organization. The configuration also allows the specification of an e-mail notification list when a change to an attribute is requested. Delegation administration includes delegating administrative tasks to local administrators. An entity can choose what rights to delegate, whom to delegate to, and the scope to delegate. Workflow definition includes defining workflows for a particular organization, defining who will be responsible for the workflow actions and/or defining who will be receiving notifications for the workflow actions. Setting the search base includes setting the search base for a particular organization, person or set of persons. This will localize access to ensure security.
Configure tab 440 allows an entity to provide attribute access control, delegate rights, define workflows and expand dynamic groups. Attribute access control includes controlling who has view and modify permissions for each attribute in group identity profiles. Additionally, e-mail notification lists can be created which are used to notify entities when a change to an attribute is requested. Administration tasks can be delegated to local administrators. An entity can choose what rights to delegate, who to delegate to, and what the scope of the delegation is. Workflow definition includes defining the workflows for a particular group. This includes defining who is responsible for the workflow actions and who will be receiving notifications for workflow actions. Note that some of the tabs and services may not be available to all entities, depending upon the privileges of those entities.
Create Organizational Profile tab 446 allows a user to create new organizational objects, if the user has sufficient privileges. Request tab 448 allows a user to access pending workflows and workflows that have recently been finished that relate to organizational objects. Access to Request tab 448 can be restricted and/or limited depending upon users privileges. If a user has a step to perform for a workflow, it will be indicated by Request tab 448.
Configure tab 450 allows the entity to perform attribute access control, delegate administration, define workflows and define container limits. Attribute access control includes controlling who has view and modify permissions for each attribute of an organizational identity profile. In addition, an entity can specify an e-mail notification list when a change to an attribute is requested. Delegating administration includes delegating administrative tasks to local administrators. An entity can choose what rights to delegate, whom to delegate to, and the scope of the delegation. Workflow definition includes defining the workflows for a particular organization, including who will be responsible for the workflow actions and who will be receiving notifications for the workflow. Container limits includes controlling how many objects can be created in an organization. This would also include defining who will be receiving notifications that a container limit has been met, has been violated or is close to being met.
As discussed above, user identity profiles, group identity profiles and organization identity profiles all contain attributes. In the various services provided by User Manager, Group Manager and Organization Manager, users with the appropriate privileges can configure the rights to access each of the attributes.
Provisioning system 510 includes agents 512, 514, and 516. Provisioning system 520 includes agents 522, 524, and 526. Provisioning systems 510 and 520 receive requests from Provisioning Bridge Server 49 to allocate or eliminate access to external resources for entities managed by the Identity System, such as users. Examples of external resources include applications and operating systems on computer systems and telephone connections. Provisioning systems 510 and 520 delegate each request they receive to an agent that is adapted to interface with the requested resource. Provisioning system 510 may allocate a task to agent 512, 514, or 516. Provisioning system 520 may allocate a task to agent 522, 524, or 526. As shown in
Multiple provisioning systems may be required to support all of the resources employed by the Identity System's entities. For example, provisioning system 510 may only have agents that interface with engineering related external resources, and provisioning system 520 may only have agents that interface with marketing related external resources. In one example, provisioning system 510 employs agents 512, 514, and 516 to provide and remove access to engineering related resources 511, 513, and 515. Provisioning system 520 employs agents 522, 524, and 526 to provide and remove access to marketing related external resources 521, 523, and 525.
Provisioning Bridge Server 49 facilitates the Identity System's automated use of multiple provisioning systems 510 and 520. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 maintains control information 500, which correlates the external resources used by Identity System entities with the various provisioning systems. During operation the Identity System may need to have a resource related task performed, such as providing an entity with access to a resource or eliminating an entity's access to a resource. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 identifies the proper provisioning system for performing the resource related task and submits a request to the proper provisioning system to perform the task. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 employs control information 500 to identify the proper provisioning system for performing the desired task.
In one implementation, control information 500 includes entries with the following fields: 1) Job Code—identifying a classification assigned to an entity in the Identity System based on the entity's role in one or more organizations; 2) Target—identifying an external resource corresponding to the Job Code; 3) Type—identifying a type of service the Target resource provides for the Job Code; 4) Approval—indicating whether approval is required to provide or eliminate access to the resource Target and Type for the Job Code; and 5) PS—identifying the provisioning system that supports the resource Target and Type. This only provides one example of fields for control information 500. Alternate embodiments of control information 500 may include numerous other configurations that correlate job codes, external resources, and provisioning systems.
Table 2 below shows one example of content in control information 500 having the fields described above:
Job Code
System 1
System 510
System 2
System 520
System 3
System 520
System 1
System 510
Table 2 shows that Provisioning Bridge Server 49 needs to arrange for entities with Job Code A to receive the following: 1) accounts on computer system 1 for performing legal applications and engineering applications, and 2) an account on computer system 2 to perform e-mail applications. Approval must be obtained before gaining access to the engineering applications and e-mail. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 goes through provisioning system 510 for the engineering and legal applications and provisioning system 520 for the e-mail. Entities with Job Code B receive accounts for performing marketing applications on computer system 3 after obtaining approval. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 goes through provisioning system 520 for the marketing applications. Engineering applications may include design and simulation software among other things. Marketing applications may include inventory and order tracking software among other things. Legal applications may include docketing software among other things. In the example from Table 2, Job Code A could be assigned to an entity with a role related to engineering and legal groups within an organization. Job Code B could be assigned to an entity with a role related to a marketing group within an organization.
By employing job codes, the Identity System can provide entities, such as users, with a label that corresponds to the external resources the entity needs. The Identity System can assign job codes to an entity based on the role the entity plays in the organization managed by the Identity System. In one implementation the Identity System sets job codes for an entity based on the groups to which the entity belongs. In one embodiment, the Identity System associates a job code attribute with an entity to identify all of the entity's job codes.
In some instances, an entity may have multiple job codes nested within the job code attribute. For example, an organization's Chief Executive Officer may need access to the resources available to multiple groups within the organization, such as a finance group and an engineering group. In this case, the Chief Executive Officer's job code attribute includes a nested job code assigned to members of the finance group and a nested job code assigned to members of the engineering group. In another embodiment, an entity can be associated with multiple job code attributes each corresponding to a single job code.
At the outset of the process shown in
The Identity System determines whether an entity's job code attribute is available for editing by the entity requesting the edit (step 601). For instance, a system administrator adding or removing a user from a group will most likely have authority to edit the user's job code attribute. A user, however, may not have authority to edit his or her job code attribute. In some embodiments of the process in
In setting the job code attribute in response to the requested edit (step 602), the Identity System either adds a new job code, removes an existing job code, or performs a combination of job code additions and removals. As described above, some embodiments allow job code attributes to include multiple nested job codes. In these instances, a requested job code attribute edit may call for adding or removing multiple nested job codes.
After the job code attribute is set, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 determines whether the changes to the job code attribute are supported (step 604). Provisioning Bridge Server 49 determines whether provisioning systems in communication with the Identity System support the job codes being added or removed from the job code attribute. In one embodiment, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 accesses control information 500 to ensure that the job codes being added or removed are included in control information 500. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 verifies that a provisioning system in communication with the Identity System supports each resource Target and Type associated with the job codes being added to or removed from the job code attribute. In an alternate embodiment, the Identity System or another system performs step 604.
If the job code attribute edit is not supported, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 causes an error message to be sent (step 608). Otherwise, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 provisions the tasks associated with the job code attribute edit to the provisioning systems (step 606). In one implementation, the tasks being provisioned are those associated with adding or removing an entity's access to an external resource. For example, adding job code A from Table 2 to a job code attribute results in the need to provision three resource related tasks—1) creating an account on computer system 1 for performing legal applications, 2) creating an account on computer system 1 for performing engineering applications, and 3) creating an account on computer system 2 for performing e-mail applications. Removing job code B from Table 2 from a job code attribute results in the need to provision one task—eliminating an entity's account on computer system 3 for performing marketing applications.
In the implementation shown in
If approval is requested, the Identity System waits for a response (step 646). If approval is rejected, the Identity System sends an error message (step 648). If approval is granted, the Identity System sets the job code attribute in accordance with the requested job code attribute edit (step 644).
In provisioning approval step 680, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 determines whether approvals are required for each of the tasks necessitated by the job code attribute edit. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 also attempts to obtain any required approvals. If approval is required and not provided, an approval error can be signaled. Otherwise, the job code related tasks can be provisioned (step 606).
If approval for a job code task is required and approval has not yet been requested, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 requests approval (step 700). As indicated above, one method of requesting approval is to send an e-mail to an entity authorized to provide approval. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 then determines whether any more approvals need to be requested (step 702).
When Provisioning Bridge Server 49 determines that all required approvals have been requested (step 702), Provisioning Bridge Server 49 waits for each approval request to be granted or rejected (step 704). After all of the approval requests have been either granted or rejected, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 determines whether any of the requested approvals were rejected (step 706). If none of the approvals were rejected, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 provisions the job code related tasks (step 606). Otherwise, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 determines whether to continue with provisioning in spite of the rejected approval (step 708). If Provisioning Bridge Server 49 is not to proceed with provisioning, an approval error is signaled (step 682). Otherwise, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 proceeds to provision the approved job code related tasks (step 606) and provides a signal identifying the approvals that were rejected (step 682).
The criteria for determining whether to continue in step 708 can be set by a system administrator when the Identity System is initialized. Alternatively, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 can send a message to a system administrator and wait for the reply to indicate whether to continue. Various other methods can be employed for making this determination.
In further embodiments, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 does not submit all of the approval requests and wait for their completion before proceeding. Instead, each approval request is assigned to a separate thread of operation and processed individually. In one implementation this processing occurs in parallel. In yet another implementation, this processing occurs serially.
If there are tasks that have not yet been assigned to a provisioning system, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 submits a request to one of the provisioning systems (systems 510 and 520,
Once all of the job code related tasks have been assigned, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 waits for the requested tasks to be completed (step 744), regardless of whether they have failed or completed successfully. In one implementation, each provisioning system signals when a task has been completed—indicating whether it completed the task successfully or failed. Provisioning Bridge Server 49 determines whether any of the tasks failed (step 746). If none of the tasks failed, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 signals that the job code related tasks have all been provisioned and successfully performed (step 750).
If any of the tasks failed (step 746), Provisioning Bridge Server 49 determines whether to continue with provisioning step 606 (
The criteria for determining whether to continue in step 748 can be set by a system administrator when the Identity System is initialized. Alternatively, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 can send a message to a system administrator and wait for the reply to indicate whether to continue. Various other methods can be employed for making this determination.
In further embodiments, Provisioning Bridge Server 49 does not submit all of the task requests and wait for their completion before proceeding. Instead, each task request is assigned to a separate thread of operation and proceeds individually. In one implementation this processing occurs in parallel. In yet another implementation, this processing occurs serially.
The retrieved information is stored in entries in control information 500 (step 802), as explained above and illustrated for one example in Table 2. After a predetermined period of time expires (step 804) the retrieval (step 800) and storage (step 802) operations are repeated. In one embodiment, the predetermined time period is twenty four hours—providing for daily updating of control information 500. In other embodiments, the time period may be larger or smaller. In further embodiments, system administrators are allowed to update control information 500 in real time on demand.
A lot of the tasks that are performed in the Identity System are accomplished using workflows. This includes the setting of job code attributes in one embodiment. A workflow is a predefined set of steps that perform a specific task, where information or tasks are passed between participants and programs according to a defined set of rules. One embodiment of the present invention supports the following types of workflows: create object; delete object; change the value of attributes; and certificate issuance, revocation and renewal. In one embodiment of the present invention, a user is required to create a workflow to create or delete an object, change the value of an attribute or implement certificates. Workflows ensure that an organization's guidelines for performing a task are met. Workflows can be defined in the User Manager, Group Manager or Organization Manager. A workflow can be used only in the application (e.g. User Manager) in which it was created. Each workflow has two or more steps, including one to start the action and one to implement or commit it. Each step can contain an action, send e-mail notifications to selected persons and start the next step if its entry conditions are satisfied. A workflow is associated with a portion of the directory tree. This allows an entity to have its organizations and partners enforce different workflows. Workflows can be stored in Directory Server 36.
Table 3 provides examples of different tasks that can be performed with workflows in the appropriate applications:
Workflow Tasks
User Manager
Create User
Delete User
Change Attribute
Certificate Enrollment
Certificate Renewal
Certificate Revocation
Group Manager
Create Group
Delete Group
Change Attribute
Org. Manager
Create Object
Delete Object
Change Attribute
Each workflow includes two or more steps. Each step can include one or more actions. Table 4, below, provides examples of different actions that can be performed with various types of workflows:
Workflow Type
Creating object
Self Registration
Provide Information
Provide Information and Approval
Error Report
External Action
Deleting object
Change Information
Change Approval
Error Report
External Action
Changing Attribute
Provide Information
Provide Information and Approval
Error Report
External Action
Table 5 provides a description of the various actions:
This action initiates workflows.
Required, option, and supplied
attributes may be configured for this
action. Based on the relevant data
configured in the step, the action will
compose a page for the user to fill in
the required information and to add
additional attributes for provisioning
(supplied variables) if so desired.
Once the page is submitted, the
workflow engine will trigger the
Change Attribute workflows for the
supplied attributes. People who are
configured as a participant for this
action and its corresponding workflow
will see the "Create Profile" or
"Initiate Deactivate User" button.
This action allows an e-user to fill in a
registration form and submit it for
acceptance. The required information
will be displayed on the page. It is
envisioned that self-registration will
be used before the user has access to
an application. Therefore, the UI of
this page will be designed without the
context of an application and with
credentials for authentication.
This action makes a request for
change/add/delete attribute. People
who are configured as a participant for
this action and its corresponding
workflow will see the "Request to
Modify" or "Request to Remove"
button on the profile page (during
"modify" mode).
This action is similar to initiate, in that
it collects information from the user
and triggers other workflows, if
necessary. It is treated as a different
action from initiate for the following
Initiate is always the first
action in the workflow.
Provide_info can occur at
multiple places in a workflow
while initiate can not.
The people who can initiate the
workflow may be different
from those who can provide
intermediate information.
Only the people configured as
the participants for the initiate
action will see the "Create
Profile" button.
Provide_info will try to
retrieve the required attributes
to display the values to the
user. This allows the
information setup in the
previous steps or in the
directory to be changed.
This action is identical in behavior to
provide_info. A different name is
used because the name change_info
makes more sense in the case of
This action can be configured with
only the required attributes. At run
time, the values of the required
attributes will be presented to the user
to get approval. No information is
supposed to be changed. The only
user action allowed is to click on the
button to indicate approve or reject.
In other embodiments, a digital
signature could be used to provide a
nonrepudiation approval.
Provide_info and approval
This action combines the provide_info
and the approval into one action. In
some situation, customers may want
the people who can approve also to be
able to provide or change the
information if necessary.
This action is identical in behavior to
provide approval. A different name is
given to reflect the nature of the action
in the deactivating context.
This action enables the user to
explicitly mark an entry ready. Until
this action is performed, the user's
entry has been marked as
"PendingActivation." Upon
completing this action, the status will
be changed to "Activated." Once
"Activated," this user entry may be
used for authentication to the system.
This action is the counterpart of the
activate action to mark an entry
suspended. Until this action is
performed, the user's entry has been
marked as "Pending for Deactivation."
Upon completing this action, the
status will be changed to
"Deactivated." In both of these cases,
this entry will not be recognized as an
authorized user in the system.
This action writes the information
collected this far in the previous
workflow steps to the directory.
Commit can be done multiple times.
The location of the write is the user's
permanent location as selected in the
"initiate" step.
This action is to report for a
background process. When a
background process encounters a
processing error, it has no proper way
to report the error since there is no
responsible person for the action. The
workflow definer can configure the
failed path to this error_report step, so
that the error can be designated to the
responsible individuals.
External action can be plugged into
the workflow as a distinct step.
A subflow is a workflow that is initiated by another workflow. The concept of subflow was introduced and implemented to reduce administrative work. If a workflow already exists to perform a task, any other workflow that needs to perform that task should be able to leverage off the first workflow. When creating a workflow, an indication that there is a sub-workflow is provided by the creator of the workflow when the creator indicates that one or more of the variables are supplied.
The workflow that initiates the subflow is referred to as the parent workflow. A workflow can be both a parent workflow to a first workflow and a subflow to a second workflow. The parent workflow may or may not wait for the subflow, as defined in the workflow creation. Consider the following example, a company uses a first workflow to create new users for the Identity System and add the new user's identity profile to the directory. As part of its process, the new user workflow obtains the new user's telephone number. The obtaining of the new user's telephone number is accomplished by performing a new telephone number workflow. In this example, the new telephone number workflow is initiated by a step in the new user workflow. Therefore, the new telephone number workflow is a subflow of the new user workflow. In one alternative, the new telephone number workflow can also call a subflow, for example, to get a new telephone line connected and operational. This, second subflow can also call a subflow, and so on. There can be many levels of nesting of subflows. Another example of a subflow is a workflow for setting a job code attribute. In one embodiment, the job code attribute subflow may call other subflows for determining whether the job code attribute is supported and provisioning job code related tasks. Additionally, a parent workflow can have many subflows.
In one embodiment, a parent workflow and its subflows must all be performed by the same application. For example, they all must be performed by the User Manager. Or, they must be performed by the Group Manager, etc.
In some situations, a workflow is requested without knowing the location of the target identity profile. For example, a user can request to create an object without indicating where to store the object in the directory. In such a scenario, the system will find and report workflows that perform the requested task and can be accessed by the user. When the system reports the list of workflows (e.g. via a GUI), the system will also report the domain associated with each workflow. In this situation, step 846 includes the system receiving a selection from the user of the workflow desired, and the domain to operate on.
In step 846, the system receives a selection from the user of the workflow desired. Note that is step 844 only identified one workflow, then step 846 can be skipped or performed automatically. In step 850, it is determined whether the user is allowed to perform this workflow step. If not, the process of
In step 854, pre-notifications, if any, defined in the workflow are sent out. In step 856, cross application workflows, if any, are invoked, as per the event catalog. In step 858, the current step of the workflow is performed. In step 860, it is determined whether there are supplied variables. When creating a workflow, the creator had the option of defining the types of variables. Supplied variables are those variables whose value will be supplied by a subflow. If the current step has a supplied variables, then the system searches for any workflows that can supply the variable and apply to the appropriate domain. If only one workflow is found for each supplied variable, then those workflows are initiated as a subflow in step 862. If multiple workflows are found for a particular supplied variable, then the user is given a choice and the chosen workflow is initiated as a subflow in step 862. Note that the subflow could itself have a subflow, which could itself have a subflow, and so on. There is no limitation on the number of subflow nestings.
If there are no supplied variables, or after the subflow(s) are started, the event catalog is accessed in step 864. Note that cross application workflows can be started pre-step or post-step. Step 864 is for post-step cross application workflows. In step 866, post step notifications are sent out, if any. In step 868, the next step is accessed from the workflow definition. If there are no more steps, then the process of
In step 874, the system determines whether the user is allowed to perform the next step. If not, the process of
Note that different steps may be set up for performance by different users. Thus, a first user may start the workflow but a different user or a different set of users may be needed for intermediate steps. Therefore, the process of
If the parent workflow is still active, then the result of the subflow is written to the parent workflow in step 908. If the parent workflow is not active, then the result is written to the target identity profile in step 910. In an alternative embodiment, the end result of the subflow can be written to the target identity profile regardless of whether the parent workflow is still active or not. Note that a subflow may have a subflow of its own, which would cause the process of
A workflow is performed by one of the three managers described above (User Manager, Group Manager, Organization Manager). There may be cases when one workflow in one of the applications (e.g. user manger) needs to trigger a workflow in another application (e.g. Group Manager). For example, when creating a new user with a workflow in the User Manager, it may be beneficial for that workflow to trigger another workflow in the Group Manager which subscribes the new user to groups. A cross application workflow is performed using the event catalog described above, a client program and (optionally) a configuration file for the client program, all of which will be described below.
The cross application workflow uses a pre and post processing feature of the integrated Identity System and Access System. The pre and post processing allows third parties to extend the base of functionality of the system by providing custom actions based on specific defined events. The base elements of pre and post processing are called events. Events occur any time the user interacts with the system. Events can be as simple as adding, modifying or deleting an object or could be as complex as a specific step within a workflow process.
Actions are functions or applications that perform a task in response to an event. These actions are defined to enhance the base functionality of the system of
actionName; exectype; param1, param2, . . . ; path; execparam; func;
The "actionName" is the name of the event. The convention for most events is APPNAME_EVENTNAME_PPPTYPE, where APPNAME is the name of the application, EVENTNAME is the name of the event and PPPTYPE is the type of processing (pre event or post event). For a workflow, the APPNAME is the workflow ID for the workflow, the EVENTNAME is the step number in the workflow. The "exectype" is a type of hook, which can be exec or lib. An exec is an executable. A type that is lib is in a library such as a dll. The "param" is the parameter, which the system takes to output the value. The parameters are deliminated by commas. The "path" is the path for the external exc or dll to be launched. The "execparam" identifies the input parameters, deliminated by a comma. The "func" is the function in the shared library. Thus, when the event defined in actionName occurs, the appropriate executable or library function is called.
The function in the shared library or the executable that is to be executed upon the event (hereinafter referred to as the "client program") needs to include logic to decide which workflow (or other process) to be invoked. It can make use of a configuration file to have a mapping between workflows and any distinguished names, values of attributes, system parameters and any other variables of interest. This client program, after deciding which workflow to call, must connect to the system. In some embodiments, the client program does not call any workflows rather the client program does all of the work or the client program calls another program/function.
In one embodiment, the integrated Access and Identity System accepts XML document inputs that are encapsulated in a SOAP envelope using HTTP protocol requests. The XML document contains the necessary parameters and authentication information for carrying out the request. The request is sent to an appropriate URL for the desired application. The Identity System provides the desired application's response to the client program as an output XML document.
The XML input language is a language based on SOAP that allows customers to perform functions outside of the current GUI. The structure of SOAP requests is explained in greater detail below.
One example of a use for a cross application workflow is for a new user workflow to spawn a subscribe to group workflow. The following is the XML input to spawn the subscribe to group workflow:
� Oblix, Inc., 2001
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<authentication type="basic" login="newuser"
<oblix:request application="groupservcenter"
function="SetGroupSubscription" includeRequest="none"
<oblix:param name="useruid">
<oblix:value>cn=new user,
<oblix:param name="groupuid">
<oblix:value>cn=engineering group,
When the client program is called, it is passed the following information: distinguished name of the user, attributes that have been preconfigured in the event catalog, a callback handle URL and the workflow ID. The callback handle URL is a URL for the client program to call back the workflow if the workflow returns a "async" status code. The client program is written to return either failure, success or async depending on the conditions specific to that particular program. When the client program returns with "fail" or "success" the workflow continues. If the client program returns "async," then the first workflow pauses until the client program invokes the callback handle URL to start the first workflow again. When the client program sends an "async" status, the user at the browser receives a status message that the workflow is pending for another event.
Therefore, in step 986, if the response is "async" then the workflow engine pauses and waits for the client to return in step 992. The user is provided with a message that the workflow is paused. When the client program invokes the callback URL (step 994), the workflow engine will receive an asynchronous response of either a "success" or "fail" with the callback URL. If the result is "fail" (step 986), then the process continues at step 990. If the result is "success" (step 986), then the process continues at step 988.
In step 1026, the client program returns a status message back to the workflow engine indicating success, failure or async, based on whether the second workflow started successfully and other custom logic (optional). In step 1028, the client program waits for the output message from the application running the second workflow. The output message is likely to be sent to the client program after the second workflow is completed. The output message is an XML document. In step 1030, the output message is processed (including being read and acted on). In step 1032, the client program invokes the callback URL if the previous status was "async." Note that the above discussion was tailored to cross application workflows. However, the pre and post processing features, including the event catalog, client program and XML inputs, can be used to associate with events other than workflow events and other than workflow actions.
Group manager 44 also allows an administrator to associate a policy with a group that controls user subscription to and unsubscription from that group. Subscription is defined as adding the user to the static membership of the group. Unsubscription means removing the user from the static membership of the group. A static member is a member who is explicitly identified as a member, as opposed to a dynamic member that is indirectly identified by a rule or other means. In one embodiment, an identity profile for a group includes an attribute that stores a list of all static members and an attribute that stores—an identification of the policy for subscribing/unsubscribing.
While viewing the attributes of a group, a user can request to subscribe or unsubscribe. In one embodiment, a "subscribe" button or "unsubscribe" will be displayed in the GUI while the user views the attributes of a group. By selecting the button, the subscribe or unsubscribe process will start based on the policy for that group. The process of subscribing or unsubscribing according to a policy is typically initiated by the user who is being added to or removed from the group. However, in other embodiments, a first user can request that a different user be added to or removed from the group.
There are at least four policies for subscribing/unsubscribing: open, open with filter, control through workflow and closed. An open policy does not restrict subscription or unsubscription, any user can subscribe or unsubscribe. The open with filter policy requires that a user satisfy an LDAP rule (or other type of rule) to subscribe but does not require that the rule be satisfied to unsubscribe. The control through workflow policy requires a user to subscribe or unsubscribe through a workflow process. In one embodiment, in order to start the process, the user must be a participant in the first step of a workflow that changes the static member attribute of the group. A closed policy prohibits the subscription to or unsubscription from the group. The open and open with filter policies are less restrictive than the control through workflow and close policies. In one embodiment, the system enforces the rule that no group with a less restrictive policy can be added as a nested member to a group with a more restrictive policy. This rule avoids subversion of the latter policy.
If the subscription policy was not open or open with filter, the system determines whether the subscription from policy is "controlled through workflow" (step 1270). If so, then the workflow is initiated in step 1274. If the workflow completes successfully (step 1276), then the entity is added to the group in step 1278; otherwise, the subscription fails and the entity is not added to the group in step 1268. In one embodiment, the workflow is used to approve a user for a group. If the user is approved, the user is added to the group after the workflow completes. In another embodiment, the user is approved and added to the group by the workflow. If the subscription policy is not "open," "open with filter," or "controlled through workflow," then the group is closed and the user cannot be added to the group (step 1272).
Another feature of Group Manager 44 is the ability to perform group expansion. Expanding a group means evaluating the LDAP rule that specifies its dynamic membership and then updating the static membership list with results of the evaluation of the LDAP rules. Expansion, in effect, populates the static membership with a snapshot of the dynamic membership at the time of expansion. Expansion has performance implications. On one hand, it is much faster to evaluate group membership by looking up a value in the static membership list than to evaluate the rule that specifies dynamic membership. On the other hand, frequently updating groups is, in itself, computationally expensive. If the expansion occurs as a separate process, the performance hit can be hidden from the user. An administrator should expand the groups regularly to maintain accuracy. It may be possible to create a background process that automatically expands a group at certain intervals.
In one embodiment, the group expansion feature can be accessed from Configure tab 440 in Group Manager 44. Within the configure tab there is a button labeled "Expand Dynamic Groups."
When an entity accesses the groups that were expanded in step 1354 and/or requests to see the members of the group (step 1356), the entity sees the expanded list of members. Additionally, any process that needs to access members of a group will access the membership generated in the expansion process. In one embodiment, the process of
In one embodiment, the process of expanding groups can only be performed on groups that have an expansion attribute that is set to true. Additionally, the person or entity expanding the group must have read access for the group expansion attribute and the dynamic filter attribute. That user must also have write access for the static member attribute. In one embodiment, all the expanded members are stored in the static member attribute with the original static members. In another embodiment, all of the original static members can be stored in one attribute and the members added during expansion stored in another attribute.
Another feature of Group Manager 44 is the ability to dynamically modify groups during run time. This feature is based on attaching auxiliary object classes to structural object classes. A structural object class can be instantiated to create a group such that for each entry in the directory there is only one structural object class. The structural object class cannot change after the object has been instantiated and is being used. One or more auxiliary object classes can be attached to any structural object class in a directory. The structural object class defines a set of attributes. The auxiliary object class also has a set of attributes. When an auxiliary object class is attached to an object class, the attributes of the auxiliary class are added to the object. Once instantiated, a structural object class cannot be modified or removed; auxiliary object classes, however, can be added or removed. Group manager 44 provides the user with the ability to add or remove auxiliary object classes on the fly using a GUI.
Prior identity systems allow for the addition of auxiliary classes to structural classes upon creation of the object. The present invention allows for auxiliary classes to be added and removed subsequent to object creation. That is, dynamically, an existing object class can have additional attributes added to the group object or removed from the group object by adding or removing auxiliary classes.
When creating a group, an administrator (or other user with sufficient privileges) is provided with a graphical user interface that lists all possible attributes that can be included in the group profile. Some of these attributes are part of structural object class, while others are part of auxiliary object classes (or auxiliary object class schema). If the user selects attributes from an auxiliary class, then those auxiliary classes are added to the object upon creation of the object. After the group is created, various attributes can be populated with data values. Subsequent to this time, attributes that are associated with auxiliary classes can be removed or added to the group. In addition to adding flexibility to defining which attributes are associated with a group, the present invention allows for bulk deletion of attributes. Simply removing the auxiliary object class from the group entry will automatically delete all attributes of the removed auxiliary object class.
The ability to add or remove from an existing group at runtime provides greater flexibility in defining the content for groups. Furthermore, the removal of an auxiliary class provides a means to bulk delete a set of attributes because removing an auxiliary class will, in one embodiment, delete all attributes for the removed class. Finally, the ability to add or remove from an existing group provides for less coupling between a group schema and group entries. For example, if the schema changes such that a group auxiliary class is removed, only those group entries that have that auxiliary class need to be updated.
The Identity System also includes an "Advanced Group" auxiliary object class that contains the attributes necessary to implement some of the unique functionalities described above. Administrators can attach the "Advanced Group" to a group in order to provide values for attributes that control features such as Subscription/Unsubscription and Dynamic Membership. In one embodiment, the "Advanced Group" consists of one auxiliary class that includes the attributes listed below. In another embodiment, the "Advanced Group" consists of a plurality of classes.
The attributes in the "Advanced Group" related to Subscription/Unsubscription are:
The attributes related to Dynamic Membership are:
The following two attributes belong to neither of the two categories above but are included here for completion:
The discussions above regarding workflows, groups, communication between Identity Servers, etc., primarily pertain to managing and using the Identity System. As stated above, the Identity System manages identity profiles. These identity profiles are used, among other things, to authenticate users and to authorize users to access resources. The Access System has primary responsibility for providing authentication and authorization services. In one embodiment, authentication and authorization services are performed based on using identity profiles with authentication and authorization rules. These authentication and authorization rules are associated with policy domains and policies, as described above.
The present invention supports the use of multiple authentication schemes. An authentication scheme comprises an authentication level, a challenge method, an SSL assertion parameter, a challenge redirect parameter, and authentication plug-ins. The authentication level represents an arbitrary designation of the level of confidence that an administrator has in a particular authentication scheme relative to other authentication schemes.
In one embodiment of the present invention, an authentication scheme can specify one of four challenge methods: none, basic, form, and X.509. If an authentication scheme's challenge method is set to "none," no authentication is required to access a requested resource, thus allowing support for unauthenticated users. This challenge method can be used over both unsecured as well as SSL connections. The "basic" challenge method can also be used over both unsecured and SSL connections. The "X.509" challenge method can be used over an SSL connection between a user's browser and Web Server host. A "form" challenge method employs a custom, site-specific HTML form presented to the user, who enters information and submits the form. Subsequent processing is determined by the administrator at the time the authentication scheme is created. Form challenge methods can be used over both unsecured and SSL connections.
The SSL parameter of an authentication scheme identifies whether SSL is to be asserted on the connection to the user's browser by the Web Server. The challenge parameter identifies where to redirect a request for authentication for the particular authentication scheme. Authentication plug-ins are necessary for processing the user's supplied information. Authentication plug-ins can interface with Access Server 34 through an authentication API.
An authentication scheme that an attacker can easily and profitability eavesdrop upon is typically considered "weak." In one embodiment, the basic authentication challenge method places the user's credential (supplied information), a simple password, "in the clear" over an unsecured network connection. However, the authentication scheme can be made stronger by passing the user's credential over an encrypted connection, such as SSL. In one embodiment, given two authentication schemes (one with and one without SSL), an access administrator will assign the authentication scheme without SSL to a lower authentication level than the authentication using SSL.
When a user first requests a protected resource, the user is challenged according to either: (1) the authentication scheme defined by the first level authentication rule in the applicable policy domain, or (2) the second level authentication rule in the applicable policy associated with the requested resource. If the user satisfies the authentication rule, an encrypted authentication cookie is passed to the user's browser indicating a successful authentication. Once authenticated, the user may request a second resource protected by a different policy domain and/or policy with a different authentication rule. The user is allowed access to the second resource without re-authenticating under the following condition: the authentication level of the authentication scheme used to successfully authenticate for the first resource is equal to or greater than the authentication level of the authentication scheme of the second resource. Otherwise, the user is challenged and asked to re-authenticate for the second resource in accordance with the second resource's higher level authentication scheme. Satisfaction of a higher or lower authentication level is determined by evaluating the authentication cookie sent by the user's browser when requesting the second resource. In one embodiment of the present invention, administrators can define an unlimited number of authentication levels.
Once authenticated, a user can explicitly log out, causing authentication cookies cached (or otherwise stored) by the user's browser to be destroyed or become invalid. Authentication cookies can also be set by an administrator to be destroyed after a maximum idle time has elapsed between requests to resources protected in accordance with the present invention.
If the user successfully authenticates for the requested resource (step 1562), then the method proceeds to step 1574. Otherwise, the unsuccessful authentication is logged in step 1564. After step 1564, the system then performs authentication failure actions and Web Gate 28 denies the user access to the requested resource in step 1566. In step 1574, the successful authentication of the user for the resource is logged. The method then performs authentication success actions in step 1576. In response to the successful authentication, Web Gate 28 then passes a valid authentication cookie to browser 12 (step 1580), which stores the cookie. After passing the cookie in step 1580, the system attempts to authorize in step 1556.
In step 1556, the method determines whether the user is authorized to access the requested resource. If the user is authorized (step 1590), the method proceeds to step 1592. Otherwise, the unsuccessful authorization is logged in step 1596. After step 1596, the method performs authorization failure actions (step 1598) and Web Gate 28 denies the user access to the requested resource. If authorization is successful (step 1590), then the successful authorization of the user is logged in step 1592. Authorization success actions are performed in step 1594. The user is granted access to the requested resource in step 1595. In one embodiment of step 1595, some or all of HTTP request information is provided to the resource. In one or more scenarios, the resource being accessed is the Identity System.
In one embodiment, the information stored by cookie 1600 includes: (1) the authentication level 1602 of the authentication scheme used to create the cookie, (2) the user ID 1604 of the authenticated user, (3) the IP address 1606 of the authenticated user, and (4) session start time 1608 identifying the time at which cookie 3150 was created. If the time elapsed since the session start time 1608 exceeds a maximum session time, the cookie will become invalid. Idle start time 1610 is also stored, which identifies the time when the previous HTTP request for a protected resource was made in which cookie 1600 was passed. If the time elapsed since the idle start time 1610 exceeds a maximum idle time, the cookie will become invalid.
Both of these time limits force users to re-authenticate if they have left a session unattended for longer than the maximum session or idle times. In one embodiment, user ID 1604 stores the distinguished name for the authenticated user.
Cookie 1600 also stores a secured hash 1612 of information 1602, 1604, 1606, 1608, and 1610. In one embodiment of the present invention, secured hash 1612 is created using an MD5 hashing algorithm. Most Internet browsers cache a user's supplied authentication information during basic and certificate authentication challenge methods, and then transparently re-send the information upon receiving an authentication challenge from a Web Server. In one embodiment, an administrator can enable a form authentication challenge method requiring end users to re-authenticate upon expiration of the maximum session or maximum idle time limits.
More details of various processes for authenticating and authorizing, including using an application program interface, can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/814,091, "Access System Interface," filed on Mar. 21, 2001, Charles W. Knouse and Minoo Gupta ("'091 application"), which in its entirety is incorporated herein by reference. Specifically,
The foregoing detailed description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The described embodiments were chosen in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|24 Aug 1990
|31 Dec 1991
|Emtek Health Care Systems, Inc.
|Medical information system with automatic updating of task list in response to charting interventions on task list window into an associated form
|28 Jun 1991
|5 Apr 1994
|Digital Equipment Corporation
|Workflow management and control system
|3 Nov 1993
|3 Oct 1995
|Wang Laboratories, Inc.
|Authorization system for obtaining in single step both identification and access rights of client to server directly from encrypted authorization ticket
|28 Nov 1994
|25 Jun 1996
|Hewlett-Packard Company
|Process enaction and tool integration via a task oriented paradigm
|18 Aug 1995
|3 Dec 1996
|Digital Equipment Corporation
|Work flow management system and method
|16 Jul 1996
|19 Aug 1997
|Certco, Llc
|Method for securely using digital signatures in a commercial cryptographic system
|25 Aug 1995
|14 Oct 1997
|System and method for restricting user access rights on the internet based on rating information stored in a relational database
|9 May 1995
|25 Nov 1997
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for scheduling linked events with fixed and dynamic conditions
|7 Jun 1995
|13 Jan 1998
|Open Market, Inc.
|Internet server access control and monitoring systems
|14 Jan 1994
|31 Mar 1998
|Action Technologies, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for building business process applications in terms of its workflows
|15 Dec 1995
|28 Apr 1998
|Entegrity Solutions Corporation
|Security infrastructure for electronic transactions
|23 Jul 1997
|9 Jun 1998
|Microsoft Corporation
|Method and system for adding a secure network server to an existing computer network
|21 Aug 1995
|18 Aug 1998
|Pitney Bowes Inc.
|Secure user certification for electronic commerce employing value metering system
|10 Apr 1995
|13 Oct 1998
|Rebus Technology, Inc.
|System and method for automatic page registration and automatic zone detection during forms processing
|4 Apr 1996
|3 Nov 1998
|Lucent Technologies Inc.
|System and method for hierarchical multicast routing in ATM networks
|24 Mar 1997
|2 Feb 1999
|Pfn, Inc
|Domain communications server
|23 Oct 1995
|2 Feb 1999
|Hitachi, Ltd.
|Workflow method and system therefor
|6 Aug 1997
|16 Mar 1999
|Continental Cablevision, Inc.
|Telecommunication user account management system and method
|13 Dec 1996
|11 May 1999
|Certco, Llc
|Reliance server for electronic transaction system
|17 Nov 1995
|25 May 1999
|Microsoft Corporation
|Information retrieval system in an on-line network including separate content and layout of published titles
|13 Mar 1997
|17 Aug 1999
|Mitel Corporation
|Automatic web page generator
|30 Apr 1997
|31 Aug 1999
|Mci Communications Corporation
|System and method for single sign-on to a plurality of network elements
|26 Nov 1997
|28 Sep 1999
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for optimized source selection in an information retrieval system
|22 Jan 1997
|5 Oct 1999
|Lucent Technologies, Inc.
|System and method for providing anonymous personalized browsing by a proxy system in a network
|31 Oct 1997
|12 Oct 1999
|Sun Microsystems, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for pre-processing and packaging class files
|25 Nov 1997
|16 Nov 1999
|Acceleration Software International Corporation
|Query refinement method for searching documents
|30 May 1997
|23 Nov 1999
|Oracle Corporation
|Finer grained quiescence for data replication
|24 Jun 1996
|23 Nov 1999
|Nortel Networks Corporation
|System for controlling users access to a distributive network in accordance with constraints present in common access distributive network interface separate from a server
|1 Aug 1997
|23 Nov 1999
|Novell, Inc.
|User name authentication for gateway clients accessing a proxy cache server
|2 Jun 1995
|7 Dec 1999
|Mentor Graphics Corporation
|Method and system for managing workflow
|23 Feb 1998
|4 Jan 2000
|International Business Machines Corp.
|Servlet pairing for isolation of the retrieval and rendering of data
|21 Mar 1997
|21 Mar 2000
|Hewlett-Packard Company
|System and method for performing flexible workflow process execution in a distributed workflow management system
|2 Apr 1997
|28 Mar 2000
|Method and apparatus for managing key revocation
|12 Dec 1996
|6 Jun 2000
|Action Technologies, Inc.
|Computerized method and system for managing business processes using linked workflows
|19 Mar 1998
|6 Jun 2000
|Agorics, Inc.
|Electronic authority server
|24 Nov 1997
|1 Aug 2000
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for controlling access rights to and security of digital content in a distributed information system, e.g., Internet
|22 Dec 1997
|15 Aug 2000
|Motorola Inc
|Transaction authentication for 1-way wireless financial messaging units
|5 May 1998
|15 Aug 2000
|International Business Machines Corp.
|Client-server system for maintaining application preferences in a hierarchical data structure according to user and user group or terminal and terminal group contexts
|5 May 1998
|15 Aug 2000
|International Business Machines Corp.
|Client-server system with central application management and using fully qualified class names of object-oriented applications for determining permanent server storage locations for application configuration information
|6 Nov 1997
|29 Aug 2000
|Intertrust Technologies Corporation
|Systems and methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information
|24 Oct 1997
|10 Oct 2000
|Directory Logic, Inc.
|Enterprise network management directory containing network addresses of users and devices providing access lists to routers and servers
|15 Oct 1999
|24 Oct 2000
|Workgroup Technology Corporation
|Product development system and method using integrated process and data management
|29 Jun 1998
|31 Oct 2000
|Mci Communications Corporation
|Method and apparatus for automating security functions in a computer system
|12 Dec 1996
|21 Nov 2000
|Charles Frankel Et Al
|System and method for managing the alteration of garments
|12 Feb 1999
|5 Dec 2000
|Crosslogix, Inc.
|System and method for maintaining security in a distributed computer network
|13 Feb 1997
|9 Jan 2001
|Pointcast, Inc.
|Apparatus, method and article of manufacture for servicing client requests on a network
|10 Jul 1998
|30 Jan 2001
|Encommerce, Inc.
|Distributed access management of information resources
|5 May 1999
|27 Feb 2001
|Mediaone Group, Inc.
|Headend provisioning agent
|1 Oct 1998
|27 Feb 2001
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Systems, methods and computer program products for assigning, generating and delivering content to intranet users
|15 Dec 1997
|27 Mar 2001
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Web interface and method for accessing and displaying directory information
|24 Dec 1997
|3 Apr 2001
|Anand K. Antur
|Method and apparatus for configuring and managing firewalls and security devices
|25 Apr 1997
|10 Apr 2001
|At & T Corp.
|Specifying security protocols and policy constraints in distributed systems
|28 May 1998
|17 Apr 2001
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Efficient large-scale access control for internet/intranet information systems
|26 Mar 1999
|24 Apr 2001
|Motorola, Inc.
|Secure wireless electronic-commerce system with digital product certificates and digital license certificates
|26 Nov 1997
|3 Jul 2001
|Juno Online Services, Inc.
|Method and apparatus to determine user identity and limit access to a communications network
|14 Aug 1998
|17 Jul 2001
|Vignette Corporation
|System and method for query processing of structured documents
|28 Jan 1999
|17 Jul 2001
|Skydesk, Inc.
|System and method for creating an internet-accessible working replica of a home computer on a host server controllable by a user operating a remote access client computer
|8 Oct 1998
|24 Jul 2001
|Entrust Technologies Limited
|Method and apparatus for secure group communications
|18 Dec 1997
|14 Aug 2001
|Alcatel Usa Sourcing, L.P.
|Object oriented program memory management system and method using fixed sized memory pools
|17 Jul 1998
|18 Sep 2001
|Openwave Systems Inc.
|Method and apparatus for providing access control to local services of mobile devices
|30 Nov 1999
|25 Sep 2001
|Dbm Korea
|Computer system and method for dynamic information display
|24 Aug 1998
|16 Oct 2001
|U.S. Philips Corporation
|Data processor with localized memory reclamation
|27 Oct 1999
|13 Nov 2001
|Verticalone Corporation
|Apparatus and methods for automated aggregation and delivery of and transactions involving electronic personal information or data
|30 Jun 1999
|11 Dec 2001
|Unisys Corp.
|Method for versioning a UML model in a repository in accordance with an updated XML representation of the UML model
|7 Jul 1999
|1 Jan 2002
|Bcl Computers, Inc.
|Conversion data representing a document to other formats for manipulation and display
|10 Nov 1998
|1 Jan 2002
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for automatically generating browsable language grammars
|19 Jun 1998
|8 Jan 2002
|Sap Aktiengesellschaft
|Cross application time sheet for communicating with one or more enterprise management applications during time data entry
|5 May 1998
|15 Jan 2002
|International Business Machines Corp.
|Client-server system for maintaining a user desktop consistent with server application user access permissions
|5 Nov 1998
|12 Feb 2002
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Lightweight directory access protocol (LDAP) directory server cache mechanism and method
|17 Jul 1998
|12 Mar 2002
|Novell, Inc.
|Cache fencing for interpretive environments
|21 Oct 1998
|2 Apr 2002
|Netscape Communications Corporation
|Centralized directory services supporting dynamic group membership
|1 Dec 1999
|2 Apr 2002
|Eoriginal Inc.
|System and method for electronic transmission, storage, and retrieval of authenticated electronic original documents
|21 Sep 1998
|14 May 2002
|Microsoft Corporation
|Class store schema
|23 Aug 2001
|28 May 2002
|Acer Inc.
|Method and system for translating the format of the content of document file
|4 Mar 1998
|18 Jun 2002
|David S. Schneider
|Distributed administration of access to information
|6 May 1997
|13 Aug 2002
|Clinicomp International, Inc.
|Method and system for facilitating patient care plans
|31 Dec 1998
|20 Aug 2002
|International Business Machines Corp.
|Vault controller based registration application serving web based registration authorities and end users for conducting electronic commerce in secure end-to-end distributed information system
|14 May 1999
|27 Aug 2002
|Appintec Corporation
|Method and apparatus for improved contact and activity management and planning
|10 Nov 1997
|24 Sep 2002
|Microsoft Corporation
|Simple object access protocol
|9 Aug 1999
|26 Nov 2002
|Thomas W. Lynch
|System and method for supporting multimedia communications upon a dynamically configured member network
|5 May 1999
|10 Dec 2002
|Xerox Corporation
|System and method for searching and recommending documents in a collection using share bookmarks
|27 Jan 1999
|10 Dec 2002
|Xerox Corporation
|Document management system for recording and viewing the history of document use
|10 Mar 2000
|14 Jan 2003
|Sun Microsystems, Inc.
|Extending the capabilities of an XSL style sheet to include components for content transformation
|27 May 1999
|11 Feb 2003
|Accenture Llp
|Dynamic customer profile management
|7 Jun 1995
|11 Feb 2003
|Microsoft Corporation
|Compiler and method for automatically building version compatible object applications
|30 Jul 1999
|18 Feb 2003
|Accenture Llp
|Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture
|2 Oct 1998
|25 Mar 2003
|Nortel Networks Limited
|Role based management independent of the hardware topology
|23 Aug 1999
|25 Mar 2003
|Oblix, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for implementing a corporate directory and service center
|17 Jul 2002
|1 Apr 2003
|Zih Corp.
|Native XML printer
|19 May 1999
|1 Apr 2003
|Sun Microsystems, Inc.
|Profile service
|6 May 1999
|13 May 2003
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Attribute signature schema and method of use in a directory service
|14 Jan 2000
|27 May 2003
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Differential rewards with dynamic user profiling
|19 May 1999
|27 May 2003
|Pinpoint Incorporated
|Location enhanced information delivery system
|22 Sep 1999
|3 Jun 2003
|Netscape Communications Corporation
|Simple workflow access protocol
|7 Dec 1998
|1 Jul 2003
|Oracle International Corporation
|Method and system for representing and accessing object-oriented data in a relational database system
|28 Jan 2000
|8 Jul 2003
|Commerce One Operations, Inc.
|Method of retrieving schemas for interpreting documents in an electronic commerce system
|24 Feb 2000
|12 Aug 2003
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and technique for dynamic information gathering and targeted advertising in a web based model using a live information selection and analysis tool
|30 Dec 1998
|14 Oct 2003
|Polydoc N.V.
|Document producing support system
|27 Apr 2001
|4 Nov 2003
|Brio Software, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for implementing search and channel features in an enterprise-wide computer system
|21 Jan 2003
|2 Dec 2003
|Zih Corp.
|Native XML printer
|18 Jun 2001
|30 Dec 2003
|The Procter & Gamble Company
|Dynamic group generation and management
|30 Nov 2001
|6 Jan 2004
|Oblix, Inc.
|Request based caching of data store data
|26 Oct 1999
|13 Jan 2004
|At Home Corporation
|Method and system for authorizing and authenticating users
|22 Jan 2001
|5 Jul 2001
|Mark Moriconi
|System and method for maintaining security in a distributed computer network
|29 Jan 2001
|10 Oct 2002
|Gullotta Tony J.
|System and method for provisioning resources to users based on policies, roles, organizational information, and attributes
|26 Nov 2001
|5 Jun 2003
|Macleod Stewart P.
|Workflow management based on an integrated view of resource identity
|Camenisch, Jan et al., "Privacy and Identity Management for Everyone", ACM, 2005, 8 pages.
|Clear Trust, Unified Access Management, Securant Technologies, Inc., pp. 1-23, 1997.
|Cooney, IBM rolls out host-and server-based mgmt. apps, Network World, Framingham, Feb. 6, 1995, vol. 12, Iss. 6, pp. 6-7.
|Howes, Timothy A. et al., "Understanding And Deploying LDAP Directory Services," Netscape Communications Corporation, pp. 2 cover pp. 102-105, 277-292 and 699-723, 1999.
|Leon, McAfee's NetTools Promises to Ease Network Desktop Diagnosis, InfoWorld, San Mateo, Jul. 24, 1995, vol. 17, Iss. 30, p. 53.
|Microsoft, "Microsoft's Vision for an Identity Metasystem", Microsoft Corporation, http://www.Identityblog.com/stories/2005/07/05/IdentityMetasystem.htm, printed date Oct. 6, 2006, 9 pages.
|Musthaler, The trouble with help desk selection, Network World, Framingham, Feb. 20, 1995, vol. 12, Iss. 8, pp. 35-39.
|Myers, M. et al., "X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status.Protocol-OCSP," The Internet Society, 22 pages, Jun. 1999.
|PC PRO, "Identity Systems", http://research.pcpro.co.uk/detail/ORG/1139341311<SUB>-</SUB>744.html, printed date Oct. 6, 2006, 2 pages.
|Prasad, CK, "Distributing Sun Java System Identity Server Applications Using Java Web Start", Article Index, Apr. 2004, 8 pages.
|Schmersal, Testing to maintain service standards, Communications News, Nokomis, Mar. 1998, vol. 35, Iss. 3, pp. 22-23.
|SiteMinder Agent Operations, Verson 4.0, Netegrity Inc., 1997.
|SiteMinder Deployment Guide, Version 4.0, Netegrity Inc., 1997.
|SiteMinder Developer's API Guide, Version 4.0, Netegrity Inc., 1997.
|SiteMinder Installation Guide, Version 4.0, Netegrity Inc., 1997.
|SiteMinder Policy Server Operations Guide, Version 4.0, Netegrity Inc., 1997.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,408, Final Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2006, 7 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,408, Office Action dated Aug. 7, 15 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,408, Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2005, 11 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,409, Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2005, 17 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,409, Office Action dated May 3, 2006, 9 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,409, Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2005, 12 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,409, Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2006, 21 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,893, Final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2005, 12 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,893, Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2006, 17 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,893, Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2005, 20 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,895, Advisory Action dated Oct. 20, 2005, 3 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,895, Final Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2005, 19 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,895, Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2006, 22 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,895, Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2006, 13 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,895, Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2005, 18 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,898, Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2006, 7 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,898, Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2005, 13 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,908, Advisory Action dated Nov. 1, 2005, 3 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,908, Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2005, 14 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,908, Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2006, 25 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,908, Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2006, 15 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,908, Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2005, 24 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,910, Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2005, 10 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,910, Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2005, 12 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,910, Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2006, 12 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,914, Final Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2006, 15 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,914, Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2005, 19 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,916, Advisory Action dated Apr. 5, 2006, 11 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,916, Advisory Action dated Dec. 9, 2005, 4 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,916, Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2005, 12 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,916, Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2005, 16 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,916, Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2006, 20 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,926, Final Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2006, 15 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,926, Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2005, 26 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,926, Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2006, 19 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/999,074, Advisory Action dated Dec. 20, 2005, 3 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/999,074, Final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2005, 19 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/999,074, Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2005, 24 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/999,177, Advisory Action dated Dec. 14, 2005, 6 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/999,177, Final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2005, 26 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 09/999,177, Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2005, 23 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 10/145,684, Advisory Action dated Mar. 9, 2006, 3 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 10/145,684, Final Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2005, 10 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 10/145,684, Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2005, 17 pages.
|U.S. Appl. No. 10/145,684, Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2006, 25 pages.
|Wahl, M., "Informed Control Enabling Identity Interoperability", http://www.Idap.com/1/commentary/wahl/20050203<SUB>-</SUB>01.shtml, Feb. 3, 2005, 3 pages.
|Walsh, Remedy releases three applications for help-desk suite, InfoWorld, San Mateo, Apr. 21, 1997, vol. 19, Iss. 16, p. 34.
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|30 Nov 2001
|25 Mar 2008
|Oracle International Corporation
|Runtime modification of entries in an identity system
|20 Dec 2002
|16 Dec 2008
|Oracle International Corporation
|Rule based data management
|20 Dec 2002
|13 Jan 2009
|Oracle International Corporation
|Supporting multiple application program interfaces
|25 Mar 2005
|7 Sep 2010
|Oracle International Corporation
|System for change notification and persistent caching of dynamically computed membership of rules-based lists in LDAP
|30 Nov 2001
|21 Sep 2010
|Oracle International Corporation
|Domain based workflows
|15 May 2002
|23 Nov 2010
|Oracle International Corporation
|Employing job code attributes in provisioning
|1 Nov 2005
|26 Apr 2011
|Accenture Global Services Limited
|Collaborative intelligent task processor for insurance claims
|30 Nov 2001
|3 May 2011
|Oracle International Corporation
|Workflows with associated processes
|4 May 1999
|12 Jul 2011
|Accenture Global Services Limited
|Component based information linking during claim processing
|30 Nov 2001
|6 Sep 2011
|Oracle International Corporation
|Employing electronic certificate workflows
|7 May 2004
|10 Jan 2012
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and system for externalizing session management using a reverse proxy server
|9 May 2003
|28 Feb 2012
|Accenture Global Services Limited
|Automated assignment of insurable events
|20 May 2009
|20 Mar 2012
|Hsbc Technologies Inc.
|Methods and systems for single sign on with dynamic authentication levels
|24 Mar 2011
|15 May 2012
|Accenture Global Services Limited
|Collaborative intelligent task processor for insurance claims
|11 Jul 2011
|17 Jul 2012
|Accenture Global Services Limited
|Component based information linking during claim processing
|5 Feb 2004
|25 Sep 2012
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Methods, systems and computer program products for selecting among alert conditions for resource management systems
|20 Dec 2002
|12 Feb 2013
|Oracle International Corporation
|Employing wrapper profiles
|22 Apr 2011
|19 Feb 2013
|Open Text S.A.
|Method and system for transforming input data streams
|21 Mar 2012
|19 Mar 2013
|Accenture Global Services Limited
|Automated task processor for insurance claims
|13 May 2008
|26 Mar 2013
|Microsoft Corporation
|Codeless provisioning
|22 Feb 2008
|2 Jul 2013
|Accenture Global Services Limited
|Conversational question generation system adapted for an insurance claim processing system
|22 Feb 2008
|20 Aug 2013
|Accenture Global Services Gmbh
|Rule generation system adapted for an insurance claim processing system
|4 Jun 2012
|29 Apr 2014
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for providing restrictions on the location of peer subnet manager (SM) instances in an infiniband (IB) network
|11 Nov 2011
|6 May 2014
|Citrix Systems, Inc
|Methods and apparatus for scalable secure remote desktop access
|4 Jun 2012
|3 Jun 2014
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for supporting sub-subnet in an infiniband (IB) network
|16 Sep 2011
|23 Sep 2014
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for supporting management network interface card port failover in a middleware machine environment
|4 Jun 2012
|11 Nov 2014
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for providing secure subnet management agent (SMA) based fencing in an infiniband (IB) network
|24 Apr 2012
|16 Dec 2014
|Open Text S.A.
|Message broker system and method
|18 Jan 2013
|2 Jun 2015
|Open Text S.A.
|Method and system for transforming input data streams
|7 May 2014
|22 Dec 2015
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for supporting sub-subnet in an infiniband (IB) network
|10 Aug 2010
|12 Jan 2016
|Oracle International Corporation
|Domain based workflows
|28 Oct 2014
|12 Jan 2016
|Open Text S.A.
|Message broker system and method
|4 Jun 2012
|19 Jan 2016
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for authenticating identity of discovered component in an infiniband (IB) network
|5 Dec 2013
|16 Feb 2016
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for supporting in-band/side-band firmware upgrade of input/output (I/O) devices in a middleware machine environment
|4 Jun 2012
|23 Feb 2016
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for providing secure subnet management agent (SMA) in an infiniband (IB) network
|4 Mar 2015
|26 Jul 2016
|Open Text S.A.
|Method and system for transforming input data streams
|25 Feb 2014
|26 Jul 2016
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for supporting reliable connection (RC) based subnet administrator (SA) access in an engineered system for middleware and application execution
|16 Sep 2011
|27 Sep 2016
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for facilitating protection against run-away subnet manager instances in a middleware machine environment
|22 May 2013
|29 Nov 2016
|Level 3 Communications, Llc
|Methods and systems for allocating and provisioning computing resources
|25 Feb 2014
|28 Feb 2017
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for preventing denial of service (DOS) attack on subnet administrator (SA) access in an engineered system for middleware and application execution
|16 Sep 2011
|4 Apr 2017
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for providing ethernet over network virtual hub scalability in a middleware machine environment
|5 Dec 2013
|30 May 2017
|Oracle International Corporation
|System and method for supporting host-based firmware upgrade of input/output (I/O) devices in a middleware machine environment
|30 Nov 2001
|26 Sep 2002
|Teng Joan C.
|Workflows with associated processes
|30 Nov 2001
|26 Sep 2002
|Teng Joan C.
|Domain based workflows
|30 Nov 2001
|26 Sep 2002
|Delany Shawn P.
|Runtime modification of entries in an identity system
|30 Nov 2001
|21 Nov 2002
|Sinn Richard P.
|Employing electronic certificate workflows
|4 May 1999
|31 Jul 2003
|George V. Guyan
|Method and article of manufacture for component based task handling during claim processing
|15 May 2002
|20 Nov 2003
|Richard P. Sinn
|Employing job code attributes in provisioning
|20 Dec 2002
|15 Jan 2004
|Sinn Richard P.
|Rule based data management
|20 Dec 2002
|15 Jan 2004
|Richard Sinn
|Employing wrapper profiles
|20 Dec 2002
|15 Jan 2004
|Vikas Jain
|Supporting multiple application program interfaces
|5 Feb 2004
|8 Sep 2005
|Uthe Robert T.
|Methods, systems and computer program products for selecting among alert conditions for resource management systems
|7 May 2004
|9 Feb 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and system for externalizing session management using a reverse proxy server
|25 Mar 2005
|28 Sep 2006
|Oracle International Corporation
|System for change notification and persistent caching of dynamically computed membership of rules-based lists in LDAP
|12 Mar 2007
|19 Jul 2007
|Oracle International Corporation
|Identifying dynamic groups
|13 May 2008
|3 Sep 2009
|Microsoft Corporation
|Codeless provisioning sync rules
|13 May 2008
|3 Sep 2009
|Microsoft Corporation
|Codeless provisioning
|20 May 2009
|26 Nov 2009
|Hsbc Technologies Inc.
|Methods and systems for single sign on with dynamic authentication levels
|10 Aug 2010
|3 Mar 2011
|Oracle International Corporation
|Domain based workflows
|22 Apr 2011
|11 Aug 2011
|Ladd Dennis D
|Method and system for transforming input data streams
|11 Nov 2011
|8 Mar 2012
|Anatoliy Panasyuk
|Methods and Apparatus for Scalable Secure Remote Desktop Access
|16 Sep 2011
|29 Mar 2012
|Oracle International Corporation
|Stateful subnet manager failover in a middleware machine environment
|28 Feb 2011
|30 Aug 2012
|Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.
|Method and system for integrating data from multiple sources
|28 Nov 2016
|16 Mar 2017
|Level 3 Communications, Llc
|Methods and systems for allocating and provisioning computing resources
|U.S. Classification
|709/224, 709/223, 709/203, 709/225, 709/226
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|15 May 2002
Owner name: OBLIX, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SINN, RICHARD P.;REEL/FRAME:012904/0609
Effective date: 20020514
|29 Jul 2005
Owner name: ORACLE, USA, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OBLIX, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016327/0222
Effective date: 20050708
Owner name: ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ORACLE, USA;REEL/FRAME:016327/0803
Effective date: 20050708
Owner name: ORACLE, USA,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OBLIX, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016327/0222
Effective date: 20050708
Owner name: ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ORACLE, USA;REEL/FRAME:016327/0803
Effective date: 20050708
|5 Aug 2005
Owner name: ORACLE CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE FROM ORACLE, USA TO ORACLE CORPORATION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 016327 FRAME 0222;ASSIGNOR:OBLIX, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016361/0252
Effective date: 20050708
Owner name: ORACLE CORPORATION,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE FROM ORACLE, USA TO ORACLE CORPORATION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 016327 FRAME 0222. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE IDENTITY OF THE ASSIGNEE. SEE THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ATTACHED CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT.;ASSIGNOR:OBLIX, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016361/0252
Effective date: 20050708
Owner name: ORACLE CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE FROM ORACLE, USA TO ORACLE CORPORATION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 016327 FRAME 0222. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE IDENTITY OF THE ASSIGNEE. SEE THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ATTACHED CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT.;ASSIGNOR:OBLIX, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016361/0252
Effective date: 20050708
|8 Aug 2005
Owner name: ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR FROM ORACLE, USA TO ORACLE CORPORATION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 016327 FRAME 0803;ASSIGNOR:ORACLE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016364/0919
Effective date: 20050708
Owner name: ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR FROM ORACLE, USA TO ORACLE CORPORATION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 016327 FRAME 0803. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE IDENTITY OF THE ASSIGNOR. SEE THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ATTACHED CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT.;ASSIGNOR:ORACLE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016364/0919
Effective date: 20050708
Owner name: ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR FROM ORACLE, USA TO ORACLE CORPORATION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 016327 FRAME 0803. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE IDENTITY OF THE ASSIGNOR. SEE THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ATTACHED CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT.;ASSIGNOR:ORACLE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016364/0919
Effective date: 20050708
|19 Oct 2010
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
|8 Oct 2014
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 8